Data Friend
Data Friend
Introduction 3
Background 3
Rationale 3
Research Questions 4
Annotated Bibliography 5
Data 11
References 13
Introduction................................................................................................................................................................. 4
Context.................................................................................................................................................................. 4
Background......................................................................................................................................................... 4
Rationale.............................................................................................................................................................. 4
Purpose of Research....................................................................................................................................... 5
Research Questions......................................................................................................................................... 6
Annotated Bibliography.......................................................................................................................................... 6
Data Collection......................................................................................................................................................... 27
Analysis........................................................................................................................................................................ 28
Results.......................................................................................................................................................................... 28
Ethical Considerations.......................................................................................................................................... 29
Timeline....................................................................................................................................................................... 30
SWOT Analysis......................................................................................................................................................... 32
Introduction................................................................................................................................................................. 33
Research Strategy...................................................................................................................................................... 33
Research Philosophy...................................................................................................................................... 33
Research Strategy............................................................................................................................................ 34
Choices................................................................................................................................................................ 34
Time Horizon.................................................................................................................................................... 35
Data Analysis................................................................................................................................................... 37
Conclusion................................................................................................................................................................... 38
Reflective Evaluation............................................................................................................................................... 38
Introduction
Context
A classic management approach known as “transactional leadership” is based on
exchanging incentives and penalties for output. The well-known British retailer Marks and
Spencer (M&S) has made transactional leadership a key component of its personnel
management strategy. This approach emphasizes defining roles and duties precisely, laying
out expectations in detail, and putting in place performance-based incentive and
punishment systems (Xu, 2023). Though transactional leadership can offer stability and
structure, it can also stifle innovation and lower employee engagement. This essay
examines the merits and drawbacks of M&S’s transactional management style and offers
ideas for improving it to keep talented employees.
Background
Since its founding in 1884, Marks and Spencer (M&S) has been a recognizable name in the
retail sector, renowned for both its superior goods and outstanding customer support. M&S
has tried several different management and leadership philosophies over the years to help
them deal with the changing retail environment (Udin, 2020). Among M&S, transactional
leadership became the most popular approach, placing a strong emphasis on task-oriented
supervision and performance-based incentives. This strategy complemented the business’s
emphasis on production and efficiency. But as the retail industry developed, M&S
encountered difficulties with staff engagement and retention, which prompted a review of
its leadership approach to better serve its workforce’s needs and hold onto top talent.
Rationale
At Marks and Spencer (M&S), the implementation of a transactional leadership style was
motivated by the necessity for established management procedures to guarantee
operational effectiveness and uphold high-performance standards. Transactional
leadership offers a clear structure for establishing goals, tracking advancement, and
recognizing success in a fast-paced retail industry with strict targets and competitive
pressures (Nurlina, 2022). M&S sought to maintain its reputation for dependability and
quality while streamlining operations by placing a strong emphasis on task completion and
adherence to set procedures. But as the retail industry changed, it became clear that a
transactional strategy was limited in terms of encouraging innovation, long-term
commitment, and employee satisfaction (Siers, 2017). Understanding how crucial it is to
hold onto top talent in a cutthroat industry, M&S is working to modernize its leadership
approach by adding aspects of transformational leadership, employee empowerment,
creativity stimulation, and a common goal to promote long-term success.
Purpose of Research
The purpose of this research is to evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of the transactional
management style within the framework of Marks and Spencer (M&S) and offer
recommendations for how to make it better to retain skilled workers. The purpose of this
study is to shed light on the effectiveness of transactional leadership in a reputable retail
company like M&S and how it impacts employee satisfaction and retention. In addition, the
study looks into how M&S could improve and adapt its leadership style to better meet the
changing needs and expectations of its employees in a competitive industry. The purpose of
this study is to provide information to M&S leadership and management teams by outlining
the key benefits and drawbacks of the transactional approach, along with potential areas
for development.
Background
The retail industry is one of the largest and most rapidly evolving sectors all over the
world, employing millions upon millions of people globally. Given this, it is also a focal
point of research for business management studies looking to identify and evaluate
theories and strategies for enhancing performance, improving employee retention, driving
organisational growth, and so on. In this context, leadership theories/approaches are one
of these focus areas which is emphasised as a means of improving employee motivation
and productivity. There are many approaches/styles of leadership that have been theorised
by scholars and practitioners over the years, one of which is the transactional leadership
(TL) style. It involves leaders motivating their subordinates/followers through the process
of exchange, by rewarding those who meet or exceed the requirements of their roles and
punishing those who do not (Asghar and Oino, 2017). However, today the use of
transactional leadership, while still prevalent, is not given much weight. This study will
seek to assess the positive and negative aspects of this leadership in the context of the
retail industry. To this end, the study will focus its inquiry on transactional leadership
approaches on a specific retailer, in this case, Marks & Spencer – a UK-based multinational
retailer that deals in selling clothing, home, beauty, and food products. The business was
founded in 1884 by Michael Marks and is now headquartered in Paddington, London (M&S,
2023a). With more than 400 stores and 72,316 people employed globally and generating
revenues in millions (£11,931.3 in the year ending 1 April 2023), the company is thriving
(M&S, 2023b; M&S, 2023c). The study will thus seek to assess the positive aspects and
major challenges related to the use of transactional leadership approaches in the company.
Rationale
Transactional leadership is founded upon the reward and punishment mechanism, which is
taps into a fundament psychology of human behaviour. It is a simple and clear-cut
approach to leadership, where leaders set goals for their employees, the latter meets them
or not, and are correspondingly rewarded or punished. However, it has its cons, like the
lack of innovation and empowerment to name a few, which have been recognised in many
studies. However, it is still quite commonly used in the retail sector (Afsar et al., 2017;
Khan and Jantan, 2022). This study seeks to examine this inconsistency by assessing the
positive and negative aspects of transactional leadership, as well as the challenges faced by
the retail sector, with the underlying purpose of developing this style to help retain
employees. This is an important topic as it serves to add to the literature on effective
leadership standards.
the study aims to examine the major challenges of the Transactional Leadership Style faced
by the Retail Industry.
Research Questions
● How transactional leadership and management can be a challenge for the retail
industry and M&S specifically?
● What should the management at M&S do to deal with the challenges of transactional
leadership?
Annotated Bibliography
[1]Citation: Dong, B. (2023). A Systematic Review of the [1]Citation
The author aims to synthesize key findings and identify future [4]Scope
[3]Aims & Research: The study aims to examine the [8] Reflections
objective one.
[1] Citation: Deichmann, D., & Stam, D. A. (2015). [1]Citation
study in a retail company with four branches, collecting data [8] Reflections
objective two
[1] Citation: Mabotuwana Vithanage, S. S. U. (2020). The Impact of [1]Citation
[3] Aims & Research: This research aims to assess the [8] Reflections
Annotated Bibliography 1
Citation: Khan, A.M. and Jantan, A.H.B., 2022. Moderating Role of Psychological
Empowerment on the Relationship between Transactional Leadership and Individual
Innovation: Evidence from Banking Sector of Bangladesh. Journal of International Business
and Management, 5(10), pp.01-12.
Summary of content: This research study delves into the concept of transactional
leadership and its role in fostering innovative work behaviour among employees in a
commercial bank in Bangladesh. The study expands on the concepts of transactional
leadership and innovative work behaviour. It also assesses the moderating role of
transactional relationships towards psychological empowerment. The study gathers data
through a survey of 372 employees which was analysed using SPSS and Smart-PLS. Key
findings in the study included the finding that psychological empowerment is a variable in
the relationship between transaction leadership and innovative work behaviour, as lower
empowerment leads to weaker relationships and higher empowerment allows for stronger
relationships.
Evaluation of the source: In regard to the source, the publication is recent and is
published in a respectable journal, with the authors also having other works of literature.
Furthermore, the research has been transparent about the use of methodology and ethics.
Reflection on use: The study provides a clear and comprehensive description of the
concept of transactional leadership, taking from other relevant sources as well as a critical
evaluation of these descriptions.
Annotated Bibliography 2
Citation: Young, H.R., Glerum, D.R., Joseph, D.L. and McCord, M.A., 2021. A meta-analysis of
transactional leadership and follower performance: Double-edged effects of LMX and
empowerment. Journal of Management, 47(5), pp.1255-1280.
Evaluation of the source: This study is also very recent indicating the currency of the
findings, while the source and publication are also reputed, which establishes the quality of
the research. Furthermore, the authors are also established academicians, with a number of
published works.
Reflection on use: The results of the study present both positive and negative correlations
between transactional leadership and follower performance, enabling its use to identify the
benefits and shortcomings of the approach.
Annotated Bibliography 3
Citation: Deichmann, D. and Stam, D., 2015. Leveraging transformational and transactional
leadership to cultivate the generation of organization-focused ideas. The leadership
quarterly, 26(2), pp.204-219.
Summary of content: This research study investigates how both transactional and
transformational relationships serve to motivate employees to commit to an organisational
ideation program with the aim of generating ideas that benefit the organisation. The
research uses previous studies about leadership styles regarding leadership behaviours,
with multilevel data collected from multinational companies revealing that both the
leadership approaches allow for effective motivation of employees in regard to committing
to an ideation program, and ideas generated by leaders, but has also been found to be
contingent on how strong leaders are aligned with the organisation’s culture and beliefs.
Evaluation of the source: Looking at the source, it can be said that while the study is not
that current, its findings are still relevant considering the contextual relationships that are
being assessed. The source of the journal is also trustworthy and the authors are credible
with a number of other works under their belt.
Cheng et al. (2014) proposed TL to be positively associated with the creativity of middle-
level managers in terms of finding new ways to keep employees motivated to perform to a
certain standard. On the other hand, the study by Öncer (2013) found that there was no
association between innovativeness or risk-taking dimensions of entrepreneurship and TL.
Khan and Jantan (2022) posit that the discrepancies in the effectiveness of transactional
leadership in different organisational settings are down to variations in power distance,
organisational structure, culture, and individual perceptions. As Si and Wei (2012) state,
transactional leaders avoid risks, do not generally challenge the status quo, try to operate
within stipulated boundaries, and focus on operational effectiveness and efficiency. As
such, the argument put forward by Deichmann and Stam (2015), that transactional
leadership is especially effective in providing results in less dynamic workplaces which
involve routine tasks which require stability and certainty, stands to be accurate.
However, this leads to shortcomings like the lack of enterprise among employees in terms
of introducing change, envisioning innovative strategies, or trying out new solutions. Khan
and Jantan (2022) find that there is a negative relationship between transactional
leadership and innovative work behaviour and actually demotivates or shuts down such
tendencies. In light of this, transactional leadership can be argued to not line up with
workplaces which require critical and innovative thinking and problem-solving. As such, it
has the shortcoming of being negatively related to entrepreneurial behaviour considering
that it does not stimulate motivation to exploit opportunities. The results of the study by
Young et al. (2021) found that transactional leadership can be a double-edged sword, with
both positive and negative effects on follower performance. From the SDT perspective, the
transactional leadership approach can be argued to exhibit more positive effects on
follower performance. Whereas, from the SDT perspective, it would seemingly have a
negative effect.
Annotated Bibliography 4
Citation: Jacobs, E. and Mafini, C., 2019. Transactional leadership, supply chain quality and
business performance in the fast-moving consumer goods industry. Journal of Transport
and Supply Chain Management, 13(1), pp.1-13.
Summary of content: This literature focuses on the topic of how leadership practices can
serve to improve performance in the FCMG industry in South Africa, with a focus on the
link between transactional leadership and supply chain performance in the industry. The
research a quantitative approach through a survey that targeted managers and employees
in the industry. The results of this study proposed that two aspects of transaction
leadership, namely contingent reward and management by expectation effective in
positively influencing supply chain performance, including non-financial and financial
performances.
Evaluation of the source: This source is also valid given the recency as well as the source
of publication. In this case, as well, the authors of the study have a number of other works
of literature.
Reflection on use: This study has provided a good understanding of how different
transactional leadership approaches can allow for improved business performance,
particularly in regard to the supply chain function.
Annotated Bibliography 5
Citation: Fröber, K. and Dreisbach, G., 2014. The differential influences of positive affect,
random reward, and performance-contingent reward on cognitive control. Cognitive,
Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14, pp.530-547.
Evaluation of the source: Unlike the above-mentioned sources, this research is not very
recent but is published in a trusted journal publication. The authors have been found to
have several well-known works of literature.
One study by Jacobs and Mafini (2019) focused on the relationship between different
approaches of TL style and store performance or supply chain quality (SCQ) in retail and
FCMG businesses. The study found that while some approaches of transactional leadership
had positive correlations with supply chain quality, others did not. The contingent reward
approach of TL was found to have a positive relation with SCQ. Similar findings were
obtained in the study by Fröber and Dreisbach (2014) where effective contingent reward
relationships strengthened competitive advantage through SCQ. Jacobs and Mafini (2019)
also found the management-by-expectations approach to have a positive association with
SCQ.
Annotated Bibliography 6
Citation: Alrowwad, A.A., Abualoush, S.H. and Masa'deh, R.E., 2020. Innovation and
intellectual capital as intermediary variables among transformational leadership,
transactional leadership, and organizational performance. Journal of Management
Development, 39(2), pp.196-222.
Summary of content: This research study examines the relationship between different
leadership practices like transactional and transformational leadership with organisational
performance in Jordanian banks. The study makes use of questionnaire surveys of 350
respondents to test the research hypotheses. The findings of the study imply that
transformation and transactional leadership are positively related to organisational
performance, which serves to establish the argument that transaction leadership can help
improve contextual performance in transactional leadership.
Evaluation of the source: The source of this research is also valid and credible in regard
to its currency being quite recent, and is also published in a trusted source journal. The
authors of the study are also known academicians and have a number of published works.
Reflection on use: The results of the study can be used to develop strategies that can be
used to improve the quality and performance of transactional leadership in a business
while improving and overcoming the negative aspects of the approach.
The above discussion concisely outlines the shortcomings and challenges of transactional
leadership in general and retail settings specifically. The lack of autonomy and freedom of
thought are the negative aspects. As such, based on the findings by Young et al. (2021),
transactional leaders need to be more focused on the motivational aspect of the leader-
follower relationship. Creating opportunities to foster social exchanges that inspire and
push employees to be more productive and put in greater effort can be a cost-effective way
to improve contextual performance in transactional leadership (Alrowwad et al., 2020).
Therefore, the focus should be more on the empowerment of the employees and allowing
space for autonomy in work to overcome the challenges.
Data Collection
Method of Data Collection
Secondary data collection techniques will be used in this study on the advantages and
drawbacks of transactional leadership at Marks and Spencer (M&S) and tactics for keeping
talented employees. Without having to interact directly with participants, secondary data
gives a multitude of pre-existing information that can shed light on M&S’s management
techniques and staff retention tactics. To guarantee the relevance and currency of the
sources, the data-gathering period will span the last ten years, from 2014 to 2024. This
time makes it possible to analyze current patterns and advancements in M&S staff
retention tactics as well as transactional leadership methods.
Research Design
This study on transactional leadership at M&S will use a methodical approach to secondary
data analysis as part of its research strategy. The study will utilize a qualitative research
approach to investigate the diverse facets of transactional leadership in the workplace and
its impact on employee retention (Lesley et al., 2020). Reviewing previous research on
transactional leadership in the retail sector as well as M&S-specific case studies and
reports will be part of the research. This will make it possible to comprehend transactional
leadership’s theoretical underpinnings and real-world applications in the context of M&S.
Furthermore, the gathered secondary data will be analyzed qualitatively using techniques
like thematic analysis to pinpoint important themes, patterns, and insights. This analytical
method will help to better understand M&S’s transactional leadership style and how it
affects employee retention, offering insightful recommendations for leadership
development and organizational enhancement.
As part of its research strategy, this study on transactional leadership at M&S will employ a
methodical approach to secondary data analysis. The study will look into the various
aspects of transactional leadership in the workplace and how it affects employee retention
using a qualitative research approach (Lesley et al., 2020). The research will include a
review of earlier studies on transactional leadership in the retail industry as well as case
studies and reports that are relevant to M&S. This will provide understanding of the
practical applications and theoretical foundations of transactional leadership within the
context of M&S.
Data
For the data collection, secondary research will be conducted, which will involve gathering
secondary information from different sources. The research will make use of academic
books, research journals, online newspaper and magazine articles and so on. To this end,
the research will make use of trusted databases like Google Scholar as well as regular
online searches to obtain the required source materials, by using appropriate keywords
and filtering them to the needs of the research. The data gathered will be focused on
exploring the notions/issues put forward by the research aims and objectives and will be
linked to the literature review to assess the findings and test the preliminary suppositions.
In order to ensure the reliability, accuracy, validity, and credibility of the research, the
CRAAP test for the evaluation of online sources will be applied. The test will enable the
assessment of the currency, relevance, authority (trustworthiness), accuracy, and
alignment of purpose with the research topic (Abrams et al., 2022). Based on this, the most
relevant and useful sources will be selected for the research.
An interpretivist philosophy will be adopted which is based on the assumption that reality
is subjective and depends on the individual perceptions of those who observe the social
world (Žukauskas et al., 2018). A deductive research approach will be used to develop the
theory, meaning that the suppositions about the topic will be developed based on existing
theory which will be subsequently tested in the research (Woiceshyn and Daellenbach,
2018). A descriptive research design will be used to structure the research and attempt to
answer the research questions.
Analysis
The examination of secondary data regarding transactional leadership at Marks and
Spencer (M&S) provides important information about the company’s management
strategies and how they affect employee retention. Upon examining extant literature, case
studies, and industry reports, significant themes and patterns concerning the efficacy of
transactional leadership in the retail setting become apparent. The findings of the
investigation suggest that although transactional leadership has the potential to offer task
management clarity and structure, it may not be as effective in promoting employee
engagement, contentment, and sustained dedication. Research indicates that transactional
leadership might be more appropriate in routine, task-oriented settings where
performance incentives and unambiguous expectations are crucial. However, in order to
succeed, workers may need greater freedom, opportunity for personal development, and
empowerment in fast-paced, creative sectors like retail.
Analysis
The thematic analysis method will be used to interpret the secondary data. The data used
will primarily include qualitative data. Thematic analysis is a method of analysing
qualitative data by identifying common patterns in the data set and using them to develop
themes and answers to the research questions (Qualtrics, 2023).
Results
The analysis of secondary data regarding Marks and Spencer’s (M&S) transactional
leadership offers intricate insights into how it impacts employee retention and
organizational dynamics. The key conclusions suggest that while transactional leadership
can provide clarity and organization to task management, there may be limitations to its
ability to foster long-term employee commitment and enjoyment. Studies and industry
reports indicate that accountability frameworks, performance incentives, and stated
expectations—all of which align with M&S’s focus on efficiency and productivity—are
commonly associated with transactional leadership. However, this approach might
undervalue the importance of employee autonomy, creativity, and personal development—
particularly in a fast-paced, customer-focused retail environment.
The analysis also highlights some potential negative effects of transactional leadership,
including decreased levels of employee engagement, job satisfaction, and organizational
commitment. Employees may feel constrained by rigid structures and limited growth
opportunities, which can diminish morale and increase turnover rates. Positively, task-
oriented environments where responsibility and transparency are essential can benefit
greatly from transactional leadership. It ensures that employees understand their
responsibilities, receive feedback on time, and are acknowledged when they surpass
performance targets. To address the shortcomings of transactional leadership, M&S may
need to consider integrating elements of transformational leadership into its management
practices. This strategy emphasizes staff empowerment, inspiring a shared vision, and
fostering a culture of innovation and continuous progress. By embracing a more holistic
leadership style, M&S can create a productive and encouraging work environment that
promotes employee happiness, retention, and organizational success.
Ethical Considerations
To protect the privacy and well-being of participants in this study on transactional
leadership at Marks and Spencer (M&S), several ethical issues need to be taken into
account. Initially, each participant will be asked for their informed consent, which will
include a detailed explanation of the study’s objectives, the voluntary nature of
participation, and how data will be used for analysis. Throughout the study, confidentiality
and anonymity will be upheld, and data will be securely stored and only accessed by
authorized staff. Furthermore, precautions will be taken to reduce any risk of injury or
discomfort to participants, especially in qualitative interviews where delicate subjects may
be covered. Every participant will be free to leave the study at any moment and without
penalty.
Timeline
Descripti 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9- 11- 13- 15- 17- 19- 21-
on/Week 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Topic
selection
Detailed
Reading
Selection
of final
topic
Picking
of
sources
Objectiv
e
submissi
on
detailed
proposal
report
Final
draft
Incorpor
ation of
feedback
Final
submissi
on
Results
The expected result that the research will be looking for is some form of theoretical
viewpoint that can improve leadership outcomes. These can potentially come to use as
guidance for the implementation of transactional leadership in retail organisations or
others. It will be of interest to business leaders, managers, scholars, and other
professionals.
Action: The letter of critique was addressed and I altered the paper’s presentation by
substituting the red and black ink with the formal academic layout. The second element has
been that I made sure that the sources I cited in the article are reliable and authentic
sources of information about Marks and Spencer’s staff retention and transactional
leadership.
Reflection: On second thought, I understand that the initial arrangement, presumably, had
not been quite decent considering the quality of the work. Although the color and the
thickness of the ink might have been used to draw certain aspects, it may still look chaotic
or unprofessional. For certain, a study and its outcomes make the research gain culpability
when the sources are not verified. Not only for the sake of the research but also to keep the
credibility and the integrity of the writing, one should make sure that the sources in
academic writing are from trustworthy and well-reputed sources.
Learning: To be honest, this experience has shown me how great the role of academic
writing is when proper citations, style, and presentation are taken into account. This
criticism by our teacher gave an insight into areas that could be well improved including
taking into consideration source validation and the impact of visual presentation. Hence,
from now on my academic research work will have appropriate references and formatting
conventions checked to make it academically and professionally presentable. I will also
employ some measures to enhance the authenticity and reliability of all data sources I shall
use. However, I can reach this goal by using everyone’s insights in my upcoming academic
projects.
Critical reflection
SWOT Analysis
Strengths
Weaknesses
- Opportunity to further enhance academic writing skills through continued practice and
feedback.
- Chance to explore and implement new strategies for source validation and presentation in
future projects.
Threats
- Risk of credibility and integrity of academic work if sources are not properly validated.
- Potential for future criticism if presentation and formatting issues are not addressed
effectively.
Introduction
The well-known management approach known as “transactional leadership” is defined by
the exchanging of incentives and penalties for following instructions from the leader. Although
this style has been widely adopted by a number of businesses, including the retail industry, its
advantages and disadvantages have been discussed. The purpose of this study is to investigate
the transactional leadership style in the context of Marks and Spencer (M&S), a well-known
store, in order to comprehend its difficulties and suggest possible improvements to keep talented
employees. The primary aim of this study is to examine the major challenges of the
Transactional Leadership Style faced by the Retail Industry, with a focus on Marks & Spencer.
Research Strategy
Research Philosophy
This study’s research philosophy is in line with the interpretivist paradigm, which
stresses seeing social phenomena from the viewpoint of individuals who are affected. This model
influencing organizational dynamics, making it appropriate for researching the difficulties and
possible advancements of the transactional leadership style inside Marks and Spencer (M&S)
(Steinbacher, 2018). The goal of this study is to identify the fundamental elements determining
the efficacy of transactional leadership by delving deeply into the lived experiences of managers
Research Strategy
This study used an inductive approach as part of its qualitative research methodology.
(Azungah, 2018). Because it can offer a thorough examination of the nuances surrounding Marks
and Spencer’s (M&S) transactional leadership style, qualitative research is the method of choice.
This methodology enables a thorough, contextualized knowledge of the difficulties M&S had in
implementing transactional leadership and the possible solutions through techniques including
observations, interviews, and document analysis. Rather of testing preexisting hypotheses, the
inductive technique enables the researcher to build theories and insights based on the facts
obtained. (Pearse, 2019) This method allows the researcher to discover fresh insights and
understandings that may not have been previously explored, making it ideal for investigating
intricate and varied phenomena like leadership styles. Furthermore, the inductive approach’s
flexibility enables the researcher to modify their strategies and concentrate on new information
research topic.
Choices
Given its importance in the retail sector, Marks and Spencer (M&S) was specifically
chosen as the case study organization. M&S is a well-known store with a lengthy history and a
significant market share, (Chen et al., 2021) which makes it an excellent case study topic for
number of obstacles recently, such as shifting consumer preferences and heightened rivalry,
which presents an intriguing opportunity to examine how well transactional leadership can
M&S can offer important insights for both theory and practice. Transactional leadership is a
commonly employed approach in many industries, including retail (Mkheimer, 2018) because of
its reputation for emphasizing incentives and penalties for performance, transactional leadership
is especially pertinent when discussing staff engagement and retention, two major issues that
gathered at a particular moment to give an overview of the difficulties M&S is currently facing
with regard to the transactional leadership style (Bolander et al., 2017). This method eliminates
the need for longitudinal data collection by allowing the researcher to capture a point in time and
conduct a targeted examination of the current situation at M&S. For this study, a cross-sectional
approach makes sense since it enables a thorough analysis of the difficulties M&S faced over a
given period of time. (Gabriel et al., 2018) Through the collection of data at a specific point in
time, the researcher can discover chances for improvement and acquire insights into the current
status of transactional leadership at M&S. A cross-sectional approach is appropriate for this kind
The main method of gathering data for this research will be semi-structured interviews.
To learn more about key stakeholders’ experiences with transactional leadership at Marks and
Spencer (M&S), (Mazhar, 2021) including managers and staff, interviews will be conducted. For
this study, semi-structured interviews work best because they provide the researcher flexibility in
reports (Husband, 2020), will be done through document analysis in addition to interviews. This
will offer more information to improve comprehension of M&S’s transactional leadership and
The first step in the data collection procedure will be to identify and choose interview
subjects. (Rezzky et al., 2021) The selection of participants will be based on their responsibilities
in M&S as well as their firsthand knowledge of transactional leadership. Interviews will take
place either in-person or electronically, according on participant availability and location. With
the participant’s permission, every interview will be audio recorded. Extensive notes will be
step in the document analysis process. We will carefully go over these documents to get
Data Analysis.
The data analysis for this study will take a qualitative approach with a thematic analytic
focus. One popular technique for finding, examining, and summarizing patterns (themes) in
qualitative data is thematic analysis. This methodology is ideal for this research because it
enables a thorough examination of the obstacles and future directions of Marks and Spencer’s
(M&S) transactional leadership style. Familiarization is the initial stage of thematic analysis,
(Majumdar, 2022) in which the researcher immerses themselves in the material to comprehend
the main ideas and concerns. This will entail going over the organizational documents and
interview transcripts in order to get a thorough grasp of the data. The next step in the process is
coding, which is arranging the data in a methodical way to find important themes. To do this,
pertinent data sections related to the research objectives—such as M&S’s issues and possible
order to create overarching themes that encapsulate the essence of the data, this approach will
entail locating patterns and relationships within the data. After then, the themes will be examined
to make sure they appropriately represent the data and are pertinent to the goals of the study. To
find any discrepancies or holes in the analysis, this will entail comparing the themes from several
data sources. Ultimately, the themes will be clarified and examined in light of the study’s goals.
This will entail examining the ways in which the themes advance our knowledge of the
difficulties and future directions facing M&S’s transactional leadership style (Cassell, 2019).
The results from the qualitative analysis may be supplemented by quantitative data analysis in
addition to thematic analysis. This could entail analyzing quantitative data from organizational
Conclusion
This research has offered a thorough analysis of the difficulties and future directions facing
Marks and Spencer’s (M&S) transactional leadership style. Key insights have been obtained
from organizational document analysis and interviews with M&S managers and staff using a
qualitative case study methodology. The research has uncovered a number of obstacles that M&S
had to overcome in order to use transactional leadership, such as problems with staff morale,
communication, and flexibility. Notwithstanding these obstacles, the research has also revealed
several promising tactics for enhancing M&S’s transactional leadership efficacy. These include
establishing clearer and more regular communication procedures, offering more chances for
employee recognition and rewards, and cultivating a more friendly and cooperative work
atmosphere. It is envisaged that this research will add to the body of knowledge already available
on transactional leadership and how it is used in the retail industry, offering insightful
information to academics, professionals, and organizational leaders alike. Subsequent studies
may investigate the use of transactional leadership in additional retail settings or assess how well
Reflective Evaluation
Throughout the course of my study, I have come across a number of components of my
methodology that have worked well and areas where it may be strengthened. My research
approach’s ability to clearly define its objectives and choose relevant procedures to achieve them
was one of its strongest points. Through the implementation of an interpretivist paradigm and
and possible advancements associated with the transactional leadership style at Marks and
Spencer (M&S). Additionally, choosing M&S as the case study organization gave the research a
rich and pertinent background and enabled a thorough examination of transactional leadership
analysis shown efficacy in locating significant themes and patterns within the data, augmenting
My research strategy may have been stronger in a few other areas, though. The element
of the research process that dealt with time management was one such area. I discovered that,
although I had originally budgeted time for every step of the data gathering and analysis process,
I had overestimated the amount of time needed for some activities, such interviewing and data
processing. The research process was somewhat delayed as a result, which affected how long it
took to do the task overall. I want to overcome these obstacles going forward by putting better
time management techniques into practice, such giving tasks more reasonable deadlines and
leaving enough time for unforeseen delays. In order to make sure I stay on course and submit by
the deadline, I also want to periodically examine and modify my research strategy
1
References
Xu, L. (2023). Enhancing firm value through capital structure: A case study of Marks
and Spencer PLC. *International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth
Evaluation*, 4(6), 532-547. DOI: 10.54660/.IJMRGE.2023.4.6.532-547.
Udin, U., Dananjoyo, R., & Isalman, I. (2022). Transactional leadership and
innovative work behavior: Testing the mediation role of knowledge sharing in
distribution market. DOI: 10.15722/jds.20.01.202201.41.
Nurlina, N. (2022). Examining linkage between transactional leadership,
organizational culture, commitment and compensation on work satisfaction and
performance. *Golden Ratio of Human Resource Management*, 2(2), 108-122. DOI:
10.52970/grhrm.v2i2.182.
Siers, A. (2017). Facilitating and impeding factors of child health professionals’
adherence towards the protocol and guideline used after child death: A qualitative
evaluation of working procedures at the municipal health service Twente.
Kumara, A. S. (2022). Researching with secondary data: A brief overview of
possibilities and limitations from the viewpoint of social research. MPRA Paper No.
112639. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/112639/.
Tomaszewski, L. E., Zarestky, J., & Gonzalez, E. (2022). Planning qualitative
research: Design and decision making for new researchers. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920967174.
18-00035](https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00035)
(https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42942-7_4)
Bolander, W., et al. (2017). Time Horizon: Time, change, and longitudinally emergent
2
research. DOI:
[10.1080/08853134.2017.1314187](https://doi.org/10.1080/08853134.2017.1314187)
Cassell, C. (2019). Data Analysis: Qualitative Data Analysis - Exploring Themes, Metaphors
Chen, L., et al. (2021). Choice: Supply chain leadership and firm performance - A meta-
analysis. DOI:
[10.1016/J.IJPE.2021.108082](https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPE.2021.108082)
[10.1097/DCC.0000000000000322](https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000322
Gabriel, A. S., et al. (2018). Experience Sampling Methods: A Discussion of Critical Trends
DOI: [10.1177/1094428118802626](https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118802626)
Husband, G. (2020). Ethical Data Collection and Recognizing the Impact of Semi-Structured
[10.3390/educsci10080206](https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10080206)
DOI: [10.4018/978-1-6684-3881-7.ch031](https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-3881-
7.ch031)
3
Mazhar, S. A. (2021). Data Collection Techniques: Methods of Data Collection - A
[10.24321/2319.9113.202101](https://doi.org/10.24321/2319.9113.202101)
Mkheimer, I. M. (2018). The Impact of Leadership Styles on Business Success: A Case Study
[10.4172/2223-5833.1000343](https://doi.org/10.4172/2223-5833.1000343)
DOI: [10.34190/jbrm.17.3.004](https://doi.org/10.34190/jbrm.17.3.004)
Rezzky, E., et al. (2021). Factors that Affect Data Gathered Using Interviews for
[10.1109/iccsai53272.2021.9609706](https://doi.org/10.1109/iccsai53272.2021.96097
06)
Steinbacher, K. (2018). Research Philosophy. In *Exporting the Energiewende* (pp. 4). DOI:
[10.1007/978-3-658-22496-7_4](https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22496-7_4)
Abrams, S., Delf, L., Drummond, R. and Kelly, K., 2022. The CRAAP Test. A Dam Good
Argument, p.171.
Afsar, B., Badir, Y.F., Saeed, B.B. and Hafeez, S., 2017. Transformational and transactional
leadership and employee’s entrepreneurial behavior in knowledge–intensive
industries. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(2), pp.307-
332.
Alrowwad, A.A., Abualoush, S.H. and Masa'deh, R.E., 2020. Innovation and intellectual
capital as intermediary variables among transformational leadership, transactional
leadership, and organizational performance. Journal of Management Development, 39(2),
pp.196-222.
4
Asghar, S. and Oino, D.I., 2017. Leadership styles and job satisfaction. Asghar, S., & Oino,
I.(2018). Leadership Styles and Job Satisfaction, Market Forces, 13(1), pp.1-13.
Cheng, C.C., Yang, C.L. and Sheu, C., 2014. The link between eco-innovation and business
performance: A Taiwanese industry context. Journal of cleaner production, 64, pp.81-90.
Fröber, K. and Dreisbach, G., 2014. The differential influences of positive affect, random
reward, and performance-contingent reward on cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective, &
Behavioral Neuroscience, 14, pp.530-547.
İşcan, Ö.F., Ersarı, G. and Naktiyok, A., 2014. Effect of leadership style on perceived
organizational performance and innovation: the role of transformational leadership
beyond the impact of transactional leadership–an application among Turkish
SME's. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, pp.881-889.
Jacobs, E. and Mafini, C., 2019. Transactional leadership, supply chain quality and
business performance in the fast-moving consumer goods industry. Journal of Transport
and Supply Chain Management, 13(1), pp.1-13.
Khan, A.M. and Jantan, A.H.B., 2022. Moderating Role of Psychological Empowerment on
the Relationship between Transactional Leadership and Individual Innovation:
Evidence from Banking Sector of Bangladesh. Journal of International Business and
Management, 5(10), pp.01-12.
M&S, 2023c. Annual Report & Financial Statements 2023 [online] Available at:
https://corporate.marksandspencer.com/sites/marksandspencer/files/2023-06/M
%26S_2023_Annual_Report.pdf [Accessed 14 November 2023]
5
Öncer, A., 2013. Investigation of the effects of transactional and transformational
leadership on entrepreneurial orientation. International Journal of Business and Social
Research, 3(4).
Si, S. and Wei, F., 2012. Transformational and transactional leaderships, empowerment
climate, and innovation performance: A multilevel analysis in the Chinese
context. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(2), pp.299-320.
Skogstad, A., Hetland, J., Glasø, L. and Einarsen, S., 2014. Is avoidant leadership a root
cause of subordinate stress? Longitudinal relationships between laissez-faire leadership
and role ambiguity. Work & Stress, 28(4), pp.323-341.
Young, H.R., Glerum, D.R., Joseph, D.L. and McCord, M.A., 2021. A meta-analysis of
transactional leadership and follower performance: Double-edged effects of LMX and
empowerment. Journal of Management, 47(5), pp.1255-1280.
Žukauskas, P., Vveinhardt, J. and Andriukaitienė, R., 2018. Philosophy and paradigm of
scientific research. Management culture and corporate social responsibility, 121(13),
pp.506-518.