Chapter Title: Contrapunctus 1: The Art of Fugue

Book Title: Art of Fugue

Book Subtitle: Bach Fugues for Keyboard, 1715–1750
Book Author(s): Joseph Kerman, Davitt Moroney and Karen Rosenak
Published by: University of California Press

Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1ffjn2z.10

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
This content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives
4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). To view a copy of this license, visit
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

University of California Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Art of Fugue

This content downloaded from

144.126.132.95 on Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:29:23 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
 chapter 5

Contrapunctus 1
The Art of Fugue

Bach prepared The Art of Fugue for publication in open score, after
having composed it on two staves, in the usual keyboard-music
format. The work is a staggering compendium of nearly twenty
fugues and canons all based on a single theme, and open-score
format—with each voice on its own stave—showed off the con-
trapuntal devices applied to this ur-theme as clearly as possi-
ble. Technical exploits on this scale were unmatched in his own
earlier work or that of any other composer then known (then or
ever, perhaps). Bach died in 1750, before signing off on The Art
of Fugue, and for more than two hundred years it was admired
and revered, if not always greatly loved, as his last musical tes-
tament, undertaken at the end of his life and never completed
because of illness and then death.
In the twentieth century, inevitably, his ostensibly abstract
score became a very honeypot for performers of every possible
sort. It has been recorded by string quartets, orchestras, saxo­
phone quartets, harpsichordists, organists, pianists, and even

30

This content downloaded from

144.126.132.95 on Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:29:23 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
 Contrapunctus 1 / 31

a consort of seventeenth-century viols. But for this composer

learned display was inseparable from practical performance. He
wrote the fugues to be played on a harpsichord, and while opin-
ions may differ as to whether that should privilege harpsichord
as their ideal performance medium, it should certainly earn
them a privileged place on every keyboard player’s music stand.
Most of the fugues differ significantly from any Bach had
composed earlier. Some are contrapuntally much more complex,
loaded with strettos, diminutions, augmentations, and inversions.
Some are simpler, for in order to set off the technical v­ irtuosity
that was the work’s raison d’être, Bach had the extraordinary idea
of making its first number a fugue without contrapuntal devices.
Contrapunctus 1 has neither strettos, diminutions, and so on,
nor even countersubjects or recurring episodes. These devices
will be introduced only in the succeeding contrapuncti, one by
one. In Contrapunctus 1 invertible counterpoint itself is in very
short supply. This elemental fugue never modulates beyond the
­obligatory dominant and subdominant keys.
Of course, as many have pointed out, what Bach accom-
plished here amounts to a kind of negative virtuosity, for if you
set up a fugue subject ahead of time with countersubjects and
strettos they will write the fugue for you (some of it, much of it).
It is a lot harder to write a convincing fugue without the usual
aids. Also extraordinary, and paradoxical, is Bach’s decision to
open a work like The Art of Fugue with a fugue that evokes impro-
visation. There is actually a written-out cadenza at the end.
­Paradoxical, because if one improvises a fugue with a simple
subject tailor-made for strettos—as this subject is—it is almost
perverse to eschew them. Compare the fugal Prelude in E-flat
Major from The Well-Tempered Clavier, book 1.

This content downloaded from

144.126.132.95 on Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:29:23 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
 32 / The Art of Fugue

In any case, this most basic of fugues is necessarily also one of

Bach’s freest and must also be one of his smoothest. This quality
is related to an archaic impulse that has often been noted in his
later works. Still, the seamless style that he developed for The
Art of Fugue, starting with its first number, does not sound much
like the seamless style of sixteenth-century “­Palestrina counter­
point.” The contrapuntal lines, consisting mostly of q­ uarter-
and eighth-note patterns, move stepwise or by the smallest
leaps, and the expectations of eighteenth-century harmony
often go unfulfilled. Strong cadences are shunned. While such
generalities only begin to explain the almost mesmeric ­fluency
of Bach’s late style, they may help sensitize us to contrasts where
it is abrogated, such as at those episodes featuring larger leaps
[bars 29–30, 36–40, 49–53], and at the one really, decisively strong
cadence [bar 74].

Smoothness is all in this fugue, one feels. It is less articulated

or segmented than other fugues—it is hardly segmented at all.
The exposition presents the subject and answer uneventfully at

Example 5
a. Contrapunctus 1

b. Contrapunctus 10

25
25

This content downloaded from

144.126.132.95 on Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:29:23 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
 Contrapunctus 1 / 33

regular four-bar intervals (see example 5). No doubt the absence

of links or episodes also feels “elemental.”
Eventually the surface does begin to ruffle, when in a new
exposition the bass steps in on the heels of its predecessor and
enters after three bars rather than four [bar 32]. This entry—it
can be heard as a second stab at stretto, after a previous, pre-
mature effort in bars 29–30, what is sometimes called a false
stretto—moves rather hastily from the dominant around to the
subdominant, twisting and turning the subject oddly. Then the
tenor entry, as though checked by the low As in the bass, hes-
itates, accumulating dissonances—sevenths, ninths, and pun-
gent augmented intervals [bars 41, 42, 43]. The soprano in this
group of entries emerges as a sort of ethereal climax, led into
by another false stretto. The bass drops out, allowing for height-
ened activity in the remaining voices, like a beating of wings
[bars 48–54].
Past the exposition, then, the piece can be seen to grow
increasingly complex, though the feeling seems to me not
exactly of complexity but of complexities tested out and drifted
past, ideas considered and shelved, in a constantly changing
improvisational field of a unique kind. Endlessly fertile and quite
unstoppable, Bach proceeds spontaneously, almost distractedly,
until the piece pulls itself together with one grand gesture, the
long dominant pedal in the bass from bar 63 to bar 73.
Literally, of course, the pitch A drops out at bar 66, but in the
ear it lasts all the way, so the passage has the effect of a cadenza,
an increasingly rhapsodic epilogue during which pitch rises
and tension mounts until it is too much to bear—or so we must
infer; the buildup is so smooth we had no inkling of impending
crisis. This programmatically seamless music literally breaks
off, stammers, and finally sinks—truly sinks—to rest. To this

This content downloaded from

144.126.132.95 on Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:29:23 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
 34 / The Art of Fugue

aporia some performers add improvised ornaments or flour-

ishes. These cushion the break and seem somehow to humanize
the crisis.

An elemental fugue evoking improvisation, without contra-

puntal artifice—this is true, but as one gets to know it better,
intriguing details of purposeful counterpoint begin to show up
just below the surface. While Bach may abjure countersubjects,
Benito Rivera has shown in a close analysis how shards of coun-
tersubject material, as it were, contribute a pervasive sameness
and tranquility to the free flow (compare, for example, details at
the beginning of bars 7, 11, 15, 42, 51, and 58). There are no recur-
ring episodes in the ordinary sense, but the two-part canon in
the first episode reappears later under bright new streams of
soprano melody [bars 17–22, 36–39, 67–70]. No strettos—but as we
have seen, false stretto used quietly to great effect.
As for Bach’s use of the solemn term “contrapunctus,” that
accords with his evident intention in The Art of Fugue to con-
trol counterpoint as a universal principle, rather than simply
the genre of fugue. Made up of canons and fugues of various
kinds all based on a single theme, the work encompasses more
than one contrapuntal process. (The original title of Die Kunst
der Fuge, added to Bach’s manuscript in another hand, was Die
Kunst der Fuga, “fuga” being the archaic, and by now pedantic
Latin term for imitative counterpoint.) In fact, the project was
not the swan song it was thought to be after its publication in
1751: an early version exists from as early as 1742–46, and whereas
the final publication remains a torso, the early text looks com-
plete; it is preserved as an autograph fair copy that could have
gone right to the printer after one or two final touches. This
text, though it received more and more touches over the years

This content downloaded from

144.126.132.95 on Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:29:23 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
 Contrapunctus 1 / 35

Example 6

73

and was obviously superseded by the printed version, has its

own integrity. Had Bach died a few years earlier, The Art of Fugue
would now be admired and revered among the great master-
works of Western music in the early version.
For the final version, Bach expanded Contrapunctus 1 beyond
its state in the autograph. He also composed two extra fugues
for the collection and expanded others, most extensively
­Contrapunctus 10. Originally Contrapunctus 1 closed four bars
­earlier, prior to the final subject entry that now seals the cadence
and bathes it in a wash of fresh color [bars 74–78]. The origi-
nal ending, shown in example 6, is less celebratory, more radical
and romantic.

This content downloaded from

144.126.132.95 on Thu, 26 Jun 2025 17:29:23 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms