Mercantilism: An Introduction

Mercantilism was an economic theory and practice that dominated Europe from the 16th to the 18th
century. It was based on the idea that a country’s wealth and power depended mainly on the amount
of gold and silver it had. According to this belief, the more precious metals a nation owned, the
stronger it would be. To increase this wealth, countries needed to export more goods than they
imported. In other words, they had to sell more products to other countries while buying fewer
products from them. This would help them earn money from trade and increase their national
wealth.

The word “mercantilism” comes from the Latin word “mercari,” which means “to trade.” This
clearly shows that trade was at the center of this theory. Governments during this time believed that
international trade was the key to increasing their national power. So, they focused heavily on
controlling trade, creating colonies, and protecting their own industries. They did everything
possible to encourage exports and discourage imports. This is why mercantilism is often called a
“protectionist” policy, because it aimed to protect the economy of a nation from foreign
competition.

Historical Background of Mercantilism

Mercantilism began to develop in the late 15th and early 16th centuries, a time when many
European countries were expanding their in uence overseas. This period is often called the Age of
Exploration. During this time, explorers like Christopher Columbus, Vasco da Gama, and Ferdinand
Magellan discovered new lands and sea routes. As a result, European nations like Spain, Portugal,
England, France, and the Netherlands began to establish colonies in Asia, Africa, and the Americas.

With these new colonies, European countries found a great opportunity to increase their wealth.
They could now get raw materials like gold, silver, spices, cotton, and sugar from the colonies at
cheap rates. These materials were then used to make goods in Europe. The nished goods were
either sold back to the colonies or to other countries for a pro t. This trade gave a big boost to the
economies of these countries. But it also led to competition among European powers to control as
many colonies as possible. The goal was simple: more colonies meant more raw materials, more
trade, and more wealth.

In this way, mercantilism was not just an economic policy but also a political and military strategy.
European powers built large navies to protect their trading ships and colonies. Wars were often
fought over trade routes and colonial territories. Economic power and military power were closely
linked under mercantilism. A strong economy could support a strong army and navy, which in turn
helped protect and expand trade.

Basic Principles of Mercantilism

Mercantilism was based on several key ideas that guided the economic policies of many European
countries. These principles were:

1. Wealth is Measured in Gold and Silver

According to mercantilists, a nation’s wealth was measured by the amount of gold and silver it
owned. These precious metals were seen as the most valuable resources. So, the main goal of
fl
fi
fi
 economic policy was to collect and hoard as much gold and silver as possible. This could be done
by having a favorable balance of trade, meaning that a country sold more than it bought.

2. Positive Balance of Trade

A positive or favorable balance of trade meant that a country exported more goods than it imported.
Exports brought money into the country, while imports sent money out. To achieve this,
governments encouraged industries to produce more goods for export. They also imposed tariffs
(taxes) on imported goods to make them more expensive and less attractive to buyers.

3. Government Regulation of the Economy

In mercantilist economies, the government played a very active role. It controlled trade policies,
regulated industries, and even gave special privileges to certain businesses. The government could
also ban the export of raw materials to ensure that industries at home had enough resources to make
goods.

4. Colonies as Sources of Wealth

Colonies were seen as important tools for gaining wealth. They provided raw materials to the
mother country and served as markets for its nished goods. The colonies were not allowed to trade
freely with other nations. All trade had to go through the mother country, which controlled prices
and pro ts.

5. Protection of Domestic Industries

To protect local industries from foreign competition, governments used high tariffs, import bans,
and other barriers. They also supported domestic manufacturers through subsidies and grants. This
made home-grown products cheaper and more competitive in both local and foreign markets.

6. Building a Strong Navy and Army

Mercantilist policies required a strong navy to protect merchant ships and trade routes. Many
countries invested heavily in their naval power to protect their economic interests. Military strength
was seen as necessary for economic success.

Part 2: Mercantilist Policies and Practices in Detail

Under mercantilism, governments used many tools and policies to make their nations richer and
stronger. The goal was always to increase national wealth by maximizing exports and minimizing
imports. These policies covered various areas such as trade, manufacturing, agriculture, taxation,
and colonial control.

1. Export Promotion

Mercantilist states gave a lot of importance to exports. They believed that selling more goods to
foreign countries would bring in gold and silver. To promote exports, governments gave support to
local industries. They provided money, resources, and sometimes even land to manufacturers. They
fi
fi
also encouraged the production of goods that were in demand in other countries. In some cases, the
government xed low prices for exported goods to make them more attractive in international
markets.

In addition to this, rulers established trading companies, like the British East India Company or
the Dutch East India Company, and gave them exclusive rights to trade in certain regions. These
companies were backed by the state and had military support to carry out their trade. They were
major tools of mercantilist policy.

2. Import Restrictions

While exports were encouraged, imports were usually discouraged. Buying goods from other
countries was seen as a loss of national wealth because it meant sending gold and silver abroad. To
prevent this, governments imposed high tariffs on foreign goods. These tariffs made imported goods
more expensive, so people would prefer to buy products made in their own country.

In many cases, imports of certain goods were completely banned, especially if those goods were
already produced within the country. Governments also made rules to prevent the import of luxury
items that were seen as unnecessary or wasteful.

3. Development of Local Industries

Mercantilist policies focused on strengthening local industries. Governments wanted to make sure
that everything needed by the country could be produced at home. To do this, they offered nancial
help to businesses, including loans, tax breaks, and subsidies. They also provided technical support
and sometimes trained workers to improve their skills.

In many countries, rulers encouraged the production of textiles, weapons, ships, and other important
goods. Some countries also imported skilled workers from other places to improve their industries.
For example, France brought in Dutch and Italian craftsmen to help develop its manufacturing
sector.

4. Control Over Colonies

Colonies were a central part of mercantilist policy. European countries like Britain, France, Spain,
and the Netherlands used their colonies to get raw materials and to sell their manufactured goods.
Colonies were not allowed to set up their own industries or trade with other countries. Everything
had to be controlled by the mother country.

For example, Britain made laws like the Navigation Acts, which required that goods imported to or
exported from the American colonies had to be carried on British ships. This gave British merchants
and shipbuilders a big advantage. Colonial economies were made to depend on the mother country,
and this brought wealth and power back to Europe.

5. Accumulation of Bullion (Gold and Silver)

One of the most important goals of mercantilism was to increase a country’s stock of gold and
silver. Countries believed that holding large amounts of precious metals would make them powerful
and safe. To achieve this, governments tried to export goods for money rather than barter or trade.

The focus on gold and silver also led to mining activities in colonies, especially in the Americas.
Spain, for example, extracted vast amounts of silver from mines in Mexico and Peru. These
fi
fi
 resources helped Spain become very rich for a time, although they later faced problems due to
in ation and mismanagement.

6. Establishment of Trading Monopolies

Many mercantilist governments gave exclusive trading rights to powerful companies. These
monopolies had special permission to trade in certain parts of the world. They were expected to
bring pro ts to the state and to expand national in uence. In return, they got protection from the
government and often had their own armies.

For example, the British East India Company not only traded but also governed large parts of India.
It collected taxes, maintained law and order, and even fought wars. Similar companies existed in the
Netherlands (Dutch East India Company) and France (French East India Company). These
companies were vital to mercantilist expansion.

7. Encouragement of Population Growth

Mercantilists believed that a large population was good for the economy. More people meant more
workers, more soldiers, and more consumers. Therefore, governments encouraged population
growth through various policies. They gave rewards to families with many children, supported
marriage, and discouraged emigration.

A growing population helped in producing more goods and services. It also meant a larger army to
defend the country and protect its trade interests. Labor was needed for agriculture, mining, and
industry, so a big population was seen as a national asset.

8. Use of Taxes and Laws to Support Economic Goals

Under mercantilism, taxation was used not just to collect money but to shape economic behavior.
High taxes were imposed on imported goods, while domestic goods were taxed less. Laws were
also made to control wages, prices, and working hours. In some places, the government decided
how much of a certain product could be produced or sold.

Mercantilist rulers believed that strict control was necessary to build a strong economy. They didn’t
support free markets or open competition. Instead, they wanted to guide and direct the economy for
the bene t of the state.

Part 3: Mercantilism in Practice – Country by Country

1. Mercantilism in England

England was one of the most successful countries in applying mercantilist policies. Starting from
the late 15th century, English rulers began to focus on developing national industries and increasing
overseas trade. Over time, England built a strong navy, created colonies in the Americas and Asia,
and passed laws to control trade and industry.

One of the most important tools of English mercantilism was the Navigation Acts, rst introduced
in 1651. These laws required that all goods imported into England or its colonies be carried in
English ships or ships owned by English merchants. The goal was to limit the role of foreign
fl
fi
fi
fl
fi
traders, especially the Dutch, and give British merchants full control of trade routes and colonial
markets. These acts were later expanded to include other products and trade conditions.

The government also supported industries like shipbuilding, textiles, and iron production. British
wool and cloth exports increased rapidly during this period. The rise of the British East India
Company played a key role in English mercantilism. This company was given the right to control
trade in Asia, especially India. It eventually became a powerful political and military force in the
region, collecting taxes and governing territories.

Through these policies, England became one of the richest and most powerful countries in the
world. However, the strict control over colonial trade also created tensions, especially in the
American colonies. These tensions later contributed to the outbreak of the American Revolution in
the late 18th century.

2. Mercantilism in France

France was another country that practiced mercantilism in a very structured and organized way,
especially under the leadership of Jean-Baptiste Colbert, the nance minister of King Louis XIV.
Colbert was one of the most famous mercantilist thinkers. He believed that the power of the French
state depended on economic strength, and he worked to make France self-suf cient and rich
through strict economic planning.

Colbert introduced policies to boost industry, especially luxury goods like glass, mirrors, textiles,
and furniture. He gave subsidies and loans to manufacturers, invited foreign skilled workers to
France, and set quality standards for French goods. Colbert also built roads and canals to improve
transportation and trade within the country.

To protect French industries, Colbert raised tariffs on foreign goods and limited imports. Like
England, France established overseas colonies in North America, the Caribbean, and Africa. It also
created the French East India Company to trade in Asia.

While Colbert's policies made some industries stronger, they also had drawbacks. The heavy
regulation made it hard for small businesses to compete. Also, the strict control of trade made the
colonies dependent and unhappy, which caused problems later. Still, during Colbert’s time, France
became a major economic and military power.

3. Mercantilism in Spain

Spain was one of the earliest European powers to adopt mercantilist ideas, especially after it
discovered the New World in the late 15th century. Spanish ships brought huge amounts of gold and
silver from colonies in the Americas, especially from the mines in Mexico and Peru. This made
Spain extremely wealthy in the 16th century.

However, Spain's version of mercantilism was different. Instead of focusing on industry or exports,
Spain relied heavily on the ow of precious metals. The Spanish government did not develop its
own industries as much as England or France. As a result, much of the wealth from the colonies was
spent on imports, especially from other European countries.

This approach led to in ation and economic decline in the long run. Because Spain did not build a
strong industrial base, it could not maintain its position as a major power. Over time, other countries
like England and the Netherlands took control of global trade.
fl
fl
fi
fi
 Spain also had tight control over its colonies. The colonies were not allowed to trade with other
nations, and all goods had to pass through Spanish ports. This system created a black market and
corruption, and many colonial subjects were unhappy with the rules.

4. Mercantilism in the Netherlands

The Netherlands followed a unique form of mercantilism. Unlike other countries that focused on
restricting imports and increasing domestic production, the Dutch relied heavily on shipping, trade,
and nance. Amsterdam became the nancial center of Europe in the 17th century, and Dutch
merchants dominated trade routes from Asia to the Americas.

The Dutch East India Company (VOC) was one of the most powerful trading companies in the
world. It had its own army, navy, and colonial territories in places like Indonesia. The Dutch also
controlled important ports and sea routes, and they developed a strong banking and insurance
system to support trade.

Although the Dutch did not follow all traditional mercantilist policies (like import restrictions or
self-suf ciency), they were still part of the mercantilist world. Their goal was the same: to increase
national wealth and power through trade and economic control. The Dutch model showed that a
exible and open trade system could also work under mercantilist principles.

5. Mercantilism in Portugal

Portugal was among the earliest colonial powers, especially during the Age of Exploration in the
15th and 16th centuries. Portuguese ships traveled to Africa, India, and Brazil, creating a vast
trading empire. Like Spain, Portugal focused on collecting wealth from its colonies through gold,
spices, sugar, and other goods.

The Portuguese crown controlled trade through royal monopolies. Most goods had to pass through
Lisbon, and foreign traders were not allowed to deal directly with the colonies. Portugal also built
forts and trading posts along key sea routes to protect its interests.

However, Portugal did not invest heavily in industry or domestic production. This made it
dependent on other countries for manufactured goods. Over time, this weakened Portugal’s
economy, and it lost in uence to other powers like England and the Netherlands.

Part 4: Theoretical Foundations of Mercantilism

Mercantilism was not based on a single book or theory written by one thinker. Instead, it was a
collection of economic ideas that developed over time in response to the needs of growing nation-
states. These ideas were promoted by advisers, ministers, businessmen, and intellectuals who
believed that the strength of a country depended on its wealth, especially in gold and silver.

Although mercantilism didn’t follow a xed theory like modern economics does, many common
themes connected its supporters. Let’s look at the main ideas and the thinkers behind them.

1. Core Beliefs of Mercantilist Thinkers

Mercantilist thought was built around several key beliefs:

fl
fi
fi
fl
fi
fi
 • Wealth equals power: A nation’s strength was directly linked to its stock of precious
metals, especially gold and silver. The more a country had, the stronger it would be.

• A favorable balance of trade is essential: Countries should export more than they import
to earn gold and silver from foreign lands.

• National self-suf ciency is ideal: Countries should try to produce everything they need
within their own borders, reducing dependency on others.

• Colonies exist for the bene t of the mother country: Colonies should provide raw
materials and serve as markets for manufactured goods.

• Government control is necessary: The economy should not be left to individuals or

markets. The state should guide economic activity to serve national interests.

These ideas supported the belief that economic success came not from cooperation, but from
competition between nations. Trade was seen as a zero-sum game: if one country gained, another
lost.

2. Important Mercantilist Thinkers and Writers

Although there was no single "school" of mercantilism, several individuals wrote about mercantilist
ideas or helped develop them in practice.

Thomas Mun (England)

One of the most famous English mercantilists was Thomas Mun, who worked for the British East
India Company. In his book England’s Treasure by Forraign Trade (published posthumously in
1664), Mun argued that the country should focus on exporting more than it imported. He explained
that this would bring in more gold and silver, which was the true measure of wealth. He also
supported the idea that colonies and trading companies were essential tools of national prosperity.

Jean-Baptiste Colbert (France)

Colbert, as mentioned earlier, was the nance minister of King Louis XIV of France. He didn’t
write formal economic books, but he put mercantilist ideas into practice more thoroughly than
almost anyone else. He believed that wealth came from industrial and agricultural production, not
just from gold. His policies supported industries, restricted imports, and promoted exports. He also
improved infrastructure like roads and ports to strengthen internal trade.

Antonio Serra (Italy)

Antonio Serra was an Italian economist who wrote A Short Treatise on the Causes Which Make
Gold and Silver Plentiful in Kingdoms (1613). He argued that gold and silver would naturally ow
into countries with strong manufacturing and export industries. He explained how wealth could be
increased by promoting domestic production and discouraging the out ow of money.

Gerard de Malynes (England)

fi
fi
fi
fl
fl
 Another English mercantilist, Malynes, believed in regulating foreign exchange and maintaining
the balance of trade. He thought that unrestricted trade could harm national interests and drain a
country’s wealth. He supported detailed regulations on commerce and strict government control.

These thinkers helped shape the ideas and practices of mercantilism across Europe.

3. Justi cations for Mercantilism

Mercantilism became the dominant economic philosophy in early modern Europe for several
reasons:

• It supported national unity and strong governments. As monarchs tried to centralize

power and build strong nation-states, mercantilist policies helped them gather resources,
maintain armies, and fund wars.

• It promised growth through trade and colonization. Mercantilism encouraged overseas

expansion, which helped European countries explore, conquer, and control parts of Africa,
Asia, and the Americas.

• It created a sense of security. By focusing on self-suf ciency and gold reserves,

mercantilist policies made rulers feel that they were protecting their countries from future
crises or wars.

• It t well with the political realities of the time. The 16th to 18th centuries were full of
rivalry and con ict. Mercantilism provided an economic justi cation for expansion and war.

4. Criticism of Mercantilism

Even during its peak, mercantilism was not without its critics. Over time, many economists began
to question its assumptions and effectiveness.

a. Misunderstanding of Wealth

Critics argued that mercantilists misunderstood what wealth truly was. They believed that having
gold and silver was not enough. What really mattered was production, labor, and the ability to
satisfy people’s needs. Gold was only useful if it could be used to buy goods and services.
Hoarding it did not help the economy grow.

b. Inef ciency and Waste

Mercantilist policies often led to inef ciency. High tariffs, trade restrictions, and state monopolies
made goods more expensive and limited choices for consumers. Protectionism could also lead to
low-quality products because businesses didn’t face much competition.

c. Colonial Exploitation

Many people in the colonies suffered under mercantilist rule. Their economies were kept weak and
dependent on the mother country. They were forced to send raw materials and buy expensive
nished goods. This inequality led to anger and eventually revolutions, especially in the Americas.
fi
fi
fi
fi
fl
fi
fi
fi
d. Rise of Classical Economics

By the 18th century, new thinkers like Adam Smith began to argue for free trade and limited
government interference. In his famous book The Wealth of Nations (1776), Smith explained that
wealth comes from productive labor and ef cient markets, not from gold or trade surpluses. He said
that people should be free to buy, sell, and invest as they wished. This marked the beginning of
modern economics and the decline of mercantilist thinking.

5. Transition from Mercantilism to Modern Economics

By the late 18th and early 19th centuries, many European countries began to move away from strict
mercantilist policies. They started lowering tariffs, removing trade restrictions, and promoting free-
market capitalism.

However, mercantilist ideas never disappeared completely. Even today, some countries use policies
that resemble mercantilism—such as protecting local industries, limiting imports, or using state
power to control trade.

In this way, mercantilism continues to in uence the world, even if it is no longer the main economic
philosophy.

Part 5: Impact and Legacy of Mercantilism

Mercantilism was not just an economic theory—it shaped the way nations interacted with each
other, how governments worked, and how the modern world economy developed. Its effects can be
seen in trade systems, colonial empires, and even today’s economic policies.

1. Impact on European Economies

Mercantilism helped transform small kingdoms into powerful modern states. Through careful
planning, government control, and colonial expansion, countries like England, France, Spain, and
the Netherlands became wealthy and strong.

• Economic growth and urbanization: Many European cities grew as a result of trade and
manufacturing encouraged by mercantilism. Industries like shipbuilding, textiles, and
mining received support from the state, leading to the growth of urban centers.

• Development of national economies: Before mercantilism, people mostly lived in small

local economies. Mercantilism pushed for a national economy with shared goals, rules, and
policies. The idea of the “nation” as an economic unit took root during this time.

• Formation of commercial classes: As trade and industry expanded, a new class of

merchants and businesspeople gained wealth and in uence. This group played a major role
in shaping modern capitalism and democratic movements later.

2. Impact on Colonies
fl
fi
fl
 Mercantilism had a deep and long-lasting impact on the colonies of European powers. Colonies
were not treated as equal partners but as sources of raw materials and markets for goods.

• Resource extraction: Colonies were forced to produce raw materials—like sugar, cotton,
tobacco, coffee, gold, and silver—and ship them to the mother country. These materials
were then used to manufacture goods, which were sold back to the colonies at higher prices.

• Restricted trade: Colonies were often not allowed to trade freely with other countries. This
made them economically dependent on the colonizing country and prevented them from
building strong local industries.

• Social inequality and exploitation: Mercantilist policies created wealth for the colonial
rulers but led to poverty, underdevelopment, and exploitation for many local people.
Slavery, forced labor, and land grabs were common under this system.

• Colonial resistance and revolution: Over time, people in the colonies became unhappy
with mercantilist policies. For example, the American Revolution (1775–1783) was partly
a reaction against British mercantilist laws that limited trade and taxed colonial goods. Other
independence movements around the world had similar roots.

3. Contribution to Capitalism

Mercantilism helped lay the foundation for modern capitalism, even though its methods were very
different from free-market ideas.

• Growth of business and nance: The focus on trade, pro t, and accumulation of wealth
encouraged the development of banks, stock exchanges, and insurance systems. Big trading
companies like the British East India Company and the Dutch East India Company
became early examples of capitalist enterprises.

• Investment and risk-taking: Mercantilism promoted overseas exploration and investment

in industries. This culture of investing for pro t eventually led to the rise of capitalism in the
18th and 19th centuries.

• Private enterprise with state support: While the government controlled many things
under mercantilism, private companies also played a large role. This partnership between
business and government would become a key feature of later economic systems.

4. In uence on Global Trade

Mercantilism transformed global trade networks in many ways:

• Creation of global trade routes: European countries established sea routes that connected
Europe, Africa, Asia, and the Americas. These routes became the basis of a global economy.

• The Triangular Trade: A key feature of mercantilist trade was the triangular trade, which
involved three regions:

◦ Manufactured goods were sent from Europe to Africa.

◦ Enslaved Africans were sent to the Americas.

fl
fi
fi
fi
 ◦ Raw materials like sugar and tobacco were sent from the Americas to Europe.
This system enriched European countries but caused great human suffering,
especially through the slave trade.

• Standardization of trade practices: Mercantilism led to more organized trade policies,

standard weights and measures, and better transportation. It made trade more ef cient,
though not always fair.

5. Political and Military Impacts

Mercantilism was deeply tied to politics and warfare. The goal was not just economic success but
also military strength and global dominance.

• Increased state power: Governments gained more control over the economy, especially in
the form of taxes, tariffs, and trade laws. Kings and rulers used this wealth to build armies,
navies, and empires.

• Economic causes of war: Since trade was seen as a zero-sum game, countries often fought
wars to control trade routes, colonies, and resources. Examples include:

◦ The Anglo-Dutch Wars over control of sea trade.

◦ The Seven Years’ War (1756–1763), which involved battles over colonies between
Britain and France.

◦ Many colonial wars in Africa, Asia, and the Americas.

6. Long-Term Legacy

Even though classical economists like Adam Smith criticized mercantilism and replaced it with
free-market theory, mercantilist ideas never completely disappeared.

• Modern protectionism: Today, countries still use some mercantilist-like policies to protect
domestic industries. These include:

◦ Import tariffs.

◦ Export subsidies.

◦ Trade quotas.

◦ Government aid to key industries.

• Nationalism in economics: Some governments still believe in prioritizing national interests

in global trade. This can be seen in trade wars and policies aimed at reducing dependence on
other countries.

• Development strategies: In the 20th century, countries like Japan, South Korea, and China
used government-led industrial policies (similar to mercantilism) to build strong economies.
They protected local industries while promoting exports, much like mercantilist countries in
the past.
fi
 7. Legacy in Thought and Education

Mercantilism is now taught as an early stage in the development of economic thought. Although
modern economists generally prefer free trade, mercantilism is still studied for its historical and
theoretical importance.

• It reminds us that economics and politics are closely connected.

• It shows how ideas about wealth and power have changed over time.

• It helps explain the history of colonization, trade, and industrial development.

Conclusion of Part 5
Mercantilism was a major force in shaping the modern world. It guided the policies of powerful
empires, laid the groundwork for global trade, and helped develop early capitalist institutions.
Although its strict focus on gold, colonies, and government control has been replaced by newer
theories, many of its ideas still in uence how nations think about wealth, power, and economic
strategy.

Part 6: Summary, Criticism, and Comparison of Mercantilism

1. Summary of Mercantilism

Mercantilism was the dominant economic system in Europe from the 16th to the 18th century. It
focused on strengthening the power of the state by increasing national wealth, mainly through the
accumulation of gold and silver. The core ideas of mercantilism included:

• A favorable balance of trade: Export more than you import.

• Government control: Economic policies should serve national interests.

• Colonial dependence: Colonies should supply raw materials and buy nished goods.

• Economic nationalism: The wealth of a country is measured by how much precious metal
it owns.

These policies were used to support powerful monarchies and empires like Spain, France, England,
and the Netherlands. They built strong navies, expanded into the Americas, Asia, and Africa, and
competed for global trade dominance.

Mercantilist thinkers, such as Thomas Mun, Jean-Baptiste Colbert, and Antonio Serra,
promoted these ideas in both theory and practice. Their goals were to make the country self-
suf cient, wealthy, and militarily strong.
fi
fl
fi
 Over time, these policies led to the growth of major colonial empires and global trade networks.
However, they also caused major social and economic problems—especially in the colonies, where
local industries were suppressed and people were exploited.

2. Major Criticisms of Mercantilism

Mercantilism eventually fell out of favor as new economic ideas emerged. Critics pointed out
several serious aws in the system:

a. Confused Wealth with Money

Mercantilists believed that gold and silver were the main forms of wealth. But critics like Adam
Smith argued that real wealth lies in the ability to produce goods and services that improve
people’s lives.

b. Zero-Sum View of Trade

Mercantilism assumed that in trade, one nation’s gain is another’s loss. This discouraged
cooperation between nations. Modern economists see trade as a win-win situation, where all
parties can bene t through specialization and exchange.

c. Inef cient and Restrictive

Tariffs, monopolies, and trade restrictions often led to inef ciency, higher prices, and less
innovation. These policies protected weak industries instead of encouraging them to improve.

d. Colonial Oppression

Mercantilism hurt the colonies by preventing them from building strong local economies. They
were forced to rely on their mother countries for goods and were often kept in poverty. This led to
growing resentment and eventually revolutions—like in the American colonies.

e. Ignored Human Freedom

Mercantilism prioritized state control over individual freedom. It didn’t allow people to freely
choose what to produce, sell, or buy. Later thinkers believed that economic freedom was essential
for prosperity and innovation.
fi
fl
fi
fi