0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views9 pages

Level 8 Draft 2 Model-1 - Slide 33

The Berlin Brandenburg Airport (BER) project aimed to consolidate Berlin's airports but faced significant delays and budget overruns, ultimately completing in 2020, nine years later than planned. Key challenges included poor stakeholder management, inadequate risk assessments, and technical failures, which led to increased costs and project inefficiencies. The case study highlights the importance of proactive stakeholder engagement, structured communication, and adherence to project management frameworks like PMBOK to improve future project outcomes.

Uploaded by

saved.chase60
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views9 pages

Level 8 Draft 2 Model-1 - Slide 33

The Berlin Brandenburg Airport (BER) project aimed to consolidate Berlin's airports but faced significant delays and budget overruns, ultimately completing in 2020, nine years later than planned. Key challenges included poor stakeholder management, inadequate risk assessments, and technical failures, which led to increased costs and project inefficiencies. The case study highlights the importance of proactive stakeholder engagement, structured communication, and adherence to project management frameworks like PMBOK to improve future project outcomes.

Uploaded by

saved.chase60
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

Slide 1: Title Slide

Berlin Brandenburg Airport (BER) Project: A Case Study in Project Management Challenges
Your Name
Course: Project Management Capstone (PROJ6016)
Date

Slide 2: Introduction

Project Aim

 BER was intended to merge all of Berlin’s airports into one major airport.

 Originally aimed at improving Berlin’s connectivity in the global airline system (Alberts et
al., 2009).

Timeline

 Originally planned to be opened in 2011, but the construction was completed in 2020.

 Delays due to technical and managerial challenges.

Budget Overruns

 The project was estimated to cost three times what was allocated in the budget.

 Poor financial planning and unforeseen costs.

Key Challenges

 Poor planning and stakeholder mismanagement.

 Inadequate risk management and technical failures.

Slide 3: Research Questions & Objectives

Research Questions

 What were the key issues of project management?

 What was the effect of stakeholder mismanagement on BER?

 What lessons for future managers can be derived from the given case?

Objectives
 Analyze causes of failure.

 Evaluate management practices.

 Recommend future improvements.

Slide 4: Methodology

Design

 Case Study of BER Project.

 Consequently, the emphasis should be placed on matters such as project management


challenges and success rates.

Data Sources

 Newspaper articles, magazines, research papers, academic papers, journals, government


reports, case studies.

 Interviews with stakeholders and project managers.

Criteria

 Recent, peer-reviewed, project-focused literature.

 Emphasis on practical insights and theoretical frameworks.

Analysis Techniques

 Qualitative analysis of project documents.

 The method involves comparison in order to achieve an understanding of the key


failures.

Slide 5: Theoretical Frameworks

PMBOK 7th Edition

 There are five process groups: initiating process group, planning process group,
executing process group, monitoring and controlling process group, and closing process
group.

 Framework for structured project management.

Stakeholder Management Theory


 Importance of early, continuous engagement.

 Coordinating stakeholder interests based on the project objectives.

Risk Management Framework

 Identification, analysis, mitigation.

 Mitigating measures to deal with the uncontrollable events.

Change Management

 Adapting to changes and its importance in a project.

 Strategies for effective change control.

Slide 6: Key Literature Insights

Planning Failures

 Unrealistic timelines and resource estimates.

 Frequent design changes causing confusion.

 Lack of comprehensive feasibility studies.

Stakeholder Miscommunication

 Lack of structured communication plans.

 Lack of timely updates among the stakeholders has led to mistrust.

 Conflicting priorities between stakeholders.

Risk Neglect

 Lack of consideration of technical and governance risks.

 Lack of concerns over the defects within the fire safety system.

 Inadequate contingency planning.

Technical Failures

 Problems with escalators, lifts and doors.

 Non-compliance with safety standards.


Slide 7: Stakeholder Management Failures

Poor Stakeholder Identification

 Inadequate mapping of stakeholder interests.

 Conflicting interests between contractors and government bodies.

Communication Issues

 Lack of regular stakeholder meetings.

 Lack of trust because of lack of open and honest communication.

Example of Failure

 There were conflicting objectives between the contractors and the government
departments involved.

 All the updates of the stakeholders were in harmony with the project.

Impact on Project

 Delayed decision-making processes.

 It is common to find projects experiencing a rise in the cost of undertaking them as a


result of misunderstandings.

Slide 8: Risk Management Failures

Audit Failures

 Lack of regular risk audits and assessments.

 Neglected chances to initiate an appraisal of threats at an early stage.

Technical Issues

 Fire safety systems faulty and non-compliant.

 Technical failures in escalators and elevators.

Corruption

 Bribes influenced decision-making processes.

 There are also unskilled employees being employed to do the work hence poor quality
work is produced.
Example of Risks

 Challenges that lead to additional costs in designing:

 The absence of contingency measures that are put in place for technical hitches.

Slide 9: Scheduling and Resource Issues

Scheduling Problems

 Some project schedules are set and planned without accurately analyzing all the possible
conditions.

 Frequent delays due to mismanaged timelines.

Resource Allocation

 This resulted in poor resource allocation and thus brought about inefficiency.

 Amateurs needed some of the tasks to be redone which caused delays.

Lack of Techniques

 Lack of critical path or resource leveling on a project.

 Lack of proper management of resources in projects.

Impact on Project

 Increased costs due to inefficient resource management.

 In this case, stakeholders’ trust is affected by delays in the management and completion
of projects.

Slide 10: Findings: Key Lessons Learned

Stakeholder Engagement

 Stakeholders must be engaged at the beginning of the process in order to make sure that
they are on the same page with others.

 They need to have regular communication that fosters trust to allow for quick decision
making.
 For instance, conducting weekly meetings and visiting the sites could have enhanced
participation.

Risk Management

 Carry out ongoing risk assessments and assessments.

 Develop proactive risk mitigation strategies.

 For instance, it could have been possible to avoid time wastage if fire safety concerns
had been tackled at an earlier stage.

Scheduling

 LPMs such as Critical Path Method (CPM) and Resource Leveling can be used.

 Ensure that they set realistic time frames for the project and that they adequately divide
available resources in the project appropriately.

 For instance, it could have been possible to avoid construction delays through proper
scheduling.

Communication

 Establish structured communication plans.

 Ensure transparency in project updates.

 For instance, lack of clear communication should have minimized conflicts among
stakeholders.

Slide 11: Discussion: Bridging Theory and Practice

PMBOK Structures Not Adhered To

 Failure to follow the structure or method caused confusion.

 Example: Absence of change control management.

Ignoring Stakeholder Needs

 This was contrary to best practice in stakeholder management.

 For instance, stakeholders complained of being left out from decision-making processes.

Real-World Practice Deviations

 Did not closely follow the guidelines of the best practice.


 For instance, many a time, designs are changed frequently without considering the
impacts.

Integration of Theory and Practice

 Significance of ensuring that practice corresponds to theory.

 For instance, application of PMBOK principles could have aided on the following aspects.

Slide 12: Professional Growth Reflection

Proactive Stakeholder Management

 Criticized the idea of not involving stakeholders early enough in the project.

 For instance, promoting the efficient interaction between stakeholders leads to better
project outcomes.

Regular Risk Assessments

 They got greater appreciation of ongoing risk audits.

 For instance, risks can be identified early enough and this averts any delay that would be
costly later on.

Realistic Project Planning

 Increased knowledge of setting realistic expectations for timelines in projects.

 Example: Realistic scheduling is the best practice that makes use of available resources in
the right manner.

Clear Communication

 Recognized value of transparent communication.

 For instance, clear updates minimize the conflicts of interest among stakeholders.

Slide 13: Recommendations for Future Projects

Stakeholder Management from Initiation to Closing

 Involve stakeholders throughout project lifecycle.

 Example: Continuous engagement prevents misalignments.


Integrate Risk Audits and Contingency Planning

 The frequency of risk identification activities, to determine possible dangers.

 For instance, proactive planning helps in risk management to a significant extent.

PM Software should be used for scheduling and management of resources.

 Make use of sophisticated techniques in time management.

 For instance, PM software improves on the management of resources.

Improve Communication Strategies

 Develop structured communication plans.

 Example: In the ability to make updates transparent, it helps to increase the level of
stakeholder trust.

Slide 14: Future Research Opportunities

An Analysis of Agile Application in Infrastructure Projects

 Investigate benefits of Agile methodologies.

 For instance, agile practices improve flexibility and responsiveness in the system.

Investigate Digital Project Management Systems

 Study impact of digital tools on project management.

 Example: Technology improves stakeholder collaboration.

Analyzing the Role of Technology in Facilitating Stakeholders’ Engagement

 Analyse how the various forms of digital platforms can enhance participation.

 For instance, online tools facilitate communication procedures.

Discuss the Effectiveness and Consequences of Rise in Advanced Scheduling Techniques

 Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of modern means of scheduling.

 Example: Critical path method enhances the timeline of the project.

Slide 15: Conclusion


BER Project Exposed Critical Failures

 In this case, the major problems that arose were the issues related to stakeholder
management which resulted in the delay of the project.

 Cost overruns were due to the failure of risk management systems.

 Challenges such as scheduling and planning greatly affected progress.

PMBOK principles have to be followed in all future projects

 Integrate systemization for improved performance.

 For instance, efficient application of PM frameworks improves the project outcome.

Stress Risk Audit and Stakeholder Engagement

 Regular audits prevent unforeseen challenges.

 For instance, stakeholder engagement helps in project alignment.

Slide 16: Q&A

Thank You for Your Attention

 Open the floor for questions.

 Promote conversation regarding the results and suggestions.

You might also like