It is important for people to take risks, in both their professional lives and personal lives.

Do the advantages of taking these risks outweigh the disadvantages?

Some believe that taking risks in both personal and professional life leads to positive outcomes. I strongly agree with
this view, recognizing that it can lead to growth and progress.

To begin with, risk-taking can significantly boost career prospects. While some people become comfortable with their
initial job roles, others venture into new industries or start businesses in search of their true passion. Though these
paths may involve setbacks, those who take bold steps often achieve greater long-term success. Taking calculated risks
early in one’s career can increase the likelihood of future rewards.

In addition, stepping outside of one’s comfort zone contributes to stronger, more mature personal relationships. In
more traditional societies, many people avoid serious romantic involvement until after their education. However,
postponing such experiences can result in emotional unpreparedness and poor choices in family life. In contrast, those
who take emotional risks and explore relationships earlier often gain deeper insights into human behavior, which
supports emotional development and maturity.

In summary, taking risks can lead to meaningful personal and professional growth, making it a wise strategy when
approached carefully. Nevertheless, it’s important to act responsibly and avoid impulsive decisions to reduce the
possible downsides of risk-taking.

Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the
country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they
wish.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There is an ongoing discussion about whether professionals, especially those in essential fields like medicine and
engineering, should be required to work in their home countries or be allowed the freedom to pursue careers overseas.
This essay will explore both perspectives before supporting the view that professionals should have the right to
choose.
Supporters of the idea that professionals should remain in their home country argue that this is a matter of fairness and
responsibility. In many cases, higher education is subsidized by the government, making it accessible to students
through public funding. As such, it is believed that graduates owe a debt of service to the society that supported their
education. In addition, professionals educated within their own cultural and social context may be more effective in
serving local communities, as they are more familiar with local needs and challenges.
Conversely, others believe that professionals deserve the freedom to decide where they work, especially considering
the sacrifices they make during their academic journey. Years of study often involve personal hardship, including
limited social life, financial struggles, and stress. Choosing to work abroad, where conditions may be more favorable
and compensation more attractive, is often seen as a justified reward for these sacrifices. For example, many Indian
healthcare professionals migrate to developed countries in search of better career prospects and a higher standard of
living. Moreover, while education is partly funded by taxpayers, it is also the government's responsibility to create
appealing job opportunities domestically to retain skilled workers.
To conclude, although both sides present reasonable arguments, professionals should ultimately be free to make their
own career choices, regardless of where they were educated. Importantly, many who move abroad still contribute to
their home countries by sending remittances and supporting their families. Rather than enforcing restrictions,
governments should focus on creating favorable working environments that encourage talent to stay.

Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones.

Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
A growing number of young people today spend extensive time each day engaged with their smartphones. This
widespread addiction is largely driven by two main factors and has serious implications for their well-being and
academic success.
One key cause is the lack of effective parental oversight. Many parents choose to give their children unlimited access
to smartphones to keep them occupied, often so they can focus on work or rest without interruptions. Additionally,
smartphones offer an endless array of entertaining options, such as watching videos, playing games, or browsing
social media—that capture children’s attention and can easily lead to overuse and dependency.
The consequences of this behavior are concerning. Physically, excessive screen time can harm children's eyesight,
with prolonged staring at screens contributing to issues like myopia. Moreover, being constantly on their phones
discourages physical activity, increasing the likelihood of weight problems. Academically, children who are overly
attached to their phones may struggle to concentrate on their studies. This often results in unfinished assignments and
a noticeable drop in academic performance.
In conclusion, a mix of limited parental control and highly stimulating digital content has intensified smartphone
addiction among today’s youth. This issue not only threatens their health but also disrupts their education, making it a
challenge that requires serious attention

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree
with this statement?

Science is widely regarded as a tool for improving human life. This essay will discuss the extent to which I agree with
this notion.

It is clear that one of the main goals of science is to enhance human well-being. Advances in fields such as medicine,
engineering, and information technology have had a profound impact on the way we live. For example, scientific
progress in healthcare has led to life-saving vaccines, innovative treatments, and advanced surgical techniques, all of
which have helped increase life expectancy and reduce suffering. Likewise, technological developments have
transformed how we communicate, travel, and manage everyday tasks, greatly improving overall living standards.

Nonetheless, while benefiting humanity is a central aim, it is not the only purpose science serves. Scientific
exploration also seeks to uncover the mysteries of the universe, understand natural phenomena, and broaden the scope
of human knowledge. In many cases, research is driven by curiosity and the desire to explore, even if the results are
not immediately useful. These investigations often lay the groundwork for future breakthroughs and inspire new ways
of thinking about the world.

In summary, although science undeniably plays a vital role in enhancing human life, its value extends beyond practical
benefits. The pursuit of knowledge for its own sake is equally important. A combination of applied science and pure
research ensures continued advancement and a deeper appreciation of the world around us.

Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it
is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views
and give your own opinion.

There are differing opinions on whether university students should study subjects beyond their major or concentrate
solely on a single discipline. This essay will examine both perspectives before concluding that the most suitable
approach depends on the individual student’s intended career path after graduation.

Supporters of a multidisciplinary education argue that exploring a variety of subjects equips students with diverse
perspectives, which in turn enhances their critical thinking and creativity. This broader approach is particularly
valuable in addressing today’s complex, interconnected challenges such as climate change and systemic inequality.
Students exposed to multiple disciplines are better prepared to understand the multifaceted nature of these issues and
propose effective, well-rounded solutions. Moreover, skills taught in certain universally applicable subjects—such as
Statistics or Data Analysis—can complement almost any major and significantly increase a student’s employability in
the modern job market.

On the other hand, many believe that students should dedicate their time and energy exclusively to mastering one
specific field. This is especially relevant for those pursuing professional degrees in highly specialized areas, such as
medicine or law, where in-depth knowledge is crucial. For these students, gaining broad knowledge outside their core
subject is often unnecessary and may even delay graduation, increasing educational costs. In such cases, a focused
approach enables students to acquire the qualifications and practical expertise they need as efficiently as possible.
In conclusion, I believe the decision depends largely on the nature of the student’s future profession. For careers that
require specialized training and expertise, concentrating solely on the major is the most practical route. However, for
other students, a multidisciplinary education can lead to deeper insights, greater adaptability, and improved career
prospects.

In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is
decreasing. Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?

Across the globe, many countries are witnessing a steady migration of people from rural communities to urban areas,
leading to a noticeable decline in rural populations. This demographic shift has sparked debate over whether it should
be viewed as a positive development or a concerning trend. From my perspective, this movement has both advantages
and disadvantages.

One clear benefit of urban migration is the improved access to essential services and opportunities. Cities generally
offer a broader range of educational institutions, better job prospects, and more advanced healthcare systems. For
individuals seeking personal development and a higher standard of living, urban centers can be highly attractive. For
example, someone from a rural background may move to a city, pursue higher education or vocational training, and
secure a stable job that significantly improves their life circumstances and those of their family.

Nevertheless, this shift can also lead to several negative outcomes. As rural populations shrink, these areas often face a
shortage of labor, particularly in the agricultural sector. This can hinder food production and contribute to higher food
prices. Moreover, when younger generations leave, rural regions risk losing valuable cultural traditions and ancestral
knowledge. Skills like traditional farming methods, local crafts, or regional customs may gradually disappear without
enough people to carry them forward.

In summary, the migration from rural to urban areas presents both positive opportunities and serious challenges. While
individuals may benefit from better living conditions and economic prospects in the city, rural communities may suffer
economic decline and cultural erosion. It is important to address this issue carefully to ensure both urban growth and
rural sustainability.

In many countries, people are now living longer than ever before. Some people say an ageing population creates
problems for governments. Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people. To what
extent do the advantages of having an ageing population outweigh the disadvantages?

In recent years, the rise in life expectancy has led to a significant increase in the elderly population worldwide. While
some view this demographic trend as a challenge for governments, others argue that there are notable advantages to
having a higher proportion of older citizens in society. This essay will explore both perspectives and share my own
view on the issue.

On one side of the debate, those who see an aging population as problematic highlight several concerns. One of the
most pressing issues is the strain on public healthcare systems and pension funds. As the number of elderly individuals
grows, so does the demand for medical care and financial support, which could put a considerable burden on
government budgets. Additionally, a shrinking workforce due to the aging population might lead to shortages of
skilled labor, potentially stalling economic progress in certain sectors.

Conversely, those who view an increase in elderly citizens as beneficial emphasize the valuable contributions they can
offer to society. Older individuals often have a wealth of life experience, knowledge, and skills, which can be passed
down to younger generations through mentorship and guidance. Furthermore, an older population can foster stronger
intergenerational connections, promoting a more caring and responsible society. This can lead to a greater sense of
community, improved mental health, and lower crime rates.

In conclusion, the rise in life expectancy has sparked discussions about the impact of an aging population. While it
brings challenges such as higher healthcare costs and potential labor shortages, the positive contributions of elderly
citizens to society should not be overlooked. With thoughtful policies in place, the benefits of an aging population can
be harnessed, helping to create a more inclusive, stable, and thriving society.