0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views5 pages

Solutions3 HW

The document contains solutions to exercises in a linear algebra course, focusing on properties of matrices and inner products. It demonstrates the application of various inequalities, such as the triangle inequality and Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, to establish relationships between different norms. Additionally, it includes proofs of orthogonality among vectors and their representation as linear combinations of orthogonal bases.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views5 pages

Solutions3 HW

The document contains solutions to exercises in a linear algebra course, focusing on properties of matrices and inner products. It demonstrates the application of various inequalities, such as the triangle inequality and Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, to establish relationships between different norms. Additionally, it includes proofs of orthogonality among vectors and their representation as linear combinations of orthogonal bases.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

MS-C1342 Linear algebra, V/2023 Noferini / Puska

Linear algebra
Exercise sheet 3 / Model solutions

1. Let f : R2 → R be such that


 
1/2
T 2 1
f (x) = x Ax where A= .
1 2
The matrix A can be decomposed as A = U T ΛU , where
" #
√1 − √1
 
2 2 1 0
U = √1 √1
and Λ = .
2 2
0 3

(a) Show that y T Λy ≥ y T y for all y ∈ R2 and xT Ax ≥ xT x for all x ∈ R2 . (Hint:


Write A = U T ΛU and set y = U x.)
1/2 T 1/2
(b) Show that xT Ay ≤ xT Ax y Ay . (Hint: Write xT Ay = (Λ1/2 U x)T (Λ1/2 U y)
and use the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, |x y| ≤ kxk2 kyk2 for all x, y ∈ R2 .)
T

(c) Show that f satisfies the triangle inequality : f (x + y) ≤ f (x) + f (y). Is f a norm?
Solution.
(a) By direct calculation,
y T Λy = y12 + 3y22 ≥ y12 + y22 = y T y. (1)
Using the decomposition of A,
xT Ax = xT U T ΛU x = (U x)T Λ(U x).
Denoting y = U x and using (1),
(U x)T Λ(U x) = y T Λy ≥ y T y = xT U T U x.
Noticing that U T U = I completes the proof.
(b) Using the decomposition and hint gives
xT Ay = xT U T ΛU y = (Λ1/2 U x)T (Λ1/2 U y).
Application of the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality to the RHS gives:
|(Λ1/2 U x)T (Λ1/2 U y)| ≤ kΛ1/2 U xk2 kΛ1/2 U yk2
1/2
The Euclidian norm is defined as kxk2 = xT x so that
1/2 T T 1/2
xT Ay ≤ kΛ1/2 U xk2 kΛ1/2 U yk2 = xT U T ΛU x y U ΛU y ,
which completes the proof.

1/5
MS-C1342 Linear algebra, V/2023 Noferini / Puska

(c) By direct calculation and by symmetry of A,

(x + y)T A(x + y) = xT Ax + 2xT Ay + y T Ay.

Using (b) we estimate this from above as

(x + y)T A(x + y) ≤ xT Ax + 2(xT Ax)1/2 (y T Ay)1/2 + y T Ay,

which can be written as


2
(x + y)T A(x + y) ≤ (xT Ax)1/2 + (y T Ay)1/2 .

Taking a square root from both sides completes the proof that f (x + y) ≤ f (x) +
f (y). Lastly, f is indeed a norm, as it also
√ satisfies the other two requirements because
f (x) ≥ kxk2 by item (a) and f (αx) = α2 xT Ax = |α|f (x).

2. Let q 1 = [0, 1, 1]T , q 2 = [1, 1, −1]T and q 3 = [2, −1, 1]T .

(a) Show that q 1 , q 2 and q 3 are mutually orthogonal with respect to the Euclidian inner
product.
(b) Represent the vectors v = [1, 2, 3]T and w = [4, −2, 1]T as a linear combination of the
vectors q 1 , q 2 and q 3 . (Hint: Write v = α1 q 1 + α2 q 2 + α3 q 3 . Use the orthogonality
to find coefficients α1 , α2 , α3 .)

Solution.

(a) By a direct computation,

q 1 · q 2 = 0 + 1 − 1 = 0, q 2 · q 3 = 2 − 1 − 1 = 0, q 1 · q 3 = 0 − 1 + 1 = 0.

(b) For each coefficient αi of v in the orthogonal basis {q i }i=1,...,3 we can use the formula
qi · v
αi = ,
qi · qi
from which we get that

α1 = 5/2, α2 = 0, α3 = 1/2.

With a similar technique one can show that w = (−1/2)q 1 + (1/3)q 2 + (11/6)q 3 .

3. Let q 1 = [0, 3, 2]T , q 2 = [5, 1, −1]T and q 3 = [2, −2, 2]T and define the inner product

hx, yi = x1 y1 + 2x2 y2 + 3x3 y3 . (2)

(a) Show that q 1 , q 2 and q 3 are mutually orthogonal with respect to the inner product
defined in (2).

2/5
MS-C1342 Linear algebra, V/2023 Noferini / Puska

(b) Represent the vectors v = [1, 2, 3]T and w = [4, −2, 1]T as a linear combination of the
vectors q 1 , q 2 and q 3 .

Solution.

(a) By direct calculation,

hq 1 , q 2 i = 0 × 5 + 2 × 3 × 1 + 3 × 2 × (−1) = 6 − 6 = 0,
hq 1 , q 3 i = 0 × 2 + 2 × 3 × (−2) + 3 × 2 × (2) = −12 + 12 = 0,
hq 2 , q 3 i = 5 × 2 + 2 × 1 × (−2) + 3 × (−1) × 2 = 10 − 4 − 6 = 0.

(b) Similarly to the previous exercise, we may write


3 3
X hv, q j i X hv, q j i
v= qj = 2 qj .
i=1
hq j , q j i i=1
kq j k
| {z }
norm induced
by the inn.prod.

Let us then compute the coefficients in the sum:


hv, q 1 i 0 + 12 + 18
= = 1,
hq 1 , q 1 i 0 + 18 + 12
hv, q 2 i 5+4−9
= = 0,
hq 2 , q 2 i 25 + 2 + 3
hv, q 3 i 2 − 8 + 18 1
= = ,
hq 3 , q 3 i 4 + 8 + 12 2

so that
1
v = q1 + q3.
2
Similarly for the vector w we get
hw, q 1 i 0 − 12 + 6 1
= =− ,
hq 1 , q 1 i 30 5
hw, q 2 i 20 − 4 − 3 13
= = ,
hq 2 , q 2 i 30 30
hw, q 3 i 8+8+6 11
= = ,
hq 3 , q 3 i 24 12

so that
1 13 11
w = − q1 + q2 + q3.
5 30 12
4. Let x, y ∈ Rn . Show that:

3/5
MS-C1342 Linear algebra, V/2023 Noferini / Puska

(a) kxk∞ ≤ kxk2 ≤ kxk1 ,



(b) kxk1 ≤ nkxk2 ≤ nkxk∞ ,
(c) |x · y| ≤ kxk∞ kyk1 .

(Hint: (b) Write kxk1 as an inner product between x and a vector containing elements −1
and 1. Apply the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality.)
Solution.

(a) First of all


n
!1/2
 1/2 X
kxk∞ = max |xj | = max |xj |2 ≤ |xj |2 = kxk2 .
j=1,...,n j=1,...,n
j=1

On the other hand


n
!2 n n X
n n
X X X X
kxk21 = |xj | = |xj |2 + |xj ||xk | ≥ |xj |2 = kxk22
j=1 j=1 j=0 k=1 j=1
j6=k
| {z }
≥0

(b) Define the vector x̂ = [sgn(x1 ), sgn(x2 ), . . . , sgn(xn )]T , where


(
1, if t ≥ 0,
sgn(t) =
−1 if t < 0.

Clearly
n
X n
X
x̂ · x = sgn(xj )xj = |xj |.
j=1 j=1

Now the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality gives


n
!1/2 n
!1/2
X X √
kxk1 = x̂·x ≤ kx̂k2 kxk2 = sgn(xj )2 kxk2 = 1 kxk2 = nkxk2 .
j=1 j=1

On the other hand


n
!1/2 n
!1/2 n
!1/2
X X X
kxk2 = |xj | ≤ max |xi |2 = kxk2∞
i=1,...,n
j=1 j=1 j=1
1/2 √
= nkxk2∞ = nkxk∞ ,

that is, equivalently, √


nkxk2 ≤ nkxk∞ .

4/5
MS-C1342 Linear algebra, V/2023 Noferini / Puska

(c) We have
n
X n
X
|x · y| = xj y j ≤ |xj yj |
j=1 j=1
n
X Xn
= |xj ||yj | ≤ ( max |xi |)|yj |
i=1,...,n
j=1 j=1 | {z }
=kxk∞
n
X
= kxk∞ |yj | = kxk∞ kyk1 .
j=1

5/5

You might also like