Jurnal 4 Fix
Jurnal 4 Fix
Article history: Psychological components of Online Customer's Shopping Experience (OCSE) on attitude loyalty and
online impulsive buying in e-commerce. The research approach used is quantitative. The population
Received 09 August 2023 was all Indonesian people who used and bought e-commerce products. The sample was determined
Received in rev. form 08 Sept. 2023 using a non-probability sampling method with a convenience sampling technique. The number of
Accepted 12 September 2023 samples is 470 respondents. Research data were analyzed using AMOS 24 software with Structural
Equation Model (SEM) modeling. The results of SEM analysis showed that informativeness has a
positive and significant effect on online impulsive buying, convenience has a positive and significant
Keywords: impact on online impulsive buying and attitude loyalty, and attitude loyalty has a positive and
significant impact on online impulsive buying.
Online Customers Shopping
Experience, Online Impulsive Buying,
E-Commerce. © 2023 by the authors. Licensee SSBFNET, Istanbul, Turkey. This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
JEL Classification:
M3
Introduction
This research aims to explain the positive influence of functionality and technology, which has become an inseparable part of human
life. Kemp (2022) shows Datareportal Digital report that out of 277.7 million people in Indonesia, 204.7 million are Internet
technology users. Technology plays a role in increasing the economic saturation of buying and selling in Indonesia. The adoption of
digital technology in the economy is driven by a shift from traditional or offline buying and selling transactions to online buying and
selling transactions. The transformative power of this technology has changed people's behavior, which has led to the expansion of
the digital economy industry. This behavior change was further strengthened by the emergence of Covid-19 in Indonesia.
On the other side, the Economy SEA (2022) shows gross merchandise value (GMV) data for the value of Indonesia's digital economy
of $77 billion. The most considerable GMV value is in the e-commerce sector, which reached US$ 59 billion. This increase of 22%
from the previous year, valued at $48 billion, is predicted to reach $146 billion by 2025. The significant boost with a considerable
transaction value on GMV indicates that the growth of e-commerce in Indonesia is speedy, in line with consumers' high online
shopping styles.
Meanwhile, according to the Data.ai (2023), Indonesians spend 6.6 billion hours accessing online shopping applications. So, it's not
surprising that Indonesia is listed as the country with the highest number of users of e-commerce services in the world (Kemp, 2021).
Therefore, companies must identify and analyze the factors that create consumer loyalty attitudes that can impact buying behavior,
including online impulsive buying behavior.
Online impulsive buying is the purchase of a product or service that occurs without the formation of intention because the consumer
experiences a sudden urge (Anas et al, 2022). Gulfraz et al (2022) research revealed several variables that could affect impulsive
buying online, including online customer shopping experience (OCSE) and the attitude of customer loyalty towards e-commerce.
Online impulsive buying can be influenced by various variables, including functional dimensions of OCSE (Gulfraz et al, 2022; Zhao
et al, 2022; Wu et al, 2016), psychological dimensions of OCSE (Wu et al, 2016; Darmawan & Gatheru, 2021; Bao & Yang, 2022;
Um et al, 2023; Pereira et al, 2022; Gulfraz et al, 2022) and attitude loyalty (Srivastava & Kaul, 2016; Gulfraz et al, 2022; Li et al,
2023). However, different studies state that product informativeness is part of the functional dimension on online shopping sites and
does not significantly influence consumer attitudes (Anshu et al, 2022), as well as shopping enjoyment, online shopping site quality,
and product informativeness part of the functional and psychological dimensions e-commerce cannot influence the occurrence of
online impulsive buying (Febrilia & Warokka, 2021).
The difference in the results of this study is interesting for further research with the most popular e-commerce objects with the most
significant number of users in Indonesia, namely Shopee and Tokopedia. The research results can support previous research or will
instead follow the research results by Febrilia & Warokka (2021).
In addition, this study will also reveal the role of attitude loyalty, which is not only used as a variable influence on impulsive buying
but also plays a vital role as a mediator variable for the influence of OCSE functional and psychological dimensions on impulsive
buying.
Literature Review
Online Impulsive Buying
Online impulsive buying is purchases made by consumers without thinking logically because, at that time, consumers were only
carried away by emotions about a product (Darmawan & Gatheru, 2021). The sophistication of features in online shopping platforms
easily tempts consumer behavior because of its practicality so that it can increase online impulsive buying (Aragoncillo & Orus,
2018).
According to Pereira et al (2023), online impulsive buying can be classified by several indicators, namely often buying things
spontaneously, sometimes being unable to resist the feeling of wanting to buy something online, sometimes feeling guilty after buying
something online, finding it difficult to miss online offers, it is easy to be tempted when you see online products to make transactions,
and sometimes buy things online just because you like buying things, not because you need them.
Informativeness shows the ability of a website to provide helpful information until customer decision-making occurs (Gulfraz et al,
2022). Meanwhile, according to Urdea & Constantin (2021) informativeness is a characteristic of online stores that refers to
information content that supports customer buying activities in e-commerce. Informativeness when shopping online can be measured
through 4 indicators: much information about product features and quality, accurate product information, detailed product
information, and sufficient information until the transaction is completed (Gulfraz et al, 2022).
Meanwhile, Martinez & Casielles (2021) explained that visual engagement is an important trick to attract consumers' attention to
websites that have been designed in a structured manner to support smooth access to sites that are easy to understand and enhance
customer emotional experiences. In addition, according to him, using website colors correctly can provoke a more significant
psychological and emotional response for customers. Indicators that can analyze visual engagement include viewing online products
from various angles when shopping; e-commerce screen designs such as colors, boxes, menus, and navigation tools aligned; and e-
commerce visuals designed professionally and well displayed (Gulfraz et al, 2022).
Trust is a primary element that can minimize risk perception and uncertainty (Bao & Yang, 2022). According to him, trust cannot be
built in the minds of consumers because consumers cannot touch, feel, or try products before buying, so it is difficult to reach a
purchasing decision. Customers who trust e-commerce platforms and find purchasing procedures more convenient and enjoyable
57
Nabela and Albari, International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science 12(6) (2023), 56-65
tend to spend more time accessing e-commerce, which can lead to more impulsive buying decisions (Gulfraz et al, 2022). Trust can
be measured by adopting three leading indicators: benevolence, competence, and integrity (Wu et al, 2016).
Convenience is the ability to access something without hassle (Anshu et al, 2022). Meanwhile, according to Gulfraz et al (2022),
convenience is an aspect that frees consumers to make purchases without geographic or short time restrictions. In addition, according
to Anas et al (2022), shopping convenience is defined as a multidimensional construct that includes decision-making, access to stores,
product search transactions, and the convenience created after purchase. Based on Pereira et al (2023), the convenience variable can
be measured through several indicators of convenience, safe payment methods, and reasonable prices.
Attitude Loyalty
Attitude loyalty is defined as a customer's strong commitment to rebuy their favorite products or services consistently in the future
without any elements of encouragement from competitive marketing and situational influences (Valino et al, 2021). Attitudinal
loyalty is a psychological and emotional feeling related to loyalty, which reflects a special relationship between customers and
product providers (Hermantoro & Albari, 2022). Meanwhile, Martinez & Casielles (2021) explained that attitudinal loyalty is the
desire of consumers to remain connected with companies that sell products or services without thinking about price so they can
recommend them to others. Based on Valino et al (2021), customer loyalty toward e-commerce can be measured through several
indicators including customers preferring their favorite shopping sites over competitors, customers continuing to make purchases on
their favorite sites, and customers recommending their favorite shopping sites to others.
Informativeness presented by e-commerce and supported by good visual design elements can shape customer loyalty attitudes that
can increase sales and profitability of online businesses (Urdea & Constantin, 2021). This opinion aligns with the results of Pandey
& Chawla's (2018) research, which proves that informativeness positively and significantly affects e-commerce customer loyalty in
India. So, the research hypothesis proposed is:
H2a. Informativeness has a positive effect on attitude loyalty
In addition, attitude loyalty can also be influenced by visual engagement. The research results by Martinez & Casielles (2021) suggest
that visual engagement positively affects the loyalty of e-commerce consumers. Likewise, the research results from Pandey & Chawla
(2018), so the research hypothesis is set as follows:
Gulfraz et al (2022) and Wu et al (2016) 's research results prove that trust positively affects online impulsive buying. This aligns
with research conducted by Darmawan & Gatheru (2021), which suggests that trust positively affects impulsive buying in e-
commerce Shopee. In addition, it is also supported by the research results of Bao & Yang (2022), which state that trust is proven to
positively and significantly influence impulsive purchases, where the higher the level of customer trust in e-commerce, the higher
the level of impulsive buying behavior. With that, the researcher determines the following hypothesis:
58
Nabela and Albari, International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science 12(6) (2023), 56-65
Based on the theoretical studies and hypotheses above, the researchers formed the research framework shown in Figure 1, which
consists of several variables: functional dimensions of OCSE (informativeness visual engagement), the psychological dimensions of
OCSE (trust and convenience), attitude loyalty, and online impulsive buying.
In determining the sample, the authors used non-probability sampling methods and convenience sampling techniques to draw samples
by chance from the existing population according to the needs of researchers by filling out a questionnaire on Google Forms.
The questionnaire contains variable indicators obtained from studies that have been modified by Pereira et al (2023), Gulfraz et al
(2022), Wu et al (2016), and Valino et al (2021) consisting of 4 informativeness items, three visual engagement items, three trust
statements, four convenience items, three attitude loyalty statements, and 6 statement items from online impulsive buying,
The number of respondents involved in this study was 470 people. This figure has been calculated by fulfilling the criteria of Hair et
al (2018) regarding using the analysis tool Structural Equation Model (SEM). The research data obtained were analyzed using AMOS
24 software with SEM modeling. All data is also processed based on goodness of fit (GOF) criteria to get a good model.
59
Nabela and Albari, International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science 12(6) (2023), 56-65
Before the data analysis process, the data tested the validity and reliability of each variable. The test results are shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Validity Test, Reliability, and Mean
Get a lot of information about product features and quality when shopping online. 0.787 4,145
Get accurate information about product features when shopping online. 0.956 4,049
Can see products from various sides when shopping online 0.538 3,987
The design of the e-commerce display is continuous with each other. 0.786 4,062
e-commerce visuals are professionally designed and well presented. 0.759 4,179
Online shopping sites can help meet my needs well. 0.628 4,321
Online shopping sites provide detailed product information services. 0.815 3,928
Online shopping sites are honest and trustworthy in serving consumers. 0.671 3,585
Prices for online goods in e-commerce tend to be reasonable compared to offline prices. 0.614 4,421
Prefer favorite e-commerce over competitors even though they get recommendations from friends. 0.716 3,977
Sometimes can’t resist the feeling of wanting to buy something online. 0.719 3,840
It's easy to be tempted when you see online products and make transactions 0.581 4,040
Sometimes buying things just because you like buying stuff, not because you need it. 0.703 3,717
Table 1 shows that the informativeness, visual engagement, trust, convenience, attitude loyalty, and online impulsive buying variable
indicators produce a loading factor value greater than 0.5 and a construct reliability value greater than 0.7. Therefore, all indicators
and variables used in this study are valid and reliable so that they can be used for further analysis.
Table 1 also shows the average of different indicators. The convenience variable has the highest average value of 4.393, and the trust
variable has the lowest value of 3.945.
Following analysis, convert the path diagram into structural equations according to the model for each variable, as shown in Figure
2 below:
60
Nabela and Albari, International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science 12(6) (2023), 56-65
Figure 2 shows the calculation of goodness of fit with the CMIN/DF index of 1.491 < 2.00, the RMSEA value is 0.032 < 0.08, the
GFI value is 0.946 ≥ 0.90, the AGFI value is 0.929 ≥ 0.90, the TLI value is 0.970 ≥ 0. 90, and the NFI value is 0.927 ≥ 0.90. All tests
have met the criteria. Therefore, the model is declared a good fit so that it can be accepted and is suitable for further testing, namely
hypothesis testing. The results of hypothesis testing are listed in Table 2.
Estimates SE CR P Ket.
IB <--- INF .210 .074 2,826 005 H1a Significant
IB <--- VE .104 .064 1618 .106 H1b Insignificant
AL <--- INF 012 080 .149 .882 H2a Insignificant
AL <--- VE .098 .069 1,417 .156 H2b Insignificant
IB <--- TR -.184 .157 -1,168 .243 H3a Insignificant
IB <--- CONV .249 .120 2078 038 H3b Significant
AL <--- TR .449 .169 2,650 008 H4a Significant
AL <--- CONV .336 .130 2,593 010 H4b Significant
IB <--- AL .243 062 3,944 *** H5 Significant
Based on Table 2, which has been presented, it can be explained that of the 9 hypothesis tests, 5 hypotheses are supported, and four
hypotheses are not supported. The hypothesis is supported significantly by having a probability value of less than 0.005 and a CR
value greater than 1.96. The hypothesis is not supported significantly because the probability value is more significant than 0.005,
and the CR critical ratio value is less than 1.96. The results of the hypothesis H1a can be stated that informativeness has a positive
and significant effect on online impulsive buying, H1b is proven that visual engagement has a positive but not significant impact on
online impulsive buying, H2a informativeness has a positive effect on attitude loyalty but not significant, H2b visual engagement
has a positive but not significant impact on attitude loyalty,
Discussion
Effect of Informativeness on Online Impulsive Buying
The first finding on H1a proves that the informativeness variable positively and significantly influences online impulsive buying.
The results of this study agree with Gulfraz et al (2022), which state that informative variables can significantly influence online
impulsive buying on e-commerce platforms. Also supported is research by Wu et al (2016), who argued that informativeness in e-
commerce influences online impulsive buying.
Therefore, based on the research that has been done, e-commerce must present a lot of information related to product features and
quality accurately and in detail to bring customers to reach transactions.
61
Nabela and Albari, International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science 12(6) (2023), 56-65
The findings of the H1b study show that visual engagement has a positive but insignificant effect on online impulsive buying. This
supports the research of Febrilia & Warokka (2021) and Anshu et al (2022), which became a gap in this study; that is, there was no
effect found between visual engagement and customer behavior in making shopping decisions, including online impulsive buying
behavior decisions in e-commerce. Thus, the results of this study contradict research by Zhao et al (2022), who found that visual
engagement on sites has a positive and significant relationship with online impulsive buying among college students.
The results of the H2b hypothesis reveal that visual engagement has a positive but insignificant effect on attitude loyalty, so the
hypothesis is rejected. The results of this test are supported by research by Winnie (2014), whose findings implicitly reveal that
website design and content negatively affect customer loyalty. In this study, to form attitudinal loyalty, consumers in Indonesia may
not need visual engagement, but some other variables that need to be considered by companies, such as trust and convenience.
With that, e-commerce needs to maintain and improve systems or features in e-commerce as well as services related to customer
needs to create a positive shopping experience in customers' minds to form convenience that can increase the impact on repeat
purchases.
Effect of Trust on Attitude Loyalty
The results of study H4a indicate that trust has a positive and significant effect on attitude loyalty. This is consistent with the research
by Hong & Cho (2011) and Ashraf et al (2019) which demonstrates that positive trust can influence customer loyalty attitudes. It
was also revealed in the study by Gulfraz et al (2022) that customers who strongly trust the e-commerce platform tend to show a
positive attitude toward the platform.
Customer loyalty towards e-commerce can be built through trust by helping to meet customer needs, providing detailed and precise
product information services, and serving customers honestly; this can increase customer satisfaction and impact future purchases.
Effect of Convenience on Attitude Loyalty
The results of the H4b test suggest that convenience has a positive and significant effect on attitude loyalty. In line with research by
Erigit & Fan's study (2021) and Pandey & Chawla (2018), which states that convenience related to the use of e-commerce has a
positive effect on the loyalty behavior of men and women when shopping on e-commerce. Convenience can be one aspect of the
customer experience that can influence customer loyalty.
That way, e-commerce needs to pay attention to aspects that can create customer convenience, such as smooth access, ease of
payment, reasonable prices, and others, thus enhancing loyalty attitudes.
The last hypothesis, H5, proves that attitude loyalty positively and significantly affects online impulsive buying. Supported by the
research of Hong & Cho (2011), attitude loyalty can be a significant predictor of online buying behavior. In addition, this is consistent
with the study of Srivastava & Kaul (2016) that the functional and psychological components of OCSE indirectly influence online
impulsive purchases, which are mediated by customer attitude loyalty. This is also consistent with the results of research by Gulfraz
et al (2022) and Li et al (2023), that attitude loyalty positively affects impulsive buying behavior.
62
Nabela and Albari, International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science 12(6) (2023), 56-65
Attitude loyalty can be interpreted as a customer's commitment to consistently re-purchase his favorite products or services without
thinking about the price and most likely to be able to recommend them to others. This indicates that the higher the attitude of consumer
loyalty, the higher the impulsive buying behavior of customers in e-commerce Shopee and Tokopedia. Therefore, e-commerce needs
to pay attention to creating positive experiences in the minds of consumers while shopping by emphasizing e-commerce facilities
from various aspects to build consumer loyalty and impact increasing buying and selling transactions.
With this explanation, it is possible to calculate the effect of exogenous and endogenous variables both totally, directly, and indirectly.
The recapitulation of the calculation results is shown in Table 3.
Table 3: Effect of Exogenous Variables on Endogenous Variables
Based on Table 3 above, it is known that the total influence of variables is from direct and indirect impacts. The informativeness
variable on the online impulsive buying variable has the same total effect as the direct influence value of 0.160 (16%). Then, the trust
variable directly impacts attitude loyalty by 0.363 (36.3%); this value is the same as the total effect.
Meanwhile, the trust variable for online impulsive buying indirectly affects 0.101 (10.1%). The convenience variable on attitude
loyalty produces a total effect with the same direct value of 0.267 (26.7%). Then, the total effect of the convenience variable on
online impulsive buying is 0.209 (20.9%), with a direct effect of 0.135 (13.5%) and an indirect effect value of 0.074 (7.4%). Last,
the attitude loyalty variable's direct positive effect on online impulsive buying is 0.277 (27.7%).
Overall, attitude loyalty in this study shows a very important role in the influence of trust on online impulsive buying but does not
show a dominant role in influencing informativeness and conveniences in shaping online impulsive buying. This can be seen from
the indirect effect of these variables on online impulsive buying.
Conclusions
The results of this study indicate that out of all nine hypotheses put forward, five hypotheses prove significant, namely H1a
informativeness has a positive effect on online impulsive buying, H3b and H4b convenience has a positive impact on online impulsive
buying and attitude loyalty, H4a trust has a positive effect on attitude loyalty, and H5 attitude loyalty has a positive impact on online
impulsive buying. In comparison, the other four hypotheses are stated to be insignificant.
The researcher suggests that the sample criteria be more specific for further research so that the sample that can fill out the
questionnaire is selected. The researcher can also expand the sample so that the characteristics of the respondents will be more
diverse. The data obtained will be more varied, thus enabling the research model to be more tested.
This research also provides managerial implications for Shopee and Tokopedia Indonesia e-commerce activists to shape e-commerce
customer loyalty attitudes by increasing aspects of functional and psychological dimensions to influence shopping behavior. To
achieve aspects of practical and psychological dimensions, it can improve customer experience through increased transparency of
complete and accurate information regarding products or services, prices, and payment channels to create trust and convenience in
e-commerce. This is undoubtedly the company's strategy to survive and compete in the digital transformation era.
Acknowledgments
Thanks to the Master of Management Study Program at the Islamic University of Indonesia, Yogyakarta, which has supported the author in
researching and publishing this article. We also thank the lecturers who have supported this research by providing ideas and directions for the
perfection of the study, all respondents who were happy to answer all the questionnaires so that this research was successful, and all participants who
contributed so that this research could run successfully. Thank you so much.
All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, H.R.N., A.A; methodology, H.R.N.; validation, H.R.N., A.A.; formal analysis, H.R.N., A.A.;
investigation, H.R.N.; resources, H.R.N.; writing—original draft preparation, H.R.N.; writing—review and editing, H.R.N., A.A.
Funding: This research was funded by H.R.N.
Informed Consent Statement: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement: The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly
available due to restrictions.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
63
Nabela and Albari, International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science 12(6) (2023), 56-65
References
Anas, M., Naved, M. K., & Rahman, O. (2022). Why Consumers Behaved Impulsively During Covid-19 Pandemic?. South Asian
Journal of Marketing, 3(1), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJM-03-2021-0040
Anshu, K., Gaur, L., & Singh, G. (2022). Impact of Customer Experience on Attitude and Repurchase Intention In Online Grocery
Retailing: A Moderation Mechanism of Value Co-creation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 64(1), 102798.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102798
Aragoncillo, L. & Orus, C. (2018) Impulse Buying Behaviour: An Online-Offline Comparative and The Impact of Social Media.
Spanish Journal of Marketing, 22(1), 42-62. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-03-2018-007
Ashraf, N., Faisal, C. M. N., Jabbar, S., & Habib, M. A. (2019). The Role of Website Design Artifact on Consumer Attitude and
Behavioral Intentions in Online Shopping. Technical Journal, 24(2), 50-60. https://tj.uettaxila.edu.pk/index.php/technical-
journal/article/view/926/82 (accessed February 23, 2023).
Bao, Z. & Yang, J. (2022). Why Online Consumers Have The Urge To Buy Impulsively: Roles Of Serendipity, Trust and Flow
Experience. Management Decision, 60(12), 3350-3365. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2021-0900
Barbu, C. M., Florea, D. L., Dabija, D. C. & Barbu, M. C. R. (2021) Customer Experience in Fintech. Journal of Theoretical and
Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(5), 1415–1433. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16050080
Bhattacharya, A., Srivastava, M. & Verma, S. (2018). Customer Experience in Online Shopping: A Structural Modeling Approach.
Journal of Global Marketing, 32(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2018.1441938
Darmawan, D. & Gatheru, J. (2021). Understanding Impulsive Buying Behavior in Marketplace. Journal of Social Science Studies,
1(1), 11-18. DOI: 10.56348/jos3.v1i1.2
Data.ai. (2023). State of Mobile 2023. https://www.data.ai/en/go/state-of-mobile-2023/ (accessed February 23, 2023).
Economy SEA . (2022). Through the waves, towards, a sea of opportunity. Google, Temasek, Bain & Company.
https://economysea.withgoogle.com/report/ (accessed February 23, 2023).
Eryigit, C. & Fan, Y. (2021). The Effects of Convenience and Risk on E-Loyalty through the Mediating Role of E-Service Quality:
A Comparison for China and Turkey. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 33(13), 1-15.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2021.1879704
Febrilia, I., & Warokka, A. (2021). Consumer Traits and Situational Factors: Exploring The Consumer’s Online Impulse Buying In
The Pandemic Time. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 4(1), 100182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100182
Gulfraz, M. B., Sufyan, M., Mustak, M., Salminem, J., & Srivastava, D. K. (2022). Understanding The Impact ff Online Customers’
Shopping Experience on Online Impulsive Buying: A Study on Two Leading E-Commerce Platforms. Journal of Retailing
and Consumer Services, 68(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103000
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Anderson, R. E., & Babin, B.J. (2018). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). United States: Cengage
Learning.
Hermantoro, M., & Albari (2022). E-Servicescape Analysis and its Effect on Perceived Value and Loyalty on E-Commerce Online
Shopping Sites in Yogyakarta. International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy, 4(4), 39-49.
https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v4i4.354
Hong, I. B. & Cho, H. (2011). The Impact of Consumer Trust on Attitudinal Loyalty and Purchase Intentions in B2C E-Marketplaces:
Intermediary Trust Vs. Seller Trust. International Journal of Information Management, 31(5), 469-479.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.02.001
Kemp, S. (2022). Digital 2022: Indonesia - The Essential Guide to The Latest Connected Behaviours. We are social & Kepios.
https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2022-indonesia (accessed February 20, 2023).
Kemp, S. (2021). Digital 2021: The Latest Insights Into The State of Digital. We Are Social & Hootsuite.
https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2021/01/digital-2021-the-latest-insights-into-the-state-of-digital/ (accessed February 20,
2023).
Klaus, P. (2013). The Case of Amazon.Com: Towards A Conceptual Framework of Online Customer Services Experience (OCSE)
Using The Emerging Consensus Techniques (ECT). The Journal of Services Marketing, 27(6), 443-457.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-02-2012-0030
Li, S., Suhari, U., Shidiqqi, M. F., Aras, M. & Mani, La. (2023). The Role of Celebrity Endorsement on Impulse Buying Behavior
with Customer Loyalty as a Moderating in the E-Commerce Industry. Business Economic, Communication, and Social
Sciences Journal, 5(1), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.21512/becossjournal.v5i1.9076
Martinez, S. C. & Casielles, R. V. (2021). Building Consumer Loyalty Through E-Shopping Experiences: The Mediating Role of
Emotions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 60, 102481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102481
Pandey, S. & Chawla, D. (2018). Online Customer Experience (OCE) in clothing e-retail-Exploring OCE dimensions and their impact
on satisfaction and loyalty – Does gender matter?. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 46(3), 323-
346. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-01-2017-0005
Pereira, M. L., Petroll, M. D. L. M., Soares, J. C., Matos, C. A. D., & Hernani-Merino, M. (2023). Impulse buying behaviour in
omnichannel retail: An approach through the stimulus-organism-response theory. International Journal of Retail &
Distribution Management, 51(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-09-2021-0394
64
Nabela and Albari, International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science 12(6) (2023), 56-65
Srivastava, M. & Kaul, D. (2016). Exploring The Link Between Customer Experience-Loyalty-Consumer Spend. Journal of Retailing
and Customer Services, 31, 277-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.04.009
Tandon, U., Kiran, R. & Sah, A. (2017). Analyzing Customer Satisfaction: Users Perspective Towards Online Shopping. Nankai
Business Review International, 8(3), 266-288. DOI https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-04-2016-0012
Um, T., Chung, N., & Stienmetz, J. (2023). Factors affecting consumers’ impulsive buying behavior in tourism mobile commerce
using SEM and fsQCA. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 29(2), 256-274. https://doi.org/10.1177/13567667221090991
Urdea, A. M. & Constantin, C. P. (2021). Exploring The Impact of Customer Experience on Customer Loyalty in e-Commerce.
Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 15(1), 672-682. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2021-
0063
Valino, P. C., Rodriguez, P. G. & Valle, C. L. (2021). Sustainable Management of Sports Federations: The Indirect Effects of
Perceived Service on Member’s Loyalty. Sustainability, 13(2), 458. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020458
Winnie, P. M. W. (2014). The Effects of Website Quality on Customer E-loyalty: The Mediating Effects Trustworthiness.
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(3), 19-41.
http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v4-i3/670
Wu, I. L., Chen, K. W. & Chiu, M. L. (2016). Defining Key Drivers of Online Impulse Puchasing: A Perspective of Both Impulse
Shoppers and System Users. International Journal of Information Management, 36(), 284-296.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.11.015
Zhao, Y., Li, Y., Wang, N., Zhou, R., & Luo, X. R. (2022). A meta-Analysis of Online Impulsive Buying and the Moderating Effect
of Economic Development Level. Information Systems Frontiers, 24, 1667-1688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-
10170-4
Publisher’s Note: SSBFNET stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee SSBFNET, Istanbul, Turkey. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478) by SSBFNET is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License.
65