International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, Vol 5, no 5, pp 5218-5221 May 2024
International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews
Journal homepage: www.ijrpr.com ISSN 2582-7421
Study of Pre-Engineered Building (PEB) In Industrial Sector
Mr. Shubham Khandagale1, Prof. Priyanka Patil2
1
Student of MBA Project and Construction Management, MIT-ADT, Loni-Kalbhor, Pune,412201, India
2
Associate Professor at MIT-ADT, Loni-Kalbhor, Pune, 412201, India.
ABSTRACT
Pre-engineered buildings (PEBs) have risen as a flexible and effective arrangement within the development industry, advertising various benefits in terms of cost-
effectiveness, speed of development, and basic execution. This paper gives a comprehensive audit of progressions and developments in PEB development, drawing
upon a wide run of writing and case thinks about. The survey starts by characterizing PEBs and looking at their key components such as Primary and secondary
members. Along these lines, the paper examines later advancements in plan strategies, manufacture methods, and fabric innovations pointed at upgrading the
auxiliary judgment, building adaptability, and supportability of PEBs. Moreover, the paper highlights developing patterns in PEB development, such as the
integration of renewable vitality frameworks, measured development procedures, and versatile reuse methodologies. Moreover, the audit examines the challenges
and openings related with the adoption of PEBs in numerous settings, counting administrative necessities, quality confirmation, and natural contemplations. At long
last, the paper recognizes regions for future inquire about and development in PEB development, with a center on tending to the advancing needs of the built
environment and progressing economic development hones. By and large, this survey underscores the noteworthiness of PEBs as a practical arrangement for
assembly the developing request for productive, cost-effective, and economical building arrangements within the 21st century
Keywords: Pre-Engineered Buildings, Cost-Effectiveness, Speed Of Development, Basic Execution.
1. Introduction
India is the world's second fastest expanding economy, owing largely to the construction industry, which ranks second only to agriculture in terms of
economic contribution to the country. The construction business has constantly discovered, invented, and produced new technologies, techniques, and
products. One of these is the pre-engineered building (PEB) concept
The industrial segment plays a pivotal part within the worldwide economy, including a different extend of activities from fabricating and production to
warehousing and coordination’s. As industries proceed to advance and extend, the request for proficient and cost-effective framework arrangements has
become progressively foremost. In reaction to these evolving needs, pre-engineered buildings (PEBs) have risen as a reasonable alternative to
conventional development strategies for industrial facilities.PEBs represent a worldview move within the way industrial structures are designed,
fabricated, and erected. Not at all like conventional development, which depends on on-site assembly of components, PEBs are manufactured off-site in
a controlled environment and after that transported to the construction site for assembly. This pre-assembled approach offers a few points of interest,
including quickened development timelines, decreased material wastage, and improved basic integrity. The industrial sector presents special challenges
and prerequisites that make PEBs especially well-suited for different applications. Fabricating facilities, warehouses, distribution centers, and industrial
parks all advantage from the adaptability, versatility, and cost-efficiency advertised by PEBs. Besides, the measured nature of PEBs permits for simple
customization to accommodate specific operational needs and spatial arrangement.
2. Literature Review
1. Difference between Pre Engineered Building Structure and RCC Conventional Structure: Pre-engineered building (PEB) structures and
reinforced concrete (RCC) conventional structures represent two distinct approaches to construction, each with its own set of characteristics,
advantages, and limitations. Here's a breakdown of the key differences between the two:
PEB Structure: PEBs are fabricated off-site in a factory-controlled environment, where structural components such as columns, beams, and roof trusses
are manufactured to precise specifications. These components are then transported to the construction site for assembly. PEBs are typically erected using
bolted connections, which speeds up the construction process.PEBs offer a high degree of design flexibility, permitting for easy customization of building
measurements, layouts, and building highlights. The measured nature of PEB components encourages quick design emphases and modifications to
accommodate particular project necessities. PEBs are known for their quick development times due to the pre-assembled nature of their components. The
assembly of PEBs on-site regularly takes less time compared to RCC structures, coming about in shorter project schedules and quicker occupancy.
International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, Vol 5, no 5, pp 5218-5221 May 2024 5219
PEBs are generally more cost-effective than RCC structures, particularly for projects with expansive clear ranges or repetitive designs. The pre-assembled
components of PEBs decrease material waste, labor costs, and construction time, resulting in overall cost investment funds.
PEBs offer good structural performance and can be designed to meet particular loading requirements, including wind, snow, and seismic loads. In any
case, the design adaptability of PEBs may result in a few limitations in terms of architectural aesthetics and structural complexity.
RCC Conventional Structure: RCC structures are built using cast-in-place concrete on-site. This involves constructing formwork, pouring concrete
into the molds, and allowing it to cure. The construction process for RCC structures is more labour-intensive and time-consuming compared to PEBs.
RCC structures also offer design flexibility, but to a lesser extent compared to PEBs. Changes to the design of RCC structures during construction can
be more challenging and may require additional time and resources.
RCC construction involves multiple stages, including formwork setup, concrete pouring, curing, and finishing. As a result, the construction of RCC
structures tends to take longer compared to PEBs, especially for large-scale projects. RCC structures can be more expensive than PEBs, particularly for
complex designs or projects with custom architectural features.
The labour-intensive nature of RCC construction and the need for formwork and scaffolding can contribute to higher construction costs.RCC structures
provide excellent structural performance and durability, making them suitable for a wide range of applications, including high-rise buildings and heavy
industrial facilities. RCC structures can also accommodate complex architectural designs and structural configurations.
3. Pre-engineered building:
The Pre-engineering building Links are manufactured here according to client necessities. Components are manufactured in a completely transportable
condition. Usually taken after by delivered to construction place, when the assembly procedure starts. Manufacturing procedure isn't carried out on-site.
Pre-assembled structures are ordinarily used for workplaces, retail, and distribution centers .Pre-assembled buildings are fundamentally low-rise
constructions suitable for use as workplaces, flats, showrooms, shops, and other similar applications. Applying the principle of pre-assembled
development to low-rise structures is especially vital cost-effective with time-efficient. Buildings can be built in a division the larger part of the time
that's commonly fundamental. PEB frameworks are utilized commonly worldwide in commercial and non-residential buildings.
4. Components of PEB
All authors are required to complete the Procedia exclusive license transfer agreement before the article can be published, which they can do online. This
transfer agreement enables Elsevier to protect the copyrighted material for the authors, but does not relinquish the authors’ proprietary rights. The
copyright transfer covers the exclusive rights to reproduce and distribute the article, including reprints, photographic reproductions, microfilm or any
other reproductions of similar nature and translations. Authors are responsible for obtaining from the copyright holder, the permission to reproduce any
figures for which copyright exists.
The key components of a pre-engineered building include:
➢ Primary Framing System: This is the skeleton of the building and typically consists of rigid frames made from steel beams or columns.
These frames bear the load of the entire structure and provide support for the secondary framing components.
➢ Secondary Framing System: This includes purlins, girts, eave struts, and other structural elements that are attached to the primary framing.
Purlins run perpendicular to the roof joists and support the roof panels, while girts run horizontally along the sidewalls and support the wall
panels.
➢ Roofing System: The roofing system usually consists of roof panels made from metal sheets or insulated panels. These panels are attached to
the purlins and provide weather protection for the building.
➢ Wall Cladding: Similar to the roofing system, wall cladding comprises panels that are attached to the girts and provide the exterior surface
of the building. These panels can be made from a variety of materials such as metal sheets, insulated panels, or even masonry.
➢ Bracing System: Bracing elements like rods, cables, or diagonal bracing are incorporated into the structure to provide stability and resist
lateral loads such as wind or seismic forces.
➢ Crane System (if required): In buildings where heavy lifting is required, a crane system may be installed. This typically consists of runway
beams attached to the primary framing and a bridge crane that can move along these runways to lift and move heavy objects within the
building.
➢ Doors and Windows: Pre-engineered buildings also include openings for doors, windows, and other access points. These openings are often
pre-designed into the building system and can be customized based on the specific requirements of the project.
Parameters of Pre-engineering building
International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, Vol 5, no 5, pp 5218-5221 May 2024 5220
➢ Design Load Requirements: This incorporates understanding the specific loads the building will have to be withstand, such as wind, snow,
seismic, and live loads. Design parameters are decided based on components like area, climate, and building utilization.
➢ Building Dimensions: Parameters related to the estimate and shape of the building, including length, width, and height. These measurements
are decided based on the planning utilize of the building, space necessities, and site constraints.
➢ Structural System: The choice of structural framework, counting the type of framing (clear-span, multi-span, or lean-to), column spacing,
and framing materials (typically steel). This parameter impacts the generally quality, stability, and cost-effectiveness of the building.
➢ Architectural Features: Parameters related to the architectural plan of the building, such as roof pitch, wall profiles, eave extensions, and
aesthetic upgrades. These features can be customized to meet the client's preferences and project necessities.
➢ Material Specifications: Specifications for the materials utilized within the construction of the building, including the grade and thickness of
steel components, roofing and wall cladding materials, insulation, and finishes. Material parameters affect the strength, performance, and cost
of the building.
➢ Building Codes and Regulations: Compliance with local building codes, zoning controls, and industry benchmarks is essential. Parameters
related to security, availability, fire assurance, and natural contemplations must be joined into the design and construction process.
➢ Foundation Requirements: Parameters related to the design and construction of the building foundation, counting soil analysis, foundation
type (concrete slab, piers, or footings), and bearing capacity. Foundation parameters ensure appropriate support and stability for the structure.
➢ Construction Methodology: Parameters related to the construction process, including fabrication, transportation, and erection of building
components. Factors such as assembly sequence, site access, and installation techniques are considered to optimize construction efficiency
and minimize costs.
➢ Performance Criteria: Parameters related to building performance, including thermal insulation, acoustic properties, air tightness, and energy
efficiency. These criteria ensure that the building meets the required performance standards and provides a comfortable and functional
environment for occupants.
➢ Lifecycle Considerations: Parameters related to the lifecycle cost, maintenance requirements, and durability of the building. Factors such as
material longevity, ease of maintenance, and potential for future expansion or modification are considered to optimize the long-term value of
the investment.
5. Concluding remarks
PEBs offer numerous advantages over traditional construction methods, including faster construction times, cost-effectiveness, flexibility in design, and
sustainability. These benefits make PEBs an attractive option for industrial projects seeking efficient and economical building solutions. While the
adoption of PEBs is increasing across the industrial sector, there are still challenges and barriers that need to be addressed. These include misconceptions
about the quality and durability of PEBs, limited awareness among stakeholders, and concerns regarding customization and design limitations. Successful
implementation of PEBs in the industrial sector requires collaboration and coordination among various stakeholders, including architects, engineers,
contractors, and clients. It's essential to involve all parties early in the project planning phase to ensure that design requirements are met and potential
issues are addressed proactively.
Additionally, ongoing research and development efforts are needed to further optimize PEB design, construction techniques, and material innovations.
This will help enhance the performance, durability, and sustainability of PEBs, making them even more competitive in the industrial construction market.
Acknowledgements
I’m very thankful to Prof. .Priyanka Patil , Prof, Aasha Oak head of Project construction Management for the help and guidance by her for writing our
first ever conference paper article.
References
[1] S. S. Mane and Mitaali Jayant Gilbile [September-2020] "A Review of a Comparative Study regarding the Structure Analysis and Construction of
Pre-Engineered Buildings [PEB] and Conventional Steel Buildings [CSB]"” Vol. 9 Issue 09
[2] Shalu Assis [May 2019] “PEB structure evaluation and contrast to traditional steel buildings of varied specifications" Volume: 06, Number: 05..
[3] S.B. Bhagate [April 2017] Issue 5, Issue 4, ISSN 2349-4476, "Comparative Study of Traditional Steel Structure and Pre- Engineered Building."
[4] Abhinav Dewangan, Abhyuday Titiksh and Akshay Sharma [November 2015 ]“ A Comparison of Conventional Steel Buildings with Pre-Engineered
Buildings for Use as Industrial Sheds”,pp.25-28 Volume 7, Issue 5.
[6] Dr. Kuldeep R. Dabhekar, Humanaaz Arif Qureshi and Dr. Isha P. Khedikar [May 2020] "A Comparison of Pre Designed and Conventional Steel
Buildings"” Volume 7, Issue 5.
International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, Vol 5, no 5, pp 5218-5221 May 2024 5221
[7] Sai Lakshmi , M. K. M. V. Ratnam and B.Meena [April -2021] “A Comparison between Pre Engineered Steel Buildings and Conventional Steel
Buildings” Volume 4, Issue 5.
[8] Pornima Naik, Dr.S.H. Mahure [May 2021] “A Comparison of Pre Engineered and Conventional Steel Buildings” Volume 8, Issue3.
[9] M.K. Krishna Chaitanya and M.K. Ratnam [April -2025] “A Comparison between Pre-Engineered and Conventional Steel Buildings” Volume 8,
Issue 8.