chapter Seven:

the road to revolution, 1754-1775

contents
7.1 IntrODUCtIOn ........................................................................................... 289
7.1.1 Learning Outcomes .................................................................................... 289
7.2 thE frEnCh anD InDIan War (1754-63) .................................................... 291
7.2.1 Pontiac’s War (1763-64) ............................................................................. 294
7.2.2 Before You Move On... ................................................................................ 295
Key Concepts ................................................................................................. 295
Test Yourself .................................................................................................. 296
7.3 thE EnD Of thE SEvEn yEarS War anD WOrSEnInG rElatIOnS, 1763-1772 296
7.3.1 The French and Indian War and the End of Salutary Neglect ............................ 297
7.3.2 The Proclamation of 1763 ........................................................................... 298
7.3.3 The Implications of the New British Approach: The Parliamentary Acts of 1764 .... 299
7.3.4 The Stamp Act of 1765 ............................................................................... 300
The Stamp Act Riots and Congress .................................................................... 301
The Colonies Apply Economic Pressure ............................................................... 303
7.3.5 The Townshend Duties: External Taxes to Regulate Trade ................................. 304
7.3.6 Trouble Continues to Brew: The Boston Massacre ............................................ 305
7.3.7 The Evolution of a Formal Theory of Revolt .................................................... 306
7.3.8 Before You Move On... ................................................................................ 307
Key Concepts ................................................................................................. 307
Test Yourself .................................................................................................. 307
7.4 thE DOWnWarD SlIDE tO rEvOlUtIOn, 1772-1775 .................................. 308
7.4.1 The Tea Act and Party of 1773 ...................................................................... 309
7.4.2 The First Continental Congress, 1774 ............................................................ 311
7.4.3 Lexington and Concord, April 19, 1775 .......................................................... 313
7.4.4 Before You Move On... ................................................................................ 318
Key Concepts ................................................................................................. 318
Test Yourself .................................................................................................. 318
7.5 COnClUSIOn ............................................................................................... 320
7.6 CrItICal thInkInG ExErCISES .................................................................. 321
7.7 kEy tErmS ................................................................................................... 322
7.8 ChrOnOlOGy .............................................................................................. 323
7.9 BIBlIOGraPhy ............................................................................................ 324
7.10 EnD nOtES ................................................................................................ 325
anSWEr kEy fOr ChaPtEr SEvEn: thE rOaD tO rEvOlUtIOn, 1754-1775 .... 327

If you need this document in another format, please email the University of North Georgia Press at
ungpress@ung.edu or call 706-864-1556.
Page |
Page | 288
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

chapter Seven: the road to revolution

7.1 IntrODUCtIOn
During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the Americans became
embroiled in a series of wars that were also fought on the European
continent. King William’s War, Queen Anne’s War, and King George’s War
originated in Europe; the French and Indian War, on the other hand, began
in the colonies two years before it “spread” to Europe and became known as
the Seven Years’ War. During most of the eighteenth century before 1763,
the British had followed a policy that William Pitt nicknamed “salutary
neglect.” This theory was based on the notion that if the colonies were
left alone to pursue their own economic interests, they would prosper and
thereby ultimately benefit the mother country. This approach to colonial
management ended in 1763 with the conclusion of the French and Indian
War. Determined to make the colonies defray part of the expenses of the
war and of their own domestic needs following the war, the Parliament
enacted a series of measures designed, in the words of the colonists, to “raise
a revenue.” Colonial opposition to these policies became strident between
1763 and 1775, and the rallying cry “no taxation without representation”
underscored the differences in the way the colonies and the mother country
looked at taxation, regulation, and control.
The climax of the protests came in 1773 as tea from the East India
Tea Company was dumped into the harbors of ports along the eastern
seaboard. The British reacted with the “Intolerable” Acts, to which the
colonies responded in spring, 1774, by sending a list of grievances to the
king and Parliament. Matters were made worse when George III came to
the conclusion late in the year that “blows must be exchanged to determine
whether [the American colonies] are to be subject to this country or
independent.”
In May, 1775, a month after the firings at Lexington and Concord, the
Second Continental Congress convened to consider the response of George
III to the petition submitted in spring, 1774, and ultimately to oversee the
war. It would be in session until replaced by the Confederation Congress,
which assembled in 1781.

7.1.1 learning Outcomes

After completing this chapter, you should be able to:
• Analyze the evolution of British colonial policy towards the North American
colonies from the end of the French and Indian War, 1763, to the firing at
Lexington and Concord.
Page | 289
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

• Define salutary neglect and explain why the British abandoned this policy
following the French and Indian War.
• Evaluate the impact of the French and Indian War on the British colonies and
the Indians.
• Identify the important people and groups involved in the colonial protests
leading up to the Revolution.
• Identify the significant Parliamentary acts passed in the years following the
French and Indian War.
• Explain the various instances of inter-colonial cooperation in the years
between 1763 and 1776, including the Committees of Correspondence, the
Stamp Act Congress, the Continental Congresses, and the boycotts of British
goods.
• Recognize that people living in Great Britain and in Colonial America saw the
conflicts of the times very differently.

Page
Page | 290
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

7.2 thE frEnCh anD InDIan War (1754-63)

The late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries was a time of warfare
in the colonies and in Europe. Over the period, the British, French, and
Spanish empires in North America clashed and vied for control of the
continent. Each of the colonial powers engaged in a series of shifting
alliances with native peoples, who participated in the colonial wars in order
to ensure or bolster their own regional economic or political power. Much
of the fighting in King William’s, Queen Anne’s, and King George’s Wars
had taken place at the periphery of the colonial borders, in Acadia and
Spanish Florida. The next and greatest of these wars, the French and Indian
War, emerged along the colonial boundaries in modern-day Pennsylvania.
Unlike the previous colonial wars, which began in Europe and spread to the
colonies, this war began in the colonies and spread to Europe and beyond.
The name French and Indian War refers only to the engagement in North
America; the greater global war is referred to as the Seven Years’ War.
The French and Indian War arose from border tensions when Virginians
crossed the Allegheny Mountains into the Ohio River Valley, an area
claimed by both the British and the French. The French responded to this
incursion by building a series of forts
in western Pennsylvania. Tensions
intensified as both sides tried to
strengthen their hold on the region
through increased presence and
thwarted attempts to force the other
power to leave the region. Militia
leader George Washington was one
of the prominent British officers in
these actions.
In 1752, Washington was sent
by Virginia lieutenant governor
Robert Dinwiddie to negotiate a
French removal from the area. Not
surprisingly, the French refused to
leave and asserted that the French
claim to the region was stronger
than England’s. In the aftermath of
the failed negotiations, both sides
decided to focus their efforts on the
Figure 7.1 George Washington | Washington
wearing his French and Indian War colonel’s convergence of the Monongahela,
uniform of the Virginia Regiment. This is the earliest
authenticated portrait of Washington and appears in Allegheny, and Ohio Rivers, the
Woodrow Wilson’s book George Washington.
site of modern-day Pittsburgh. In
artist: Charles Willson Peale
Source: George Washington 1754, Washington, his regiment of

Page
Page | 291
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

Virginians, and a small group of Mingo warriors, were charged to build a fort
at the site. They arrived at the convergence of the rivers to find that the French
had already constructed their own fort at this location. Washington and his
men fell back and made camp; the next morning, they ambushed a small party
of Frenchmen, killing many of them. The Battle of Jumonville Glen, named
for French commander Joseph Coulon de Villers de Jumonville, was the
first engagement of the French and Indian War. Although a British victory,
overall, it was a completely botched mission that embarrassed Washington
and damaged his reputation. To this day, historians do not know with any
certainty what exactly happened at the Battle of Jumonville Glen. There is
documentary evidence for two different accounts of the pivotal event of the
day: the death of French commander Jumonville. Some sources assert that
Washington effectively lost control of his Indian allies. After a ceasefire had
been called, the leader of the Mingos split open Jumonville’s skull, scalping
him in what some historians have called a ritual slaying. Several sources
assert that after this, the Mingo set about killing and scalping many of the
wounded Frenchmen, to the horror of Washington. Other accounts suggest
that Jumonville was shot and killed in the skirmish.1 In the aftermath of
the battle, Washington and his men retreated and hastily constructed Fort
Necessity, where Washington was forced to surrender to attacking French
forces a month later. The French and Indian War emerged from this series
of blunders. British politician Horace Walpole remarked on the situation,
“the volley fired by a young Virginian in the backwoods of America set the
world on fire.”2 In effect, Washington’s actions triggered a world war.
While Washington was fighting the French at Fort Necessity, colonial
representatives from seven of the thirteen British colonies were meeting
to discuss defensive measures against the French and improving foreign
relations with the Indians. This meeting, called the Albany Congress, was
the first time in the series of colonial
wars when the colonies considered
some kind of formal union. Great
Britain’s Board of Trade had called
for the meeting in order to discuss
Indian relations and to meet
with the Iroquois, hoping for an
alliance. They were disappointed;
the Iroquois refused to commit
themselves to the British. Much
of the meeting instead was spent figure 7.2 Join or Die | Franklin’s cartoon
encouraging membership in the Albany Congress
debating Benjamin Franklin’s Plan has since been viewed by many as predictive of the
formation of the United States, as many parts make
of Union, which sought to create up the whole.
a formal colonial union. The plan artist: Benjamin Franklin
Source: Library of Congress

Page
Page | 292
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

called for a colonial union comprising a “grand council,” which would pass
legislation, and a president appointed by the Crown. Although the plan was
approved by the delegates at the Albany Congress, the colonies rejected
the plan and the Colonial Office, as they were all feared their powers being
eroded by the proposed colonial union. Although the Plan of Union failed, it
later became a tremendous influence on the 1777 Articles of Confederation
and, eventually, the Constitution.
One measure of the Plan of Union that was enacted was the appointment
of a supreme commander of British and colonial military forces. In 1775,
General Edward Braddock arrived in the colonies and assumed command
of the forces. His first action was to return to western Pennsylvania and
Fort Duquesne, the fort at the convergence of the rivers. Braddock led his
force 125 miles from Fort Cumberland, Maryland, to within six miles of Fort
Duquesne. They traveled slowly, laden down with their cannons. Along the
way, they constructed a road to ensure easy transport between Cumberland
and the Ohio Valley, an area which Braddock fully expected easily to take
from the French. The French, realizing that the fort could not withstand
Braddock’s heavy artillery, decided to attack the British before the British
could lay siege to the fort.
The French and Indian forces planned to ambush Braddock’s men;
however, they were too late and were surprised to meet the British forces
just after the British had crossed the Monongahela River. The resulting
Battle of the Wilderness was fought on July 9, 1755. In the course of the
battle, both the French commander and Braddock were shot; the French
commander died on the field while Braddock lingered and died days later.
The Battle of the Wilderness is significant because it illustrates the dramatic
differences between European warfare and an emerging “American way of
war.”3 Braddock tried in vain to make his troops hold formations and to
maintain his own position on horseback in the manner of European warfare,
only to have the French and Indian troops, concealed in the woods, make
easy targets of his men and his horses: Braddock had several horses shot
out from under him before he himself was shot. After Braddock was shot,
George Washington managed to maintain order and disengage his forces.
Washington was acclaimed for his actions at the Battle of the Wilderness,
actions that led in part to his later appointment as commander in chief of
the American forces in the Revolution.
From this unexpected beginning, the French and Indian war by 1756
had spread to Europe, becoming the Seven Years’ War. This war involved
nine European powers. In the midst of the growing European involvement,
William Pitt assumed the leadership of the British government. Pitt’s
strategy named North America as the primary field of engagement against

Page
Page | 293
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

France, where he mobilized an enormous force of 45,000 troops composed

of both British regulars and colonial militiamen. Pitt was able to amass such
a huge army because he offered the colonies subsidies for their wartime
participation. His strategy also called for the British navy to blockade ports
and cut off French reinforcements as well as French trade. This hurt the
French army both directly and indirectly, as not only were they denied
French troops, but also the lack of trade goods hurt their relationship with
their Indian allies.
The turning point of the war came in 1759 in the so-called Annus Mirabilis,
or Year of Miracles. Over the course of the year, the war turned in favor of
the British. In North America, they conquered Quebec, drove the French
out of the Ohio Valley, and captured the rich island of Guadeloupe. Victories
in India, in Europe, and at sea further empowered the British. Although the
British gained the upper hand globally, in North America, the war limped
weakly on until 1763. The newly-ascended British monarch, King George
III, desired to bring the war to an end; however, Spain’s late entry into the
Seven Years’ War prevented his doing so. A second “year of miracles” in
1762 saw the capture of the Spanish ports of Havana, Cuba, and Manila,
Philippines, and, by 1763, the French and Spanish both were defeated.
The Treaty of Paris of 1763 brought the Seven Years’ War, and related
French and Indian War in America, to an end. The treaty wrought enormous
changes on the North American map, as the British were awarded everything
east of the Mississippi River, including Spanish Florida and only excepting
New Orleans and Louisiana. Great Britain was now the uncontested European
power in eastern North America. The treaty was vociferously protested by
France’s Indian allies, who had been given no voice in the negotiations. Most
groups asserted that France had no right to cede Indian lands to the British.
From a European point of view, though, the lands of France’s Indian allies
now rightfully belonged to the British as these lands were ceded as spoils of
war upon France’s, and, by extension, its Indian allies’, defeat. Though the
European war had ended, many tribes consequently remained hostile to the
British, and violence simmered beneath the surface.

7.2.1 Pontiac’s War (1763-64)

After the end of the war, many tribes of the Ohio Valley expected that
British colonists would pour over the Appalachian Mountains into their
lands. The British quickly moved into French forts in the valley and did not
trade with the tribes. Pontiac of the Ottawa nation responded to the growth
of British power in the area by calling for tribes to join forces against the
British. Pontiac used the message of a prophet named Neolin to encourage

Page
Page | 294
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

others to join his confederacy against the British. Neolin said that he had
experienced a mystical vision in which he visited the realm of the Creator,
that is, heaven, and seen the punishments of hell. In his vision, the route to
heaven was obstructed by the British, because Indians had been neglecting
their traditional ways, being corrupted instead by white ways. He attributed
the misfortunes of the Indians to this corruption and so advocated restoring
aboriginal rituals, beliefs, and practices. He concomitantly called upon
Indians to exorcise white influences, such as alcohol and other European
trade goods. The Indians, he said, must purify themselves through reforming
their ways and driving the British from their lands.
Pontiac took advantage of Neolin’s message, incorporating it into his
own speeches and campaigns in order to win tribes into the confederacy.
Ultimately, the group included the Shawnee, Munsee, Wyandot, Seneca,
Delaware, Huron, Potawatomi, Ojibwa, and Ottawa. In May of 1763, the
Ottawa attacked Fort Detroit; other groups led raids on British settlements
in Ohio and western Pennsylvania. Over the course of the year, more than
600 Pennsylvanians were killed and more than a dozen soldiers were
massacred in the destruction of Fort Sandusky. By the fall of 1764, the British
military led invasions of the Ohio Valley to subdue the confederacy. The
British were able to force the tribes to surrender because, cut off from trade,
they were quickly running out of ammunition. Pontiac’s War illuminated
several things. First, it showed how reliant the Ohio Valley tribes had
become on French trade. Second, it showed what a weak grasp Britain had
over the Ohio Valley. In response to this war, Great Britain would enact the
Proclamation of 1763, drawing a line east of the Appalachian Mountains
where British colonists would be forced to live and setting aside the land
west of the mountains for the Indians.

7.2.2 Before You Move On...

key Concepts
The French and Indian War was the most significant event of the
century prior to the Revolutionary War. The war and the rejection of
the Albany Plan of Union highlighted the fact that the British North
American colonies had developed a fairly strong sense of individual
autonomy that would take extraordinary efforts to overcome. Indeed,
this colonial political structure would carry over into the early years of
the United States in the context of the debate over states’ rights and
federal power. The war drastically changed the balance of power in
North America, with the elimination of the French presence from the
continent. This outcome not only had an impact on international affairs;

Page | 295
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

it also profoundly impacted the dynamics within the colonial situation.

The ever-present enemy on the western border now disappeared. In the
absence of such a threat, the colonists would be able to shift their focus
to other problems, such as changing British colonial policies. Of course,
the war was a major factor in changing British policy. The expenditures
of war had driven up the imperial debt, and the removal of the French
immediately precipitated a violent response from the Indians of the
Ohio Valley region in what became known as Pontiac’s War. The British
government’s responses to these problems would ultimately lead to
conflict with the colonies.

Test Yourself
1. An increasing sense of common identity among the colonists was
one of the legacies of the French and Indian War.
a. True
b. False

2. The Proclamation of 1763 was enacted in part as a response to

Pontiac’s War.
a. True
b. False

3. The Ohio Valley was one of the major points of contention between
the French and British in the French and Indian War as well as
the British and Indians in Pontiac’s War.
a. True
b. False

Click here to see answers

7.3 thE EnD Of thE SEvEn yEarS War anD

WOrSEnInG rElatIOnS, 1763-1772
Prior to the Seven Years’ and ensuing Pontiac Wars, the British had
practiced in America their unwritten policy of salutary neglect. This policy,
maintained throughout much of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries,
was based on the ideas of Robert Walpole, the first Prime Minister of Great
Britain. Walpole believed that the colonies would flourish if left alone; thus,
he did not believe in enforcing Parliamentary restrictions like the Acts of

Page
Page | 296
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

Trade and Navigation. The term “salutary neglect” was actually coined
by Edmund Burke who, in an address to Parliament in 1775, reminded
its members that the colonies had flourished not by being “squeezed” by
a “watchful and suspicious government,” but rather through a “wise and
salutary neglect.” However, this policy, which had worked so well in the
past, ended as the French and Indian War concluded with the Peace of Paris.

7.3.1 The French and Indian War and the End of Salutary Neglect
The French and Indian War was a great success, at least the colonists and
the English so believed. Though the two allies shared this opinion, they saw
their individual contributions to the war effort in very different ways. The
British believed that they had fought an expensive war in order to protect
the colonists from enemies on the western frontier and were convinced that
they had done more than their share to finance the war costs: fully two-
fifths of the monies the colonists spent in recruitment, clothing, and paying
the troops came from the mother country. The colonists, on the other
hand, believed that they had performed splendidly in the war and that their
reward would be opening the western territories to settlement. They did not
anticipate that the British would tighten their control of the colonies in an
attempt to gain additional revenues to offset war costs.
For their part, the British disliked the self-satisfied post-war colonial
attitude that gave too little credit or assistance to the mother country.
Indeed, the Commander-in-Chief in the Americas complained: “It is
the constant study of every province here to throw every expense on the
Crown and bear no part of the expense of this war themselves.”4 Colonial
America historian Curtis Nettles points out that there were three sources
of colonial opposition to assuming the responsibility for war expenses as
the British expected. On the one hand, some colonial leaders argued that
their respective colony was simply too poor to contribute to the war effort.
Other colonies, like the Quaker colonies of Pennsylvania and New Jersey,
were opposed to warfare generally by virtue of their pacifist leanings and
had no intention of funding a military action. And then there were those
colonies, such as Rhode Island, Delaware, and New Jersey, that did not have
frontier borders and were therefore uninterested in contributing to a war
that so little concerned their own experiences.5 Another problem to surface
frequently in inter-colonial relations was that each colony waited to see how
much the others would contribute before making any sort of commitment
of its own. Thus the British and the colonists could only see the issue of
military monies from their own particular standpoint; the British thought
the colonies should be grateful, while the colonists thought the British were
lucky to have had any of their support at all. As they saw it, the French and

Page
Page | 297
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

Indian War was just another extension of a war that began in Europe. Of
course, this view was mistaken, a fact that the British underscored in dozens
of communications with America.
Adding to the growing disharmony in American-British relations came
the question of the western lands. The colonies with frontiers abutting
the Appalachian and Allegheny Mountains fully expected that, upon the
signing of the Peace of Paris, these lands to be opened to settlement. Their
characteristic thirst for land would thereby be quenched. The colonists
had fought and won the “European” War and were now headed west. Not
surprisingly, the British viewed the question of the western lands very
differently. First, the mother country no longer needed colonists to settle
along the frontiers as a defense against the French and Indians. Second,
their allowing colonists to settle beyond the Appalachians would put an
increasing number out of Parliament’s reach; consequently, taxes would be
more difficult to collect and imperial laws harder to enforce. Finally, once
remote from the control of royal officials in America, the colonists would
become increasingly independent-minded.

7.3.2 The Proclamation of 1763

Ignoring the obstructionist messages coming from the colonies, the British
government in 1763 threw caution to the winds and issued the Proclamation
of 1763. Established in large part “to pacify the Indians,” the British saw
what came to be known as the “proclamation line” as a temporary measure
that would give them time to define a more permanent policy. They worded
the Proclamation so as to make it appear advantageous to the colonies:
WHEREAS, we have taken into Our Royal Consideration the extensive
and valuable Acquisitions in America, secured to our Crown by the late
Definitive Treaty of Peace concluded at Paris the 10th Day of February last;
and being desirous that all Our loving Subjects, as well as our Kingdom
as of our Colonies in America, may avail themselves with all convenient
Speed, of the great Benefits and Advantages which must accrue therefrom
to their Commerce, Manufactures, and Navigation. We have thought fit,
with the Advice of our Privy Council to issue this Royal Proclamation. 6

Members of Parliament believed this settlement to be extremely generous,

especially in light of what they saw as the potential benefits to the colonies
from the war.
Expecting to assuage American fears and mistrust with the Proclamation,
the British used it to outline their new policy, one that left no doubt as to the
motivation of Parliament and the Crown. Most importantly, the Proclamation
specified that colonists could not settle beyond the Allegheny-Appalachian

Page
Page | 298
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

Mountain chain. The British reserved this territory for the Indian tribes.
The only exception was that white traders could apply for licenses to trade
with the Indians. The British militia would enforce the Proclamation.7 The
colonists, long used to salutary neglect, ignored this law: “scores of wagons
headed westward.” 8

7.3.3 The Implications of the New British Approach: The

Parliamentary Acts of 1764
The British followed the Proclamation of 1763 with two equally
contentious acts of Parliament: the Sugar Act and the Currency Act. The
Sugar Act, drafted by George Grenville, First Lord of the Treasury, replaced
and lowered the taxes on imported sugar created by the Molasses Act of
1733; this act had long been ignored by the colonists for whom smuggling
was acceptable. The difference between the Sugar Act and the Molasses
Act, however, was that Parliament intended to collect the tax created by
the former; in addition, the tax was intended, as the colonists saw it, not
to regulate trade but to “raise a revenue.” It would do so by cutting British
taxes on molasses in half, a decrease that would reduce the need to smuggle
in tax-free molasses from the French West Indies.
According to Grenville, the tax money would be used to defend the colonies.
But James Otis, Chair of the Massachusetts Bay House of Representatives,
insisted that measures like the Sugar Act “have a tendency to deprive the
Colonies of some of their most essential Rights as British Subjects, and…
particularly the Right of assessing their own Taxes.”9 While the Sugar Act
lowered the tariff on sugar, it increased the powers of the Admiralty Courts
as well as ending the lucrative sugar and slave trade with the West Indies. It
is interesting to note that although Otis claimed that citizens of the British
Empire had the right to assess taxes on themselves, nowhere in the Empire
was this “right” recognized. The House of Commons was elected by the
wealthy and landholders, not by the citizens as a whole, and it legislated
accordingly.
The Currency Act, passed the same year, gave Parliament control of the
colonial currency system. The act specified that from 1765 onward, “no act,
order, resolution, or vote of assembly, in any of his Majesty’s colonies or
plantations in America, shall be made, for creating or issuing any paper
bills, or bills of credit of any kind or denomination whatsoever, declaring
such paper bills, or bills of credit, to be legal tender in payment of any
bargains, contracts, debts dues or demands.”10 Thus the Act abolished the
use of paper money altogether and put the colonists at a further economic
disadvantage in their trade relations with British merchants. This move in
turn caused a severe shock to the colonial economy already depressed due
to war expenses.
Page
Page | 299
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

7.3.4 The Stamp Act of 1765

If the Sugar Act was the first act intended to raise a revenue, then the
second was the Stamp Act, which levied the first internal tax. The Stamp
Act specified that stamps were to be placed on newspapers, pamphlets,
almanacs, wills, deeds, licenses, insurance policies, bills of lading, college
diplomas, and even playing cards. While the colonists did not necessarily
object to the principle of taxation as such, they did draw lines as to how
and why taxes should be applied. Indeed, ample precedent already existed
for British taxation to regulate colonial trade, even if tax revenues went
directly to the British government. However, the colonial legislatures had
for some time assumed the role of levying taxes for what they deemed as
“internal” applications; these internal applications included paying colonial
officials, supporting the militia, internal improvements, and the mail
service. Therefore, the colonists drew a fine if definite line between such
“internal” taxes and taxes of an external nature, which were for the purpose
of regulating trade. In Reasons Why the British Colonies in America Should
Not Be Charged with Internal Taxes, Governor Thomas Fitch of Connecticut
argued that “If these internal taxations take place and the principles upon
which they must be founded are adopted and carried into execution, the
colonies will have no more than a shadow of legislation left.”11
Moreover, colonial political systems and ideologies had largely developed
within the context of direct representation, which assumed that taxes of
an internal nature could only be levied by those who directly represented
the electorate. Therefore, when Parliament attempted to levy taxes that
would be used to pay for defense of the colonial frontier and the housing
and supply of British soldiers in the colonies, some colonists began to raise
the cry of “no taxation without representation,” claiming that such taxes
could be imposed only by the colonial legislatures; if imposed on them by
Parliament, then the colonies must be directly represented in that body.
The response from England to the argument regarding “actual”
representation was that the colonies were in fact represented in Parliament,
only virtually. Members of Parliament had long assumed that they re­
presented the interests of all groups in England and her colonial possessions,
rather than only narrow, local interests. Thus, according to the theory of
virtual representation, Parliament legislated for the well-being of the Irish,
the Scots, and the American colonists, in addition to those who lived in
England proper. Moreover, the British government was quick to point out
that the French and Indian War had been very costly, that Americans paid
fewer taxes than the remainder of those in the British possessions, and that
the monies raised by the stamp tax would pay for the defense of the colonies.
These arguments fell on deaf ears, as virtual representation had no
meaning for the Americans. Colonial leaders responded to the new tax
Page
Page | 300
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

laws by counter-arguing that, because they had not voted for them, these
taxes could not be imposed on their colonies. Later writers also pointed
out that the Vice-Admiralty courts that enforced the revenue laws excluded
juries and put the burden of proof on the defendants. All of these practices
infringed on their rights as British citizens. James Otis for one insisted:
…the colonists, black and white, born here are freeborn British subjects,
and entitled to all the essential civil rights of such is a truth not only
manifest from the provincial charters, from the principles of the common
law, and acts of Parliament, but from the British constitution, which was
re-established at the [English] Revolution with a professed design to secure
the liberties of all the subjects to all generations.12

The colonial response to the notion of “virtual” representation was much

like their reaction to internal taxation. Governor of Rhode Island, one of
the only two colonies that elected its governor, Stephen Hopkins, insisted
that England and her empire was “an imperial state, which consists of many
separate governments each of which hath peculiar privileges…all laws and
taxations which bind the whole must be made by the whole.”13 The impasse
over these different views of representation and taxation would ultimately
lead to armed conflict.

The Stamp Act Riots and Congress

In 1765, the Stamp Act was soon followed by the Quartering Act which
delineated where and how British soldiers found room and board in the
colonies. Immediately after these acts’ enactment, the colonists sprang into
action. Patrick Henry stirred the Virginia House of Burgesses with a speech
opposing the Stamp Act. He proclaimed that if his condemnation of this Act
“be treason…make the most of it!”14 The Sons of Liberty in Boston burned
a mock figure of Andrew Oliver, the Stamp Master in Boston, destroyed
one of his buildings at the docks, and smashed the windows, furniture, and
paneling in his home. A week or so after these events, another mob stormed
the home of Lt. Governor Thomas Hutchinson, destroying a collection of
books and old documents that Hutchinson was planning to use to write a
history of Massachusetts. Hutchinson described the action thus:
Not contented with tearing off all the wainscot and hangings and splitting
the doors to pieces they beat down the Partition walls and although that
alone cost them near two hours they cut down the cupola and they began
to take the plate and boards from the roof…The garden fence was laid flat
and all my trees &c broke down to the ground. Such ruins were never seen
in America.15

Intimidated, most of the tax collectors resigned from their posts.

Page
Page | 301
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

These “Sons of Liberty,” as the

rebels became known, led similar
riots in Newport, Rhode Island, New
York City, Pennsylvania, Maryland,
and South Carolina. In each case,
mobs took to the streets and Stamp
Masters were burned in effigy,
or worse. As the recently-arrived
Governor of New York commented
in November, 1765:
The Tumults which have been
raised in different parts of the
Continent and which have
been artfully fomented by ill
designing people, have spread
so much terror, that the Officers
Figure 7.3 Thomas Hutchinson | At
appointed for the execution different times Lt. Governor and Acting Governor
of Massachusetts, 1758-1774 Thomas Hutchinson,
of the Act, have resigned their was a thorn in the side of the Massachusetts patriots
throughout the pre-Revolutionary War years and
posts and I am sorry to observe vice versa. Hutchinson had an ardent interest in the
history of the colonies, and before his death began
that the Power of Govern[men] work on a three volume History of the Province of
Massachusetts Bay; the third volume was published
t was too weak to protect them posthumously. He was replaced as Governor by
General Thomas Gage in 1774. This image is taken
from the insults they were from The Life of Thomas Hutchinson, Royal Governor
of the Province of Massachusetts Bay by James K.
threatened with.16 Hosmer

artist: Copley
Meanwhile, in August, 1765, Source: The Life of Thomas Hutchinson, Royal
Governor of the Province of Massachusetts Bay
the Massachusetts House of
Representatives had issued a circular letter calling on all of the colonies
to send representatives to a Congress that would consider the nature and
implications of the Stamp Act. Nine colonies sent 27 representatives to the
meeting, which convened in New York on October 7, 1765. The Congress
issued the following: a Declaration of the Rights and Grievances of
the Colonies, a petition to the king for economic relief, and a petition to
Parliament for repeal of the Stamp Act. It was, the drafters insisted,
…the indispensable duty of these colonies, to the best of sovereigns,
to the mother country, and to themselves, to endeavour by a loyal and
dutiful address to his Majesty, and humble applications to both Houses
of Parliament, to procure the repeal of the Act for granting and applying
certain stamp duties, of all clauses of any other Acts of Parliament, whereby
the jurisdiction of the Admiralty is extended as aforesaid, and of the other
late Acts for the restriction of American commerce.17

Although only nine colonies sent representatives to the Congress, with

the important colony of Virginia being absent, the legislatures of all of the
colonies except one voted to accept the Resolves. The Congress was an
important first step toward united colonial action.
Page
Page | 302
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

The Colonies Apply Economic Pressure

Perhaps more important than the actions of the Stamp Act Congress,
and even the “Stamp Act Riots” that rocked almost every colony, were the
boycotts the colonists imposed on British goods. New York merchants
first boycotted British goods; those in other colonial cities soon followed.
Colonial women agreed not to buy or drink tea or buy British cloth for their
dresses. “Sage and sassafras” took the place of tea, and homespun garments
became the fashion. British merchants reacted by pressing Parliament to
realize the extent to which the welfare of the mother country was tied to
the economic well-being of the American colonies. When the Marquis of
Rockingham followed George Grenville as Prime Minister, the temperament
of Parliament changed. This new attitude was reflected by the aging William
Pitt who insisted that, while he was “no courtier of America[,]…the Stamp
Act [must] be repealed absolutely, totally, and immediately.” At the same
time, he also recommended that “the sovereign authority of this country over
the colonies, [should] be asserted in as strong terms as can be devised.”18
Thus pressured by British merchants and its own members, Parliament
repealed the Stamp Act in February, 1766, with the following comment read
into Parliamentary record:
Whereas an Act was passed in the last session of Parliament entitled,
An Act for granting and applying certain stamp duties…and whereas the
continuance of the said Act would be attended with many inconveniencies,
and may be productive of consequences greatly detrimental to the
commercial interests of these kingdoms; may it therefore please your
most excellent Majesty that it may be enacted…in this present Parliament
assembled…that from and after the first day of May, one thousand seven
hundred and sixty-six, the above-mentioned Act…shall be, and is and are
hereby repealed and made void to all intents and purposes whatsoever.19

When news of the repeal of the Stamp Act reached America, general
rejoicing ensued, so much so that the colonists paid little attention to the
accompanying Declaratory Act. This act echoed William Pitt’s sentiments
by delineating clearly the relationship between the colonies and the mother
country. In all future endeavors, the colonies were
…to be subordinate unto, and dependent upon the imperial crown and
parliament of Great Britain; and that parliament…assembled, hath, and of
right ought to have, full power and authority to make laws and statutes of
sufficient force and validity to bind the colonies and people of America,
subjects of the crown of Great Britain, in all cases whatsoever.20

Page
Page | 303
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

7.3.5 The Townshend Duties: External Taxes to Regulate

trade
The following year, the colonists learned the implications of the
Declaratory Act when Parliament created the Townshend Duties. Charles
Townshend, Chancellor of the Exchequer, proposed a new set of taxes for
the colonies, one based on the colonists’ distinctions between internal and
external taxation. The Americans did not like internal taxes, so he planned
to give them external ones. There were three primary Townshend Acts. The
first, the Restraining Act, was aimed at New York for its refusal to provide for
British troops. It nullified all legislation of the New York colonial assembly.
The second act tightened British control of colonial trade. The most onerous
was the third act, which placed duties on colonial imports of glass, lead,
paint, paper, and tea. It also set up a Board of Customs Commissioners
in Boston to oversee collection of these duties. The Townshend Acts also
established four Vice-Admiralty courts in the colonies that would try those
who attempted to evade the taxes by smuggling.
The colonialists had reacted to earlier acts by intimidating stamp tax
collectors. They were not constrained by the British Navy that would be
anchored off the harbors of major ports in order to collect the duties. An
added aggravation was the fact that the new taxes were intended to pay
British government officials residing in the colonies. Up to this time, the
colonial assemblies had paid the salaries of royal government officials and
therefore were able to influence officials by using what has been called “the
power of the purse.” Threats of withholding payment of salaries or other
benefits often influenced a stubborn governor or tax collector in the colonies’
favor. Once imposed, these new taxes clearly would release British officials
from financial dependence on the colonial assemblies.
Again, as with their reactions to the Sugar and Stamp Acts, the colonials
were galvanized into action. They put boycotts into effect, and colonists like
John Dickinson argued that Parliament did not have the power to levy either
internal or external taxes on the colonies. Dickinson declared in his Letters
from a Pennsylvania Farmer: “We are taxed without our own consent,
expressed by ourselves or our representatives. We are therefore ----------
SLAVES!”21 These essays were printed in nearly every colonial newspaper
and became as popular and influential as Common Sense, published in 1776.
Similarly, Sam Adams and James Otis wrote a circular letter in which
they agreed that all parliamentary taxation was illegal, warned that the new
duties would be used to pay colonial officers, and invited the other colonies
to join in the boycott taking place in Massachusetts. Colonial women also
formed groups called the Daughters of Liberty, which agreed not to drink
tea or buy any English products, just as they had done in an earlier boycott.

Page
Page | 304
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

The women got down spinning wheels from their attics and began to make
their clothes rather than buy the English products. When Townshend died
in 1768, all duties except that on tea were repealed.

7.3.6 Trouble Continues to Brew: The Boston Massacre

Because the Sons of Liberty continued to intimidate merchants and enforce
the boycott, Thomas Hutchinson, now acting governor of Massachusetts,
requested that British soldiers be relocated to Boston. Not surprisingly, the
arrival of the troops created great consternation among the Bostonians.
Benjamin Franklin mused on the presence of troops in Boston from his
perspective in England:
I am glad to hear that Matters were yet quiet at Boston, but fear that they
will not continue long so. Some Indiscretion on the part of their warmer
People, or of the Soldiery, I am extreamly [sic] apprehensive may occasion
a tumult; and if Blood is once drawn, there is no foreseeing how far the
Mischief may spread.”22

Franklin was correct in his fear that blood might be shed. On one wintry
day in March, 1770, a crowd of boys threw rocks and snowballs at the British
soldiers standing guard outside the
Boston Customs House. There were
some men in the crowd who worked
in the local shipyards, one of them
being Crispus Attucks, a black man
of Wampanoag and African descent.
According to bystanders, one soldier
was knocked down by the rock-laced
snowballs, and someone, perhaps
even an onlooker wishing to stir up
trouble, yelled “fire.” Regardless of
who cried out, the soldiers fired on
the crowd, and, when the smoke
cleared, five people lay dead or dying,
and eight more were wounded.
Crispus Attucks was among the first
to die.
Boston went into an uproar. A
mass meeting was held at Faneuil
Figure 7.4 Crispus Attucks | Crispus Attucks Hall where those in attendance
was among the first colonials killed in the skirmish
between the Bostonians and British soldiers in what issued a statement calling for the
was called the “Boston Massacre.”
removal of troops from the city.
Author: Unknown
Source: Library of Congress Thomas Hutchinson moved the
Page
Page | 305
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

troops to an island in the harbor and promised to put to trial the soldiers
involved in the massacre. But no lawyer wanted to take the case; even those
who were loyal to the crown refused. Finally John Adams, a well-known
patriot and cousin of Sam Adams, agreed to defend the soldiers. He made
this unpopular move because Adams believed that the men had a right to be
represented in court. He may also have wanted to avoid any embarrassing
questions about who first yelled “fire.” When the trials ended, all but two of
the soldiers were acquitted. The two who were found guilty of manslaughter
were sentenced only to branding on their thumbs.
The two years following the Boston Massacre were ones in which colonial
tempers simmered without coming to a full boil. The Townshend duties were
repealed, except for that on tea (which the colonies continued to smuggle in
from Holland). Although, the Stamp Act was gone, the Sugar, Currency, and
Quartering Acts remained as reminders of America’s colonial status. And
though British soldiers had been withdrawn from Boston, they remained in
the colony while the British navy still patrolled the Massachusetts coastline.

7.3.7 The Evolution of a Formal Theory of Revolt

During this period, a philosophy of revolt crystallized in American
thinking. The elements, logically laid out, were these:
• the American colonists were citizens of the British Empire;
• their aim was not independence from Britain but only to be given the “natural
rights” to which they were entitled;
• one of these rights was the right to be taxed only by elected bodies in which
they were actually represented;
• the colonies were not represented in Parliament, did not recognize virtual
representation, and therefore could not be taxed by Parliament.

Throughout this theory ran the issues on which the colonies and the
mother country could not agree as well as reflections of the impact of the
colonial experience on their thinking. Colonists insisted that they had a
right to be represented in Parliament by representatives they elected and
that they could not be taxed by councils in which they were not represented.
As an inevitable conclusion of Locke’s natural rights theory also came just
the suggestion of an idea that the colonists were only beginning to consider:
if the natural rights of British colonists were not protected, then the only
option was to separate from the mother country.

Page
Page | 306
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

7.3.8 Before You Move On...

key Concepts
In the nine years following the end of the French and Indian War,
the colonies and the mother country clashed on issues involving
taxation, regulation of trade, and the rights of English under the British
constitution. These rights, defined most recently in the English Bill
of Rights of 1689, were cited repeatedly as the colonists argued that,
because they were not represented in Parliament, they were not subject
to the laws, and especially to the taxes, created by that body. While
the British adhered to the idea of “virtual” representation, the colonists
decried the notion as inappropriate to their peculiar circumstances.
During these years, the British government made several attempts to
tighten its control on the colonies. The Proclamation Line was designed
to keep the colonists on the eastern seaboard, while the Sugar Act and the
Townshend duties attempted to regulate trade and the Sugar and Stamp
Acts to raise revenues to defray the costs of maintaining the colonies.
For the colonists, the “internal” taxes of the latter were anathema and
beyond the accepted authority of a mother country. Although a two-
year lull followed the violence of the Boston Massacre, problems were
far from being resolved, and the first shots of the Revolutionary War
were only a few short years away.

Test Yourself
1. The purpose of the Proclamation Line of 1763 was to
a. keep the colonists on the eastern seaboard.
b. raise a revenue to defray the costs of war.
c. encourage colonial movement past the Appalachian Mountains.
d. reward the colonists for their participation in the French and
Indian War.

2. Which of the following Parliamentary acts were designed to “raise

a revenue”?
a. Proclamation Line of 1763
b. Currency Act
c. Sugar Act
d. Declaratory Act

Page | 307
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

3. The act that claimed Parliament’s right to legislate for the colonies
in “all cases whatsoever” was the
a. Declaratory Act.
b. Currency Act.
c. Proclamation Line of 1763.
d. Townshend Act.

4. The most effective tools used by the colonists in getting the Stamp
Act repealed was
a. the Boston Massacre.
b. rioting against the Stamp Masters.
c. the boycott of English goods.
d. the arguments of the colonists against internal taxation.

5. The colonies made a very clear distinction between

a. internal and external taxation by Parliament.
b. taxes to regulate trade v. those designed to raise a revenue.
c. actual v. virtual representation in Parliament.
d. All of the above
e. None of the above
Click here to see answers

7.4 thE DOWnWarD SlIDE tO rEvOlUtIOn,

1772-1775
Two incidents in June 1772 marked the beginning of the end of the
calm that followed the Boston Massacre. The first involved a British
schooner, the Gaspee, which had been patrolling for smugglers when it
ran aground near Providence, Rhode Island. The townspeople boarded the
vessel, removed the crew, and destroyed the ship. Though a commission
of inquiry looked into the incident, no one could be found to testify. The
second occurrence centered in Boston, a city that had long been a thorn to
the Empire and the royal governor, Thomas Hutchinson. Concerned about
a recent announcement from Hutchinson that salaries of royal officials
would come from customs revenues rather than the colonial assembly,
Sam Adams persuaded the Boston town meeting to create a Committee

Page
Page | 308
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

of Correspondence. This committee would facilitate the exchange of ideas

between those in Boston and other towns of Massachusetts. Other colonies
soon followed the example of Massachusetts with their own Committees of
Correspondence that became one more example of inter-colony cooperation.
These Committees were effective in stirring up and coordinating colonial
expressions of resentment about British rule.

7.4.1 The Tea Act and Party of 1773

The lull before the storm ended permanently in 1773. At that time, in a
move designed to help the nearly bankrupt British East India Company,
the British passed the Tea Act. This Act made it easier for the British East
India Company to sell tea in the colonies by eliminating the duties on the
tea coming into England. The Act also permitted the company to sell its
tea directly to customers in the colonies, instead of going through colonial
merchants. Tea was thus cheaper than previously and, in fact, the colonists
could now buy tea more cheaply than could those living in England.
If members of Parliament and the ministers of George III thought that the
Americans would be pleased with the act and the ability of colonials to buy
cheap tea, they were sadly mistaken. American leaders and the Committees
of Correspondence railed against the act, declaring it to be an underhanded
means for getting the colonists to pay a tax on tea. They argued that not
only would the act deprive American merchants of profits but also the tax
money would be used to pay public officials in the colonies, thus depriving
the colonial assemblies of the “power of the purse.” A member of the Sons of
Liberty in the state of New York put it bluntly: “Whoever shall aid or abet, or
in any manner assist, in the introduction of tea from any place whatsoever,
into this colony…shall be deemed an enemy to the liberties of America.”23
The colonial reaction to the Tea Act was strong and swift. The Sons of
Liberty in many of the major towns forced company agents to resign and
many ships loaded with tea to return to England. In Boston, however, when
Governor Hutchison refused to let the ships depart, meetings were held to
protest this unconscionable action. One meeting was held on December 16,
1773 at the Old South Church in Boston, during which the delegates drafted
one last plea to Hutchinson to address their grievances. When the town
meeting reconvened the following day to receive the governor’s response,
the members were greeted by the sheriff of Suffolk who held a command
from Hutchinson for them to disband.
Several people at the meeting knew that, if Hutchinson still refused
to let the tea ships sail, they had an alternative plan. When news of the
Hutchinson’s final refusal reached Sam Adams, he ended a speech with

Page
Page | 309
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

words some had been anticipating:

“This meeting can do no more to
save the country.”24 Thus, disguised
as Indians, fifty young men left the
church and headed for the docks.
A crowd watched as the “Indians”
threw 342 chests of tea overboard.
When their job was completed, the
crowd broke up and awaited the
reaction of the British government.
John Adams, who was not nearly the
figure 7.5 Boston tea Party | On December
16, 1773, a group of “Indians” stormed a British tea revolutionary that his cousin Sam
ship anchored in the Boston harbor and dumped 342
chests of tea overboard. The reaction of the British was, wrote in his diary: “3 Cargoes
would eventually lead the colonies to revolution and
independence. of Bohea Tea were emptied into the
Author: Lithograph by Sarony & Major Sea. This is the most magnificent
Source: Library of Congress
moment of all. There is a Dignity, a
Majesty, a Sublimity, in this last Effort of the patriots that I greatly admire.”25
In early 1774, just months after the Tea Party, the British Crown and
Parliament decided that the time had come to punish Boston and all of
Massachusetts Bay for its continuing recalcitrant activities. A furious
Parliament quickly enacted four Coercive Acts:
1. The Boston Port Bill closed the port of Boston until the town paid for
the tea.
2. The Massachusetts Government Act revoked the Massachusetts
charter and changed the legislative assembly so that no longer would
the upper house be elected. Rather it would now be appointed by the
crown. A final insult was the provision that in no town in Massachusetts
could there be more than one town meeting a year.
3. The Administration of Justice Act specified that any person
charged with committing murder while enforcing royal authority in
Massachusetts was to be tried in England or in another colony. The
Act was modestly entitled: An act for the impartial administration of
justice in the cases of persons questioned for any acts done by them in
the execution of the law, or for the suppression of riots and tumults,
in the province of the Massachusetts Bay, in New England.26
4. The Quartering Act directed the royal governor of Massachusetts to
requisition houses for quartering British troops.
These acts were followed the same year by the Quebec Act which confirmed
the following: Roman Catholicism was the official religion in Quebec; there
would be no elected legislature in Canada; and that the new boundaries of

Page
Page | 310
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

Quebec included the western lands north of the Ohio River, lands that had
long been claimed by Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Connecticut. All of these
provisions were anathema to the colonists, who had come to prize religious
toleration and representative government, and who still looked to the land
west of the mountains as theirs to settle.
The four Coercive Acts and the Quebec Act quickly became known in
America as the “Intolerable Acts.” The message spread throughout the
colonies that, while Boston may be the target at the moment, none of the
colonies were safe from the long arm of the British Crown. While Parliament
had issued the Coercive Acts to punish Massachusetts, the acts had the effect
of uniting the colonies. In Virginia, Thomas Jefferson called on the Virginia
Assembly to set aside June 1, the date when the Boston Port Act went into
effect, as a day of prayer and fasting. When dissolved by the royal governor
of Virginia, the assembly met in a nearby tavern and drew up a resolution
calling for a Continental Congress.

7.4.2 The First Continental Congress, 1774

Several previous instances displayed inter-colonial cooperation; none
was as significant as the Continental Congress that met in Philadelphia
in September, 1774. Its proceedings explained that, “justly alarmed
at the arbitrary proceedings of Parliament,” the colonies had elected
representatives to consider a response to Parliament.27 An impressive array
of colonial leaders were in attendance, including Samuel Adams and John
Adams of Massachusetts, John Jay of New York, Joseph Galloway and John
Dickinson of Pennsylvania, and Patrick Henry, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas
Jefferson, and George Washington of Virginia. Participation in the Congress
was better than in the Stamp Act Congress, with only Georgia withholding
a delegation.
The Congress set to work and moved quickly to make American displeasure
with the Intolerable Acts known to the British Crown. First, the delegates
approved the Suffolk Resolves, which declared the Intolerable Acts null and
void. Second, they drafted a Declaration of American Rights specifying that
Parliament had no right to pass legislation that interfered with the internal
workings of the colonies and including a list of grievances leveled at the
Crown and Parliament. According to the statement of rights, each colonist
was entitled to protection under the law of the realm, including the 1689
Bill of Rights and Act of Religious Toleration; any person could petition the
king; and all colonists were entitled to “life, liberty and property.” It further
reminded the British government that the Americans had “never ceded to
any foreign power whatever a right to dispose of [these privileges] without
their consent.”28 Most probably, few Americans expected this tactic to bring

Page
Page | 311
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

the relief they wanted, however. Indeed, John Adams wrote to Patrick
Henry, “I expect no redress, but, on the contrary, increased resentment and
double vengeance.”
The list of grievances against George III and Parliament included in the
Declaration of American Rights was not unlike those that would appear
in the Declaration of Independence. The delegates railed against the
Admiralty Courts, which had always been intended to deprive the colonists
of the right to a fair trial, against the establishment of the Catholic Church
in the Canadian provinces, against the forcible quartering of British troops
in American homes, and against the maintenance of a standing army in
times of peace. Before concluding the meeting, the Congress created the
Continental Association of 1774, whose purpose was to oversee a boycott of
all British goods. The representatives vowed:
1. That from and after the first day of December next, we will not import
into British America, from Great-Britain or Ireland, any goods, wares
or merchandize whatsoever…
2. That we will neither import, nor purchase any slave imported, after
the first day of December next; after which time, we will wholly
discontinue the slave trade…
3. As a non-consumption agreement, strictly adhered to, will be an
effectual security for the observation of the non-importation, we,
as above, solemnly agree and associate, that, from this day, we will
not purchase or use any tea imported on account of the East-India
Company, or any on which a duty hath been or shall be paid.29
The boycott was to be put into effect by September 5, 1774. The Congress gave
power to the Committees of Correspondence, along with the Continental
Association, to oversee the boycott of British goods and to make sure that
violators be “universally condemned as the enemies of American liberty.”30
During the meeting, discussion inevitably arose about the relationship
of the colonies to the mother country. In the course of these conversations,
Joseph Galloway of Pennsylvania proposed an imperial union with Britain,
in which Parliament could legislate for the colonies, but the legislation would
not take effect until approved by an American Assembly. The proposal was
defeated by one vote only; the “independent thinking” of the colonists, as
George III called it, was fully evident. Before disbanding, the Congress
agreed to meet one year later to consider the response of the Crown to its
enactments. By the time the Second Continental Congress convened in
May, 1775, however, the firing at Lexington and Concord had occurred and
the first Americans lay dead.

Page
Page | 312
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

It soon became evident that the colonists would not get their hoped for
response from the King and Parliament. Shortly after the arrival of the
petitions from the colonies, George III complained that “blows must be
exchanged to determine whether [the American colonies] are to be subject
to this country or independent.”31 And in early 1775, Parliament declared
that Massachusetts was in rebellion and specified that New England could
not trade with any country outside of the British Empire. In May, 1775, Lord
North, the Prime Minister, presented a Conciliatory Proposition, which
was as far as Parliament would go to meet the demands of the Americans.
The Proposition affirmed that Parliament would continue to legislate for
the colonies, but that any taxes imposed would be to regulate trade. In
addition, the monies collected would go to the individual colonies, as long
as they agreed to assume partial responsibility for their own defense. These
provisions, while perfectly reasonable in the eyes of the British, far from met
colonial expectations, and when the Second Continental Congress convened
in May, 1775, they were faced with both an unsatisfactory response and with
British “aggression” at Lexington and Concord.

7.4.3 lexington and Concord, April 19, 1775

In 1775, the situation in Massachusetts Bay was delicate and deteriorating.
The citizens of the colony chafed at the continuing British occupation of
Boston. The British, too,
were on edge, expecting Sidebar 7.1:
Battles At Lexington and Concord
a colonial uprising at any
time. Colonial militia
existed throughout the • location: Middlesex County, Massachusetts
Bay, the road from Boston to Concord
colonies, composed
• American commanders: Colonel James
of volunteer forces of Barrett, Colonel John Buttrick, Dr. Joseph
local men who provided Warren, Captain John Parker, Brigadier
emergency defense General William Heath
against enemies, such • British commanders: Lieutenant-General
as hostile Indians. They Hugh Percy, Major John Pitcairn, Major-
General Francis Smith
were originally formed to
• American Force: 3,800 total: 77 at
provide protection in the Lexington, 400 at Concord and fewer
absence of available British numbers at other points
forces. By 1775, the British • British Force: 1,500 total: 400 at
were the enemy that Lexington, 100 at Concord; number varies at
concerned the militia. To other points
prepare for their defense, • American losses: 49
• British losses: 73
the militia maintained
• who won? The Americans
stores of weapons, shot,

Page | 313
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

Sidebar 7.2: and powder at various

Colonial Fighting Forces locations. General Gage, the
British military commander
The colonial militia had been created in in Massachusetts, learned
most of the colonies in the seventeenth century. that the militia had such a
This militia was composed of able-bodied store in Concord. He had
men in every colony (except Pennsylvania received orders to disarm
where Quakers eschewed violence) who were
the rebels and arrest their
responsible for furnishing and caring for their
own weapons. The Minutemen grew out of the
leaders. By all accounts,
tension following the Tea Party of December, Gage was sympathetic to
1773. In most colonies they were an elite arm the Americans; he had
of the colonial militia, ready to assemble personal ties to the colonies,
at a moment’s notice, hence the name. The as his wife was from New
Continental Army was created by the second Jersey. He therefore tried
Continental Congress and charged with fighting
not to provoke the people of
the war against Britain. The colonial militia
continued to participate in the fighting until the Massachusetts, even as he
war’s end. did his duty for the British
Crown.
At the same time, by early spring, George III had lost all patience with
the American colonies, believing it time to teach them a lesson. He and his
ministers were well aware that each of the colonies had formed colonial
militia, the Minutemen, so called by their vow to be ready for military
action at a moment’s notice. The British were also under the impression, as
Major John Pitcairn commented, “that one active campaign, a smart action,
and burning two or three of their towns, will set everything to rights.”32 As
it turned out, Pitcairn was overly optimistic. On April 14, Thomas Gage,
commander of the British garrison in Boston, sent 1,000 troops to move
against the colonials at Lexington and then Concord, where, he had heard,
the Americans were stockpiling weapons and gunpowder.
Despite Pitcairn’s best efforts to keep the colonists in the dark about his
plans, by mid-April, the Americans were receiving alarming information
concerning British intentions. They knew through sources that Gage was
ordered to seize the munitions and leaders of the rebellion, such as Samuel
Adams and John Hancock. When Gage took action to prevent news of the
British movements from leaving Boston and to locate the leaders, his actions
confirmed the colonists’ fears. Worse for Gage, he was too late. As the British
made preparations to march, both Samuel Adams and John Hancock had
already slipped away from Boston and were staying with Hancock’s relatives
in Lexington. The militia stores in Concord had been moved out to other
towns for safekeeping, and Paul Revere and William Dawes were riding
towards Lexington, spreading the word that the British were on their way.

Page | 314
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

By the time the British left Boston in the early hours of April 19, Adams
and Hancock were safely out of Lexington. The riders, Revere, Dawes, and
others, continued to pass the news. A system of alarm was engaged using
bonfires, bells, and other means to alert the people of Massachusetts to
the approach of the possibly hostile British forces. The Lexington militia
assembled, and more volunteers in the surrounding countryside answered
the call as well. As for the British, their morning was a miserable affair.
Boston in 1775 was almost an island, with only one narrow passage
connecting it to the mainland. Rather than march on foot out of Boston,
the British troops were packed onto barges and transported across the bay,
where they were then forced to disembark in deep water. The 700 wet and
muddy troops formed up and began to make the seventeen-mile journey to
Concord, passing through difficult, swampy terrain. The British had hoped
to catch the militia unaware. Instead, they were surprised and alarmed to
see that everyone on the road to Concord already knew they were coming.
Colonel Smith sent Major Pitcairn and his troops ahead, hoping that the
speed of a quick march might still be somewhat of a surprise to the militia.
He also sent word back to Boston for reinforcements.
On April 19, the first “battle” of the Revolutionary war then took place.
Pitcairn arrived in Lexington to find the militia of seventy-seven awaiting
the British on the green; the seventy-seven included the Minutemen, who
had been quickly assembled after the warnings of Revere and Dawes. There
was also a crowd of abou 130 bystanders. Evidently these colonials had
planned a protest only; rather than ignoring the militia and continuing to
march down the road adjacent to the green, however, the officer leading
the march, Marine Lieutenant Jesse Adair, decided to form up on the green

Figure 7.6 Routes of the British Expedition and the Patriot Messengers | This maps is a
depiction of the outbound routes taken by Patriot riders and British troops in the Battles of Lexington and
Concord on April 19, 1775.

Author: United States National Park Service

Source: Wikimedia Commons

Page
Page | 315
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

itself in order to disperse the militia. But the militia stood their ground,
facing the hundreds of British troops, even as Major Pitcairn arrived and
ordered the colonists to leave, shouting “Disperse, you damned rebels!
You dogs, run!” Some records say the militia did begin to do just that when
suddenly a shot rang out. It seems clear that whoever fired the shot was not
actually on the green. Other than that, nothing is known about the person
who, in the words of Ralph Waldo Emerson, fired the “shot heard round the
world,” so called because it marked the beginning not only of the American
Revolution, but the inspiration for the French Revolution as well.33
In the moments before the shot was fired, both the militia and the British
were in disarray; the sound of the shot was all that was needed to set off
tragedy. The British troops, tired from lack of sleep and the wet march and
nervous at being in hostile territory, opened a volley on the militia. While
some of the Minutemen ran, others did not. After firing their volleys, the
British troops charged the remaining militia with bayonets. Eight militiamen
were killed, including Captain Parker’s cousin, Jonas Parker, who was
bayoneted. Ten were wounded, including a slave, Prince Estabrook. The
British troops then turned their attention to the village, firing at will. Colonel
Smith, who was still travelling with the slower troops, heard the sounds of
the gunfire and hurried to Lexington. He brought the British back in line
and then moved them off towards Concord, leaving the people of Lexington
to tend to their own dead and wounded.
Colonel Smith later sent the following account to General Gage, governor
of Massachusetts:
[When Pitcairn approached Lexington] a body of country people drawn up
in military order, with arms and accoutrements, and, as appeared after,
loaded; and that they had posted some men in a dwelling and Meeting­
house. Our troops advanced towards them, without any intention of injuring
them, further than to inquire the reason of their being thus assembled…
[when] one of them fired…and three or four more jumped over a wall and
fired from behind it among the soldiers; on which the troops returned it,
and killed several of them.”34

Meanwhile, the militia in Concord did not know what had happened
in Lexington, other than that shots had been fired. They had intended to
confront the British but retreated when they saw Colonel Smith’s full force
on the road, a force which outnumbered theirs by almost three to one. Their
commander, Colonel James Barrett, decided to surrender the town and
moved his men out of Concord to a nearby hillside where they could watch
the British. They were joined by militia from surrounding towns, which
increased their number to several hundred.

Page
Page | 316
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

The British combed the town for supplies as the militia looked on; most of
the provisions had been removed, but the troops under Smith were able to
seize and destroy some food and munitions. The British, now outnumbered,
fell back across a bridge where command fell to Captain Laurie, a less
experienced officer. Laurie, with fewer than one hundred soldiers, was
facing possibly as many as 400 colonials. The Americans killed fourteen
British troops at the North Bridge, and, within an hour of fighting, Colonel
Smith turned his troops back on the road to Boston. By this time, the militia
and Minutemen numbered over a thousand.
Colonel Smith well understood the position he and his troops were in. The
road from Concord to Boston meanders in a general west to east direction.
In 1775, it was narrow by today’s standards and had in many places walls
along its sides, confining the troops marching along it and forcing them to
form columns. The militia and minutemen were able to leave their towns
and villages and come near the road and wait for the long red line of British
soldiers. Then they could take their shots, retreat into the shelter of the
woods, and move down the road to find a new position from which to
attack. The British, marching on foot and having to follow the road, could
neither outrun nor hide from the colonists. They were exposed and had no
cover from enemy fire for the full seventeen miles back through Lexington
to Boston with the militia firing on them. A British soldier explained the
situation thus:
…upon on our leaving Concord to return to Boston, they began to fire on us
from behind the walls, ditches, trees, etc., which, as we marched, increased
to a very great degree, and continued without the intermission of five
minutes altogether, for, I believe, upwards of eighteen miles; so that I can’t
think but it must have been a pre-concerted scheme in them, to attack the
King’s troops the first favourable opportunity that [was] offered.35

By the time the redcoats reached Boston, they had lost three times more
men than had the colonists. In commenting on the shots exchanged at
Lexington, Benjamin Franklin expressed outrage to a member of Parliament:
“[You] have doomed my country to destruction. You have begun to burn
our towns and murder our people”36 As if the situation at Lexington and
Concord were not bad enough, news reached the southern colonies that a
member of Parliament had suggested several months earlier, in January
1775, that a general emancipation of American slaves would “humble the
high aristocratic spirit of Virginia and the southern colonies.”37 The measure
did not pass, but that did nothing to reassure the Americans.
The actions at Lexington and Concord were accidents, but given the
high tension of the times, they were all that was needed to spark a war.
General Gage, in his attempt to prevent a war, helped to cause one. His

Page
Page | 317
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

miscalculations concerning the people of Massachusetts Bay and the poor

security and mishandling of his internal communications led to his failure
to preserve the peace. Afterwards, he would be blamed by the colonists
throughout New England, members of the British government, and even
his own soldiers for the events of April 19, 1775.

7.4.4 Before You Move On...

key Concepts
The lull in action that followed the Boston Massacre ended in 1773
with the passage of the Tea Act. Although this act actually lowered the
price of the tea in the colonies, making it cheaper than in the mother
country, the colonists were enraged, and insisted that the tea ships
return to England. When this did not happen, and after petitioning
Governor Thomas Hutchinson with unsatisfactory results, a group
of “Indians” boarded the tea ship in the Boston Harbor and threw its
content overboard. At this point, there was no turning back, and in the
next year and a half relations between mother country and colonies
deteriorated. Britain responded to the action of Massachusetts with a
series of acts designed not only to punish, but also to bring sweeping
changes to the government and economic endeavors of the Bay colony.
The Boston port was closed to traffic and even the long-revered New
England town meetings were disbanded.
In a spirit of cooperation reflective of the Committees of
Correspondence, the colonists, with the exception of Georgia, sent
representatives to the First Continental Congress, whose purpose it
was to respond formally to the Intolerable Acts by drafting a list of
grievances and a statement of the rights of the colonists. The delegates
agreed to meet in one year’s time to consider the Crown’s response, but
before this Second Continental Congress could assemble, the first shots
of the Revolutionary War had been fired at Lexington and Concord,
and this Congress would become involved in leading the war effort and
providing a government for the new American states.

Test Yourself
1. The colonists did not necessarily object to the principle of taxation,
but rather how the tax money would be applied.
a. True
b. False

Page | 318
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

2. Which of the following Parliamentary Acts was not one of the

Intolerable Acts?
a. Boston Port Bill
b. Massachusetts Government Act
c. Quebec Act
d. Tea Act

3. The purpose of the First Continental Congress was to

a. raise an army.
b. draft a declaration of war against Great Britain.
c. compile a list of grievances against the British government.
d. draft a Declaration of American Rights.

4. Which of the following as a provision of the Quebec Act?

a. Quebec was to be annexed to Massachusetts Bay.
b. The boundaries of Quebec were extended into the Ohio Valley.
c. A state of war existed between England and France.
d. Tea ships forced to leave the colonies would be re-directed to
the St. Lawrence Seaway.
Click here to see answers

Page
Page | 319
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

7.5 conclusion

The twenty years beginning with the onset of war in 1754 were ones of
turmoil between Great Britain and her American colonies. British-American
success in the French and Indian War had given the American colonists
the expectation that they would be rewarded for their participation in the
war and, among other things, allowed to enter into the area west of the
Allegheny and Appalachian Mountains. But the Crown had other ideas,
and, rather than giving the colonists access to the land they had so recently
fought for, the British government decided to tighten its reins on its
American subjects. Salutary neglect, long the policy toward the colonies,
was discarded as Parliament passed a series of acts designed to raise monies
to defray the costs of protecting and maintaining the colonies. American
leaders quickly created and publicized arguments in which they defined
their rights under the British constitution. They argued vehemently against
virtual representation, maintaining that they could only be taxed by a
legislature that they themselves elected. Nor would they accept taxes that
were designed to raise revenues rather than regulating trade, and internal
taxes were equally unacceptable.
In many ways, even in 1763, the year the French and Indian War ended,
it was almost too late to achieve any type of consensus between the colonies
and the mother country; the American experience of the former had led the
colonists to take for granted ideas that were foreign to the British. Measures
like the Sugar and Stamp Acts, which raised revenues and taxed the colonies
internally, the Declaratory Act, which proclaimed the right of Parliament
to legislate for the colonies in “all cases whatsoever,” and the Intolerable
Acts, which punished Massachusetts for the Tea Party, only heightened the
tension that was building. And while conditions worsened between mother
country and colonies, there was developing in America a spirit of inter-
colony cooperation reflected in the Committees of Correspondence and the
First and Second Continental Congresses. The First Continental Congress,
representing all of the colonies except Georgia, drafted a statement of
American rights, and the Second Continental Congress would conduct a
war against Britain and draft a Declaration of Independence. In the words
of Thomas Paine, whose influential work Common Sense was published in
1776, the “cause of America” was becoming “in great measure the cause of
all mankind.”38

Page | 320
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

7.6 CrItICal thInkInG ExErCISES

• Read the following accounts of the skirmish at the Lexington

Common on April 19, 1775 and answer the following questions:
1. Do you detect differences in the events recounted?
2. Why do you think these differences do or do not exist?
3. Which account do you believe is most accurately describes
what actually occurred on April 19, 1775?
• From the Annals of the Second Continental Congress: “In April
of 1775, general Gage, who in the course of the last year had taken
possession of the town of Boston, in the province of Massachusetts-
Bay, and still occupied it a garrison, on the 19th day of April, sent
out from that place a large detachment of his army, who made
an unprovoked assault on the inhabitants of the said province,
at the town of Lexington, as appears by the affidavits of a great
number of persons, some of whom were officers and soldiers of
that detachment, murdered eight of the inhabitants, and wounded
many others. From thence the troops proceeded in warlike array
to the town of Concord, where they set upon another party of the
inhabitants of the same province, killing several and wounding more,
until compelled to retreat by the country people suddenly assembled
to repel this cruel aggression.”
• From Colonel Smith, a British soldier to General Gage, governor
of Massachusetts Bay: “[As we approached the Lexington Green]
a body of country people drawn up in military order, with arms
and accoutrements, and, as appeared after, loaded; and that they
had posted some men in a dwelling and Meeting-house. Our troops
advanced towards them, without any intention of injuring them,
further than to inquire the reason of their being thus assembled…
[when] one of them fired…and three or four more jumped over a wall
and fired from behind it among the soldiers; on which the troops
returned it, and killed several of them.”39
• What did the Americans mean by “no taxation without
representation”? On what experiences did they base this idea? Why
did the British Parliament have a hard time understanding this
concept?
• Why did the colonists believe that it was all right for Parliament to
impose taxes to regulate trade, but not to raise revenues?

Page | 321
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

7.7 kEy tErmS

• Albany Congress • Mercantilism

• John Adams • Minutemen
• Samuel Adams • “No taxation without
representation”
• Battle of the Wilderness
• Thomas Paine: Common
• Boston Massacre
Sense
• Boston Tea Party
• Plan of Union
• Edward Braddock
• Pontiac’s War
• Coercive Acts and Quebec Act
• Proclamation Line of 1763
(Intolerable Acts)
• Redcoats
• Colonial Militia
• Paul Revere
• Committees of
Correspondence • Salutary Neglect
• Conciliatory Proposition • Second Continental Congress:
Declaration of Independence
• Currency Act, 1764
• Seven Years’ War
• John Dickinson: Letters from
a Pennsylvania Farmer • Sons of Liberty
• First Continental Congress: • Stamp Act, 1765
Statement of Rights of the
• Sugar Act, 1764
American People
• Taxation to regulate trade v.
• French and Indian War
taxation to raise a revenue
• The Gaspee
• Tea Act of 1773
• George III
• Townshend Duties
• George Grenville
• Treaty of Paris, 1763
• John Hancock
• Vice Admiralty Courts
• Patrick Henry
• Virtual v. actual
• Internal v. external taxation representation
• Thomas Jefferson • Robert Walpole
• Lexington and Concord • George Washington

Page | 322
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

7.8 ChrOnOlOGy
The following chronology is a list of important dates and events associated
with this chapter.

Date Event
1754-1763 French and Indian War

1754 Albany Congress; Plan of Union

1755 Battle of Wilderness

1759 Annus Mirabilis (Year of Miracles)

End of the Seven Years’ War; Peace of Paris;

1763
Proclamation Line of 1763

1763-1764 Pontiac’s War

1764 Sugar Act and Currency Act passed by Parliament

The Stamp Act and Quartering Act (both create internal

1765 taxes) enacted by Parliament; Stamp Act Congress met
in New York City

Declaratory Acts; Riots in New York City over

1766
enforcement of the Quarting Act

1767 Townshend Acts passed; Colonial Resistance built

Virginia Resolves introduced into the House of

1769
Burgesses; Royal Governor closed the House

1770 Boston Massacre; Townshend Acts repealed

Gaspee Incident; Committees of Correspondence

1772
created in many colonies

1773 Tea Act went into effect; Boston Tea Party

Coercive Acts and Quebec Act (Intolerable Acts) passed

by Parliament; First Continental Congress assembled
1774 in September and approved Declaration of Rights and
Grievances; Continental Association formed to enforce
boycotts

Lexington and Concord; Second Continental Congress

convened; drafted the Olive Branch Petition; Patrick
1775
Henry’s “Give me Liberty or give me Death”; Minutemen
and Redcoats clash at Lexington and Concord

Paine’s Common Sense Published; Second Continental

1776
Congress accepted the Declaration of Independence
Page | 323
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

7.9 BIBlIOGraPhy
Alberts, Robert C. A Charming Field for an Encounter: The Story of George Washington’s
Fort Necessity Washington: Office of Publications, National Park Service, U.S.
Department of the Interior, 1975.
Ammerman, David. In the Common Cause: American Response to the Coercive Acts of
1774. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1974.
Anderson, Fred. Crucible of War: The Seven Years’ War and the Fate of the Empire in
British North America, 1754-1766. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Bailyn, Bernard, ed. The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution. 1992.
Bailyn, Bernard, ed. Pamphlets of the American Revolution. Harvard University Press,
1965.
Berkin, Carol. Revolutionary Mothers: Women in the Struggle for America’s Independence.
2005.
Butler, Jon. Becoming America: the Revolution before 1776. 2000.
Declaration and Resolves of the First Continental Congress, History.org: http://www.
history.org/Almanack/life/politics/polhis.cfm.
Draper, Theodore. A Struggle for Power: The American Revolution. New York: Random
House, 1996.
Gipson, Lawrence Henry. The Coming of the Revolution. NY: Harper Torchbooks, 1853.
Journals of the First Continental Congress. Library of Congress.org.
McCullough, David. 1776. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2005.
McCullough, David. John Adams. New York: Simon and Schuster Paperbacks, 2001.
Morgan, Edmund S. and Helen M. Morgan. The Stamp Act Crisis: Prologue to Revolution.
1962.
Nettels, Curtis P. The Roots of American Civilization: A History of American Colonial Life.
New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1963.
Paine, Thomas. Common Sense. American History Sourcebook, ed. Paul Halsall. Fordham.
edu/halsall.
Quarles, Benjamin. The Negro in the American Revolution, 1961.
A Royal Proclamation, October 1763. ushistory.org: http://www.ushistory.org/
declaration/related/proc63.htm.
Smith, Page. A New Age Now Begins, vol. I, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1976.
The American Revolution.org: http://www.theamericanrevolution.org/documents.aspx.
The Events Leading to Independence. http://www.ushistory.org.
Tuchman, Barbara W. The First Salute: A View of the American Revolution .New York:
Alfred A. Knopf, 1988.
Weigley, Russell F. The American Way of War: A History of United States Military
Strategy and Policy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1973.

Page
Page | 324
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

Yale Law School. The Avalon Project: Documents in Law, History and Diplomacy. http://
avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/18th.asp.
Resolutions of [the Second Continental] Congress on Lord North’s Conciliatory Proposal.
http://www.avalon.law.yale.edu.

7.10 EnD nOtES

1 Fred Anderson, Crucible of War: The Seven Years’ War and the Fate of the Empire in British
North America, 1754-1766 (New York: Alfred A. Knopf), 745-747.

2 Robert C. Alberts, A Charming Field for an Encounter: The Story of George Washington’s Fort
Necessity (Washington: Office of Publications, National Park Service, U.S. Department of the
Interior, 1975), 20.

3 Russell F. Weigley, The American Way of War: A History of United States Military Strategy and
Policy (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1973) 3-18.

4 Lord Loudon quoted in Curtis P. Nettels. The Roots of American Civilization: A History of
American Colonial Life (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1963), 595.

5 Nettels, Roots of American Civilization, 596.

6 Royal Proclamation of 1763, U.S. History.org: www.ushistory.org.

7 Theodore Draper. A Struggle for Power: The American Revolution. (New York: Random House,
1996), 196-99.

8 Royal Proclamation of 1763, U.S. History.org.

9 James Otis quoted in Lawrence Henry Gipson, The Coming of the Revolution. (NY: Harper
Torchbooks, 1853), 68.

10 The Currency Act, US History.org.

11 Thomas Fitch, “Reasons Why the British Colonies in America Should Not Be Charged with
Internal Taxes,” in Bernard Bailyn, ed., Pamphlets of the American Revolution. (Harvard
University Press, 1965), 393.

12 The Rights of British Colonists, USHistory.org.

13 Stephen Hopkins quoted in Theodore Draper, A Struggle for Power: The American Revolution.
(New York: Random House, 1996), 229.

14 Patrick Henry, March 23,1775, Colonial Williamsburg, http://www.history.org/almanack/life/

politics/giveme.cfm.

15 Thomas Hutchinson quoted in Draper, Struggle for Power, 245.

16 Quoted in Draper, Struggle for Power, 249.

17 Resolutions of the Stamp Act Congress, 1765, UShistory.org.

Page
Page | 325
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

18 Pitt quoted in Draper, Struggle for Power, 279.

19 An Act Repealing the Stamp Act, The Avalon Project: Documents in Law, History and
Diplomacy, Avalon Project, avalon.law.yale.edu.

20 The Declaratory Act, Avalon Project, avalon.law.yale.edu.

21 Dickinson quoted in Draper, Struggle for Power, 306.

22 Franklin quoted in Draper, Struggle for Power, 35.

23 Association of the Sons of Liberty in New York, December 15,1773, Avalon Project.

24 Boston Tea Party Official Site: http://www.boston-tea-party.org/in-depth.html.

25 John Adams quoted in Page Smith, A New Age Now Begins, vol. I (New York: McGraw-Hill
Book Company, 1976), 381-82.

26 See David Ammerman, In the Common Cause: American Response to the Coercive Acts of
1774, Charlottesville: University of Viriginia Press, 1974.

27 Declaration and Resolves, Avalon Project, Avalon.law.yale.edu.

28 Declaration and Resolves, Avalon Project,Avalon.law.yale.edu.

29 Declaration and Resolves, U.S. History.org.

30 Declaration and Resolves, U.S. History.org.

31 The Events Leading to Independence: U.S. History.org.

32 The American Revolution.org/documents.

33 Ralph Waldo Emerson, “Concord Hymn,” Poetry Foundation, http://www.poetryfoundation.org/

poem/175140.

34 Lieutenant Colonel Smith to Gage, April 20, 1775, at U.S. History.org.

35 Smith Letter, U.S. History.org.

36 Benjamin Franklin to William Stratham, July 5, 1775.

37 Quoted in Gary B. Nash, The Unknown American Revolution: The Unruly Birth of Democracy
and the Struggle to Create America. New York: Viking, 159.

38 Thomas Paine, Introduction to Common Sense, 1776, American History Sourcebook., ed. Paul
Halsall, Fordham.edu/halsall.

39 “Battle at Lexington Green, 1775: The British Perspective,” EyeWitness to History, www.
eyewitnesstohistory.com (2010).

Page
Page | 326
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

anSWEr kEy fOr ChaPtEr SEvEn: thE rOaD tO

rEvOlUtIOn, 1754-1775
Check your answers to the questions in the Before You Move On Sections for this
chapter. You can click on the questions to take you back to the chapter section.

Correct answers are BOlDED

Section 7.2.2 - p296

1. An increasing sense of common identity among the colonists was one of the legacies
of the French and Indian War.
a. trUE
b. False

2. The Proclamation of 1763 was enacted in part as a response to Pontiac’s War.

a. trUE
b. False

3. The Ohio Valley was one of the major points of contention between the French and
British in the French and Indian War as well as the British and Indians
in Pontiac’s War.
a. trUE
b. False

Section 7.3.8 - p307

1. The purpose of the Proclamation Line of 1763 was to
a. kEEP thE COlOnIStS On thE EaStErn SEaBOarD.
b. raise a revenue to defray the costs of war.
c. encourage colonial movement past the Appalachian Mountains.
d. reward the colonists for their participation in the French and Indian War.

2. Which of the following Parliamentary acts were designed to “raise a revenue”?

a. Proclamation Line of 1763
b. Currency Act
C. SUGar aCt
d. Declaratory Act

3. The act that claimed Parliament’s right to legislate for the colonies in “all cases
whatsoever” was the
a. DEClaratOry aCt.
b. Currency Act.
c. Proclamation Line of 1763.
d. Townshend Act.

4. The most effective tools used by the colonists in getting the Stamp Act repealed was
a. the Boston Massacre.
b. rioting against the Stamp Masters.
C. thE BOyCOtt Of EnGlISh GOODS.
d. the arguments of the colonists against internal taxation.

5. The colonies made a very clear distinction between

a. internal and external taxation by Parliament.
b. taxes to regulate trade v. those designed to raise a revenue.
c. actual v. virtual representation in Parliament.
D. all Of thE aBOvE
e. None of the above

Page
Page | 327
 Chapter Seven: The Road to Revolution, 1754-1775

Section 7.4.4 - p318

1. The colonists did not necessarily object to the principle of taxation, but rather how
the tax money would be applied.
a. trUE
b. False

2. Which of the following Parliamentary Acts was not one of the Intolerable Acts?
a. Boston Port Bill
b. Massachusetts Government Act
c. Quebec Act
D. tEa aCt

3. The purpose of the First Continental Congress was to

a. raise an army.
b. draft a declaration of war against Great Britain.
c. compile a list of grievances against the British government.
D. Draft a DEClaratIOn Of amErICan rIGhtS.

4. Which of the following as a provision of the Quebec Act?

a. Quebec was to be annexed to Massachusetts Bay.
B. thE BOUnDarIES Of qUEBEC WErE ExtEnDED IntO thE OhIO vallEy.
c. A state of war existed between England and France.
d. Tea ships forced to leave the colonies would be re-directed to the St. Lawrence Seaway.

Page
Page | 328