Ethical Considerations

Ethical considerations/Ethical procedures is essential in conducting this research to ensure

that our participants, rights, welfare, and dignity are protected. This study followed strict
ethical guidelines based on the principles of respect, beneficence, and justice.
1. Informed Consent – Participants were given complete information about the study,
including its purpose, procedures, and potential risks.
Explain: This means that before participating in the study, participants were fully
informed about all aspects of this research. They were told the purpose (why the study
was being conducted), the procedures (what they would be asked to do), and any
potential risks (possible negative effects or challenges they might experience). This
ensured that participants could make an informed decision about whether they wanted
to take part, knowing exactly what to expect.
2. Confidentiality and Privacy – Personal information was kept secure and anonymous
to protect participants’ identities. Any data collected was used responsibly and stored
safely.
Explain:This means that I/we the researchers ensured that participants’ private details,
such as their names or any identifying information, were not shared or exposed. To
protect their identities, data was either anonymized or coded. Additionally, all collected
information was handled carefully, stored in a secure location, and used only for the
intended research purposes, preventing misuse or unauthorized access.
3. Avoidance of Harm – The study was designed to minimize any physical, emotional, or
psychological harm to participants. Their well-being was prioritized throughout the
research process.
Explain: This means that the research was carefully planned to ensure that participants
did not experience any harm, discomfort, or distress while taking part in the study. The
researchers took precautions to prevent any negative effects, such as stress,
embarrassment, or physical strain. Their safety and well-being were the top priority at
every stage of the research process, ensuring a respectful and supportive environment.
4. Integrity and Honesty – Researchers maintained transparency and honesty in
collecting, analyzing, and presenting data, ensuring accuracy and fairness.
Explain: This means that the researchers conducted the study with integrity by being
open and truthful at every stage. They accurately collected and analyzed data without
altering or misrepresenting the findings. When presenting results, they ensured fairness
by avoiding bias and reporting the information objectively. This approach helped
maintain the credibility and reliability of the research.
 5. Fair Selection of Participants – The study included participants without
discrimination, ensuring equal opportunities for everyone involved.
Explain: This means that the researchers selected participants fairly, without favoritism
or bias based on factors such as gender, age, socioeconomic status, or background.
Everyone who met the study’s criteria had an equal chance to participate, ensuring that
the research was inclusive and representative of different perspectives.
6. Right to Withdraw – Participants had the freedom to leave the study at any point
without facing any negative consequences.
Explain this: This means that participants were not forced to stay in the study and could
choose to withdraw at any time if they felt uncomfortable or no longer wanted to
participate. They would not face any penalties, criticism, or negative effects for their
decision, ensuring that their involvement was completely voluntary and based on their
free will.
7. Responsible Use of Data – All data collected was handled ethically, ensuring it was
not misused or altered in any way.
Explain this:This means that the researchers managed the collected data responsibly
and followed ethical guidelines to protect its integrity. They did not manipulate, falsify,
or misuse the information for personal gain or any unauthorized purpose. The data was
used only for the intended research objectives, ensuring accuracy, honesty, and respect
for participants’ contributions.
8. Transparency and Reproducibility – The research methods and findings were clear
and open for verification by others.
Explain this: This means that the researchers conducted the study in a transparent
manner, making sure that their methods and results were well-documented and easy to
understand. Other researchers or experts could review the process, check the accuracy
of the findings, and confirm that the conclusions were valid. This approach helps build
trust in the research and ensures its reliability.
9. Approval from Authorities – Before conducting the research, permission was obtained
from the school principal to ensure compliance with institutional guguidelines.
Explain: This means that before starting the study, the researchers sought approval
from the school principal to ensure that the research followed the school’s rules and
ethical standards. This step was important to make sure that the study was conducted
properly, with respect for the institution’s policies and the well-being of the participants.
These ethical considerations ensured that the research was conducted with fairness, respect,
and integrity, safeguarding the well-being of all participants.
RESEARCH GAP
Based on the study of Kiran (2021), education is emphasized as a crucial aspect of one’s life,
serving as the key to future success and providing numerous opportunities. It plays a vital
role in developing an individual’s personality, critical thinking, and social interactions,
ultimately preparing them for life experiences. However, while Kiran (2021) highlights the
importance of education, his study does not address the struggles students face in achieving
it, particularly senior high school students. This gap in the literature has inspired us, as
researchers, to explore the specific challenges encountered by senior high school students in
their pursuit of education. By examining these struggles, our study aims to contribute a
deeper understanding of the barriers to academic success and potential solutions to support
students in overcoming them.

POSIBLE QUESTIONS:
Why did you conduct this study?
- We conducted this study to understand how poverty affects students’ ability to
access essential project resources and materials. Many students struggle to afford
necessary supplies, which can impact their academic performance and overall
learning experience. By identifying these challenges, we aim to raise awareness and
propose possible solutions to support underprivileged students. This research can
help educators, administrators, and policymakers develop strategies to improve
resource accessibility and promote equal learning opportunities for all students.
How does poverty affect students’ access to essential project resources and materials?
- Poverty limits students’ ability to afford materials such as textbooks, art supplies,
and internet access. This can hinder their ability to complete projects effectively and
meet academic requirements.
What are the most common challenges faced by students from low-income backgrounds
in accessing educational materials?
- Some common challenges include financial constraints, lack of internet access,
limited availability of school supplies, and difficulty in affording transportation to
libraries or resource centers.
How do students cope with the lack of essential project resources?
- Many students rely on borrowing materials from classmates or teachers, using
second-hand supplies, or seeking help from school programs and community
organizations. Some also resort to creative solutions, such as using alternative
materials.
How does limited access to resources affect students’ academic performance?
- Students with inadequate resources may struggle to complete assignments on time,
perform poorly on projects, and experience higher levels of stress, which can
negatively impact their overall academic performance.
Are there any differences in academic performance between students with adequate
resources and those without?
- Yes, students with access to essential materials tend to perform better because they
can complete assignments efficiently and participate more actively in class. Those
without resources often face delays and lower grades due to incomplete or low-
quality work.
What specific gap does your research address?
Our research addresses the gap in understanding how poverty affects students’ ability
to access essential project resources and materials. While many studies focus on the
broader impact of poverty on education, there is limited research specifically exploring
how resource scarcity influences students’ academic performance, participation, and
project completion.
How did you formulate your research questions, and why did you choose them?
We formulated our research questions based on observations and discussions with
students who struggle to afford school materials. We focused on identifying the specific
challenges they face, how they cope, and what solutions could be implemented. These
questions were chosen to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the issue and its
impact on students.

Did your study fully answer your research questions? Why or why not?
Our study provided significant insights into the issue, but due to time and resource
limitations, we may not have captured every aspect of the problem. While we identified
key challenges and coping strategies, further research is needed to explore long-term
solutions and policy implications.

Why did you choose narrative inquiry as your research design?

We chose narrative inquiry because it allows students to share their personal
experiences and challenges in their own words. This approach provides deeper insights
into their struggles and coping mechanisms, making the study more meaningful and
relatable.
Can you explain how you selected your conversation partners?
We used purposive sampling to select students who experience financial difficulties and
struggle to access project resources. This ensured that our study included individuals
who could provide relevant and detailed insights into the issue.

How did you ensure the credibility and reliability of your data?
We used multiple sources of data, including interviews and observations, to cross-
validate our findings. We also maintained transparency in our data collection and
analysis process, ensuring that responses were accurately recorded and interpreted
without bias.
What challenges did you face during data collection, and how did you overcome them?
Some participants were hesitant to share personal financial struggles. To address this,
we reassured them of confidentiality and created a comfortable, non-judgmental
environment for discussions. Additionally, scheduling conflicts were resolved by
conducting interviews during students’ free time.
What are the key findings of your study?
Our study found that many students struggle to afford materials like textbooks,
printing costs, and internet access, which negatively impacts their academic
performance. Some rely on borrowing, school-provided resources, or alternative
materials to complete projects.
How do your findings relate to existing studies on this topic?
Our findings align with existing research that highlights the impact of poverty on
education, confirming that financial struggles limit students’ access to learning
materials. However, our study provides more specific insights into project-related
resource shortages.
Were there any unexpected results? If so, how did you interpret them?
One unexpected finding was the resilience and creativity of students in finding ways to
complete their projects despite financial limitations. This suggests that, while resource
scarcity is a major challenge, students develop adaptive strategies to cope with it.

How does poverty specifically affect students’ access to essential project resources?
Poverty limits students’ ability to buy materials, pay for printing and internet access,
and participate in group projects requiring financial contributions. This often leads to
incomplete or lower-quality work, affecting their grades and learning experience.

What were the limitations of your study?

The study was limited by sample size, as we only focused on a specific group of students.
Additionally, time constraints prevented us from exploring long-term effects and
solutions in depth.

If you had more time and resources, how would you improve your study?
We would expand our sample size, conduct a longitudinal study to track the long-term
impact of poverty on students’ academic performance, and explore the effectiveness of
different intervention strategies.

What are some possible future research directions based on your study?
Future research could examine the role of digital access in students’ project completion,
compare the impact of poverty on different academic levels, and assess the effectiveness
of school-based support programs.

If you were to redo this research, what would you do differently?

We would include a more diverse participant pool, conduct surveys alongside interviews
for quantitative insights, and explore the perspectives of teachers and administrators to
gain a broader understanding of the issue.

Why do you think your research is important?

This research is important because it sheds light on a critical issue affecting students’
education. By understanding these challenges, schools and policymakers can take action
to ensure that financial limitations do not hinder academic success.

Any final thoughts or reflections on your research journey?

Conducting this research was a meaningful experience that highlighted the struggles
many students face. It also reinforced the importance of providing equal educational
opportunities. We hope that our findings contribute to positive changes that support
students in need.
In the research topic “EXPLORING THE IMPACT OF POVERTY ON STUDENTS’
ACCESS TO ESSENTIAL PROJECT RESOURCES AND MATERIALS,” the
variables can be identified as follows:
Independent Variable:
Poverty
Why it is independent: . In this case, poverty is the independent variable because it is
the condition or factor being studied for its effect on students’ access to resources.
Researchers are investigating how poverty may impact or affect students’ ability to
access necessary resources.
Dependent Variable:
Why it is dependent:. Here, students’ access to essential project resources and materials
is dependent because it is expected to change based on the level or presence of poverty.
Researchers are measuring how access to resources varies depending on the poverty
status of the students.

In summary:

Poverty (independent variable) is the factor being manipulated or studied for its effect.
Access to project resources (dependent variable) is what researchers are measuring as it
might change based on poverty levels