Safety Chemical
Safety Chemical
Disclaimer
Mention of any company or product does not constitute endorsement by the National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC). In addition, citations to websites external to NIOSH do not constitute NIOSH
endorsement of the sponsoring organizations or their programs or products. Furthermore,
NIOSH is not responsible for the content of these websites. All web addresses referenced in
this document were accessible as of the publication date.
Suggested Citation
NIOSH [2025]. Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Respiratory Protection
Handbook. By Szalajda JV, Greenawald LA, Janssen L, Johnson AT, Johnson JS, Mansdorf SZ,
Medici OR, Metzler RW, Rehak TR. Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication
No. 2025-111.
May 2025
The NIOSH stylized logos (shown below) and P100 are certification marks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) registered in the United States.
NIOSH Approved is a certification mark of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) registered in the United
States and several international jurisdictions.
Chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) hazards are constantly evolving in type, intent
of use, and ways of dissemination. Emergency responders would most likely use air-purifying
respirators (APRs) with CBRN cannisters against all hazards in an intentional or unintentional event.
Thus, new and emerging hazards must be identified to ensure APRs with CBRN canisters continue to
provide protection to those responders.
This 2025 handbook updates the original CBRN Respiratory Protection Handbook (former Publication
No. 2018-166). This handbook reflects new and emerging chemical and radiological hazards
information identified during a recent hazard assessment conducted by the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Department of Homeland Security, and Department of
Defense. As a result of this hazard assessment, NIOSH expanded its CBRN APR Protection List to
capture additional hazards that NIOSH Approved® APRs with CBRN canisters would provide
protection against. The changes to NIOSH’s CBRN APR Protection List are captured in Chapter 2, Table
2-1. Additionally, changes in Chapter 3 reflect updates to National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
standards involving respirators with CBRN protections.
Acknowledgements
NIOSH would like to thank the following:
• The respirator manufacturers who provided NIOSH with pictures of their CBRN
respirator products to be used as illustrations.
• Chief Mark Aston of the Sonoma County Fire & Emergency Services Department
in Santa Rosa, California, and Lieutenant Greg Yeager of the Fort Collins Police
Service in Fort Collins, Colorado, for providing the current copies of their
respiratory protection programs for inclusion in this handbook.
• Terrence Cloonan, BS, Physical Scientist, NIOSH for technical contributions and
for providing background information related to the protection needs of the
emergency response community.
NIOSH would also like to thank the following for providing editorial support for this updated
handbook:
• Mary Bohman, NIOSH
• Frank Page, NIOSH
• Heidi Foust, MS, NIOSH
• Jordan Moore, MBA/MA, NIOSH
Table of Contents
Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Respiratory Protection Handbook ___________ 2
Disclaimer ____________________________________________________________________________ 4
Get More Information __________________________________________________________________ 4
Suggested Citation _____________________________________________________________________ 4
Preface ______________________________________________________________________________ 5
Acknowledgements ____________________________________________________________________ 6
Chapter 1: Introduction ________________________________________________________________ 12
Objective _________________________________________________________________________________ 13
The Need for Special CBRN RPD Standards and Tests _______________________________________________ 13
CBRN Standards and Test Development and Implementation ________________________________________ 15
References ________________________________________________________________________________ 18
Li-ion lithium-ion
LiMnO2 lithium-manganese dioxide
LiSO2 lithium-sulfur dioxide
lpm liters per minute
LRPL Laboratory Respirator Protection Level
MPC minimum packaging configuration
MSHA Mine Safety and Health Administration
NFPA National Fire Protection Association
NiMH nickel-metal hydride
NIOSH National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
NPPTL National Personal Protection Technology Laboratory
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration
PAPR powered air-purifying respirator
PEL permissible exposure limit
PLHCP physician or other licensed health care professional
PPE personal protective equipment
RDECOM Research, Development, and Engineering Command
REL recommended exposure limit
RFT respirator fit test
RPD respiratory protective device
SAR supplied-air respirator
SCBA self-contained breathing apparatus
TIC toxic industrial chemical
TRA Test Representative Agent
USACHPPM U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine
UEBSS Universal Emergency Breathing Support System
VX O-ethyl S-[2-(diisopropylamino)ethyl] methylphosphonothioate
Chapter 1: Introduction
Since 2001, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has established and
maintained performance and design standards for respiratory protective devices (RPDs) to protect
against chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) hazards and toxic industrial chemicals.
No standards for the use of RPDs by U.S. emergency response personnel that covered the full range
of expected CBRN threats existed prior to 2001.
Federal regulations require emergency response personnel to use respirators approved by NIOSH for
the expected hazards. Equipment performance standards were needed to protect against CBRN
threats. Neither industrial nor military respirators provided protection from all potential CBRN
respiratory hazards.
Research and testing to produce the necessary standards involved the partnership of several federal
departments and agencies: Department of Justice; Department of Homeland Security; Department of
Defense, U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command (RDECOM); a Department of
Commerce, National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST); and the Department of Labor,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).
The NIOSH RPD approval standards and tests developed for CBRN protections are highly specialized.
The advanced CBRN respirators have unique characteristics related to selection, use, and
maintenance compared to NIOSH Approved® respirators that do not offer CBRN protections. Due to
the enhanced protection afforded by NIOSH Approved CBRN respirators, it is likely that the
respirators will also be used in industrial applications.
Nationally prominent organizations have identified the need for advice and training on CBRN
respirators. Among these are the RAND Corporation, Science and Technology Policy Institute, and the
Federal InterAgency Board (IAB) for Equipment Standardization and Interoperability. Responders in
several RAND studies clearly expressed the need for guidelines related to personal protective
equipment (PPE), including respirators [Bartis et al. 2005; Jackson et al. 2002; Jackson et al. 2004;
LaTourrette et al. 2003; Willis et al. 2006]. As early as 2002, RAND reported:
One of the clear messages of the conference (December 10, 2001) was that most emergency workers do not
believe that they are prepared with the necessary information, training, and equipment to cope with many of the
challenges associated with the response to a major disaster such as the World Trade Center attack or for threats
associated with anthrax, and similar agents [Jackson et al. 2002].
a
Formerly U.S. Army Soldier and Biological Chemical Command (SBCCOM)
Objective
This handbook fills the critical need for authoritative technical information on CBRN RPDs and will
assist any user of CBRN respirators to improve selection, use, and maintenance. This information is
particularly useful to individuals responsible for administering respirator protection programs or
developing training programs.
The handbook is intended for organizations that use CBRN respirators in emergency response
applications (e.g., fire service, law enforcement, emergency medical services, and corrections
officers). Others who use CBRN respirators in industrial, public works, construction, utility, and other
non-emergency applications will also benefit from this information. This handbook does not include
information on how to conduct response activities.
The following chapters can be used to develop a more effective CBRN respiratory protection program
and establish effective training programs in support of other requirements such as relevant National
Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and OSHA standards. A relevant NFPA standard is NFPA 470
(Hazardous Materials/Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) Standard for Responders). Relevant
OSHA and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards include Title 29 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) 1910.134 (Respiratory Protection) and 1910.120 (Hazardous Waste Operations and
Emergency Response); and Title 40 CFR Chapter 1, Part 311 (Worker Protection).
Other organizations whose support was essential for the successful development and implementation
of the NIOSH CBRN RPD standards were:
• IAFC
• International Association of Fire Fighters
• International Safety Equipment Association
• Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism (Oklahoma City)
• National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
The collaboration with NIST and RDECOM was of foremost importance. NIST administered federal
funds made available from the Department of Justice to substantially finance the research and
technical activities required to develop new standards. RDECOM applied its expertise with military
warfare agents and its highly specialized laboratories to conduct respirator evaluations, analyses of
human factor requirements, and CBRN hazard assessments of possible chemical warfare agent (CWA)
incidents.
The hazard assessments conducted by RDECOM and NIOSH considered physical chemistry
characteristics, vapor pressure-based saturation estimates, and terrorism venue modeling techniques
to generate information about potential hazards at an incident involving CWAs. For these
assessments, RDECOM considered the means of delivery and dissemination (i.e., explosion, spill,
spray) of the CWA combined with other variables, including the amount of CWA (i.e., small
containers, large drums) and the environmental and physical characteristics of the area where the
incident occurred (i.e., small rooms, large shopping centers, airport concourses). RDECOM also
modeled conditions related to climate control (air circulation, etc.) for the various incident sites. A
team of experts from the collaborating agencies agreed on the potential exposures.
Hazards and test procedures were established based upon exposure projections. SCBAs approved by
NIOSH and NFPA standards were evaluated. The initial benchmark test results answered the key
question raised by the IAFC: new standards and test procedures were needed to enhance industrial
SCBA performance by adding CBRN protection. Thus, the NIOSH standards development process
began with a sense of urgency.
A multi-agency CBRN standards development team was established. The team began development
efforts to define an appropriate set of performance and design standards for respiratory protective
equipment with CBRN protection in July 2000.
highly specialized CBRN protection were not required for the response. However, this highlighted the
need for new standards and CBRN RPDs approved by NIOSH.
Along with the ongoing CBRN RPD standards development process, NIOSH commissioned a series of
studies with the RAND Corporation to identify gaps in PPE and RPD technology, standards, and
training. The first of these studies involved lessons learned from terrorist attacks. NIOSH and RAND
held a conference in New York City from December 9 to 11, 2001. Attendees included persons who
responded to the 1995 attack on the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, the 9/11
attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, and the anthrax incidents that occurred in 2001.
The first of four studies published by NIOSH and RAND provided key information about the
shortcomings of PPE and RPDs used for large-scale, complex tasks having long duration [Jackson et al.
2002].
The studies revealed the need for an integrated respiratory protection program, RPD equipment
standardization, and interoperable use of facepieces and air-purifying components. These findings
were incorporated into the CBRN RPD standards development process.
For example, an interoperability requirement was added to address the respirator component supply
shortages that occurred at the World Trade Center response operation. In September 2001, only
components of a NIOSH Approved complete respirator assembly, as defined in the NIOSH certificate
of approval, were permissible even when components from other manufacturers’ respirators of the
same type were available. The lack of availability of some components during the extended World
Trade Center response may have reduced the equipment available to workers. The shortages caused
delays in response activities while the proper components were obtained, alternate respirators were
employed, and proper retraining was provided. In response, the standards established for CBRN air-
purifying respirators (APRs), commonly referred to as CBRN gas masks, included special design
requirements to ensure that all NIOSH Approved CBRN APR facepieces and filtering components
(canisters), regardless of manufacturer, could be used together during an emergency and still provide
the NIOSH-defined necessary level of CBRN protection.
Other findings noted the need for RPDs with scratch-resistant lenses, improved field of view,
upgraded communications accessories, and more durable components for use in arduous
environments.
The aftermath of the terrorist attacks revealed the need for escape respirators for public use during
emergencies. Workers in buildings and private citizens may also need to evacuate the scene of a
terrorist attack. In addition to the types of RPDs used by emergency responders, the multi-agency
team added escape respirators to the list of RPDs that required enhanced standards and tests for
CBRN protection.
On December 28, 2001, NIOSH issued a letter to all interested parties, notifying them of the
acceptance of applications for testing and evaluating SCBAs for use against CBRN agents [NIOSH
2001]. These standards were adopted in 2003 by the IAB b and incorporated into the DHS c grants
program.
CBRN RPDs and CBRN SCBAs were the first respirators used in non-military applications with
protection against a broad range of chemical warfare agents, toxic industrial chemicals, and biological
hazards. Subsequently, standards and tests were also developed and implemented for APRs, powered
air-purifying respirators (PAPRs), and air-purifying escape respirators (APERs) [NIOSH 2003a,b, 2006].
The NIOSH standards development and respirator certification programs led to an increase in the
national inventory of CBRN protection for emergency response personnel. This better protects
emergency responders against various respiratory hazards. Multiple respirator models from several
manufacturers are certified to the CBRN respirator standards. Additional information on approved
models is available through the NIOSH Certified Equipment List website:
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/topics/respirators/cel/default.html.
The Department of Homeland Security, NFPA, and the IAB have endorsed and incorporated the CBRN
respirator standards. The Department of Homeland Security grants now link to NIOSH’s CBRN
respirator performance standards. The performance requirements for CBRN respirators are also being
included in the development of international standards (British Standards Institution).
Improved information and training on RPD selection, use, and maintenance are needed to address
unique characteristics of CBRN RPDs. The information contained in this handbook will support the
establishment of training programs compliant with:
• NFPA 470 (Hazardous Materials/Weapons of Mass Destruction [WMD] Standard for
Responders)
• OSHA and EPA standards, including Title 29 CFR 1910.134 (Respiratory Protection) and
1910.120 (Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response), and Title 40 CFR
Chapter 1, Part 311 (Worker Protection)
b
Sanctioned by the Attorney General of the United States, the InterAgency Board for Equipment
Standardization and Interoperability (IAB) was founded by the Department of Defense Consequence
Management Program Integration Office and the Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation
Weapons of Mass Destruction Countermeasures program on October 13, 1998. The mission objectives
related to PPE were being drafted at the time of the NIOSH-Department of Defense-OSHA sponsored
Chemical and Biological Respiratory Protection Workshop, March 10–12, 1999.
c
On July 16, 2002, U.S. President George W. Bush established the Office of Homeland Security. The
Homeland Security Act of 2002 established the Department of Homeland Security on November 25,
2002. It consolidated U.S. executive branch organizations related to homeland security into a single
Cabinet agency.
More information about the standards and test procedures established for CBRN respirators may be
found on the NIOSH website at: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/RespStds.html.
The listing of all NIOSH Approved respirators that contain CBRN protection can be found on the NIOSH
website at: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/topics/respirators/CEL.
Chapter Summaries
Chapter 2 – NIOSH CBRN Respiratory Protective Device Approval Program describes the NIOSH RPD
approval program, including the highly specialized performance and design standards and unique test
procedures that ensure an RPD has CBRN protection capability. Understanding the standards and
tests applicable to CBRN RPDs (including SCBAs, APRs, PAPRs, and APERs) provides knowledge about
the respirators’ cautions and limitations. This knowledge can be applied to establish an effective
respiratory protection program and training programs tailored to the intended user when used with
the specific instructions provided by the manufacturer and NIOSH approval labels.
Chapter 3 – CBRN Respirators introduces CBRN equipment. This chapter presents information for
each CBRN RPD class, including information on the major components, uses and limitations, markings
and labels, maintenance, and storage requirements. It also describes common uses of the RPD class
and provides pictures to illustrate key characteristics of the respirators. For example, the chapter
places special emphasis on information related to battery care for CBRN PAPRs. This chapter also
describes the characteristics of each RPD that meet the CBRN standards and test requirements.
Chapter 4 – CBRN Respirator Selection provides key information about characterization of hazards
and appropriate selection of CBRN RPDs. This chapter describes the steps required in a selection
process, including knowledge of the hazard, workplace considerations, human factors, and the
performance capabilities of the CBRN RPD. A decision logic flowchart provides further direction.
Chapter 5 – CBRN Respiratory Protection Program Requirements explains the importance of a
complete program. It integrates information from Chapters 1 and 2 for administering the selection,
use, and care of respirators in the workplace. This chapter describes the required elements of
programs that are compliant with OSHA and the American National Standards Institute. Sample
programs illustrate the diversity and level of detail typically found in compliant programs.
Chapter 6 – CBRN Respirator Fit Testing Methods gives a short history of fit testing and demonstrates
the value of testing the fit of a respirator to each specific individual to ensure proper performance.
This chapter covers the purpose of fit testing, frequency, various fit test methods, and exercises.
Information about the qualifications of the fit test operator and record keeping is also presented.
Chapter 7 – CBRN Equipment and the Wearer covers fundamental information related to human
physiology and aspects of respirator performance that affect a person’s ability to wear CBRN RPDs.
CBRN respirators and protective clothing are designed, assembled, and tested to ensure they meet
the level of protection that first responders and ancillary personnel require to respond appropriately
and safely to the emergency. Topics include the effects of breathing resistance, work rate/breathing
ventilation rates, and tolerance to carbon dioxide buildup in the respirator. Knowledge of the
physiological impact can aid in the selection and use of CBRN RPDs.
Chapter 8 – Respirator Decontamination and Disposal provides information about the various
decontamination methods, cautions, and limitations. Decontamination is important for avoiding
cross-contamination and potentially allows reuse of equipment that is expensive and difficult to
replace. It is also important when properly disposing of contaminated PPE. In every case,
decontamination must be performed to allow for the safe removal of the protective ensemble.
Decontamination approaches depend on many factors including the protective ensemble used, the
known or suspected CBRN agent, the available decontamination resources, and the urgency of the
situation.
Chapter 9 – CBRN Respirator User Training describes the goals and importance of training programs
and provides information to help establish effective training for respirator users. The NIOSH respirator
approval program ensures CBRN respirators are capable of protecting users from a wide range of
potential hazards, but the expected level of protection cannot be achieved if users do not use the
respirators properly. Initial and ongoing training are necessary to ensure each user is able to don and
wear the respirator and other protective equipment while performing assigned duties. This chapter
also describes the minimum requirements for achieving compliance with OSHA and NFPA standards.
References
Bartis JT, Jackson BA, LaTourrette T [2005]. Technical source document: personal protective equipment
R&D roadmap, firefighting and hazardous materials response. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
IAB [2009]. InterAgency Board 2008 annual report and 2009 standardized equipment list. Arlington,
VA: InterAgency Board, https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=31234.
Jackson BA, Baker JC, Ridgely MS, Bartis JT, Linn HI [2004]. Protecting emergency responders, volume
3: safety management in disaster and terrorism response. Vol. 3. Santa Monica, CA: RAND
Corporation, https://www.rand.org/publications/MG/MG170.
Jackson BA, Peterson D. J., Bartis JT, LaTourrette T, Brahmakulam IT, Houser A, Sollinger JM [2002].
Protecting emergency responders: lessons learned from terrorist attacks. Vol. 1. Santa Monica, CA:
RAND Corporation, http://www.rand.org/publications/CF/CF176.
LaTourrette T, Peterson D.J., Bartis JT, Jackson BA, Houser A [2003]. Protecting emergency responders,
volume 2: community views of safety and health risks and personal protection needs. Vol. 2. Santa
Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1646.html.
NIOSH [2000]. NIOSH-DOD-OSHA sponsored chemical and biological respiratory protection workshop
report. By Dower JM, Metzler RW, Palya FM, Peterson JA, Pickett-Harner M. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2000-122,
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2000-122/.
NIOSH [2001]. Letter to all interested parties. Acceptance of applications for the testing and evaluation
of self-contained breathing apparatus for use against chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear
agents. By Metzler RW, Acting Director, National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory.
December 28, 2001. Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
https://archive.cdc.gov/www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/resources/pressrel/letters/lttr-122801.html.
NIOSH [2003a]. Statement of standard for full facepiece air purifying respirators (APR). Pittsburgh, PA:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/standardsdev/cbrn/APR/standard/pdfs/aprstd-A-508.pdf
NIOSH [2003b]. Statement of standard for chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) air-
purifying escape respirator. Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/respstandards/pdfs/CBRN_APER-508.pdf.
NIOSH [2006]. Statement of standard for chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN)
powered air-purifying respirators (PAPR). Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health, https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/respstandards/pdfs/CBRNPAPRStatementofStandard-
508.pdf.
Willis HH, Castle NG, Sloss EM, Bartis JT [2006]. Protecting emergency responders, volume 4: personal
protective equipment guidelines for structural collapse events. Vol. 4. Santa Monica, CA: RAND
Corporation, https:// www.rand.org/publications/MG/MG425.
Information about the NIOSH RPD approval program—including lists of NIOSH Approved respirators
(referred to as the NIOSH Certified Equipment List), NIOSH public announcements concerning
approved respirators, standard test procedures for each RPD type, and other investigative reports—is
available on the NIOSH website: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl. More information regarding CBRN
resources can be found on the NIOSH CBRN respirator approval resources website:
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/CBRNrespApprovalResources.html.
Types of RPDs
NIOSH has only limited authority and flexibility specified in 42 CFR 84 (§84.60[b], §84.63[c], and
§84.110[c]) to approve types of respirators not prescribed in 42 CFR 84, such as respirators for
protection against chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) hazards. These sections
provide NIOSH with the limited authority to develop additional requirements that the agency
determines are “necessary to establish the quality, effectiveness and safety of any respirator used as
protection against hazardous atmospheres.”
These sections specify:
• 84.60(b) – “In addition to the types of respirators specified in subparts H through L of
this part, the Institute shall issue approvals for other respiratory protective devices not
specifically described in this part subject to such additional requirements as may be
imposed in accordance with 84.63(c).”
• 84.63(c) – “In addition to the minimum requirements set forth in subparts H through L
of this part, the Institute reserves the right to require, as a further condition of
approval, any additional requirements deemed necessary to establish the quality,
effectiveness, and safety of any respirator used as protection against hazardous
atmospheres.”
• 84.110(c) – “Gas masks for respiratory protection against gases and vapors other than
those specified in paragraph (b) of this section, may be approved upon submittal of an
application in writing for approval to the Certification and Quality Assurance Branch
listing the gas or vapor and suggested maximum use concentration for the specific
type of gas mask. The Institute will consider the application and accept or reject it
because of on the basis of effect on the wearer’s health and safety and any field
experience in use of gas masks for such exposures. If the application is accepted, the
Institute will test such masks in accordance with the requirements of this subpart”
[Approval of respiratory protective devices, 1995].
To approve respirators with CBRN protection (commonly referred to as CBRN RPDs), NIOSH and its
federal partners researched hazards, defined appropriate standards for each type of respirator,
established test procedures, defined product and packaging markings, and determined appropriate
cautions and limitations of use. Because these CBRN RPD requirements are not prescribed in 42 CFR
84, the standards, tests, applications for approval, and other requirements (e.g., fees) are voluntary,
not mandatory. All other requirements of 42 CFR 84 (e.g., Subpart A: General Provisions, Subpart B:
Application for Approval, Subpart D: Approval and Disapproval, Subpart E: Quality Control, Subpart F:
Classification of Approved Respirators, and Subpart G: General Construction and Performance) and
the NIOSH approval program investigative activities described above also apply to NIOSH Approved
CBRN RPDs and the applicant to whom the certificate of approval is issued. Applicants submitting an
application for a NIOSH CBRN RPD approval do so with this knowledge.
NIOSH established additional voluntary requirements for several types of RPDs with CBRN protection
to meet the needs of a diverse range of emergency responders (firefighters, law enforcement, and
emergency medical services), work activities, durations of use, and hazards. These RPD types include
SCBAs [NIOSH 2001], APRs (gas masks) [NIOSH 2003b], PAPRs [NIOSH 2006b], and air-purifying escape
respirators (APERs) (see Figures 2-1 through 2-4) [NIOSH 2003a]. NIOSH continues to establish
standards and test requirements for other types of respirators, such as those with a combination of
respirator types.
Figure 2-1. CBRN SCBA Figure 2-2. CBRN APR Figure 2-3. CBRN PAPR Figure 2-4. CBRN APER
Final Rules and Notice [Approval of respiratory protective devices, 1995]. This chapter describes the
key additional requirements for CBRN protection, including:
1. Chemical agent permeation and penetration resistance against distilled sulfur mustard (HD)
and sarin (GB)—commonly referred to as “live agent tests” (all CBRN RPD types)
2. Laboratory respirator protection level (LRPL) test (all CBRN RPD types)
3. Canister gas/vapor challenge and breakthrough concentration service life tests and particulate filter
efficiency tests (APR, PAPR, APER)
4. National/international requirements:
• Durability/environmental conditioning (APR, PAPR [tight-fitting], APER)
• Minimum packaging configurations (APR, PAPR [tight-fitting], APER)
• Breathing resistance (SCBA, APR, PAPR [tight-fitting], APER)
• Carbon dioxide and oxygen levels (PAPR [loose-fitting], APER)
• Canister/cartridge color code (APR, PAPR)
• Mechanical connector, gasket, tolerance analysis (APR)
• Field of view, lens material haze, luminous transmittance, and lens abrasion
resistance (APR)
• Communications (APR)
• Fogging (APR, APER)
• Flammability and heat resistance in accordance with National Fire Protection
Association (NFPA) Standard 1981 (SCBA, APER with carbon monoxide protection)
• Training and donning time (APER)
• Useful life (APER)
• Hydration (APR)
• Emergency Breathing Safety System (EBSS) (SCBA with EBSS Accessory)
• Optional testing
Each of these additional requirements applicable to NIOSH Approved RPDs with CBRN protection is
briefly described in the following sections. Detailed specifications for the standards and national or
international requirements are available through the Standard Respirator Testing Procedures at:
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/stps/respirator_testing.html
Chemical Agent Permeation and Penetration Resistance Against Distilled Sulfur Mustard and
Sarin (all CBRN RPD types)
NIOSH and its standards development partners (see Chapter 1: Introduction) carefully considered
comments made by the public during public meetings and comments provided to the NIOSH Docket
002 (https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docket/default.html). The emergency response community (e.g.,
International Association of Fire Chiefs; International Association of Fire Fighters) required that any
standards and tests for NIOSH Approved CBRN RPDs include performance testing using chemical
warfare agents (CWAs).
Anything less was considered unacceptable. Excluding performance testing using CWAs would leave
responders with a level of uncertainty about the RPD protection, potentially leading to a lack of
confidence in the protective equipment.
Based on this input, a systematic evaluation was performed on the physical characteristics of CWAs
and toxic industrial chemicals (TICs) identified in several sources. These sources include the U.S. Army
Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine (USACHPPM) Technical Guide 244 and the
NFPA Standard 1994 on Protective Ensembles for Chemical/Biological Terrorism Incidents – 2000
Report on Proposals. A total of 151 CWAs/TICs were initially identified as potential candidates for test
agents. As part of the review of physical properties, the chemicals were evaluated for permeation
(molecularly diffusing through respirator materials) and penetration (seeping through respirator
interfacing components). These are commonly referred to as live agent tests.
Sarin (GB) and sulfur mustard (HD) were selected due to their physical properties and molecular
structure as the two representative agents for use during laboratory permeation and penetration
tests of RPDs. GB and HD represent challenge agents based on their permeation and penetration
characteristics, relative ease to produce, and their worldwide availability in thousands of metric tons.
GB is representative of nerve agents, including tabun, soman, and O-ethyl S-{2-[Di(propan-2-
yl)amino]ethyl}O-ethyl methylphosphonothioate VX. Since GB is the most volatile (having a volatility
of 22,000 mg/m3) of the nerve agents and evaporates rapidly, it is used in testing only as a vapor
agent. GB also permeates through materials more readily than G and V nerve agents.
HD was selected as a representative test agent because of its permeation characteristics. HD is a
linear molecule (as compared to GB, which has a branched configuration) and is expected to permeate
most materials faster than GB. A combination liquid droplet and vapor test was defined for HD
testing. The test chamber used for conducting these tests is shown in Figure 2-5. Figure 2-6 illustrates
where liquid droplets of HD are placed on the respirator and its components during testing. An HD
vapor challenge is introduced into the test chamber containing the respirator with liquid HD droplets
on it.
To determine the applicable level of chemical concentrations of GB and HD for laboratory testing, the
U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command (RDECOM; now referred to as the
Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center) developed plausible
incident scenarios. RDECOM considered possible venues (e.g., small room, large room, arena, and
open air areas), dissemination devices for release of CWAs, and a wide variation in hazardous vapor
concentration-time profiles. Scenarios evaluated included worst case (chemical saturation limit), high
concentrations, Department of Defense military mask concentrations, and U.S. Army Domestic
Preparedness evaluation levels.
RDECOM examined concentration-time profiles by evaluating the cumulative dose for time periods
associated with various response activities. For example, for first responders wearing SCBAs, a period
of 30 minutes was used; that time period is based on the capacity of a typical SCBA air cylinder. The
initial 30 minutes will also generally be the time frame with the highest concentration as the agent
dissipates over time.
Based on these factors and others (e.g., RPD types), “most credible event concentrations” were
defined and used as test challenge concentrations during laboratory testing of NIOSH Approved RPDs
against GB vapor, HD liquid droplets, and HD vapor.
The evaluation also considered concentration level impact on human health to determine an
appropriate level of protection. Toxicological analysis drawing on test data for GB and HD exposures
was used to define acceptable limits based on Acute Emergency Guideline Levels, established by the
National Advisory Committee for Acute Emergency Guideline Levels for Hazardous Substances. CBRN
RPD test criteria for each agent were based on a total exposure value (concentration over time),
combined with maximum (peak) exposure values.
Figure 2-5. Live agent test chamber Figure 2-6. SCBA in live agent test chamber
The criteria established a cumulative exposure level over a specified period of time for each
respirator type. The cumulative value was combined with maximum (peak) exposure value that could
not be exceeded during the test period. Each RPD type has a defined CWA exposure test for specified
periods based on this analysis and agreed upon by NIOSH and U.S. Army toxicologists.
Thus, the Chemical Agent Permeation and Penetration Resistance Performance Against Distilled HD
and GB Test defines the performance of various types of NIOSH Approved respirators with CBRN
protection [NIOSH, 2006a, 2015a,b]. Based on these laboratory tests specifically defined for each
respirator type, the following cautions and limitations are placed on the use of the NIOSH Approved
CBRN RPDs:
• CBRN SCBAs should not be used beyond six hours after initial exposure to chemical warfare
agents (liquid or vapor) to avoid the possibility of agent permeation.
• CBRN SCBAs with Emergency Breathing Safety System (EBSS) accessory - EBSS
activation or engagement of EBSS in either the donor or receiver mode changes the
SCBA use to Escape-Only, approved service time for either the donor, or the receiver is
no longer applicable. Additional critical cautions and limitations apply. Refer to section
EBSS in the user’s manual.
• CBRN APRs (14G approval a) should not be used beyond eight hours after initial
exposure to chemical warfare agents to avoid the possibility of agent permeation or
penetration. If liquid droplet exposure is encountered, the CBRN APR must not be used
for more than two hours.
• Tight-fitting (14G approval) and loose-fitting (23C approval b) CBRN PAPRs must not be
used beyond eight hours after initial exposure to chemical warfare agents to avoid the
possibility of agent permeation or penetration. If liquid droplet exposure is
encountered, the 14G CBRN PAPR demonstrated the ability to be used for up to but no
more than two hours. The 23C CBRN PAPR must not be used where liquid droplet
exposure is encountered.
a
NIOSH issues certificates of approval, referred to as a “14G approval,” to APRs, PAPRs, and APERs as
tight-fitting full facepiece gas mask respirators with canisters. The “14G” refers to the original U.S.
Bureau of Mines test schedule (number) and revision level (letter) for tight-fitting gas mask respirators
with canisters. CBRN APRs, PAPRs, and APERs with a 14G approval must not be used in oxygen-deficient
atmospheres. These respirators may be used for escape from immediately dangerous to life or health
(IDLH) atmospheres, but not for entry into them.
b
NIOSH issues certificates of approval, referred to as a “23C approval,” to APRs with cartridges and to
PAPRs with loose-fitting hoods and helmets with cartridges. The “23C” refers to the original U.S. Bureau
of Mines test schedule (number) and revision level (letter) for chemical cartridge respirators. CBRN
PAPRs with a 23C approval must not be used in oxygen-deficient atmospheres. These respirators may
not be used for escape from IDLH atmospheres.
test subjects use the instructions provided with the CBRN RPD to guide them in the proper
preparation, donning, and wearing of the CBRN RPD.
This LRPL test assesses the ability of a CBRN RPD facepiece to fit a respirator wearer’s face and does
not rely on the wearer’s ability to sense a proper fit. It measures the fit and produces a quantitative
measurement. For each CBRN RPD type, an LRPL value is defined in a laboratory test atmosphere
atmosphere containing 20-40 mg/m3 corn oil aerosol of a mass median aerodynamic
diameter of 0.4-0.6 µm.
• APR gas mask - The measured overall LRPL for each APR respirator shall be >2000 for
greater than 95 percent of trials when the APR facepiece is tested in an atmosphere
containing 20-40 mg/m3 corn oil aerosol of a mass median aerodynamic diameter of
0.4-0.6 µm.
o Some tests are performed to confirm that the facepiece can be used effectively
with a canister of the maximum allowable weight of 500 grams and dimensions
permitted by NIOSH requirements. This additional modified test for CBRN APRs
evaluates the ability of the respirator facepiece to properly fit if used in an
emergency interoperable configuration with a canister from another
manufacturer’s NIOSH Approved CBRN APR.
• Tight- and loose-fitting PAPR – The overall LRPL for each PAPR shall be > 10,000 for 95 percent
of trials with the blower operating in an atmosphere containing 20-40 mg/m3 corn oil aerosol
of a mass median aerodynamic diameter of 0.4-0.6 μm. For tight-fitting PAPRs only, the LRPL
shall be ≥ 2,000 for 95 percent of trials with the blower not operating. A modified LRPL using a
sample size of eight subjects will be used for evaluation. The respirator is tested in an
atmosphere containing 20-40 mg/m3 corn oil aerosol of a mass median aerodynamic
diameter of 0.4-0.6 μm.
• APER - The measured overall LRPL for each APER shall be > 2,000 for 95 percent of
trials, sampled in the breathing zone of the respirator, and shall be >150 for 95 percent
of trials sampled outside the breathing zone (under the hood). The respirator is tested
in an atmosphere containing 20-40 mg/m3 corn oil aerosol of a mass median
aerodynamic diameter of 0.4-0.6 μm.
• User instructions provided by the manufacturer are crucial for properly selecting and donning
the respirator facepiece, as well as for preparing the respirator for use. The respirator
manufacturer may provide unique instructions for qualifying the respirator for use by an
individual wearer. This could include instructions for adjusting the facepiece to fit small or
large faces, such as inserting an additional sizing component (called an insert) into the mask.
Some manufacturers may have additional components to use during storage to retain the
shape of the facepiece.
• Some manufacturers of CBRN RPDs also recommend fit factors during fit testing of individual
wearers much higher than those typically required of industrial respirators of the same RPD
type. For example, where industrial tight-fitting full facepiece APRs require an individual fit
factor of 500 (i.e., 10 times the class assigned protection factor of 50), some manufacturers of
tight-fitting full facepiece CBRN APRs recommend an individual fit factor up to 2,500 for the
CBRN APRs to be used for protection against CWAs. Failure to follow manufacturers’ user
instructions may result in improperly fitting facepieces for certain individual respirator
wearers.
Figure 2-8. NIOSH service life test chamber Figure 2-9. NIOSH gas chromatograph
c
Vapor- and gas-removing respirators normally remove the contaminant by interaction of its molecules
with a granular, porous material, commonly called the sorbent. The general method by which the
molecules are removed is called sorption [NIOSH 1987]. The sorbent used in canisters and cartridges
generally consists of activated carbon. Other materials, such as synthetic polymers and zeolite, have
been tested for filtration, but no other absorbent has proven to be as widely applicable as activated
carbon.
In 2018, NIOSH, the Department of Defense, and the Department of Homeland Security
completed an updated hazard assessment. From 2016 to 2018, NIOSH partnered with these
agencies to identify and evaluate new/emerging chemical and radiological respiratory hazards
that may pose a risk to emergency responders [NIOSH 2022]. The project team included several
individuals present during the original hazard assessment.
NIOSH and its partners first identified and compiled hazards by reviewing various hazard
assessments available to the Department of Homeland Security. To assess each hazard, the team
then developed a four-step evaluation process:
1. Evaluate its chemical and physical properties.
2. Evaluate its actual or anticipated filtration behavior within the CBRN canister (i.e., physical
adsorption, chemisorption, or mechanical filtration).
3. Categorize it into one of NIOSH’s Chemical Families.
4. Compare it against the existing TRA in its respective Chemical Family and determine if additional
testing is needed
The team identified a total of 238 hazards (192 chemicals and 46 radiologicals). Of the 238
hazards, 203 could be grouped into one of the existing seven NIOSH Chemical Families—29
hazards were too unstable in the emergency responder operational environment (e.g., quick
decomposition) and 5 needed further testing and evaluation to confirm NIOSH Approved APRs
would adequately filter out these hazards [Greenawald et al. 2020]. Testing and further
evaluation as part of this study concluded that current NIOSH Approved CBRN APR technology
would provide protection against these five hazards.
After reviewing each of these 238 hazards, the key finding of this updated assessment was that
the current 11 CBRN TRAs continued to represent the known CBRN hazards and should remain
the basis for NIOSH respirator approval testing. Thus, no changes were needed to NIOSH’s original
11 CBRN TRAs or NIOSH’s CBRN APR, APER, or PAPR Statements of Standard. However, as a result
of the described evaluation, NIOSH expanded its original CBRN APR Protection List of 139 hazards
to include those additional hazards identified. It combined the two lists and removed duplicate
chemicals. A total of 286 hazards now make up NIOSH’s CBRN APR Protection List. The NIOSH
CBRN TRAs and list of hazards in each NIOSH Chemical Family, constituting NIOSH’s updated CBRN
APR Protection List, can be seen in Table 2-1.
Actual CBRN incident responses may lead to adjustments to the CBRN APR Protection List. The
service life of a CBRN canister depends upon many factors including environmental conditions
(e.g., temperature, percent relative humidity), breathing rate, filtering capacity, and the type and
concentration of contaminant(s) in the air. Filtering capacity is based on many product-specific
criteria. It is important for users to follow the manufacturer’s guidance and consult their
respiratory protection program administrator for additional guidance on determining change-out
schedules.
The Organic Vapor/Hydrocarbon class is diverse in its ability to be adsorbed and bound in
activated carbon. The multi-agency team concluded that a method to determine the relative
absorption affinity of carbon was required. Physical properties of the chemicals were the means of
classification. The team considered a number of properties, including molecular weight, boiling
point, vapor pressure, relative toxicity, and polar/non-polar characteristics. Vapor pressure
continues to be a key indicator of the ability to be adsorbed on activated carbon through physical
adsorption [Karwacki and Jones 2000]. A benefit of this approach is that vapor pressure data of
most compounds is readily available in literature or via laboratory determinations. Vapor pressure
limits for acceptability were set at the value of carbon tetrachloride (92 mmHg @ 20°C). The lower
the vapor pressure, the greater the affinity for the organic vapor/hydrocarbon to activated
carbon; the higher the vapor pressure, the lesser the affinity to activated carbon.
When the Statements of Standards were being developed, the standards for gas masks in Europe
and the United States (NIOSH) were reviewed. These included reviews of military purchasing
specifications for ASZM-T carbon for C2A1 military canisters. The review had several key findings:
• Some of the chemicals used in testing were redundant, since other test chemicals
would ensure carbon effectiveness against the gases in question (chlorine, hydrogen
chloride, hydrogen fluoride, and arsine, as well as CS and CN tear gases).
• Cyclohexane is commonly used as an organic vapor test representative agent in
European and Japanese standards. Meeting the organic vapor test for a canister and
cartridge provides protection for all organic vapors having vapor pressures less than
that of cyclohexane, which includes approximately 109 d organic chemicals from the
TIC/CWA list including GB and HD.
• The adsorption of acid gases (48 e chemicals) is effectively addressed by laboratory
testing using cyanogen chloride, hydrogen cyanide, hydrogen sulfide, and sulfur
dioxide, each as a TRA.
• Ammonia is an effective TRA for the base gases: ammonia; ally amine; 1,2 dimethyl
hydrazine; and methyl hydrazine.
• Formaldehyde, phosgene, phosphine, and nitrogen dioxide are considered special case
chemicals and must be individually used as TRAs in testing.
• Phosphine is a hydride and must be removed catalytically (copper+2 and silver
impregnants on carbon). It is individually used as a TRA.
d
Chemicals in the Organic Vapor Chemical Family were expanded from 61 to 109 as a result of the 2018
CBRN hazard assessment.
e
Chemicals in the Acid Gas Chemical Family were expanded from 32 to 48 as a result of the 2018 CBRN
hazard assessment.
f
42 CFR 84, Subpart K [§84.179(3)] defines a P100 filter as one having 99.97 percent efficiency with a
label color of magenta, indicating it is a high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter.
Particulate filter efficiency testing described in 42 CFR 84, Subpart K was determined to be
appropriate for filters of a CBRN RPD.
In summary, the chemical respiratory inhalation hazards can be addressed through testing the
identified TRAs listed in the Table 2-1. This list was updated as a result of a 2018 comprehensive
hazard assessment and evaluation process conducted by NIOSH and the Departments of Defense
Homeland Security. The methodology and findings of this evaluation can be found in Greenawald
2020 [Greenawald et al. 2020].
A NIOSH Approved CBRN APR canister provides protection against a minimum of 286 identified CBRN
hazards, which are classified into the following seven families: Acid Gases (48), Nitrogen Oxides (6),
Base Gases (4), Hydrides (4), Formaldehyde (1), Organic Vapors (109), and Particulates (113)
[composed of 56 chemical, 13 biological, and 44 radiological and nuclear particulate threats].
Table 2-1. NIOSH CBRN APR canister protection list
Arsine Phosphine
Germane Stibine
NIOSH certification testing uses 1 TRA chemical (Formaldehyde) to represent the Formaldehyde Family.
Formaldehyde
NIOSH certification testing uses 1 TRA chemical (Cyclohexane) to represent the Organic Vapor Family.
NOTE: Chemical warfare agents are in this TRA Organic Vapor Family.
Acrylonitrile Isobutyronitrile*
Aniline* Mercury*
Chlorosoman* Parathion
Cyclohexylamine* Phenyldichloroarsine
Diketene Propyleneimene*
Fluorotrichloromethane* VM (EDEMO)*
2-fluoroethanol* VX
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene R-VX*
In contrast to particulate filters, which are effective no matter what the particulate, cartridges and
canisters used for vapor and gas removal protect against specific contaminants. To establish a test
concentration and acceptable breakthrough level (pass/fail criterion) for each TRA, laboratory
benchmark evaluations of existing NIOSH Approved gas mask canisters were analyzed to generate
baseline performance data. The gas and vapor removal mechanisms (adsorption, absorption,
chemisorption, and catalysis) were also considered for various canisters and gas and vapor TRAs. g
Where a canister uses a catalyst in the sorbent to influence the rate of reaction, there is a potential to
create daughter byproducts that are toxic. These byproducts could potentially be as toxic as or more
toxic than the atmospheric contaminant to be filtered. Thus, for the TRA where there is a concern for
breakthrough of daughter byproducts, both the test agent and daughter products are monitored
during NIOSH testing (i.e., for hydrogen cyanide testing, cyanogen is also monitored; for nitrogen
dioxide testing, nitric oxide is also monitored).
The test concentration levels for a respirator cartridge were calculated by comparing the higher of a
safety factor multiplier (varied depending on the TRA) on the NIOSH recommended exposure limit
(REL) or OSHA permissible exposure limit (PEL), or three times the IDLHh value. In the instances where
values other than the higher REL/PEL or IDLH values were used, the selection of an alternate value
was based on test technology limitations or OSHA advice. Breakthrough concentrations were
determined by doubling the REL/PEL or IDLH values. To establish the test and breakthrough
concentrations, several iterations of NIOSH benchmark testing of cartridges and canisters were
conducted.
Table 2-2 summarizes the standard established for gas life test challenge and breakthrough
concentrations for canisters used on CBRN APRs and tight-fitting CBRN PAPRs, as well as cartridges
used with loose-fitting CBRN PAPRs. NIOSH cartridge and canister gas life tests are performed using a
single TRA challenge concentration. The gas life tests are conducted individually, and agents are not
combined to simplify the testing process.
To determine an appropriate capacity for the CBRN APR canister, NIOSH reviewed national and
international standards. All standards organizations require that industrial respirators be labeled to
identify the specific chemical or classes of gases and vapors for which the respirator affords
protection. The military standards, by contrast, focus on a battery of CWA challenges and filtration
capacity over time. Canister/cartridge gas life is a function of the mass of sorbents, type of sorbents
utilized, sorbent bed structure, and gas or vapor residence time.
The European Committee for Standardization and Australian standards limit the mass of replacement
filters to 300 grams for half-mask protection and 500 grams for full facepiece protection. NIOSH
performance requirements in 42 CFR Part 84 and the Japanese industrial standard (JIS T 8152:2012
[JSA 2024]) stipulate the minimum gas absorption capacities for each gas or vapor without stipulating
the mass of the canister and cartridge.
NIOSH established a standard requiring the applicant, as part of the application for CBRN RPD
approval, to specify a gas life (i.e., service life under test conditions) period for the canister. Short
duration capacities are required to be identified in 15-minute intervals (15, 30, and 45). Long duration
capacities are identified in 30-minute intervals (60, 90, and 120). The canister capacity maximum size
g
Cyclohexane was chosen as a TRA because of the health issues associated with using carbon
tetrachloride in laboratory tests, and the use of Cyclohexane by other standards organizations
worldwide.
h
OSHA defines an IDLH value in their hazardous waste operations and emergency response regulation as
follows: An atmospheric concentration of any toxic, corrosive, or asphyxiant substance that poses an
immediate threat to life or would cause irreversible or delayed adverse health effects or would interfere
with an individual’s ability to escape from a dangerous atmosphere (29 CFR 1910.120).
limitation is based on a maximum canister mass of 500 grams. Figures 2-10 and 2-11 show samples of
CBRN canisters. In addition, the particulate filter is required to conform to the P100 filter
requirements, as described in 42 CFR 84.
Table 2-2. Gas life test challenge and breakthrough concentrations for canisters and cartridges*
environmental conditions, and human interface requirements. These additional requirements derive
from a variety of national and international standards. The requirements vary depending on the RPD
type and its intended use. The following is a summary of each additional requirement.
allow damage to occur and could affect the ability to provide the expected level of protection. The
damage may not be detectible by the user prior to use.
Examples of common MPCs include hard plastic mask carriers, clamshell containers, drawstring plastic
bags, cardboard/plastic containers, and hermetically sealed or vacuum-sealed canister bags. Each
manufacturer is likely to have unique MPC requirements. The manufacturer’s user instructions will
identify the MPC requirements.
are conducted at an ambient temperature of 25 + 5°C. A concentration of five percent carbon dioxide
in air is exhaled into the facepiece. The minimum allowable oxygen concentration is 19.5 percent.
Thread dimensions are measured with the instrumentation shown in Figure 2-16. The canister is
required to be readily replaceable without use of special tools. The interface connector on the
facepiece is required to be the female thread and gasket-sealing gland as identified in EN148-1. The
canister shall use a male thread in accordance with EN148-1. For respirator assemblies where the filter
canister is not directly attached to the facepiece (i.e., not mask-mounted), a female thread and gasket
sealing gland connector complying with EN148-1 must be securely attached to a harness system to
provide strain relief between the canister and the remaining respirator assembly. In addition to the
requirements of EN 148-1, the gasket material shall be ethylene propylene diene monomer with a
hardness of 65 + 10 shore A durometer at room temperature.
Field of View, Lens Material Haze, Luminous Transmittance, and Lens Abrasion Resistance
(APR)
The full facepiece must have an effective field of vision not less than 70 percent of the natural field of
vision. The overlapped field of vision must not be less than 20 percent of the natural overlapped field
of vision. The field of view test procedure is based on procedures of EN136:1998 [European Standards
1998]. Figure 2-17 shows the instrumentation used for measuring the field of view.
Specimen CBRN APR facepiece lenses are tested for abrasion resistance. The average value of the
tested specimens must not exhibit a delta haze greater than 14 percent. The applicant provides test
data demonstrating compliance with the haze requirement when tested in accordance with NFPA
1981 Standard on Open-Circuit Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus for Fire and Emergency Services,
2019 edition, Section 8.9, Facepiece Lens Abrasion Test. Figure 2-18 shows the instrumentation used
for performing the abrasion resistance and haze measurement.
Communications (APR)
Speech intelligibility testing is accomplished using the Modified Rhyme Test [ANSI 1989], which
evaluates a listener’s ability to comprehend single words, providing an indication of speech
transmission of the selected words. The Modified Rhyme Test consists of multiple lists of 50
monosyllabic, phonetically balanced words each. Each individual listener’s average score with the
respirator is divided by their average unmasked Modified Rhyme Test score to calculate a
performance rating. The respirator performance rating for communications must be greater than or
equal to 70 percent when tested in accordance with the communications test procedure.
Hydration (APR)
For CBRN APRs equipped with a hydration facility (shown in Figure 2-20), the CBRN APR respirator
must meet all requirements of the CBRN APR standard with the hydration facility in place. In addition,
dry drinking tube valves, valve seats, or seals are subjected to a suction of 75 mm water column
height while in a normal operating position. Leakage between the valve and the valve seat may not
exceed 30 milliliters per minute.
Starting from a full cylinder and prior to the minimum End-of-Service-Time-Indicator activation
pressure, the EBSS donor/receiver line will be opened to atmosphere and held open. The duration for
which the host unit performance meets pressure-demand performance requirements will be
measured and recorded, as determined by testing in accordance with the current revision of Standard
Testing Procedure TEB-CBRN-ASR-STP-0220.
Optional Testing
At the time of this writing, updates made to NFPA 1986 and 1987 proposed optional tests for other
chemical hazards [NFPA 2023a,b]. The performance requirement and test procedures for these
optional tests are defined in those respective standards.
The information provided in this chapter is not a complete description of the standards, tests, and
additional requirements for NIOSH Approved CBRN RPDs. This chapter provides only a summary of
the key requirements. For each of the requirements applicable to NIOSH Approved RPD with CBRN
protection and background information on the standards, visit:
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/respmanuf. For details on the applicable test procedures visit:
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/stps/respirator_testing.
References
ANSI [1989]. ANSI S3.2-1989 Diagnostic rhyme test (DRT). Washington, DC: American National
Standards Institute Inc.
Coffey CC, Campbell DL, Myers WR, Zhuang Z [1998]. Comparison of six respirator fit test methods with
an actual measurement of exposure in a simulated health care environment: part ii – method
comparison testing. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 59(12): 862-870.
DoD [2001]. An overview of the hazards from potential terrorist use of nuclear, biological, and
chemical (NBC) materials. Classified Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense.
European Standards [1998]. CSN EN 136 Respiratory protective devices. Full face mask. Requirements,
testing, marking. European Standards.
European Standards [2018]. CSN EN148-1 Respiratory protective devices: threads for facepieces. Part
1: standard threaded connection. European Standards.
Greenawald LA, Karwacki CJ, Palya P, Browe MA, Bradley D, Szalajda JV [2020]. Conducting an
evaluation of CBRN canister protection capabilities against emerging chemical and radiological
hazards. J Occup Environ Hyg 17:10, 480-494, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2020.1798452.
Karwacki CJ, Jones P [2000]. Toxic industrial chemicals assessment of NBC filter performance, United
States, September 2000. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Edgewood Chemical Biological Center, U.S.
Army Soldier and Biological Chemical Command; Report No.: ECBC-TR-093. (U//FOUO)
NFPA [2019]. NFPA 1981 Standard on open-circuit self-contained breathing apparatus for fire and
emergency services. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association.
NFPA [2023a]. NFPA 1986 Standard on respiratory protection equipment for tactical and technical
operations. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association.
NFPA [2023b]. NFPA 1987 Standard on combination unit respirator systems for tactical and technical
operations. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association.
NIOSH [1987]. Guide to industrial respiratory protection. By Bollinger NJ, Schutz RH. Morgantown, WV:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 87-116,
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/87-116/.
NIOSH [2001]. Letter to all interested parties. Acceptance of applications for the testing and evaluation
of self-contained breathing apparatus for use against chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear
agents. By Metzler RW, Acting Director, National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory.
December 28, 2001. Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
https://archive.cdc.gov/#/details?url=https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/resources/pressrel/letters/lttr
-122801.html.
NIOSH [2002]. Concept for CBRN full facepiece air purifying respirator standard. Draft for discussion.
Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control, National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/niosh/npptl/standardsdev/cbrn/apr/concepts/cbrnconsep16.h
tml
NIOSH [2003a]. Statement of standard for chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) air-
purifying escape respirator. Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/respstandards/pdfs/CBRN_APER-508.pdf
NIOSH [2003b]. Statement of standard for full facepiece air purifying respirators (APR). Pittsburgh, PA:
US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
https://archive.cdc.gov/#/details?url=https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/standardsdev/cbrn/apr/defau
lt.html
NIOSH [2005]. Determination of open circuit, self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) performance
during dynamic testing against chemical agents of sarin (GB) vapor and distilled sulfur mustard (HD)
vapor and liquid standard test procedure (STP). Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health, https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/stps/pdfs/RCT-ASR-CBRN-STP-0200-0201-508.pdf.
NIOSH [2006a]. Determination of CBRN, powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) performance during
dynamic testing against chemical agent distilled sulfur mustard (HD) vapor and distilled sulfur mustard
(HD) liquid chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) standard testing procedure (STP).
Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/stps/pdfs/NPPTL-STP-CBRN-PAPR-0551-508.pdf.
NIOSH [2006b]. Statement of standard for chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN)
powered air-purifying respirators (PAPR). Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health, https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/respstandards/pdfs/CBRNPAPRStatementofStandard-
508.pdf
NIOSH [2014]. Letter to all interested parties. Subject: evaluation and acceptance of emergency
breathing support systems (EBSS) incorporated into SCBA approvals. By Szalajda, J. Acting Chief,
Technical Evaluation Branch, National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory. February 18, 2014.
Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/resources/pressrel/letters/interestedparties/pdfs/lttr-02182014-
508.pdf.
NIOSH [2015b]. Determination of chemical agent permeation and penetration resistance performance
against sulfur mustard (HD) liquid and vapor of the chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear
(CBRN) air-purifying escape respirator standard test procedure (STP). Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/stps/pdfs/CET-APRS-STP-CBRN-
0451-508.pdf.
NIOSH [2022]. CBRN respirator approval resources. Pittsburgh PA. U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health, https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/CBRNrespApprovalResources.html .
CBRN SCBA
The CBRN SCBA was first adopted as an upgrade or option to firefighters’ SCBA, as compliant with the
performance requirements of NFPA 1981, 2002 Edition [NFPA 2002]. However, NIOSH approved the
first CBRN SCBA equipment configurations based on NFPA 1981, 1997 Edition [NFPA 1997]. When this
standard was revised in 2007, CBRN protection became a mandatory requirement for the NFPA 1981,
2007 Edition [NFPA 2007], in accordance with the NIOSH Statement of Standard for NIOSH CBRN
SCBA Testing. The subsequent 2019 Edition of NFPA 1981 also contains CBRN requirements. In the
future, NFPA 1981 will be consolidated into a new document NFPA 1990.
SCBAs that are compliant with the later edition can be used to protect users during structural fires
and other types of emergencies requiring SCBA (e.g., hazardous materials operations), as well as to
provide respiratory protection from CBRN hazards during a terrorist attack [NFPA 1997].
SCBAs that are compliant with the current edition of NFPA 1986: Standard on Respiratory Protection
Equipment for Tactical and Technical Operations have CBRN protections incorporated in the
standard. In May 2017, NIOSH published a Letter to Manufacturers informing stakeholders on the
updated policy statement for CBRN SCBA regarding the incorporation of NFPA 1986:2017 to begin
accepting applications for the testing and evaluation of SCBAs with CBRN protections [NIOSH 2017]. A
new edition of NFPA 1986 was published in 2023 and will likewise be addressed. Similarly, another
NFPA standard (NFPA 1987: Standard on Combination Unit Respirator Systems for Tactical and
Technical Operations) includes CBRN protections.
SCBAs are the only class of CBRN respirator that may be used for both entry into and escape from
hazardous atmospheres that are immediately dangerous to life or health (IDLH). The OSHA Hazardous
Waste Operations and Emergency Response regulation defines an IDLH atmosphere as an
atmospheric concentration of any toxic, corrosive, or asphyxiating substance that poses an immediate
threat to life or would cause irreversible or delayed adverse health effects or would interfere with an
individual’s ability to escape from a dangerous atmosphere [OSHA 2006]. This includes atmospheres
that:
• Contain a contaminant (or contaminants) at concentrations above its listed IDLH
concentration
• Contain an unknown contaminant (or contaminants) or an unknown concentration of
known contaminant (or contaminants)
• Contain less than 19.5 percent oxygen
The specific designs of CBRN SCBAs differ, but all include the same basic components, shown in Figure 3-1.
Figure 3-1. CBRN SCBA detachable regulator model compliant with NFPA
1981 and 1982, Edition 2007. Adapted from MSA.
• Backframe/harness assembly
• Regulator
• Pneumatic lines
• Facepiece assembly with exhalation valve
Figure 3-2 shows a CBRN SCBA worn by an emergency responder. It is important for the user to understand the
cautions and limitations of the CBRN SCBA and become familiar with all the labels required by NIOSH and NFPA
standards to identify the capabilities and limitations of the equipment.
CBRN SCBA NIOSH Approval for Universal Emergency Breathing Safety System –Emergency
Breathing Safety System –Buddy Breather
Current SCBA technology makes tethering apparatus possible, thus enabling two SCBA users to share
breathing air from a donor SCBA. The hardware used for this is the Universal Emergency Breathing
Safety System (UEBSS)–Emergency Breathing Safety System (EBSS)–Buddy Breather (BB). However,
the unknown condition of a receiver CBRN SCBA at the time of tethering limits the level of protection
for UEBSS-EBSS-BB apparatus. The following are the levels of NIOSH Approved® respiratory
protection for tethered CBRN SCBA:
• A tethered donor CBRN SCBA is approved by NIOSH as an escape-only device.
• A tethered receiver CBRN SCBA is not approved by NIOSH to provide respiratory
protection.
Background
The use of BB connectors to tether two SCBAs can be a life-saving tool. However, incorrect
interpretation and application of the NIOSH policy regarding CBRN SCBA equipped with UEBSS-EBSS-
BB hardware may lead to a false sense of protection for a tethered receiver CBRN SCBA.
NFPA standards—NFPA 1981 Standard on Open-Circuit Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus for
Emergency Services, 2013 edition; NFPA 1986 Standard on Respiratory Protection Equipment for
Tactical and Technical Operations, 2017 Edition; and subsequent editions of these standards—include
requirements related to the use and operation of UEBSS-EBSS-BB. In support of the NFPA standards
addressing UEBSS-EBSS-BB, a NIOSH Letter to All Interested Parties dated February 18, 2014 [NIOSH
2014]), announced a revision to the NIOSH November 1984 policy for the use of EBSS. The NIOSH
Letter stated:
NIOSH will recognize NFPA 1981, 2013-compliant EBSS systems as part of the NIOSH SCBA approval for users who
have received the appropriate level of training. Users will be able to identify approvals for SCBA which incorporate
the required hardware by the explicit listing of an additional EBSS statement to the standard cautions and
limitations on the approval label. The statement will signify the EBSS components have been evaluated by NIOSH
and accepted as meeting the requirements for EBSS under the requirements of NFPA 1981, Revision 2013 [NIOSH
2014].
The 2014 NIOSH policy is consistent with provisions of 42 CFR Part 84, which describes the purpose of
NIOSH respirator approval to provide for the issuance of certificates of approval for respirators which
have met applicable construction, performance, and respiratory protection requirements of the
regulation.
The 2014 NIOSH policy requires NFPA 1981 or NFPA 1986 standards as construction evaluation
criteria, performance testing to ensure safe operation at low temperature, and positive pressure
testing to establish the level of protection. The NIOSH tests validate that UEBSS-EBSS-BB connector
engagement does not affect the performance of a donor CBRN SCBA in its normal, one-person-use
mode of operation. However, the NIOSH policy does not evaluate the level of protection for a
tethered receiver unit.
The 2014 NIOSH policy further requires the following additional Caution and Limitation statements to
appear in the EBSS section of the users’ manual:
• EBSS may not be engaged or activated in donor mode after the donor End-of Service-
Time-Indicator (EOSTI) has activated.
• Users must be fully trained in the operation of EBSS in accordance with a training
program conforming to the requirements of NFPA Standards 1404, Fire Service
Respiratory Protection Training and 1500, Fire Department Occupational Safety and
Health Program.
• Simultaneous connection of more than two users, one donor, and one receiver, is not
permitted.
Training
The 2014 NIOSH policy recognizes the importance of appropriate training programs developed and
incorporated by the Fire Service. These programs conform to National Fire Protection Association
Standards 1404 [NFPA 2018], Fire Service Respiratory Protection Training and 1500, Fire Department
Occupational Safety and Health Program [NFPA 2021]. The topic of buddy breathing is complex and
subject to change with evolving technology and user awareness. The NFPA standards revision process
provides a means to address the changing needs of UEBSS-EBSS-BB training.
Respirator Components
Alternate Cautions and
TC- Protection 1 Alternate Facepiece Alternate Harness Alternate Cylinder Regulator Accessories Limitions2/3
C
0
10 20 30 40 C0 C0 C0 0 R1 R2 R3 Len Alar Cas
00 00 00 00 H95 H96 H97 H98 H99 01 02 03 4 11 22 33 s10 m50 e20
30 min/
13F- 2216 psi/
AARa SC/PD/ IJMNOS,
-CBRN EOSTI 33 X X X X X X X X X X X ORTUEBSS
13F- 30 min/
AARb 4500 psi/
- SC/PD/ IJMNOS,
CBRN EOSTI 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X ORTUEBSS
13F- 45 min/
AARc 2216 psi/
- SC/PD/ IJMNOS,
CBRN EOSTI 33 X X X X X X X X X X ORTUEBSS
13F- 60 min/
AARd 2216 psi/
- SC/PD/ IJMNOS,
CBRN EOSTI 33 X X X X X X X X X ORTUEBSS
1. PROTECTION
PD - Pressure-Demand EOSTI - End-of-Service-Time Indicator
SC - Self-Contained CBRN – Chemical, Biological, Nuclear and Radiological
Figure 3-3. Full NIOSH Label for a CBRN SCBA (The original form can be accessed through the manufacturer of the
specific RPD.)
J - Failure to properly use and maintain this product could result in injury or death.
M - All approved respirators shall be selected, fitted, used, and maintained in accordance with MSHA,
OSHA, and other applicable regulations.
N - Never substitute, modify, add, or omit parts. Use only exact replacement parts in the configuration
as specified by the manufacturer.
O - Refer to User Instructions, and/or maintenance manuals for information on use and maintenance of
these respirators.
S - Special or critical User Instructions and/or specific use limitations apply. Refer to User Instructions
before donning.
Q - Use in conjunction with personal protective ensembles that provide appropriate levels of protection
against dermal hazard.
R - Some CBRN agents may not present immediate effects from exposure, but can result in delayed
impairment, illness, or death.
T - Direct contact with CBRN agents requires proper handling of the respirator after each use and
between multiple entries during the same use. Decontamination and disposal procedures must be
followed. If contaminated with liquid chemical warfare agents, dispose of the respirator after
decontamination.
U - The respirator should not be used beyond 6 hours after initial exposure to chemical warfare agents
to avoid possibility of agent permeation.
Figure 3-5. NIOSH “CBRN Agent Approved” label (adhesive) for new and retrofitted CBRN SCBA
It is important to check all these approval labels to be sure that the SCBA is CBRN approved by NIOSH. If these labels do
not show the CBRN designation, the respirator is not approved to provide protection against CBRN agents.
Facepieces, regulators, valves, hoses, and cylinder connections are the main components that may
differ in materials or construction from non-CBRN SCBAs. Thus, only those components with exact
part numbers shown on the full NIOSH Approved CBRN SCBA label provide CBRN protection and
maintain NIOSH approval.
It is important to emphasize the unique features of CBRN SCBAs that set them apart from their
industrial counterparts. These are explained in detail in the CBRN SCBA standards and test
procedures, which are posted on the NIOSH website [NIOSH 2024].
Testing
LRPL
The fit of each NIOSH Approved CBRN SCBA facepiece is evaluated to ensure a minimum LRPL under
specified laboratory conditions. This test assesses the respirator’s ability to fit a wide range of facial
sizes and shapes. It also ensures that user instructions can be understood. Chapter 2 provides details
on the LRPL test procedures found in the NIOSH Standard Testing Procedure document TEB-CBRN-
APR-STP0352 [NIOSH 2021].
LRPL testing ensures CBRN SCBAs have generally good fitting characteristics for a variety of facial sizes
and shapes. However, individual fit testing must be done to select the correct facepiece model and
size for each individual wearer. Quantitative fit tests are acceptable to OSHA for CBRN SCBAs. The
user instructions must be consulted for additional details on fit testing to properly select the
equipment and to perform the recommended fit testing protocol.
I
Contains electrical parts that may cause an ignition in flammable or explosive atmospheres.
J Failure to properly use and maintain this product could result in injury or death.
M All approved respirators shall be selected, fitted, used, and maintained in accordance with MSHA,
OSHA, and other applicable regulations.
N Never substitute, modify, add, or omit parts. Use only exact replacement parts in the
configuration specified by the manufacturer.
O Refer to user instructions and/or maintenance manuals for information on use and maintenance
of these respirators.
S Special or critical user instructions and/or specific use limitations apply. Refer to user instructions
before donning, due to unique or unusual design or critical operation requirements.
Q* Use in conjunction with personal protective ensembles that provide appropriate levels of
protection against (CBRN agent) dermal hazards.
R* Some CBRN agents may not present immediate effects from exposure, but can result in delayed
impairment, illness, or death.
T* Direct contact with CBRN agents requires proper handling of the SCBA after each use and
between multiple entries during the same use.
U* The respirator should not be used beyond 6 (six) hours after initial exposure to chemical
warfare agents to avoid possibility of continued agent permeation.”
EBSS* Activation or engagement of EBSS in either the donor or receiver mode changes the SCBA use
to Escape-Only, approved service time for either the donor, or the receiver is no longer
applicable. Additional critical cautions and limitations apply. Refer to EBSS in the User's Manual.
*CBRN-specific C&L.
CBRN PAPRs
The CBRN PAPR has a blower to provide purified air to the user by drawing the contaminated air
through an air-purifying canister(s) or cartridge(s). Important design differences separate CBRN PAPRs
from their industrial counterparts.
CBRN PAPRs with NIOSH 14G approvals may be used for escape from IDLH atmospheres that
contain at least 19.5 percent oxygen. PAPRs with 23C approvals may not be used for escape
from IDLH atmospheres. Neither class of CBRN PAPR can be used to enter an atmosphere that
is IDLH.
During NIOSH laboratory evaluation, the same test agents and concentrations are used to evaluate
PAPR canisters (14G) and cartridges (23C), except that the concentrations are reduced by one half for
loose-fitting PAPR with cartridges.
To gain CBRN approval, NIOSH subjects CBRN PAPRs to special tests:
• Chemical agent permeation and penetration resistance against distilled sulfur mustard
(HD) and sarin (GB)
• LRPL
• Canister/cartridge test challenge and test breakthrough concentrations for the 10 test
representative agents described in Chapter 2
• Durability conditioning for CBRN tight-fitting PAPRs only
When the types of inhalation hazards are known, their concentrations do not exceed IDLH levels, and
there is at least 19.5 percent oxygen, these CBRN PAPRs may be used to enter contaminated
atmospheres.
NIOSH Approved® CBRN PAPRs can be recognized by their labels. Two types of NIOSH approval labels
provide information on the PAPR protections and the list of required component configurations: 1)
the full NIOSH approval label for the CBRN respirator, and 2) the full NIOSH approval label for the
CBRN canister and cartridge. These are paper labels included with the facepiece and air-purifying
component packaging and/or provided with the user instructions. Both full labels contain the
following information:
• Department of Health and Human Services and National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health logos
• Respirator components, protections, accessories, and cautions and limitations
• Part numbers of components for each NIOSH Approved CBRN APR or canister
configuration/system
• The NIOSH approval number (TC-14G-XXX or TC-23C-XXX), is shown as a row of
component parts—each row represents required components for a specific approved
configuration
• Type and level of protection
• The configuration(s) of components that are approved for CBRN level of protection are
listed with “CBRN” and a capacity level (i.e., CAP1, CAP2, etc.)
• Specified cautions and limitations
There is also an abbreviated adhesive NIOSH approval label on CBRN PAPR canisters and cartridges.
This label does not contain the approved configuration of components. In addition, the information of
this label may be split between the CBRN canister/cartridge component and its packaging.
The full NIOSH approval label is the most important document to define the correct configuration of
the CBRN PAPR. As stated before, the full NIOSH approval label may be included in the user
instructions or as a paper insert. The full respirator approval label is usually provided with the PAPR
blower unit and/or facepiece packaging.
The full NIOSH approval labels (respirator, canister, and cartridge) should be reviewed to check that
the components of the CBRN PAPR meet the NIOSH Approved CBRN configuration suitable for the
application for which it was selected.
The NIOSH approval number shows the unique protections for each configuration of the CBRN PAPR.
The components are marked in the matrix grid. Any components that are not marked in the grid for a
given approval number are not permitted.
CBRN PAPR canisters or cartridges must have a NIOSH approval label with a “CBRN” designation. The
color of the canister or cartridge label will be olive and contain all the information of the full label
except for the component configurations, as shown in Figure 3-7.
Canister/cartridge packaging is also labeled “CBRN.” Blower units, breathing tubes, and facepieces do
not have markings or adhesive labels indicating that they are CBRN components. They are marked
with a component number, which is listed on the full label identifying that component is in the NIOSH
Approved® configuration.
Testing
NIOSH tests CBRN canisters or cartridges for PAPRs against 10 test agents representing over 131
chemicals: ammonia, cyanogen chloride, cyclohexane (organic vapors), formaldehyde, hydrogen
cyanide, hydrogen sulfide, nitrogen dioxide, phosgene, phosphine, and sulfur dioxide. They are also
tested against GB, HD, and dioctyl phthalate (DOP) for P100 particulate filtration efficiency.
These tests evaluate the capacity (CAP) of the canisters, as specified by their manufacturer. They are
evaluated in 15-minute intervals up to 60 minutes. NIOSH assigns numerical ratings to indicate the
duration of the tests for which the canister prevented unacceptable chemical breakthrough: CAP1 =
15 minutes, CAP2 = 30 minutes, and CAP3 = 45 minutes. For CAP ratings of 60 minutes or greater, the
canisters are evaluated at 30-minute intervals up to 120 minutes. Actual service life in use will be
affected by the specific chemical exposure, airflow rate, and environmental conditions.
Figure 3-7. CBRN canisters showing the adhesive NIOSH approval label
All NIOSH Approved CBRN PAPRs are evaluated to ensure a minimum LRPL and clarity of user
instructions. Tight-fitting 14G PAPRs are tested with the blower running and with it turned off. The
loose-fitting 23C PAPRs are tested with their blower running, under specified laboratory conditions.
NIOSH also assesses the tight- and loose-fitting PAPR’s ability to fit a wide range of facial sizes and
shapes. NIOSH also ensures that instructions for the facepiece size selection and donning can be
understood.
Although LRPL testing ensures CBRN PAPRs have generally good fitting characteristics, individual fit
testing must be done to select the correct tight-fitting facepiece model and size for each user.
Individual fit testing is not required for loose-fitting PAPRs. Procedures for conducting qualitative and
quantitative fit tests can be found in OSHA’s Respiratory Protection regulation [OSHA 1999] and
Chapter 6 of this handbook. Qualitative fit tests rely on the user’s senses to detect unacceptable
leakage of a test agent. Quantitative fit tests are similar to the LRPL test, using instrumentation to
measure “fit factors,” which are numerical expressions of fit.
A minimum fit factor of 500 is required to demonstrate acceptable fit for a tight-fitting CBRN
PAPR. Higher values represent “better” fit. While the minimum fit factor of 500 satisfies OSHA’s
regulation, manufacturers of CBRN PAPRs may specify higher minimum values (up to 2500) for
their products. The user instructions must be consulted to determine the minimum acceptable
fit factor for a specific CBRN PAPR.
Table 3-2. NIOSH C&L statements for tight-fitting CBRN PAPRs (14G Approval Schedule)
A Not for use in atmospheres containing less than 19.5 percent oxygen.
F Do not use powered air-purifying respirators if airflow is less than four (4) cfm (115 lpm)
for tight fitting facepieces or six (6) cfm (170 lpm) for hoods and/or helmets.
H Follow established cartridge and canister change schedules or observe ESLI to ensure
that cartridges and canisters are replaced before breakthrough occurs.
I Contains electrical parts that may cause an ignition in flammable or explosive
atmospheres.(Note - Applies if the respirator contains electrical components and the
intrinsic safety has not been evaluated and approved by MSHA or a recognized
independent laboratory.
J Failure to properly use and maintain this product could result in injury or death.
L Follow the manufacturer’s user instructions for changing cartridges, canister, and/or
filters.
M All approved respirators shall be selected, fitted, used, and maintained in accordance
with MSHA, OSHA, and other applicable regulations.
N Never substitute, modify, add, or omit parts. Use only exact replacement parts in the
configuration as specified by the manufacturer.
O Refer to user instructions, and/or maintenance manuals for information on use and
maintenance of these respirators.
R* Some CBRN agents may not present immediate effects from exposure, but can result in
delayed impairment, illness, or death.
S Special or critical user instructions and/or specific use limitations apply. Refer to user
instructions before donning, due to unique or unusual design or critical operation
requirements.
Y* The respirator provides respiratory protection against inhalation of radiological and
nuclear dust particles. Procedures for monitoring radiation exposure and full radiation
protection must be followed.
Z* If during use, an unexpected hazard is encountered such as a secondary CBRN device,
pockets of entrapped hazard or any unforeseen hazard, immediately leave the area for
clean air.
BB Not for use for entry into atmospheres immediately dangerous to life or health.
CC For entry, do not exceed maximum use concentrations established by regulatory
standards.
GG* Direct contact with CBRN agents requires proper handling of the respirator after use.
Correct disposal procedures must be followed.
UU* The respirator should not be used beyond eight (8) hours after initial exposure to
chemical warfare agents to avoid possibility of agent permeation. If liquid exposure is
encountered, the respirator should not be used for more than two (2) hours.
VV* PAPRS with TC-23C approvals may NOT be used for escape from IDLH atmospheres.
* CBRN-specific C&L.
Table 3-3. NIOSH C&L statements for loose-fitting CBRN PAPRs (23C Approval Schedule)
A Not for use in atmospheres containing less than 19.5 percent oxygen.
B Not for use in atmospheres immediately dangerous to life or health.
C Do not exceed maximum use concentrations established by regulatory standards.
F Do not use powered air.
H Follow established cartridge and canister change schedules or observe ESLI to ensure that
cartridges and canisters are replaced before breakthrough occurs.
I Contains electrical parts that may cause an ignition in flammable or explosive atmospheres. (Note:
Applies if the respirator contains electrical components and the intrinsic safety has not been
evaluated and approved by MSHA or a recognized independent laboratory.)
J Failure to properly use and maintain this product could result in injury or death.
L Follow the manufacturer’s user instructions for changing cartridges, canister, and/or filters.
M All approved respirators shall be selected, fitted, used, and maintained in accordance with
MSHA, OSHA, and other applicable regulations.
N All approved respirators shall be selected, fitted, used, and maintained in accordance with
O Refer to user instructions, and/or maintenance manuals for information on use and
maintenance of these respirators.
R* Some CBRN agents may not present immediate effects from exposure, but can result in
delayed impairment, illness, or death.
S Special or critical user instructions and/or specific use limitations apply. Refer to user
instructions before donning, due to unique or unusual design or critical operation
requirements.
Y* The respirator provides respiratory protection against inhalation of radiological and
nuclear dust particles. Procedures for monitoring radiation exposure and full radiation
protection must be followed.
GG* Direct contact with CBRN agents requires proper handling of the respirator after use.
Correct disposal procedures must be followed.
QQ* Use in conjunction with personal protective ensembles that provide appropriate levels of
protection against dermal hazard. Failure to do so may result in personal injury even when
the respirator is properly fitted, used, and maintained.
UU* The respirator should not be used beyond eight (8) hours after initial exposure to chemical
warfare agents to avoid possibility of agent permeation. If liquid exposure is encountered,
the respirator should not be used for more than two (2) hours.
VV* PAPRS with TC-23C approvals may NOT be used for escape from IDLH atmospheres.
*CBRN-specific C&L.
Canisters are also subjected to a rough handling drop test in a designated MPC. This test is not done
for loose-fitting NIOSH Approved CBRN PAPR and cartridges.
The MPC is the protective packaging configuration in which the end user will store or maintain the
CBRN PAPR and its required components after it has been issued for immediate use. The type of MPC,
if any, is left to the discretion of the manufacturer.
Examples of common MPCs are mask carriers, clamshell containers, drawstring plastic bags, hermetically sealed
canister bags, and cardboard containers, as shown in Figure 3-9.
Figure 3-9. Minimum packaging configuration for CBRN canister and CBRN PAPR system
CBRN APRs
CBRN APR RPDs consist of a full facepiece made of materials resistant to permeation of chemical
agents and a canister to remove hazardous chemicals and particulates [NIOSH 2003b]. Only canisters
are approved with CBRN APRs; cartridges are not used. Canisters can be mounted on the front or on
either side of the facepiece. Figures 3-10 and 3-11 show typical CBRN APRs.
Figure 3-10. CBRN APR protection for Figure 3-11. CBRN APR protection for
police responders. Photo courtesy Avon emergency responders. Photo courtesy MSA
Protection Systems – The Safety Company)
Testing
NIOSH subjects CBRN APRs to a range of tests based on existing national and international standards.
These tests evaluate mechanical connector and gasket properties; canister properties, including
breathing resistance; dimensions and weight; facepiece field of view; lens material haze, luminous
transmittance, and abrasion resistance; carbon dioxide level; and hydration.
Special test requirements for CBRN use include canister challenge and breakthrough concentrations;
service life; low temperature/fogging (visual acuity score); communications modified rhyme test;
chemical agent permeation and penetration resistance against distilled HD and GB agent; LRPL; and
environmental conditioning (transportability, temperature range, survivability).
The 14G approval for CBRN APR is shown in the full NIOSH approval label for the facepiece and
canister, found with the manufacturer’s user instructions or as an insert in the MPC. The user
instructions and the full NIOSH respirator approval label are distributed with the facepiece, and the
full NIOSH canister approval label is distributed with the canister.
Most CBRN APR components, including facepieces, are not marked “CBRN.” NIOSH only requires the
canister to be labeled and marked “CBRN” and requires the color of the canister or its label to be
olive.
NIOSH Approved® CBRN APR canisters must provide protection at the same level as the canister
specified on the NIOSH CBRN approval label. For a service life less than 60 minutes, the canister
capacity is specified in 15-minute intervals, identified by a capacity level. A capacity level of CAP1
designates a laboratory-rated service life of 15 minutes; CAP2 is 30 minutes; and CAP3 is 45 minutes.
The canister must meet or exceed the manufacturer’s specified service life during the laboratory test
without exceeding the NIOSH-identified breakthrough concentration level for the test gas or vapor.
CBRN APR canisters are unique as they are interoperable among manufacturers. This interoperability
provision does not apply to NIOSH Approved industrial gas masks. Users should not interchange
canisters until instructed to do so by incident commander/other designated command authority.
Figure 3-12. CBRN canisters showing the threaded connection and abbreviated adhesive label.
The interoperability requirement for CBRN canisters is intended to ensure that canisters from
different manufacturers’ NIOSH Approved CBRN APR will provide the same protection level as the
canister specified on the NIOSH CBRN approval label. The RD-40-1/7” thread used for the canister
connectors, shown in Figure 3-12, is the round standard thread defined by the European Standard
EN148-1:2018 [BSI 2018].
NIOSH evaluates the fit of each NIOSH Approved CBRN APR to ensure a minimum LRPL under
laboratory-specified conditions as described for CBRN PAPRs with tight-fitting facepieces. Figure 3-13
shows the LRPL testing for APRs. Manufacturers may require fit factors higher than 500 to qualify
users when individual fit testing is conducted.
Since different fit factors are required by manufacturers for CBRN APRs (ranging from 500 to 2500),
the user instructions for the particular device must be consulted.
A Not for use in atmospheres containing less than 19.5 percent oxygen.
I Contains electrical parts that may cause an ignition in flammable or explosive atmospheres. Applies
if the respirator contains electrical components and the intrinsic safety has not been evaluated and
approved by Mine & Safety Administration (MSHA) or a recognized independent laboratory.
J Failure to properly use and maintain this product could result in injury or death.
L Follow the manufacturer’s instructions for changing cartridges, canister, and/or filters.
M All approved respirators shall be selected, fitted, used, and maintained in accordance with MSHA,
OSHA, and other applicable regulations.
O Refer to user instructions and/or maintenance manuals for information on use and maintenance of
these respirators.
R* Some CBRN agents may not present immediate effects from exposure, but can result in delayed
impairment, illness, or death.
S Special or critical user instructions and/or specific use limitations apply. Refer to user instructions
before donning, due to unique or unusual design or critical operation requirements.
T* Direct contact with CBRN agents requires proper handling of the respirator after each use and
between multiple entries during the same use. Decontamination and disposal procedures must be
followed. If contaminated with liquid chemical warfare agents, dispose of the respirator after
decontamination.
V* Not for use in atmospheres IDLH, or where hazards have not been fully characterized.
W* Use replacement parts in the configuration as specified by applicable regulations and guidance.
X* Consult manufacturer’s user instructions for information on the use, storage, and maintenance of
these respirators at various temperatures.
Y* The respirator provides respiratory protection against inhalation of radiological and nuclear dust
particles. Procedures for monitoring radiation exposure and full radiation protection must be
followed.
Z* If during use, an unexpected hazard is encountered such as a secondary CBRN device, pockets of
entrapped or any unforeseen hazard, immediately leave the area for clean air.
CC For entry, do not exceed maximum use concentrations established by regulatory standards.
HH* When used at defined occupational exposure limits, the rated service time cannot be exceeded.
Follow established canister change out schedules or observe End-of-Service-Life Indicators to ensure
that canisters are replaced before breakthrough occurs.
QQ* Use in conjunction with personal protective ensembles that provide appropriate levels of protection
against dermal hazard. Failure to do so may result in personal injury even when the respirator is
properly fitted, used, and maintained.
UU* The respirator should not be used beyond eight (8) hours after initial exposure to chemical warfare
agents to avoid possibility of agent permeation. If liquid exposure is encountered, the respirator
should not be used for more than two (2) hours.
*CBRN-specific C&L.
CBRN APERs
CBRN APERs consist of a hood made of materials resistant to permeation of chemical agents and a
canister with media to remove hazardous chemicals and particulates. They typically include an
oral/nasal cup or mouthpiece to further protect the respiratory system. NIOSH approves these
devices as 14G gas masks. These devices may be used for escape from IDLH environments but not for
entry into or working in an IDLH atmosphere.
CBRN APER canisters are designed to remove a wide variety of air contaminants but are ineffective for
some chemicals. CBRN APERs with carbon monoxide protection and heat and flame resistance are not
commonly available.
These RPDs are designed for the general working population and provide escape protection
against CBRN agents. The NIOSH standard does not address special populations, such as
children and adults with respiratory or other health conditions that may adversely affect the
ability to don and use CBRN APERs effectively. Figures 3-17 and 3-18 show examples of CBRN
APERs.
The useful life of the APER in the ready-to-use, stowed condition must be specified by the
manufacturer.
Figure 3-15. CBRN canister MPC Figure 3-16. CBRN facepiece with its clamshell packaging
Manufacturers’ user instructions may contain special requirements for the type or frequency of
training necessary for a given APER. Periodic retraining and/or review of instructions for donning,
fitting, and doffing must be performed as required by the manufacturer. For example, some
manufacturers may require retraining every 30 days, while others may require periodic review of
instructions or inspection, or stipulate inspection requirements without specifying a time interval.
It is important to check the “wearability” of the APER hood to select the proper device for each
potential user. Hoods that fit too tightly around the head or neck can contribute to feelings of
claustrophobia or choking. To mitigate these problems, some CBRN APER hoods come in more than
one size.
Manufacturers typically provide information on neck and/or head sizes that a particular APER hood
might best fit. Manufacturers’ user instructions and training materials must be followed to select a
properly fitting hood and for special instructions on how to don, wear, doff, and store the respirator.
Training units (not intended to provide respiratory protection) are available to assist learning these
activities.
To determine proper fit, it is important to keep the following considerations in mind:
• For APERs that contain an oronasal cup, it is important that the cup fits properly over
the wearer’s nose and mouth to prevent the buildup of carbon dioxide inside the
hood.
• If the wearer’s head is too large for the hood, it may not fit properly.
• If the wearer’s neck is small, the APER may not seal properly; if it is too large, the APER
may choke the wearer.
• Some manufacturers require that the wearer cross-check the fit of the APER with
another person.
The CBRN APER full NIOSH approval label, as explained for the other RPDs, contains the information
that the user needs to consult to determine if an APER has been tested and certified by NIOSH for use
in CBRN environments. This label is found in the manufacturer’s packaging or with the user
instructions. The full NIOSH approval label and manufacturer’s user instructions must be carefully
reviewed to determine the protections applicable to each APER model.
In addition to the information shown on the NIOSH full approval label for all RPDs, the NIOSH full
approval label for CBRN APERs should include the type and level of protection, as shown in Table 3-5.
Table 3-5. CBRN APER label examples for different types of protection
Testing
CBRN APERs are tested for permeation and penetration resistance with liquid and vapors of distilled
HD and GB. LRPL tests are also conducted. Each one of these tests is explained in Chapter 2. NIOSH
Cautions and Limitations Statements for CBRN APER
At a minimum, NIOSH requires the C&L statements shown on Table 3-6 for CBRN APERs [NIOSH
2006a]
Table 3-6. NIOSH C&L statements for CBRN APERs (Approval Schedule 14G)
A Not for use in atmospheres containing less than 19.5 percent oxygen.
I Contains electrical parts that may cause an ignition in flammable or explosive
atmospheres. (NOTE: Applies if the respirator contains electrical components and
the intrinsic safety has not been evaluated and approved by Mine & Safety
Administration (MSHA) or a recognized independent laboratory.)
J Failure to properly use and maintain this product could result in injury or death.
L Follow the manufacturer’s instructions for changing cartridges, canister, and/or
filters.
M All approved respirators shall be selected, fitted, used, and maintained in
accordance with MSHA, OSHA, and other applicable regulations
O Refer to user instructions and/or maintenance manuals for information on use and
maintenance of these respirators.
R* Some CBRN agents may not present immediate effects from exposure, but can
result in delayed impairment, illness, or death.
S Special or critical user instructions and/or specific use limitations apply. Refer to
user instructions before donning, due to unique or unusual design or critical
operation requirements.
X* Consult manufacturer’s user instructions for information on the use, storage, and
maintenance of these respirators at various temperatures.
AA This respirator is to be used for escape only and will protect against the inhalation
of certain respiratory hazards.
DD* This respirator provides respiratory protection against inhalation of certain gas and
vapor chemical agents, biological particulates, and radiological and nuclear dust
particles. This respirator provides limited dermal (skin) protection to the head area
and eyes.
EE* Eye irritation may be experienced based upon the CBRN agent and exposure
(concentration and duration).
GG* Direct contact with CBRN agents requires proper handling of the respirator after
use. Correct disposal procedures must be followed.
II* This respirator provides protection from certain inhalation hazards associated with
fire.
JJ* CBRN agents, depending on how they are used, may provide a disabling effect as a
result of skin exposure.
NN* This respirator is a one-time-use device with no replaceable parts. Discard after use
regardless of contaminant exposure.
*CBRN-specific C&L.
The NIOSH C&L statements required on approval labels for CBRN PAPRs do not directly address
battery requirements such as storage, conditioning, usage, and disposal. However, the following
NIOSH C&L statements, shown in Table 3-8, are indirectly associated with battery performance.
Table 3-8. NIOSH C&L statements indirectly associated with battery performances
Do not use powered air-purifying respirators if airflow is less than four (4) cfm (115 lpm)
F
for tight-fitting facepieces or six (6) cfm (170 lpm) for hoods and/or helmets
Comment: If the batteries are not properly charged, these airflow rates may not be
achievable.
I Contains electrical parts that may cause an ignition in flammable or explosive
atmospheres.
Comment: Not all batteries used with CBRN PAPRs are intrinsically safe.
Do not use powered air-purifying respirators if airflow is less than four (4) cfm (115 lpm)
J
for tight-fitting facepieces or six (6) cfm (170 lpm) for hoods and/or helmets.
Comment: If batteries are not stored and conditioned properly, they can be damaged and
cause personal injury.
Consult manufacturer’s user instructions for information on the use, storage, and
X
maintenance of these respirators at various temperatures.
Comment: Battery storage conditions and charging methods can adversely
affect battery performance or damage the battery.
Manufacturers may use different color battery caps or different length caps to help identify the
correct battery that a particular CBRN PAPR will use, as shown in Figure 3-21. A battery not listed on
the PAPR’s full NIOSH approval label should never be used.
Battery life depends on many factors, including conditioning (if needed), maintenance, temperature,
age, and number of charge/discharge cycles. Spent CBRN PAPR batteries should be disposed of
properly. The manufacturers’ user instructions provide information for proper disposal.
Although batteries cannot be repaired, rechargeable batteries can be recharged and conditioned for
reuse if they are in good condition. Manufacturers’ user instructions typically describe specific
recharging and conditioning procedures. NIOSH Approved CBRN PAPRs must demonstrate a battery
service life of at least four hours when tested on a breathing machine operating at 24 respirations per
minute with a minute volume of 40 l/min [NIOSH 2021].
This performance is not guaranteed in use situations. The actual in-use service life of a CBRN PAPR will
depend on a number of factors, including:
• Charge level of the battery
• Battery condition
• Battery operating temperature
• User workload
• Resistance to airflow
NIOSH -appr oved CBRN PAP Rs must de monstrate a battery servicelife of at
Figure 3-21. This NIOSH Approved® CBRN PAPR blower can be operated
with different types of batteries. To identify the type of battery to be used,
manufacturers supply battery covers of different colors or lengths. This
picture shows the short cover for non-rechargeable batteries and the
longer cover for rechargeable batteries.
Manufacturers’ user instructions provide estimates of how long batteries will supply sufficient power
to the CBRN PAPR in use and describe procedures to check for proper airflow rate. Some CBRN PAPRs
have battery or airflow indicators on the blower to alert the wearer when the flow rate falls below
minimum required specifications. Alternatively, manufacturers may indicate a maximum length of
time a CBRN PAPR can be used before leaving the contaminated environment to check the airflow
rate or replace the battery. Other manufacturers may simply specify a minimum runtime (e.g., four
hours for a NiMH battery). The instructions provided with the PAPR blower, battery, and/or battery
charger will provide information on battery use, care, and storage.
Battery Chargers
Different types of battery chargers are available for CBRN PAPRs. These can include quick charge,
trickle charge, post-trickle charge, and combinations of these.
User instructions should be followed carefully to ensure proper battery performance and to avoid
damage to the batteries. For example, some chargers are made to constantly condition (charge and
discharge) batteries.
Thus, the batteries can remain in the charger until needed for use. Other chargers are made only to
quick-charge batteries. Batteries should be removed from these chargers when a full charge is
achieved to avoid damage.
Some manufacturers produce “gang” battery chargers, which can charge or condition multiple
batteries. Heat is generated during the charging of a battery and must be dissipated to prevent
overheating. Care must be taken to ensure there is ample ventilation where the charger is placed, and
sources of heat are not adjacent to the charger.
Battery Recharging
Periodic recharging is recommended to maintain fully charged batteries. Charging times vary,
depending on the level of partial charge of the battery and charger characteristics. User instructions
for recommended charging time should be followed.
In many cases it is necessary to discharge batteries before recharging them. This is typically done by
running the PAPR until the low battery warning comes on, or the airflow rate drops below the
manufacturer’s specified level. Discharging is not necessary for battery chargers that are able to
properly condition batteries through the discharge/charge cycle. Not all battery chargers have this
capability.
Battery Reconditioning
New batteries, or batteries not used for extended periods, may require “reconditioning” before they
can be fully charged. This generally involves subjecting the battery to several discharge and charge
cycles. In most cases, batteries are discharged by connecting them to the PAPR blower and running it
until the low battery or flow indicator indicates performance below required specifications.
Manufacturers’ reconditioning procedures may differ from these general guidelines for specific PAPR
batteries.
Non-rechargeable Batteries
These three types of disposable batteries are currently used in CBRN PAPRs:
• Alkaline
• Lithium-sulfur dioxide (Li-SO2)
• Lithium-manganese dioxide (Li-MnO2)
Alkaline Batteries
Alkaline cells are subject to both self-discharge and possible decomposition of the chemical contents.
They should be kept cool or refrigerated during storage. A temperature range of 32°F to 50°F (0°C to
10°C) is optimal since it prevents freezing and overheating of the aqueous electrolyte. For prolonged
storage, the batteries should be stored in vapor-proof packing to help alleviate the problem of
electrolyte loss. Manufacturers may provide special containers for placing batteries in temporary
storage.
Commercially available, D-cell alkaline batteries can provide PAPR operating times up to 12 hours.
Increased resistance to airflow through the cartridges or canisters from clogging can reduce the
service time of the batteries. Only batteries within their expiration date should be used.
Li-SO2 Batteries
Li-SO2 batteries are designed for extended shelf life. A shelf life of 10 years or longer is possible if the
batteries are stored in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Fresh Li-SO2 batteries should
be kept in their original packaging until used.
Ideally, Li-SO2 batteries should be stored in a dry, cool environment. CBRN PAPR manufacturers’ user
instructions specify acceptable ranges of temperature and humidity for batteries in storage. These
recommendations are typically in the range of -22°F to 131°F (-30°C to 55°C). Heat sources such as
furnaces and heating pipes should be avoided.
Li-SO2 single-use batteries can operate the CBRN PAPR up to 2
eight hours under favorable conditions.
However, after four hours of use, the user must leave the contaminated area, decontaminate if
required, and check the PAPR airflow with cartridges installed according to the manufacturer’s
instructions. Thereafter, the airflow must be checked at least every two hours of use.
Li-MnO2 Batteries
Li-MnO2 batteries are designed for extended shelf life. A shelf life of 10 years or longer is possible if
the batteries are stored in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Special battery storage
containers may be available from some manufacturers.
Manufacturers specify acceptable ranges of temperature and humidity for Li-MnO2 batteries in
storage. Temperature extremes and exposure to heat sources should be avoided; a cool, dry storage
area is desirable.
Li-MnO2 batteries may be used up to 12 hours under appropriate conditions. These batteries may
have a label with a grid to mark the number of hours used. When the discharged batteries are
exhausted, they should be prepared for disposal in accordance with their manufacturer’s instructions.
Some manufacturers recommend checking the PAPR airflow using the same procedures and time
intervals described above for Li-SO2 batteries.
Disposal of Non-rechargeable
2 Batteries
Alkaline batteries can be discarded with regular domestic waste in some locations. However, all
batteries should be discarded or recycled in accordance with federal, state, and local regulations.
Non-rechargeable Li-SO2 batteries must be discarded on termination of use. They should be removed
from the PAPR and discharged according to the manufacturer’s instructions. LiMnO2 batteries are
generally not hazardous waste, and the Department of Transportation does not regulate them as
hazardous materials.
CBRN respirator manufacturers provide specific instructions for disposal of non-rechargeable
batteries, and these instructions should be followed.
The CBRN PAPR retrofit kit must, at a minimum, contain the following:
• CBRN PAPR retrofit kit instructions
• Replacement packaging, components, parts, materials, CBRN canisters or cartridges (as
applicable), and operation instructions required to retrofit the PAPR to the identical
configuration as the approved CBRN configuration level (including minimum packaging
configuration for tight-fitting CBRN PAPRs)
• CBRN PAPR retrofit approval label(s) for the respirator retrofit kit
It is important to read the manufacturer user instructions and NIOSH approval labels to
determine if the accessories are required components of an approved CBRN configuration or
optional.
Lens Covers
Lens covers protect the standard facepiece lenses from impact or scratches. They are made of
polycarbonate and normally come clear or shaded. These lens covers can easily be mounted on top of
the facepiece lens to provide additional impact protection. This is a good accessory for a facepiece in
which the lenses are of flexible design. Figure 3-22 shows a dark shade lens cover to conceal the face
of the user.
Rubber Hoods
Rubber hoods, as shown in Figure 3-23, provide additional protection to the protective clothing
selected for the user involved in a CBRN event.
Amplifier
CBRN facepieces have a speaking diaphragm designed to enhance the quality of communication.
Nevertheless, there are situations in which an amplifier attached to the facepiece will be of great
convenience and allow for clearer communication among users during an emergency.
There are other maintenance requirements regarding the hydrostatic cylinder check, which must be
followed according to the user instructions and U.S. Department of Transportation regulations
[Qualification, maintenance and use of cylinders, 2000]. Furthermore, SCBAs must be visually
inspected and functionally tested as dictated by the manufacturer’s user instructions and OSHA
regulations [OSHA 1999]. OSHA also requires documentation of monthly inspections of all respirators
maintained for emergencies.
Summary
CBRN RPDs have unique features that make them different from industrial respirators. CBRN
respirators are designed to protect the user against a large number of highly toxic contaminants that
may be present in a terrorist attack or accident.
As discussed in this chapter, it is important to learn the unique features of a CBRN respirator and
understand the NIOSH approval labels. These labels will guide the user in selecting appropriate and
approved components to protect against CBRN contaminants.
It is also important to understand the cautions and limitations of each device and component
configuration. NIOSH C&L statements and manufacturer user instructions provide the necessary
information.
Finally, the manufacturer user instructions should be read carefully. They provide specific instructions
and recommendations for the particular CBRN respirator.
References
Approval of respiratory protective devices. 42 CFR 84 (1995).
BSI [2018]. BS EN 148-1:1999: Respiratory protective devices: threads for facepieces. Standard thread
connection. German version. London, UK: British Standards Institution.
NFPA [2002]. NFPA 1981: Standard on open-circuit self-contained breathing apparatus for fire and
emergency services. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association.
NFPA [2007]. NFPA 1981: Standard on open-circuit self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) for
emergency services. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association.
NFPA [2013a]. NFPA 1404: Standard for fire service respiratory protection training. Quincy, MA:
National Fire Protection Association.
NFPA [2013b]. NFPA 1981: Standard on open-circuit self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) for
emergency services. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association.
NFPA [2018]. NFPA 1404: Standard for fire service respiratory protection training. Quincy, MA:
National Fire Protection Association.
NFPA [2019]. NFPA 1981: Standard on open-circuit self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) for
emergency services. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association.
NFPA [2021]. NFPA 1500: Standard on Fire Department Occupational Safety, Health, and Wellness Program. Quincy,
MA: National Fire Protection Association.
NFPA [2022]. NFPA 470: Hazardous Materials/Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) Standard for
Responders. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association.
NFPA [2023a]. NFPA 1986 Standard on respiratory protection equipment for tactical and technical
operations. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association.
NFPA [2023b]. NFPA 1987 Standard on combination unit respirator systems for tactical and technical
operations. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association.
NIOSH [1987]. Guide to industrial respiratory protection. By Bollinger NJ, Schutz RH. Morgantown, WV:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 87-116,
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/87-116.
NIOSH [1997] Letter to all users of P-series particulate respirators. NIOSH service time
recommendations for p-series particulate respirators. By Metzler RW. May 2, 1997. Pittsburgh, PA:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
https://archive.cdc.gov/#/details?url=https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/usernotices/notices/run-
050297.html
NIOSH [2002]. Statement of standard for self-contained breathing apparatus, Statement of Standard
(attachment a). Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/RespStandards/ApprovedStandards/scba_cbrn.
NIOSH [2003b]. Statement of standard for chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) full
facepiece air-purifying respirator (APR). Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health,
https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/niosh/npptl/standardsdev/cbrn/apr/standard/aprstd-a.html
NIOSH [2006a]. List of NIOSH standard protections, cautions and limitations for approval labels.
Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docket/archive/pdfs/niosh-008/0008-100106-handout_7.pdf
NIOSH [2006b]. Statement of standard for chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN)
powered air-purifying respirators (PAPR). Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health,
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/respstandards/pdfs/CBRNPAPRStatementofStandard-508.pdf
NIOSH [2008]. Guidance on emergency responder personal protective equipment (PPE) for response to
CBRN terrorism incidents. Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH)
Publication No. 2008-132, https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2008-132/.
NIOSH [2014]. Letter to all interested parties. Subject: evaluation and acceptance of emergency
breathing support systems (EBSS) incorporated into SCBA approvals. By Szalajda, J. Acting Chief,
Technical Evaluation Branch, National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory. February 18, 2014.
Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/resources/pressrel/letters/interestedparties/pdfs/lttr-02182014-
508.pdf.
NIOSH [2017]. Letter to all interested parties: incorporation of National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA) 1986, Standard on Respiratory Protection Equipment for Tactical and Technical Operations,
2017 edition into NIOSH Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) policy statement on “Acceptance
of Applications for the Testing and Evaluation of Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus for Use against
Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Agents.” Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health, https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/resources/pressrel/letters/interestedparties/pdfs/lttr-
05092017-508.pdf.
NIOSH [2021]. Determination of laboratory respirator protection level (LRPL) for CBRN self-contained
breathing apparatus (SCBA) facepieces or CBRN air-purifying respirator (APR), standard testing
procedure (STP). Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/stps/pdfs/TEB-CBRN-APR-STP-0352-508.pdf.
NIOSH [2024]. Standard respirator testing procedures. Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health, https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/stps/respirator_testing.html.
OSHA [1999]. 29 CFR 1910.134 Respiratory protection. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=standards&p_id=12716.
OSHA [2006]. 29 CFR 1910.120 Hazardous waste operations and emergency response. Washington,
DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=9765.
Selection Overview
Four categories of information must be considered to select the correct respirator for use in any
hazardous atmosphere:
• Hazard analysis
• Work area conditions
• Human factors
• Respirator capabilities and limitations
The following sections describe how to address each category in the context of a CBRN response.
Hazard Analysis
At the point of notification of a potential CBRN incident, efforts to characterize the respiratory hazard
should begin. Answers to basic questions about the physical state of the suspected agent (i.e., liquid,
gas, or particle) can start the process of identifying the contaminant(s). Reports of odors, a
description of the agent’s container or delivery device, and reports of symptoms of people exposed
can provide useful clues to help identify the hazardous material. Oxygen deficiency must also be
considered for incidents occurring in small indoor areas with limited natural ventilation. As noted
earlier, if site entry must be made, the Level A ensemble with CBRN SCBA must be used. Direct-
reading instruments should be used to measure oxygen content and, if possible, identify and quantify
the contaminant and extent of contamination.
In many cases, it may be necessary to collect air or bulk contaminant samples for laboratory analysis
to make these determinations. Until the contaminant can be identified and its concentration measured
or estimated, the only permissible respirator is the CBRN SCBA. When these steps are complete,
further steps can be taken to determine if CBRN powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) or air-
purifying respirators (APRs) can be safely used.
As described in Chapter 2, CBRN PAPRs and APRs share approvals for particulate hazards (e.g.,
biological and radiological hazards), plus a wide range of chemical warfare agents (CWAs) and toxic
industrial chemicals (TICs). Table 2-1 displays the CWAs and TICs covered by the CBRN approval. If the
contaminant in question is covered by the CBRN approval, further analysis can determine if CBRN
PAPRs or APRs are suitable to enter and work in the contaminated area. To make this decision, the
following information is required:
• An atmospheric concentration of the contaminant that is considered IDLH. These
values can often be found in the NIOSH Emergency Response Safety and Health Database
[NIOSH 2010] or the NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards [NIOSH 2020]. If the
measured concentration exceeds the listed IDLH value, neither CBRN PAPRs nor CBRN
APRs are acceptable. Only CBRN SCBAs can be used.
• An atmospheric concentration of the contaminant that is defined as acceptable,
generally called an occupational exposure limit. For most TICs, these values are listed
as recommended exposure limits (RELs), Threshold Limit Values, and permissible
exposure limits (PELs). These values can be found in one or more commonly available
references [ACGIH 1991; NIOSH 2020; OSHA 2010a]. Equivalent information for CWAs
can often be found in the NIOSH Emergency Response Safety and Health Database [NIOSH
2010]. Note: Because occupational exposure limits do not exist for biological hazards,
NIOSH makes specific, risk-based protective ensemble recommendations for these
materials [NIOSH 2009].
• Once a measured or estimated contaminant exposure is determined, it is divided by
the selected limit of acceptable exposure to determine the hazard ratio (HR):
• The HR describes how much reduction in airborne exposure (i.e., protection) the
selected respirator must provide.
APFs represent the level of respiratory protection that a class of respirators is expected to
provide to employees when a continuing, effective respiratory protection program is in place
[OSHA 1999].
Note that APFs cannot be used if an effective respiratory protection program is not in place.
Stated mathematically, an APF is the ratio of the contaminant concentration outside the respirator
(Co) to the maximum amount of contamination expected to penetrate to the inside of the
respirator(Ci):
With the exception of military operations, most employers and responder organizations in the United
States are regulated by OSHA or an equivalent state agency. The APFs OSHA lists for CBRN respirators
are shown in Table 4-1. A CBRN respirator with an APF equal to or greater than the calculated HR can
be selected for contaminant concentrations below the IDLH value.
Table 4-1. Assigned Protection Factors (APFs) for CBRN respirators
Example, Part 1
Responders wearing CBRN SCBAs have identified a liquid spilled in a storeroom as allyl alcohol. After
securing the area and performing initial cleanup, an airborne concentration of 5 parts per million
(ppm) remains. Additional cleanup of the area is expected to take three hours. The NIOSH REL for allyl
alcohol is 2 ppm (up to 10-hour exposure) and the IDLH concentration is 20 ppm. What is the
minimum acceptable CBRN respirator for the cleanup crew?
Solution
The allyl alcohol concentration is below the IDLH value, but greater than the REL. The hazard ratio is
calculated as:
From Table 4-1, both the CBRN PAPR and CBRN APR have APFs greater than the hazard ratio. Allyl
alcohol is an organic vapor covered by both CBRN approvals. The CBRN APR is the minimum
acceptable respirator if a canister change schedule is developed and implemented (see discussion
below).
These portions of the selection process are summarized graphically in Figure 4-1.
Figure 4-1. The flow chart shows a sequential series of yes/no questions to help
responders choose among CBRN SCBAs, CBRN PAPRs, and CBRN APRs.
Determination of the breakthrough time for a specific set of conditions is best done using
computer applications or equivalent tools developed by CBRN respirator manufacturers [3M
2010; MSA 2010; Scott 2010].
Different manufacturers’ canisters may have different physical characteristics and different sorbents,
and their software may use different assumptions or default values when performing calculations. For
these reasons, each manufacturer’s software must be considered unique to its own CBRN devices and
cannot be used to estimate breakthrough time for another manufacturer’s device. It is critical to work
with the manufacturer before an incident occurs to learn which breakthrough estimation tools are
available and how to use them. If an incident should occur, the breakthrough time can be quickly
determined for the site-specific conditions. This estimate can then be used to set a change schedule
that is both protective (i.e., it ensures users are not exposed to hazardous contaminant
concentrations) and administratively feasible (i.e., it coincides with users’ break times or end of the
work shift).
Example, Part 2
A CBRN CAP1 APR was selected for the allyl alcohol clean-up crew in Part 1 of this example. The
Cartridge Life Calculator [MSA 2010] was used to estimate breakthrough time with the following
assumptions:
• Inlet concentration: 5 ppm allyl alcohol
• Environmental conditions—Temperature: 68°F, Relative humidity: 60%
• Atmospheric pressure: 760 Torr
• Work (breathing) rate: 60 L/min (moderate work rate)
• No safety factor selected
closely with the respirator manufacturer before an incident occurs to ensure the end user has the
necessary information.
If other information is not available, a rough estimate of breakthrough time can be made using
information from NIOSH testing and worksite conditions. This might be the case, for example, if for
emergency reasons, an APR canister from one manufacturer is used on another manufacturer’s
facepiece. As described in Chapter 2, canisters and cartridges are tested with test representative
agents (TRAs) for six families of gases and vapors. An underlying assumption is that each TRA will have
a breakthrough time no greater than other members of its family [NIOSH 2002]. Therefore, a
breakthrough estimate can be made for all members of a family using the TRA as a surrogate for the
family member. A simple ratio of the NIOSH challenge concentration to the site concentration,
multiplied by the minimum required breakthrough time in the NIOSH certification test provides a
rough estimate of how long a canister or cartridge will last before breakthrough. Because service time
is inversely proportional to flow rate [Colton and Nelson 1997, p. 974–1000], it is acceptable to adjust
the result for breathing rates significantly higher or lower than the test flow rate of 64 L/min.
Figure 4-2. The bar chart shows breakthrough time in minutes on the y-axis and cyclohexane concentration in ppm
on the x-axis. Points on the chart compare Mfr. 1 Applications, Mfr. 2 Applications, and the simple ratios.
This procedure was compared with two manufacturers’ software breakthrough estimates for their
respective CAP1 canisters over a range of cyclohexane concentrations. Input conditions were 60 L/min
breathing rate, sea level pressure, and 60 percent relative humidity. Figure 4-2 shows that the results
were similar at each concentration, with the simple ratio method at or near the shortest
breakthrough estimate.
This simple ratio method must be used with caution, and appropriate safety factors applied when
setting a change schedule.
Example, Part 3
A generic CBRN CAP1 APR was selected for the allyl alcohol cleanup crew in Part 1 of this example.
The organization cannot locate specific service life information or data to allow use of the OSHA or
NIOSH service life calculators. A rough estimate of service life can be made as follows:
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH 94
CHAPTER 4
CBRN RESPIRATOR SELECTION
Change schedule: The estimated breakthrough time is well beyond the 180 minutes the respirators
are expected to be used, even with a safety factor of 3 to account for the use of a surrogate vapor and
the very approximate nature of the method used. The canisters should be discarded at the end of the
task.
Users must recognize that a change schedule represents an estimated maximum amount of
time that cartridges or canisters should be used. Replacement must be done before the
scheduled time if a wearer detects chemical odor or experiences symptoms of exposure, or if
the respirator is damaged in any way.
Summary
The factors that influence selection of CBRN respirators are the same as those that affect respirator
selection in any work environment. Users must understand these principles and the unique
characteristics of CBRN respirators to make the most appropriate selection for a given set of use
conditions. All respirators chosen must be used in the context of a complete respiratory protection
program.
References
3M [2010]. Service life software. Maplewood, MN: The 3M Company.
http://extra8.3m.com/SLSWeb/serviceLifeDisclaimer.html?reglId=20&langCode=EN&countryName=U
nited%20States.
ACGIH [1991]. Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological
exposure indices. Cincinnati (OH): American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.
Colton C, Nelson T [1997]. The occupational environment-its evaluation and control: respiratory
protection. Fairfax , VA: AIHA Press.
Janssen L [2001]. Respiratory protection-a manual and guideline: Emergency escape respirators. 3rd
ed. Fairfax , VA: AIHA Press.
MSA [2010]. Cartridge life expectancy calculator. Cranberry Twp, PA: MSA The Safety Company.
http://webapps2.msasafety.com/responseguide/Home.aspx.
NFPA [2022] NFPA 1990: Standard for protective ensembles for hazardous materials and CBRN
operations. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association.
NIOSH [2002]. Concept for CBRN full facepiece air purifying respirator (APR) standard. Cincinnati, OH:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
https://archive.cdc.gov/#/details?url=https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/standardsdev/cbrn/apr/conce
pts/pdfs/conceptAug19-508.pdf
NIOSH [2006]. List of NIOSH standard protections, cautions and limitations for approval labels.
Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docket/archive/pdfs/niosh-008/0008-100106-handout_7.pdf.
NIOSH [2009]. Recommendations for the selection and use of respirators and protective clothing for
protection against biological agents. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2009-132, https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2009-
132/default.html
NIOSH [2010]. The emergency response safety and health database. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, https://www.cdc.gov/NIOSH/ershdb.
NIOSH [2020]. Pocket guide to chemical hazards. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health, https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg.
NIOSH [2024]. Multivapor version 2.2.3. Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health, https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/multivapor/multivapor.html.
OSHA [1999]. 29 CFR 1910.134 Respiratory protection. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=standards&p_id=12716.
OSHA [2010a]. 29 CFR 1910.1000-1052 Toxic and hazardous substances. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=9991
OSHA [2010b]. The advisor genius: selecting an appropriate respirator. Washington, D.C. Occupational
Safety and Health Administration
https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/respiratory/respirator_selection_advisorgenius.html
Scott [2010]. SureLife cartridge calculator. Monroe, NC: Scott Safety. https://scottu.3m.com/surelife-
calculator/.
These organizations employ law enforcement officers, firefighters, and emergency medical
technicians who respond to chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) and other
hazardous material emergencies. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Worker Protection
regulation, 40 CFR Chapter 1, Part 311 [Worker protection, 2011] also clearly identifies the OSHA
Respiratory Protection regulation, 29 CFR 1910.134, as a requirement for organizations that respond
to CBRN and other hazardous material incidents. National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 470
(Hazardous Materials/Weapons of Mass Destruction [WMD] Standard for Responders) also
references this standard.
T.K. Cloonan, a National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) physical scientist,
presented his findings on the use of CBRN respiratory protection equipment by a number of large U.S.
fire and police departments. As part of this unique assessment of 155 organizations, he interacted
directly with these organizations and evaluated the current content and implementation of their
CBRN respiratory protection programs [Cloonan 2011]. In his interaction with the 42 fire service
organizations contacted, he noted:
• U.S. Tier I fire service organizations continue to use variations of written/non-written
respiratory protection programs. a
• U.S. Tier II and III cities rely on partial/incomplete respiratory protection programs
using policy letters; standard operating procedures; and standards, objectives, and
goals.a
• The use of written respiratory protection programs is not as common in states that
have not implemented a state OSHA program.
• “NIOSH-approved” is misunderstood; many incorrectly equate it with a respirator
approved by NIOSH with CBRN protection.
• Field self-contained breathing apparatus upgraded to CBRN Agent Approved (retrofit)
require quality assurance inspections to ensure the upgrade was done correctly.
In his interaction with the 15 law enforcement organizations contacted, Cloonan noted:
a
Tier I through Tier III classification refers to various Homeland Security risk assessment processes
[Cummings et al. 2006].
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
98
CHAPTER 5
CBRN RESPIRATORY PROTECTION PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
Cloonan’s findings identify the need to develop a compliant respiratory protection program for CBRN
applications for various emergency responder organizations.
The purpose of a CBRN respiratory protection program is to ensure the correct and functional CBRN
respiratory protection is provided to the trained respirator user. The program provides an organized
set of elements to implement to accomplish this purpose. CBRN respiratory protection programs
provide a safety net for emergency responders. The programs ensure they are properly qualified and
trained and their equipment is properly selected and maintained. Proper training and selection will
protect them in emergency situations.
A 1938 American Standard Safety Code [ASA 1938] first recognized the need for various respiratory
protection program elements. A 1959 revision of that code expanded on its work [ASA 1959]. The
specific requirement for a comprehensive respirator program was first laid out in the American
National Standards Institute (ANSI) Z88.2-1969 Standard, “Practices for Respiratory Protection” [ANSI
1969], which was adopted by OSHA as 1910.134 in 1971 [OSHA 1971]. This OSHA respiratory
protection regulation was revised in 1998 [OSHA 1998] and 2006 [OSHA 2006]. An OSHA-compliant
CBRN respiratory protection program currently contains nine elements:
1. Procedures for selecting respirators for use in the workplace
2. Medical evaluations of employees required to use respirators
3. Fit testing procedures for tight-fitting respirators
4. Procedures for proper use of respirators in routine and reasonably foreseeable
emergency situations
5. Procedures and schedules for cleaning, disinfecting, storing, inspecting, repairing,
discarding, and otherwise maintaining respirators
6. Procedures to assure adequate air quality, quantity, and flow of breathing air for
atmosphere-supplying respirators
7. Training of employees in respiratory hazards to which they are potentially exposed
during routine and emergency situations
8. Training of employees in the proper use of respirators, including putting on and
removing them, any limitation of their use, and their maintenance
9. Procedures for regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the program
This written respiratory protection program is required to be updated on a regular basis to reflect
changes in the workplace.
This chapter addresses each of these program elements, some of them will be expanded in separate
chapters of this handbook. To implement each respiratory protection program element, organizations
typically prepare a standard operating procedure (defined as a set of written instructions to
document a routine or repetitive activity followed by the organization) for each program element. The
benefit of developing standard operating procedures for each respiratory protection program
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH 99
CHAPTER 5
CBRN RESPIRATORY PROTECTION PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
element is that it minimizes variation and promotes quality through consistent implementation of
well-defined procedures. Specific reference documents are available to provide recommendations in
the preparation of standard operating procedures [EPA 2007; FEMA 1999; SAFECOM 2006].
Use of these respirators requires a complete respiratory protection program. The employer is
required to provide CBRN respirators, training, and medical evaluations at no cost to the employee.
Chapter 4 on CBRN respirator selection addresses these four categories of information: hazard
analysis, work area conditions, human factors, and respirator capabilities. This chapter provides more
detailed information about the respirator selection process and these four categories of information,
including specific examples of how to utilize them for respirator selection.
The PLHCP reviews this information and provides the employer with a determination for each
employee, including whether the employee cannot use a respirator (no usage), full respirator usage, or
limited respirator usage (with specific restrictions). Assessing the ability of the worker to safely
tolerate the physiological burden created by wearing a CBRN respirator is the purpose of the medical
evaluation. Additional information on this subject is available in Chapter 8.
The pre-placement medical evaluation must occur prior to fit testing and the use of any respirator.
There is no specific time interval for additional medical evaluations, but they must be provided based on
observations or a request by the PLHCP, respirator program administrator, respirator fit tester,
supervisor, or the worker. An additional evaluation is also required if the worker is assigned to a
different job with a greater physiological burden (e.g., higher work rate, additional protective
clothing, or higher temperatures).
Specific medical evaluation requirements for the Fire Service are provided in NFPA 1582, “Standard
on Comprehensive Occupational Medical Program for Fire Departments” [NFPA 2013b]. ANSI Z88.6-
2006, “American National Standard for Respiratory Protection-Physical Qualifications for Respirator
Use,”[ANSI 2006] provides additional information related to medical evaluations for workers required
to use respirators.
improper donning can be demonstrated quickly by smell, taste, or with direct readout
instrumentation.
The two general types of fit testing techniques are qualitative and quantitative. Qualitative fit testing
utilizes the worker’s senses of taste or smell to detect the test agent and to determine success of
proper respirator fit. Quantitative fit testing, on the other hand, uses a separate analytical instrument
to determine if there has been a measurable leak of the respirator.
Additional fit testing is required when a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model, or make) is
used, or at least annually after the initial test. Additional fit tests must also be provided when
observations are made that identify changes in the respirator user’s physical condition that could
affect respirator fit. Such conditions include, but are not limited to, facial scarring, dental changes,
cosmetic surgery, facial piercings, or an obvious change in body weight. Fit testing is required for all
tight-fitting respirators, such as CBRN SCBAs, PAPRs equipped with a tight-fitting full facepiece, and
APRs.
Differently than a fit test, another way to evaluate respirator fit is by checking the facepiece seal of a
CBRN respirator. OSHA requires the positive or negative pressure user seal check test be successfully
completed after each donning of a CBRN tight-fitting respirator.
Additional information and details on respirator fit testing are provided in Chapter 6.
Procedures for Proper Use of CBRN Respirators in Routine and Reasonably Foreseeable
Emergency Situations
Procedures are necessary to instruct the worker on the proper use of CBRN respirators in routine and
reasonably foreseeable emergency situations. These procedures must ensure the worker knows how
to use the CBRN respirator properly to obtain the necessary level of protection. A clean and
unobstructed respirator-sealing surface on the wearer’s face is pivotal in ensuring the respirator seals
properly. When other personal protective equipment is provided, the employer shall ensure that it
does not interfere with the seal of the facepiece.
CBRN respirator use procedures should forbid facial hair that interferes with the respirator-sealing
surface. Controlling facial hair has presented ongoing respirator program issues for decades. A
personnel policy that clearly states that facial hair is not permitted for specific jobs that require the
use of CBRN respirators with tight-fitting facepieces is the best way to address this issue. Some
accommodation can be made for facial hair by using a PAPR equipped with a hood, but this respirator
cannot be used in an immediately dangerous to life or health (IDLH) environment or when
concentrations exceed 1000 times the OSHA permissible exposure limit.
The procedures should also forbid the use of eyeglass temple bars or straps that interfere with the
respirator-sealing surface. If the user requires corrective lenses, specific manufacturer spectacle insert
kits with the appropriate prescription lenses shall be provided. Alternatively, contact lenses can be
worn.
Another required procedure should lay out an ongoing activity to determine the effectiveness of CBRN
respirators in use. This activity requires an evaluation of how the respirators are used and maintained
in the field as well as how the worker behaves when using the respirator. When respirator
performance or use problems are observed in the field, the employer must make sure the worker
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH 102
CHAPTER 5
CBRN RESPIRATORY PROTECTION PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
leaves the respirator use area before removing the respirator to address the issue. Any issues
identified should be documented and corrected. OSHA requires a separate procedure for entry into
IDLH atmospheres that lists the specific requirements and details to be followed. This IDLH procedure
should address:
• Dedicated outside standby person
• Communication between entrant and outside standby
• Appropriate training and equipment (SCBA or positive pressure airline respirator with
five minute escape cylinder) for the entrant(s) and outside standby to provide effective
emergency rescue
• Communication with the employer by the outside standby before undertaking a rescue
• Appropriate employer action when informed of a rescue being initiated
• Appropriate entrant retrieval equipment, where appropriate
• Equivalent means for rescue where retrieval equipment is not required
The IDLH environment for structural firefighting requires at least two firefighters be located on the
outside of the IDLH environment when two or more firefighters enter the IDLH environment. All
firefighters involved in structural firefighting must be equipped with SCBAs. Checklists that summarize
the requirements of these procedures make good training aids and improve the understanding,
performance, and compliance.
that the NIOSH Approved CBRN APR canister selected provides protection at the same level (e.g., CAP
1 or Cap 2, etc.) as the canister specified on the NIOSH CBRN approval label.
Use of components not listed on the full NIOSH approval label for the CBRN respirator
constitutes configurations not included in the NIOSH CBRN approval and may result in serious
injury and/or death of the wearer.
Respirators must be stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme
temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals. They must also be packed or stored to
prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve.
CBRN respirators and cartridges must be kept in their original packages per the manufacturer’s
instructions. CBRN respirators maintained for emergency response purposes must be inspected at
least monthly and immediately prior to use. Emergency escape respirators must be inspected before
being taken into the workplace for use.
Procedures to Ensure Adequate Air Quality, Quantity, and Flow of Breathing Air for
Atmosphere-Supplying CBRN Respirators
Breathing air for CBRN atmosphere-supplying respirators is required to meet purity and quality levels
for content and not exceed certain contaminant levels and moisture requirements. OSHA requires
that CBRN respirator breathing air meet the requirements for Grade D breathing air described in ANSI
G-7.1-2011 [ANSI/CGA 2001].
Cylinders used to supply breathing air to respirators must be tested and maintained as prescribed by
the Department of Transportation [Transportation specifications, 2006]. When air is purchased in
cylinders, a certificate of analysis must be obtained from the supplier to assure that the breathing air
meets the Grade D specification. The moisture content in the cylinders must not exceed a dew point
of -50°F (-45.6°C) at one atmosphere pressure.
If a compressor is used to supply breathing air for SCBA tank filling or for airline respirators, the
compressor should be located so that contaminated air does not enter the air supply system.
Moisture content should be controlled so that the dew point at one atmosphere pressure is 10°F
below ambient temperature. The compressor should also be equipped with suitable in-line air-
purifying sorbent beds and filters to further ensure breathing air quality. Carbon monoxide breathing
air levels must not exceed 10 parts per million (ppm) for non-oil-lubricated compressors. Oil-
lubricated compressors must be equipped with a high-temperature or carbon monoxide monitor or
both to monitor for carbon monoxide. If only a high-temperature alarm is used, the breathing air
must be monitored at intervals to prevent carbon monoxide levels in the breathing air from
exceeding 10 ppm. Breathing air hose couplings shall be unique to prevent the connection to non-
respirable air or other gas systems. Breathing air cylinders shall be marked in accordance with the
NIOSH certification standard, 42 CFR Part 84.
NFPA 1989, “Standard on Breathing Air Quality for Emergency Service Respiratory Protection,”[NFPA
2013e] requires quarterly air sampling from breathing air systems to confirm compliance with
requirements for oxygen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, condensed oil and particulate content,
water content, non-methane volatile organic compounds, odor, and nitrogen content. Commercial
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH 104
CHAPTER 5
CBRN RESPIRATORY PROTECTION PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
contractors provide this quarterly sampling service utilizing a sampling system that is returned for
analysis after the sample is collected. Sample results from some services are available on the web
within a short period of time.
NFPA provides specific firefighter training requirements for SCBAs in NFPA 1404, “Standard for Fire
Service Respiratory Protection Training” [NFPA 2013a]. Additional information on employee training
can be found in Chapter 9.
Recordkeeping
OSHA requires the employer to establish and retain written information regarding medical
evaluations, fit testing, and the respiratory protection program. Medical records must be preserved
and maintained for at least the duration of employment plus 30 years, with several exceptions noted
in the section addressing access to employee exposure and medical records, 29 CFR 1910.1020
[Access to employee exposure records, 2006]. Qualitative and quantitative fit test results must be
kept until the next fit test is administered. A written copy of the respiratory protection program must
also be retained.
Summary
A major task of the emergency services respiratory protection program manager is the preparation,
implementation, and revision of the elements of the respiratory protection program and the various
standard operating procedures identified in the respiratory protection program. Each of the nine
OSHA respiratory protection program elements can require one or more standard operating
procedures. The addition of CBRN respiratory protection requires the inclusion of additional
information and in some cases the creation of additional standard operating procedures. Appendix C
contains two respirator program examples from a fire and police organization for review: Sonoma
County Fire and Emergency Services Department, Respiratory Protection Program, Revised 2/20/11;
[Sonoma County Fire and Emergency Services Department 2011] and the Fort Collins Police Services,
Office of Chief of Police, Directive No. D-6, Respiratory Protection Policy, March 24, 2009 [Fort Collins
Police Services 2009]. These examples are provided to illustrate how different organizations address
standard operating procedures and a respiratory protection program.
References
ANSI [1969]. ANSI Z88.2 Practices for respiratory protection. Washington, DC: American National
Standards Institute.
ANSI [2006]. ANSI Z88.6-2006: Practices for respiratory protection–physical qualifications for respirator
use. Washington, DC: American National Standards Institute.
ANSI/CGA [2001]. ANSI/CGA G-7.1-1997: Commodity specification for air. Washington, DC: American
National Standards Institute.
ASA [1938]. ASA Z2: American standard safety code for the protection of heads, eyes, and respiratory
organs. Washington, DC: American Standards Association Inc.
ASA [1959]. ASA Z2.1 American standard safety code for head, eye, and respiratory protection. New
York, NY: American Standards Association Inc.
Cloonan TK [2011]. CBRN respiratory protection program design. Poster presented at the NPPTL
Stakeholders Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, March 29.
Cummings MC, Mcgarvey DC, Vinch PM [2006]. Homeland security risk assessment. Methods,
techniques, and tools. Vol II. Arlington, VA: Homeland Security Institute.
EPA [2007]. Guidance for preparing standard operating procedures (SOPs). Washington, DC: US
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information, https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/.
FEMA [1999]. Guide to developing effective standard operating procedures for fire and EMS
departments. Emmitsburg, MD: US Fire Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency,
https://www.sopcenter.com/downloads/fema-sop-documents/465-fema-fa-197/file.html.
Fort Collins Police Services [2009]. Respiratory protection policy. Directive No. D-6. Fort Collins, CO:
Fort Collins Police Services.
NFPA [2013a]. NFPA 1404: Standard for fire service respiratory protection training. Quincy, MA:
National Fire Protection Association.
NFPA [2013b]. NFPA 1582: Standard on competence occupational medical program for fire
departments. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association.
NFPA [2013c]. NFPA 1989: Standard on breathing air quality for emergency services respiratory
protection. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association.
NFPA [2022]. NFPA 470:Hazardous materials/weapons of mass destruction (WMD) standard for
responders. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association.
OSHA [1971]. 29 CFR 1910.134 Respiratory protection. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=standards&p_id=12716.
OSHA [1990]. 29 CFR 1910.120 Hazardous waste operations and emergency response. Washington,
DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=9765.
OSHA [1998]. 29 CFR 1910.134 Respiratory protection. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=standards&p_id=12716.
OSHA [1999]. 29 CFR 1910.134 Respiratory protection. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=standards&p_id=12716.
OSHA [2006]. 29 CFR 1910.1020 Access to employee exposure and medical records. Washington, DC:
U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
https://www.osha.gov/laws-
regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.1020#:~:text=This%20section%20applies%20to%20each
%20general%20industry%2C%20maritime%2C,exposed%20to%20toxic%20substances%20or%20harmf
ul%20physical%20agents.
OSHA [2006]. 29 CFR 1910.134 Respiratory protection. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=standards&p_id=12716.
SAFECOM [2006]. Writing guide for standard operating procedures. Washington, DC: Department of
Homeland Security, Office for Interoperability and Compatibility, SAFECOM,
https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Writing%20Guide%20for%20Standard%20Opera
ting%20Procedures_0.pdf#:~:text=%20%20%20Title%20%20%20Writing%20Guide,Created%20Date%2
0%20%2011%2F2%2F2006%201%3A49%3A03%20PM%20.
Sonoma County Fire and Emergency Services Department [2011]. Procedure manual, safety program,
respiratory protection program. Santa Rosa, CA: Sonoma County Fire and Emergency Services
Department, Appendix C-2.
Transportation specifications for shipping containers. 49 CFR, Part 173 and Part 178 (2006).
specify a fit factor higher than 500 for their full facepiece respirators in the user instructions.
Manufacturer-specified fit factors currently range from 500 to 2500 and must be identified by the
respirator program manager and used by the respirator fit test (RFT) operator to determine the
correct pass/fail value for that specific respirator. As noted previously, OSHA requires the minimum
pass level of 500 for quantitative fit tests for tight-fitting full facepiece respirators, but it would allow
a manufacturer’s higher pass level to be used. Because of the positive pressure maintained inside the
full facepiece for these classes of respirators, a qualitative fit test is permitted. The general purpose
for these tests on positive pressure respirators is to identify significant facepiece-to-face leaks. The
quantitative fit test is only required when the fit test is used for negative pressure CBRN air-purifying
respirator facepieces.
Respirator fit testing provides the opportunity for hands-on training of the respirator wearer. This
training complements normal classroom or computer-based training typically provided to respirator
users. In either a qualitative or quantitative fit test, a RFT operator observes the wearer as they put on
the respirator, adjust the strap tightness, position the respirator on the face and the straps on the
head, and carry out a positive and/or negative user seal check. During the mask donning and checking
process, the RFT operator can provide hands-on instruction, as needed, to ensure the mask is worn
properly and the user seal checks are conducted correctly. The RFT operator can also demonstrate the
test results (and thus the danger) of improper donning.
To achieve the required level of respiratory protection for CBRN agents, some respirator
manufacturers specify a fit factor higher than 500 for their full facepiece respirators in the user
instructions. Manufacturer-specified fit factors currently range from 500 to 2500 and must be
identified by the respirator program manager and used by the RFT operator to determine the correct
pass/fail value for that specific respirator. As noted previously, OSHA requires the minimum pass level
of 500 for quantitative fit tests for tight-fitting full facepiece respirators but would allow a
manufacturer’s higher pass level to be used.
The general qualitative fit test and quantitative fit test requirements and instructions for both the
person being fit tested and the person conducting the fit test are provided in the mandatory Appendix
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH 110
CHAPTER 7
CBRN EQUIPMENT AND THE WEARER
A [OSHA 1998] of 29 CFR 1910.134. This standardizes the methods used and provides more consistent
fit test results.
Before being fit tested, the test subject must first pass a user seal check. A general overview of each
test is provided below with specific procedural details, where appropriate.
12. Test subject carries out the required fit test exercises, and the test atmosphere is replenished every
30 seconds with one half of the original number of nebulizer squeezes used (5, 10, or 15). If the taste
of saccharin is detected at any time during the required exercises, the fit is deemed unsatisfactory,
and the test is failed. If the taste of saccharin is not detected throughout all of the required exercises,
the test is passed.
Bitrex (Denatonium Benzoate) Method
Bitrex is bitter-tasting chemical that is widely used as a taste aversion agent in household liquids. It
can be aerosolized easily using a nebulizer to make a small aerosol test atmosphere. The steps in a
Bitrex test are as follows:
13. RFT operator verifies the sensitivity of the test subject to the taste of Bitrex.
• Test subject places a small portable enclosure placed over their head. The enclosure
has a ¾-inch hole at nose level.
• RFT operator fills a specified commercially available nebulizer with a specified solution
of Bitrex and five percent salt water. RFT operator inserts the nebulizer outlet nozzle
into the ¾-inch hole and squeezes it 10 times.
• If the test subject detects a bitter taste, they are ready to proceed with the test.
• RFT operator can administer two additional 10-squeeze exposures to determine if the
test subject can taste the Bitrex. The RFT operator notes the number of 10-squeeze
exposures and uses this information for the respirator test.
• If the subject tastes nothing after three tries, the test may not be performed on that
subject.
14. The qualified test subject dons the CBRN full facepiece respirator, equipped with the appropriate
filters, performs a user seal check, and places the enclosure over the respirator and their head.
15. RFT operator inserts the nebulizer nozzle into the ¾-inch hole and completes one, two, or three ten-
squeeze exposures, based on the taste test.
16. Test subject carries out the required fit test exercises and the test atmosphere is replenished every
30 seconds with one-half of the original number of nebulizer squeezes used (5, 10, or 15). If the taste
of Bitrex is detected at any time during the required exercises, the fit is deemed unsatisfactory, and
the test is failed. If the taste of Bitrex is not detected throughout all the required exercises, the test is
passed.
Irritant Smoke (Stannic Chloride) Method13
Irritant smoke tubes contain a mixture of vermiculite and stannic chloride. When the ends of the tube
are removed and a squeeze bulb is attached to one end, the ambient humidity of the air forced
through the tube produces a white smoke consisting of hydrogen chloride and tin compounds.
Exposure to this test agent causes an immediate involuntary cough in the test subject. The test must
be performed in an area with adequate ventilation to prevent test agent exposure to the RFT
operator. The CBRN full facepiece respirator must be equipped with P100® filters. The steps in an
irritant smoke test are as follows:
13
NIOSH does not recommend the use of this test method because of the health risk associated with the
exposure to irritant smoke, hydrochloric acid [NIOSH 2005].
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH 112
CHAPTER 7
CBRN EQUIPMENT AND THE WEARER
17. RFT operator uses a weak concentration of the irritant smoke to confirm the test subject’s response.
18. Test subject dons the respirator and performs a user seal check to confirm the seal integrity.
19. RFT operator directs a stream of irritant smoke toward the face seal area and moves the smoke
stream around the perimeter of the mask.
20. Test subject carries out the required fit test exercises and if any irritant smoke is detected the test is
failed. If no irritant smoke is detected throughout the required fit test exercises and a final sensitivity
response is confirmed, the fit test is passed.
29. RFT operator compares the inside concentration to the outside concentration for each exercise and
averages them to determine the average leak rate (penetration) and fit factor for the respirator.
These calculations can be automated using a computer and software provided by the equipment
manufacturer.
Controlled Negative Pressure Method
The controlled negative pressure quantitative fit test method uses air molecules as the test agent. An
instrument is used to generate a negative pressure inside the facepiece of the respirator, while the
subject holds their breath to measure the resulting volumetric air leak rate.
The negative pressure generated in the respirator facepiece corresponds to a specific predetermined
inspiratory flow rate. To perform this test, the respirator must be modified with the appropriate
controlled negative pressure test adaptors before the test subject dons it.
The steps in a controlled negative pressure test are as follows:
30. Test subject dons the modified respirator.
31. Test subject completes a required set of exercises, stopping at the completion of each exercise to
permit the controlled negative pressure measurement device to determine the leak rate. Before the
measurement is initiated, the test subject takes a breath and holds it. The controlled negative
pressure monitor is started, produces a negative pressure in the respirator, and measures the flow of
air exhausted to maintain a constant pressure during the test period.
32. RFT operator measures the exhausted air after each exercise and uses the measurement to calculate
the leak rate (penetration) and fit factor for the respirator (e.g., OHD Fit Tester 3000).
quantitative fit test methods previously described require each exercise to be carried out for one
minute, except the grimace exercise that must be performed for 15 seconds. The grimace exercise is
not required for any of the qualitative fit test methods, and the results from this test are not used in
calculating the overall respirator fit factor for the quantitative fit tests. One can expect the results
from the individual fit test exercises to vary, but it is the overall fit factor of the respirator that is used
to determine pass or fail of a quantitative respirator fit test.
Summary
Respirator fit is a critical component for providing adequate CBRN respiratory protection and a major
part of any respirator program. The primary purpose of respirator fit testing is to choose a specific
make, model, style, and size of a tight-fitting CBRN full facepiece respirator that properly fits the
wearer. Qualitative and quantitative fit test procedures and equipment, as well as specific test
exercises, should be followed to determine if a respirator fits properly. Positive and negative pressure
user seal checks are also available to confirm the respirator is being worn correctly. Initial and annual
respirator fit testing and use of a user seal check as part of each donning are major components in
providing respiratory protection to workers wearing CBRN respirators.
References
AIHA/ANSI [2010]. ANSI/AIHA Z88.10-2010 Respirator fit testing methods. Washington, DC: American
Industrial Hygiene Association: American National Standards Institute, Inc.
ANSI [1969]. ANSI Z88.2-1969 American national standard practices for respiratory protection.
Washington, DC: American National Standards Institute.
ANSI [1980]. ANSI Z88.2-1980 American national standard practices for respiratory protection.
Washington, DC: American National Standards Institute.
NIOSH [2005]. NIOSH respirator selection logic. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2005-100, https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2005-100/.
OSHA [1971]. 29 CFR 1910.134 Respiratory protection. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=standards&p_id=12716.
OSHA [1998]. 29 CFR 1910.134 Respiratory Protection, Appendix A. Washington, DC: U.S. Department
of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=9780.
OSHA [2011]. Interpretation of the fit-testing requirements for CBRN respirators. Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
USBM [1934]. Schedule 21, procedure for testing filter-type dust, fume, and mist respirators for
permissibility. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Interior, United States Bureau of Mines.
At the end of this chapter is a summary of physiological adjustments to exercise. This summary
explains what goes on inside the body when working and aids understanding of the effects of
respirators and other personal protective equipment (PPE) on responders in emergency situations.
Gases/Vapors
Many of the gases and vapors produced in a fire are classified as asphyxiants or irritants [Harrison and
Elkabir 2006]. The most common are carbon monoxide and hydrogen cyanide.
Carbon monoxide, like oxygen, links to hemoglobin in the red blood cells but, unlike oxygen, does not
release easily. Carbon monoxide, a product of incomplete combustion of hydrocarbons, is about 200
times more tightly bound to hemoglobin than is oxygen. If enough hemoglobin sites for oxygen are
filled with carbon monoxide, body cells can no longer be supplied with sufficient oxygen, and death is
imminent. If exposure to carbon monoxide is nonlethal, it can still lead to serious complications even
at low carbon monoxide concentrations. The victim must either be placed in hyperbaric oxygen
chamber for a long time to force the carbon monoxide to leave the hemoglobin sites or be given
supplemental oxygen through some other means. Even then, some central nervous system damage
may persist.
Hydrogen cyanide is also dangerous [Caretti et al. 2007; Harrison and Elkabir 2006]. Cyanide
irreversibly binds to an enzyme in cells critical for the metabolism of glucose to form energy. As a
result, cells cannot use oxygen from the blood, and the person can die if enough hydrogen cyanide is
inhaled. Humans, as well as other animals, have a small tolerance to cyanide, but the concentration of
cyanide in a fire can cause death [Jones et al. 1987].
Irritants may be either inorganic or organic and are usually produced when organic materials in
furniture, wallboard, resins, adhesives, paint, pesticides, petroleum, plastics, solvents, and other
construction materials are burned [Harrison and Elkabir 2006; Sumi and Tsuchiya 1973]. This class of
contaminants causes immediate irritation of the respiratory tract. Those that are water-soluble
irritate the upper airways, whereas insoluble gases irritate the lower airways. Depending on the
nature of the gas or vapor, irritation may range from mild to severe. The bronchial airways may
constrict in response to serious irritation, cutting off air to the lungs.
Rescue workers and others exposed to the dusts, gases, and fumes at the World Trade Center site in
New York were tested, and some were found to lack the ability to detect odors and irritants years
after they left the area [LaTourrette et al. 2003; NIOSH 2024]. The insidious property of irritating gases
is a major reason why implementing change schedules for canisters, rather than relying on
responders’ sensory warnings, is necessary in emergency response situations where responders use
air-purifying respirators. Responders may not realize they are being affected by the irritants.
Chemical agents may also be present at the site of a terrorist attack. There are a number of possible
effects with gases or vapors, including neuromuscular (e.g., sarin), irritating (e.g., tear gas, chlorine),
asphyxiants (e.g., cyanide), and lung dysfunction (phosgene) as only some of the many possible
examples. Sarin vapors were released in an attack in Tokyo in 1995 killing 12 people and severely
injuring 50 [Wikipedia 2012].
Particulates/Dusts
Many particulates form in events such as fires and structural collapse [Savolainen and Kirchner 1997].
These can range in size from nanoparticles (on the order of 10-9 meters, or 10-7 inches) to 50-100
microns (10-6 meters, or 10-4 inches). Larger particles require the turbulence of flame and smoke
convection to remain airborne. Inhaled particles larger than 5-10 microns can be deposited on the
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH 118
CHAPTER 7
CBRN EQUIPMENT AND THE WEARER
walls of the respiratory system. The deposited particles are entrapped in mucous lining the
epithelium, and cila in the epithelial cells vibrate to move the particle-laden mucous toward the
throat. When at the throat, they can be swallowed or expelled. Smoking cigarettes can impair cilia
function reducing their ability to remove particles from the lung.
Inhaled particles smaller in size than 10 microns are called “respirable dust.” Some of these particles
may not impact the airway walls and can reach the alveolar level (bottom level) of
the lung.
There they can stay and cause lung damage or be dissolved and absorbed into the body. Even
chemically relatively inert substances such as gold or titanium dioxide can become toxic in these small
sizes [Karn and Mathews 2007]. Some nanoparticles have been shown to be carcinogenic in animals.
The dusts and other contaminants to which emergency workers were exposed at the World Trade
Center site were hazardous but not unusual, and the concentrations of individual contaminants in the
dust were not unusually high [LaTourrette et al. 2003; Westfeld 2006]. Workers had prolonged
exposure to a complex mixture, and many did not wear respirators. Inhalation of toxic, highly alkaline
dust (pH 10–11) is the probable cause of much of the upper and lower respiratory injury in rescue
and recovery workers. According to the World Trade Center Health Program at a Glance [NIOSH
2024], as of March 31, 2024, over 11,800 responders still suffer from respiratory disorders and/or
pulmonary disease. Chrysotile asbestos fibers (Figure 7-1) were also present in the debris from the
World Trade Center collapse. Chrysotile asbestos is the most used form of asbestos in developed
countries. Reactions in the lungs caused by asbestos fibers can result in asbestosis (thickening and
scarring of tissue that is called fibrosis which makes breathing difficult), lung cancer, or mesothelioma
(a lethal cancer that affects the pleura [covering] of the lung) after a significant lag period [NIH 2011].
Particulates can also cause a condition known as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, in which the
tissue structure of the lung breaks down until it becomes difficult to exhale [NIH 2010]. chronic
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH 119
CHAPTER 7
CBRN EQUIPMENT AND THE WEARER
obstructive pulmonary disease is the fourth leading cause of death in the United States [ALA 2012;
NIH 2010].
Radiological Products
The danger posed by radiological products depends on the type of radiation (alpha, beta, or gamma)
emitted by the particular contaminant. Even the most energetic alpha particle from radioactive decay
can be stopped by the outermost layer of dead skin that covers the body. Therefore, exposure to most
alpha particles originating outside the body is not a serious hazard. On the other hand, if alpha-emitting
radioactive materials are taken inside the body by inhalation, they can be the most damaging source of
radiation exposure. Respirators will provide protection against the inhalation of radiological particles,
however, they won’t negate the effect of radiation (e.g., if beta or gamma emitters are present).
The short range of the alpha particle causes the damaging effects of the radiation to be concentrated in a
very localized area as small as few cells.
Beta radiation is a light, short-range particle and is actually an ejected electron. Beta radiation may travel
several feet in air and is moderately penetrating and can penetrate human skin to the “germinal layer,”
where new skin cells are produced. Like alpha-emitters, beta-emitting contaminants are the most harmful
if deposited internally through inhalation.
Gamma rays emit extremely high-energy photons which can travel through most forms of matter because
they have no mass. When inhaled, the ionizations caused by gamma-emitters take place over a greater
area compared to alpha- and beta-emitters.
Plutonium is often mentioned as a potential terrorist threat [Sutcliffe et al. 1995]. Inhaled plutonium
is much more dangerous than is ingested plutonium because small particles of respirable size can
penetrate the lung and enter body cells via the blood stream. A typical respirable plutonium particle
that is three microns in size has a mass of about 1.4×10-10 grams and has a risk of increasing cancer in
the person inhaling the particle of only 0.00017 percent [Sutcliffe et al. 1995].
Biological Agents
Almost any bacterium, virus, or prion that causes human disease can be used by terrorists to provoke
panic in the population. Prions are abnormal proteins that are implicated in Jakob-Cruetzfeldt and
Alzheimer’s diseases in humans [Johnson 2011]. As long as respiratory protection is used and worn
properly, sufficient protection is available to stop the threat.
The most notorious bacterial agent used in the recent past is anthrax, caused by a bacterium belonging
to a class of toxin-producing microbes. Others in this class, such as Salmonella, Listeria, and
Clostridium, produce food poisonings of various kinds. The recent outbreaks of Ebola and Zika were
caused by viruses.
Anthrax is particularly dangerous because its endospore form is hardy and respirable, measuring one
to five microns in diameter. The endospores can cause the anthrax disease if they contact the skin or
if they are inhaled. They are much more dangerous if inhaled. It takes an inhalation of 8,000-10,000
endospores to kill an average person. As few as 100 endospores may kill those most susceptible [Park
2001]. As with most, but not all biological agents, these bacteria need time to grow to a dangerous
population size within the body, and therefore are not immediately lethal.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH 120
CHAPTER 7
CBRN EQUIPMENT AND THE WEARER
Another biological agent of interest is ricin, a toxic material derived from castor beans. Ricin interferes
with cellular metabolism and can be particularly dangerous if swallowed or inhaled as a dust or mist.
Respirator high-efficiency particulate filters can easily remove these particles from the air.
Heat
Heat can dry and burn unprotected skin. It can also damage lung tissue to the point that oxygen and
carbon dioxide can no longer be exchanged.
exhalation contract actively). Previous work seems to indicate that inspiratory and expiratory
resistance effects are equivalent [Caretti et al. 2007], although testing using very high expiratory
resistance resulted in severely degraded performance [Johnson et al. 1997d].
The effects of APR inspiratory resistance on performance are felt most at very intense exercise (80-85
percent maximum oxygen consumption) [Johnson et al. 1992a, 1999a, 2000b]. Performance time
decreases linearly with increased inspiratory resistance at this exercise intensity. A resistance level of
3.5 cm H2O-sec/L is expected to result in a 30 percent performance decrement [Johnson et al. 1999b].
Because of this, one might expect performance with PAPRs to be better than with APRs, but this has
yet to be definitively shown. In addition, the extra weight of the blower and tubing may counteract at
least some of the advantage of lower resistance [Johnson et al. 1999a].
Extreme environmental conditions may drastically shorten PAPR battery capacity. If the battery fails
to provide sufficient current to power the blower motor, the filtration capacity of the device would
still be present. However, it would become an unpowered APR with significant inspiratory resistance
and dead volume and carbon dioxide accumulation (especially if there is no check valve located
between the blower and the wearer). Breathing under this circumstance may become more of a
burden, but the respirator must still be worn to provide respiratory protection. Wearers must be
trained to leave the contaminated area immediately if this occurs.
Extra inspiratory resistance promotes hypoventilation of the wearer (lower volumes of air breathed
and smaller amounts of oxygen used). This can result in an earlier transition from aerobic (using
oxygen) to anaerobic (no oxygen needed) respiration and faster progress toward the maximum
tolerance for exercise (maximum oxygen debt) [Johnson et al. 1999a]. Consequently, higher
resistance filters can be expected to need smaller filtering capacity because of the reduced air
breathed through them.
Exhaled carbon dioxide (dead volume) accumulates in the voids between the respirator and the face
and returns it to the respiratory system during the next inspiration. This carbon dioxide then acts as a
respiratory stimulant. Because carbon dioxide is a psychoactive gas, dead volume may also produce
discomfort and a performance decrement at low-intensity work [Billings 1973, pp 35–63]. A typical
value for APR respirator dead volume is 350 milliliters. Such a dead volume is expected to reduce
performance time by 19 percent at 80 to 85 percent of maximum oxygen uptake [Johnson et al.
2000a]. Dead volume may be reduced by choosing a PAPR over an APR.
Intense exercise uses more air than does moderate exercise [Mackey et al. 2005], and because very
intense exercise metabolism has a higher anaerobic component than does moderate exercise
metabolism, the air that is used is not consumed as efficiently as it is at lower intensity [Johnson et al.
2005d]. This can severely limit the time spent immersed in the emergency environment. Some SCBAs
recycle spent air, but there is still some air blown off through exhalation valves (no closed-circuit
SCBAs have been approved for CBRN use as of this writing). The net result of spent air expulsion is
that tank air depletes much more rapidly at high work rates than at moderate work rates.
eliminate fogging but are not always effective. Fog-proof lenses are available on some models. Fog-
proofing solutions that can be applied to the face shield are also available. Cold can also cause valve
sticking and stiffen the rubber facepiece material to the point that it prevents a good facial seal. Cold
rubber has a higher thermal conductivity than does still air, so in still, cold air the face may be cooled
by the respirator. In a cold wind, however, the facepiece may add a small amount of insulation to the
face.
Use of respirators in hot conditions leads to several difficulties:
1. Facial temperatures inside the facepiece can cause discomfort. Facial skin temperatures are
more important for comfort than skin temperatures in other parts of the body. PAPR blowers
send filtered air over the face that evaporates sweat and cools the face [Johnson et al. 1999a,
2005a]. SCBA air expands and cools when released from the cylinder; this cool air can help
alleviate facial discomfort. Some SCBAs have coolant packs used to further cool supplied air
before it reaches the facepiece. APRs, however, have been found to be uncomfortable in the
heat because they do not supply cool air.
2. At moderate work rates (50 to 70 percent of maximum oxygen uptake, or maximum exercise
capacity), respirators impede the loss of heat from the face and can result in hyperthermia
occurring sooner. This is not usually a problem except when the rest of the body is sealed in
protective clothing. With no easy means to lose heat, the body can overheat, especially in hot
and active conditions.
3. Sweat produced inside the facepiece can accumulate and cause discomfort, interfere with
breathing, and cause exhalation valve sticking [Johnson et al. 1997c]. Accumulated sweat can
cause a respirator facepiece to slip on the face and promote leakage.
Figure 7-2. Effect of body temperature on dexterity, cognition, and motor skills.
The x-axis of the line chart shows body temperature in degrees Celsius; the y-
axis shows performance decrement as a percentage. Three lines represent
worsening dexterity, cognition, and motor skills as body temperature increases.
Heat can also affect the ability to recognize dangers, make coordinated movements, and perform
manual tasks. As deep body temperature increases, dexterity, cognition, and motor skills degrade
significantly, as shown in Figure 7-2 [Johnson et al. 1992b]. One of the most dangerous effects of
overheating is disorientation and not being able to recognize the direction to safety in the event of
extreme danger. This inability to recognize safe passage has contributed to past deaths [MSHA 2002].
Humidity in the air has a profound effect on the ability of the body to lose heat when there is exposed
skin or when the respiratory system breathes ambient air directly. When humidity tends toward
saturation (100 percent relative humidity), it is more difficult for moisture to evaporate into the air. Loss
of heat through sweating and loss of moisture through breathing are inversely related to the amount
of moisture in the air.
When fully encapsulated in CBRN protective gear, however, the likelihood that there will be areas of
exposed skin is small. In that case, the effect of ambient relative humidity on heat loss is little to
none. APR and PAPR filters remove at least some of the humidity from the air that is inhaled by the
wearer. High humidity conditions may promote respirator lens fogging.
times the distance compared to communicating by single words [Coyne et al. 1998]. Simple words and
phrases are unable to be understood 27 percent of the time at distances as close as two feet.
When telephones or radios are used for long-distance communication, a 10 percent error rate in
recognition of words and a 50 percent increase in the time required to recognize the words can be
expected [Johnson et al. 2000c,d, 2001b]. Because standard telephone and radio equipment
dimensions are not entirely compatible with respirator facepieces, protocols should be established to
let the user know when to move the earpiece from the ear and to move the mouthpiece in front of
the speech diaphragm. Training in the use of these protocols is essential.
Special communication equipment is available from some manufacturers, and some respirators
include speech diaphragms or are made of materials that enhance speech transmission.
If responders are close enough to see each other, a lot of communication can take place with hand
signals. There are some generally accepted hand signals that denote easily understood, simple
messages (examples of these are thumbs up for agreement, a finger across the throat for danger, an
upright palm to indicate “stop,” and pointing to indicate direction). These will be harder to see in a
smoky environment and with gloves on, so there is a distance penalty even with hand signals.
One of the most difficult impediments to clear communication is accented speech. If speech cannot be
clearly understood without a respirator, it will be nearly impossible with a respirator. Hand signals
may serve to overcome speech understanding, but different cultures may also have different
interpretations of hand signals.
Dust, mist, smoke, condensation, or water flowing down over the facepiece lenses can reduce vision
during an emergency and in turn negatively impact, task performance as shown in Figure 7-3 [Johnson
et al. 1994]. Extra training under these conditions might be warranted. Disorientation in a low-
visibility environment is common and may make it difficult to know how to move or which is the
Figure 7-3. The x-axis of the line chart shows Snellen eye chart scores from 0 to 12; the y-axis shows performance as a
percentage. Three lines chart control panel recognition, tracking, and random touch.
safest direction to go. Although visual acuity has little to no effect on performance of intense physical
activity, wearing a full facepiece respirator while walking, running, or driving can erode visual acuity
somewhat, probably due to the pull of the facepiece on the face [Johnson et al. 1997a]. Recognition
of objects or signs while wearing a respirator and walking or driving cannot be expected to happen as
quickly as without a respirator.
Anxieties
Anxious individuals should not be asked to wear respirators. Studies have shown that anxiety level is a
very reliable indicator of difficulty encountered while wearing a respirator [Morgan and Ravan 1985].
Extremely anxious individuals do not perform for as long or at the same work rate as low-anxiety
wearers [Johnson et al. 1995a]. A supervisor, therefore, should probably avoid these problems by
allowing their anxious employees to perform jobs that do not require respirators to be worn.
difficult at best, and, unless first responder training includes communications training, this issue could
repeat in the next general emergency.
The uncontrolled nature of extreme emergencies and terrorist actions makes precise planning and
training very difficult. CBRN equipment is only one element to be considered . Maintaining some
semblance of order and situational control can be challenging. Understanding the limitations imposed
by normal physiological adjustments to exercise, as modified by CBRN equipment use, can help
planning and training programs.
Physical stress during the World Trade Center response accounted for one quarter of the firefighter
injuries and one half of their immediate deaths [Park 2001]. Currently, there are no effective solutions
to this problem. CBRN equipment is heavy and hot and not likely to become lighter or cooler any time
soon. The immediate concern is protection, which the equipment provides. Training and responder
tactics must be used as much as possible to overcome the limitations imposed by the equipment. It
cannot be expected that first responders operate as if they were not wearing the equipment.
Figure 7-4. The x-axis of the line chart shows performance time in seconds; the y-axis shows work rate (N
m/Sec). Four lines track cardiac, respiratory, thermal, and long term (irritation) effects. [Johnson and
Cummings 1975]
Physiological Adjustments
The human body is attuned to performing physical labor [Hurley and Johnson 2006, pp. 66-1 to 66-
10]. What follows the start of muscular activity is a coordinated series of adjustments involving all
parts of the body, including the heart, blood vessels, lungs, digestive system, nervous system, and
kidneys. The ones with the most direct bearing on exercise adjustments are described below.
Metabolism
Muscular movement requires energy. This energy comes from an energy storage molecule called
adenosine triphosphate (ATP). When the supply of ATP is exhausted, muscle activity ceases. It is
important, therefore, to replenish the ATP supply as quickly as possible to maintain muscular work.
There is also another energy-rich compound in the muscles called creatine phosphate that can act to
replenish the ATP supply extremely quickly. When the muscle starts working, there is enough ATP in
the muscle to sustain the work for 0.5 seconds. There is enough creatine phosphate present to keep
the muscle working for up to 2 minutes. After that, other energy-forming mechanisms are necessary
to replenish the ATP supply.
This other energy comes from stores of glucose in the blood, glycogen (an animal form of starch) in
the muscles and liver, fats in the form of triglycerides in fat tissue, and body proteins. In order to
extract the energy from these compounds, they must be respired. There are two kinds of cellular
metabolism (sometimes called cellular respiration): anaerobic and aerobic. The difference between
the two is that aerobic metabolism requires oxygen and anaerobic metabolism does not. Oxygen
delivery to the muscles begins in the lungs, continues in the blood, and is finally delivered to the
muscles, as shown in Figure 7-5. If enough oxygen can be delivered to the tissues, then aerobic
metabolism can keep up with the energy demands of the muscles. However, there are limits to the
rate that oxygen can be supplied, called the maximum oxygen uptake. Once the maximum oxygen
uptake is reached, additional muscular energy must come from anaerobic metabolism.
Very heavy exertion requires at least some anaerobic metabolism because oxygen demand exceeds the
maximum oxygen uptake. This is called the anaerobic threshold. Anaerobic metabolism yields 18 times
Figure 7-5. The flowchart depicts oxygen delivery across three areas: lungs, blood, and muscle.
fewer ATP molecules than aerobic respiration, and so is not nearly as efficient. However, it does allow
movement to continue, at least for a while.
One of the end products of aerobic metabolism is carbon dioxide, which can be removed during
exhalation. Carbon dioxide levels in the exhaled breath rarely reach more than four or five percent,
even at the extreme. However, if these levels were to climb much higher, carbon dioxide could cause
disorientation, confusion, and even death.
The main end product of anaerobic metabolism is lactic acid that is released from the muscles into
the blood. There are buffering mechanisms in the body that tolerate lactic acid additions, but these
mechanisms have limited capacity. Once this capacity is reached, there is no other source of energy
for the muscles and all muscular activity must cease. This capacity to tolerate lactate is called the
maximum oxygen debt because all the lactic acid must be reformulated into glucose at the end of
exercise, and this requires oxygen.
Buffering the blood against lactic acid formation during anaerobic metabolism produces extra carbon
dioxide that can be exhaled. This extra carbon dioxide acts as a respiratory stimulant that leads to
hyperventilation, or harder and deeper breathing.
All these processes proceed each time a person moves actively [Dooly et al. 1996; Johnson et al.
1995b]. They are much more efficient for younger people than for older people. Maximum oxygen
uptake is about 2.5 liters per minute for 20-year-olds but declines nearly linearly to about 1.7 liters
per minute at age 65. Well-trained individuals can have maximum oxygen uptakes up to twice these
values. In addition, the maximum oxygen debt that can be incurred by an individual declines with age
and is also affected by training.
Metabolic responses during exercise, and especially during emergencies, are modified by the release
of the adrenal hormones adrenalin (epinephrine) and cortisol. These hormones increase metabolic
rate, increase the rate and force of heart contractions, enhance the availability of blood glucose,
reroute blood from the gut to the muscles, and mobilize the nervous system.
The combined actions of these hormones can affect physical, emotional, and cognitive functions.
Muscular strength declines with age, making task performance less efficient when more muscles must
be recruited to perform a task [Hurley and Johnson 2006, pp. 66-1 to 66-10]. Muscular power can be
restored relatively rapidly with strength training.
Drugs and medicines can also affect body metabolism, as can illness. Products of cigarette smoking
and caffeine also affect metabolic rate [Scott et al. 2002].
Cardiovascular Adjustments
The heart adjusts to the physical demands of exertion by increasing its cardiac output, or the volume
rate of blood flow through the arteries, capillaries, and veins. This increases the rate of glucose and
oxygen supplied to the muscles and the rate of removal of lactate and carbon dioxide from the
muscles. The heart rate increases nearly linearly with work rate, beginning to increase nearly as soon
as work rate increases. This is due to kinesthetic neural sensors in the muscles and joints that signal
the fact that increased oxygen demand is on its way, despite the fact that there is as yet no reduction
in blood oxygen concentration or rise in carbon dioxide concentration. Once the concentrations of
these gases change, then control of heart response is determined by chemical sensors in the aorta, in
the carotid arteries in the neck, and in the brain.
The stroke volume of the heart or the volume of blood pumped for each heartbeat increases initially
at the start of exercise but soon reaches its maximum level. Thereafter, increases in cardiac output
are determined only by heart rate. Cardiac output at rest is about five or six liters per minute but can
rise to 25 liters per minute during strenuous activity. Blood volume in a 150-pound (70 kg) person is
about 5.6 liters. Hence, it takes about one minute at rest and 12 seconds during exercise for blood to
make the loop of the whole circulatory system.
Larger people generally have larger hearts and larger stroke volumes. Well-trained individuals have
lower resting heart rates and higher resting stroke volumes. Older individuals can have somewhat
lower cardiac efficiencies than younger individuals.
If body temperature rises due to overheating, then there is a secondary rise in heart rate, which puts
additional stress on the heart. The water from sweat is derived from the blood plasma, causing the
blood to thicken somewhat during prolonged exercise. This also increases stress on the heart but is
alleviated by drinking sufficient amounts of liquid, some of which can be consumed before the
responder answers the emergency.
Cardiovascular adjustments also include shunting the blood from maintenance activities, such as
digestion and kidney function, to working muscles where it is needed. Much of the blood in the
circulatory system at rest is in the leg veins; during exercise, most of the blood is shifted to the
arteries. These changes occur very quickly after activity begins. Release of the hormones epinephrine
and cortisol in an emergency speeds the heart and constricts some blood vessels to shunt blood to
the arms and legs.
Oxygen delivery to the working muscles can be limited by the maximum cardiac output, given as the
maximum heart rate times the maximum stroke volume. Once this maximum has been reached,
metabolism continues anaerobically. Depending on the muscles being used and the vascular structure
serving those muscles, there may be local regions of anaerobic metabolism occurring while the
muscles as a whole are still aerobic.
Respiration
Respiration also increases as exercise progresses, but respiratory responses lag behind activity level
changes by about 45 seconds. Many respiratory responses occur: the respiration rate increases
[Christie 1953]; the tidal volume (or the amount of air breathed during each breath) increases up to a
maximum amount [Brokaw et al. 2011; Coyne et al. 2006; Johnson 2006; Johnson et al. 2005c]; the
respiratory waveform changes; there are adjustments to the airways; and lung volumes change
[Johnson 1995]. Many of these changes appear to be stimulated by carbon dioxide concentration of
the blood, but initial respiratory adjustments occur too quickly for that to be the only determinant;
kinesthetic sensors may also be important for initial respiratory adjustments [Saunders et al. 1980].
Respiration is a multistep process, whereby air is breathed in, travels through the airways, reaches the
alveoli (the sacs at the end of the lung where gas exchange takes place), diffuses across the alveolar
membrane, dissolves in the blood, and is absorbed by the hemoglobin in the red blood cells. Carbon
dioxide diffuses rapidly into the blood, so the concentration of carbon dioxide in the alveoli and the
blood equilibrate rapidly, even during the most intense activity level. Oxygen, on the other hand,
diffuses more slowly than carbon dioxide, so its concentration in the blood is lower than in alveolar air
during inhalation. Diffusion rates of both gases change somewhat with activity level, with those for
men being somewhat higher than those for women.
Inhaled air is oxygen rich and carbon dioxide poor. Exhaled air is oxygen poor and carbon dioxide rich.
Because airflow in the airways is bidirectional, the first air that reaches the alveoli is the same as the
last air that was exhaled during the previous exhalation. This is an indication of the dead volume of
the lung, or that volume that stores carbon dioxide from the previous breath. Dead volume for the
average adults is about 180 milliliters, but dead volume of respirators can add to the effective dead
volume of the respiratory system and affect performance.
Carbon dioxide is a very powerful respiratory stimulant [Billings 1973, pp 35-63]. Increasing the
concentration of inhaled carbon dioxide increases lung ventilation much more than oxygen deficiency.
Metabolically produced carbon dioxide is even more effective than inhaled carbon dioxide at
stimulating respiration. This is critical for additions of external dead volume, which transforms
exhaled metabolic carbon dioxide into carbon dioxide inhaled during the next breath. Once the
anaerobic threshold is reached, blood buffering makes it appear that metabolic carbon dioxide
increases, and respiration is stimulated so much that lung ventilation increases dramatically as work
rate intensifies.
Working muscles change their efficiencies over time as they heat and tire. Additional oxygen demands
of muscles that have been worked for several minutes increase the need for the respiratory system to
respond. This leads to a secondary rise in lung ventilation that continues well into the exercise
duration.
Moving the chest wall, lung tissue, and air in the airways requires energy. This energy is equivalent to
about one to two percent of the total body oxygen consumption at rest, but increases during intense
activity to 8-10 percent. For people with obstructive pulmonary disease, the percentage at rest can be
18-20 percent. These people cannot perform strenuous exercise. Adding external resistance or dead
volume from a respirator (APR) or external pressure (SCBA or PAPR) increases the amount of work
that must be supplied to breathe [Johnson and Masaitis 1976; Johnson and McCuen 1980, 1981].
Oxygen to supply the needs of the respiratory system cannot be used to supply the working muscles,
so respiratory demands can limit the rate of work that can be expected of a responder.
The work of respiration is supplied by the respiratory muscles. These include the diaphragm, the
intercostals, and the abdominals. Inhalation is caused mainly due to the straightening of the
diaphragm in the chest. Exhalation at rest is passive—that is, the force to propel the air to leave the
lung comes from the elasticity of the stretched lung.
Exhalation during exercise needs to happen a lot faster than during rest, so it becomes active when
the abdominal muscles push air out of the lung [Johnson and Berlin 1974; Johnson and Curtis 1978].
Due to this difference, it is much easier and more comfortable to breathe against PAPR or SCBA
positive pressure during exertion than during rest.
The airways are reactive, and they change during exercise. They can constrict somewhat to reduce
dead volume, and thus lower wasted breathing effort, but as they constrict, they resist airflow and
increase the work of breathing, so there is a dynamic level of airway tone achieved [Johnson et al.
2012b]. These same airways may constrict to protect against respiratory irritants reaching the lung
and cause the same symptoms as a severe asthma attack.
Thermal Responses
The large skeletal muscles are only about 20 percent efficient. Of the energy supplied to the muscles,
approximately 80 percent ends up as heat [Johnson and Berlin 1973; Johnson et al. 2012a; Scott et al.
2008]. Thus, heat loss mechanisms are necessary to maintain thermal equilibrium of the human body.
These mechanisms include vascular adjustments, sweating, and voluntary responses. Voluntary
responses include moving to cooler locales, stretching out to lose more heat, drinking cool liquids, or
removing heavy clothing. These responses will generally be unavailable to emergency responders.
There is a thermal mass to the body that requires some time for heat to build up and cause dangerous
body temperatures. There is a normal six to ten minutes of activity that can occur before deep body
temperature significantly rises. Skin temperature probably increases during this time. If sufficient heat
cannot be lost to the environment, then body temperature will continue to rise until it reaches
dangerous levels. Heat exhaustion can set in when core body temperatures rise above 100.4°F (38°C). It
is characterized by the abnormal performance of at least one organ system and may signal impending
heat stroke. A core body temperature of 104°F (40°C) is expected to result in a 50 percent casualty
rate [Goldman 1975]. This condition is characterized by disorientation, convulsions, loss of body
temperature control, and death. At body temperatures lower than this, performance efficiency still
suffers (refer to Figure 7-2).
Heat can be lost from the body by convection (usually air movement), radiation (as to a cold clear
sky), or evaporation. Convection and radiation heat loss depend on the difference in temperature
between the surface losing heat and the surrounding fluid (usually air, but in a pool, for example,
water). Thus, one adjustment the body makes during thermal stress is to warm the skin surface. It
does this by shunting blood from deep veins into surface veins. This is why veins on the surface of the
hands seem to stand out more in hot weather than in the cold. There is also a small, but significant,
amount of convective heat loss from the respiratory system as air is breathed.
Evaporating water absorbs a large amount of heat, making sweating effective as a heat loss
mechanism. Sweating heat loss on the surface of the skin is nearly 100 percent effective for losing
heat. Sweating through clothing cools the clothing surface where the evaporation takes place and
only partially cools the skin. Sweat that drops from the skin is completely ineffective for heat removal.
The amount of sweating depends on the cooling necessary, and different parts of the skin are
recruited at different times to produce sweat. When fully recruited the maximum cooling that can be
obtained from sweating is equivalent to nearly 12 times the body heat production at rest (or 11.4
mets).
Women have higher percentage of body fat than men. They use this body fat as insulation between
their body cores and the outside environment. To lose heat, therefore, women depend more on
vascular adjustments than men.
Men sweat more than women and lose a larger fraction of their heat that way. Acclimation to hot
environments can improve sweating efficiency by increasing both the rate of response and amount of
sweat produced.
Some responders may not need to wear protective clothing with their respirators. However, covering
the entire body and moving into a hot environment eliminates nearly all possibility of heat loss
natural to the human body. Other means must be provided, such as supply of cool air from an SCBA,
or body temperatures must be closely monitored. An alternative is to limit heat exposure time and to
provide adequate rest cycles.
Some emergencies may require response in very low temperatures. At the beginning, low
temperatures may limit movement and dexterity. However, heat produced during activity and the
extra insulation afforded by protective clothing and respirators soon overcome low temperature
effects on the body. Surface blood vessels in the head do not constrict in the cold, as do similar blood
vessels in other parts of the body. Hence, nearly half of the body’s heat loss in the cold can come from
the head. Covering the head and face with protective equipment helps to insulate against this large
amount of heat loss.
One mistake that can be made is to cool an overheated responder by stripping protective clothing
and venting remaining clothing with cool or cold air. Sweat accumulated on the skin evaporates,
overcooling the skin. This elicits a reflex that shunts blood from the skin to interior blood vessels in an
effort to conserve heat. The result is that deep body temperature not only does not cool very fast,
but also can increase by another degree as metabolism continues at a high level for some time after
physical work ceases. To cool the overheated responder faster after intense work, protective clothing
should be opened only moderately to allow some of the accumulated sweat to evaporate slowly. Of
course, venting protective clothing, removing gloves, and taking respirators off should only happen in
a safe location.
Prolonged Activity
Some responders will be assigned support tasks that will require the use of protective gear. While
the physical intensity issues described above may not apply, these responders will face different
challenges and may need to be in protective gear for extended periods of time. There can be a
considerable amount of discomfort associated with wearing respirators, gloves, boots, and protective
suits. These pieces of equipment are worn to protect users from contaminants that can shorten or
reduce the quality of their lives.
Anxieties are the most important threat to protective equipment wear, and extremely anxious people
should not be asked to wear CBRN equipment if possible [Johnson et al. 1995a; Koh et al. 2006].
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH 135
CHAPTER 7
CBRN EQUIPMENT AND THE WEARER
For those who can tolerate the discomfort and claustrophobic feelings when wearing CBRN equipment,
there will nonetheless be physical effects of prolonged wear. Many respirators require a tight face seal
for adequate protection. The site of the face seal may produce rashes and edema in surrounding skin
areas. These will disappear with time once the equipment is removed. Vision can be important at low
work rates. There may be tasks that require a broad visual field or fine discrimination among various
lights, switches, or objects. Respirators interfere with vision in various ways, but visual acuity at low
work rates can be compromised by lens fogging, dust or films on the lenses, or wearing of improper
corrective lenses [Johnson et al. 1997a]. Sweating while wearing respirators in cold drafts can easily
incur moisture condensation inside the facepiece. Dusts and precipitates that are of no respiratory
consequence to the wearer can obscure vision if they cannot be wiped from the lenses.
Physiological Limits
Respirator masks may look like relatively simple devices. However, they are complex pieces of
equipment. They can interfere with vision, speaking and hearing, respiration, heat loss, eating and
drinking, sneezing, scratching one’s face, other equipment, and a feeling of well-being. Interference
with each of these functions can be the source of impaired performance when working while wearing
a respirator. Both respirators and other protective clothing can be heavy, adding weight and bulk to
make movements even harder than they would have been without them. Each protective component
insulates not only against contaminants, but also against heat loss.
Cardiovascular
There is a maximum heart rate that can be achieved by an individual. This is age-dependent, generally
predicted as 220 minus the age of the individual. Younger people therefore have higher maximum
heart rates. Once this maximum heart rate is reached, cardiac output no longer increases, and oxygen
delivery to the muscles becomes static. Anaerobic metabolism is incurred, terminating when the
maximum oxygen debt in reached. Cardiovascular-limited exercise normally terminates in two to four
minutes.
Respiratory
The most important function of the respiratory system is the removal of carbon dioxide from the
body. Adjustments during exercise increase depth and rate of breathing to expel this gaseous end
product of aerobic metabolism. Exercise exhalation becomes actively supported by the abdominal
muscles, spewing carbon dioxide at faster rates as exercise intensifies. At some point, the rate at
which air can be exhaled becomes limited by the distensible airways in the respiratory system. Any
further increase in abdominal pressure cannot increase expiratory flow rate [Lausted et al. 2006].
Thus, for normal individuals, there is a limitation when exhalation time decreases to one-half second
or so [Johnson and Berlin 1974; Johnson and Curtis 1978].
Carbon dioxide cannot be expelled any faster than this minimum exhalation time allows. Respiration
does not usually limit work performances of healthy individuals, but respiration can limit work time
when respirators are worn. Respiratory-limited work usually lasts 5-20 minutes.
For people with respiratory impairments, the maximum pressures that can be generated by the
respiratory muscles can limit the rates at which they can breathe through external resistances or
against external pressures. These people are not likely to be found as first responders but may
volunteer from onsite spectators.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH 136
CHAPTER 7
CBRN EQUIPMENT AND THE WEARER
Thermal
The most important work limitation associated with heat is deep body temperature. It must be
prevented from reaching 40°C. A conservative limit might be 39.2°C (102.5°F). Beyond this, thermal
discomfort becomes overwhelming, and death may ensue. Muscular efficiency is reduced at high
temperatures and judgment becomes impaired. Thus, the overheated individual cannot be expected
to recognize his or her own dangerous situation.
Because of the thermal capacity of the body to store heat, it takes a while before body temperature
rises to the point where it can become limiting. Heat-limited work usually occurs in the 10-minute to
2-hour time range.
Physiological Limits
Physiological limits to long-term exercise involve limitations on blood glucose levels and muscle
glycogen stores. Dehydration or electrolyte depletion may occur. These are difficult to quantify for
any individual, but frequent eating and drinking can deter them from occurring.
Psychological effects are also important and can contribute to feelings of fatigue, anxiety, and
discontent.
Summary
Physical exertion involves the entire body in a coordinated fashion. The limitations of exercise or work
can be modified or overcome by training and proper selection of equipment. Familiarity with the
physiological adjustments that occur can lead to enhanced effectiveness and larger return on
investment in relation to both staffing and equipment. As long as humans are involved in emergency
responses, accommodation must be made for the adjustments that characterize their physical
abilities. Training is important to improve the wearer’s ability to respond in an emergency but does
not eliminate the basic physiological and psychological limits to performance.
References
ALA [2012]. Lung disease. Chicago, IL: American Lung Association https://www.lung.org/.
Billings CO [1973]. Atmosphere. In: Parker JF, West VR, eds. Bioastronautics data book. Washington,
DC: NASA.
Brokaw E, Johnson AT, McCuen R [2011]. Improved prediction of minute volume flow rates Internat
Soc Respir Prot 28:40–47.
Caretti DM, Coyne K, Johnson A, Scott W, Koh F [2007]. Performance when breathing through different
respirator inhalation and exhalation resistances during hard work. J Occup Environ Hyg 3(4):214–224.
Caretti DM, Scott WH, Johnson AT, Coyne KM, Koh FC [2001]. Work performance when breathing
through different respirator exhalation resistances. Am Indus Hyg Assoc J 62(4):411–415.
Christie RV [1953]. Dyspnoea in relation to the visco-elastic properties of the lung. Proc Roy Soc Med
46(5):381–386.
Coyne KM, Caretti DM, Scott WH, Johnson AT, and Koh F [2006]. Inspiratory flow rates during hard
work when breathing through different respirator inhalation and exhalation resistances. J Occup
Environ Hyg 3(9):490–500.
Coyne KM, Johnson AT, Yeni-Komshiain GH, Dooly CR [1998]. Respirator performance ratings for
speech intelligibility. Am Indus Hyg Assoc J 59(4):257–260.
Dooly CR, Johnson AT, Brown EY [1994]. Performance decrement due to altered vision while wearing a
respiratory face mask. Mil Med 159(5):408–411.
Dooly CR, Johnson AT, Dotson CO, Vaccaro P, Soong P [1996]. Peak oxygen consumption and lactate
threshold in full mask versus mouth mask conditions during incremental exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol
73(3-4):311–316.
Goldman RF [1975]. Predicting the effects of environment, clothing, and personal equipment on
military operations, Paper presented to the Eleventh Commonwealth Defense Conference on
Operational Clothing and Combat Equipment, India.
Harrison H, Elkabir D [2006]. Products of combustion. Draft summary information. London, England:
Health Protection Agency, Centre for Radiation and Environmental Hazards, Chemical Hazards and
Poisons Division.
Hurley BF, Johnson AT [2006]. Factors affecting mechanical work in humans, in biomedical engineering
fundamentals, Brozino JD (ed) Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, FL.
Johnson AT [1976]. The energetics of mask wear. Am Indus Hyg Assoc J 37(8):479–488.
Johnson AT [1995]. The change in initial lung volume during exercise, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.
42(3):278–281.
Johnson AT [1997]. Biological process engineering, an analogical approach to fluid flow, heat transfer,
and mass transfer applied to biological systems. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
Johnson AT [2006]. Why peak flow matters. J Internat Soc Respir Prot 23:100–110.
Johnson AT [2007]. Biomechanics and exercise physiology: quantitative modeling. Boca Raton, FL:
Taylor and Francis.
Johnson AT [2011]. Biology for engineers. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis.
Johnson AT, Berlin HM [1973]. Interactive effects of heat load and respiratory stress on work
performance of men wearing cb protective equipment, Edgewood Arsenal Technical Report ED TR
83059 APG, MD 2l0l0.
Johnson AT, Berlin HM [1974]. Exhalation time characterizing exhaustion while wearing respiratory
protective masks, Am. Indus. Hyg. Assoc. J. 35(8):463–467.
Johnson AT, Cummings EG [1975]. Mask design considerations, Am. Indus. Hyg. Assoc. J. 36(3):220–
228.
Johnson AT, Curtis AV [1978]. Minimum exhalation time with age, sex, and physical condition, Am.
Indus. Hyg. Assoc. J. 39(10):820–824.
Johnson AT, Dooly CR [1995a]. Design of respirator masks to incorporate physiological effects: a
review. J. Internat. Soc. Respir. Prot. 13(2):8–22.
Johnson AT, Dooly CR [1995b]. Design of respiratory protective masks to improve human performance.
In: Bronzino JD, ed. The biomedical engineering handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Johnson AT, Dooley CR [2006]. Exercise physiology. In: Bronzino JD, ed. Biomedical engineering
fundamentals. Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, FL.
Johnson AT, Masaitis C [1976]. Prediction of inhalation time/exhalation time ratio during exercise, IEEE
Trans Biomed Eng 23(5):376–380.
Johnson AT, McCuen RH [1980]. A comparative model study of respiratory period prediction on men
exercising while wearing masks, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 27(8):430–439.
Johnson AT, McCuen RH [1981]. Prediction of respiratory period on men exercising while wearing
masks, Am Indus Hyg Assoc J 42(10):707–710.
Johnson AT, Benjamin MB, Silverman N [2012a]. Oxygen consumption, heat production, and muscular
efficiency during uphill and downhill walking, Appl Ergon 33(5):485–491.
Johnson, AT, Colton CE, Brosseau LM [2001a]. Human factors and ergonomic aspects of respirator
wear. In: Colton CE, Brosseau LM, eds. Respiratory protection: a manual and guideline. Fairfax, VA:
AIHA Press.
Johnson AT, Dooly CR, Blanchard CA, Brown EY [1995a]. Influence of anxiety level on work
performance with and without a respirator mask. Am Indus Hyg Assoc J 56(9):858–865.
Johnson AT, Dooly CR, Brown EY [1994]. Task performance with visual acuity while wearing a respirator
mask. Am Indus Hyg Assoc . 55(9):818–822.
Johnson AT, Dooly CR, Caretti DM, Green M, Scott WH, Coyne KM, Sahota MS, Benjamin B [1997b].
Individual work performance during a 10-hour period of respirator wear. Am Indus Hyg Assoc J
58(5):345–353.
Johnson AT, Dooly CR, Coyne KM, Sahota MS, Benjamin MB [1997d]. Work performance when
breathing through very high exhalation resistance. J Internat Soc Respir Prot 15:25–29.
Johnson AT, Dooly CR, Dotson CO [1995b]. Respirator mask effects on exercise metabolic measures.
Am Indus Hyg Assoc J 56(5):467–473.
Johnson AT, Dooly CR, Sahota MS, Coyne KM, Benjamin MB [1997a]. Effect of altered vision on
constant load exercise performance while wearing a respirator. Am Indus Hyg Assoc J 58(8):578–586.
Johnson AT, Dooly CR, Simpson CR [1998]. Generating the Snellen chart by computer. Comput Meth
Prog Biomed 57(3):161–166.
Johnson AT, Grove CM, Weiss RA [1992]. Respirator performance rating tables for nontemperate
environments. Am Indus Hyg. Assoc J 53(9):548–555.
Johnson AT, Grove CM, Weiss RA [1993]. Mask performance rating table for specific military tasks. Mil
Med 158(10):665–670.
Johnson AT, Jones SC, Pan JJ, Vossoughi J [2012b]. Variation of respiratory resistance suggests
optimization of airway caliber. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 59(8):2355–2361
Johnson AT, Koh FC, Scott WH, Mackey KM, Chiou KYS, Rehak T [2005c]. Inhalation flow rates during
strenuous exercise, J. Internat. Soc Respir Prot 22:79–96.
Johnson AT, Mackey KR, Scott WH, Koh FC, Chiou KYS, Phelps SJ [2005a]. Exercise performance while
wearing a tight-fitting powered air purifying respirator with limited flow. J Occup Environ Hyg 2(7):
368–373.
Johnson AT, Phelps SJ, Scott Jr WH, Koh FC [2005d]. Using self-contained self-rescuers at high work
rates. J Internat Soc Respir Prot 22(3/4):106–111.
Johnson AT, Scott WH, Caretti DM [2000b]. Review of recent research on respiration while wearing a
respirator. J Internat Soc Respir Prot 18(1):22–30.
Johnson AT, Scott WH, Caretti DM [2000d]. Review of recent research on communications while
wearing a respirator. J Internat Soc Respir Prot 8:31–36.
Johnson AT, Scott WH, Caretti DM, Danisch SG [2003]. Do respirators stress the cardiovascular system?
J Internat Soc Respir Prot 20(1/2):26–36.
Johnson AT, Scott WH, Coyne KM, Koh FCS, Rebar, JE [2001b]. Telephone communications with several
commercial respirators. Am Indus Hyg Assoc J 62(6):685–688.
Johnson AT, Scott WH, Coyne KM, Sahota MS, Benjamin M, Rhea PL, Martel GF, Dooly CR [1997c].
Sweat rate inside a full facepiece respirator. Am Indus Hyg Assoc J 58(12):881–884.
Johnson AT, Scott WH, Koh FC, Francis EB, Lopresti ER, Phelps SJ [2006]. Effects of PAPR helmet weight
on voluntary performance time at 80-85% of maximal aerobic capacity. J Internat Soc Respir Prot 23
(3/4):111–118.
Johnson AT, Scott WH, Lausted CG, Benjamin MB, Coyne KM, Sahota MS, Johnson MM [1999b]. Effect
of respirator inspiratory resistance level on constant load treadmill work performance. Am Indus Hyg
Assoc J 60(4):474–479.
Johnson AT, Scott WH, Lausted CG, Coyne KM [1999a]. Comparison of treadmill exercise performance
times for several types of respirators. J Internat Soc Respir Prot 17:19–23.
Johnson AT, Scott WH, Lausted CG, Coyne KM, Sahota MS, Johnson MM [2000a]. Effect of external
dead volume on performance while wearing a respirator. Am Indus Hyg Assoc J 61(5):678–684.
Johnson AT, Scott WH, Lausted CG, Coyne KM, Sahota MS, Johnson MM, Yeni-Komshian G, Caretti DM
[2000c]. Communication using a telephone while wearing a respirator. Am Indus Hyg Assoc J
61(2):264–267.
Johnson AT, Scott WH, Phelps SJ, Caretti DM, Koh FC [2005b]. How is respiratory comfort affected by
respiratory resistance? J Internat Soc Respir Prot 22:38–46.
Johnson AT, Weiss RA, Grove C [1992a]. Respirator performance rating table for mask design. Am
Indus Hyg Assoc J 53(3):193–202.
Johnston AR, Colton CE, Brosseau LM [2001]. Introduction to selection and use. In Colton CE, Brosseau
LM, eds. Respiratory protection: a manual and guideline. Amer Indus Hyg Assoc Fairfax, VA: AIHA
Press, pp. 13–24.
Jones J, McMullen MJ, Doughtery J [1987]. Toxic smoke inhalation: cyanide poisoning of fire victims.
Am J Emerg Med 5(4):317–321.
Karn B, Mathews HS [2007]. Nano particles without macroproblems. IEEE Spectr. 44(9): 55–58.
Koh FC, Johnson AT, Scott WH, Phelps SJ, Francis EB, Cattungal S [2006]. The correlation between
personality type and performance time while wearing a respirator. J Occup Environ Hyg 3(6)317–322.
LaTourrette T, Peterson DJ., Bartis JT, Jackson BA, Houser A [2003]. Protecting emergency responders,
volume 2: community views of safety and health risks and personal protection needs. Vol 2. Santa
Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1646.html.
Lausted CG, Johnson AT, Scott WH, Johnson MM, Coyne KM, Coursey DC [2006]. Maximum static
inspiratory and expiratory pressures with different lung volumes. Biomed Eng 5(29),
https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-5-29.
Mackey KRM, Johnson AT, Scott WH, Koh FC [2005]. Over breathing a loose-fitting PAPR. J Internat Soc
Respir Prot 22(1/2): 1–10.
Morgan WP, Ravan PB [1985]. Prediction of distress for individuals wearing industrial respirators. Am
Indus Hyg Assoc J 46(7):363–368.
MSHA [2002]. Metal and nonmetal safety and health fatal investigation report; storm exploration
decline, Barrick Goldstrike Mines, Inc. Washington, DC: U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration,
https://arlweb.msha.gov/FATALS/2002/FTL02m36&37.HTM.
NIH [2010]. What is COPD? Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National
Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-
topics/copd.
NIH [2011]. What are asbestos-related lung diseases? Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and
Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute,
https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/asbestos-related-lung-diseases.
NIOSH [2024]. World Trade Center health program at a glance. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, https://www.cdc.gov/wtc/pdfs/statistics/paag20240331-P.pdf
Rebar JE, Johnson AT, Russek-Cohen E, Caretti DM, Scott WH [2004]. Effect of differing facial
characteristics on breathing resistance inside a respirator mask. J Occup Environ Hyg 1(6):343–348.
Saunders KB, Bali HN, Carson ER [1980]. A breathing model of the respiratory system: the controlled
system. J Theor Biol 84(1):135–161.
Savolainen H, Kirchner N [1997]. Toxicological mechanisms of fire smoke. Internet J Rescue Disaster
Med 1(1), http://ispub.com/IJRDM/1/1/5495.
Scott WH, Coyne, KM, Johnson MM, Lausted CG, Sahota M, Johnson AT [2002]. Effects of caffeine on
performance of low intensity tasks. Percep Motor Skills 94(2):521–532.
Scott WH, Koh FC, Chiou KYS, Mackey KRM, Johnson AT [2008]. Quantifying energy expenditure during
water-immersion in non-trained cyclists. Biol Eng 1(4):281–289.
Sumi K, Tsuchiya Y [1973]. Combustion products of polymeric materials containing nitrogen in their
chemical structure. J Fire Flamm 4:15–22.
Sutcliffe WG, Condit RH, Mansfield WG, Myers DS, Layton DW, Murphy PW [1995]. A perspective on
the dangers of plutonium. Livermore, CA: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Westfeld, A [2006]. Study reveals effects of ground zero toxins. Thibodaux, LA: Nicholls State
University, The Nicholls Worth. http://thenichollsworth.com/105920/uncategorized/study-reveals-effects-
of-ground-zero-toxins/.
What Is Contamination?
Simply defined, contamination is the addition of an unwanted agent. It follows then that
decontamination is the removal (or neutralization) of the unwanted agent. The contaminating agent
can be something as benign as dirt or as difficult as an extremely hazardous agent that has permeated
the protective ensemble. For some substances, there may be no effective decontamination procedure
available (e.g., polychlorinated biphenyls), while for others, decontamination is simply a matter of
cleanliness (e.g., removal of the surface contamination). Effective decontamination of CBRN materials
depends on knowing the type and physical nature of the material encountered, extent of
contamination, degree of hazard presented, and access to an effective decontamination method.
For those situations beyond normal cleaning for hygienic purposes where contamination is likely or
decontamination is a required precaution, the decontamination technique and efficiency should be
determined before use of the respirator and protective clothing. This would include information and
training supplied to the user on how to minimize the potential for contamination, the risks from
contamination, and the decontamination procedures.
Types of Contamination
There are three basic categories of contamination of respirators and chemical protective clothing
[Mansdorf 1992a]. The first is surface contamination. This is where the contaminant (e.g., dry
particulate) does not enter the pores or molecular matrix of the protective barrier. It is simply surface
adhesion taking place. The second category is pore contamination. This is where the contaminant
enters the pore structure of the barrier (much like the contamination of leather by organics such as
solvents, gasoline, etc.). The third and most difficult category is matrix contamination. This is where
the contaminant permeates the molecular matrix of the protective barrier (e.g., goes into solution
with the barrier or its ingredients). Matrix contamination is basically an artifact of permeation
(diffusion of the contaminant through the barrier).
Elastomeric respirator facepiece materials are subject to surface and matrix contamination, but not
pore contamination as their surfaces are essentially non-porous. Surface contamination is usually
removed through physical means, such as washing or brushing. Contaminants with water solubility
can be dissolved with enhanced efficiency using agents such as emulsifiers or wetting agents (e.g.,
soaps and detergents). Water washing should be used cautiously for water reactive chemicals and
solids. The military also uses sorbents and neutralizing agents for removal of some chemical and CWA
contamination (e.g., M295 Individual Decontamination Kit) [USACHPPM 2008].
A good example of matrix contamination is the diffusion of ethylene oxide from rubber medical
catheters after being sterilized. That is, the gaseous ethylene oxide permeates the rubber of the
catheter in the sterilizer and then continues to outgas small quantities of ethylene oxide even when
removed from the gas source. Hence, aeration is required to “rinse” the ethylene oxide from the
rubber matrix.
Accessory equipment for respirators such as communications systems, drinking systems, hoods, lens
protectors, or camera systems also have the potential for contamination. Users should consult the
manufacturer for specific instructions and limitations for decontamination.
Effects of Contamination
Surface contamination is generally not as harmful to the barrier as matrix contamination.
Nevertheless, surface contamination can result in physical deterioration of the barrier, such as
discoloration, pitting, cracking, or other changes. Matrix contamination can wash out additives in the
barrier, such as the plasticizers, causing physical damage or loss of physical properties. For example,
some rubbers may become brittle after contamination and decontamination [Coletta et al. 1988].
What is perhaps most important is the subsequent effects of re-exposure. Tests have shown that
contamination of the matrix typically results in short subsequent breakthrough times and may also
result in a greater flow or migration of the contaminant to the inside of the barrier [Forsberg and
Faniadis 1986; Perkins 1991; Schlatter 1988].
Even where there is no visible change to the barrier and permeation is not expected, there is still the
potential for cross-contamination of the wearer from removal of the protective ensemble [Mansdorf
1989]. Prevention of cross-contamination should be handled as degradation occurs, and the facepiece
should be discarded after initial decontamination. Degradation of the barrier material is the primary
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH 144
CHAPTER 8
RESPIRATOR DECONTAMINATION AND DISPOSAL
reason NIOSH Use and Limitation recommendations for CBRN-approved respirators (as a complete
ensemble) include specific time periods for decontamination and disposal following liquid and vapor
exposure to a CWA. These are generally based on a 30-minute vapor challenge test that runs for eight
hours and a liquid challenge test also performed for eight hours [NIOSH 2005a,b].
The user of the protective clothing should take off (doff) that clothing in a manner that will result in
the least likelihood of cross-contamination. This usually requires that the boots and outer gloves be
removed first, followed by the suit (handling the inside surface for removal), followed by the
respirator and inner gloves (from the cuffs, inside out).
The process for the NIOSH approval standard for CBRN respirators includes breakthrough testing
using an actual representative CWA of sulfur mustard and sarin [Bartram et al. 2008]. Chapter 2
describes this testing. Research performed by NIOSH has demonstrated some permeation for certain
types of facepiece elastomers. CWA permeation testing has been done on other polymers that are
used in chemical protective clothing as well, but mostly on suit materials [Forsberg and Mansdorf
2007].
Degradation can occur when barrier materials are exposed to liquid or vapor challenges. Degradation
is the change in the physical properties of the barrier. This can include discoloration, cracking,
staining, and other visual indicators. It should be noted that not all degradation can be observed
visually. When degradation occurs, the facepiece should be discarded after initial decontamination.
Degradation of the barrier material is the primary reason that NIOSH Use and Limitation
recommendations for CBRN-approved respirators (as a complete ensemble) include specific time
periods for decontamination and disposal following liquid and vapor exposure to a CWA. These are
generally based on a 30-minute vapor challenge test that runs for eight hours and a liquid challenge
test also performed for eight hours [NIOSH 2005a,b].
Evaluation of Contamination
Tests for contamination can range from simple visual observation or use of a radiation detection
device to relatively sophisticated chemical or biological analysis. Visual observation is appropriate if
the contaminant does not permeate the barrier and can be visually observed (e.g., a dry pigment). For
other materials that do not permeate the barrier, simple “swipe” testing of the surface of the barrier
may be appropriate. The military uses a “swipe” test kit for determining certain types of
contamination [Lillie et al. 2006]. As another example, pH paper can be used to test for contamination
of the protective ensemble if the contaminant is acidic or basic [Mansdorf 1992a].
[Eckroade 2010]. There are many TICs that represent a significant hazard to responders, including
cyanides, hydrogen fluoride, chlorine gas, and others. In general, materials that are gases or highly
volatile are not as much of a decontamination problem as the liquid chemicals, which do not disperse
with the wind or evaporate quickly, such as VX [USACHPPM 2009]. Since the range of CWAs and TICs
is so broad, there is no single universal neutralizing agent available. Strong oxidizing or reducing
liquids (e.g., hypochlorite, potassium permanganate, and sodium hydroxide) were originally used to
decontaminate chemical agents, especially nerve agents, from equipment.
Today, there are a number of military and commercial products that work for most, but not all CBRN
agents. The manufacturers can provide the test data for evaluation.
Biological Agents
The wide variety of biological agents span the spectrum of viruses (e.g., Zaire ebolavirus, which causes
Ebola), bacteria (e.g., Bacillus anthracis, which causes anthrax), rickettsia (e.g., Rickettsia prowazekii,
which causes typhus), and toxins (e.g., ricin). The threat is generally from aerosols (e.g., powder for
anthrax spores) [Lillie et al. 2006]. If a biological agent is suspected, strong disinfecting solutions can
be used for initial decontamination of equipment. This includes the use of sodium hypochlorite
(household bleach) in a 1 to 10 ratio. This is effective for most, but not all, biological contamination
with attention paid to contact time [Lillie et al. 2006].
Radiological Agents
Radiological agents can be removed based on their physical and chemical nature just as non-
radiological agents are decontaminated; however, they cannot be truly decontaminated (neutralized).
The advantage with radiological agents is the availability of monitoring equipment to detect the level
of contamination. Again, it is important to know the radiological agent or agents to ensure the
measurement technique will have the appropriate sensitivity to the radiological spectrum presented
(alpha, beta, or gamma). Most of the radiological hazards can be physically removed (washing with
soap and water) since the hazard will probably be from particulate contamination [Lillie et al. 2006].
Nuclear Agents
Response following a nuclear event would present radiological hazards from neutron-induced activity
hazards and fission products contained principally in the fallout (particulate debris). As in the case of
radiological agents, determination of contamination is relatively simple, provided adequate detection
equipment is available. Scrubbing with soap and water is generally an effective initial
decontamination technique since the majority of the contamination is from fallout [Lillie et al. 2006].
SCBAs can be worn inside a fully encapsulating gas-tight suit (Environmental Protection Agency
[EPA]/Occupational Safety and Health Administration [OSHA] Level A). SCBAs can also be worn inside
or outside of an EPA/OSHA Level B protective suit that is not gas tight. Only SCBAs worn inside a fully
encapsulating gas-tight suit will not require decontamination (other than normal cleaning
procedures), provided the suit remains intact and there is no cross-contamination in removal of the
protective ensemble. All other respirators will require decontamination unless there is confirmation
that the area entered was not contaminated.
The normal response to an unknown CBRN agent would be a level A ensemble [Mansdorf 1992b]. In
the unlikely event that there is a response with less protection than this, the respirators should be
sprayed or brushed with a soap and water solution (or the same solution used for cleaning the
protective clothing) to hopefully dislodge any surface contamination as a first stage. The runoff from
the cleaning must be collected (usually piped or held in a small pool). After the outer gloves and
protective suit are removed, the canisters from APR and PAPR respirators must be removed and
cannot be decontaminated. They should be removed by a protected attendant (wearing the same
level of protection as the respirator wearer or one level lower if the contaminant is known) and
bagged as contaminated.
Then, the same attendant should collect the respirator facepiece and bag it either in the same bag as
the canisters for disposal or in a separate bag for later decontamination and testing. The military use
transparent six-millimeter plastic bags to collect these respirators. For both the canisters and the
respirator facepieces, the bags could then be placed into another clean transparent six-millimeter
plastic bag (double bagging) and placed into a metal drum or otherwise handled for later
decontamination or disposal [Lillie at al. 2006].
The military decontaminates and reuses their non-SCBA respirator facepieces, except when they
cannot confirm effective decontamination. The NIOSH advice for CBRN APR respirators does not
permit reuse after contact with a CWA (liquid or vapor), and the respirator manufacturers provide
this warning in their instructions. Therefore, the entire respirator with canisters could be discarded
after use for later disposal as hazardous waste.
Decontamination Staging
It is necessary to establish an area for decontamination either before or during the initial entry into
the contaminated zone. Ideally, the decontamination area would be established before entry. The
decontamination area must be sited in a “clean” location free of contamination. If this is not possible,
contaminated personnel should initially be “washed” in their full response ensembles and transported
to an area that is “clean.” The runoff from the initial field wash (normally soap and water) must be
collected either using a temporary ditch lined with plastic or a portable pool for later treatment of the
wastewater.
A decontamination station can range from a very simple field expedient arrangement (see Figure 8-1)
to use of commercial or military mobile units or even the construction of semi-permanent buildings.
The same basic principles apply in all cases. The established decontamination station must be in a
clean zone upwind of the contaminated area; provide rinse and wash stations either by pressurized
spray, shower, or hand application; include collection points for the response ensemble; and provide
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH 147
CHAPTER 8
RESPIRATOR DECONTAMINATION AND DISPOSAL
a shower area for personnel after decontamination. Victims should be handled in a similar fashion,
with the addition of medical triage and potentially an isolation capability for transportation to a
medical facility.
The focus of this section is specific to the decontamination of the CBRN respirators. The rinse and
wash solutions used will depend on the CBRN agent suspected or known to be present. The default
standard is uncontaminated water and soap. Warm water is more effective than cold water if the
capability for heating is present. As noted earlier, the mechanical displacement of contamination is
generally effective using standard washing techniques for most CBRN agents [Lillie et al. 2006].
The general procedure is an initial rinse with water followed by an aggressive washing (using brushes)
and a final rinse of the protective clothing ensemble. Boots should be removed first, followed by the
outer gloves and suit, followed by the respirator, and then the inner gloves. Each should be collected
by the attendant. The attendant should remove the canisters from
the respirator or PAPR and place the facepiece in a normal sanitization solution. The canisters should
be bagged as hazardous waste. The blower assembly and hoses for the PAPR should be collected
separately for a determination of whether they could be recovered and reused. SCBAs that have been
worn in a gas-tight suit should not require decontamination other than normal handling, unless they
were inadvertently contaminated during removal. Level B or NFPA Class 2 protection with an SCBA
worn on the outside of the protective suit (splash suit) would require decontamination or disposal
and is not recommended for this reason. This also applies to the National Institute of Justice Law
Enforcement Response Level 1.
a precautionary measure until the contaminant and decontamination technique are known. There
may be an immediate need to enter the contaminated zone before the decontamination station is
completed.
This scenario, while not advisable, could occur. In this case, personnel should be kept at an absolute
minimum and kept in a relatively safe area upon return, until the decontamination station is
completed. All wastes from the decontamination station are considered hazardous unless otherwise
determined. This includes all decontamination solutions used and collected. If a method to measure
the contamination is unknown, the entire protective ensemble, including respiratory protection, must
be held as hazardous waste. Reuse of respirators of all types requires assurance that they are not
contaminated. Therefore, the effectiveness of the decontamination procedures must be determined
before the respirators are reused. In large responses, this could create equipment shortages.
Summary
All CBRN response ensembles require some level of decontamination before they can be taken off if
exposed to a CBRN agent. This is necessary because of the risk of user exposure and cross-
contamination. Decontamination also allows for the potential reuse of expensive and difficult to
replace equipment, as well as for the proper disposal of contaminated PPE. Decontamination
approaches vary widely depending on the CBRN agent encountered. A universal approach used until
the actual CBRN agent is known is a soap and water wash before doffing the equipment.
Decontamination of Level A or NFPA 1991 ensemble SCBAs is not necessary, assuming the fully
encapsulating gas-tight suit is not breached and there is effective decontamination of the ensemble
before removal of the SCBA. Recovery and reuse of the respirators will depend on the ability to
demonstrate that the decontamination has been effective. Reuse is not permitted with Level B and C
CBRN respirators under NIOSH recommendations and manufacturers’ criteria if a CWA is present.
References
3M [2009]. Technical data bulletin #159, recommended use of CBRN full facepiece air-purifying
respirators. St. Paul, MN: 3M, http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/211122O/recommend-use-of-
cbrn-full-facepiece-air-purifying-respirators.pdf?fn=TDB159(2-2009).pdf.
Bartram PW, Lindsay RS, Palya FM, Rivin D, Rodriguez A, Shuely WJ [2008]. Estimating the permeation
resistance of nonporous barrier polymers to sulfur mustard (HD) and sarin (GB) chemical warfare
agents using liquid simulants. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, CDC Stacks, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/11749.
Coletta GC, Mansdorf SZ, Berardinelli SP [1988]. Chemical protective clothing test method
development: part II, degradation test method. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 49(1):26–33.
Czerw RJ, Flynn GJ, Carpenter WB, Loftus TJ [2009]. Multiservice tactics, techniques, and procedures
for health service support in a chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear environment, field manual
(FM) 4-02.7 Washington, DC: Department of Defense, U.S. Army, U.S. Marine Corps, U.S. Navy, U.S. Air
Force.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH 149
CHAPTER 8
RESPIRATOR DECONTAMINATION AND DISPOSAL
Eckroade RJ [2010]. Understanding performance standards for law enforcement CBRN protective
apparel. The Police Chief 77(7):16–19, https://www.policechiefmagazine.org/understanding-
performance-standards-for-law-enforcement-cbrn-protective-apparel/.
Forsberg K, Faniadis S [1986]. The permeation of multi-component liquids through new and pre-
exposed glove materials. Am Ind Hyg Assoc 47(3):189–193.
Forsberg K, Mansdorf SZ [2007]. Quick selection guide to chemical protective clothing. 5th ed. New
York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Lillie SH, Kelly JM, Mattis JN, Rayburn BB [2006]. CBRN decontamination: multiservice tactics,
techniques, and procedures for chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear decontamination, field
manual (FM) 3-11.5. Washington, DC: Department of Defense, U.S. Army, U.S. Marine Corps, U.S.
Navy, U.S. Air Force, https://www.marines.mil/Portals/1/MCWP%203-37.3.pdf.
Mansdorf SZ [1992a]. Personal protective equipment decontamination for hazardous waste operations
and emergency response. In: McBriarty J, Henry N eds. Performance of protective clothing: fourth
volume. ASTM STP 1133. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
Mansdorf SZ [1992b]. Personal protective equipment for hazardous materials spills response. ByDesign
37(12).
NIOSH [2006]. List of NIOSH standard protections, cautions and limitations for approval labels.
Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docket/archive/pdfs/niosh-008/0008-100106-handout_7.pdf.
Perkins JL [1991]. Decontamination of protective clothing. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 6(1):29–35.
Schlatter CN [1988]. Effects of water rinsing on subsequent permeation of rubber chemical protective
gloves. In: Mansdorf SZ, Sager R, Nielsen AP, eds. Performance of protective clothing. ASTM STP 989.
West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
USACHPPM [2008]. The medical CBRN battlebook, technical guide 244. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD:
U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Army.
USACHPPM [2009]. Safety and health guidance for mortuary affairs operations: infectious materials
and CBRN handling, technical guide 195. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.S. Department of Defense,
U.S. Army.
4. How to inspect, put on, remove, use, and check the seals of the respirator
5. Procedures for maintenance and storage of the respirator
6. How to recognize medical signs and symptoms that may limit or prevent the effective
use of respirators
7. General requirements of the Respiratory Protection regulation (29 CFR 1910.134)
Training in all these areas must be completed before a worker’s first respirator use in a work situation
and must be repeated at least annually. Retraining is also required if changes in respirator type or
usage make prior training obsolete or if a deficiency in a worker’s knowledge or respirator use is
apparent. OSHA does not specify a particular training method or provide assistance on how to assess
workers’ knowledge and understanding of the training.
In order to integrate these minimal respirator training requirements with the additional PPE and the
duties of the workers undergoing training, the following additional topics should also be addressed:
8. Recognition of CBRN vs. non-CBRN respirators
9. Specific nature of the tasks/duties to be performed while using CBRN respirators
10. Concurrent donning and use of other protective equipment
11. Doffing the selected ensemble, including decontamination and disposal procedures
12. The organization’s respiratory protection program and policies, including user rights and
responsibilities
While not specifically required by OSHA regulations, individuals who supervise respirator use (e.g.,
incident commanders) should receive the same training as users, with additional emphasis on
equipment selection, administrative procedures, and the recognition and resolution of problems
related to respirator use. Those involved in purchasing or issuing respiratory protection or other PPE
must also be familiar with the devices in use and understand why only the specified devices may be
purchased. Substitution is not acceptable.
Instructors
It is implicit that those who design, deliver, and evaluate user training should have the necessary
knowledge and skills to do so. This is not stated in OSHA’s Respiratory Protection regulation but is
mentioned in general terms for training employees covered by the HAZWOPER standard [Hazardous
waste, 2010].
NFPA standard 1041 [NFPA 2007] describes in detail the qualifications and competencies necessary
for fire service instructors at three levels of responsibility for preparing, delivering, and evaluating the
results of instruction as well as training program administration.
Specificity
It is critical to recognize that for every group trained, the program presented must address the
specific respirator(s) and other PPE that will be used as well as the tasks each person will be
expected to perform [NFPA 2006].
“Generic” training materials and other programs that provide broad information not relevant to the
tasks to be performed are not appropriate. The 12 training topics listed earlier in this chapter must be
addressed regardless of the type of CBRN respirator chosen. However, each topic must be tailored to
address special characteristics, unique training or use procedures, and the limitations of the respirator
to be used. In some cases, these attributes may only apply to one brand or model of respirator. As
such, manufacturers’ instructions must always be an integral part of user training materials. For
example, different manufacturers of CBRN powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) may require
different procedures for battery maintenance or verifying that their device’s flow rate is adequate.
Only the information that applies to the specific respirator in use should be covered in training; the
other manufacturers’ instructions are irrelevant.
Training should be designed to impart proficiency in a desired set of skills. Attainment of these goals
demands not only classroom instruction, but also opportunity for demonstrations and extensive
“hands-on” practice of each skill. Skills should be introduced and developed individually and, when
each is mastered, combined and practiced as they will be used during a response [NFPA 2006].
Specifically, the goals for user training are to develop proficiency in the following skills:
• The ability to don, use, and doff (including, if appropriate, decontamination and disposal of)
the chosen respirator(s) and additional protective equipment
• The ability to perform the intended tasks while wearing the protective ensemble
Evaluation
Evaluation of the adequacy of training should assess both the knowledge and the skills of the
participants (i.e., their ability to perform as they were trained). The former can be accomplished using
verbal or written assessments such as quizzes or discussion with each training recipient. The latter
must be judged by observation of the trainees performing the procedures and tasks they were taught.
This evaluation is best done with simulations of the intended response (e.g., victim rescue, containing
and cleaning up a chemical release, or administering medical assistance). Of the 12 training topics
listed earlier in this chapter, only numbers 1, 2, 6, 7, and 12 lend themselves to evaluation by
knowledge testing alone; the remaining 7 topics must be evaluated by a combination of knowledge
assessment and observation of performance.
Criteria for acceptable performance must be developed prior to the training and clearly conveyed to
the participants when training starts. Procedures and policies for retraining and reevaluating
unacceptable performance must also be in place before training begins. Given the potentially severe
consequences of improper respirator or PPE use in highly toxic work environments, student evaluation
criteria must be rigorous, but fair.
Frequency
As noted earlier in this chapter, the minimum frequency for respiratory protection training is annually
for organizations regulated by OSHA. The HAZWOPER regulation also calls for annual refresher
training, including use of PPE for affected workers [Hazardous waste, 2010]. While NFPA 1404
specifies at least annual retraining and recertification of respirator users, it also refers to “an ongoing
training program”[NFPA 2006]. The latter should be the goal of the organization. More frequent
periodic training, as resources permit, will enhance retention of the skills needed for the safe use of
respirators and other PPE.
Records
While OSHA has no specific legal requirement to keep records of respiratory protection training, it is
advisable to keep records that include at least the following information:
• Names of the people trained
• Dates the training was conducted
• Training materials, including handouts, outlines, manufacturer's instructions, and a
description of simulations and other activities
• Evaluation criteria and performance results
As described in Chapter 5, an annual evaluation of the effectiveness of the entire respiratory protection program is
strongly recommended. The training program should be a part of this evaluation. If changes to the training are needed,
they should be documented in the evaluation and incorporated into the next training session.
iii. U s e a protective ensemble (e.g., Level A or NFPA 1991 with CBRN self-
contained breathing apparatus [SCBA]) shown to resist penetration and
provide inhalation protection against a wide range of chemical warfare
agents and other toxins when properly selected, fitted, maintained,
and used
b. For known hazards (e.g., initial responders have identified and quantified the toxic
materials or industrial use):
i. Identify contaminant(s), describe toxic effects, relate to exposure limits if
applicable
ii. Use a protective ensemble that offer appropriate protection (e.g., skin,
inhalation) at the concentrations/conditions encountered when properly
selected, fitted, maintained, and used
iii. Describe measures to control/reduce/eliminate hazardous exposures
3. How to use the respirator effectively in emergency situations, including situations in which
the respirator malfunctions:
a. Specific to respirator(s) in use
b. Include relevant information from user instructions
c. Specific to reasonably anticipated emergency situations
d. Describe organization’s written operating procedures for reacting to equipment failure
e. Develop and practice drills and simulations
4. How to inspect, put on, remove, use, and check the seals of the respirator:
a. Specific to respirator(s) in use
b. Include relevant information from user instructions
c. Describe organization’s written operating procedures on what to do if inspection reveals
defects or if a seal cannot be achieved
d. Explain and demonstrate user seal checks
e. Supervise practice of these procedures
f. Describe qualitative or quantitative fit testing procedures to be used
5. Procedures for maintenance and storage of the respirator:
a. Specific to respirator(s) in use
b. Include relevant information from user instructions
c. Describe organization’s written operating procedures for maintenance and storage
i. Responsibilities—individual and/or centralized maintenance
ii. Location
iii. Ensure identified personnel learn and practice the procedures
6. How to recognize medical signs and symptoms that may limit or prevent the effective use of
respirators:
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH 156
CHAPTER 9
CBRN RESPIRATOR USER TRAINING
a. Respirator/PPE-related
i. Breathing resistance
11. Doffing the selected ensemble, including decontamination and disposal procedures:
a. Describe organization’s written operating procedures for decontamination
b. Explain and demonstrate doffing sequence for the protective ensemble, including
disposal of used components
c. Supervise practice of these procedures. Integrate into drills and simulations
12. The organization’s respiratory protection program and policies, including user rights and
responsibilities
Conclusion
Effective and ongoing user training is necessary for the safe use of CBRN respirators. The training
should be designed specifically for the respirator(s) and other protective equipment to be used and
the work to be performed. Training must ensure that workers not only learn the capabilities and
limitations of their protective equipment, but also demonstrate the procedures and skills necessary to
achieve the expected level of protection.
References
Hazardous waste operations and emergency response. 29 CFR 1910.120 (2010).
NFPA [2006]. NFPA 1404: Standard for fire service respiratory protection training. Quincy, MA:
National Fire Protection Association.
NFPA [2007]. NFPA 1041: Standard for fire service instructor professional qualifications. Quincy, MA:
National Fire Protection Association.
NFPA [2022]. NFPA 70: Hazardous materials/weapons of mass destruction (WMD) standard for
responders. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association.
1.0 Purpose:
The purpose of this standard is to specify minimum requirements to determine the effectiveness of full
facepiece air purifying respirators (APR) used during entry into chemical, biological, radiological, and
nuclear (CBRN) atmospheres not immediately dangerous to life or health. The respirator must meet the
minimum requirements identified in the following Paragraphs:
• Paragraph 2.0, Requirements Specified in Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 84
applicable paragraphs,
• Paragraph 3.0, Requirements based on existing national and international standards,
• Paragraph 4.0, Special requirements for CBRN use.
The interface between the canister and the facepiece or respirator system shall use a standard Rd 40 X
1/7 thread in accordance with Figure 1 (NIOSH CBRN Full Facepiece APR Mechanical Connector and
Gasket). The canister shall be readily replaceable without the use of special tools. For respirators
where the canister is attached directly to the facepiece, i.e. respirator mounted, a single interface
connector thread shall be located on the facepiece. The interface connector on the facepiece shall be
the internal thread and gasket sealing gland. The canister shall use the external thread.
For respirators where the canister is not directly attached to the facepiece, i.e. not respirator mounted,
an internal thread and gasket sealing gland connector complying with Figure 1 must be securely
attached to a harness system to provide strain relief between the canister and the remaining respirator
system. For respirator systems where the canister is not respirator mounted, multiple canister
assemblies are permitted.
Low temperature brittleness at minus 51° C --- Pass --- --- ---
(1) Test specimens shall be cut from Die B or Die C. Test specimens shall not be a mixture of Die specimens. See Table 2:
Tear Resistance Method ASTM 624 D.
(2) The applicant shall submit agent permeation data on materials that are not classified as EPDM. Rubber material
formulations that are 51% or greater in EPDM classifies the material as EPDM.
Tensile set at 300% Cut one specimen Cut one specimen Cut one specimen 9 ASTM D 412
elongation from each of three from each of three from each of three
slabs. slabs. slabs.
Tear resistance, Either Cut one specimen Cut one specimen Cut one specimen 9 ASTM D 624
Die B or Die C from each of three from each of three from each of three
slabs/buttons. slabs. slabs.
Compression set (3) Three test buttons. None None 3 ASTM D 395
Agent permeation
(4) (5) Cut two specimens None None 12 MIL-STD-282
Sarin (GB) and Sulfur from each of six test Method 208
Mustard (HD) slabs. Six specimens Method 209
per agent.
(1) Heat Aging. The specimens selected for heat aging shall be aged in an air oven at a temperature of 158° F
+/-7°F (70°C -/+ 2°C) for a continuous period of 24 hours as prescribed in ASTM D 573.
(2) Oxygen Aging. Specimens shall be aged in an oxygen environment in accordance with ASTM D 572 for 72
hours. (3) Same test buttons shall be used for impact resilience and compression set in that order.
(4) If gasket material is not EPDM, applicant shall submit permeation test data for gasket material along with
six test slabs f or Agent Permeation Test.
(5) Test specimens shall be fabricated in accordance with ASTM D 3182 from material of the same
formulation that will be used during regular production of the respirator. The test specimens shall have a
cure equivalent to that of the regular production gaskets. The thickness of the test specimens shall be the
minimum gasket thickness specified by the applicants’ design specification. Any finish or treatment, applied
to the finished gasket, shall be applied to the test specimens.
3.7.1 Haze:
The haze value of the primary lens material shall be 3% or less when tested in accordance with ASTM
D 1003-00.
3.7.2 Luminous Transmittance:
The luminous transmittance value of the primary lens material shall be 88% or greater when tested in
accordance with ASTM D 1003-00.
3.7.4
The test specimens shall be the flat four (4) inch (102mm) square version as prescribed in ASTM D
1044-99 and shall have the same nominal thickness and within the tolerance range as the primary
lens of the CBRN APR. The test specimens shall be subjected to the same coating process and any
other processes, as the primary lens would be under normal production conditions. A total of 6
specimens shall be furnished to NIOSH for certification testing, three pre-abrasion specimens and
three specimens after being tested for abrasion in accordance with ASTM D-1044-99
3.8 Carbon Dioxide:
The maximum allowable average inhaled carbon dioxide concentration shall be less than or equal to 1
percent, measured at the mouth, while the respirator is mounted on a dummy head operated by a
breathing machine. The breathing rate will be 14.5 respirations per minute with a minute volume of
10.5 liters. Tests will be conducted at ambient temperature of 25 ± 5°C. A concentration of 5 percent
carbon dioxide in air will be exhaled into the facepiece. The minimum allowable oxygen concentration
shall be 19.5 percent. NIOSH Test Procedure RCT-APR-STP-0064 is used for Carbon Dioxide Testing.
3.9 Hydration:
For CBRN APR respirators equipped with a hydration facility, the CBRN APR respirator shall meet all
requirements of the CBRN APR standard with the hydration facility in place. Dry drinking tube valves,
valve seats, or seals will be subjected to a suction of 75mm water column height while in a normal
operating position. Leakage between the valve and the valve seat shall not exceed 30 milliliters per
minute. NIOSH Test Procedure RCT-APR-STP-0014 is used for hydration facility leakage.
(2) Nitrogen Dioxide breakthrough is monitored for both NO2 and NO. The breakthrough is determined by which
quantity, NO2 or NO, reaches breakthrough first.
4.6 Communications:
Communication requirements are based upon performance using a Modified Rhyme Test (MRT).
The communications requirement is met if the overall performance rating is greater than or equal
to seventy (70) percent. The MRT will be performed with a steady background noise of 60 dBA
consisting of a broadband “pink” noise. The distance between the listeners and speakers shall be 3
meters.
4.7 Chemical Agent Permeation and Penetration Resistance Against Distilled Sulfur
Mustard (HD) and Sarin (GB) Agent Requirement:
The air purifying respirator system, including all components and accessories shall resist the
permeation and penetration of Distilled Sulfur Mustard (HD) and Sarin (GB) chemical agents when
tested on an upper-torso manikin connected to a breathing machine operating at an air flow rate
of 40 liters per minute (L/min), 36 respirations per minute, 1.1 liters tidal volume.
Test requirements for Distilled Sulfur Mustard (HD) are shown in Table 4:
Table 4. Vapor-Liquid Sequential Challenge of APR with Distilled Sulfur Mustard (HD)
Agent Challenge Duration of Breathing Maximum Maximum Breakthrough Number Minimum
Concentration Challenge Machine Peak (concentration integrated over of Service
(min) Airflow Rate Excursion minimum service life)(mg Systems Life
(L/min) (mg/m3) min/m3) Tested (hours)
(1) Vapor challenge concentration will start immediately after the test chamber has been sealed. Minimum Service Life
for liquid exposure starts after the first liquid drop is applied.
(2) Liquid volume dependent on accessories used with the respirator. Minimum volume is 0.43 ml based on the
respirator and single respirator mounted canister.
(3) Three consecutive sequential test data points at or exceeding 0.3 mg/m3 will collectively constitute a failure where
each test value is based on a detector sample time of approximately 2 minutes.
(4) The cumulative Ct including all maximum peak excursion data points must not be exceeded for the duration of the
test. (5) Liquid agent is applied to respirator at hour 6 of the test cycle.
(6) The test period begins upon initial generation of vapor concentration and ends at 8 hours.
(1) The vapor challenge concentration generation will be initiated immediately after test chamber has been sealed.
(2) The test period begins upon initial generation of vapor concentration and ends at 8 hours.
(3) Three consecutive sequential test data points at or exceeding 0.044 mg/m3 will collectively constitute a failure
where each test value is based on a detector sample time of approximately 2 minutes.
(4) The cumulative Ct including all maximum peak excursion data points must not be exceeded for the duration of the
test.
The measured laboratory respiratory protection level (LRPL) for each full facepiece, air purifying
respirator shall be 2000, when the APR facepiece is tested in an atmosphere containing 20-40 mg/m3
corn oil aerosol of a mass median aerodynamic diameter of 0.4 to 0.6 micrometers.
Drop 3-foot drop onto bare concrete Canister only; In individual canister 1 drop/filter on one of the 3
surface packaging container axes.
(1) A total six systems tests are performed, 3 GB and 3 HD. Two systems tests, 1 GB and 1 HD, are performed prior to Para. 4.9
Environmental Conditioning. Four systems tests, 2 GB and 2 HD, are performed after Para. 4.9 Environmental Conditioning.
(2) The Drop Test is performed on the canister only, in the minimum manufacturer ’s recommended packaging.
The applicant shall specify a sampling/test/inspection plan for respirator parts and materials to
ensure the construction and performance requirements of this standard are established through the
manufacturing process. As a minimum, specific attributes to be addressed are:
a) Materials of construction used for respirator parts that form a barrier between the user and
ambient air.
b) Integrity of mechanical seals that comprise a barrier between the user and ambient air.
c) Final performance quality control tests on complete canisters demonstrating compliance
with the gas life and particulate filter requirements of this standard.
d) Conformance with mechanical dimensions of respirator to canister connecting thread.
e) Conformance with mechanical dimensions of respirator to canister sealing gland including
length of threads, gasket seating dimensions, and configuration.
f) Conformance with material properties, dimensional and hardness requirements of the
respirator to canister gasket.
Prior to making or filing any application for approval or modification of approval, the applicant shall
conduct, or cause to be conducted, examinations, inspections, and tests of respirator performance,
which are equal to or exceed the severity of those prescribed in the standard. Paragraph 4.7 Systems
Tests are excluded from this requirement. NIOSH CBRN Full Facepiece APR Mechanical Connector and
Gasket Drawing from Revision 3 (April 3, 2007) to Revision 4 (August 30, 2007).
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory (NPPTL)
P.O. Box 18070 Pittsburgh, PA 15236-0070 Phone: 412-386-5200 Fax: 412-386-4089
NIOSH CBRN APR approvals issued prior to the date of this letter remain NIOSH certified and
reevaluation is not required. New or pending applications submitted for NIOSH CBRN APR
certification must meet the requirements of Revision 4.
The subject drawing was updated in response to questions concerning the dimensioning of
Revision 3 (Letter To All Manufacturers, NIOSH/NPPTL, April 5, 2007, Subject: Update to the
NIOSH CBRN Full Facepiece APR Mechanical Connector and Gasket Drawing from Revision 2
(January 9, 2004) to Revision 3 (April 3, 2007)
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/resources/pressrel/letters/pdfs/NewUpdate_%20NIOSHCBRN
Revisions2and3-508.pdf ). The NIOSH/NPPTL received specific comments from manufacturers
regarding Revision 3 and they were considered in the development of Revision 4.
x Part A: The absolute maximum, canister air-outlet, diameter was increased from 34.0 mm to
34.5 mm. This enhances the flexibility of the design especially with thinner walled plastic
canisters.
x Part A: The one-degree boundary was added so that no canister cross-sectional back face
protrudes beyond the marked boundary to avoid interference with a facepiece
component. For ease of measurement, a definitive location for the dimension was moved
to the end of the Thread Runout feature.
x Part A: The dimension of the bend radius (2.0 Bend R) at the intersection between the thread neck
and the canister back face was removed because it was design restrictive to the manufacturers.
x Part B: The connector depth will range from 7.00 mm to 14.00 mm. This allows the depth
measurement to remain consistent for all connectors and eliminates the need for Option B1 and B2
(Shorter and Longer Internal Thread Connector). All measurements will now be taken from the outer
edge of the connector to the gasket surface.
x Part B & C: The maximum tolerance on the gasket undercut height and gasket thickness
has been removed, and it is left to the discretion of the manufacturer to produce a gasket that fits and
is positively retained in the undercut. The connector depth measurement is defined from the outer
edge of the connector to the gasket surface, thus controlling the thread engagement.
x Part D: The height of the thread (t1) is a reference dimension and is indicated with
parenthesis.
Any questions concerning this letter, or the revised drawing should be directed to the NPPTL Policy and
Standards Development Branch at 412-386-5200.
Sincerely,
Jonathan V. Szalajda
Branch Chief, Policy and Standards Development
National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory
The Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Powered Air-Purifying Respirator
(PAPR) must meet the following minimum performance requirements:
(a) PAPR performance criteria from NIOSH 42 CFR Part 84, to include as applicable: Test #
Title
1 Initial DOP - HE protection (if applicable)
3 Exhalation resistance with blower off (tight fitting)
4 Exhalation valve leakage (if applicable)
5/5A/6 IAA fit test
7 Inhalation resistance with blower off (tight fitting)
12 PAPR Airflow*
25 Silica Dust+
30 Sound Level (if applicable)
33-48 or 62 Gas and Vapor (as applicable)
60 ESLI visibility (if applicable)
61 ESLI damage resistance (if applicable)
* 115 liters per min (Lpm) for tight-fitting, 170 Lpm for loose-fitting
+ CBRN Canister/Cartridge evaluated in Silica Dust test
1.0 Durability conditioning (CBRN tight-fitting PAPR only) (Reference STP CBRN-0311)
1.1
Respirator containers; minimum requirements
1.1.1
Required packaging configuration (minimum packaging configuration): The CBRN tight-fitting PAPR
and the required components will be subjected to the environmental and transportation portions of
the durability conditioning in the manufacturer specified minimum packaging configuration. The
canisters will also be subjected to an additional rough handling drop test in its designated minimum
packaging configuration
If over cases, packaging, or shipping containers are provided by the applicant over and above the
minimum packaging configuration, these additional packaging levels may not be a substitute for the
minimum packaging configuration and will not be used by NIOSH in the durability conditioning of the
application.
* End user: The definition of the end user is the person who will derive protection from the respirator
by wearing it. It is assumed that the end user will store the respirator in a location where it will be
available for immediate access and use during an emergency.
1.2
Durability conditioning will be performed in accordance with Table 1
2.0 Chemical Agent Permeation and Penetration Resistance against Distilled Sulfur Mustard (HD) and
Sarin (GB) Agent Requirement - (Reference STPs CBRN - 0550 and 0551)
2.1
The PAPR, while the blower is running and including all components and accessories except for the
battery (or batteries), will resist the permeation and penetration of distilled sulfur mustard (HD) and
Sarin (GB) chemical agents when tested on an upper-torso manikin connected to a breathing machine
operating at an airflow rate of 40 L/min, 36 respirations per minute, and 1.1 liters tidal volume. Test
requirements for distilled sulfur mustard (HD) are shown in Table 2. Test requirements for Sarin (GB)
agent are shown in Table 3. For tight-fitting PAPRS, two systems will be used for preliminary screening.
Chemical agent permeation and penetration resistance testing will be performed on four tight-fitting
PAPRS (two for HD and two for GB) following the durability conditioning of Paragraph 1.0.
Breathing Maximum
Duration Maximum Breakthrough Number *
Machine Minimum
Challenge Of Peak (concentration Of
Agent Airflow Test Time
Concentration Challenge Excursion integrated over Systems
Rate (hours)
(min) (mg/m3) minimum test time) Tested
(L/min) (mg-min/m )
3
HD-
50 mg/m3* 30* 40 0.30‡ 3.0§ 3 8††
Vapor
HD- 0.43 to
0.86 ml*,†,** 120* 40 0.30‡ 3.0‡ 3 2
Liquid
Vapor challenge concentration will start immediately after the test chamber has been sealed. Minimum
test time for liquid exposure starts after the first liquid drop is applied.
†
Liquid Volume is dependent on accessories used with the respirator. Minimum volume is 0.43 ml based
on the respirator only. Liquid challenge required on CBRN tight-fitting PAPRs only.
‡
Three consecutive sequential test data points at or exceeding 0.3 mg/m3 will collectively constitute a
failure where each test value is based on a detector sample time of approximately two (2) minutes.
Breathing Maximum
Duration Maximum Breakthrough Number
Machine Minimum
Challenge Of Peak (concentration Of
Agent Airflow Test Time
Concentration Challenge Excursion integrated over Systems
Rate (hours)
(min) (mg/m3) minimum test time) Tested
(L/min) (mg-min/m )
3
3.0 Laboratory Respiratory Protection Level (LRPL) Test Requirement – (all Respirators, Reference
STP CBRN 0552)
3.1
The measured laboratory respiratory protection level (LRPL) for each powered, air-purifying
respirator will be 10,000 for > 95% trials with the blower operating (Blower On mode). The
respirator is tested in an atmosphere containing 20–40 mg/m3 corn oil aerosol of a mass median
aerodynamic diameter of 0.4–0.6 μm.
3.2
The measured laboratory respiratory protection level (LRPL) for each tight-fitting powered air-
purifying respirator will be 2,000 for > 95% trials with the blower not operating (Blower Off mode).
A modified LRPL using a sample size of eight subjects will be used for evaluation. The respirator is
tested in an atmosphere containing 20–40 mg/m3 corn oil aerosol of a mass median aerodynamic
diameter of 0.4–0.6 μm.
4.0 Canister and Cartridge Test Challenge and Test Breakthrough Concentrations– Reference STPs
CBRN – 0501, 0502, 0503, 0504, 0505, 0506, 0507, 0508, 0509, 0510
4.1
Canisters (tight-fitting PAPR)
4.1.1
The gas/vapor test challenges and breakthrough concentrations are shown in Table 4. Canister
capacity tests will be performed at room temperature, 25 ºC ± 2.5 °C; and at 25% ± 2.5% relative
humidity and 80% ± 2.5% relative humidity. Three canisters will be tested at each specified
humidity. Canister test time will be identified in 15-minute intervals (15 minutes, 30 minutes, 45
minutes). For a service life of 60 minutes or greater, applications will be identified in 30-minute
intervals (60 minutes, 90 minutes, 120 minutes). Canister capacity testing for the system will be
tested at a flow rate of 115 Lpm divided by the least number of canisters used on any
configuration of the system for which approval is sought. Canister capacity testing will be
performed following the durability conditioning.
4.2
Cartridges (loose-fitting PAPR)
Test Breakthrough
Concentration Concentration (ppm)
(ppm)
Ammonia 1,250 12.5
Cyanogen Chloride 150 2
Cyclohexane 1,300 10
Formaldehyde 250 1
Hydrogen Cyanide 470 4.7*
Hydrogen Sulfide 500 5.0
Nitrogen Dioxide 100 1 ppm NO2 or 25 ppm NO†
Phosgene 125 1.25
Phosphine 150 0.3
Sulfur Dioxide 750 5
*
Sum of HCN and C2N2.
†
Nitrogen Dioxide breakthrough is monitored for both NO2 and NO. The breakthrough is determined
by which quantity, NO2 or NO, reaches breakthrough first.
4.3
Particulate/aerosol testing
4.3.1
The canister/cartridge will meet the requirements of 99.97% particulate filter efficiency in accordance
with the following criteria. Particulate filter efficiency testing will be performed following the
durability conditioning.
4.3.2
Twenty (20) canisters/cartridges will be tested for filter efficiency against a dioctyl phthalate or
equivalent liquid particulate aerosol.
4.3.3
The canister/cartridge including holders and gaskets, when separable, will be tested for filter
efficiency level, as mounted on a test fixture in the manner as used on the respirator.
4.3.4
When the canister/cartridge does not have separable holders and gaskets, the exhalation valves
will be blocked to ensure that leakage, if present, is not included in the filter efficiency level
evaluation.
4.3.5
Cartridge particulate testing for loose-fitting PAPR systems will be tested at a flow rate of 170
Lpm divided by the least number of cartridges used on the system for which approval is sought.
Canister particulate testing for the tight-fitting system will be tested at a flow rate of 115 Lpm
divided by the least number of canisters used on the system for which approval is sought.
4.3.6
A neat cold-nebulized dioctyl phthalate (DOP) or equivalent aerosol at 25ºC ± 5°C that has been
neutralized to the Boltzmann equilibrium state will be used. Each canister/cartridge will be
challenged with a concentration not exceeding 200 mg/m3.
4.3.7
The test will continue until minimum efficiency is achieved or until an aerosol mass of at least 200
mg ± 5 mg challenge point is reached. The test will be continued until there is no further
decrease in efficiency
4.3.8
The DOP aerosol will have a particle size distribution with count median diameter of 0.185 μm ±
0.020 μm and a standard geometric deviation not exceeding 1.60 at the specified test conditions
as determined with a scanning mobility particle sizer or equivalent.
4.3.9
The efficiency of the canister/cartridge will be monitored throughout the test period by a suitable
forward-light-scattering photometer or equivalent instrumentation and recorded.
4.3.10
Current test technology limits flow rate testing to 95 Lpm. When test equipment has been
validated to test at higher flows, single filter elements will be able to be evaluated.
5.2
Retrofit of previously approved 42 CFR Part 84 and CBRN tight-fitting PAPR must be performed
in accordance with manufacturer instructions, to ensure the retrofit complies with the
approved CBRN PAPR configuration, quality assurance, and performance requirements
5.3
The CBRN PAPR retrofit kit must, as a minimum, contain the following:
• CBRN PAPR retrofit kit instructions
• Replacement packaging, components, parts, materials, CBRN canisters or cartridges (as
applicable), and operation instructions required to retrofit the PAPR to the identical
configuration as the approved CBRN configuration level (including minimum packaging
configuration)
• CBRN PAPR retrofit approval label(s) for the respirator retrofit kit
• Respirators which are to be retrofitted must be in “fully operational and protective
condition”
5.4
Manufacturers will need to submit a Standard Application Form and associated documents
which clearly define the respirators eligibility for retrofit and explain the configuration changes
achieved with the retrofit kit
5.5
The manufacturer must provide four PAPRs which have been in service for one to five years. As
a minimum, submitted respirators are to be from two different conditions of use: Two from a
light condition of use category. Light use is defined as a PAPR primarily in a storage
configuration; used intermittently throughout the service life. Two from a heavy condition of
use category. Heavy use is defined as PAPR used routinely for respiratory protection as part of
an OSHA-compliant respirator program.
5.6
The units should be supplied with the retrofit kit installed
5.7
NIOSH testing performed on the respirators will be evaluated to the special tests for chemical
agent permeation and penetration resistance against Distilled Mustard (HD) and Sarin (GB) for
each respirator use condition provided plus any other tests described above or as deemed
necessary by NIOSH
1.0 Purpose:
The purpose of this standard is to specify minimum requirements to determine the effectiveness of air-
purifying escape respirators that address CBRN materials identified as inhalation hazards from possible
terrorist events for use by the general working population. The air-purifying escape respirator must
meet the minimum requirements identified in the following Paragraphs:
x Paragraph 2.0, Requirements Specified in Title 42, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
Part 84 applicable paragraphs,
x Paragraph 3.0, Requirements based on existing national and international standards,
x Paragraph 4.0, Special requirements for CBRN use.
The resistance of airflow will be measured at the breathing zone (nose cup or mouthpiece) of an air-
purifying escape respirator mounted on a head form test apparatus operated at a continuous airflow
rate of 85 Liters per minute (Lpm). The inhalation resistance will not exceed 70 mm H2O and the
exhalation resistance will not exceed 20 mm H2O.
The air-purifying escape respirator will obtain a Visual Field Score (VFS) of 70 or greater when tested in
accordance with NIOSH Standard Test Procedure CET-APRS- STP-CBRN-0314. The VFS will be obtained
by using a medium size respirator or equivalent that is sized to fit the Head Form described in Figure 14
of EN 136, Respiratory protective devices – Full face masks – Requirements, testing, marking; January
1998 or equivalent.
The VFS is determined by using a VFS grid (Dots on visual field) as defined in the American Medical
Association Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 5th Edition (2000) that is overlaid on
the diagram of the visual field plot obtained using the spherical shell of EN 136 apertometer or
equivalent. The VFS score is the average of three fittings of the same respirator on the specified head
form.
3.3 Fogging:
The air-purifying escape respirator will demonstrate an average Visual Acuity Score (VAS) of greater or
equal to 70 points for all measurements for each individual. A minimum of two respirators shall be
evaluated.
The respirator will be donned by the test subject in an indoor ambient temperature of approximately
72+20 F at 40+5% Relative Humidity (RH) and then will enter into a simulated outdoor extreme
temperature chamber where the visual acuity tests will be administered. The air-purifying escape
respirator will be tested for fogging in the hot/humid condition of 90+20F and 60+5% RH, and the cold
condition of 13+20F.
Breathing gas criteria will be evaluated as a two-part requirement: 1) a dead-space carbon dioxide test
performed with a breathing machine and 2) carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations during human
test subject exercises. The wearer will not experience undue discomfort because of restrictions to
breathing or other physical or chemical changes to the respirator. All trials will be considered as part of
the Practical Performance criteria of paragraph 4.8.
The maximum allowable average inhaled carbon dioxide concentration will be less than or equal to one
percent, measured at the mouth, while the air-purifying escape respirator is mounted on a dummy head
operated by a breathing machine. The breathing rate will be 14.5 respirations per minute with a minute
volume of 10.5 Liters. Tests will be conducted at ambient temperature of 25 ± 5°C. A concentration of
five percent carbon dioxide in air will be exhaled into the facepiece. The minimum allowable oxygen
concentration will be that of the ambient room oxygen concentration. NIOSH Test Procedure RCT-APR-
STP-0064 is used for carbon dioxide testing.
During the testing required by this section, the concentration of inspired carbon dioxide gas at the
mouth will be continuously recorded, and the calculated maximum range concentration during the
inhalation portion of the breathing cycle will not exceed the limits as stated in Table 1.
The inhaled carbon dioxide concentration will be as indicated in the above table. The inhaled
fractional oxygen concentration will be no less than 0.195 (or19.5%) when tested with human
subjects at the following work rates: standing and walking at 3.5 miles per hour. Two tests
(standing and walking at 3.5 miles per hour) will be performed, each using 12 test subjects. Table
2 gives face length and width criteria, which the subjects will be required to fill. Table 2 is
applicable for ‘one size fits all air-purifying escape respirator’ or an air-purifying escape respirator
with small, medium, and large sizes. For other variations in air-purifying escape respirator size,
test subjects will be determined to provide for panel range of Table 2.
1, 2, 3, 4 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 7, 8, 9, 10
Four subjects in ‘Small’ boxes. More Four subjects in ‘Medium’ Four subjects in ‘Large’ boxes.
boxes. More than one subject More than one subject possible in any box
than one subject possible in any box. possible in any box.
*Adapted from the Los Alamos National Laboratory report respirator test panel
Each exercise will be performed for 10 minutes. Carbon dioxide and oxygen data will be considered
for the last five minutes of each exercise. For each of these last five minutes, the last five breaths will
be considered.
For each group of 12 subjects, 95% of the total number of trials must meet the stated criteria.
Should a group of test trials not pass the 95% of trials, one addition run of test trials consisting of
12 test subjects may be performed to increase the total number of trials; the total number of trials
(total of 48) will be the sum of trials from the first and second run of subjects. All trials will be
considered in the Practical Performance requirement criteria of paragraph 4.8.
Air-purifying escape respirators submitted for approval for carbon monoxide protection will be tested for
Flammability and Heat Resistance using the test equipment specified in EN 136, Respiratory Protective
Devices, Full Face Masks, Requirements, Testing, Marking, 1998 Edition, Class 1 facepiece. No component
of the respirator will have an after flame after five seconds. No component of the escape respirator will
drip, melt, or develop a visible hole.
The distance between the outer surface of the escape respirator and the burner will be adjusted
to 20 ± 2 mm. The pressure reducer will be adjusted to 2.1 ± .05 psi. The temperature of the
flame positioned above the burner tip shall be 800 ± 500 C at a point 20+2 mm above the tip. The
respirator will be rotated once through the flame at a velocity of 6 ± 0.5 cm/s. Where components
of the respirator such as valves, filters, etc. are arranged on the respirator, the test will be
repeated with these components at the appropriate height of 250 mm ± 6.4 mm.
3.6.1 Function:
The air-purifying escape respirator will provide a barrier from ambient conditions for the wearer’s
entire head, eyes, and respiratory system. The air-purifying escape respirator will not require the use
of hands to maintain the respirator position to ensure proper function of the respirator when fully
donned.
The air-purifying escape respirator will be designed as a hooded device. The hood will include an
area for field of vision. A hood is a respirator component which covers the wearer’s head and neck,
or head, neck, and shoulders, and is supplied with incoming respirable air for the wearer to breathe.
The respiratory protection system may consist of an oral/nasal cup or mouthpiece. If a mouthpiece
is employed, a method of preventing nasal breathing must be provided. An oral/nasal cup or a
mouthpiece is not required provided all requirements of this standard are fulfilled by the air-
purifying escape respirator.
Escape respirators will be rated for 15, 30, 45, or 60-minute duration as specified by the
manufacturer. Only one duration rating can apply to any respirator.
Escape respirators will meet the gas/vapor test challenge concentrations in Table 3, when
tested in accordance with 4.3 Gas Life requirements.
4.2.1.1 General Category Escape Respirator Multi Gas/Vapor/Particulate with Carbon Monoxide
Requirements:
Escape respirators intended for use at the General category with carbon monoxide protection
will meet the requirements of paragraph 4.2.1 plus carbon monoxide.
For the general category, the test challenge concentration will be 3600 ppm. The maximum
allowable carbon monoxide penetration will not exceed the values identified in the Table 4.
The penetration of carbon monoxide will not exceed a maximum peak excursion of 500 ppm
at any point of the test.
a) Three respirators tested at 64+10 Lpm continuous airflow at 89 to 95% relative humidity,
25+30C
b) Three respirators tested at 64+10 Lpm continuous airflow at 89 to 95% relative humidity,
0+2.50C
APPENDIX A - CBRN RESPIRATOR STANDARDS | A-33
4.2.1.1.1 Service Life Testing, High Flow, Carbon Monoxide:
The escape respirator will provide a minimum duration of five minutes when tested at a flow rate of
100+10 Lpm, 89 to 95% relative humidity, 25+30C, when tested at a challenge concentration of 3600
ppm. The penetration of carbon monoxide will not exceed a maximum peak excursion of 500 ppm at
any point of the test. The maximum allowable carbon monoxide penetration shall not exceed an overall
Ct of 2013 ppm- minutes. Three respirators will be tested.
Three escape respirators mounted to a head form and connected to a breathing machine, cycling at
40Lpm, 36 respirations per minutes, 1.1 Liters tidal volume, will be tested with a challenge concentration
of 1200 ppm (IDLH), at 89 to 95% relative humidity and 25+2.5oC. The inspired air temperature
measured at the facepiece must always be less than or equal to 46°C (dry bulb) with less than or equal to
10 ppm CO for the entire test if the inspired air humidity is less than or equal to 50%. The inspired air
temperature must be less than or equal to 41°C (dry bulb) with less than or equal to 10 ppm CO for the
entire test if the inspired air relative humidity is greater than 50%. NIOSH test procedure RCT-APR-STP-
0034 will be used.
Escape respirators intended for use at the specific hazard threat category conditions will meet the
gas/vapor testing of paragraph 4.2.1. In addition to the test requirements of paragraph 4.2.1, test
concentrations for additional specific test agent protections will be as specified in Table 5.
Additional specific test agent protections can be added to the minimum as specified by the
applicant for any combination of the listed test agents. Test breakthrough concentrations
for the specific category will be the breakthrough concentrations identified in paragraph
4.2.1.
Escape respirators intended for use at the Specific category with carbon monoxide protection
will meet the requirements of paragraph 4.2.2 for the requested test agent protection, plus
carbon monoxide.
For the specific category, the carbon monoxide test challenge concentration will be 6000 ppm. The
maximum allowable carbon monoxide penetration will not exceed the values identified in paragraph
4.2.1.1 and Table 4.
The escape respirator will provide a minimum duration of five minutes when tested at a flow rate
of 100+10 Lpm, 89 to 95% relative humidity, 25+30C, when tested at a challenge concentration of
6000 ppm. The penetration of carbon monoxide will not exceed a maximum peak excursion of 500
ppm at any point of the test. The maximum allowable carbon monoxide penetration will not
exceed a Ct of 2013 ppm-minutes. Three respirators will be tested.
Three systems mounted to a head form and connected to a breathing machine, cycling at
40 Lpm, 36 respirations per minute, 1.1 Liters tidal volume, will be tested with a challenge
concentration of 1200 ppm IDLH (IDLH) at 89 to 95% relative humidity and
25+2.5oC. The inspired air temperature measured at the facepiece must always be less than or
equal to 46°C (dry bulb) and less than or equal to 10 ppm CO for the entire test if the inspired air
humidity is less than or equal to 50%. The inspired air temperature must be less than or equal to
41°C (dry bulb) and less than or equal to 10 ppm CO for the entire test if the inspired air relative
humidity is greater than 50%. NIOSH test procedure RCT-APR-STP-0034 will be used.
Gas life tests are performed at room temperature, 25±50C; 25±5 percent relative humidity, and 80±5
percent relative humidity. Three filters will be tested at each specified humidity with a flow rate of
64+10 Lpm, continuous flow. Tests will be conducted to minimum specified service time. Gas
testing will be performed following environmental conditioning and rough handling. The
breakthrough concentration must be no greater than the specified breakthrough for each tested gas
in Table 3. Testing is terminated after the applicant’s specified service time is achieved.
The canister will meet the requirements of a P100 particulate filter in accordance with the
following criteria of 42 CFR, Part 84.
1) Twenty filters for the air-purifying respirator will be tested for filter efficiency against a
dioctyl phthalate or equivalent liquid particulate aerosol.
3) When the filters do not have separable holders and gaskets, the exhalation valves will be
blocked to ensure that leakage, if present, is not included in the filter efficiency level
evaluation.
4) For air-purifying particulate respirators with a single filter, filters will be tested at a
continuous airflow rate of 85 + 4 liters per minute. Where filters are to be used in pairs, the
test-aerosol airflow rate will be 42.5 + 2 liters per minute through each filter.
5) A neat cold-nebulized dioctyl phthalate (DOP) or equivalent aerosol at 25 + 5oC that has
been neutralized to the Boltzmann equilibrium state will be used. Each filter will be challenged
with a concentration not exceeding 200 mg/m3.
6) The test will continue until minimum efficiency is achieved or until an aerosol mass of at
least 200 + 5 mg has contacted the filter. If the filter efficiency is decreasing when the 200 + 5
mg challenge point is reached, the test will be continued until there is no further decrease in
efficiency.
7) The DOP aerosol will have a particle size distribution with count median diameter of
0.185 + 0.020 micrometer and a standard geometric deviation not exceeding 1.60 at the
specified test conditions as determined with a scanning mobility particle sizer or equivalent.
8) The efficiency of the filter will be monitored and recorded throughout the test period by a
suitable forward-light-scattering photometer or equivalent instrumentation.
9) The minimum efficiency for each of the 20 filters will be determined and recorded and be
equal to or greater than the filter efficiency criterion listed for the P100 filter:
>99.97%.
Each escape respirator will provide a minimum duration of five minutes when tested at a flow
rate of 100+10 Lpm, 50+5 percent relative humidity and 25+50C for each of the gases/vapors
identified in paragraphs 4.2.1 and 4.2.2.
4.6 Chemical Agent Permeation and Penetration Resistance Against Distilled Sulfur
Mustard (HD) and Sarin (GB) Agent Requirement:
The air-purifying escape respirator system, including all components and accessories will resist
the permeation and penetration of Distilled Sulfur Mustard (HD) and Sarin (GB) chemical
agents when tested on an upper-torso manikin connected to a breathing machine operating at
an air flow rate of 40 liters per minute (L/min), 36 respirations per minute, 1.1 liters tidal
volume.
Maximum
Breathing Maximum Breakthrough Number
Duration of Minimum Test
Challenge Machine Peak (concentration of
Agent Challenge Time
Concentration Airflow Rate Excursion integrated over Systems
(min) mg/m minimum service Tested (hours)
(Lpm)
life)(mg-min/m3)
HD Vapor 50 mg/m3* 15/30/45/60*,**
* Vapor challenge concentration will start immediately after the liquid drops have been applied and the test chamber has
been sealed.
†. Minimum volume is 0.43 ml based on the respirator and single canister. Liquid volume is applied as 25 drops of equal
size.
‡ Three consecutive sequential test data points at or exceeding 0.6 mg/m3 will collectively constitute a failure where each
test value is based on a detector sample time of approximately two minutes.
§ The cumulative Ct including all maximum peak excursion data points must not be exceeded for the duration of the test.
** Duration of challenge is 15, 30, 45, or 60 minutes, equal to applicant’s identified rated duration (para 4.1)
†† Minimum Test Life is 30, 60, 90, or 120 minutes, equal to twice the applicant’s rated duration (para 4.1)
* The vapor challenge concentration generation will be initiated immediately after test chamber has been sealed.
‡ Three consecutive sequential test data points at or exceeding 0.087 mg/m3 will collectively constitute a failure where
each test value is based on a detector sample time of approximately two minutes.
§ The cumulative Ct including all maximum peak excursion data points must not be exceeded for the duration of the test. The
breakthrough duration is based upon the applicant’s identified duration.
** Duration of challenge is 15, 30, 45, or 60 minutes, equal to applicant’s identified rated duration (para 4.1).
†† Minimum Test Life is 30, 60, 90, or 120 minutes, equal to twice the applicant’s identified rated duration (para
4.1).
The measured laboratory respiratory protection level (LRPL) for each air-purifying escape respirator will
be 2000 or greater, for 95% of trials, sampled in the breathing zone of the respirator, and will be 150, or
greater, for 95% of trials, sampled outside the breathing zone (under the hood). Each trial must meet the
breathing zone criteria and ‘under the hood’ criteria simultaneously for the trial to be considered passing.
Test subject and replication numbers are outlined in Table 8.
The respirator is tested in an atmosphere containing 20-40 mg/m3 corn oil aerosol of a mass
median aerodynamic diameter of 0.4 to 0.6 micrometers. Should a group of test subjects result
in LRPL trials where less than 95% of trials have passing results, one additional run of test
subjects that fills the entire anthropometric panel requirements may be performed to increase
the total number of trials; the total number of trials will be the sum of trials from the first and
second run of subjects. All trials will be considered in the Practical Performance criteria of
paragraph 4.8. The LRPL will be calculated using nine exercises: Normal Breathing, Deep
Breathing, Turn Head Side to Side, Move Head Up and Down, Reach for the Floor and Ceiling, On
Hands and Knees - Look Side to Side, Facial Grimace, Climb Stairs at a Regular Pace, and Normal
Breathing.
For each size category (Small, Medium, and Large), each cell corresponding to the anthropometric
parameter will be tested. Cells can be either consecutively tested (if the test subjects only meet the
requirements of a specific cell) or simultaneously tested (if the test subjects meet the requirements
of more than one cell) for each size category.
The Practical Performance of the air-purifying escape respirator will be evaluated as part of the test
procedures of paragraphs 3.4, Breathing Gas, and 4.7, Laboratory Respirator Protection Level. The
Practical Performance of the respirator will evaluate human
Practical Performance trials will be accumulated from the test procedures of paragraphs
3.4, Breathing Gas, and 4.7, Laboratory Respirator Protection Level. For the total of these accumulated
trials, 95% of these trials will exhibit acceptable Practical Performance. Should 95% of the Practical
Performance test trials not be acceptable, one additional run of test trials consisting of either, or both,
paragraph 3.4, Breathing Gas, or paragraph 4.8, Laboratory Respirator Protection Level, may be
performed to increase the total number
of trials. The total number of trials will be the sum of trials from the first and second run of subjects.
4.9 Donning:
The time to don the respirator from the ready-to-use configuration will be no greater than 30 seconds.
The ready to use configuration is the operational packaging state prior to use such that immediately
upon opening allows the user to don the respirator.
Environmental, vibration, and drop conditioning will be performed on escape respirators in the ready-
to-use configuration. The ready-to-use configuration is the operational packaging state prior to use,
such that immediately upon opening allows the user to don the respirator. Respirators will be visually
inspected following environmental conditioning to ensure no damage or deterioration has occurred
that could negatively affect the intended use of the respirator.
Test Resistance and Human Service Life, 100Lpm Service Life Testing, 64 Penetration and Efficiency Particulate LRPL Test†
Order Breathing Gas Factors Lpm flow Permeation Testing
† All tests in the Resistance and Breathing Gas and LRPL column are performed prior to Paragraph 4.10, Environmental
Conditioning.
Respirators submitted for CBRN approval will be accompanied by a complete quality control plan
meeting the requirements of Subpart E of 42 CFR, Part 84.
The applicant will specify a sampling/test/inspection plan for respirator parts and materials to ensure the
construction and performance requirements of this standard are established through the manufacturing
process. As a minimum, specific attributes to be addressed are:
a) Materials of construction used for respirator parts that form a barrier between the user
and ambient air.
b) Integrity of mechanical seals that comprise a barrier between the user and ambient air.
c) Final performance quality control tests on complete air-purifying escape respirators
demonstrating compliance with the gas life and particulate filter requirements of this
standard.
Prior to making or filing any application for approval or modification of approval, the applicant will conduct,
or cause to be conducted, examinations, inspections, and tests of respirator performance, which are equal
to or exceed the severity of those prescribed in the standard. Chemical Agent Penetration and Permeation
Resistance against Distilled Sulfur Mustard (HD) and Sarin (GB) tests, Paragraph 4.6, are excluded from this
requirement.
The applicant will identify an initial useful life, not to exceed five (5) years of the escape respirator. The
“useful life” is defined as the length of time a unit can remain deployed in the ‘ready to use’ stowed
condition. All applications for certification must specify useful service life with supporting data and
rationale. Further, a rationale must be included for any sampling plan set forth in the user instructions
which would extend the useful life of the escape respirator beyond any initial useful life. However,
extensions of useful life will be determined during the last year of the initial useful life.
The following guidelines should be included in the useful service life plans:
b. All respirator service actions are the responsibility of the applicant, or their authorized
representative. The user/owner of the respirators should perform basic inspections as described
in the instruction manual and/or as required by federal regulations.
c. In order for an escape respirator to receive an incremental useful life extension, some service
action must be performed on each unit.
d. After the service action has been performed, the applicant, or their authorized representative,
should collect a random sample of the serviced units and performance test these respirators to
verify that they function as approved. The purpose of post-service sampling and performance
testing is to identify unexpected problems caused by uncontrolled or unpredicted factors.
e. The applicant may define “performance testing” by specifying the following: test
procedures, pass/fail standards, performance tolerances, sample size, etc.
Start 1st Service Date 2nd Service Date 3rd -- etc. Stop
[--------I----------- ---------I----------- ---------I----------- ---------I----------- -------I >
1st Service expiration After a completed After a completed After a completed Terminal End of
date permanently action on each unit action on each unit action, etc. useful life
visible on the unit stamp 2nd service stamp 3rd service
Note: The date on which the unit must be removed from service is to be permanently marked and
clearly visible on the unit at the time of manufacture. If an incremental service life is granted, the
applicant, or their authorized representative, must stamp the unit with a new date, as described by
the timeline model. The terminal date represents the final expiration date of the unit with no
further extensions.
8.0 Training:
The applicant will identify training requirements associated with its air-purifying escape
respirator. As a minimum, the applicant will include an instruction manual, which will address
donning procedures, respirator use, maintenance (care and useful life), and cautions and
limitations. The applicant will also provide for training aid systems, to include a training
respirator that mimics the performance of the approved respirator, such as inhalation and
exhalation breathing resistance that will develop user proficiency in operation of the equipment,
as well as identification of periodic refresher training requirements to maintain user proficiency.
The applicants’ training materials will be used as the basis for preparing the human test subjects
In accordance with the requirements of paragraph 84.33 of 42 CFR, Subpart D, approval labels
will be marked with a CBRN Rating as determined by paragraph 4.1 Duration Rating, of the
Statement of Standard for Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Air-Purifying
Escape Respirator dated September 30, 2003. For example:
(a) Respirators receiving approval for a 30-minute duration rating are marked: ESCAPE ONLY
(b) Respirators receiving approval for a 30-minute duration rating with carbon monoxide
protections are marked:
(c) Respirators receiving approval for a 30-minute duration rating with a specific category are
marked:
(d) Respirators receiving approval for a 30-minute duration, with a specific category, and carbon
monoxide are marked:
ESCAPE ONLY NIOSH CBRN 30 with “chemical” Specific and with Carbon Monoxide September
30, 2003
Statement of Standard
Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Self-
Contained Escape Respirator
1.0 Purpose:
The purpose of this standard is to specify minimum requirements to determine the effectiveness of
self-contained escape respirators that address CBRN materials identified as inhalation hazards from
possible terrorist events for use by the general working population. The respirator must meet the
minimum requirements identified in the following paragraphs:
X Paragraph 2.0, Requirements Specified in Title 42, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 84
applicable paragraphs
X Paragraph 3.0, Requirements based on existing national and international standards
X Paragraph 4.0, Special requirements for CBRN use
Approval under Title 42, CFR, Part 84, Subpart H, for escape only, with a minimum service time of
15 minutes.
The CBRN self-contained escape respirator will obtain a Visual Field Score (VFS) of 70 or greater when
tested in accordance with NIOSH Standard Test Procedure CET-APRS-STP-CBRN-0314.
The VFS will be obtained by using a medium size respirator or equivalent that is sized to fit the
Head Form described in Figure 14 of EN 136, Respiratory protective devices – Full face masks –
Requirements, testing, marking; January 1998 or equivalent.
3.2 Fogging:
The CBRN self-contained escape respirator will demonstrate an average Visual Acuity Score (VAS)
of greater or equal to 70 points for all measurements for each individual. A minimum of two
respirators will be evaluated.
The respirator will be donned by the test subject in an indoor ambient temperature of
approximately 72+20F at 40+5% Relative Humidity (RH) and then will enter a simulated outdoor
extreme temperature chamber where the visual acuity tests will be administered. The self-
contained escape respirator will be tested for fogging in the hot/humid condition of 90+20F and
60+5% RH and the cold condition of 13+2oF.
Breathing gas criteria will be evaluated as a two-part requirement: 1) a dead-space CO2 test
performed with a breathing machine and 2) carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations during
human test subject exercises. The wearer will not experience undue discomfort because of
restrictions to breathing or other physical or chemical changes to the respirator. All trials will be
considered as part of the Practical Performance criteria of paragraph 4.4.
The maximum allowable average inhaled carbon dioxide concentration will be less than or equal
to one percent, measured at the mouth, while the respirator is mounted on a dummy head
operated by a breathing machine. The breathing rate will be 14.5 respirations per minute with a
minute volume of 10.5 Liters. Tests will be conducted at ambient temperature of 25 ± 5°C. A
concentration of five percent carbon dioxide in air will be exhaled into the facepiece. The
minimum allowable oxygen concentration will be that of the ambient room oxygen concentration.
NIOSH Test Procedure RCT-APR-STP-0064 is used for carbon dioxide testing
During the testing required by this section, the concentration of inspired carbon dioxide gas at the
mouth will be continuously recorded, and the calculated maximum range concentration during
the inhalation portion of the breathing cycle will not exceed the limits as stated in Table 1.
The inhaled carbon dioxide concentration will be as indicated in the above table. The inhaled
fractional oxygen concentration will be no less than 0.195 (or19.5%) when
tested with human subjects at the following work rates: standing and walking at 3.5 miles per hour.
Two tests (standing and walking at 3.5 miles per hour) will be performed, each using 12 test subjects.
Table 2 gives face length and width criteria, which the subjects will be required to fill. Table 2 is
applicable for ‘one size fits all air-purifying escape respirator’ or an air-purifying escape respirator with
small, medium, and large sizes. For other variations in air-purifying escape respirator size, test
subjects will be determined to provide for panel range of Table 2.
Each exercise will be performed for 10 minutes. Carbon dioxide and oxygen data will be considered
for the last five minutes of each exercise. For each of these last five minutes, the last five breaths will
be considered.
For each group of 12 subjects, 95% of the total number of trials must meet the stated criteria.
Should a group of test trials not pass the 95% of trials, one addition run of test trials consisting of
12 test subjects may be performed to increase the total number of trials; the total number of trials
(total of 48) will be the sum of trials from the first and second run of subjects. All trials will be
considered in the Practical Performance requirement criteria of paragraph 4.4.
Self-contained escape respirators submitted for approval will be tested for Flammability and Heat
Resistance using the test equipment specified in EN 136, Respiratory Protective Devices, Full Face
APPENDIX A - CBRN RESPIRATOR STANDARDS | A-47
Masks, Requirements, testing, Marking, 1998 Edition, Class 1 facepiece. No component of the
respirator will have an after flame after five seconds. No component of the escape respirator shall
drip, melt, or develop a visible hole.
The distance between the outer surface of the escape respirator and the burner will be adjusted
to 20 ± 2 mm. The pressure reducer will be adjusted to 2.1 ± .05 psi. The temperature of the
flame positioned above the burner tip will be 800±500 C at a point 20+2 mm above the tip. The
respirator will be rotated once through the flame at a velocity of 6 ± 0.5 cm/s. Where
components of the respirator such as valves, filters, etc. are arranged on the respirator, the test
will be repeated with these components at the appropriate height of 250 mm ± 6.4 mm.
3.5.1 Function:
The self-contained escape respirator will provide a barrier from ambient conditions for the
wearer’s entire head, eyes, and respiratory system. The self-contained escape respirator will not
require the use of hands to maintain the respirator position to ensure proper function of the
respirator when fully donned.
The self-contained escape respirator will be designed as a hooded device. The hood will include
an area for field of vision. A hood is a respirator component which covers the wearer’s head and
neck, or head, neck and shoulders, and is supplied with incoming respirable air for the wearer to
breathe.
The self-contained escape respirator will have a minimum service life of 15 minutes.
4.2 Chemical Agent Permeation and Penetration Resistance Against Distilled Sulfur
Mustard (HD) and Sarin (GB) Agent Requirement:
The self-contained escape respirator system, including all components and accessories, will resist the
permeation and penetration of Distilled Sulfur Mustard (HD) and Sarin (GB) chemical agents when
For a mean VO2 = 1.67 L/min for 30 minutes (aggregate VO2 = 50 L/minTime)
For open-circuit devices, a breathing machine will be used, operating at an airflow rate of
19.5 Lpm,18 respirations per minute, 1.1 Liters tidal volume.
Test requirements for Distilled Sulfur Mustard (HD) are shown in Table 3.
* Vapor challenge concentration will start immediately after the liquid drops have been applied and the test chamber has been
sealed.
‡ Three consecutive sequential test data points at or exceeding 0.6 mg/m3 will collectively constitute a failure where each test
value is based on a detector sample time of approximately two minutes.
§ The cumulative Ct including all maximum peak excursion data points must not be exceeded for the duration of the test.
* The vapor challenge concentration generation will be initiated immediately after test chamber has been sealed.
‡ Three consecutive sequential test data points at or exceeding 0.087 mg/m3 will collectively constitute a failure where
each test value is based on a detector sample time of approximately two minutes.
§ The cumulative Ct including all maximum peak excursion data points must not be exceeded for the duration of the test.
The measured laboratory respiratory protection level (LRPL) for each air-purifying escape respirator will
be 3000 or greater, for 95% of trials, sampled in the breathing zone of the respirator, and will be 150, or
greater, for 95% of trials, sampled outside the breathing zone (under the hood). Each trial must meet the
breathing zone criteria and ‘under the hood’ criteria simultaneously for the trial to be considered passing.
Test subject and replication numbers are outlined in Table 5.
Face Length Use LANL boxes 1, 2, 3, Use LANL boxes 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, Use LANL boxes 7, 8, 9, 10;
and 4 (2 or 3 subjects each 8; panel size 17 (2 or 3 panel size 11 (2 or 3 subjects
Face Width box, 2 trials per subject) subjects each box, 2 trials per each box, 2 trials per subject)
subject)
Subjects= 10 Subjects= 17 Subjects= 11
Trials= 20 Trials= 34 Trials= 22
Cell B Cell E Cell H
The respirator is tested in an atmosphere containing 20-40 mg/m3 corn oil aerosol of a mass
median aerodynamic diameter of 0.4 to 0.6 micrometers. Should a group of test subjects result in
LRPL trials where less than 95% of trials have passing results, one additional run of test subjects
that fills the entire anthropometric panel requirements may be performed to increase the total
number of trials; the total number of trials will be the sum of trials from the first and second run of
subjects. All trials will be considered in the Practical Performance requirement criteria of
paragraph 4.4. The LRPL will be calculated using nine exercises: Normal Breathing, Deep
Breathing, Turn Head Side to Side, Move Head Up and Down, Reach for the Floor and Ceiling, On
Hands and Knees - Look Side to Side, Facial Grimace, Climb Stairs at a Regular Pace, and Normal
Breathing.
For each size category (Small, Medium, and Large), each cell corresponding to the anthropometric
parameter will be tested. Cells can be either consecutively (if the test subjects only meet the
requirements of a specific cell) or concurrently (if the test subjects meet the requirements of more
than one cell) tested for each size category.
The Practical Performance of the air-purifying escape respirator will be evaluated as part of the
test procedures of paragraphs 3.4, Breathing Gas, and 4.7, Laboratory Respirator Protection
APPENDIX A - CBRN RESPIRATOR STANDARDS | A-51
Level. The Practical Performance of the respirator will evaluate human interface issues
associated with the use of the escape respirator. As a minimum, contributing factors (if
applicable based upon the respirator design) are: the use of mouth bits and nose clips; seal of
the hood around the respirator wearer’s neck; seating of inner masks; position of the hood on
the respirator wearer’s head; and strength required to don the respirator. Test subjects will be
trained on proper use of the escape respirator in accordance with the applicant’s instructions
identified in paragraph 8.0, Training. Inability of any test subject participating in the test
procedures of paragraphs 3.3, Breathing Gas, and 4.3, Laboratory Respirator Protection Level, to
complete the test procedures will constitute a failure of the Practical Performance requirement
for that trial.
Practical Performance trials will be accumulated from the test procedures of paragraphs
3.3, Breathing Gas, and 4.3, Laboratory Respirator Protection Level. For the total of these
accumulated trials, 95% of these trials will exhibit acceptable Practical Performance. Should
95% of the Practical Performance test trials not be acceptable, one additional run of test trials
consisting of either, or both, paragraph 3.3, Breathing Gas, or paragraph 4.3, Laboratory
Respirator Protection Level, may be performed to increase the total number of trials. The total
number of trials will be the sum of trials from the first and second run of subjects.
4.5 Donning:
The time to don the self-contained escape respirator from the ready-to-use configuration will be
no greater than 30 seconds. The ready to use configuration is the operational packaging state
prior to use such that immediately upon opening allows the user to don the respirator.
Environmental, vibration, and drop conditioning will be performed on the self-contained escape respirators
in the ready-to-use configuration. The ready-to-use configuration is the operational packaging state prior to
use, such that immediately upon opening allows the user to don the respirator. Respirators will be visually
inspected following environmental conditioning to ensure no damage or deterioration has occurred that
could negatively affect the intended use of the respirator.
Penetration
Test and
Breathing Human LRPL
Order Permeation
Gas† Factors Test †
Testing
Qty 24. 5-11 6 systems * 30-65
Breathing Hot
Gas Donning Constant LRPL
1. Para 4.5 Para 4.3
Para 3.3 Para 4.6
Practical
Fogging Cold Constant Practical Performance
Performance
2 Para 3.2 Para 4.6 Para 4.4
Para 4.4
Field of
View Humidity
3 Para 4.6
Para 3.1
Flammability
and Heat Transportation/
Resistance Vibration Para
4
Para 3.4 4.6
* A total six systems tests are performed, 3 GB and 3 HD. Two systems tests, 1 GB and 1 HD, are performed prior to
Para. 4.6 Environmental Conditioning. Four systems tests, 2 GB and 2 HD, are performed after Para. 4.6
Environmental Conditioning.
† Breathing Gas and LRPL are performed prior to Paragraph 4.6, Environmental Conditioning.
5.0 Quality Assurance Requirements:
Respirators submitted for CBRN approval will be accompanied by a complete quality control plan meeting
the requirements of Subpart E of Title 42, CFR, Part 84.
The applicant will specify a sampling/test/inspection plan for respirator parts and materials to
ensure the construction and performance requirements of this standard are established through
the manufacturing process. As a minimum, specific attributes to be addressed are:
a) Materials of construction used for respirator parts that form a barrier between the user and
ambient air.
b) Integrity of mechanical seals that comprise a barrier between the user and ambient air.
In addition to the requirements of Title 42, CFR, Subpart G – General Construction and
Performance Requirements, the following requirements apply:
Prior to making or filing any application for approval or modification of approval, the applicant will
conduct, or cause to be conducted, examinations, inspections, and tests of respirator
performance, which are equal to or exceed the severity of those prescribed in the standard.
Chemical Agent Penetration and Permeation Resistance Against Distilled Sulfur Mustard (HD) and
Sarin (GB) tests, Paragraph 4.2, are excluded from this requirement.
The applicant will identify an initial useful life, not to exceed five (5) years, of the escape respirator. The
“useful life” is defined as the length of time a unit can remain deployed in the ‘ready to use’ stowed
condition. All applications for certification must specify useful service life with supporting data and rationale.
Further, a rationale must be included for any sampling plan set forth in the user instructions which would
extend the useful life of the escape respirator beyond any initial useful life. However, extensions of useful
life will be determined during the last year of the initial useful life.
APPENDIX A - CBRN RESPIRATOR STANDARDS | A-54
The following guidelines should be included in the useful service life plans:
a. Useful life plans should be based upon reliability engineering methodology and describe the
conditions for use for the unit. Each plan will be individually evaluated.
b. All respirator service actions are the responsibility of the applicant, or their authorized
representative. The user/owner of the respirators should perform basic inspections as described
in the instruction manual and/or as required by federal regulations.
c. In order for an escape respirator to receive an incremental useful life extension, some service
action must be performed on each unit.
d. After the service action has been performed, the applicant, or their authorized representative,
should collect a random sample of the serviced units and performance test these respirators to
verify that they function as approved. The purpose of post-service sampling and performance
testing is to identify unexpected problems caused by uncontrolled or unpredicted factors.
e. The applicant may define “performance testing” by specifying the following: test
procedures, pass/fail standards, performance tolerances, sample size, etc.
Start 1st Service Date 2nd Service Date 3rd -- etc. Stop
[--------I----------- ---------I----------- ---------I----------- ---------I----------- -------I->
1st Service expiration After a completed After a completed After a completed Terminal End of
date permanently action on each unit action on each unit action, etc. service life
visible on the unit stamp 2nd service stamp 3rd service
date or terminal date date or terminal date
Note: The date on which the unit must be removed from service is to be permanently
marked and clearly visible on the unit at the time of manufacture. If an incremental service
life is granted, the applicant, or their authorized representative, must stamp the unit with a
new date, as described by the time line model. The terminal date represents the final
expiration date of the unit with no further extensions.
8.0 Training:
The applicant will identify training requirements associated with its air-purifying escape
respirator. As a minimum, the applicant will include an instruction manual, which will address
donning procedures, respirator use, maintenance (care and useful life), and cautions and
limitations. The applicant will also provide for training aid systems, include a training respirator
that mimics the performance of the approved respirator, such as inhalation and exhalation
breathing resistance that will develop user proficiency in operation of the equipment, as well as
APPENDIX A - CBRN RESPIRATOR STANDARDS | A-55
identification of periodic refresher training requirements to maintain user proficiency. The
applicants’ training materials will be used as the basis for preparing the human test subjects in
the test procedures of paragraph 3.3, Breathing Gas, paragraph 4.3, Laboratory Respirator
Protection Level, and paragraph 4.5, Donning.
NIOSH will authorize the use of an additional approval label on the self-contained escape respirator
that demonstrates compliance to the CBRN criteria. This label is to be placed
in a visible location. The addition of this label will provide visible and easy identification of equipment
for its appropriate use. In accordance with the requirements of paragraph
84.33 of 42 CFR, Subpart D, approval labels will be marked with a CBRN Rating as determined by
paragraph 4.1 Duration/Service Life Rating. For example, respirators tested for 15 minutes are
marked ESCAPE ONLY NIOSH CBRN 15.
Statement of Standard
Open-circuit, positive-pressure SCBAs, including all components and accessories except the air cylinder
(shell), will resist the permeation and penetration of distilled sulfur mustard (HD) and sarin (GB)
chemical agents when tested on an upper-torso manikin connected to a breathing machine
operating at an airflow rate of 40 liters per minute (L/min), 36 respirations per minute, 1.1 liters
tidal volume.
Test requirements for distilled sulfur mustard (HD) are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Simultaneous Liquid and Vapor Challenge of SCBA with Distilled Sulfur Mustard (HD)
Duration Breathing Maximum Maximum Number Minimum
Agent Challenge of Machine Peak Breakthrough of Service
Concentration Challenge Airflow Excursion (concentratio System s Life
(min) Rate (mg/m3) n integrated Tested (hours)
(L/min) over Minimum
Service Life)
(mg-min/m3)
3
HD-Vapor 300 mg/m 30 (1)
40 0.60 (3) 6.0 (4) 3 6 (2)
HD-Liquid 0.86 ml 360
(1)
Vapor challenge concentration will start immediately after the liquid drops have been applied
and the test chamber has been sealed.
(2)
The test period begins upon start of initial vapor generation.
(3)
Three consecutive sequential test data points at or exceeding 0.6 mg/m3 will collectively constitute a failure
where each test value is based on a detector sample time of approximately two minutes.
(4)
The cumulative Ct including all peak data points must not be exceeded for the duration of the six-hour
test.
(1)
The vapor challenge concentration generation will be initiated immediately after test chamber
has been sealed.
(2)
The test period begins upon initial generation of vapor concentration.
(3)
Three consecutive sequential test data points at or exceeding 0.087 mg/m3 will collectively
constitute a failure where each test value is based on a detector sample time of approximately two
minutes.
(4)
The cumulative Ct including all peak data points must not be exceeded for the duration of the six-
hour test.
The measured laboratory respiratory protection level (LRPL) for each open-circuit positive- pressure self-
contained breathing apparatus will be >500, when the SCBA facepiece is tested in a negative pressure mode in
an atmosphere containing 20-40 mg/m3 corn oil aerosol of a mass median aerodynamic diameter of 0.4 to 0.6
micrometers.
Thank you for your July 6, 2011, letter to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA)
Directorate of Enforcement Programs. You requested an interpretation of the fit testing requirements in
the Respiratory Protection Standard, 29 CFR 1910.134. Your paraphrased
question and our response are below. This response constitutes OSHA's interpretation only of
the requirements discussed and may not be applicable to other scenarios and questions.
Scenario: There is some confusion about the fit-testing requirements that apply to NIOSH certified
respirators for chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) protection.
Many respirator manufacturers include requirements in their user instructions for users to achieve a fit
factor up to 2500 using a quantitative fit test (QNFT), if the respirator is to be used for a CBRN
application. The types of CBRN respirators currently available are self-contained breathing apparatus
(SCBAs), powered air-purifying respi rators (PAPRs), and air-purifying respirators (APRs) with canisters.
All respirators that require fit testing are equipped with a full facepiece. The Respiratory Protection
Standard 's requirements for fit testing, as summarized in Table 1 of OSHA Directive CPL 02-00-120,
Inspection Procedures for the Respiratory Protection Standard, permits either qualitative or quantitative
fit testing methods to be used for some full facepiece respirators.
Question: Which protocol does OSHA require for fit testing CBRN respirators?
Response: Workers wearing full facepiece air-purifying respirators must achieve a fit factor of at least
500 when using an OSHA-accepted quantitative fit test protocol. OSHA's Respiratory Protection
Standard, 29 CFR 1910.134, does not treat CBRN full facepiece respirators
differently from other full facepiece respirators. The standard designates an assigned protection factor
(APF) of 50 for full facepiece air-purifying respirators. The standard requires all workers who are
required to wear them to be fit tested using an OSHA-accepted QNFT protocol and receive a fit factor of
500 or greater to pass. While a manufacturer's recommendation for a pass level of 2000 or 2500 would
provide an added safety factor when fit-testing their respirators, obtaining such a fit factor does not
increase the assigned protection factor for that respirator, nor does it allow the use of the respirator in a
more toxic atmosphere. When enforcing this standard, OSHA would still require that these tight-fitting
full facepiece respirators achieve the minimum pass level of 500 when using QNFT as provided in
paragraph 191 0.134(f)(7). OSHA also would allow a manufacturer's higher pass level to be used.
For fit testing tight-fitting atmosphere-supplying respirators and tight-filling PAPRs, paragraph (f)(8) allows
employers to use either quantitative or qualitative fit testing (QLFT) methods with the respirator in a negative
pressure mode. As previously mentioned, if the QNFT protocol is used, OSHA requires the minimum pass level of
500 for QNFTs provided for in paragraph 191 0.134(f)(7) for these tight-fitting full facepiece respirators, but also
would allow a manufacturer's higher pass level to be used.
OSHA allows the use of QLFT for testing tight-fitting atmosphere-supplying respirators and tight-fitting PAPRs
with the respirator tested in the negative pressure mode. These respirators will be used in a positive pressure
or pressure demand mode in the workplace, and QLFT will determine whether the worker can get a
reasonably good fit with the facepiece. This testing procedure ensures the mask is capable of maintaining a
positive pressure inside the facepiece during work activities and any leakage would be from inside the mask to
the outside.
As you are located in California, you should be aware that the California Department of Industrial Relations,
Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA), operates an OSHA-approved State Plan that is
responsible for the adoption and enforcement of standards throughout the State. State Plans are required to set
workplace safety and health standards that are at least as effective as the comparable Federal standards.
Information on the Cal/OSHA program is available at http://vvww.osha.gov dcsp/osp/stateprogs/california.html.
Please contact Cal/OSHA directly for further information and to discuss your specific compliance situation:
Thank you for your interest in occupational safety and health. We hope you find this
information helpful. OSHA requirements are set by statute, standards, and regulations. Our interpretation
letters explain these requirements and how they apply to particular circumstances, but they cannot create
additional employer obligations. This letter constitutes OSHA's interpretation of the requirements discussed.
Note that our enforcement guidance may be affected by changes to OSHA rules. Also, from time to time we
update our guidance in response to new information. To keep apprised of such developments, you can consult
OSHA's website at www.osha.gov. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact the Office of Health
Enforcement at (202) 693-2190.
Sincerely,
2.01 PURPOSE
To establish rules, procedures, and guidelines relative to respiratory protection that reflects the
Sonoma County Fire and Emergency Services Department (County Fire) commitment to the safety
and well being of our members and compliance with CAL/OSHA Title 8, Section 5144.
2.02 SCOPE
All County Fire paid and volunteer staff
2.03 POLICY
County Fire is committed to maintaining an injury free workplace, and making every effort to protect
our members from harmful airborne substances. We accomplish this through engineering controls such
as air monitoring and ventilation and through administrative controls limiting the duration of exposure.
When these methods are not adequate, we provide respirators to allow members to breathe safely in
potentially hazardous environments.
We recognize that respirators have limitations and their successful use is dependant upon an effective
respiratory protection program. This Respiratory Protection Program is designed to: identify, evaluate,
and control exposure to respiratory hazards; select and provide the appropriate respirators; and
coordinate all aspects required for proper use, care, and maintenance of the equipment.
2.04 PROCEDURES
1. Program Administration:
County Fire will provide leadership by example and ensure that adequate resources are available for
effective implementation of our Respiratory Protection Program. We expect and require all members
to work conscientiously to carry out our Respiratory Protection Program, which is an element of our
Injury and Illness Prevention Program. The County Fire Safety Officer is the program administrator who
has the authority and responsibility for overall management and administration of our Respiratory
Protection Program, which consists of the following:
a. Preparing, evaluating, and modifying the written respiratory protection program
b. Identifying, locating, and maintaining ongoing surveillance and evaluation of airborne
exposures
c. Selecting respirators
d. Conducting medical screening for potential respirator users e.
Conducting respirator fit testing and assignment
f. Training
g. Record keeping
To assist the program administrator, certain aspects of the program will be delegated to others
3/8/11
within County Fire. All supervisors are responsible for members under their supervision.
4. Respirator Selection
In those instances where engineering and administrative means do not achieve the desired control, or in
the case of an emergency, respirators MUST be worn. Different types of respirators are available for
a variety of applications and we must ensure that the proper NIOSH/MSHA approved respirator is selected
and used for the kind of work being performed and hazards involved.
Given the type of environment, operations, and response our personnel participate in, the
following types of respiratory protection are available:
a. Self-contained positive pressure breathing apparatus b.
Air-Purifying Respirators
c. HEPA filter respirator (N95) and (P100)
All unknown products will be considered an IDLH environment requiring Positive Pressure Self- Contained
Breathing Apparatus (SCBA).
Each member will be provided with the physical status questionnaire packet consisting of the following:
a. OSHA Respirator Medical Questionnaire
b. An envelope addressed to the Department’s Designated Physician marked Confidential and affixed
with the appropriate postage
c. A referral for medical evaluation
Hazardous Materials Emergency Response Team members will participate in a quantitative fit testing
procedure due to the type of response they are assigned to.
Fit testing and respirator selection will be conducted consistent with CAL/OSHA Title 8, Section
5144, Appendix A, and will be conducted upon appointment and annually thereafter.
The form “Respirator Fit Testing and Assignments” (Appendix 2) will be used to document fit test results
and respirator assignment. This form will be maintained in the member’s personnel and training records.
Members who have facial hair that comes between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face,
or that interferes with the valve function; or any condition that interferes with the face-to-face piece
seal or valve function, shall not be fit tested. In addition, it will be the responsibility of the responder
and the Chief to ensure that at no time will a member with facial hair be allowed to don a respirator
and therefore will be excluded from any response requiring respiratory protection.
Any member that is not fit tested and subsequently medically cleared for respirator use, will not
participate in any activity requiring respiratory protection or activities with the potential for requiring
respirator use. This shall include any structure fire interior attack, vehicle fire attack, structure fire back
up team and/or Rapid Intervention Crew (RIC), hazardous materials response, medical response, etc.
Members will be defined as any County Fire paid or volunteer personnel, who may have to don and
place in operation any type of respiratory protective devise.
7. Training
Once the member is fitted with the correct respirator for the task, the County Fire Training Officer will
ensure he/she is thoroughly trained in the need, use, limitations, inspection, fit checks, maintenance, and
storage of the equipment. Ordinarily this training is initiated during the fit test and will be completed in
accordance with Appendix E of the CAL/OSHA “Guide to Respiratory Protection.”
The manufacturer provides detailed instructions for the use and care of the respirator with the equipment.
This information is to be used in the training. Each employee required to wear a Self-Contained Breathing
Apparatus will meet or exceed the training as outlined in the State of California Fire Fighter I program
for Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus. At a minimum, annually each employee will demonstrate their
competency by manipulative skills and written testing. The manufactures Training Guidelines for M.S.A.
Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus will be used as reference for all training standards pertinent to SCBA
use/maintenance.
2.05 REFERENCES
Dear Jim,
Thank you for requesting permission to use our "Procedure Manual Safety Program, Respiratory Protection
Program, Code 2-8-2, Respiratory Protection Program," Original Date:
2005, Revised Date: 2/20/11 in the CDC/NPPTL publication entitled: "CBRN Handbook." With
appropriate citation we are happy to extend our permission to use this information.
MA/slt
I. INTRODUCTION
Because of their unique law enforcement and emergency services roles, many Police
Services employees are potentially exposed to respiratory hazards during routine
operations. These hazards include lack of oxygen, harmful concentrations of dusts, mists,
fumes, smoke, gases, vapors, and, in some cases, represent conditions Immediately
Dangerous to Life or Health (IDLH). The primary objectives of this policy are to preserve
the respiratory health of employees and to allow employees to safely function in adverse
atmospheric environments so that they can provide emergency services to citizens and
co-workers. While the frequency of the need to operate in such adverse environments
may be low, the need to be able to safely and effectively operate in those environments
when they do exist is very high from a health and safety standpoint. Fort Collins Police
Services shall provide appropriate respiratory protection to employees when such
equipment is necessary to protect the health and safety of the employee and the public.
II. SCOPE
A. This policy:
B. The provisions of this policy are mandatory. Failure to follow the provisions of
this policy may result in the imposition of discipline up to and including
termination of employment.
3. The employee is able to meet the above use standard with the
alternative equipment.
D. Depending upon the needs of Police Services and the availability of respiratory
equipment, employees may voluntarily become qualified in the use of different
types of respiratory equipment.
A. Medical Evaluation
4. The PLHCP conducting the follow-up medical exam will review the
medical questionnaire and information provided
by the Policy Administrator concerning respiratory equipment availability,
workplace needs, and circumstances under
which the equipment will be needed. The PLHCP will complete a
Respirator Certification form providing a written determination regarding
the employee's ability to be qualified in the use of the designated
respiratory equipment within the specified protection Level and, if
applicable, providing any recommendations regarding optional ways for
B. Fit Testing
2. Police Services will make a number of models and sizes of the respiratory
equipment available within a protection Level in order to provide correct
fit and to increase the likelihood of employees being able to meet the
above use standard.
3. The results of the fit test will be recorded on the Respirator Fit Test
Record form and will be maintained by the Policy Administrator.
C. Remedial Program
2. The Policy Administrator and the employee's supervisor will meet with
the employee to determine whether or not a remedial program can be
implemented that is likely to result in achievement of the qualification
status within six months. The goal is to establish a realistic plan that is
likely to result in the employee becoming qualified as soon as
reasonably
possible. The employee may be re-evaluated for qualification
at the request of the employee or the Policy Administrator.
1. A fit test will be administered not less than annually and will be
administered whenever an employee: changes makes, models, or sizes
of respirators; perceives that the respirator does not seal properly; or
experiences any condition which alters the configuration of the face,
e.g., weight change of ten pounds or more, broken nose, loss of teeth,
or facial surgery.
V. RESPONSIBILITIES
4. Provide the PLHCP with the information required for them to conduct
respiratory equipment users' medical evaluations.
5. Review this Respiratory Protection Policy not less than annually and
recommend revisions to it as necessary to ensure that employees are
protected from respiratory hazards and employees are able to safely
and effectively provide emergency services in hazardous
environments.
2. Ensure that employees receive respiratory medical exams, fit tests, and
appropriate respiratory equipment before their initial use of the
respiratory equipment.
4. Ensure that employees are properly trained and comply with all elements
of this program, including respiratory equipment inspection and
maintenance.
C. Employees: Employees within the scope of this Policy have the following
duties:
7. Complete and file with the Program Administrator and the City's Risk
Management Office a hazardous exposure report any time that an
employee believes he/she may have been exposed to a hazardous
substance.
A. Only respiratory equipment identified for use in an area or for a particular task
by the Policy Administrator shall be used. The Policy Administrator shall publish
a list of such areas/tasks and the appropriate respiratory equipment.
C. Employees may use corrective or protective eyewear in a manner that does not
interfere with the seal of the faceplate of a respirator. Eyewear with straps or
temple bars that pass through the sealing surface of the respirator facepiece
shall not be used. The Policy Administrator will coordinate acquiring proper
eyewear for the employee at the City's expense.
D. Hats, headphones, jewelry, or other articles that may interfere with a respirator
facepiece seal are not permitted.
E. To ensure proper sealing, an employee must perform a fit check each time
the employee wears his/her respirator.
A. Prior to use, employees shall be trained in the use and care of respiratory
equipment. Employees must also receive annual refresher training.
5. Inspection
9. Recognizing the medical signs and symptoms that may limit or prevent
the effective use of respiratory equipment
VIII. RECORDKEEPING
4. Employee training
This program has not been reviewed in detail by the author or NIOSH and represents each organization's current
respiratory protection program. NIOSH takes no responsibility for the content of this respiratory protection program.