************************************

***********Unit- 4
Analysis of two-hinged arch
Introduction
Mainly three types of arches are used in practice: three-hinged, two-
hinged and hingeless arches. In the early part of the nineteenth
century, three-hinged arches were commonly used for the long span
structures as the analysis of such arches could be done with confidence.
However, with the development in structural analysis, for long span
structures starting from late nineteenth century engineers adopted
two-hinged and hingeless arches. Two-hinged arch is the statically
indeterminate structure to degree one. Usually, the horizontal reaction
is treated as the redundant and is evaluated by the method of least
work. In this lesson, the analysis of two-hinged arches is discussed and
few problems are solved to illustrate the procedure for calculating the
internal forces.
bending moment diagram of two hinged arch
Concept: If two-hinged parabolic is subjected to uniformly distributed load
of intensity q per unit length. The bending moment at anywhere in the arch
is zero. So, the maximum bending moment in the arch is equal to zero.

What is normal thrust in arches?

Explanation: For an arch: At section x - x', bet Vx and Hx be the effective
vertical and horizontal load acting at the section. Then, the resultant force
action in the direction along the tangent drawn to the center line of arch is
called normal thrust and it is denoted by
What is the effect of temperature on two hinged arches?

But as the temperature increases in a two hinged arch (degree of indeterminacy

one), the horizontal thrust will increase. Moment due to horizontal thrust is – Py. So
maximum bending moment will be at crown as crown has highest value of y.
Temperature effects on a two-hinged arch refer to the changes in the internal forces, stresses, and
deformations that occur due to thermal expansion or contraction of the arch material. A two-
hinged arch, having hinges at both ends, is particularly sensitive to temperature changes because
it can experience movements in both the horizontal and vertical directions, leading to alterations
in its internal force distribution.

Here’s a breakdown of how temperature changes can affect a two-hinged arch:

1. Thermal Expansion or Contraction

 Positive Temperature Change (Heating): When the temperature increases, the arch
material expands. If the arch is rigid and restrained (without sufficient room for
expansion), this expansion will generate internal forces. Since the arch is hinged at both
 ends, the horizontal reaction at the supports will resist this expansion, which leads to
axial forces developing in the arch (tension).
 Negative Temperature Change (Cooling): When the temperature decreases, the
material contracts. This contraction tends to reduce the overall length of the arch. Again,
since the arch is hinged, the contraction will result in compression forces developing
within the arch.

2. Internal Force Redistribution

The two hinges allow for rotational movement, so the arch will adjust to the temperature
changes. These adjustments can cause:

 Axial Force Change: The axial force (tension or compression) within the arch will
change due to temperature-induced changes in length.
 Moment Redistribution: Since the arch is hinged, there is no fixed moment at the ends,
but temperature-induced forces can still affect the bending moments along the arch.
These moments will redistribute depending on the arch's geometry and temperature
distribution.

3. Displacement and Deformation

 Vertical and Horizontal Shifts: If the temperature change is non-uniform (i.e., there is a
gradient of temperature across the arch), the arch may experience uneven thermal
expansion or contraction, causing it to deform or shift in both vertical and horizontal
directions.
 Deflection of the Arch: Temperature-induced forces can cause deflections, especially if
there is a significant temperature change. The deflections may lead to increased bending
stresses and deformations along the arch.

4. Hinge Behavior

 The hinges in a two-hinged arch allow for rotations but not for any translation. When
temperature changes cause thermal expansion or contraction, the hinges enable the arch
to adjust by rotating, which helps reduce the buildup of internal moments. However, if
the temperature change is large enough, the adjustment may lead to large rotations at the
hinges and considerable changes in internal axial forces.

5. Material Properties

The effect of temperature on a two-hinged arch also depends on the material properties. For
example:

 Thermal Expansion Coefficient: Different materials have different coefficients of

thermal expansion. Steel, concrete, or aluminum will each behave differently under
temperature changes.
  Strength and Stiffness: Materials may become weaker or less stiff at higher
temperatures (such as concrete losing strength at elevated temperatures). This can affect
the arch’s ability to carry loads or resist deformations.

6. Long-Term Effects (Cyclic Temperature Variation)

If the temperature varies cyclically (e.g., daily or seasonally), the arch will repeatedly expand
and contract. Over time, this can lead to:

 Fatigue: Repeated thermal cycling can cause fatigue in the material, potentially leading
to cracks or failure in the arch if it’s not designed to accommodate these repeated
movements.
 Creep (in concrete): Concrete arch structures may experience creep under constant
temperature and load conditions, which can contribute to long-term deformations.

7. Design Considerations

To account for temperature effects in the design of a two-hinged arch:

 Expansion Joints: In some designs, expansion joints may be included to allow for
thermal movement without causing large internal stresses.
 Material Selection: The choice of materials should take into account the expected
temperature range and thermal expansion properties.
 Temperature Gradients: Engineers need to evaluate how temperature gradients (uneven
heating or cooling) may affect the arch’s behavior, especially if the arch spans large
distances.

Example:

For a two-hinged steel arch, assuming a temperature increase, the arch will expand, causing a
tension force in the arch, and since the ends are hinged, the arch may rotate or shift, depending
on the size of the temperature change. If the temperature decrease occurs, the arch will contract,
leading to a compression force in the arch.

In conclusion, temperature effects on a two-hinged arch involve changes in internal forces,

deformations, and possible movements of the structure, all of which need to be accounted for in
the design and analysis to ensure the arch's stability and performance over time.

Rib-shortening in the case of arches.

In a two hinged arch, the normal thrust which is a compressive force along the axis of
the arch will shorten the rib of the arch. This in turn will release part of the horizontal
thrust. Normally, this effect is not considered in the analysis (in the case of two hinged
arches). Rib shortening in the case of a two-hinged arch refers to the reduction in the length of
the arch ribs (the curved elements of the arch) due to axial forces, such as those caused by
external loads, temperature changes, or settlement effects. In the case of a two-hinged arch, the
ribs are subjected to both axial forces (tension or compression) and bending moments. Rib
shortening specifically refers to the axial shortening (or elongation) of the rib due to the forces
acting on it.

1. Rib Shortening due to Axial Forces (Compression)

 In a two-hinged arch, when compression forces act on the rib (as a result of external loads), the
rib will shorten axially.
 The axial shortening is directly related to the axial compression force and the stiffness of the rib
material.
 The amount of shortening can be estimated using the following formula for axial deformation:

ΔL=P⋅LA⋅E\Delta L = \frac{P \cdot L}{A \cdot E}ΔL=A⋅EP⋅L

Where:

 ΔL\Delta LΔL is the axial shortening,

 PPP is the axial compression force in the rib,
 LLL is the length of the rib,
 AAA is the cross-sectional area of the rib,
 EEE is the Young’s Modulus (elastic modulus) of the material.

As the compression force increases, the shortening of the rib increases, which can affect the
geometry and internal force distribution within the arch.

2. Effect of Rib Shortening on the Arch's Behavior

 Displacement of Hinges: Since the two-hinged arch is supported by two hinges, the
shortening of the rib will cause a small displacement or shift in the location of the hinges.
This change in the hinge positions can affect the overall geometry of the arch and lead to
redistribution of forces within the structure.
 Effect on Internal Forces: The axial shortening of the rib can also change the internal
forces in the arch. The shortening of the rib length can reduce the distance between the
hinge points, leading to a change in the arch's curvature, which can, in turn, alter the
bending moments and shear forces.
 Geometry Adjustment: As the rib shortens, it may cause a slight "flattening" or
deformation in the arch. Since the arch is hinged at both ends, it can rotate to
accommodate the shortening, but this will still result in some change in the overall shape
and forces.
 Strain and Stress Distribution: Rib shortening can cause strain in the material, and if
the shortening is significant, it could lead to local over-stressing in the rib, especially if
the material has limitations on strain or deformation.
3. Temperature Effects on Rib Shortening

 Thermal Effects: Temperature variations (either heating or cooling) can also cause rib shortening
or elong

Settlement and foundation yielding in the context of a two-hinged arch refer to

the behavior and potential deformations that occur when the foundation of the arch settles or
undergoes displacement. This can affect the overall stability and performance of the arch
structure.

In a two-hinged arch, the two hinges are typically located at the base or support points, and they
allow rotation to accommodate deformations due to loads, such as the weight of the structure or
external forces. When the foundation under these supports settles (e.g., due to soil movement,
loading conditions, or other factors), the structure may deform, leading to changes in the internal
forces and moments within the arch.

Here's an overview of the effects of settlement or foundation yielding in a two-hinged arch:

1. Rotation of Hinges: The hinges in the arch allow for rotational movement. If the
foundation at one or both of the hinge points settles unevenly, it will cause the arch to
rotate about its hinges. This rotation can redistribute internal forces and change the
curvature of the arch.
2. Redistribution of Forces: Settlement can lead to a change in the load distribution on the
arch. The arch might shift its internal force distribution, leading to different bending
moments, axial forces, or shear forces within the arch members.
3. Potential for Structural Distress: If the settlement is uneven or too large, the change in
internal forces might cause excessive stresses in the arch, leading to structural distress or
failure in extreme cases.
4. Impact on Stability: Excessive settlement, especially if it’s not uniform, can affect the
stability of the arch. In some cases, large foundation movements can lead to a loss of
equilibrium or cause the arch to become unstable.
5. Deflection of the Arch: Settlement can also cause vertical deflections or tilting of the
arch structure. This can result in additional forces or displacements in the arch and other
connected components.
6. Design Considerations: Engineers need to design foundations to resist settlements or
movements. In many cases, settlement can be accounted for in the design by using
flexible foundations or by choosing materials that accommodate some movement without
significant loss of structural integrity.

Shrinkage in a two-hinged arch refers to the reduction in the dimensions of the arch's material
due to factors like drying shrinkage (in concrete) or material-specific shrinkage (in steel or
other materials under certain conditions). This effect is particularly important for concrete
arches, but can also apply to other materials, although to a lesser extent.
1. Shrinkage in Concrete Arches

Concrete is the material most commonly associated with shrinkage in construction. Shrinkage in
concrete typically occurs as the material dries and loses moisture after it has been placed and set.
This shrinkage can have various effects on the behavior of a two-hinged arch.

Types of Shrinkage in Concrete:

 Drying Shrinkage: As the water in the concrete evaporates, the material shrinks. This type of
shrinkage continues over time, particularly in the early years after construction.
 Plastic Shrinkage: Occurs when concrete is in its plastic state (before it fully hardens) and
experiences rapid loss of water, especially in hot and dry climates.
 Autogenous Shrinkage: This occurs as the chemical reactions in concrete (hydration) use up
water and cause the material to shrink even if moisture is not lost to the atmosphere.

2. Effects of Shrinkage on a Two-Hinged Arch

In the context of a two-hinged arch, shrinkage (especially drying shrinkage) has specific
impacts on the structure:

Changes in Geometry:

 Axial Shortening: When concrete shrinks, it undergoes axial shortening. For a two-
hinged arch, the material shrinking leads to a reduction in the overall length of the arch
ribs. Since the arch is hinged, this shortening will cause the hinges to move closer
together, potentially altering the arch's overall shape.
 Arch Flattening: If the shrinkage is non-uniform or occurs more significantly in certain
sections of the arch, this can lead to slight changes in the curvature of the arch. A
reduction in the rib length may lead to a “flattening” of the arch, causing a redistribution
of forces.

Impact on Internal Forces:

 Redistribution of Axial and Bending Forces: Shrinkage can cause a redistribution of

the internal forces within the arch. Since the arch is hinged, the axial shortening can
result in a change in the internal axial force (compression or tension) in different parts of
the arch. The moments within the arch can also change as the arch's geometry adjusts due
to the shortening.
 Potential for Increased Compressive Forces: In a concrete two-hinged arch, the
material's shrinkage could increase the axial compressive forces. As the arch ribs shorten,
the structure may develop additional compression, especially if the arch is under a load.

Hinge Behavior:

 Movement at Hinges: Shrinkage causes a slight movement of the hinge points, as the ribs
shorten and the overall length of the arch decreases. The hinges must be designed to
 accommodate this movement without affecting the stability of the arch or causing over-
stressing at the hinge points.

3. Shrinkage in Steel and Other Materials

While steel and other materials have much lower shrinkage effects compared to concrete,
thermal contraction and material-specific shrinkage could still play a role, though these
effects are typically less pronounced.

 Steel: For steel, shrinkage is generally negligible compared to concrete, but temperature
variations can lead to thermal expansion or contraction. In some cases, if the steel is welded or
fabricated in a way that induces residual stresses, those stresses may alter the material's
response to shrinkage.

4. Cumulative Effects of Shrinkage

 Long-Term Effects: Concrete shrinkage generally occurs over time, meaning that over
the lifespan of the arch, the structure will continue to experience small reductions in
length. This long-term shrinkage can cause gradual shifts in the geometry and force
distribution.
 Creep and Shrinkage Combined: In concrete, shrinkage often occurs in conjunction
with creep (the gradual deformation under sustained load). Together, these two factors
can lead to significant long-term deformations in the arch, which may need to be
accounted for in the design and analysis.

5. Design Considerations to Account for Shrinkage

Engineers typically account for shrinkage in the design of concrete arches through various
methods:

 Expansion Joints: To accommodate movement caused by shrinkage, expansion joints

may be included at strategic locations, allowing for the material to shrink without causing
excessive stress or cracking.
 Allowance for Shrinkage in Calculations: In the design calculations, engineers
typically consider the potential effects of shrinkage on the final dimensions of the arch.
This is particularly important in long-span arches, where shrinkage can have more
noticeable effects.
 Pre-Stressing or Post-Tensioning: In some cases, pre-stressed or post-tensioned
concrete arches are used to counteract the effects of shrinkage, as the applied stresses can
help maintain the desired shape and geometry of the arch.
 Control of Moisture During Curing: Managing the moisture content during the curing
process of concrete can reduce the amount of shrinkage. This is especially important in
high-humidity environments or when large concrete pours are involved.
6. Conclusion

Shrinkage in a two-hinged arch, particularly in concrete, is a significant factor that must be

carefully considered during the design and construction phases. While concrete shrinkage is
inevitable over time, its effects on the arch's geometry, internal forces, and stability can be
minimized by proper design, material selection, and construction techniques. Axial shortening
and redistribution of forces due to shrinkage can influence the long-term behavior of the arch,
especially if the arch spans large distances or is exposed to significant
environmental changes.

infuence line for two hinged arch

Therefore, the influence line for horizontal thrust in a two-
hinged parabolic arch is a parabolic curve that passes through the
hinges and has a maximum value at the midpoint of the arch. The
shape of the influence line is identical to the shape of the arch's
vertical deflection curve.
An influence line for a two-hinged arch is a graphical representation that shows how the internal
forces, such as bending moments, shear forces, or axial forces, vary along the arch in response to
a moving point load. Influence lines are crucial for analyzing structures under moving loads, like
vehicles on a bridge, and they help engineers determine the worst-case scenarios for internal
forces during these dynamic load conditions.

Key Concepts:

 A two-hinged arch is a structure that has hinges at both ends, allowing for rotational movement
at the supports. This makes it a statically determinate structure if only the geometry and
material properties are considered, and it provides flexibility for analysis under varying loading
conditions.
 The influence line helps determine how the internal forces (like moments, shear, or axial forces)
change as a moving load crosses the structure.

Steps to Determine the Influence Line for a Two-Hinged Arch

To derive an influence line for a two-hinged arch, the general approach involves:

1. Choosing the Internal Force: Decide which internal force you want to examine (bending
moment, shear force, or axial force).
2. Placing a Unit Load: Place a unit point load (typically 1 unit of force) at different positions along
the span of the arch, and calculate how this load affects the internal force.
3. Analyzing the Structure: Use the method of virtual work, influence lines for beams, or other
analytical methods to compute the change in the internal force as the load moves.
Example: Influence Line for Bending Moment (at a Specific Point)

Let’s consider you are looking to create the influence line for the bending moment at a specific
point on the arch.

1. Calculate the Reactions: Determine the reactions at the two hinges when the point load
is applied. Since the arch is two-hinged, the reactions will vary as the position of the load
changes.
2. Apply a Unit Load: Place a unit load (1 unit of force) at different locations along the
span of the arch and calculate the bending moment at the point of interest for each
position of the load.
3. Superposition Principle: The influence line for bending moment is the summation of the
effects of the unit load at each position along the arch. This means you calculate the
bending moment at each point of the arch and plot it.
4. Plot the Influence Line: The final graph represents how the bending moment changes
along the arch as the moving load crosses it. The influence line for the bending moment
will typically show a curve with peaks corresponding to the positions where the load
creates maximum moment at the point of interest.

Influence Line for Axial Force in a Two-Hinged Arch:

The analysis for axial forces is similar to that for bending moments but focuses on how the axial
force (compression or tension) changes as a moving load affects the arch.

1. Apply a Unit Load: As with the bending moment, apply a unit load at different points
along the arch.
2. Calculate Axial Forces: For each position of the unit load, calculate the axial force at the
location of interest (usually a point along the rib of the arch).
3. Plot the Influence Line: The resulting influence line will show how the axial force
varies along the arch, with positive values indicating tension and negative values
indicating compression.

Influence Line for Shear Force:

Shear forces in arches are similar to shear forces in beams, but with the added complexity of the
curved geometry. The steps are essentially the same:

1. Place a Unit Load: Move a unit load across the span of the arch.
2. Calculate Shear Forces: For each load position, compute the shear force at a point of interest
along the arch (usually a support or a specific location along the span).
3. Plot the Influence Line: The resulting curve will show the shear force variations due to the
moving load.
Virtual Work Method (For Advanced Analysis)

In more complex situations, especially when dealing with curved or non-linear arches, the
virtual work method may be used to derive influence lines. This involves using a unit virtual
displacement at the point of interest and calculating the work done by virtual forces to compute
the response due to a moving load.

Example of Influence Line Shape

 For a bending moment at a point near the middle of a two-hinged arch, the influence line will
typically have a triangular or trapezoidal shape, with the maximum bending moment occurring
when the load is at the location of interest or near it.
 For shear force, the influence line will usually have a step-like or triangular shape.
 For axial forces, the influence line might appear as a ramp or triangular shape, depending on the
location.

Influence Line for a Two-Hinged Arch: General Considerations

 Hinged Support Reaction: The hinge at each end of the arch allows for rotation and horizontal
displacement. This flexibility must be considered when determining how the arch reacts to
moving loads.
 Curvature: Since the arch is curved, the effect of the load depends on its position relative to the
curve, and this curvature affects how internal forces develop as the load moves.
 Static Determinacy: A two-hinged arch is statically determinate, meaning that the internal
forces can be determined using equilibrium equations alone. This makes the influence line
analysis relatively straightforward compared to indeterminate structures.

Conclusion

An influence line for a two-hinged arch represents how internal forces (bending moment, shear
force, or axial force) vary as a point load moves along the structure. By placing a unit load at
different positions along the arch, the influence of each load position on the internal force is
calculated and plotted, resulting in an influence line that helps engineers identify the worst-case
loading conditions. This is especially useful in bridge design, where moving loads are common.
The analysis for each internal force requires understanding the reaction at the supports and the
effect of the curved geometry of the arch.
influence lines for statically indeterminate structure

Influence line is a diagram that shows the variation for a particular

force/moment at specific location in a structure as a unit load moves
across the entire structure.For statically indeterminate structures,
influence lines are usually curved.
The Müller-Breslau principle is a powerful and intuitive method used to construct influence
lines for internal forces (such as bending moment, shear force, or axial force) in structural
elements, particularly beams. The principle is widely used for statically determinate structures
and is an essential tool for analyzing structures under moving loads.

Müller-Breslau Principle Explained

The Müller-Breslau principle provides a way to derive influence lines by considering the
deflection of the structure when a unit displacement is applied at the point where the internal
force is of interest.
Steps to Apply Müller-Breslau Principle:

1. Identify the Internal Force of Interest: First, determine which internal force (bending
moment, shear force, or axial force) you are interested in. For example, if you want to
know how the bending moment changes along a beam, focus on the bending moment.
2. Deform the Structure: Apply a unit displacement (i.e., 1 unit of deflection) at the
location where you wish to evaluate the influence line. This is done in a manner that
corresponds to the force you are investigating:
o For a shear force influence line, apply a unit vertical displacement at the location where
the shear force is to be evaluated.
o For a bending moment influence line, apply a unit rotation at the location of interest.
o For axial force, apply a unit axial displacement.

3. Apply Compatibility Conditions: The structure should remain compatible under this
unit displacement. This means that the displacement must not cause unrealistic
deformations (such as breaking the structure). The response of the structure to the unit
displacement will give you an idea of how the internal force at the point of interest
changes as the load moves.
4. Evaluate the Influence Line: The magnitude of the deflection or rotation in response
to the applied unit displacement at different points of the structure determines how the
internal force varies as a moving load travels across the beam. This gives you the shape
of the influence line for the internal force.

Applying the Principle: Example for a Simply Supported Beam

Let’s go through an example of deriving an influence line for the bending moment at a point
AAA on a simply supported beam using the Müller-Breslau principle.

1. Set up the Beam:

Consider a simply supported beam of length LLL with a unit load P=1P = 1P=1 applied at some
position along the beam. We are interested in finding the influence line for the bending moment
at point AAA, a distance xxx from the left support.

2. Deform the Structure:

To apply the Müller-Breslau principle, we need to deform the structure in a way that corresponds
to a unit rotation at point AAA (since we're interested in the bending moment). For bending
moments, the deformation that corresponds to a unit moment is a unit rotation at point AAA.

 To represent the unit rotation, remove the supports temporarily and rotate the beam at point
AAA by 1 radian. The deflection or rotation at any point along the beam due to this rotation will
contribute to the shape of the influence line for the bending moment.
3. Apply the Compatibility Condition:

After applying the unit rotation at point AAA, the beam deforms accordingly. For any position of
a unit load on the beam, the displacement or rotation at point AAA will show how the bending
moment at that point changes.

4. Evaluate the Influence Line:

 The influence line for the bending moment at point AAA can be constructed by
evaluating the moment caused by a unit load at various positions along the beam. The
deflection (rotation) induced by the unit displacement gives us the magnitude of the
bending moment at point AAA for each load position.
 For a simply supported beam, the influence line for the bending moment at a point
AAA is a triangular shape, with the peak of the triangle occurring when the load is at
point AAA itself. The moment is zero at both supports and increases as the load
approaches the point AAA.

Example for Influence Line of Shear Force:

Now, if we are interested in the shear force at a point BBB on the beam, the process would be
slightly different.

1. Deform the Structure:

For shear force, you apply a unit vertical displacement at point BBB where the shear is of
interest. This simulates how the shear force varies as the unit load moves.

2. Evaluate the Influence Line:

For a simply supported beam, the influence line for shear force is typically step-shaped. It will
be positive on one side of the point and negative on the other, with the magnitude of the shear
varying as the load moves across the beam.

Influence Line for Axial Force (in case of trusses or frames):

In a truss or frame, the Müller-Breslau principle can be similarly used to derive influence lines
for axial forces. For axial forces, the deformation corresponds to a unit axial displacement at
the location of interest.

Summary of Müller-Breslau Principle:

 The Müller-Breslau principle is a method for deriving influence lines based on the structural
deformations.
 To derive an influence line, apply a unit displacement (rotation, translation, or axial
displacement) at the point of interest and analyze how this affects the internal force.
  The shape of the influence line for internal forces such as bending moment, shear force, or axial
force depends on the deformation response to the applied unit displacement.

Common Influence Line Shapes:

 For Bending Moment: The influence line is often triangular for simply supported beams, with
the peak at the point of interest.
 For Shear Force: The influence line is typically step-shaped, with a change in sign as the moving
load crosses the point.
 For Axial Force: The influence line shape can vary depending on the structure and the position
of the point.

By using the Müller-Breslau principle, engineers can easily derive influence lines for a variety of
internal forces in beams and other structural elements, aiding in the design and analysis of
structures subjected to moving loads.
muller breslau principle for indeterminate beams

CHATGPT SAID:

The Müller-Breslau Principle is also applicable to indeterminate structures (such as

indeterminate beams, frames, and arches) to construct influence lines for internal forces.
However, the application to indeterminate structures is somewhat more complex than for
determinate structures, because of the need to account for the additional unknowns (internal
forces, reactions, etc.) due to the extra degrees of freedom.

For indeterminate beams, the principle still involves the idea of applying a unit displacement at
the point of interest and considering how the structure responds. However, you must also account
for the structural indeterminacy, which means that you need to use additional methods, such as
compatibility conditions or the force method (also known as the method of consistent
deformations) to solve for the influence lines.

Müller-Breslau Principle for Indeterminate Beams

In the case of indeterminate beams, the Müller-Breslau Principle is used similarly to the
statically determinate case, but you need to consider the additional constraints that arise from the
indeterminacy of the structure. Here's how the process works:

Steps for Applying the Müller-Breslau Principle to Indeterminate

Beams

1. Identify the Internal Force of Interest: Determine which internal force you want to
derive the influence line for (e.g., bending moment, shear force, or axial force).
2. Deform the Structure:
o Apply a unit displacement (a unit deflection, rotation, or axial displacement, depending
on the force you are interested in) at the location where the influence line is to be
constructed.
o For a bending moment, you would apply a unit rotation at the point of interest.
o For a shear force, you would apply a unit vertical displacement at the point where shear
is to be evaluated.
o For an axial force, apply a unit axial displacement.

3. Consider Compatibility Conditions: The main difference when dealing with

indeterminate structures is that you need to account for compatibility conditions. These
conditions arise because the displacements of an indeterminate beam are not independent;
they are linked by the extra degrees of freedom introduced by the redundant forces
(reactions or internal forces that need to be solved for).

The general approach is to solve the system of equations derived from equilibrium and
compatibility conditions to determine how the structure responds to the unit
displacement at the point of interest. This often involves applying methods such as:
 o The force method (solving for the redundant forces using compatibility conditions).
o Moment-curvature relations (in the case of beam bending).
o Displacement-based methods (using virtual displacements, as in the method of virtual
work).

4. Superposition of Responses: After applying the unit displacement, you will need to use
superposition to combine the effects of the different parts of the structure (such as
reactions, internal forces, and moments). This helps to express the response of the beam
in terms of the influence line at the point of interest.

Since the structure is indeterminate, you will need to compute how each element of the
beam (or frame) contributes to the internal force at the point of interest. This typically
involves solving for the internal forces or moments at various locations across the beam
under various loading conditions.

5. Plot the Influence Line: Once you've calculated how the internal forces change with a
moving load, plot the influence line for the internal force at the point of interest. The
shape of the influence line will depend on the configuration of the beam (e.g., continuous
or fixed beams) and the position of the applied unit displacement.

Example: Influence Line for a Fixed Beam with a Unit Load

For an indeterminate beam, such as a beam fixed at both ends (a fixed-fixed beam), you would
apply the following steps:

1. Apply Unit Rotation:

 For the bending moment at a point AAA, apply a unit rotation at point AAA.
 This creates a deformational response in the beam. Since the beam is fixed, the displacement of
the beam at the point AAA will depend on the stiffness of the beam as well as the reactions and
moments at the supports.

2. Solve for the Redundant Forces:

Because the beam is indeterminate, there are additional unknown forces and moments at the
supports. Use compatibility conditions to relate the displacements at the supports to the applied
rotation at point AAA. For example, the rotational displacement at AAA is constrained by the
fixed supports.

3. Apply Superposition:

Superimpose the effects of the moving unit load on the beam using the solution of the structure's
deformations. This can be done using virtual work or force method analysis to combine the
contributions from different parts of the beam.
4. Plot the Influence Line:

Plot the influence line based on how the internal bending moment (or shear) at AAA varies as a
unit load moves across the span of the beam. The shape of the influence line will reflect the
indeterminate nature of the beam.

For a fixed-fixed beam, the bending moment influence line will likely have a parabolic or
curved shape, as the bending moments will be influenced by the stiffness of the beam and the
fixed supports.

General Considerations for Indeterminate Structures:

 Compatibility Equations: For indeterminate structures, the compatibility of

deformations is critical. This means that the deformation due to the applied load must be
compatible with the boundary conditions of the beam (e.g., no displacement at fixed
supports).
 Flexibility of the Beam: The extra degrees of freedom (due to the indeterminacy) change
how the structure deforms when subjected to a load. For example, a fixed-fixed beam is
stiffer and has more resistance to deformation compared to a simply supported beam, so
the shape of the influence line for bending moments will differ.
 Use of Force or Displacement Methods: When dealing with indeterminate beams, you
often need to solve the structure using the force method or displacement method to
determine how the internal forces are distributed. These methods take into account the
extra constraints or redundant forces and solve for the deformations.

Example Influence Line Shapes for Indeterminate Beams:

 For a fixed-fixed beam, the influence line for a bending moment will typically have a parabolic
shape, with higher moments near the supports and lower moments in the middle of the span.
 For a fixed-pinned beam, the influence line for a shear force might show a step-like variation,
with shear changing sign at the supports.

Summary:

In summary, applying the Müller-Breslau Principle to indeterminate beams follows a similar

basic concept to determinate structures but involves more complexity due to the additional
degrees of freedom and the need to apply compatibility conditions. The main steps involve:

1. Applying a unit displacement corresponding to the internal force of interest.

2. Using equilibrium and compatibility conditions to solve for the response of the indeterminate
structure.
3. Superimposing the effects of the moving load.
4. Plotting the resulting influence line.
For indeterminate structures, this method allows engineers to derive the influence line for
internal forces like bending moments, shear forces, or axial forces, despite the complexity of the
extra unknowns in the system.

Influence Line for a Reaction

To determine the influence line for a reaction, you are essentially interested in the magnitude of
the reaction at a given support point as a function of the position of a moving load on the
structure. The influence line is a plot that shows how the reaction changes when the load moves
from one support to the other.

Steps to Determine the Influence Line for a Reaction:

1. Identify the Reaction of Interest:

Determine which reaction (vertical or horizontal) you want to analyze. For most cases,
you'll be interested in the vertical reaction at a support.
2. Apply a Unit Load:
To construct the influence line, apply a unit load (a load of 1 unit) at various positions
along the beam or structure. This allows you to determine how the reaction at the point of
interest changes as the load moves across the span.
3. Analyze the Structural Response:
For each position of the unit load, compute the reaction at the support of interest. The
reaction is calculated using the equilibrium equations, considering the positions of the
applied load.
4. Plot the Influence Line:
Plot the reaction values for each position of the unit load across the beam. The resulting
graph is the influence line for the reaction.

Example for a Simply Supported Beam:

Consider a simply supported beam with a point load PPP applied at different points along its
length. Let's determine the influence line for the reaction at the left support (denoted as
RAR_ARA).

1. Reaction when Unit Load is Applied:

 First, apply a unit load (1 unit of force) at a position xxx along the beam.
 The reaction at the left support RAR_ARA for the unit load at position xxx is calculated using the
equilibrium equations (taking moments about the right support, for example):

RA(x)=L−xLR_A(x) = \frac{L - x}{L}RA(x)=LL−x

where LLL is the length of the beam, and xxx is the distance of the unit load from the left
support.
2. Plotting the Influence Line:

 As the unit load moves from the left support to the right support, the reaction at RAR_ARA
changes.
 When the load is at the left support (i.e., x=0x = 0x=0), the reaction at RAR_ARA is 111 (since the
load is at the left support).
 When the load is at the right support (i.e., x=Lx = Lx=L), the reaction at RAR_ARA is 000, because
the moment arm of the load is zero with respect to the left support.
 The influence line for the reaction at RAR_ARA is a straight ramp that starts at 1 when the load
is at the left support and decreases linearly to 0 as the load moves to the right support.

Influence Line for Reaction at Left Support (RAR_ARA):

 The influence line is a straight line that starts at 1 when the load is at the left support and
decreases linearly to 0 as the load moves towards the right support.

Influence Line=L−xL\text{Influence Line} = \frac{L - x}{L}Influence Line=LL−x

3. General Form of the Influence Line for Reactions:

 For simply supported beams, the influence line for the reaction at the left support RAR_ARA is a
straight line starting at 1 and sloping linearly to 0 at the right support.
 For the reaction at the right support RBR_BRB, the influence line will have a similar shape, but it
will be the reverse: it starts at 0 when the load is at the left support and increases linearly to 1 as
the load moves to the right support.

Influence Line for Reactions in Indeterminate Beams:

For indeterminate beams (such as fixed beams, continuous beams, etc.), the process of
determining the influence line for reactions is similar, but the structural indeterminacy needs to
be accounted for. The compatibility conditions and redundant forces must be considered in the
analysis.

 For a fixed-fixed beam, for example, applying a unit load at various positions will
produce reactions at the fixed supports. However, the analysis will require the use of the
force method, virtual work, or other advanced methods to account for the
indeterminacy.
 For continuous beams (with multiple spans), the reactions will depend on how the load
distributes itself across the spans, and the influence line will be constructed by
considering the effects of the load on each individual span and support.

Summary of Influence Line for Reactions:

 The influence line for a reaction shows how a reaction at a given support changes as a unit load
moves across the beam or structure.
 For a simply supported beam, the influence line for a reaction is a linear ramp: it starts at 1 at
one support and decreases linearly to 0 at the other support.
  For indeterminate structures, the analysis becomes more complex due to the additional
unknowns and constraints. Compatibility and equilibrium equations are required to solve for the
influence lines.

This concept is particularly useful in bridge and highway design, where moving vehicles or loads
must

The force method of analysis, also known as the method of consistent deformation, uses
equilibrium equations and compatibility conditions to determine the unknowns in statically
indeterminate structures. In this method, the unknowns are the redundant forces. A redundant
force can be an external support reaction force or an internal member force, which if removed
from the structure, will not cause any instability. This method entails formulating a set of
compatibility equations, depending on the number of the redundant forces in the structure, and
solving these equations simultaneously to determine the magnitude of the redundant forces. Once
the redundant forces are known, the structure becomes determinate and can be analyzed
completely using the conditions of equilibrium.

For an illustration of the method of consistent deformation, consider the propped cantilever beam
shown in Figure 10.1a. The beam has four unknown reactions, thus is indeterminate to the first
degree. This means that there is one reaction force that can be removed without jeopardizing the
stability of the structure. The structure that remains after the removal of the redundant reaction is
called the primary structure. A primary structure must always meet the equilibrium requirement.
A careful observation of the structure being considered will show that there are two possible
redundant reactions and two possible primary structures (see Fig. 10b and Fig. 10d). Taking the
vertical reaction at support B and the reactive moments at support A as the redundant reactions,
the primary structures that remain are in a state of equilibrium. After choosing the redundant
forces and establishing the primary structures, the next step is to formulate the compatibility
equations for each case by superposition of some sets of partial solutions that satisfy equilibrium
requirements. Equations 10.1 and 10.2 satisfy options 1 and 2, respectively. The terms
∆BP, θAP, δBB, and αAA are referred to as flexibility or compatibility coefficients or constants. The
first subscript in a coefficient indicates the position of the displacement, and the second indicates
the cause and the direction of the displacement. For example, ∆BP implies displacement at
point B caused by the load P in the direction of the load P. The compatibility coefficients can be
computed using the Maxwell-Betti Law of Reciprocal, which will be discussed in the subsequent
section.
 Fig. 10.1. Propped cantilever beam.

where

M = moment in the primary structure due to the applied load P.

m = moment in the primary structure due to a unit load applied at B.

mθ = moment in the primary structure due to a unit moment applied at A.

Procedure for Analysis of Indeterminate Structures by the Method of Consistent Deformation

 Determine the degree of indeterminacy of the structure.

 Choose the redundant reactions from the indeterminate structure.
 Remove the chosen redundant reactions to obtain the primary structure.
 Formulate the compatibility equations. The number of the equations must match the number of
redundant forces.
 Compute the flexibility coefficients.
 Substitute the flexibility coefficients into the compatibility equations.
 In the case of several redundant reactions, solve the compatibility equations simultaneously to
determine the redundant forces or moments.
  Apply the computed redundant forces or moments to the primary structure and evaluate other
functions, such as bending moment, shearing force, and deflection, if desired, using equilibrium
conditions.

Unit -1
analysis of statics indeterminate structure
Analyzing a statically indeterminate structure requires methods beyond simple
statics because there are more unknowns (reactions or internal forces) than
equations of equilibrium, necessitating consideration of compatibility and
material properties.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects:
1. What is a Statically Indeterminate Structure?
 A structure where the internal forces and support reactions cannot be
determined solely by using the equations of static equilibrium (sum of forces
and moments equal zero).
 These structures have "redundant" reactions or internal forces, meaning there
are more unknown forces than independent equilibrium equations.
 Examples include continuous beams, frames, and arches.
2. Why is Analysis Needed?
 To determine the internal forces and support reactions accurately, which is
crucial for structural design and safety.
 To understand how the structure behaves under different loading conditions.
3. Methods for Analysis
 Force (Flexibility) Method:
 This method involves converting the indeterminate structure to a determinate
structure by identifying and removing redundant reactions.
 The compatibility conditions (displacements and rotations) are then used to
determine the redundant forces.
 Displacement (Stiffness) Method:
 This method focuses on the displacements and rotations of the structure.
 It uses a system of equilibrium equations and compatibility conditions to
determine the unknowns.
 Moment Distribution Method:
 This method is a manual technique for analyzing indeterminate structures,
particularly frames.
 It involves distributing the fixed-end moments until equilibrium is reached.
 Finite Element Method (FEM):
 This is a numerical method that discretizes the structure into smaller elements,
allowing for complex geometries and material properties to be analyzed.
 Matrix Structural Analysis:
 This method uses matrices to represent the structure's stiffness and load,
allowing for efficient analysis by computer software.
4. Key Concepts
 Redundant Reactions: Unknown forces in excess of the number of
equilibrium equations.
 Compatibility Equations: Equations that ensure the structure's deformation
is consistent with its geometry and material properties.
 Degree of Indeterminacy: The number of redundant reactions or internal
forces.
 Static Indeterminacy: A structure is statically indeterminate if the number of
unknown reactions exceeds the number of independent equilibrium
equations.
 Kinematic Indeterminacy: A structure is kinematically indeterminate if the
number of unknown displacements exceeds the number of independent
kinematic equations.
5. Examples
 Continuous Beam:
A beam supported by multiple supports, where the reactions at the supports
cannot be determined by statics alone.
 Frame:
A structure composed of interconnected beams and columns, often used in
buildings.
 Arch:
A curved structure that carries loads, often used in bridges and buildings.
 In the context of structural mechanics, the "degree of statics" refers to the
number of redundant forces or reactions in a structure, while the "degree of
kinematics" represents the number of independent degrees of freedom or
movements a structure can have.

what is the degree of statics and kinematics

Here's a more detailed explanation:
 Degree of Static Indeterminacy (DSI):
 This indicates whether a structure can be analyzed using only the equations of
static equilibrium (sum of forces and moments equal zero).
 If the number of unknown forces or reactions exceeds the number of available
equilibrium equations, the structure is statically indeterminate.
 A structure with DSI = 0 is statically determinate, meaning it can be analyzed
using only the equilibrium equations.
 A structure with DSI > 0 is statically indeterminate, meaning additional equations
(e.g., from material properties or deformation compatibility) are needed for analysis.
 Degree of Kinematic Indeterminacy (DKI):
 This represents the number of independent motions or displacements a
structure can undergo.
 It's also known as the number of degrees of freedom.
 For a 2D structure, each joint can have 3 degrees of freedom (2 translations and
1 rotation), while for a 3D structure, each joint can have 6 degrees of freedom (3
translations and 3 rotations).
 The DKI is determined by considering the number of joints and the constraints
imposed by supports or connections.
 A structure with DKI = 0 is kinematically determinate, meaning it has no
independent motions.
 A structure with DKI > 0 is kinematically indeterminate, meaning it has multiple
possible motions.
Example:
 A simply supported beam (statically determinate) has a DSI of 0, and a DKI of
1 (it can only move vertically).
 A continuous beam (statically indeterminate) will have a DSI greater than 0,
and a DKI of 1 (it can only move vertically).
 A rigid frame (statically indeterminate) will have a DSI greater than 0, and a
DKI of 3 (it can move in 2 translations and 1 rotation).
 


1. General Introduction
. Static and Kinematic Indeterminacy of Structures The aim of
structural analysis is to evaluate the external reactions, the deformed
shape and internal stresses in the structure. If this can be determined
strictly from equations of equilibrium, then such structures are known
as determinate structures. However, in many structures, it is not
possible to determine either reactions or internal stresses or both using
equilibrium equations alone, because the structures having more
unknown forces than available equilibrium equations such structures
are known as the statically indeterminate structures. Static
indeterminacy may be internal or external (or both), depending on the
redundancy. The total number of releases required to make a structure
statically determinate is called the degree of statical indeterminacy. Fig
1.1 Statically indeterminate structure For instance, the beam shown in
Fig.1.1 has four reaction components, whereas we have only 3
equations of equilibrium. Hence the beam is externally indeterminate
to the first degree.
Advantages and disadvantages of indeterminate structures
The advantages of statically indeterminate structures over determinate
structures include the following. Smaller Stresses- the maximum
stresses in statically indeterminate structures are generally lower than
those in comparable determinate structures.
Greater Stiffnesses- Statically indeterminate structures generally have
higher structures. Redundancies- Statically indeterminate structures, if
properly designed, have the capacity for redistributing loads when
certain structural portions become overstressed or collapse in cases of
overloads due to earthquakes, impact (e.g. vehicle impacts), and other
such events. CENG 2103-Theory of Structures II AAiT, School . Lecture
Note by: Dr. Abrham Gebre and Yisihak Gebre
The following are some of the main disadvantages of statically
indeterminate structures, over determinate structures.
Stresses Due to Support Settlements - Support settlements do not
cause any stresses in determinate structures; they may, however,
induce significant stresses in indeterminate structures, which should be
taken into account when designing indeterminate structures. Stresses
Due to Temperature Changes and Fabrication Errors- Like support
settlements, these effects do not cause stresses in determinate
structures but may induce significant stresses in indeterminate ones.
Kinematic Indeterminacy of structures
When the structure is loaded, the joints undergo displacements in the
form of translations and rotations. In the displacement-based analysis,
these joint displacements are treated as unknown quantities. The joint
displacements in a structure is treated as independent if each
displacement (translation and rotation) can be varied arbitrarily and
independently of all other displacements. The number of independent
joint displacement in a structure is known as the degree of kinematic
indeterminacy or the number of degrees of freedom. Consider a
propped cantilever beam shown in Fig. 1.2 (a). The displacements at a
fixed support are zero. Hence, for a propped cantilever beam, we have
to evaluate only rotation at B and this is known as the kinematic
indeterminacy of the structure. A fixed-fixed beam is kinematically
determinate but statically indeterminate to the 3rd degree. A simply
supported beam and a cantilever beam shown in Fig. 1.2 (a) & (b) are
kinematically indeterminate to 2nd degree.
Analysis of Indeterminate Structure
s In the analysis of statically determinate structures, the equations of
equilibrium are first used to obtain the reactions and the internal forces
of the structure; then the member forcedeformation relations and the
compatibility conditions are employed to determine the However
, in the analysis of statically indeterminate structures, the equilibrium
equations alone are not sufficient for determining the reactions and
internal forces. Therefore, it becomes necessary to solve the
equilibrium equations in conjunction with the compatibility conditions
of the structure to determine its response. Because the equilibrium
equations contain the unknown forces, whereas the compatibility
conditions involve displacements as the unknowns, the member force-
deformation relations are utilized to express the unknown forces either
in terms of the unknown displacements or vice versa. The resulting
system of equations containing only one type of unknowns is then
solved for the unknown forces or displacements, which are then
substituted into the fundamental relationships to determine the
remaining response characteristics of the structure.
For analyzing statically indeterminate structures,
many methods have been developed. These methods can be broadly
classified into two categories, namely, the force (flexibility) methods
and the displacement(stiffness) methods, depending on the type of
unknowns (forces or displacements, respectively), involved in the
solution of the governing equations. Thus, some of these methods are:
The consistent deformation method (force/ flexible method) Slope-
displacement method Cross Moment distribution method Kani Method
of Moment Distribution The stiffness method Analysis of indeterminate
structures using consistent deformation and slope deflection methods
involve solutions of simultaneous equations. On the other hand, Cross
and Kani moment distribution methods involve successive cycles of
computation. 1.3. Revision on Consistent Deformation Method The
method of consistent deformations, or sometimes referred to as the
force or flexibility method, is one of the several techniques available to
analyze indeterminate structures. The following is the procedure that
describes the concept of this method for analyzing externally
indeterminate structures with single or double degrees of
indeterminacy.
Principle: - Given a set of forces on a structure, the reactions must
assume such a value as are not only in static equilibrium with the
applied forces but also satisfy the conditions of geometry at the
supports as well as the indeterminate points of the structure. This
method involves with the replacement of redundant supports or
restrains by unknown actions in such a way that one obtain a basic
determinate structure under the action of the applied loading and
these unknown reactions or redundant. Then, the derived basic
determinate structure must still satisfy the physical requirements at the
location of the excess supports now replace by redundant reactions.
1.3.1. Beams by Consistent Deformation The basic procedures to solve
intermediate beams by the method of consistent deformation method
are as follows: determine the degree of indeterminacy select redundant
and remove restraint determine reactions and draw moment diagram
for the primary structure calculate deformation at redundant write
consistent deformation equation solve consistent deformation
equation determine support reactions draw moment, shear, and axial
load diagrams
The displacement method analyzes indeterminate structures by
considering the unknown displacements (degrees of freedom) as the primary
unknowns. This method involves determining the stiffness of each member,
assembling them into a global stiffness matrix, and then solving for the
unknown displacements based on equilibrium conditions. Finally, the member
 forces are determined using the calculated displacements and member
stiffness.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
1. Determine Degrees of Freedom: Identify the independent joint
displacements (horizontal and vertical displacements, rotations) that are
unknown.
2. Calculate Member Stiffness: Determine the stiffness matrix for each
member based on its material properties, cross-sectional area, and geometry.
3. Assemble Global Stiffness Matrix: Combine the individual member stiffness
matrices into a global stiffness matrix for the entire structure.
4. Apply Loads and Boundary Conditions: Represent the external loads and
support conditions as forces acting on the structure.
5. Establish Equilibrium Equations: Write the equilibrium equations for each
degree of freedom, expressing the forces at each node in terms of the
unknown displacements and the global stiffness matrix.
6. Solve for Displacements: Solve the system of equilibrium equations to
determine the unknown joint displacements.
7. Calculate Member Forces: Use the calculated displacements and member
stiffness matrices to determine the internal forces (moments, shear, axial
forces) within each member.

Key Advantages of the Displacement Method:

 Suitable for Computer Solutions:
The method is well-suited for computer-based analysis of complex indeterminate
structures.
 Efficient for High Indeterminacy:
The method is often more efficient than the force method when the degree of statical
indeterminacy is high.
 Focus on Displacements:
The primary unknowns are displacements, which can be easily visualized and
interpreted.

trusses by the consistent deformation

 The method of consistent deformation, also known as the force
method, analyzes indeterminate trusses by using equilibrium equations and
compatibility conditions to determine unknown redundant forces, which are
forces that, if removed, wouldn't cause the structure to become unstable.
Here's a breakdown of the method:
 Indeterminate Structures:
The method is specifically designed for structures that are statically
indeterminate, meaning they have more unknowns (reactions and member
forces) than available equilibrium equations.
 Redundant Forces:
In an indeterminate truss, there are redundant forces, which are forces that
can be removed without causing the structure to collapse.
 Compatibility Equations:
The method relies on compatibility equations, which ensure that the
structure's deformations (displacements) are consistent with the applied
loads and the geometry of the structure.
 Procedure:
1. Determine Indeterminacy: Identify the degree of indeterminacy of the truss
(number of redundant forces).
2. Choose Redundants: Select the redundant forces to be determined.
3. Apply Real Loads: Analyze the truss with the real loads applied, considering
the redundant forces as unknowns.
4. Apply Unit Loads: Apply a unit load (or a series of unit loads) at the location of
each redundant force, one at a time, to determine the influence coefficients (how
the structure deforms under the unit load).
5. Formulate Compatibility Equations: Write compatibility equations based on
the deformations caused by the real loads and the unit loads, ensuring the
structure's deformations are consistent.
6. Solve for Redundants: Solve the compatibility equations to determine the
unknown redundant forces.
7. Analyze the Structure: Once the redundant forces are known, the truss can be
analyzed using standard methods of structural analysis to determine the forces
in all members.

frames by the consistent deformation

 The "Method of Consistent Deformation," also known as the force or flexibility
method, is used to analyze statically indeterminate structures, including
frames, by ensuring that the structure's deformations remain compatible under
the applied loads and redundant forces.
Here's a breakdown of the method:
1. Understanding Indeterminate Structures:
 Statically indeterminate structures have more unknown reactions or internal
forces than can be solved using static equilibrium equations alone.
 This means you need additional equations, based on the principle of
compatibility (ensuring the structure doesn't deform in an impossible way), to
solve for all the unknowns.
2. Key Concepts:
 Redundant Forces:
These are the unknown forces that, if removed, would make the structure
statically determinate (meaning it can be solved using only equilibrium
equations).
 Compatibility Equations:
These equations ensure that the deformations of the structure are
compatible, meaning they don't lead to impossible or unrealistic
displacements or rotations at any point in the structure.
3. Steps in the Method of Consistent Deformation:
 Identify the Degree of Indeterminacy:
Determine how many redundant forces exist in the structure.
 Choose Redundant Forces:
Select the unknown reactions or internal forces that will be treated as
redundant.
 Formulate Compatibility Equations:
Write equations that ensure the structure's deformations are compatible,
considering the redundant forces.
 Solve for Redundant Forces:
Solve the compatibility equations simultaneously to determine the
magnitudes of the redundant forces.
 Analyze the Structure:
 Once the redundant forces are known, analyze the structure using static
equilibrium equations to determine the remaining reactions and internal
forces.
4. Example:
 Consider a frame with one unknown reaction at a support (making it statically
indeterminate of the first degree).
 You would select that reaction as the redundant force.
 Then you would write a compatibility equation based on the displacement or
rotation at the redundant location, ensuring that the structure's deformation is
consistent.
 By solving this equation, you can determine the magnitude of the redundant
force, and then the remaining reactions and internal forces can be calculated
using equilibrium equations.
law of reciprocal defection
Maxwell's reciprocal theorem, sometimes called Maxwell's reciprocal rule,
is a technical relationship that equates two separate distortions in an
elastic structure under load. It can either be used to reduce the number of
factors calculated in a given circumstance or used as a check that the
calculation has correctly predicted the equality of two separate
distortions. Maxwell's rule is one of the basic tools of structural
engineering.
In a
nutshell Aright.
simple example of the general rule is illustrated in the diagram on the
A beam is supported near either end. A unit load is applied in the
centre (for simplicity as an example), at point C. The beam is not just
deflected at the centre but all along its length. Let the deflection at a
point D be δDC. Maxwell's reciprocal theorem says that the deflection at D
due to a unit load at C is the same as the deflection at C if a unit load
were applied at D. In our notation, δCD = δDC. The lower diagram illustrates
the second situation.

technical Maxwell's reciprocal theorem doesn't just apply to beams but to any
linear elastic body, including surfaces. It doesn't just apply to
detail displacements but also to rotations produced by torques. It is derived
relatively straightforwardly by examining the work done when two
different forces are applied.

If a force F is applied against an elastic resistance, Hooke's law says that

the force of resistance increases linearly until it balances the applied
force. Suppose the final displacement is x. The work done against the
increasing resistance is ½Fx. On the other hand, if a force is moved a
distance y, then the work done is Fy. There is a further assumption that
the distortion applied by a given force at a given point is independent of
the existence of other loads. These basics are applied on the right to the
situation of loads being applied in succession, first at C and then at D,
and then in the reverse order. With a linear elastic system undergoing
small distortions, the net result will not depend on the order in which
the two loads are applied. The argument on the right has been given for
 'unit load' but any load can be taken under the assumptions.

JSR 2016

method of least work

The method of least work, derived from Castigliano's second theorem, states
that in a statically indeterminate structure, the redundant reaction components
are such that they minimize the total internal work (strain energy).
Here's a more detailed explanation:
 Statically Indeterminate Structures:
These are structures where the number of unknowns (reactions and internal
forces) exceeds the number of independent equilibrium equations.
 Redundant Reactions:
These are the extra unknown reactions that cannot be determined solely
from static equilibrium equations.
 Castigliano's Second Theorem:
 This theorem states that the partial derivative of the total internal energy
(strain energy) with respect to a force applied at any point is equal to the
deflection at the point of application of that force in the direction of its line of
action.
 Method of Least Work:
This method uses Castigliano's second theorem to determine the redundant
reactions by minimizing the total internal work (strain energy) of the
structure.
 Minimizing Strain Energy:
The method ensures that the redundant reactions are such that the total
strain energy (or internal work) of the structure is minimized.
 Compatibility Equations:
The compatibility equations are established by using Castigliano's second
theorem instead of deflection superposition in this method.
 Application:
This method is particularly useful for analyzing statically indeterminate
structures where the strain energy can be determined relatively easily.

induced reaction on statically indeterminate beams and rigid beams

due to yielding of supports
When a statically indeterminate beam or rigid frame experiences support
yielding, it induces additional internal forces and reactions that are not present
in a statically determinate structure. These induced reactions are determined
by analyzing the structure's compatibility conditions, along with the equations
of equilibrium.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
1. What are Statically Indeterminate Structures?
 A structure is considered statically indeterminate when the number of
unknown reactions or internal forces exceeds the number of independent
equilibrium equations (sum of forces and moments equals zero).
 Examples include fixed beams, continuous beams, and rigid frames.
2. Support Yielding and Induced Reactions
 Support Yielding:
 When supports settle or yield, it introduces additional constraints or
deformations that are not present in the original structure.
 Induced Reactions:
These deformations cause the structure to develop internal stresses and
reactions that were not present under the original loading conditions.
 Compatibility Equations:
To analyze the structure, you need to consider the compatibility equations,
which relate the deformations of the structure to the applied loads and
reactions.
 Analysis Methods:
You can use methods like the force method (flexibility method) or the
displacement method (stiffness method) to analyze these structures.
3. Examples
 Fixed Beam:
A fixed beam (supported at both ends with fixed supports) is statically
indeterminate. If one of the supports settles, it will induce bending moments
and shear forces in the beam, even if the original loads were simply vertical.
 Continuous Beam:
A continuous beam (supported at multiple points) is also statically
indeterminate. If one of the intermediate supports settles, it will cause
changes in the bending moments and shear forces along the beam.
 Rigid Frame:
A rigid frame (a structure with interconnected beams and columns) is
another example of a statically indeterminate structure. If one of the supports
settles, it will induce internal forces in the frame members.
4. Key Concepts
 Redundant Reactions:
In statically indeterminate structures, there are more unknown reactions than
equilibrium equations. These extra reactions are called redundant reactions.
 Compatibility Equations:
These equations ensure that the deformations of the structure are consistent
with the geometry and material properties.
 Force Method:
This method involves releasing the redundant reactions and then using
compatibility equations to determine the values of these reactions.
 Displacement Method:
This method focuses on the deformations of the structure and uses
equilibrium equations to determine the internal forces and reactions.

fixed and continuous beam

A fixed beam is rigidly supported at both ends, preventing rotation and

horizontal movement, while a continuous beam spans over more than two
supports, allowing for some rotation and exhibiting greater bending
resistance.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
Fixed Beam:
 Support Conditions:
A fixed beam is supported at both ends, with the supports preventing any
rotation or horizontal movement.
 Bending Moments:
Due to the fixed support conditions, fixed beams develop bending moments,
which are the internal resistance to bending forces.
 Shear Forces:
Fixed beams also experience shear forces along their length, which vary
depending on the applied loads.
 Deflection:
The deflection of fixed beams is generally lower compared to simply
supported beams because of the constraints imposed by the fixed supports.
 Applications:
Fixed beams are commonly used in high-rise buildings, where they are
rigidly attached to intermediate columns or beams.
Continuous Beam:
 Support Conditions:
A continuous beam is supported by more than two supports along its length.
 Load Distribution:
The multiple supports in a continuous beam allow for load distribution,
leading to a more efficient use of materials.
 Rotation:
Unlike fixed beams, continuous beams allow for some rotation at the
supports.
 Deflection:
Continuous beams generally exhibit more deflection compared to fixed
beams, as they are not as rigidly constrained.
 Applications:
Continuous beams are commonly used in building construction to span long
distances and support loads such as the weight of the structure, occupants,
furniture, and environmental loads like wind and snow.

analysis of fixed beam by moment area theorem

The moment-area method, developed by Mohr, is a powerful tool
for finding the deflections of structures primarily subjected to
bending. Its ease of finding deflections of determinate structures
makes it ideal for solving indeterminate structures, using
compatibility of displacement.
Area-Moment Method:It is also known as Mohr's method. This
method establishes a procedure that utilizes the area of the moment
diagrams [actually, M/EI diagram] to evaluate the slope or deflection at
selected points along the axis of a beam. This method is applicable to
both prismatic and non-prismatic beams.

The Moment Area Theorems

>>When you're done reading this section, check your understanding with
the interactive quiz at the bottom of the page.

The moment area theorems provide a way to find slopes and deflections
without having to go through a full process of integration as described in
the previous section. They still rely on the Bernoulli-Euler beam theory
assumptions (plane sections remain plane and small angles).

There are two moment area theorems, one that relates to the slope of
the beam and one that relates to the deflections. It is important to
understand that both theorems only provide information about one location
on a beam relative to another location on the beam. They are quite powerful
once you know how to use them properly.

First Moment Area Theorem

The first moment area theorem is that the change in the slope of a
beam between two points is equal to the area under the curvature diagram
between those two points. Recall that the curvature is just equal
to M/EIM/EI, so the curvature diagram often looks similar to the moment
diagram; however, be careful, because it is possible for
EIEI to change along the length of a beam, which may cause 'steps' in the curvature diagram, which
won't be present in the moment diagram.

The first moment area theorem is illustrated in Figure 5.4. The sample
structure in the figure is a simply-supported beam with a point load. This
support condition and loading on the beam results in a triangle-shaped
moment diagram. To find the curvature diagram, you would have to divide
the moment diagram by EIEI at every point along the beam. If the EIEI of
the beam is the same all the way along, this results in a simple scaling of
the moment diagram and the curvature diagram so the curvature diagram
would also have a triangular shape as shown in the figure (but with different
magnitude).

Figure 5.4: First Moment Area Theorem

Once we have a curvature diagram, we can use the moment area

theorems. The first moment area theorem, described above, relates the
slope (rotation) at one point along a beam to the slope at another point on
the beam. The slopes at two points along the sample beam (points B and C)
are shown in Figure 5.4. The change in slope between points B and C is
equal to the area under the curvature diagram between points B and C as
shown (which is the same thing as the integral of the curvature). This
change in slope is referred to as θC/BθC/B:
θC/B=θC−θB(1)(1)θC/B=θC−θB
 1.

 First Moment Area Theorem: The change in slope between two points on a beam is
equal to the area of the bending moment diagram between those points divided by EI
(flexural rigidity).
 Second Moment Area Theorem: The deflection of a point relative to a tangent line drawn
at another point is equal to the first moment of the bending moment diagram area between
those points about that point divided by EI.
2.
Second Moment Area Theorem
The second moment area theorem is that the vertical distance
between (a) a reference tangent line that is tangent to the slope at one
point on the beam and (b) the deflected shape of the beam at another point,
is equal to the moment of the area under the curvature diagram between
the two points with the moments of the areas calculated relative to the
point on the deflected shape (b).

The second moment area theorem is illustrated in Figure 5.5. The same
sample structure is used for this illustration as for the first moment area
theorem in the previous sections, so it has the same curvature diagram.

Figure 5.5: Second Moment Area Theorem

The second moment area theorem relates the tangent line at one point
on a beam (our reference tangent) to the deflection of another part of the
beam, as shown in Figure 5.5; however, it is important to realize that this
can give us only the distance between the reference tangent line and the
deflected shape (ΔB/CΔB/C in the figure), it cannot directly give us the
deflection of the beam relative to the initial undeformed shape (which is
usually the parameter that we are most interested in). We can use the
second moment area theorem to find total deflection relative to the
undeformed position, but it is a multi-step process, as we will learn in the
next section.
For the second moment area theorem itself, that relative distance
(between a reference tangent at one point and the deflected shape at
another point) is found by taking the moment of the area under the
curvature diagram between the two points. This is actually a similar process
to the process required to find the centroid of a cross-section. If the area
under the curvature diagram is a complex shape then we can split it up into
smaller areas with simple shapes ( A1A1 to A4A4 as shown in Figure 5.5)
and find the sum of the moments of the areas for each of them. A moment of
an area is simply the area of the shape ( AA) multiplied by the distance to
the centroid (x¯x¯) as shown in the figure. For the second moment area
theorem, that distance is always measured from the deflected shape point
(B in the figure). In the figure, this results in a distance between the
reference tangent and the deflected shape of:
ΔB/C=A1x¯1+A2x¯2+A3x¯3+A4x¯4(3)(3)ΔB/
C=A1x¯1+A2x¯2+A3x¯3+A4x¯4
ΔB/C=∫CBM(x)E(x)I(x)x¯dx(4)(4)ΔB/C=∫BCM(x)E(x)I(x)x¯dx
Using the Moment Area Theorems
This section will outline two common scenarios that are often encountered
for which the moment area theorems can be very useful.

Slope and Deflection are both Zero at One Point

If we know the slope and deflection at a single point in a beam are both zero
(at the same point), as shown in Figure 5.6, then we can easily find the
slope or deflection anywhere else on the beam in one step. This situation
happens most commonly if our beam has a fixed end, like the cantilevered
beam shown in the figure.
 Figure 5.6: Using the Moment Area Theorems when Slope and Deflection are Zero at a
Single Point

With reference to Figure 5.6 part (a), we know that the slope at point A
(θAθA) is zero (because the fixed end does not permit rotation). Since we
know the slope at point A, we can find the slope anywhere else on the beam
using the first moment area theorem. For example, if we want to find the
slope at point B, the change in the slope between points A and B is equal to
the area under the curvature diagram between A and B as shown by the
darkened portion of the curvature diagram in the figure, as previously
described in First Moment Area Theorem:
θB/A=∫BAM(x)EIdxθB/A=∫ABM(x)EIdx
In this case, this change in slope ( θB/AθB/A) is equal to the area of the
shaded trapezoid (or can be calculated as the area of a rectangle plus the
area of a triangle as shown in part (b) of the figure). Knowing the change in
slope, we can find the slope at point B (knowing that θA=0θA=0):
θBθB=θA+θB/A=θB/AθB=θA+θB/AθB=θB/A
Of course, the end at point A did not have to be fixed in order for us to
find the rotation at point B. For any beam, if we know the slope at one
location for any reason, then we can find the slope at any other location
using the first moment area theorem, unless there is an internal hinge or
roller between the two points
 analysis of fixed beam by stain energy
The analysis of fixed beams using the strain energy method
involves calculating the total strain energy stored in the beam due to bending
and then applying Castigliano's second theorem to determine redundant
reactions. This method leverages the principle that the strain energy of a
structure is equal to the work done by external forces.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:

1. Understanding Strain Energy:

 When a beam is subjected to an external load, it undergoes deformation, storing energy
as strain energy.
 For a beam under bending, the strain energy (U) is calculated using the formula: U = ∫
(M²/2EI) dx, where M is the bending moment, E is the modulus of elasticity, I is the
moment of inertia, and dx is an infinitesimal element along the beam's length.
2. Castigliano's Second Theorem:
 This theorem states that the partial derivative of the strain energy (U) with respect to a
redundant reaction (R) is equal to zero: ∂U/∂R = 0.
 By equating the partial derivative of the strain energy with respect to a redundant
reaction to zero, you can solve for the unknown reaction forces in a fixed beam.
3. Steps in Applying the Strain Energy Method to Fixed Beams:
1. 1. Determine the Bending Moment (M) Function:
 First, find the bending moment (M) as a function of x (distance along the beam).
 This often involves considering the beam as a statically indeterminate structure and
finding the redundant reactions.
 The bending moment diagram will vary depending on the loading and supports of the
beam.
2. 2. Calculate the Total Strain Energy (U):
 Integrate the strain energy formula (U = ∫ (M²/2EI) dx) over the length of the beam.
 This will give you the total strain energy stored in the beam due to bending.
3. 3. Apply Castigliano's Second Theorem:
 Take the partial derivative of the strain energy (U) with respect to the redundant reaction
you want to determine.

 Set the derivative equal to zero and solve for the unknown reaction force.
4. 4. Solve for Redundant Reactions:
 By applying Castigliano's second theorem, you can solve for the fixed supports' reactions
at both ends of the beam.
 This will allow you to calculate the fixed beam's response under different load conditions.
Example:
Consider a simply supported beam with a uniformly distributed load. To
analyze this beam using the strain energy method, you would:
1. Determine the bending moment (M) function for the beam.
2. Calculate the total strain energy (U) by integrating the strain energy formula.
3. Apply Castigliano's second theorem to find the redundant reactions at the supports.
4. Solve for the unknown reactions, which are the fixed support reactions in this case.
Key Considerations:
 The strain energy method is particularly useful for analyzing statically indeterminate
structures, such as fixed beams.
 The accuracy of the method depends on the accurate determination of the bending
moment and the correct application of Castigliano's theorems.
 This method is a powerful tool for structural analysis, especially when dealing with
complex loading conditions.
.

fixed end moment due to different types of

loading
Fixed End Moments for different cases and Types of Loads! Fixed end
moments refer to sthe bending moments that occur at the ends of a beam
when it is fully restrained or fixed against rotation and translation. These
fixed restraints prevent any relative movement between the beam and its
supports. When a beam is fixed at its ends, it undergoes a rotation restraint,
meaning it cannot rotate or twist at those points. This results in the
development of moments at the fixed ends, known as fixed end moments.
These moments are induced by the external loads applied to the beam. The
magnitude and distribution of fixed end moments depend on various factors,
including the applied loads, the span length of the beam, and the support
conditions. The distribution of fixed end moments along the beam is
determined by the specific loading configuration and the stiffness of the
beam. Fixed end moments play a crucial role in determining the internal
forces within the beam, such as bending moments, shear forces, and
deflections. By considering these moments, engineers can analyze the
structural behavior of the beam and assess its capacity to resist the applied
loads without failure. To calculate fixed end moments, engineers employ
mathematical techniques and structural analysis methods. Some common
methods include the slope-deflection method, moment distribution method,
or finite element analysis. These methods involve solving a system of
equations derived from equilibrium and compatibility conditions to determine
the fixed end moments accurately. It's important to note that fixed end
moments are idealized assumptions used to simplify the analysis of beam
structures. In reality, there may be some flexibility and deformation at the
fixed supports, especially in more complex structural systems. However, for
many engineering applications, the fixed end moment assumption provides a
reasonable approximation of the beam's behavior and is widely used in
design and analysis. ....................................................................... Check
out #mehrtashsoltani for educational and practical content in civil
engineering!

Fixed Beam
Consider the table below for the calculation of SF and BM.

Condition SFD and BMD Calculation

With Centre SF at the section ‘A-C’ (where x = 0
Concentrated to l2l2) is given as,
Load: SA=+W2SA=+W2.

SF at the section ‘C-B’ (where x

At this point, the = l2l2 to l) is given as,
SF reverses SB=−W2SB=−W2.
direction and
reaches zero,
making the BM Now, BM at the ends of the beam
its maximum (points ‘A’ and ‘B’ where x = 0 to l)
value. is,

MA=MB=−Wl8MA=MB=−Wl8,

And, BM at the midpoint ‘C’ is

(where x = l2l2) is,
Mmax=+Wl8Mmax=+Wl8.
With Uniformly At ‘A’, SF = SA=+Wl2SA=+Wl2.
Distributed Load:
At ‘B’, SF = SB=−Wl2SB=−Wl2.

SF varies linearly, At ‘A’ and ‘B’ , BM

but BM varies = MA=MB=−Wl212MA=MB=−Wl212
according to a .
parabolic curve.

BM at x = l2l2 =
Mmax=Wl224Mmax=Wl224
The maximum
bending moment
occurs at the
midpoint when
the Shear Force
Diagram changes
direction.
Properties of Shear Force and Bending Moment Diagrams

The following are some fundamental properties of shear

and moment diagrams:

1. The region of the Shear diagram to the right or left of

the section corresponds to the moment at the section.
2. At a particular point, the shear is equal to the slope of
the bending moment diagram.
3. At a particular point, the load is the slope of the shear
diagram.
4. The maximum moment occurs at the point when the
shear (also the slope of the moment diagram) is zero.
At this stage, the horizontal tangent is drawn to the
moment diagram.
5. When the SFD rises, the bending moment diagram will
exhibit a rising slope curve.
6. The BMD will have a decreasing slope curve as the SFD
lowers.
7. When the SFD between two loading sites is constant,
the BMD will have a line with a constant slope.

Shear Force and Bending Moment Diagrams

We are aware that a Beam is a structural part upon which

a system of external loads acting at right angles to the
axis act. Shear Force and Bending Moment Diagram (SFD
& BMD) is the graphical representation of the Shear Force
distribution and Bending Moment along the length of a
beam.

Along the span length of the beam, the shear force and
bending moment values change from section to section.
These diagrams can be used to determine the Stress
concentration of a loaded beam and it contributes to the
crucial failure analysis required for the beam's design .
8.

What is the slope and deflection of a fixed beam?

En-castre beams, or fixed beams, have fixed supports at both

ends. So, they don't allow horizontal, vertical or rotational
movement of that support. The most important characteristic of
this beam is that the slope and deflection are zero at both ends.
SLOPE OF A BEAM: ✓ slope at any section in a deflected beam is
defined as the angle in radians which the tangent at the section makes
with the original axis of the beam. ✓ slope of that deflection is the
angle between the initial position and the deflected position.
DEFLECTION OF A BEAM: ✓ The deflection at any point on the axis of
the beam is the distance between its position before and after loading.
✓ When a structural is loaded may it be Beam or Slab, due the effect of
loads acting upon it bends from its initial position that is before the
 load was applied. It means the beam is deflected from its original
position it is called as Deflection.
In a fixed beam, both ends are rigidly fixed, meaning they cannot rotate or
deflect at the supports. Consequently, both the slope and deflection are zero
at the fixed ends of the beam. However, due to these fixed supports, the
beam will experience end moments.

Elaboration:
 Fixed Ends:
The fixed ends of a beam are rigidly supported, preventing any movement or rotation
at those points.
 Zero Slope and Deflection:
Because the supports prevent rotation and vertical displacement, the slope (angle of
the beam's tangent) and deflection (vertical displacement) at the fixed ends are zero.
 End Moments:
The fixed supports introduce end moments in the beam to resist the applied loads and
maintain the fixed conditions.

analysis of continuous beam by the three moment equation due to

different type of loading
Clapeyron's theorem, also known as the theorem of three moments, is a
relationship among the bending moments at three consecutive supports of a
horizontal continuous beam, derived by Émile Clapeyron in 1857.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
 What it is:
Clapeyron's theorem provides a way to determine the bending moments at
the supports of a continuous beam, which are statically indeterminate
structures.
 How it works:
The theorem establishes a relationship between the bending moments at
three consecutive supports (A, B, and C) of a continuous beam, based on
the lengths of the spans (AB and BC), the loads on those spans, and the
moments of inertia of the beam.
 Key Concepts:
 Continuous Beam: A beam supported at more than two points, creating
multiple spans.
 Bending Moments: The internal moments that resist bending stresses in a
beam.
 Three Consecutive Supports: The theorem focuses on the bending moments
at three supports that are next to each other.
 Spans: The lengths between the supports (AB and BC in this case).
 Moments of Inertia: A measure of the resistance of a beam's cross-section to
bending.
 Significance:
This theorem is a valuable tool for structural engineers in analyzing and
designing continuous beams, as it simplifies the calculation of bending
moments at supports.
 Derivation:
The theorem is derived using the principles of statics and the moment-area
method.
 Limitations:
The theorem is primarily applicable to continuous beams and is not suitable
for trusses or frames.
 Equation:
The three-moment equation relates the bending moments at three
consecutive supports (MA, MB, and MC) to the loads and spans.
 Example:
 Let's consider a continuous beam with supports A, B, and C, and spans AB and
BC.
 The theorem helps to establish a relationship between the bending moments at
A, B, and C (MA, MB, and MC).
 This relationship can be used to solve for unknown bending moments.

The Three-Moment Equation is a fundamental tool used for analyzing

continuous beams under various types of loads. It relates the moments at
three consecutive supports of a beam, making it particularly useful for
solving the bending moments and reactions in continuous beams with
multiple spans and varying loading conditions. The equation is derived
from the equations of equilibrium and the compatibility conditions, and
it can be applied to both uniform and non-uniform loading.

Three-Moment Equation Formula:

For a continuous beam with three supports AAA, BBB, and CCC, the
Three-Moment Equation is:

Types of Loadings on Continuous Beams:

The Three-Moment Equation can be applied to beams subjected to

various loading conditions. Let's consider some common loading
scenarios:

1. Uniformly Distributed Load (UDL)

A uniformly distributed load (w) acting over a span can be represented

as a linearly varying load. The equation for the Three-Moment Method
can be adapted for UDLs.

 For a UDL of magnitude www over a span LLL, the reaction forces
at the supports can be determined by equilibrium conditions. The
moment at any section along the span due to the UDL can be
computed as a function of the distance from the support.

2. Point Load at an Intermediate Point

If a point load PPP is applied at a distance aaa from the left-hand support
(in a span between two supports), the corresponding bending moments
and reactions at the supports can be derived using equilibrium.

 This type of loading causes a sharp concentration of bending

moments at the points of load application. The Three-Moment
 Equation accounts for these changes by adjusting the moment
calculation at the supports and including the reaction forces.

3. Concentrated Moment (Moment Applied at a Point)

If a concentrated moment is applied at any point along the span, the

effect on the adjacent supports must be accounted for in the Three-
Moment Equation. The moments at supports are influenced by the
applied moment, and the equilibrium equations must include the
influence of this external moment.

4. Combination of UDL and Point Loads

In real-world applications, beams are often subjected to combinations of

different types of loading. In such cases, the Three-Moment Equation is
solved by breaking down the loading conditions into individual effects
(e.g., UDL and point loads) and then using superposition to combine the
effects on the bending moments.

5. Overhanging Beams

For overhanging beams, where one or more spans extend beyond the
support, the Three-Moment Equation can still be applied, though special
care must be taken in treating the overhanging portions. The equation
might need to be modified for the boundary conditions at the overhangs.

Solving for the Bending Moments

For solving continuous beams using the Three-Moment Equation, the

following steps are typically followed:

1. Determine the length and load conditions of the beam.

2. Apply the Three-Moment Equation for the three consecutive
supports. For each span, the equation will relate the moments at
the supports and the external loads.
 3. Solve the system of equations for the unknown moments at the
supports.
4. Compute the reactions at the supports using equilibrium
conditions.
5. Plot the bending moment diagram across the beam once the
moments are known at the supports and at other key points along
the span.

Example Problem: Continuous Beam with UDL

Consider a continuous beam with three supports AAA, BBB, and CCC,
where a uniform load www is applied across the span between AAA and
BBB, and another load w2w_2w2 is applied between BBB and CCC.

1. Step 1: Apply the Three-Moment Equation to the spans ABABAB

and BCBCBC.
2. Step 2: Solve for the unknown moments at the supports,
MAM_AMA, MBM_BMB, and MCM_CMC.
3. Step 3: Compute reactions at the supports.
4. Step 4: Plot the bending moment diagram across the beam.

The results will depend on the exact magnitudes and distances of the
loads, but the Three-Moment Equation simplifies the process by relating
the bending moments directly to the applied loads

effects of sinking of supports in fixed and contineous beam

When supports in fixed or continuous beams sink, it leads to additional
moments and changes in bending moment distribution, with sinking of an
intermediate support in a continuous beam reducing negative moments at the
support and increasing positive moments at the mid-span.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
Fixed Beams:
 Unequal Sinking:
 If one end of a fixed beam sinks, it causes a difference in levels, resulting in
additional moments at the ends of the beam.

 Moment Development:
These additional moments are developed to counteract the change in
boundary conditions caused by the sinking support.
 Slope and Deflection:
The sinking support changes the slope and deflection of the beam, impacting
the bending moment distribution.
Continuous Beams:
 Intermediate Support Sinking:
When an intermediate support sinks, it reduces negative bending moments
at the support and increases positive bending moments at the mid-span on
either side.
 Moment Redistribution:
The sinking of a support causes a redistribution of moments, with the
negative moments at the supports decreasing and the positive moments at
the mid-span increasing.
 Calculation:
The changes in moments due to sinking can be calculated using methods
like the moment distribution method.
 Deflection Curve:
The deflection curve changes from convexity upwards over the intermediate
supports to concavity upwards over the mid-span.

UNIT – 2
The slope deflection method, introduced by George A. Maney in 1915, is a
structural analysis method for beams and frames that relates member end
moments to rotations and displacements of joints, allowing for the analysis of
indeterminate structures.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
 What it is:
 The slope deflection method is a displacement method where the unknowns
are joint displacements (rotations and relative joint displacements). It's used
to analyze statically indeterminate structures like beams and frames.

 How it works:
 The method establishes a relationship between member end moments and the
corresponding rotations and displacements of the joints.
 It involves writing equilibrium equations for each joint in terms of deflections and
rotations, then solving for these generalized displacements.
 Once the displacements are known, the member end moments can be
determined using moment-displacement relations.
 Assumptions:
The slope-deflection method assumes that a typical member can flex, but
shear and axial deformations are negligible.
 Historical Context:
While the method was developed by Otto Mohr for trusses, it was presented
in its current form by G.A. Maney for analyzing rigid jointed structures in
1915.
 Significance:
The slope deflection method was widely used for a while until the moment
distribution method was developed. With the advent of computers, the
development of this method in matrix form, known as the stiffness matrix
method, gained importance for analyzing large structures.
 Key Concepts:
 Slope: The angle of rotation of a member's end.
 Deflection: The displacement of a joint or member.
 Fixed-End Moments (FEM): The moments that develop at the ends of a
member when it is restrained against rotation.
 Stiffness: A measure of a member's resistance to bending.
 Joint Equilibrium: The condition where the sum of forces and moments acting
on a joint is zero.
 SLOPE DEFECTION equation
The slope deflection equations relate the end moments of a structural member
to the rotations (slopes) at its ends and the relative displacement (settlement)
of its supports, using the member's stiffness (EI/L) and fixed-end moments.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
 What are Slope-Deflection Equations?
 These equations are a method of structural analysis, particularly for
indeterminate structures, that focuses on finding the relationship between the
moments at the ends of a member (MAB, MBA) and the rotations (slopes) at its
ends (θA, θB) and any relative displacement (settlement) of its supports (ψ).
 They are a key part of the "stiffness method" of structural analysis, where the
primary unknowns are displacements and rotations, rather than forces.
 Key Concepts:
 EI/L: Represents the stiffness factor of the structural member, where E is the
modulus of elasticity, I is the moment of inertia, and L is the length of the
member.
 θA, θB: Rotations at the ends A and B of the member, respectively.
 ψ: Chord rotation caused by settlement of end B.
 Fixed-End Moments (FEM): The moments that would exist at the ends of the
member if it were fixed at both ends, due to external loads.
 The Equations (General Form):
 MAB = 2EI/L (2θA + θB - 3ψ) + FEMAB
 MBA = 2EI/L (θA + 2θB - 3ψ) + FEMBA
 Where:
 MAB = End moment at end A due to the member AB
 MBA = End moment at end B due to the member AB
 FEMAB = Fixed-end moment at end A
 FEMBA = Fixed-end moment at end B
 How to Use Slope-Deflection Equations:
 Identify the Structure: Determine the type of structure (e.g., continuous beam,
frame) and its degrees of freedom (rotations and displacements).

Calculate Fixed-End Moments: Determine the fixed-end moments for each

member based on the applied loads.
Apply Slope-Deflection Equations: Write the slope-deflection equations for
each member, relating the end moments to the rotations and displacements.
Solve for Unknowns: Solve the system of equations to find the unknown
rotations and displacements.
Calculate End Moments: Substitute the solved values back into the slope-
deflection equations to determine the final end moments.

analysis of statically indeterminate sttruture beam frames by (sway and

nonsway type) due o applied loads and uneve

To analyze statically indeterminate beam frames (sway and non-sway) under

applied loads and uneven support settlement, you can use methods like the
force method or displacement methods (e.g., slope-deflection, moment
distribution), considering compatibility and equilibrium equations.
Here's a breakdown of the process:
1. Understanding Statically Indeterminate Structures:
 Definition:
A structure is statically indeterminate if the number of unknown reactions or
internal forces exceeds the number of available equilibrium equations (sum
of forces and moments = 0).
 Examples:
Continuous beams, frames with fixed supports, and structures with
redundant members are examples of statically indeterminate structures.
 Degree of Indeterminacy:
The number of redundant unknowns (reactions or internal forces) is called
the degree of indeterminacy.
2. Types of Indeterminate Frames:
 Sway Frames:
Frames that can sway or undergo lateral movement under load, often due to
asymmetrical loading or structure.
 Non-Sway Frames:
Frames that are designed to resist lateral movement, often due to
symmetrical loading or bracing.
3. Methods for Analysis:
 Force Method (Flexibility Method):
 Concept: Convert the indeterminate structure into a determinate structure by
removing redundant reactions and replacing them with unit forces.
 Procedure:
Identify redundant reactions and create a primary structure (determinate).
Write compatibility equations based on the displacements or rotations of the
redundant reactions.
 Solve the compatibility equations to find the redundant reactions.
 Use these reactions in conjunction with equilibrium equations to find the
remaining reactions and internal forces.
 Displacement Methods (e.g., Slope-Deflection, Moment Distribution):
 Concept: These methods focus on the displacements (rotations and
translations) of joints and members.
 Procedure:
1. Write equilibrium equations for each joint, considering rotations and
translations.
2. Write compatibility equations based on the displacements and rotations of the
members.
 Solve the equations simultaneously to find the unknown displacements and
rotations.
 Use these displacements and rotations to determine the member end moments
and reactions.
4. Uneven Support Settlement:
 Effect:
Uneven settlement of supports introduces additional displacements and
rotations into the structure, which must be considered in the analysis.
 Analysis:
 Force Method: Introduce compatibility equations that account for the support
settlements.
 Displacement Methods: Account for the support settlements as known
displacements in the analysis.
5. Key Considerations:
 Material Properties:
Elastic properties (Young's modulus, E) and moment of inertia (I) of
members are crucial for determining deflections and rotations.
 Loading Conditions:
Carefully consider the type and magnitude of applied loads.
 Boundary Conditions:
The type of supports (e.g., pinned, fixed, rollers) affects the reactions and
internal forces.
 Software:
Structural analysis software can automate the calculations and provide
efficient solutions for complex indeterminate structures.

Or
The analysis of statically indeterminate beam frames, especially in the context of sway and non-
sway types, involves a few complex steps. When structural frames or beams are statically
indeterminate, it means that the system's internal forces and displacements cannot be
determined solely by static equilibrium equations (force and moment balance). To analyze these
structures, additional methods such as compatibility of displacements, energy methods, or
matrix methods (like the stiffness method) are employed. Sway and non-sway frames refer to
whether the structure undergoes lateral displacement (sway) or remains rigid (non-sway) under
applied loads.

Key Concepts in the Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Frames:

1. Static Indeterminacy: A structure is statically indeterminate when there are more

unknown forces or reactions than can be determined by the equations of static
equilibrium (3 equations in 2D and 6 equations in 3D).
o For a frame, the number of unknowns (reactions, internal forces, and moments) exceeds
the number of equilibrium equations.
o The degree of static indeterminacy DsD_sDs is given by: Ds=(r+m)−2jD_s = (r + m) - 2jDs
=(r+m)−2j Where:
 rrr = number of reaction components (support reactions),
 mmm = number of internal forces (moments and axial forces),
 jjj = number of joints in the structure (for planar frames).

2. Sway and Non-Sway Frames:

o Non-Sway Frames: These are frames in which no significant lateral displacements occur
under load. The structure remains rigid under vertical loading. This means the frame
doesn't experience noticeable horizontal deformation.
o Sway Frames: In sway frames, horizontal or lateral displacement (sway) occurs under
vertical loads due to the structure's geometry or due to external horizontal loads. A
 sway frame is more susceptible to lateral displacement and can develop significant
bending in the lateral direction.

3. Load Types:
o Vertical Loads: Typically point loads or uniform loads, which create bending and axial
forces.
o Horizontal Loads (Wind or Earthquake Forces): Can induce lateral sway.
o Uneven Support Settlement: If the supports settle unevenly (differential settlement),
this can cause additional internal forces and moments due to the shift in alignment,
which may lead to sway in frames that were originally designed to be non-sway.

Steps for Analyzing Statically Indeterminate Frames

The analysis typically involves the following approaches, depending on whether the frame is
sway or non-sway:

1. For Non-Sway Frames:

o Elastic Compatibility Equations: The displacements and deformations due to
bending (deflections) need to be compatible with the boundary conditions of the
frame. These displacements are found using energy methods or through numerical
methods like the stiffness method.
o Superposition of Effects: If a structure is subjected to both vertical and
horizontal loads, superimpose the effects of the vertical loads and horizontal loads
separately and solve the system equations.
o Moment Distribution Method: For indeterminate structures, the moment
distribution method can be used to distribute moments iteratively across the
structure based on the stiffness and rigidity of the beams and joints.
o Method of Redundant Forces: This method assumes that some redundant forces
or displacements (such as reactions) are known, and additional compatibility
equations are used to solve for unknowns. You can solve for displacements and
forces iteratively.
2. For Sway Frames:
o P-Delta Analysis: For sway structures, the P-Delta effect (due to large displacements)
must be considered, which takes into account the change in the geometry due to
displacement. A large sway can alter the load distribution on the frame.

Peff=P+Δ⋅PP_{eff} = P + \Delta \cdot PPeff=P+Δ⋅P

Where PeffP_{eff}Peff is the effective load considering the displacement, and Δ\DeltaΔ
is the lateral displacement of the structure.

o Nonlinear Effects: For sway frames, especially those subject to large displacements or
nonlinear behavior, finite element analysis (FEA) is often used to simulate the nonlinear
material and geometric response of the structure.
 3. Uneven Settlement: When there is uneven settlement of supports, it can cause additional
internal moments in the frame. The following effects must be accounted for:
o Rigid Body Motion: Uneven settlement can cause rigid body motion (translations and
rotations) of the structure. The overall stability is affected if large rotations occur.
o Moment Redistribution: The redistribution of internal moments and forces due to
differential settlement needs to be considered.
o Additional Stresses and Deflections: These can cause bending stresses and larger
deflections, which must be accounted for by considering the compatibility of
displacements.

Methods to Solve Indeterminate Frames:

1. Force Method (Flexibility Method):

o Involves removing the redundants (reactions or internal forces), calculating the
displacements, and applying compatibility conditions to find the redundant forces.

2. Displacement Method (Stiffness Method):

o Involves writing the structure's equations in terms of displacement (i.e., nodal
displacements) and solving for the unknowns iteratively.

3. Finite Element Method (FEM):

o For more complex frames, FEM is used to model the structure’s behavior. It breaks
down the frame into small elements and solves for forces and displacements iteratively.

4. Moment Distribution and Convergence:

o Iterative methods such as moment distribution are often used for indeterminate frames,
where initial guesswork is used to iteratively converge to the correct moments and
forces.

Sway and Non-Sway Analysis Based on Load and Support Types:

 For Sway Frames:

o Applied Vertical Load: Vertical loads can cause vertical bending, and lateral loads can
cause lateral displacements. A sway frame must account for lateral displacement due to
both applied and internal loads.

 For Non-Sway Frames:

o Applied Vertical Load: Vertical loads primarily cause bending and axial forces. These
frames will not experience significant lateral displacement, assuming no initial sway or
imperfections.

 Uneven Settlement: If supports settle unevenly, the lateral displacement in a sway frame
will be significant. For a non-sway frame, the structure may bend slightly, but large sway
will not occur unless the settlement is extreme.
 Example:

For a cantilever beam frame with a point load at the free end and a differential settlement at
the supports:

 Non-sway Analysis:
o Calculate internal moments due to the point load.
o Use the displacement method to account for the reaction at the support and the
deflections.

 Sway Analysis:
o Consider the effects of differential settlement. Use the P-delta method to include the
effects of the lateral displacement on the internal forces.
o Iterate to find the final sway displacement and adjust internal forces accordingly.

Conclusion:

The analysis of statically indeterminate beam frames involves sophisticated methods depending
on whether the frame experiences sway or not. Non-sway frames typically require compatibility
of displacements and iterative methods for solving, while sway frames require additional
considerations for lateral displacements (P-delta effects, large deflections). Uneven settlement
introduces complexity by causing shifts in the alignment of supports, necessitating careful
consideration of compatibility and moment redistribution in the analysis.

moment distribution method introduction

The moment distribution method, developed by Hardy Cross, is an iterative,
approximate method for analyzing statically indeterminate beams and frames,
focusing on balancing moments at joints and carrying them over to adjacent
members until equilibrium is achieved.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
 Purpose:
The method is used to analyze structures where the supports are not fully
known (statically indeterminate structures), such as continuous beams and
frames, by determining the bending moments at the joints.
 Iterative Process:
The analysis involves a series of approximations or iterations, where
moments are distributed and balanced at each joint until the desired level of
accuracy is reached.
 Key Concepts:
 Fixed-End Moments: The method starts by assuming all joints are fixed,
calculating the moments that would develop in each member due to external
loads (fixed-end moments).

 Balancing Moments: Once the joints are released, the fixed-end moments
cause an imbalance at the joints. The method then involves balancing these
moments by distributing them to adjacent members.
 Carry-Over Moments: After balancing, a portion (usually half) of the distributed
moments is carried over to the opposite end of the member, further contributing
to the overall moment distribution.
 Advantages:
 Simplicity: The method is relatively straightforward and doesn't require solving
simultaneous equations, making it suitable for manual calculations.
 Iterative Nature: The iterative nature allows for a gradual refinement of the
analysis, leading to a more accurate solution.
 Disadvantages:
 Approximation: The method is an approximation, and the accuracy depends on
the number of iterations performed.
 Not Suitable for Complex Structures: For very large or complex structures,
the method can become cumbersome and time-consuming.

moment distribution method absolute and relative stiffness of a

member
in the moment distribution method, absolute stiffness (4EI/L) represents the
resistance of a member to rotation, while relative stiffness (I/L) simplifies
calculations by omitting the material property (E) and is used to determine
distribution factors.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
 Absolute Stiffness:
 It's the moment required to produce a unit rotation (1 radian) at the end of a
member.
 For a member with a fixed far end, the absolute stiffness is 4EI/L.
 For a member with a hinged far end, the absolute stiffness is 3EI/L.
 For a member with a free far end, the absolute stiffness is 0.
 Stiffness factor when the far end is guided roller is EI/L.
 Relative Stiffness:
 It's derived from absolute stiffness by dividing it by 4E (4E is a constant).
 This simplification allows for easier calculations when dealing with multiple
members connected at a joint, as the material property (E) is assumed to be the
same for all members.
 For a member with a fixed far end, the relative stiffness is I/L.
 For a member with a hinged far end, the relative stiffness is 3I/4L.
 For a member with a free far end, the relative stiffness is 0.

stiffness nad carry over factor

In the moment distribution method, stiffness represents a member's resistance

to rotation, while the carry-over factor quantifies the moment transferred from
one end of a member to the other when a moment is applied at one end.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
1. Stiffness:
 Definition:
Stiffness (denoted as 'k') is a measure of a member's resistance to rotation
at a joint. It's essentially how much moment is required to cause a unit
rotation at the end of a member.
 Calculation:
For a member with a constant cross-section, stiffness is typically calculated
as 4EI/L, where E is the modulus of elasticity, I is the moment of inertia, and
L is the length of the member.
 Importance:
Stiffness is crucial in the moment distribution method because it determines
how much of the unbalanced moment at a joint is distributed to each
connecting member.
 Distribution Factor:
The distribution factor (DF) is derived from the stiffness of individual
members and the total stiffness at a joint. DF = Member Stiffness / Total
Joint Stiffness.
 The sum of all distribution factors at a joint must equal 1.

2. Carry-Over Factor:
 Definition:
The carry-over factor (COF) represents the fraction of the moment applied at
one end of a member that is "carried over" to the other end of the member.
 Calculation:
For a member with fixed ends, the carry-over factor is 1.0, meaning the
entire moment is carried over. For a member with a pin or hinge at one end,
the carry-over factor is 0.0. For a member with a fixed end and a pin, the
carry-over factor is 0.5.
 Importance:
The carry-over factor is used to determine the moments that are transferred
to the other end of a member after a balancing moment is applied at a joint.
 Example:
If a moment of 100 kNm is applied at one end of a member with a carry-over
factor of 0.5, then a moment of 50 kNm will be carried over to the other end.
In Summary:
The moment distribution method involves balancing moments at joints by
distributing unbalanced moments to connecting members based on their
stiffness. The carry-over factor then accounts for the moments that are
transferred to the other end of each member, completing the iterative
balancing process until the structure reaches equilibrium.

distribution factor
in the moment distribution method, the distribution factor (DF) represents the
proportion of an unbalanced moment at a joint that is carried by each member
connected to that joint, calculated as the ratio of the member's stiffness to the
total joint stiffness.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
 What it is:
The distribution factor (DF) is a crucial concept in the moment distribution
method, a technique used to analyze indeterminate structures. It essentially
 determines how much of an unbalanced moment at a joint is distributed to
each member connected to that joint.
 How it's calculated:
The distribution factor for a member is calculated by dividing the member's
stiffness by the sum of the stiffness of all members meeting at the joint (joint
stiffness).
 Member Stiffness: This refers to the resistance of a member to rotation, often
expressed as EI/L (where E is the modulus of elasticity, I is the moment of
inertia, and L is the length of the member).
 Joint Stiffness: This is the sum of the stiffness of all members connected to the
joint.
 Formula:
DF = (Member Stiffness) / (Joint Stiffness).
 Significance:
 The sum of the distribution factors for all members meeting at a joint is equal to
1 (except for fixed joints).
 The distribution factors are used to determine the moments that develop in each
member when a joint is released and rotates under the influence of an
unbalanced moment.
 Example:
Imagine a joint where three members meet. If the distribution factors for
these members are 0.3, 0.4, and 0.3, respectively, then when an unbalanced
moment is applied to the joint, 30% of the moment will be resisted by the first
member, 40% by the second, and 30% by the third.

moment distribution method analysis of statically indeterminate beams and rigid frames ( sway and non
sway type
The moment distribution method is an iterative structural analysis technique
used for statically indeterminate beams and rigid frames, both sway and non-
sway, to determine member end moments due to applied loads and uneven
support settlements.
Here's a breakdown of the method:
1. Basic Concepts:
 Statically Indeterminate Structures:
Structures where the number of unknowns (reactions and internal forces)
exceeds the number of independent equilibrium equations.
 Moment Distribution:
An iterative process where moments are distributed among members at
joints based on their stiffness and relative stiffness.
 Fixed End Moments (FEM):
Bending moments that develop at the ends of a member when it is fixed
against rotation due to external loads.
 Stiffness Factor (K):
A measure of a member's resistance to rotation, typically expressed as 4EI/L
for a fixed end and 3EI/L for a hinged end.
 Distribution Factors (DF):
The proportion of unbalanced moment at a joint that a member will take up,
based on its stiffness relative to the stiffness of other members connected at
that joint.
 Carry-Over Factor (COF):
The ratio of the moment induced at the far end of a member to the moment
applied at the near end, typically 0.5 for a fixed end and 0 for a hinged end.
2. Steps in the Moment Distribution Method:
 Step 1: Determine Fixed End Moments:
Calculate the FEM for each member due to the applied loads, assuming all
joints are fixed.
 Step 2: Calculate Relative Stiffness:
Determine the relative stiffness of each member (K/ΣK) at each joint.
 Step 3: Calculate Distribution Factors:
Calculate the DF for each member at each joint, based on its relative
stiffness.
 Step 4: Perform Iterative Moment Distribution:
 Balance Moments: At each joint, distribute the unbalanced moment among the
connected members in proportion to their DFs.
 Carry-Over Moments: Carry over half of the distributed moment to the far end
of each member.
 Repeat: Continue balancing and carrying over moments until the unbalanced
moments at each joint are negligible.
 Step 5: Analyze Sway Frames:
 Non-Sway Analysis: First, analyze the frame as if it is prevented from swaying
(non-sway case).

 Sway Analysis: Then, analyze the frame for sway, assuming an arbitrary
horizontal force and determine the sway factor.
 Combine Results: Combine the moments from the non-sway and sway cases
to obtain the final member end moments.
 Step 6: Analyze Uneven Support Settlements:
 Fixed End Moments Due to Settlement: Calculate the FEM due to support
settlements, considering the sign convention (clockwise moments are positive).
 Distribute Moments: Distribute the moments due to settlement in the same
manner as fixed end moments.
3. Key Considerations:
 Sign Convention:
Establish a consistent sign convention for moments (e.g., clockwise
moments as positive).
 Joint Stiffness:
The stiffness of a joint is determined by the stiffness of the members
connected to it.
 Iterative Process:
The method is iterative, meaning that the process of balancing and carrying
over moments is repeated until equilibrium is achieved.
 Accuracy:
The accuracy of the method depends on the number of iterations performed.
 Sway Frames:
For sway frames, the analysis needs to consider the effects of horizontal
forces and frame deformation.
 Uneven Support Settlements:
Uneven settlements introduce additional moments and require careful
consideration of the sign conventio

symmetrical beams
ymmetrical beams are structural elements with cross-sections that exhibit
mirror-image symmetry, meaning their shape is identical on both sides of a
 central axis. This symmetry simplifies analysis and design, as the neutral axis,
the point where stress is zero, always passes through the centroid of the
cross-section.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
 Definition of Symmetry:
A beam is considered symmetrical if its cross-section can be divided into two
identical halves by a central line (or axis).
 Examples of Symmetrical Cross-Sections:
Common examples include rectangular, square, and circular cross-sections,
as well as I-beams and T-beams with symmetrical flange and web
dimensions.
 Neutral Axis:
The neutral axis is the line within a beam's cross-section where the bending
stress is zero.
 Stress Distribution:
In symmetrical beams, the bending stress distribution is also symmetrical,
with tensile stresses on one side of the neutral axis and compressive
stresses on the other.
 Shear Stress:
The maximum shear stress in a symmetrical beam section occurs at the
neutral axis.
 Symmetrical Bending:
Symmetrical bending occurs when the applied loads and moments are also
symmetrical with respect to the beam's axis of symmetry.
 Analysis and Design:
The symmetry of the beam and loading simplifies the analysis of stresses,
deflections, and other structural parameters.
 Applications:
Symmetrical beams are commonly used in bridges, buildings, and other
structures where their strength and stability are important.

skew symmertrical and general loading in structure analysis

 In structural analysis, understanding skew-symmetric loading, where loads are
applied in a way that creates an antisymmetric distribution, is crucial,
particularly for structures with inherent symmetry, as it allows for simplified
analysis and design.
Here's a breakdown of the concepts:
1. Skew-Symmetry in Structures:
 Definition:
A structure is considered skew-symmetric if it exhibits a form of symmetry
where a half-revolution around an axis, followed by a reversal of loads,
results in self-coincidence.
 Example:
A bridge with identical spans and symmetrical support conditions, but with
loads applied on one side that are mirrored and reversed on the other, is a
skew-symmetric structure.
 Significance:
Skew-symmetric structures can be analyzed by focusing on half the
structure, significantly reducing computational effort.
2. Skew-Symmetric Loading:
 Definition:
Skew-symmetric loading refers to a loading pattern where the loads are
applied in a way that creates an antisymmetric distribution.
 Example:
A structure with a load applied on one side that is mirrored and reversed on
the other side, or a structure with a load applied on one side that is the
negative of the load applied on the other side.
 Significance:
Understanding skew-symmetric loading allows engineers to simplify the
analysis of structures with inherent symmetry.
3. General Loading:
 Definition:
General loading refers to any loading pattern that does not necessarily
exhibit symmetry or antisymmetry.
 Example:
 A structure with loads applied randomly or unevenly on different parts of the
structure.
 Significance:
General loading requires a full analysis of the entire structure, as simplifying
assumptions cannot be made based on symmetry.
4. How Skew-Symmetry Simplifies Analysis:
 Reduced Degrees of Freedom:
By focusing on half the structure, the number of degrees of freedom
(unknowns) is reduced, leading to faster and easier calculations.
 Symmetry in Deformations:
Deformations in skew-symmetric structures are also skew-symmetric, which
means that the analysis of one half of the structure can be used to determine
the behavior of the entire structure.

 Simplified Boundary Conditions:
The symmetry of the structure and loads can simplify the definition of
boundary conditions, further reducing the complexity of the analysis.
5. Importance in Structural Engineering:
 Optimized Design:
Understanding skew-symmetric loading allows engineers to design
structures that are more efficient and cost-effective.
 Accurate Load Assessment:
Identifying skew loading scenarios helps engineers develop structures that
balance loads effectively.
 Improved Durability:
Proper addressing of skew loads contributes to the durability of a structure
by distributing stress more evenly.

UNIT -4
The Rotation Contribution Method, also known as Kani's method, is an
approximate method for analyzing indeterminate structures, particularly multi-
story frames, by distributing fixed-end moments to adjacent joints to satisfy
continuity conditions.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
 What it is:
Kani's method, developed by Gasper Kani in the 1940s, is an iterative
method for analyzing indeterminate structures. It's a simplification of the
moment distribution method, focusing on distributing unknown fixed-end
moments to adjacent joints to ensure continuity of slopes and
displacements.
 How it works:
 The method involves distributing the fixed-end moments of structural members
to adjacent joints.
 It iteratively calculates the contributions of rotations at each joint, ensuring that
the conditions of continuity are met.
 The process is usually stopped when the end moment values converge.
 Advantages:
 It's a simpler and less time-consuming method compared to other methods,
especially for analyzing multi-story frames.
 Even if mistakes are made in one cycle of distribution, the method generally
converges to the correct answer.
 Limitations:
 It is an approximate method, so the results may not be as accurate as those
obtained using more precise methods.
 It is primarily suited for analyzing frames with fixed connections.
 Applications:
 It is commonly used for the approximate analysis of multi-story frames, beams,
or other statically indeterminate structures.
 Many engineers, particularly those not familiar with computer methods, use
Kani's method for analyzing 3-4 story building frames.

ROATION CONTRIBUTION METHOD BASSIC CONCEPT

The Rotation Contribution Method, also known as Kani's method, is an
approximate method for analyzing indeterminate structures, particularly multi-
story frames, by distributing fixed-end moments to adjacent joints to satisfy
continuity conditions.
Here's a breakdown of the basic concept:
 Purpose:
 To determine approximate values of internal forces (like bending moments)
in indeterminate structures, especially frames.

 Method:
 Fixed-End Moments: Calculate the fixed-end moments for each member due to
external loads.
 Stiffness and Rotation Factors: Determine the relative stiffness of each
member and calculate rotation factors based on these stiffnesses.
 Iteration: Distribute the fixed-end moments to the joints, considering the rotation
contributions from each member, and repeat this process iteratively until the
moments converge to a stable solution.
 Convergence: The process is usually stopped when the end moment values
stabilize or converge to a desired level of accuracy.
 Advantages:
 Relatively simple and less time-consuming compared to other methods,
especially for preliminary analysis.
 Even if errors are made in distribution, the method often converges to a correct
answer.
 Limitations:
 Provides approximate results, not exact solutions.
 Less accurate than more advanced methods like finite element analysis.

ROATION CONTRIBUTION METHOD ANALysis of statically

indeterminate beam and rigid frames ( sway and non sway type ) due
to applied loading and yielding of support
The Kani's method, also known as the rotation contribution method, is an
approximate method for analyzing statically indeterminate beams and rigid
frames (both sway and non-sway) by distributing unknown fixed-end moments
to adjacent joints, satisfying continuity of slopes and displacements.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
What is Kani's Method?
 Purpose:
 Kani's method is a simplified iterative approach for analyzing indeterminate
structures, particularly portal frames and multi-story frames with fixed
connections.
 Basis:
It's based on the principle of distributing fixed-end moments to adjacent
joints to satisfy the conditions of continuity of slopes and displacements.
 Iterative Nature:
The method involves repeated calculations and distributions until the end
moments converge to a stable solution.
 Advantages:
It's considered simpler and less time-consuming compared to other methods
like the slope-deflection method or moment distribution method.
Key Steps in Kani's Method:
1. 1. Calculate Fixed-End Moments:
Determine the fixed-end moments for each member under the given loading
conditions.
2. 2. Determine Rotation Factors:
Calculate the rotation factors for each member based on its length and
stiffness.
3. 3. Represent Contributions:
Represent the contributions of fixed-end moments and rotations at each
joint.
4. 4. Calculate Final Moments:
Iteratively distribute the unbalanced moments at each joint until the end
moments converge.
5. 5. Draw Bending Moment Diagram:
Use the calculated final moments to draw the bending moment diagram for
the structure.
Considerations for Sway and Non-Sway Frames:
 Sway Frames: These frames allow lateral movement or swaying due to
asymmetrical structure or loading. The analysis of sway frames requires
considering the effect of lateral movement.
 Non-Sway Frames: These frames resist lateral movement and are analyzed
similarly to beams.
  Support Yielding: If a support yields or settles, it introduces additional
unknowns and requires a modified analysis using Kani's method or other
methods like the slope-deflection method.
In summary, Kani's method provides a practical and relatively simple
approach for analyzing statically indeterminate beams and rigid frames,
considering both sway and non-sway conditions, and even accounting for
support yielding.
general case - storey column unequal in height and base fixed or hinged
in rotation contribution method
In the context of Kani's method (rotation contribution method) for analyzing
indeterminate structures, a general case involves storey columns of unequal
heights with bases that can be either fixed or hinged, requiring adjustments to
the standard calculations to account for these variations.
Here's a breakdown of how these factors are addressed:
 Unequal Column Heights:
 In the standard Kani's method, the assumption is that columns within a storey
have equal heights. When this is not the case, the calculations for rotation
contributions (and therefore, the distribution of moments) need to be modified.
 The formula for calculating the rotation contribution at a joint will need to be
adjusted to account for the different column heights.
 The method does not give realistic results in cases of columns of unequal
heights within a storey.
 Fixed vs. Hinged Bases:
 The boundary condition at the base of the columns (fixed or hinged) significantly
impacts the rotational stiffness of the columns and, consequently, the
distribution of moments.
 A fixed base provides a higher rotational restraint compared to a hinged base,
influencing the distribution of moments within the frame.
 The rotation factor for a fixed end is zero, while for a hinged end it is not zero.
 Kani's Method (Rotation Contribution Method) Overview:
 Kani's method is a simplified approach to analyzing indeterminate structures,
particularly rigid frames, by considering the rotation contributions at joints.
 It involves iteratively calculating the rotation contributions at joints and then
distributing the resulting moments to adjacent members.
 The method is based on the principle that the sum of moments at each joint
must be zero.
 General Case Considerations:
 In the general case, the fixed end moments at all joints can be found.
 To calculate the rotation contributions, the far end contributions, which are not
known initially, are assumed to be zero.
 The near end contribution is calculated using the fixed end moment and the far
end contribution.
 This process is repeated iteratively until the moments stabilize.
 The method is not suitable for cases of columns of unequal heights within a
storey and for pin ended columns.

approxim,ate method of structure analysis

interoduction
Approximate methods of structural analysis provide quick and simplified
solutions for analyzing complex structures, particularly during preliminary
design stages, by making realistic assumptions about structural behavior and
simplifying the analysis process.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
 Purpose:
Approximate methods are valuable for:
 Preliminary Design: Quickly determining member forces and moments for
initial design decisions.
 Quick Checks: Verifying the results of more detailed analyses.
 Spontaneous Scrutiny: Evaluating designs during the planning phase,
considering economic aspects.
 How they work:
 Simplification: They involve simplifying statically indeterminate structures into
statically determinate ones by making assumptions about the structure's
behavior.
 Assumptions: These assumptions are based on the analyst's experience and
understanding of the structure's behavior.
 Statics: The analysis is then carried out using the principles of statics.
 Examples of Approximate Methods:
 Portal Method: Assumes that the shear in interior columns is twice that of
exterior columns and that points of contraflexure lie at midpoints of members.

The Portal Method

The portal method is based on the assumption that, for each
storey of the frame, the interior columns will take twice as
much shear force as the exterior columns. The rationale for
this assumption is illustrated in Figure 7.3.

Figure 7.3: Portal Method for the Approximate Analysis of

Indeterminate Frames
Let's consider our multi-storey, multi-bay frame as a series
of stacked single storey moment frames as shown at the top
of Figure 7.3. The columns on either end of each individual
portal frame are likely similar size because they would each
equally share the gravity load from above. When we join these
all together into a stacked system, we can see, as in the figure,
that the interior columns have two portal frame columns each
since they need to take axial force from the left and from the
right (whereas the exterior columns only take gravity loads
from the left or right). So, if we combine all of these individual
portal frames together, our interior column (the sum of the two
individual portal frame columns) will need to be twice as
strong as the exterior columns.

If the interior columns are twice as strong, they may also

be approximately twice as stiff (as shown in the diagram at the
top right of Figure 7.3). If we then have three columns in
parallel as shown and they all share the total lateral load at the
top as shown, then they will resist the total load in shear in
proportion to their relative stiffness. A column that is twice as
stiff will take twice as much load for the same lateral
displacement.

So, it may be reasonable to assume that, since the interior

columns are approximately twice as big, and therefore twice as
stiff, as the exterior columns, those interior columns will take
twice as much shear as the exterior columns. This is the basis
of the portal method assumption.

This assumption is valid for the columns at every storey as

shown in Figure 7.3. So, the portal method provides us with
the shear force in each column at each storey in the structure.
In our example structure, for any given free body diagram
cutting at the hinge location at a single storey, the system will
be 2∘2∘ indeterminate. If we know the shear in the middle
column in relation to the shear at the left column, that
eliminates one unknown (we assume the middle column has
twice as much as the left column 2F12F1). If we know the
shear in the right column in relation to the shear at the left
column, that eliminates another unknown (we assume they are
equal). These two assumptions eliminate the remaining 2∘2∘ of
static indeterminacy, meaning that we can find the rest of the
 unknowns using the equilibrium equations only. The portal
method assumptions do not give us three known forces
because we still have to solve for the force in the left column
using horizontal equilibrium before we can use that force to
find the forces in the middle and right columns.
The portal method is an approximate method used in structural analysis to
analyze building frames subjected to lateral loads, such as wind or seismic
forces. It simplifies the analysis by making assumptions about the distribution
of shear and bending moments within the frame, making it easier to calculate
the internal forces.

Key Assumptions of the Portal Method:

 Inflection Points:
The method assumes that points of inflection (zero moment) occur at the mid-height of
columns and the mid-span of beams.
 Shear Distribution:
It assumes that interior columns resist twice the shear force compared to exterior
columns in each story.
 Frame as Portals:
The entire frame is conceptually divided into a series of individual portal frames, each
with its own columns and beams.
Steps in the Portal Method Analysis:
1. Divide the Frame: Identify the individual portal frames within the overall building
structure.
 2. Assume Shear: Assume the interior columns take twice the shear of exterior columns.
3. Determine Base Shear: Calculate the base shear at each story level.
4. Calculate Moments: Use the assumed shear forces and geometry to calculate the
bending moments in the columns and beams.
5. Verify Stability: Ensure that the calculated forces and moments are within acceptable
limits for the design.
Advantages of the Portal Method:
 Simplicity: It is a relatively simple and quick method for analyzing building frames.
 Suitable for Low-Rise Structures: It is particularly useful for low-rise buildings where
shear deformations are dominant.
Limitations of the Portal Method:
 Approximate Solution:
The method provides an approximate solution, and the results may not be as accurate
as more sophisticated methods like finite element analysis.
 Not Suitable for High-Rise Buildings:
The assumptions of the portal method may not be accurate for high-rise buildings
where bending deformations are more significant.

 Cantilever Method: Assumes that the structure behaves like a cantilever, with
the shear and moment distribution determined accordingly.
 Substitute Frame Method: Simplifies a complex structure by replacing parts
with simpler, equivalent frames.
 Limitations:
 Accuracy: The results are approximate and may not be as accurate as those
obtained from more rigorous analyses.
 Assumptions: The validity of the results depends on the accuracy of the
assumptions made.
 When to use them:
 Initial Design: During the preliminary design phase, when a quick estimate of
member forces and moments is needed.
 Checking Results: As a quick check of the results obtained from more detailed
analyses.
 Spontaneous Scrutiny: For quickly evaluating different design option

vertical and lateral load analysis of multistory frames, portal in structrue
analysis

n structural analysis, the vertical and lateral load analysis of multistory frames involves
determining how different forces (vertical loads like dead loads, live loads, and lateral loads such
as wind or seismic forces) affect the frame and its components (columns, beams, joints, etc.).
These loads impact the frame's stability, strength, and overall design, and understanding them is
cru

cial to ensuring the safety and reliability of the structure.

1. Vertical Load Analysis:

Vertical loads primarily act in the direction of gravity and include dead loads, live loads, and
sometimes other loads like snow or soil pressure. Here's a breakdown of these loads and their
analysis:

 Dead Loads (DL): These are the permanent or static loads that come from the weight of
the structure itself, including beams, columns, floors, roofs, and fixed equipment. They
are generally constant and known.
 Live Loads (LL): These are variable loads due to occupancy or use, such as people,
furniture, equipment, and movable objects. They change over time, so they require
assumptions based on the type of building and occupancy.
 Other Vertical Loads: Sometimes, there may be additional vertical loads like snow or
soil pressure on foundations.

Vertical Load Analysis Process:

1. Load Distribution: Identify the loads acting on each floor of the structure, which
typically include both dead and live loads.
2. Load Path: Determine the load path from each floor down to the foundation. Loads are
transferred from the floor slabs to beams, then to columns, and eventually to the
foundation.
3. Equilibrium Conditions: Ensure the system is in equilibrium by calculating the forces at
different joints and components, considering moments, shear forces, and axial forces.
4. Analysis Method: For simple structures, methods like static equilibrium or frame
analysis can be used. For more complex structures, methods like finite element analysis
(FEA) might be needed.

2. Lateral Load Analysis:

Lateral loads act horizontally on a structure and include wind forces, seismic forces (earthquake
loads), and forces due to soil-structure interaction. These forces can significantly affect the
stability of a multistory frame, particularly in tall buildings.
  Wind Loads (WL): Wind exerts a horizontal pressure on the building, which varies
based on the building's height, location, and shape. This is usually calculated using wind
pressure coefficients based on code recommendations.
 Seismic Loads (SL): Seismic forces result from the ground motion during an earthquake.
These forces can be more dynamic and are dependent on the building’s location relative
to seismic zones, building mass, and height.

Lateral Load Analysis Process:

1. Determine Load Intensity: For seismic loads, use the seismic design codes (like the
U.S. IBC or Eurocode) to determine the seismic force, typically based on building
parameters like seismic zone, building height, and type of soil. For wind loads, use wind
load codes (like ASCE 7 in the U.S.).
2. Distribution of Lateral Loads: In a multistory frame, lateral forces are distributed
among the floors based on the stiffness of the structure. Stiffer floors (those with stiffer
columns or shear walls) will resist a larger portion of the lateral load.
3. Building Configuration: The lateral load is typically transferred from the roof and upper
floors to the lower floors, ultimately reaching the foundation. The distribution may
involve shear walls, braced frames, or moment-resisting frames.
4. Analysis Method: Lateral load analysis is generally done through one of the following
methods:
o Equivalent Lateral Force Method (ELF): Used for regular buildings in moderate seismic
regions. It involves applying a lateral force based on the building's mass and height.
o Response Spectrum Analysis (RSA): For taller or more complex buildings in seismic
zones, this method is used to consider dynamic effects like natural frequency and mode
shapes.
o Time History Analysis: This method is used for detailed analysis in seismic regions to
simulate the actual ground motion during an earthquake.

3. Interaction Between Vertical and Lateral Loads:

While vertical and lateral loads are typically analyzed separately, they can interact. For instance,
a building might experience a combination of vertical and lateral forces during an earthquake,
affecting both the axial forces and moments in the columns and beams. In such cases, the
following factors are considered:

 P-Delta Effects: This is a second-order effect where vertical loads cause additional
moments when lateral displacements occur. This needs to be included in the analysis,
especially for taller buildings.
 Combined Load Cases: Design codes often provide load combinations (e.g., 1.2DL +
1.6LL, or 1.2DL + 1.0WL) to ensure that the structure can withstand both vertical and
lateral loads simultaneously.

4. Structural Systems to Resist Lateral Loads:

Different structural systems can be used to resist lateral loads, including:

  Shear Walls: Vertical walls that resist lateral forces.
 Braced Frames: Diagonal braces that provide resistance to lateral forces.
 Moment-Resisting Frames: Frames where beams and columns work together to resist bending
moments due to lateral forces.

Conclusion:

Both vertical and lateral load analysis are fundamental to designing safe and stable multistory
frames. Vertical load analysis focuses on gravity-driven loads like dead and live loads, while
lateral load analysis addresses forces like wind and seismic activity. Properly analyzing and
designing for these forces ensures the structural integrity and resilience of multistory buildings in
a variety of load conditions.

 cantilever and substitute - frames method and their comparison

In structural analysis, Cantilever Method and Substitute Frame Method are two common
approaches used to analyze the internal forces and displacements of indeterminate structures,
especially in multistory frames. Both methods help in simplifying the analysis of complex
structures by reducing them to simpler forms or by approximating the behavior of the actual
structure. Here's a detailed look at both methods and their comparison:

1. Cantilever Method:

The Cantilever Method is a popular technique used for analyzing indeterminate frames
(structures that cannot be solved using static equilibrium alone). In this method, a portion of the
structure is treated as a cantilever (a beam or frame that is fixed at one end and free at the other),
and the internal forces are determined by applying a sequence of loading conditions and solving
for the unknowns.

Steps in Cantilever Method:

1. Idealization of the Structure:

o The structure is simplified to a cantilever system (or a series of cantilevers) by
considering parts of the frame as cantilever beams.
2. Determine Reactions:
o The reactions at the supports or joints of the frame are calculated using equilibrium
equations (static analysis).
3. Apply Loads:
o Loads are applied to the idealized cantilever system. The displacement and rotation at
various points of the structure are calculated by using the moment-curvature
relationship (which relates the bending moment to the curvature of the beam).
4. Determine Internal Forces:
o Internal bending moments, shear forces, and axial forces in the structure are
determined by analyzing the displacements and rotations induced by the loads.
5. Iterative Process:
 o In indeterminate structures, the method often requires iterative calculations (or use of
superposition principle) to account for the compatibility of deformations between
connected members.

Applications of the Cantilever Method:

 Used for structures where the main concern is bending and moment distribution, like in simple
multistory frames.
 Often used for analyzing frames with high symmetry or when modifications to an existing
structure are needed.

Limitations of the Cantilever Method:

 Iterative in nature, requiring several rounds of calculations to reach a solution.

 Complex for large or irregular structures due to the need for simplifications and assumptions.

2. Substitute Frame Method:

The Substitute Frame Method is a technique used to analyze indeterminate structures by

simplifying the system into an equivalent frame that is easier to analyze. The idea is to replace
part of the structure with a substitute (or simplified) frame that can represent the behavior of
the actual system under loading conditions.

Steps in Substitute Frame Method:

1. Idealization of the Frame:

o The structure is divided into several sections, and the internal forces and displacements
are calculated for the simplified, equivalent frame.

2. Determine Substitute Frame:

o The original frame is simplified into a substitute frame that has the same overall
behavior but is easier to solve. This substitute frame can be considered to have the
same boundary conditions as the real frame.

3. Moment Distribution or Other Methods:

o For the substitute frame, techniques like Moment Distribution Method (MDM) or other
direct methods (e.g., stiffness method) can be used to analyze internal forces, such as
bending moments and shear forces.

4. Solve for Reactions and Internal Forces:

o Once the substitute frame is solved, the reaction forces and internal moments are
calculated, and the displacements are determined.

5. Iterative Adjustment:
 o Similar to the Cantilever method, iterative calculations may be required to fine-tune the
results by adjusting the idealized frame to match the actual structure's behavior.

Applications of the Substitute Frame Method:

 Used when the frame includes complex loading or irregular geometry that requires
simplification for analysis.
 Typically applied to indeterminate frames (such as multistory buildings, braced frames, or
frames with many members).

Limitations of the Substitute Frame Method:

 The idealization of the frame might not always accurately capture the behavior of certain
structural systems.
 Complicated geometry or unusual boundary conditions might require more advanced analysis
methods (e.g., finite element analysis).

3. Comparison Between Cantilever Method and Substitute Frame

Method:
Aspect Cantilever Method Substitute Frame Method

Treats parts of the frame as cantilever Replaces part of the frame with an equivalent
Basic Concept
beams. frame.

Suitable for analyzing simpler, Suitable for complex, indeterminate

Application
symmetric frames. structures.

Type of Typically used for frames with Applied to more general indeterminate
Structures bending dominated by moments. structures.

Computational Requires iterative calculation and may May require solving for reactions using
Effort become complex for large frames. moment distribution or stiffness methods.

Idealizes the structure as a cantilever Simplifies the frame into a more manageable
Simplification
beam. form (substitute frame).

Uses more sophisticated methods like

Primarily uses static equilibrium and
Analysis Method moment distribution or stiffness matrix
displacement analysis.
analysis.

Results can be less accurate for More accurate, especially when using finite
Accuracy complex structures due to element method (FEM) for the substitute
approximations. frame.

Easier to apply to simpler systems More suited for complicated structures but
Ease of Use
with fewer members. requires better understanding of the structural
 Aspect Cantilever Method Substitute Frame Method

behavior.

May require many iterations for Complexity arises in idealizing the substitute
Limitations
larger, more complex frames. frame.

Key Differences:

 Complexity and Accuracy: The Cantilever Method is relatively simpler but less accurate for
more complex structures, while the Substitute Frame Method is more accurate and effective for
larger and more irregular structures.
 Iterative Process: Both methods may require iterations to reach the final solution, but the
Cantilever Method is more directly reliant on iterative adjustments, especially in highly
indeterminate structures. The Substitute Frame Method, on the other hand, may rely on more
advanced techniques like moment distribution or stiffness methods to simplify the frame.
 Idealization: In the Cantilever Method, parts of the frame are idealized as cantilevers, whereas
in the Substitute Frame Method, the entire frame is replaced by a simpler equivalent frame that
mimics the behavior of the original structure.

Conclusion:

Both the Cantilever Method and Substitute Frame Method are important tools in structural
analysis, particularly for indeterminate frames. While the Cantilever Method is more
straightforward and best suited for simpler structures, the Substitute Frame Method is more
flexible and powerful for more complex, real-world systems. The choice between these methods
depends on the complexity of the structure, the required accuracy, and the available
computational tools.