1.

Introducing Ideas

 One key argument in favor of this view is that…

 A fundamental reason why some advocate for this approach is that…

 It is widely believed that…

 There is substantial evidence to suggest that…

 An often-cited benefit of this approach is…

2. Adding Points (Developing Ideas Further)

 Furthermore, it is important to highlight that…

 In addition to this, another significant aspect to consider is…

 Not only does this contribute to… but it also helps in…

 Equally important is the fact that…

 Another compelling reason supporting this argument is…

3. Contrasting Ideas (Discussing Both Perspectives)

 On the other hand, some critics argue that…

 Despite the advantages mentioned above, there are those who believe that…

 Nevertheless, it must be acknowledged that…

 While this perspective has its merits, it is also essential to consider…

 Conversely, an opposing viewpoint suggests that…

4. Explaining Causes and Effects

 As a result of this, students are more likely to…

 Consequently, this leads to…

 Due to the fact that…, many students struggle with…

 This inevitably results in…

 One of the primary consequences of this is…

5. Giving Examples (Supporting Arguments with Evidence)

 For instance, studies have shown that…

 A clear illustration of this can be seen in…

 To take an example, many successful individuals have…

 Research conducted by… suggests that…

 A striking example of this is…

6. Concluding the Essay (Restating Your Opinion & Summarizing)

 Taking everything into account, it is evident that…

 In light of the above discussion, it can be concluded that…

 Overall, while both perspectives have their own merits, the benefits of… outweigh the drawbacks.

 Thus, it is reasonable to assert that a balanced approach is the most effective solution.

 Ultimately, ensuring that students receive a well-rounded education will equip them for future success.

1. Introducing Ideas (Sophisticated Openers)

 A widely held belief is that…

 There exists a compelling argument that…

 It is frequently asserted that…

 A prevailing school of thought maintains that…

 Some proponents argue that… whereas opponents contend that…

2. Adding Points (Enhancing Coherence and Cohesion)

 Moreover, it is imperative to acknowledge that…

 Beyond this, a more nuanced perspective suggests that…

 Another salient point to consider is that…

 What is often overlooked, however, is that…

 Not only does this contribute to…, but it also serves as a catalyst for…

3. Contrasting Ideas (Sophisticated Counterarguments)

 That being said, one cannot disregard the fact that…

 Notwithstanding these advantages, critics argue that…

 Conversely, a contrasting school of thought posits that…

 While this argument holds some validity, a broader perspective reveals that…

 Despite the apparent benefits, it would be remiss to ignore the challenges associated with…

4. Explaining Causes and Effects (Complex Causal Relationships)

 Owing to the fact that…, there has been a significant shift in…

 This phenomenon can largely be attributed to…

 A direct consequence of this is that…

 Inevitably, this has led to a situation where…

 Such developments have far-reaching implications, including…

5. Giving Examples (Academic & Formal Illustration)

 This assertion is substantiated by the fact that…

 Empirical evidence suggests that…

 For instance, a study conducted by… demonstrated that…

 A quintessential example of this is…

 Historical precedent further reinforces this notion, as evidenced by…

6. Strengthening an Argument (Emphasizing Key Points)

 It is of paramount importance to consider that…

 Undoubtedly, this underscores the necessity of…

 A compelling body of evidence corroborates the idea that…

 It is worth emphasizing that…

 This is particularly significant when considering…

7. Concluding the Essay (Powerful Closures)

 In weighing the arguments presented, it becomes evident that…

 All things considered, the advantages of… far outweigh the drawbacks.

 From a broader standpoint, it is reasonable to assert that…

 Thus, while both perspectives offer valuable insights, a balanced approach is most prudent.

 Ultimately, fostering a well-rounded education system is indispensable for future generations.

-----------------------------------------------Rewrite-------------------------------------------------------

Anh Huy the Forum

Some people believe that secondary students should learn international news as a subject at school, while others think it’s a
waste of time. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Focus on secondary students ( focus TR)

Give features of secondary students=> explain why secondary students will gain benefits from reading international news

Poe.com/ielts grading

Write!!!!!:

Paraphase: International news= News from around the world

Some individuals think that learning international news as a subject at school is beneficial for secondary students and should be applied
widely. Others, however, suggest that including this type of teaching is not necessary and would waste time and resources. Although
both views hold merit, I agree more with the former/latter perspective.

(Ideas for body 1: Reading international news is not easy for secondary students, and a lot of them would not know how to do its/
approach it properly/ effectively)

On the one hand, there are some reasons that explain why schools should corporate/ the teaching of international news for secondary
students. It is true that international news are extremely diverse, encompassing many aspects of the economy, culture, politics, and
even commerce. As a secondary students lack reading and analyzing skills, they would not know how to approach international news
properly. As a result, is their schools can introduce reading international news as a subject, it would help more students get access
to latest changes around the world, enhance their knowledge, and improve their chances of becoming successful in the future.

On the other hand, other people still believe that it is unnecessary to teach international news as a subject for secondary students.
It is true that learning about international would require a lot of time and effort due to the fact that the range of information is
extremely diverse. Unfortunately, many secondary students have already handled a heavier learning program, making the
inclusion of a new subject problematic for them. As a result, many people oppose that suggestion that we should include the
teaching of international news in secondary student education.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------

𝙎𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙠 𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙙𝙖𝙧𝙮 𝙨𝙘𝙝𝙤𝙤𝙡 𝙨𝙩𝙪𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙨 𝙨𝙝𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙 𝙨𝙩𝙪𝙙𝙮 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙣𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙣𝙚𝙬𝙨 𝙖𝙨 𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙞𝙧 𝙨𝙪𝙗𝙟𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙨, 𝙬𝙝𝙞𝙡𝙚
𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙨 𝙗𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙚𝙫𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙖 𝙬𝙖𝙨𝙩𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙫𝙖𝙡𝙪𝙖𝙗𝙡𝙚 𝙨𝙘𝙝𝙤𝙤𝙡 𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚. 𝘿𝙞𝙨𝙘𝙪𝙨𝙨 𝙗𝙤𝙩𝙝 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙨𝙚 𝙫𝙞𝙚𝙬𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙜𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙮𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙤𝙬𝙣 𝙤𝙥𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙤𝙣.

The inclusion of international news as a subject in secondary schools has been a contentious issue. While some argue that it enriches
students' knowledge and global awareness, others contend that it diverts attention from(lose attention) core academic subjects. This
essay will discuss both perspectives before presenting my own viewpoint.

Proponents of(Supporters of) integrating international news into the curriculum argue that it significantly enhances secondary students'
understanding of global issues, which is increasingly crucial in our interconnected world. By learning about events beyond their
national borders, students can develop a more comprehensive worldview and foster critical thinking skills. For example,
understanding the economic impacts of international trade agreements can provide valuable insights into local economic policies
and personal career choices. Additionally, exposure to diverse cultures and political systems can promote tolerance and empathy,
essential traits in a multicultural society like Vietnam. It is also noteworthy: dang chu y, noi bat that in many progressive educational
systems around the world, the inclusion of current events is seen as an integral part of a well-rounded education. Consequently(As a
result), students equipped with such knowledge are better prepared to engage in informed discussions and make educated decisions in
their personal and professional lives.

However, critics argue that dedicating time to international news in secondary education can detract from essential subjects such as
mathematics, science, and literature. They believe that the core curriculum is already packed and that adding another subject could
overwhelm students, leading to a decline in overall academic performance. For instance, students struggling with foundational subjects
might find it challenging to cope with additional material, potentially widening the achievement gap. Furthermore, it is argued that the
content of international news can often be complex and sometimes distressing, which might not be suitable for the psychological well-
being of younger students. However, I believe that the benefits of teaching international news outweigh these concerns. With careful
curriculum planning, the integration can be managed in a way that complements, rather than competes with, existing subjects.

In conclusion, while there are valid arguments on both sides, I am convinced that the inclusion of international news as a subject in
secondary schools offers more benefits than drawbacks. By fostering a well-rounded education that includes global awareness, we are
preparing students to be informed and empathetic citizens in an increasingly interconnected world. Therefore, it is imperative(crucial,
cap bach) that educational policymakers consider the long-term advantages of such an inclusion.

𝐕𝐨𝐜𝐚𝐛 𝐇𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬

1. global awareness /ˈɡləʊ.bəl əˈweə.nəs/ (n.): nhận thức toàn cầu

2. interconnected world /ˌɪn.tə.kəˈnek.tɪd wɜːld/ (np.): thế giới liên kết

3. comprehensive worldview /ˌkɒm.prɪˈhɛn.sɪv ˈwɜːld.vjuː/ (np.): thế giới quan toàn diện

4. critical thinking skills /ˈkrɪt.ɪ.kəl ˈθɪŋ.kɪŋ skɪlz/ (np.): kỹ năng tư duy phản biện

5. economic impacts /ˌiː.kəˈnɒm.ɪk ˈɪm.pækts/ (np.): tác động kinh tế

6. trade agreements /treɪd əˈɡriː.mənts/ (n.): thỏa thuận thương mại

7. academic performance /ˌæk.əˈdem.ɪk pəˈfɔː.məns/ (np.): thành tích học tập

8. achievement gap /əˈtʃiːv.mənt ɡæp/ (np.): khoảng cách thành tích

9. psychological well-being /ˌsaɪ.kəˈlɒdʒ.ɪ.kəl ˌwelˈbiː.ɪŋ/ (np.): sức khỏe tâm lý

10. long-term advantages /lɒŋ-tɜːm ædˈvɑːn.tɪdʒz/ (np.): lợi ích lâu dài

11. contentious issue /kənˈten.ʃəs ˈɪʃ.uː/ (np.): vấn đề gây tranh cãi

12. integral part /ˈɪn.tɪ.ɡrəl pɑːt/ (np.): phần không thể thiếu

13. multicultural society /ˌmʌl.tiˈkʌl.tʃər.əl səˈsaɪ.ə.ti/ (np.): xã hội đa văn hóa

14. educational policymakers /ˌedʒ.uˈkeɪ.ʃən.əl ˈpɒl.ɪ.siˌmeɪ.kəz/ (np.): các nhà hoạch định chính sách giáo dục.

As a part of their education, students should spend a period of time living in another country to learn its language and culture.
To what extent do you agree and disagree?

Some people say that in order to learn more about the language and culture of a country, students should spend several years studying
overseas. Despite some issues regarding cultural shock or language barriers, I still believe that studying abroad is a good way for young
people to widen their knowledge of foreign cultures and enhance. linguistic ability: kha nang ngon ngu

Undeniably, a few years spent in another country would be a golden opportunity to learn new cultures and languages.
Compared to reading books and magazines, by which people can only see local traditions through pictures and texts, studying in a
foreign nation allows students to experience the locals’ activities directly. For instance, foreign students are studying in Vietnam attend
the Flower Festival in Dalat city, they can not only deeply understand about many kinds of flowers, but also give gardening a try.
Regarding linguistic ability, students having daily interactions with native people are obviously given countless chances (numerous
opportunities, a multitude of chances) to sharpen their fluency as well as pick up new vocabulary used in different contexts.

Some might say that students studying abroad would be faced with language barriers and culture shocks. Admittedly,
there would be those who did not have a good control of the native language, and therefore find it difficult to integrate into the local
community. However, the process of absorbing a foreign language takes students a certain amount of time to familiarize themselves,
and practice every day, irrespective of: bat ke, k phan biet their language ability. After only a few months of trial and error, individuals
who are persistent enough can overcome language difficulties and confidently pursue more knowledge of cultures and traditions.
In conclusion, it is a great idea to spend a period of time living and studying in a new country. This would help students enhance their
knowledge of the country’s culture and improve their language skills.

Lesson 3: It is desirable for a school to have its own small farm in order to help educate its student about agriculture and other
subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Writingggg: Some individuals claim that having a small farm for a school should be beneficial as it can help teach students about
agricultural knowledge as well as other subjects. Personally, I partly/ totally agree/ disagree with this suggestion based on some reasons
that are explained in this essay.

Body 1: Give background: Students nowadays do not know about agriculture-> need to have a small farm.
Write!!!!!!!!: There are some clear benefits when schools have their own farms for the teaching of agriculture and other subjects. In the
present time, most children do not know how food is grown and harvested due to/ by virtue of urbanization and the modern way of
living. As a result, having a farm connected with their school can help them gain important knowledge about how crops grow and how
livestock is raised. This can improve their general knowledge, help them appreciate their food more, and equip them with more survival
skills.

Body 2: Job satisfaction, income

Despite the idealistic nature of having a farm attached with a school, it would not be practical, especially in the current conditions.
First and foremost, in order to establish a farm, a massive area of land is required, costing a lot of money and required extensive
maintaining efforts. As a result, regardless of the size, having a farm would increase the cost of education, making it harder for parents
to handle and leading to teacher having to work more.

In conclusion, although there are mixed opinions on determining whether each school should have a small and designated area for
agricultural education or the teaching of other subjects, I believe that it should be done, but only selectively. Specifically, schools should
share land together, and also may need to take into account the financial burden that parents must bear.

------------------Other

In recent years, there has been growing interest in incorporating practical skills into school education, and one suggestion is for schools
to establish their own small farms. While this initiative may not be feasible: KHA THI, CO THE THUC HIEN DC for all institutions, I
strongly agree that having a school farm can significantly enrich the educational experience of students.

To begin with, a school farm provides an excellent opportunity for experiential learning. Rather than relying solely on textbooks, students
can observe and participate in the processes of planting, growing, and harvesting crops. Such practical engagement not only deepens
their understanding of biology and environmental science but also enhances critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Moreover,
agricultural activities can be integrated with subjects like mathematics—measuring land area or calculating crop yields—or economics,
through lessons on budgeting and marketing produce. This interdisciplinary approach makes learning more meaningful and memorable.
In addition, working on a farm instills essential values such as responsibility, teamwork, and patience. Students learn the importance of
consistency in tending plants and animals, which can translate into better self-discipline in other areas of life. Exposure to sustainable
farming practices also raises awareness about environmental issues and healthy eating habits. For instance, growing organic vegetables
can teach students the benefits of pesticide-free food and reduce their dependence on processed meals.

However, it is important to acknowledge the potential challenges. Establishing and maintaining a farm requires space, funding, and
trained staff, which may be difficult for schools in densely populated urban areas. Nevertheless, these obstacles can be addressed through
community partnerships, government support, or smaller-scale solutions such as rooftop gardens or greenhouse projects.

In conclusion, although logistical difficulties may arise, the educational and personal development benefits of having a school farm are
substantial. Therefore, I believe that this is a highly desirable initiative that schools should consider implementing wherever possible.

Incorporating a small farm within a school setting has been proposed as a valuable way to educate students about agriculture and related
disciplines. While I agree that this idea offers several educational advantages, I also believe it is not suitable for all schools due to
practical and logistical limitations.

On the one hand, school farms can serve as powerful educational tools. They offer hands-on learning experiences that reinforce
theoretical knowledge from subjects such as biology, chemistry, and environmental science. For instance, students can learn about plant
life cycles, soil chemistry, and sustainable farming methods in a direct and engaging way. Additionally, maintaining a farm teaches
important life skills such as patience, responsibility, and collaboration. These values, often overlooked in traditional classroom settings,
are crucial for character development and long-term success.

Moreover, agriculture can be integrated across the curriculum. Mathematics can be applied to measure plots of land or calculate crop
yields, while economics lessons can focus on budgeting and selling produce. Such interdisciplinary learning makes education more
practical and relevant, particularly in rural areas where agriculture plays a significant role in the local economy.

On the other hand, the implementation of school farms may not be feasible for every institution. Urban schools, for example, often lack
the necessary space and resources to maintain such a facility. Even when land is available, establishing a farm requires funding, trained
staff, and ongoing maintenance—all of which may divert resources from core academic subjects. Furthermore, not all students are
interested in or suited to agricultural work, which may limit the farm’s overall educational value in diverse school populations.

There are also health and safety concerns to consider. Working with animals or certain types of plants could pose risks such as allergies
or injuries. Without proper supervision and regulation, a farm may create more problems than educational benefits.

In conclusion, while the presence of a school farm can enrich learning and promote important life skills, it is not a universally practical
solution. I partly agree with the idea: it should be encouraged where conditions allow, but it should not be considered essential or
appropriate for every school.

📘 Useful Vocabulary

General Vocabulary:
  Practical education

 Agricultural practices

 Sustainability

 Eco-consciousness

 Hands-on experience

 Interdisciplinary learning

 Environmental awareness

 Food production

Academic Vocabulary:

 Enhance cognitive development

 Foster responsibility and discipline

 Allocate resources efficiently

 Integrate agriculture into the curriculum

 Rural and urban divide

 Holistic education

Linking phrases:

 On the one hand… / On the other hand…

 Moreover / Furthermore / In addition

 For instance / For example

 As a result / Consequently / Therefore

 While it is true that… / Nevertheless…

Lesson 4: Young people are leaving their homes from rural areas to study or work(focus) in the cities. What are the reasons? Do
you advantages of this development outweigh it disadvantages?

Leaving homes from remote locations to pursue work or education (professional and educational pursuits) in the cities has become a
prevalent choice of many young individuals. In this essay, I would explore the reasons behind this development before proposing whether
it has more benefits than drawbacks.

(Study/ Work)

There are some reasons that explain why young people are moving from rural to urban areas to work and study. Urban areas are
characterized by vibrant economic activities and a higher demand for educational quality. As a result, these areas offer a wide range of
employment opportunities, attracting young people who are seeking for jobs. Furthermore, prestigious and highly developed schools in
urban areas also enhance the attractiveness of cities by providing chances for young people to improve themselves academically.

Body 2:

In many countries, young people are leaving their homes in the countryside to live in large cities. Do the advantages outweigh
the disadvantages?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để nêu quan điểm.

Body 1: DOL giải thích lợi ích từ cơ hội việc làm ở thành phố lớn, sau đó phản biện (Antithesis) rằng sự cạnh tranh gay gắt sẽ khiến
việc tìm việc trở nên khó khăn.

Body 2: DOL phân tích 3 tác động tiêu cực của việc giới trẻ rời bỏ nông thôn đến sống ở các thành phố lớn.

Body paragraph 1: Advantages of moving to large cities

+ Job opportunities >> Explanation: cities offer a wide range of career options.

>> Example: Ho Chi Minh City, a thriving hub, attracts young talent nationwide.

>> Antithesis: fierce competition cities makes jobs scarce >> defeats the purpose of migration.
Body paragraph 2: Negative consequences of urban migration

+ Effect on rural communities >> Explanation: rural areas lack skilled workers. >> Effect: stunts rural economies + widens urban-
rural inequality.

+ Poor quality of life for young people in cities >> Explanation: the high cost of living forces young people to work long hours. >>
Effect: lead to stress and burnout.

+Environmental consequence >> Explanation: overpopulation leads to more traffic, emissions, and waste. >> Example: Beijing and
New Delhi are notorious for air pollution due to more vehicles and factories.

In recent years, there has been a noticeable trend of young people leaving their rural homes to settle in major cities.
While this shift can bring about certain benefits, I believe that the negative consequences, both on individuals and society, far
overshadow the advantages.

One of the primary attractions of moving to large cities is the availability of employment opportunities. Unlike rural areas,
which often have limited job markets, urban centers provide young individuals with a wide range of career options in various sectors,
from technology to finance. For example, cities like Ho Chi Minh City in Vietnam are thriving economic hubs that draw young talent
from all over the country. However, while job opportunities are abundant, they also come with fierce competition. As more young
workers flock to major cities, the labor market becomes saturated, making it harder to secure a position. This phenomenon can lead to a
situation where even highly qualified individuals struggle to find work, which ultimately defeats the very purpose of migrating to cities
in search of better prospects.

In addition to this, the mass migration of young people to urban areas has significant negative effects on rural
communities. As the labor force shrinks, rural areas suffer from a lack of skilled workers, which stunts(KIM HAM, LAM CHAM)
their economic development. This imbalance also contributes to the growing disparity between urban and rural areas, further
exacerbating social inequality. Another challenge worth mentioning is that young people would be prone to poor quality of life while
settling in major cities. Indeed, the highly competitive environment and escalating daily expenses in large cities would place financial
burden on young people’s shoulders and demand them to work long hours. Many young people apply themselves to work just to keep
up with the high cost of living, thereby leading to stress and burnout. Furthermore, as more people flock to cities, urbanization often
leads to environmental degradation. Increased population density results in more traffic, higher emissions, and greater waste production.
Illustrations for this can be seen in metropolitan cities like Beijing and New Delhi that are notorious for their air pollution, directly
linked to the growing number of vehicles and factories.

In conclusion, while the move to big cities may offer young people job opportunities and a chance to experience
urban life, the downsides—such as job market saturation, social inequality, and environmental damage—are significant. From my
perspective, the negative impacts far outweigh the benefits.

🧠 Understanding the Task

Topic: Young people are leaving rural areas for cities to study or work.
Question:

1. What are the reasons for this trend?

2. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

You are expected to:

 Explain why this is happening.

 Evaluate pros and cons, and clearly state whether the benefits are stronger than the drawbacks (or not).

💡 Ideas

🔎 Reasons:

 Better education: Cities offer universities, specialized courses, and access to skilled teachers.

 More job opportunities: Urban areas have a wider range of careers and higher salaries.

 Modern lifestyle: Access to technology, entertainment, healthcare, and infrastructure.

 Lack of opportunities in rural areas: Fewer schools, fewer job prospects, poor living conditions.

✅ Advantages:

 Personal development: Exposure to new cultures, ideas, and opportunities for growth.

 Economic contribution: Young people contribute to the urban economy.

  Higher standard of living: Access to better services and facilities.

 Education and career advancement: Improved qualifications and future prospects.

❌ Disadvantages:

 Rural depopulation: Aging populations left behind, labor shortages in agriculture.

 Urban overcrowding: Pressure on housing, transport, and public services.

 Cultural erosion: Loss of rural traditions and lifestyles.

 Increased cost of living: Stress and inequality for young migrants.

🧠 Useful Vocabulary

 Migration / urban migration

 Rural exodus / brain drain

 Infrastructure / public services

 Employment prospects / job market

 Socioeconomic gap / regional inequality

 Depopulation / overcrowding

 Livelihood / subsistence farming

 Adapt to urban life / settle in cities

🏗️ Essay Structure

Introduction:

 Paraphrase the topic.

 State reasons briefly.

 Clearly give your opinion (advantages outweigh disadvantages or not).

Body Paragraph 1 – Reasons:

 Explain why young people are leaving rural areas.

 Support with examples.

Body Paragraph 2 – Advantages:

 Describe the benefits for individuals and the country.

 Example and explanation.

Body Paragraph 3 – Disadvantages:

 Highlight negative effects on rural areas and cities.

 Example and explanation.

Conclusion:

 Restate your view.

 Summarize key points.

✍️ Full Band 8–9 Sample Essay

Topic: Young people are leaving their homes from rural areas to study or work in the cities. What are the reasons? Do the advantages
of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

Essay:
In recent years, a growing number of young people have been leaving rural areas to pursue education and employment in urban centers.
This trend is driven by several social and economic factors. While this movement can bring individual and national benefits, I believe
its disadvantages for rural communities and urban environments outweigh its advantages.

There are two main reasons why young people migrate from the countryside to the cities. Firstly, cities offer far better educational and
career opportunities. Universities, vocational schools, and a wider job market attract students and workers seeking a better future.
Secondly, rural areas often lack basic infrastructure such as hospitals, high-quality schools, and reliable internet, making urban life more
appealing to the younger generation.

On the positive side, migration to cities provides young people with the chance to improve their quality of life. Access to higher education
and diverse job opportunities allows them to develop their skills and increase their income. In the long term, this contributes to the
country’s economy and innovation. For example, many successful entrepreneurs and professionals originally came from rural
backgrounds but flourished in urban environments.

However, the downsides of this trend are significant. Rural areas face depopulation and labor shortages, especially in agriculture, which
weakens local economies. At the same time, cities become overcrowded, placing enormous pressure on housing, healthcare, and public
transport systems. Moreover, cultural traditions in rural regions may be lost as young people abandon their hometowns and do not return.

In conclusion, although moving to cities can benefit young individuals and the national economy, the long-term consequences for both
urban and rural communities are concerning. Therefore, I believe the disadvantages of this trend outweigh the advantages.

Some people believe that parents should teach children how to recycle materials and avoid waste, while others think that schools
should take on this responsibility.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.

🧠 Understanding the Task

This is a "Discuss both views + your opinion" type of question.

You need to:

1. Present both sides fairly.

2. Give your own opinion clearly, supported with reasons.

💡 Ideas

🏡 View 1: Parents should teach children

 Early education starts at home: Children spend their formative years with parents.

 Parents are role models: Kids copy behaviors at home – if parents recycle, kids likely will.

 Personal habits: Recycling and waste management are daily routines often done at home.

🏫 View 2: Schools should take the responsibility

 Professional education: Schools have trained teachers and structured programs.

 Scientific knowledge: Students can learn about environmental impact, sustainability, and global consequences.

 Equal access: Not all parents are informed or care about recycling—schools can ensure every child learns.

🏗️ Essay Structure

Introduction:

 Paraphrase the question.

 Briefly state both views.

 State your opinion clearly.

Body Paragraph 1 – Parents’ responsibility:

 Explain the reasoning.

 Give examples or evidence.

Body Paragraph 2 – Schools’ responsibility:

 Explain the reasoning.

  Give examples or evidence.

Conclusion:

 Restate both views.

 Reaffirm your opinion.

📘 Useful Vocabulary

 Environmental awareness / eco-friendly habits

 Sustainability / waste management

 Play a vital role / take the lead

 Set a good example / instill good values

 Formal education / national curriculum

 Consistent message / long-term impact

✍️ Full Band 8–9 Sample Essay

Essay:

Teaching children how to recycle and reduce waste is crucial in the fight against environmental degradation. While some believe that
this responsibility lies with parents, others argue that schools should lead this effort. In my opinion, both institutions play essential roles,
but schools are better equipped to provide structured and consistent environmental education.

On one hand, parents are the first teachers of a child, and home is where lifelong habits are often formed. When parents model eco-
friendly behavior—such as sorting garbage, reusing plastic containers, or conserving water—children are likely to follow these practices
naturally. Moreover, learning about recycling at home allows children to connect the concept to real-life routines, such as taking out the
trash or choosing reusable bags. This kind of practical, everyday learning can be highly effective in shaping a child’s attitude toward
sustainability.

On the other hand, schools have the ability to educate all children equally, regardless of their family background. Not all parents have
sufficient knowledge about recycling, and some may not consider it a priority. Schools, by contrast, can offer lessons that explain the
science behind recycling, the consequences of waste, and the global importance of environmental protection. For instance, a curriculum
that includes climate change, pollution, and sustainability projects can inspire students to take meaningful action. Additionally, schools
can organize clean-up campaigns or recycling drives, making the learning experience more engaging and impactful.

In conclusion, while parents can lay the foundation for eco-conscious habits, schools are better positioned to deliver comprehensive,
science-based education on recycling and waste reduction. Therefore, I believe that schools should take the primary responsibility, with
support from parents at home.

Most agree that schools should be training children to recycle waste to preserve the Earth’s natural resources. However, some
believe that it is parents who should teach their children to recycle waste while others feel schools are more responsible. Discuss
both views and give your own opinion.

😵 Dàn ý

DOL sẽ trình bày quan điểm qua 1 đoạn mở bài (introduction), 2 đoạn thân bài (body paragraph), và 1 đoạn kết bài (conclusion)

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để cho giám khảo biết ý kiến của mình đối
với ý kiến được nêu trong bài

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL sẽ chỉ ra một vài lý do vì sao phụ huynh nên là người hướng dẫn trẻ em tái chế rác thải

Body 2: Vì DOL đồng tình rằng nhà trường nên đóng vai trò quan trọng trong việc hướng dẫn trẻ em tái chế rác thải,
DOL chỉ ra lý do ủng hộ luận điểm đó

Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình là cả phụ huynh và nhà trường đều nên hướng dẫn trẻ,
nhưng nhà trường nên đóng một vai trò quan trọng hơn

Parents and schools can both teach their children to recycle waste, but schools should play a more vital role.

Body paragraph 1: Parents

Children mimic their parents’ behaviors

If parents do not recycle waste at home → children will think that it’s normal → tend to follow their parents’ behaviors
Most recycling happens in a domestic environment

Most of recycling happens at home with groceries packaging → it is best for children to practice recycling at home using knowledge
learned at school

Body paragraph 2: Schools

Schools are more open-minded and environmentally conscious

Parents can come from older generations → not aware of environmental issues → schools are more conscious and open-minded →
shape children’s behaviors in a positive way

Children have peer pressure → perform well

Other children are recycling → children think it’s a good behavior → mimic the behaviors from peer pressure → build a habit to recycle

Building the habit of recycling is one of the recommended practices for everyone living in today’s societies. However, many wonder
whether schools or parents should be the ones mainly responsible for developing this practice. Although I think both can contribute to
this, schools should play a more vital role.

However, that is not to say that parents should not be involved in teaching children to recycle. Firstly, children usually mimic their
parents’ behaviors, both good and bad ones. As a result, if parents do not promote this habit by regularly practicing it, children will see
that they do not need to do so. Secondly, because the process of recycling products mostly takes place in a domestic environment, parents
should teach their children how to recycle and reuse in their homes. For example, parents can start by recycling groceries packaging,
like oil bottles, plastic bags, or egg cartons.

Nevertheless, I believe that schools play a more crucial role in educating children on recycling. Firstly, schools are more open-minded
and environmentally-conscious environment. For example, many parents from older generations do not believe in recycling and think
of it as a waste of time. As a result, schools should provide children with a thorough analysis of why recycling is critical and the best
ways to recycle. Secondly, children also develop habits through peer pressure, which is an element prevalent in schools. For example,
when seeing that other students are recycling, children will be motivated to do so, regardless of their beliefs.

In conclusion, it is undeniable that families play a significant role in educating children on recycling. However, I believe that schools
remain the most important source of both information and motivation for children to develop a habit of recycling.
Đề 17/1: Some people think that parents should have a strong influence on how their children choose life partners or friends.
Others think it should be an independent decision. Discuss both views.

Intro: Paraphrasing and answer both views => In conclusion, answer the question shortly

Some individuals claim that children choose a life partners or friends, it is important to have an influence from their parents, others think
that this decision should be made independently. In this essay, I would explore both perspectives before proposing my own opinion on
this matter/ Although both views hold merits, I agree more with the former/latter.

Body 1: Parents have life experience/ skills and understand children

Choosing partners and friends is so complicated

On the one hand, there are some reasons that explain why parents should influence the choice of life partners and friends of their children.

( It is true that choosing/ selecting life partners and close friends is complex and challenging as conflicts may happen and may lead to
problematic results. Fortunately, parents often have more life experiences, which helps them deal with people/ treat with people, and
they also possess a deep knowledge about their children’s personality. As a result, they may help guide their children through challenging
relationships, leading to stability and happiness.)

2: Choosing life partners and close friends often requires a deep understanding of human’s emotions, which can be limited among young
individuals. As parents often possess a vast amount of knowledge about relationships and the profound of mental state of their children,
their involvement can be helpful. Not only can they guide their children towards beneficial relationships, but they also help navigate
them through conflicts and challenges.

Body 2: independent decisions:

On the other hand, opponents of the previous view believe that children should experience a high degree of independence when choosing
their friends and life partners. The quality of a relationship is highly influenced by the understanding between involved parties, which
is a result of the time spent being together. As parents often do not spend more time with their children’s friends or life partners as of
their offsprings, they may not have enough information to make the optimal decisions.

In conclusion, although there are mixed opinions on determining whether parents should have an input regarding the choice of their
children’s friends or life partners. I believe that this decision should be made independently. The reason is that each person must be
responsible for their life choices, and each person have a unique understanding of people of their lives.

CHAT GPT
Some people think that parents should have a strong influence on how their children choose life partners or friends. Others
think it should be an independent decision.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.

🧠 Phân tích đề bài

Đây là dạng “Discuss both views and give your opinion”. Bạn cần:

1. Trình bày cả hai quan điểm một cách công bằng.

2. Đưa ra ý kiến cá nhân rõ ràng.

💡 Gợi ý ý tưởng

🔹 View 1: Cha mẹ nên có ảnh hưởng lớn

 Kinh nghiệm sống: Cha mẹ từng trải, có thể nhận ra dấu hiệu của mối quan hệ độc hại.

 Lợi ích lâu dài: Cha mẹ quan tâm đến tương lai con, nên muốn đảm bảo con chọn người bạn đời/xã hội tốt.

 Giá trị văn hóa/truyền thống: Ở một số nền văn hóa, hôn nhân do cha mẹ sắp xếp vẫn phổ biến.

🔹 View 2: Con cái nên tự quyết định

 Tự do cá nhân và cảm xúc: Hôn nhân và tình bạn dựa trên tình cảm, không thể ép buộc.

 Hiểu bản thân hơn: Người trẻ biết rõ ai phù hợp với tính cách, sở thích của mình.

 Phát triển độc lập: Quyết định cá nhân giúp họ học cách chịu trách nhiệm.

📘 Từ vựng hữu ích

 Parental authority / parental guidance

 Life partners / romantic relationships

 Emotional compatibility / shared values

 Personal autonomy / independence

 Toxic relationship / harmful friendship

 Arranged marriage / traditional values

 Mutual understanding / personal growth

 Respect for elders / generational gap

🏗️ Bố cục bài viết

Introduction:

 Paraphrase đề bài

 Giới thiệu 2 quan điểm

 Đưa ra ý kiến cá nhân

Body Paragraph 1 – Quan điểm 1: Cha mẹ nên có ảnh hưởng

 Giải thích lý do, ví dụ

 Lợi ích của việc cha mẹ góp ý

Body Paragraph 2 – Quan điểm 2: Con nên tự quyết định

 Giải thích lý do, ví dụ

 Tầm quan trọng của sự độc lập

Conclusion:

 Tóm tắt hai quan điểm

 Nhấn mạnh lại ý kiến cá nhân

✍️ Bài mẫu Band 8–9

Essay:

Choosing life partners or close friends is one of the most important decisions in a person's life. While some believe that parents should
have a strong say in this matter, others argue that such choices should be made independently by the individual. In my opinion, although
parents can offer valuable guidance, the final decision should ultimately rest with the individual.

On the one hand, parental influence can help young people make wiser decisions. Parents often have more life experience and are able
to assess people more objectively, especially when emotions cloud their children’s judgment. For instance, a parent might recognize
signs of manipulation or selfishness in a potential partner that their child overlooks. Furthermore, in many cultures, parents are seen as
protectors of family traditions and values. Their involvement can help ensure compatibility in terms of religion, family expectations, or
long-term goals, which are essential for stable relationships.

On the other hand, relationships are deeply personal and based on emotional connection, which only the individuals directly involved
can truly understand. Young adults today often value independence and self-expression, and allowing them to make their own decisions
encourages maturity and personal growth. If forced to choose friends or life partners based on parental approval alone, individuals may
feel resentful or unhappy in the long run. Also, generational gaps may cause disagreements about what qualities are most important in
a partner or friend.

In conclusion, while parents can and should offer their perspective out of love and concern, the final choice of friends and life partners
should be left to the individual. This balance allows young people to benefit from parental wisdom while also learning to trust their own
judgment.

DATE: 13/12; RECENT ATUAL TEST

Some people believe that it is important for parents to tell or read stories for their children. Others think that parents don’t
have to do this because there are many sources for children to read like books, TV and movies. Discuss both views and give your
opinion.

Writingggggg:

Some individuals are of the opinion that telling or reading stories for their children is highly beneficial, while others believe that
personally reading the books is not essential, and parents should rely on other resources instead. In this essay, I would explore both
perspectives before proposing my own opinion on this matter.

……

Đề bài:

Some people believe that it is important for parents to tell or read stories for their children. Others think that parents don’t
have to do this because there are many sources for children to read like books, TV and movies.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.

🧠 Hiểu đề và yêu cầu

Dạng bài: "Discuss both views and give your opinion"

Nhiệm vụ:

 Trình bày cả hai quan điểm.

 Nêu rõ quan điểm cá nhân.

💡 Gợi ý ý tưởng

🧠 View 1: Cha mẹ nên kể hoặc đọc truyện cho con

 Tăng sự gắn kết tình cảm giữa cha mẹ và con cái.

 Khơi gợi trí tưởng tượng và phát triển ngôn ngữ.

 Tạo nền tảng cho thói quen đọc sách về sau.

 Trẻ em nhỏ tuổi chưa biết đọc, cần sự hướng dẫn ban đầu từ cha mẹ.

🔵 View 2: Không cần thiết vì có sách, phim, chương trình TV

 Nhiều nguồn truyện có sẵn và dễ tiếp cận, sinh động, hấp dẫn.

 Cha mẹ bận rộn, không phải ai cũng có thời gian hoặc kỹ năng kể chuyện.
  Trẻ em có thể tự học nếu được khuyến khích và có phương tiện phù hợp.

📘 Từ vựng hữu ích

 Bedtime stories / storytelling tradition

 Bonding / emotional connection

 Imagination / cognitive development

 Digital media / animated content

 Passive learning vs. interactive learning

 Literacy skills / reading habits

 Role models / parental involvement

Introduction

 Paraphrase đề bài

 Nêu hai quan điểm

 Đưa ra ý kiến cá nhân

Body 1 – View 1 (ủng hộ cha mẹ kể truyện)

 Phân tích lý do

 Ví dụ thực tế

Body 2 – View 2 (trẻ có thể học qua nguồn khác)

 Phân tích lý do

 Ví dụ thực tế

Conclusion

 Tóm tắt hai quan điểm

 Nhấn mạnh lại ý kiến của bạn

✍️ Bài mẫu band 8–9

Essay: Many people believe that it is essential for parents to read or tell stories to their children, while others argue that modern media
and books are sufficient for a child's development. In my opinion, although external sources can be helpful, parental storytelling plays
a unique and irreplaceable role in a child’s emotional and cognitive growth.

On the one hand, there are strong reasons why parents should read or tell stories to their children. Firstly, storytelling strengthens the
emotional bond between parent and child, creating a sense of security and affection. These shared moments can become cherished
memories and build trust. Secondly, listening to stories told by parents helps develop children’s language, listening, and imagination
skills in an interactive way. For example, when parents pause to ask questions or explain new words, children are more engaged and
learn more deeply than when watching a passive video.

On the other hand, it is understandable why some people believe that storytelling by parents is not essential. With the vast amount of
books, audiobooks, animated movies, and educational TV shows available today, children have more access to stories than ever before.
These media are often designed with bright visuals, music, and professional narration, which can be more appealing and easier for busy
parents. Additionally, some parents may lack confidence or time to read aloud, especially in households where reading is not a common
habit.

However, despite the convenience of digital media, I believe it cannot fully replace the value of parental involvement. Storytelling from
a loved one carries emotional warmth and interaction that technology cannot provide. Moreover, it sends a message that reading is
valuable and enjoyable, which can help build lifelong reading habits.

In conclusion, while modern sources of storytelling offer many benefits, I believe parents should still actively engage in reading or
telling stories to their children whenever possible. The personal connection and educational impact they provide are truly unmatched.

🎯 Topic: In some countries, there has been an increase in the number of parents who educate their children themselves at home
instead of sending them to school.
Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
💡 Ideas

✅ Advantages of homeschooling:

 Personalized learning: Children can learn at their own pace, focusing on their strengths and interests.

 Flexible schedule: Allows for more family time and learning in real-life situations.

 Safe environment: Protection from school bullying or peer pressure.

 Closer parent-child bond: Parents are more involved in their child's development.

❌ Disadvantages of homeschooling:

 Lack of social interaction: Children may struggle with teamwork and social skills.

 Limited access to facilities: No labs, sports fields, libraries, or clubs like in school.

 Parents may lack expertise: Not all parents are qualified to teach every subject well.

 Harder to develop discipline: No school routine, less external accountability.

📘 Useful Vocabulary

 Homeschooling / home education

 Traditional schooling / conventional schools

 Individualized curriculum / tailored learning

 Academic progress / educational development

 Social isolation / peer interaction

 Holistic education / all-rounded learning

 Qualified educators / subject specialists

 Extracurricular activities / real-world exposure

Introduction

 Paraphrase the topic

 Clearly state your opinion

Body Paragraph 1 – Advantages

 Explain 2–3 benefits

 Support with examples

Body Paragraph 2 – Disadvantages

 Explain 2–3 drawbacks

 Support with examples

Conclusion

 Summarize both sides

 Reaffirm your opinion

Essay: In recent years, homeschooling has become increasingly popular in some countries, with more parents choosing to educate their
children at home rather than sending them to traditional schools. While this trend offers certain advantages, I believe the disadvantages
outweigh them in most cases.

One of the main benefits of homeschooling is that it allows for personalized and flexible learning. Children can study at their own pace,
focusing on subjects they enjoy or excel at, which can boost motivation and academic performance. Additionally, parents can design a
curriculum that aligns with their values and goals. Homeschooling also provides a safer and more comfortable learning environment,
especially for students who have experienced bullying or anxiety in school. Furthermore, the close involvement of parents can strengthen
family bonds and give children more emotional support./ On the one hand, there are some benefits when it comes to teaching children
at home rather than

However, homeschooling also presents significant challenges. Firstly, children who are taught at home often miss out on opportunities
for social development. Interacting with peers at school helps children learn teamwork, communication, and conflict resolution skills—
abilities that are hard to replicate in a home setting. Secondly, most parents are not professionally trained educators, and may struggle
to teach complex subjects such as advanced science or mathematics. Schools offer access to qualified teachers, laboratories, libraries,
and extracurricular programs that enrich a child’s overall development. Finally, homeschooling may lack the structure and routine of a
school day, which can make it harder for children to develop discipline and time-management skills.

In conclusion, although homeschooling provides flexibility and a personalized approach to education, the drawbacks in terms of limited
socialization and academic resources make it less beneficial for most children. Therefore, I believe the disadvantages of homeschooling
outweigh its advantages.

Some people think that older school children should learn a wide range of subjects to acquire more knowledge, while other
people believe they should learn a small number of subjects in details. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Body 1: On the one hand, there are some reasons that explain why some people believe that it is beneficial to teach older children a
wide range of subjects. In the day and age, as innovations have become the competitive edge of many companies, the ability to
understand and apply multiple areas of knowledge has become valuable asset.

Đề bài: Some people think that all students should study a foreign language in school, while others believe it is not necessary.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.

While some emphasize the cognitive and career advantages of learning additional languages, I believe that it should not be
universally required in all educational contexts.

Body paragraph 1: Supporters of foreign language education argue that it offers key benefits for students’ futures. 1. Cognitive and
academic advantages

Explanation: Language learning → boosts memory, concentration, and problem-solving.

Cause & Effect: Improved brain function → better overall academic performance.

Global communication and career opportunities

Explanation: Speaking multiple languages → opens up international paths.

Example: Job prospects in tourism, diplomacy, and multinational companies.

Body paragraph 2: Foreign language study is not essential for all students, especially in certain contexts.

Limited practical use for some careers

Explanation: Many professions → require technical or vocational skills, not language fluency.

Cause & Effect: Language focus → reduced time for more relevant subjects.

Resource and interest constraints

Explanation: Not all schools have qualified teachers; not all students are motivated.

Example: Rural schools → lack funding or support for foreign language programs.

There is ongoing debate about whether foreign language education should be a mandatory part of school curricula. While some
emphasize the cognitive and career advantages of learning additional languages, I believe that it should not be universally required in
all educational contexts.

Supporters of compulsory foreign language education argue that it provides vital benefits that enhance both academic and professional
success. From a cognitive standpoint, learning another language has been shown to improve memory, concentration, and problem-
solving skills. These mental benefits often translate into stronger performance across other academic subjects. In addition, language
skills open doors to global communication and career opportunities. In an increasingly interconnected world, the ability to speak multiple
languages is a valuable asset. For instance, careers in tourism, international business, and diplomacy often require multilingual
competence, giving language learners a distinct competitive edge in the job market.
Nevertheless, I would argue that foreign language instruction is not necessary for all students, particularly when their future paths do
not demand it. The first reason is that many professions rely more heavily on technical knowledge or vocational training than on
communication across languages. For these students, allocating school time to language classes may detract from more directly relevant
subjects, such as science, mathematics, or practical skills. Additionally, not all schools have the resources to deliver quality language
instruction. In rural or underfunded areas, for instance, there may be a shortage of qualified teachers and insufficient support for sustained
language learning. Therefore, requiring all students to learn a foreign language may result in inefficient use of limited educational
resources and may not align with the practical needs of certain career paths.

In conclusion, while learning foreign languages can offer cognitive and career benefits, I believe it should not be a universal requirement.
Instead, education systems should consider the specific needs, goals, and resources of their students and schools, offering foreign
language learning as a valuable but flexible option.

Some people believe that schools should invest in the best equipment for students, while others think that schools should spend
on employing good teachers. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Although modern tools can enrich the learning experience, I firmly believe that skilled teachers are the cornerstone of
meaningful and lasting educational success.

Body 1: Investing in high-quality equipment can enhance the learning environment and improve student engagement.

1, Access to modern technology and tools

Explanation: Updated computers, science labs, and multimedia tools support interactive learning.

Cause & Effect: Better equipment → improved understanding and skill development.

Preparation for real-world demands

Explanation: Exposure to current tools and platforms reflects workplace environments.

Example: Learning with industry-standard software helps students transition into careers smoothly.

Body paragraph 2: Skilled teachers play a far more critical role in shaping student success.

Personalized instruction and motivation

Explanation: Great teachers adapt methods to student needs and inspire learning.

Cause & Effect: Effective teaching → higher academic performance and confidence.

Long-term impact on values and thinking

Explanation: Teachers influence communication skills, critical thinking, and character development.

Example: A passionate teacher can leave a lifelong positive impact, regardless of available tools.

While some argue that investing in state-of-the-art equipment is key to advancing education, others believe that the quality of teachers
has a more profound impact on student outcomes. Although modern tools can enrich the learning experience, I firmly believe that skilled
teachers are the cornerstone of meaningful and lasting educational success.

Allocating resources to high-quality equipment can enhance the learning environment and increase student engagement. Access to
modern technology—such as up-to-date computers, interactive whiteboards, and well-equipped science laboratories—enables more
dynamic, hands-on learning experiences. These tools support a deeper understanding of complex concepts and help students develop
essential technical skills. Moreover, integrating industry-standard platforms into classrooms prepares students for the real-world
demands of future workplaces. For instance, learning how to use professional software or conducting experiments with advanced lab
tools can give students a competitive edge when transitioning to higher education or employment.

However, while resources are important, the role of the teacher is ultimately far more influential in shaping a student’s academic and
personal development. One reason worth mentioning is that exceptional teachers not only deliver content but also personalize instruction
based on individual needs, adapt strategies to diverse learning styles, and foster a motivating environment. This tailored approach often
leads to improved academic outcomes and greater self-confidence among students. Furthermore, teachers play a vital role in shaping
communication skills, critical thinking, and character. A passionate, dedicated educator can leave a lasting impression on students,
inspiring lifelong curiosity and ethical values—regardless of whether the classroom is outfitted with the latest technology.

In conclusion, although investing in educational equipment can enhance learning opportunities, I believe that improving the quality of
teachers has a more substantial and long-term impact. Ultimately, it is the human connection and guidance that great teachers provide
which most powerfully shapes student success.

Some people believe that the experiences children have before they go to school will have the greatest effect on their future life.
Others argue that experiences gained when they are teenagers have a bigger influence. Discuss both views and give your own
opinion.

Intro: DOL sẽ paraphrase đề bài và viết Thesis statement để trả lời câu hỏi của đề.
Body 1: DOL sẽ phân tích quan điểm cho rằng những trải nghiệm đầu đời định hình sự phát triển trí não, tính cách và thói quen cốt lõi
của trẻ.

Body 2: DOL sẽ lập luận rằng giai đoạn thiếu niên ảnh hưởng lớn đến việc hình thành bản sắc cá nhân và đưa ra các quyết định quan
trọng về học vấn và sự nghiệp.

Conclusion: DOL sẽ nhắc lại câu trả lời ở phần Intro và nhắc lại các ý chính trong bài.

DOL sẽ tiếp tục phân tích dàn ý cụ thể cho 2 body paragraph bên dưới nhé.

I agree with the latter view, as the teenage years involve more complex decision-making and personal autonomy, which more directly
influence the course of one’s adult life. Body paragraph 1: Early childhood experiences are seen by many as the
most influential in shaping a person's future.

Brain development and personality formation

Explanation: Early years are critical for cognitive, emotional, and social development.

Cause & Effect: Positive early care → stronger foundation for learning and relationships.

Formation of core values and habits

Explanation: Young children internalize behavior patterns from parents and environment.

Example: Consistent routines and emotional support → self-discipline and confidence.

Body paragraph 2:

Others believe that teenage experiences play a greater role in determining future outcomes.

Identity formation and peer influence

Explanation: Teen years are marked by self-discovery and social comparison.

Cause & Effect: Peer pressure and independence → critical life choices and direction.

Academic and career decisions

Explanation: Teenagers make choices about education and future paths during this stage.

Example: Selecting a field of study or career track → shapes long-term opportunities.

Some argue that early childhood experiences are the most decisive in shaping an individual’s future, while others believe that
adolescence has a greater impact on life outcomes. I agree with the latter view, as the teenage years involve more complex decision-
making and personal autonomy, which more directly influence the course of one’s adult life.

Early childhood is widely regarded as a critical period for brain development and personality formation. The first reason for this is that
brain development and personality formation occur at a rapid pace before school begins. In this period, attentive care and stimulation
help establish neural pathways that support later learning and social interaction. Thus, positive early care can lead to stronger foundations
for future education and relationships. Another possible reason is that during childhood, core values and habits are ingrained through
daily routines and role modelling. This is because young children often internalize behaviour patterns by observing parental guidance
and consistent schedules. For instance, regular bedtime and affectionate support can encourage self-discipline and foster confidence.

However, I believe that experiences during the teenage years exert a more substantial influence for several reasons. Chief among these
is that identity formation and peer influence play a central role during adolescence. At this stage, young people engage in social
comparison and experiment with different roles to discover who they are. Consequently, peer pressure and the quest for independence
often drive critical decisions about values and behaviour. Another point worth mentioning is that academic and career choices made as
teenagers set the course for long-term opportunities. Specifically, selecting particular subjects, extracurricular activities, or vocational
paths provides exposure to specialized skills and knowledge. By way of illustration, a student who opts for science electives and
internships in high school is more likely to pursue a STEM career, thereby shaping future professional prospects.

In conclusion, while early childhood provides the emotional and developmental groundwork, I maintain that the identity-forming
encounters and pivotal decisions of adolescence carry more weight in determining a person’s future.

Doing an enjoyable activity with a child is better for their overall skills development and creativity than reading. To what extent
do you agree?

Intro: DOL sẽ paraphrase đề bài và viết Thesis statement để trả lời câu hỏi của đề.

Body 1: DOL sẽ phân tích rằng các hoạt động vui vẻ cùng trẻ như chơi trò chơi hay làm đồ thủ công giúp phát triển kỹ năng và khả
năng sáng tạo toàn diện.

Body 2: DOL sẽ lập luận rằng việc đọc sách vẫn đóng vai trò quan trọng trong việc nâng cao ngôn ngữ và tư duy cho trẻ.

Conclusion: DOL sẽ nhắc lại câu trả lời ở phần Intro và nhắc lại các ý chính trong bài.
Cụ thể: In my view, while hands-on play and shared tasks can offer certain benefits, reading provides unparalleled linguistic enrichment
and cognitive stimulation that more holistically nurture a child’s growth.

Body paragraph 1:

Enjoyable activities contribute greatly to children’s skill development and creativity.

Creative play and hands-on tasks

Explanation: Use of toys, drawing, or crafts to encourage imagination.

Cause & Effect: Active participation → improvement in motor and problem-solving skills.

Emotional bonding through shared activities

Example: Group games or joint cooking sessions.

Cause & Effect: Positive interaction → development of social awareness and empathy.

Body paragraph 2:

Reading still plays an essential role in children’s intellectual growth.

Exposure to vocabulary and grammar

Explanation: Storybooks and picture books as language input.

Cause & Effect: Language absorption → enhanced communication and literacy skills.

Cognitive stimulation through storytelling

Example: Listening to fairy tales or reading illustrated books.

Cause & Effect: Mental engagement → increased attention span and creative thinking.

It is often argued that participating in enjoyable activities with a child often yields richer skill development and creativity than reading
alone. In my view, while hands-on play and shared tasks can offer certain benefits, reading provides unparalleled linguistic enrichment
and cognitive stimulation that more holistically nurture a child’s growth.

It is true that pleasurable pursuits make a profound contribution to a child’s overall development. First, creative play and hands-on
tasks—whether building with blocks, drawing elaborate scenes, or crafting simple models—encourage youngsters to visualise solutions
and experiment with ideas. Active engagement in such activities can directly lead to marked improvements in fine motor coordination
and emerging problem-solving abilities. Equally important, emotional bonding through shared activities can deepen social awareness
and empathy. For instance, cooking a simple recipe side by side can teach turn-taking and cooperation in real time. As a result, these
positive interactions naturally cultivate a deeper understanding of others’ feelings.

Nonetheless, reading still occupies an essential place in a child’s intellectual growth. The first reason behind this is that exposure to
vocabulary and grammar provides rich linguistic input. Specifically, encountering descriptive narratives and varied sentence structures
via storybooks and picture books allows children to internalise complex syntax and expand their word bank. Hence, this immersive
language absorption enhances communication skills and early literacy. Another notable benefit of reading is that cognitive stimulation
through storytelling sharpens attention and creative thought. By way of illustration, when listening to fairy tales or exploring illustrated
books, children have the opportunity to imagine characters and settings from a vividly told tale that captivates their minds. Consequently,
such mental engagement lengthens attention spans and sparks inventive thinking. In
conclusion, although playful, shared activities undeniably support motor coordination and social bonding, I maintain that reading’s
unique capacity to broaden language proficiency and challenge young minds makes it the more valuable tool for holistic child
development.

Some people think learning history in school is important. Others think learning subjects more relevant to life is important.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Intro: DOL sẽ paraphrase đề bài và viết Thesis statement để trả lời câu hỏi của đề.

Body 1: DOL cho rằng môn Lịch sử giúp học sinh phát triển tư duy phản biện và nuôi dưỡng tinh thần dân tộc.

Body 2: DOL lập luận rằng các môn học thiết thực giúp nâng cao kỹ năng nghề nghiệp và chăm sóc sức khỏe cá nhân.

Conclusion: DOL sẽ nhắc lại câu trả lời ở phần Intro và nhắc lại các ý chính trong bài.

In my view, while studying history builds informed, thoughtful citizens, life-relevant subjects are equally vital for personal and
professional success.

Body 1: History cultivates informed, thoughtful citizens. // Critical-reasoning development

Explanation: Source evaluation & bias detection.

Cause & Effect: Insight into past policy failures → prevention of repeated mistakes.
Cultural identity & social cohesion

Explanation: Narratives of national struggles and achievements.

Example: Vietnamese independence-struggle narratives.

Body paragraph 2: Practical subjects meet contemporary life needs. Workforce competitiveness

Explanation: Coding, data analysis, financial-literacy curricula.

Cause & Effect: Market-aligned skills → higher employability.

Personal health & safety

Explanation: Nutrition, mental-health, first-aid modules.

Example: CPR drills lowering emergency response time.

History and practical skills both vie for attention in modern education, with strong arguments on either side. In my view, while studying
history builds informed, thoughtful citizens, life-relevant subjects are equally vital for personal and professional success.

Admittedly, through a deep exploration of past triumphs and failures, history builds informed, thoughtful citizens. First, critical-
reasoning development arises when students learn to evaluate sources and detect bias. By way of illustration, analysing the Versailles
Treaty’s punitive reparations teaches pupils how excessive policy measures can destabilise economies, thereby equipping them to
question grandiose proposals and avert similar mistakes. Moreover, history reinforces cultural identity and social cohesion by presenting
narratives of national struggles and achievements. For example, studying Vietnamese independence accounts not only deepens learners’
understanding of collective sacrifice but also strengthens pride in shared heritage.

Nevertheless, life-relevant subjects are equally vital in my view. Initially, workforce competitiveness is enhanced through coding, data-
analysis, and financial-literacy curricula. As a result, graduates acquire market-aligned competencies—such as spreadsheet modelling
and investment simulations—that ensure they are job-ready from day one. Furthermore, personal health and safety competence develops
via modules on nutrition, mental health, and first aid. For instance, regular CPR drills reduce emergency response times and empower
students to act decisively in crises, thereby promoting individual well-being and community resilience.

In conclusion, although history cultivates analytical minds and civic awareness, life-relevant subjects deliver practical skills essential
for today’s world. I maintain that an integrated curriculum valuing both domains best prepares students to become capable, conscientious
members of society.

Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are played alone. To what extent do you agree or
disagree?

Intro: DOL sẽ paraphrase đề bài và viết Thesis statement để trả lời câu hỏi của đề.

Body 1: DOL cho rằng hoạt động nhóm giúp phát triển kỹ năng giao tiếp và hợp tác hiệu quả hơn so với hoạt động cá nhân.

Body 2: DOL lập luận rằng làm việc nhóm còn rèn luyện tinh thần trách nhiệm và khả năng xử lý xung đột trong môi trường tập thể.

Conclusion: DOL sẽ nhắc lại câu trả lời ở phần Intro và nhắc lại các ý chính trong bài.

Chi tiết:

I fully agree with this view, as team-based experiences offer valuable lessons that are often more difficult to acquire through solitary
activities.

Body paragraph 1:

Team activities are effective in building communication and collaboration skills.

Development of group interaction abilities

Explanation: Teamwork → active listening, clear expression, and viewpoint adaptation.

Example: Coordination and strategy in team sports like football or basketball.

Enhancement of communicative depth

Explanation: Shared responsibilities → improvement in non-verbal cues, tone, and empathy.

Body paragraph 2:

Team activities also foster accountability and conflict management.

Growth of responsibility and teamwork

Explanation: Shared goals → reliance on others and role acceptance.

Cause & Effect: Role-based cooperation → improved group outcomes.

Development of emotional and social resilience

Explanation: Conflict resolution in teams → builds emotional intelligence.

Example: Navigating disagreements during university group projects.

Viết:

Many people believe that team activities are more effective than individual pursuits when it comes to developing essential life skills. I
fully agree with this view, as team-based experiences offer valuable lessons that are often more difficult to acquire through solitary
activities.

Team activities are particularly effective in building communication and collaboration skills. Specifically, working within a group
demands active listening, clear expression, and the flexibility to adapt one’s viewpoint—qualities honed on sports teams where
coordination and strategy are paramount. For example, football players must signal intentions non-verbally, call plays aloud, and adjust
tactics on the fly to achieve a common objective. In terms of collaboration, shared responsibilities in team contexts deepen
communicative nuance as participants learn to interpret tone, facial cues, and body language, thereby enhancing empathy and ensuring
that messages are conveyed and received accurately.

Beyond communication, team activities foster accountability and conflict management. When goals are collective rather than individual,
each member must accept a defined role and depend on others to fulfil their tasks, driving a sense of responsibility that transcends
personal ambition. Consequently, role-based cooperation often yields superior group outcomes, as seen in project-based learning
environments where students allocate tasks according to strengths and then integrate their efforts into a cohesive final product.
Furthermore, navigating disagreements can undoubtedly build emotional and social resilience. For instance, in university group projects,
students who mediate conflicting viewpoints and negotiate compromises emerge better equipped to manage workplace disputes and lead
teams effectively.

In conclusion, I believe that team-based experiences offer a broad spectrum of life skills—particularly in communication, accountability,
and conflict resolution—that are critical for thriving in an interconnected world.

Despite better access to education, many adults today still can not read or write. In what ways are they disadvantaged? What
can governments do to help them?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để nêu quan điểm.

Body 1: DOL cho rằng người lớn mù chữ chịu thiệt thòi lớn về nghề nghiệp, sức khỏe và đời sống tinh thần.

Body 2: DOL lập luận rằng chính phủ có thể giải quyết vấn đề này bằng các chương trình xóa mù chữ linh hoạt và hợp tác cộng đồng.

Body paragraph 1:

Illiterate adults face serious personal and social disadvantages.

Barriers to daily functioning and employment

Explanation: Illiteracy → difficulty accessing information, limited job prospects.

Cause & Effect: Inability to read → poor health, unstable jobs, reduced independence.

Emotional and social consequences

Explanation: Illiteracy → social exclusion, low self-esteem, mental health issues.

Example: Avoiding medical services due to inability to read forms or fear of judgment.

Body paragraph 2:

Governments can effectively address adult illiteracy through targeted initiatives.

Implementation of flexible literacy programs

Explanation: Free, tailored programs → better access for working or rural adults.

Example: Evening literacy classes in disadvantaged communities.

Collaboration with community organizations

Explanation: Partnerships with libraries and NGOs → supportive learning environments.

Example: ABC Life Literacy Canada’s programs in libraries and community centers.

Despite significant improvements in access to education, a considerable number of adults around the world still struggle with basic
literacy skills. Being unable to read or write places individuals at a serious disadvantage in many aspects of life. However, with targeted
policies and practical support, governments can play a key role in addressing this issue.

Illiterate adults face serious personal and social disadvantages. First and foremost, the inability to read undermines daily
functioning and career advancement. To be specific, without basic literacy skills, individuals cannot access information—such as
medical instructions or job postings—and face limited job opportunities, often confined to low-wage, unstable work. Consequently,
poor health outcomes and financial insecurity become commonplace. Moreover, illiteracy carries profound emotional and social
consequences. Many adults feel socially excluded and suffer from low self-esteem, avoiding medical services or social welfare programs
for fear of judgment. As a result, mental health issues such as anxiety and depression often accompany illiteracy, perpetuating a cycle
of isolation and vulnerability.

However, governments can effectively address adult illiteracy through targeted policy measures. First, the implementation
of flexible adult literacy programs is vital. By offering free, tailored classes—held in the evenings or online—working and rural adults
gain access to learning without sacrificing employment or family duties. For instance, community-based evening literacy classes have
dramatically improved skills and confidence in disadvantaged communities. Furthermore, collaboration with community organizations
amplifies government efforts. Partnerships with libraries, NGOs, and faith-based groups create informal learning environments and
leverage local trust. A notable example is ABC Life Literacy Canada’s library-led programs, which provide one-on-one tutoring and
peer support, yielding substantial improvements in adult reading and writing abilities.

In conclusion, adult illiteracy remains a serious issue despite wider access to education, and it continues to limit
individuals’ opportunities and well-being. Governments have a responsibility to implement inclusive solutions to help illiterate adults
gain the skills they need to lead fuller, more independent lives.

Training 65-year-olds people to use computers would be a good use of government money. To what extent do you agree or
disagree?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để nêu quan điểm.

Body 1: DOL phân tích việc đào tạo máy tính góp phần nâng cao khả năng tự chủ kỹ thuật số ở người cao tuổi.

Body 2: DOL phân tích tác động tích cực của đào tạo máy tính đối với nhận thức và sức khỏe tinh thần của người cao tuổi.

Training 65-year-olds in computer use is a worthwhile public investment. I fully agree with this view.

Body paragraph 1:

Computer training helps seniors use digital services.

Bridging the digital divide

Explanation: Without digital skills→ seniors struggle with routine tasks.

Example: Booking appointments & managing pensions online.

Cause & Effect: Government training → confidently access these services + increase independence.

Body paragraph 2:

Digital literacy improves well-being in older adults.

Cognitive stimulation

Explanation: Learning new skills → brain engagement → delayed cognitive decline.

Social connection

Explanation: Digital tools → maintain relationships → reduced loneliness → lower the strain on public healthcare in the long term.

As digital technology becomes increasingly integrated into everyday life, some people argue that training 65-
year-olds to use computers would be a wise use of government funds. I fully agree with this view, as it promotes social inclusion and
enhances the well-being of older adults.

Firstly, providing computer training to senior citizens helps bridge the digital divide and ensures they are not left
behind in a rapidly evolving society. Many essential services, such as banking, healthcare, and government communication, are now
primarily accessible online. Without basic digital skills, older adults may struggle to complete routine tasks independently. For instance,
booking medical appointments or managing pensions online can become overwhelming for those unfamiliar with technology.
Government-funded training would empower them to access these services with confidence, increasing their independence and reducing
reliance on family or support staff.

Secondly, learning to use computers can significantly improve the quality of life and mental well-being of older
people. Acquiring new skills stimulates the brain, helping to keep it active and potentially delaying age-related cognitive decline. In
addition, digital literacy enables seniors to stay socially connected through video calls, email, and social media, which can help combat
loneliness and isolation. These mental and emotional benefits may also reduce the demand on public healthcare services in the long
term, making such training not only socially valuable but economically practical.

In conclusion, I believe that funding computer training for people aged 65 and older is a worthwhile investment. It
enhances their independence, strengthens their connection to society, and supports healthier aging—benefiting both individuals and the
wider community.
Some people believe that teenagers should concentrate on all school subjects equally. Others believe that teenagers should focus
on the subjects that they are best at or that they find the most interesting. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để nêu quan điểm.

Body 1: DOL phân tích lợi ích của việc học đều các môn trong chương trình học.

Body 2: DOL chứng minh lợi ích của việc tập trung vào môn học yêu thích hoặc có thế mạnh.

Some argue for a balanced education, while others believe specialization fosters talent and motivation. I support the latter view.

Body paragraph 1: Studying all subjects provides a well-rounded growth.

Development of reasoning and problem-solving

Explanation: Broad curriculum → gain essential life skills → enhance logic and problem-solving.

Example: Math → for manage personal finances.

Uncovers new strengths

Explanation: Broad education → reveals hidden talents → expand academic or career opportunities.

Body paragraph 2:

Specializing boosts motivation & career readiness.

Increased motivation and academic success

Explanation: Passion for subjects → higher engagement and better performance.

Example: Art or science → leads to professional success.

Competitive advantage in higher education and careers

Explanation: Early specialization → deeper understanding & proficiency.

There is ongoing debate over whether teenagers should give equal attention to all school subjects or focus primarily on the ones they
excel in or enjoy most. While some argue that a balanced approach to education builds a strong academic foundation, others believe that
allowing students to specialize fosters talent and motivation. Although I acknowledge the reasons behind the former view, I am still in
favor of the latter.

Supporters of studying all subjects equally argue that this ensures a well-rounded education. First, exposure to a broad range of
subjects cultivates essential life skills—students learn to think critically, communicate effectively, and apply numeracy in everyday
situations. This means that by engaging with different disciplines, teenagers develop the logical reasoning and problem-solving abilities
they will need as adults. For example, mastering basic math concepts empowers them to manage personal finances with confidence.
Additionally, a broad curriculum can expose students to unexpected interests, potentially opening doors to new academic or career paths
they might not have considered otherwise.

Despite this, I am convinced that allowing students to focus on subjects they enjoy or are good at can lead to higher
engagement, better academic outcomes, and greater career readiness. The first reason for this is that when students are passionate about
what they study, they are more likely to stay motivated and perform well. For instance, a student who excels in art or science may thrive
when given more time and support in those areas, eventually turning that talent into a successful profession. Furthermore, in today’s
competitive world, early specialization can give students an edge in pursuing higher education or specific career goals. This is because
by focusing on a particular subject or skill set early on, students gain a deeper understanding and proficiency, which can set them apart
from others who may have a broader, less focused academic background.

In conclusion, while it is important for teenagers to gain a basic understanding of all school subjects, I believe they
should be given more flexibility to focus on the areas that halign wit their strengths and interests. This approach can foster deeper
learning, personal fulfillment, and long-term success.

The best way to teach children to cooperate is through team sports at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để nêu quan điểm.

Body 1: DOL lý giải tại sao thể thao đồng đội được xem là phương pháp dạy trẻ hợp tác hiệu quả.

Body 2: DOL chứng minh rằng thể thao đồng đội không phải là phương pháp hiệu quả nhất.

Some believe team sports are the best way to teach cooperation, but I think they are not the most effective method.

Body paragraph 1:

Team sports promote cooperation.

Team sports provide a natural setting for cooperation.

Example: Football, basketball, volleyball → share tasks + support each other.

Cause & Effect: These interactions → teach teamwork, patience, and trust.

Emotional development through competition

Explanation: Team sports, involving winning and losing → foster empathy & resilience.

Cause & Effect: Emotional growth through competition → stronger cooperation skills.

Body paragraph 2:

Team sports may not be the most effective method.

Limited appeal of sports

Cause & Effect: Not all children enjoy sports → some may feel excluded due to abilities or confidence.

Example: Relying only on sports → excludes children thriving in other activities.

Alternative cooperative activities

Cause & Effect: Group projects, clubs → require collaboration & decision-making → appeal to more students → build social skills.

Teaching children to cooperate is an essential part of their personal and social development. Some believe that team sports
in school are the most effective method for instilling cooperation skills. While I acknowledge the reasons behind this view, I believe
these sports are not the only or necessarily the best way to promote cooperation among children.

On the one hand, team sports offer a natural environment for learning how to work with others. Specifically, in games
like football, basketball, or volleyball, children must communicate, share responsibilities, and support one another to achieve a common
goal. These interactions teach them the value of teamwork, patience, and trust. Moreover, team sports often involve dealing with both
winning and losing, which can help students develop empathy and resilience—two qualities closely linked to cooperative behavior. In
many school settings, physical education programs are specifically designed to encourage collaboration, making sports a practical and
engaging way to promote cooperation.

On the other hand, while team sports are beneficial, they may not be the most inclusive or universally effective method.
The main reason for this is that not all children enjoy sports, and some may feel left out due to differences in ability, confidence, or
physical limitations. Therefore, relying solely on sports may exclude children who could thrive in other cooperative environments. In
comparison, group projects in the classroom, school clubs, or drama performances also require students to collaborate, make collective
decisions, and resolve conflicts together. These activities can be more accessible and appealing to a broader range of students, allowing
them to develop social and cooperative skills in contexts that match their interests and strengths.

In conclusion, while I agree that team sports are a valuable way to teach children cooperation, I do not believe they
are the only or the best method in all cases. A variety of group-based activities, both physical and non-physical, should be offered in
schools to ensure that all children have the opportunity to develop strong cooperative skills in a supportive and inclusive environment.

Some people say free time activities for children should be organized by parents. Others say that children should be free to
choose what they do in their free time. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để nêu quan điểm.

Body 1: DOL phân tích quan điểm cho rằng hoạt động giải trí cho trẻ em nên do cha mẹ tổ chức.

Body 2: DOL tin rằng trẻ em nên tự do chọn lựa hoạt động giải trí của họ.

Some argue that parents should organize structured activities for children, but I think children should choose their own leisure.

Body paragraph 1:

Children need guidance in choosing productive leisure activities.

Children lack the maturity to choose wisely

Explanation: Structured activities → build confidence.

Example: Enroll in sports team → gets physical exercise, teamwork & time management.

Addressing concerns over screen time

Cause & Effect: Excessive screen time → direct children to meaningful activities.

Body paragraph 2:

Children’s freedom in choosing activities boosts creativity and well-being.

Fostering creativity and exploration

Cause & Effect: Freedom to choose → exploration of personal interests.

Example: A child chooses drawing → hidden talent revealed.

Mental health and self-confidence benefits

Cause & Effect: Freedom in time use → better relaxation and self-awareness.

Example: Hobbies like painting or sports → relaxation and confidence.

The question of how children should spend their free time has sparked considerable debate. Some believe that parents should organize
structured activities to ensure their children use time productively, while others argue that children should have the freedom to choose
their own leisure pursuits. Although I acknowledge the reasons behind the former view, I am still in favor of the latter.

Supporters of parent-organized activities argue that children often lack the discipline or maturity to make wise choices on their own.
They may well argue that structured activities, such as sports, music lessons, or educational workshops, can help children develop useful
skills, build confidence, and form healthy routines. For example, a child enrolled in a weekend sports team not only gets physical
exercise but also learns teamwork and time management. Additionally, with increasing concerns over excessive screen time, some
parents feel it is necessary to direct their children toward more meaningful activities that contribute to their overall development.

However, giving children the freedom to choose their own leisure activities fosters creativity, independence, and emotional well-
being. First, free play or unstructured time allows children to explore their interests, make decisions, and learn from their experiences.
For instance, a child who enjoys drawing in their free time may develop artistic talent that would have gone unnoticed in a fully scheduled
routine. Moreover, having control over their own time can help children feel more relaxed and in tune with their personal needs, which
is essential for mental health and self-confidence. For example, children who have the opportunity to set aside time for hobbies like
painting or playing sports often report feeling more relaxed and confident, as these activities allow them to express themselves and
manage stress in a way that suits their individual needs.

In conclusion, while structured activities can offer valuable opportunities for growth, I believe it is equally important to allow
children the freedom to choose how they spend their free time.

Some people think secondary school students should study international news as one of their subjects, while others believe that
this is a waste of valuable school time. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để nêu quan điểm.

Body 1: DOL phân tích lợi ích của việc đưa tin tức quốc tế vào chương trình học trung học.

Body 2: DOL nhấn mạnh rằng điều này có thể làm giảm sự tập trung vào các môn học nền tảng.

International news offers educational benefits, but I believe it may distract from more essential subjects.

Body paragraph 1: International news offers educational benefits

Enhancement of students’ global awareness

Explanation: exposure to world events → understand global cultures and issues.

Example: learning about climate change & conflicts → deeper insight into global challenges → foster empathy & open-mindedness.

Development of critical thinking

Explanation: analyzing perspectives → evaluate credibility & form informed opinions.

Example: students exposed to news → better judgments & discussions.

Body paragraph 2:

Including international news may distract from core subjects

Lack of personal relevance

Explanation: international news disconnects students' daily lives → lack of engagement and interest.

Cause & Effect: distant events → harder to relate → student disengagement.

Disruption of core academic focus

Explanation: additional news → less time for fundamental subjects.

Cause & Effect: priority on building strong academic foundations → avoid compromise students' learning time.

Viết:

The question of whether secondary school students should study international news as part of their curriculum has sparked significant
debate. While some argue that such studies offer valuable educational benefits, I believe that the inclusion of international news may
detract from more essential subjects.

On the one hand, proponents of incorporating international news into the school curriculum emphasize the broadening of students’
global awareness. Exposure to world events helps students understand different cultures, political systems, and the most pressing global
issues, which ultimately enhances their understanding of the world. For example, by learning about international topics such as climate
change or geopolitical conflicts, students develop a deeper insight into global challenges, fostering empathy and open-mindedness.
Furthermore, studying diverse news sources can significantly improve students’ critical thinking skills. Analyzing various perspectives
allows them to evaluate the credibility of information and form their own informed opinions, which are essential skills in today’s
complex, interconnected world. Research suggests that students who engage with different news sources tend to be better equipped to
make reasoned judgments and engage in thoughtful discussions.

On the other hand, there are valid concerns regarding the relevance and practical application of international news for secondary
school students. Chief among these is that the topics covered in international news may not directly relate to their daily lives, leading to
a lack of engagement or interest. Students may find it difficult to connect distant events to their personal experiences, which could result
in disengagement from the subject matter. Moreover, adding international news to an already packed school schedule may take valuable
time away from core academic subjects like mathematics, science, and language studies. With an emphasis on building strong
foundational knowledge in these subjects, it is crucial not to compromise students' learning time for subjects that may not be as
immediately relevant to their educational development.

In conclusion, while studying international news can undoubtedly broaden students' perspectives and improve their critical
thinking skills, I believe that its inclusion can overload them with topics that may not resonate with their current stage of life.

Some people think that language should be taught in small classes, while other people think the number of students in a language
class does not matter. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để nêu quan điểm.

Body 1: DOL phân tích lợi thế của lớp học ít học viên đối với việc học ngôn ngữ.

Body 2: DOL nhấn mạnh rằng chất lượng giảng dạy và công cụ hiện đại quan trọng hơn quy mô lớp học.

While smaller classes may aid language learning, teaching quality and modern tools matter more than class size.

Body paragraph 1:

Smaller classes can enhance language learning

Increased individual attention

Explanation: fewer students → more tailored instruction for each student → deeper understanding.

Example: class of only 10 students → focus on pronunciation and grammar challenges.

Greater student participation

Explanation: smaller groups → more opportunities for speaking.

Cause & Effect: students in smaller classes → more contributions → boost speaking confidence.

Body paragraph 2:

However, I believe teaching quality and resources outweigh class size

Effective teaching strategies

Explanation: right teaching methods & tools → large classes can still be effective.

Example: group tasks & peer work → engage all learners.

Support from educational technology

Explanation: advanced educational technology → large classes benefit from interactive tools.

Example: language apps & virtual exercises → provide extra practice.

Viết:

The debate over the ideal size of language classes has long been a topic of discussion in educational circles. While some believe that
smaller classes are more conducive to effective language learning due to personalized attention, I would argue that the quality of
instruction and the use of modern tools are far more important than the number of students in the classroom.

On the one hand, supporters of smaller classes contend that the individual attention afforded to students in such environments
significantly enhances their learning experience. In smaller groups, teachers are better able to tailor their lessons to meet the specific
needs of each student, thus ensuring a deeper understanding of the material. For example, in a class of only 10 students, the teacher can
dedicate more time to addressing individual challenges, such as pronunciation and grammar, providing more precise and targeted
support. Moreover, smaller classes foster greater student participation, as fewer students mean more opportunities for each person to
actively engage in discussions. Research has demonstrated that students in smaller groups are more likely to contribute to conversations,
which ultimately boosts their confidence in speaking the language.

However, I believe that class size is not as important as the overall quality of teaching and the resources available to students. With the
right teaching strategies and tools, large classes can also provide effective language instruction. A skilled teacher can use group activities,
peer collaborations, and even technology to engage all students, ensuring that each student receives ample opportunities for practice and
feedback. Furthermore, advances in educational technology have made it possible for large classes to benefit from interactive learning
platforms. For example, the use of language learning apps and virtual exercises allows students to practice outside of class time,
supporting their learning regardless of the class size.

In conclusion, while I understand the advantages of small classes in fostering personalized attention and increased participation, I believe
that the quality of teaching and the use of digital resources are more crucial in ensuring effective language acquisition. With proper
instruction and modern tools, both large and small classes can offer successful language learning experiences.

It is the responsibility of schools to teach children good behavior in addition to providing formal education. To what extent do
you agree or disagree?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để nêu quan điểm.

Body 1: DOL phân tích quan điểm rằng trường học nên dạy học sinh cách cư xử tốt bên cạnh việc cung cấp giáo dục chính quy.

Body 2: DOL khẳng định rằng việc giáo dục cách cư xử tốt nên là trách nhiệm chính của cha mẹ.

While some argue that schools should shape students' character, I believe parents hold the primary responsibility.

Body paragraph 1:

Supporters argue that schools should teach good behavior

Social skills development

Explanation: incorporate social skills into the curriculum → build interpersonal skills.

Example: SEL → foster emotional intelligence & positive relationships.

Preparation for future roles in society

Explanation: behavioral education → equips students for community and workplace interaction

Example: teaching conflict resolution and respectful communication.

Body paragraph 2:

However, I believe that parents should be primarily responsible for teaching good behavior

Parental influence in shaping values

Explanation: parents are the key influences → instill core values from an early age.

Explanation: home environment shapes child's moral compass.

Schools have limited time and resources

Cause & Effect: focus too much on behavior → hinder academic progress.

In many educational systems, there is an ongoing debate about whether schools should take responsibility for teaching children good
behavior in addition to providing formal education. While some argue that schools have an essential role in shaping students' character,
I believe that this responsibility lies primarily with parents, as schools should focus on academic instruction.

On the one hand, there is a strong case for schools teaching good behavior alongside academic subjects. First, incorporating
social skills development into the curriculum helps students build essential interpersonal skills such as respect, empathy, and
cooperation. For example, programs like Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) are increasingly popular in schools as they aim to foster
emotional intelligence and positive relationships among students. Second, teaching children how to behave responsibly and respectfully
prepares them for future roles in society. Schools have the unique opportunity to guide students in conflict resolution and respectful
communication, which are valuable skills for contributing positively to their communities and workplaces. Studies have shown that
children who learn these skills in school are more likely to become responsible and constructive members of society.

On the other hand, I still firmly believe that the responsibility of teaching good behavior primarily rests with parents, not
schools. Parents are the first and most significant influences on a child’s behavior, as they instill foundational values such as honesty,
discipline, and integrity from an early age. A child’s home environment shapes their moral compass, and while schools can reinforce
these values, they cannot replace the influence of parents. Additionally, schools have limited time and resources, which should be
dedicated primarily to academic subjects such as mathematics, science, and literacy. Focusing too much on behavior could divert
precious time away from essential learning, potentially hindering academic progress and development.

In conclusion, while I acknowledge the importance of schools contributing to students' personal development, the primary
responsibility for teaching good behavior should lie with parents given the aforementioned arguments.

Some people think young people should be required to have full time education until they are at least 18 years old. To what
extent do you agree?
Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để nêu quan điểm.

Body 1: DOL phân tích lý lẽ của những người phản đối quan điểm "người trẻ nên học đến 18 tuổi". Sau đó, DOL đưa ra phản biện
(Antithesis) làm cơ sở cho quan điểm của mình ở body 2.

Body 2: DOL phân tích những lợi ích của việc theo đuổi giáo dục đến năm 18 tuổi mang lại.

Body paragraph 1:

Opposing viewpoint

Requiring education until 18 limit early career opportunities.

>> Explain: some people prefer practical work over academics.

>> Example: people drop out to learn vocational skills & start businesses.

Anti: these are exceptions, not the norm.

Concluding sentence: leaving school early limits future opportunities.

Body paragraph 2:

Formal education provides benefits beyond academics

Provides foundational knowledge

>> Effect: help students make informed career choices.

Cultivate essential values & skills

>> Explain: these attributes are essential for success.

Offers students greater flexibility

>> Explain: pursue higher education or vocational training.

Viết:

It is often argued that young people should be mandated to pursue full-time education until the age of 18. I completely agree with
this viewpoint, as formal education equips individuals with profound benefits in different respects.

Opponents of this idea argue that requiring education until 18 may limit young people's freedom to pursue their desired career paths
earlier. Indeed, there are young individuals who are not particularly interested in academic studies but are passionate about practical,
hands-on work. For example, in Vietnam, several teenagers drop out of high school to learn vocational skills, such as manicure or
eyelash extensions, and some successfully establish businesses at a young age. These cases demonstrate that formal education is not the
only route to success. However, such examples are exceptions rather than the norm, often relying on innate talent or unique
circumstances that may not apply to the majority of young people. For most, leaving school too early could limit their future
opportunities, especially as industries increasingly demand more advanced qualifications and skills.

Formal education, on the other hand, provides students with invaluable benefits that extend beyond academics. Chief among
these is that exposure to a broad curriculum equips students with foundational knowledge across multiple disciplines, helping them
better understand their interests and strengths to make informed career choices in the future. Furthermore, schools are vital for cultivating
essential values like integrity and discipline, as well as life skills such as teamwork and communication. These attributes are
indispensable for personal growth and professional success. In addition, completing high school offers students greater flexibility, as
they can choose to pursue either higher education or vocational training later in life, without the barriers faced by early school leavers.

In conclusion, I strongly support the idea of requiring full-time education until the age of 18. While alternative paths may
work for a small minority, the advantages of formal education far outweigh the drawbacks. It lays the foundation for academic, ethical,
and professional development while ensuring that young people are well-prepared to seize future opportunities and achieve their goals.

In some countries, there has been an increase in the number of parents who are choosing to educate their children themselves
at home instead of sending them school. Do the advantages of home education outweigh the disadvantages?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để nêu quan điểm.

Body 1: DOL phân tích lợi ích của việc học ở nhà.

Body 2: DOL phân tích bất cập của phương pháp học tại nhà và điểm mạnh của phương pháp học truyền thống.

Body paragraph 1: Advantages of homeschooling

Parents have greater control over their children's learning.

>> Explain: closely monitor progress, identify strengths and weaknesses and adjust the curriculum accordingly.

>> Effect: help children with special learning needs learn at their own pace.

>> Example: children with attention or cognitive challenges & gifted students.
Body paragraph 2: Disadvantages of homeschooling

Lack of social interaction

>> Explain: homeschooled children miss peer interaction, essential for communication and teamwork skills.

>> Contrast: traditional schools provide group activities and extracurriculars.

Lack of pedagogical expertise

>> Explain: not all parents can teach complex subjects effectively.

>> Contrast: qualified teachers in schools are trained to explain concepts better.

Viết:

In recent years, homeschooling has gained popularity in many countries. While it offers certain advantages, this essay contends that the
disadvantages significantly overshadow the benefits.

On the one hand, homeschooling does provide certain advantages. Chief among these is that parents have greater control over
their children's learning experience. Homeschooling allows for a more tailored approach, as parents can closely monitor their children's
progress, identify specific strengths and weaknesses, and adjust the curriculum accordingly. This approach can be particularly
advantageous for children with special learning needs, allowing them to learn at their own pace. For example, those who struggle with
attention deficits or other cognitive challenges can learn at home without the pressure of keeping up with a classroom setting. Meanwhile,
some gifted students may be able to delve deeper into subjects they are passionate about when being homeschooled, whereas in a
conventional school, the pace might be too slow for them.

However, despite these advantages, homeschooling comes with several significant disadvantages that can hinder a child's
overall development. The most critical issue is the lack of social interaction. Homeschooled children miss out on the daily interactions
with peers that are essential for developing communication and teamwork skills. In contrast, traditional schools provide opportunities
for children to engage in group activities and extracurriculars, which help develop these crucial life skills. Another problem worth
mentioning is that not all parents have the pedagogical expertise to teach complex subjects effectively. Qualified teachers in schools, on
the other hand, are trained to explain concepts in an engaging and accessible way, which many parents, despite their best intentions,
may struggle to replicate.

In conclusion, it is evident that homeschooling offers certain benefits, such as personalized learning and flexibility. However, I believe
that the disadvantages it presents are far more significant because of the lack of social interaction and the potential limitations in the
quality of education provided at home. Ultimately, the structured, social environment and professional teaching offered in traditional
schools make them a more suitable option for most children.

Full-time university students spend a lot of time studying. Some say they should do other activities too. To what extent do you
agree or disagree?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để nêu quan điểm.

Body 1: DOL phân tích lợi ích của việc học các kiến thức ở trường đại học.

Body 2: DOL phân tích tầm quan trọng của mối quan hệ và mạng lưới kết nối.

Body 3: DOL phân tích tầm quan trọng của các hoạt động ngoại khóa.

Body 4: DOL phân tích lợi ích của các công việc bán thời gian.

Body paragraph 1: Benefits of studying

>> Explain: higher education offers specialized knowledge.

>> Effect: requires time and effort for deep understanding.

Body paragraph 2: However, relationships and networking are crucial.

>> Example: competitions allow interaction with talented peers and professors.

>> Expand: students can secure pre-graduation jobs through company-sponsored events to find talent.

Body paragraph 3: Importance of extracurricular activities

>> Explain: equip students with essential careers and life skills.

>> Example: joining a competition or club teaches students efficient collaboration in teams.

>> Effect: make students valuable team members.

Body paragraph 4: Advantages of part-time jobs

>> Explain: helps students understand the value of money and manage time effectively.
>> Effect: university students should engage in other activities.

>> Expand: students can participate in one or two activities each semester for practical experience while balancing academics.

These days, a large number of university students dedicate most of their time to studying. However, it is believed that they should also
spend time participating in other activities. This essay completely agrees with this statement.

Granted, it is essential for students to apply themselves to studying, given the importance of knowledge in their later years. Higher
education aims to provide students with laser-focused and specialized knowledge tailored to their future occupations. In order to gain a
deep understanding of such knowledge, students need to invest significant time and effort in learning.

Nevertheless, knowledge alone might not help students secure a decent job in the future, as relationships and networking play a
very important role in finding employment, and these are often acquired through activities at school. For example, when students take
part in certain competitions at their schools, they gain an opportunity to meet and even collaborate with other talented individuals in
their field, ranging from peers to professors. Additionally, university students can proactively secure a job position even before
graduating, as many companies sponsor these events to identify potential talent for their organizations.

Taking part in extracurricular or volunteering activities also equips students with a wide range of essential skills that help
them excel in their careers as well as in life. For instance, when joining a competition or a club, which usually requires students to work
in teams, they can learn how to collaborate with others efficiently. These hands-on experiences and real-life collaboration can help them
become valuable team members in future working environments.

Not only do students benefit from activities at their schools, but they also gain substantial advantages from having part-time
jobs. Working as a part-time employee helps students understand the value of money at an early stage and teaches them how to manage
their time more effectively. These benefits are why I believe that university students should allocate their time to other activities in
addition to studying. They can schedule their time to participate in one or two activities every semester, which allows them to gain
practical experience while still balancing their academic commitments.

In conclusion, while studying diligently is undoubtedly a virtue, I believe that university students should also take part in
activities such as school competitions, volunteering projects, and part-time jobs to develop more comprehensively.

Some people think the government should invest more money in teaching science than other subjects in order for a country to
develop and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để nêu quan điểm.

Body 1: DOL phân tích lý do vì sao một số người ủng hộ việc ưu tiên các môn khoa học hơn.

Body 2: DOL chứng minh tầm quan trọng của khoa học nhân văn trong phát triển quốc gia.

Body paragraph 1: Some advocate for prioritizing science subjects

>> Explain: science has driven technological breakthroughs >> national development.

>> Example 1: America's tech power comes from tech education investments.

>> Example 2: China and Germany grew remarkably due to similar tech investments.

>> Brief conclusion: science contributes to a country's development.

Body paragraph 2: Importance of humanities in national development

Benefits of understanding national history

>> Explain: understanding their homeland's origins fosters patriotism >> desire to build and develop the country.

>> Contrast: ignorance of history >> challenging to devote to their homeland & brain drain.

Importance of learning international history

>> Explain: understanding global conflicts >> people value peace, essential for a developed country.

>> Explain: such knowledge bolster faith in their country + dedicate to its development.

>> Expand: literature and philosophy foster critical thinking, empathy, and ethics.

Write:

Some people believe that more national funding should be allocated to the teaching of science subjects rather than other subjects because
these disciplines could facilitate the growth of a country. This essay strongly disagrees with this opinion, asserting that a strong and
flourishing country results from a combination of both humanities and science subjects.

There are valid reasons why some advocate for prioritizing science education. In the current technological landscape, science
has paved the way for numerous breakthroughs that drive a country's development. For instance, America is renowned as a technological
powerhouse, home to numerous tech giants such as Apple and Google. Such achievements are largely the result of massive investments
in science and technology within their educational system. Similarly, countries such as China and Germany have also experienced
remarkable growth due to similar investments in these fields. Therefore, it is undeniable that science significantly contributes to national
development.

However, for a country to experience holistic development and long-term prosperity, humanities should also be invested in,
with history being a prime example. When citizens are knowledgeable about their homeland’s origins and the endeavors of previous
generations to unify the country, they develop a sense of patriotism. This patriotism is the foundation of the desire and effort to build
and develop a country. Conversely, when people are ignorant about their country's history and have little gratitude towards the past, it
is challenging for them to devote themselves to their homeland, potentially leading to issues like brain drain. Moreover, teaching
international historical events is equally crucial. Insights into world wars or conflicts occurring in other parts of the world help people,
especially young generations, understand the value of peace, which is another essential groundwork for a developed and united country.
Such knowledge can bolster people’s faith in their home country and encourage them to dedicate themselves to its development and
protection. Humanities subjects like literature and philosophy also play a vital role in fostering critical thinking, empathy, and ethical
reasoning, all of which are essential for well-rounded citizens.

In conclusion, while it is true that science and technology are vital for a country's progress, this essay argues that educational
funding should not be disproportionately channeled into these fields at the expense of the humanities. A balanced approach that values
both scientific and social subjects is crucial for fostering patriotism, critical thinking, and a comprehensive understanding of the world,
which collectively form the foundation of a country's growth.

Despite better access to education, many adults today are still cannot read or write. In what ways are they disadvantaged? What
can governments do to help them?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để nêu quan điểm.

Body 1: DOL phân tích 2 bất lợi mà người không biết đọc viết phải chịu.

Body 2: DOL phân tích 2 giải pháp từ chính phủ để giúp họ xóa mù chữ. Body paragraph 1: Hinders personal
growthExplain: without the ability to read materials with accumulated knowledge >> cannot broaden understanding or realize their
potential;

>> Effect: stifles personal growth + impedes goal development;

>> Effect: unable to chart a meaningful path.

Limits job prospects

>> Explain: illiterate individuals are confined to low-wage jobs;

>> Effect: restricting their economic mobility and quality of life.

Body paragraph 2: Measures aimed at illiteracy removal

Learning programs should suit adults' needs and schedules.

>> Explain: effectiveness improves with flexible timings, practical materials, and community support;

>> Example: in Vietnam, classes in rural areas have enabled many to become literate, opening new opportunities.

Governments should promote participation in these classes.

>> Explain: adults may feel ashamed due to illiteracy;

>> Effect: supportive campaigns can boost literacy program enrollment.

Write:

Despite the increased accessibility of education, many adults remain illiterate. This inability to read and write significantly impacts their
lives in several detrimental ways. However, government intervention can mitigate these challenges by providing practical support to
help these individuals acquire literacy skills.

Illiteracy severely hampers personal development and employment opportunities. Without the ability to read books, documents, and
other informational materials that contain a wealth of accumulated knowledge, individuals are unable to broaden their understanding of
the world, appreciate scientific and cultural advancements, or realize their own potential. This limitation not only stifles personal growth
but also impedes the development of vision and goals, leaving individuals unable to chart a meaningful life path. Furthermore, illiterate
individuals are often confined to low-skilled, physically demanding jobs that offer minimal wages and limited benefits, thereby
restricting their economic mobility and quality of life.

To address these issues, governments can implement several measures aimed at illiteracy removal. Firstly, providing free literacy
classes is essential, and the learning programs should be tailored to accommodate the specific needs and schedules of adults. Indeed, the
effectiveness of these programs can be enhanced through flexible class timings, practical learning materials, and community-based
support. For instance, in Vietnam, numerous classes are held across the country, particularly in rural and remote areas where illiteracy
rates are high. These initiatives have successfully enabled many children and adults to become literate, thereby opening up new
opportunities for them. Additionally, governments should launch awareness campaigns to encourage participation in these classes.
Adults may feel ashamed or fear ridicule due to their illiteracy, which deters them from seeking help. Campaigns that promote a
supportive and non-judgmental learning environment can significantly increase enrollment in literacy programs.

In summary, illiteracy deprives individuals of both personal and professional opportunities, limiting their access to valuable
knowledge and confining them to low-wage jobs. Governments can combat these disadvantages through free literacy classes, and
awareness campaigns, thereby fostering a more inclusive and educated society.

All university students should do some voluntary work to help the local community. To what do you agree or disagree?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để nêu quan điểm.

Body 1: DOL phân tích những bất lợi của việc sinh viên Đại học làm tình nguyện.

Body 2: DOL chứng minh những lợi ích của việc sinh viên Đại học làm tình nguyện vượt trội hơn bất lợi.

Body paragraph 1: The potential drawbacks Impose pressure on busy students

>> Effect: increased stress and burnout;

>> Example: students who rely on part-time employment >> conflict with their work schedules.

>> Hypothesis: if not genuinely interested in >> lack enthusiasm >> low productivity >> undermine the effectiveness of the initiatives.

Body paragraph 2: The benefits far outweigh the concerns

Instills a sense of responsibility in students.

>> Explain: develop a deeper understanding of social issues;

>> Foster essential qualities for responsible citizenship.

Build meaningful connections >> Effect: enhances the university's reputation + mutual learning between academia and the community.

In recent years, there has been increasing advocacy for university students to engage in voluntary work to support their local
communities. While this suggestion has its potential drawbacks, I strongly believe that the benefits far outweigh the concerns.

On the one hand, it is important to acknowledge the potential drawbacks of requiring university students to participate in voluntary
work. Some may argue that mandating such activities could impose additional pressure on already busy students, leading to increased
stress and burnout. This is usually the case of students who rely on part-time employment to support themselves financially. For them,
mandating voluntary activities could conflict with their work schedules, forcing them to choose between earning income and fulfilling
their academic or volunteer commitments. Additionally, if students are not genuinely interested in the causes they are supporting, they
may lack motivation and enthusiasm when participating in voluntary activities. This could result in low levels of engagement and
productivity, ultimately undermining the effectiveness of the initiatives.

However, despite these potential drawbacks, I firmly support the idea of university students engaging in voluntary work for several
reasons. One of these is that voluntary work instills a sense of responsibility and civic duty in students. By actively contributing to their
local communities, students develop a deeper understanding of social issues and the importance of collective action in addressing them,
thereby fostering a sense of empathy, compassion, and solidarity, which are essential qualities for responsible citizenship and leadership.
Another benefit is that by actively participating in community projects and initiatives, students can build meaningful connections with
local residents, organizations, and businesses. This not only enhances the university's reputation as a socially responsible institution but
also creates opportunities for collaborative partnerships and mutual learning between academia and the community.

In conclusion, while there are potential drawbacks to including voluntary work in university education, the benefits far outweigh
the concerns. Therefore, I strongly believe that universities should encourage and facilitate voluntary work as an integral part of the
educational experience.

In some countries, university students live at home, while in other countries university students go to other cities rather than
live with their family. Do you think the benefits of living away from home outweigh the disadvantages?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để nêu quan điểm.

Body 1: DOL phân tích 2 bất lợi của việc đi xa nhà để học đại học.

Body 2: DOL phân tích 2 lợi ích của việc đi xa nhà để học đại học.

Kết bài: DOL kết luận và khẳng định lại quan điểm của mình.

Body paragraph 1: Drawbacks 1. Costs

Impose a financial burden on students >>> reason: the costs of accommodation, food, and transportation >>> the stress of academic life.

Mental health

Homesickness and loneliness >>> affecting their mental well-being >>> Anti-thesis: the problem impacts individuals temporarily.

Body paragraph 2: Benefits Personal growth

The opportunity for independence >>> navigate life's challenges independently >>> fostering resilience and maturity.
Academic success

Provides an environment conducive >>> without the distractions of home >>> dedicate more time and energy to studies >>> improved
academic performance.

Write:

In today's interconnected world, the decision regarding whether to stay at home or venture to another city for university
education is a pivotal one for many students. While both options offer unique advantages and challenges, I firmly believe that the
benefits of living away from home outweigh the drawbacks.

Moving away from home for university education poses challenges related to costs and mental health. Regarding the former, this
option can impose a financial burden on students as the costs of accommodation, food, and transportation in a new city can strain already
tight budgets, adding to the stress of academic life. Concerning the second issue, feelings of homesickness and loneliness are common
among students living away from home, affecting their mental well-being and academic performance. Nevertheless, I believe that this
problem is not significant as it usually impacts individuals temporarily as they would gradually get accustomed to their new life.

In my opinion, living away from home offers tremendous advantages that contribute to personal growth and academic success.
Chief among these is the opportunity for independence and self-reliance. Away from the safety net of familial support, students can
learn to navigate life's challenges independently, fostering resilience and maturity. Moreover, living away from home provides students
with an environment conducive to academic focus and achievement. Without the distractions of home, such as familial obligations and
household chores, students can dedicate more time and energy to their studies, and thus this heightened focus often translates into
improved academic performance and a deeper understanding of course material.

In conclusion, while living away from home for a university education can be challenging in terms of costs and mental
well-being, the positives far outweigh the negatives. The personal growth and academic opportunities afforded by this experience are
invaluable in shaping students into well-rounded individuals prepared to tackle the challenges of the modern world.

Many students find it harder to study when they are at university or college than when they were at school. Why is this? What
can be done to solve the problem?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để nêu quan điểm.

Body 1: DOL nêu 2 lý do việc nhiều học sinh cho rằng học ở đại học khó hơn ở trường học.

Body 2: DOL nêu 2 giải pháp để giải quyết vấn đề trên.

Kết bài: DOL kết luận và khẳng định lại quan điểm của mình.

Body paragraph 1:

The reason studying at university is more challenging than studying at school.

University courses: greater depth of knowledge & faster pace of learning.

Explain: demand critical thinking, independent research, and analytical skills >< freshmen may severely lack.

The newfound independence in university life.

Explain: students manage their own time (a daunting task).

Body paragraph 2: The solution to address this situation.

Adopt a range of strategies.

Expand: the implementation of comprehensive orientation programs.

Creating smaller tutorial groups.

Expand: provide a more conducive environment for asking questions.

Promote a culture of open communication.

Write:

The transition from school to university presents a formidable challenge for many students. This essay will explain why this is the case
and then suggest several measures to overcome these difficulties.

This shift in academic rigour can be attributed to several key factors. Chief among these is that university courses are
characterized by a greater depth of knowledge and a faster pace of learning compared to school. This demands a higher level of critical
thinking, independent research, and analytical skills, all of which freshmen may severely lack. Another contributing factor is the
newfound independence that comes with university life. Unlike school, where there is often a structured timetable and close monitoring
by teachers and parents, university students are expected to manage their own time, which can be a daunting task for those unaccustomed
to this level of autonomy.

To address this issue, higher education institutions can adopt a range of strategies. One such approach is the
implementation of comprehensive orientation programs designed to equip incoming students with essential study competencies,
effective time management strategies, and awareness of available campus resources. Additionally, by creating smaller tutorial groups
within larger classes, these institutes could provide students with a more conducive environment for asking questions and seeking
clarification. Moreover, universities should promote a culture of open communication between professors and students, encouraging
them to seek help when needed.

In conclusion, the transition from high schools to tertiary education poses a significant academic challenge for students
due to the differences in terms of curricula and greater independence required. By initiating specialized orientation programs, cultivating
smaller learning communities, and advocating open channels of communication, universities can help students overcome these
challenges and thrive in their academic pursuits.

Schools should focus on academic success and passing examinations. Skills such as cookery, dressmaking and woodwork should
not be taught at school as it is better to learn these from family and friends. To that extent do you agree or disagree?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để nêu quan điểm.

Body 1: DOL phân tích lý do không nên dạy các kỹ năng thực tế ở trường.

Body 2: phân tích lý do khác chứng minh trường học không nên dạy các kỹ năng cuộc sống.

Kết bài: DOL kết luận và khẳng định lại quan điểm của mình.

Body paragraph 1: Acquiring life skills >>> individuals to handle everyday challenges.

Antithesis: Each student has unique strengths >>> impractical to enforce compulsory courses for all >>> parents can play a pivotal role
in skill development.

Body paragraph 2: Overwhelming academic workload.

Students are confronted with a multitude of subjects + acquiring knowledge across various fields >>> exacerbates the burden >>>
heightened stress levels.

It may divert away from academic endeavors >>> affecting students' academic performance.

Write: It is believed that schools should prioritize academic education, leaving practical skills including cookery, dressmaking, and
woodwork to be learned from family and friends. This essay strongly agrees with this suggestion for several reasons.
Undoubtedly, acquiring life skills such as cooking and woodworking can be invaluable for personal growth and self-reliance. These
skills empower individuals to handle everyday challenges with confidence. However, incorporating such a diverse range of skills into
the school curriculum presents significant challenges. Chief among these is that each student has unique interests and strengths, making
it impractical to enforce compulsory courses for all. Instead, parents can play a pivotal role in identifying their children's inclinations
and providing tailored opportunities for skill development.

Another compelling argument against integrating life skills into the school curriculum is the already overwhelming
academic workload. Indeed, students are confronted with a multitude of subjects, encompassing the sciences, humanities, and more.
Their educational journey entails acquiring knowledge across various fields, completing assignments, and preparing for examinations.
The addition of skill-based courses could exacerbate the burden and lead to heightened stress levels. Furthermore, it may divert precious
time and energy away from academic endeavors, potentially affecting students' academic performance.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that the acquisition of practical skills, such as cooking or woodworking, should be viewed as
leisure activities that students can pursue at home rather than obligatory subjects within the school curriculum. By maintaining a focus
on academic success, schools can better prepare students for a broader range of future opportunities.

The best way to reduce poverty in developing countries is by giving up to six years of free education, so that they can at least
read, write and use numbers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để nêu quan điểm.

Body 1: DOL phân tích vì sao nhiều người đồng tình với quan điểm của đề bài.

Body 2: phân tích vì sao giáo dục sơ cấp miễn phí chưa phải cách tốt nhất để giải quyết cái nghèo.

Kết bài: DOL kết luận và khẳng định lại quan điểm của mình.

Despite the pivotal role that basic education can play, I firmly believe that the effectiveness of such a strategy is limited and must be
complemented by more comprehensive measures.

Body paragraph 1: Establish a strong foundation and alleviate financial strain

Fundamental skills and knowledge

Enabling people to read, write, and use numbers ➡ informecd decisions + productive activities ➡ personal success ➡ contriburte to
society

Alleviate the financial burden

make education more accessible

break the cycle of poverty

Body paragraph 2: One solution alone cannot holistically address poverty

Lack knowledge and skills needed in globalization and technological advancement

should extend to secondary and higher levels

enhancing employability + equip individuals for complex economic landscapes

Poverty needs a multifaceted solution

Sole focus on education = overlooks critical factors

Write;

The proposition of offering up to six years of free education as a solution to alleviate poverty in developing countries is a matter of
paramount importance. Despite the pivotal role that basic education can play, I firmly believe that the effectiveness of such a strategy is
limited and must be complemented by more comprehensive measures.

Advocates of this view may emphasize that six years of free education can establish a strong foundation and alleviate financial strain.
Regarding the former, this initiative can equip individuals with fundamental skills and knowledge, which can in turn contribute to
personal success and community development. Enabling individuals to read, write, and use numbers empowers them to make informed
decisions and engage in productive activities, meaning that they can make meaningful contributions to their societies. Moreover,
providing free education for at least six years would alleviate the financial burden on families, especially those who cannot afford their
children’s school fees. This aid can make education more accessible to marginalized communities, thereby potentially breaking the cycle
of poverty.

However, I disagree with the notion that six years of free education alone can holistically address the intricate challenge of poverty.
Primary education may lack the advanced knowledge and skills that individuals need amid rapid globalization and technological
advancement. This means that subsidized education should extend to secondary and higher levels, enhancing employability and
equipping individuals for complex economic landscapes. Additionally, it is imperative to acknowledge that poverty, being a multifaceted
and deeply rooted issue, necessitates a multifaceted solution. A sole focus on education, even if extended to six years, overlooks critical
factors such as healthcare, infrastructure development, job creation, and the establishment of robust social safety nets.

In conclusion, while providing up to six years of free education is a commendable step towards poverty reduction, it should be viewed
as part of a larger framework. A more comprehensive approach, involving extended education opportunities and a multifaceted strategy,
is essential to effectively combat the complex problem of poverty in developing countries.

In the modern world, schools are no longer necessary because there is so much information available through the internet that
children can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để nêu quan điểm.

Body 1: DOL phân tích vì sao thông tin trên Internet hỗ trợ công tác học tập.

Body 2: DOL phân tích vai trò không thể thay thế của trường học truyền thống.

Kết bài: DOL kết luận và khẳng định lại quan điểm của mình.

This essay contends that, despite the value of the Internet for children’s learning, schools remain indispensable as they provide a
structured academic environment and foster children’s holistic development

Body paragraph 1: It is true that the informational resources found on the Internet can serve to bolster children’s learning.

Educational platforms and digital tools

(specify) watch educational videos + take interactive lessons

(result) promotes self-directed learning + personalized educational paths

Anti-thesis

Internet = lack of structure and its impersonal nature

(result) cannot replace traditional schooling

Body paragraph 2: Therefore, I hold the belief that formal schools remain irreplaceable because of their unique advantages over online
learning.

A systematic approach to learning

guidance from trained educators + monitoring from academic staff

Socialization and the development of interpersonal skills

(specify) school - learn to collaborate, communicate, and negotiate

(result) strengthen children’s social skills, increase their empathy, and improve their emotional intelligence

Write: In the digital age, some people believe that the vast amount of information accessible via the Internet has rendered traditional
schools inessential. This essay contends that, despite the value of the Internet for children’s learning, schools remain indispensable as
they provide a structured academic environment and foster children’s holistic development.

It is true that the informational resources found on the Internet can serve to bolster children’s learning. Children with an
Internet-connected device can log onto educational platforms and utilize various digital tools that can greatly enhance their learning
experience. By visiting websites such as Khan Academy, for example, children can watch educational videos and take interactive lessons
on virtually any subject. Such accessibility promotes self-directed learning, enabling students to explore their interests and pursue
personalized educational paths. However, the major limitations of the Internet, particularly its lack of structure and its impersonal nature,
make it ill-suited to replace traditional schooling, especially where children are concerned.

Therefore, I hold the belief that formal schools remain irreplaceable because of their unique advantages over online
learning. One primary function of formal academic institutions is to provide a systematic approach to learning supported by not only
guidance from trained educators but also additional monitoring from academic staff, which many online courses still lack. Another
pivotal role of schools is in fostering socialization and the development of interpersonal skills. In a school setting, students learn to
collaborate, communicate, and negotiate with their peers by engaging in extracurricular activities or participating in group projects. Such
experiences cannot be adequately replicated in a virtual learning environment, yet they are vital for strengthening children’s social skills,
increasing their empathy, and improving their emotional intelligence, all of which contribute to their well-rounded development.

In conclusion, while the internet has undoubtedly revolutionized access to information, traditional schools provide a
holistic education that extends beyond knowledge acquisition to encompass children’s personal growth in emotional and social terms.
Thus, these institutions remain a vital nexus of education and development for children in the modern world.

Children today find it difficult to concentrate on or to pay attention to school. What are the reasons? How can we solve this
problem?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để nêu quan điểm.

Body 1: DOL phân tích lý do vì sao ngày nay trẻ em khó tập trung.

Body 2: DOL đưa ra 2 giải pháp cho vấn đề trên.

Kết bài: DOL kết luận và khẳng định lại quan điểm của mình.

This essay intends to examine the causes of this issue and propose potential solutions.

Body paragraph 1: Causes: Technological distraction

expose to fast-paced digital content >> brain constantly stimulated >> slower pace of classoom >> become boring >> cannot focus

Academic pressure: increased Academic pressure >> impaired cognitive functions >> impact the capacity to focus

Body paragraph 2: Solutions

Digital literacy in the curriculum

skills to navigate the digital world

understand the pros and cons

Academic pressure reduction

moving away from standardized tests >> other methods of assessment

stress management programs

Write: In recent years, there has been a perceived decrease in the ability of children to focus or pay attention in class. This essay intends
to examine the causes of this issue and propose potential solutions.

While different factors contribute to the decreased attention span among students, the main ones may be technological
distraction and academic pressure. Regarding the former, children’s increased exposure to fast-paced, instantly gratifying digital content
is causing their brains to be constantly stimulated. This overstimulation can make the slower pace of traditional classroom learning seem
uninteresting in comparison, which can explain their struggle with staying focused during lessons. Another possible explanation is the
increased academic pressure on children over the past few decades can lead to impaired cognitive functions related to attention and
concentration. This is because high-stakes standardized tests, competition for college admission, and parental expectations can create a
negative environment that raises students’ levels of stress and anxiety, both of which are known to have adverse impacts on the capacity
to focus at length.

To address these challenges, it is helpful to consider a multi-faceted approach that considers both the larger societal context
and the individual needs of students. One strategy is for schools to incorporate digital literacy into the curriculum, which can help equip
students with the skills to navigate the digital world effectively. This includes understanding the potential pitfalls of excessive screen
time and learning to use technology as a tool for learning rather than a source of constant distraction. Another important solution involves
reducing the excessive academic stress experienced by a large number of young students. This can be achieved by moving away from
high-stakes standardized tests towards more holistic methods of assessment or by implementing stress management programs, whereby
teachers could be trained to recognize and respond to signs of stress and anxiety in students.

In conclusion, the rampant technological distractions and undue study-related stress contribute to the declining ability to
concentrate among students today. To improve the situation, it is imperative to make digital literacy part of the learning program and
promote a stress-free learning environment through holistic assessment methods and stress management programs.

It is the responsibility of schools to teach children good behavior in addition to providing formal education. To what extent do
you agree or disagree?

MB: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để nêu quan điểm: hoàn toàn đồng ý với quan điểm trường
học có trách nhiệm dạy trẻ để có những hành vi tốt.

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL phân tích lý do thứ nhất: trang bị cho học sinh những kỹ năng cần thiết để trở thành những công dân có trách
nhiệm.

Body 2: DOL phân tích lý do thứ hai: tạo ra môi trường học tập an toàn và hỗ trợ nhau.

Kết bài: DOL kết luận và khẳng định lại quan điểm của mình.

Body paragraph 1: Reason 1:

Equipping children with the necessary skills helps them develop into responsible citizens.

Teachers instill positive behaviors in students.

For instance: anti-bullying campaigns (in Japanese schools)

Body paragraph 2: Reason 2:

Creating a safe and supportive learning environment.

Schools can foster positive relationships between students and teachers.

This can lead to improved academic outcomes and better student well-being.

While formal education remains a top priority, many argue that schools must also instill good behavior in students. I strongly
agree that it is the responsibility of schools to teach children good behavior.

First, schools are more than just academic institutions, and I believe they also play a vital role in shaping the character of their
students. Teachers serve as role models for children, and they are responsible for instilling positive values and behaviors in students. By
teaching good manners and values, schools can equip children with the necessary skills to navigate the world and interact with others
respectfully and kindly. This can help children develop into responsible citizens who contribute positively to society and promote a
more harmonious community. For instance, many Japanese schools have adopted anti-bullying campaigns that teach students about
respect, empathy, and kindness towards others. These programs not only promote good behavior but also create a safe and inclusive
learning environment for all students.

Furthermore, as students spend a significant portion of their time in school, the school environment can profoundly impact
their behavior and academic performance. Schools can create a safe and supportive learning environment that fosters positive
relationships between students and teachers by promoting good behavior and values. This, in turn, can lead to improved academic
outcomes and better student well-being, as students feel valued, respected, and motivated to learn. By prioritizing good behavior
alongside academic achievement, schools can help students succeed both in and outside the classroom.

In conclusion, while a formal education is essential, it is equally crucial for schools to teach good behavior to children.
Personally, the responsibility of schools goes beyond academic excellence to ensure that students are prepared to be responsible citizens
who can positively contribute to society.

Children should study all subjects at school, while others think they should only study subjects they are find interesting. Discuss
and give your opinion.

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để nêu quan điểm: học sinh học tất cả các môn
học hoặc chỉ học những môn học họ thích có những mặt tích cực riêng.

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL phân tích lợi ích của việc học tất cả các môn học.

Body 2: DOL phân tích lợi ích của việc chỉ học những môn yêu thích.

Kết bài: DOL kết luận và khẳng định lại quan điểm của mình.

Body paragraph 1: The benefits of studying all subjects

Develop a broad range of skills.

Broaden students' perspectives --> appreciate the value of different disciplines.

Improve a student's chances of success in exams and future academic pursuits.

Body paragraph 2: The benefits of concentrating on the subjects in which children excel

Studying all subjects can be overwhelming + lead to a lack of depth in learning.

In contrast, children can delve deeper into the subject by focusing on their strengths.

Furthermore, this approach can help children build confidence in their abilities.

However, children may miss important subjects essential for their future academics.

While some individuals believe that studying all subjects is necessary for a well-rounded education, others argue that it is
more beneficial to concentrate on the areas in which children excel. In my opinion, both perspectives are valid since learning all subjects
can aid students in obtaining a diverse set of skills, while concentrating on a single subject can facilitate deeper comprehension and
analytical abilities.

On the one hand, studying all subjects can help students develop a broad range of skills, such as time management, problem-
solving, and communication. Exposure to various subjects can broaden their perspectives and help them appreciate the value of different
disciplines. Moreover, in many educational systems, a wide range of subjects is required to progress to higher levels of education.
Studying them all can improve a student's chances of success in exams and future academic pursuits. Therefore, proponents of studying
all subjects argue that it can lead to well-rounded individuals with diverse skill sets and a better understanding of the world.

On the other hand, some argue that studying all subjects can be overwhelming and lead to a lack of depth in learning.
Students may need more time to fully understand and engage with each subject, resulting in surface-level knowledge. In contrast,
children can delve deeper into the subject matter by focusing on their strengths and interests, leading to a more profound understanding
and critical analysis. Furthermore, this approach can help children build confidence in their abilities and feel more motivated to learn.
However, critics of this approach argue that children may miss out on important subjects essential for their future academic and career
paths.

In conclusion, while children must have a well-rounded education, it is equally important to let them focus on their interests
and strengths.

The advantages of the spread of English as a global language will continue to outweigh its disadvantages. To what extent do you
agree or disagree?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để đồng ý với quan điểm việc phổ biến tiếng
anh như là ngôn ngữ toàn cầu có nhiều lợi ích hơn là bất lợi --> Hoàn toàn đồng ý.

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL phân tích nhược điểm của sự phổ biến tiếng Anh như là một ngôn ngữ toàn cầu và biện pháp để giảm thiểu
chúng.

Body 2: DOL phân tích lợi ích của việc tiếng Anh trở thành ngôn ngữ toàn cầu.

Kết bài: DOL kết luận và khẳng định lại quan điểm của mình.

Body paragraph 1: The spread of English as a global language has numerous downsides

Cultural homogeneity

A lack of linguistic variety

Harm the preservation of languages and civilizations.

Persons who speak English may be preferred over those who do not.

Mitigating the disadvantages by language preservation initiatives and educational policies.

Body paragraph 2:

English also offers significant benefits

It has enabled worldwide communication, especially in business and commerce.

Individuals from many nations may now communicate with one another in English.

Access standard international educational resources.

English has become the predominant language in technology, research, and medicine.

Hence, those who speak English may comprehend the most recent information in these domains.

The advantages of the spread of English as a global language will continue to outweigh its disadvantages. I fully agree with
this viewpoint as the language has enabled worldwide communication and accessibility to the academic world.
English is now the most widely used language in the world, which regrettably has numerous downsides. It may result in cultural
homogeneity, in which English-speaking cultures dominate and repress the cultures of non-English-speaking nations. Moreover,
English's predominance might result in a lack of linguistic variety, which can harm the preservation of languages and civilizations.
Regarding education, employment possibilities, and access to information, persons who speak English may be preferred over those who
do not due to the expansion of English. Nevertheless, the disadvantages may be mitigated by language preservation initiatives and
educational policies that foster linguistic variety. This will ensure that English remains a viable instrument for global communication
and mutual understanding.

Despite these problems, English also offers significant benefits. It has enabled worldwide communication, especially in
business and commerce. Individuals from many nations may now communicate with one another in English, hence removing
communication obstacles. Second, the English language has enabled non-native English speakers to access standard international
educational resources, such as online courses and academic research. In addition, English has become the predominant language in
technology, research, and medicine. Hence, the common knowledge in these domains is in English, giving those who speak English an
advantage in obtaining and comprehending the most recent information.

In conclusion, English, although having certain manageable difficulties, has genuinely facilitated international
communication and exposure to the academic community. This is why I completely agree that the benefits of English's globalization
will continue to exceed its drawbacks.

Some students take a gap year after graduating high school to work and/or travel. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of
this.

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để nêu quan điểm taking gap year gây ra bất lợi
nhiều hơn lợi ích: tốn nhiều chi phí + không khuyến khích học sinh đi học đại học.

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL phân tích quan điểm taking gap year giúp học sinh phát triển các kỹ năng và kiến thức thực tế + mang đến sự
phát triển cá nhân

Body 2: DOL phân tích quan điểm taking gap year gây ra nhiều bất lợi: ngăn cản học sinh đi học đại học + tốn nhiều chi phí.

Kết bài: DOL kết luận và khẳng định lại quan điểm của mình.

Body paragraph 1: The benefits of taking gap year

Improve their academic skills by enrolling in academic courses or workshops.

For instance, a science student may work in a laboratory.

Equip them with the practical skills and knowledge for their future academic endeavors.

Offers personal growth

They can introspect, cultivate healthy habits, and enhance their physical and mental well-being.

A refreshed outlook and vigor to resume academic work.

Body paragraph 2: Some potential drawbacks

A loss of motivation to return to academic pursuits.

Causing students to struggle with resuming their studies upon their return.

Traveling during a gap year can be costly.

Students may encounter financial difficulties.

These potential drawbacks should be weighed against the advantages.

Write: After finishing high school, some people take a gap year to get professional experience and explore the world. While this tendency
helps students develop their practical knowledge and personal growth, it may be prohibitively costly and discourage them from
continuing their higher education.

Taking a gap year allows students to improve their academic skills by enrolling in academic courses or workshops during this time.
For instance, a student who intends to pursue a career in science may utilize their gap year to participate in a research internship or work
in a laboratory. Such experience equips them with the practical skills and knowledge necessary for their future academic endeavors.
Additionally, a gap year offers personal growth as students can take a break from their academic pursuits and concentrate on self-
development. During this time, they can introspect, cultivate healthy habits, and enhance their physical and mental well-being. The
result is a refreshed outlook and vigor to resume academic work with renewed vigor.

While a gap year presents many benefits, some potential drawbacks should be considered. Firstly, taking a break from education
can lead to a loss of motivation to return to academic pursuits, causing students to struggle with resuming their studies upon their return.
Students may also find it challenging to regain their academic focus and catch up with their peers, which can impede their academic
progress. Secondly, traveling during a gap year can be costly. Students may encounter financial difficulties while trying to finance their
trip or secure employment that provides adequate remuneration to cover their expenses. These potential drawbacks should be weighed
against the advantages of taking a gap year to determine if it is the right choice for the student.

In conclusion, although having a gap year benefits students' academic and personal development, it may be financially
burdensome and deter them from continuing their higher education.

Video records are better to learn about the way other people in the world live than written documents. To what extent do you
agree or disagree?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để nêu quan điểm: Nghiên cứu về những nền
văn hóa khác qua xem video records sẽ hiệu quả hơn đọc sách.

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL phân tích ưu điểm của video records: cung cấp hình ảnh trực quan về cách mọi người sống.

Body 2: DOL phân tích ưu điểm khác của video records: cho phép nhìn và nghe những điều sách khó có thể ghi lại.

Kết bài: DOL kết luận và khẳng định lại quan điểm của mình.

Body paragraph 1: Video records provide a visual representation of how people live

More engaging and memorable than written documents

Offer an authentic insight into their way of life

Valuable for those who have never had the opportunity to travel to other countries

Develop a more nuanced perspective of their way of life.

Body paragraph 2:

Video records allow to see and hear things that may be difficult to capture in writing.

For example: facial expressions, tone of voice, and body language

Enhance our understanding of other cultures.

However, video records may present a limited or biased view of a culture.

The filmmaker's perspective influences the selection of video content.

Therefore, seeking out various sources is essential to understand a culture better.

While some argue that written documents are the best way to learn about other cultures, others believe video records are
more effective. From my perspective, video records offer a more immersive and engaging way to learn about how other people live.

One of the main advantages of video records is that they provide a visual representation of how people live, which can be more
engaging and memorable than written documents. Watching videos of people from different cultures going about their daily lives,
interacting with one another, and practicing their traditions can offer a unique and authentic insight into their way of life. This can be
particularly valuable for those who have never had the opportunity to travel to other countries or experience other cultures firsthand. By
seeing people in their natural environment, we can better understand their habits and customs and develop a more nuanced perspective
of their way of life.

Another advantage of video records is that they allow us to see and hear things that may be difficult to capture in writing.
For example, videos can capture the nuances of facial expressions, tone of voice, and body language essential to communication in many
cultures. This type of nonverbal communication can be challenging to convey in written documents and can significantly enhance our
understanding of other cultures. However, it is essential to acknowledge that video records may present a limited or biased view of a
culture. The filmmaker's perspective or agenda may influence the selection of what is included in a video, and specific aspects of a
culture may be omitted or distorted. Therefore, seeking out various sources, including written documents, is essential to gain a more
comprehensive understanding of a culture.

In conclusion, personally, video records offer a unique and engaging way to learn about other cultures. However, it is crucial
to approach video records with a critical eye to gain a more comprehensive understanding of other cultures.

The best way to teach children to cooperate is through team sports at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để trình bày tóm tắt 2 lý do chính DOL không
đồng ý với quan điểm thể thao đồng đội là cách tốt nhất để dạy trẻ hợp tác.

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL phân tích lý do thứ nhất: thể thao đồng đội có thể dẫn đến tư duy cạnh tranh không lành mạnh.

Body 2: DOL phân tích lý do thứ hai: thể thao đồng đội không dạy trẻ tư duy hợp tác trong những bối cảnh khác.

Kết bài: DOL kết luận và khẳng định lại quan điểm của mình.

Body paragraph 1: Team sports can lead to a competitive mindset.

Focusing on winning and being the best lead children to view their teammates as opponents.
This can result in an unhealthy approach to teamwork

Children with certain personalities would see counterproductive results

Alternative activities (emphasizing collaboration + working towards a shared goal)

Body para 2: Team sports not teach children the specific skills required in other contexts.

In sports: following rules, listening to the coach, achieve a common goal

However, in other areas require a different skill set

Therefore, group discussions or role-playing scenarios are more effective

Team sports in the classroom are an excellent method for developing the value of cooperation in young minds. I completely
disagree with this viewpoint, as team sports may promote an unhealthy emphasis on competition while failing to instill the importance
of teamwork in the workplace or the classroom.

First, team sports can sometimes lead to a competitive mindset, hindering cooperation. In team sports, there is often a focus
on winning and being the best, leading children to view their teammates as opponents rather than collaborators. This can result in an
unhealthy and counterproductive approach to teamwork. Children with certain personalities would even see counterproductive results
when exposed to excessive competitiveness through team sports. In such situations, alternative activities emphasizing collaboration and
the importance of working towards a shared goal rather than individual achievement can promote a more cooperative mindset.

Furthermore, team sports may not teach children the specific skills required for cooperation in other contexts. Cooperation
in sports is often focused on following rules and instructions, listening to the coach, and working together to achieve a common goal.
However, cooperation in other areas, such as the classroom or workplace, may require a completely different skill set, such as effective
communication, conflict resolution, and adaptability. Therefore, activities that teach these skills, such as group discussions or role-
playing scenarios, are more effective in preparing children for real-world situations where cooperation is essential.

In conclusion, I strongly disagree that team sports are the most effective approach to conveying the value of working
collaboratively because they may encourage an inappropriate focus on competitiveness while failing to establish collaboration's
significance in the context of the job or the classroom.

While many people go to university for academic study, more people should be encouraged to do vocational training because
there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers. Do you agree or disagree?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để cho giám khảo biết là mình Agree hay
Disagree với câu hỏi. Vì DOL đứng ở giữa nên sẽ trình bày như sau:

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL sẽ nói về kinh nghiệm thực tiễn khi học nghề.

Body 2: DOL sẽ nói về cơ hội việc làm cao khi học nghề.

Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình bằng cách tóm lại 2 ý chính ở thân bài.

I agree with this viewpoint because skills training offers greater practical knowledge and is more likely to result in a successful job
search.

Body paragraph 1: Vocational education is primarily beneficial because it teaches pupils the particular tasks and procedures of a specific
occupation.

Real-world and hands-on experience

students may apply their theoretical classroom knowledge in actual scenarios.

Ex: plumber + electrician training includes practical application

Effect: allow learners to get a comprehensive knowledge of the abilities required for a job.

Body paragraph 2: Vocational training can also be an effective way to prepare for a successful job search.

Increase employment rate

vocational training programs are more practical + teach skills in high demand in the job market

Ex: programs in healthcare, information technology, and skilled trades --> graduates can find work more quickly.

strong connections with local employers --> give students networking chances

Despite the popularity of universities, some argue that vocational education should be promoted to help alleviate the increasing scarcity
of competent workers across many labor sectors. I agree with this viewpoint because skills training offers greater practical knowledge
and is more likely to result in a successful job search.

Vocational education is primarily beneficial because it teaches pupils the particular tasks and procedures of a specific occupation.
Therefore, its typical training component often involves real-world and hands-on experience. By participating in these practical
experiences, students may apply their theoretical classroom knowledge in actual scenarios. For instance, training to become an
electrician or plumber must include practical application. They only become proficient when using specialized tools, interpreting
technical manuals, and identifying common problems. This practical aspect of vocational training allows learners to get a comprehensive
knowledge of the abilities required for success in their chosen sector.

Furthermore, vocational training can also be an effective way to prepare for a successful job search. The reason is that not only does
vocational training programs are more practical it also often teaches skills in high demand in the job market. For example, programs in
healthcare, information technology, and skilled trades like plumbing and electrical work are consistently in high demand. Consequently,
graduates of these programs can find work more quickly. In addition, many vocational training programs have strong connections with
local employers in their respective industries. This can give students valuable networking opportunities and access to job leads that may
not be advertised publicly. As demonstrated, graduates of vocational training programs often have practical experience, in-demand
skills, and industry connections, all of which can help them stand out in a competitive job market.

In conclusion, personally, more individuals should be encouraged to pursue vocational training since it provides
more relevant, hands-on experience and increases the likelihood of securing employment.

Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who want to study at universities. Do you agree
or disagree with this statement?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm).

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL sẽ nói về những ưu điểm nếu nhà nước chi trả tiền học phí đại học cho toàn dân.

Body 2: DOL sẽ nói về những bất lợi đối với nguồn lực của các trường đại học và thị trường lao động nếu áp dụng chính sách trên.

Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ tổng kết lại những ý chính đã nêu trên và nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình.

Even while I see the value of making higher education accessible to everyone, I worry about the potential adverse effects on the job
market and academic outcomes that would emerge.

Body paragraph 1:

Investing in our youth by covering their college costs has several apparent benefits.

100% of children can access higher education

inspire children from low-income or underprivileged backgrounds to attend college --> have the same possibilities to further their
education -->

boost the quality of the working population

a rise in the number of people with advanced degrees and well-developed skill sets --> essential for sustained economic expansion.

Body paragraph 2:

Nonetheless, I feel the downsides of this approach are far more severe.

Overwhelmed college resources

everyone can access higher education --> a dramatic application surge --> higher education institutions are not yet equipped to handle -
-> collapse the education system

Imbalance job market

higher education more accessible --> increase the number of job seekers who have degrees --> a lack of labor for inferior vocations and
a surplus in other fields

The government, according to some, should cover the cost of higher education for everyone who wishes to attend. Even while I see the
value of making higher education accessible to everyone, I worry about the potential adverse effects on the job market and academic
outcomes that would emerge.

Investing in our youth by covering their college costs has several apparent benefits. First, this policy would inspire children from
low-income or underprivileged backgrounds to attend college. Because of this, children from less affluent backgrounds may have the
same possibilities to further their education as students from wealthier families. Second, investing additional funds into universities may
boost the quality of the working population. This is because there would be a rise in the number of people with advanced degrees and
well-developed skill sets, both of which are essential for sustained economic expansion.

Nonetheless, I feel the downsides of this approach are far more severe. Because of the high demand for making higher
education accessible for all, colleges and their resources would quickly become overwhelmed. Higher education institutions are not yet
equipped to handle a dramatic application surge, which would lead to a total collapse of the education system. In addition, increasing
the number of people seeking work will likely result from making higher education more accessible. With universal access to higher
education at no cost, the number of people who get their degrees will rise dramatically. Consequently, there will be a lack of labor for
inferior vocations and a surplus of labor in other fields as university graduates seek employment in their respective fields, such as
marketing and not construction.
 In conclusion, although I agree that expanding access to higher education is desirable, I am concerned about the negative
consequences this may have on campus resources and the labor market.

In many countries, not enough students study science subjects. What are the causes? What will be the effect on society?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để trình bày quan điểm của mình về vấn đề
được đặt ra.

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL sẽ nói về lí do vì sao không có nhiều người theo học các ngành khoa học.

Body 2: DOL sẽ nói về ảnh hưởng của xu hướng này lên xã hội nha.

Kết bài: DOL kết luận và khẳng định lại quan điểm của mình.

These subjects require significant effort and time to master, and they have a reputation for being extremely challenging. If this trend
continues unchecked, it will impede the country's technical progress, which would indirectly affect our standard of living.

Body paragraph 1: The widespread lack of interest in science, technology, engineering, and math is due primarily to two causes

Difficulty : necessitate a tremendous amount of hard work, dedication, and wit

Example: potential biology majors are dissuaded from pursuing the field

Competitive job market + lack of positions in this science industry

society places a higher value on money than on research >> finance majors are hired >> low employment rate following the graduation
of science majors

Body paragraph 2: The fall in the number of scientists also means fewer scientific achievements, making it more challenging to raise
living standards.

Lower living standards

Scientists' work >> make the world a better place >> they have historically produced useful technologies

Fewer science majors = less scientific discovery >> technological progress would stagnate + fewer life-enhancing breakthroughs

Today, science education is under-represented in several nations. These subjects require significant effort and time to master,
and they have a reputation for being extremely challenging. If this trend continues unchecked, it will impede the country's technical
progress, which would indirectly affect our standard of living.

The widespread lack of interest in science, technology, engineering, and math is due primarily to two causes. It is important
to note that such topics are notoriously difficult and necessitate a tremendous amount of hard work, dedication, and wit. Many potential
biology majors are dissuaded from pursuing the field because of the sheer volume of research required of each student. Furthermore,
the job market is exceedingly competitive, and there is a severe lack of positions in this industry. Even if a significant amount of energy
and time is devoted to science education in school, there is still a low likelihood of employment following graduation. This is because
society places a higher value on money than on research, and hence only finance majors are hired.

The fall in the number of scientists also means fewer scientific achievements, making it more challenging to raise living
standards. Scientists work on various initiatives with the overarching goal of making the world a better place for future generations.
While scientists may not generate profits for the country straightaway, they have historically produced useful technologies like
automobiles, the Internet, and electricity. Ultimately, fewer science majors mean less scientific discovery; technological progress would
stagnate without scientists, and fewer life-enhancing breakthroughs would be made.

In conclusion, the difficulty and devotion necessary to study science are two significant reasons for the scarcity of
scientific students. If left uncontrolled, this propensity might hamper the nation's technological growth as a whole, which would have a
detrimental impact on our quality of life.

Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us, but others think that studying past history can help us better understand
the present. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để trình bày quan điểm của mình về vấn đề
được đặt ra.

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL giải thích vì sao nhiều người không tin tưởng giá trị của tại liệu lịch sử.

Body 2: DOL giải thích tầm quan trọng của việc học lịch sử.

Kết bài: DOL kết luận và khẳng định lại quan điểm của mình.

Personally, the second viewpoint is more reasonable since we may be better prepared for the present and future by learning from previous
mistakes.

Body paragraph 1: First, some individuals are skeptical of historical accounts because they believe they are biased.

Physical and scientific evidence is insufficient >> dismiss historical trivia

Example: archaeologists have uncovered old remains >< knowledge provided in history books about the ancient kingdom

Antithesis: a lack of proof >< not genuine and irrelevant

Body paragraph 2: On the other hand, knowledge of history is vital for comprehending the present and future.

Can learn from our mistakes and improve our future actions + be inspired to work harder

Example: In Germany, educating children about World War II history is a must >> help them learn from and prevent repeating past
errors

While some argue that history has nothing significant to teach us, others insist that understanding the past help us better grasp the present.
Personally, the second viewpoint is more reasonable since we may be better prepared for the present and future by learning from previous
mistakes.

First, some individuals are skeptical of historical accounts because they believe they are biased. In most cases, physical and scientific
evidence is insufficient to establish the knowledge. For this reason, many individuals dismiss historical trivia as legends or exaggerations
that contribute nothing to modern life. In Vietnam, for instance, archaeologists have uncovered old remains in various locations, but
they have yet to match this information with the proper knowledge provided in history books about the ancient kingdom. However, I
cannot entirely agree with this idea since a lack of proof does not mean the past is not genuine and irrelevant.

On the other hand, knowledge of history is vital for comprehending the present and future. In reality, by studying the past, not only
can we learn from our mistakes and improve our future actions, but we may also be inspired to work harder by hearing about the heroic
efforts and personal sacrifices that our ancestors made. In Germany, for instance, educating children about World War II history is a
must because of the many lessons and insights it provides for helping them learn from and prevent repeating past errors.

In conclusion, as a result of learning from past mistakes, it is essential to study history so that humans may be better equipped for the
present and future.

Nowadays young people mostly learn by reading books or watching movies and TV shows, rather than personal experiences. To
what extent do you agree or disagree?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để trình bày quan điểm của mình về vấn đề
được đặt ra.

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL sẽ trình bày lý do tại sao mọi người nên học từ những trải nghiệm thực tiễn

Body 2: DOL sẽ trình bày lý do tại sao mọi người nên học từ sách báo và phim ảnh

Kết bài: DOL kết luận và khẳng định lại quan điểm của mình.

While I acknowledge that there are still a certain number of people who prefer the latter, I think that it is more reasonable to widen
young people’s knowledge via books and movies.

Body paragraph 1: Real-life experiences

The provision of practical knowledge

Offer individuals the authentic sensation & a long-lasting understanding of a myriad of subjects

Example: participating in making ceramics greatly enhances people’s comprehension of the process

Body paragraph 2: Learning through books and movies

Financial affairs

Written form of texts and films cost much less considerable amount of money

The variety of contents

Advancements in technology have facilitated the growth of the Internet => proliferation of movies has been encouraged, which fosters
the diversity of data

Juveniles these days demonstrate their personal preference for different media such as books and films instead of putting emphasis on
hands-on experiences when learning. While I acknowledge that there are still a certain number of people who prefer the latter, I think
that it is more reasonable to widen young people’s knowledge via books and movies.

Those who advocate the paramount importance of real-life experiences in learning may point to its provision of practical knowledge. It
goes without saying that firsthand experiences offer individuals the authentic sensation as well as a long-lasting understanding of a
myriad of subjects. For example, in comparison to reading about the production of ceramics through books, participating in making
them greatly enhances people’s comprehension of its process, which will definitely last longer in our memory and the experience will
not be ever replaced.

Learning through books and movies, on the other hand, is more recommendable in terms of financial affairs and the variety of
contents. With regard to the former, written form of texts and films cost much less considerable amount of money compared to the
payment for hands-on experiences. A book about the history and geography of Hoi An - an ancient town in central Vietnam, for instance,
is undoubtedly much more affordable compared to a journey to this breathtaking hotspot. Looking at the second idea, advancements in
technology have facilitated the growth of the Internet where the proliferation of movies has been encouraged, which fosters the diversity
of data that people can utilize for learning purposes. The process of obtaining new knowledge is supported by a wide range of content,
which makes the attempt to gain firsthand experience become meaningless.

In conclusion, although I acknowledge that the role of offering pragmatic knowledge of real-life experiences is undeniable,
from my perspective, the inexpensive cost and diversified content of books and movies make them a more possible approach to widen
one’s horizon.

Although there is a lot of translation software available, learning a language could still be advantageous. To what extent do you
agree or disagree?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để trình bày quan điểm của mình về vấn đề
được đặt ra.

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL sẽ trình bày những lợi ích khi dịch máy

Body 2: DOL sẽ trình bày lý do tại sao tự học ngôn ngữ vẫn có nhiều thuận lợi hơn

Kết bài: DOL kết luận và khẳng định lại quan điểm của mình.

Despite this development, I hold the belief that the process of obtaining lingual knowledge is still beneficial in terms of career prospects
and cultural experience.

Body paragraph 1: Machine translation can bring greater benefits

Speed: Computer programs can translate texts much faster than human translators

A variety of languages

Artificial intelligence software is capable of translating multiple languages

Example: Google Translate

Body paragraph 2: A clear comprehension of languages is more advantageous

Working; The more languages individuals can master, the more chances of job promotion they may be offered

The world = a global village => international trade has enhanced cross-border communication and cooperation => proficiency in
languages provides people with many employment opportunities and eventual success in life

Cultural exposure: Language is one of the authentic reflections of its culture => linguistic learning provides cultural experience that
electronic translators fail to deliver

Advancement in technology has fostered the availability of operating systems that can translate text automatically. Despite this
development, I hold the belief that the process of obtaining lingual knowledge is still beneficial in terms of career prospects and cultural
experience.

It goes without saying that machine translation can bring greater benefits in terms of speed and a variety of languages. Regarding the
former, it is undeniable that computer programs can translate texts much faster than human translators, making the former a much better
option when the time given is limited or when only an approximate or summary translation is needed. Concerning the second advantage,
artificial intelligence software is capable of translating multiple languages. A prime example of this is Google Translate, as it can
instantly recognise and translate up to one hundred languages, thereby being used basically throughout the entire world.

Nevertheless, I think that having a clear comprehension of languages is more advantageous in working and experiencing the culture.
Some may say that the more languages individuals can master, the more chances of job promotion they may be offered. Since the world
has virtually been a global village in which international trade has enhanced cross-border communication and cooperation. The
proficiency in languages, thus, provides people with many employment opportunities and eventual success in life. Another benefit that
is worth considering is the cultural exposure that one may have when discovering any language. Undoubtedly, language is one of the
authentic reflections of its culture; thus, linguistic learning would play a pivotal role in the provision of cultural experience that electronic
translators fail to deliver.

In conclusion, although machine translation software can produce less accurate texts, faster translation and the range of language options
it can offer are undeniably convenient. As such, I am of the opinion that studying languages still holds an irreplaceable role.

Some people think that the main purpose of school is to turn children into good citizens and
workers, rather than to benefit children as individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để trình bày quan điểm của mình về vấn đề
được đặt ra.

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL sẽ trình bày vai trò của trường học trong việc giáo dục học sinh thành những công dân tốt và công nhân có ích
cho xã hội

Body 2: DOL sẽ trình bày vai trò của trường học trong việc giáo dục học sinh để chúng có thể phát triển theo lợi ích cá nhân
Kết bài: DOL kết luận và khẳng định lại quan điểm của mình.

While I agree with this idea, I also think that it is of paramount importance to train children as people who gain for themselves.

Body paragraph 1: The main purpose of school is to turn children into good citizens and workers

Teaching disciplines

Teachers guide children in differentiating between right and wrong => moral lessons are fully obtained => children can be principled
and aware of the significance of being good citizens

Training skills

The primary function of education is enhancing the understanding of people => the schools’ responsibility to provide their students with
essential knowledge as well as practical skills to be intellectual and become innovative workers in the job market

Body paragraph 2: Schools should benefit children as individuals

Emotionally develop

Children promote their early social interaction with peers at school => foster friendships & companionship => assisting the advancement
of internal emotion as well as feeling

Unleash their potential

Children have more chances to expose themselves to various fields => help them discover their likes and dislikes => schools’ aim is
achieved in terms of nourishing students’ strengths and improving their weaknesses

Write Opinions are divided on whether the ultimate responsibility of educational institutions is shaping students into productive citizens
or fostering the awareness of individual advantages. While I agree with this idea, I also think that it is of paramount importance to train
children as people who gain for themselves.

It goes without saying that schools play a pivotal role in teaching disciplines and training skills that turn students into productive citizens
and workers. Teachers, undoubtedly, are those who guide children in differentiating between right and wrong as well as leading them
to take the right path in life. Once moral lessons are fully obtained, children can be principled and aware of the significance of being
good citizens. Also, since the dawn of time, the primary function of education is to enhance the understanding of people; thus, it is the
schools’ responsibility to provide their students with essential knowledge as well as practical skills to be intellectual and become
innovative workers in the job market.

However, schools should benefit children as individuals because these institutes are crucial in helping children to emotionally develop
and unleash their potential. Firstly, children promote their early social interaction with peers at school, via which they can foster
friendships and companionship. Thus, these social contacts are proven to be helpful in assisting the advancement of internal emotion as
well as feeling. Besides, through subjects learning at educational establishments, children have more chances to expose themselves to
various fields, which would accordingly help them discover their likes and dislikes. In this way, schools’ aim is achieved in terms of
nourishing students’ strengths and improving their weaknesses.

In conclusion, although it is said that the major function of schools should be training children to become productive citizens and
laborers, I would agree that educational institutions ought to fulfill their duty by helping students to gain benefits for themselves.

In some countries, schools are teaching foreign languages for primary school children. Do the advantages of this outweigh the
disadvantages?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để trình bày quan điểm của mình về vấn đề
được đặt ra.

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL nói về bất lợi của việc dạy ngoại ngữ cho trẻ ở cấp tiểu học.

Body 2: DOL nói về những thuận lợi của việc dạy ngoại ngữ cho trẻ ở cấp tiểu học.

Kết bài: DOL kết luận và khẳng định lại quan điểm của mình.

Despite the disadvantages involved, I am of the opinion that this development is generally more favorable.

Body paragraph 1: Disadvantages

Create considerable pressure on young learners

Students nowadays already have a burdensome volume of schoolwork and a hectic curriculum to follow

Example: a state school in Japan => forcing students to learn foreign languages => raised a number of objections from parents => voiced
their concern over the paramount amount of stress their children have to suffer from

Body paragraph 2: Advantages

Developing students' intellectual faculties

The acquisition of a new language promotes frequent exposure to diverse and unique cultures => allows children to gain knowledge
about others' customs and lifestyles & develop an acute awareness of other exotic people.

Improve students' future employability

Employers have a tendency to recruit applicants who demonstrate exceptional linguistic competence => students possessing expert
language skills have chances to work in various fields

Many educational institutions at the elementary level in certain nations include non-native languages as a compulsory subject in their
curriculum. Despite the disadvantages involved, I am of the opinion that this development is generally more favorable.

One of the main disadvantages is that implementing non-native languages in elementary education programs may create
considerable pressure on young learners. The reason for this is that many students nowadays already have a burdensome volume of
schoolwork and a hectic curriculum to follow, they would find it challenging to have spare time if one more subject is added to their
already tight schedule. For example, when a primary state school in Japan introduced a new scheme of forcing students to learn foreign
languages, it raised a number of objections from parents as they voiced their concern over the paramount amount of stress their children
have to suffer from.

Nevertheless, I would argue that teaching foreign languages to primary school students is more beneficial in terms of
developing their intellectual faculties and improving their future employability. It is true that the acquisition of a new language at the
beginning level promotes frequent exposure to diverse and unique cultures. Such experience allows children to gain an enormous wealth
of knowledge about others' customs and lifestyles as well as develop an acute awareness of other exotic people. Furthermore, foreign
languages are undoubtedly a crucial tool to open more job opportunities. Employers in certain sectors have a tendency to recruit
applicants who demonstrate exceptional linguistic competence, which suggests that students possessing expert language skills are more
inclined to have chances to work in various fields such as interpretation, diplomacy, aviation, etc.

In conclusion, although children have to face pressure from studying more lingual subjects in their very early years of life,
the integration of foreign languages in primary school's curriculum has paved the way for enhancing students' capability and career
prospects. Therefore, I hold the belief that the advantages of this development clearly overshadow the drawbacks involved.

The education of young people is the main priority in countries around the world. Some people believe that educating adults
who cannot read or write is essential for society and more funding should be made available for it. Do you agree or disagree?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để trình bày quan điểm của mình về vấn đề
được đặt ra.

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL sẽ bàn về lợi ích cho xã hội khi tài trợ cho giáo dục người lớn không biết đọc hoặc viết.

Body 2: DOL sẽ bàn về lợi ích cho cá nhân và con cái của họ khi những người lớn được giáo dục phổ cập.

Kết bài: DOL khẳng định lại là việc đi học của người lớn có lợi về mặt tăng trưởng kinh tế cho các quốc gia và đảm bảo sự phát triển
toàn diện cho cá nhân.

From my perspective, I side with the latter idea as adult schooling can have positive impacts on the development of countries and
individuals.

Body paragraph 1:

A decline in the rate of illiterate adults can offer countries strategic economic advantages

Increase the number of high quality laborers => improved economic growth

A high rate of illiteracy among adults => heavy burdens on social assistance

Example: monetary assistance during the Covid-19 pandemic

Body paragraph 2: Individuals

Adults who cannot read nor write often shy away from social interactions => a sense of inferiority

Children with illiterate parents help their parents make ends meet => lose their access to education

Write: While some people claim that educating the young should be the main concern the world over, others believe that more funds
should be allocated to decrease the rate of illiteracy among adults. From my perspective, I side with the latter idea as adult schooling
can have positive impacts on the development of countries and individuals.

To start with, a decline in the rate of illiterate adults can offer countries strategic economic advantages. First, this will
increase the number of high quality laborers in the country, resulting in improved economic growth. As most white-collar positions’
minimum requirement nowadays is the ability to read and write, illiterate adults will have to resort to low-paid work, which means a
loss of tax, as well as scarce resources of intellectual workers. Secondly, having a high rate of illiteracy among adults may also lead to
heavy burdens on social assistance. During times of crisis, such as the Covid-19 pandemic, illiterate adults are the ones who are most
prone to unemployment. The indication of this is that governments will have to provide them monetary assistance, thus, the larger the
number of uneducated grown-ups, the more considerable the subsidy.
 Regarding individuals, being able to read and write can be advantageous to one’s mental health and their offsprings. What
illiteracy brings to individuals is low self-esteem. Adults who cannot read nor write often shy away from social interactions, as well as
experience a sense of inferiority due to their lack of basic abilities. Moreover, children with illiterate parents often lose their access to
education. Since their mothers and fathers often cannot find well-paid jobs that can cover their school fees, these kids have to help their
parents make ends meet from an early age, resulting in illiteracy from one generation to the next.

All in all, adult schooling is beneficial in terms of economic growth for nations and of fostering well-being for individuals.

Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments or
even criticism of their teachers. Others think it will lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views
and give your own opinion.

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để trình bày quan điểm của mình về vấn đề
được đặt ra.

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL sẽ nói về việc phản hồi hai chiều giữa người dạy và người học có thể dẫn đến sự thiếu tôn trọng và kỷ luật

Body 2: DOL sẽ nói về quan điểm mình ủng hộ là việc học sinh có thể đánh giá các nhà giáo dục sẽ giúp cải thiện giáo dục

Kết bài: DOL nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình là mặc dù thực tế là sự thiếu tôn trọng và mất trật tự có thể xảy ra khi cho phép người
học đánh giá giáo viên, nhưng những ưu điểm của việc này như hiểu biết tốt hơn và đổi mới vượt trội hơn những nhược điểm vừa nêu.

While some people argue that this means a loss of respect and order in a classroom, I support the view that this development could lead
to a better educational experience.

Body paragraph 1: Two-way feedback between teachers and learners could possibly result in a lack of regard and discipline

Most students lack emotional maturity and understanding of the world’s workings to give constructive comments => sabotage the
teacher’s reputation

Each student holds different opinions => difficult for the teacher to come to a unified conclusion as to what he should improve on =>
confusion and strenuity for educators

Body paragraph 2: Empowering students with the ability to assess their educators could lead to the betterment of education

The core of education is to serve students and equip them with more knowledge => understanding their insight and needs are critical

Help teachers to hone their pedagogical skills => teachers will encounter more innovative approaches, and become more flexible

Whether students should be allowed to criticize and give recommendations to their teachers has been a hotly debated topic. While some
people argue that this means a loss of respect and order in a classroom, I support the view that this development could lead to a better
educational experience.

On the one hand, two-way feedback between teachers and learners could possibly result in a lack of regard and discipline.
First and foremost, most students lack emotional maturity and thorough understanding of the world’s workings to give constructive
comments. In case a student is impulsive and immature, he could sabotage the teacher’s reputation by giving unjust criticisms should
he be hostile towards the teacher for giving him bad marks or reprimanding him. Moreover, as each student holds different opinions, it
would be difficult for the teacher to come to a unified conclusion as to what he should improve on. This could lead to confusion and
strenuity for educators who are trying to establish themselves as better teachers.

On the other hand, I agree that empowering students with the ability to assess their educators could lead to the betterment of
education. To start with, the core of education is to serve students and equip them with more knowledge, thus, understanding their insight
and needs are critical to being a successful educator. Through learners’ responses, teachers could refine their methods and make
adjustments to their lesson plans to better suit their students, resulting in more educated and motivated learners. Furthermore, this
development could help teachers to hone their pedagogical skills. As teachers are forced to alter their teaching methods, they will
encounter more innovative approaches, and become more flexible in dealing with special cases in the classroom.

To conclude, while it is a fact that disrespect and a loss of order could ensue from equipping learners with the power to judge
their teachers, the notion’s advantages such as gaining better understanding and innovation have overshadowed the disadvantages.

Some believe that people are naturally born leaders while others feel that leadership skills can develop. Discuss both views and
give your opinion.

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để trình bày quan điểm của mình về vấn đề
được đặt ra.

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL sẽ bàn về luận điểm đầu tiên - một số cá nhân bẩm sinh đã là những nhà lãnh đạo, được trời phú những đặc
điểm của một người chỉ huy giỏi.

Body 2: DOL bàn về luận điểm thứ 2 - khả năng lãnh đạo là một phẩm chất có thể học được.

Kết bài: DOL nhấn mạnh lại ý kiến của mình là mặc dù thực tế là một số người được phú cho những phẩm chất đặc trưng của một nhà
lãnh đạo, thì lãnh đạo là một kỹ năng có thể đạt được thông qua đào tạo nghiêm ngặt và kinh nghiệm thực hành.
From my perspective, through extensive training, people can become leaders.

Body paragraph 1: People are naturally born leaders

Qualities such as perception, assertiveness, self-confidence, and courage can be inherited and observed in families of leaders.

For example, many conglomerates nowadays are family-owned: Walmart, Samsung, Prada.

Body paragraph 2: Leadership is a learned quality

Numerous required skills of a leader can be practiced through extensive training and hands-on experience.

For example: Adam Khoo

Whether leadership skills are innate or acquired through practice has been a topic of discussion. From my perspective, through extensive
training, people can become leaders.

On the one hand, some individuals are born leaders, being gifted with traits that are predictive of a good commander.
Qualities such as perception, assertiveness, self-confidence, and courage can be inherited and observed in families of leaders. For
example, many conglomerates nowadays are family-owned, meaning that chairmanship is passed down from one generation to another
in a bloodline. Some of the most notable names are Walmart, which belongs to the Walton family, Samsung, which is owned by the Lee
family, and Prada, which has been run by members of the Prada family. Under leadership of the talented heirs, these businesses have
flourished and became powerful names in their respective fields.

On the other hand, I side with the view that leadership is a learned quality. Numerous required skills of a leader can be practiced
through extensive training and hands-on experience. Take Adam Khoo for example. When Adam was at a young age, he was considered
a dull-witted, lazy, and apathetic child. Nevertheless, under guidance from a program of Ernest & Young, Adam managed to hone his
abilities, started accumulating success, and eventually become Singapore’s youngest millionaire and famed inspirational speaker. These
days, programs that are specialized in leadership qualities are abundant, teaching willing proteges in every aspect: decision making,
strategy planning, communicating, et cetera. Aspiring leaders can sign up for these programs and gain skills that they are lacking in
order to become good commanders.

In conclusion, although it is a fact that some people are endowed with trademark qualities of a leader, I strongly believe that
leadership is a skill that can be obtained through rigorous training and hands-on experience.

In many countries, more and more young people are leaving school but unable to find jobs. What problems do you think youth
unemployment causes to the individual and society? Give reasons and make some suggestions.

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để trình bày quan điểm của mình về vấn đề
được đặt ra.

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL đưa ra những ảnh hưởng tiêu cực của sự gia tăng tỷ lệ thất nghiệp ở thanh niên.

Body 2: DOL đưa ra những giải pháp để giải quyết vấn đề này. Kết bài: DOL kết luận tỷ
lệ thất nghiệp ở thanh niên cao sẽ có những tác động tiêu cực đến nền kinh tế và tình hình xã hội của một quốc gia. Trong cuộc chiến
chống thất nghiệp ở thanh niên, cần có sự hỗ trợ của cả chính phủ và phụ huynh để đảm bảo tương lai của thanh niên.

This essay will discuss the problems as well as possible solutions for this issue.

Body paragraph 1: Problems

The short-term and long-term effect on the national economy

The most potent generation cannot contribute would be an immediate loss => an aging workforce is going to be an imminent problem
with insufficient supply of young power

From an individual perspective

One who fails to find a job may suffer from stress stemming from family and peer pressure => depression and deaths

Body paragraph 2: Solutions

To increase the rate of employment, one has to be trained or educated properly => raise their citizen’s awareness of the importance of
education

Governments should subsidize vocational training programs for youngsters to enhance their skill sets

Parental support is crucial in guiding the young generation on correct career paths

There has been an increase in the unemployment rate among the young in various countries, which has stirred up great concerns. This
essay will discuss the problems as well as possible solutions for this issue.

As a matter of fact, the rise in youth unemployment is going to negatively affect a country in many aspects. First, the short-
term and long-term effect on the national economy is inevitable. The fact that the most potent generation cannot contribute would be an
immediate loss. Meanwhile, an aging workforce is going to be an imminent problem with insufficient supply of young power. From an
individual perspective, one who fails to find a job may suffer from stress stemming from family and peer pressure. In extreme cases,
this can even lead to depression and deaths. Examples have been set in Japan, where a small proportion of jobless young adults, called
hikikomori, refuse communication with the outside world and have to rely on their families or social assistance.

In order to address the issue, various strategies can be adopted. Firstly, to increase the rate of employment, one has to be
trained or educated properly. Many countries, especially in Africa, need to raise their citizen’s awareness of the importance of education
so as to decrease the school dropout rate. Secondly, governments should subsidize vocational training programs for youngsters to
enhance their skill sets. Moreover, from an individual point of view, parental support is crucial in guiding the young generation on
correct career paths. It has been proven that students who receive mental guidance and support from their parents stand a higher chance
in success later in life.

In conclusion, high youth unemployment is going to have detrimental effects on the economy and social situation of a country.
In the fight against unemployment amongst youngsters, both governmental and parental support are urgently needed to ensure the future
of the young.

Despite the increased access to education, a significant number of people cannot read or write. What are the disadvantages and
what action should the government take?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để trình bày quan điểm của mình về vấn đề
được đặt ra.

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL nói về những bất lợi khi không biết đọc và viết.

Body 2: DOL đưa ra những biện pháp để giải quyết vấn đề nhiều người không biết đọc và viết.

Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình là việc thiếu các kỹ năng cơ bản như đọc hoặc viết sẽ dẫn đến những
trở ngại lớn trong con đường sự nghiệp và tiếp thu kiến thức của một người. Tuy nhiên, một số biện pháp có thể được thực hiện để giúp
người mù chữ có cơ hội bình đẳng trong cuộc sống thông qua giáo dục phổ cập và cơ sở hạ tầng liên quan đến giáo dục.

This essay will discuss the disadvantages as well as how this grave issue can be tackled.

Body paragraph 1: Disadvantages of not being able to read or write

Limit one’s accessibility to general knowledge

Written sources of information still account for the majority of knowledge

Illiteracy can put one at great disadvantages at work where written messages play a crucial role in day-to-day communication

white-collar positions require the ability to perform basic office tasks => illiterate people would not be qualified => are tied to blue-
collar

Body paragraph 2: Solutions Ensuring universal education

Basic classes that teach reading and writing should be openly accessible

Infrastructure concerning education needs to be constructed and improved

The 21st century has witnessed the growth of universal education, yet many are suffering from illiteracy. This essay will discuss the
disadvantages as well as how this grave issue can be tackled.

As a matter of course, not being able to read or write will limit one’s accessibility to general knowledge. Nowadays, written
sources of information still account for the majority of knowledge. Take signposts, for example, the best option on the road for a driver
to rely on to locate his whereabouts are road signs. However, with these being written signs, people who are unable to read have to find
counterintuitive alternatives to look for directions. Moreover, illiteracy can put one at a great disadvantage at work where written
messages play a crucial role in day-to-day communication. What most white-collar positions require these days is the ability to perform
basic office tasks such as typing. This means that illiterate people would not be qualified for any of these jobs, and consequently, are
tied to blue-collar, low-paid posts.

Nevertheless, there are a number of solutions that can be applied to alleviate this issue. First, ensuring universal education will
play a significant role in the fight against illiteracy. Basic classes that teach reading and writing should be openly accessible for citizens
of all ages, especially the disadvantaged or ethnic minority groups. Furthermore, infrastructure concerning education such as schools
and roads needs to be constructed and improved in a way that people in all places can gain access to educational institutions easily. In
Vietnam, many ethnic children have lost their right to learn due to poor road conditions; therefore, infrastructure should be one of the
first areas that need fixing.

The lack of fundamental skills such as reading or writing certainly results in major setbacks in one’s knowledge and career
path. Yet changes can be made to enable the illiterate to stand an equal chance in life through universal education and education-related
infrastructure.

Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better
to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.
Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để trình bày quan điểm của mình về vấn đề
được đặt ra.

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL nói về ý kiến thứ 1: lựa chọn học sinh dựa trên khả năng của chúng có một số lợi ích nhất định.

Body 2: DOL nói về ý kiến thứ 2: việc tích hợp học sinh có các năng khiếu khác nhau sẽ tạo một môi trường học tập toàn diện hơn.

Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình là việc tích hợp các học sinh có năng lực khác nhau sẽ tốt hơn vì điều
này có thể giúp học sinh phát triển toàn diện.

From my perspective, I strongly support the latter idea as it can create a more holistic approach to education.

Body paragraph 1: Select students according to their academic abilities

Students who have varying academic merits have different acquisition speed => dividing pupils based on their skill-sets => schools can
have more well-paced curriculums

Example: the comparison between students in gifted and normal classrooms

Body paragraph 2: Integrating students with different aptitudes

Pupils in a mixed class will have the chance to exchange their knowledge => aid others in learning

Pupils in these classes can expand their knowledge on all subjects => become well-rounded citizens

While some say that students should be admitted based on their academic merits, others argue that schools should select students with
varying skill-sets. From my perspective, I strongly support the latter idea as it can create a more holistic approach to education.

On the one hand, selecting students on the basis of their abilities is quite advantageous to a certain extent. This is because students
who have varying academic merits have different acquisition speed. Therefore, grouping them together in a lesson will cause weaker
students confusion and stronger students time. By dividing pupils based on their skill-sets, schools can have more well-paced
curriculums. To illustrate, gifted schools in Vietnam all have specialized classes where students can acquire knowledge in their chosen
field more intensively, thus advancing in their academic abilities quicker. Meanwhile, pupils in normal classrooms can take time learning
these subjects at their own discretion.

On the other hand, advocates of integrating students with different aptitudes also have grounds to believe that this approach
will facilitate a more holistic learning environment. As all students excel in a different field, what pupils in a mixed class will have is
the chance to exchange their knowledge with one another. Students who are well-versed in a subject can aid others in learning by sharing
their tips. Moreover, pupils in these classes will be able to expand their knowledge on all subjects, thus becoming more well-rounded
citizens, whereas students who study in a specialized class will miss the opportunity to explore their interests in other areas.

To summarize, segregating students according to their academic abilities can aid in planning lessons that are suitable for the
students’ acquisition speed. However, I am of the opinion that integrating students of different abilities is better as this can create citizens
who are well-rounded academically.

Some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age. Some think they should begin at least
7 years old. Discuss both views give your opinion.

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để đưa ra quan điểm của mình về vấn đề này
đồng thời để người chấm nắm được outline mà mình sắp trình bày

Thân bài: Body 1: Đầu tiên, DOL sẽ chỉ ra các ưu điểm của việc cho trẻ bắt đầu học chính quy sớm

Body 2: Sau đó, DOL sẽ thảo luận quan điểm còn lại

Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình bằng cách tóm lại các ý chính đã nêu trên

Although starting early might be economically beneficial for the family in the short run, it might ultimately be a futile endeavour

Body paragraph 1: Children should begin their formal education at a very early age

Help support parents financially.

Parents often struggle to arrange babysitters and have to resort to expensive daycares and if schooling started earlier, → a financial
stress they would not have to cope with.

For example: Primary education in many Western countries allows parents to save money to spend on other things for their family.

Body paragraph 2: Children should begin their formal education at at least 7 years old.

Children are still in the early developmental stages for the first few years of their lives

They would lack the abilities to understand the things taught to them to a sufficient degree → children may not be capable of recalling
their lessons → time and money spent on them would simply be wasted

For example: Most adults today will find it almost impossible to recall what they have learnt in primary school.
There has been recent debate surrounding the age at which children should begin formal education: while some people argue that children
should start as early as 7 years old, others believe they should begin even earlier. I personally contend that although starting early might
be economically beneficial for the family in the short run, it might ultimately be a futile endeavour as the children would be unable to
absorb the information in the long run.

One could argue that by starting children on their path of formal education sooner may help support parents
financially. Parents often struggle to arrange babysitters and have to resort to expensive daycares that are of no real benefit to them or
their children, and if schooling started earlier, this would be a financial stress they would not have to cope with. Primary education in
many Western countries, for example, is free for this reason: it allows parents to save money to spend on other things for their family.

However, as children are still in the early developmental stages for the first few years of their lives, they would
undoubtedly lack the abilities to understand the things taught to them to a sufficient degree. More specifically, since children may not
be capable of recalling their lessons, time and money spent on them would simply be wasted. Most adults today, for example, will find
it almost impossible to recall what they have learnt in primary school. It could be argued that these early years of a children’s life should
instead be spent being emotionally bonded with the parents instead of being taught skills they would forget later on anyway.

Ultimately, I argue that despite short term economic benefits to the family, the inability of young children to
learn what is presented to them means that they should not start education at too early of an age.

Some people think children have the freedom to make mistakes, while other people believe that adults should prevent children
from making mistakes. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để đưa ra quan điểm của mình

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL nói về quan điểm thứ nhất, về việc nên ngăn trẻ em mắc lỗi Body 2: DOL nói về quan
điểm thứ hai, về việc cho phép trẻ em mắc lỗi Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ tóm lại ý chính
vừa trình bày phía trên và nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình về vấn đề nàya; In my opinion, I side with the latter notion.

Body paragraph 1: Parents should prevent

Prevent mortality

Dangerous situations --> Without guidance, children might harm themselves --> Because they haven't had a proper understanding of the
surroundings

Body paragraph 2: Parents should not prevent

Children will be more responsible

Have to face consequences --> Won't make the same mistakes

Children will be equipped with sharper minds

Have to come up with solutions --> Improve problem solving skills and build their confidence

While some believe that children should be free to make mistakes, others argue that preventive measures should be taken by parents to
ensure that children do nothing wrong. In my opinion, I side with the latter notion.

To begin with, hampering children from causing mishaps is advantageous to an extent. First, it can prevent mortality when it comes to
dangerous situations such as touching a naked wire with wet hands or crossing the road without looking at the traffic lights. Without
parental guidance, children may perform these actions and harm themselves, which could be extremely probable among toddlers who
have not had full control of their actions and proper understanding of their surroundings. Therefore, children should be educated on
essential knowledge for survival before they have any chance to hurt themselves.

On the other hand, advocates of allowing children to make mistakes freely also have grounds to believe why this practice is beneficial.
Firstly, children will learn to become responsible. As children face consequences from their choices, the lessons learnt will stay with
them longer. This is because the repercussions can instill fear of the wrongdoings into children and prevent them from taking similar
courses of action. Another point is that having the autonomy to make mistakes will equip children with sharper minds. To be more
specific, having to come up with a solution for their mishaps will help children develop problem solving skills and build their confidence
should these resolutions prove to be useful.

All in all, although parents’ intervention is beneficial in some cases, letting children learn from their mistakes has more positives for
children’s development.

Some claim that studying abroad has great benefits for a student’s home country. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để cho giám khảo biết là mình Agree hay
Disagree với câu hỏi

Thân bài: Body 1: Đầu tiên, DOL nói về những lợi ích của việc du học nước ngoài đối với nước nhà

Body 2: Tiếp đến DOL sẽ đưa ra quan điểm về mặt hạn chế của việc này
Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình, cho biết việc này vừa có những lợi ích nhất định nhưng cũng có một
số tác hại.

Although I strongly agree that there are benefits to the home country, I also think there are downsides.

Body paragraph 1: Studying abroad is beneficial to home country

Opportunities to learn from prestigious schools

Example: VNmese students have attended prestigious colleges

Learn about new cultures and perspectives

Example: lots of startups currently have employees who are studying abroad students → more active and more diverse thoughts

Body paragraph 2: Studying abroad is not entirely good

Many students will not come back to their home country

Example: students in tech fields get higher paid in other countries → will not come back

Study-abroad students may be out of touch with VN

Example: spending 4 to 5 years abroad can make students ignorant about what’s going on in VN → cannot blend in with the VN lifestyle
& culture & work style

Today, more and more parents are sending their kids to study abroad, leading to the question of whether study-abroad students are
beneficial to their home country. Although I strongly agree that there are benefits to the home country, I also think there are downsides.

There are two main reasons why I think the government should welcome students who choose to pursue education in
another country. Firstly, it is a fact that there are lots of prestigious educational institutions around the world that Vietnamese students
can attend. This means that these students can grow to their fullest potentials, then return to Vietnam with this knowledge and help to
develop the country in multiple aspects. Secondly, going abroad will help equip students with new perspectives and lifestyles, which
benefits the home country. For example, students who come back from the US will usually be more open-minded and proactive in their
workplace. As a result, they will gradually change the work culture for the better.

However, that is not to say that the home country would always benefit from study-abroad students. The first reason is
that there is an alarming portion of students who do not return home after being abroad. Many reasons can explain this phenomenon,
such as the home country does not offer a stable enough career prospect, or that the pay is not high enough, but one thing for sure is that
this leads to brain drain. The second reason is that students can be out of touch with the social scene in their home country after studying
abroad. As a result, fresh graduates may find it difficult to blend in at work. For example, most abroad students are ignorant of social
movements happening in their home countries and often are not engaged in conversations at work with these topics.

In conclusion, I strongly agree that the benefits that study-abroad students bring to their home country are undeniable. However, I do
not think studying abroad is suitable for anyone, and that we should have some policies to ensure that these students will be more likely
to return after graduating.

Competition for university study is becoming increasingly strong. Why are universities becoming more competitive? Is this a
positive or negative development?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để trả lời trực tiếp cho câu hỏi và bên cạnh đó
cho người chấm nắm sơ được hướng trả lời của mình.

Thân bài: Body 1: Đầu tiên, DOL sẽ trình bày nguyên nhân vì sao các trường đai học ngày nay có tỷ lệ cạnh tranh cao

Body 2: Tiếp đó, DOL sẽ trình bày quan điểm của mình về vấn đề này

Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình bằng cách tóm lại các ý chính đã trình bày ở trên.

I believe there are two main reasons for this, and I don’t think this is either an entirely positive or negative phenomenon.

Body paragraph 1: Why colleges are competitive

More and more families are investing in their children’s education → children are getting more competitive → college admissions needs
to be competitive

Example: old times, children can drop out and do farming jobs, nowadays parents want children to have white collared jobs

Rising population → greater demands for college seats

Example: high school students’ population is at an all-time high

Body paragraph 2: Neither positive nor negative

Positive because future generations are getting more educated and knowledgeable → innovate the country
Example: more and more college graduates in VN → more technological companies → develop country

Negative because colleges getting more and more competitive means that there is more pressure on high school students and parents

Example: financial pressure of attending tutoring centers, mental health issues…

In recent years, it has been noticeable that the university entrance exam is getting increasingly competitive, and some have questioned
why or whether this is a positive development. I believe there are two main reasons for this, and I don’t think this is either an entirely
positive or negative phenomenon.

The first reason why attending tertiary education nowadays is more competitive than ever is due to the vast investment of parents into
their children’s education. In the past, it was acceptable for a child to drop out of school to help with farming. However, most parents
now want to ensure a better future for their kids, so they urge them to compete for a slot in the most prestigious university possible. The
second reason why universities are getting harder to get into is simply because of the rising population of high schoolers. More
universities should have been built to accommodate this demand from upcoming generations. However, because the rate of opening new
colleges cannot compete with that of population rise, children would have to compete against one another for college admissions.

Regardless of the reason for this development, I do not see this as entirely positive nor negative. On the one hand, there are some benefits
to this. Future generations will be more knowledgeable than the current ones. With an influx of fresh graduates equipped with high-
level knowledge, the country can expect more technological developments. This can be seen from the growth of entrepreneurship in the
technology industry. On the other hand, however, this intense competition will take a toll on both students and parents. More time will
be spent studying for the exam, which equates to deteriorating physical and mental health of high schoolers. Parents are also affected
by the mental and financial pressure of finding and paying for tutoring centers.

In conclusion, getting into colleges is more competitive due to children being more competitive and the population rising. Although I
think this is a positive development for society, some measures are needed to prevent the ultimate burnout.

Some think that it is more important for children to engage in outdoor activities instead of playing video games. To what extent
to you agree or disagree?

DOL sẽ trình bày quan điểm qua 1 đoạn mở bài (introduction), 2 đoạn thân bài (body paragraph), và 1 đoạn kết bài (conclusion)

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để cho giám khảo biết là mình Agree hay
Disagree với câu hỏi

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL sẽ chỉ ra một vài lợi ích của việc khuyến khích trẻ chơi ngoài trời nhiều hơn

Body 2: Vì DOL đồng tình rằng trò chơi điện tử có thể có ích nếu sử dụng có điều độ, DOL cũng chỉ ra những lợi ích của việc đó để
củng cố quan điểm

Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình, cho biết là chơi trò chơi điện tử có điều độ có thể đem lại nhiều lợi ích

I believe that video games are good, but only in moderation.

Body 1: Agree Outdoor activities are good for physical and mental health

Less time spending looking at screens with high contrast → relaxed eyes → prevent eye problems; many video games contain violence
→ not suitable for children → mental health improved

Outdoor activities are a way to get connected with local community

When doing outdoor activities → meet locals → befriend them → enhance communication skills and also a sense of belonging

Body paragraph 2: Disagree :Video games promote technology fluency =>Technology fluency is important these days since everyone
works with computers → kids who play video games will grow up knowing better about computer hardware and keyboard shortcut →
might be beneficial

Many can be inspired by video games → develop a profession

If a child is interested in video games due its storyline or graphic design → should not stop his/her from learning more and test out video
games → might develop as a profession (pro-gamer or video game designer)

Because video games are becoming more popular with children than ever, many parents express their worries about whether
or not their children should spend time outdoors instead of playing games. I believe that video games are good, but only in moderation.

Engaging in outdoor activities is always good for children for various reasons. Outdoor activities are better than video games
for both their physical health and morals. Playing video games means looking at high-contrast screens for an extended period, which is
damaging to children’s eyes. Also, today’s games involve blatant violence, which can distort their moral beliefs. Secondly, doing
outdoor activities is a way to connect with their neighborhood. For example, when hanging outdoors, like playing soccer, children can
develop their communication skills between their playmates and a sense of belonging with that community.
 However, that is not to say that video games are not important for child development. Firstly, video games teach children
technology fluency, which is a skill essential in the current society. For example, many children who play video games grow up being
familiar with computer hardware and keyboard shortcuts. These skills would come in handy for them in the future. Secondly, I believe
parents should not prevent children from playing video games as these games can serve as career inspirations. For example, children
can be interested in the storyline or the graphic design of games and be motivated to become pro-gamers or game developers.

In conclusion, the benefits of hanging outdoors are undeniable for child development. However, I believe that, in some cases,
allowing children to engage in video games can also be important. Parents should understand that moderation is the key in both types
of activities.

Some think that students must travel to another country in order to learn its language and customs. To what extent do you agree
or disagree?

DOL sẽ trình bày quan điểm qua 1 đoạn mở bài (introduction), 2 đoạn thân bài (body paragraph), và 1 đoạn kết bài (conclusion)

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để cho giám khảo biết là mình Agree hay
Disagree với câu hỏi. Trong trường hợp này DOL chỉ đồng ý một phần nên sẽ trình bày như sau

Thân bài: Body 1: Đâu tiên DOL sẽ đưa ra những ưu điểm của việc đi sang quốc gia khác để học ngôn ngữ của họ

Body 2: Tiếp đến, DOL sẽ trình bày những lý do không cần đi sang quốc gia khác vẫn học được ngôn ngữ

Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình bằng cách tóm lại các ý chính đã nêu trên

I partially agree with this opinion

Body paragraph 1: Going to a country allows individuals to submerge themselves in that culture

Although the internet is a useful tool, the subtlety of human interactions might not be conveyed through online pictures and videos alone.
Immigrants in other countries might also not speak the same version of the language from their host country. For instance, in the textbook
version of a language → very different to how normal people speak, with slang words and other cultural references.

Body 2: Possible to read about languages and cultures through the internet or talking to people from a certain country => The ease of
access to information today mediated by the internet → possible for individuals to learn about another country’s history and language
through sitting at home. => People would be able to find immigrants from the country whose language they are trying to learn.

For instance, polyglots such as Tim Doner being able to speak as many as twenty languages through speaking to people around the US.

Some people believe that in order for students to learn a new language or culture, they must move to another country. I partially
agree with this opinion, since although I believe that going to a country allows individuals to submerge themselves in that culture, it is
still possible to read about languages and cultures through the internet or talking to people from a certain country.

It could be said that given the ease of access to information today mediated by the internet, it is actually possible for individuals to
learn about another country’s history and language purely through sitting at home. Furthermore, given the interconnected nature of
today’s countries, it is likely that people would be able to find immigrants from the country whose language they are trying to learn. For
instance, there have been many cases of polyglots such as Tim Doner being able to speak as many as twenty languages purely through
speaking to people around the US.

However, it might also be contended that to fully understand the richness and nuances of a country’s language and culture, it would
be worthwhile to travel to that country. This is because although the internet is a useful tool, the subtlety of human interactions might
not be conveyed through online pictures and videos alone. Furthermore, immigrants in other countries might also not speak the same
version of the language from their host country. For instance, it is often the case that the textbook version of a language, which one
might be able to learn from the internet, is very different to how normal people speak, with slang words and other cultural references.
Therefore, to appreciate the latter, a change of location is warranted.

Overall, therefore, I argue that while it is possible to learn a language and customs to an adequate amount, to fully appreciate and
deeply understand, students should travel to the country they are trying to examine.

Some people believe that the experiences children have before they go to school will have the greatest effect on their future life.
Others argue that experiences gained when they are teenagers have a bigger influence. Discuss both views and give your own
opinions.

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để trình bày quan điểm của mình

Thân bài: Body 1: Phân tích quan điểm đầu tiên Body 2: Phân tích quan điểm thứ hai

Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình bằng cách tóm lại các ý chính đã nêu trên.

While our adult years certainly have an effect on our future lives, most of our personality will have been formed by the early periods of
our lives

Body paragraph 1: Experiences gained when they are teenagers have a bigger influence

As we get older, our outlook on life is most affected as our personalities have already been formed
By learning certain things about ourselves, and what to do and what not to do, we will be better assimilated into wider society. → young
adults are in the best position to learn about the world and how to live within it.=> For example: important life skills can only be
communicated to an adult, since children would not be able to understand about those topics.

Body paragraph 2: The experiences children have before they go to school will have the greatest effect on their future life => A healthy
upbringing → more functional people ; the opposite case → individuals being more susceptible to mental health issues later in life.
When children are taught certain skills at a young age → learn quicker => For instance: learn language

Today, there is an ongoing debate surrounding the stage in which people’s personalities are most crucial: while some believe
that it is the formative years before they attain formal education, others believe that their teenage years are the most important. In my
opinion, while our adult years certainly have an effect on our future lives, most of our personality will have been formed by the early
periods of our lives.

On the one hand, one could argue that as we get older, our outlook on life is most affected as our personalities
have already been formed and we can now have the ability to make our own mistakes. By learning certain things about ourselves, and
what to do and what not to do, we will assimilate into wider society better. For instance, important life skills such as doing taxes or
investing into a retirement fund can only be communicated to an adult, since children would not be able to understand what is being
taught to them. Thus, young adults are in the best position to learn about the world and how to live within it.

On the other hand, I believe that one’s childhood greatly affects their outlook on life. Numerous studies have shown that
a healthy upbringing can result in more functional people, whereas the opposite case would likely lead to individuals being more
susceptible to mental health issues later in life. Furthermore, when children are taught certain skills at a young age, when their brains
have yet to mature, this could paradoxically lead to them being able to learn it quicker. For instance, we can see that young children are
able to learn languages much quicker than full grown adults.

Thus, I conclude that while there are many experiences to be gained in your teenage years that will undoubtedly be pivotal to
your future development, I still nonetheless hold that the years before school are the most important indicator as to how well you will
do later in life.

It is sometimes suggested that primary school children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals. Do you think that
the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để cho giám khảo biết về quan điểm của mình

Thân bài: Body 1: Đầu tiên, DOL sẽ chỉ ra những lợi ích của việc này

Body 2: Tiếp đến, DOL sẽ đưa ra những bất lợi, hạn chế Kết bài: Cuối
cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình, cho biết các ưu điểm có ý nghĩa lớn hơn các nhược điểm

Primary school children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals.

Body paragraph 1: Advantages : Have an appreciation for farmers and gardeners =>Many kids never know how their vegetables and
meat are produced → learn about it → appreciate farmers → support local produce

Can grow their own vegetables or raise pets => Have vegetables to eat when supplies are scarce (during COVID), have pets to befriend
→ relaxing for the mind

Body paragraph 2:

Disadvantages : Few students can apply this knowledge => Students in urban areas → never have a chance to raise a livestock, most
cannot have pets → cannot apply this knowledge → soon forget it → waste time

Create more stress for students => Children are already under multiple stress → should not burden them more (example: no one cares
about home economics) → if taught, no grading scale

Many schools worldwide have proposed to include a new, mandatory course in which students learn how to grow
vegetables and raise animals. Although there are some drawbacks that schools should consider, I believe this idea is generally beneficial.

There are many direct and indirect advantages to learning about these topics. Firstly, children can develop an
appreciation for farmers after this course. Many children, especially ones living in cities, never know where and how their vegetables
and meat are produced. After knowing the amount of work and care put into making their food, they can appreciate and support local
produce more. Secondly, this course can prepare them for growing vegetables at home. This skill will become important should they
find themselves in a time when supplies are scarce, like during the COVID lockdown.

However, that is not to say that this proposal is without disadvantages. Firstly, there is a chance that few students will
ever incorporate this knowledge into their daily lives. With students living in urban areas, most will never raise livestock, while many
living in apartments cannot have pets. Learning about raising livestock in detail will not be helpful for them. Secondly, this course can
add more stress to students. High school kids are already under pressure to perform well in their exams, thus schools should not burden
them more. Students’ objection to the home economics subject is a sufficient example to illustrate this point.
 In conclusion, I believe the advantages of learning about how to grow vegetables and how livestock and other animals are
raised far outweigh the disadvantages.

Some educators believe that every child should be taught how to play a musical instrument. To what extent do you agree or
disagree?

Body 1: Đầu tiên DOL sẽ lập luận theo hướng ủng hộ quan điểm của đề bài - chỉ ra những lợi ích mà việc học nhạc cụ mang lại cho trẻ
em

Body 2: Tiếp đến, DOL sẽ lập luận theo hướng ủng hộ quan điểm của mình - cho rằng trẻ em nên được khuyến khích học những gì phù
hợp với họ

Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình, cho biết việc học nhạc là tốt, nhưng không nên được xem là việc bắt
buộc

Teaching children to play musical instruments should not be superimposed, and that parents should develop the skills that most
aligns with a child’s interest.

Body paragraph 1: Every child should be taught how to play a musical instrument

Learning how to play a musical instrument from an earlier age could unlock more doors for children in the future.

For instance, in Harvard University, every person applying would be academically talented, what differentiates successful applicants
are things such as musical and sports achievements.

Body paragraph 2: Parents should develop the skills that most aligns with a child’s interest.

Forcing children to learn a musical instrument might be a waste of time if they do not truly enjoy it.

All individuals can be said to be different, and not everyone can (or want to) become a musician → parents should pay attention to what
their children aspire to be and assist them in that instead.

The widespread access to information and resources available in order to learn a musical instrument today could be
said to be unparalleled; however, there is an intense debate around whether or not every child should be made to undergo musical
training, or if it should be left to the child to decide what they want to do. In my opinion, teaching children to play musical instruments
should not be superimposed, and that parents should develop the skills that most align with a child’s interest.

One side of the argument is that learning how to play a musical instrument from an earlier age could unlock more doors for
children in the future. In today’s competitive world, universities are increasingly looking at not only academic abilities but also
candidates’ extracurricular activities in order to assess their applications. As such, being able to fluently play a musical instrument would
be a great addition to a child’s future CV and allow them access to better opportunities. For instance, statistics for schools like Harvard
University show that while every person applying would be academically talented, what differentiates successful applicants are things
such as musical and sports achievements.

On the other hand, forcing children to learn a musical instrument might be a waste of time if they do not truly enjoy it. This is
because not only would the child not pursue a musical interest later in life, but making the investment to teach them an instrument be in
vain, there is also an opportunity cost to not teaching them something else they are interested in. All individuals can be said to be
different, and not everyone can (or want to) become a musician. Thus, I argue parents should pay attention to what their children aspire
to be and assist them in that instead.

Overall, I argue that while there are many benefits to learning a musical instrument, it should not be mandatory for all children
to have to learn this skill.

Plagiarism in academics has become a pressing problem in many countries today. What are the causes of this problem? What
are some possible solutions?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để cho giám khảo biết những Causes (nguyên
nhân) và Solutions (giải pháp) của vấn đề là gì

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL sẽ chỉ ra một vài nguyên nhân của tình trạng đạo văn tăng cao

Body 2: Bên cạnh đó, DOL cũng không quên chỉ ra những giải pháp dành cho vấn đề này

Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình, cho biết dù là có nhiều nguyên nhân dẫn đến vấn đề này, cũng có nhiều
giải pháp để giải quyết nó

Plagiarism in academics has become a pressing problem in many countries today. I believe that both a lack of interest
and poor time management skills can explain this phenomenon, but there are also solutions to tackle this.

Body paragraph 1: Cause

Lack of interest: Students do not care for subjects → think that they should not spend time studying → find ways to plagiarise to save
time or save their efforts or to express their boredom
Poor time management skills: Many good students also plagiarise → pressure from family / themselves to perform well → aiming for
too many goals at a time → cannot manage their time → plagiarise to save time

Body paragraph 2: Solutions

Frequent check-ins : Method often used in colleges → professors assign a end-of-term writing project → have check-ins every week
to discuss with students about the writing progress → help student with discipline and time management

Have students peer-review each other before submitting with rewards : Give out rewards if other students find signs of plagiarism
during peer-review → chances for student to check each other’s work and chances for students to revise before submit

In the last decade, there has been a significant rise in the number of plagiarism cases reported. I believe that both a lack of interest and
poor time management skills can explain this phenomenon, but there are also solutions to tackle this.

Among various reasons for this dishonesty in writing-intensive courses, one that stands out is the lack of interest in the course.
Many students are forced to take the class to fulfill some requirements for graduation, which is why they think they can spend time
doing something else. As a result, they often plagiarise because they did not learn anything in class. However, many students with good
academic performance also plagiarise simply because their time management skills are inefficient. For example, many overachieving
students aim for multiple goals at once, meaning they do not have enough time to tend to each one. This lack of time explains why they
tend to plagiarise to save time writing essays.

Regardless of the reasons, plagiarism can be tackled through various methods. Firstly, professors can check in with
students more often during the writing process. This method is most often used in college education to ensure that students do not have
problems in their writing process. This method lowers the chance of plagiarism since students will have to discuss their papers with
teachers beforehand. Secondly, many schools also offer peer-review sessions before submitting papers. These sessions are for fellow
students to read each other’s works and check whether they might run a risk of plagiarising. Many professors even give out bonus points
for those who detect signs of dishonesty.

In conclusion, I believe that the increasing rate of plagiarism in education mainly stems from a lack of interest in the course, along with
poor time management skills. However, by adopting check-ins with students mid-writing and peer-review sessions, teachers can tackle
this problem.

Full-time university students spend a lot of time studying. Some say they should do other activities too. To what extent do you
agree or disagree?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để cho giám khảo biết là mình Agree hay
Disagree với câu hỏi. Vì DOL đồng tình với quan điểm nên sẽ trình bày thân bài như sau

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL sẽ đưa ra những lý do vì sao học sinh nên tập trung vào việc học.

Body 2: Tiếp đến, DOL đưa ra những điểm mạnh của việc làm thêm và tham gia các hoạt động ngoại khóa

Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình, cho rằng dù việc học quan trọng nhưng những lợi ích có được từ việc
làm thêm hay hoạt động ngoại khóa mang ý nghĩa lớn hơn.

I strongly agree that students should participate in other activities aside from only studying

Body paragraph 1: Disagree

Working or doing extracurricular activities can distract them

Many are invested in working and doing extracurricular activities than studying because they are more rewarding (money + having fun
/ meeting new people)

Universities often promote team orientation

Spend too much time working -->barely have time for group meetings --> Result in project failure

Body paragraph 2: Agree

Have working / internship experience

Working part time jobs → experiences in resumes & soft skills

Be aware of what’s going on in society

Extracurricular activities → learn social problems → develop solutions → have life experiences

Nowadays, it is common knowledge that university students are becoming busier than ever. Some people think that despite
this, students should participate in other activities aside from only studying. I strongly agree with this statement.

However, I do understand why university students should spend time studying. Firstly, working part-time jobs or
participating in extracurricular activities can distract them from their studies. These activities sound more attractive than studying
because there are rewards for them, such as money, connections, or friends. As a result, there have been cases where students eventually
fail classes because of these activities. Another reason is that universities often promote team orientation by encouraging collective
efforts. If students allocate too much time to peripheral activities, they would barely have time to squeeze a group meeting into their
schedule, resulting in project failure.

Despite these challenges, I still think university students should engage in other activities rather than just studying. As
university students, they are becoming young professionals, so working either part-time jobs or internships means preparation for the
workplace. Working also provides them financial independence from their family, which lessens their burden. Moreover, by
participating in extracurricular activities, students can have a better understanding of what is going on in society. For example, many
universities have debate clubs that discuss both international and domestic socio-political issues. Students can gain crucial insights into
society through these.

In conclusion, although I understand that many students cannot afford to participate in other activities aside from
studying, I strongly believe that participation in extracurricular activities or working is essential for their personal development.

After graduation many students take a year to travel. Some think that it would be more useful to work for a year. To what extent
do you agree or disagree?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để cho giám khảo biết là mình Agree hay
Disagree với câu hỏi

Thân bài: Body 1: Đầu tiên, DOL sẽ chỉ ra các lý do vì sao mà một số người có quan điểm giống với đề bài

Body 2: Tiếp đến, DOL sẽ đưa ra ý kiến của mình, chỉ ra các lý do vì sao học sinh nên dành 1 năm để đi đây đi đó

Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình, tóm lại ý chính đã được trình bày ở trên.

Students should explore both themselves and the work after they graduate in order to ensure both the enjoyment of their
careers and their mental wellbeing.

Body paragraph 1: Why some people think students should start earning money

In order to get ahead in the job market

Working straight after college could be attractive on one’s CV → their future potential earnings can be much higher

Working early allows students to gain financial independence

Financial independence → improve their well-being further down the line

Body paragraph 2: Students should take a year to travel => To prevent work overload

For instance, many junior investment bankers and lawyers quit after only two years, citing mental health and stress reasons.

Provide people with clarity as to what they want to do : Many people start working too early for the money and without consideration
as to what they truly want in life → young workers tend to burn out quite early before switching jobs to something more enjoyable

A common question asked by students today is whether to travel or work in the year after completing their degrees. In my opinion,
students should explore both themselves and the work after they graduate in order to ensure both the enjoyment of their careers and their
mental wellbeing.

On the one hand, there are those who believe that students should start earning money as quickly as possible in order to get ahead in the
job market. Employers today prefer work experience due to the increasingly competitive job market, and as such, working straight after
college could be attractive on one’s CV. Therefore, their future potential earnings can be much higher if they start their career early.
Furthermore, working early allows students to gain financial independence, which can improve their wellbeing further down the line.

Yet I argue that while money and having an illustrious career is desirable, it should nonetheless not come at the cost of
individual health. Many people today, I argue, start working too early purely for the money and without consideration as to what they
truly want in life. As a result, young workers tend to burn out quite early before switching jobs to something more enjoyable. For
instance, many junior investment bankers and lawyers quit after only two years, citing mental health and stress reasons. Therefore, a
year of travelling might not only prevent this sort of work overload, but also provide people with clarity as to what they want to do.

Thus, I argue that while a career is important, students should take a break after university to learn more about themselves.

Some today argue that schools are no longer necessary because children can learn so much from the internet and be educated
at home.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

😵 Dàn ý I strongly disagree with this statement

Body paragraph 1: Disagree 1 : Students don't have enough self-discipline to study on their own without supervision → If supervised
by parents:

One would have to stay at home → put more financial pressure on the working parent

Their pedagogical methods are not verified → ineffective

Body paragraph 2: Disagree 2 : Having the detrimental effects on their communication skills
Cannot make friends

Cannot know where they stand in the pool of kids in the same age and area → parents cannot fully assess whether their children are
smart or not

Due to the rapid development of technology today, many people think that children no longer need to go to school to study. Instead,
they can learn from the Internet and be home-schooled. I strongly disagree with this statement, however.

It is common knowledge that children are not the most self-discipline demographic and that studying is not the most relaxing
activity. This means that there have to be some forms of supervision to ensure children are studying instead of slacking off. Many parents
think they can fulfill this responsibility, but in reality, having one parent stay at home to take care of their child’s education does more
harm than good. Firstly, this will put more financial pressure on the working parent to make ends meet for the family. Secondly, the
pedagogical style of the teaching parent might not be suitable for the children, making home-schooling ineffective.

Another reason why I think kids should not learn from the Internet or be home-schooled is the detrimental effects on their
communication skills. For most children, school is not only a source of education but also a place where they can meet other kids,
teachers, and other staff members. Some of the most beautiful and long-lasting friendships and romantic relationships stem from middle
or high school, for example. Moreover, by meeting other children, parents can acknowledge some standards to which they should
compare their children; hence, knowing if their children’s development is on par with others.

In conclusion, although the benefits technology brings to education are undeniable, I strongly disagree that children
do not need to go to school because of this. Schools are an effective use of educational workers and provide children with chances to
communicate with other children as well as teachers and staff members.

Some people believe that education is the key to tackling hunger worldwide while others feel that the answer is in food aid.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để cho giám khảo biết mình đồng ý với ý kiến
nào

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL sẽ chỉ ra một vài lợi ích để ủng hộ cho quan điểm rằng hỗ trợ lương thực là một giải pháp tốt cho nạn đói

Body 2: Bên cạnh đó, DOL cũng không quên chỉ ra những lợi ích mà giáo dục có thể mang lại để giải quyết nạn đói

Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình, cho biết rằng cả hai phương pháp đều hữu hiệu và có tác động khác
nhau

I believe that food aid and proper education are valid approaches, but each would solve the problem
differently.

Body paragraph 1: Food aid : Solves the problem immediately and has short term effects

Food aid → solves the problem chronically and straightforward → requires less effort invested for effective short term effects

Suitable for people in underdeveloped countries

Areas that face hunger are undeveloped → tend to not appreciate / cannot afford education → much education has to be done to change
the situation → not as effective as immediate food aid

Body paragraph 2: Education : Develop solutions that are sustainable in the long run

Education on sustainable farming or high-yield crops → sustainable solutions for the future

Solves the core problem and not just relieving the adverse effects

Unsustainable farming practices, climate changes are the core causes for food aid → cannot tackle with food aid → only education and
research can develop solutions

Dàn ý: As scientists give out warnings about the potential global food crisis, many people wonder whether the key to tackling this
problem lies in food aid or proper education. I believe that both are valid approaches, but each would solve the problem differently.

The most considerable benefit that food aid brings to the table is that it solves food hunger straightforwardly and quickly.
Donating food to famine areas is the solution that requires the least resources to help people with food insecurity. For example, when
people face chronic food shortages in Vietnam, usually after natural disasters, food banks are created and are readily donated to by
mostly everyone. It requires only human resources to manage and distribute the food. Another benefit is that it is the solution suitable
for people in underdeveloped countries. Many people there do not fully appreciate or can afford proper education on food security. As
a result, providing them with food aid is a better solution because that is something they can comprehend.

However, in the long run, I believe that education will solve world hunger, due to various reasons. Firstly, only education and
research can guarantee to prevent food shortages for many ongoing decades. The result of education will be more higher-yield crops,
resistive solutions to climate change, and fair trade, which are all factors that reduce food insecurity. Secondly, education can solve the
core issues of global hunger. Food aid is only the chronic solution to the problem, which means it is not addressing the roots of food
shortages. With adequately funded research into the phenomenon, scientists can come up with solutions to develop sustainable
agriculture and high-efficient farming practices, which will eradicate famine for good.

In conclusion, although I think that food aid is an effective and short-term solution to areas with critical famine, I believe
that research and development on developing food security is the only way to tackle the problem in the long run.

Some people think that it is a waste of time for high school students to study literature, such as novels and poems. To what extent
do you agree or disagree?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để cho giám khảo biết là mình Agree hay
Disagree với câu hỏi

Thân bài: Body 1: Vì DOL đồng tình với việc học ngữ văn ở trường trung học, DOL sẽ chỉ ra một vài lợi ích về mặt học tập để ủng hộ
cho quan điểm của mình

Body 2: DOL cũng chỉ ra những lợi ích khác mà ngữ văn mang lại về mặt hiểu biết văn hóa

Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình, cho biết rằng văn học rất quan trọng và học sinh nên học ngữ văn

It is not a waste of time for high school students to study literature, such as novels and poems.

Body paragraph 1: Disagree 1 :Individual can learn how to write from learning literature

For example: students can expand vocab, learn new expressions, how to put forth a logical argument

Body paragraph 2: Disagree 2 :Students can learn about the Vietnamese culture through literature

For example: learn about traditions, beliefs of that time, relationship with other cultures

Although some might think that high school students should focus more on other subjects but literature, I strongly disagree that
students should stop studying novels and poems.

The first reason why students should continue learning about literature is that they can improve their communication skills. For
example, students can expand their vocabulary, learn new ways of expressing themselves, and know how to put forth a logical argument.
Many great writers have confirmed that the secret to better writing is via extensive pursuing. Learning about literature also helps with
verbal communication, as students can pick up slang from a novel to use in real life. Also, there are many characters in famous
Vietnamese works used to refer to certain qualities, such as using Hoan Thu to represent a jealous person.

The second reason students should learn more about literature is that students can learn a lot about Vietnamese culture. Because
literature reflects peoples' lives in a certain region during a certain period, much is revealed through studying novels and poems. For
example, students can learn what lives were like from reading Chi Pheo, a famous short story. They can imagine what philosophy the
villagers were practicing and what they did for a living. Moreover, students can interpret how much influence other cultures have on
Vietnam through reading. An example of this is by examining the language used in literature to see where those words originate.

In conclusion, there are multiple reasons why literature should be a big part of the curriculum. I strongly disagree with the
opinion that learning literature is a waste of time.

Many people feel that students should learn from online materials while others feel that it is better to use printed materials.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để trực tiếp đưa ra quan điểm của mình về vấn
đề này

Thân bài: Body 1: Thảo luận về quan điểm đầu tiên (Online materials)

Body 2: Thảo luận về quan điểm thứ hai (Printed materials)

Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình bằng cách tóm lại các ý chính đã thảo luận ở trên

I believe this matter depends on both the subject taught and the level of education of students.

Body paragraph 1: Online materials =>Good for the environment

This method is usually for higher education → lots of materials → if print all of them → waste of paper → online materials solve that
problem

Convenience for both learners and teachers

Many learning materials come in many forms (audio, interactive diagrams & graphs) → more convenient if online; easier to share
between friends, easier for storage

Body paragraph 2: Printed materials

Easier for students to annotate (take notes) and to study materials

Some subjects (science) are hard to annotate online → printed materials; studies show reading printed materials retain memorization
better → printed materials when memorization is needed (languages courses or any beginners’ courses)
User-friendly

Many teachers / professors are old and are not tech-savvy → printed materials. Same goes with students (esp younger ones); teacher can
monitor class better with printed materials (lessen chance of playing on laptops / phones during classes)

With the advancement of technology, many people think online materials are sufficient for teaching, and printed materials have
no place in schools today. I believe this matter depends on both the subject taught and the level of education of students.

Online materials are the solution to protect the environment while still providing convenience for both students and teachers. This
type of learning material usually appears in higher education because there are lots of students in courses that require a heavy load of
materials. If they are all printed, it would be a considerable amount of paper waste, so online materials are the solution. Another benefit
is that online materials come in many forms, such as audio, interactive diagrams, or graphs. It will be more helpful than printed ones for
engineering courses and graphic design ones. Also, it is easier to store and share online materials with your peers because it can be done
on a laptop and takes up no physical space.

However, that is not to say that printed material has no place in modern education. This type of material is especially suitable
for classes that require memorization and annotation. Many subjects, like maths or physics, are hard for note-taking on laptops because
they involve various scientific notations, which is why maths is taught by strictly printed materials. Studies also show that memorization
is more efficient when students read from printed materials rather than digital ones. Another reason is that printed materials are more
user-friendly. This advantage is significant because many teachers and students are not tech-savvy enough to work with digital materials.
For example, many underprivileged students in middle and high schools still struggle with using computers due to not having prior
exposure.

In conclusion, I think that online materials are suitable for higher education, or for courses that require perusing lots of
materials. On the other hand, printed materials are user-friendly and suitable for classes with lots of memorization and annotation.

A few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive
or a negative development?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để cho giám khảo biết là mình Agree hay
Disagree với câu hỏi.

Thân bài: Body 1: Dù DOL cho rằng đây là một xu hướng không tốt, nhưng DOL vẫn chỉ ra những điểm tích cực của nó để lập luận
không bị một chiều và sẽ chặt chẽ hơn.

Body 2: Tiếp đến, DOL chỉ ra những tác hại xấu của xu hướng này để ủng hộ cho quan điểm của mình.

Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình, cho rằng dù có mang lại lợi ích về kinh tế, những mất mát là quá lớn.

I argue in this essay why I believe this is an unwanted trend, for although it could help stimulate economic growth, the
long term consequences of cultural erosion is comparatively more undesirable.

Body paragraph 1: Positive

Economic boost => Globalization → more people are learning the languages of world-leading economies → a greater overall increase
in global GDP

Being bilingual boosts employment opportunities

Prospective employees can bridge the gap between two different cultures and economies.

For instance, English and Chinese are the languages of choice today, and fluency is a skill sought after by international employers →
they hope to do business in both English and Chinese speaking countries.

Body paragraph 2: Negative

The cultural erosion: Language is the foundation of culture → if people cannot communicate, they cannot form a collective identity →
the decline of a language would also mean the decline of a culture =>> For example: the Welsh language is barely spoken because the
English sought to replace their culture following an invasion → learning Welsh has been considered an important way to preserve culture
for many young Welsh people.

Today, only a few languages reign supreme in most countries, whilst the usage of many other languages have declined. I argue in this
essay why I believe this is an unwanted trend, for although it could help stimulate economic growth, the long-term consequences of
cultural erosion is comparatively more undesirable.

On the one hand, it could be said that as a result of globalization, more people are learning the languages of world-leading
economies, which leads to a greater overall increase in global GDP. At the moment, being bilingual boosts employment opportunities
drastically for prospective employees since they can bridge the gap between two different cultures and economies. For instance, English
and Chinese are the languages of choice today, and fluency is a skill sought after by international employers as they hope to do business
in both English and Chinese speaking countries.

However, it could be posited that language is the foundation of culture, and if people cannot communicate, they cannot form
a collective identity: the result would be that the culture gets eroded over time. Going into more detail, some words in many languages
cannot be translated to others precisely because they are specific to a cultural context; the decline of a language would also mean the
decline of a culture. Using a more specific example, the Welsh language is barely spoken because the English sought to replace their
culture following an invasion; thus, learning Welsh has been considered an important way to preserve culture for many young Welsh
people.

In conclusion, whilst I argue that although the use of only a few languages over the many can lead to more economic development, it
is still nonetheless more important that people preserve their individual cultures; thus the aforementioned trend has been an unwanted
one.

In some cultures, children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough. What are the advantages and
disadvantages of giving children this message?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để đưa ra quan điểm của mình.

Thân bài: Body 1: Đầu tiên, DOL sẽ nói về các ưu điểm của triết lý này

Body 2: Tiếp đó, DOL sẽ nói về các nhược điểm

Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình bằng cách tóm lại các ý chính đã nêu trên.

I think there are many advantages as well disadvantages to this philosophy.

Body paragraph 1: Advantages

Encourage them to be more diligent

Self-discipline is hard to train → motivate children to work harder → setting them up for success

Exhibit appreciation for hard working people

See hard working people → think they are trying to be successful → appreciate them → be humble and understanding → well-liked

Body paragraph 2: Disadvantages

Overlook other factors

Overlooking connections, attitude, creativity, or soft skills → harder to success

Self-hating behaviors when not successful

Try hard but not success → beating themselves up thinking they don’t try hard enough → mentally exhausting (seen in many gen Z
kids)

Nowadays, many parents, especially Asian ones, tend to educate their children to always try hard because as long as they do
so, they certainly will be successful. I think there are many advantages as well disadvantages to this philosophy.

It is undeniable that there are many benefits to telling children so. The first reason, obvious as it is, is that this will encourage
children to become much more diligent. Self-discipline is the most difficult trait to develop for almost anyone, and telling children that
success awaits them if they work hard incentivizes them to become self-disciplined. As a result, they stand a better chance of being
successful since they are more goal-oriented and determined. Another reason is that these children will exhibit appreciation for hard-
working people. They will perceive these people as also wanting to be successful like them and thus appreciate their diligence. Therefore,
these children would be more grateful and humble towards other people.

However, there are certain disadvantages to teaching children to expect success once they have worked hard. The first
disadvantage is that these children can ignore other factors for success, such as natural talent, soft skills, attitude, or connections. For
example, a child might be so engrossed in one's studies that one neglects to make friends, which might serve as crucial connections
many years later. The second disadvantage is that children will show self-deprecating behaviors if this philosophy fails them. For
example, when children study hard for their university entrance exam but cannot get into their dream school, they will blame themselves
for not working hard enough. In the long run, this will be mentally exhausting for them.

In conclusion, there are both advantages and disadvantages to telling children that once they work hard, success will come.
Generally, I think parents should encourage their children to work hard for their success, but diligence should not be the only factor
leading to success.

Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as cooking or dressing should not
be taught. To what extent do you agree/disagree? Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis
Statement (luận điểm) để cho giám khảo biết là mình Agree hay Disagree với câu hỏi.

Thân bài: Body 1: Vì DOL không đồng tình và cho rằng việc dạy kỹ năng sống cũng rất quan trọng nên ở đoạn này DOL sẽ đưa ra lý
do đầu tiên - dựa trên hạn chế của việc chỉ dạy mỗi các môn học thuật

Body 2: Tiếp đó, DOL đưa ra lý do thứ hai - dựa trên lợi ích của việc dạy các kỹ năng sống.

Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình bằng cách tóm lại ý chính đã trình bày ở trên.

We should teach them not only academic subjects but also life skills.
Body paragraph 1: Reason 1

A series of standardized exams makes children unable to discover their talents

A mere scheme for achieving high scores on exams → a generation that knows nothing more than studying and is unable to develop
their potential.

For example: Children who are taught to cook at an early age, find that it is their specialty → they might rather be a chef than an average
worker.

Body paragraph 2: Reason 2

Students should be taught basic housework skills in order to take care of themselves and support their parents.

Low incomes families do not have time for teaching these skills

For example: By saving time cooking, mothers can focus on answering emails → supplement family income and better support their
child in other ways.

The issue of deciding what should go on academic curricula has been hotly debated, with some arguing that time would be
better spent preparing for the exams with no time wasted on other skills such as cooking or dressing. Personally, I believe that the
purpose of education is to develop children’s potential, and this would mean teaching them not only academic subjects but also life
skills.

Firstly, the idea that schooling exists only to get young minds through a series of standardized exams can result in a generation
of students that know nothing more than studying and who are unable to develop their potential. Education is meant to be a tool to
empower and uplift children, to prepare them for the world and to ensure they thrive within it; to twist it into a mere scheme for achieving
high scores on exams is to miss the point entirely, and could result in them not being able to discover hidden talents. Children who are
taught to cook at an early age, for example, might find that it is their specialty - as they grow up, they might rather be a chef than an
average worker.

Secondly, whilst some will argue that this job should be delegated to the parents, relying on them to teach essential life skills is
a flawed idea as they are not likely to have both the experience and the opportunity to teach such skills. Most low income families hold
down two or three jobs at once, and are unable to make the time to teach such skills; students should therefore be taught basic housework
skills in order to take care of themselves and support their parents. By saving time cooking, for instance, mothers can instead focus on
answering emails, allowing them to supplement family income and better support their child in other ways.

In conclusion, I believe that only teaching students about academic knowledge means missing out on potential talent and results in
more responsibility on parents; as such, I argue that other skills should be taught as well.

Government should invest in teaching science subjects rather than other subjects for country development and progress. To
what extent do you agree or not agree?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để cho giám khảo biết là mình Agree hay
Disagree với câu hỏi

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL sẽ chỉ ra một vài lợi ích của việc chỉ đầu tư giảng dạy các môn khoa học

Body 2: Vì DOL cho rằng các môn khoa học xã hội có tầm quan trọng đối với xã hội, DOL cũng không quên chỉ ra những lợi ích mà
các môn khoa học xã hội mang lại

Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình là các môn khoa học xã hội không thể nào bị loại bỏ khỏi chương trình
giáo dục

Science is important, but humanities subjects should also be included in the curriculum

Body paragraph 1: Science is important

Science is the revolutionising force in improving the material conditions of humanity.

Scientific breakthroughs allow production processes to become more efficient → improving both the quality and quantities of goods
→ it can be prioritised within any learning program.

Body paragraph 2: Arts and humanities should be taught as well

Arts and humanities create the leaders that can guide science to its socially beneficial conclusions

There are many ethical problems with using scientific technology → requires those who can consider the potential social consequences

Without arts and humanities, science might not serve the benefit of mankind, and might lead us towards a very dark path.

In recent years, there has been talk of prioritising science over other subjects for the sake of national progress. Although science is
important, I argue that humanities subjects should also be included in the curriculum.

Science could be said to have been a revolutionising force in improving the material conditions of humanity and thus can be argued
to rightfully be prioritised within any learning program. Scientific breakthroughs allow production processes to become more efficient,
improving both the quality and quantities of goods. These goods can either be exported to the international market, improving a country’s
prosperity, or used by the domestic population to improve their lives. It was through improving its scientific research that the United
States, for example, is at the forefront of technology and leads in economic and military prowess.

However, one might also argue that arts and humanities should be taught as well, for they create the leaders that can effectively
guide science to its most socially beneficial conclusions. Science could be said to be a tool, and like other tools, require a direction that
it can be used towards. More specifically, there are many ethical problems with using scientific technology such as gene editing that
requires those who can consider the potential social consequences. Without arts and humanities, science might not serve the benefit of
mankind, and might lead us towards a very dark path.

Therefore, I believe that although science is important, it cannot be left on its own. As such, along with a new generation of
scientists, governments should also invest in bringing up a generation of philosophers and politicians.

Some educationalists think international exchange programs would benefit teenagers in high school. Do the advantages of this
outweigh the disadvantages?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để cho giám khảo biết những Advantages (lợi
ích) và Disadvantages (tác hại) của vấn đề là gì

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL sẽ chỉ ra những lợi ích mà việc du học trao đổi mang lại

Body 2: Bên cạnh đó, DOL cũng không quên chỉ ra một vài tác hại của việc du học trao đổi đối với học sinh

Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình là du học trao đổi có rất nhiều lợi ích đối với học sinh và nên được thực
hiện

International exchange programs would benefit teenagers in high school.

Body paragraph 1: Advantages : Exchange culture

Expose themselves to new cultures → promote their own culture while learning about others → new perspectives into their own

Build their independence

Study abroad for a year → sometimes it’s the first time buying groceries, cooking, doing laundry → becoming more independent

Body paragraph 2: Disadvantages : Disrupt one’s studies in home country

Difference in curriculum (some countries don’t teach the same subject or at a different level) → harder to adjust when come back

Reverse culture shock

Many people after a time studying abroad find it harder to adjust to their own culture → some even despise it in extreme cases (from a
developed country to a developing one)

Nowadays, as many are implementing international exchange programs, people start to ponder whether this is a positive development.
In my opinion, the advantages far outweigh the disadvantages.

International exchange programs benefit both students in the host country and those from abroad in many ways. One significant
advantage is the cultural exchange between both parties. Students from abroad find themselves exposed to different cultures, while local
students can learn how to introduce and promote theirs sincerely. Another benefit is that abroad students can build their independence
through this program. Many abroad students live alone or stay in schools’ dorms with other local students. Sometimes, this will be the
first time they buy groceries, cook, or do laundry without the help of family. These experiences will shape their independence over time.

However, there are some minor disadvantages to this program that many should take into consideration. At a high school level, a year
of international exchange means a potential disruption in one’s studies. For example, a Vietnamese curriculum differs much from an
American one, which means Vietnamese students would miss out on subjects like literature when studying abroad. Moreover, a study
abroad program might cause a reverse culture shock on students when they return. This phenomenon describes a person finding it
difficult to adjust to one’s own culture after a time in other countries. In extreme cases, usually occur when students study abroad in a
developed country and return to a developing one, they can exhibit hatred for their own culture.

In conclusion, I understand that the international exchange program is not exactly for any high school students due to its potential
harms. However, its advantages to both students from host countries and students from abroad far outweigh the disadvantages.

In certain countries, unemployment is so high that some have suggested children should stop their education after primary
school to learn skills necessary to join the workforce. Do you agree or disagree?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để cho giám khảo biết là mình Agree hay
Disagree với câu hỏi

Thân bài: Body 1: Vì DOL không đồng ý rằng trẻ em nên nghỉ học để đi học nghề và các kỹ năng cần thiết để tìm việc, DOL sẽ chỉ ra
lý do vì sao đây là một giải pháp kém hiệu quả trong việc giảm tỷ lệ thất nghiệp

Body 2: Bên cạnh đó, DOL cũng không quên chỉ ra những vấn đề không tốt mà việc này mang đến cho sự phát triển của trẻ em
Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình, cho biết rằng trẻ em không nên nghỉ học để học nghề và các lớp kỹ
năng

Children shouldn't stop receiving education after primary school to join the workforce after training necessary skills.

Body paragraph 1: Disagree 1: This is not supposed to help the unemployment rate

This will only cause an influx of kids who are ready for the workforce where older generations are still unemployed → how is that
going to help bring the unemployment rate down? → not effective in the slightest

Body paragraph 2: Disagree 2 : Skills needed to join the workforce are taught in schools

After primary schools, most students only know basic math, virtually no efficiency in foreign languages and have low self-discipline
→ all the skills to join the workforce includes technical skills (taught in usually universities) and other basic soft skills (accumulate
through years of studying in schools) → this solution just sounds like schools in another form

With the growing unemployment rate, many countries think children should stop receiving education after primary school to join the
workforce after training necessary skills. I strongly disagree with this idea due to various reasons.
The most significant reason why I do not support the idea is that I completely fail to see its effectiveness. If this idea were to be
implemented immediately, society within a few years should expect an increase in the number of teenagers claiming that they are suitable
to work. In this hypothetical situation, the older generations are still struggling to find jobs due to global unemployment. As a result, the
competition for jobs will even be harsher for both generations. This solution is not effective as this would only generate more labor
without job listings to accommodate them.

Another reason why I think this idea is ill-advised is I believe that education beyond primary schools is essential. Primary schools
only teach students basic math and little language skills. Moreover, the majority of students this age have low self-discipline. This means
that to prepare them for the workforce, they will need extensive education to acquire both in-depth knowledge and soft skills. The current
education system solves this problem by providing students with academic knowledge and various opportunities to practice these skills.
Communication skills and self-discipline are also trained through group assignments and the pressure to perform well. All in all, this
new solution does not do anything that the current system cannot.

In conclusion, I do not support the idea because it is both ineffective and unoriginal. Unemployment rates have to be solved
by other means, rather than proposing that students quit formal education at such a young age.

Some people believe that universities should only accept students with the highest marks while others believe that some students
with low marks should have an opportunity. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để cho giám khảo biết ý kiến của mình đối với
hai quan điểm được nêu ra

Thân bài: Body 1: DOL sẽ chỉ ra một vài nguyên nhân vì sao các trường đại học hàng đầu nên chọn lọc các sinh viên giỏi

Body 2: Bên cạnh đó, DOL cũng không quên chỉ ra những lý do vì sao các sinh viên kém hơn vẫn nên được học đại học

Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình rằng các trường đại học hàng đầu nên tiếp tục chọn lọc sinh viên giỏi,
nhưng các sinh viên kém hơn vẫn nên được học ở các cơ sở khác

While rigorous universities should not lower their standards, private universities can still accept those who are willing
to pay.

Body paragraph 1: Accept students with highest mark

Maintain school’s reputation → rewarding for students and professors

Raising the bar on entrance exams → accept students that will achieve great things → maintain reputation (like many rigorous school
like SNU (South Korea), HCMC Med School) → students & professors will be motivated to put more effort

Easier for students and professors to conduct academic researches

Accepting the best students → creating environment where everyone is focused on studying and researching → make teaching in class
easier (spend less time on materials and receive more innovative ideas) → this is why most prestigious universities also invest a lot of
money into researches

Body paragraph 2: Give students with low performance a chance

An entrance exam does not entirely reflect a student’s academic performance

Many factors lead to a low score on the entrance exam (coming from an underprivileged family, health issues on exam day, not
performing well under pressure) → judging 12 years of studying based on grades of an exam is not fair

Everyone has a right to access education

Education is a human right and everyone should be able to access knowledge regardless of their intellectual abilities → currently, some
private universities still take in students as long as they pay the tuition
 Nowadays, many people think that higher education is only for people with the highest marks, while others do not agree. I believe
that while rigorous universities should not lower their standards, private universities can still accept those who are willing to pay.

On the one hand, accepting only top scorers guarantees that the university’s reputation is maintained. This policy is what
current top universities, such as the Seoul National University in South Korea or the Ho Chi Minh City Medical School, are doing. As
a result, students and professors of these universities feel motivated by pride to put more effort into their studies and research to
continuously bring more achievements to the university. Another advantage of this policy is that this creates an environment that is
spear-headed towards learning and researching. This environment will incentivize students and professors to undergo academic research.
For example, teaching in schools like these will be easier for professors as they need not spend much time on the materials, so they can
devote more time to nurturing innovative ideas. As a result, more students will have a chance to put their academic knowledge into use.

On the other hand, I think that universities should not deny anyone with a willingness to study. An entrance exam does not fully
reflect a student’s academic performance since many factors can lead to low scores. For example, a student may come from an
underprivileged area and could not afford tutoring centers, thus not having enough materials to practice. As a result, they tend to perform
more poorly than students who have these resources at hand. Another point is that everyone should have a right to access education.
This mindset is prevalent from primary to high school and should be the same for higher education. A solution for this might be to have
universities with high acceptance rates, which ensures that top scorers can enroll in prestigious universities but low scorers can also
learn if they are willing to pay.

In conclusion, I think that reputed universities should maintain their high standards, but those willing to learn should not be
denied the opportunity to, hence the existence of private universities with low entrance scores.

Many people believe that lecture halls have been replaced by online learning. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để cho giám khảo biết là mình Agree hay
Disagree với câu hỏi

Thân bài: Body 1: Vì DOL không đồng tình rằng học trực tuyến có thể thay thế học tại lớp, DOL sẽ chỉ ra một vài lợi ích của việc học
trên giảng đường để củng cố quan điểm

Body 2: Bên cạnh đó, DOL cũng không quên chỉ ra những lợi ích mà việc học trực tuyến có thể mang lại

Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình rằng học trực tuyến không thể thay thế việc học trên giảng đường

Online learning cannot fully replace traditional teaching because each method has its target audience and cannot be
eradicated.

Body paragraph 1: Disagree : Lecture halls are more efficient and saves money

Many people experience technological disruptions, even professors → lecture hall saves times for people with poor connections / not
tech-savvy, saves money since schools do not pay for online platforms

Lecture halls are more suitable for classes that needs contact

Discussion-based classes (writing or social science classes) or classes that involves experiments are easier to carry face-to-face →
students find it more personal and easier to observe the lecturer

Body paragraph 2: Agree Online class are best for working students

Students who work do not have a flexible schedule → non-synchronous remote classes are better for scheduling (can watch videos
anytime, even exams can become online projects to accommodate)

Online classes can be helpful when people want to review

Benefits of online classes are that people can rewatch videos → easier to review, can also speed up to save time

With the advancements of technology, online classes are becoming more prevalent than ever. Many people believe this is why
they will soon replace lecture halls. However, I strongly disagree with this statement because each method has its target audience and
cannot be eradicated.

I believe lecture halls are the most effective way to educate a large group of students due to various reasons. Firstly, this teaching
method saves resources for both educational institutions and students. For example, most online classroom platforms, like Zoom, will
charge institutions for student accounts, whereas lecture halls are university properties, and their maintenance costs, when divided among
students, are cheaper. Secondly, lecture halls are better for classes that require direct communication between students and professors.
For example, discussion-based courses, like writing or philosophy, have proved to go better in lecture halls because students can build
personal relationships among fellow students and the lecturer. Classes involving doing experiments would also benefit from this teaching
format.

However, that is not to say that online classes do not offer any benefits at all. One of their main advantages is that they are
suitable for people with strict schedules, like working students. Attending online non-synchronous classes can benefit them because it
is significantly easier to work or travel and still catch up with course materials. Another advantage is that online lectures are usually
better than face-to-face ones at helping students to review the materials. Students can re-watch lecture videos and read slides to prepare
for exams. On the contrary, when attending lecture halls, students have to diligently take notes, since few lecturers allow recording in
classes. Moreover, when reviewing online lectures, students can speed up these videos to save time on content that they feel confident
in.

In conclusion, I believe that both face-to-face lectures and online classes have their advantages to offer both students and
lecturers. As a result, I strongly disagree that one will be replaced by another, at least soon.

Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than other countries. Do you
agree or disagree?

Mở bài: Sau khi paraphrase lại đề bài, DOL sẽ đưa ra một Thesis Statement (luận điểm) để cho giám khảo biết là mình Agree hay
Disagree với câu hỏi

Thân bài: Body 1: Vì DOL đồng tình với việc cho trẻ em học cả văn học trong nước và nước ngoài, DOL sẽ chỉ ra một vài lợi ích của
việc học văn học trong nước

Body 2: Bên cạnh đó, DOL cũng không quên chỉ ra những lợi ích mà việc học văn học nước ngoài có thể mang lại

Kết bài: Cuối cùng, DOL sẽ nhấn mạnh lại quan điểm của mình là học tập cả văn học trong nước và nước ngoài đều rất cần thiết

While children will gain a range of benefits when studying literature works of their own culture, I also believe that learning foreign
literature is equally important.

Body paragraph 1: Literature of their own country

A literary work reflects the historical context -> knowledge gained from literature lessons helps extend knowledge of the country’s
history and culture

Literature works such as folktales, poems or stories help develop children’s patriotism

Example: Thanh Giong story -> reminded to make every possible effort in everything they do in order to contribute to the development
of their country

Body paragraph 2: Literature of other nations

Foreign literature books provide kids with in-depth knowledge -> avoid culture shock when travelling or working for an international
company

Learn literature from both resources -> children can think from different perspective -> better decision-making and problem-solving
skills.

It is argued that teaching children the literature of their own country should be given more importance than that of other
countries. While children will gain a range of benefits when studying literature works from their own culture, I also believe that learning
foreign literature is equally important.

On the one hand, children can derive several benefits from learning the literature of their country. In fact, a literary work always
reflects the historical context when it is written and characters in the works show ways of life of people in that context. Such knowledge
that children gain from literature lessons helps to extend students’ knowledge of their own country’s history and culture. In addition,
literary works such as folktales, poems or stories help develop children’s patriotism. For example, children who have been told about
the Thanh Giong story have the chance to learn about how their ancestors went through various challenges and even sacrificed
themselves for the independence of Vietnam; therefore, they are reminded to make every possible effort in everything they do in order
to contribute to the development of their country.

On the other hand, I believe that teaching children literature of other nations is equally important. Foreign literature books provide
kids with in-depth knowledge about the cultural and traditional values of different parts of the world. This can help them to avoid cultural
shock or other culture-related problems when they travel abroad or work for an international company in the future. Another reason is
that by learning literature from both local and foreign resources, children would be able to think from different perspectives when
encountering a problem. This helps develop better decision-making and problem-solving skills.

In conclusion, I personally believe that it is necessary for children to learn both local and foreign literature.