CHAPTER-1

1.1 INTRODUCTION

The insurance sector plays a crucial role in the global economy by providing financial
security and risk management for individuals and businesses. By pooling premiums, insurers
protect against various uncertainties like accidents, illnesses, and natural disasters, helping
reduce the financial burden of unexpected events. This shared-risk model promotes economic
stability and responsible behavior.

Insurance has ancient roots, with early merchants forming mutual loss-sharing agreements.
These evolved into formal institutions like Lloyd’s of London in the 17th century, leading to
today’s diverse products such as life, health, vehicle, and property insurance. As the economy
and technology advanced, the industry adapted to meet changing needs.

Underwriting is central to insurance, involving risk assessment based on factors like age,
health, and claims history to set fair premiums. Modern tools like AI and data analytics have
improved accuracy, reduced fraud, and enabled personalized policies.

Due to their financial responsibility, insurers face strict regulations to protect consumers and
ensure transparency, solvency, and ethical practices. Adhering to these rules builds trust and
supports the industry's long-term stability.

TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENT

Technological advancements have transformed the insurance industry across the value chain—
from product development to claims processing. Digital platforms now allow users to compare
policies, purchase coverage, file claims, and access support through their devices.

AI, machine learning, and big data are used to detect fraud, personalize policies, and predict
risks. Tools like telematics and wearable devices help monitor real-time behaviour, improving
risk assessment and lowering administrative costs while enhancing customer engagement.

1
However, these innovations come with challenges. Insurers must balance tech adoption with
regulatory compliance, ensuring data security, fairness, and accountability. Any breach in
privacy or transparency can harm trust and lead to legal issues.

To succeed, insurers must integrate technology responsibly and prioritize a customer-first

approach. Consumers today expect fast, personalized, and seamless service. In response,
insurers are using CRM systems, mobile apps, and chatbots to boost engagement and tailor
products, ultimately driving customer loyalty and sustainable growth.

SUSTAINABILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, AND GOVERNANCE (ESG)

Sustainability and ESG principles are becoming central to insurance strategies. With rising
climate risks, insurers are adjusting underwriting and investments to account for natural
disasters and extreme weather, particularly in property and casualty lines.

Insurers are also promoting eco-friendly behaviour by offering incentives for using solar panels
or electric vehicles.

Trust remains essential in the insurer-policyholder relationship. To maintain it, insurers must
ensure transparency, clear communication, and fair claims handling. Delays, hidden costs, or
unclear terms can harm credibility.

Educating customers and processing claims with empathy are key to building loyalty. In today’s
service-driven market, trust is not optional—it’s critical.

Finally, insure tech is transforming the industry with fast, tech-enabled services that emphasize
convenience and efficiency.

2
1.2 INDUSTRY PROFILE

1.Overview

The insurance industry plays a crucial role in the global economy by providing risk management,
financial protection, and investment services to individuals and organizations. It operates across
multiple segments—life, health, general (non-life), and reinsurance—offering coverage for
events ranging from illness and death to accidents, natural disasters, and liability claims.

2.Structure and Key Segments

Life Insurance: Provides financial compensation to beneficiaries upon the policyholder’s death
or after a fixed maturity period. Health Insurance: Covers medical and hospitalization expenses,
often including critical illness and cashless treatment options. General Insurance: Covers non-
life assets like vehicles, homes, travel, and businesses against damage or loss. Reinsurance:
Insurance purchased by insurers themselves to mitigate large-scale risk exposure.

3. Market Dynamics

Digital Transformation: The sector is rapidly digitizing, using AI, machine learning, blockchain,
and mobile platforms to streamline operations and enhance customer experience. Consumer-
Centric Innovation: Insure Tech companies like Digit Insurance are reimagining insurance with

3
simplified products, paperless processes, and 24/7 digital access. Regulatory Evolution:
Regulatory bodies like IRDAI (India), NAIC (USA), and FCA (UK) play a vital role in ensuring
consumer protection, financial stability, and product transparency. Risk-Based Pricing: The use
of big data and predictive analytics allows insurers to set premiums more accurately based on
customer behaviour and risk profiles.

4. Key Trends

Telematics & IoT Integration: Insurers use vehicle sensors and home devices for real-time data
to customize policies and incentivize safe behaviour. Usage-Based & Microinsurance Models:
Especially in emerging markets, bite-sized and usage-based policies are gaining traction. AI &
Automation: Chatbots, automated claim settlements, and fraud detection systems improve
efficiency and reduce human error. Ecosystem Expansion: Partnerships with health tech, auto-
tech, and fintech platforms help insurers offer bundled and value-added services.

5. Challenges

Low Penetration in Emerging Markets: Despite growth, insurance penetration remains low in
many regions due to lack of awareness, affordability issues, and mistrust. Legacy Systems:
Traditional players face difficulties in integrating new technologies due to outdated IT
infrastructure. Cybersecurity Threats: The shift to digital operations increases exposure to data
breaches and cyberattacks. Regulatory Complexity: Constantly evolving compliance
requirements across borders can be difficult for global insurers to manage.

6. Growth Outlook

The global insurance market is expected to grow steadily, driven by increasing risk awareness
post-pandemic, economic development in emerging countries, and the widespread adoption of
digital channels. In India, the industry is projected to reach USD 250 billion by 2025, with
private players like Digit Insurance contributing significantly through innovation and customer-
first strategies.

4
Let me know if you'd like this adapted for a specific format (PowerPoint, report section, etc.) or
made more technical or beginner-friendly.1.2.1 TYPES OF INSURANCE

1. LIFE INSURANCE

Life insurance provides financial protection by covering medical expenses from illnesses,
accidents, surgeries, or hospitalization. As healthcare costs rise, it has become essential for
individuals and families. Modern plans often include benefits like cashless hospitalization,
preventive check-ups, wellness rewards, and coverage for critical illnesses. Health insurance not
only eases financial stress during emergencies but also supports better health management and
peace of mind.

5
2. HEALTH INSURANCE

Health insurance provides financial protection by covering medical expenses from illnesses,
accidents, surgeries, or hospitalization. As healthcare costs rise, it has become essential for
individuals and families.

Modern plans often include benefits like cashless hospitalization, preventive check-ups,
wellness rewards, and coverage for critical illnesses. Health insurance not only eases financial
stress during emergencies but also supports better health management and peace of mind.

3.HOME INSURANCE:

6
Home insurance provides financial protection against risks like fire, theft, vandalism, and natural
disasters, covering both the home's structure and its contents. It safeguards homeowners from
costly repairs or losses, ensuring peace of mind. As a home is often one’s largest investment,
insurance is essential to avoid major financial setbacks. Many policies also include liability
coverage for accidents on the property, offering added security.

4.MOTOR INSURANCE:

Motor insurance is essential for vehicle owners, offering financial protection against accidents,
theft, damage, and third-party liabilities. Comprehensive policies cover not only the vehicle but
also medical expenses for occupants and personal injury. With increasing road risks, motor
insurance is both a legal requirement and a practical safeguard. It provides peace of mind and
often includes added benefits like roadside assistance, no-claim bonuses, and coverage for
weather-related damage, making it a valuable risk management tool.

7
5.FIRE INSURANCE

Fire insurance provides financial protection against losses or damages caused by fire and related
incidents such as explosions or lightning. It covers the cost of repairing or rebuilding property,
including buildings, furniture, and equipment. This type of insurance is essential for
homeowners, businesses, and property owners to safeguard their assets and ensure recovery after
fire-related events.

6.TRAVEL INSURANCE

8
Travel insurance provides financial protection against unexpected events during a trip, such as
medical emergencies, trip cancellations, delays, or lost luggage. It can cover hospital bills,
refund prepaid expenses, and assist with lost items or documents. Some plans also offer
emergency evacuation and legal help. While optional, it's highly recommended—especially for
international travel—for peace of mind and security in case of unforeseen issues.

7.MARINE INSURANCE

Marine insurance provides financial protection for ships, cargo, and other maritime assets
against risks such as damage, loss, theft, or accidents during transit by sea or inland waterways.
It helps cover losses from events like storms, collisions, or piracy, ensuring the safe and secure
movement of goods. Essential for businesses involved in shipping and trade, marine insurance
minimizes financial risks and supports global commerce.

9
8.CROP INSURANCE

Crop insurance protects farmers from financial losses caused by natural disasters like droughts,
floods, pests, and diseases. It covers damaged or lost crops, helping farmers recover and continue
farming without falling into debt. By reducing risk, it encourages investment in better farming
practices. Often subsidized by governments, especially in countries like India, crop insurance
supports farmer income, food security, and agricultural stability—becoming increasingly vital
in the face of climate change.

10
9.BUSINESS INSURANCE

Business insurance protects companies from financial losses due to risks like property damage,
lawsuits, employee injuries, theft, or natural disasters. It covers costs such as repairs, legal fees,
and lost income, helping businesses stay stable during disruptions. Types include property,
liability, business interruption, workers’ compensation, professional indemnity, and cyber
insurance. Proper coverage ensures legal compliance, builds trust, and supports long-term
resilience in an unpredictable environment.

11
10.PROPERTY INSURANCE

Property insurance provides financial protection against damage or loss to buildings and their
contents due to risks like fire, theft, vandalism, or natural disasters. It covers homes, businesses,
and rented spaces, helping owners repair or replace property without major out-of-pocket costs.
With options like homeowner’s, commercial, and renter’s insurance, it ensures peace of mind
and supports continuity in both personal and business life.

12
1.3 COMPANY PROFILE

Digit Insurance, officially known as Go Digit General Insurance Limited, is a modern insurance
provider based in Bengaluru, India. Founded in 2016 by experienced insurance professional
Kamesh Goyal, the company was created with a vision to make insurance simple, transparent,
and accessible. In a sector often seen as complex and bureaucratic, Digit set itself apart by
offering a digital-first experience that puts the customer at the center of every interaction. With
strong early backing from global investor Fairfax Group, Digit quickly established itself as a
trusted name in the Indian insurance ecosystem.

The company's operations are built around a fully digital model. From buying a policy to
renewing it or filing a claim, customers can complete every step online through the Digit website
or mobile app. This eliminates the need for in-person visits or paperwork, significantly
improving convenience and efficiency. Digit's digital infrastructure not only enhances user
experience but also reduces operational costs, allowing the company to offer competitive
premiums without compromising service quality. The focus on automation and mobile
accessibility has been key to its widespread adoption, especially among younger, tech-savvy
customers.

13
One of Digit’s most notable strengths is its efficient and user-friendly claims process. Rather
than relying on traditional, time-consuming methods like in-person inspections, Digit allows
customers to submit video evidence from their smartphones to support claims.

Many claims, especially in the motor segment, are resolved within 24 hours a turnaround time
that is significantly faster than the industry norm. This focus on quick resolution and
transparency has helped Digit build a reputation for reliability and earned high levels of
customer satisfaction.

The company’s rapid growth is reflected in its strong financial performance and expanding
customer base. As of the end of 2023, Digit had served more than 50 million customers across
India. The company’s total assets stood at ₹3,619.95 crore, with a net worth of ₹2,459.34 crore
and profits of ₹129.02 crore. In May 2024, Digit launched a successful Initial Public Offering
(IPO), reinforcing its status as a major player in the general insurance market. It also boasts a
large and growing network of over 61,000 partners, including more than 58,000 Point of Sale
Persons (POSPs), helping it reach customers in every corner of the country.

Technology continues to be the foundation of Digit’s operational strategy. The company employs
more than 470 active bots to automate internal processes, enhance partner efficiency, and
streamline customer service. With close to 4,000 employees and 75 offices across India, Digit
balances its digital-first approach with a strong on-ground presence.

14
Its technology infrastructure supports a range of functions including fraud detection, policy
management, and real-time claims handling, ensuring that customers receive consistent and
highquality service at scale. Digit Insurance remains focused on revolutionizing the insurance
experience in India. Its mission to make insurance simpler, faster, and more human guides every
aspect of its business.

By leveraging cutting-edge technology, prioritizing customer needs, and continuously

innovating its offerings, Digit aims to redefine how Indians perceive and interact with insurance.
With a strong foundation and an ambitious vision for the future, the company is well-positioned
to lead the next phase of digital transformation in the insurance industry.

15
1.4 PROBLEM STATEMENT

Digit Insurance aims to revolutionize traditional insurance models by leveraging design thinking
and cutting-edge digital innovation. The key financial challenge lies in creating scalable, cost-
effective digital solutions that enhance customer experience, streamline operations, and drive
profitability—while maintaining regulatory compliance and minimizing risk. By reimagining
claims processing, underwriting, and customer service through user-centric design and advanced
technologies, Digit seeks to build a more agile, efficient, and inclusive insurance ecosystem

1.5 OBJECTIVES

• To evaluate the transparency and effectiveness of the claims settlement process at

Digits Insurance.
• To explore the underlying reasons for claim processing delays.
• To examine how the complexity of premium calculations affects customer
understanding.
• To identify the extent and impact of hidden charges and unanticipated premium
increases.
• To assess customer trust and satisfaction levels with the company’s products and
services.
• To suggest strategies aimed at improving transparency, communication, and overall
customer experience.

16
1.6 SCOPE

• The study focuses solely on Digits Insurance Company and its current service
offerings.
• It covers major insurance products including health, life, and motor insurance.
• Customer complaints, claim histories, and feedback from the past 2 to 3 years will
be reviewed.

• Insights will be gathered through structured interviews and surveys with customers
and employees.

• The geographical scope is limited to the areas where the company is presently
operating.

1.7 LIMITATIONS

• Access to internal company data may be limited due to confidentiality concerns.

• The analysis may not fully reflect the experiences of all policyholders due to sample
size constraints.

• Time and resource limitations may affect the depth and breadth of data collection.
• Survey and interview responses may include personal biases or subjective opinions.
• Certain operational practices may not be disclosed due to regulatory or legal
restrictions.

17
 CHAPTER-2

2.1 REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Recent Literature (2024 - 2020)

1. Rana, S., & Sharma, A. (2024)

Digital-First Insurance: Revolutionizing the Insurance Customer Journey

Focuses on how insurers are leveraging AI, cloud, and design thinking to enhance
customer engagement and operational agility.

2. KPMG (2023)

Global Insure Tech Report 2023

Highlights trends in digital innovation, customer-centric design, and investments in

Insure Tech startups like Digit Insurance.

3. McKinsey & Company (2023)

How Digital Ecosystems are Shaping the Future of Insurance

Explores the role of design thinking in building digital ecosystems that enable insurers
to offer hyper-personalized services.

4. Accenture (2023)

Insurance Redefined: The Digital and AI-Driven Future

Explores how insurers use automation, AI, and customer journey mapping to redefine
their services.

18
5. PwC (2023)

The Future of Insurance: Rethinking the Customer Journey

Discusses digital innovation with real-world examples from companies like Digit that
have simplified insurance purchase and claims processes.

6. Deloitte Insights (2022)

The Insurance Industry in 2025: Innovating at the Speed of Digital

Details the use of digital tools and agile design thinking methodologies to improve
product offerings.

7. Chakraborty, P. et al. (2022)

Design Thinking in Fintech: A Case Study of Indian Insure Tech Startups

Case-based study on how Indian players like Digit use empathy-driven innovation.

8. EY (2022)

Reimagining Insurance for the Digital Consumer

Emphasizes digital agility, cloud-native solutions, and design-led innovation for product
redesign.

9. Capgemini (2021)

World Insure Tech Report 2021

Analyses how insurance startups have used design-centric thinking to bridge the
customer trust gap.

10. Naik, M. & Singh, R. (2021)

The Impact of Mobile and AI Technologies on Insurance Penetration in India

Empirical study showing how companies like Digit used mobile-first solutions and
intelligent interfaces.

11. Ghosh, A. (2021)

Customer Experience Transformation in Indian Insurance

Explores journey mapping, touchpoint innovation, and tech stack integration.

19
12. Forrester Research (2021)

Why Design Thinking is the Future of Financial Services

Insight into how design thinking frameworks deliver ROI in insurance.

13. BCG (2021)

The Rise of the Digital Insurer in Asia-Pacific

Features Indian players’ transformation journeys including Digit’s UI/UX-driven claim

systems.

14. World Economic Forum (2020)

The Future of Financial Infrastructure: Innovations Reshaping Insurance

Analyses blockchain, AI, and user- centred innovation in the insurance space.

15. IBM Institute for Business Value (2020)

Design for Trust: Rebuilding Insurance with Digital Empathy

Introduces design thinking frameworks that foster trust and transparency.

Older but Foundational Literature (2019 - 2010)

16. Brown, T. (2019)

Change by Design: How Design Thinking Creates New Alternatives

Introduced the fundamental principles of design thinking, widely adopted in insurance

innovation.

17. Porter, M. & Heppelmann, J. (2019)

How Smart, Connected Products are Transforming Insurance

Discusses IoT and data-enabled insurance products reshaped by digital tools.

18. Bain & Company (2018)

Redefining Customer Loyalty in Insurance

Focus on personalization, user feedback loops, and tech-enabled loyalty programs.

20
19. Miller, J. & Robbins, D. (2018)

Agile & Design Thinking in Financial Services Outlines the synergistic use of agile
methodology and design principles in banking and insurance.

20. HBR (2017)

Design Thinking Comes of Age in Financial Services

Analyses early adoption of design thinking in financial product development.

21. Liedtka, J. (2015)

Perspective: Linking Design Thinking with Innovation Outcomes

Empirical connection between design processes and financial performance

improvements.

22. Accenture (2014)

The Digital Insurer: Redefining the Customer Experience

Details early examples of insurers adopting mobile-first, digitally-native strategies.

23. PwC (2013)

Insurance 2020: The Digital Prize – Taking Customer Connection to a New Level

Predicted trends that now define the Insure Tech space.

24. Deloitte (2012)

Harnessing Technology to Meet Rising Customer Expectations in Insurance

One of the earlier works urging digitization in legacy systems.

25. Christensen, C. (2011)

The Innovator’s Dilemma (Financial Services Edition)

Discusses how disruptive innovation affects insurance incumbents and opens space for
startups like Digit.

21
 CHAPTER-3

3.1 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Research methodology is a systematic approach that guides how a study is conducted, including
data collection, tools used, and methods of analysis. It ensures the research is logical, consistent,
and focused on its objectives, while also allowing others to evaluate or replicate the study. A
well-designed methodology reflects the researcher's understanding of the problem and outlines
ethical practices like informed consent and confidentiality. It includes participant selection,
strategies to reduce bias, and clear data analysis plans. Proper documentation enhances
transparency and strengthens the credibility of the research.

3.2 SAMPLE DESIGN

This study utilized a random sampling technique to select participants from the target population.
This method ensures that each individual has an equal chance of being included, which helps
eliminate selection bias and supports a fair and objective sampling process. By doing so, it
increases the likelihood that the sample accurately represents the broader population, thereby
enhancing the credibility and generalizability of the findings.

A total of 60 participants were chosen at random to participate in the survey. This number
provided a diverse mix of responses and viewpoints, making the collected data more
comprehensive and reflective of varying perspectives. The randomness of the selection helped
prevent any unintended preference or pattern in the participant pool, contributing to a more
balanced and impartial set of results.

Using random sampling strengthened the reliability and validity of the research. It ensured that
the data collected were not only fair but also more likely to represent the true opinions and
experiences of the larger population. This method played a crucial role in improving the
accuracy, transparency, and overall quality of the study. Data for this study was collected using
an online survey created with Google Forms. A structured questionnaire was carefully designed
to gather relevant information aligned with the research objectives. The survey link was shared
with selected participants, allowing them to respond at their convenience. This online approach

22
enabled quick and efficient data collection, reaching a wider audience without geographical
limitations.

The responses received are considered primary data, as they were collected directly for the
specific purpose of this study. Primary data is valuable because it provides original and firsthand
insights. After collection, the responses were organized, reviewed for accuracy, and prepared for
analysis. This process ensured that the data was clean, complete, and ready for interpretation.
Analyzing this data helped uncover patterns and draw conclusions that sup

port the research findings.

3.3 TOOL USED FOR SPSS DATA ANALYSIS

1. DESCRIPTIVE STATSTICS
2. FREQUENCIES
3. ONE -WAY ANNOVA
4. PAIRED SAMPLES TEST
5. ONE SAMPLE t-TESt
6. REGRESSION TEST
7.CHI -SQUARE TEST (CROSS TABS)
3.3.1 SPSS ANALYSIS

23
SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) is a versatile and widely used statistical
software designed for analyzing and managing complex data. It is especially popular in the fields
of social science, psychology, education, business, and health research. At a moderate level,
SPSS enables users to carry out a wide range of statistical analyses such as descriptive statistics,
correlation, regression, t-tests, ANOVA, and reliability testing like Cronbach’s alpha. It also
allows for efficient data management tasks like data entry, transformation, merging, and
handling missing values. Users can generate detailed tables, graphs, and charts to visually
interpret data. One of SPSS’s strengths lies in its easy-to-use graphical interface, though it also
supports syntax commands for users who want more control and automation in their analysis.
Overall, SPSS combines powerful statistical tools with accessibility, making it ideal for
intermediate-level users looking to perform meaningful and accurate data analysis.

3.3.2 FLUTTERFLOW

24
FlutterFlow is a powerful low-code platform that allows users to design, build, and deploy fully
functional mobile and web applications using Google's Flutter framework—without writing
extensive code. It is especially popular among developers, designers, and entrepreneurs who
want to create cross-platform apps efficiently and visually. FlutterFlow provides a drag-and-
drop interface that simplifies the app development process, enabling users to build responsive
UIs, set up navigation, and integrate backend services such as Firebase, REST APIs, and custom
code snippets with minimal technical effort. The platform supports real-time previews, making
it easy to test and refine the app's look and behavior during development. It also offers features
like custom widgets, animations, push notifications, and role-based user authentication.
Advanced users can export clean Flutter code for further customization in an IDE like VS Code
or Android Studio. Moreover, FlutterFlow includes tools for version control, team collaboration,
and direct deployment to app stores, streamlining the full app lifecycle from idea to production.
Its combination of visual development tools and powerful backend integration makes
FlutterFlow a popular choice for rapidly prototyping and launching high-quality, cross-platform
mobile and web apps.

25
 CHAPTER 4

4.1 ANALYSIS AND INTREPRETATION

Analysis is the process of examining data, information, or a situation in detail in order to

understand it better, identify patterns, draw conclusions, or make informed decisions. It involves
breaking down complex material into simpler components to explore relationships, causes, and
effects. In academic, scientific, and professional settings, analysis is used to interpret data
collected from various sources—such as experiments, surveys, or reports—allowing researchers
and decision-makers to extract meaningful insights. Analytical methods can be qualitative,
focusing on themes and narratives, or quantitative, involving numerical data and statistical
techniques. Effective analysis requires critical thinking, logical reasoning, and sometimes the
use of specialized tools or software. Whether in business strategy, research studies, data science,
or everyday problem-solving, analysis plays a crucial role in transforming raw information into
actionable knowledge.

Interpretation is the process of making sense of information, data, or results by explaining

their meaning, significance, and implications in a given context. It goes beyond simply
presenting facts or figures—it involves understanding what those facts imply, how they relate to
the research objectives or real-world situations, and what conclusions can be drawn from them.
In research and data analysis, interpretation helps bridge the gap between raw results and
meaningful insights by considering the broader context, existing theories, and the goals of the
study. It requires critical thinking, analytical reasoning, and often the integration of multiple
sources of information to arrive at a well-rounded understanding. For example, in statistical
analysis, interpretation involves explaining what the numbers actually reveal about the subject
being studied—such as identifying trends, evaluating the strength of relationships, or
understanding the practical significance of findings. Good interpretation also considers
limitations, alternative explanations, and potential implications for future research or decision-
making. Whether in scientific research, business analytics, or social studies, interpretation is
essential for transforming data into knowledge that can inform actions, strategies, or further
inquiry.

26
3.3.1 DESCRIPTIVE & FREQUENCIES ANALYSIS

TABLE :

1. Descriptive Statistics Table

Std.
Variable N Minimum Maximum Mean Variance
Deviation

Age 60 17 69 38.48 14.859 220.726

Gender 60 1 2 1.50 0.504 0.254

Q4_PurchasedOnline 60 0 1 0.58 0.497 0.247

INTERPRETATION

• Age: Participants had an average age of 38.48 years, with ages ranging from 17 to 69.
The standard deviation (14.86) shows a widespread in ages.

• Gender: The mean value of 1.50 suggests an equal number of males (coded 1) and
females (coded 2) in the sample.

• Q4_PurchasedOnline: The mean is 0.58, indicating that about 58% of respondents have
purchased online (assuming 1 = Yes, 0 = No).

2. Frequencies – Summary Statistics Table

Variable N Mean Median Mode Std. Dev Sum

Q6_HeardUsedDigit 60 0.48 0.00 0 0.504 29

Q13_OnlineConfidence 60 1.07 1.00 1 0.254 64

27
INTERPRETATION

• Q6_HeardUsedDigit: Mean = 0.48, Mode = 0 (majority said No), so most people have
not heard or used digital tools. Std. Deviation is 0.504, suggesting low variability.

• Q13_OnlineConfidence: Mean = 1.07, Mode = 1, which implies that most participants

reported being confident online (assuming 1 = Confident, 2 = Not confident).

3. Frequency Tables

• Q6_HeardUsedDigit:

o No (0): 37 respondents (61.7%)

o Yes (1): 23 respondents (38.3%)

o Interpretation: A majority of participants (61.7%) reported not having heard or

used digital tools.

• Q13_OnlineConfidence:

o Confident (1): 56 respondents (93.3%)

o Not confident (2): 4 respondents (6.7%)

o Interpretation: A large majority (93.3%) felt confident about using online

platforms.

OVERALL INTERPRETATION

• The sample is fairly balanced in terms of gender and has a wide age range.

• Most participants are confident in using online platforms, although many have not heard
of or used digital tools.

• A little over half the respondents have purchased something online.

• These results suggest that while digital confidence is high, digital exposure or awareness
may still be limited in some segments of the population.

28
OUTPUT :

3.3.2 DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS

Descriptive analysis involves summarizing and organizing data to understand its main features.
It includes measures such as mean, median, mode, standard deviation, and frequency
distributions. In this analysis, we focus on key demographic and behavioral variables from the
dataset: Age, Gender, Online Purchase Behavior (Q4_PurchasedOnline), Awareness/Usage of
Digital Tools (Q6_HeardUsedDigit), and Online Confidence (Q13_OnlineConfidence).

29
OUTPUT

INTERPRETATION
• The sample includes a diverse age group and a balanced gender distribution.

• A majority have purchased online and feel confident navigating online platforms.

• However, awareness or usage of digital tools is lower, suggesting a gap between

confidence and actual digital exposure.

30
3.3.3 FREQUENCIES ANALYSIS
Frequency analysis is a descriptive statistical technique used to count and display how often each
value of a variable occurs in a dataset. It helps researchers understand the distribution of responses
or characteristics in categorical or ordinal data. Frequency tables usually include:

TABLE

Valid Cumula
Categ Freque Perc Interpreta
Variable Perc tive
ory ncy ent tion
ent Percent
Majority
(61.7%)
Q6_HeardUsedDi 61.7 61.7 have not
No (0) 37 61.7%
git % % heard/used
digital
tools
Minority
(38.3%)
38.3 38.3
Yes (1) 23 100.0% are
% %
aware/have
used them
Vast
majority
feel
Q13_OnlineConfi Confid 93.3 93.3
56 93.3% confident
dence ent (1) % %
using
online
platforms
Not Very few
Confid 4 6.7% 6.7% 100.0% lack
ent (2) confidence

31
OUTPUT

32
INTERPRETATION
The frequency analysis reveals that while most participants (93.3%) are confident in using online
platforms, a significant portion (61.7%) have never heard of or used digital tools. This suggests a
gap between digital confidence and actual exposure to digital technologies. Moreover, over half
(58%) have experience with online purchasing, indicating moderate engagement in digital commerce.
The data points to the importance of increasing digital literacy and awareness, especially among
those who are confident but not yet actively using digital resources.

3.3.4 ONE SAMPLE T - TEST

A one-sample t-test is a statistical method used to compare the mean of a single sample to a known
or hypothesized population mean. It helps determine whether the sample mean is significantly
different from the expected value. This test is useful when you want to evaluate how a group’s
average compares to a benchmark. A significant p-value (usually < 0.05) indicates a meaningful
difference. It is commonly used in surveys, experiments, and research studies.

TABLE

95%
Sig. CI
Test Mean
Variable N Mean t df (2- (Lower
Value Difference
tailed) –
Upper)

0.44 –
Q9_UsedChartSupport 0 60 0.57 8.784 59 0.000 0.567
0.70

1.68 –
Q11_DigitalImportance 0 38 1.95 14.338 37 0.000 1.947
2.21

33
OUTPUT

INTERPRETATION

1. Q9_UsedChartSupport:
The sample mean (0.57) is significantly different from the test value of 0 (p < 0.001).
This indicates that, on average, respondents use chart support significantly more than
none at all.

2. Q11_DigitalImportance:
The sample mean (1.95) is also significantly greater than 0 (p < 0.001), suggesting that
participants consider digital importance to be significantly high.

3.3.5 PAIRED SAMPLE T-TEST ANALYSIS

A Paired Sample T-Test is a statistical method used to compare the means of two related groups.
It is commonly used when the same participants are measured before and after an intervention,
or under two different conditions. The goal is to see if there is a significant difference between the
two sets of scores. It assumes the differences between pairs are normally distributed.
A p-value < 0.05 indicates a statistically significant change between the two conditions.

34
 TABLE

Sig. 95%
Mean Std.
Pair Variable Pair t df (2- Confidence
(Diff.) Deviation
tailed) Interval

Pair Q10_UserFriendlyDesign – -0.404 to

0.133 2.079 0.497 59 0.621
1 Q14_RecommendationLikelihood 0.670

INTERPRETATION

The paired sample t-test compares the mean scores of:

• Q10_UserFriendlyDesign (M = 3.20) and

• Q14_RecommendationLikelihood (M = 3.07)

The mean difference between them is 0.133, with a p-value of 0.621.

Since the p-value is greater than 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. This means
there is no statistically significant difference between the user’s perception of the
platform’s user-friendliness and their likelihood to recommend it.

35
OUTPUT

3.3.5 REGRESSION ANALYSIS

Regression analysis is a statistical method used to examine the relationship between one dependent
variable and one or more independent variables. It helps predict the value of the dependent variable
based on the values of the independent variables. The regression coefficient shows the strength
and direction of the relationship. A significant p-value (typically < 0.05) indicates a meaningful
relationship. It is widely used in forecasting, trend analysis, and decision-making.

36
TABLE

Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate

1 0.296 0.088 0.073 0.485

ANNOVA TABLE

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Regression 1.334 1 1.334 5.667 0.021

Residual 13.660 58 0.235

Total 14.994 59

37
CO-EFFICIENT TABLE

Standardized
Unstandardized Std.
Model Coefficients t Sig.
Coefficients (B) Error
(Beta)

(Constant) 0.134 0.160 0.838 0.407

Q10_UserFriendlyDesign 0.046 0.019 0.298 2.381 0.021

OUTPUT

38
INTERPRETATION

1. ModelFit
The R Square value is 0.088, meaning that only 8.8% of the variation in the dependent
variable (Q6_HeardUsedDigit) is explained by the independent variable
(Q10_UserFriendlyDesign). This is a weak model fit.

2. StatisticalSignificance:
The ANOVA Sig. value is 0.021, which is less than 0.05, indicating that the regression
model is statistically significant. So, the independent variable does have a significant
impact on the dependent variable.

3. CoefficientsInterpretation:
The unstandardized coefficient (B) for Q10_UserFriendlyDesign is 0.046, with a p-value
of 0.021, which is also significant (< 0.05). This means for every one-unit increase in
User-Friendly Design, Heard/Used Digital increases by 0.046 units on average.

4. Constant:
The intercept (constant) is 0.134, which is the predicted value of the dependent variable
when the independent variable is 0 (though it is not significant with p = 0.407).

5. Conclusion:
Although the model explains only a small portion of the variance, the variable User-
Friendly Design has a significant positive effect on whether users have heard or used
digital tool.

3.3.6 CHI SQUARE TEST ANALYSIS

The Chi-Square test is a statistical method used to determine whether there is a significant
association between two categorical variables. It works by comparing the observed frequencies

in each category of a contingency table with the frequencies that would be expected if there were

39
no relationship between the variables. A low p-value (typically less than 0.05) indicates that

the difference between the observed and expected values is statistically significant, suggesting

a relationship exists. This test is particularly useful in survey research, market analysis, and

behavioral studies, where responses fall into categories. It assumes that the sample size is

adequate and that the expected frequency in each cell is not too small.

TABLE

Test Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 127.321 136 0.690

Likelihood Ratio 114.672 136 0.890

Linear-by-Linear Association 0.023 1 0.874

N of Valid Cases 60

OUTPUT

40
INTERPRETATION

The Chi-Square test is used to examine whether there is a significant association between

Age and Q10_UserFriendlyDesign.

From your SPSS output:

• Pearson Chi-Square value = 127.321

• Degrees of freedom (df) = 136

• Asymptotic Significance (2-sided p-value) = 0.690

Since the p-value (0.690) is greater than 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. This means:

There is no statistically significant association between Age and perceptions of User-Friendly

Design (Q10).

In simpler terms:
Users across different age groups do not significantly differ in their opinion about whether the
design is user-friendly.

Let me know if you need this in a paragraph format or added to a report

3.3.7 CROSS TABS

Cross tabulation (Crosstabs) is a statistical tool used to analyze the relationship between two or more
categorical variables by displaying their frequency distributions in a matrix format. It shows how the
categories of one variable relate to the categories of another (e.g., Age vs. User-FriendlyDesign).
Each cell in the table represents the count or percentage of responses that fall into both categories. It
helps identify patterns, trends, or associations between variables. Crosstabs are often accompanied
by Chi-Square tests to determine if observed associations are statistically significant.

41
TABLE

Age Rating = 1 2 3 4 5 Total

17 1 (100%) 0 0 0 0 1
18 1 (25.0%) 1 (25.0%) 0 1 (25.0%) 1 (25.0%) 4
19 0 0 0 1 (50.0%) 1 (50.0%) 2
21 1 (33.3%) 1 (33.3%) 0 1 (33.3%) 0 3
22 1 (33.3%) 0 1 (33.3%) 1 (33.3%) 0 3
23 0 1 (50.0%) 1 (50.0%) 0 0 2
24 1 (100%) 0 0 0 0 1
25 0 0 0 1 (50.0%) 1 (50.0%) 2
26 1 (50.0%) 0 0 0 1 (50.0%) 2
27 0 0 0 1 (100%) 0 1
28 0 0 0 0 1 (100%) 1
60 2 (50.0%) 1 (25.0%) 1 (25.0%) 0 0 4
61 1 (100%) 0 0 0 0 1
62 1 (100%) 0 0 0 0 1
67 1 (100%) 0 0 0 0 1
Total 9 (15.0%) 12 (20.0%) 12 (20.0%) 14 (23.3%) 13 (21.7%) 60

42
OUTPUT

INTERPRETATION

Overall Interpretation (Cross Tabulation of Age × User-Friendly Design Rating)

The cross-tabulation analysis between respondents' age and their rating of the user-friendly design
reveals a diverse spread of opinions across different age groups. While younger respondents (ages
17 to 28) appear more frequently in the dataset, there is no consistent trend indicating that a
particular age group rated the design significantly higher or lower than others. Ratings of 4 and 5
were the most common across all ages, suggesting a generally favorable perception of the user
interface. However, older participants (ages 60 and above) gave mixed or slightly lower ratings,
hinting at potential usability concerns for senior users. Despite these variations, the lack of statistical
significance in the chi-square test (p = 0.690) confirms that age does not have a meaningful
association with how user-friendly the design was perceived. Thus, the user-friendliness of the
system is broadly accepted across age groups, without any strong age-based bias.

43
SOLUTION (IN APP FORMAT)

APP NAME: LIFELINE

Lifeline is an app created to tackle the key challenges faced by Digits Insurance Company, including
transparency issues in claims processing, complicated premium calculations, and undisclosed
charges. These problems have caused customer dissatisfaction, delays in claims, and frustration with
unexpected premium hikes. The app offers a transparent, easy-to-navigate platform that allows users
to track their claims in real-time and provides clear, simple breakdowns of premiums and charges.
By eliminating hidden fees and streamlining premium calculations, Lifeline helps rebuild customer
trust and confidence. It aims to improve customer retention, reduce frustration, and drive sustainable
growth. Ultimately, the app empowers customers with more control and transparency in their
insurance journey, restoring their faith in the company.

LIFELIFE LOGO

44
45
46
47
48
49
50
CHAPTER-5

5.1 FINDINGS

• The data shows more males (35) than females (25), revealing a gender imbalance. This
calls for evaluating and improving gender representation where relevant.

• The 26–45 age group dominates the customer base. This group should be the primary
focus for marketing and service strategies.

• Most customers haven't faced or accept premium increases, though some view them as
unfair. Transparent communication around pricing is essential.

• A majority (34) support the proposition, indicating a positive customer sentiment. This
insight can help tailor services and offerings accordingly.

• Many users find the premium breakdown unclear, particularly in one group. Simplifying
and clarifying information can improve understanding.

• Website usability feedback is inconsistent, especially within one group. Improving

consistency can enhance the user experience for all.

• Insurance premium understanding varies across groups. Targeted communication can

help reduce confusion and improve clarity.

• Customers seek faster claims, better pricing tools, and support. These service areas need
focus to meet user expectations.

• Longer claim processing times lead to lower satisfaction. Fast resolutions are key to
maintaining positive customer relationships.

• Effective complaint resolution significantly boosts satisfaction. Poor handling causes

dissatisfaction, stressing the need for quality support.

51
5.2 SUGGESTIONS

• Enable customers to check the real-time status of their claims through app notifications
or SMS, reducing confusion and increasing transparency.

• Provide a simple, step-by-step guide for the claims process to help users navigate
procedures confidently and avoid delays.

• Establish clear timelines for claim settlement and share them with customers to manage
expectations and build reliability.

• Show a full premium cost breakdown including base charges, taxes, and additional fees
to ensure complete cost clarity.

• Include an intuitive premium calculator that allows users to explore how different inputs
affect their insurance cost.

• Display all applicable charges clearly before policy purchase or renewal to avoid
unexpected costs and build trust.

• Rewrite policy terms in plain, easy-to-read language so that customers can understand
their coverage without legal complexity.

• Send advance notifications to customers about any premium increases or policy

modifications to avoid last-minute surprises.

• Use automation and AI tools to handle straightforward claims quickly, improving

efficiency and customer satisfaction.

• Provide round-the-clock chatbot assistance to answer basic queries instantly and

improve accessibility.

• Train service representatives to communicate policy details and costs clearly, helping
customers feel more informed and supported.

• Create a straightforward complaint resolution path with defined steps and contacts to
resolve customer concerns promptly.

52
5.3 CONCLUSION

Digit Insurance is currently dealing with critical issues that have significantly impacted its
reputation and weakened customer loyalty. One of the major problems is the lack of
transparency in the claims process. Customers, often in difficult and stressful situations, expect
a smooth and timely resolution when they file claims. However, the existing system lacks clear
communication and leaves many unsure about the status or progress of their claims. This
uncertainty causes frustration and leads some customers to consider switching to other
providers. To regain customer confidence, Digit Insurance needs to improve its claims process
by offering clear, consistent updates and ensuring that policyholders are informed at every step.
Creating a more transparent and responsive experience will help rebuild trust and enhance
customer satisfaction.

Another major concern lies in the complexity of premium calculations. Many customers
struggle to understand how their premiums are determined, and unexpected rate increases only
add to their frustration. This lack of clarity makes policyholders feel that they are being
overcharged or misled. To address this, Digit Insurance must adopt a simpler and more
transparent pricing model that clearly explains how premiums are calculated. Additionally,
hidden fees and charges that were not disclosed during the purchase of a policy further damage
the company’s credibility. Customers deserve to know exactly what they are paying for. Full
disclosure of all associated costs, including service fees and policy charges, will help foster a
stronger sense of trust and fairness.

Rebuilding trust requires a consistent, proactive effort from Digit Insurance. The company must
not wait for issues to arise but should take the initiative to keep customers informed about any
changes to policies, premiums, or procedures. Clear, timely communication can prevent
confusion and show customers that their concerns are being taken seriously. Moreover, the
company should commit to ongoing improvements through regular feedback collection, internal
audits, and continuous staff training. By consistently evaluating and refining its operations,

53
Digit Insurance can better align with customer expectations. These actions will not only address
current challenges but also create a more loyal and engaged customer base, helping the company
re-establish itself as a trusted leader in the insurance industry.

BIBILOGRAPHY & REFERENCE

Baker, T. (2001). Insuring morality. Economy and Society, 30(4), 560–584.

Berry-Stölzle, T. R., & Hoyt, R. E. (2012). Determinants of strategic choice in reinsurance

markets: Evidence from the U.S. property liability insurance industry. Journal of Risk and
Insurance, 79(2), 401–428.

Browne, M. J., & Hoyt, R. E. (2000). The demand for flood insurance: Empirical evidence.
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 20(3), 291–306.

Crosby, L. A., Evans, K. R., & Cowles, D. (1990). Relationship quality in services selling: An
interpersonal influence perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 68–81.

Cummins, J. D., & Tennyson, S. (1996). Moral hazard in insurance claims processing. Journal
of Risk and Insurance, 63(1), 29–49.

Derrig, R. A. (2002). Insurance fraud. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 69(3), 271–287.

Doherty, N. A., & Schlesinger, H. (2002). Insurance contracts and securitization. Journal of Risk
and Insurance, 69(1), 45–62.

Doyle, J. J. (2005). Health insurance, treatment and outcomes: Using auto accidents as health
shocks. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(2), 256–270.

Eastman, J. K., & Langenderfer, J. (2001). Consumer vulnerability and the insurance industry:
An examination of the elderly. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(2), 268–286.

Frederick, H., & Marsden, D. (2002). Small businesses and insurance literacy: A New Zealand
case study. Small Enterprise Research, 10(1), 54–67.

Gollier, C. (2004). The economics of risk and time. MIT Press.

Grönroos, C. (2007). Service management and marketing: Customer management in service

competition (3rd ed.). Wiley.

54
Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing public relations. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Hoy, M., & Polborn, M. (2000). The value of information in insurance markets: Policyholder
heterogeneity and adverse selection. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 67(2), 249–262.

Huang, Y., & Wang, S. (2010). Customer satisfaction with actuarial fairness in premium setting.
Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 47(2), 123–132.

Jin, G. Z., & Sorensen, A. T. (2006). Information and consumer choice: The value of publicized
health plan ratings. Journal of Health Economics, 25(2), 248–275.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist,
39(4), 341–350.

Klein, R. (2000). The regulation of insurance. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Issues
and Practice, 25(3), 360–375.

Kunreuther, H. (1996). Mitigating disaster losses through insurance. Journal of Risk and
Uncertainty, 12(2–3), 171–187.

Lee, H.-J., & Cunningham, L. F. (2001). A cost/benefit approach to understanding service

loyalty.
Journal of Services Marketing, 15(2), 113–130.

Lemaire, J. (1995). Bonus-malus systems in automobile insurance. Kluwer Academic

Publishers.

Malhotra, N. K., & Birks, D. F. (2006). Marketing research: An applied approach (Updated 2nd
ed.). Pearson Education.

Maynard, A., & Bloor, K. (2003). Our certain fate: Rationing in health care. In D. Light & A.
Maynard (Eds.), Rethinking rationing: Health care in the United States and United Kingdom
(pp. 13–28). Oxford University Press.

55
Mayers, D., & Smith, C. W. (1981). Contractual provisions, organizational structure, and
conflict control in insurance markets. Journal of Business, 54(3), 407–434.

Nguyen, N., & LeBlanc, G. (2001). Corporate image and corporate reputation in customers’
retention decisions in services. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 8(4), 227–236.

Outreville, J. F. (1990). Whole-life insurance lapse rates and the emergency fund hypothesis.
Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 9(4), 249–255.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale
for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.

Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk
with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3),
101–134.

Puelz, R., & Snow, A. (1994). Evidence on adverse selection: Equilibrium signaling and
crosssubsidization in the insurance market. Journal of Political Economy, 102(2), 236–257.

Rust, R. T., & Zahorik, A. J. (1993). Customer satisfaction, customer retention, and market
share. Journal of Retailing, 69(2), 193–215.

Schlesinger, H. (2003). The theory of risk and insurance. In G. Dionne (Ed.), Handbook of
Insurance (pp. 67–85). Springer.

Sheth, J. N., & Parvatiyar, A. (1995). Relationship marketing in consumer markets: Antecedents
and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 255–271.

Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J., & Sabol, B. (2002). Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational
exchanges. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 15–37.

Smith, M. D., & Telang, R. (2009). Competing with free: The impact of movie broadcasts on
DVD sales and Internet piracy. MIS Quarterly, 33(2), 321–338.

Tennyson, S. (2001). Information and consumers’ insurance choices: A review of the literature.
Journal of Insurance Regulation, 19(2), 141–163.

56
Urban, B., & Naidoo, R. (2012). Business sustainability: Empirical evidence on operational
skills in SMEs in South Africa. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 19(1),
146–163.

Verhoef, P. C., Reinartz, W. J., & Krafft, M. (2009). Customer engagement as a new perspective
in customer management. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 247–252.

Weisbart, S. (2005). Transparency in insurance: Making policies easier to understand. Insurance

Information Institute.

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Zweifel, P., & Eisen, R. (2012). Insurance economics. Springer.

57
ANNEXURE

QUESTIONNARIE

Survey Title

Digit Insurance – Transforming Insurance through Design Thinking & Digital Innovation

Section A: Basic Information

1. Name: ______________________________

2. Age:

☐ Under 18

☐ 18–25

☐ 26–35

☐ 36–45

☐ 46–60

☐ Above 60

3. Gender:

☐ Male

☐ Female

☐ Other

☐ Prefer not to say

58
Section B: Insurance Experience & Digital Interaction

4. Have you ever purchased any type of insurance online?

☐ Yes

☐ No

5. Which type(s) of insurance have you purchased? (Select all that apply)

☐ Health

☐ Motor

☐ Travel

☐ Home

☐ Life

☐ None

6. Have you heard of or used Digit Insurance?

☐ Yes

☐ No

7. How would you rate the ease of using Digit Insurance’s mobile app or website?

☐ Very Easy

☐ Easy

☐ Neutral

59
☐ Difficult

☐ Very Difficult

8. How satisfied are you with the speed and transparency of Digit’s digital claim process?

☐ Very Satisfied

☐ Satisfied

☐ Neutral

☐ Dissatisfied

☐ Very Dissatisfied

9. Have you interacted with Digit Insurance via WhatsApp or chatbot for support?

☐ Yes

☐ No

10. Do you feel that Digit designs its services to be user-friendly and simple to understand?

☐ Strongly Agree

☐ Agree

☐ Neutral

☐ Disagree

☐ Strongly Disagree

60
11. How important is digital innovation (apps, AI support, instant claims, etc.) in your
choice of insurer?

☐ Very Important

☐ Important

☐ Neutral

☐ Not Important

☐ Not Sure

12. What digital features matter most to you in an insurance company? (Select up to 3

☐ Instant claim approval

☐ Paperless process

☐ 24/7 Chat/WhatsApp support

☐ Simple app interface

☐ Transparent policy details

☐ Personalized recommendations

13. Do you feel more confident buying insurance online compared to using an agent ?

☐ Yes

☐ No

61
14. How likely are you to recommend Digit Insurance to a friend or colleague based on its
digital services?

☐ Very Likely

☐ Likely

☐ Neutral

☐ Unlikely

☐ Very Unlikely

15. In your opinion, can design thinking and technology make insurance more accessible
and affordable for everyone?

☐ Yes

☐ No

☐ Not Sur

62
RESPONSES:

63
64