COMPANY LAW

UNIT I: The Companies Act, 1956 – Corporate Personality and Its Kinds –
Promoters – Registration and Incorporation – MOA

The Companies Act, 1956 was one of the most comprehensive legislations enacted
in India for the regulation of companies. It governed the formation, functioning, and
dissolution of companies in the country until it was substantially replaced by the
Companies Act, 2013. Nevertheless, its principles remain foundational in
understanding the legal nature and framework of companies. At the heart of
company law lies the concept of a "company" as a legal person. This concept is
central to the idea of corporate personality. A company is considered an artificial
person created by law, having its own legal identity separate from its members. This
means the company can own property, incur debts, sue or be sued, and enter into
contracts independently of its shareholders or directors. The doctrine of separate
legal personality was firmly established in the landmark case of Salomon v. Salomon
& Co. Ltd. (1897), where the court held that a company is a separate legal entity
even if all shares are owned by a single person.

Corporate personality can be classified into different kinds. Statutory corporations

are created by special statutes, such as the Life Insurance Corporation (LIC).
Registered companies, on the other hand, are incorporated under general company
law. Registered companies are further divided into companies limited by shares,
companies limited by guarantee, and unlimited companies. Companies limited by
shares are the most common form and are used for business purposes. Private and
public companies differ in terms of membership, transferability of shares, and
statutory requirements. A private company restricts share transfer, limits the number
of members to 200, and does not invite public to subscribe to its shares. A public
company has no such restrictions and may be listed on a stock exchange.

The promoters of a company are those who conceive the idea of a business and
take the necessary steps to form a company. They undertake a range of activities
such as selecting the name, drafting legal documents, arranging capital, and
registering the company. Promoters may act individually or in groups and are
considered fiduciaries, meaning they must act honestly and disclose any personal
profits or interests in transactions. Although promoters are not agents or trustees in
the legal sense before the company is formed, they owe a duty of full disclosure to
the company and its future shareholders. Any breach of this duty may lead to legal
consequences, including restitution of secret profits.

Registration and incorporation of a company involve several legal and procedural

steps. The process begins with name approval by the Registrar of Companies
(ROC). Once the name is approved, the promoters prepare the Memorandum of
Association (MOA) and Articles of Association (AOA). Along with statutory forms and
fees, these documents are submitted to the ROC. Upon scrutiny, if the Registrar is
satisfied, the company is issued a Certificate of Incorporation, which is conclusive
proof that the company has been duly formed in accordance with the law. From this
moment, the company attains a legal personality, irrespective of any irregularities
that may have occurred during incorporation. This status enables it to enter into legal
obligations and hold rights as an independent entity.

The Memorandum of Association (MOA) is regarded as the charter of the company.

It lays down the company’s structure, objectives, and scope of operations. It is a
public document that defines the relationship of the company with the outside world.
The MOA contains several clauses: the Name Clause (which states the legal name
of the company), the Registered Office Clause (which indicates the state in which the
registered office is situated), the Object Clause (which defines the purposes for
which the company is formed), the Liability Clause (which limits the liability of
members), the Capital Clause (which mentions the authorized share capital of the
company), and the Association Clause (where subscribers declare their intention to
form a company and agree to take shares). Any act performed outside the scope of
the object clause is considered ultra vires, meaning beyond the powers of the
company, and is void and unenforceable.

In conclusion, Unit I forms the backbone of company law and provides the
foundational understanding necessary to study more complex aspects of corporate
legislation. The legal recognition of companies as distinct entities, the pivotal role of
promoters, the formal registration process, and the importance of the MOA in
defining the company’s existence and limits are all essential concepts for anyone
studying or practicing company law in India.

Great! Let’s continue with detailed and expansive paragraph-style notes for each
remaining unit from the Company Law syllabus. Here is Unit II:

---

UNIT II: Articles of Association (AOA) – Prospectus – Directors – Meetings –

Role of Company Secretary – Dividends – Corporate Ethics

The internal governance of a company is mainly dictated by its Articles of

Association (AOA), which serve as the rulebook for its day-to-day operations. While
the Memorandum of Association (MOA) outlines the external objectives and scope of
the company, the AOA complements it by setting out the internal regulations. It
defines the rights, responsibilities, and powers of the shareholders and directors,
procedures related to meetings, issue and transfer of shares, and the declaration of
dividends. Being a public document, the AOA is binding upon the company and its
members under the doctrine of constructive notice and contractual obligation.
However, it cannot override the MOA, and any provision inconsistent with the
Companies Act is void. Amendments to the AOA require a special resolution passed
by shareholders in a general meeting and must be filed with the Registrar.

The prospectus is another vital document, particularly in the context of public

companies, as it is issued to invite the public to subscribe to shares or debentures.
According to Section 2(70) of the Companies Act, 2013 (which builds upon the 1956
Act), a prospectus includes any document described or issued as a prospectus and
includes any notice, circular, or advertisement inviting deposits or subscription. It
plays a crucial role in investor protection by ensuring transparency and full disclosure
of the company’s financial status, objectives, risks, and managerial information.
Misstatements or concealment in the prospectus can lead to civil and criminal liability
under Sections 34 and 35 of the Companies Act. Companies are also allowed to
issue shelf prospectuses, red herring prospectuses, or abridged prospectuses
depending on the nature of the offering.

Directors form the governing body of a company, collectively known as the Board of
Directors. They are elected by shareholders to oversee the company’s activities,
make strategic decisions, and ensure compliance with laws and regulations. A
director is considered an agent, trustee, and sometimes an employee of the
company, and owes fiduciary duties including acting in good faith, exercising
reasonable care, and avoiding conflict of interest. The minimum and maximum
number of directors varies depending on the type of company, and there are various
categories like independent directors, managing directors, nominee directors, and
women directors. Board meetings must be held periodically, and directors are
expected to actively participate and ensure corporate governance is maintained.

Meetings form an essential component of a company's governance structure. Board

meetings deal with managerial decisions and must comply with quorum and notice
requirements. General meetings, such as the Annual General Meeting (AGM) and
Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM), involve the shareholders and are used to
pass resolutions on important matters like dividend declarations, appointments, and
major changes in the company’s structure. Proper maintenance of minutes, statutory
registers, and procedural compliance ensures that decisions are legally sound and
transparent.

The Company Secretary plays a pivotal role in ensuring statutory compliance and
corporate governance. A qualified Company Secretary is considered a key
managerial personnel (KMP) and acts as the link between the board and
stakeholders. The duties include maintaining company records, filing returns with the
ROC, ensuring compliance with board procedures, advising directors on legal
obligations, and facilitating communication between shareholders and the
management. The Secretary also ensures that proper notice is given for meetings
and that the minutes are accurately recorded.

Dividends represent the portion of profits distributed to shareholders and are

declared based on the recommendation of the Board of Directors, subject to
approval at the AGM. Dividends may be interim or final, and can be paid in cash,
stock, or other assets. The declaration and payment of dividends are regulated by
various provisions to ensure protection of creditors and maintenance of reserves.
The company must comply with conditions like adequate profits, board resolution,
and payment within 30 days of declaration.

Lastly, corporate ethics refers to the moral values and principles that govern the
behavior of companies and their stakeholders. Ethical corporate behavior goes
beyond compliance and includes transparency, accountability, fairness, respect for
stakeholders, and social responsibility. Adopting corporate ethics helps companies
build trust, improve their reputation, and contribute positively to society. The
Companies Act encourages this through provisions on board composition,
disclosures, CSR obligations, and audit requirements. Companies are increasingly
being held accountable not just for their financial performance, but also for how
responsibly they conduct their business.

Here are detailed and expansive notes on Unit III of Company Law, in paragraph
form:

---

UNIT III: Issue of Shares – Types of Shares – Debentures – Procedure for

Allotment of Shares and Debentures – Share Capital – Rights and Privileges of
Shareholders – Prevention of Oppression and Mismanagement – Different
Modes of Winding Up of Companies

The capital of a company is raised primarily through the issuance of shares, which
represent ownership in the company. The process of issuing shares is governed by
legal procedures intended to ensure transparency and protect investors. A company
can issue shares at the time of incorporation or later through public offerings, rights
issues, private placements, or bonus issues. The issue of shares may be made at
face value, at a premium, or even in certain circumstances, at a discount (though
discount issuance is generally restricted under current laws except for sweat equity).
Before issuing shares, the company must comply with several steps including board
approval, filing of relevant forms with the Registrar of Companies (ROC), and
adherence to guidelines issued by SEBI in the case of listed companies.
Shares are broadly classified into two main types: equity shares and preference
shares. Equity shares, also known as ordinary shares, are the most common form
and carry voting rights. Equity shareholders are considered the real owners of the
company and bear the ultimate risk and reward. Preference shares, on the other
hand, provide shareholders with preferential rights to receive dividends at a fixed
rate before dividends are paid to equity shareholders. They also get priority over
equity shareholders during the distribution of assets in case of winding up. However,
they usually do not carry voting rights except in certain circumstances. Within these
categories, there can be further subtypes such as cumulative, non-cumulative,
redeemable, and convertible preference shares.

Debentures are long-term debt instruments issued by a company to raise funds,

typically secured against the company’s assets. Unlike shares, debentures do not
confer any ownership interest in the company. Debenture holders are creditors who
receive fixed interest payments, usually annually or semi-annually. Debentures can
be secured or unsecured, convertible or non-convertible, and may be registered or
bearer. Secured debentures are backed by specific assets, while unsecured ones
are based solely on the issuer’s creditworthiness. Convertible debentures can be
converted into shares at a later stage, providing an incentive to investors who may
benefit from future equity appreciation.

The procedure for allotment of shares and debentures involves several regulatory
steps to ensure fairness and legal compliance. After issuing a prospectus and
receiving applications from the public, the company must ensure the minimum
subscription is received within the prescribed period. The allotment must then be
made through a resolution passed by the Board of Directors. Allottees must be
informed by way of an allotment letter, and the company is required to file a return of
allotment with the ROC. The securities are then credited to the investors’ demat
accounts, and share certificates are issued where applicable.

Share capital refers to the amount of capital raised by the company through the
issue of shares. It is divided into authorized capital, issued capital, subscribed
capital, and paid-up capital. Authorized capital is the maximum capital the company
can raise as stated in the MOA. Issued capital is the portion of authorized capital that
is offered to investors. Subscribed capital refers to the part of the issued capital for
which applications have been received, and paid-up capital is the amount actually
paid by shareholders. Companies can alter their share capital through processes like
increase, consolidation, subdivision, or reduction, all of which require shareholder
approval and ROC filings.

The rights and privileges of shareholders vary depending on the class of shares they
hold. Equity shareholders have voting rights, the right to receive dividends (if
declared), and the right to participate in the surplus assets upon winding up.
Preference shareholders have preferential rights as discussed earlier. Shareholders
also have the right to inspect records, participate in meetings, file complaints with
regulatory bodies, and approach courts for redress in cases of oppression or
mismanagement. The Companies Act provides these safeguards to ensure that
shareholders, particularly minority shareholders, are not exploited by those in
control.

Prevention of oppression and mismanagement is a critical area of corporate

governance. Oppression occurs when the majority acts in a way that is unfairly
prejudicial to the minority shareholders. Mismanagement includes conduct by
directors that results in financial instability or prejudices the interest of the company.
Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 empower shareholders holding at
least 10% of the share capital (or 100 members, whichever is less) to approach the
National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) for relief. The Tribunal may then pass orders
including regulation of the company’s affairs, removal of directors, recovery of undue
gains, and even the winding up of the company if it deems necessary.

Winding up refers to the process of dissolving a company and distributing its assets
to satisfy its liabilities. There are several modes of winding up under company law.
The most common are compulsory winding up by the Tribunal, voluntary winding up,
and winding up under the supervision of the Tribunal. Compulsory winding up may
be initiated due to insolvency, inability to pay debts, failure to file financial
statements, or upon just and equitable grounds. Voluntary winding up can occur
when the members or creditors of the company decide to dissolve the company,
subject to statutory procedures including declaration of solvency, appointment of
liquidators, and final meetings. The liquidator appointed in any form of winding up is
responsible for collecting assets, paying off liabilities, and distributing the remainder
among shareholders.

In summary, Unit III covers the financial foundation and lifecycle of corporate
funding, investor rights, and legal safeguards. Understanding the distinctions
between types of securities, procedures of raising capital, and mechanisms for
redressal and closure of companies is crucial to mastering corporate law.

Here are the detailed notes on Unit IV of Company Law in paragraph form:

---

UNIT IV: SEBI Act, 1992; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 and Rules

The Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (SEBI Act) was enacted to
establish a statutory regulatory body—SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of
India)—to protect the interests of investors in securities, promote the development of
the securities market, and regulate its functioning. Before SEBI was given statutory
powers, the capital market in India lacked comprehensive regulation, resulting in
manipulative practices, insider trading, and poor investor confidence. With the
liberalization of the Indian economy in the early 1990s, the need for a strong,
autonomous, and legally empowered regulator became apparent, leading to the
enactment of the SEBI Act. SEBI now acts as the capital market watchdog with wide
powers over listed companies, stock exchanges, brokers, mutual funds, and other
intermediaries.

SEBI’s primary functions fall into three broad categories: protective, developmental,
and regulatory. In its protective role, SEBI seeks to safeguard investor interests
through measures like ensuring transparency in Initial Public Offerings (IPOs),
prohibiting fraudulent practices, regulating insider trading, and mandating
disclosures. SEBI’s regulatory functions include registering and regulating market
intermediaries like stockbrokers, merchant bankers, depositories, and portfolio
managers. It also prescribes a code of conduct for them and oversees their
performance. On the developmental front, SEBI undertakes investor education
initiatives, modernizes the securities infrastructure, promotes research, and
encourages fair practices. The SEBI Act empowers SEBI to conduct investigations,
impose penalties, issue directions, and pass binding orders. Notably, SEBI has the
authority to regulate substantial acquisition of shares and takeovers under its
Takeover Code, and the issuance of securities through its ICDR (Issue of Capital and
Disclosure Requirements) Regulations.

The Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (SCRA) predates the SEBI Act and
was enacted to regulate trading in securities and ensure the functioning of stock
exchanges in a fair and efficient manner. The SCRA empowers the central
government to recognize stock exchanges and prescribes the legal framework for
organized securities trading. Under the SCRA, only recognized stock exchanges are
permitted to operate, and trading of securities outside recognized platforms (i.e.,
“off-market” trading) is generally prohibited to avoid manipulation and fraud. The Act
defines important terms such as securities, contracts, and options, and lays down
provisions for the listing and delisting of securities, suspension of trading, and
penalties for illegal trading practices.

One of the critical features of the SCRA is that it lays the foundation for standardized
contracts in securities trading and mandates certain compliance measures from
recognized stock exchanges. These include submission of annual reports,
maintenance of trading records, and adherence to prescribed rules for margin
money, settlement cycles, and price bands. The Act also grants the government
powers to frame rules and regulations, and to issue notifications and guidelines as
necessary to prevent undesirable practices in the securities market.
The rules framed under the SEBI Act and SCRA include detailed procedural and
compliance requirements. These encompass a wide range of issues—from the
procedure of listing securities, mandatory disclosures by listed companies, reporting
of financial results, insider trading regulations, and takeover guidelines. SEBI (Listing
Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, SEBI (Prohibition of Insider
Trading) Regulations, and SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers)
Regulations are some of the key rule-based instruments. These rules aim to create
transparency, ensure accountability, and maintain investor confidence in the market.

Together, the SEBI Act and the SCRA form the backbone of India’s securities
regulatory framework. While the SEBI Act institutionalizes the regulator and grants it
legal authority, the SCRA provides the legal infrastructure for securities trading and
contracts. Both Acts are complementary in their operation, ensuring that the Indian
securities market operates in a fair, efficient, and legally sound manner. The
implementation of these laws has significantly contributed to the modernization of the
Indian capital markets, reduced fraudulent practices, and aligned the regulatory
framework with international standards.

Here are the detailed and comprehensive notes on Unit V of Company Law, written
in paragraph form:

---

UNIT V: Recent Trends in Company Law – NCLT and NCLAT – Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016 – Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) –
Producer Companies – E-Governance and MCA21

The landscape of corporate regulation in India has undergone significant

transformation in recent years, driven by the increasing complexity of business
operations, the need for faster dispute resolution, and a greater emphasis on
transparency and accountability. These changes are reflected in the recent trends in
company law, which include structural reforms, digital governance, new regulatory
bodies, and evolving legal mandates.

One of the most significant reforms is the establishment of the National Company
Law Tribunal (NCLT) and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT)
under the Companies Act, 2013. The NCLT was constituted to consolidate the
corporate jurisdiction which was earlier dispersed among multiple forums such as the
Company Law Board (CLB), Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction
(BIFR), and High Courts. The NCLT functions as a quasi-judicial authority to deal
with matters relating to company law, including disputes related to oppression and
mismanagement, amalgamation, winding up, and more recently, insolvency cases.
Appeals against the decisions of the NCLT are made to the NCLAT. These tribunals
aim to provide a specialized, efficient, and quicker redressal mechanism, reducing
the burden on traditional courts and ensuring expertise-driven decisions.

The enactment of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016 is another
landmark reform that has fundamentally altered the approach to insolvency
resolution in India. Before the IBC, the insolvency framework was fragmented and
plagued with delays. The IBC consolidated existing laws into a single legislation and
introduced a time-bound process for the resolution of insolvency of corporate
persons, partnerships, and individuals. It provides for the appointment of insolvency
professionals, creation of resolution plans, and establishment of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) as the regulator. Under the IBC, if a company
defaults on its debt, creditors (financial or operational) can trigger the Corporate
Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) through the NCLT. If the resolution fails within
the stipulated time, the company may undergo liquidation. The Code prioritizes
revival of viable businesses and seeks to protect the interests of creditors while
preserving the value of assets.

Another progressive development in corporate law is the mandate for Corporate

Social Responsibility (CSR) under Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013. India is
one of the first countries in the world to make CSR a statutory obligation. As per the
provision, every company having a net worth of ₹500 crore or more, turnover of
₹1,000 crore or more, or net profit of ₹5 crore or more during any financial year is
required to spend at least 2% of its average net profits from the preceding three
years on CSR activities. These activities include eradicating hunger, promoting
education, environmental sustainability, gender equality, and contributing to national
heritage. The company must constitute a CSR committee, formulate a CSR policy,
and disclose the CSR expenditure in its board report. Failure to spend the specified
amount now attracts penalties. CSR reflects the evolving notion that companies must
serve not just shareholders, but all stakeholders, including society at large.

The Companies Act, 2013 also recognizes a unique form of business entity known
as Producer Companies, which combine the features of cooperative societies and
companies. These companies are formed by primary producers such as farmers,
weavers, artisans, etc., with the objective of enhancing their income and welfare. A
Producer Company must consist of at least 10 individual producers or 2 producer
institutions and can undertake activities such as production, harvesting,
procurement, grading, pooling, marketing, and sale of produce. These companies
operate on the principle of mutual assistance and democratic governance while
enjoying the benefits of corporate structure like limited liability and separate legal
entity. The concept is vital for the inclusive development of the rural economy and
the empowerment of marginalized producer groups.
In the domain of regulatory compliance and administration, E-Governance and the
MCA21 initiative have revolutionized the way companies interact with the Ministry of
Corporate Affairs. MCA21 is an e-governance project launched by the Government
of India to enable easy and secure access to company-related information and
filings. It facilitates electronic filing of documents, registration of companies, filing of
returns, payment of fees, and accessing of public documents. MCA21 enhances
transparency, reduces red tape, curtails delays, and ensures real-time access to
regulatory data. With the advent of digital signatures, electronic forms, and online
tracking of applications, compliance has become more efficient and less
burdensome. The integration of Artificial Intelligence and data analytics into MCA
systems also helps detect fraud and non-compliance more effectively.

Overall, the recent trends in company law reflect a shift toward a more responsive,
tech-driven, and stakeholder-oriented regulatory framework. With the implementation
of modern institutions like the NCLT/NCLAT, the enactment of comprehensive codes
like the IBC, statutory enforcement of CSR, promotion of inclusive entities like
Producer Companies, and the adoption of digital governance platforms like MCA21,
Indian company law has taken significant strides toward modernization and global
relevance.