Capacidad Funcional
Capacidad Funcional
DOI 10.1007/s11556-008-0035-4
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Received: 25 May 2007 / Accepted: 22 July 2008 / Published online: 6 August 2008
# EGREPA 2008
devised by society to deal with the disruptive effects of                vitality and mobility, allowing an older person to live
illness...” (p. 196).                                                    proactive and to set and pursue a larger variety of personal
    As for illness and disease, we need a more comprehensive—            valued goals. Second, an older person can satisfy psycho-
what we call a bio-psychological—view, to explain what is                logical needs directly while being active (e.g., self-respect).
meant by the term “successful aging.” Up to now, successful                 Whether an older person will actually be active depends on
aging has not been adequately explained because previous                 a variety of determinants and life conditions. To predict
models fail to account for the concept of subjective perspec-            advanced activities of daily living, Schlicht [53] suggested
tives of the elderly.                                                    combining individual life circumstances, typical mindsets,
    In developmental psychology, subjective well-being                   and environmental conditions (see [37] as a meaningful study
(SWB) defines one out of several significant criteria of                 that combines individual, social, and physical/environmental
successful aging. Therefore, successful aging is not only the            influences to explain and predict PA).
effort to reduce age-related diseases; it is the effort to                  As SWB is a key component or criterion for successful
enhance SWB, to feel good, and to be satisfied with life                 aging, we present a heuristic model to explain how to
despite physiological declines.                                          enhance SWB in order to age successfully (see Fig. 1). We
    Among others, Diener et al. [17] stated that setting                 point out that older people have the chance to influence
individually valued goals and having means to cope with                  their SWB by setting and pursuing personally and culturally
stressful stimuli are both important for positive SWB. Ryan              valued goals satisfying their psychological needs. The main
and Deci [48] pointed out that goals affect SWB if and only              point of our model is the combination of physiological,
if someone is able to satisfy psychological needs while                  psychological, and sociological factors as relevant influences
pursuing these goals. Psychological needs are basic needs                on setting and pursuing personal valued goals. From this, it
like physiological ones. They refer to the motivational                  follows that the chance to enhance SWB is restricted by
processes by which a person strives for autonomy and self-               personal dispositions and social–structural constraints.
expression within social contexts. Psychological needs are                  By explaining the structure of the bio-psycho-social
“an energizing state that, if satisfied, conduce [...] toward            model, we focus on PA. As mentioned above, PA is a
health and well-being but, if not satisfied, contribute [...] to         crucial behavior for successful aging influencing the
pathology and ill-being” ([48], p. 74). Taken together,                  (successful) aging process in two different ways.
achieving SWB in older age is facilitated by setting and
pursuing goals conducive to meeting personal psychological
needs.                                                                   Successful aging
    We assume that physical activity (PA) can support
psychological need satisfaction in two different ways. First,            Different disciplines have been keeping busy assessing and
several studies have shown that PA is followed by a variety              describing the “success” of an aging process in great detail (for
of physiological and cognitive consequences (e.g., [36]).                a review, see [32, 35]). However, an explicit definition of
The physiological and psychological effects result in                    what is successful aging has not yet been readily accepted [5].
Fig. 1 Bio-psycho-social model
                                                   personal                                                                  social-structural
of successful aging with
subjective well-being as a                        disposition                                                                   constraints
criterion of a successful aging
                                                                                             subjective
process                                                 physiological
                                                     constitution/genotyp                    well-being                           stereotypes
                                                                                                                              of aging/ "behavior
                                                                                                                                 correctness"
                                                                                               psychological
                                                      personality                            need satisfaction
                                                  (i.e. neuroticism)
                                                                                                                                       behavior
                                                                                                                                        setting
                                                                                         setting & pursuing
                                                   socialization/                       personal valued goals
                                                      sports-
                                                     biography                                                                     offers/facilities
                                                                                           cognitive &                                especially
                                                                                       emotional processes                        for target groups
                                                        socio-economic
                                                            status               (active )      lifestyle      (inactive )
                                                                                         dynamic processes
                                                    stable                                                                                 stable
                                                   structure                                                                              structure
Eur Rev Aging Phys Act (2008) 5:79–87                                                                                         81
   In a recent narrative review integrating 28 studies, Depp    with my life the majority of time.” Therefore, the older
and Jeste [16] discovered 29 different definitions of           people maintain that physiological and functional aspects
successful aging. On average, one definition includes 2.6       are important key components. Nevertheless, sociological
different components (range = 1–6). “Disability and/or          and psychological needs must be satisfied too, if an older
physical functioning” are the components most frequently        person experiences the aging process as to be successful.
named (90%). In 45% of the definitions, the amount of               Gatz and Zarit [26] pointed out that subjective perspec-
“cognitive functioning” is integrated, followed by “life        tives of older persons are as important as objective
satisfaction and SWB” (31%), as well as by “social              measures concerning health or cognitive functioning.
engagement” (28%). The review emphasizes that it seems          Subjective perspectives include SWB, life satisfaction, and
to be popular to describe successful aging mainly by            evaluations of health or judgments about loneliness. From
physiological factors as well as cognitive and physical/        this point of view, subjective perspectives give the idea of
functional factors (see also [43]).                             “good old age” a psychological dimension. Defining
   Rowe and Kahn [47] chose an analogical approach.             successful aging without subjective perspectives will be
Their definition of successful aging includes three key         an erroneous proceeding provoking incomplete results and
behaviors or characteristics which should be perpetuated as     disabling several groups in successfully aging (e.g.,
long as possible: (1) low risk of disease and disease-related   physically handicapped persons).
disabilities, (2) high mental and physical functioning, and         Due to Staudinger`s argumentation [56], self-assessment
(3) active engagement with life. The authors described that     and peer evaluation are not inevitably convergent. Against
although each factor is important in and of itself, they are    great odds (e.g., restrictions due to disease) most people
also independent of each other. It is the combination of all    feel happy (paradox of happiness) as one can see in the
three components that most extensively represents successful    research of invulnerability or happiness (e.g., [61]).
aging.                                                          Therefore, it is important to analyze whether and to which
   In our consideration, there is a close relationship          extent older persons are satisfied with their actual lives.
between the possibility to engage actively in life and the          We agree with Bowling and Dieppe [7] or other authors
other two characteristics. An older person in good shape is     that successful aging should be described multidimensionally.
more likely to be able to be active in life. As is supported    These authors state that successful aging should be assessed
by abundant scientific evidence, PA lowers the risk of          continuously instead of dichotomously with the poles success
disease and contributes significantly to mental and physical    or failure.
functioning [36].                                                   As mentioned above, in developmental psychology, SWB
   In addition to their attempts to define successful aging,    and life satisfaction are defined as one out of several important
Depp and Jeste [16] also designated determinants that           criteria for successful aging [24]. Life satisfaction is a
influence successful aging. These determinants are as           category or dimension of SWB and refers to the evaluation
follows: young age, good health, and a healthy lifestyle        of one’s own life and life circumstances. It figures a balance
(no smoking, exercise moderately and regularly).                between the “ought life” and the “real life.” A high amount
   Phelan et al. [42] explored how older persons define         of life satisfaction will be reached if a person does not feel a
successful aging themselves. One thousand eight hundred         significant difference between these two assessments.
ninety older American men and women (Mage =79 years)                Life satisfaction corresponds to the cognitive dimension
were contacted. The sample was primarily Caucasian and          of SWB, whereas positive and negative affects correspond
well educated. They mostly reported good self-rated health.     to an affective dimension [6].
Eighty percent to 90% of the sample felt independent in all         Moreover, SWB can be conceptualized as a “trait” and
their daily activities. The authors generated statements for    as an actual state oscillating around an individual set point
the questionnaire of what successful aging might be. These      [19]. So, the actual mood or affect (e.g., pleasure) has to be
were based on scientific conceptions and definitions of         distinguished from general or habitual feelings (e.g., depressive
successful aging existing at present (e.g., [2, 26, 43, 49]).   or anxious mind). SWB as a “trait” shows more consistency in
The sample rates the importance of these meanings on a          different types of situations (e.g., during work and during
three-point Likert scale with the anchors “important” and       leisure time) and more stability across time.
“not relevant.” The sample’s rating matches Rowe and                To recapitulate what we have considered up until now,
Kahn’s definition most closely [47]. According to this,         SWB is a significant criterion of successful aging. That
successful aging should be described multidimensionally         means that older people age successfully if they feel well
rather than unidimensionally (see also [8]). In addition to     and if they are satisfied with their lives. By this and as to be
the three key factors, 75% of the older people also assess a    seen in Fig. 1, we define SWB (including life satisfaction as
psychological dimension to be important. This fourth            well as positive and negative affects) as the criterion of
dimension was surveyed with items like “feeling satisfied       successful aging.
82                                                                                           Eur Rev Aging Phys Act (2008) 5:79–87
Successful aging and need satisfaction                             second study, a more complex model is analyzed. In addition
                                                                   to the measurements of the first study, the second sample had
Following the explanation above, the regulation of SWB is          to specify six personal goals (e.g., avoid conflicts with
critical for successful aging. To enhance habitual SWB, an         others, keep myself in good physical condition) that they
older person needs the opportunity to experience often             wanted to pursue during the following semester. Further-
positive affects and life satisfaction in daily life.              more, they rated how far they attained their personal goal
    Diener et al. [17] gave a review including the last            eight times during the current semester. A structural equation
30 years of research on SWB asking what the main                   model shows that goal attainment influences SWB. This
influences on SWB are. Demographic variables like sex,             effect is mediated by experiences of need satisfaction. In
age, marital status, and so on account for only 15% of the         turn, this experience is influenced by the extent to which the
variance of SWB. Personality factors like neuroticism,             goal meets the wishes, wants, and ideals of the person (self-
hostility, or extraversion as well as tangible resources (like     concordance). The analysis is conducted with a small
socioeconomic status) are further factors influencing SWB.         sample size; however, it reaches an acceptable fit (χ2 =20.3
Beyond the direct effects of both personal dispositions and        [9], goodness of fit index=0.93, comparative fit index
tangible resources, a person is able to regulate SWB by            [CFI]=0.93).
setting and pursuing personally and culturally valued goals            Reis et al. [44] investigated the hypothesis that SWB is a
perseveringly [13, 17]. Those goals are specified by               direct outcome of the satisfaction of the three fundamental
particular sociocultural contexts and/or by personal dispo-        psychological needs. In their study, 76 students provided
sitions. Due to specific sociocultural backgrounds, valued         daily reports for 14 days. The authors used hierarchical
goals change across a lifespan [23].                               linear modeling for their analyses with a data of measure-
    As Cantor et al. [13] stated, a person should select the       ment level (within persons) and a person level (between
“right” task at the “right” time. If a person lives the life he    persons). Their findings support the relevance of the three
or she wants to live, SWB and life satisfaction will benefit       fundamental psychological needs for SWB. For overall
the most (see also the construct of personal striving, e.g.,       SWB, the between-person effect of feeling competent was
[20]). Therefore, the strength of the association between          significant (B=0.108, t=2.0, p<0.05), whereas relatedness
participation in life and positive SWB depends on how far          (B=3.29, t=2.2, p<0.05) was associated significantly with
the chosen activity meets the wishes, wants, and ideals of the     positive affects.
person (self-concordance). This level of self-concordance              Baltes et al. stated that everybody, even older people,
expresses to what extent a person decides in a self-               have possibilities to reach personally and culturally valued
determined manner and acts autonomously. The more a                goals. But, older people who suffer from diverse health
person has an “internal perceived locus of causality” ([49],       problems (multimorbidity) usually reduce their daily activities
p. 13) toward a goal and the more he or she is able to             and therefore miss the opportunities to reach those goals. For
pursue that goal in a way that is valued intrinsically, the        them, it might be very difficult to set and pursue a personal
more her SWB will benefit. On the other hand, pursuing             valued goal autonomously. In accordance to Baltes and Smith
tasks that are intended to fulfill other people’s desires and      [3], they need a “strategy of managing the journey of aging
expectations (i.e., introjected regulation) do not have            into the oldest old.” Baltes et al. have articulated and tested a
positive effects on SWB [55].                                      model called Selective Optimization with Compensation
    Ryan and Deci [48] described someone’s desire to act           (e.g., [2]). This model characterizes an effective life
autonomously and in a self-determined manner as one of             management strategy illustrating how to strive for specific
three fundamental psychological needs. Feeling competent           goals: First, older people should select tasks which are
and related to others are the other two fundamental needs.         individually important and fit their psycho-physical potenti-
    Sheldon and Elliot [54] analyzed the association between       alities. For example, for an older person, it may not
satisfied psychological needs and SWB in two longitudinal          beneficial to set exercising goals similar to those of younger
studies with 152 (first study) and 73 (second study)               people. If an older person has only become acquainted with
American students of psychology. At the beginning and at           competitive sports and is no longer able to reach the required
the end of the current semester, all students in the first study   performance, the person should change these goals toward
had to rate their SWB during the previous few days.                exercising for companionship and for the joy of the activity
Additionally, they rated their experiences of autonomy,            itself (see also primary and secondary control [28]). In
competence, and relatedness in their daily lives during the        addition to the selection of a specific task, a person should
past 24 h at the beginning of the current semester, as well as     optimize his or her skills (i.e., make an effort) or should
three times during it. According to the results of the first       compensate favored behaviors (i.e., make a claim on
study, need satisfaction (autonomy, competence, relatedness)       someone). With growing age, compensation becomes more
has significant and positive effects on positive SWB. In the       and more important [51]. Baltes [2] emphasized that a
Eur Rev Aging Phys Act (2008) 5:79–87                                                                                        83
person will be able to age successfully if he or she arranges      of the cross-sectional study included 10,063 women
all three strategies in a clever and efficient manner. By this     between the age of 70 and 75. Higher levels of PA were
means, even the “oldest old” have the chance to age                associated with increased SWB even after the data had been
successfully [45].                                                 adjusted for different confounders (marital status, body
   Which goals a person prefers and strives for (selecting         mass index, recent life events). A follow-up was made
and optimizing) and which deficit will be compensated              3 years later. Now, data from 6,472 women were used in the
differ interindividually. As our model in Fig. 1 premises, it      longitudinal study. Comparing with women who remained
is crucial for SWB that the behaviors, which an older              inactive, women who started with PA (exercise adoption) or
person wants to optimize, are self-concordant.                     who maintained PA (maintenance group) showed an
   All in all, older people are able to manage their positive      increase in SWB, whereas women canceling being physi-
and negative affects and their life satisfaction—in short,         cally active (cessation group) showed a significantly greater
their SWB. As Baltes showed, special competencies and              decrease in SWB (e.g., for the subscale social functioning:
coping strategies seem to be crucial in keeping the SWB            Mchange adoption 1.25, p<0.001, N=654; Mchange mainte-
positive [10].                                                     nance 0.87, p<0.001, N=3,832; Mchange cessation −8.51, p<
                                                                   0.01, N=1,103; means were adjusted for values of the first
                                                                   measurement, marital status, body mass index, and recent
Exercise and its impact on successful aging                        life events).
                                                                       Results of two German studies ILSE (Interdisciplinary
Being in good shape is a relevant physiological factor             and Longitudinal Study of Adulthood [46]) and Bonn
influencing the setting and pursuing personally and culturally     Aging Study [15] emphasize that older people exercise in
valued goals. PA can effect the constitution in a positive way.    order to increase their fitness and their SWB.
This has been demonstrated in a lot of studies. For example,           American women up to 65 years intend nearly the same.
moderate PA induces physiological and psychological effects        They want to be fit, and they presume that a fit person can
(for physiological effects, see [38, 57]; for psychological,       manage health problems more efficiently [34]. Again, 95%
especially cognitive, effects, see [36, 60]).                      of a sample (n=409) of older Scottish people (65 to
   PA increases SWB, and PA supports older people in               84 years old) supposes that exercise supports health [14],
living without assistance as long as possible. An older            and 79% of this sample believes devoutly that they do
person in good shape (physiological and cognitive) is able         enough exercise to benefit from the anticipated health-
to participate in several leisure activities (e.g., visit a        enhancing effects of PA.
concert), and he or she can be involved with friends or                But, the matter of fact is that more than half of the
family, for instance. In doing so, the opportunity increases       people exercise less than 2 h per week with moderate
to set and pursue personally and culturally valued goals           intensity. For the remaining time, they prefer playing cards
with more variety (e.g., visiting a zoo with grandchild or         or meeting friends, or they volunteer for church activities.
inviting friends to play cards). For this, PA in our judgment          The abovementioned studies demonstrate the positive
is seen as a key behavior and as a precondition for                impact of PA, and they clarify that older people do not
successful aging [18]. PA fosters functional abilities             expect to feel well and happy exclusively while being
referring to activities of daily living (e.g., dressing, eating,   active. There are interindividual differences among older
bathing), instrumental activities of daily living (e.g., shop-     people as to which behaviors make them feel well. PA can
ping, housework, cooking), advanced activities of daily            produce good feelings like acceptance, competence, and
living (e.g., recreational activity, volunteer work), and mo-      relatedness (cf. fundamental psychological needs). But, a
bility (e.g., walking, stair climbing).                            person must believe devoutly in PA as a supporting
   Likewise, PA impacts SWB directly. A meta-analysis              practice. So, it depends on internal and external influences,
examined the effects of organized PA on SWB of older               whether an older person prefers an active or sedentary
adults (Mage =66.4, SD=7.5) [40]. The analysis included 36         lifestyle.
studies, and the authors calculated effect sizes representing
the magnitude of the difference between pretest and posttest
for treatment and for control groups, respectively. Physically     Psychological and social–structural influences on older
                   c
active persons (dtreatment ¼ 0:24) show a greater increase in      people’s decision as to which goal will be set
                                 c
SWB then inactive persons (dcontrol    ¼ 0:09).                    and pursued
   Lee and Russell [31] analyzed the relationship between
PA and SWB cross-sectionally and longitudinally. SWB               In a cross-sectional study, Salman et al. [50] analyzed
was measured with the four mental health subscales of the          several factors possibly influencing the decision as to what
Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF36). The sample               kind of activities someone prefers during leisure time. The
84                                                                                       Eur Rev Aging Phys Act (2008) 5:79–87
authors use the behavioral choice theory sensu Epstein [22]         These models presume that the decision to be active
including explicitly both individual and environmental           depends on internal factors like attitudes, motives, and
influences to explain and predict behavioral choices. They       interests (for the area of sports biography, see the review
performed multiple linear regression analyses to determine       [25]). However, the decisions for being active are not only
the overall variance in PA explained by the following three      an expression of willingness (cognitive effort). They are
barriers: (1) psychological (e.g., feeling tired) and environ-   determined by social constraints and environmental causes,
mental barriers (e.g., cost), (2) fun and enjoyment while        and by this, they are somewhat unconscious or not
being active or inactive, and (3) the individual preference to   reflected. Thus, sociological and cultural living conditions,
choose an active or an inactive spare-time job. Data from        as well as adequate opportunities and offers, influence the
1,332 men and women (Mage =45 years) were analyzed. All          psychological entities (see Fig. 1).
three factors are associated significantly with being active        McNeill et al. [37] tested different pathways by which
during leisure time (fit of the model: χ2 (8)=10.8, p=0.212;     social cognitive and ecological factors influence PA. They
feeling tired: odds ratio [OR]=0.5, 95% confidence interval      analyzed social environmental variables like informational
[CI]=0.4, 0.8, p<0.001; cost: OR=1.5, 95% CI=1.1, 2.1,           and emotional social support, physical environmental
p=0.009; enjoy PA: OR=1.8, 95% CI=1.4, 2.5, p<0.001;             variables like quality and availability of PA facilities, and
prefer moderate PA: OR=1.9, 95% CI=1.4, 2.6, p<0.001).           individual variables like motivation and self-efficacy. Nine
Therefore, the kind of activity a person prefers does not        hundred ten adults (Mage =33, SD=13.1) completed a self-
depend on perceived psychological and environmental              administered survey. Structural equation modeling was used
barriers only. Individual preferences and perceived fun and      for analyzing, and the results show that both the social and
enjoyment during exercise are also important for the decision    the physical environments had indirect effects on PA. The
to be physically active or inactive during leisure time.         effect was mediated through motivation and self-efficacy
    As our model in Fig. 1 describes, the decision whether       (for moderate PA: χ2 =1,969.5 [677]; CFI=0.93; root mean
an older person chooses and pursues a physically active          square error of approximation [RMSEA]=0.046).
lifestyle depends on cognitive (like self-efficacy or atti-         Nowadays a 60-year-old person shows more readiness to
tudes) and emotional processes concerning those activities.      exercise than some decades before. Furthermore, older
    The results of leastwise one prospective cohort study        people, especially female, are in fact more active today than
with 1,725 persons older than 50 years (Mage =60.9; SD=          older women 20 years before [12]. Breuer [11] explained
8.2) show that positive attitudes about exercising have an       this alteration with higher motivation of older people to
important influence. First, positive attitudes influence the     keep healthy. A second reason may be a modified view of
intention to participate in an exercise program, and second,     what is prototypic for an older person today and what older
they have an impact on the actual rate of participation [58].    persons are expected to do. Those normative beliefs and
The authors asked subjects at baseline and 6 months later.       culturally learned ideas form special stereotypes of aging
The subjects took part in one of ten different activity          influencing behavior of older people [9]. A few years ago,
programs designed especially for older persons (e.g.,            older people lived in accordance with the predominant
calisthenics, fitness, walking). The stepwise logistic regres-   stereotype of aging when they exercised only due to
sion analysis identified proactive attitudes (OR=1.9; 75%        therapeutic or rehabilitative reasons. Today, higher age is
CI=1.2, 3.0) and the intention to participate (OR=3.9; CI=       no longer connected inevitably with inactivity. Older people
2.0, 7.6) as significant predictors for regular participation.   who are active are not only accepted; they even form
Proactive attitudes (OR=3.30; CI=1.73, 6.31) were a              today’s ideal. Thus, the social environment forms a special
predictor for intention, too. The determinants for taking        structure of thoughts and expectancies which we will call
part in an exercise program were based on two behavioral         “behavior correctness” (cf. Fig. 1).
models, the theory of planned behavior [1] and social               In addition to the impact of normative beliefs, typical
learning theory [4].                                             behavior settings also influence an individual’s action. In
    Social–cognitive models mention certain predictors with      the concept of behavior setting, Barker emphasized
a specific conjunction among them. Each model allows             interindividually equal behavior in specific situations (for
describing, explaining, and predicting the behavior change       a review, see [30]). Kaminsky ([30], p. 13) gave colorful
process. The main purpose of these models is to explain          examples: People in a bread shop behave like someone
behavior, especially behavior change from risk behavior,         needing bread, and most people are convinced that a
like smoking or inactivity, to health-enhancing behavior         dancing school is not the right place for worship, and so
(quitting smoking, being active). The predictors are             on ([30], p. 34). So, in a behavior setting, the behavior of
cognitive processes. In addition to intention and attitude,      different people shows no significant interindividual
they include self-efficacy and outcome expectancies, for         difference. The concept of behavior setting describes an
instance.                                                        existing close fit between typical behavior patterns and
Eur Rev Aging Phys Act (2008) 5:79–87                                                                                            85
corresponding environmental situations (synomorphe con-                  The model in Fig. 1 suggests that an individual’s
nection). In these (typical) situations, people usually do not        socialization and experiences with exercise (sports biography)
behave like they want; they behave like the situation                 influence cognitive and emotional factors concerning exer-
“forces” them to. Behavior settings are some kind of a                cise. Again, these social–structural and psychological factors
socio-physiological environment dictating the individual’s            have an impact on older people’s decision whether exercise is
behavior.                                                             worthwhile to be chosen as a component of their lifestyle. A
    As a concrete example, the impact of given facilities for         physically active person can influence his or her constitution
exercising on the rate of activity is analyzed by Li et al.           so that personally and culturally valued goals can be set and
[33] in their longitudinal study. During 1 year, they inter-          pursued with more variety (physiological factor). Therewith,
viewed 303 American women and men every third month. On               social–structural, psychological, and physiological factors
the average, the sample was 74 years old (SDage =6.24) and            have an influence on SWB and with it on the chance to age
lived in 28 different municipalities. The authors used                successfully.
multilevel modeling to investigate between-neighborhood
and within-neighborhood variability in walking activity. The
model yielded a reasonably good fit to the data (χ2 =51.71            Concluding remarks
[27], p=0.003; RMSEA=0.05). Due to the results of the
between-neighborhood analysis, social cohesion of the                 We introduce a heuristic model explaining successful aging
neighborhood was significantly related to the amount of               as a process (see Fig. 1). In doing this, we focus on PA. PA
walking activities at baseline (β=0.62) showing that neigh-           proves to be a crucial behavior because of its two different
borhoods with high levels of social cohesion were associated          roles in the successful aging process. First, it causes
with greater levels of walking activity at baseline. The              physiological and cognitive effects: An older person in
presumed safety of relevant paths for walking (β=0.44) and            good shape has the opportunity to set and pursue a greater
easy access to other facilities for exercising (β=0.61) are           variety of personal goals. Second, an older person can
significant predictors of a lower decline of walking activity         satisfy psychological needs directly while being physically
during the survey period.                                             active.
    Breuer [11] compared the self-reported activity rate of               We conclude that everybody has the chance to age
people who are living in a rural area with the activity rate of       successfully when he or she manages to do something on
people who are living in an urban area. According to his              his or her own initiative. To enhance SWB, it seems to be
results, people, living in the rural area, are more active than       highly important that a (older) person considers which tasks
people, living in the city. But, above the 60th birthday, the         or goals could satisfy psychological needs. To achieve this
proportion changed. With this age, people who are living in           satisfaction, the person should know whether all of these
an urban area are most active now. Breuer [11] stated that            needs are being continually satisfied or, for example,
especially older people may find adequate activities more             whether one is being neglected. For instance, after a person
often in an urban than in a rural area. As an alternative             has gone into retirement, he or she may feel unhappy,
interpretation, we guess that the anonymity of the city               somewhat depressed, and superfluously. It seems likely that
makes it easier for older people to be active.                        this person misses the feeling of competence and therefore
    An interesting result is the proportion of active men to          should look for tasks or goals satisfying the psychological
active women above the 70th birthday. In the rural area, men          need for competence. Maybe, the person will learn a new
were more active than women (men=42% vs. women=                       language or study history at the university.
33%), whereas in the urban area, women show a more active                 Second, we point out that the decision as to which goal
lifestyle (women=41% vs. men=35%). Again, it may be that              will be set and pursued is not made by the older person
the tradition-based behavior correctness concerning activity          exclusively. The decision to be physically active, for
is stronger in the rural area than in the city.                       instance, depends on social–cognitive (e.g., self-efficacy,
    All in all, it seems that the predominate stereotype of           attitude) and emotional factors toward exercise. These
aging, special behavior settings, and given facilities form a         factors, in turn, are influenced by social–structural con-
social and physical environment that hinder or facilitate an          straints (e.g., facilities for exercise especially for older
active lifestyle of older people (see Fig. 1).                        persons) and personal dispositions (e.g., sports biography).
    But, neither the physical nor the social environment                  The heuristic model presented in Fig. 1 is a holistic
influences someone’s activity rate in a unidirectional manner.        approach in the sense that it includes physiological (e.g.,
Personal ideas and wishes (concerning exercise) depend on how         constitution), psychological (e.g., social–cognitive determi-
a person examines his or her social and physical environment.         nants), and sociological (e.g., stereotype of aging) aspects
Thus, the process of socialization toward an active lifestyle is an   to explain successful aging. As such, the model agrees with
interactive process with an active human in focus.                    the recommendations of developmental psychology that an
86                                                                                                    Eur Rev Aging Phys Act (2008) 5:79–87
aging process is dependent upon different factors and                    10. Brandtstädter J, Rothermund K (1998) Bewältigungspotentiale im
                                                                             höheren alter: adaptive und protektive prozesse. In: Kruse A (ed)
should be explained multidimensionally rather than unidi-
                                                                             Psychosoziale gerontologie (Bd 1 grundlagen). Hogrefe, Göttingen,
mensionally [29].                                                            pp S223–S237
   Likewise, Lehr [32] presented a model postulating an                  11. Breuer C (2002) Sozialer wandel und sportengagement im
impact of psychological and physiological factors on                         lebenslauf. In: Allmer H (ed) Sportengagement im lebenslauf
                                                                             (Bd. 23). Academica, Sankt Augustin, pp S61–S82
longevity. Furthermore, emotional and cognitive (psycho-
                                                                         12. Breuer C (2004) Zur dynamik der sportnachfrage im lebenslauf—
logical) factors were influenced by individual socialization                 dynamics of life-span demand for sport. Sport und Gesellschaft—
and environmental factors. The model is, however, very                       Sport and Society 1:50–72
complex so that it is not revisable (cf. [59]). Additionally,            13. Cantor N, Sanderson CA (2003) Life task participation and well-
                                                                             being: the importance of taking part in daily life. In: Kahneman D,
Lehr [32] used longevity as a criterion, which does not                      Diener E, Schwarz N (eds) Well-being: the foundation of hedonic
include subjective perspectives of one’s aging process.                      psychology. Russel Sage Foundation, New York, pp 230–243
   Although individual parts of our bio-psycho-social                    14. Crombie IK, Irvine L, Williams B, McGinnis AR, Slane PW,
model are well founded, more studies are needed to confirm                   Alder EM, McMurdo MET (2004) Why older people do not
                                                                             participate in leisure time physical activity: a survey of activity
the assumptions of the heuristic model as a whole. For
                                                                             levels, beliefs and deterrents. Age Ageing 33(3):287–292
example, it is not clear whether the impact of social–                   15. Denk H (1997) Health, the main motivation for physical activities
structural constraints is as powerful as the impact of                       of the elderly? In: Huber G (ed) Healthy, aging, activity and
personal dispositions. Furthermore, we do not know if this                   sports. Health Promotion, Wertbach-Gamburg, pp 394–399
                                                                         16. Depp CA, Jeste DV (2006) Definitions and predictors of
relation is transferable to older people in general. Because
                                                                             successful aging: a comprehensive review of larger quantitative
of differing biographies and diverse impacts of life changes,                studies. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 13(1):6–20
older people show high interindividual variability. For                  17. Diener E, Suh EM, Luca RE, Smith HL (1999) Subjective well-
instance, some older people may not care about predomi-                      being: three decades of progress. Psychol Bull 125(2):276–302
                                                                         18. DiPietro L (2007) Physical activity, fitness, and aging. In:
nant stereotypes of aging or about existent exercise                         Bouchard C, Blair SN, Haskell WL (eds) Physical activity and
facilities as they live in anonymous urban surroundings                      health. Human Kinetics, Champaign IL, pp 271–285
and prefer exercising on their own (e.g., walking). For these            19. Eid M, Diener E (2004) Global judgment of subjective well-
older people, social–structural constraints hardly influence                 being: situational variability and long-term stability. Soc Indic Res
                                                                             65:254–277
their decision to be physically active.
                                                                         20. Emmons RA (1996) Striving and feeling—personal goals and
                                                                             subjective well-being. In: Gollwitzer PM, Baragh JA (eds) The
                                                                             psychology of action. Guilford, New York, pp 313–337
                                                                         21. Engel GL (1977) The need for a new medical model: a challenge
                                                                             for biomedicine. Science 196(No. 4286):129–136
References                                                               22. Epstein LH (1998) Integrating theoretical approaches to promote
                                                                             physical activity. Am J Prev Med 15(4):257–265
 1. Ajzen I, Madden TJ (1986) Prediction of goal directed behaviour:     23. Erikson EH (1950) Childhood and society. Norton, New York
    attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. J Exp Soc   24. Ferring D, Filipp SH (1997) Retrospektive bewertung des eigenen
    Psychol 22:453–474                                                       lebens: der lebenszufriedenheits-graph. Z Entwicklungspsychol
 2. Baltes PB (1997) On the incomplete architecture of human                 Padagog Psychol 29(1):83–95
    ontogeny: selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation    25. Frogner E (1991) Sport im lebenslauf. eine verhaltensanalyse im
    of developmental theory. Am Psychol 52:366–380                           breiten- und freizeitsport. In: Baier H, Klages H, Schäfer B, Tenbruck
 3. Baltes PB, Smith J (2003) New frontiers in the future of aging:          FH (eds) Soziologische gegenwartsfragen. Enke, Stuttgart, p 50
    from successful aging to the young old to the dilemmas of the        26. Gatz M, Zarit SH (1999) A good old age: paradox or possibility.
    fourth age. Gerontology (Behav Sci) 49:123–135                           In: Bengtson VL, Schaie KW (eds) Handbook of theories of
 4. Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of              aging. Springer, New York, pp 396–416
    behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84:191–215                            27. Havighurst RJ (1963) Successful aging. In: Williams RW, Tibbitts
 5. Blazer DG (2006) Successful aging. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 13            C, Donahue W (eds) Processes of aging. vol. 1. Atherton, New
    (1):2–5                                                                  York, pp 299–320
 6. Böhmer S, Ravens-Sieberer U (2005) Das konzept der lebensqualität    28. Heckhausen J, Schulz R (1998) Development and regulation in
    in der gesundheitsbezogenen forschung. In: Schwarzer R (ed)              adulthood: selection and compensation via primary and secondary
    Gesundheitspsychologie (Bd 1 der Enzyklopädie der Psychologie).          control. In: Heckhausen J, Dweck CS (eds) Motivation and self-
    Hogrefe, Göttingen, pp S369–S389                                         regulation across the life-span. Cambridge University Press, New
 7. Bowling A, Dieppe P (2006) What is successful ageing and who             York, pp 50–77
    should define it. BMJ 331:1548–1551                                  29. Inui TS (2003) The need for an integrated biopsychosocial approach
 8. Bowling A, Iliffe S (2006) Which model of successful ageing              to research on successful aging. Ann Int Med 139(Suppl):391–394
    should be used? Baseline findings from a British longitudinal        30. Kaminski G (1986) Ordnung und variabilität im alltagsgeschehen.
    survey of ageing. Age Ageing 35:607–614                                  Hogrefe, Göttingen
 9. Brandtstädter J (1990) Entwicklung im lebenslauf. Ansätze und        31. Lee C, Russell A (2003) Effects of physical activity on emotional
    probleme der lebenspannen-entwicklungspsychologie. In: Mayer             well-being among older Australian women—cross-sectional and
    KU (ed) Lebensverläufe und sozialer Wandel. Kölner zeitschrift           longitudinal analyses. J Psychosom Res 54:155–160
    für soziologie und sozialpsychologie, sonderheft, 31. West-          32. Lehr U (2000) Psychologie des alterns, 9th edn. Quelle & Meyer,
    deutscher, Opladen, pp S322–S350                                         Wiebelsheim
Eur Rev Aging Phys Act (2008) 5:79–87                                                                                                            87
33. Li F, Fisher KJ, Brownson RC (2005) A multilevel analysis of           48. Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the
    change in neighborhood walking activity in older adults. J Aging           facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-
    Phys Act 13:145–159                                                        being. Am Psychol 55(1):68–78
34. Lucas JA, Orshan SA, Cook F (2000) Determinants of health-             49. Ryan RM, Sheldon KM, Kasser T, Deci EL (1996) All goals are
    promoting behavior among women ages 65 and above living in                 not created equal—an organismics perspective on the nature of
    the community. Sch Inq Nurs Pract 14(1):77–100                             goals and their regulation. In: Gollwitzer PM, Baragh JA (eds)
35. Lupien SJ, Wan N (2004) Successful aging: from cell to self.               The psychology of action. Guilford, New York, pp 7–26
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 359:1413–1426                       50. Salmon J, Owen N, Crawford D, Bauman A, Sallis JF (2003)
36. McAuley E, Kramer AK, Colcombe SJ (2004) Cardiovascular                    Physical activity and sedentary behavior: a population-based study of
    fitness and neurocognitive function in older adults: a brief review.       barriers, enjoyment, and preference. Health Psychol 22(2):178–188
    Brain Behav Immun 18:214–220                                           51. Schlicht W (2000) Gesundheitsverhalten im alltag: auf der suche
37. McNeill LH, Wyrwich KW, Brownson RC, Clark EM, Kreuter                     nach einem paradigma. Z Gesundh Psychol 8(2):49–60
    MW (2006) Individual, social environmental, and physical envi-         52. Schmidt L (1998) Zur Dimensionalität von gesundheit (und
    ronmental influences on physical activity among black and white            krankheit). Z Gesundh Psychol 6:161–178
    adults: a structural equation analysis. Ann Behav Med 31(1):36–44      53. Schulz R, Heckhausen JA (1996) A life span model of successful
38. Meusel H (2004) Bewegung und sport. In: Kruse A, Martin M (eds)            aging. Am Psychol 51:702–714
    Enzyklopädie der gerontologie. Huber, Göttingen, pp S255–S272          54. Sheldon KM, Elliot AJ (2005) Goal striving, need satisfaction,
39. Myrtek M (1998) Gesunde kranke—kranke gesunde: psychologie                 and longitudinal well-being: the self-concordance model. J Pers
    des krankheitsverhalten, 1st edn. Huber, Bern                              Soc Psychol 76(3):482–497
40. Netz Y, Wu M-J, Becker BJ, Tenebaum G (2005) Physical activity         55. Sheldon KM, Kasser T (1995) Coherence and congruence: two
    and psychological well-being in advanced age: a meta-analysis of           aspects of personality integration. J Pers Soc Psychol 68:531–543
    intervention studies. Psychol Aging 20:272–284                         56. Staudinger UM (2000) Viele gründe sprechen dagegen und
41. Oeppen J, Vaupel JW (2002) Broken limits to life expectancy.               trotzdem geht es vielen Menschen gut: das paradox des
    Science 296:1029–1031                                                      subjektiven Wohlbefindens. Psychol Rundsch 51(4):185–197
42. Phelan EA, Anderson LA, LaCroix AZ, Larson EB (2004) Older             57. Stewart KJ (2005) Physical activity and aging. Ann NY Acad Sci
    adults’ view of “successful aging”—how do they compare with                1055:193–206
    researchers’ definition. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 52:211–216            58. Stiggelbout M, Hopman-Rock M, Crone M, Lechner L, van
43. Phelan EA, Larson EB (2002) “Successful aging”—where next?                 Mechelen W (2006) Predicting older adults’ maintenance in
    Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 50:1306–1308                                       exercise participation using an integrated social psychological
44. Reis HT, Sheldon KM, Gable SL, Roscoe J, Ryan RM (2000)                    model. Health Educ Res 21(1):1–14
    Daily well-being: the role of autonomy, competence, and                59. Stiller J, Alfermann D (2003) Sind aktivere auch die gesünderen?
    relatedness. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 26:419–435                               —die beziehung zwischen freizeitaktivitäten und subjektiver
45. Riedinger M, Freund A, Baltes PB (2005) Managing life through              gesundheit im höheren Lebensalter. In: Eisfeld K, Wiesmann U,
    personal goals: intergoal facilitation and intensity of goal pursuit       Honnich HJ, Hirtz P (eds) Gesund und bewegt ins alter. AFRA,
    in younger and older adult. J Gerontol 60B(2):P84–P91                      Butzbach-Griedel, pp S165–S171
46. Roether D, Vogt M (2003) Freizeitsport—ein aktiver beitrag für         60. Vance DE, Wadley VG, Ball KK, Roenker DL, Rizzo M (2005)
    wohlbefinden und gesundheit im alter. In: Eisfeld K, Wiesmann              The effects of physical activity and sedentary behavior on
    U, Honnich HJ, Hirtz P (eds) Gesund und bewegt ins alter. AFRA,            cognitive health in older adults. J Aging Phys Act 13:294–313
    Butzbach-Griedel, pp S126–S136                                         61. Whitbourne SK (2001) Adult development and aging—
47. Rowe JW, Kahn RL (1998) Successful aging. Dell (Trade), New York           biopsychosocial perspectives, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken, NY