0 ratings 0% found this document useful (0 votes) 24 views 50 pages Modern 2
The document discusses the challenges and innovations in the construction industry, highlighting issues such as system engineering responsibilities, project management, and the impact of regulatory changes. It emphasizes the low investment in research and development within the sector and the difficulties in patenting innovations. Additionally, it notes the importance of adapting innovations from other industries and the need for collaborative efforts to foster growth and efficiency in construction.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here .
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Go to previous items Go to next items
ite tel Et ess es See aussi ce aS
Peete BU is
DeenaAfter completing the two projects, the following problem was identified: “The system engineering and
Petia Corer ence ae fined d
responsibilities for alliances developing LXRP projects resulting in uncertainty, waste, and program
risk
{1-day Kaizen Event workshop was organised in June 2018, followed by some short workshops with
eee i ere tye aan
the future. AVR was the first project in which the future state was fully implemented,
«Total saving is expected to be between $5.8m and $7.1m for the total 10 work packages. Based on
different models, the result varies. For an accurate result, the SESA team used the actual cost
(Gystem Engineering System Assurance) and AOC ( Actual Outturn Cost) after the completion of each
oer
Se ue)
ROI: over 10,000%PROCESS - CURRENT STATE (FIRST TWO PROJECTS: KCR
ca oscar
Cospetonkmsane Speers
te cnt eee
SEgs9)SESA PROCESS - FUTURE STATEPEN Tel st-9
+Haz Log, including ref to evidence clearly articulated
+Haz Log progressively updated ~ at time of incident / at least onc:
+RAATM is used only for PRS requirements
+Clear roles & responsibilty using RACI
See aS se ta
IMC for Short Interval Control
Progressive assurance through extract of an Hazard Log (SF
+Focus on Unique & Novel assets + Material + Construction methods
eee eee EteASSUMPTIONS
See ae
*ABR & KCR are the baseline for the calculation
1. SESA team spent more time on KCR compare to ABR to set up intial processes and forming the team
sumed extra 30% - the frst 3 months with more management time), therefore a ratio of 1.3is applied to
ce the outcome
a e rd
3- DIV and MTM cost is based on $150 hourly rate for managers and $1;
hhours per month
4: The average cost of the SESA team on KCR and ABR was 1.168% of the AOC13
The principle of Kaizen utilising a system engineering process can
eee re Re eee ed
ener
eee eu
Core OSE ee CEU ct
as procurement, scheduling, labour management, financial and
Cee een ee ay
SOT na eon
Coc Cm eteQUESTIONS
PRES bene ao CNUs ese ee cosy
one rd
Pre ee ae ee ee en eu Lean
ca
ER eee gee eo Re gcse ep need
1 use system engineering as shown above on a single-family house operation - Why?
e eC Cee aeSOME ROOT CAUSES
The High Court decision in the case of Brookfield Multiplex Limited v The Owners
trata 61288 deemed the builder not to be responsible for economic loss sustained by
Ree mute ee eC ee me ese
eee ee CO
There is no requirement for any licence to construct a commercial (residential
must have) building in NSW over three stories
EMC ee eae Ca
architect, ensured quality and compliance to the plan and specifications
SE MMM Cente LEO
«Apprenticeships have declined over the past few decadesQUESTIONS
1.Would the NSW Construction Regulatory Transformation occur without the Opal and Masec
Towers scandals?
2.Has there been an overreaction to Opal and Mascot manfestingin unnecessary regulation and
Seep enced
cee ee Ceca!
Pete ere Eee Caen aca nebac) 3)
Sia aie eC ues Ue cC
Maegan Cree eee)
-RAATM is used only for PRS requirements
Secret eM Tm Ce
Combined PHA workshops & reports
-VMC for Short Interval Control
+Progressive assurance through extract of an Hazard Log (SRSR)
Focus on Unique & Novel assets + Material + Construction methods
abet CMU trae Eee)scarey
eee eee
ent
2.Has there been an overreaction to Opal and Mascot manifesting in unn ee
ure
3.Were there other root causes - not listed ~ that may have enabled these quality problems?
Renee ecu) Peers Tere Ce
5.Have system engineering's required effort and detail orientation been justified in the end?SLO 4 - Review the impact of the need for buildings
to be adaptable over their useful lifetimes
(Te value of Buldingse oro than USD 400tilion-Sn comparison, workwide GDP isapproximaaly USD SO rilion)
» Changing Dmograpice
Worilfebalanoe demand workers
Ccovib 19:0 bourne changorto work eutonthips conditions andstructural porting
Rapidurbansation
Cimatechangs tacts
«Aland Machine Learing (MI effects onthe workspace including securky andenery management
+ Some specialty structures, such aslearingspeces movement to onlin) and datacentre (not wired forthe new es wb
» Breakout Question: Have you witnessed a re-purposing of a building?
Can you share what you observed?IThe delivery of innovation
involves a significant
improvement in a product Unrealised jnventions
lor process
Adaptive Innovations
{Technical innovation
in the construction industry
incorporates improvements
to building materials,
lant/equipment
and/or building processes. /
Innovative inventionsBares Roo acLY: r quality of life.
Met eee tert hacer cneacne near sen ties
Perret
nase sa ea eae Cee cr cence)
Tia:
ener tee ct once nate ert
Meee eter ene torn
Groene ethic tentatcc chet ten)Construction Entrepreneurial Behaviour
Fiscal Year Ending June, 2021 - Source Australian Bureau of Statistics
(Measure [Unit of measure
usiness entrepreneurship characteristics - usually he frstin the market Percent
innovate 27)
usiness entrepreneurship characteristics - often got involved in high Percent
panied project i
usiness entrepreneurship characteristics - capacity to acquire/exploit Percent
See external to business organisation
pes entrepreneurship characteristics - initiated change such its Percent
52|
smpetitors reacted 23
puree entrepreneurship characteristics - innovation strategy a part of Percent
usiness plan 52)
usiness entrepreneurship characteristics - continually sought new aay
rtners to collaborate 1g,
usiness entrepreneurship characteristics - proactive approach to market Percent
mpetition 175,
_business entrepreneurship characteristics - None ofthe above Percent [ag10 Construction Innovation Barriers
© 1. Low percentage of net profit before tax
© The construction industry invests in research and development much ess than other parts ofthe economy.
‘This sector invests less than 0.5% of sales in research and development (R&D), while the Australian
national average is approximately 4% (Hassell eta. 2008).
© Source: Australian Stock Exchange 2022
[Construction ‘Technol ‘Medical
Global Construction ‘OFX. Ansell
8.1% 21.0% 35.19%
Lendlease ‘Technology One Sonic Healtheare
64% 21.29% 12%
‘Simonds Group Telstra Zenitas
059%
7%
6%3. Low market share for industry leaders
‘The largest construction companies in Australia do not dominate the market. For example,
CIMIC's market share of 2.0%, whereas BBPHA I Pty Ltd has approximately 1.0%, and
Lendlease is less than 1.0% (IBISWorld 2022).
4, Extreme and nimble competition
Construction continues to be the industry with the largest number of businesses in Australia
in FYE 2023 and accounts for approximately 16% or 499,00 of all businesses. Additionally,
new entrants, which appear to be more aggressive in pricing and promises to customers,
numbered most (6.1%) of the nine major industries (ABS 2023).
Construction is sometimes referred to as a “cottage” industry; 98.5% of construction firms
employ less than 20 people, and only 0.1% of firms have workforces of 200 or more (ABS
2022). These small competitors are far more flexible in meeting customer needs and
addressing their wants.'5. The “intersectionality" problem of construction
(Classifying construction businesses as homogenous is problematic. Each business’ operation’
ficantly affected by its characteristics. A simple categorising may include: a) trade
focus, b) project type, c) region(s) operating in, d) client types, e) contract type(s) working,
under, f) publicly or privately owned, g) amount and type of technology used, h) number of,
‘employees, i) accounting basis and j) management culture. Since there are multiple choices
for each of these nine areas, itis clear that over 3.6 million (10 factorial) combinations are)
ipossible. However, there are 499,000 built environment firms in Australia (ABS 2024);
therefore, few organisations are similar
Most innovations cannot be economically feasible for the inventor if they appeal to only a
few customers ic. if there are few buyers of a construction-specific innovation-its high cost
land time investment cannot be formally justified. Projects are also dissimilar, making
‘possible targets less in number.7. The construction industry has problematic employment dynamics
‘The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS 2021) documents that 37% of worker services are
secured by contract, whereas the next highest — administrative and support services - is
slightly over 20%. This seems to indicate that there is little incentive to make employees
‘more productive since they are on contract for a fixed hourly rate, lumpsum outcome or a
fee per piece, and thus, there is less need to create or adopt innovation to make them more
productive. Similarly, independent contractors have little incentive to invest in large-scale
and risky innovation since these arrangements represent employment, not a business
‘opportunity.
‘The Australian government labour statistics show that between 1991 and 2019,
involuntary employment separation (Lost Last Job) ranged from 76% to 274% of the total
employment population (ABS 2022). This means that the knowledge of a specific
innovation may travel with a departing employee, thus disincentivising the creation of a
unique task methodology and training to facilitate mastery.Location,
Funding
Client Type
Construction Process
eee
‘Number and Type General
Factors
Residential. Commercial,
Industral, Institutional, Civil
Marine, and Infrastructure.
Urban, Suburban, and Rural
Public, Public or PPP
Government (Federal, State. And
Local), Corporate (Local or
International), or Individual.
New Construction, Remodeling,
Rehabilitation, or Replacement8. A service such as construction is difficult to patent
Nagy (2013) notes the difficulty of patenting services and protecting the inventor's
intellectual property rights. It is partially due to its intangible nature. In Australia, patents
are strong protection for unique tangible products for a legally prescribed 20-year period.
However, this can be a protracted and challenging process that is a high risk to the creator
of patents. Research by London and Siva (2013) indicates the challenges for those in the
construction industry to create and protect their patents. The Australian system affords few
rights to the creator of patents and little protection with the onus solely with the creator.
Coupled with this, it is not easy to patent a process, construction or otherwise, and protect
it from duplication by competitors. The US Supreme Court confirmed this in the Alice
decision (2014) about business methods. In preserving a method as intellectual property, it
is difficult to prove where the employee's expertise and experience (current or former) stops
and the organisational, institutional knowledge rights start.Average utilised to minimise COVID disruption effets. *laciodes ICT Software **Valuation of products les ost
to produce -expresed in uent pries in millions AUD
Tadusty | Revenue | Valueof | tatellecual | Value | ValueAdded/ | 1PVabe
Intellestoal | Property’ Reveane | Added
Revense | Added**
Propety*
Apicukure, | siz0sa | sss osm | ssa 09%
Forestry and
Fihang
‘Constrstion | $259,030 sissast | 284% 3%
Manufsctorng | S724 [Sasi si6o8 | 259%
Mining, O@ | S392966 | $1,009 osm | sow | com
GasIs “Innovator”
Your New
Career Path?
ere tT
ns
SST
eneInnovators are
Made not Born -
MuutDebhul1eb Kee
fobs bebeloy isle ebelet}
pte ey =r ce
Itis More Science
Buetlee tad
the cost of a NASA launch (SpaceX) or thetime it
‘takes to travel from San Francisco to os Angeles
(he Boring Company)cay
Ceri Creamed
prone) pee
een
Launch Pad Process Map «r2)coe
Cerny
ooo
eee
Bvatras
Corr
Proposton
peter
od
ree
odDanae
sbabeleyiccin(oyel
Client Related Factors
« Client Requirements
« Improving Project
Performance
«© Approach of the Project
Team
« Project Complexity
+ Project Related Factors
«= Improving Firm
Performance
«© Corporate Social
Responsibility
+ Leadership
« Innovation Policy,
Industry Related Factors
= Competition Level
© Regulations and
Legisiations
» Technology/Design
Trends
« Environmental
Sustainability
+ Reward SchemesInnovation Spillover
RIO NU Te ean eae
Petra RS eT
PaO ORE See ONT
Pa RC EN
oO VIREO UT Oat)
pee E Lae
ONSET TTD
INDUSTRIAL CLUSTERS GAIN BENEFITS FROM.
BNO on Range nd
(canto 2017)Construction Industry 2022 - Survey
digital skis or capabilities - Decreased since last year Percent
45
ICT/digital skills or capabilities - Stayed the same since last year. Percent.
24
ICT/digital skills or capabilities - increased since last year Percent
aq
iCal skis or capabilities - Not applicable Percent
eg
se of digital technologies - Decreased since last year Percent od
Use of digital technologies - Stayed the same as last year_ Percent. -
8 of digital technologies - Increased since last year Percent
bs of cigtatchnologies-Not apple
pecentSummary and Conclusions
» Construction is a resource-poor industry - especially net profit
margins and innovation lab facilities - for innovation.
» There are many risk factors that make greenfield innovation a
hazard
© However, adapting other industries’ innovations to construction is
more effacious.
» Hackathons and incubators sponsored by government,
universities, and industry appear to be the logical next stepIThe delivery of innovation
involves a significant
improvement in a product
lor process
Adaptive
[Technical innovation
in the construction industry
incorporates improvements
to building materials,
[plant/equipment
Jand/or building processes.
Innovations
Unrealised jnventions|
Innovative inventionseet rabcusomoc ela
rganisations and for the industry as a whole
Cire ieee etieeatiat Mean
Ee nomic and environmental factors are driving the ne5. The “intersectionality" problem of construction
Classifying construction businesses as homogenous is problematic. Each business!
operation is significantly affected by its characteristics. A simple categorising may
include:
a) trade focus, Since there are multiple choices for each of these
b) project type, nine areas, it is clear that over 3.6 million (10
c) region(s) operating in, factorial) combinations are possible. However,
d) client types, there are 499,000 built environment firms in
e) contract type(s) working under, Australia (ABS 2024); therefore, few organise
f) publicly or privately owned, are similar
g) amount and type of technology used, Most innovations cannot be economically feait
h) number of employees, for the inventor if they appeal to only a few
accounting basis and customers i.e. if there are few buyers of a
i) management culture, construction-specific innovation-its high cost and
time investment cannot be formally justified.
Projects are also dissimilar, making possib
targets lass in number.5 continued
yracteristic jumber Number and Type General
Factors
Use Type SCS ——SSSCRsideniial. Commercial,
Industral, Institutional, Civil,
Marine, and Infrastructure.
Location Urban, Suburban, and Rural
Funding Public, Public or PPP
Client Type 3 Government (Federal, State. And
Local), Corporate (Local or
International), or Individual.
Construction Process 4 New Construction, Remodeling,
Rehabilitation, or Replacement6. The industry is precarious
The construction industry has a high failure rate when compared to other
sectors. Recent data from the ABS (2021) reported 14.0% of the companies that
started 2021 exited by the end of the year. The Australian Tax Office (ATO)
latest filings report that 78% of Business Owning Households hold some form of
debt. Additionally, 54% of Australian companies declared a loss and thus paid
no taxes. This appears to point to a financially meagre environment with little
means to pay for innovation. It seems to justify an aversion to speculative
investment, which characterises research and development. Further
demonstrating risk, a bankruptcy study sponsored by Australia's Construction
Forestry Maritime Mining Energy Union (CFMEU 2014) concluded that the
construction industry outscored all other industries for each deficiency category
above $500,000.7. The construction industry has problematic employment dynamics
‘The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS 2021) documents that 37% of worker services are
secured by contract, whereas the next highest - administrative and support services - is
slightly over 20%. This seems to indicate that there is little incentive to make employees more
productive since they are on contract for a fixed hourly rate, lumpsum outcome or a fee per
piece, and thus, there is less need to create or adopt innovation to make them more
productive. Similarly, independent contractors have little incentive to invest in large-scale and
risky innovation since these arrangements represent employment, not a business opportunity.
The Australian government labour statistics show that between 1991 and 2019, involuntary
‘employment separation (Lost Last Job) ranged from 76% to 274% of the total employment
population (ABS 2022). This means that the knowledge of a specific innovation may travel with
‘departing employee, thus disincentivising the creation of a
Unique task methodology and training to facilitate mastery.9, The Government is not keeping pace nor encouraging construction innovation
Western nations have robust laws governing construction activity and limiting risk
to the construction service buyer and end-user. This risk governance is core to the
role of industry regulators and appears to lag the rapid pace of invention
(oeteman-Hernandez et al. 2019).
Few proactive processes conditionally approve the early phase creation of
innovative ideas or development. Rose and Manley (2014) noted that regulatory
agencies in Australia lack clear procedures for assessing new products. Suprun
and Stewart (2015) found repeated "Regulations, public policy, and supporting
mechanisms" barriers in many countries.Average utilised to minimise COVID disruption effects. *Includes ICT Software **Valuation of products less cost
‘to produce - expressed in current prices in millions AUD.
Industry Revenue | Value of | Intellectual Value Added) | IP/Value
Intellectual | Property’ Revenme | Added
Revenue
Property*
‘Agriculture, | $120,582 sus 03% 295% 09%
Forestry and
Fishing
Construction | $259,030 | $2,000 ose | siasasi 284% 31%
Manufacturing | $447,124 | $4,811 1% | st6oos | 289% 41%
Mining, 1 | $392,966 [$1,009 03% | szsosas | 63.9% 0.4%
Gas
‘Source Goods Producing Industries. ABS 2023Is “Innovator”
Your New a's poore
Career Path? ro rere err]
Ere eeeFirst Step of Innovation
is Up To You
“Tthinkthat te rst thing sto picka good
problem Pick a probiem where you kvow yout
‘make aaiferenceifyou solve t"-Ann Marie
say,
when somebody has a breaithrough innovation
It israrelyone iti thing Its usually a whole
bunch of things tat cectively amount toa hugeEneloyment se persone £9 partons 210 parone 210 rmore persone TetClient Related Factors
Client Requirements
Pinos pnprond Elves
i Performance
Innovation peercacticd ie rite
Team
‘Project Complexity
Project Related Factors
‘Improving Firm
Performance
‘Corporate Social
Responsibility
Leadership
Innovation Policy
Industry Related Factors
‘Competition Level
Regulations and
Legislations:
Technology/Design
Trends
Environmental
Sustainability
Reward Schemes