Contribution of British American Tobacco To Tree Planting in Kenya
Contribution of British American Tobacco To Tree Planting in Kenya
ABSTRACT:- Tobacco industry has been associated with claims of degradation. A study in 2016 addressed
the environmental impact of tobacco growing, paying special attention to soil degradation and loss of
vegetation. The objective of the tree census was to evaluate the effect of afforestation programs by BAT tree
planting project to its contracted farmers in Kenya that is Eastern, Western and Nyanza regions. The study
targeted 517 farmers sampled from the total number of farmers estimated at 5500. Consultative and
participatory approaches mainly key informant interviews, documents reviews, questionnaires and focus group
discussions were used. These targeted various levels of BAT customers/beneficiaries. Desk reviews on existing
secondary data and documents were undertaken for: study preparations, reconnaissance, to understand the
study area, methodologies, types of land uses and micro-climates, suitable preferred tree species and their
uses, benchmarking with other similar studies and to develop a comprehensive report. The study suggests
three triggers that lead to vegetation loss associated with tobacco growing namely; forest degradation,
deforestation due to curing and deforestation due to clearance for more growing land. The study noted that,
although the global share of agricultural land used for tobacco growing is less than 1%, its impact on global
deforestation is 2–4%, making a visible footprint for climate change.
Key words: Tree census, tree planting, Participatory, tobacco growing, degradation, deforestation
I. INTRODUCTION
Every year 6.7 million tons of tobacco are produced throughout the world. The top producers of
tobacco are China (39.6%), India (8.3%), Brazil (7.0%) and the United States (4.6%), (US Census Bureau-
Foreign Trade Statistics, Washington DC; 2005).Tobacco is one of the Kenya's largest industries contributing
both to export earnings and creating employment locally. The history of tobacco production in Kenya can be
traced back from the year 1935, when a native tobacco industry was started by settlers in Nyanza province for
making cigarettes. The area increased in 1954, due to the Swynnerton Plan of improved agriculture in Kenya
and in 1956, a cigarette factory was constructed in Nairobi. However, production remained low until the late
1960s. There was expansion of areas under tobacco in late sixties due to stable political environment compared
to the other East Africa Community member states.BAT Kenya started growing tobacco in Kenya in 1975, with
small-scale farmers on a contract basis. It is the largest tobacco company in Kenya with about 73% of the
estimated annual 6 billion stock market.
Tobacco production was organized by BAT on the concept of contract farming- a system whereby
schemes or companies use small holder farmers to produce cash crops. BAT became the third British company
to use the contract system in Western Kenya following initiatives in Tea and Sugar (BabereKerataChacha, 1969-
1999).
The tobacco crop takes six months to grow and mature, from the nursery to the time it is harvested. It
has been a major income earner for farmers in Teso and Bungoma West, providing stability for an estimated
30,000 farmers. The farmers and co-operative unions in Kolanya, Malakisi, Changara and Tamlega said they
earn more than KShs 250,000 every six months. Farmers are currently planning to increase the acreage under
tobacco, despite sustained efforts by several local non-governmental organizations to get them to grow more
wholesome food crops, http://www.standardmedia.co.ke/business/article/2000142451/tobacco-farming-on-rise-
as-growers-bag-lucrative-deals.
Tobacco industry has been associated with claims of degradation. A study in 2012 addressed the
environmental impact of tobacco growing, paying special attention to soil degradation and loss of vegetation.
The study suggests three triggers that lead to vegetation loss associated with tobacco growing namely; forest
degradation, deforestation due to curing and deforestation due to clearance for more growing land. The study
noted that, although the global share of agricultural land used for tobacco growing is less than 1%, its impact on
global deforestation is 2–4%, making a visible footprint for climate change. However, the claims on the fact that
tobacco is a major cause of deforestation also do not take into consideration another factor highlighted by the
FAO that population growth is a major determinant of land clearing in shifting cultivation, through the growth
*Corresponding Author: Joram Kagombe 1 www.aijbm.com 114 | Page
Contribution Of British American Tobacco To Tree Planting In Kenya
in requirements for food and other agricultural products. The need for additional land, in this case, is roughly
proportional to the growth in food requirements of the population.
In reality, it is quite normal that agricultural expansion takes place in areas which have already been
free of trees for several years, and therefore deforestation cannot be solely associated with cutting of trees for
tobacco farming. It is worth to note that tobacco industry is involved in afforestation programs in different parts
of the world. Demand for wood fuel is a major driver of deforestation in developing world as wood fuel is the
primary source of energy for most households and therefore forest resource in and around the most heavily
populated regions have been depleted (Kariuki J. G et al., 2008). The exploitation of forests and tree resources
to meet demand for wood fuel has resulted to environmental degradation. The problem is to such a scale that the
Kenya constitution in Chapter 4a has obligated to have the environment protected for the benefit of present and
future generations. It has also under section 69b stated that the State shall work to achieve and maintain a tree
cover of at least 10% of the land area of Kenya. The Forest Conservation and Management Act, 2016 article 6
(3a, iii) also requires for a program to achieve and maintain a tree cover of at least 10% of the land area of
Kenya. The Agriculture (Farm Forestry) Rules, 2009 Section 6 also requires maintenance of 10% tree cover on
the farms.
BAT Kenya Ltd began an afforestation program in 1976 as way of ensuring that the company
replenishes the wood used for tobacco curing, and also to contribute to the international and national
environmental conservation initiatives. The company started afforestation program that works with farmers as
well as with government agencies, commercial tree farmers, NGOs, private and public institutions. The
company’s aim is to increase the tree cover and conserve the environment in tobacco growing areas and other
parts of the country.
1.3 Objectives
1. To verify area planted with trees on community land and proportion contributed by BAT in comparison
with other organizations.
2. To verify the survival rate of trees planted by BAT farmers both from company issued seedlings and
other sources by area and species
II. METHODOLOGY
2.1 Study areas
The study was done in all the three regions of BAT operation in Kenya that is Eastern, Western and
Nyanza. The Eastern region covers Meru, Tharaka-Nithi and Embu counties. Meru lies between latitudes 1 30’
South and 0 35’ North and between longitudes 30 20’ and 39 5’ East whereas Embu lies between 0º - 35’0
North and 37° 40' 0 East. The topography in Meru ranges from 5200 m above sea level (Mt. Kenya) to the flat
lands of Giaki/Gaitu and lower Nkuene, Igoki and Abogeta of 400 m above sea level, whereas in Embu the
altitude ranges from 760m to 2070m above sea level. The climate and rainfall in this region is greatly influenced
by Mt. Kenya. The long rains occur between March and May and the short rains from October to December.
Rainfall varies from 2,600 mm annually in the upper highlands of Mt. Kenya to 500 mm in the lower dry parts.
The soils in Meru region are dominated with Ferralsols and Acrisols which are well drained, light and
BAT has a policy and a tradition of supporting its contracted farmers with tree planting. This is due to
the realization that trees are very vital in the tobacco curing. The support is much appreciated since even if the
farmer does not have the capacity to plant the trees, BAT through its extension agents do support them in
ensuring that they provide the necessary support. Farmers are provided with loaned/subsidized seedling
according to their capacity to produce tobacco (10 seedlings per every 100 kg of tobacco produced). Though
some farmers talked of provision of free seedlings, they were actually loaned to be deducted during the sale of
their tobacco.
The farmers contracted to raise seedlings on behalf of BAT (Figure 5), are also supported in various
ways. First, they are assured of the market for the raised seedlings since they will be supplied to the BAT
contracted tobacco farmers and institutions for planting. Tree nursery operators are usually paid for the raised
and supplied seedlings in stages. These stages include after potting the seedlings (20%), after pricking out
(20%), after root pruning (20%) and upon issue of the seedlings (40%). The nursery operators are also provided
with potting bags and relevant chemicals for pests and diseases control.
Table 4: Surviving trees planted by BAT farmers from company issued seedlings
Region Year Trees Total Trees Total % survival
issued survived issued (N) survived
(n) (n) (N)
These other sources supplement the BAT’s tree planting program by availing more trees and more tree species
to the farmers. Among the government entities where trees could be sourced include, the ministry of agriculture,
especially through Horticultural Crops Development Authority (HCDA) which specializes on fruit trees and
Kenya Forest Service (KFS) for other type of tree species. Since quite a number of farmers indicated that they
get their seedlings from their own tree nurseries, wildings or friends, they should be trained on how to select
good mother trees, extraction of collected seeds, storage, pre-treatment methods and germination tests to ensure
quality planting material.
Table 6 gives the overall survival rate of seedlings sourced by farmers from other sources. Highest
survival in was reported in Western (74.2%), followed by Nyanza (69%) and Eastern at 65.4%.Survival had
wide variation from year to year.
Table 7: Comparison of number of tree seedlings sourced from BAT to other sources
Region
Year Parameter Eastern Western Nyanza
2015 Number of tree seedlings from BAT 23475 54039 50690
Number of tree seedlings from other sources 1747 10891 52271
Total number of seedlings planted 25222 64930 102961
% seedlings sourced from BAT 93 83.2 50.8
2014 Number of tree seedlings from BAT 11116 28781 37153
Number of tree seedlings from other sources 1071 19700 48172
Total number of seedlings planted 12187 48481 85325
% seedlings sourced from BAT 91.2 59.4 56.5
2013 Number of tree seedlings from BAT 2398 10682 5057
Number of tree seedlings from other sources 340 2456 12671
Total number of seedlings planted 2738 13138 13381
% seedlings sourced from BAT 87.5 81.3 94.7
In all the three regions, main source of seedlings was BAT and so has a great effect in afforestation and onfarm
tree planting efforts.
*Corresponding Author: Joram Kagombe 1 www.aijbm.com 121 | Page
Contribution Of British American Tobacco To Tree Planting In Kenya
3.1.4 Comparison of BAT promoted trees species and those from other sources
About half of tree species supplied by BAT were also listed as ones preferred by farmers. The top ten trees
species preferred by farmers and BAT are listed in the, Table 9. Those that are preferred by both farmers and
BAT include Grevillea robusta, Senna siamea, Eucalyptus spp, Cordia africanaand Markhamia lutea. A record
of 25 trees species were supplied by BAT while 14 tree species were sort by farmers from other planting
material sources.
Table 9: Comparison of BAT promoted trees species and those from other sources (farmers)
BAT promoted tree species Tree species from other sources
Region Tree species % frequency Tree species % frequency
Eastern Grevillea robusta 42.1 Grevillea robusta 39.4
Senna siamea 22.1 Morus alba 15.2
Eucalyptus spp 11 Carica papaya 15.2
Markhamia lutea 10.5 Senna siamea 11.1
Jacaranda mimosifolia 2.8 Mangiferaindica 4.0
Cordia africana 1.3 Eucalyptus spp 4.0
Croton megalocarpus 1.3 Cordia africana 3.0
Croton macrostachyus 1.1 Markhamia lutea 2.0
Brideliamicrantha 1.1 Combretum molle 1.0
Acacia spp 1.1 Citrus spp 1
Western Eucalyptus spp 41.9 Grevillea robusta 43.9
Grevillea robusta 35.8 Eucalyptus spp 36.5
Markhamia lutea 8.6 Mangiferaindica 3.4
Senna siamea 4.7 Perseaamericana 3.4
Acacia spp 2.7 Markhamia lutea 2
Casaurinaspp 1.5 Melia azedarach 1.4
Jacaranda mimosifolia 0.8 Podocarpusspp 1.4
Syzygiumspp 0.8 Casimiroa edulis 1.4
Cordia fricana 0.6 Tipuanatipu 1.4
Melia azedarach 0.6 Senna siamea 1.4
Nyanza Eucalyptus spp 49.1 Eucalyptus spp 67.3
Grevillea robusta 31.9 Grevillea robusta 24.1
Casaurinaspp 4.5 Casaurinaspp 2.7
Markhamia lutea 3.9 Markhamia lutea 1.8
Spathodeacampanulata 2.3 Cupressus lusitanica 1.4
Acacia spp 2.2 Senna siamea 0.9
Senna siamea 1.9 Balanitis aegyptiaca 0.9
Cordia africana 0.8 Croton macrostachyus 0.5
Croton macrostachyus 0.5 Albiziaspp 0.5
Albiziaspp 0.5
BAT supplies some tree species that are also sourced elsewhere by farmers. This indicates that they
consider farmers’ preference in their tree species production. The management should however consider other
Prolonged drought featured as main reason for mortality of seedlings planted in the field. This could
easily be lumped together with late planting and wrong tree species site matching. When quality trees seedlings,
of the right size are carefully grown in their correct agro-climatic zones and at the correct timing, the chances of
their survival are very high.
Plate 1; Trees on soil conservation structures Plate 2; Trees planted on internal boundary
Plate 1; Trees/Seedling attacked Plate 2; A tree attacked by Plate 3; Eucalyptus lerp psyllids
by termites Cuscutaspp, a parasitic plant
3.2 BAT Tree Planting Support to Institutions
BAT support to Eastern region institutions was issuance of free seedlings (66.7%), training on tree
planting (22.2%) and tree protection from pests and disease attack (11.1%). In Western region, BAT was
reported to support institutions in their tree planting initiatives largely by provision of free seedlings (45.5%)
and training on tree planting. BAT support to Nyanza institutions was on free seedlings (70%), training on tree
planting (20%) and provision of subsidized seedlings (10%) as shown in Table 12.
The results established BAT’s outstanding support to institutions in tree planting which demonstrate
BAT Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) within tobacco growing region. These trees provide fuel wood and
construction materials to the respective institutions; contribute to the country’s tree cover while at the time
conserving the environment and rehabilitating degraded sites.
3.2.1 Comparison of survival rate among trees issued by BAT and those sourced elsewhere by institutions
The appraisal established that a total of 35,720 seedlings supplied by BAT were planted on community
land of Eastern region between 2013 and 2015 (Table 13), 7,558 in Western and 29,620 in Nyanza. Survival rate
of those provided by BAT in Eastern region was at 47.7%, 68.5% for Western and 78.5 % for Nyanza whereas
seedlings from other sources, the percentage survival was 57.8%, 61.8% and 78.9% for Eastern, Western and
Nyanza respectively. This shows that survival of seedlings from other sources was higher than those supplied by
BAT. However, considering BAT is the main source of seedlings there should be efforts to improve survival of
BAT supplied seedlings.
Additional information on survival by species of seedlings from BAT and those sourced elsewhere is in
Appendices 4a and 4b.
Different tree species were faced with different growing constraints. Reasons for mortality amongst different
species of tree seedlings include drought, poor timing and pests attack, especially termites as highlighted in
Appendix 5.
3.2.3 Challenges / Constrains to Tree Growing and Possible Intervention for Institutions
The respondents in institutions found in different regions mentioned drought and termite attack as the
key challenges they face while planting different tree species as shown in Table 15
Challenges/constraints by species are shown in Appendix 6. Possible solutions suggested include watering trees
during dry seasons, provision of pesticides and timely supply of seedlings by their respective administrations
and BAT management Table 16.
Table 16: Possible solutions for the constraints to tree growing by institutions
Region, % frequency
Challenges/constraints Possible intervention Western Nyanza Eastern
Drought Water trees during dry season 42.9 50.0 100.0
Provision of termiticides/ pesticides 14.3 0.0 0.0
Increase the number of seedlings 14.3 0.0 0.0
Timely supply of seedlings 28.6 50.0 0.0
Termite/ pests attack Water trees during dry season 0.0 0.0 12.5
Provision of termiticides/ pesticides 75.0 66.7 75.0
Increase the number of seedlings 0.0 0.0 12.5
Timely supply of seedlings 25.0 0.0 0.0
Right species 0.0 33.3 0.0
Few seedlings provided Timely supply of seedlings 0.0 0.0 100.0
Cutting of branches for Restriction by teachers
0.0 100.0 0.0
sweeping by students
Destruction to pave way Increase the number of seedlings
0.0 0.0 100.0
for construction
Frequency (n) 13 13 13
V. CONCLUSION
The key tree planting support that BAT gave to institutions was provision of free seedlings. In Western,
the survival rate was higher for trees issued by BAT compared to trees sourced elsewhere. In Eastern and
Nyanza, survival rate was lower for trees issued by BAT. The major reasons for mortality amongst different
species of tree seedlings include drought, poor season timing and pests attack, especially termites. The key
challenges to tree growing mentioned were drought and termite attack and the possible interventions for the
challenges were watering trees during dry seasons and provision of pesticides/ termiticides. The company
should supply tree seedlings in good time and provide termiticides to institution which will increase survival
rate of planted trees.
The study revealed that most of the tree species promoted by BAT in tree planting program are also
preferred from other sources. The Eastern region is leading in the number of farmers wholly relying on BAT for
tree planting support. The most significant support provided by BAT to farmers and institutions in tree planting
initiatives include provision of free, subsidized or loaned seedlings. The most preferred niche for tree planting in
eastern is external farm boundaries while in western and Nyanza include woodlots and external boundaries. The
trend of seedlings survival rate is generally low in eastern region, improving in western and Nyanza regions.
General Recommendations
Several recommendations were drawn from the study. To improve on tree planting initiatives:
1. BAT should continue and enhance its tree planting policy
2. Contract more farmers to do tree nurseries to increase number of seedlings raised and reduce distance
for farmers to collect the seedlings
3. Pests and disease monitoring and control need to be enhanced
4. The time for tree planting to be coincided with rainfall to reduce issues of reported drought and late
delivery of seedlings as well as tackling other constraints.
5. The tree-site matching need to be encouraged as well niches, densities and other management aspects
for optimal growth and minimal competition.
6. The farmers to be consulted on their favorable tree species for planting. The listed preferred tree
species for tobacco curing need to be evaluated for their promotion as well as fruit and other multi-purpose tree
species.
7. BAT should expand its tree planting collaboration efforts. The Kenya Forest Service (KFS) needs to be
a major partner. The county government also has forestry and environmental programs that could really
complement the company’s tree planting efforts.
LIST OF REFERENCES
[1]. Okalebo, J. R., Gathua K. W, and Woomer P. L. (2002). Laboratory methods of soil and plant analysis:
A working manual. TSBF-CIAT and SACRED Africa, Nairobi;
[2]. Jaetzold R., H. Schmidt., B. Hornetz and C. Shisanya (2009). Farm Management Handbook of Kenya,
Natural Conditions and Farm Management Information. Ministry of Agriculture, Nairobi. Volumes IIB
and C
[3]. Moore, J.M., and G. Harris, (2013). NUTRIENT UPTAKE IN TOBACCO FERTILIZATION.
[4]. Http//www. commodities.caes.uga.edu/fieldcrops/tobacco/.../documents2013/5Fertilization2013.p.
KCCAP, 2015
Kariuki J. G et al., 2008
ref/ Zimbabwe/ Malawi
www.surveysystem.com/sscal.htm,
www.raosoft.com/samplesize/html