Abstract
NOMED: Nanorobots Operating in Medical Exploration and Diagnostics
       The imminent revolution in healthcare revolves around the groundbreaking potential of
nanorobots, bound to redefine diagnostics as well as targeted treatments. Our proposed
technology presents a medicinal goldmine with the potential to diagnose illnesses, bacterial
infections, and cancerous growths faster and more efficiently than current methods and provide
grounds for immediate intervention. Comprising artificial platelets, red blood cell membranes,
and microcameras, these nanorobots work in synchronization to bind to pathogens and neutralize
toxins produced in the human body. The micro camera allows for precise navigation and
real-time imaging within the body, whilst red blood cell membranes conceal the nanorobots,
allowing the nanorobots to evade immune responses. Artificial platelets provide a detection
mechanism through molecular recognition, delivering synthetic antibodies for targeted
intervention. Additional aspects of the nanorobots include advanced sensors, navigation systems,
and adaptive coatings, all of which ensure the overall functionality of our technology, as well as
precision and adaptability.
                                      Present Technology
   NOMED: Nanorobots Operating in Medical Exploration and Diagnostics
       Nanotechnology, commonly defined as the manipulation of matter at the atomic and
molecular level, has made significant advances in the medical field, in turn leading to the
formation of a new area known as nanomedicine. Nanomedicine involves the use of
nanoparticles and nanorobots, which are nanosized machines capable of carrying payloads like
drugs and genes performing various biomedical functions such as diagnosis and therapeutic
actions, and targeting specific disease sites. They can harness power from external power sources
(NIR light, ultrasound, magnetic driving force, etc) as well as utilize existing energy sources in a
biological system. The scientific principles behind nanorobots involve assembling and deploying
functional bio-machinery at a “nanoscale.” This scale of nanotechnology is defined by “the
National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) as approximately 1 to 100 nanometers.” (Gao, 2023)
For context, a cell surface receptor is about 40 nanometers, a DNA strand is around 2 nanometers
in diameter, and an albumin molecule is approximately 7 nanometers. (Gao, 2023) Microbiology
has been instrumental in the development of nanobiotechnology, particularly in the creation of
microrobots and nanorobots. However, their use in the vascular system is limited due to
transportation and propulsion challenges. To overcome this, magnetotactic bacteria like
Magnetococcus and Magnetospirillum are coupled with these robots. These bacteria contain
magnetosomes, which respond to magnetic fields and can guide the robots in the desired
direction. (Giri, 2021) At 0.5 μm (500 nanometers), the marine magnetotactic spirillum is the
smallest known species of magnetotactic bacteria, but due to their slow speed, magnetotactic
cocci are more practical for intravascular function. These bacteria-robot hybrids have potential
                                                                                                   1
uses in delivering therapeutic compounds or functioning as sensors. A two-component robotic
system has been proposed for navigating both large vessels and capillaries, with a larger robot
for transport in large vessels and a smaller one for capillaries. Nanorobots have found different
uses in many diverse fields from neurosurgery to dentistry and are increasingly being used in
cancer diagnosis and treatment. The transition from theoretical applications to real-world
implementations of nanorobots for cancer treatments has been significant over the years, with
progress from in vitro experiments to in vivo applications. (Gao, 2023) However, the journey of
nanorobots in medicine is not without its challenges. The sheer complexity of the human body
demonstrates a significant obstacle in the development of medicinal nanorobots. The body’s
various barriers can disrupt the movement and function of nanorobots. Additionally, concerns
about potential toxicity and long-term health effects make further research necessary to ensure
the safety and efficiency of nanorobots in medical applications. (Burak, 2023) Despite these
challenges, the field of nanomedicine still holds incredible promise for the advancement of
healthcare and treatment outcomes. The potential of nanorobots to revolutionize targeted
medicine, particularly for cancer treatment, is being “explored with optimism.” Other problems
that require assessment include high development costs, determining a constant power source for
the nanorobots, and integrating nanorobots into medical treatment and diagnosis with FDA
approval. (Nanotechnology Guidance Documents, 2018)
                                         History
After its first introduction to the public in 1959, the utilization of nanotechnology in medicine
has been increasing ever since. (Nanotechnology: There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom –
Richard Feynman, n.d.) Nanotechnology, or mechanizations on the atomic level was announced
by famous scientist Richard Feynman at the American Physical Society meeting,
                                                                                                    2
which has been occurring every year since 1899. In his presentation to the crowd, Feynman
shared his revolutionary idea of creating nanoscopic contraptions capable of medical advances
that are on the molecular scale. Even though Feynman did not propose or exhibit an actual
prototype of his intention, he is regarded as the father of modern nanotechnology to the world as
a whole. Reaching into the 1960’s, the desire of nanotechnology to be used for medicinal
purposes did not show great improvement from the 1950’s. As would be expected, many
experiments and research was done after the thinking of scientists shifted from large-scale to
molecular scale. Electric circuits and many electronics as a whole were starting to be designed
based on the premise of making new inventions smaller. In the1970’s, the world was seeing no
enormous releases in terms of new nanotechnology products nor research to support or deny if
these types of mechanisms were possible for humans to create. The knowledge of this time
period in nanotechnology’s history was largely devoted to scientists Alfred Cho and Jon Arthur,
who worked together to create a process that was capable of forming single atomic layers.
Known as the Molecular beam epitaxy, the device, promoted by its popularity of being a
milestone in the history of molecular electronics, was capable of forming an atomic-sized
product of multiple layers of material. (McSwine, 2023) When functioning together as a whole,
all of the layers that were assembled to carry out specific functions would be able to hold a great
amount of storage. This new and improved model of nanotechnology did not conduct purposes
that were assistful to the enhancement in medicine, but instead gave humans a reference as to
what medical nanotechnology may appear as. Heading into the 1980’s, a time when technology
was advancing all around, renowned scientists Gerd Binnig and Heinrich Roher presented to the
people a new advancement known as the scanning tunneling microscope which became the first
tool that enabled individual atoms to be seen. (Quate, n.d.) Just five years later, in 1986, Gerd
                                                                                                    3
Binnig, Calvin Quate and Christopher Gerber shared an enhanced version of the recent
discovery, now identified by the name of the atomic force microscope. This microscope, unlike
the past one, allowed the atoms to not only be seen, but measured and manipulated at the same
time. This new found accomplishment permitted scientists to understand that if materials can be
maneuvered on the atomic scale, then functional products can be built from atoms as well. The
addition of a microscope that was capable of moving individual atoms was a great reach towards
the creation of medical nanotechnology. The 1990’s were the decade when nanotechnologies
were starting to be implemented in many household devices such as laptops and cameras. Also,
in 1991, scientist Iijima et al. discovered a material known as carbon nanotubes which were
believed to be helpful in the creation of nanotechnologies. These carbon nanotubes are both
strong and flexible, and are used to assist with the mechanical, electric and heat-related areas of
the products. (Quate, n.d.) They also showed possibilities of being able to assist with other areas
of electrical engineering as well. But, in the 2000s, human knowledge of medical
nanotechnology soared dramatically from what was known before. After endless research from
scientists, it was found that nanotechnology can play multiple roles in the lives of medical needs.
Nanotechnology can deliver drugs unlike any pill or medicine ever taken. The devices will carry
the drug through the body and deliver the medicine to the exact location where it is required, in
certain amounts, and even on a specific schedule. (Nano Based Drug Delivery Systems: Recent
Developments and Future Prospects - Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 2018)
                                        Future Technology
       Over the next several decades, the medicinal goldmine of nanorobots will continue to
develop. Our proposed technology offers the potential to diagnose illness, bacterial infection, and
                                                                                                      4
cancerous growths faster than any currently known method while also providing grounds for
immediate intervention.
       This feat can be achieved by three major components of these futuristic nanorobots:
artificial platelets, red blood cell membranes, and micro cameras. The initial two components are
formulated to replicate the roles of their counterparts, enabling the nanorobots to bind to
potential pathogens and neutralize toxins. However, these components' unique ability is their
function in neutralizing microscopic viruses by binding to them, which are typically capable of
bypassing the body’s natural defense mechanisms, including the cell membrane, without any
hindrance. (Nano Based Drug Delivery Systems: Recent Developments and Future Prospects -
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 2018)
       Red cell membranes are used to conceal the nanorobots, aiding in preventing an immune
response. Although red blood cells themselves do not neutralize pathogens, the red blood cell
membrane can absorb and neutralize harmful toxins produced by bacteria and viruses. This is
largely due to their deformability and stability. (Esteban, 2018)
       Artificial platelets provide the means for a detection mechanism, based on the concept of
molecular recognition. The delivery of artificial platelets, released by the nanorobots and further
facilitated by the circulatory system, enables the nanorobots to deliver synthetic antibodies that
match the antigen of the target cell. (Freitas & Kurzweil, n.d.)
       The third major component, the micro camera, offers a crucial role in the overall
functionality of these nanorobots, as well as the ability to diagnose. It allows for precise
                                                                                                     5
navigation and real-time imaging within the body, enabling the nanorobots to reach specific
locations, such as sites of tumors, and perform targeted treatments. (I'mnovation Hub, 2020)
       Two additional components contributing to the functionality of nanorobots are the power
supply and advanced sensors. Throughout the years energy sources have had a significant
decrease in size, enabling the development of compact and efficient power units that can sustain
the continuous operation of nanorobots within the human body. Two prime examples of such
energy storage technologies include nanoscale batteries and energy-harvesting mechanisms,
enabling the nanorobots to operate independently and efficiently for extended periods.
(McGovern, 2019)
       The advanced sensors function in gathering live data about the body's internal
environment, contributing to the nanorobot’s ability to diagnose. An example of this would be
pH sensors, as they can help identify acidic conditions associated with certain diseases, while
temperature sensors aid in identifying areas of inflammation or infection. These sensors provide
crucial information for accurate diagnosis and targeted treatments. (Gao, 2023)
       Nanorobots also utilize advanced navigation systems that allow them to navigate
complex and sophisticated structures of the human body. These navigation systems, inspired by
biological principles, mimic the capabilities of microorganisms to move through tissues and
fluids (biomimetic locomotion). Nano GPS-like technology allows for an accurate placement of
the nanorobots, enabling them to reach specific bodily sites flawlessly. (McSwine, 2023)
       Furthermore, the coating of nanorobots is designed with adaptive materials (such as
polymers, lipid-based structures like liposomes, and smart hydrogels) that respond to
                                                                                                   6
environmental cues, including changes in temperature, pH, or specific biochemical signals. This
adaptability is crucial for evading the immune system and ensuring little to no interference with
the nanorobots active in the bloodstream. (Chemical Tunability of Advanced Materials Used in
the Fabrication of Micro/nanobots, n.d.)
        To address concerns about potentially harmful side effects or misuse, various fail-safe
mechanisms, and programmed self-destruction protocols are implemented into the nanorobots.
For example, target-specific functionality allows nanorobots to only operate in specific locations,
deactivating upon completion of their task. Time-dependent self-destruction protocols may also
be employed, giving nanorobots a predetermined lifespan to prevent long-term effects. (Seppala,
2015)
                                         Breakthroughs
        In order for our technology to come to fruition, multiple breakthroughs are necessary to
fully realize the potential of nanorobots. Firstly, progress is necessary in the design and
development of the nanorobot’s components, specifically artificial platelets, red blood cell
membranes, and microcameras. Achieving an accurate replication of their natural counterparts'
roles whilst maintaining their unique capabilities, particularly in countering microscopic viruses,
requires a more precise engineering model and innovation in the material.
        The strategy of concealing nanorobots with red blood cell membranes welcomes
possibilities for breakthroughs in immune evasion. The technique calls for improvement in both
the deformability and stability of nanorobots to consistently avoid immune responses. In addition
to this, developing efficient detection mechanisms based on molecular recognition for artificial
                                                                                                    7
platelets and engineering a feasible delivery system would also make for a major milestone.
(Oppermann, 2023)
       On the topic of power supply, the ongoing trend of minimizing energy sources,
demonstrated by nanoscale batteries and energy-harvesting mechanisms, represents a
breakthrough in sustaining the nanorobot’s operations within the human body for extended
periods of time. However, these advancements need further optimization for enhanced energy
efficiency and longevity. (McGovern, 2019)
        The role of advanced sensors in real-time data gathering is critical for accurate diagnosis.
Breakthroughs in sensor technologies, especially in pH and temperature sensors, are of incredible
importance for identifying specific disease conditions and areas of inflammation or infection,
contributing to a more precise and targeted course of treatment. (Gao, 2023)
       The adaptation of nanorobot coatings with adaptive materials is another critical aspect
that requires breakthroughs. Advancing polymers, lipid-based structures, and smart hydrogels to
respond efficiently to environmental cues, such as changes in temperature, pH, or biochemical
signals, is vital for ensuring the nanorobots' adaptability, aiding in evading the immune system.
(Recent Advances in the Synthesis of Smart Hydrogels, n.d.)
       To address ethical concerns and potential misuse, breakthroughs in fail-safe mechanisms
and programmed self-destruction protocols are vital. Developing foolproof target-specific
functionality and time-dependent self-destruction protocols will be crucial to ensure nanorobots'
safe and responsible deployment in medical applications. (Strong et al., 2012)
                                       Design Process
                                                                                                    8
       At first, we thought of a simple nano robot that could detect pathogens and viruses by
programming the robot to look for certain viruses in the blood so once detected, the robot could
alert an app in your phone or a program sent to your doctor so a treatment plan could be
developed but then, after talking to our teachers we realized that if the robot did detect a virus
already in the system and alerts your phone or doctor, it could cause an alarm. Hundreds of
single-cell viruses could be detected in the body, there would not be cause for concern until the
virus bypasses the natural immune system.
       Then we thought of a more complex system with cameras all around the robot and a
system that watches over the film live to help any cells that appear dangerous. Once a virus cell
has been detected the nanorobot would send a signal to the immune system to activate an
immune response to help regulate the presence of the virus. After thinking, we realized that cells
have many different shapes and their shape does not determine if it's dangerous or not. If the
nanorobot determines a cell is dangerous, but in reality, it is crucial or harmless to the body, the
immune system could attack the cell and any other cell similar, destroying anything beneficial
that cell could have been doing for the body.
       Afterward, we thought of attaching a program that can detect slight changes to the
blood’s environment then once the robot detects a change, it flows through the blood finding the
source of the change, assessing if the change was caused or could cause something that affects
the health of its user. This idea was clever but the response to the environmental change was the
issue. The body could have multiple changes all at once, even if the user has multiple nanorobots
in their body, the robots could all respond to the one specific change, leading back to the one
specific choice.
                                                                                                       9
       In the end, our team came up with a nanorobot that can use artificial platelets that aid the
robot in detecting harmful toxins. The platelets rely on molecular recognition to detect pathogens
which is better than relying on imaging. Once detected the robots use micro cameras to allow for
precise navigation and imaging making the robot’s diagnosis more accurate to avoid (With the
usage of multiple nanorobots) misdirection of robots, causing an overstock of robots in one
concern site, and an understock of robots in another. The nanorobot would treat harmful toxins
utilizing its red blood cells’ membranes, preventing the user, or their doctor, from being alarmed.
                                      Consequences
It is widely recognized that any new technologies or innovations introduced to society will have
both backlash and acceptance by many. This is due to either the presence of fear in one or, on the
opposing side, the desire for something new in one’s life. The idea of implementing
nanotechnology or robots on the molecular level into someone’s body would cause a disturbance
and major concern.
       Two significant concepts of the nanorobot that permit it to carry out its function are the
nano camera, as well as the sensors all around the exterior of the technology. But, to allow these
devices to function with this technology, there must be an energy source to provide long-range
operation, especially in a person who is very ill. This energy source must be in the form of a
nano battery. This is when a possible consequence becomes acknowledged and thought upon. To
allow the nanorobots to function, there must be great sums of them, since they are so tiny and
individually, will not operate as well as in large masses. Since there will be great sums of the
robots, large amounts of energy will be required. This results in there being many nano batteries
in one’s body as long as they have the robots present. Batteries themselves already present a
                                                                                                    10
grave danger to health on the exterior of the body due to the acid that they hold within them. If
battery acid is to leak onto the skin, then that skin will face very serious burns that will last long
periods. Now, we are considering placing very large quantities of batteries, evidently not as great
in size, into the bloodstream of humans. In current times, the risk of a battery leaking is very slim
because of new technologies, however, it will never be impossible. Any volume of battery acid
that leaks from a battery can cause severe harm to the tissue of the veins, arteries, or capillaries,
and can even burn a hole through the transport tube, causing severe damage. The possible risk of
allowing the nanorobots to travel throughout the body is not great, yet there is always risk
associated with new devices, particularly in the medical field where they have direct contact with
the internal body.
       The other consequence that could arise from the introduction of this technology to society
is that a vast majority of people will not want to utilize nanorobots for treatment. Already in
present-day times, nearly half of all people have a fear recognized as pharmacophobia or fear of
medications. That statistic only factors in the medications that are widely known such as in pill
form, not medical technologies. Based on that information, it can be assumed that if so many
people already refuse to use basic medications, then nanorobots are not going to be brought in
with open arms. That percentage of people can jump up to most likely around sixty-five percent
of those who will not consider nanotechnology. Fear is what drives the human mind to take
action or not take action in certain situations. As one can see, fear is already a major factor in
determining if people will take medications or not.
       The ideas and purpose behind the medical nanorobots make complete sense and cause the
future to look bright. But, after considering both the positives and consequences of
nanotechnology in humans, many could be turned away from considering this viable option.
                                                                                                     11
                                      Bibliography
Burak, A. (2023, September 15). The Impact of Nanobots in Medicine: What You Need to Know.
       Relevant Software. Retrieved January 8, 2024, from
       https://relevant.software/blog/nanobots-in-medicine/
Chemical tunability of advanced materials used in the fabrication of micro/nanobots. (n.d.). RSC
       Publishing. Retrieved January 8, 2024, from
       https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2023/tb/d2tb02743g
Environmental and health risks of nanorobots: an early review. (2020, August 27). RSC
       Publishing. Retrieved January 8, 2024, from
       https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2020/en/d0en00570c
Esteban, B. (2018, May 31). Cell-like nanorobots clear bacteria and toxins from blood.
       ScienceDaily. Retrieved January 8, 2024, from
       https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/05/180531102807.htm
Freitas, R. A., & Kurzweil, R. (n.d.). Clottocytes: Artificial Mechanical Platelets « the Kurzweil
       Library + collections. Ray Kurzweil. Retrieved January 8, 2024, from
       https://www.thekurzweillibrary.com/clottocytes-artificial-mechanical-platelets
Gao, P. (2023, July 14). Advances of medical nanorobots for future cancer treatments - Journal
       of Hematology & Oncology. Journal of Hematology & Oncology. Retrieved January 8,
       2024, from https://jhoonline.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13045-023-01463-z
Giri, G. (2021, November 5). A Brief Review on Challenges in Design and Development of
       Nanorobots for Medical Applications. MDPI. Retrieved January 8, 2024, from
       https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/21/10385
I'mnovation Hub. (2020, December 25). Nanorobots into Photographers. Retrieved January 8,
       2024, from
                                                                                                12
       https://www.imnovation-hub.com/science-and-technology/micro-sized-camera-nanorobot
       s/?_adin=01833301559
McGovern, A. (2019, April 12). Smaller, faster, better: Nanoscale batteries may power future
       technology. MIT News. Retrieved January 8, 2024, from
       https://news.mit.edu/2019/smaller-faster-better-nanoscale-hydrogen-batteries-may-power
       -future-technology-0412
McSwine, D. (2023, November 7). .,. Retrieved January 8, 2024, from
       https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/physics-and-astronomy/molecular-beam-epitaxy
McSwine, D. (2023, November 7). IEEE. Modeling Electromagnetic Navigation Systems.
       Retrieved January 8, 2024, from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9329101
Nano based drug delivery systems: recent developments and future prospects - Journal of
       Nanobiotechnology. (2018, September 19). Journal of Nanobiotechnology. Retrieved
       January 8, 2024, from
       https://jnanobiotechnology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12951-018-0392-8
Nanotechnology Guidance Documents. (2018, March 23). FDA. Retrieved January 8, 2024, from
       https://www.fda.gov/science-research/nanotechnology-programs-fda/nanotechnology-gui
       dance-documents
Nanotechnology - Nanotubes, Nanowires, Applications. (n.d.). Britannica. Retrieved January 8,
       2024, from
       https://www.britannica.com/technology/nanotechnology/Nanotubes-and-nanowires
Nanotechnology: There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom – Richard Feynman. (n.d.). Richard
       Feynman. Retrieved January 8, 2024, from
       http://www.feynman.com/science/nanotechnology/
                                                                                               13
Oppermann, A. (2023, March 3). Nanorobotics: Theory, Applications, How Does It Work? Built
       In. Retrieved January 8, 2024, from https://builtin.com/robotics/nanorobotics
Quate, C. F. (n.d.). Scanning tunneling microscope (STM). Britannica. Retrieved January 8, 2024,
       from https://www.britannica.com/technology/scanning-tunneling-microscope
Recent advances in the synthesis of smart hydrogels. (n.d.). RSC Publishing. Retrieved January
       8, 2024, from https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2021/ma/d1ma00193k
Rules of the road: The navigational 'strategies' of bacteria in motion. (2021, May 11). Phys.org.
       Retrieved January 8, 2024, from
       https://phys.org/news/2021-05-road-strategies-bacteria-motion.html
Seppala, T. J. (2015, January 23). Scientists successfully implant self-destructing nanobots into
       live mice. Engadget. Retrieved January 8, 2024, from
       https://www.engadget.com/2015-01-23-nanobots-in-mice-do-the-twist.html
Strong, C., Douglas, S., & McGill, G. (2012, February 16). Researchers at Harvard's Wyss
       Institute Develop DNA Nanorobot to Trigger Targeted Therapeutic Responses. Wyss
       Institute. Retrieved January 8, 2024, from
       https://wyss.harvard.edu/news/researchers-at-harvards-wyss-institute-develop-dna-nanoro
       bot-to-trigger-targeted-therapeutic-responses/
                                                                                                    14
15
16
17