DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.

74565

Provisional chapter
Chapter 20

Titanium
Titanium Dioxide
Dioxide Modifications
Modifications for
forEnergy
EnergyConversion:
Conversion:
Learnings from Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells
Learnings from Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

Hammad Cheema and Khurram S. Joya

Hammad Cheema and Khurram S. Joya
Additional information is available at the end of the chapter
Additional information is available at the end of the chapter

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74565

Abstract
During the last two and half decade modifying anatase TiO2 has appreciably enhanced
our understanding and application of this semiconducting, non-toxic material. In the
domain of DSCs, the main focus has been to achieve band adjustment to facilitate electron
injection from anchored dyes, and high electronic mobility for photo-generated electron
collection. In retrospection, there is a dire need to assimilate and summarize the findings
of these studies to further catalyze the research, better understanding and comparison of
the structure–property relationships in modifying TiO2 efficiently for crucial photo-
catalytic, electrochemical and nanostructured applications. This chapter aims at categoriz-
ing the typical approaches used to modify TiO2 in the domain of DSCs such as through
TiO2 paste additives, TiO2 doping, metal oxides inclusion, dye solution co-adsorbing
additives, post staining surface treatment additives and electrolyte additives. A summary
of the consequences of these modifications on electron injection, charge extraction, elec-
tronic mobility, conduction band shift and surface states has been presented. This chapter
is expected to hugely benefit the researchers employing TiO2 in energy, catalysis and
battery applications.

Keywords: modification, co-adsorption, surface treatment, recombination, electron

lifetime, electronic mobility, photovoltage

1. Introduction

Global energy demand is expected to increase from 18 TW in 2013 to 50 TW in 2050, along with
corresponding increase in CO2 emissions due to inevitable increase in population and indus-
trialization in the developing world [1, 2]. So far, most of the energy (~80%) have been derived
from fossil fuels, which is not sustainable and detrimental to the environment [2]. Thus,

© 2016 The Author(s). Licensee InTech. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
© 2018 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative
Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use,
Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and eproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
388 Titanium Dioxide - Material for a Sustainable Environment

sustainable and fossil-free pathways for producing clean energy and fuels such as conversion
of sunlight to electricity and molecules in atmosphere, e.g., water, CO2 and nitrogen, to H2,
hydrocarbons and ammonia respectively are highly required [3–8]. In this regard, dependence
on renewable energy sources such as solar, wind and hydroelectric has been strategically
deployed from last few decades with reasonable effect [5, 7]. Among all the renewable energy
sources, solar energy is the most potent and exploitable source [9]. However, in order to
achieve large scale, cost effective, carbon neutral supply of energy from sun; capture, conver-
sion and storage of energy should be highly efficient and cost effective [6, 9]. In this regard,
photovoltaics (PVs) are playing a substantial role in harnessing the sun energy mainly domi-
nated by silicon based solar cells at present. However, manufacturing of silicon PVs require
high temperature (>1600
C for silicon melting) and ultra-pure materials, thus adding to the
manufacturing complexity and cost [10]. Additionally, the scarcity of silver, a common elec-
trode material greatly limits to meet the future terawatt challenge. This have motivated
researchers around the globe to develop strategies for solar energy conversion based on
abundant, non-toxic, easy to process, commercially viable and cost effective systems. In this
regard solar PVs prepared from mesoscopic metal oxides such as (TiO2, ZnO, SnO2, etc.) and
organic light absorbing materials could meet the criteria as a suitable alternative, provided
high efficiency can be realized. Metal oxide serves as an electron acceptor and facilitates the
transport of electrons, along with being a scaffold for the adsorption of light harvesting
constituents in many cases [11, 12]. Out of different metal oxides, mesoscopic (10–50 nm size
pores) titanium dioxide (TiO2) by far has been the most widely studied and employed owing
to ease process-ability, chemical stability, high surface area, low cost and non-toxic nature.
[12–15] Out of the four naturally occurring polymorphs of TiO2, anatase (tetragonal), rutile
(tetragonal), brookite (orthorhombic), and TiO2 (monoclinic), anatase is preferred for PV’s
applications because of higher conduction band energy and slower recombination rate of
charge carriers [16–18].
In terms of mesoscopic-TiO2 based solar cells, dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs) are the most
widely studied with recent surge in research for perovskite solar cells [12, 19, 20]. The discus-
sion in the remaining chapter will be with the reference to DSCs employing TiO2 as electron
accepting and transport layer. The seminal report of 1991 on TiO2 based DSCs by Grätzel and
O0 Regan has garnered more than 26,500 citations (November 2017) highlighting the plethora
of knowledge generated and wide spread interest of scientific community [11]. It should be
noted that nanocrystalline morphology which goes through necking as the result of sintering
and lead to mesoscopic film of TiO2 is essential for the efficient operation of the DSCs, since a
monolayer of sensitizer on flat metal oxide surface only absorb small portion of incident light
[13]. Realization of this important nanostructure requirement aspect enhanced the adsorption
and subsequent light harvesting in DSCs by molecular sensitizers or dyes more than 1000 time
[13]. This enabled DSCs only system where charge generation (sensitizer) and transport (semi-
conductor) is performed by separate components. [14] DSCs are attractive compared to other
photovoltaic technologies in terms of economic advantage, tunability of color, can be built on
rigid and flexible substrates, made of benign materials such as TiO2 and metal free organic
dyes, offer sustained efficiency for indoor applications, and perform independently of the
angle of incidence [11, 12, 21–24]. Current, DSC record power conversion efficiency (PCE) up
 Titanium Dioxide Modifications for Energy Conversion: Learnings from Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells 389
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74565

to 14.3% has been demonstrated by judicious choice of co-sensitizing organic photosensitizers

having strong binding to TiO2 and broad absorption, post staining surface capping and
tailored solution based redox shuttle and electrolyte additives [25]. However, for further
improvement in PCE (1) sensitizers with efficient conversion of absorbed photons to electrons
(400–900 nm), particularly beyond 650 nm (2) redox shuttles with photovoltage output greater
than 1.2 V (3) minimized recombinations and over potential losses and (4) optimized tandem
devices are highly required [26–29].

The standard components of a typical DSC embodiment are (1) FTO (fluorine doped tin oxide)
deposited on glass substrate (2) mesoscopic TiO2 film (3) sensitizer, organic or metal complex
anchored to TiO2 (4) mediator, to regenerate the dye (5) counter electrode with platinum (pt) to
reduce the mediator (Figure 1). Upon illumination the sensitizer gets photo-excited and injects
an electron in the conduction band (CB) of TiO2 thus generating an electric potential difference.
This injected electron then diffuses through the mesoporous TiO2 where it is extracted to outer
circuit at photoanode. Meanwhile the oxidized sensitizer is regenerated by the redox mediator,
whereas the extracted electron travels through the load to the counter electrode, which then
transfers electron to the mediator. At the interface boundary, back electron transfer to the
oxidized dye and recombination with the electrolyte has been known the most drastic events
which lower the performance along with inefficient light absorption beyond 650 nm [13, 14].
On the same note before printing the mesoporous TiO2 film a compact TiO2 layer (mostly from
aqueous TiCl4 solution) is deposited on the FTO glass which prevents the short circuiting of
the device, improves adhesion of TiO2 nanoparticles and minimizes the direct contact of
electrolyte with FTO [30–32]. In terms of characterization of DSCs, two important measure-
ments are short photocurrent-density (Jsc) and open circuit voltage (Voc) curve also known as

Figure 1. Operational principle of DSCs.

390 Titanium Dioxide - Material for a Sustainable Environment

J-V curve and incident photon to current conversion efficiency (IPCE) or EQE (external quan-
tum efficiency). IPCE depicts the photocurrent density response of the device at monochro-
matic wavelength and depends on the same parameters as Jsc [33].
J-V curve is measured by scanning the voltage across the device from 0 to higher voltage
(forward bias) or higher to zero voltage (reverse bias) either with a source meter or a
potentiostat. Power conversion efficiency (PCE) of the cells, the main performance metric is
then calculated according to the equation, PCE = (JscVoc FF)/I0, where FF is the fill factor which
is simply the measure of the squareness of the J-V curve, and depicts the electrochemical losses
in the device with value between 0 and 1 (normally between 0.65 and 0.75 for DSCs) [34]. I0 is
the power input for the incident irradiation which is normally 1 sun (100 mW/cm2). A high
performing DSC should behave an ideal diode with infinite shunt resistance and minimum
series resistance which will lead to higher FF and PCE ultimately [13]. Briefly, Jsc α
LHE.φinj.φreg.ηcoll, where LHE is light harvesting efficiency of sensitizer on given thickness of
TiO2, φinj and φreg are the quantum yield of electron injection and dye regeneration and ηcoll is
the charge collection efficiency [12].
In Figure 2, thermodynamic requirements for electron injection (up to 300 mV) and dye
regeneration (100–500 mV) overpotential has been shown. Dotted lines highlight the
unwanted recombination reactions with redox shuttle (102 sec) and oxidized sensitizer
(104 sec) also known as “dark current” [12, 35, 36]. Kinetically, electron injection happens in
100 s of pico seconds and vary with sensitizer, with usual ms to μs range of recombination
with electrolyte and oxidized dye, respectively. [24] Tuning of electrochemical properties of
sensitizers (Ru (II), organic, and porphyrin) with optimized geometry offering higher light
absorption and minimum aggregation and redox shuttles (iodide/triiodide, cobalt and copper)
has been widely studied for DSCs with the aim of minimum overpotential loss, broad absorp-
tion and higher PCE [37–40]. Interested readers are encouraged to consult the more detailed
reviews on design principles of sensitizers and redox shuttles for DSCs [21, 33, 40–43].

Figure 2. Energy level diagram, overpotential requirements and typical time constants.
 Titanium Dioxide Modifications for Energy Conversion: Learnings from Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells 391
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74565

Jsc can be increased by molecular engineering of the sensitizer, with ideal ground and excited
state energetics, high molar absorptivity, and aggregation less anchoring on TiO2 [12]. Voc is the
energy difference between the TiO2 fermi level and the redox potential of the mediator and
depends on the electron density in TiO2. Higher Voc can be achieved by minimization of the
dark current, increase in electron injection, negative (upward) shift in the energy of the con-
duction band, positive (downward) shift in the energy of the redox shuttle and series connec-
tion of devices [35, 44]. Both Voc and FF are hugely related to recombination reactions (dark
current) and can be substantially influenced by modification of TiO2 in the presence of addi-
tives vide infra. Along with J-V and IPCE measurements, electrochemical impedance spectros-
copy (EIS) and small modulation photovoltage transient measurements have been widely
employed to fully characterize the devices. Readers are kindly referred to the previously
published reviews to learn about these powerful techniques to characterize interface and
charge transfer properties [45–48].
In terms of achieving higher efficiency by modification of TiO2 the main objective is to mini-
mize the recombination losses by blocking the TiO2 surface, increase in electron injection by
manipulation of TiO2 CB, aid in better orientation, structure and geometry of the dyes on TiO2
and suppression of dye aggregation and stacking. This enhancement of DSCs devoid of dye
and electrolyte designing and arduous manipulations of their molecular structures can be
achieved by (1) TiO2 paste additions (2) dye solution co-adsorbing additives (3) post staining
surface treatment additives and (4) electrolyte additives (Figure 3). This chapter is now further
divided into sections as shown in Figure 3. to integrate and analyze the most successful
strategies, their role in enhancing DSCs performance, similarities among different approaches
and discussion of proposed mechanisms.
It is crucial to highlight that just like dyes for DSCs most of the additives will require an
anchoring group for immobilization on TiO2, other than plasmonic nanoparticles and compos-
ite of TiO2 NPs (Section 1, which become the intrinsic part of TiO2 NPs after sintering also
termed as “hard modification”). The most widely used anchoring groups are same as dyes,
e.g., carboxylic acid, phosphonic/phosphinic acid, pyridine, and most recently siloxanes.
Though multitude of anchoring modes such as covalent attachment, hydrogen bonding, elec-
trostatic interaction, van der Waals interaction and physical entrapment has been proposed
[49]. It is important to notice that these anchoring systems should also facilitate the electron
transfer. Additionally, due to structural complexity of the interface environment several
models are used to elucidate the anchoring. For physical characterization of interface Fourier

Figure 3. Summary layout for TiO2 modification approaches.

392 Titanium Dioxide - Material for a Sustainable Environment

transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and photoelectron spectroscopy (PES) are mainly
employed [50]. However for anchoring on TiO2 for the well-known carboxylic acid, (similarly
anchoring phosphonic/phosphinic acid, siloxane, etc.) (Figure 4) covalent interaction can only
offer the strongest coupling for stable anchoring with ester type bonds or metal complexation
for pyridine additives [51]. For an in depth analysis of anchoring mode and surface adsorption
for different anchoring groups, readers are kindly referred to reviews published previously
[49, 51].

For efficient light harvesting different kinds of TiO2 pastes (active layer for dye anchoring with
scattering or reflective layer on top of it) are used for achieving specific features such as iodide/
triiodide systems mainly employ 18–20 nm size NPs based formulations, whereas for larger
size redox shuttles such as cobalt and copper based systems 28–31 nm size NPs are employed
[52, 53]. This selectivity comes from the mass-transport related limitations of outer sphere
based redox shuttles (cobalt and copper) which is mitigated by the larger pore size of bigger
NP size based TiO2 films [54]. On top of active layer, 4–5 μm thick scattering or reflective layer
is printing with NPs size of >100 nm, to back scatter light into the cell.

1.1. Scope

Though synthesis and preparation of TiO2 paste for film formation has historical importance,
however, at this stage more than 95% of the studies employ a commercially available TiO2
paste which is developed after years of research and employ patented methods [53, 55].
However, design of morphologically new structures, and development of efficient synthesis
routes for anatase TiO2 is an active area to achieve higher loading, better charge transport, and
minimum recombinations losses [18]. For this chapter please be referred to commercially
available TiO2 (transparent 18–20 nm from Dyesol or Solaronix, or 30–31 from Dyesol or
Dyenamo nm particle size for active layer and > 100 nm size for scattering layer from Dyesol,
Solaronix and Dyenamo) for improvement [56–58]. With ready to use TiO2 paste in hand, its
light absorption properties can be enhanced by simple mixing in systematic way with silver

Figure 4. Depiction of anchoring mode of general additives for TiO2 modifications.

 Titanium Dioxide Modifications for Energy Conversion: Learnings from Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells 393
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74565

and gold nanoparticles (Section 1). Additionally, different types of TiO2 geometries such as
nanotubes (NTs) and hollow spheres can be mixed with nanoparticles (NPs) to achieve higher
loading (Section 1.2 and 1.3). An important class of additives to modify and enhance the
interface properties of TiO2 is the addition of electronically insulating molecules with anchor-
ing groups (Section 2). Quite recently, simple surface treatment by chemical bath method on
dye anchored TiO2 (stained) films has been explored with impressive enhancements, such
strategies are discussed in Section 3. Historically, most widely studied approach in regard to
enhancement of DSCs and modification of TiO2 is the introduction of new electrolyte additives
including solvent, surface and recombination blocking pyridines and different anchoring
groups, which are discussed in Section 4. At the end an overall perspective on the state of
DSCs and the role of learnings to other fields is analyzed.

2. TiO2 paste modifications

Integration of subwavelength plasmonic nanostructures and morphologically varied mesoporous

films of TiO2 have been widely explored for enhancing DSCs performance. Hard modification of
TiO2, such as sintering step is required at high temperature (500 0C) to activate the functionality
are discussed below.

2.1. Plasmonic enhancement of DSCs

Plasmonic enhancement or light entrapment in DSCs by means of the plasmonic resonance of

metal nanostructures has been a topic of intense research in the last decade. Since the first
report in 2000 of metal nanostructured mediated enhancements in DSCs, many successful
studies has been published outlining the role of size, shape and composition of metal
nanoparticles on DSCs performance and working mechanisms [59–61]. Metal nanostructures
capable of surface plasmon such as Au and Ag has been systematically introduced with TiO2
NPs. Such as these nanoparticles can be designed and integrated in TiO2 NPs in a way to offer
light entrapment from visible to NIR region [62].
In plasmonic materials the coupling of incident photons to conduction band electrons upon
excitation give rise to collective oscillations of electrons defined as localized surface plasmon
resonances (LSPR) [63, 64]. By the engineering of plasmonic nanostructure’s geometry, dimen-
sions and composition LSPR’s radiative (hot electron transfer, plasmon resonant energy trans-
fer) and non-radiative (far-field scattering >50 nm size, near field coupling 3–50 nm size)
processes can be tailored (Figure 5) [55, 56]. Out of four processes summarized in Figure 5
far-field scattering and near field coupling are easily observed for DSCs such as by improve-
ment in IPCE, whereas role of hot electron transfer and PRET to improve DSCs is thus far
poorly explored [62]. Detailed discussion of each process and its implications for DSCs are
beyond the scope of this chapter [62, 65].
In radiative effects metal nanostructure acts as a secondary light source and in non-radiative
effects absorbed energy is subsequently transferred to neighboring semiconductor NPs (Figure 5).
394 Titanium Dioxide - Material for a Sustainable Environment

Figure 5. Summary of radiative (a) and (b) and non-radiative LSPR-based processes and their features, modified from
reference [62], with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.

For LSPR based enhancement of DSCs the size of the metal nanoparticles plays huge role. Such as
at 5 nm regime of metal nanostructure non-radiative processes are dominant, near field coupling
for 45 nm size regime and far field scattering for 120 nm size metal nanostructures [62]. In terms of
application, some reports evidence the beneficial effect of topical presence of plasmonic
nanoparticles on TiO2 film, however, homogenous integration of plasmonic nanoparticles
throughout active layer have proven more efficient, particularly in enhancing photocurrent
response of devices (Figure 6) [67, 68].

The highest PCE achieved through plasmonic enhancements so far (2013) is 10.8% which is
30% higher (8.3% PCE) than the control device employing N719 sensitizer by Belcher et al..
with 0.01–0.32% core shell particles mixed with regular TiO2 [61]. In this study, oxide-metal-
oxide multiple core-shell nanostructured spheres were blended with already available
photoactive materials to achieve balanced light harvesting in panchromatic fashion. Kamat
et al.. in a pioneering work (2012) identified the plasmonic and charging effect based on the
composition of Au@SiO2 and Au@TiO2, leading to achieve a higher photocurrent and
photovoltage with overall PCE of 10.2 and 9.7%, respectively [60]. Au nanoparticles of 5 nm
size were used in the core with shell as passivation layer of either SiO2 or TiO2 and mixed with
Solaronix T/SP paste in 0.7 wt%. Wang et al in 2013, in a unique study employed the organic
sensitizer FNE29 and I/I3, along with TiO2 inlaid 2 nm sized Au nanoparticles resulting in
10.1% PCE improved from 5.5% PCE (84% increase) [66]. Au nano colloid in 0–0.8 wt% ratio
 Titanium Dioxide Modifications for Energy Conversion: Learnings from Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells 395
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74565

Figure 6. Effect of ~2 nm sized inlaid Au NPs with different wt% in TiO2 paste on IPCE, adopted from Ref. [66], with
permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.

was blended with TiO2 paste to constitute the active layer (Figure 6). With most prominent
current report, DSCs employing organic dye (FNE29) compared to Ru (II) dyes for plasmonic
enhanced DSCs are rare. With the survey of reports published so far it is clear that though
plasmonics has led to increased device efficiencies however, reports lack (1) application of non-
precious metal plasmonics for enhanced DSCs such as Al, graphene and semiconducting
nanocrystal plasmonics (2) application of metal nanoparticles in conjunction with high
photovoltage redox shuttles such as Co (III/II) or Cu (II/I) and organic sensitizers (3) long term
stability studies particularly against redox shuttles for corrosion and chemical resistance of
plasmonic DSCs [69–74].

2.2. Morphological investigation on TiO2

NP based mesoporous TiO2 shows excellent features for DSCs however it suffers from low
electrical conductivity and charge recombination losses [75–78]. Additionally, enhanced light
scattering and dye adsorption can be achieved by modifying the shape of NPs or mixing
nanotubes, nanowires, nanospheres, and hollow TiO2 [58, 77–81]. On the same note, 2D and
3D structures of TiO2 such as nanoribbons, nanodisks, nanoleaves, nanoflowers, nanorods,
hedgehog nanostructure and dendritic hollow structures have also be explored for DSCs
[82–87]. The studies focused on the morphological modification of TiO2 have demonstrated
marginal increase in DSC performance with scattered results, however, due to structural
complexity and reproducibility issues such investigations has not resulted in wide spread
application for DSCs [76]. For details please refer to the cited work.
396 Titanium Dioxide - Material for a Sustainable Environment

2.3. Metals and metal oxides for TiO2 modifications

Doping or intentional addition of impurities while synthesis of TiO2 can have substantial effect
on band structure and surface states which dictate charge transport and dye/TiO2 interface in
DSCs [88]. The purpose of doping is to achieve higher conductivity and minimized recombi-
nations. In the regime of DSCs, doping has been studied with metals (lithium, magnesium or
calcium), metalloids (boron, silicon, germanium, antimony), non-metals (carbon, nitrogen,
sulfur, fluorine and iodine), transition metals, post transition metals and lanthanides. For a
detailed analysis on choosing the dopant and its effects interested readers are referred to
previously published review on the topic [88]. These dopants are generally added during the
synthesis stage and require subsequent sintering step to be integrated as the part of crystalline
structure of TiO2 (hard modification).
Additionally, to enhance the interface properties of DSCs at TiO2/dye/electrolyte for efficient
charge transfer wide bandgap and electronically insulating metal oxides has been widely
studied [75, 89]. Wide band gap metal oxides such as ZnO, Nb2O5, and WO3 and electronically
insulating oxides such as SrO, Al2O3, ZrO2 and SiO2 are known to form barrier layer at the
interface which impedes back electron transfer at the interface boundary thus lowering recom-
bination losses [90]. Most recently, MgO have been studied for TiO2 modification during
synthesis, leading to negative shift of up to 200 mV of TiO2 owing to its more basic nature
[91, 92]. An alternative approach is to surface treat the TiO2 film with Mg+2 precursor such as
(Mg (OC2H5) or Mg (NO3)2) followed by high temperature sintering, however, concentration
control becomes very critical for final performance [90, 93, 94]. Albeit, these studies report
higher Voc for DSCs employing Mg+2 and reduced recombination losses. However, negatively
shifted conduction band can also lower the electron injection if the sensitizer-excited state
potential gets very close to CB energy. Interested readers are referred to relevant reviews for
in-depth analysis of such modifications [75, 89].

3. Dye solution co-adsorbing additives

“Soft modification,” simple rinse and dry to alter TiO2/dye/electrolyte interface favorably is to
add additives along with the dye adsorption solution known as “co-adsorbents” [95–98].
These additives are also known as de-aggregating agents which aid in favorable dye orienta-
tion on TiO2 and increased electron injection through minimization of dye–dye intermolecular
charge transfer and π-π stacking [99]. These mainly insulating additives are known to occupy
the vacant spaces among dye molecules which prevents the diffusion of oxidized redox species
(e.g., I3) to TiO2 (Figure 7) [100, 101]. This approach has been widely explored for DSCs since
the first report in 1993, though such modifications of TiO2 surface were already explored by
Miayasak et al. in 1978 [95, 96]. These co-adsorbents are amphiphilic in nature and consists of
an anchoring group (Figure 4) such as carboxylic or phoshonic/phosphinic moiety and a long
alkyl chain or three dimensional aromatic and alkyl components acting as a buffer between
TiO2 and electrolyte. These co-additives can be divided based on the chemical identity of
anchoring group and their influence on the interface can be best studied through EIS and
 Titanium Dioxide Modifications for Energy Conversion: Learnings from Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells 397
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74565

Figure 7. Illustration of dye on TiO2 surface with (right) and without co-additive, I3 is the oxidized redox component.

Figure 8. Representative co-additives.

electron lifetime measurements. Since aggregation is a common phenomenon for mostly pla-
nar organic sensitizer including phthalocyanine and porphyrin, the effect of co-additives on
aggregation can be studied by simple current dynamic measurements at different light inten-
sities [102, 103].

3.1. Carboxylic acid based anchoring co-additives

Since the first report on deoxycholic acid (DCA) and chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA, Figure 8)
in 1993 by Grätzel et al. in ethanolic dye solution along with the sensitizers, CDCA has become
the most widely used co-additive [96]. CDCA adsorption for pre-stained and post stained TiO2
films was found less effective in terms of enhancing Jsc and Voc [104]. Generally, the optimum
concentration of CDCA in the dye solution depends on the nature of the dye and study of
several concentrations (such as 2, 10, 20, and 40 times, etc., of the dye) is a normal routine [105,
106]. It should be kept in mind that excess of CDCA or any other co-adsorbent can adversely
affect the dye loading as well. Under optimum conditions, CDCA is generally known to
positively (downward) shift the conduction band of TiO2, increasing electron injection along
with lower recombination losses thus enhancing both Jsc and Voc. It should be noted that CDCA
mainly serves the role of de-aggregating agent for organic, porphyrin and phthalocyanine
398 Titanium Dioxide - Material for a Sustainable Environment

sensitizers and a recombination blocking agent for Ru (II) sensitizers since latter dyes do not
aggregate on TiO2 [102]. In a recent study for ladder-like carbazole donor and cyanoacrylic
acid (CA) anchor based D-A-π-A type dye, CDCA resulted in up to 9% enhancement in PCE
when co-adsorbed with the dye [107]. Concentration of CDCA was 5 mM compared to 0.3 mM
of the dye. The effect for the presence of CDCA was analyzed through EIS measurements
which confirmed higher recombination resistance leading to 8% increase in Jsc and 2% increase
in Voc for most efficient dye in the series (C1). In a similar study for an organic phenothiazine
based dye (P2), effect of different concentrations of CDCA was studied in detail [106]. CDCA
concentration of 10 mM was found to result in optimum improvement in DSCs performance
compared to 0.3 mM concentration of the dye.
Figure 8 shows the CDCA alternatives such as pivalic acid (PVA), 3,4,5-Tris(dodecyloxy)
benzoic acid (DOBA) and EG1 (an amidoamine dendritic molecule) [108–110]. PVA in a
comparative study approach showed enhanced electron lifetime and negative shift in the
conduction band of TiO2. This lead to 53 mV increase in Voc and 8% increase in PCE. Adsorp-
tion of PVA before staining was found to be more effective, compared to co-adsorption with
the dye. In an example with ss-DSCs (solid state-DSCs), DOBA and Z907 sensitizer resulted in
negative shift of the TiO2 CB, decreased charge recombination, higher hydrophilicity and
enhanced PCE as evidenced by EIS, and IMVS (intensity modulated photovoltage decay
spectroscopy) measurements. In another example, strategically designed amidoamine-
dendron based molecules (EG0–2) were studied as the co-additives and compared with
CDCA. This study showed that superior surface blocking, higher electron injection, minimized
intermolecular energy transfer and higher PCE can be tailored with increasing size of the
dendritic molecules. In spite of co-additives examples (Figure 8), CDCA is mostly widely
employed co-additive to modify the interface on TiO2, however, it should be employed with
caution particularly in terms of its co-adsorbing concentration.

3.2. Phosphonic/phosphinic acid anchoring and zwitterion-based co-additives

Co-additives with phosphorous containing anchoring groups are generally believed to anchor
strongly compared to carboxylic acid anchors. First example of such an additive was appeared
in 2003 by Zakeerudin et al. when 1-decyl phosphonic acid (DPA, Figure 9) was used with a
Z-907 (a benchmark hydrophobic dye historically popular for stable devices) [111]. It was
claimed as the first example of stable DSCs under heat stress and continuous illumination,

Figure 9. Representative additives.

 Titanium Dioxide Modifications for Energy Conversion: Learnings from Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells 399
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74565

with 7% increase in PCE due to DPA (4:1 dye/co-additive concentration was employed). Later
on in a unique example octydecyl phosphonic acid (OPA) was also characterized for Z-907 and
cobalt redox shuttle [112].
OPA (18C) was found more effective in blocking recombination compared to DPA (10C)
because of longer alkyl chain with overall 20% increase in PCE (8.4% versus 7% no OPA,
Figure 10) with 18:1 (dye:OPA) concentration ratio. This is one of the highest efficiency
reported so far for a Ru (II) dye containing NCS with cobalt redox shuttles, owing to inherently
higher recombination losses [113–115].
In this class of co-additives, dineohexyl phosphinic acid (DINHOP, Figure 11) is known as an
efficient molecular insulator to electronically passivate the oxide junctions such as TiO2, even
outperforming CDCA in some comparative studies vide infra [105, 116]. DINHOP particularly
benefits from the three dimensional orientation leading to better surface coverage [116].
Increase in PCE of 9% was realized for Z-907 and DINHOP with 1:1 dye concentration (PCE
7.9% versus 7.24%).

In a comparative study for different small molecules (Figure 9 containing phenylphosphonic

acid (PPA), diphenylphosphinic acid (DPPA), phosphoric acid triethyl ester (PATEE), and
phosphoric acid tributylester (PATBE) were employed as co-adsorbents [117]. It was found
that alkyl chains performed better than the aromatic containing co-additives with ~12%
enhancement in device PCE with N719 sensitizer. The observed effect was established by EIS
measurements (Nyquist plot), showing larger semicircle for high performing PATBE, pointing

Figure 10. Effect of OPA on Z907 performance, taken from Ref. [66], with permission from The Royal Society of
Chemistry.
400 Titanium Dioxide - Material for a Sustainable Environment

Figure 11. Co-additives employed in the comparative study.

to higher recombination resistance as the result of co-additive pretreatment of TiO2 film before
dipping in dye solution.

4-guanidino butyric acid (GBA, Figure 8) was first time employed in 2005 by Grätzel group
with a Ru (II) sensitizer K19 [118]. In that detailed study, cyclic voltammetry was employed to
determine the density of states (DOS), EIS to analyze interface charge transfer properties and
photovoltage decay measurements for the effect of GAB on electron life time and capacitance
of TiO2. GBA was found to have similar kind of effect as t-butyl pyridine on TiO2 conduction
band with negative shift in the quasi-fermi level of TiO2. Additionally, increase in Voc did not
come as the result of decreased Jsc, thus leading to higher overall PCE (~9% increase with 1:1
concentration with the dye). In 2009, same group studied and compared GBA and 4-
aminobutyric acid (ABA) for solid state DSCs and additives effect on long term stability
(Figure 11) [101]. GBA outperformed ABA with about 37% increase in PCE compared to 16%
decrease with ABA at 1:1 concentration. This was caused presumably due to more effective
barrier formation to recombination and upward shift in the conduction band of TiO2 by GBA.
Enhancement in device performance due to GBA was caused by 15% increase (113 mV) in Voc
and 18.5% increase in Jsc. GBA was also found to enhance the long term stability.
In a recent study based on C106 dye, Chandiran et al. studied four different additives
(Figure 11) for their potential effect on the TiO2 interface and device performance with differ-
ent concentrations [105]. For C106, 4-guanidino butyric acid (GBA) resulted in 11% PCE,
compared to 10.8% with CDCA at 0.5:1 (dye:CDCA) ratio compared to 6:1 for GBA (dye:
GBA). In the same study, dineohexyl phosphinic acid (DINHOP) also showed slightly better
results compared to CDCA (11% versus 10.8%), whereas dodecyl phosphonic acid (DPA) at 6:1
ratio marginally improved to 9.7% PCE. The device PCE without additives was reported to be
10.6%.

3.3. Dual function dyes as co-additives

An interesting approach to achieve multiple functionality such as light absorption and aggre-
gation/recombination blocking at TiO2 surface is to employ small molecule organic light
absorbing dyes along with main dye [119–122]. Few successful example of such yellow to
orange dyes which can be termed as co-sensitizers and co-additives are shown in Figure 12.
In a detailed study in 2011, it was shown that Y-shaped molecules such as HC-A, can
 Titanium Dioxide Modifications for Energy Conversion: Learnings from Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells 401
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74565

Figure 12. Small molecule co-sensitizing dyes as co-additives to modify TiO2.

potentially play multiple roles when co-adsorbed along with another organic dye (NKX2677)
[119, 120]. IPCE confirmed the increased photocurrent response, EIS was used to rationalize
the higher Voc due to increased electron lifetime, and transient absorption studies showed the
carbazole cation formation favorable for hole conduction. In a detailed study on similar lines
with different molecules (HC3–5, Figure 12), black dye (BD) was optimized from 10.3% PCE to
11.3% for BD + HC-5, with 1:1 dye solution concentration [121]. As the result of co-
sensitization, BD + HC-5 mainly realized enhancement in Jsc (8.5%). It should be noted that
CDA (chenodeoxycholic acid) as a co-adsorbent was also added in 100 times excess in this
study. In a recent study, similar effects were claimed with LD03 and LD04 when co-sensitized
along with N719. N719 + LD04 showed highest enhancement of PCE from 7.896% to 8.955%
(13.4% increase) due to better light harvesting, decrease in aggregation and higher electron
recombination resistance [122]. BPHA (2-(4-butoxyphenyl)-N-hydroxyacetamide), Figure 12),
was recently applied for chemical modification of TiO2 before dye adsorption [123]. Though
BPHA, was found to lower the adsorbed dye concentration, however, faster regeneration was
reasoned for improved device performance (10–20%). Co-sensitizing approach of adsorbing mul-
tiple dyes on TiO2 for enhanced light harvestings works on the same principles, in addition to
order of staining, and dyes ratio, etc., interested readers are referred to the cited work [124–126].

4. Post-staining surface treatment additives

To minimize the non-productive electron recombination pathways at the interface, chemical

bath surface treatment of stained or dyed TiO2 is a very effective approach (soft modification).
Such that the highest reported efficiency DSCs (12–14.3%), applied the most extensive surface
treatments known (Figure 13) [25, 53, 127, 128]. It should be noted that post staining surface
treatment additive need to be inert towards the sensitizer, i.e., it should not impede light
harvesting and detach it from the surface of TiO2. Surface treatment is less complex than co-
additive approach and offer better control on treatment parameters such as concentration,
402 Titanium Dioxide - Material for a Sustainable Environment

Figure 13. Post staining surface treatment example “alkyl-thicket” layer formation, adopted from Ref. [127], with per-
mission from The Royal Society of Chemistry.

dipping time, etc. Below section highlights the most successful strategies categorized on the
basis of anchoring groups.

4.1. Carboxylic/phosphonic acid anchoring additives

Similar to dyes and co-adsorbing additives carboxylic/phosphonic acid anchoring groups are
widely applied for surface treatment additives as well (Figure 14). Effect of long alkyl chain on
enhancing electron lifetime in TiO2 was already known in conjunction with DSC sensitizers
[129–131]. However, Hanaya et al. popularized the concept of “alkyl thicket” as an insulating
barrier layer to block unwanted electron recombinations at TiO2. As the result, overall device
PCE increased impressively ~20% (9.44–11.3%), with increase in Jsc from 15.1 to 15.8 mA/cm2
and increase in Voc from 0.826 to 0.958 V (16% increase). It is interesting to note, the presence of
long alkyl chains was not found to impede the charge transfer and diffusion with potentially
favorable effect on long term stability as well [47]. These additives are usually applied in a
hierarchical (stepwise) way with dipping in 0.1 M conc. (empirical) solution with the longest
chain additives followed by small chain additives which can penetrate well in smaller cavities.
In a very interesting study, a multifunctional methoxy-terminated oligomeric poly(ethylene
glycol) (PEG) chain containing a carboxylic acid at one chain end (Mw - 2000) (m-PEG-succinic
acid, Figure 14) is employed for post staining surface treatment [132]. The presence of electron
rich oxygen atoms in m-PEG was claimed to favorably co-ordinate with vacant sites on TiO2
 Titanium Dioxide Modifications for Energy Conversion: Learnings from Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells 403
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74565

Figure 14. Additives used to modify TiO2 in post-staining fashion.

Figure 15. Alkoxysilyl-based alkyl chain additives to modify TiO2.

and worked collegially with common electrolyte additives such as Li+, and tBP (4-ter
butylpyridine). Increase in electron lifetime, decrease in dark current, and entrapment of Li+
resulted in both Jsc and Voc enhancements.

4.2. Alkoxysilyl-based anchoring additives

In addition to “alkyl thicket” barrier layer for modifying TiO2 surface, Hanaya et al. also
introduced and studied the silanol-based sensitizer and additives for TiO2 anchoring (Figures 13
and 15). It was found that titano-siloxane bonds are stronger and are more resistant to detach-
ment from TiO2 compared to carboxylic acid anchors [127, 133]. However, it should be noted,
other groups reported on the synthetic challenges related to the inclusion of siloxanes for DSC
sensitizers [134].

An interesting and effective evolution is the replacement of hydrocarbon chain by fluorocar-

bon chain while keeping alkoxysilyl anchoring groups the same (Figure 16) [135–138]. In the
regime of organic PV’s (OPVs) fluorinated alkyl chains has been effectively employed to result
in surface segregated monolayer to achieve better charge transfer, polymer alignment and
404 Titanium Dioxide - Material for a Sustainable Environment

Figure 16. Alkoxysilyl and fluorocarbon based additives to modify TiO2.

direction of dipole moment at the interface [139–141]. For TiO2 modification, detailed studies
focused on unrevealing the impressive effect of fluorinated alkyl chains evidenced, enhanced
electron lifetime in TiO2, de-aggregating behavior for organic dyes, negative (upward)
conduction band shift of TiO2 with metal complex dye, hydrophobicity and overall PCE
enhancements presumably due to fluorinated self-assembled monolayer formation (FSAM)
[53, 94, 142–145]. Interestingly, in one study, cationically charged TMEA-TMOS (Figure 15)
outperformed C16 based alkyl chain analog when used with Ru (II) dye and cobalt redox
shuttle. Detailed studies on unrevealing the structure–property relationship of such fluorocar-
bon chains for modifying TiO2 are rare in literature at this stage.

5. Electrolyte additives

Electrolyte is an integral component of DSCs, and its composition has huge effect on perfor-
mance, and long term stability. It consist of redox active species such as iodide/triiodide, Co
(III)/Co(II), Fc (I)/Fc (0), and Cu (II)/Cu(I), etc., and certain additives which are known to
adsorb on TiO2 surface such as lithium cation (Li+), 4-ter butylpyridine (4-tBP) and guanidium
thiocyanate (GuNCS) and others as shown in Table 1 [160–162]. Source of Li+ is mostly LiI for
iodide/triiodide mediator and LiTFI or LiClO4 for cobalt and copper based redox shuttles. Two
widely studied redox systems for DSCs are iodide/triiodide and Co(III)/Co(II) with most recent
as Cu(II)/Cu(I) [160–162]. Iodide/triiodide redox shuttle has been the favorable choice histori-
cally, but it results in lower photovoltage due to higher (less positive) redox potential, higher
dye regeneration overpotenial due to complex two step chemistry and corrosion of the DSCs
components [160]. On the other hand, one electron redox shuttles such as cobalt and copper
offer higher photovoltage, tunability, and less dye regeneration overpotential making them
 Titanium Dioxide Modifications for Energy Conversion: Learnings from Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells 405
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74565

No. Additive Conc. (M) Electrolyte/dye CB effect Electron lifetime Jsc Voc PCE
+
1. Li [146] 0.05–0.5 I/Co Down Inc. Inc. Dec. Inc.
2 CDCA [147] 0.1 Co/Ru (II) Inc. Inc. Inc. Inc. Inc.
3 Li2CO3 [148] 0.0025 I/Ru (II) Up Inc. Inc. Inc. Inc.
4 K2CO3 [148] 0.05 I/Ru (II) Up Inc. Inc. Inc. Inc.
5 GuNCS [149] 0.1 I Down Dec. Inc. Dec. Inc.
6 GuNO3 [150] 0.1 I Up Inc. Inc. Inc. Inc.

7 1 I/Ru (II) Down Dec. Inc. Dec. Inc.

[151]

8 0.25–0.5 I/Co Up Inc. Dec. Inc. Inc.

[152, 153]

9 0.5 I/Ru (II) Up Inc. Dec. Inc. Dec.

[154–156]

10 0.5 Co Up Inc. Dec. Inc. Inc.

[157]

11 0.1 Co Up Inc. Inc. Inc. Inc.

[158]

12 0.5 I/Ru (II) Up Inc. Dec. Inc. Inc.

[159]

13 0.5 I/Ru (II) Up Inc. Dec. Inc. Dec.

[159]

Up = upward shift, Down = downward shift, Inc. = increase, and Dec. = decrease.

Table 1. Summarizing the effect of electrolyte additives effect on TiO2 and DSC parameters.

popular for recent studies [52, 163]. For iodide/triiodide most commonly employed additives
are Li+, GuNCS and 4-tBP, whereas one electron redox shuttles mainly employ Li+ and 4-tBP
only. Generally speaking, cationic additives charge the TiO2 surface positively thus lowering
the conduction band (Table 1, entry 1) [56, 146]. Electron rich or nitrogen containing additives
on the other hand charge the TiO2 surface negatively or increase electron density thus raising
the conduction band, blocking the recombination and resulting in higher Voc. An important
factor is the concentration which is commonly optimized empirically such as for Li2CO3,
GuNO3, etc., additives [148, 150]. Electrolyte additives and their known effect in terms of
TiO2 modification and subsequent DSC device parameters are shown in Table 1.
406 Titanium Dioxide - Material for a Sustainable Environment

Since NCS containing Ru (II) sensitizers are incompatible with cobalt, inclusion of CDCA
(Table 1, entry 2) substantially lowered the recombination losses and increased the PCE from
1.9 to 5.7% [147]. An interesting study, was the inclusion of Li2CO3 and K2CO3 (Table 1, entries
3 and 4) as a source of Li+, where former outperformed latter [148]. Li2CO3 enhanced the
device performance (6.5–7.6%) without lowering Voc, presumably due to formation of carbon-
ate layer on TiO2, as evidenced by FT-IR. In a comparative study, GuNO3 showed overall
better performance compared to well-known GuNCS, without negative effect on Voc [150].
It was supported by the favorable effect of NO3 on TiO2 CB (upward shift), which was not
observed for NCS without affecting diffusion negatively. Thiophene (Table 1, entry 7) when
added in 1 M concentration had Li+ like effect to enhance the Jsc [151]. 4-tBP (Table 1, entries
8–10) and its derivatives such as methyl pyridine, pyrimidine, pyrazole, triazole, thiazole and
quinolone has been extensively explored by Arakawa et al. [154, 164–167]. Out of these,
4-trimethylsilylpyridine (Table 1, entry 10), have particularly shown better overall perfor-
mance due to its bulkiness to block recombination reaction at interface, and better electron
donating ability without negatively effecting the electron injection [157]. In a recent study,
tris(4-methoxyphenyl)amine (TPAA, Table 1 entry 11) as an electron donor was explored by
Boschloo et al. [158].
The inclusion of TPAA in cobalt electrolyte particularly blocked the recombination with
oxidized sensitizer which lead to 26% increase in the DSC performance. 2-ethylimidazole and
benzimidazole (Table 1, entries 12 and 13) due to labile proton and lone pairs on electron were
expected to be good coordinating candidates to modify TiO2 as studied by Wei et al. [159].
Benzimidazole and 2-ehtylimidazole were found to perform best when employed in the molar
ratio of 9.5/0.5 respectively (7.93% PCE compared to 6.8%). These additives showed pyridine
type effect in modifying TiO2. To this point, only few reports are available on the long term
stability effect of these additives on TiO2 properties and DSC device performance [168, 169].
In this chapter, DSC electrolyte additives are discussed with respect to liquid based systems,
whereas liquid in these electrolytes eventually has to be replaced for long term stability either
by solid or semi-solid (gel type) systems. Reader are kindly referred to the published literature
for semisolid gel type electrolyte which generally apply similar additives and offer better long
term stability [162, 170–172].

6. Summary

In summary, this chapter aimed at recognizing and highlighting various approaches to modify
TiO2 material based on the studies focusing on dye-sensitized solar cells. The emphasis was to
identify the most successful examples and to rationalize their effect in enhancing electronic
mobility, charge carrier generation and diffusion, conduction band shift, surface passivation,
light harvesting, long term stability and ease of application. In general, TiO2 modification can
be categorized into hard modification and soft modification. Hard modification involves the
addition of moieties such as plasmonic nanostructures, metal oxides, and morphological
variations during synthesis such as a high temperature sintering (400–500
C) step is required
 Titanium Dioxide Modifications for Energy Conversion: Learnings from Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells 407
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74565

to achieve required functionality. On the other hand, soft modification (simple rinse and dry)
post sintering surface treatment with additives, co-adsorbents, and electrolyte additives is
rather simple to apply. With the discussion and literature provided in the chapter we hope
the state of knowledge learned from dye-sensitized solar cells will benefit the scientific com-
munity to expand on the functionality of TiO2 as it is being applied and explored in the fields
of energy storage (batteries, super capacitors), photocatalysis, PVs, and sensors.

Author details

Hammad Cheema1* and Khurram S. Joya2,3

*Address all correspondence to: hac@go.olemiss.edu

1 Chemistry Department, University of Mississippi, MS, USA
2 Department of Energy Conversion and Storage, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde,
Denmark

3 Department of Chemistry, University of Engineering and Technology (UET), Lahore, Punjab,

Pakistan

References

[1] Joya KS, Joya YF, Ocakoglu K, van de Krol R. Water-splitting catalysis and solar fuel
devices: Artificial leaves on the move. Angewandte Chemie, International Edition. 2013;
52(40):10426-10437

[2] Outlook WE. World energy outlook 2015. International Energy Agency. 2015
[3] Colton W. The Outlook for Energy: A View to 2040. Exxon Mobil Corporation; 2011
[4] Olah GA. Beyond oil and gas: The methanol economy. Angewandte Chemie, Interna-
tional Edition. 2005;44(18):2636-2639
[5] Chu S, Majumdar A. Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future.
Nature. 2012;488(7411):294-303

[6] Turner JA. Sustainable hydrogen production. Science. 2004;305(5686):972-974

[7] Joya KS, Morlanes N, Maloney E, Rodionov V, Takanabe K. Immobilization of a molec-
ular cobalt electrocatalyst by hydrophobic interaction with a hematite photoanode for
highly stable oxygen evolution. Chemical Communications. 2015;51(70):13481-13484
[8] Ocakoglu K, Joya KS, Harputlu E, Tarnowska A, Gryko DT. A nanoscale bio-inspired light-
harvesting system developed from self-assembled alkyl-functionalized metallochlorin
nano-aggregates. Nanoscale. 2014;6(16):9625-9631
408 Titanium Dioxide - Material for a Sustainable Environment

[9] Lewis NS, Nocera DG. Powering the planet: Chemical challenges in solar energy utili-
zation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2006;103(43):15729-15735
[10] Feltrin A, Freundlich A. Material considerations for terawatt level deployment of photo-
voltaics. Renewable Energy. 2008;33(2):180-185
[11] O'Regan B, Grätzel M. A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized
colloidal TiO2 films. Nature. 1991;353(6346):737-740
[12] Hagfeldt A, Boschloo G, Sun L, Kloo L, Pettersson H. Dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem-
ical Reviews. 2010;110(11):6595-6663

[13] Gratzel M. Photoelectrochemical cells. Nature. 2001;414(6861):338-344

[14] Grätzel M. Recent advances in sensitized mesoscopic solar cells. Accounts of Chemical
Research. 2009;42(11):1788-1798
[15] Kalyanasundaram K. Dye-sensitized Solar Cells. Boca Raton, Fla.; London: CRC; Taylor
& Francis [distributor]; 2009
[16] Kavan L, Grätzel M, Gilbert SE, Klemenz C, Scheel HJ. Electrochemical and photoelec-
trochemical investigation of single-crystal anatase. Journal of the American Chemical
Society. 1996;118(28):6716-6723
[17] Carp O, Huisman CL, Reller A. Photoinduced reactivity of titanium dioxide. Progress in
Solid State Chemistry. 2004;32(1):33-177

[18] Dambournet D, Belharouak I, Amine K. Tailored preparation methods of TiO2 anatase,

rutile, brookite: Mechanism of formation and electrochemical properties. Chemistry of
Materials. 2010;22(3):1173-1179

[19] Yang WS, Noh JH, Jeon NJ, Kim YC, Ryu S, Seo J, et al. High-performance photovoltaic
perovskite layers fabricated through intramolecular exchange. Science. 2015
[20] Gratzel M. The light and shade of perovskite solar cells. Nature Materials. 2014;13(9):
838-842

[21] Mishra A, Fischer MKR, Bäuerle P. Metal-free organic dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells:
from structure: Property relationships to design rules. Angewandte Chemie, Interna-
tional Edition. 2009;48(14):2474-2499

[22] Zhang S, Yang X, Numata Y, Han L. Highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cells: Progress
and future challenges. Energy & Environmental Science. 2013;6(5):1443-1464

[23] Ahmad S, Guillen E, Kavan L, Gratzel M, Nazeeruddin MK. Metal free sensitizer and
catalyst for dye sensitized solar cells. Energy & Environmental Science. 2013;6(12):3439-3466

[24] Ardo S, Meyer GJ. Photodriven heterogeneous charge transfer with transition-metal
compounds anchored to TiO2 semiconductor surfaces. Chemical Society Reviews. 2009;
38(1):115-164
 Titanium Dioxide Modifications for Energy Conversion: Learnings from Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells 409
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74565

[25] Kakiage K, Aoyama Y, Yano T, Oya K, Fujisawa J-i, Hanaya M. Highly-efficient dye-
sensitized solar cells with collaborative sensitization by silyl-anchor and carboxy-anchor
dyes. Chemical Communications. 2015;51(88):15894-15897
[26] Li J-Y, Chen C-Y, Ho W-C, Chen S-H, Wu C-G. Unsymmetrical squaraines incorporating
quinoline for near infrared responsive dye-sensitized solar cells. Organic Letters. 2012;
14(21):5420-5423
[27] Liyanage NP, Yella A, Nazeeruddin M, Grätzel M, Delcamp JH. Thieno[3,4-b]pyrazine
as an electron deficient π-bridge in D-A-π-A DSCs. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.
2016;8(8):5376-5384
[28] Lu X, Zhou G, Wang H, Feng Q, Wang ZS. Near infrared thieno[3,4-b]pyrazine sensi-
tizers for efficient quasi-solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells. Physical Chemistry Chem-
ical Physics (PCCP). 2012;14(14):4802-4809
[29] Wu J, Li G, Zhang L, Zhou G, Wang Z-S. Energy level engineering of thieno[3,4-b]
pyrazine based organic sensitizers for quasi-solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells. Journal
of Materials Chemistry A. 2016;4(9):3342-3355
[30] Ito S, Murakami TN, Comte P, Liska P, Grätzel C, Nazeeruddin MK, et al. Fabrication of
thin film dye sensitized solar cells with solar to electric power conversion efficiency over
10%. 6th International Conference on Coatings on Glass and Plastics (ICCG6). Advanced
Coatings for Large-Area or High-Volume Products. 2008;516(14):4613-4619
[31] Yella A, Mathew S, Aghazada S, Comte P, Gratzel M, Nazeeruddin MK. Dye-sensitized
solar cells using cobalt electrolytes: The influence of porosity and pore size to achieve
high-efficiency. Journal of Materials Chemistry C. 2017;5(11):2833-2843
[32] Cheema H, Ogbose L, El-Shafei A. Structure–property relationships: Steric effect in
ancillary ligand and how it influences photocurrent and photovoltage in dye-sensitized
solar cells. Dyes and Pigments. 2015;113(0):151-159
[33] Yum J-H, Baranoff E, Wenger S, Nazeeruddin MK, Grätzel M. Panchromatic engineering
for dye-sensitized solar cells. Energy & Environmental Science. 2011;4(3):842-857
[34] Pazoki M, Cappel UB, Johansson EMJ, Hagfeldt A, Boschloo G. Characterization tech-
niques for dye-sensitized solar cells. Energy & Environmental Science. 2017;10(3):672-
709
[35] Ning Z, Fu Y, Tian H. Improvement of dye-sensitized solar cells: What we know and
what we need to know. Energy & Environmental Science. 2010;3(9):1170-1181

[36] Hardin BE, Snaith HJ, McGehee MD. The renaissance of dye-sensitized solar cells.
Nature Photonics. 2012;6(3):162-169

[37] Cheema H, Islam A, Han L, El-Shafei A. Monodentate pyrazole as a replacement of

labile NCS for Ru (II) photosensitizers: Minimum electron injection free energy for dye-
sensitized solar cells. Dyes and Pigments. 2015;120:93-98
410 Titanium Dioxide - Material for a Sustainable Environment

[38] Cheema H, Islam A, Han L, Gautam B, Younts R, Gundogdu K, et al. Influence of mono
versus bis-electron-donor ancillary ligands in heteroleptic Ru(ii) bipyridyl complexes on
electron injection from the first excited singlet and triplet states in dye-sensitized solar
cells. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2014;2(34):14228-14235

[39] Liyanage NP, Cheema H, Baumann AR, Zylstra AR, Delcamp JH. Effect of donor
strength and bulk on thieno[3,4-b]-pyrazine-based panchromatic dyes in dye-sensitized
solar cells. ChemSusChem. 2017;10:2635-2641

[40] Brogdon P, Cheema H, Delcamp JH. Low-recombination thieno[3,4-b]thiophene-based

photosensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cells with panchromatic photoresponses.
ChemSusChem. 2017;10(18):3624-3631
[41] Brogdon P, Cheema H, Delcamp JH. NIR absorbing metal-free organic, porphyrin, and
phthalocyanine dyes for panchromatic DSCs. ChemSusChem.n/a-n/a
[42] Wu Y, Zhu W. Organic sensitizers from D-π-A to D-A-π-A: Effect of the internal
electron-withdrawing units on molecular absorption, energy levels and photovoltaic
performances. Chemical Society Reviews. 2013;42(5):2039-2058
[43] Wu Y, Zhu WH, Zakeeruddin SM, Gratzel M. Insight into D-A-π-A structured sensi-
tizers: A promising route to highly efficient and stable dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS
Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2015;7(18):9307
[44] Ito S, Dharmadasa IM, Tolan GJ, Roberts JS, Hill G, Miura H, et al. High-voltage (1.8 V)
tandem solar cell system using a GaAs/AlXGa(1X)As graded solar cell and dye-
sensitised solar cells with organic dyes having different absorption spectra. Solar
Energy. 2011;85(6):1220-1225
[45] Fabregat-Santiago F, Bisquert J, Garcia-Belmonte G, Boschloo G, Hagfeldt A. Influence
of electrolyte in transport and recombination in dye-sensitized solar cells studied by
impedance spectroscopy. International Conference on Physics, Chemistry and Engineer-
ing. 2005;87(1–4):117-131
[46] Koide N, Islam A, Chiba Y, Han L. Improvement of efficiency of dye-sensitized solar
cells based on analysis of equivalent circuit. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiol-
ogy A: Chemistry; Proceedings of 7th AIST International Symposium on Photoreaction
Control and Photofunctional Materials 7th AIST International Symposium on Photore-
action Control and Photofunctional Materials. 2006;182(3):296-305
[47] Cheema H, Islam A, Younts R, Gautam B, Bedja I, Gupta RK, et al. More stable and
more efficient alternatives of Z-907: Carbazole-based amphiphilic Ru(ii) sensitizers for
dye-sensitized solar cells. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2014;16(48):27078-
27087

[48] Barnes PRF, Miettunen K, Li X, Anderson AY, Bessho T, Grätzel M, et al. Interpretation
of optoelectronic transient and charge extraction measurements in dye-sensitized solar
cells. Advanced Materials. 2013;25(13):1881-1922
 Titanium Dioxide Modifications for Energy Conversion: Learnings from Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells 411
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74565

[49] Zhang L, Cole JM. Anchoring groups for dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Applied Mate-
rials & Interfaces. 2015;7:3427-3455
[50] Deacon GB, Phillips RJ. Relationships between the carbon-oxygen stretching frequencies
of carboxylato complexes and the type of carboxylate coordination. Coordination Chem-
istry Reviews. 1980;33(3):227-250
[51] Kalyanasundaram K, Grätzel M. Applications of functionalized transition metal com-
plexes in photonic and optoelectronic devices. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 1998;
177(1):347-414
[52] Freitag M, Teuscher J, Saygili Y, Zhang X, Giordano F, Liska P, et al. Dye-sensitized solar
cells for efficient power generation under ambient lighting. Nature Photonics. 2017;
11(6):372-378
[53] Cheema H, Rodrigues RR, Delcamp JH. Sequential series multijunction dye-sensitized
solar cells (SSM-DSCs): 4.7 volts from a single illuminated area. Energy & Environmen-
tal Science. 2017;10(8):1764-1769
[54] Feldt SM, Gibson EA, Gabrielsson E, Sun L, Boschloo G, Hagfeldt A. Design of organic
dyes and cobalt polypyridine redox mediators for high-efficiency dye-sensitized solar
cells. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2010;132(46):16714-16724
[55] Fakharuddin A, Jose R, Brown TM, Fabregat-Santiago F, Bisquert J. A perspective on the
production of dye-sensitized solar modules. Energy & Environmental Science. 2014;
7(12):3952-3981
[56] Bai Y, Mora-Seró I, De Angelis F, Bisquert J, Wang P. Titanium dioxide nanomaterials for
photovoltaic applications. Chemical Reviews. 2014;114(19):10095-10130

[57] Li Z-Q, Chen W-C, Guo F-L, Mo L-E, Hu L-H, Dai S-Y. Mesoporous TiO(2) yolk-shell
microspheres for dye-sensitized solar cells with a high efficiency exceeding 11%. Scien-
tific Reports. 2015;5:14178

[58] Li Z-Q, Ding Y, Mo L-E, Hu L-H, Wu J-H, Dai S-Y. Fine tuning of nanocrystal and pore
sizes of TiO2 submicrospheres toward high performance dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS
Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2015;7(40):22277-22283

[59] Wen C, Ishikawa K, Kishima M, Yamada K. Effects of silver particles on the photovoltaic
properties of dye-sensitized TiO2 thin films. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells.
2000;61(4):339-351

[60] Choi H, Chen WT, Kamat PV. Know thy nano neighbor. Plasmonic versus electron
charging effects of metal nanoparticles in dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Nano. 2012;
6(5):4418-4427

[61] Dang X, Qi J, Klug MT, Chen P-Y, Yun DS, Fang NX, et al. Tunable localized surface
plasmon-enabled broadband light-harvesting enhancement for high-efficiency panchro-
matic dye-sensitized solar cells. Nano Letters. 2013;13(2):637-642
412 Titanium Dioxide - Material for a Sustainable Environment

[62] Erwin WR, Zarick HF, Talbert EM, Bardhan R. Light trapping in mesoporous solar cells
with plasmonic nanostructures. Energy & Environmental Science. 2016;9(5):1577-1601
[63] Maier SA. Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications. Springer Science & Business
Media; 2007
[64] Novotny L, Van Hulst N. Antennas for light. Nature Photonics. 2011;5(2):83-90
[65] Xu Q, Liu F, Meng W, Huang Y. Plasmonic core-shell metal-organic nanoparticles
enhanced dye-sensitized solar cells. Optics Express. 2012;20(S6):A898-A907

[66] Li Y, Wang H, Feng Q, Zhou G, Wang Z-S. Gold nanoparticles inlaid TiO2 photoanodes:
A superior candidate for high-efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells. Energy & Environ-
mental Science. 2013;6(7):2156-2165

[67] Adhyaksa GWP, Baek S-W, Lee GI, Lee DK, Lee J-Y, Kang JK. Coupled near- and far-
field scattering in silver nanoparticles for high-efficiency, stable, and thin plasmonic dye-
sensitized solar cells. ChemSusChem. 2014;7(9):2461-2468

[68] Zheng D, Pang X, Wang M, He Y, Lin C, Lin Z. Unconventional route to hairy

plasmonic/semiconductor core/shell nanoparticles with precisely controlled dimensions
and their use in solar energy conversion. Chemistry of Materials. 2015;27(15):5271-5278
[69] Liu M, Yin X, Ulin-Avila E, Geng B, Zentgraf T, Ju L, et al. A graphene-based broadband
optical modulator. Nature. 2011;474(7349):64
[70] Akimov YA, Koh W. Resonant and nonresonant plasmonic nanoparticle enhancement
for thin-film silicon solar cells. Nanotechnology. 2010;21(23):235201
[71] Chen X, Jia B, Zhang Y, Gu M. Exceeding the limit of plasmonic light trapping in
textured screen-printed solar cells using Al nanoparticles and wrinkle-like graphene
sheets. Light: Science and Applications. 2013;2(8):e92
[72] Hwang E, Sarma SD. Dielectric function, screening, and plasmons in two-dimensional
graphene. Physical Review B. 2007;75(20):205418
[73] Comin A, Manna L. New materials for tunable plasmonic colloidal nanocrystals. Chem-
ical Society Reviews. 2014;43(11):3957-3975

[74] Liu X, Swihart MT. Heavily-doped colloidal semiconductor and metal oxide
nanocrystals: An emerging new class of plasmonic nanomaterials. Chemical Society
Reviews. 2014;43(11):3908-3920

[75] Jose R, Thavasi V, Ramakrishna S. Metal oxides for dye-sensitized solar cells. Journal of
the American Ceramic Society. 2009;92(2):289-301
[76] Shakeel Ahmad M, Pandey AK, Abd Rahim N. Advancements in the development of
TiO2 photoanodes and its fabrication methods for dye sensitized solar cell (DSSC)
applications. A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017;77(Supple-
ment C):89-108
 Titanium Dioxide Modifications for Energy Conversion: Learnings from Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells 413
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74565

[77] Feng X, Zhu K, Frank AJ, Grimes CA, Mallouk TE. Rapid charge transport in dye-
sensitized solar cells made from vertically aligned single-crystal rutile TiO2 nanowires.
Angewandte Chemie. 2012;124(11):2781-2784
[78] Feng X, Shankar K, Varghese OK, Paulose M, Latempa TJ, Grimes CA. Vertically aligned
single crystal TiO2 nanowire arrays grown directly on transparent conducting oxide
coated glass: Synthesis details and applications. Nano Letters. 2008;8(11):3781-3786
[79] Fattakhova-Rohlfing D, Zaleska A, Bein T. Three-dimensional titanium dioxide
nanomaterials. Chemical Reviews. 2014;114(19):9487-9558
[80] Mor GK, Varghese OK, Paulose M, Shankar K, Grimes CA. A review on highly ordered,
vertically oriented TiO2 nanotube arrays: Fabrication, material properties, and solar
energy applications. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 2006;90(14):2011-2075
[81] Zhou Q, Fang Z, Li J, Wang M. Applications of TiO2 nanotube arrays in environmental
and energy fields: A review. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2015;202(Supple-
ment C):22-35
[82] Lin J, Peng Y, Pascoe AR, Huang F, Cheng Y-B, Heo Y-U, et al. A bi-layer TiO2
photoanode for highly durable, flexible dye-sensitized solar cells. Journal of Materials
Chemistry A. 2015;3(8):4679-4686
[83] Lee CS, Kim JK, Lim JY, Kim JH. One-step process for the synthesis and deposition of
anatase, two-dimensional, disk-shaped TiO2 for dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Applied
Materials & Interfaces. 2014;6(23):20842-20850
[84] Deepak TG, Anjusree GS, Pai KRN, Subash D, Nair SV, Nair AS. Cabbage leaf-shaped
two-dimensional TiO2 mesostructures for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. RSC
Advances. 2014;4(51):27084-27090
[85] Oh J-K, Lee J-K, Kim H-S, Han S-B, Park K-W. TiO2 branched nanostructure electrodes
synthesized by seeding method for dye-sensitized solar cells. Chemistry of Materials.
2010;22(3):1114-1118
[86] Roh DK, Chi WS, Jeon H, Kim SJ, Kim JH. High efficiency solid-state dye-sensitized
solar cells assembled with hierarchical anatase pine tree-like TiO2 nanotubes. Advanced
Functional Materials. 2014;24(3):379-386

[87] Kim H-B, Kim H, Lee WI, Jang D-J. Hierarchical mesoporous anatase TiO2 nano-
structures with efficient photocatalytic and photovoltaic performances. Journal of Mate-
rials Chemistry A. 2015;3(18):9714-9721

[88] Roose B, Pathak S, Steiner U. Doping of TiO2 for sensitized solar cells. Chemical Society
Reviews. 2015;44(22):8326-8349

[89] Lee J-J, Rahman MM, Sarker S, Nath ND, Ahammad AS, Lee JK. Metal oxides and their
composites for the photoelectrode of dye sensitized solar cells. In: Advances in Compos-
ite Materials for Medicine and Nanotechnology. Rijeka: InTech; 2011
414 Titanium Dioxide - Material for a Sustainable Environment

[90] Peng T, Fan K, Zhao D, Chen J. Enhanced energy conversion efficiency of Mg2+-modified
mesoporous TiO2 nanoparticles electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. The Journal of
Physical Chemistry C. 2010;114(50):22346-22351
[91] Kakiage K, Osada H, Aoyama Y, Yano T, Oya K, Iwamoto S, et al. Achievement of over
1.4 V photovoltage in a dye-sensitized solar cell by the application of a silyl-anchor
coumarin dye. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:35888
[92] Kakiage K, Tokutome T, Iwamoto S, Kyomen T, Hanaya M. Fabrication of a dye-
sensitized solar cell containing a Mg-doped TiO2 electrode and a Br3/Br redox medi-
ator with a high open-circuit photovoltage of 1.21 V. Chemical Communications. 2013;
49(2):179-180
[93] Zhang C, Chen S, Mo L, Huang Y, Tian H, Hu L, et al. Charge recombination and band-
edge shift in the dye-sensitized Mg2+-doped TiO2 solar cells. The Journal of Physical
Chemistry C. 2011;115(33):16418-16424
[94] Cheema H, Delcamp JH. Harnessing photovoltage: Effects of film thickness, TiO2 nano-
particle size, MgO and surface capping with DSCs. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.
2017;9(3):3050-3059
[95] Miyasaka T, Watanabe T, Fujishima A, Honda K. Light energy conversion with chloro-
phyll monolayer electrodes. In vitro electrochemical simulation of photosynthetic pri-
mary processes. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1978;100(21):6657-6665
[96] Kay A, Graetzel M. Artificial photosynthesis. 1. Photosensitization of titania solar cells
with chlorophyll derivatives and related natural porphyrins. The Journal of Physical
Chemistry. 1993;97(23):6272-6277
[97] Ogunsolu OO, Murphy IA, Wang JC, Das A, Hanson K. Energy and electron transfer
cascade in self-assembled bilayer dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Applied Materials &
Interfaces. 2016;8(42):28633-28640
[98] Manthou VS, Pefkianakis EK, Falaras P, Vougioukalakis GC. Co-adsorbents: A key
component in efficient and robust dye-sensitized solar cells. ChemSusChem. 2015;8(4):
588-599
[99] Delcamp JH, Shi Y, Yum JH, Sajoto T, Dell'Orto E, Barlow S, et al. The role of π-bridges
in high-efficiency DSCs based on unsymmetrical squaraines. Chemistry - A European
Journal. 2013;19:1819-1827
[100] Reynal A, Palomares E. Increasing the performance of cis-dithiocyanato (4, 40 -dicarboxy-
2, 20 -bipyridine)(1, 10-phenanthroline) ruthenium (ii) based DSC using citric acid as co-
adsorbant. Energy & Environmental Science. 2009;2(10):1078-1081
[101] Wang M, Grätzel C, Moon S-J, Humphry-Baker R, Rossier-Iten N, Zakeeruddin SM,
et al. Surface design in solid-state dye sensitized solar cells: effects of zwitterionic co-
adsorbents on photovoltaic performance. Advanced Functional Materials. 2009;19(13):
2163-2172
 Titanium Dioxide Modifications for Energy Conversion: Learnings from Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells 415
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74565

[102] Peddapuram A, Cheema H, Adams RE, Schmehl RH, Delcamp JH. A stable panchro-
matic green dual acceptor, dual donor organic dye for dye-sensitized solar cells. The
Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2017;121(16):8770-8780
[103] Cheema H, Peddapuram A, Adams RE, McNamara L, Hunt LA, Le N, et al. Molecular
engineering of near infrared absorbing thienopyrazine double donor double acceptor
organic dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2017
[104] Neale NR, Kopidakis N, Van DL, GrÃtzel M, Frank AJ. Effect of a coadsorbent on the
performance of dye-sensitized TiO2 solar cells: Shielding versus band-edge movement.
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2005;109(49):23183-23189
[105] Chandiran AK, Zakeeruddin SM, Humphry-Baker R, Nazeeruddin MK, Grätzel M, Sauvage
F. Investigation on the interface modification of TiO2 surfaces by functional co-adsorbents for
high-efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells. Chemphyschem. 2017;18(19):2724-2731
[106] Li J, Wu W, Yang J, Tang J, Long Y, Hua J. Effect of chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA)
additive on phenothiazine dyes sensitized photovoltaic performance. Science China:
Chemistry. 2011;54(4):699-706
[107] Zheng L, Cao Q, Wang J, Chai Z, Cai G, Ma Z, et al. Novel D-A-π-A-type organic dyes
containing a ladderlike dithienocyclopentacarbazole donor for effective dye-sensitized
solar cells. ACS Omega. 2017;2(10):7048-7056
[108] Li X, Lin H, Zakeeruddin SM, Grätzel M, Li J. Interface modification of dye-sensitized
solar cells with pivalic acid to enhance the open-circuit voltage. Chemistry Letters. 2009;
38(4):322-323
[109] Kwon YS, Song IY, Lim J, Park S-H, Siva A, Park Y-C, et al. Reduced charge recombina-
tion by the formation of an interlayer using a novel dendron coadsorbent in solid-state
dye-sensitized solar cells. RSC Advances. 2012;2(8):3467-3472
[110] Xu J, Wu H, Jia X, Kafafy H, Zou D. Amidoamine dendron-based co-adsorbents:
Improved performance in dye-sensitized solar cells. Journal of Materials Chemistry A.
2013;1(46):14524-14531
[111] Wang P, Zakeeruddin SM, Humphry-Baker R, Moser JE, Grätzel M. Molecular-scale
interface engineering of TiO2 nanocrystals: Improve the efficiency and stability of dye-
sensitized solar cells. Advanced Materials. 2003;15(24):2101-2104
[112] Liu Y, Jennings JR, Wang X, Wang Q. Significant performance improvement in dye-
sensitized solar cells employing cobalt(iii/ii) tris-bipyridyl redox mediators by co-
grafting alkyl phosphonic acids with a ruthenium sensitizer. Physical Chemistry Chem-
ical Physics. 2013;15(17):6170-6174
[113] Liu Y, Jennings JR, Huang Y, Wang Q, Zakeeruddin SM, Grätzel M. Cobalt redox
mediators for ruthenium-based dye-sensitized solar cells: A combined impedance spec-
troscopy and near-IR transmittance study. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2011;
115(38):18847-18855
416 Titanium Dioxide - Material for a Sustainable Environment

[114] Wu K-L, Huckaba AJ, Clifford JN, Yang Y-W, Yella A, Palomares E, et al. Molecularly
engineered Ru(II) sensitizers compatible with cobalt(II/III) redox mediators for dye-
sensitized solar cells. Inorganic Chemistry. 2016;55(15):7388-7395
[115] Omata K, Kuwahara S, Katayama K, Qing S, Toyoda T, Lee K-M, et al. The cause for the
low efficiency of dye sensitized solar cells with a combination of ruthenium dyes and
cobalt redox. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2015;17(15):10170-10175
[116] Wang M, Li X, Lin H, Pechy P, Zakeeruddin SM, Gratzel M. Passivation of nanocrystal-
line TiO2 junctions by surface adsorbed phosphinate amphiphiles enhances the photo-
voltaic performance of dye sensitized solar cells. Dalton Transactions. 2009;(45):10015-
10020
[117] Shen H, Li X, Li J, Wang W, Lin H. Effect of proton numbers of phosphate-based co-
adsorbents on the photovoltaic performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. Electrochimica
Acta. 2013;97(Supplement C):160-166
[118] Zhang Z, Zakeeruddin SM, O'Regan BC, Humphry-Baker R, Grätzel M. Influence of 4-
guanidinobutyric acid as coadsorbent in reducing recombination in dye-sensitized solar
cells. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2005;109(46):21818-21824
[119] Song BJ, Song HM, Choi IT, Kim SK, Seo KD, Kang MS, et al. A desirable hole-
conducting coadsorbent for highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cells through an organic
redox cascade strategy. Chemistry - A European Journal. 2011;17(40):11115-11121
[120] Choi IT, Ju MJ, Kang SH, Kang MS, You BS, Hong JY, et al. Structural effect of carbazole-
based coadsorbents on the photovoltaic performance of organic dye-sensitized solar
cells. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2013;1(32):9114-9121
[121] Zhang S, Islam A, Yang X, Qin C, Zhang K, Numata Y, et al. Improvement of spectral
response by co-sensitizers for high efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells. Journal of Mate-
rials Chemistry A. 2013;1(15):4812-4819
[122] Luo J, Wan Z, Jia C, Wang Y, Wu X. A co-sensitized approach to efficiently fill the
absorption valley, avoid dye aggregation and reduce the charge recombination.
Electrochimica Acta. 2016;215:506-514
[123] Aung SH, Hao Y, Oo TZ, Boschloo G. 2-(4-butoxyphenyl)-N-hydroxyacetamide: An
efficient preadsorber for dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Omega. 2017;2(5):1820-1825
[124] Yum JH, Holcombe TW, Kim Y, Yoon J, Rakstys K, Nazeeruddin MK, et al. Towards
high-performance DPP-based sensitizers for DSC applications. Chemical Communica-
tions. 2012;48:10727-10729
[125] Pei K, Wu Y, Li H, Geng Z, Tian H, Zhu WH. Cosensitization of D-A-pi-A quinoxaline
organic dye: Efficiently filling the absorption valley with high photovoltaic efficiency.
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2015;7(9):5296-5304

[126] Babu DD, Elsherbiny D, Cheema H, El-Shafei A, Adhikari AV. Highly efficient panchro-
matic dye-sensitized solar cells: Synergistic interaction of ruthenium sensitizer with
 Titanium Dioxide Modifications for Energy Conversion: Learnings from Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells 417
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74565

novel co-sensitizers carrying different acceptor units. Dyes and Pigments. 2016;132:316-
328
[127] Kakiage K, Aoyama Y, Yano T, Otsuka T, Kyomen T, Unno M, et al. An achievement of
over 12 percent efficiency in an organic dye-sensitized solar cell. Chemical Communica-
tions. 2014;50(48):6379-6381
[128] Kakiage K, Aoyama Y, Yano T, Oya K, Kyomen T, Hanaya M. Fabrication of a high-
performance dye-sensitized solar cell with 12.8% conversion efficiency using organic
silyl-anchor dyes. Chemical Communications. 2015;51(29):6315-6317
[129] Cao Y, Cai N, Wang Y, Li R, Yuan Y, Wang P. Modulating the assembly of organic dye
molecules on titania nanocrystals via alkyl chain elongation for efficient mesoscopic
cobalt solar cells. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2012;14(23):8282-8286
[130] Zhang M, Zhang J, Fan Y, Yang L, Wang Y, Li R, et al. Judicious selection of a pinhole
defect filler to generally enhance the performance of organic dye-sensitized solar cells.
Energy & Environmental Science. 2013;6(10):2939-2943
[131] Kroeze JE, Hirata N, Koops S, Nazeeruddin MK, Schmidt-Mende L, Grätzel M, et al.
Alkyl chain barriers for kinetic optimization in dye-sensitized solar cells. Journal of the
American Chemical Society. 2006;128(50):16376-16383

[132] Lee Y-G, Park S, Cho W, Son T, Sudhagar P, Jung JH, et al. Effective passivation of
nanostructured TiO2 interfaces with PEG-based oligomeric coadsorbents to improve
the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C.
2012;116(11):6770-6777

[133] Unno M, Kakiage K, Yamamura M, Kogure T, Kyomen T, Hanaya M. Silanol dyes for
solar cells: higher efficiency and significant durability. Applied Organometallic Chemis-
try. 2010;24(3):247-250

[134] Sobuś J, Gierczyk B, Burdziński G, Jancelewicz M, Polanski E, Hagfeldt A, et al. Factors

affecting the performance of champion silyl-anchor carbazole dye revealed in the femto-
second to second studies of complete ADEKA-1 sensitized solar cells. Chemistry - A
European Journal. 2016;22(44):15807-15818

[135] Gregg BA, Fo P, Ferrere S, Fields CL. Interfacial recombination processes in dye-
sensitized solar cells and methods to passivate the interfaces. The Journal of Physical
Chemistry B. 2001;105(7):1422-1429

[136] Feldt SM, Cappel UB, Johansson EMJ, Boschloo G, Hagfeldt A. Characterization of
surface passivation by poly(methylsiloxane) for dye-sensitized solar cells employing
the ferrocene redox couple. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2010;114(23):10551-
10558

[137] Spivack J, Siclovan O, Gasaway S, Williams E, Yakimov A, Gui J. Improved efficiency of

dye sensitized solar cells by treatment of the dyed titania electrode with alkyl(trialkoxy)
silanes. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells. 2006;90(9):1296-1307
418 Titanium Dioxide - Material for a Sustainable Environment

[138] Morris AJ, Meyer GJ. TiO2 surface functionalization to control the density of states. The
Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2008;112(46):18224-18231
[139] Geng Y, Wei Q, Hashimoto K, Tajima K. Dipole layer formation by surface segregation
of regioregular poly(3-alkylthiophene) with alternating alkyl/semifluoroalkyl side
chains. Chemistry of Materials. 2011;23(18):4257-4263
[140] Tada A, Geng Y, Wei Q, Hashimoto K, Tajima K. Tailoring organic heterojunction
interfaces in bilayer polymer photovoltaic devices. Nature Materials. 2011;10:450
[141] Ma J, Hashimoto K, Koganezawa T, Tajima K. End-on orientation of semiconducting
polymers in thin films induced by surface segregation of fluoroalkyl chains. Journal of
the American Chemical Society. 2013;135(26):9644-9647
[142] Carli S, Casarin L, Caramori S, Boaretto R, Busatto E, Argazzi R, et al. A viable surface
passivation approach to improve efficiency in cobalt based dye sensitized solar cells.
Polyhedron. 2014;82:173-180
[143] Sewvandi GA, Tao Z, Kusunose T, Tanaka Y, Nakanishi S, Feng Q. Modification of TiO2
electrode with organic silane interposed layer for high-performance of dye-sensitized
solar cells. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2014;6(8):5818-5826
[144] Wooh S, Kim T-Y, Song D, Lee Y-G, Lee TK, Bergmann VW, et al. Surface modification of
TiO2 photoanodes with fluorinated self-assembled monolayers for highly efficient dye-
sensitized solar cells. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2015;7(46):25741-25747
[145] Matsui M, Mizutani T, Manseki K, Kubota Y, Kubo S, Tomoda H, et al. Effects of alkyl-,
polyfluoroalkyl-, and perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids on the performance of D205 in
dye-sensitized solar cells. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology, A: Chemistry.
2017;348(Supplement C):134-138
[146] Jennings JR, Wang Q. Influence of lithium ion concentration on Electron injection, trans-
port, and recombination in dye-sensitized solar cells. The Journal of Physical Chemistry
C. 2010;114(3):1715-1724
[147] Konstantakou M, Falaras P, Stergiopoulos T. Blocking recombination in Ru(II) complex-
sensitized solar cells by incorporating co-adsorbents as additives in the Co(II)/(III)-based
redox electrolytes. Polyhedron. 2014;82:109-115

[148] Zhang J, Zaban A. Efficiency enhancement in dye-sensitized solar cells by in situ passiv-
ation of the sensitized nanoporous electrode with Li2CO3. Electrochimica Acta. 2008;
53(18):5670-5674

[149] Kopidakis N, Neale NR, Frank AJ. Effect of an adsorbent on recombination and band-
edge movement in dye-sensitized TiO2 solar cells: Evidence for surface passivation. The
Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2006;110(25):12485-12489

[150] Nath NCD, Jun Y, Lee J-J. Guanidine nitrate (GuNO3) as an efficient additive in the
electrolyte of dye-sensitized solar cells. Electrochimica Acta. 2016;201(Supplement C):
151-157
 Titanium Dioxide Modifications for Energy Conversion: Learnings from Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells 419
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74565

[151] Afrooz M, Dehghani H. Significant improvement of photocurrent in dye-sensitized solar

cells by incorporation thiophene into electrolyte as an inexpensive and efficient additive.
Organic Electronics. 2016;29:57-65
[152] Boschloo G, Häggman L, Hagfeldt A. Quantification of the effect of 4-tert-butylpyridine
addition to I-/I3- redox electrolytes in dye-sensitized nanostructured TiO2 solar cells.
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2006;110(26):13144-13150
[153] Nakade S, Kanzaki T, Kubo W, Kitamura T, Wada Y, Yanagida S. Role of electrolytes on
charge recombination in dye-sensitized TiO2 solar cell (1): The case of solar cells using
the I-/I3- redox couple. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2005;109(8):3480-3487
[154] Kusama H, Arakawa H. Influence of alkylaminopyridine additives in electrolytes on
dye-sensitized solar cell performance. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells. 2004;81(1):
87-99
[155] Sun Z, Zhang R-K, Xie H-H, Wang H, Liang M, Xue S. Nonideal charge recombination
and conduction band edge shifts in dye-sensitized solar cells based on adsorbent doped
poly(ethylene oxide) electrolytes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2013;117(9):4364-
4373
[156] Koh TM, Li H, Nonomura K, Mathews N, Hagfeldt A, Gratzel M, et al. Photovoltage
enhancement from cyanobiphenyl liquid crystals and 4-tert-butylpyridine in co(ii/iii)
mediated dye-sensitized solar cells. Chemical Communications. 2013;49(80):9101-9103
[157] Kakiage K, Tsukahara T, Kyomen T, Unno M, Hanaya M. Significant improvement
of photovoltaic performance of dye-sensitized solar cells by using 4-Trimethylsilyl-
pyridine as organic additive to electrolyte solution. Chemistry Letters. 2012;41(9):895-
896
[158] Hao Y, Yang W, Zhang L, Jiang R, Mijangos E, Saygili Y, et al. A small electron donor in
cobalt complex electrolyte significantly improves efficiency in dye-sensitized solar cells.
Nature Communications. 2016;7:13934
[159] Sun X, Li Y, Mao H, Dou J, Wei M. Towards a high open-circuit voltage by co-additives
in electrolyte for high-efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells. Journal of Power Sources.
2017;359:142-146
[160] Boschloo G, Hagfeldt A. Characteristics of the iodide/Triiodide redox mediator in dye-
sensitized solar cells. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2009;42(11):1819-1826
[161] Cong J, Yang X, Kloo L, Sun L. Iodine/iodide-free redox shuttles for liquid electrolyte-
based dye-sensitized solar cells. Energy & Environmental Science. 2012;5(11):9180-9194
[162] Wu J, Lan Z, Lin J, Huang M, Huang Y, Fan L, et al. Electrolytes in dye-sensitized solar
cells. Chemical Reviews. 2015;115(5):2136-2173

[163] Saygili Y, Söderberg M, Pellet N, Giordano F, Cao Y, Muñoz-García AB, et al. Copper
Bipyridyl Redox Mediators for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells with High Photovoltage.
Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2016;138(45):15087-15096
420 Titanium Dioxide - Material for a Sustainable Environment

[164] Kusama H, Arakawa H. Influence of benzimidazole additives in electrolytic solution on

dye-sensitized solar cell performance. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology, A:
Chemistry. 2004;162(2–3):441-448
[165] Kusama H, Arakawa H. Influence of pyrimidine additives in electrolytic solution on
dye-sensitized solar cell performance. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology, A:
Chemistry. 2003;160(3):171-179
[166] Kusama H, Arakawa H. Influence of quinoline derivatives in I/I3 redox electrolyte
solution on the performance of Ru(II)-dye-sensitized nanocrystalline TiO2 solar cell.
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology, A: Chemistry. 2004;165(1–3):157-163
[167] Yin X, Tan W, Zhang J, Lin Y, Xiao X, Zhou X, et al. Synthesis of pyridine derivatives and
their influence as additives on the photocurrent of dye-sensitized solar cells. Journal of
Applied Electrochemistry. 2009;39(1):147-154
[168] Gao J, Yang W, Pazoki M, Boschloo G, Kloo L. Cation-dependent photostability of Co(II/
III)-mediated dye-sensitized solar cells. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2015;
119(44):24704-24713
[169] Gao J, Bhagavathi Achari M, Kloo L. Long-term stability for cobalt-based dye-sensitized
solar cells obtained by electrolyte optimization. Chemical Communications. 2014;50(47):
6249-6251
[170] Suzuki K, Yamaguchi M, Kumagai M, Tanabe N, Yanagida S. Dye-sensitized solar cells
with ionic gel electrolytes prepared from imidazolium salts and agarose. Comptes
Rendus Chimie. 2006;9(5):611-616
[171] Ileperuma O. Gel polymer electrolytes for dye sensitised solar cells: A review. Materials
Technology. 2013;28(1–2):65-70
[172] De Gregorio GL, Agosta R, Giannuzzi R, Martina F, De Marco L, Manca M, et al. Highly
stable gel electrolytes for dye solar cells based on chemically engineered polymethacrylic
hosts. Chemical Communications. 2012;48(25):3109-3111