Scribd
Upload
13 views1 page

DSM 596 Peer Evaluation

The document is a peer evaluation form for a final project, where team members assess each other's contributions and progress. Each member can receive a maximum of 20 points, with specific notes provided for two evaluated members, Kalinda Xiao and Jiaqian Wang, both receiving full points. The evaluator, Xinyue Hu, scored herself 19 out of 20, indicating a strong performance overall.

Uploaded by

yukihxy7
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
13 views1 page

DSM 596 Peer Evaluation

The document is a peer evaluation form for a final project, where team members assess each other's contributions and progress. Each member can receive a maximum of 20 points, with specific notes provided for two evaluated members, Kalinda Xiao and Jiaqian Wang, both receiving full points. The evaluator, Xinyue Hu, scored herself 19 out of 20, indicating a strong performance overall.

Uploaded by

yukihxy7
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Final Project Peer Evaluation Form

Please evaluate all members of your team based on their contributions to the final project and the progress you’ve seen
them make over the semester. Each person may be allocated a maximum of 20 points.

Name: ____________Xinyue Hu____________________ Group # ____4_____

Date: ____07/05/2025__________ Group Name:


_____________________________________________

Team Member 1: ___________Kalinda Xiao__________________________________


(Full Name)
Total Points: ___20___ /20

Notes:
I think Kalinda does a great job of blending her personal interests with her professional focus in exploring the gaming
industry. It was interesting for me to learn about a field I hadn’t previously been familiar with.

Team Member 2: ___________Jiaqian Wang__________________________________


(Full Name)
Total Points: __20____ /20

Notes:
Jiaqian has effectively aligned her work with the goals of her current internship. The LinkedIn campaign is well-timed
and relevant to both the medical school and her project team.

Team Member 3: _____________________________________________


(Full Name)
Total Points: ______ /20

Notes:

Team Member 4: _____________________________________________


(Full Name)
Total Points: ______ /20

Notes:

Yourself: _____________Xinyue Hu________________________________


(Full Name)
Total Points: ___19___ /20

Notes:

You might also like