Ip318 en
Ip318 en
European
Economic
Forecast
Spring 2025
EUROPEAN ECONOMY
Economic and
Financial Affairs
European Economy Institutional Papers are important reports analysing the economic situation and
economic developments prepared by the European Commission's Directorate-General for Economic and
Financial Affairs, which serve to underpin economic policy-making by the European Commission, the Council
of the European Union and the European Parliament.
DISCLAIMER
The views expressed in unofficial documents do not necessarily represent the views of the European
Commission.
LEGAL NOTICE
Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the European Commission is responsible
for the use that might be made of the information contained in this publication.
CREDIT
Cover photography: © iStock.com/kwasny221
European Commission
Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs
AE Advanced economy
CEE Central and Eastern European
EFTA European Free Trade Association
EME Emerging markets economy
EMU Economic and Monetary Union
MENA Middle East and North Africa
ROW Rest of the World
iii
Economic variables and institutions
CPI Consumer price index
ECB European Central Bank
EUI Economic Uncertainty Indicator
ESI Economic Sentiment Indicator
FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
FED Federal Reserve Bank
GDP Gross Domestic Product
GNI Gross National Income
HICP Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices
NEER Nominal Effective Exchange Rate
OPEC Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries
PMI Purchasing Managers’ Index
Other abbreviations
AF Autumn Forecast
APP ECB asset purchase programme
BCS Joint Harmonised EU Programme of Business and Consumer Surveys
COICOP Classification of individual consumption by purpose
COVID-19 Coronavirus disease 2019
DGSE Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium model
EUCAM European Union Commonly Agreed Methodology
GM European Commission's Global Multi-country model
NACE Statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community
NFC Non-financial corporation
NGEU NextGenerationEU
LNG Liquefied Natural Gas
PPP Purchasing power parity
RRF Recovery and Resilience Facility
RRP Recovery and Resilience Plan
SF Spring Forecast
SME Small and medium-sized enterprise
S&P GSCI Standard and Poor's Goldman Sachs Commodities Index
TFP Total factor productivity
TTF Title Transfer Facility
VAT Value-added tax
WiF Winter interim Forecast
Graphs/Tables/Units
bbl Barrel
bcm Billion cubic meters
bn Billion
bp. /bps. Basis point / points
euro/MWh Euro per megawatt hour
GW Giga Watt
lhs Left hand scale
mn Million
pp. / pps. Percentage point / points
pt. / pts. Point / points
Q Quarter
q-o-q% Quarter-on-quarter percentage change
rhs Right hand scale
tr Trillion
y-o-y% Year-on-year percentage change
iv
Currencies
EUR Euro
ALL Albanian lek
BAM Bosnian Mark
BGN Bulgarian lev
CZK Czech koruna
DKK Danish krone
GEL Georgian Lari
GBP Pound sterling
HUF Hungarian forint
ISK Icelandic krona
INR Indian rupee
MDL Moldovan Leu
MKD Macedonian denar
NOK Norwegian krone
PLN Polish zloty
RON New Romanian leu
RSD Serbian dinar
RUB Russian Ruble
SEK Swedish krona
CHF Swiss franc
JPY Japanese yen
CNY Chinese Yuan Renminbi
TRY Turkish lira
UAH Ukrainian hryvnia
USD US dollar
v
CONTENTS
Executive Summary 1
vii
23. Denmark 136
24. Hungary 138
25. Poland 140
26. Romania 142
27. Sweden 144
Candidate Countries 147
28. Albania 148
29. Bosnia and Herzegovina 150
30. Georgia 152
31. Moldova 154
32. Montenegro 156
33. North Macedonia 158
34. Serbia 160
35. Türkiye 162
36. Ukraine 164
Other non-EU Countries 167
37. The United Kingdom 168
38. The United States 170
39. Japan 172
40. China 174
41. EFTA 176
42. Russian Federation 179
43. India 181
LIST OF TABLES
1. Overview – the Spring 2025 Forecast 1
I.2.1. International environment 19
I.5.1. Labour market outlook - euro area and EU 44
I.6.1. Inflation outlook - euro area and EU 50
I.7.1. External position – euro area and EU 52
I.8.1. General government budgetary position - euro area and EU 58
II.1.1. Unilateral persistent US tariffs on imports 66
II.2.1. Factors and examples provided to respondents. 78
LIST OF GRAPHS
I.1.1. US effective tariff rate on imports 8
I.1.2. Global trade uncertainty 8
I.1.3. Volatility index, US 9
I.2.1. Global GDP growth 14
I.2.2. World PMIs 14
I.2.3. Exchange rates vs USD 16
I.2.4. 10-year government bond yields of major World economies 16
I.2.5. US imports by country of origin in 2024 16
I.2.6. Growth in global goods trade 18
I.2.7. Container shipping costs and supply-chain pressure index 18
I.2.8. Brent oil prices 20
I.2.9. TTF gas futures prices 20
I.2.10. Electricity futures prices 20
I.3.1. Short-term euro interest rate expectations 21
I.3.2. Yield curves in the euro area and the US 21
I.3.3. Euro area benchmark interest rate 22
I.3.4. Sovereign bond yields, US and Germany 23
I.3.5. Market-based inflation expectations 23
I.3.6. Equity markets 24
I.3.7. Corporate spreads over German 5-y sovereign bonds 24
I.3.8. Financial stress indicators 24
I.3.9. Corporate market funding 24
I.4.1. Real GDP growth and its demand contributions, EU 29
I.4.2. Demand side components, EU excl. IE 29
I.4.3. Sources and use of real disposable income of households 30
I.4.4. Consumer confidence, EU 30
I.4.5. Investment contribution to GDP growth, EU 31
I.4.6. Gross value added in the EU across sectors 32
I.4.7. Short-term indicators, EU 33
I.4.8. ESI/Confidence and PMI, euro area 34
I.4.9. Growth dispersion and convergence 34
I.4.10. Output gaps across Member States 35
I.5.1. Employment growth by sector and by period, EU 40
I.5.2. Job vacancy rate by sector, EU 41
I.5.3. Labour market indicators, EU 41
I.5.4. Hours worked per employee by sectors 41
I.5.5. Compensation per employee and HICP inflation in 2024 across
Member States 42
I.5.6. Employment growth and unemployment rate 43
I.5.7. Job intensity of the economic growth and labour productivity 43
I.5.8. Unemployment rates across Member States, 2024 compared to
2019 and 2026 44
I.6.1. Inflation breakdown, euro area 45
I.6.2. Energy commodity prices and inflation in the euro area 45
I.6.3. Inflationary pressures, euro area 46
I.6.4. Services inflation, euro area 47
I.6.5. HICP excluding energy and food, and a range for 20 alternative
underlying inflation indicators in the euro area 47
I.6.6. Selling price expectations, euro area 48
I.6.7. Inflation breakdown, EU 49
I.6.8. Decomposition of the annual growth in GDP deflator, EU 49
I.6.9. Range of annual HICP inflation rates in EU Member States 50
I.6.10. Cumulative HICP excl energy and food inflation and wage growth
2025-2026 50
I.7.1. Merchandise balance, volume and terms of trade effects 51
I.7.2. Merchandise balance 51
I.7.3. Services balance by sector (BOP), EU 51
I.7.4. Current account balance, EU 52
I.8.1. Drivers of the change in general government balance, EU 55
I.8.2. General government balance developments across Member States 55
I.8.3. Expenditure and revenue contributions to the change of general
government balance, EU 56
I.8.4. Public investment in the EU 56
I.8.5. Drivers of change in the debt-to-GDP ratio, EU 57
ix
I.8.6. Debt developments across Member States 57
I.8.7. Fiscal stance and its components, EU 58
I.8.8. Fiscal stance across Member States, 2025 58
II.1.1. Unilateral US tariffs on imports 64
II.1.2. Export decomposition (unilateral US tariffs on imports) 65
II.1.3. Macroeconomic effects on the EU and the US under unilateral
tariffs and retaliations. 67
II.1.4. Macroeconomic effects on the EU and the US with unilateral tariff
and risk premium shocks. 68
II.2.1. Intention to adjust strategy, by sector 75
II.2.2. The adjustments are or will be of the following nature, per sector 75
II.2.3. Effect on production and final prices 77
II.2.4. EU estimate (*) - Consumer confidence and component
contributions (mean adjusted) 77
II.2.5. EU estimate results 78
II.2.6. Impact of the different factors by age group - percentage balance 79
II.2.7. Factor ''labour market'' - percentage balance 79
II.2.8. Factor ''technological change'' - percentage balance 79
II.3.1. The evolution of EU defence expenditure and its composition 82
II.3.2. EU defence expenditures by Member States in 2023 83
II.3.3. The impact of higher defence spending on real GDP and general
government debt in the EU 84
LIST OF BOXES
I.1.1. Technical elements and general assumptions behind the forecast 11
I.3.1. Signals of a turnaround in the housing market 26
I.4.1. The potential economic impact of the reform of Germany’s fiscal
framework 36
I.4.2. The impact of interest rate changes on euro area households' net
interest income 37
I.7.1. What do different data sources reveal about the EU’s export
performance? 53
II.1.1. EU-US trade relationship through the lens of global value chains 69
FOREWORD
The world was largely unprepared for the abrupt shift in US trade policy. The sweeping tariff hikes
announced on 2 April sent shockwaves through the global economy. The swift response by
financial markets prompted a suspension in their application, but the uncertainty unleashed by an
unpredictable US trade policy will not subside in the near term and weighs heavily on the global
outlook. The escalation of the standoff between the US and China adds to the damage. The
agreement reached on 12 May to partially roll back tariffs is a positive development. However,
tariffs remain elevated and will inevitably result in a gradual unwinding of US-Chinese trade flows.
As the world’s most open economy, the EU is feeling the strain. Weaker economic expansion in
global markets will inevitably drag on export growth. Survey data already point to deteriorating
sentiment among households and businesses—who are thus likely to respond by curbing
consumption and deferring investment.
Crucially, the current geoeconomic challenges highlight not just vulnerabilities of our economy, but
also its solid economic fundamentals and institutional strengths. The EU’s consistent support for a
rules-based international order is reinforcing its pivotal role in global trade. At the same time, the
credibility of EU institutions and the resilience of its financial system are enhancing the global
appeal of euro-denominated assets in times of high volatility.
Extending and deepening our network of trade partnerships is more important than ever. It will
help diversify trade flows and bolster resilience—and is also key to enhancing the EU’s
attractiveness as a base for firms seeking reliable access to global markets.
To fully reap the benefits of increased investor interest, the EU must move forward decisively on
its capital markets’ integration. But capital inflows only become an economic engine when
channelled into productive investment. This in turn requires unlocking the growth potential of the
Single Market: ensuring it is fit for today’s drivers of growth and aligned with EU geopolitical,
technological, and environmental strategic objectives.
The road ahead will be testing. But in a more uncertain, fragmented and volatile world, the EU still
holds a strong hand. Let’s make sure we play it well.
Director General
Economic and Financial Affairs
xi
MODERATE GROWTH AMID GLOBAL TRADE UNCERTAINTY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The EU growth outlook This Spring Forecast projects real GDP growth in 2025 at 1.1% in the
has deteriorated, while EU and 0.9% in the euro area– broadly the same rates attained in
inflation decelerates more 2024. This represents a considerable downgrade compared to the
swiftly. Autumn 2024 Forecast (AF24), largely due to the impact of increased
tariffs and the heightened uncertainty caused by the recent abrupt
changes in US trade policy and the unpredictability of the tariffs’ final
configuration. Despite these challenges, EU growth is expected to rise
to 1.5% in 2026, supported by continued consumption growth and a
rebound of investment. Growth in the euro area is projected to reach
1.4% in 2026. Disinflation is anticipated to proceed more swiftly than
expected in autumn, with new disinflationary factors from ongoing
trade tensions outweighing higher food prices and stronger short-term
demand pressures. After averaging 2.4% in 2024, headline inflation in
the euro area is expected to meet the ECB target by mid-2025—earlier
than previously anticipated—and to average 1.7% in 2026. Starting
from a higher level in 2024, inflation in the EU is projected to continue
easing to 1.9% in 2026.
The EU economy started In the fourth quarter of last year, the EU economy grew by 0.4%,
the year on a slightly slightly surpassing the autumn projections. For the entire year, GDP
stronger footing than growth reached 1.0%. The volume of government consumption
expected. expanded vigorously and provided a larger-than-expected contribution
to EU growth, mainly through employment growth in the government
sector. Growth in private consumption also exceeded expectations
Table 1: Overview – the Spring 2025 Forecast
Unemployment
Real GDP Inflation Current account Budget balance
rate
2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 1.0 0.8 0.9 4.3 2.8 1.8 5.7 6.1 5.8 -0.2 -0.7 -1.0 -4.5 -5.4 -5.5
Germany -0.2 0.0 1.1 2.5 2.4 1.9 3.4 3.6 3.3 6.1 5.3 5.3 -2.8 -2.7 -2.9
Estonia -0.3 1.1 2.3 3.7 3.8 2.3 7.6 7.6 7.3 -2.0 -2.1 -2.0 -1.5 -1.4 -2.4
Ireland 1.2 3.4 2.5 1.3 1.6 1.4 4.3 4.3 4.4 17.0 12.6 11.6 4.3 0.7 0.1
Greece 2.3 2.3 2.2 3.0 2.8 2.3 10.1 9.3 8.7 -8.3 -8.2 -7.9 1.3 0.7 1.4
Spain 3.2 2.6 2.0 2.9 2.3 1.9 11.4 10.4 9.9 3.1 2.7 2.8 -3.2 -2.8 -2.5
France 1.2 0.6 1.3 2.3 0.9 1.2 7.4 7.9 7.8 -0.9 -0.6 -0.6 -5.8 -5.6 -5.7
Croatia 3.9 3.2 2.9 4.0 3.4 2.0 5.0 4.6 4.5 -0.7 -1.1 -1.1 -2.4 -2.7 -2.6
Italy 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.8 1.5 6.5 5.9 5.9 0.9 1.3 1.6 -3.4 -3.3 -2.9
Cyprus 3.4 3.0 2.5 2.3 2.0 2.0 4.9 4.7 4.6 -7.0 -6.5 -5.9 4.3 3.5 3.4
Latvia -0.4 0.5 2.0 1.3 3.0 1.7 6.9 6.8 6.6 -3.3 -3.9 -3.5 -1.8 -3.1 -3.1
Lithuania 2.8 2.8 3.1 0.9 2.6 1.2 7.1 6.8 6.6 2.6 2.0 1.9 -1.3 -2.3 -2.3
Luxembourg 1.0 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.1 1.8 6.4 6.6 6.4 2.3 0.8 0.3 1.0 -0.4 -0.5
Malta 6.0 4.1 4.0 2.4 2.2 2.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.6 3.7 3.4 -3.7 -3.2 -2.8
Netherlands 1.0 1.3 1.2 3.2 3.0 2.0 3.7 3.9 4.0 10.0 10.2 10.6 -0.9 -2.1 -2.7
Austria -1.2 -0.3 1.0 2.9 2.9 2.1 5.2 5.3 5.2 2.0 2.4 2.3 -4.7 -4.4 -4.2
Portugal 1.9 1.8 2.2 2.7 2.1 2.0 6.5 6.4 6.3 1.7 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.1 -0.6
Slovenia 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.0 2.1 1.9 3.7 3.7 3.8 4.6 4.7 4.8 -0.9 -1.3 -1.5
Slovakia 2.1 1.5 1.4 3.2 4.0 2.9 5.3 5.3 5.3 -1.6 -2.3 -2.5 -5.3 -4.9 -5.1
Finland -0.1 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.7 1.5 8.4 8.6 8.3 -0.8 -0.7 -0.7 -4.4 -3.7 -3.4
Euro area 0.9 0.9 1.4 2.4 2.1 1.7 6.4 6.3 6.1 3.3 3.0 3.0 -3.1 -3.2 -3.3
Bulgaria 2.8 2.0 2.1 2.6 3.6 1.8 4.2 4.0 3.8 -0.8 -1.1 -1.0 -3.0 -2.8 -2.8
Czechia 1.1 1.9 2.1 2.7 2.2 2.0 2.6 2.6 2.6 1.2 0.8 0.5 -2.2 -2.3 -2.2
Denmark 3.7 3.6 2.0 1.3 1.6 1.5 6.2 6.2 6.3 13.0 13.7 13.5 4.5 1.5 0.6
Hungary 0.5 0.8 2.5 3.7 4.1 3.3 4.5 4.4 4.3 2.4 2.0 1.5 -4.9 -4.6 -4.7
Poland 2.9 3.3 3.0 3.7 3.6 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.8 0.2 1.0 0.7 -6.6 -6.4 -6.1
Romania 0.8 1.4 2.2 5.8 5.1 3.9 5.4 5.3 5.2 -8.5 -7.9 -7.0 -9.3 -8.6 -8.4
Sweden 1.0 1.1 1.9 2.0 2.2 1.6 8.4 8.7 8.4 7.0 6.8 7.0 -1.5 -1.5 -0.8
EU 1.0 1.1 1.5 2.6 2.3 1.9 5.9 5.9 5.7 3.2 3.0 3.0 -3.2 -3.3 -3.4
1
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
2
Executive Summary
Lower external demand EU exports are expected to grow by a modest 0.7% this year and 2.1%
for EU goods detracts in 2026, in line with the lower global demand for goods. This marks a
from economic growth. significant downward revision from the autumn projections (at 2.2%
and 3.0%, respectively). Weakness in exports is amplified by
competitiveness losses, as well as heightened trade uncertainty.
Although EU firms are adapting their trade strategies in response to
geopolitical tensions and trade fragmentation (see Special Issue 2),
many might hesitate to bear the high fixed costs associated with e.g.
product adaptation, regulatory compliance, and finding new distribution
networks, necessary to enter new export markets. Growth in imports
was also revised down, in line with lower export growth and weaker
domestic demand, although the re-routing of some Chinese exports
and the euro's appreciation lend some support to import growth.
Consequently, in 2025, net external demand is set to subtract nearly
0.5% from growth, but this drag is expected to fade in 2026. Despite
adverse trade volume developments, the sharp drop in energy
commodity prices, cheaper industrial goods imports, and a stronger
currency will enhance the terms of trade further. These movements in
terms of trade help maintain a largely unchanged inflow of income
from the rest of the world. As a result, the current account surplus is
expected to fall only slightly from 4.4% of GDP in 2024 to 4.2% in both
succeeding years.
Elevated uncertainty and a Following a 1.9% contraction in 2024, gross fixed capital formation is
tightening of financial expected to expand over the forecast horizon. With a growth rate of
conditions exert a drag on 1.5% in 2025 and 2.4% in 2026, the expected rebound and
investment growth. acceleration are significantly less pronounced than projected in
autumn. Depressed capacity utilization lowers investment needs, while
uncertainty heightens the option value of deferring investment.
Moreover, despite ongoing easing of monetary policy, the adverse and
volatile market response to trade tensions negatively affect financing
conditions. In the first quarter, banks reported some tightening of credit
standards—even before the financial turmoil of early April. While
corporate bond spreads narrowed again after the suspension of tariffs,
longer-term interest rates remain above their level in the AF24.
Equipment investment is expected to be disproportionately affected by
this challenging environment, barely expanding this year and only
modestly picking up in 2026. After contracting for two years,
residential construction is poised to recover in 2025 and enter more
vigorous expansion in 2026. Conditions for households appear slightly
more favourable than for corporates. Infrastructure, as well as R&D
investment, are set to expand more vigorously—partly supported by
RRF and the deep digital transformation needs of businesses.
Labour markets remain The modest GDP growth achieved in 2024 still led to further
resilient and real wages employment expansion. The job intensity of growth has begun to
expand further. decline from high levels and is expected to normalize further over the
forecast horizon, with employment expanding by about 1%
cumulatively over 2025 and 2026—slightly less than the autumn
projection, but still adding 2 million jobs. As the labour force expands
more modestly, the EU unemployment rate is projected to decline to a
new historic low of 5.7% in 2026. Tight labour markets and improving
productivity are set to drive further wage growth. After increasing by
5.3% in 2024, growth in nominal compensation per employee is
expected to slow to 3.9% in 2025 and 3.0% in 2026. On aggregate in
the EU, this year, real wages should fully recover the purchasing power
3
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
4
Executive Summary
5
PART I
Economic outlook for EA and EU
1. SETTING THE SCENE
The EU economy ended 2024 on a stronger footing than anticipated, and the stage
seemed set for a gradual acceleration in economic activity. Real GDP growth in the fourth
quarter of 2024 turned out slightly better than expected, and data revisions for earlier quarters
were positive too. As a result, activity is now reported to have expanded by 1% in 2024 — a
modest pace, but a welcome shift after the stagnation of the previous year. With the gradual
easing of restrictive monetary policy, financing costs were expected to fall further. Continued
tightness in the labour market was set to support further gains in nominal compensation per
employee, allowing real wages to recover all purchasing power losses incurred since end-2021 by
2025 — and continue growing thereafter. Private-sector balance sheets remained sound, offering
a solid foundation for renewed investment. On the fiscal side, governments were progressing along
a path of slow but steady consolidation. On the external front, world imports were forecast to
expand steadily, supported by a rebound in goods trade and continued resilience in services.
Yet, in early 2025 the EU and global economies were hit by the most significant policy-
induced trade and economic uncertainty shock in decades. The first months of the Trump
administration, which took office in January 2025, saw a wave of executive orders raising tariffs
on goods imports from an expanding list of countries and products. Framed as actions to hold
Mexico and Canada accountable for drug trafficking and illegal immigration, the US imposed 25%
tariffs on goods deemed non-compliant with the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). This was
followed by 25% tariffs on steel, aluminium, automobiles and auto parts from all countries —
hitting producers in the EU, Japan, Korea and North America. On 2 April, the US introduced a 10%
baseline tariff on most imports, along with higher duties on countries with which it runs the largest
trade deficits. The EU faced tariffs of up to 20%, while some smaller economies in Africa and Asia
were hit even harder, while tariffs on Chinese goods increased to 54%. As a result, the effective US
tariff rate surged to levels unseen since the early 20 th century (see Graph I.1.1). The unpredictable
and seemingly arbitrary nature of these measures pushed trade policy uncertainty to record highs,
comparable only to levels seen during the COVID-19 pandemic and the global financial crisis (see
Graph I.1.2).
Graph I.1.1: US effective tariff rate on imports Graph I.1.2: Global trade uncertainty
2004
1900
1908
1916
1932
1940
1948
1956
1964
1972
1980
1988
1996
2012
2020
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, The Budget Lab analysis. Source: worlduncertaintyindex.com
8
Economic outlook for EA and EU
10-year yield suddenly reversed course, increasing by some 50 basis points in less than one week.
The dollar, which had also initially strengthened on expectations of stronger growth, also reversed
course in mid-February, and losses accelerated after the April tariff announcement, fully erasing
the earlier appreciation. This unusual combination of rising yields and a depreciating dollar was
widely read as a loss of confidence in US policy credibility. Risk premia widened across asset
classes. Commodity prices — especially oil and industrial metals — also declined amid fears of
weakening global trade. In Europe, equity indices followed suit, while sovereign yields edged down
as capital moved out of the US and into bond markets in the EU and other advanced economies.
Yields and stock indices also declined in other major economies, including Japan and the UK.
Following fierce market reactions, on 9 April Graph I.1.3: Volatility index, US
the US administration suspended
“reciprocal” tariff rates, and additional 60 Index
carve-outs were granted in the following 50
days. The backlash forced the US administration
to backtrack on its “reciprocal tariffs”. However, 40
the 10% minimum tariff and the 25% sector-
specific tariffs remain in place. At the same time, 30
the administration escalated trade tensions with
20
China — raising baseline tariffs on Chinese
imports in waves, from 10% in February to 145% 10
at the cut-off date of this forecast. China
responded with tariffs on US farm goods, 0
Jan-23 Jul-23 Jan-24 Jul-24 Jan-25
regulatory pressure on American firms, and 125%
tariffs on US imports. After the initial turbulence
in early April, market volatility remained high and Source: CBOE.
sentiment fragile, as uncertainty over US trade
policy persisted (see Graph I.1.3). While equity markets rebounded — recovering most of their post-
2 April losses and returning by early May to levels close to those at the start of April — the
recovery did not extend to bond yields or the dollar. Ten-year Treasury yields remained below post-
election highs, and the dollar stayed weak in nominal trade-weighted terms.
The uncertainty surrounding the tariff regime prevailing over the forecast horizon
forces this forecast to rely on technical assumptions. The situation remains fluid and still
subject to policy shifts, thus necessitating the use of ad hoc technical assumptions. These are
detailed in the Box I.1.1 together with other technical assumptions. Importantly, the individualised
“reciprocal” higher tariffs are assumed to not be reinstated at the expiry of the 90 days
suspension. The forecast also assumes that the exceptionally high tariffs on Chinese imports,
imposed after 2 April, will be scaled back to pre-escalation levels, as they are deemed
unsustainable. Nevertheless, based on the stated US policy objective of reducing its merchandise
trade deficit with China, the forecast assumes a 20% drop in bilateral merchandise trade in 2025,
followed by another 20% in 2026 compared to 2024 levels. Developments after the cut-off date
largely support this approach: on 12 May, the US and China agreed to substantially roll back
tariffs. At the time of publication, the new tariffs in place are lower than those assumed at the cut-
off. The possible extension of the new tariffs agreed on 12 May over the whole forecast horizon is
an upside risk to our global growth forecast. Still, two factors warrant caution. First, the agreement
only temporarily lowers tariffs. There is still considerable uncertainty about the final outcome of
the negotiations and the risk of renewed escalation persists if talks were to break down. Second,
the tariffs in place — 30% on Chinese exports to the US and 10% on US exports to China — remain
significantly higher than pre-escalation levels and are still set to result in an unwinding of the US-
China trade relationship.
Beyond trade, broader geopolitical tensions remain elevated, reinforcing uncertainty,
weighing on confidence, and posing significant risks to the economic outlook. Security
concerns have intensified, as the war in Ukraine continues without signs of resolution. Despite
efforts involving the US, the EU or individual Member States, Russia and Ukraine, a durable peace
agreement offering sufficient guarantees to Ukraine and the EU remains elusive. Meanwhile, the
9
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Middle East remains unstable. Besides the intolerable human toll it is causing, it poses continued
risks of abrupt repricing in energy markets. Adding to the sense of insecurity, contradictory signals
from the US regarding its NATO commitments have heightened EU security concerns. Against this
backdrop, the urgency to bolster defence capabilities has come to the fore. The Readiness 2030
package, presented by the European Commission in March, aims to support Europe’s defence
industry, deepen the single defence market, and enable an increase in defence spending —
including, where needed, through the activation of the Stability and Growth Pact’s national escape
clause in a coordinated manner. By the forecast cut-off date, Member States had requested this
activation, but their defence spending plans remained insufficiently detailed to be included in the
baseline. The same applies to the German parliament’s decision to boost defence and investment
spending.
10
Economic outlook for EA and EU
Box I.1.1: Technical elements and general assumptions behind the forecast
This box details the technical and ad hoc assumptions underlying this forecast. The cut-off date for
taking information into account in this European Economic Forecast was 30 April 2025.
1. Technical elements behind the forecast
Nominal exchange rates are kept constant over the forecast horizon at the level recorded during the
reference period between 14 and 25 April 2025 (see Table 1 in this box and Table 31 in the Statistical
Annex) (1). All interest rate assumptions are derived from implicit market rates, thus fully reflecting
market expectations at the time of the forecast. The assumptions for short-term interest rates for euro
area Member States are derived from the average level during the reference period of three-month
EURIBOR futures contracts over the forecast horizon. In the absence of future contracts, the
assumptions for short-term rates of non-euro area Member States and countries outside EU are
derived from the average level over the reference period of the implicit forward three-month OIS
(overnight indexed swap) rates, corrected for the average spread over the reference period between
the three-month EURIBOR rate and the OIS swap rate with a similar maturity (i.e. three-month). The
assumptions for long-term interest rates for the euro area Member States are derived from the
average forward sovereign rates over the reference period, when available. Forward sovereign rates
are also used, when available, to derive assumptions for long-term interest rates of the other EU
Member States as well as of the countries outside EU examined in the forecast (2).
Commodity prices
Assumptions for Brent oil, gas and electricity prices are based on futures markets, using the average
over the 10-day reference period between 14 and 25 April.
Trade policies and assumptions
For trade policy, this forecast pencils in only the measures that have been implemented until the cut-
off date and includes bans on specific exports and imports (see https://eu-solidarity-
ukraine.ec.europa.eu/eu-sanctions-against-russia-following-invasion-ukraine_en).
(1)
Given the importance of Türkiye as EU trading partner, an exception to the constant nominal-exchange rate
assumptions was made for all bilateral exchange rates of the Turkish lira, due to the outlook of persistently
high inflation in the country. The nominal exchange rate of the Turkish lira vis-à-vis the EUR is assumed to be
35.57 in 2024, 42.01 in 2025 and 43.3 in 2026.
(2)
When forward sovereign rates are not available, the assumptions are derived from forward swap rates (i.e.
Russia and Iceland), corrected in a similar way as for short-term interest rates. For countries where no market
instrument is available (i.e. forwards), a fixed spread is added to the relevant interest rate assumptions for the
euro area (i.e. the difference between the country short or long term rates and the three-month EURIBOR rate
for the short-term rate and the 10-year German sovereign rate for the long-term rate), based on the monthly
average of the country short- or long-term benchmark rates.
11
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Box (continued)
ESA 2010
The forecast is based on the ESA 2010 system of national accounts for all Member States, the EU and
the euro area aggregates.
The number of working days may differ from one year to another. The Commission’s annual GDP
forecasts are not adjusted for the number of working days, but quarterly forecasts are. The working-
day effect in the EU and the euro area is estimated to be limited over the forecast horizon, implying
that adjusted and unadjusted annual growth rates differ slightly (about -0.1pps. in 2025 and around
0.1pps. in 2026), though it may be significant in the case of some Member States. Since the working-
day effect is considered temporary, it is not incorporated in the estimates of potential GDP and output
gaps.
EGR: Net expenditure indicator and fiscal stance
With the reform of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) (3), Member States’ fiscal commitments are
expressed in terms of country-specific net expenditure paths. The new focus on such net expenditure
paths is operationalised through a new net expenditure growth indicator. The net expenditure growth
is the single operational indicator used to assess Member States’ compliance with Council fiscal
recommendations. Moreover, for the purpose of assessing the impulse provided by fiscal policy to the
economy, the Commission services monitor the growth of a similar (somewhat broader) net
expenditure-based metric relative to medium-term potential GDP growth.
The inclusion of the Recovery and Resilience Facility in the forecast
Transactions related to the RRF in the forecast are recorded in line with Eurostat’s ‘Guidance note on
the statistical recording of the Recovery and Resilience Facility’ of 7 October 2021
(https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/1015035/12618762/GFS-guidance-note-statistical-
recording-recovery-resilience-facility.pdf). In particular, this implies that, except for 2020, the
budgetary impact of any expenditure or other costs financed with non-repayable financial support
(‘grants’) from the RRF is neutralised in revenue projections by matching transfers received from the
EU. Expenditure financed by loans from the RRF are not neutralised and thus affect the government
balance, while the loans by the RRF are recorded as Member States’ debt towards the EU.
Budgetary data and forecasts
The forecast incorporates validated public finance data up to 2024 as published in Eurostat’s news
release of 22 April 2025 (4). In this press release, Eurostat withdraws its reservation on the quality of
data reported by Estonia for 2023. The Estonian statistical recorded the relevant expenditures in 2023.
The public finance forecast is made under the ‘no-policy-change’ assumption, which extrapolates past
revenue and expenditure trends and relationships in line with past policy orientations. This may also
include the adoption of working assumptions, in particular to deal with structural breaks. The no-policy-
change forecast includes all fiscal policy measures that imply a change to past policy orientations on
the condition that they are sufficiently detailed as well as adopted or at least credibly announced by
the cut-off date.
In line with Eurostat’s press release, EU and euro area aggregates for general government balance and
debt are based exclusively on the Member States’ balances and debt. For debt, whereas Eurostat
publishes the consolidated figures (corrected for intergovernmental loans, including those made
through the European Financial Stability Facility), the projections in the forecast years 2025 and 2026
are published on a non-consolidated basis. To ensure consistency in the time series, historical data are
also published on the same basis. For 2024, this implies an aggregate debt-to-GDP ratio that is
somewhat higher than the consolidated general government debt ratio published by Eurostat in its
news release 22 April 2025 (by 1.5 pps. in the euro area and by 1.2 pps. in the EU).
(3)
Regulation - 2024/1263 - EN - EUR-Lex ; Regulation - EU - 2024/1264 - EN - EUR-Lex
(4)
Euro area government deficit at 3.1% and EU at 3.2% of GDP
12
Economic outlook for EA and EU
Box (continued)
US tariffs
Notes: (1) Temporary tariff relief in the form of an “import adjustment offset” for parts used in vehicles assembled in the United
States is neglected. (2) Imports from Belarus, Cuba, North Korea, and Russia (known as Column Two countries) are subject to their
separate duty rates only.
The economic impact of Russia’s war against Ukraine remains highly uncertain and depends crucially
on its evolution. The central scenario assumes that geopolitical tensions in the region and sanctions
against Russia remain in place throughout the forecast horizon.
People fleeing the war in Ukraine to the EU
The number of beneficiaries of temporary protection in the EU was about 4.3 million by January
2025. (5) It is assumed that the number of active temporary protection registrations will stay broadly
stable over 2025 before decreasing to 4.1 million by the end of 2025 and to 3.8 million by the end of
2026. (6) Over 2025, new registrations are expected to continue declining at the average rate observed
in the last two years, while downward revisions by Member States (i.e. data revisions by Member States
reflecting people who returned to Ukraine, moved on to another country, or attained another status in
their country of residence) are expected to continue at a rate reflecting the average over the same
period. This results in the projection of an annual average of people seeking protection of about 4.2
million in 2025 and 4.0 million in 2026. Assumptions on the geographical distribution of people fleeing
the war reflect their current distribution across Member States. Finally, as the labour market integration
of people fleeing the war continues to make progress, related assumptions remain in line with the
Autumn 2024 Forecast.
(5)
Eurostat [data code: migr_asytpsm].
(6)
These technical assumptions are not meant as predictions of the development of the conflict, nor of policy
decisions made by the EU or Member States related to the temporary protection scheme.
13
2. INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENT
A more restrictive trade environment and higher uncertainty are set to slow global
economic activity and in particular trade. In the Autumn Forecast, global growth was
projected to reach 3.3% in both 2025 and 2026, the same pace of growth seen in 2024, though
still below the average pace recorded before the pandemic. Global trade was expected to pick up
momentum in 2025 and 2026 and to grow broadly in line with GDP. The current forecast revises
the global outlook for growth and trade significantly downward. Aside from the direct impact of
tariffs, weighing particularly on merchandise trade flows, the sharp rise in trade policy uncertainty
is set to affect both investment and consumption. Concerns over longer term geo-economic
fragmentation may also affect investment plans and the efficiency of supply chains, adversely
affecting productivity. Following the pandemic and energy price shocks, which reduced fiscal
buffers and prompted a strong monetary policy response, the policy space to address renewed
vulnerabilities appears limited for many advanced and emerging economies.
The global economy registered a steady albeit moderate expansion in late 2024, but
early year survey data for 2025 point to some fall in momentum. Global economic activity
is estimated to have expanded by around 0.8% q-o-q in 2024-Q4 (see Graph I.2.1). This was only
marginally slower than the 0.9% expansion seen in 2024-Q3. The global economy is estimated to
have grown by 3.3% in 2024, the same pace as in 2023. Advanced economies are estimated to
have grown by 1.9% and emerging and developing economies by 4.3%. China grew by 5%, and the
US by a strong 2.8%, with both ending the year on a solid footing. Recent survey data (PMIs) for
March 2025 continue to show expansion but they have deteriorated in April (see Graph I.2.2). The
Global composite PMI fell from 52 in March to 50.8 in April. The services PMI fell from 52.6 in
March to 50.8 in April, while the manufacturing PMI weakened slightly from 50.3 in March to 49.8
in April. Both manufacturing and service PMIs are a little stronger for the emerging economies than
for the advanced economies.
Graph I.2.1: Global GDP growth Graph I.2.2: World PMIs
1.8 q-o-q %
change 62 Index >50 =
1.6 expansion
60
1.4
1.2 58
1.0
56
0.8
0.6 54
0.4 52
0.2
50
0.0
-0.2 48
21Q4 22Q2 22Q4 23Q2 23Q4 24Q2 24Q4 Jan-21 Jan-22 Jan-23 Jan-24 Jan-25
GDP contribution emerging markets Composite PMI Manufacturing PMI Services PMI
.
GDP contribution advanced economies
Source: S&P Global.
Sources: OECD, IMF and national sources.
Global inflation eased through 2024, though the beginning of 2025 saw renewed
inflationary pressures across both advanced and emerging economies. Headline inflation
in the majority of G20 economies eased through 2024, helped by the continued decline in goods
price inflation and – especially in the second part of the year - some moderation in energy prices.
However, inflation ticked up again in early 2025 with inflation in emerging markets rising from
3.1% in December 2024 to 3.5% in March 2025 and for advanced economies from 2.2% in
December to 2.6% in March. Services and shelter (rent) inflation remains elevated in some
economies (e.g. UK, Canada, US). In emerging economies, inflation shows significant regional
divergence, with inflation rates in the Asian region typically very low or even in negative territory
14
Economic outlook for EA and EU
(China, Indonesia) or continuing to fall (India), while in Latin America the disinflation process has
slowed and inflation remains elevated in some economies (e.g. Mexico, Brazil).
Global financial conditions have tightened amid market volatility, shifting sentiment,
and elevated uncertainty. Global financial conditions tightened abruptly in early April as
markets reacted badly to US tariff announcements, with sharp selloffs. Although markets have
since rebounded, financial conditions are tighter than in the autumn. Despite the volatility in bond
yields in recent weeks, ten-year yields in the US are now close to levels at the time of the Autumn
Forecast, while in the EU, UK and Japan they are a little higher. However, sentiment towards risks
assets has soured somewhat, and spreads and risks premiums have widened – particularly for
corporates, including in the US. By the cut-off date of the forecast, equity markets had regained
most of the losses incurred since 2 April, but volatility remains high, and the elevated uncertainty
is likely to weigh on credit developments until the outlook becomes clearer. The sharp appreciation
of the US dollar in November through to January, and equally steep depreciation since mid-
January, has added another element to the mix of factors affecting global financial conditions.
Real GDP contracted in 2025-Q1 in the US, and forward-looking indicators suggest a
worsening of the outlook. The US economy expanded at a healthy pace of 2.8% in 2024 with
employment gains and rising real wages supporting robust household consumption. The US
unemployment rate was 4.2% in March, roughly unchanged since mid-2024. Although domestic
demand continued to expand in the first quarter, by 0.6% q-o-q, an apparent shift towards imports
in anticipation of tariffs led to a surprise 0.1% q-o-q GDP contraction. Sentiment has also shifted
profoundly. The University of Michigan consumer sentiment index plunged to 52.2 in April 2025
from 71.1 in January on expectation of higher inflation and weaker economic activity and similar
negative trends are visible in US companies’ investment intentions. The March NFIB survey of small
businesses shows that business uncertainty is at record high levels. Headline PMIs have materially
worsened since December, mainly on the loss of impetus in the services sector, with the S&P
services PMI falling to 51.4 in April, from 56.8 in December. The manufacturing PMIs moved into
expansionary territory in April 50.7, up from 49.4 in December, but this partly reflects some
business stockpiling in anticipation of tariffs.
The US economy is expected to slow down in 2025 and 2026. The unprecedented increase in
the effective tariff rate on US imports, and very elevated policy uncertainty is projected to affect
households’ consumption and firms’ investment decisions, with consumers pulling back on
spending and businesses delaying corporate investment. Employment growth is set to slow down
and the unemployment rate to increase moderately. With wage growth stalling just as tariffs spill
over to consumer prices, household incomes are likely to receive a hit. The ongoing worsening of
financial conditions is expected to further bear on personal consumption and fixed investment,
while higher mortgage rates may weigh on residential investment. The higher tariffs and weaker
dollar are set to significantly reduce import growth, while less dynamic global demand and more
expensive production inputs are projected to weigh on exports over the forecast horizon. The
current account balance is forecast to improve modestly but the deficit, at 3.4% of GDP in 2026, is
expected to remain large. Overall, the US economy is forecast to grow by 1.6% in both 2025 and
2026, down by 0.5 pps. in 2025 and 0.6 pps. in 2026 relative to the AF24. The forecast (i)
assumes that the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 will expire at the end of 2025, in line with its
legal provisions, (ii) does not account for the various government saving proposals under
discussion, which for now are highly uncertain, and (iii) makes assumptions about the extra
customs revenue from the new tariffs. Together, these assumptions lead to projection of a gradual
reduction in the US headline fiscal deficit, from 7.5% of GDP in 2024 to 5.8% of GDP in 2026.
Currently there is a particularly high risk that the TCJA will be extended for another 10 years or
longer, and that the extra revenue from tariffs will be lower than pencilled in, due to some import
tariff rates being lower than was assumed in the baseline for this forecast. Should either of these
risks materialize, the US headline deficits in 2025-2026 may be substantially higher than
projected.
Tariffs are set to push up inflation in the US over the forecast horizon. CPI inflation in the
US already proved sticky in late 2024, rising from 2.4% in September to 3% in January 2025,
15
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
though it eased to 2.4% in March, partly on account of lower energy prices. Inflation excluding
energy and food – which had been stuck at around 3.3% since last September, driven largely by
housing and services - also eased in March to 2.8%. Nevertheless, inflation is expected to rise later
this year as the higher import tariffs are passed through to consumer prices. CPI inflation is
expected to reach 3% in 2025 (up by 1 pp compared to the AF24), moderating to 2.3% in 2026 (up
by 0.3 pps. compared to the AF24). Assuming medium term inflation expectations remain
anchored, this may be a one-off shift in the price level. With economic growth expected to fall
below potential, this slower return of CPI inflation towards the Fed’s 2% inflation target may
create some tension between the Fed’s dual goals of maximising employment and achieving price
stability.
Graph I.2.3: Exchange rates vs USD Graph I.2.4: 10-year government bond yields of major
World economies
106 USD per LCU, Index
1Jan24=100
104 5.0 %
4.5
102
4.0
100 3.5
3.0
98
2.5
96 2.0
1.5
94
Depreciation 1.0
92 0.5
Jan-24 Apr-24 Jul-24 Oct-24 Jan-25 Apr-25 Oct-24 Dec-24 Feb-25 Apr-25
The outlook for other advanced economies Graph I.2.5: US imports by country of origin in 2024
has also softened, particularly for those in
% of total
the firing line of tariffs. The introduction of
the tariffs on Canada assumed in the baseline is
expected to have a serious impact on the
EU, 18.5
Canadian economy, given Canada’s high trade
exposure to the US, leading to several quarters of Others, 24.4
2025 and 2026. Projections for the UK have also South Korea, 4.0
16
Economic outlook for EA and EU
17
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
growth is forecast to remain relatively resilient over the forecast horizon as it is not directly
subject to tariffs. However, the growth rate of services is projected to slow as the tariff-induced
weakening of global goods trade is also set to negatively affect transport-related services.
Graph I.2.6: Growth in global goods trade Graph I.2.7: Container shipping costs and supply-chain
pressure index
25
3m ma, y-o-y
% change 18 1000 USD/container Index (std dev 6
from avg
Thousands
20 16 5
index)
14 4
15 12
3
10
10 2
8
1
6
5
4 0
2 -1
0
0 -2
Jan-21 Jan-22 Jan-23 Jan-24 Jan-25
-5
Jan-21 Jan-22 Jan-23 Jan-24 Jan-25 Drewry Global Container Freight Index
World Advanced economies Emerging markets Drewry China-EU Container Freight Index
Global Supply Chain Pressure Index (rhs)
Source: Own calculations based on CPB data.
Sources: Drewry and New York Fed.
Supply chain pressures eased in early 2025, with shipping rates declining substantially.
After gradually increasing since October 2024, the Federal Reserve Supply Chain Pressure index (1)
declined in April 2025 to levels below its long-term average (-0.29). Supplier delivery times have
remained stable so far in 2025. With the maritime shipping industry having adjusted to the de
facto closure to traffic of the Red Sea, transit rates in the Suez Canal remain around the lowest
point since the start of the pandemic. By contrast, traffic along the Panama Canal has been
restored, with daily transit rates returning to pre-drought levels. The combination of the end of US
import frontloading, the sharp tariff-driven decline of shipping demand for U.S-China routes and
heightened trade policy uncertainty has led container rates to halve since the beginning of the
year.
Overall, projections for both global growth and trade are weaker than at the time of the
Autumn Forecast. For 2024, the higher outturns for China and strong performance in the US
imply a slight mark-up in global growth (excluding the EU) relative to autumn, to 3.6%. Thereafter,
the growth momentum is expected to weaken materially. For 2025 global growth (excluding the
EU) is now projected at 3.1% for 2025 and 3.2% for 2026, compared to 3.6% for both years in the
autumn. This reflects the above-mentioned downgrades to some large advanced and emerging
market economies, including the US, China, Canada, UK, Japan, India, and Mexico. Including the EU,
global GDP growth is projected to be 2.9% in 2025 and 3% in 2026 – an adjustment of -0.4 pps.
and -0.3 pps. respectively, relative to the AF24.
Projections for global trade (ex-EU) are substantially weaker than in the autumn, mainly
reflecting the impact of tariffs included in the baseline. Although trade growth remained
robust in 2025-Q1 due to frontloaded purchases ahead of tariffs, this is set to level off, and a
more restrictive trade environment is expected to dampen global trade growth. Overall, global
trade is now projected to expand well below the pace of global economic growth over the forecast
horizon.
(1)
The index integrates a number of commonly used metrics with the aim of providing a comprehensive summary of
potential supply chain disruptions.
18
Economic outlook for EA and EU
Japan 3.3 2.7 0.9 1.5 0.1 0.7 0.6 0.2 1.2 1.0
United Kingdom 2.2 8.6 4.8 0.4 1.1 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.4 1.4
United States 14.9 6.1 2.5 2.9 2.8 1.6 1.6 2.7 2.1 2.2
Emerging and developing Asia 35.6 7.5 4.6 5.8 5.2 4.7 4.7 5.3 5.1 5.0
- China 19.5 8.6 3.1 5.4 5.0 4.1 4.0 4.9 4.6 4.4
- India 8.3 9.7 7.6 9.2 6.5 6.4 6.4 7.2 6.9 6.7
Latin America 7.3 7.4 4.0 2.3 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.4 2.6
- Brazil 2.4 4.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 2.0 1.5 3.1 2.3 2.4
MENA 5.5 4.6 5.9 2.1 2.2 3.2 3.7 2.3 3.7 3.5
Eastern Neighbourhood and Central Asia 1.1 4.6 3.4 4.6 4.9 4.3 3.8 4.1 4.1 3.5
Russia 3.5 5.9 -1.4 4.1 4.3 1.7 1.2 3.5 1.8 1.6
Sub-Saharan Africa 3.3 4.3 3.6 2.5 2.9 3.7 4.1 2.9 4.1 4.5
Candidate Countries 2.4 9.6 -1.4 5.0 3.3 2.7 3.7 3.2 3.2 4.3
World excluding EU 85.6 6.6 3.5 3.9 3.6 3.1 3.2 3.5 3.6 3.6
World 100.0 6.5 3.5 3.4 3.3 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.3 3.3
Trade of goods and services, volumes
World excluding EU 11.3 4.8 1.9 3.7 2.0 2.2 3.4 3.4 3.4
World 11.1 5.7 1.1 2.9 1.8 2.2 2.6 3.1 3.3
Trade of goods, volumes
World excluding EU 11.9 2.2 -0.2 3.4 1.6 2.0 3.1 3.5 3.4
World 11.7 3.1 -0.9 2.3 1.3 2.0 2.1 3.2 3.3
Trade of services, volumes
World excluding EU 10.0 16.4 10.2 4.8 3.2 3.0 4.2 3.2 3.3
World 9.4 15.8 7.8 4.4 2.9 2.8 4.0 2.9 3.1
(a) Relative weights in %, based on GDP (at constant prices and PPS) in 2024.(b) Imports of goods and services to the various markets (incl. EU-markets) weighted according to
their share in country's exports of goods and services.
Oil prices have dropped sharply since the Autumn Forecast amidst fear of weakening
global demand and oversupply concerns. After the tariff announcement by the US, Brent
prices dropped 16% in less than a week to 64 USD/bbl on 8 April. The subsequent suspension of
part of the tariff regime and US-Chinese attempts at rapprochement have helped to stabilise
prices, although they remain at a lower level than before 2 April. On the supply side, the OPEC+
announcements in April and May to increase supply more than originally scheduled depressed
futures prices further. Moreover, non-OPEC+ members are also projected to increase production. At
the same time heightened sanctions pressure against Iran and Venezuela from the US is exerting
some upward pressure on prices.
Markets expect crude prices to continue falling until 2025-Q4 and stabilise thereafter.
For 2025-Q2 Brent futures point to a price around 67 USD/bbl, around 9% lower compared to
those assumed in the Autumn Forecast. Quarterly averages of Brent futures continue to drop for
the following two quarters, then stabilise at around 64 USD/bbl in 2025-Q4 and remain broadly at
that level over the rest of the forecast horizon. The oil price in euro terms is expected to be even
lower, especially in 2026. Overall, quarterly averages of Brent futures over the forecast horizon are
on average nearly 10.5% lower in USD terms than at the time of the Autumn Forecast. Risks are
high for oil prices in both directions. Substantial uncertainty emanates from the US administration
and its erratic trade policies. Potential trade deals might buoy markets expectations about future
oil demand, while escalating trade tensions would pull prices even lower. On the supply side,
increases by OPEC+ countries and an end to the war in Ukraine would decrease prices. At the same
time an additional expansion of the US sanction regimes against Iran and Venezuela would
constrict global supply. Similar supply side risks are still associated with a renewed escalation in
the Middle East.
European TTF gas prices almost halved in recent months and are expected to remain
lower than anticipated in autumn over the forecast horizon. The halt of Russian piped gas
transit via Ukraine on January 1 and lower than average winter temperatures led to European gas
storage inventory dropping faster below the seasonal average, leading to higher prices, which
peaked at 59 EUR/MWh in mid-February. Since then, gas prices have fallen steeply to 32 EUR/MWh
19
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
by the end of April, the cut-off date of this forecast. The decline was led by both weaker demand
expectations and a steady supply outlook. Moreover, warmer than usual weather in March and April
and increased renewable energy generation added to downward pressure on prices. Looking
forward, the expansion of new LNG export capacity led by the US and Qatar may lead to less
market pressures. (2) Compared to the autumn, the futures contracts curve shifted lower, by around
-4% in 2025 and -6% in 2026, on average. After increasing by 10% in 2025 over 2024, futures
suggest that gas prices in the EU are expected to drop by 14% in 2026, averaging 36 EUR/MWh.
Reflecting these lower gas prices, average European wholesale electricity futures also decreased
by around 4% over the forecast horizon, compared to the autumn. Electricity prices are expected to
be 9% higher in 2025 compared to 2024, but to decline by 5% in 2026.
Graph I.2.8: Brent oil prices Graph I.2.9: TTF gas futures prices
70
100 $/bbl €/MWh
95
60
90
85 50
80
75 40
70
30
65
60 20
Jan-23 Jul-23 Jan-24 Jul-24 Jan-25 Jul-25 Jan-26 Jul-26 Jan-23 Jul-23 Jan-24 Jul-24 Jan-25 Jul-25 Jan-26 Jul-26
Futures (10-day mov avg) At the time of SF24 Futures (10-day mov avg) At the time of SF24
At the time of AF24 historical prices At the time of AF24 historical prices
European agricultural produce prices rose in Graph I.2.10: Electricity futures prices
2025-Q1 but are expected to fall over the 160 €/MWh
forecast horizon. Compared to the Autumn
140
Forecast both agricultural produce prices and
their expected future trajectories have shifted 120
upwards but remain downward sloped over the
forecast horizon. Most prominent drivers of the 100
recent increases were beef, cheese, cocoa and 80
coffee. Prices for beef were supported by reduced
international and domestic supply. Supply side 60
price increases. Cocoa and coffee prices were Futures (10-day mov avg) At the time of SF24
pushed up by a combination of production At the time of AF24 historical prices
problems in key suppliers and robust global
Source: S&P Global.
demand. The projected fall in prices over the
forecast horizon is shared by both animal and vegetable products, with vegetable products
showing a more pronounced decline, driven by palm oil, rapeseed oil, cocoa, coffee and sugar.
Precious metal prices continue to rise, while industrial metal prices have started to drop, although
futures curves for both remain upward tilted. Precious metal prices have been steadily increasing
since the beginning of the year and continued rising after the 2 April US tariff announcement, as
the uncertainty drove investors into safer assets. Precious metal futures indicate further price
increases over the forecast horizon. In contrast, industrial metals like copper, aluminium and steel,
have declined in the wake of the escalating US tariffs, with futures curves also shifting downwards
but remaining tilted upwards over the forecast horizon.
(2)
International Energy Agency (Gas Market Report, Q1-2025)
20
3. FINANCIAL CONDITIONS IN THE EU
Since the Autumn 2024 Forecast, the ECB has cut rates four times - each time by 25bps.
The ECB has continued to lower its policy rates as the disinflation process has remained on track,
with both headline and underlying inflation declining towards the ECB’s inflation target. Since the
start of the easing cycle in June 2024, the main policy rate – the deposit facility rate - has been
lowered by 175 bps, to 2.25%. The rate on main refinancing operations was lowered to 2.40% and
the marginal lending facility rate to 2.65%.
Markets have marginally reassessed the ECB future policy rate path. The ECB Governing
Council reaffirmed in the April meeting that it would continue to follow a data-dependent and
meeting-by-meeting approach to determining the appropriate monetary policy stance to ensure
that inflation stabilises sustainably at its 2% medium-term target. Reflecting a sharp decline in
short-term inflation expectations in the context of increasing downside risks to the growth outlook,
at the cut-off date of the forecast markets expected the policy rate to go down to 1.65% in the
second half of this year (through two to three additional 25 bps cuts) before increasing very mildly
to 1.8% by end 2026. This implies about 20-30 bps lower short-term rates than assumed at the
time of the Autumn Forecast (see Graph I.3.1). As a result, over the forecast horizon, the Euribor 3-
months rates are expected to move on a somewhat lower trajectory than assumed in the AF24.
Graph I.3.1: Short-term euro interest rate expectations Graph I.3.2: Yield curves in the euro area and the US
6 %
4.0 %
5
3.0
4
2.0
3
1.0
2
0.0
1
remaining maturity in years
-1.0 0
Jan-22 Oct-22 Jul-23 Apr-24 Jan-25 Oct-25 Jul-26 0 5 10 15 20
Notes: Expectations based on future contracts for 3 months Notes: * Euro area AAA-rated government securities.
Euribor. Sources: ECB, US Department of Treasury.
Sources: S&P Global, LSEG, Bloomberg, ECB.
Outside the euro area, EU central banks followed different paths, depending on their
respective position in the monetary loosening cycle. The monetary authorities in Denmark,
Sweden and Czechia continued decreasing rates broadly in parallel with the monetary policy
conducted by the ECB. By contrast, central banks in Poland, Hungary, and Romania paused their
rate cuts last autumn, as their economies still experience high inflation rates. By the end of 2026
though, Poland and Hungary are expected to have cut rates more forcefully than the ECB.
21
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Following a bout of volatility, long-term real Graph I.3.3: Euro area benchmark interest rate
interest rates in the euro area are now
above their levels in the autumn. The high 6 %
forecast
volatility reflected investors’ shifting views on US 4
and EU growth prospects. Markets initially 2
welcomed the outcome of the US elections, and 0
expectations of a pro-business policy agenda
-2
pushed up long-term yields in both the US and
the euro area. However, sentiment shifted by -4
area sovereign bond yields following suit. A term- Notes: Short term rate: 3M Euribor; Long term rate: 10Y interest
structure model-based decomposition of EU rate swap; Real rates are derived from the respective short or
long-term rate minus annual HICP inflation and average future
yields suggests that the increase was not related inflation inferred from 10Y inflation swaps, respectively. Short-
to changes in long-term credit risk, but rather to a term nominal forecasts (derived from forward short-term rates)
are deflated by ECFIN inflation forecasts. Long-term nominal
rising term premium. (3) This reflected a forecasts (derived from forward long-term swap rates) are
combination of uncertainty about future short- deflated by their respective forward inflation swaps (i.e. 1Y 10Y
term rates and economic growth prospects, and 2Y 10Y forward inflation swap rates).
Sources: Bloomberg, ECB.
expected demand-supply imbalances in bond
markets driven by a surge in German debt issuance. Since mid-March, long-term interest rates
have declined, as markets realised that the implementation of the stimulus package was likely to
be gradual. Downward pressures were exacerbated by a flight to safety triggered by risks
stemming from US trade policy. At the cut-off date of this forecast, market expectations for real
10-year yields were however markedly higher than assumed in autumn—by about 40 basis
points—suggesting that some of the factors behind the March sudden rise in term premium
persisted and point to a tightening of financial conditions relative to the autumn. In nominal terms,
the Bund 10 years yield was close to the levels recorded at the time of the Autumn Forecast, due
to declining inflation expectations. Still, the yield curve had steepened (see Graph I.3.2.), with yields
for bonds with maturities above 10 years slightly above —by around 20 to 30 basis points – their
level in autumn.
(3)
Analysis based on the PRISM model applied to daily data for Germany, France and Italy. For model details, see
Monteiro, D. P. (2025), “A PRISM decomposition of euro area interest rates”, Quarterly Report on the Euro Area, 2025
vol. 1 (forthcoming).
22
Economic outlook for EA and EU
Graph I.3.4: Sovereign bond yields, US and Germany Graph I.3.5: Market-based inflation expectations
(4)
The 5y5y inflation expectation stands for five-year inflation in five years’ time and is calculated from inflation linked
swaps. Note that market-based inflation expectations capture both 'true' inflation expectations, as well various risk
premia
23
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Graph I.3.6: Equity markets Graph I.3.7: Corporate spreads over German 5-y sovereign
170 bonds
Index,
160 1 January 2023 =100 350 200000
150 180000
300
140 160000
120 120000
200
110 100000
150
100 80000
90 100 60000
80 40000
Jan-23 Jul-23 Jan-24 Jul-24 Jan-25 50
20000
Shanghai Stock Exchange EuroSTOXX
0 0
NIKKEI 225 MSCI UK Jan-23 Jul-23 Jan-24 Jul-24 Jan-25
S&P 500
AA A BBB CCC & lower (rhs)
Graph I.3.6 and I.3.7), investor risk appetite VIX (7-day moving average) ECB stress indicator (rhs)
progressively resumed on expectations for Sources: S&P Global, LSEG, Bloomberg, ECB.
reasonable trade agreements to be reached in the
coming months. Similarly, hopes for a trade agreement between the US and China boosted further
investor confidence. By the beginning of May, the losses on the Eurostoxx600 since 2 April had
been erased while bond spreads narrowed back.
Bank lending activity continues its modest
Graph I.3.9: Corporate market funding
recovery as lower policy interest rates pass
through to the private sector. While financing 10 %
costs for the euro area private sector have been
8
trending down since the beginning of the year,
they remain relatively high, standing above 6
24
Economic outlook for EA and EU
The latest ECB bank lending survey for 2025-Q1 (5) points to further divergence between
lending conditions to firms and for mortgages. Banks reported a small further net tightening
of credit standards for loans to firms and consumer loans, driven by higher perceived risks. By
contrast, credit standards eased moderately for housing loans, owing to higher competition. As
regards loan demand, banks reported a renewed slight net decrease from firms after two quarters
of weak recovery. The decrease was driven by a negative contribution from inventories and
working capital. By contrast, net demand for housing loans continued to increase strongly, while
consumer credit demand increased moderately, both supported mainly by declining interest rates.
Looking forward to the second quarter of 2025, banks expect a net tightening of credit standards
coupled with an increase in demand across all three loan segments. The ECB’s Survey of Access to
Finance of Enterprises (SAFE) for the first quarter of this year corroborates banks’ views expressed
in the ECB’s bank lending survey: firms reported a further decrease in bank loan interest rates,
while indicating a tightening of credit conditions. SAFE respondents confirmed the slight decrease
in demand by firms as they reported a small reduction in the need for bank loans.
Overall, EU financial conditions appear tighter now compared with autumn. While
expected policy rates have shifted downwards, long-term interest rates are now (at the cut-off
date of the forecast) expected higher than in autumn, in both nominal and real terms. Moreover,
bank lending conditions for corporates continued to tighten in the first quarter of this year and
further tightening is expected in the second quarter, largely on account of lower tolerance to risk.
The cautious approach from banks towards lending is mainly motivated by the perceived risks
towards the macro-economic situation and is not related to metrics of asset quality, nor banks’
financial situation, which keeps showing strong profitability, solvency and liquidity. Corporate
bankruptcy stabilised over the last year amidst still very low levels of non-performing loans,
suggesting solid asset quality on banks’ balance sheets. Market-based indicators of risk such as
equity prices or bond spreads have been very volatile in the context of heightened uncertainty
linked to the US trade policies. This in turn is likely to lead to tightening financial conditions over
the forecast horizon.
(5)
Available at
https://www.ecb.europa.eu/stats/ecb_surveys/bank_lending_survey/html/ecb.blssurvey2025q1%7Edd155b616a.en.html
25
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
After falling in the second and third quarter of Graph 1: Housing prices and price-to-income
2023, housing prices started growing again in ratio, EU
2024. After rising steadily since 2013 and picking up 170
Index,
in the aftermath of the pandemic crisis, nominal 160
2013=100
house prices in the EU experienced a mild decline in
150
2023. This decline was more pronounced in real
140
terms – that is, when adjusting for inflation (using the
private consumption deflator) and relative to 130
comparable to that recorded in the pre-pandemic Nominal house price Real house price
Price-to-income
years. By 2024-Q4, nominal house prices in the EU
were 4.9% higher than a year earlier, surpassing the mid-2022 peak. In real terms, the price increase
was more modest, but still 2.1% over the year. The magnitude of the increase varied considerably
across Member States (see Graph 2). Bulgaria, Hungary, Portugal, Spain, the Netherlands, Poland, and
Croatia recorded annual growth rates above 10% in 2024-Q4. At the other end of the spectrum,
Sweden Germany, Austria, and Luxembourg — which experienced more significant contractions in 2023
— recorded more modest gains. France and Finland, in contrast, continued to see year-on-year declines.
15
10
-5
-10
-15
EL
AT
EU
HU
ES
HR
EE
EA
CY
NL
IE
CZ
IT
LU
FR
FI
BG
SI
LV
SK
RO
DK
BE
SE
DE
PT
PL
LT
MT
2023-Q4 2024-Q4
The fall in housing prices was largely driven by weakening borrowing capacity. Since most
home purchases are financed through mortgage credit, households’ borrowing capacity has historically
been a key long-term driver of house demand and house prices. It is driven by household incomes,
mortgage rates and other factors such as housing-related taxes and benefits. When the borrowing
capacity weakens, prospective homebuyers may face larger required downpayments or simply be
denied access to credit. They may also scale down or postpone the decision to buy a house. Households’
borrowing capacity fell sharply in 2022 and 2023, as the increase in household incomes was not
sufficient to offset the negative impact of surging interest rates (see Graph 4). This was reflected in a
sharp contraction of mortgage credit flows and ultimately falling prices.
26
Economic outlook for EA and EU
Box (continued)
Home buyers have to cope with high house Graph 3: Mortgage flows and house price
prices relative to their borrowing capacity. After index, euro area
the pandemic, the ratio between house prices and 12
households’ borrowing capacity – which can be 10 % y-o-y change
Graph 4: House prices over borrowing capacity Graph 5: Borrowing capacity vs real house
ratio, and contributions to borrowing prices, 2019 to 2024-Q4
capacity change, EU
50
15 pps. contr. annual Index, 2013=100 130
% change EL
10 120 PT
LT 25 SI HR
Real house prices % change
5 110
EE PL BG
0 100 NL
CZ DK HU ESIE MT
-5 90 SK LV 0
LUAT BEIT CY
-10 80 FR
SE DE
-15 70 FI RO
-25
-20 60
Going forward, further improvements in households’ borrowing capacity are set to foster
housing demand, amid increasing prices (see Graph 7). After an improvement in 2024, households’
borrowing capacity in the EU is expected to improve further in 2025 and 2026, driven mainly by positive
contributions from household incomes – as real wages are projected to increase by 1.6% this year and
1.1% in 2026. Rising house prices provide a positive signal to housing developers. Indeed, housing
27
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Box (continued)
investment is set to start growing again this year. Still, the supply of new housing is set to respond
with a lag to lower financing costs and higher prices.
Graph 7: EU house price index and household Further increase in house prices are set to lift
income confidence, but also to widen the gap between
homeowners and renters. Real house prices and
180
Index,
2013=100
the price-to-income ratio are still below their 2022
160 peak. This may have contributed to dampening
consumer sentiment by reducing the real value of
140 household wealth for homeowners and, in turn,
maintaining upward pressures on the saving rate, as
120
households try to rebuild wealth buffers eroded by
100
inflation. This effect is more pronounced in countries
with higher homeownership rates and where
80 housing wealth plays a larger role in household
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
balance sheets. (1) A faster recovery in real estate
Adjusted disposable income per capita
prices therefore heralds a more dynamic
Nominal house price
consumption growth. At the same time,
deteriorating affordability widens the gap between homeowners and non-homeowners, dampening the
prospects of the latter to access property.
(1)
See: What explains the high household saving rate in the euro area? And
Why are euro area households still gloomy and what are the implications for private consumption?
28
4. ECONOMIC ACTIVITY
The EU economy ended 2024 on a solid Graph I.4.1: Real GDP growth and its demand
footing and kept momentum in early 2025. contributions, EU
23-Q4
24-Q4
22-Q4
23-Q4
24-Q4
22-Q4
23-Q4
24-Q4
22-Q4
23-Q4
24-Q4
below projections. Services & less durable goods Machinery, equipment, others
Construction Goods
Public consumption grew at a brisk pace in
Services
2024. The volume of government consumption
Notes: (1) Domestic household consumption includes
increased by 2.7% in 2024 in both the EU and the consumption spending by both residents and non-residents.
euro area, contributing 0.6 pps. to real GDP (2) IE excluded to limit volatility in investment, exports and
growth (see Graph I.4.1). The expansion was imports.
29
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
on the upside relative to the Autumn Forecast in most Member States. Employment growth in the
government sector, e.g. in public administration, (adult) education and the care sector, underscores
the volume increase in government consumption.
Private consumption expanded on the back Graph I.4.3: Sources and use of real disposable income of
of solid gains in real disposable income households
30
Economic outlook for EA and EU
prices and a pick-up in lending for mortgage loans suggests the nearing of a turning point (see Box
I.3.1).
Investment in equipment was held back by Graph I.4.5: Investment contribution to GDP growth, EU
weak demand, elevated uncertainty and still % or pps.,
1.0
tight financing conditions. Although corporate y-o-y
forecast
balance sheets have remained solid, with
0.5
leverage ratios near historical lows, profitability
has been dented in 2024 by weak demand as
0.0
well as rising labour and high funding costs.
Moreover, cyclical pressures from the global -0.5
manufacturing downturn, less competitive energy
prices, and uncertainty over global trade policies -1.0
remained a drag on equipment investment – 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
31
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
also suffered under weak demand. Machine building in general, including the automotive industry,
has seen output decline throughout 2023 and 2024, reflecting cyclical and structural issues (see
Graph I.4.7). The Commission’s surveys for the manufacturing sector show that managers’
assessment of their firm’s competitive position on international markets, particularly outside the
EU, failed to recover from the major deterioration in the wake of the energy crisis, and in April it
was still very close to its all-time low reached in October 2024. This trend is particularly relevant in
Germany, but lately it has spread to other Member States. Manufacturing of other transport
equipment (non-automotive) has been steadily recovering from a deep slump following the COVID-
19 pandemic. It regained the pre-pandemic level of output in late 2023. The expansion was
progressing throughout 2024 but has stalled in early 2025 (see Graph I.4.7). 2025-Q1 saw a mild
rebound in the automotive sector. It is too early to judge whether this is a durable turnaround, as
new car registrations have not moved up relative to late 2024, and the uptick could have been an
attempt to front-load deliveries ahead of increased US tariffs. The sector of non-durable consumer
goods appears more sheltered from the still bearish sentiment characterising most other
manufacturing sectors and has enjoyed a massive rebound. This trend is driven by the
pharmaceutical industry, which is running at historically high volumes (notably in Ireland) close to
double the level of 2019 and keeping manufacturing from an outright decline. In construction,
though certain activities benefitted from the buoyant investment in non-residential construction
(see Graph I.4.7, right panel), the still declining housing investment continues to weigh on overall
value added in the sector (see Graph I.4.6).
Graph I.4.6: Gross value added in the EU across sectors
115 Index,
2019-Q4=100
110
105
100
95
90
85
21-Q4
20-Q4
22-Q4
23-Q4
24-Q4
20-Q4
21-Q4
22-Q4
23-Q4
24-Q4
20-Q4
21-Q4
22-Q4
23-Q4
24-Q4
20-Q4
21-Q4
22-Q4
23-Q4
24-Q4
20-Q4
21-Q4
22-Q4
23-Q4
24-Q4
The service sector was the only driver of growth. Activity in business services remained
buoyant in 2024 (see Graph I.4.6). Together with a rebound in distribution services - trade,
transport - and consumer services - hospitality, recreation and entertainment, this made up for the
weakness in industry. Readings of the services PMI and the European Commission’s services survey
were in expansionary territory throughout 2024.
Looking forward, consumption is projected to stay the key growth driver but remains
constrained by a still elevated saving rate. Continued gains in employment and wages and
decelerating inflation should support a further increase in household gross disposable income.
However, the relapse in consumer confidence in March – and more markedly in April, to an 18-
month low – suggests that households are also affected by the current trade tensions and policy
uncertainty, primarily due to fears of a worsening general economic outlook (see Graph I.4.4).
Rather than job security, households appear primarily concerned with the high cost of living (see
Special Issue 2). This concern likely reflects the legacy of the recent inflationary experience, which
significantly eroded the purchasing power of consumers (in late 2024, real wages were only at
their level of 2021-Q3) and left prices for essential goods and services significantly higher.
32
Economic outlook for EA and EU
Moreover, while conditions for continued easing in inflation exist, consumers’ expectations of price
increases have surged since October 2024. In this context, consumption may continue to be held
back by precautionary saving motives, as well as efforts to rebuild wealth buffers following the
erosion of financial wealth by inflation and the still incomplete recovery in real estate valuations
(see Box I.3.1). The saving rate is thus projected to decline more gradually than previously
expected, from 14.8% in 2024 to 14.2% in 2026. Real private consumption is therefore forecast to
grow by 1.5% this year, with further strengthening expected in 2026.
Graph I.4.7: Short-term indicators, EU
105 80
100 150
75
90 130
Index 3m rolling, 100 70
80 Feb-2020=100 110
65
70 90
21/07
22/01
22/07
23/01
23/07
24/01
24/07
25/01
95 60
33
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
As a result of these developments, in 2025, net external demand is set to detract almost 0.5%
from growth, but the drag is set to fade out in 2026.
Graph I.4.8: ESI/Confidence and PMI, euro area
Apr-23
Apr-24
Apr-25
Apr-22
Apr-23
Apr-25
Apr-22
Apr-23
Apr-24
Apr-25
Apr-22
Apr-23
Apr-24
Apr-25
PMI ESI/ Confidence
Notes: EC BCS series rescaled to align interpretation to PMI: Confidence'=50+0.5*Confidence; ESI'=ESI/2. The Economic Sentiment Indicator
(ESI) has broader coverage than the composite PMI. In addition to services and industry it includes retail, construction, and consumers.
Sources: S&P Global, European Commission.
Overall, real GDP growth is seen to maintain the pace observed in 2024 and pick up in
2026. Real GDP growth in 2025 is projected at 1.1% in the EU and 0.9% in the euro area –
broadly the same growth attained in 2024. This is a substantial downgrade with respect to the
autumn projections, which largely reflects the impact of higher tariffs and elevated uncertainty
ushered in by the trade protectionist turn of the new US administration. Growth in the EU is
nonetheless expected to pick up to 1.5% in 2026, as consumption keeps expanding and investment
accelerates after rebounding in 2025. Growth in the euro area is set to attain 1.4% in 2026.
Graph I.4.9: Growth dispersion and convergence
a. GDP level relative to 2024 b. Per capita GDP at PPP: change in percentage
AT points of EU average since 2023
MT110 DE DK
PL IT
HR BE AT PL
LU BG
DE 4 LT
IE FR
LT 100 EA BE HR
0
FI MT
CY FI
FR -4 EL
DK 90
LV
IT -8 CZ
ES NL
EA CY
EL EU
SE SK
SI SK
EE RO
BG SE IE ES
CZ HU SI PT
PT LU RO EE HU NL
LV
2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Importantly, most Member States are expected to return to growth in 2025. Only Austria
(-0.3%) is projected to contract and Germany to stagnate. France and Italy are expected to grow
just below average, while Spain and Poland are projected to grow robustly. Malta, Croatia and
Denmark are the countries with the strongest growth projections for the current year. In 2026, all
Member States are expected to grow by close to 1% or more, with growth being weakest in
Belgium and Italy (0.9%). France and Germany are projected to grow below average, while Poland
(3%) and Malta (4%) are set to grow the strongest. With economic expansion in the southern and
central EU still outpacing growth in north and western Europe, economic convergence in the EU is
expected to progress further (see Graph I.4.9).
34
Economic outlook for EA and EU
Growth is estimated to stay below potential Graph I.4.10: Output gaps across Member States
in 2024 and 2025, but outpace it in 2026.
4 OG narrows OG widens
The output gap has widened in 2024 to -0.4% of OG negative OG positive
potential output in the EU (-0.3% in the euro 3
35
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Box I.4.1: The potential economic impact of the reform of Germany’s fiscal framework
In March 2025, Germany adopted a constitutional reform of its national fiscal framework, with three
major novelties. First, a new infrastructure fund, worth EUR 500 billion (11.6% of 2024 GDP), was set
up outside the scope of the ‘debt brake’ (1). The fund is intended to finance new projects in the fields
of transport, healthcare, energy, education, research and digitalisation. Projects financed by the fund
can be approved within 12 years. Second, defence spending above 1% of GDP is excluded from the
calculation of the ‘debt brake’. Third, the Länder are allowed to take up new net borrowing of up to
0.35% of GDP annually, as was the case at the federal level. This eases the previous requirement of
the Länder to run balanced budgets.
The aim of the new infrastructure fund is to address Germany’s large investment needs, and as such
it has the potential to significantly boost economic growth over the next decade. At the cut-off date of
this forecast, plans for increased spending from the infrastructure fund and for defence based on the
adopted reform were not deemed sufficiently detailed to be included in the baseline projections. In
particular, they had not yet been formalised in a supplementary budget. The baseline forecast
presented in this publication is therefore complemented by stylised model simulations, based on the
QUEST model, to assess the potential economic impact of the reform.
Assuming that the infrastructure fund is fully debt-financed and allocated to productive projects, and
factoring in a linear spending profile starting in the second half of 2025, the model simulations show
that compared to the baseline, Germany’s GDP would be around 1¼% higher by the end of this
legislative term (2029) and 2½% higher by 2035 thanks to the fund’s investments. This reflects a
long-lasting expansion of economic activity driven by an increase in capital stock and productivity. The
impact on public debt would be relatively contained, provided the investment yields high productivity
gains and boosts growth, with public spending rising below GDP growth. (2) The debt-to-GDP ratio would
be around ½ percentage point higher in 2029, rising to 3¼ percentage points above baseline in 2035. (3)
The increase in investment would also have positive economic spillovers to other EU Member States: EU
GDP would be lifted by ¾% in 2035, with around one-third of this impact due to spillovers.
The growth benefits of focusing on productive investments can be further illustrated by comparing the
above results with an alternative scenario, in which half of the additional spending from the fund would
finance (unproductive) public consumption. In this case, the impact on German GDP would be
significantly smaller, amounting to ¾% of GDP in 2029 and 1¼% of GDP in 2035. This more muted
impact reflects a smaller increase in overall production capacity, with knock-on effects on private
demand. The debt-to-GDP ratio would be around 1½ percentage points higher in 2029 and 5½
percentage points higher in 2035 than in the baseline.
As long as the emphasis on productive use is maintained, a speedy fruition of the fund would yield the
most economic gains. This however requires addressing other investment bottlenecks than just
financing, such as those related to labour supply, the efficiency of planning and permitting procedures,
institutional complexity and administrative capacity.
As to the new possibility for the Länder to increase their deficit and for Germany to increase defence
spending outside the scope of the debt brake, their impact on economic growth may be smaller, as
there is no requirement to spend these two new sources of fiscal space on productive investment.
(1)
The ‘debt brake’ is a German fiscal rule embedded in the federal constitution (Basic Law for the Federal Republic
of Germany). Before the reform, it limited annual net new borrowing of the federal level to 0.35% of GDP.
(2)
To isolate the effects of the increased investment, we assume that debt is stabilised only in the long run. No
discretionary fiscal adjustments are introduced within the horizon of reported results.
(3)
The simulation results are based on highly stylised and simplified assumptions. Their interpretation comes with
important caveats, particularly regarding the uncertain productivity of government investment, the assumed
absence of spending and implementation delays, and the response of other public spending. For additional
analysis on these factors and alternative assumptions in the QUEST model, see Motyovszki G., Pfeiffer, P., & in
‘t Veld, J. (2024), “The Implications of Public Investment for Debt Sustainability”, European Economy Discussion
Paper 204.
36
Economic outlook for EA and EU
Box I.4.2: The impact of interest rate changes on euro area households' net interest income
This Box analyses the impact of interest rate Graph 1: ECB policy rate and interest rates for
changes on the net interest income of households
households in the euro area. Between July 2022 7 %
and September 2023, the ECB deposit facility rate
6
increased from 0.50% to 4% (see Graph 1).
5
Compared to previous tightening phases in the euro
4
area, the strength and speed of the monetary policy
tightening was unprecedented. The ECB started 3
1). The analysis in this Box examines the dynamics of Implicit interest rate of outstanding loans to HH
Implicit interest rate of deposits of HH
net interest income for the euro area household
ECB deposit facility rate
sector on aggregate and by income groups. In a
Source: ECB.
context of a high cost of living, the rise in interest
rates sparked concerns about the resilience of households, in particular low-income households with
outstanding mortgages at flexible interest rates. In fact, household disposable income appears to have
hardly been affected by the surge and subsequent fall of interest rates.
Households’ net interest income tends to be negative. Net interest income is the difference
between the interest payments households receive on their fixed income financial assets (mostly
deposits and bonds), and the interest payments they make on their liabilities, mostly mortgage loans.
Households in the euro area on aggregate have a positive net financial asset position, including with
regard to interest-bearing instruments. (1) However, as the interest rates paid on loans exceed those
earned on deposits, households’ net interest income tends to be marginally negative (see Graph 2). In
2024, it stood at around -1% of gross household disposable income (GHDI).
Following a decline and subsequent stability in Graph 2: Net interest income, household sector,
the period leading to and following the global euro area
financial crisis, household net interest income 6 % GHDI
turned less negative over 2020-2024. Net
5
interest income (as a % of GHDI) declined in the
4
aftermath of the financial crisis and broadly
3
stabilised thereafter, in an environment of low
2
inflation, low interest rates and gradual household
1
deleveraging. In 2020, net interest income in the euro
area turned less negative, as interest receipts 0
(1)
Interest-bearing instruments considered in this note are deposits and bonds on the assets side, and loans on
the liabilities side. They exclude other financial assets (such as equity, pension and insurance savings) and non-
financial assets (such as real estate). Households’ financial assets in the euro area are mostly composed of
deposits, shares, and insurance/pension guarantees, each making up about one third of all their financial assets
in recent years. Over the 2010s, households saw a strong increase in their net financial asset positions, mostly
on account of equity and investment fund shares.
37
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Box (continued)
Despite the sharp monetary policy tightening in 2022-23, debt servicing costs and income
from savings grew only moderately. In 2022, over half of households’ deposits in the euro area
were held as overnight deposits (2), which carry relatively low interest rates and are not very responsive
to changes in policy rates (3). The remaining share of deposits were either redeemable at notice or time
deposits with a pre-agreed maturity. The high share of overnight deposits in total deposits, and inertia
in portfolio shifts, possibly due to heightened uncertainty, resulted in a limited increase in the overall
deposit interest rate, which peaked at just below 1.2% in mid-2024. On the liabilities side, the
sensitivity of rates on outstanding loans to policy rate changes has declined over time. ECB data
suggest that in 2010, around 40% of the stock of loans to households was due to have an interest
rate reset within the next 12 months; by 2024, this proportion had halved. The strong decline in credit
flows also contributed to the inertia of the implicit interest rate on the outstanding loan stock.
The net position on interest-bearing financial instruments varies across income groups. (4)
Data from the 2020-21 wave of the Household Finance and Consumption Survey (HFCS) (5) suggest
that most households in the euro area have net positive asset positions when considering both financial
and non-financial assets (e.g. real estate). When looking only at interest-bearing instruments, about
two-thirds of households still have a positive net position. Almost all households have some savings,
but only around 40% of them have outstanding debt, and only 27% have mortgage debt. (6) Negative
positions on interest-bearing instruments are observed mostly among higher earning households (i.e;
households in the two highest income quintiles), who tend to have more debt, especially mortgage
debt (see Graph 3a), and less deposits (as % GHDI) as they shift a larger proportion of their wealth
into higher-yielding non-interest-bearing financial assets (such as equity and insurance and pension
savings) and non-financial assets (not shown in Graph 3). Although interest-bearing assets and
liabilities represent a fairly similar share of income across quintiles (see Graph 3a), nominal amounts
vary widely (see Graph 3b) — resulting in top earners receiving and paying much more interest overall.
(2)
The Commission’s recent communication on a “Savings and Investments Union” aims to mobilize households’
savings and encourage households to shift to financial assets with a higher return. See COM (2025) 124 final.
(3)
See Box 4 in ECB Financial Stability Review, May 2023 and Chapter 3, p. 54 in ECB Financial Stability Review,
May 2024 on the lower responsiveness of overnight deposit interest rates to policy rate changes.
(4)
For a broader discussion on the impact of high inflation on different groups of households, see Chafwehe, B.,
Ricci, M., Salto, M. and Stoehlker, D. (2025) The distributional impact of high inflation and the related policy
response, Quarterly Report on the Euro Area, 23, 2025, ECFIN, European Commission,
https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2765/196965, JRC140748.
(5)
The Household Finance and Consumption Survey by the ECB collects household-level data on household
finances and consumption. The data used in this analysis are from the fourth wave of the survey, carried out
between the first half of 2020 and the first half of 2022.
(6)
Because mortgage loans are typically much larger than non-mortgage loans, the volume of outstanding non-
mortgage loans is only a fraction (around 10% according to MFI data) of all outstanding loans.
38
Economic outlook for EA and EU
Box (continued)
Graph 3: Households' net position on interest-bearing instruments, average by income quintile 2021, euro area
Notes: Income quintile 1 (5) presents the households at the bottom (top) of the income distribution.
Sources: Own calculations based on the most recent HFCS data (2020-21 round). Income quintile 1 (5) presents the households at
the bottom (top) of the income distribution.
Interest rate increases likely had a negative impact on households in the two upper income
quintiles. Assuming that the distribution of deposits and loans across quintiles is unchanged from the
one suggested by the 2020-21 HFCS data, and that interest rates on interest-bearing instruments
have evolved in a similar manner across quintiles, households in the two highest income quintiles are
likely to have been the most negatively affected by interest rate increases. These results should be
interpreted with caution, as they rest on strong assumptions. In reality, savings and lending dynamics
in the face of economic shocks diverge between income groups. (7) Research suggests that richer
households are more likely to move their savings into higher-yielding deposit types (e.g. time rather
than overnight deposits); and HFCS data suggest that the share of flexible rate mortgages decreases
with income, (8) which increases exposure to interest rate shocks for low-income households. They also
suggest that, conditional on having debt, low-income households have higher debt service burdens as
a share of their income. In addition, they tend to own less other (non-interest bearing) assets, which
could otherwise act as a buffer in the face of income shocks. At the same time, HFCS data suggest
that households with mortgage debt at flexible rates and a debt service burden above 40% of their
gross income make up less than 1% of euro area households overall, and less than 2% in the bottom
income quintile. The next round of HFCS will allow better insights into dynamics across income groups.
(7)
For instance, various studies have suggested that high-income households were more likely than low-income
households to see an increase in savings during the COVID-19 pandemic. See e.g. Friz, R., Morice, F. (2021) Will
consumers save the EU recovery? Insights from the Commission’s consumer survey. SUERF Policy Note 237, 20
May 2021; Mathä, T.Y., Montes-Viñas, A., Pulina, G., Ziegelmeyer, M. (2023) COVID-19 effects on income,
consumption and savings: evidence from the Luxembourg Household Finance and Consumption Survey. Bulletin
BCL 2023/2: 50-59. The Commission’s 2025 Alert Mechanism Report also suggests that saving rates and credit
growth have shown heterogeneous patterns across euro area countries over recent years, with the euro area
saving rate remaining above its long-term average on aggregate, while countries with already lower saving
rates before the pandemic saw a further reduction in saving rates in the face of high inflation.
(8)
The analysis considers the euro area-wide income distribution. Between country differences (e.g. in the use of
flexible rate mortgages) are likely to have a stronger impact on the results than within country differences.
Within countries, the presented variables may vary differently across income quintiles.
39
5. LABOUR MARKET
The EU economy added 1.73 million jobs in 2024. According to national accounts, headcount
employment in the EU continued to increase last year, though at a more moderate pace than in
previous years. The annual growth rate in employment stood at 0.8% in the EU compared with
1.2% in 2023 and 2.2% in 2022. In the euro area, employment growth was slightly more dynamic
over the past three years, with 1.0% growth last year after 1.4% in 2023 and 2.4% in 2022.
Employment growth was strong in services. Graph I.5.1: Employment growth by sector and by period,
According to national accounts data, the services EU
sector created jobs for around 1.8 million workers 10 mn, difference
from 2019-Q4
in 2024. 940 000 of these were in the private 8
sector, mostly in wholesale, retail,
6
accommodation, and transport, but also IT. The
public sector also contributed significantly, with 4
Non market
Agriculture
Information
Professional
Industry
Construction
accom., transport
Total
Market services
Wholesale, retail,
services
agriculture sector continued to lose workers last
year, by as many as 290 000 jobholders. Looking
at the longer time period since the pandemic
crisis, the private services sector emerges as the 2021-Q4 2023-Q4 2024-Q4
(8)
This indicator measures unmet demand for work and consists of the unemployed, underemployed part-time workers,
and those available for work but not seeking work, as well as of those actively seeking work but not available to take
up work.
40
Economic outlook for EA and EU
The severe labour shortages experienced during the post-pandemic rebound are further
easing. The job vacancy rate continued to decline throughout last year. In the fourth quarter of
2024, it stood at 2.3% in the EU (2.5% in the euro area), down from 2.6% at the end of 2023
(2.9% in the euro area). Sectors such as administrative and support services (NACE sector N),
construction (F), IT (J) and accommodation and food services (I) continue to display the highest
vacancy rates but are all at or below pre-covid levels (see Graph I.5.2). The Commission business
surveys also suggest a loosening labour market. Data for April 2025 indicate that the share of
managers reporting shortage of labour force as a factor limiting production declined further for
both industry and services. In April, this share stood at 22.9% for services, down from 25% in
January and 34.1% in the same month of 2023. In industry, it stood at 18.2%, down from 18.6%
three months earlier and 29.2% in spring 2022.
Graph I.5.2: Job vacancy rate by sector, EU Graph I.5.3: Labour market indicators, EU
6 3 z-score
%
2
5
1
4 0
-1
3
-2
Labour market loosening
2 -3
-4
1
14-Q2 15-Q4 17-Q2 18-Q4 20-Q2 21-Q4 23-Q2 24-Q4
Notes: B-S: Industry, construction and services; B: Mining and Notes: Z-scores are used as measures and computed by
quarrying, C: Manufacturing; D: Electricity, gas, steam and air subtracting the mean from a data value and then dividing by the
conditioning supply; E: Water supply; sewerage, waste standard deviation. Mean and standard deviation are calculated
management and remediation activities; F: Construction; G: from 2000, except for the job vacancy rate and labour market
Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles and slack. *Share of managers indicating shortage of labour force as
motorcycles; H: Transportation and storage; I: Accommodation and factor limiting production.
food service activities; J: Information and communication; K:
Financial and insurance activities; L: Real estate activities; M:
Professional, scientific and technical activities; N: Administrative
and support service activities.
Graph I.5.4: Hours worked per employee by sectors While remaining below pre-crisis levels,
hours worked per worker have increased.
105 Index, While employment growth slowed down
2019-Q4 = 100
progressively last year, hours worked per
100 employee have started to rise, particularly during
the last two quarters of 2024 (see Graph I.5.4).
95 However, average hours worked per employee
continue to hover below pre-pandemic levels.
90 Among sectors, only hours in market services are
above pre-pandemic levels while construction and
85
non-market sectors are rising but remain below
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 pre-pandemic levels. Hours worked in industry
Market services Non-market services
stagnate at low levels.
Industry Construction
Labour productivity also resumed growing in the second half of 2024. Productivity,
measured by real GDP per employed person, posted annual declines each quarter from 2023-Q1
to 2024-Q1. After stagnating in 2024-Q2, productivity grew in the last two quarters of last year,
by 0.3% in 2024-Q3 and by 0.8% in 2024-Q4. When measured by output per hour worked,
productivity already increased marginally in the first half of 2024 and accelerated during the last
41
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
two quarters. Overall, labour productivity per person increased on average by 0.2% last year in the
EU but declined marginally in the euro area (-0.1%). There is a large dispersion across Member
States, with a rebound especially noticeable in the non-euro area Member States. Among the
largest EU Member States, further declines in labour productivity in 2024 were recorded in
Germany and Italy, while a rebound took place in France and Spain.
Wage growth decelerated further in 2024. Compensation per employee continued to grow
throughout last year but at slowing pace in both the EU and the euro area. Annual growth in
compensation per employee in the EU stood at 4.7% in 2024-Q4, down from 5.7% in 2024-Q1. In
the euro area it declined from 4.8% in 2024-Q1 to 4.1% in 2024-Q4. Annual growth in real
compensation per employee also slowed down, but to a lesser degree than the nominal values
thanks to further declines in inflation rates. Growth remained largely positive, at 2.1% in 2024-Q4
for the EU and 1.8% for the euro area. A comparison between the whole years 2024 and 2023
show a slowdown in nominal wage growth in the EU, from 6.0% in 2023 to 5.3% in 2024.
Conversely, real compensation per employee increased to 2.3% in 2024 from a decline of 0.6% in
2023 thanks to a significant decline in annual inflation between 2023 and 2024.
Differences in wage growth across Member Graph I.5.5: Compensation per employee and HICP
States were wide. For the whole year 2024, the inflation in 2024 across Member States
highest wage growth rates (in double digits) were 18 y-o-y % growth
recorded in Eastern EU countries such as 16
Romania, Poland, Hungary, Croatia and Bulgaria. 14
Despite higher-than-average inflation, these 12
countries still rank high in terms of real wage 10
growth rates. Among large Member States, the 8
Netherlands, Germany and Spain recorded higher
6
than average nominal wage growth (6.5%, 5.2%
4
and 5.0% respectively) while wages in France and
2
Italy grew more modestly, by 3.2% and 3.4%
0
respectively. In real terms, wage growth
HU
HR
AT
EL
EE
ES
NL
CZ
BG
DK
IE
IT
FR
RO
SK
SI
DE
SE
EA20
CY
BE
FI
PL
LT
LV
MT
EU27
LU
PT
42
Economic outlook for EA and EU
This forecast projects a slowing but still Graph I.5.6: Employment growth and unemployment rate
broad-based employment expansion for this 3 forecast 12
y-o-y %
year and next. Employment growth in the EU is 11
2
expected to decline from an annual growth rate 10
of 0.8% in 2024 (1.0% in the euro area) to 0.5% 1
9
this year and next in both the EU and the euro 0 8
area (see Graph I.5.6) (9). Across countries, job 7
-1
losses are expected this year in a few countries 6
including Germany and France (-0.2% in both -2 5
countries). Conversely, strong employment growth -3 4
this year is set to continue in Spain (2.1%) and in
a few other countries such as Malta and Croatia.
Employment growth
In 2026, employment growth is projected to Unemployment rate (rhs)
converge somewhat with moderation in countries Unemployment rate forecast (rhs)
(9)
After the cut-off date of this publication, Eurostat published on 15 May the flash estimate on GDP and employment for
the first quarter. Employment growth for 2025-Q1 came in at 0.2% for the EU and 0.3% for the euro area, above our
projections. This introduces an upside risk to the employment growth and a downside risk to productivity growth.
(10)
Job intensity is defined as the ratio of employment growth to economic activity growth and captures the extent to
which economic growth is converted into employment growth.
43
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
The unemployment rate is expected to Graph I.5.8: Unemployment rates across Member States,
stabilise this year and hit a new record low 2024 compared to 2019 and 2026
AT
HU
EE
EL
ES
CZ
CY
HR
NL
IE
BG
SK
RO
IT
FI
FR
PL
DE
SI
BE
LU
DK
LV
SE
MT
EU27
PT
EA20
LT
narrowing of cross-country dispersion (see
Graph I.5.8). 2024 2019 2026
Wage growth is set to moderate further over the forecast horizon. Latest indicators such
as the ECB wage tracker continue to indicate that negotiated wage pressures are easing this year.
Furthermore, inflation expectations are also trending lower this year and in 2026. As such, growth
of nominal compensation per employee in the EU is expected to moderate further from 5.3% in
2024 to 3.9% this year and 3.0% in 2026. For the euro area, nominal compensation per employee
would decline from 4.5% last year to 3.4% this year and 2.7% in 2026. Real compensation is also
set to moderate but remain above productivity growth. This year, real wages at EU and euro area
level are set to recover all the purchasing power lost since the surge of inflation and start
expanding again in 2026. However, the recovery in real wages displays large cross-country
disparities. By 2026, average real wages in six Member States (Estonia, Finland, Ireland,
Luxembourg, Sweden and Slovakia) are still set to be below their post pandemic peak of 2021 or
2022.
(a) Employment as a percentage of population of working age. Definition according to structural indicators. See also note 6 in the Statistical Annex. For the EU and EA, this table now also displays
employment in persons, limiting the comparability to figures published before Spring 2023.
44
6. INFLATION
Energy has dominated the inflation Graph I.6.1: Inflation breakdown, euro area
dynamics since last autumn. After declining 12
y-o-y % change,
over the summer, annual headline inflation in the 10 pps.
euro area rose steadily from its three-and-a-half- 8
year-low of 1.7% in September to 2.5% in 6
January, to then moderate to 2.2% in March and
4
April (11). The increase between September and
2
January was driven primarily by the energy
0
component, which rose by 8 pps. over the same
-2
period, progressively turning from a Jan-21 Jan-22 Jan-23 Jan-24 Jan-25
disinflationary to inflationary factor. Energy Energy
Unprocessed food
turned disinflationary again as from February Non-energy industrial goods
(see Graph I.6.2.b), reflecting a sharp decline in Processed food incl alcohol &tobacco
Services
energy commodity prices, which culminated with HICP, y-o-y % change
a contraction of 2.3% m-o-m, in April - the
largest monthly decline since end-2022 (see Graph I.6.2.a). Similar trends were observed in most
Member States.
Graph I.6.2: Energy commodity prices and inflation in the euro area
After moderating in late 2024, food inflation rebounded as of February 2025, fuelled by
strong momentum in unprocessed food. Following a temporary increase in autumn 2024, food
inflation in the euro area moderated to 2.3% in January 2025, back to the 3-year-low registered
over the summer months, only to rise gradually thereafter to 3% in April. This increase reflects
rising pressures in unprocessed food, with annual inflation rising by 3.5 pps. in the first 4 months
of the year, to 4.9% in April (see Graph I.6.3.b). The price momentum in this component firmed
rapidly as pipeline pressures rebounded in food commodity markets (e.g. fruit and vegetables),
amid rising agricultural commodity prices (see Section 2), persistent wage pressures and the pass-
through from earlier energy price increases. Inflation of processed foods, on the rise in the fourth
quarter, fell back 0.4 pps. from December to 2.5% y-o-y in April, still somewhat above historical
averages (1).
(11)
According to the flash estimate for the euro area published after the cut-off date of the forecast
45
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Note: * seasonally and working-day adjusted, annualised Note: * seasonally and working-day adjusted, annualised
c. Services d. Energy
12 % 80 % % 400
70
10 60 300
50
8
40 200
6 30
20 100
4 10
0 0
2
-10
0 -20 -100
-30
-2 -40 -200
Apr-22 Oct-22 Apr-23 Oct-23 Apr-24 Oct-24 Apr-25 Apr-21 Oct-21 Apr-22 Oct-22 Apr-23 Oct-23 Apr-24
Note: * seasonally and working-day adjusted, annualised Note: * seasonally and working-day adjusted, annualised
Price pressures in services lost impetus over autumn and but firmed again in early
2025. The gradual easing of momentum in services prices over most of 2024 (see Graph I.6.3.c)
was fully offset by positive base effects, resulting in an annual services inflation persisting at
around 4%. The price momentum picked up again as from January 2025 but was more than offset
by base effects turning negative in the first quarter, leading to a moderation of services inflation
to 3.5% in March. A very strong m-o-m rise in services prices in April, however, pushed the annual
inflation rate to 3.9%. Even net of the Easter (12) calendar effect, the increase in services price
pressures in April remains remarkably strong as highlighted by the spike in the monthly price gain
adjusted for seasonal and calendar effects (see Graph I.6.3.c). Looking at individual services
categories (see Graph I.6.4a), inflation in communication remained relatively weak, while inflation
in other categories continued to exceed historical patterns. Inflation of package holidays and
accommodation plunged, likely temporarily, in March, following high readings since 2021 (see
Graph I.6.4.a). Overall, the gradual convergence of inflation in services with different degrees of
exposure to the successive pandemic, energy and wage shocks suggests that the legacy effect of
these shocks is fading (see Graph I.6.4.b).
(12)
The timing of Easter (March in 2024 but in April of 2025) likely resulted in a shift in the seasonal increase in package
holiday prices with the ensuing strong negative impulse for annual inflation in March 2025 and a positive one in April
2025.
46
Economic outlook for EA and EU
Notes: Graph b: Contact-intensive sectors include Transport services (cp073), Recreational and cultural services (cp094), Package holidays
(cp096), Restaurants and hotels (cp11), Hairdressing salons and personal grooming establishments (cp1211). Energy- and wage- sensitive
components based on ECB (Fagandini et al, 2024, Decomposing HICPX inflation into energy-sensitive and wage-sensitive items, ECB
Economic Bulletin, Issue 3/2024).
Inflation in non-energy industrial goods Graph I.6.5: HICP excluding energy and food, and a range
remains around historical averages. It held for 20 alternative underlying inflation
indicators in the euro area
steady at 0.5-0.6% since August 2024 amid
deflationary pressures from imports, a 10
%
strengthening euro and subdued consumer
demand. Deflation on an annual basis continued 8
47
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
0 0 0 5
10 0
0
-5 -20 -2 0 -2 -5
Jan-20 Jan-21 Jan-22 Jan-23 Jan-24 Jan-25 Jun-22 Dec-22 Jun-23 Dec-23 Jun-24 Dec-24 Jun-25 Dec-20 Dec-21 Dec-22 Dec-23 Dec-24
3m-o-3m price momentum 3m-o-3m price momentum 3m-o-3m price momentum
SPE in food retail (lagged 2 months) SPE in consumer goods manufacturing (lagged 2 months) SPE in services (lagged 4 months)
SPE in food manufacturing (lagged 4 months) SPE in consumer goods retail (lagged 2 months)
Food inflation is set to remain high in the near term reflecting recent increases in
agricultural commodity prices and still elevated labour cost pressures. Agricultural
commodity prices have risen markedly since the autumn and futures contracts suggest prices
significantly above those assumed in the autumn this and next year. The resulting acceleration in
momentum of unprocessed food prices is set to keep annual total food inflation elevated in the
near term. This outlook is confirmed by the increase in the Commission’s Business and Consumer
Survey’s selling price expectations of food manufacturers, and especially in food retail (see Graph
I.6.6.a). Food inflation is then set to decline over the course of 2026, in line with receding pipeline
pressures from agricultural commodities and labour cost, to settle around its longer-term average
for the year as a whole (2.1% in the euro area and 2.5% in EU). All in all, food inflation is revised
up strongly by around ¾ pps. in 2025 around ⅓ pps. in 2026 in both the euro area and EU.
48
Economic outlook for EA and EU
Summing up, HICP inflation is set for a Graph I.6.7: Inflation breakdown, EU
gradual decline in 2025 and 2026 at a pps.,
11
somewhat faster pace compared to the 10 y-o-y %
change forecast
autumn. The current assessment of the impact 9
8
of trade tensions incorporated in the baseline 7
scenario (13) on EU inflation is clearly negative, 6
with key channels related to the (i) correction of 5
4
energy commodity prices, (ii) competitive 3
pressures from diversion of Chinese goods away 2
from the US market and (iii) appreciation of the 1
0
euro and other EU currencies. These downward -1
pressures outweigh (i) higher-than-previously- 21 22 23 24 25 26
Energy
expected food inflation and (ii) stronger pressures
Food
in services amid slightly higher wage growth and HICP excl. energy, food and tobacco
tighter labour market compared to the autumn. HICP, all items (y-o-y % change)
49
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
forecasts across the EU should continue narrowing over 2025 and 2026, a strong geographical
pattern remains, with Member States from central and eastern Europe set to have visibly higher
core inflation, linked primarily to domestic unit labour cost (see Graph I.6.10). Moreover, in 2025,
headline inflation is set to increase from 2024 in e.g. Slovakia, Bulgaria, Hungary and Lithuania,
reflecting important hikes in VAT and excise taxes, and in Sweden on the back of an increase in
pressures in food and energy. In 2026 headline inflation is projected to moderate in all Member
States except for France, where it is set to rebound from below 1% in 2025 (dragged by the
largest deflation in energy prices in EU). Except for a pick-up in Slovakia and Bulgaria in 2025, core
inflation (excl. energy and food) is projected to moderate in all Member States in 2025 and then
further in 2026.
Graph I.6.9: Range of annual HICP inflation rates in EU Graph I.6.10: Cumulative HICP excl energy and food
Member States inflation and wage growth 2025-2026
30 40
y-o-y % change
forecast RO
50
7. EXTERNAL TRANSACTIONS
Merchandise trade volumes declined in 2024, though the net balance increased
marginally as the contraction in imports volumes outpaced that of exports. Imports
contracted more than exports, as detailed in Section 4, so the trade balance in volume terms
increased in 2024. Trade statistics show a slightly different picture. Export volumes continued
declining much stronger than import volumes in 2024, resulting in a lower net balance compared
to national accounts. The methodological difference between trade statistics and national accounts
is explained in detail in Box I.7.1.
Graph I.7.1: Merchandise balance, volume and terms of Graph I.7.2: Merchandise balance
trade effects
6
% of GDP
7 % GDP
6
4
5
4
3 2
2
1 0
0
-1
-2 -2
-3
-4 -4
-5
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
-6
Terms of trade effect 19-Q1 20-Q1 21-Q1 22-Q1 23-Q1 24-Q1
Change in volumes of import of goods Goods excl energy Energy Total
Change in volumes of exports of goods
Trade balance t-1
Merchandise trade balance
Terms of trade normalised further as energy prices fell, further lifting the merchandise
trade balance. In addition to the volume effect, terms of trade continued improving following the
strong rebound in 2023. Particularly the further easing of energy prices helped import prices
decelerate more markedly compared to export prices, leading to the positive terms of trade effect
on the trade balance (see Graph I.7.1). The lower energy costs reduced the energy deficit to EUR
336 billion in 2024, from EUR 433 billion in 2023. This contributed to a boost in the overall
merchandise balance, which averaged 2.6% of GDP in 2024, despite a dip in the last two quarters
(see Graph I.7.2).
The services trade surplus reached a new Graph I.7.3: Services balance by sector (BOP), EU
record high in 2024, supported by higher 2 % of GDP
export volumes and further improvement in 1.5
terms of trade. Services export volumes rose 1
more markedly than the previous year, while 0.5
growth in import volumes slowed somewhat, 0
pushing the services balance up. Besides the -0.5
volume effect, terms of trade improved -1
marginally as export prices accelerated faster
-1.5
than import prices. Although the terms of trade 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Telecommunication and information
effect was less pronounced than for goods, it Intellectual property use
nonetheless contributed positively to the overall Travel
Transport
surplus, reinforcing the upturn of the services Manufacturing services
trade balance. Other
Total
51
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
transport balance was still below. Besides, the dynamic increase of the ICT services, that was
already pointed to in Section 4, pushed up the overall services balance. In contrast, intellectual
property continued to drag down the balance due to the high import share (see Graph I.7.3).
Overall, the trade balance increased to 4.4 % of GDP in 2024 and the current account to
3.2 % of GDP (14), with large differences in contributions by Member States. After
rebounding in 2023, the aggregate trade balance continued to expand as both the merchandise
and services balance strengthened in 2024. The current account balance picked up too, supported
by the increased trade surplus, albeit slightly dampened by a higher deficit of net primary income
and current transfers. Member States, however, still diverge largely in their current account ratio to
GDP. Amongst large Member States, Ireland, the Netherlands and Germany continued recording
current account surpluses, while France is amongst the countries with current account deficits.
Looking forward, the trade balance is set to Graph I.7.4: Current account balance, EU
remain broadly stable as the drag of trade 5
% of GDP forecast
tensions is partially offset by further gains
4
in terms of trade. Exports of goods are set to
3
keep contracting in 2025 before rebounding in
2026, while imports of goods are expected to pick 2
Euro area EU
Spring 2025 Autumn 2024 Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
Forecast Forecast Forecast Forecast
2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Merchandise trade balance (a) 2.2 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.1 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.6
Services trade balance (a) 1.4 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.9
Primary income balance (a) 0.0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 0.0 -0.1 -0.1
Secondary income balance (a) -1.1 -1.1 -1.1 -1.1 -1.0 -1.1 -1.1 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
Current-account balance (a) 2.6 3.3 3.0 3.0 3.8 3.6 3.6 2.6 3.2 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.4 3.3
Net lending or net borrowing (a) 2.6 3.1 2.9 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 2.7 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.5 3.4 3.4
Terms of trade (b) 4.4 1.6 1.6 0.8 1.4 0.0 -0.1 3.9 1.3 1.6 0.7 1.2 0.1 -0.1
(a) % of GDP, (b) annual percentage change.
(14)
Based on National Accounts.
52
Economic outlook for EA and EU
Box I.7.1: What do different data sources reveal about the EU’s export performance?
Different trade data reveal diverging trends for EU goods exports and trade performance.
According to international trade in goods statistics, EU export volumes were nearly 8% lower in 2024
compared to 2019 (see Graph 1b), and the EU lost nearly 15% of its market share in the world,
underscoring a long-term downward trend (see Graph 1c). Instead, national accounts data indicate an
8% increase of goods export volumes over the same period, resulting in an only 3% decrease of market
share since 2019, following a decade of stability. These figures include both extra- and intra-EU trade
for comparability, because national accounts only report total exports for the EU27 aggregate.
Sources: Eurostat, WTO (world trade based on ITGS), European Commission (world trade based on national accounts).
International trade in goods statistics (ITGS) and national accounts diverge due to
methodological differences in how trade is defined and measured. (1) ITGS records goods
crossing borders, while national accounts focus on ownership changes. For instance, ITGS excludes
merchanting (goods bought from and resold to non-residents without the good actually crossing the
territory of the merchant), while national accounts record merchanting as exports on a net basis (i.e.,
revenue less the purchase value of goods sold). (2) Additionally, ITGS does not record any transactions
when a resident company buys inputs within a foreign territory, hires a foreign company to process
them on its behalf, and sells the finished goods abroad (contract manufacturing). In contrast, national
accounts record these transactions as imports (acquisition of inputs) and exports (sales of outputs) of
goods, while also booking the value of processing as an import of manufacturing services. (3) National
accounts also include in goods trade transactions such as products purchased by tourists, low-value
trade and illegal trade activities, which ITGS misses as it is traditionally based on customs
declarations. (4) Valuation methods differ as well: ITGS record exports ‘free on board’ (FOB) and imports
including ‘cost, insurance and freight’ (CIF), while national accounts record both exports and imports
on a FOB basis. These methodological differences result in a steady gap between the two statistics:
(1)
The methodology of ITGS is described in Eurostat (2020): User guide on European statistics on international
trade in goods, 2020 edition. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union (link).
(2)
Merchanting trade occurs when for example a German company buys consumer electronics from a Chinese
manufacturer and sells them directly to a retailer in Brazil without the goods ever entering Germany. German
customs authorities would not register either the import or the export, but the national accounts would record
the net export value (broadly corresponding to the sales margin of the German company on this transaction).
(3)
Contract manufacturing occurs when for example an Irish pharmaceutical firm develops and owns the patent
for a medication and decides to produce it cost-effectively, by purchasing raw materials in China and
contracting a manufacturer in India. The Indian plant manufactures the product on behalf of the Irish company
without taking ownership of it. Once produced, the drugs are shipped from India to the US, where they are sold
to US distributors. In this case the goods never enter Ireland (thus no impact on trade in ITGS), but the Irish
national accounts record an export of goods (to the US), an import of goods (of raw materials from China) and
a service import (from India, for the value of the processing services). See also: Contract Manufacturing - CSO
- Central Statistics Office
(4)
Due to the lack of customs controls within the EU, intra-EU trade is measured through a monthly survey among
operators, complemented by other data such as VAT declarations. Low-value (de minimis) trade refers to
transactions below the minimum threshold required for customs declarations. Currently, imports from third
countries to the EU below EUR 150 are not liable to customs duty, but a simplified customs declaration for
such consignments was introduced following amendments to customs legislation in 2019 and 2020. Illegal
trade can include smuggling or the underreporting of import values in customs declarations.
53
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Box (continued)
national accounts systematically record 7-9% less goods exports in the EU27 than the ITGS (see
Graph 1a). A common feature of the two datasets is that neither record tariffs levied by the importing
country in the value of imports. In national accounts, import tariffs are recorded as indirect taxes on
goods.
The two datasets also use different price indicators to compute trade volumes. The ITGS uses
unit values based on physical quantities (typically, the weight or the number of units), which do not
capture the effect of composition and quality changes. Therefore, if there are changes in the quality
of goods being traded, these will not necessarily be reflected in unit values. Conversely, an increase in
the unit value of car exports can reflect either a growing share of luxury cars within exports
(composition), or improvements in comfort and safety features, performance or range (quality).
Comparisons of unit value indices and price indices show that the two methods can give significantly
different results. (5) For this reason, national accounts prefer price indices (ideally adjusted for quality)
to account for composition and quality effects and generally do not accept the use of unit values
(except for sufficiently homogenous goods).
Export unit values could be biased upward by composition and quality changes, which could
explain why the ITGS reports lower export volumes than national accounts. The national
accounts-based export price index of the EU systematically increases less than the ITGS-based export
unit value, suggesting a steady shift towards higher-value and higher-quality products within exports
(see Graph 2b). Furthermore, this gap between the growth rates of export prices and unit values is
systematically larger in the EU than on average in the world economy, which might suggest that the
EU experienced more export quality improvement and/or a stronger shift towards high-value products
than the rest of the world. This might reflect the relatively strong integration of EU countries in global
value chains (ECB, 2019) which facilitates their specialisation in activities with high skill content
(Timmer et al., 2014). (6)
Graph 2: Selected trade variables: ratios of national accounts to International Trade in Goods Statistics
a. Trade at current prices b. Deflator c. Trade volume
1.3 2019=1 1.3 2019=1 1.3 2019=1
1 1 1
Notes: The graph shows each variable in national accounts divided by its counterpart in the ITGS, taking 2019 as base year. Each
panel has the same scale for comparability purposes.
Sources: Eurostat, WTO (world trade based on ITGS), European Commission (world trade based on national accounts).
These observations have implications for the use of trade data. National accounts better gauge
the contribution of exports to GDP growth and aggregate trade performance, as they account for
changes in export quality and composition. They also include exports of goods that are produced by
resident companies outside national borders. The ITGS, due to their monthly availability, remain a
useful source for the timely monitoring of trade flows, mainly at current prices. They can also be used
to analyse trade by product and partner, as these breakdowns are not available in national accounts,
keeping in mind the different coverage of ITGS data and the potential biases of the volume measures
calculated with unit values.
(5)
See: Eurostat (2016): Handbook on prices and volume measures in national accounts. Luxembourg: Publications
Office of the European Union (link), section 3.9.2
(6)
ECB (2019): The impact of global value chains on the euro area economy. ECB Occasional Paper Series 221
(link). Timmer, M.P., Erumban, A.A., Los, B., Stehrer, R., de Vries, G.J. (2014). Slicing Up Global Value Chains.
Journal of Economic Perspectives 28: 99-118. As a caveat, the same data patterns could also arise if the
national accounts of non-EU countries relied more strongly on unit values to compute trade deflators.
54
8. PUBLIC FINANCES AND THE FISCAL POLICY STANCE
The EU general government deficit fell Graph I.8.1: Drivers of the change in general government
slightly in 2024. After the small rise recorded in balance, EU
GDP in the euro area). The 0.3 pps. reduction was 0.5
deficit exceeding 3% of GDP is expected to Ch. COVID-19 and one-offs measures Ch. interest expenditure
Ch. cyclical component of the budget Change of budget balance
stabilise at eleven in 2025 and to decline to nine
in 2026, based on unchanged policies (see Graph
I.8.2). Eight EU countries are currently under an excessive deficit procedure. (16)
The EU deficit is set to rise marginally in both 2025 and 2026 (see Graph I.8.1). It is
projected to increase by more than 0.1 pps. in 2025 and only marginally in 2026, reaching 3.4% of
GDP (3.3% in the euro area). Discretionary fiscal policy is set to provide a deficit-reducing
contribution in 2025, whereas increasing interest expenditure and revenue shortfalls are projected
to exert upward pressure on the deficit in both years.
Graph I.8.2: General government balance developments across Member States
6
5 % of GDP
4
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
-7
-8
-9
-10
HU
EE
AT
EL
HR
ES
CY
EU27
RO
FR
FI
IT
NL
CZ
IE
BE
SK
LV
DE
MT
BG
LT
SI
SE
LU
DK
PL
PT
EA20
Notes: Member States are ordered according to the projected 2026 general government balance.
Revenue- and expenditure-to-GDP ratios are both expected to increase over the
forecast horizon (see Graph I.8.3). The 0.5 pps. increase of the revenue ratio in 2024 was driven
by significant revenue windfalls, which offset large shortfalls recorded in 2023, mainly reflecting
the lagged impact of high inflation on certain tax bases, notably wages. (17) The expenditure-to-GDP
(15)
Revenue windfalls (shortfalls) are increases (decreases) in the revenue-to-GDP ratio that are not explained by
discretionary measures or transfers from the EU budget.
(16)
Excessive deficit procedures - overview - European Commission
(17)
Higher withholding taxes on financial assets’ income also supported tax collection in 2024.
55
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
ratio also rose in 2024, by 0.2 pps., driven by higher interest expenditure. In 2025, despite some
shortfalls, the revenue-to-GDP ratio is forecast to increase by a further 0.3 pps., mainly supported
by discretionary measures to sustain social contributions and indirect taxes, as well as by higher
transfers from the EU budget. Simultaneously, the expenditure-to-GDP ratio is set to rise by 0.4
pps. due to further increases in interest expenditure and higher investment financed by both
national and EU budgets. Both the revenue and expenditure ratios are projected to increase
marginally in 2026, based on unchanged policies.
Graph I.8.3: Expenditure and revenue contributions to the Public investment is projected to further
change of general government balance, EU increase over the forecast horizon. The EU
0.75
pps. of GDP
public investment-to-GDP ratio increased to 3.6%
forecast in 2024, from 3.2% in 2019, and is projected to
0.50 rise further to 3.8% in 2025 and to stabilise in
0.25
2026. The increase between 2019 and 2026 is
expected to be supported by both the national
0.00 and the EU budgets. (18) In particular, the projected
increase in defence investment, around 0.3% of
-0.25
GDP between 2019 and 2026, drives the increase
-0.50
in investment financed by national budgets (see
Graph I.8.4). By the end of the forecast horizon,
-0.75 most EU countries are projected to spend more on
2023 2024 2025 2026
nationally financed public investment than they
Revenue Expenditure Change in budget balance did in 2019.
(18)
Differences in investment financed by the EU budget among Member States depend on the allocation of Recovery and
Resilience Facility grants and other EU funds, as well as the degree of absorption.
(19)
The stock-flow adjustment (SFA) explains the difference between the change in government debt and the government
deficit/surplus for a given period. Conceptually, the stock-flow adjustment can be broken down into the following
categories: net acquisition of financial assets, debt adjustment effects and statistical discrepancies. The debt-
increasing SFA projected in the EU is mainly driven by the developments in Italy, Spain and the Netherlands in both
2025 and 2026, and also Poland in 2026.
56
Economic outlook for EA and EU
Graph I.8.5: Drivers of change in the debt-to-GDP ratio, EU Graph I.8.6: Debt developments across Member States
4 180
160
2
140
0 120
-2 100
80
-4
60
-6
40
debt decreasing
-8 20
2023 2024 2025 2026
0
Primary balance Stock-flow adjustment
EE
HU
AT
HR
ES
EL
NL
BG
CZ
CY
SE
IE
SK
FR
LU
LV
LT
DK
RO
MT
DE
FI
IT
SI
BE
EU27
PL
PT
EA20
GDP deflator effect Real GDP growth effect
Interest expenditure Change in the debt ratio 2020 2024 2026
The EU fiscal stance was slightly contractionary in 2024 and is set to be broadly neutral
in 2025. After an overall expansion of around 3% of GDP in 2020-23, the fiscal stance for the EU
aggregate was slightly contractionary in 2024, by around ½% of GDP (see Graph I.8.7). (20) This
slightly contractionary stance was driven by the decline in governments’ subsidies to private
investment (other capital expenditure; especially housing renovations in Italy) and lower
expenditure financed by EU funds, (21) only partly offset by increasing investment financed by
national budgets. A broadly neutral fiscal stance is projected for 2025 in the EU aggregate (and
the euro area), with some restraint in both net current expenditure (22) and other capital
expenditure, driven by the adjustment requirements of the new EU fiscal framework, partly offset
by further expanding investment nationally financed (mainly for defence) and expenditure financed
by RRF grants. In 2026, the no-policy-change forecast points to a neutral fiscal stance in the EU
(and in the euro area). The impact of activating the National Escape Clause of the Stability and
Growth Pact, providing flexibility over 2025-2028 for higher defence expenditure, is likely to
materialise from 2026 onwards. For the EU aggregate, this impact is expected to be broadly offset
by the additional consolidation measures needed to comply with the requirements of the EU fiscal
framework (see also Special Issue 3 “The economic impact of higher defence spending”).
(20)
The fiscal stance measures the short-term impulse to the economy from discretionary fiscal policy. See for more
details Cepparulo et al. (2024), An Assessment of the Euro Area Fiscal Stance, Economic Brief 080, European
Commission. The fiscal stance is considered broadly neutral at a value within the -0.25% / +0.25% of GDP range while
it is considered expansionary (-) or contractionary (+) outside this range.
(21)
Expenditure financed by EU funds was particularly high in 2023 due to the absorption of remaining funds from the
Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2014-2020.
(22)
Current expenditure net of i) interest expenditure; ii) discretionary revenue measures; iii) current expenditure on
programmes of the Union fully matched by current revenue from Union funds; iv) cyclical elements of unemployment
benefit expenditure; and v) one-offs and other temporary measures. For further discussion and comparison of this
aggregate with the fiscal stance, see also See Box I.2.4 of the Commission Autumn 2024. For an overview of Member
States’ medium-term fiscal plans, see e.g. European Commission (2024). 2025 European Semester: bringing the new
economic governance framework to life. COM(2024) 705 final (link).
57
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Contractionary fiscal policies are expected Graph I.8.7: Fiscal stance and its components, EU
in eight Member States in 2025. Cross- 0.75 Contractionary/
country heterogeneity in fiscal policy is expected 0.25 Consolidation
3.0 % of GDP
2.5
Contractionary/ Consolidation
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
-1.0
-1.5
-2.0
-2.5 Expansionary/Relaxation
-3.0
DK LT PT LU BG LV CY EL HR NL HU BE PL ES SI IE CZ SK IT DE FI SE FR EE AT RO MT EA EU
RRF grants and other EU funds contribution Other nationally financed capital expenditure contribution
Nationally financed investment contribution Net nationally financed current expenditure contribution
Fiscal stance
Actual balance (3) = (1)-(2) -3.5 -3.1 -3.2 -3.3 -3.0 -2.9 -2.8 -3.5 -3.2 -3.3 -3.4 -3.1 -3.0 -2.9
Interest expenditure (4) 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.1 1.9 2.0 2.1 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.1 1.9 2.0 2.0
Primary balance (5) = (3)+(4) -1.8 -1.2 -1.2 -1.1 -1.1 -0.9 -0.7 -1.7 -1.3 -1.3 -1.3 -1.2 -1.0 -0.9
Change in structural budget balance (a) 0.4 0.7 0.1 -0.2 0.8 0.2 -0.2 0.3 0.5 0.0 -0.2 0.6 0.2 -0.2
Overall fiscal stance (b) 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.1
- Fiscal stance - contribution from national net expenditure 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.0
- Fiscal stance - contribution from the EU -0.1 0.2 -0.2 -0.1 0.1 -0.1 0.0 -0.1 0.2 -0.2 -0.1 0.1 -0.1 0.0
Gross debt 88.9 88.9 89.9 91.0 89.1 89.6 90.0 82.1 82.2 83.2 84.5 82.4 83.0 83.4
(a) pps. of potential GDP. (b) The fiscal stance measures the short-term impulse to the economy from discretionary fiscal policy. A positiv e figure corresponds to a contractionary stance while a negativ e figure corresponds
to an expansionary stance.
58
9. RISKS
The risk assessment for this forecast is dominated by the uncertainty surrounding the
tariff configuration that will prevail over the forecast horizon. The set-up of US tariffs vis-
à-vis the EU and other partners that underpins this forecast (see Section 1) is a purely technical
assumption. The negotiations with trade partners that the US government intends to engage in
could yield very different outcomes. If the currently suspended high tariffs are reinstated, they
could significantly impact EU GDP, particularly through substantial confidence effects. The scale
and nature of this shock would largely depend on the policy responses from the EU and other
partners, as discussed in the Special Issues section, and would be commensurate to the high
importance of bilateral trade relations between the EU and the US, both directly and via global
value chains (see Box II.1.1). The trade agreement between the US and China reached on 12 May,
which reduced tariffs to 30% on Chinese imports into the US and 10% on US imports into China, is
a positive development that presents an upside risk to our growth forecast. However, the baseline
projections already factor in lower US tariffs than those seen at the forecast's cut-off date. Though
current rates are arguably even lower than assumed in the forecast, they remain relatively high
and are likely to significantly lead to a reduction of trade flows between the US and China.
Additionally, the agreement only temporarily suspends tariffs, leaving the door open for renewed
escalation. From the EU's viewpoint, the new trade deal between China and the US suggests that
negotiation outcomes may not necessarily be worse than those assumed. However, for the EU, the
scope for a relatively (i.e. in the sense of relative to other US trading partners) more favourable set
up than currently assumed appears more limited. Moreover, a continuously changing (trade) policy
environment could continue to restrain domestic demand. Overall, risks to the forecast are
perceived to be skewed towards the downside. Related risks to consumer inflation are both on the
upside – triggered by e.g. a rebound in commodity prices or possible EU retaliatory tariffs – and on
the downside – due to weaker demand pressures on services.
Episodes of financial stress could have lead to broader spillovers and have potentially
systemic impacts. Trade tensions could also lead to protracted financial volatility, especially if
retaliatory measures result in sharp corrections in asset values. While the market turbulence
observed during the week of 2–9 April remained contained, it underscored the risk of contagion
from non-bank financial institutions to the wider financial system. In a scenario where stress
spreads from leveraged intermediaries to the banking sector via asset fire sales, the impact on
credit availability and economic activity could be more severe than currently anticipated.
A more adverse global environment could strengthen the EU’s resolve to act
collectively and catalyse long-needed reforms. Ongoing trade tensions may prompt the EU to
accelerate trade negotiations with other key partners, thereby reinforcing its position as a reliable
trading partner. The political resolve to deepen the Single Market, particularly in services, digital,
and energy sectors, could be summoned in the face of external headwinds. Progress on the
Savings and Investment Union and a recalibration of regulatory burdens—where disproportionate
to their benefits—could boost productivity, support growth, and ease inflationary pressures in the
medium term. Narrowing the gap between abundant savings and insufficient investment could
also help reduce the EU’s elevated current account surplus, thus addressing concerns over global
imbalances.
Some recent initiatives aimed at boosting productive spending, not incorporated in this
forecast, could bolster economic activity. Germany’s planned increase in infrastructure and
defence spending could support economic activity, enhancing potential growth in Germany and in
the EU, albeit at the risk of higher inflation. Additional defence spending, leveraging flexibility
margins within the Stability and Growth Pact, might also provide a marginal boost to economic
activity, especially if investments are directed towards R&D, though as a secondary benefit to the
primary goal of enhanced security for the EU as a whole (Box I.4.1 and Special Issue 3).
59
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
60
PART II
Special Issues
1. THE MACROECONOMIC EFFECT OF US TARIFF HIKES
This Special Topic presents estimates of the effects of the US tariff announcements up to 2 April
2025, alongside hypothetical symmetric retaliations by the affected countries or trade blocks.
While highlighting the channels through which tariffs – taken in isolation - impact both the
economies of the imposing nation and the targeted economies, the analysis complements the
baseline projections presented in this publication. Results indicate that the imposition of tariffs
weakens the US economy, with moderate negative effects also on EU GDP. A general tit-for-tat
retaliation deepens the negative impacts in both the US and the EU. Beyond the direct effects of
tariffs, rising uncertainty and a loss of investor confidence in the US economy further aggravates
the adverse economic consequences by tightening financing conditions.
This Special Topic presents model simulations of three stylised scenarios related to the
sharp protectionist turn of US trade policy and potential countervailing measures. The
first scenario reflects US announcements up to and including 2 April 2025, featuring sizeable
unilateral tariff hikes on US imports of goods from virtually all trading partners. (23) As the long-
term outlook remains uncertain, the increase in tariffs is assumed to be highly persistent, though
not permanent. In a second scenario, the simulations add the effects of symmetric retaliations by
other countries, amid a stylised global tit-for-tat escalation. The sweeping US tariff
announcements, as well as the uncertainty regarding their application, triggered strong responses
in financial markets, with investors demanding higher risk premia on dollar-denominated financial
assets. (24) The third scenario therefore illustrates the impact of shifts in US risk premia, on top of
the pure unilateral tariff effects. Simulations are based on DG ECFIN’s QUEST model. (25)
(23)
The effective bilateral tariff rates used in our simulations are calculated based on the following set of assumptions: a
general increase of 25 percentage points (pps) on goods imported from Mexico and Canada, with only 10pp on oil
imports from Canada, and with USMCA-compliant imports (assumed to be 40% of total imports) being fully exempted;
54 pps on goods imports from China, 20 pps on goods from the EU, and 23 pps on average from the rest of the world.
These country-specific headline rates are fine-tuned by sectoral tariff hikes of 25 pps in the case of aluminium, steel
and automobile imports. For other sectors that are temporarily exempted (e.g. pharmaceuticals and semiconductors) we
assumed the country-specific headline rate would apply. Trade in services is taxed at 0%. As a result, the effective
tariff rate on total US imports (including services) goes up by around 20 pps.
(24)
See, e.g., Jiang et al. (2025) “Dollar Upheaval: This Time is Different”, mimeo (16 April 2025).
(25)
QUEST is a New Keynesian open economy dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model. The model framework
includes the main features relevant for understanding tariffs, such as imperfect substitutability of goods produced in
different regions, and sluggish adjustment of import volumes in response to relative price changes. Trade flows and
nominal exchange rates are modelled bilaterally, via integrated international goods and capital markets. The dynamic
model structure enables us to trace both short and long-run effects. The model distinguishes between a tradable and a
non-tradable sector. While it lacks the sectoral detail of typical trade Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) models and
therefore cannot assess impacts on specific manufacturing sectors and services, it includes trade in intermediate inputs
for both the tradable and non-tradable sectors. This captures linkages through cross-border value chains, which is
crucial as trade in intermediate inputs amplifies the effects of trade barriers. For these simulations, we use a 6-region
version of the model, including the EU, US, China, Canada, Mexico and the rest of the world (RoW), with trade linkages
calibrated based on the FIGARO database.
(26)
This demand-boosting effect of tariffs is partially weakened in our model by several channels: a) substitution between
imports and domestic goods is sluggish in the short run; b) with liquidity-constrained households, as tariffs erode the
purchasing power of incomes, this weakens demand not just for imports but also for domestically produced goods (real
income channel).
(27)
This reflects the substitution effect from lower real wages, reducing labour supply as leisure becomes relatively
cheaper. In the case of tariffs, the opposing income effect from lower real wages – which would typically increase
labour supply, as poorer households can afford less leisure – is offset for unconstrained households by an income
boost from higher expected net government transfers, funded by tariff revenues.
63
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Notes: The panels on the left report real GDP in %-deviation from baseline, with the contribution of expenditure components to GDP. The
panels on the right show the respective trade balance-to-GDP ratios (in pp-deviation from baseline), showing contributions by volumes,
average price level change and terms-of-trade (relative price) changes. NX (ToT) refers to net exports (terms-of-trade).
Tariffs reduce US trade deficits only temporarily, by 1.3-1.5% of GDP. While tariffs shift
the composition of demand from imports towards US-produced goods, the resulting terms-of-
(28)
The terms-of-trade (ToT) is the ratio of export prices to import prices (at the border, expressed in the same currency),
capturing the relative price of domestically produced and foreign-produced goods. In other words, it shows how much a
country can import in exchange for its exports (with a higher ToT making a country richer), but also how expensive its
exporters are in world markets (with higher/stronger ToT hurting competitiveness). The ToT is a kind of real effective
exchange rate measure, and depends on nominal exchange rates as well as on domestic and foreign price levels. While
in the medium term, monetary policy has less control over the real exchange rate itself, it can influence to what extent
a given real appreciation pressure is reflected in stronger nominal exchange rates or relatively higher domestic
inflation.
(29)
To a smaller extent, weakened US import demand also puts downward pressure on the export prices of US trading
partners, which contributes somewhat to the US terms-of-trade appreciation.
(30)
As the tariff shock is assumed to be non-permanent, tariffs act as an intertemporal tax, encouraging the postponement
of consumption, and deepening the negative intertemporal substitution effects.
64
Special Issues
trade appreciation crowds out exports, in order to bring demand for US goods back in line with
supply capacities. Therefore, the tariff hike reduces gross trade flows, lowering both imports and
exports. (31) That said, initially, import volumes decline more (by 6-11%) than export volumes (by 2-
6%), implying a positive contribution to the trade balance (see top right panel of Graph II.1.1). On
top of the volume component, the terms-of-trade gain raises the nominal trade balance further, as
it reduces the import bill and boosts export revenues through changes in relative prices. (32)
However, in the medium run, these effects fade as the fundamental drivers behind the US external
balance – saving relative to investment – are not significantly affected.
EU GDP would be lowered moderately, by around 0.2%, driven mainly by weaker exports
(bottom left panel of Graph II.1.1). The exports of the EU initially decrease by 1.1-1.5% (see Table
II.1.1). Since the US is one of the EU’s largest export markets, EU exports suffer from the shrinking
American market size, as US firms and households respond to tariffs by importing less overall,
including from Europe (see yellow bars in top left panel of Graph II.1.2). However, this effect is
somewhat mitigated via two channels. First, EU exporters gain market share in third countries at
the expense of American exporters who become less competitive due to a stronger dollar and more
costly imported inputs (see purple bars). Second, they would also gain market share in the US, at
the expense of Chinese exporters who are targeted with asymmetrically higher tariffs. At the same
time, this asymmetry also implies a larger ToT depreciation for China than for the EU, eroding the
competitiveness of EU exporters in the Chinese market (see red bars), and slightly raising EU
imports from China (blue bars in the top right panel). Graph II.1.2 also highlights the importance of
exposure to the US market: despite a similar rise in tariff rates, the decline in US-bound exports is
significantly smaller for the EU than for Mexico or Canada, who are more reliant on the US as an
export destination.
Graph II.1.2: Export decomposition (unilateral US tariffs on imports)
Notes: Export volumes are reported in %-deviation from baseline, with the contribution of various destination markets.
The EU’s trade balance would decline by about 0.3% of GDP (see bottom right panel of
Graph II.1.1). The flipside of a stronger dollar is a weaker (more competitive) real effective
(31)
This is a (partial) manifestation of the Lerner symmetry, which points out that a tax on imports behaves similarly to a
tax on exports.
(32)
The higher current account balance is also a reflection of a temporarily higher saving-investment differential in the US,
stemming from lower domestic demand (i.e. spending falling more than national income). This can also be broken down
as higher government budget balances, driven by tariff revenues of around 2.0-2.5% of GDP (while the net lending
balance of the private sector initially declines by a smaller amount).
65
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
exchange rate for Europe. This does not only cushion the fall in EU exports (as discussed above),
but also reins in European import demand, inducing substitution towards domestically produced
goods that mitigates the fall in GDP and in the volume component of the trade balance. That said,
this volume component is still negative as exports initially decline more than imports.
The terms-of-trade loss makes the EU
Table II.1.1: Unilateral persistent US tariffs on imports
poorer. A depreciating terms-of-trade lowers the
2025 2026 2027
trade balance beyond the negative volume US
contribution and erodes the purchasing power of GDP (level, % dev) -0.6 -1 -1
European incomes beyond the fall in real GDP, CPI inflation (p.p. dev)
Trade balance (p.p. dev)
0.7
1.3
0.2
1.5
0.1
1.5
lowering real gross disposable income (rGDI) by Imports (level, % dev) -5.6 -9.3 -10.7
0.4% (see Graph II.1.3). (33) This real income loss ToT (level, % dev) 5.6 5.6 5.4
(33)
Real gross disposable income (rGDI) expresses the value of an economy’s output in terms of its domestic spending (i.e.
private and public consumption and investment). In other words, it reflects the purchasing power of the incomes earned
from domestic production. rGDI is equal to the sum of real GDP and the terms-of-trade gain.
66
Special Issues
Graph II.1.3: Macroeconomic effects on the EU and the US under unilateral tariffs and retaliations.
Notes: The macroeconomic effects on the EU (blue) and the US (red) of unilateral US import tariffs (solid lines), with potential symmetric
retaliation from trading partners on imports from the US (“trade war” scenario, dashed lines). Tariff hikes are persistent (with quarterly AR1
coefficient of 0.975). Unless indicated, lines depict %-deviation of levels from no-tariff baseline. Real GDI refers to real gross disposable
income, which is real GDP complemented with the terms-of-trade gain.
These stylised simulations only cover selected channels of the tariff hikes. One important
caveat for the interpretation of the results is that the model simulations do not consider
productivity losses stemming from the lower exploitation of comparative advantages amid a more
fragmented global trade landscape and reduced gross trade flows. This channel could exacerbate
the negative economic consequences further. (34) In addition, while our macroeconomic model
suggests moderate aggregate effects on the EU, the impacts on specific Member States and
economic sectors could differ substantially.
(34)
While the model distinguishes between traded goods produced in different regions, it does not single out commodities
in general. Therefore, the effects of specific commodity price movements observed recently might not be captured
entirely.
67
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Graph II.1.4: Macroeconomic effects on the EU and the US with unilateral tariff and risk premium shocks.
Note: The macroeconomic effects on the EU (blue) and the US (red) of unilateral US import tariff hikes only (solid lines), with additional
illustrative risk premium shocks on US financial assets and capital (dashed lines). Tariff hikes are persistent (with quarterly AR1 coefficient of
0.975. Unless indicated, lines depict %-deviation of levels from no-tariff baseline. Real GDI refers to real gross disposable income, which is
real GDP complemented with the terms-of-trade gain.
Higher risk premia on US assets raise interest rates further and induce a dollar
depreciation. In recent weeks, such USD depreciation has more than offset the appreciation
pressure that would be implied by unilateral US tariff hikes alone. However, as shown in
Graph II.1.4, despite a weaker nominal dollar, the US real exchange rate (and terms-of-trade) is
still expected to strengthen over time, only more gradually. While the more gradual terms-of-trade
appreciation supports US net export volumes relative to a pure tariff shock, the higher interest
rates induced by rising risk premiums dampen domestic capital accumulation and consumption
demand – on balance deepening the decline in US GDP. Moreover, the smaller terms-of-trade gain
lowers real gross disposable income even further. Therefore, although the US trade balance rises
more in this scenario (due to both a more competitive terms-of-trade as well as lower domestic
spending), it happens amid a more recessionary economic landscape.
For the EU, the consequences of the additional risk premium shocks are more contained,
as long as the loss of confidence concerns primarily the US (as assumed here). The stronger
euro weighs on the trade balance, but at the same time, investments also become relatively more
attractive in Europe, leaving the GDP response similar.
68
Special Issues
Box II.1.1: EU-US trade relationship through the lens of global value chains
The analysis in this Box looks at global trade from the point of view of integration in Global
Value Chains, with a focus on the EU-US relationship. In an increasingly challenging geoeconomic
landscape, the narrative of deglobalization has gained traction, claiming an ongoing process of fast
decreasing economic interdependence between different parts of the world. However, analysis in the
Autumn 2024 Forecast publication (1) presented new evidence of still expanding Global Value Chains
(GVC) in recent years (until 2022). The analysis presented in this box extends to 2023 and takes a
deeper look at the EU-US relationship through the lens of GVC.
EU-US trade links are analysed taking into account intra-EU trade relevant for GVC. This
analysis looks at EU trade from the perspective of Member States, treating intra-EU trade as equally
important as extra-EU trade in forging GVC, thus underscoring the importance of the EU’s single
market. While all EU Member States share a Common Commercial Policy (CCP) they nevertheless
constitute a very diverse group of economies with, namely, different structures, currencies and legal
systems. Thus, intra-EU trade exploits the same type of comparative advantages that motivate
countries to engage in GVC and should therefore not be ignored in the analysis. While accounting for
intra-EU flows naturally increases all measures of EU’s integration in GVC, it also puts the EU-US
relationship in a pragmatic perspective, in which the US becomes yet another important trading partner,
but for most Member States it ranks well behind their major EU export markets.
For both the EU and the US, participation in GVC increasingly relies on services. Eurostat’s
macroeconomic globalisation indicators based on the FIGARO database (2024 edition) (2) suggest that
in 2023 integration in GVC (3) rose further in the US and remained broadly stable in the EU (4).
Participation of the EU in GVC has been broadly stable over the two first decades of the century but
increased in the post-pandemic years. Total GVC integration rose from around 50% of gross exports
in 2010 to 54% in 2022 and 2023 (see Graph 1). This increase was driven by services whose
contribution doubled between 2000 and 2023. This occurred largely via backward participation – that
is, by relying on inputs from other countries in earlier stages of the value chain to produce goods that
the EU later exports further. The contribution of goods trade, while still accounting for two-thirds of
total GVC participation in 2023, has seen a steady decline in the past 25 years (from nearly 85% in
2000). Turning to the US (see Graph 1b), its participation in GVC moderated from 2010 until 2015 on
a declining importance of (backward participation) of goods, but started recovering as services took
centre stage, gradually lifting the contributions to US GVC indices from 9% in the early 2010s to 15%
in 2023. Services now account for half of US participation in GVC, compared to roughly one-third in
the first half of the previous decade. Services in US GVC predominantly represent intermediate inputs
that are further processed and exported by other countries (i.e. forward participation).
(1)
Box I.2.1 “Global trade outlook and the resilience of Global Value Chains” (Autumn 2024 Forecast)
(2)
FIGARO is the official global input-output tables released annually for the 27 EU Member States and its main
18 trade partners, including a rest of the world region for 64 industries and 64 products. More details at:
Rémond-Tiedrez, I., Rueda-Cantuche, J.M. (eds.) (2019). EU inter-country supply, use and input-output tables:
full international and global accounts for research in input-output analysis (FIGARO): 2019 edition, Publications
Office of the European Union. Luxembourg.
(3)
Total GVC participation indices are the sum of backward and forward participation rates. The backward
participation is calculated as a share of foreign value added in gross exports of an economy and is an indicator
of the extent of an economy’s use of foreign-sourced intermediates in the production of goods and services
for export. The forward participation is calculated as domestic value added generated in an economy due to
other countries’ exports as a share of a country’s gross exports. It is indicative of the extent to which an
economy’s exports of domestically produced inputs are used by the import countries for further processing and
exports in downstream production stages (WTO, Global Value Chain Development Report, 2023.). These indices
thus provide a comprehensive picture of an economy's involvement in GVCs, encompassing both the input and
output sides of global value chains.
(4)
In line with the adopted approach to account for intra-EU trade relevant for the GVC, throughout the box, GVC
participation indices of the EU are calculated as a (weighted) sum of individual Member States GVC.
69
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Box (continued)
Graph 1: Total GVC Participation indices - contributions from backward, forward, goods and services
55 % of total exports a. EU 40 b. US
% of total exports
50
35
45
40 30
35 25
30
20
25
20 15
15 10
10
5
5
0 0
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23* 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23*
BW -goods BW-services FW - goods FW - services BW -goods BW-services FW - goods FW - services
Bilateral EU-US links via GVC have grown significantly over the past two decades. Trade in
intermediate goods between the EU and US propelled by expanding GVC has grown steadily as a share
of exports since 2010 (see Graph 2). In the EU, this was driven entirely by backward links, i.e. foreign
inputs imported by EU countries, processed domestically and later exported to the US. Over the past
14 years the share of these exports doubled in services and increased by one-third in goods (see Graph
2a). In contrast, forward integration, i.e. the share of EU value added embedded in exports to the US
that are processed there and later exported, remained broadly stable. These trends have lifted the
overall share of the US in EU’s GVC participation between 2010 and 2023 by roughly 1 pp, to 3.4% of
EU exports in 2023. This happened against a broadly stable contribution from the rest of the world
and a slight increase in contributions from intra-EU trade. When it comes to the US’ participation in
GVC, the contribution from the EU has grown even more. However, here EU’s input has been more
important on the side of forward participation, that is directly related to US exports to the EU that are
further processed and reexported by the EU. Expansion in these trade flows has been particularly
buoyant in services, the contribution of which roughly doubled in the last decade and now account for
more than half of the total trade (up from one-quarter in 2011).
2.5 10
2.0 8
1.5 6
1.0 4
0.5 2
0.0 0
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23* 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23*
BW - goods BW - services FW - goods FW - services BW - goods BW - services FW - goods FW - services
The EU plays a much greater role in US GVC than the US in EU’s ones. While expansion in
bilateral trade has supported GVC integration in both countries over the last two decades, there is a
stark difference in relative reciprocal importance. From the point of view of the EU, GVC-related intra-
EU flows are by far the most important, accounting for 60% of total EU exports in 2023, up from 56%
in 2011-2013, with a notable 2-pp-increase since 2019. GVC-related trade within the EU thus dwarfs
that with the US. The latter rose, as a share of total EU exports, from below 5% in 2010-2013 to 6.3%
in 2023 (see Graph 3a). By contrast, the EU remains by far the biggest partner in the GVC-related trade
in the US. The EU’s share more than doubled between 2011 (16.5%) and 2023 (35.4%), largely driven
70
Special Issues
Box (continued)
by the tripling of the contribution from Ireland, which in 2023 accounted for roughly one-third of the
EU’s input. This occurred against the backdrop of broadly stable shares of Canada and Mexico, declining
shares of Korea and Japan and a sharp reduction in the share of China due to its gradual retrenchment
from GVC (see Box I.2.1 in the Autumn 2024 Forecast).
80% 80%
60% 60%
40% 40%
20% 20%
0% 0%
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23* 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23*
US CN INTRA EU GB ROW EU CN CA MX ROW
Services lie at the heart of bilateral EU-US trade within GVC. While the importance of the US
to EU GVC integration is considerably smaller than the other way around for both goods and services,
a clear specialisation shapes the bilateral trade patterns. The share of both countries in respective
partners’ GVC is considerably higher in services than in goods, particularly in the case of EU’s input to
US GVCs. This is not surprising given that services have been driving both countries’ integration in GVC
over the past two decades (see Graph 1). However, backward links are more important for the US’
contribution to EU GVCs, while forward links are key to the EU’s contribution to US GVCs (see Graph 4).
In other words, where the US matters most for the EU is exports to the US that are related to processing
of intermediate goods and services previously imported by the EU. In contrast, the importance of the
EU in US GVC is key in the segment of exports to the EU that are further processed in and then exported
by the EU. The latter is where the EU becomes clearly indispensable for US integration in GVC. In 2023,
the domestic US value added embodied in the exports to the EU that are then further exported by the
EU accounted for 25.5% of all US exports in goods (up from 14.4% in 2011) and as much as 54% of
all US exports of services (up from 25.4% in 2011). The contribution from Ireland was instrumental in
driving up GVC trade in services between the EU and US, with the country accounting for nearly half of
all GVC-related exports from the US to the EU in 2023, up from 32% in 2011.
71
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Box (continued)
Graph 4: Bilateral importance of trade within GVC: Percentage contribution to the GVC participation
50 50
45 45
40 40
35 35
30 30
25 25
20 20
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23* 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23*
US EU US EU
50 50
45 45
40 40
35 35
30 30
25 25
20 20
15 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23* 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23*
US EU US EU
Both the EU and US are vulnerable to the intensification of bilateral trade tensions, but the
threat seems greater for large segments of the US integration in GVC. While the trade-
restrictive measures taken by the U.S concern trade in goods and the growth impact analysis of the
new tariffs rightly focuses on the fallout from disruptions to merchandise trade, it is trade in services
that has driven GVC in recent years and therefore appears key to their further expansion. The relative
importance of the bilateral EU-US relationship is also by far more critical for services than for goods
where diversification of trade is much higher, and both the EU and the US have many other important
trading partners. In services, however, the vulnerability of the US to the EU market appears very high,
with GVC-related exports to the EU accounting for roughly one-half of all US services exports. It is
therefore, in services rather than in goods, that the EU has a powerful potential leverage in trade
negotiations and disputes with the US.
Graph 5: Total GVC participation indices of EU Member States in 2023, contributions from the US, EU and rest of
the world
12
80
10
60 8
40 6
4
20
2
0 0
CY DK IE FI SK PT IT BE EU DE FR SE NL AT HU GR ES LU MT PL LT EE SI CZ LV BG RO HR
Contribution from rest of the world
Contribution from EU
Contribution from US
Share of goods in US contribution to the total GVC participation index (lhs)
Share of US in total GVC Participation Index (rhs)
72
Special Issues
Box (continued)
Cyprus, Denmark and Ireland are most exposed to the US via GVC. The contribution of the US
to individual Member State’s integration in GVC varies significantly across the EU (see Graph 5). While
intra-EU trade dominates GVC-related trade for all EU MS, the US is nevertheless an important partner
for Cyprus, Denmark and Ireland, with absolute contributions exceeding 7 pps (of total exports), or
more than 10% of all GVC-related exports. Interestingly, exposure of Cyprus is concentrated almost
entirely in services, in the case of Denmark services account for less than 80%, while for Ireland only
43%. Other countries highly exposed to the US via GVC include Finland, Slovakia, Portugal, Italy and
Belgium – all predominantly in goods, with the exception of the latter where exposure is equally divided
between goods and services. Overall exposure of most Central and Easter European (CEE) countries
(except Slovakia) remains relatively low, with the lowest in Bulgaria, Romania and Croatia. However, in
view of current tensions concerning merchandise trade, the overall share of goods in GVC-related trade
with the US is particularly relevant. From this perspective exposure of the CEE and several southern
European countries appears remarkably high, with more than 80% of GVC links with the US accounted
for by goods in Slovakia, Italy, Austria, Slovenia, Czechia, Hungary and Portugal.
73
2. BUSINESS ADJUSTMENT TO TENSIONS IN FOREIGN
MARKETS AND DRIVERS OF CONSUMERS’ VIEWS ON THE
ECONOMY: SURVEY EVIDENCE
In February/March 2025, the Commission’s harmonised business and consumer surveys included
additional ‘ad hoc’ questions investigating 1) the extent to which European firms adjust their
business strategies in response to tensions, disruptions or policy changes in foreign markets, and
2) the impact of selected factors on consumers’ views of their country’s economic situation. (35)
This Special Topic summarises the results of the two ad hoc surveys.
European firms’ strategic response to tensions, disruptions and policy changes in foreign
markets
Increasing geopolitical tensions and trade fragmentation challenge the resilience of
global value chains, by undermining the collaborative networks on which they depend. As
countries impose trade restrictions or become less dependable partners, companies may
reconfigure their supply chains, redirect output to new markets, or relocate production or
operational hubs to more stable or 'friendly' countries. The set of four ad hoc questions included in
the February/March waves of the business surveys investigated these adaptive strategies and their
potential impacts on operational costs and output prices. The results of this ad hoc survey must be
interpreted against the backdrop of mounting challenges to the global trade environment posed by
the recent turn towards protectionism in the US. While the questions were asked before the
announcements of new US tariffs on goods imports from the EU, the new US administration had
already clearly signalled its sharp protectionist shift.
Twelve EU Member States, representing 63% of EU GDP took part in the ad hoc survey,
though not always covering all four sectors. In the EU, more than 44 000 firms took the ad hoc
survey. Of these, firms in the manufacturing and services sectors accounted for around 30% each;
construction and retail trade made up another 20% each of the sample. To derive EU and cross-
sector country estimates, the results were aggregated using weights based on gross value added
in each country and sector. All figures reported in this text are weighted averages.
The questions read as follows:
Q1. Have you adjusted, or plan to adjust, your strategies regarding the sourcing of inputs, location
of production, or destination markets in recent years, in response to tensions, disruptions or policy
changes in your foreign markets?
− yes, we have adjusted our strategies;
− yes, we plan to adjust our strategies;
− no, we have not adjusted our strategies and don’t plan to do so;
− not applicable, fully domestic business.
Firms that responded to this question with either "yes, we have adjusted our strategies" or "yes, we
plan to adjust our strategies" were subsequently asked the following questions:
Q2. The adjustments are or will be of the following nature (multiple answers possible)?
− increasing stocks to serve as buffers in the face of unexpected disruptions;
− changing the countries from which you source inputs/goods or to which output is destined;
− relocation of production/operation back to your country (reshoring);
− relocation of production/operation to other countries (friendshoring).
− other.
(35)
The ad-hoc questions were optional for national partner institutes in the harmonised business and consumer surveys,
and they could choose to include them in either the February or March survey, with the overall survey period running
from early February to 21 March.
74
Special Issues
Q3. What is or would be the effect on your production costs or operational costs?
− an increase;
− no impact;
− a decrease.
Q4. What is or would be the effect on your final prices charged to consumers/customers?
− an increase;
− no impact;
− a decrease.
A large share of EU firms is exposed to Graph II.2.1: Intention to adjust strategy, by sector
foreign markets, most of them in the
manufacturing sector. Roughly 40% of all
Total
enterprises identified themselves as fully 19.2 8.1 32.2 40.5
75
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
and higher inventory holdings, especially in global value chain-intensive industries. (36)
“Other” adjustments were reported most prominently in the services sector. Across
sectors, a relatively high share of firms (36%) reported “other” adjustments. Additional strategies
identified in the literature include vertical integration, digitisation, and enhanced supply chain
monitoring. The European Investment Bank's survey on supply chains provides evidence of these
strategies. (37) Within sectors, nearly a quarter of manufacturing firms reported adopting
alternative measures, while the services sector reported the highest share, at over 45%. This may
relate to the sector's specific methods for adapting to changes in the trade environment, such as
service modularisation and increased investment in compliance and risk monitoring to effectively
navigate regulatory shifts
Among the firms considering to re-locate their production or operations, most consider
relocating to another country rather than back to their country. Offshoring firms and
multinational enterprises may also find it necessary or advantageous to relocate their production
or operations to other countries or bring them back to their home country. Of the 21% firms that
chose to relocate, a large majority — almost two thirds — considered relocating to other countries
(friendshoring) rather than moving operations/production back to their country (reshoring)’. In
industry, almost one fifth considered relocating their production hubs, of which four fifths
preferring to move to another country rather than re-shoring. Moreover, a higher share of firms in
services reported a preference for reshoring activities than in industry.
More firms expect incurred costs and prices charged to increase than to decrease. (38)
Around 38% of the adjusting firms expect the changes in their trade strategies to lead to an
increase in their production or operational costs, while 17% anticipate a decrease. The distribution
of these responses is similar across the industry, services, and construction sectors, whereas nearly
half of retailers expect an increase in operational costs. Regarding the effect on prices charged to
customers or consumers, a majority of adjusting firms (57%) at total sector level expected prices
not to change as a consequence of changing strategies, while close to a third expected prices to
increase. Very few firms (4%) expected prices to decrease. A slightly smaller share of firms in
industry expected prices to increase.
(36)
See McKinsey & Company (2021) "Taking the pulse of shifting supply chains"; OECD (2024) "Promoting resilience and
preparedness in supply chains; European Central Bank (ECB) Economic Bulletin, Issue 8, 2023; and International
Monetary Fund (IMF) – World Economic Outlook, April 2023.
(37)
The SUCH supply chain survey carried out by the European Investment Bank in cooperation with the European
Commission (DG GROW) in 2023 singles out Investment in digital inventory and inputs tracking, which allow firms to
track goods through the supply chain and delivery to their premises.
(38)
Graph II.2.3 for question 3 excludes data for Italy. The response shares for question 3 and question 4 would otherwise
not be directly comparable, as question 4 was optional to reduce the survey burden in some countries participating to
the ad hoc survey. As such, question 4 was not asked in Italy, a sufficiently large country to make a difference when
aggregating the results and drawing conclusions.
76
Special Issues
Total 37.6 38.5 17.2 6.6 Total 31.3 57.4 4.1 7.1
INDU 39.2 40.2 17.6 3.1 INDU 26.2 64.3 5.4 4.1
SERV 36.3 44.7 17.0 1.8 SERV 34.3 60.0 3.9 1.8
RETA 48.3 35.4 14.7 1.6 RETA 41.8 52.7 4.6 0.9
BUIL 44.2 27.6 12.4 15.8 BUIL 38.8 44.5 1.9 14.8
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
The results indicate that firms will not necessarily pass on higher costs to prices but
increase profit margins if costs become lower because of changing strategies. More firms
expect costs to increase (38%) than prices to increase (31%). This is true at sectoral level as well.
Conversely, the share of firms expecting prices to decrease (4%) is lower than the share expecting
costs to decrease (17%). In the absence of microdata allowing to match firms’ replies to the two
questions, these results can only be tentatively suggestive of some degree of profit squeeze when
costs increase and pricing power by firms when costs decrease.
partially recovered since then but remain below Financial situation over the next 12 months
Financial situation over the last 12 months
their respective long-term averages and Consumer confidence
significantly lower than their pre-COVID-19 levels.
(*) see footnote 39
Since summer 2024 they have been worsening
again. As one of the four variables making up the Commission’s consumer confidence indicator,
consumers’ expectations about their country’s economic situation is the component contributing
most to the changing moods of consumers since 2020 – and consistently dragging consumer
confidence down since early 2022 (Graph II.2.4).
(39)
In this box, EU aggregates are calculated as population-weighted averages of the results for the 13 countries that
carried out the ad-hoc question, namely Austria, Bulgaria, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Germany, Finland, Croatia,
Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Malta, Poland and Slovakia. In terms of population, these countries represent around 52% of the
EU-wide aggregate.
77
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Factor Examples
Labour market Unemployment rate, job availability, job improvement
Inflation/Cost of living Prices, purchasing power
Interest rate developments Borrowing costs, return on investment
Taxation, public spending, in particular on social benefits and
Changes in taxes and public spending
pensions
Important political initiatives, new legislation, changes in
Political developments in your country
government
International conflicts, changes in foreign governments, trade
Global developments and trade policies
policies
An ad hoc question in the European Commission’s consumer survey explores the impact
of selected factors on consumers’ views on their country’s economic situation. The
question was formulated as follows: "Over the past 12 months, how have the following factors
influenced your views about the economy of your country?”. Table II.2.1 displays the factors that
were presented to consumers. For each factor, respondents could select one of four answer
options: ‘Positive impact’, ‘Negative impact’, ‘No impact’, or ‘Don't know’. To enhance clarity,
examples were provided for each factor. Thirteen EU countries, accounting for 52% of the EU
population, participated in the ad hoc survey. The results presented in this Special Topic (40) must be
interpreted in the context of the increasingly complex and unpredictable economic and geopolitical
landscape facing the EU economy. At the same time, falling inflation, a resilient labour market, and
more favourable financing conditions for households and firms laid the foundation for a gradual
recovery in consumption in the EU.
Most factors were assessed as negatively Graph II.2.5: EU estimate results
impacting the economy, with the cost of
living remaining the most widespread Inflation/Cost of living 6.411.1 76.3 6.3
surge, which significantly eroded the purchasing Technological change 37.8 25.3 23.0 13.9
factors viewed negatively by most respondents Positive impact No impact Negative impact Don't know
78
Special Issues
interest rate developments are reported to impact the economic situation. In six countries, the
labour market was largely perceived as a negative factor for the economy, while interest rate
developments were predominantly viewed negatively in five countries.
Technological change was the only factor for which positive views prevailed over
negative ones. As many as 37.8% of respondents reported technological change as a positive
factor for the general economic situation, against less than a quarter viewing it negatively and
another quarter considering they have no impact on their assessment.
The age of interviewees significantly Graph II.1.6: Impact of the different factors by age
influenced their responses. Younger individuals group - percentage balance (42)
(18-29 years) tend to be more optimistic, or less
pessimistic, about the impact of all factors, and in Inflation/Cost of living
play a role. The unemployed, lower income -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40
labour market (see Graphs II.1.6 and II.1.7) and Younger (18-29) Older (65+)
Graph II.1.7: Factor "labour market" - percentage Graph II.1.8: Factor "technological change" -
balance (42) percentage balance (42)
20 40
10 35
30
0
25
Pecentage balance
Pecentage balance
-10 20
-20 15
-30 10
5
-40
0
-50 -5
-60 -10
Further
1st quart.
2nd quart.
4th quart.
Unemployed
3rd quart.
Total employed
Primary
Secondary
Primary
1st quart.
2nd quart.
4th quart.
3rd quart.
Unemployed
Further
Total employed
Secondary
(42)
The percentage balance represents the difference between the percentage of respondents who believe a factor has a
positive impact on their country's economy and the percentage who believe it has a negative impact.
79
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
80
3. THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF HIGHER DEFENCE SPENDING
Increasing geopolitical tensions have brought to the fore the need to strengthen the EU’s defence
capabilities. The Readiness 2030 package, put forward by the European Commission in March,
aims to support Europe’s defence industry, deepen the single defence market and facilitate the
stepping up of defence spending, inter alia through fiscal flexibility. The stylised simulations
presented in this box, using the QUEST macroeconomic model, estimate the impact on economic
activity and EU government debt of a linear increase in defence spending by up to 1.5% of GDP,
starting this year and until 2028. The results of the main scenario show that real GDP would rise
by 0.5% above the baseline by 2028, while the EU government debt-to-GDP ratio would be 2 pps.
above the baseline by 2028. A higher share of spending devoted to R&D and infrastructure
investment could generate more positive GDP effects in the longer term, while a higher import
content of defence spending would reduce the overall economic stimulus. The macroeconomic
effects will also depend significantly on factors that are not explicitly modelled, such as
production capacity constraints as well as uncertain R&D spillovers. Importantly, the QUEST
simulations - based on simplified assumptions and referring to the EU as a whole - are
analytically distinct from the surveillance under the EU fiscal framework. (43)
A rapidly deteriorating strategic environment calls for a significant increase in EU
defence spending. Russia’s war of aggression in Ukraine and decades of underinvestment in
defence have underscored the EU’s vulnerability to external threats. This, together with the
changing focus of traditional allies and partners, such as the US, to other regions of the world, has
prompted a reassessment of the security risks faced by the EU. Additionally, rapid advancements
in technologies for defence purposes and evolving warfare techniques, including through cyber and
hybrid threats, require adaptation and modernisation of Europe’s defence capabilities. In this
context, to restore credible deterrence, the EU faces the imperative of increasing and potentially
reorienting defence capabilities.
81
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
States. (45) From an international perspective, EU Member States on average still spend less on
defence than the US (2.9% of GDP in 2023) or the UK (2.1% in 2022). (46)
Defence spending in the EU is geared towards current expenditure, mainly compensation
of employees. According to COFOG data, compensation for military and civilian personnel
represents a significant share of current expenditure on defence, especially in countries with larger
standing armies (see Graphs II.3.1 and II.3.2). Intermediate consumption, including items such as
fuel, spare parts, maintenance, utilities, and outsourced services, has been growing due to rising
operational costs and increased reliance on private-sector contractors for logistical and support
functions. Capital formation, which reflects long-term investment in military capabilities including
military infrastructure, new equipment such as aircraft, warships and tanks, as well as ammunition
and missiles inventories, accounts for a relatively small share of defence expenditure in the EU,
despite an increase in recent years. In 2023 it amounted to 19.5% of defence expenditure in the
EU, compared to 40.7% in the US. Public research and development (R&D) expenditure on defence
decreased over time to just 0.02% of GDP in 2023, compared to 0.3% in the US. Foreign military
aid has increased significantly in recent years, largely on the back of military support to Ukraine. In
contrast, compensation of employees accounted for 38.5% of US defence expenditure in 2024
while capital formation amounted to 33.5%.
Graph II.3.1: The evolution of EU defence expenditure and its composition
% of total % of GDP
100 1.7
90
1.6
80
70 1.5
60 1.4
50
40 1.3
30 1.2
20
1.1
10
0 1.0
95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
(45)
An important difference between COFOG and NATO figures is that downpayments for military equipment affect the
NATO figures immediately, whereas in national accounts including COFOG the impact of the same equipment will
materialise later, at the time of the delivery of this equipment. There are also some differences in scope between the
NATO and COFOG definitions, but these are not expected to lead to systematic differences between the two
aggregates. According to NATO, seven countries out of the 23 EU Member States that are also NATO members spent
less than 2% on defence in 2024. See: NATO (2025): The Secretary-General’s Annual Report 2024. North Atlantic
Treaty Organisation (link).
(46)
US figures are based on NIPA table 3.11.5 of the Bureau of Economic Analysis; the UK figure is based on IMF
government finance statistics. These are based on the same methodology as the Eurostat figures for the EU.
82
Special Issues
% of total % of GDP
100 3.5
90
3
80
70 2.5
60 2
50
40 1.5
30 1
20
0.5
10
0 0
Share of current expenditure Share of capital expenditure Defence expenditure as % of GDP (rhs)
Notes: Capital expenditure includes gross capital formation and capital transfers.
Sources: Eurostat, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
The EU has a solid domestic production base of defence goods, but high fragmentation
contributes to high import dependence. Although several globally competitive companies
operate mostly in a few large Member States, the European defence industry is characterised by
mainly national companies catering for domestic markets in relatively small volumes.
Consequently, the EU’s defence efforts remain fragmented, with over 170 different weapons
systems in use compared to 30 in the US. (47) Low collaboration among European producers inhibits
economies of scale, raising unit costs, hindering technological development and reinforcing the
EU’s dependence on imports from the US. The US is the EU’s largest supplier of defence
equipment, and its role has grown significantly in recent years. According to data by the Stockholm
International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), arms imports by European NATO members more
than doubled from 2015–19 to 2020–24, and the share of imports from the US rose from 52% to
64%. The EU largely relies on the US for critical systems such as missile defence, aircraft engines,
and drones, where European alternatives are often less technologically developed or
uncompetitive. Without greater consolidation of its defence industry and procurement policies, the
EU will struggle to reduce its dependence on external suppliers, limiting its strategic autonomy.
83
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
EUR 150 bn loan instrument (Security Action for Europe, SAFE) (52) support to the EIB group in
widening the scope of its lending to defence and security projects, and the acceleration of the
Savings and Investment Union to mobilise private capital.
0.5 5
0.4 4
0.3 3
0.2 2
0.1 1
0.0 0
-0.1 -1
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 ...2034 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 ...2034
Main scenario "Higher productivity" "Higher imports" Main scenario "Higher productivity" "Higher imports"
Economic activity increases moderately in the short term as the shift towards defence
spending crowds out private demand, while the EU debt-to-GDP ratio rises compared to
the baseline. According to the simulation results, the level of EU GDP rises to a limited extent, by
(52)
See Commission’s proposal for a Council Regulation establishing the Security Action for Europe (SAFE) through the
reinforcement of European defence industry Instrument. COM(2025) 122 final (link).
(53)
We use a two-region variant of DG ECFIN’s QUEST model, featuring the EU and the rest of the world. The model
incorporates different fiscal policy instruments, including productive government investment, as well as forward-looking
decisions and endogenous adjustments in interest rates and prices.
(54)
Defence spending is modelled as a combination of current public expenditure and public investment. The latter
enhances productivity for the private sector.
(55)
The Draghi report cites “78% of procurement spending [in 2022-2023] was diverted to purchases from suppliers
located outside the EU”. Others question these figures, indicating that most military equipment spending is directed
towards domestic producers, with imports accounting for less than 10% of total expenditure; see: Mejino-López, J. and
Wolff, G. (2024). What role do imports play in European defence? Bruegel (link).
84
Special Issues
0.3% to 0.6% above the baseline by 2028 (depending on the scenario, see Graph II.3.3). (56) EU
public debt rises 2 pps. above the baseline in 2028, continues rising until 2032, and then gradually
declines towards the baseline due to the tax increase starting in 2029. The muted effect on
economic activity is due to the forward-looking behaviour of agents who anticipate higher future
taxes in response to higher public debt, and to higher interest rates as increased spending drives
up prices in the short term while higher debt also raises risk premia. The level of real GDP remains
above baseline in the medium run (0.3% in 2034 in the main scenario). At the same time, the
central bank’s response and the associated slowdown of private demand limits inflationary
pressures (inflation remains around 0.2 pps. above baseline on average until 2028).
In the medium to long term, higher R&D spending and infrastructure investment could
further boost the positive impact of defence spending on EU GDP. The “higher productivity”
scenario, which assumes a 20% share of capital spending in total defence expenditure with higher
benefits to private sector productivity, raises the medium-term GDP level by an additional
0.2 pps. (57) By contrast, a higher import content of defence spending reduces the overall economic
stimulus in the EU.
These stylised simulations focus on selected channels under simplified assumptions and
are not intended to serve as a debt sustainability analysis. Three caveats are noteworthy.
First, production capacity constraints and labour supply shortages can limit the ability to rapidly
scale up defence spending (Antonova et al., 2025). (58) (59) Without sufficient capacity, short-term
demand increases may drive up prices rather than GDP. While the assumed gradual increase in
defence spending is intended to allow for a slow adjustment to frictions, the simulations do not
include more specific assumptions on labour supply constraints and product market frictions.
Second, the scenarios presented here do not include any productivity spillovers beyond the regular
productivity impact from public capital spending. However, the literature suggests that in the
longer term, defence R&D spending can also spur private R&D, leading to small but statistically
significant productivity gains (Moretti et al., 2025). This is consistent with findings of a positive
long-run effect of defence R&D spending on GDP in the US (Antolin-Diaz and Surico, 2024). (60)
Such benefits could accrue mostly in Member States producing advanced military equipment. As a
final caveat, these stylised EU-wide simulations are separate from and do not pre-empt the
formal, country-specific assessments of fiscal sustainability, which will follow the activation of the
national escape clause.
The estimated impact on economic activity is within the broad range reported by the
literature. For a comprehensive literature review, see e.g. Ilzetzki (2025). (61) The available studies
aligning with the Keynesian view argue that military expenditure stimulates aggregate demand,
creating jobs and driving investment, particularly during economic downturns. For example,
Barro (1990) suggests that in the short term, defence spending acts as a fiscal stimulus through
(56)
The multiplier measures how much economic output increases for each unit of government spending. In the QUEST
model, multipliers are not fixed parameters. They vary depending on the specific fiscal instruments used and a range of
other factors, such as the economic environment, the timing of the measures. Typically, for the EU as a whole, the
multiplier for a short-lived government spending program is around 0.7-0.8, which aligns well with the literature, see
e.g. Coenen, G. et al. (2012). Effects of fiscal stimulus in structural models. American Economic Journal:
Macroeconomics 4(1): 22-68. However, a longer spending program, as considered here, raises the need for future
financing, which dampens the growth effects, in addition to import leakages. Moreover, the demand effects only
materialise gradually in line with the assumed slow increase in defence spending. Consequently, under these
assumptions, the model indicates smaller multipliers.
(57)
Antolin-Diaz J. and Surico P. (2024). The Long-Run Effects of Government Spending. American Economic Review
(forthcoming). The authors estimate that an increasing share of government spending going to R&D is associated with
persistent increase in output and TFP.
(58)
Antonova, A., Luetticke, R., and Müller, G. J. (2025). The Military Multiplier. Mimeo (link)
(59)
While the production of military equipment is capital intensive, an increase in military personnel can raise labour
demand more substantially, especially among younger cohorts.
(60)
Moretti, E., Steinwender, C., and Van Reenen, J. (2025). The Intellectual Spoils of War? Defense R&D, Productivity and
International Spillovers. Review of Economics and Statistics 107: 14-27. Antolin-Diaz, J. and Surico, P. (2024). The Long-
Run Effects of Government Spending. American Economic Review (forthcoming).
(61)
Ilzetzki, E. (2025). Guns and growth: The economic consequences of defense buildups. Kiel Report No. 2, Kiel Institute
for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
85
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
the multiplier effect. In contrast, the neoclassical approach highlights long-term crowding-out
effects as higher military expenditure can reduce private investment and increase fiscal deficits
(Deger and Smith, 1983; Barro and Sala-i-Martin, 1992). (62) Empirical findings on the multiplier
effect are mixed. Some papers report a positive correlation between defence spending and
economic growth particularly in the US (Atesoglu and Mueller, 1990; Ando, 2018), while others find
negligible or negative effects, especially in Europe (Dunne and Nikolaidou, 2012; Kollias and
Paleologou, 2016). (63) Cross-country studies yield inconclusive results, suggesting that the impact
varies by context, spending levels, and time horizon (Landau, 1996; Hou and Chen, 2014; Gómez-
Trueba Santamaria et al., 2021). (64)
(62)
Barro, R. (1990). Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth. Journal of Political Economy 98 (5):
102-26. Deger and Smith (1983). Military Expenditure and Growth in Less Developed Countries. Journal of Conflict
Resolution 27: 335-353. Barro, R. J. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Public Finance in Models of Economic Growth. Review
of Economic Studies 59: 645-661.
(63)
Atesoglu, H. S. and Mueller, M. J. (1990). Defence spending and economic growth. Defence Economics 2: 19-27. Ando, J.
(2018). Externality of Defense Expenditure in the United States: A New Analytical Technique to Overcome
Multicollinearity. Defence and Peace Economics 29: 794-808. Dunne, P. and Nikolaidou, E. (2012). Defence Spending
and Economic Growth in the EU15. Defence and Peace Economics 23: 537-548. Kollias, C. and Paleologou, S. M. (2016).
Investment, growth and defense expenditure in the EU15: Revisiting the nexus using SIPRI’s new consistent dataset. The
Economics of Peace and Security Journal 11: 28-37.
(64)
Landau (1996). Is one of the 'peace dividends' negative? Military expenditure and economic growth in the wealthy
OECD countries. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 36(2): 183-195. Hou and Chen (2014). Military
Expenditure and Investment in OECD Countries: Revisited. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy 20(4): 621-
630. Gómez-Trueba Santamaria, P., Arahuetes Garcia, A. and Curto González, T. (2021). A tale of five stories: Defence
spending and economic growth in NATO´s countries. PLoS ONE 16(1): e0245260. (link).
(65)
“Accommodating increased defence expenditure within the Stability and Growth Pact”, C(2025) 2000 final (link).
86
PART III
Prospects by individual economy
Euro Area Member States
1. BELGIUM
Economic activity in Belgium is expected to slow down to 0.8% in 2025, mainly due to high
global uncertainty and decreased exports. It is projected to increase slightly to 0.9% in 2026,
supported by improving external demand. Inflation is forecast to decrease to 2.8% in 2025 and
1.8% in 2026, driven by lower price pressures for industrial goods and energy. The government
deficit is projected to increase over the forecast horizon due to rising expenditure, mainly on
ageing related costs, defence and interest payments. Therefore, the government debt is also
expected to continue its increasing path.
90
Euro Area Member States, Belgium
by the increase in service vouchers and public transport prices. Inflationary pressures are projected
to ease further to 1.8% in 2026, with all the components registering a slower growth in prices.
91
2. GERMANY
After slightly contracting for two years in a row, economic activity is expected to broadly stagnate
in 2025. Trade tensions are set to significantly weigh on exports, though private consumption is
projected to expand slightly in 2025, boosted by increases in purchasing power and lower interest
rates. Investment is expected to stagnate this year, inhibited by tighter financing conditions and
weaker economic sentiment – both related to the elevated uncertainty. In 2026, growth is
projected to rebound to 1.1%, as domestic demand strengthens, driven by continued consumption
growth and a gradual recovery in investment. The government deficit is set to remain elevated,
and the government debt ratio is expected to increase to 64.7% of GDP in 2026.
92
Euro Area Member States, Germany
93
3. ESTONIA
The Estonian economy is set to resume growing in 2025, albeit weakly amid very high global
uncertainty and tax increases. Private consumption is projected to recover slowly. Uncertainty is
set to heavily weigh on private investment, while public investment is expected to increase.
Exports and imports are projected to contract due to the tariffs and their impact on global growth.
After growing by 1.1% in 2025, real GDP is expected to expand by 2.3% in 2026. HICP inflation is
projected at 3.8% in 2025 amid persistent services inflation and tax hikes, and at 2.3% in 2026.
The government deficit is expected at 1.4% of GDP in 2025 before increasing to 2.4% in 2026,
and the debt-to-GDP ratio is set to reach 23.8% of GDP in 2025 and 25.4% in 2026.
94
Euro Area Member States, Estonia
decelerate to 2.3% in 2026, as the impact of tax measures gradually dissipates and global food,
energy and non-energy industrial good price pressures weaken.
95
4. IRELAND
Ireland’s GDP is forecast to grow by 3.4% in 2025 and 2.5% in 2026 supported by a strong
labour market. However, the high uncertainty and deterioration in global trading conditions are
expected to detract from growth. Moreover, Ireland’s deep economic ties to the US pose notable
downward risks in the context of rising protectionism. The general government balance is forecast
to remain in surplus, though significant risks arise from the uncertain outlook for corporate tax
revenues.
to underpin private consumption over the forecast Net exports Investment Priv. consumption
period. However, elevated uncertainty is expected Gov. consumption Inventories Real GDP (y-o-y%)
to keep household saving rates above pre-
pandemic norms, tempering the pace of consumption growth.
Investment declined sharply in 2024, largely due to intellectual property exports, while modified
investment - which excludes the volatile intangible and aircraft leasing components – recorded
modest growth. Looking ahead, modified investment is expected to remain subdued due to high
uncertainty. Headline investment figures incorporate a technical assumption that intellectual
property investment will return to levels similar to those of the past years.
Exports rebounded strongly in 2024, largely driven by multinationals, with pharmaceutical trade
surging and computer services remaining robust. While export growth is expected to continue,
momentum is expected to moderate amid the imposition of tariffs and a weak external
environment.
Overall, GDP is expected to grow by 3.4% in 2025 and 2.5% in 2026. Modified domestic demand is
set to expand by 2.2% in 2025 and 2.3% in 2026. However, Ireland’s openness and high trade and
investment links to the US leaves it vulnerable to further protectionist policies. While the current
US tariff exemptions - notably on pharmaceuticals - cover a large majority of Ireland’s goods
exports to the US, the introduction of new tariffs, along with broader US policy changes to
disincentivise investment and activity in Ireland present significant downside risks to Ireland’s
economy.
96
Euro Area Member States, Ireland
97
5. GREECE
The Greek economy is projected to maintain its robust momentum, and expand by 2.3% in 2025
and 2.2% in 2026, thanks to sustained consumption and EU-funded investment growth. Inflation is
expected to moderate to 2.3% by 2026, with strong wage and demand developments still putting
pressures on consumer prices. Greece achieved a significant budgetary surplus in 2024, which is
set to be sustained over the forecast horizon. Helped by robust nominal GDP growth, the debt-to-
GDP ratio continues to fall and is expected to reach 140.6% in 2026.
the United States. However, risks to the growth Gov. consumption Inventories Real GDP (y-o-y%)
98
Euro Area Member States, Greece
99
6. SPAIN
Real GDP growth is expected to remain robust in 2025, reaching 2.6%, and to soften in 2026 to
2.0%. Economic activity is set to be supported by domestic demand, owing to continued strong
labour market performance upholding private consumption growth and the projected
strengthening of investment, also thanks to the implementation of the recovery and resilience
plan. Headline inflation is projected to ease to 1.9% in 2026. The general government deficit is
set to decrease to 2.8% of GDP in 2025 and 2.5% in 2026, driven by the phase-out of energy-
related support and the withdrawal of temporary measures introduced in response to the
devastating floods in Valencia. The debt-to-GDP ratio is set to decline to 100.9% in 2025 and
then to broadly stabilise in 2026.
Domestic demand is set to remain the key driver Net exports Investment Priv. consumption
of economic growth over the forecast period, Gov. consumption Inventories Real GDP (y-o-y%)
driven by private consumption and the projected
pickup in investment, whilst - amidst rising trade tensions - the contribution from net exports is
expected to be negative in both years. Consumer spending would be upheld by further, yet
moderating, real wage gains coupled with further employment growth in a context of sustained but
decelerating inward migration. Policy uncertainty surrounding global trade and tariffs is set to
weigh on private investment growth, even if the direct exposure of the Spanish economy to the US
in terms of exports of goods and non-tourism services remains limited overall. Nonetheless, the
healthy financial position of non-financial corporations, together with the continued
implementation of the RRP, is expected to sustain the pick-up of gross fixed capital formation,
benefitting also by the lower short-term interest rates environment. On the external demand side,
the less buoyant evolution of total exports together with the recovery of import growth is expected
to lead to a marginally negative contribution of net exports to GDP growth in 2025 and 2026.
Downside risks to the outlook relate mainly to the larger than expected slowdown of economic
activity in the euro area and in Spain’s main trading partners, particularly those with a relatively
high exposure to US markets. This could generate negative spill-over effects on activity in Spain, by
further disrupting access to export markets, prompting a prolonged precautionary behaviour by the
private sector delaying corporate investment and further upholding the household saving rate
above its long-term historical average.
100
Euro Area Member States, Spain
101
7. FRANCE
Economic activity in France is expected to decelerate strongly in 2025, to 0.6%, held back by
fiscal adjustment and trade-related uncertainty. GDP growth is then projected to pick up to 1.3%
in 2026, as investment recovers and higher real wages support a further expansion in private
consumption. Inflation is projected to fall below 1% in 2025, on the back of falling energy prices.
The government deficit is forecast to decline to 5.6% in 2025 and to edge up to 5.7% of GDP in
2026. Public debt is set to increase to 118.4% of GDP by 2026, from 113% in 2023, as the
primary deficit remains sizeable.
Inflation expected to fall below 1% on the back of a sharp fall in energy prices
Inflation fell to 0.8% in April 2025, from 0.9% in March and 1.8% in January, largely thanks to the
decrease in regulated electricity prices in February. Inflation is expected to remain broadly stable in
2025, due to the recent fall in energy commodity prices. Energy prices are projected to fall by
5.0% in 2025. Consumer price inflation is expected to ease to 0.9% in 2025 (after 2.3% in 2024)
before picking up slightly to 1.2% in 2026.
102
Euro Area Member States, France
The increase in the deficit was due to tax revenues rising well below economic activity, mainly
because of shortfalls in corporate income and stamp duty taxes, the indexation of social benefits
(pensions) to high inflation in 2023 and high public consumption and investment growth by local
governments. These deficit-increasing factors were only partially offset by the withdrawal of most
energy-related measures and by additional expenditure saving measures of 0.3% of GDP adopted
in February 2024. In turn, interest payments on public debt increased by 0.2% of GDP.
The budget law for 2025 that was eventually adopted in February incorporates sizeable fiscal
adjustment measures aimed at curbing the dynamics of public spending and collecting extra
revenues. This forecast factors in revenue-increasing measures of around 0.5% of GDP and
expenditure-decreasing measures, mainly on public consumption and social transfers, worth
almost 0.3% of GDP. The economic deceleration forecast for 2025 is set to weigh on tax revenues,
which are expected to again rise slightly below economic activity, while higher unemployment is
set to lift unemployment benefit expenditure. Interest payments on government debt are projected
to rise further by 0.3 pps, to 2.5% of GDP, pushed by the higher debt and higher interest rates on
new bond issuances. The revenue ratio is projected to increase by almost ¾% of GDP, while the
expenditure ratio is expected to rise by some ½ pps. All in all, the general government deficit in
2025 is forecast at 5.6% of GDP.
For 2026, the general government deficit is expected to creep up to 5.7% of GDP, as some revenue
measures adopted for 2025 are set to expire. The revenue-to-GDP ratio is thus projected to decline
by around 0.2 pps., while the expenditure ratio is set to remain broadly stable, with interest
payments expected to keep rising to 2.9% of GDP.
After edging up to 113% of GDP in 2024, the government debt ratio is estimated to maintain an
upward trend, increasing to 116.0% in 2025 and to 118.4% in 2026. The increases are set to be
mainly driven by high primary deficits and rising interest payments, whereas the debt-reducing
effect stemming from nominal growth is projected to moderate compared to recent years.
103
8. CROATIA
After growing by 3.9% in 2024, economic activity in Croatia is projected to expand by 3.2% in
2025 and 2.9% in 2026, driven by robust household consumption. The labour market is set to
remain tight, with the unemployment rate below 5%. Inflation is forecast to decelerate and reach
2% in 2026. After widening significantly in 2024, the general government deficit is expected to
increase further and reach 2.7% in 2025. In a context of solid nominal GDP growth, the debt-to-
GDP ratio is expected to decline to 56.3% in 2025.
104
Euro Area Member States, Croatia
decline is projected to be driven mainly by services and food inflation. The expected fall in
international energy commodity prices is forecast to lead only to a small decline in energy inflation
as government’s energy price measures expire in October 2025. Inflation excluding energy and
food is set to decrease from 4.8% in 2024 to 3.4% in 2025 and 2.4% in 2026.
105
9. ITALY
Real GDP growth is expected to remain stable at 0.7% in 2025 and to rise to 0.9% in 2026. The
economic expansion is set to be supported by domestic demand, in particular investment fuelled
by RRF-related spending. Inflation is forecast to remain below 2% in both 2025 and 2026, on the
back of negative import price dynamics and moderate domestic costs increases. The government
deficit is projected to continue falling from 3.4% of GDP in 2024 to 3.3% in 2025 and 2.9% in
2026. By contrast, the debt ratio is set to rise over the forecast horizon, driven by the lagged
impact of housing renovation tax credits accrued in the deficit until 2023.
106
Euro Area Member States, Italy
107
10. CYPRUS
Economic growth is expected to remain strong in 2025 and 2026, thanks to the continuation of
dynamic domestic demand. Despite a fragile international environment, exports of services are
also set to remain robust. Inflation is expected to decline. The government budget is forecast to
register noticeable surpluses, supported by continued strong growth in revenues. The debt-to-GDP
ratio continues to decrease and is projected to move below 60% this year.
expected to translate into strong investment Net exports Investment Priv. consumption
flows into emerging sectors such as ICT, which Gov. consumption Inventories Real GDP (y-o-y%)
also contribute to productivity gains. However, the
growing presence of foreign-owned companies, and the resulting repatriation of their profits, is
expected to partially offset improvements in the trade balance. Still, the current account deficit is
projected to narrow to 5.9% of GDP by 2026.
Economic uncertainty remains the main downside risk. Cyprus’s limited goods trade with the US
suggests only marginal direct impact from the recent tariffs. However, indirect negative spillovers
resulting from global trade disruptions remain a risk. This is particularly the case given the
importance of the sea transport sector for the Cypriot economy, which is more exposed to
international trade fluctuations.
108
Euro Area Member States, Cyprus
109
11. LATVIA
Latvia’s GDP growth is expected to remain weak in 2025. Private consumption is set to slowly
accelerate driven by wage growth, whereas government consumption is projected to remain
strong. The economy is forecast to pick up in 2026 driven by private consumption and
investments, with GDP growth reaching 2%. After a strong decline in 2024, inflation is set to
rebound as the deflationary impact from energy prices fades away while services and processed
food inflation remains strong. Inflation is expected to increase from 1.4% in 2024 to 3% in 2025,
before falling to 1.7% in 2026. After an increase in 2024, unemployment is projected to decrease
slightly in 2025 and further in 2026. The general government deficit is forecast to increase to
3.1% of GDP in 2025 driven by weaker revenue growth and increasing current expenditure and
remain at 3.1% of GDP in 2026.
Private and public consumption set to drive growth in 2025 and 2026
In 2024, real GDP fell by 0.4%. This was mostly due to the adverse geopolitical context and
increasing uncertainty weighing on consumption and especially investment. Supported by strong
wage growth, private consumption recovered from its contraction in 2023 but remained weak
(0.5%). Private investments were also hampered by high financing costs while public investments,
in particular EU co-financed programmes, faced delays. As a result, after solid growth in 2023
(9.9%), investment significantly declined in 2024 (-6.7%). Goods and services export growth was
negative in 2024 due to a weak external environment and a deterioration in cost competitiveness.
Strong growth of public consumption provided support to the economy.
In 2025, the economy is expected to recover Graph III.11.1: Latvia - Real GDP growth and contributions
slowly from the 2024 contraction. Real disposable
12 pps. forecast
incomes and private consumption are set to
10
benefit from solid wage growth and the expected 8
increase in disposable income due to the tax 6
reform. However, increasing uncertainty amid a 4
challenging geopolitical context is set to 2
encourage precautionary savings. After a sharp 0
110
Euro Area Member States, Latvia
111
12. LITHUANIA
Lithuania’s economy is expected to continue growing over the forecast horizon, supported by
robust private consumption, a modest recovery in investment, and buoyant exports. However,
global trade tensions and uncertainty, in addition to the adverse geopolitical context, are set to
have a limiting effect on goods exports, consumption, investments and prices. Real GDP is
expected to grow by 2.8%. in 2025 and pick up to 3.1% in 2026. Inflation is expected to rise to
2.6% in 2025 driven by an increase in energy and food prices in the early months of the year but
ease to 1.2% in 2026, supported by lower commodity prices. The general government deficit is
projected to increase from 1.3% in 2024 to 2.3% in 2025 and to stay constant in 2026.
4
In 2025 and 2026, continued real wage growth is
2
supporting private consumption, although
geopolitical uncertainty and an increase in excise 0
Inflation expected to pick up but remain limited by trade and oil price developments
HICP inflation is expected to increase to 2.6% in 2025 following a jump in energy and food prices
in the early months of the year, increased excise duties on petrol, alcohol and cigarettes, and
sustained by continued services inflation. However, commodity prices are set to decline in 2025, as
oil prices counteract increasing gas and electricity prices, and recover very slowly at the end of
2026. The rest of the components of HICP are set to increase only gradually in 2026 and services
price inflation is expected to progressively slow over the horizon to around 4% by the end of 2026,
112
Euro Area Member States, Lithuania
following the normalisation of wage growth. The additional impact of trade tensions is set to bring
HICP down to 1.2% in 2026.
113
13. LUXEMBOURG
After expanding to 1% in 2024, real GDP growth in Luxembourg is projected to pick up to 1.7% in
2025 and 2.0% in 2026. Growth is expected to be mainly supported by domestic demand in 2025
while the contribution from net exports is due to turn positive only in 2026. Headline inflation is
set to decelerate thanks to a gradual reduction of energy inflation. Windfall revenues led to a
substantial surplus of the general government balance in 2024, which is expected to turn to a
deficit in 2025.
to accelerate, as the fallout from trade Net exports Investment Priv. consumption
restrictions initiated by the hike in US tariffs is Gov. consumption Inventories Real GDP (y-o-y%)
foreseen to be more than compensated by the
recovery of investment. The consumer confidence indicator points towards a mild recovery in
consumption supported by an expansionary fiscal stance and falling interest rates, which underpin
investment. A wage indexation that occurred in May 2025 should further support private demand,
while the recent increase in the number of transactions in both new and existing construction and
in mortgage demand indicate a recovery in investment in dwellings which is set to further
accelerate in 2026. Credit to companies is projected to pick up from the current low level,
benefiting both from lower short-term interest rates and from the realisation of delayed
equipment investment projects. On the net exports side, while a financial services recovery started
in 2024 thanks to a pick-up in investment fund revenues, uncertainty surrounding global trade is
set to weaken the prospects of the sector and weigh on the contribution from net exports
throughout 2025. In 2026, domestic demand is expected to continue to support the economy,
while a stabilising international trade situation should support exports.
114
Euro Area Member States, Luxembourg
115
14. MALTA
Malta's economy is expected to sustain its growth momentum in 2025, driven by robust domestic
consumption and positive net exports. Following a notable 6.0% expansion in GDP in 2024, the
Maltese economy is expected to grow by 4.1% in 2025 and 4.0% in 2026. The labour market is
projected to stabilise and inflation to slow down. On the fiscal front, the government deficit
narrowed to 3.7% of GDP in 2024, and is expected to decline further, going below the 3.0%
threshold in 2026, with the debt ratio stabilising below 48% of GDP.
116
Euro Area Member States, Malta
117
15. THE NETHERLANDS
Real GDP growth in the Netherlands is forecast to pick up to 1.3% in 2025, driven by domestic
demand and despite the US tariffs weighing on trade. Substantial wage growth and the resulting
expansion of real disposable income is expected to drive a strong increase in private consumption.
The US tariffs on the other hand are projected to reduce export growth. In 2026, GDP growth is set
to come down to 1.2% as the negative impact of decreased trade and high uncertainty persists.
Growth in domestic demand is set to moderate because of the increased uncertainty and
somewhat lower real wage growth. The government deficit is forecast to increase to 2.1% in 2025
and to widen further in 2026.
118
Euro Area Member States, The Netherlands
gradually. At the same time, processed food inflation is also expected to remain elevated, only
coming down more substantially as of mid-2025 when the effects of last year’s tax increase
dissipate. At the same time, energy price futures signal a decrease in oil, gas and electricity prices.
Overall, annual HICP inflation is forecast at 3.0% in 2025 and 2.0% in 2026.
Government deficit to widen on the back of tax cuts and increased spending
The general government deficit increased to 0.9% of GDP in 2024, up from 0.4% in 2023. The
general government balance was affected by compensation payments to taxpayers following a
court ruling invalidating the wealth tax based on assumed rather than actual returns.
In 2025, the deficit is set to increase to 2.1%. On the revenue side, this is driven by structural cuts
in personal income taxation, with a budgetary impact of 0.3% of GDP as of 2025. At the same
time, expenditure is projected to grow as public investments are expected to further increase.
Higher-than-expected spending due to wage and price increases as well as social benefits also
increase the deficit while the shifting of funds that are likely not spent in 2025 to later years has
the opposite effect.
The government balance in 2026 is set to be temporarily affected by a reform of the military
pension system that requires a transfer of approximately 0.7% of GDP from the government to a
private pension fund. Increases of the VAT rates for accommodation services as well as limiting
the indexation of personal income tax brackets are expected to contribute to a moderate increase
in revenue in 2026, although not sufficient to compensate for the increase in spending. The deficit
for 2026 is forecast to reach 2.7%.
The general government debt continued its downward trend and fell to 43.3% of GDP in 2024.
However, higher deficits thereafter are expected to increase the debt ratio to 45.0% in 2025 and
47.8% in 2026, still below the euro area average.
119
16. AUSTRIA
Austria is projected to experience its third consecutive year of economic recession in 2025.
This results from low investment, modest consumption and declining exports, exacerbated by
international trade tensions. Growth is set to resume only in 2026. The government deficit is
projected to be above 4% of GDP in 2025 and 2026, and the government debt-to-GDP ratio is
forecast to remain above 80%.
7.1%. -4
-6
In 2025, private consumption is expected to grow
-8
modestly, recouping some lost ground after two 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
weak years when consumption per capita declined Net exports Investment Priv. consumption
and saving rates reached historically high levels.
Gov. consumption Inventories Real GDP (y-o-y%)
Last year’s strong real income gains and a slow
unwinding of savings are set to support
consumption, despite the planned fiscal consolidation measures. Investment is expected to decline
further, with low-capacity utilisation in industry weighing on equipment investment. By contrast,
construction investment is expected to start recovering slowly, supported by slowly declining
housing loan rates. The loss of cost competitiveness and the weakness of the industrial sector in
Europe is set to be a drag on Austrian net exports. Last year, exports to the US, Austria’s second
most important export destination, grew dynamically reaching 8.5% of total exports, but this year,
trade tensions create headwinds for exports.
In 2026, a return to growth is projected, with strengthening private consumption and investment
growth turning positive. However, trade tensions are projected to weigh on Austria’s economic
performance.
Overall, in 2025, GDP is expected to decline by 0.3%. In 2026, growth is projected to pick up to 1%.
120
Euro Area Member States, Austria
121
17. PORTUGAL
Domestic demand is set to continue supporting economic growth in Portugal while exports of
goods face significant headwinds due to global trade tensions. Headline inflation is projected to
continue easing amid moderating employment and wage growth and a marginal drop in
unemployment. Portugal is expected to continue to pursue an expansionary fiscal policy, turning
the general government surplus into a deficit by 2026.
2024 to 1.8% in 2025 as the strong domestic Net exports Investment Priv. consumption
demand is offset by setbacks in external demand. Gov. consumption Inventories Real GDP (y-o-y%)
In 2026, growth is expected to improve to 2.2%.
While Portugal’s direct exposure to the US market is relatively limited, risks of significant indirect
setbacks remain high and relate to global trade disruptions and uncertainty. On the positive side,
Portugal’s recent increase in household savings and possible expenditure switching towards
domestically produced goods could result in higher than projected demand. All in all, the balance of
risks is tilted to the downside as the high level of external risks appears only partly offset by
domestic factors.
122
Euro Area Member States, Portugal
in 2024 to 2.1% in 2025 and 2.0% in 2026. Inflation excluding energy and food is set to remain
slightly higher as wage growth and strong domestic demand are expected to keep services
inflation elevated albeit in a slight disinflationary trajectory. The price pressure in the tourism
sector is also projected to remain relatively high as foreign tourism is expected to continue
growing despite tensions in global trade of goods.
123
18. SLOVENIA
After growing by 1.6% in 2024, Slovenia’s GDP is forecast to increase by 2.0% in 2025 and 2.4%
in 2026. Inflation is expected to remain rather stable over the forecast horizon and the
unemployment rate to remain low. The general government deficit dropped markedly to 0.9% of
GDP in 2024 and is forecast to increase to 1.3% of GDP in 2025. The debt-to-GDP ratio is
projected to decrease, from 67.0% in 2024 to 65.5% in 2025 and 63.8% in 2026.
124
Euro Area Member States, Slovenia
125
19. SLOVAKIA
GDP is expected to expand by 1.5% in 2025, as Slovak export recovery slows down due to the
direct and indirect effects of increased global protectionism, and government fiscal consolidation
weighs on domestic demand. In 2026, GDP growth is expected to slow down to 1.4% as net
exports decrease. Inflation is projected to increase to 4.0% this year due to increased taxes and
higher wage growth, before moderating to 2.9% in 2026. The tight labour market is projected to
keep real wage growth even though the economy is expected to slow down. The public deficit is
expected to decrease to 4.9% of GDP in 2025 before increasing to 5.1% in 2026.
126
Euro Area Member States, Slovakia
growth, are expected to be the main driver of inflation. As a result, HICP inflation is forecast to rise
to 4.0% in 2025, and to moderate to 2.9% in 2026.
127
20. FINLAND
Following two years of recession, real GDP is expected to grow by 1.0% in 2025 and 1.3% in 2026.
The unemployment rate is forecast to decline to 8.3% by 2026, while HICP inflation is set to
remain below 2% over the forecast horizon. The economic recovery and fiscal consolidation
measures are projected to reduce the deficit from 4.4% in 2024 to 3.4% by 2026. The public debt-
to-GDP ratio is set to increase to 87.5%.
128
Euro Area Member States, Finland
to exert downward pressure on overall inflation. HICP inflation is projected to reach 1.7% in 2025
before declining to 1.5% in 2026.
129
Non-EA Member States
21. BULGARIA
Real GDP growth is forecast to slow down to 2% in 2025 and 2.1% in 2026, due to both external
and domestic factors. Private consumption is set to grow more moderately on account of
temporarily higher inflation and precautionary savings. The outlook for exports has also been
revised downwards, reflecting subdued external demand and increased competition on external
markets. Private investment is projected to contract, while public investments would be supported
by intensified EU funds absorption. Wage growth is expected to moderate and annual inflation to
fall gradually after the increase at the beginning of 2025. The general government deficit for
2025 is projected to decrease to 2.8% and to remain constant in 2026. The debt-to-GDP ratio is
set to increase to 25.1% and 27.1% in 2025 and 2026 respectively.
132
Non-EA Member States, Bulgaria
domestic factors. The higher inflation in domestic food prices at the beginning of 2025 is expected
to decelerate gradually, following broadly the international developments. The pass-through of
lower futures’ prices into retail energy and non-energy industrial goods prices is projected to keep
inflation down. The disinflation in the services sector is set to benefit from wage moderation and
the need to preserve competitiveness for exported services in a worsened external environment.
Overall, HICP inflation is projected at 3.6% in 2025 and 1.8% in 2026.
133
22. CZECHIA
Czechia’s economy resumed its expansion in 2024 with real GDP growth at 1.1% and forecast to
accelerate to 1.9% in 2025 and 2.1% in 2026. Growth is expected to be driven primarily by
domestic demand, while the external environment remains challenging. The resumption of growth
in real wages helped households’ consumption re-emerge as the main driver of economic activity,
despite still depressed consumer confidence. With ongoing trade wars and an economic slowdown
expected for Czechia’s main trading partners, net exports are forecast to contribute negatively to
growth. Headline inflation is projected at 2.2% in 2025, with services contributing the most and
negative energy inflation offsetting the growth in food prices. A forecasted broad-based decline in
inflationary pressures leads to headline inflation dropping to 2.0% in 2026. After the phase-out of
energy-related measures and the government’s public finance consolidation package in 2024,
public finances are set to stay in deficit at around 2.3% in 2025 and 2.2% in 2026.
has been eroded by high inflation in 2022-23, Gov. consumption Inventories Real GDP (y-o-y%)
134
Non-EA Member States, Czechia
135
23. DENMARK
The Danish economy is forecast to withstand current geopolitical uncertainties and expand
further in 2025 and 2026, driven by industrial production in combination with renewed North
Sea energy extraction. Unemployment is set to rise marginally from present levels. Public
finances are robust, with continued, albeit declining, general government surpluses in both
2025 and 2026.
expansion, as well as making Denmark more than Net exports Investment Priv. consumption
self-sufficient with natural gas. Notwithstanding Gov. consumption Inventories Real GDP (y-o-y%)
the current geopolitical and trade uncertainties,
Denmark enjoys a still positive growth outlook for 2025. Private and public consumption as well as
investments, helped by lower interest rates, increasingly take over as the main factors behind
economic growth. Real wage increases are boosting household real incomes, which are projected to
translate into higher consumption for both this year and next notwithstanding current weak
consumer confidence. Overall, real GDP is forecast to grow by 3.6% in 2025, easing to a rate of
2.0% in 2026.
136
Non-EA Member States, Denmark
to a decline in exports. In particular, the increased importance of the pharmaceutical sector means
that any major swings in production and demand within this sector would have economy-wide
implications. Volatility in sea freight rates, as witnessed over the past years, could also impact the
foreign trade balance and the balance of payments significantly.
137
24. HUNGARY
GDP is projected to grow at 0.8% in 2025 and to pick up to 2.5% in 2026, supported by
consumption and a gradual recovery of investment and exports. Although inflation has decreased
from very high levels, underlying inflationary pressures remain strong. After a significant correction
in 2024, the general government deficit is projected to remain elevated at 4.6% this year. The
debt-to-GDP ratio is expected to increase to reach 74.1% this year.
138
Non-EA Member States, Hungary
139
25. POLAND
Economic growth in Poland is set to remain robust in 2025 and 2026, supported by strong private
consumption and investment, while net exports are expected to be a drag on the economy.
Inflation eased in 2024 and is forecast to continue moderating in 2025 and 2026. In spite of the
deterioration of the general government deficit in 2024, a gradual fiscal consolidation is expected
in 2025 and 2026.
140
Non-EA Member States, Poland
141
26. ROMANIA
After a lacklustre 2024, Romania’s economy was on course to pick up speed at the start of 2025,
due, in particular, to construction, agriculture and services, and better export prospects. However,
the uncertainties generated by the imposition of US tariffs, and also by heightened domestic
political and fiscal volatility are expected to dampen exports, economic sentiment, and ultimately
investment and consumption. This is expected to result in only moderate real GDP growth of 1.4%
in 2025 that is set to further strengthen to 2.2% in 2026. Inflation is projected to ease, but to
remain high, while unemployment is projected to decline marginally. The general government
deficit was 9.3% of GDP in 2024, fuelled by very large increases in public wages and pensions. It
is projected to decline modestly to 8.6% of GDP in 2025 and 8.4% in 2026, reflecting a package
of measures implemented at the end of 2024.
current account deficit is projected to narrow Gov. consumption Inventories Real GDP (y-o-y%)
142
Non-EA Member States, Romania
continued in 2024, affecting cost competitiveness, but the pace of wage increases is projected to
moderate significantly over the forecast horizon. A freeze in public wages was enacted in
December 2024 and the introduction of a minimum wage setting mechanism in February 2025 is
likely to contain further large increases in private sector wages.
143
27. SWEDEN
gradually pick up in 2026, primarily supported by Gov. consumption Inventories Real GDP (y-o-y%)
144
Non-EA Member States, Sweden
continued substantial spending on infrastructure and defence and slowing tax revenue growth, the
balance is set to remain stable at -1.5% of GDP. As growth is expected to pick up in 2026, and
with it government revenue, the nominal general government balance is set to improve to -0.8% of
GDP.
While increasing somewhat from 2024, the general government gross debt ratio is projected to
remain stable over the forecast horizon between 33 and 34% of GDP.
145
Candidate Countries
28. ALBANIA
Following a strong growth momentum in previous years, Albania’s economy is expected to grow
by 3.6% in 2025 and 3.5% in 2026, driven by domestic demand. Supported by tourism, exports
of services are set to continue expanding, while exports of goods are expected to rebound
somewhat following two years of significant contraction. After a rapid decline in 2024, inflation
is expected to gradually return to the 3% target next year. The fiscal deficit is set to widen
before falling below 2% of GDP in 2026. The public debt-to-GDP ratio is forecast to decrease
only gradually, driven by nominal GDP growth.
Similarly to 2023, most economic sectors Gov. consumption Inventories Real GDP (y-o-y%)
148
Candidate Countries, Albania
149
29. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
Economic activity slightly accelerated in 2024 on the back of strong domestic demand,
benefitting from rising real disposable income as a result of high nominal wage growth, declining
inflation and solid remittances from abroad. GDP growth is set to remain subdued due to
persisting structural and governance weaknesses and the latest trade-related uncertainties.
Decelerating import prices are projected to bolster domestic demand. The government deficit is
expected to remain contained, while the country’s public debt-to-GDP ratio is forecast to remain
stable. Risks are largely on the downside.
The labour market situation is set to remain tight, due to a shrinking labour supply
Registered employment growth slowed down from 1.4% in 2023 to 0.5% in 2024. Trade and
tourism continued to be sectors with the largest employment gains, while employment declined in
other sectors such as mining and agriculture. There are indications of a continued outflow of
qualified labour, which is expected to result in labour shortages in some sectors, such as
construction and health. This is set to contribute to further wage pressures above productivity
growth. The outflow of labour also helped to reduce the LFS unemployment rate, which dropped
from 13.2% in 2023 to 12.6% in 2024 and is likely to continue dropping further during the
forecast period.
150
Candidate Countries, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Nominal wage growth was nearly 10% in 2024 and is projected to remain high, also reflecting
labour shortages in certain areas, such as in construction and health services. This is expected to
maintain some upward pressure on headline inflation, which is expected to rise to about 3% and
3¼% respectively in 2025 and 2026, as domestic price pressures, resulting from strong recent
wage increases and expected electricity price increases, are likely to dominate the inflation
reducing effect of lower import prices.
151
30. GEORGIA
Following another year of very strong growth, Georgia’s economic activity is projected to
decelerate but to remain robust at 5-6% in 2025 and 2026, partly reflecting positive spillovers
from Russia’s war of aggression on Ukraine. Growth is expected to continue to be driven by
domestic demand, especially by private and government consumption. Inflation is set to pick up
temporarily due to the pass-through from wage increases and demand pressures, before
returning close to the central bank’s target. The current account deficit is projected to widen,
driven by the increasing trade deficit. The general government deficit is expected to remain
contained, and the public debt-to-GDP ratio is set to continue declining.
reallocation of certain services and trade routes Gov. consumption Inventories Real GDP (y-o-y%)
152
Candidate Countries, Georgia
Inflation to pick up temporarily before stabilising around the central bank’s target
The average consumer price inflation slowed down to 1.1% in 2024 thanks to low imported
inflation and prudent monetary policy of the central bank. Inflation has, however, increased in the
first months of 2025 to 3.4% in April and is expected to reach 4% on average in 2025. The
acceleration of consumer prices can be attributed to the pass-through from wage increases and
from the limited depreciation of the lari, as well as to base effects. As these factors are expected
to gradually fade, inflation is set to return towards the central bank’s 3% target in 2026.
153
31. MOLDOVA
The economic recovery came to a halt in 2024, due to another weak harvest and related drop in
demand for transport services. While these factors are set to continue weighing on real GDP
growth in the first half of 2025, along with the renewed energy price crisis, growth is projected to
gradually regain traction. Private consumption growth is set to remain robust, driven by rising real
wages. While tighter monetary policy and increased energy prices are expected to slow
investment growth, public investment is forecast to gain momentum in 2026 supported by EU
financial assistance from the new Reform and Growth Facility. The general government deficit is
projected to widen in 2025 and 2026 on account of the expected growth-enhancing expenditure
supported through the Facility’s financial resources, while the debt-to-GDP ratio is expected to
rise over the forecast horizon.
back of strong public investment supported by the Gov. consumption Inventories Real GDP (y-o-y%)
…as real wages are set to rise further, alongside a recovery of agriculture
Real wages continued to grow in the second half of 2024 largely on account of lower inflation
though at a slower pace. Until 2026, they are expected to be boosted by higher public sector
salaries and minimum wages as well as continued labour shortages. Pension indexation is also set
to support household incomes, while energy compensation payments help offsetting higher energy
costs. Both employment and labour force participation fell in the second half of 2024, primarily
due to the negative impact of the summer drought on agriculture. However, policies supporting
women’s participation across sectors cushioned the effect on female employment. Overall
154
Candidate Countries, Moldova
employment growth is expected to rebound in 2025 and to remain solid in 2026 as agriculture
recovers, and the economic growth strengthens.
Inflation to remain above central bank target before declining at the end of 2025
Following a disinflationary period, inflation averaged 3.9% in the first half of 2024 but rebounded
again in the second half of the year on account of higher food prices, partly attributed to the
drought in summer 2024 and an increase in energy prices. Continuously rising energy prices
pushed up inflation to 8.75% in March 2025. In response to rising inflation, the NBM shifted to
monetary tightening beginning of 2025 increasing the base rate up to 6.5% in February 2025.
Inflation is projected to remain above the central bank’s target range of 5% ±1.5% in 2025 but to
decline again towards the end of 2025. However, risks related to price effects from energy import
and further food price volatility remain elevated.
155
32. MONTENEGRO
Montenegro’s economic growth moderated in 2024 due to weak exports, while private
consumption and recovering investment supported economic activity. Recently adopted
measures to raise the minimum wage and cut pension contributions are set to support GDP
growth in 2025, but also to contribute to higher inflation. The general government deficit in
2024 was broadly in line with the revised target. The implementation of policy measures is set
to weaken budget revenue and raise spending, leading to widening budget deficits in 2025-
2026 and increasing public debt.
156
Candidate Countries, Montenegro
lower prices for food and energy, while inflation excluding energy and food has remained
stubbornly high, hovering around 5%. In 2025 consumer prices are projected to hover around the
same level, supported by domestic price pressures stemming from higher wages and social
transfers while import prices are likely to have a negative impact of inflation. For 2026 inflation is
expected to moderate, under the assumption of no policy change.
Risks to the outlook are skewed to the downside. Montenegro’s exposure to the US is limited, but a
key downside risk is related to the uncertain global environment and the ensuing slowdown in
exports. Montenegro’s narrow export base and small economy makes it highly vulnerable to
fluctuations in international demand.
Table III.32.1:
Table 2.1.1:
Main features of country forecast - MONTENEGRO
2024 Annual percentage change
mio EUR Curr. prices % GDP 05-20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
GDP 7459.2 100.0 2.0 13.0 6.4 6.3 3.0 3.0 3.2
Private Consumption 5689.8 76.3 : 4.0 9.7 6.5 8.7 5.3 3.3
Public Consumption 1332.4 17.9 : 0.5 1.5 3.1 1.7 2.7 2.5
Gross fixed capital formation 1509.6 20.2 : -12.3 0.1 6.9 9.3 7.2 6.8
Exports (goods and services) 3347.2 44.9 : 81.9 22.7 9.0 -3.2 -0.1 3.3
Imports (goods and services) 5038.7 67.5 : 13.7 21.3 5.9 5.5 4.4 4.0
GNI (GDP deflator) 7480.4 100.3 : 13.6 6.3 5.3 2.3 3.0 3.2
Contribution to GDP growth: Domestic demand 3.8 0.0 7.4 6.8 8.5 6.0 4.4
Inventories -0.3 0.2 2.6 -0.7 -0.1 0.0 0.0
Net exports -2.0 12.9 -3.6 0.2 -5.4 -3.0 -1.2
Employment : -2.4 17.3 10.5 2.9 3.2 2.2
Unemployment rate (a) 18.1 16.8 15.0 13.4 11.5 11.0 10.8
Compensation of employees / head : : : : : : :
Unit labour costs whole economy : : : : : : :
Saving rate of households (b) : : : : : : :
GDP deflator : : : : : : :
Consumer price index 2.4 2.4 13.0 8.6 3.3 3.0 2.5
Terms of trade goods : : : : : : :
Trade balance (goods) (c) -43.6 -38.7 -45.1 -42.9 -43.9 -44.2 -43.8
Current-account balance (c) -15.9 -9.2 -12.9 -11.2 -17.0 -17.9 -17.5
General government balance (c) -3.5 -1.9 -4.2 0.4 -3.1 -3.7 -3.4
Structural budget balance (d) : : : : : : :
General government gross debt (c) 53.2 82.5 69.2 59.3 61.1 64.5 65.9
(a) as % of total labour force. (b) gross saving divided by adjusted gross disposable income. (c) as a % of GDP. (d) as a % of potential GDP.
157
33. NORTH MACEDONIA
GDP growth accelerated in 2024, driven by investment and public consumption. Headline
inflation continued to fall, yet it resurged towards the end of the year mainly due to base effects.
Growth is projected to gradually accelerate further, supported by a major public infrastructure
project and by household consumption, which benefits from strong wage growth and abating
inflation. The fiscal deficit turned out lower in 2024 than the government’s revised target, partly
as capital expenditure was again under-implemented. Though gradually decreasing over the
forecast period, the fiscal deficit is likely to stay above 4% of GDP in 2025, as concrete revenue-
enhancing measures are lacking, while current expenditure is bound to rise significantly.
158
Candidate Countries, North Macedonia
rose by 12.9% y-o-y on average in 2024, which is slightly less than in 2023, but real wages still
grew faster than sluggish productivity. Real wages are likely to increase also in 2025, due mainly
to the continuing implementation of the 2023 collective wage agreement for the public sector and
a further increase in the minimal wage in March 2025, amidst further declining inflation.
159
34. SERBIA
The Serbian economy is projected to continue growing at a robust pace, but headwinds are
emerging on both the domestic and the international front. Growth is forecast to remain largely
driven by domestic demand, on the back of buoyant investment and private consumption amid a
strong labour market. In line with the surge in domestic demand, the current account deficit
widened sharply in 2024 and is expected to remain elevated. The fiscal stance is set to loosen,
with a relaxed deficit target of 3% of GDP, but public debt is still projected to decrease
marginally.
and the primary income deficit deteriorated Gov. consumption Inventories Real GDP (y-o-y%)
Inflation still hovering around the upper band of the target range
Consumer price inflation fell to 4.7% y-o-y in 2024, down from 12.4% in 2023, thanks to easing
food and energy price pressures. However, after reaching its lowest reading in June 2024, inflation
rebounded in the second half of the year and has since hovered around the upper end of the
160
Candidate Countries, Serbia
National Bank of Serbia’s (NBS) target range (3%+-1.5pps), surpassing it slightly in January (4.6%)
and falling to 4.4% in March. Inflation excluding energy and food also remains elevated,
consistently exceeding 5%, thereby largely reflecting higher services inflation. In 2025, inflation is
forecast to slow down gradually to 4.0%, starting in the second half of the year, and to approach
the target mid-point thereafter, helped by lower imported inflation, the expected deceleration in
real wage growth and relatively tight monetary conditions. Since September, the NBS has refrained
from any further interest rate cuts, keeping the policy rate at 5.75%.
161
35. TÜRKIYE
Domestic political and financial market turmoil is forecast to lower economic growth and slow
down the pace of disinflation. However, disinflation is set to continue, helped by tight monetary
and fiscal policy, and lower prices of energy. Export growth is expected to be subdued but the
external position to remain stable. The budget deficit is forecast to decline but to overshoot the
authorities’ target as revenue is expected to underperform, while government indebtedness is set
to remain largely unchanged at moderate levels.
162
Candidate Countries, Türkiye
cold spell in the spring damaged some crops, posing a risk for food inflation in 2025. Although on
a downward trend, inflation is forecast to remain elevated, in the double-digits in the next two
years.
20
Tighter fiscal stance to support disinflation -4
163
36. UKRAINE
While the economy continued to show resilience to Russia’s war of aggression, growth
momentum weakened in the second half of 2024 due to intensified attacks on critical
infrastructure, which disrupted energy supply and increased production costs. As the war
continues to weigh heavily on productive capacity and business sentiment, growth is forecast to
slow further to 2.0% in 2025, before rebounding to 4.7% in 2026 as early reconstruction efforts
are assumed to take hold. Inflation is projected to rise to 12.6% in 2025, driven by surging energy
and labour costs, before easing in 2026 as supply-side pressures abate. Persistent spending
needs are expected to keep the public deficit elevated throughout the forecast horizon.
defence and reconstruction is set to keep import Gov. consumption Inventories Real GDP (y-o-y%)
164
Candidate Countries, Ukraine
War-related disruptions in the labour market to keep the unemployment rate high
Large-scale displacement, together with conscription, has significantly reduced the labour force
since the start of the invasion, resulting in acute shortages and pushing average nominal wages up
by 23% in 2024. Despite the assumed gradual return of some externally displaced persons, labour
shortages are expected to remain pronounced due to slow reintegration, the lasting impact of the
war on the workforce, and persistent regional and skills mismatches. The unemployment rate is
therefore projected to remain elevated, albeit on a gradually declining path.
165
Other non-EU Countries
37. THE UNITED KINGDOM
After ending 2024 on a weak footing, the UK economy is forecast to grow modestly in both 2025
and 2026. Private consumption and investment remain subdued, though lower interest rates and
energy prices are expected to provide some support ahead. Inflation is projected to tick up slightly
in coming months, before gradually subsiding as the labour market loosens further. Fiscal policy
is set to remain restrictive. Risks are tilted to the downside. While there is scope for domestic
demand to pick-up more rapidly than projected if saving rates fall back from current high levels,
uncertainty remains high, sentiment weak, and external risks are exceptionally elevated.
investment - including residential and business Net exports Investment Priv. consumption
investment - is projected to remain soft in 2025 Gov. consumption Inventories Real GDP (y-o-y%)
and to recover only in 2026. Goods exports are
expected to remain weak, with little prospect of a strong recovery given the less supportive
external climate, with the new US tariffs, an appreciation of the sterling exchange rate, and slower
growth in the EU than projected in the Autumn. However, services trade remains buoyant, and
services imports and exports are expected to grow steadily over the forecast horizon.
The labour market has loosened, but the extent of slack remains hard to assess
The UK labour market has loosened in recent months, with vacancies continuing to fall, and the
vacancy to unemployment rate now at pre-pandemic levels. The unemployment rate has risen
gradually from 4% in mid-2024 to 4.4% in March 2025, with labour force growth a little faster
than employment growth. However, the data from the Labour Force Survey remains impaired by a
steep decline in response rates. Other metrics (e.g. KPMG/Recruitment and Employers
Confederation report on jobs and the Bank’s Decision Maker’s Panel survey) have also weakened in
recent months. Labour market slack is expected to rise in 2025 and nominal wage growth to
gradually slow, though from relatively high levels of close to 5%.
168
Other non-EU Countries, The United Kingdom
Inflation has fallen back significantly, though services inflation is slowing more gradually
Headline CPI inflation fell back from 3% in January to 2.6% in March, still above the Bank of
England’s 2% target. Inflation excluding energy and food falling from 3.7% to 3.4%. Services
inflation also fell back, but at 4.7% in March remains much higher. Higher regulated prices are
expected to push up the CPI in coming months, though the recent sharp fall in energy prices for
both gas and oil is set to work in the opposite direction, and underlying inflationary pressures
appear to be weakening. With the labour market loosening, nominal wage inflation and services
inflation are both expected to subside further in coming months, though headline CPI inflation may
not return to target levels until well into 2026. The Bank of England cut the main policy rate by 25
bps to 4.5% in February, and markets expect further cuts in the coming months.
Public finances to improve only slowly, as taxes and spending both rise
The government’s Spring Statement in March made only modest fiscal adjustments, with some
slight increases in total spending and net borrowing. The fiscal stance is still projected to tighten
significantly in both 2025 and 2026, reflecting the sizeable tax rises announced in the October
2024 budget. Revenues are expected to rise by close to 1pp of GDP in each of 2025 and 2026.
Expenditure is set to remain stable as a share of GDP, in line with spending plans, implying a lower
public deficit over the forecast horizon. The general government deficit is nevertheless expected to
remain close to 4.5% of GDP in 2026, above the pace of nominal GDP growth, and general
government debt is projected to rise modestly over the forecast horizon.
169
38. THE UNITED STATES
The US economic growth is expected to moderate and expand by 1.6% both in 2025 and 2026,
while consumer price inflation is set to take longer to return to the 2% inflation target. The
outlook is subject to exceptionally large risks, especially if the trade tensions escalate further.
Major sources of additional policy uncertainty are related to the new administration’s fiscal and
immigration policy and the future Fed policy rate path.
and soaring uncertainty have triggered a sharp Net exports Investment Priv. consumption
deterioration in sentiment indicators. The Gov. consumption Inventories Real GDP (y-o-y%)
University of Michigan consumer index sentiment
plunged from 71.1 in January to 52.2 in April, and similar negative trends are visible in US
companies’ investment intentions and business outlook expectations. The March small businesses
sentiment survey (NFIB) shows that business uncertainty is at around record high levels. Headline
PMIs have worsened since December, mainly on a weakening services sector, with the services PMI
falling to 51.4 in April from 56.8 in December. The manufacturing PMI slightly improved to 50.7 in
April, up from 49.4 in December, consistent with businesses stockpiling in anticipation of tariffs.
The unprecedented increase in the effective tariff rate on US imports and an elevated policy
uncertainty are expected to curb private consumption and investment. As disposable income
growth falters due to higher inflation, household consumption is forecast to moderate from 2.8%
in 2024 to 2% in 2025 and 1.3% in 2026. With economic activity expected to soften, the
unemployment rate is forecast to edge up to 4.3% in the current year and to 4.5% in 2026. Facing
elevated uncertainty, higher input prices due to tariffs and declining corporate profits, investment
activity is projected to weaken. Higher tariffs and a weaker dollar are set to reduce imports growth,
while less dynamic global demand and costlier production inputs are expected to weigh on exports.
The current account balance is projected to improve moderately, with net trade contributing
positively to the economic growth in 2026.
Overall, the US economy is forecast to grow by 1.6% both in 2025 and 2026. This is lower by
0.5pp for 2025 and by 0.6pp for 2026, relative to the Autumn Forecast (noting that the
uncertainty is particularly large for the outlook for the US).
170
Other non-EU Countries, The United States
FRB members’ projections released in March suggested two rate cuts in 2025 (the same as in their
January meeting), but the rate outlook is highly uncertain: a weakening economy, rising
unemployment and a risk of an inflation rebound may put the Fed’s legally established dual goals
of maximizing employment and achieving price stability in tension.
171
39. JAPAN
After an almost stagnant 2024, economic activity in Japan is expected to pick up to 0.7% in
2025. While domestic demand is projected to be the main driver of growth over the forecast
horizon, it is expected to remain relatively subdued due to heightened uncertainty. Growth is
projected to stabilise at around 0.6% in 2026. Headline inflation is expected to gradually taper off
but remain above the central bank’s target of 2% over the forecast horizon. Public finances are
projected to remain in deficit, but the general government debt-to-GDP ratio is set to decline
slightly below 246% driven by the denominator effect.
172
Other non-EU Countries, Japan
is largely due to rapid population ageing and only modest increases in immigration, despite recent
policy changes aimed at boosting inflows. The unemployment rate is projected to remain broadly
stable at 2.5% in both 2025 and 2026, with persistent sectoral labour gaps. The 2025 annual
spring wage negotiations resulted in wage increases exceeding 5%, surpassing last year’s three-
decade record and reflecting persisting cost-of-living pressures. However, overall wage growth is
expected to be more moderate given limited union participation and the constrained ability of
SMEs to offer significant raises. Still, average compensation per employee is forecast to grow by
2.9% in 2025 before easing to 2.1% in 2026, in line with moderating inflation.
173
40. CHINA
Following a relatively strong performance in 2024, the Chinese economy is poised for a more
challenging period as it navigates unprecedented external headwinds and persistent domestic
vulnerabilities. Real GDP growth reached 5% in 2024, driven by resilient domestic demand,
supported by government policies, and a strong rebound in exports. However, unresolved
weaknesses in the property sector and prohibitively high U.S. tariff measures are expected to
weigh on growth prospects. The outlook for 2025 and 2026 points to a more domestically driven
expansion, underpinned by fiscal stimulus, proactive investment incentives, and some measures
to bolster household consumption. Despite these efforts, growth is projected to slow down
markedly to 4.1% in 2025 and 4.0% in 2026, as unfavourable trade prospects and structural
headwinds increasingly constrain economic activity.
A robust external sector and a more decisive policy stimulus underpin growth
After a notable rebound in 2023, the Chinese economy grew by 5% in 2024, exceeding
expectations and meeting the official target of “around 5%”. Growth was supported by an
unusually high contribution of net exports. Robust export performance, especially in the second
half of the year, and more moderate imports boosted the growth contribution of the external
sector, reversing the modest drag observed in 2023. In addition, the Autumn’s government policy
package reinvigorated growth towards the end of the year. Still, domestic demand has remained
constrained by relatively subdued consumption and an unresolved property crisis, which led real
estate investment to decline by over 10% in the year.
Real GDP growth in the first quarter of 2025 maintained the momentum of the last quarter of
2024, reaching 5.4% y-o-y (1.2% q-o-q). Growth was supported by strong household spending,
growing also by 5.4% y-o-y. Investment growth accelerated to 4.2% y-o-y, largely driven by State-
Owned Enterprises and with private investment growing only marginally. Exports maintained the
strong momentum, as many US importers anticipated the impact of tariffs by advancing
purchases, thereby further widening the trade surplus.
Graph III.40.1: China - Real GDP growth and contributions
Domestic demand takes the lead as external
pressures mount 10 pps.
9
forecast
Growth over the forecast horizon is expected to 8
be driven by domestic demand, supported by a 7
6
series of proactive policy measures. Further 5
fuelled by the shock that US tariffs are exerting 4
on external demand, Chinese authorities have 3
declared the expansion of domestic demand as 2
1
its top policy priority for 2025. Consumption is 0
expected to be supported by several household -1
consumption support programs, including the 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
nationwide trade-in scheme that offers subsidies Net exports Investment Consumption
and incentives for replacing old appliances and Domestic demand Real GDP (y-o-y%)
174
Other non-EU Countries, China
increasingly focused on China, exports to the U.S. are expected to sharply decline as early as the
second quarter of 2025. Although surrounded by an unusually large degree of uncertainty on how
this bilateral trade war may play out and where trade diversion through third countries may
partially offset the impact, the loss of direct access to the U.S. market is likely to weigh heavily on
Chinese exports, resulting in stagnating goods export volumes over 2025 and 2026. Import growth
is also expected to remain subdued, reflecting still-weak domestic demand. As a result, the current
account surplus is forecast to narrow to 1.7% of GDP in 2025 and further to 1.2% of GDP in 2026.
Against this backdrop, GDP growth is projected to undershoot the government's target of “around
5%” in 2025, reaching 4.1%, before stabilising at 4.0% in 2026.
175
41. EFTA
The subdued international demand also affected the EFTA economies in 2024. The outlook for
these countries is for moderate economic growth in 2025 and 2026, reflecting further weakened
external demand, while domestic demand is likely to remain resilient. Inflation is projected to
continue moderating, supporting disposable income and domestic demand. Public finances are
expected to remain sound despite a challenging environment.
Switzerland
Output growth accelerated from 0.7% in 2023 to 1.3% in 2024, although, when correcting for
accounting effects, actual economic growth in Switzerland remained at around 1%. On the
production side the main contributor to growth was the pharmaceutical industry, while the metal
and machinery industry registered a weaker performance, in particular in the second half of 2024.
On the expenditure side, private consumption remained solid, benefiting from a resilient labour
market and declining inflation, which decreased from 2.1% in 2023 to 1.1% in 2024, mainly
thanks to lower energy prices and a strong currency. In response to weakening inflation, the Swiss
National Bank lowered its policy rate in four steps, from 1.75% to 0.5%. The exchange rate
continued to appreciate during 2024 in early 2025 mainly reflecting the CHF’s status as a safe-
haven currency.
Private consumption is expected to remain the Graph III.41.1: Switzerland - Real GDP growth and
primary driver of growth, fuelled by a robust contributions
labour market and rising real wages in the Graph II.37.1: Switzerland - Real GDP growth and
context of moderate inflation. Investment growth pps.
contributions
10 forecast
is projected to remain subdued in view of the
8
uncertain international environment. Exports are 6
likely to be affected by tariff increases for 4
exports to the US, which account for some 10% 2
of total exports. However, a large share of exports 0
is in less price sensitive sectors, like watches or -2
machinery, which might dampen the negative -4
impact on Swiss exports. Overall, GDP growth -6
might decelerate to slightly below 1% in 2025 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Norway
In spite of a weak fourth quarter, the economy rebounded in 2024, with real GDP expanding by
2.1%. Growth was largely driven by private consumption, supported by higher real disposable
income, mainly as real wages continued to rise strongly. Public consumption slowed down, and
investment dropped, for a second year in a row, largely driven by housing investment. The external
sector made a much larger contribution to growth than in 2023, as export growth accelerated
176
Other non-EU Countries, EFTA
markedly, reflecting improving price competitiveness due to currency depreciation. Lower global
commodity prices contributed to a further moderation of inflation in the second half of 2024,
bringing average annual inflation to 3.1%, still well above the central bank’s target of 2%. Against
its forward guidance, the Norges Bank’s Executive Board, on 26 March, decided to keep the policy
rate at 4.5%, a 17-year high, unchanged since December 2023. The Bank cited the uptick in
inflation excluding energy and food in the beginning of the year for its decision.
Economic growth is projected to decelerate in Graph III.41.2: Norway - Real GDP growth and contributions
2025, largely due to weaker export growth. Graph II.37.2: Norway - Real GDP growth and
Private consumption is expected to continue its contributions
Iceland
Real GDP increased by a modest 0.5% in 2024, due to weak growth of private consumption and
the contraction of exports. Private consumption lost steam in 2024 as past inflation depressed real
disposable income, while rising interest rates fostered savings. Export growth faced headwinds
from weak external demand, low fish quotas and a lacklustre tourism season due to volcanic
eruptions. Public consumption and investment continued to support GDP growth, with the latter
mainly driven by business investment in data centres and housing. Inflation tapered off in the
course of 2024, reaching 3.8% in March 2025. The central bank undertook several cuts of the key
interest rate from 9.25% at the beginning of 2024 to 7.75% in March 2025.
The outlook is for a gradual pick-up of growth to 1.7% in 2025 and 2.7% 2026, mostly supported
by domestic demand. Monetary easing is likely to continue gradually in 2025 and give some
impetus to private consumption and investment. Furthermore, private consumption is set to benefit
177
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
from continued population growth and a partial use of accumulated savings. The expansion of
innovation-based sectors, such as pharmaceuticals, biotechnologies, and data centres, are
projected to support investment growth. The uncertain external environment is projected to weigh
on exports in 2025, which would be supported by Graph III.41.3: Iceland - Real GDP growth and contributions
innovation-based sectors and modest growth of Graph II.37.3: Iceland - Real GDP growth and
tourism. Imports are set to increase with high contributions
forecast
investment needs in 2025 but grow more 10 pps.
8
moderately afterwards. The impact of the US 6
import tariffs on Iceland’s exports is highly 4
uncertain. Exports to the US, mainly seafood and 2
(a) as % of total labour force. (b) gross saving divided by adjustd gross disposable income. (c)as a % of GDP.
178
42. RUSSIAN FEDERATION
After two years of unexpectedly strong growth, the Russian economy is forecast to cool off
considerably in 2025 and 2026. Despite historically high interest rates, inflation continued
increasing in recent months but is expected to decelerate going forward. Further war-related
spending paired with depressed oil and gas receipts, as well as declining tax receipts due to the
projected economic deceleration, are expected to widen the budget deficit over the forecast
horizon. Accordingly, Russian public debt is also forecast to increase until 2026.
Over the forecast horizon private consumption Net exports Investment Priv. consumption
and investment growth are projected to ease Gov. consumption Inventories Real GDP (y-o-y%)
substantially, with a slight uptick in 2026 as the
inflation and interest rate environment becomes more benign for both investors and consumers.
Public investment and subsidised private investment in war-related sectors are expected to buoy
aggregate investment and prevent it from contracting, despite the high interest rates. Government
consumption growth is set to decrease over the forecast horizon but outperform other GDP
components as it is carried by war-related spending. In the external sector, the deteriorating global
economic and foreign trade environment is expected to depress export and import growth.
Overall, GDP growth is projected to decelerate from 4.3% in 2024 to 1.7% in 2025 and further to
1.2% in 2026.
179
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
growth is expected to continue declining throughout the year. These trends are projected to
continue in 2026, pushing annual inflation down to 5.8%.
Risks for Russian growth prospects are manifold and tilted to the downside
Economic prospects for Russia exhibit an increasingly high level of uncertainty, with risks overall
tilted to the downside. An expansion of the sanctions regime and further deceleration of global
growth, with an associated deeper drop in oil prices, represent external downside risks to Russian
growth. Domestically, stickier-than-expected inflation would require tight monetary policy for
longer, which would additionally weigh on growth. An end to the war in Ukraine paired with
sanctions relief as well as subsiding global trade tensions could, on the other hand, bolster growth
prospects.
180
43. INDIA
India’s economy continues to expand at a robust pace of around 6.5%, the highest among the
larger emerging market economies. Fiscal policy remains broadly growth-supportive through
targeted capital spending, while gradual fiscal consolidation continues. Monetary policy has
begun to cautiously ease amid moderating inflation and stable credit conditions. However,
growth is expected to remain below pre-pandemic levels, constrained by still high real interest
rates and subdued external demand amid persistent global uncertainty. Escalating trade
tensions pose a significant downside risk but could also offer opportunities over the medium
term. Domestic vulnerabilities remain linked to weather-related shocks and commodity price
volatility.
181
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
down to around 80% of GDP over the forecast horizon, from 81.5% in FY24-25. The government
has reiterated its medium-term goal of reducing central government debt to 50% of GDP by 2030.
In the near term, fiscal policy remains supportive of growth through targeted capital spending.
Monetary policy has begun to ease. In its first reduction since the pandemic, the central bank cut
its policy repo rate by 25 basis points in February and April 2025, to 6.0%. Liquidity conditions are
comfortable, and private sector credit growth remains healthy. The monetary stance is expected to
remain mildly accommodative to support the recovery while maintaining price stability.
182
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This report was prepared in the Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs under the
direction of Maarten Verwey – Director-General and Reinhard Felke – Director “Policy coordination,
economic forecasts and communication”.
Executive responsibilities were attached to Laura Bardone – Head of Unit “Economic situation,
forecasts, business and consumer surveys”, Kristian Orsini – Deputy Head of Unit “Economic
situation, forecasts, business and consumer surveys”. Reuben Borg and Alexandru Zeana ensured
the coordination of the forecast process.
Part I “Economic outlook for the euro area and the EU” benefited from contributions by Christos
Axioglou, Reuben Borg, Lucian Briciu, Christian Buelens, Alessandra Cepparulo, Aron Kiss, Anna
Chiara Küffel, Gábor Márk Pellényi, Vito Ernesto Reitano, Andras Rezessy, Farzaneh Shamsfakhr,
Rupert Willis, Przemysław Woźniak, Tomasz Zdrodowski and Alexandru Zeana. In Part II “Special
issues”, Special Issue 1 “The macroeconomic impact of US tariffs" was prepared by Gergő
Motyovszki, Philipp Pfeiffer; Special Issue 2 “Business adjustment to tensions in foreign markets
and drivers of consumers’ views on the economy: Survey evidence" was prepared by Roberta Friz,
Irene Gkiouleka, Staffan Lindén, Fiona Morice; and Special Issue 3 “The economic impact of higher
defence spending” was prepared by Alessandra Cepparulo, Olga Croitorov, Luigi Giamboni, Kristian
Orsini, Gábor Márk Pellényi, Philipp Pfeiffer, Vito Ernesto Reitano. Box I.3.1. “Signals of a turnaround
in the housing market” was prepared by Vitor Martins, Bořek Vašíček, and Alexandru Zeana. Box
I.4.1. “Estimating the growth potential of Germany’s recent reform of its national fiscal framework”
was prepared by Francesca Crucitti, Felix Lödl, Philipp Pfeiffer, Leonard Salzmann. Box I.4.2. “The
impact of interest rate changes on euro area households' net interest income” was prepared by
Lucian Briciu, Anneleen Vandeplas and Alexandru Zeana. Box I.7.1. “What do different data sources
reveal about the EU’s export performance?” was prepared by Gábor Márk Pellényi. Box II.1.1: “EU-
US trade relationship through the lens of global value chains” was prepared by Alba Catalan Piera,
Pablo Piñero-Mira, Jose Manuel Ruede Cantuche (JRC) and Przemysław Woźniak.
Part III on “Member States” was prepared under the supervision of Isabel Grilo, Luc Tholoniat and
Javier Yaniz Igal (acting), Directors for the “Economies of the Member States”. These sections
benefited from contributions by Ronald Albers, Lucian Albulescu, Aurelija Anciūtė, Judit Antal,
Martin Åström, Luca Barbieri, Paolo Battaglia, Barbara Bernardi, François Blondeau, Paul Brans,
Francisco de Castro Fernández, Polona Cigoj, Eglė Čeponytė, Alessandro Cisotta, Fanny Dellinger,
Marika Demkowicz, Živilė Didžiokaitė, László Dózsa, Miriam Franzelin, Carmine Gabriele, Sotirios
Giannoulis, Oscar Gómez Lacalle, Leyre Gómez-Oliveros Duran, Peter Harvan, Martijn Hoogeland,
Zuzanna Iskierka, Dirk Kamps, Leena Kerkelä, Szabolcs Klubuk, Daniel Kosicki, Mitja Košmrl,
Radoslav Krastev, Jens Larsen, Anna Laudwein, François Le Helloco, Felix Lödl, Ivan Lozev, Simone
Macchi, Nikolas Mayer, Giulia Maravalli, Ján Mutkovič, Natalie Lubenets, Ardi Priks, Ruslan Lukach,
Mihai Macovei, Janis Malzubris, Dorin Mantescu, Robert Markiewicz, Tiago Pereira, Benedetta
Martinelli, Jakub Mazur, Clíona McDonnell, Fabrizio Melcarne, Laurent Moulin, Thomas Ouin-
Lagarde, Balázs Pálvölgyi, Mona Papadakou, Angeliki Paritsi, Martin Pažický, Sabine Prevost,
Paulina Rogowska, Marija Roguljić, Leonard Salzmann, Matilde Santini, Johannes Schuffels, Ana
Seco Justo, Suada Sela, Roberto Sigismondo, Michael Sket, Peeter Soidla, Gints Trupovnieks,
Susanna Ulinski, Daniel Vâlcu, Milda Valentinaitė, Vasiliki Vasilopoulou, Michael Vedsø, Alberto
Vidan Bermudez, Martina von Terzi, Goran Vukšić, Kai-Young Weißschädel, Kristina Xuereb, Christos
Zavos and Pieterjan van der Zwan.
The sections on “Candidate Countries” and “Other non-EU countries” were prepared under the
supervision of Annika Eriksgaard, Director of the “International economic and financial relations,
global governance”. These sections, and forecasts for all other non-EU economies, benefited from
contributions by Annika Beermann, Piotr Bogumił, Bernhard Böhm, Samir Chouman, Hugo
Ferradans Ramonde, Norbert Gaál, Ignacio García Aguilar, Dalia Grigonytė, Renata Hrůzová, Plamen
183
Kaloyanchev, Lisa Klinger, Ivan Kušen, Milan Lisicky, Vincent Löwe, Andreea Maerean, Maria
Maierean, Alexandros Mouzakitis, Moisés Orellana, Stéphanie Pamies, José Ramón Perea, Jerzy
Pieńkowski, Rafał Raciborski, Uwe Stamm, Barbara Stearns-Bläsing, Vladimír Solanič, András Tari
and Rupert Willis.
Support in editing the report by Lorenzo Rosati, and for its communication and publication by
Lorenzo Rosati, Nicolas Carpentiers, Manuel De La Red Carino, Robert Gangl, Olivier Glorieux,
Tamás Nagy, Sarka Novotna, Yasmina Quertinmont and Susanne Krenzer under the responsibility
of Matthieu Hebert and Iciar Rodriguez Miranda, is gratefully acknowledged.
Follow-up calculations were performed by Pedro Arevalo, Francesca D’Auria, Olga Croitorov,
Francesca Crucitti, Anna Monisso and Kieran Mc Morrow under the responsibility of Björn Döhring.
Forecast assumptions were prepared by Paloma Cortés, Grzegorz Janowicz and Jannik Sielmann.
Statistical support for the production of the forecast was provided by Anna Chiara Küffel, Ingo
Kuhnert, Simone Russo, Jurgen Van Geijstelen, Cédric Viguie and Tomasz Zdrodowski. Further
statistical and layout assistance was provided by Szabolcs Klubuk, Johann Korner, Gianluca Papa,
Jacek Szelożyński and Christos Zavos.
Valuable comments and suggestions by Gerrit Bethuyne, Stefan Ciobanu, Angela D’Elia, Björn
Döhring, María José Doval Tedin, Patrick D’Souza, Miroslav Florian, Christian Gayer, Joern Griesse,
Valeska Gronert, Martin Hallet, Renata Hrůzová, Aron Kiss, Zenon Kontolemis, Bettina Kromen,
Stefan Kuhnert, Paul Kutos, Júlia Lendvai, Milan Lisicky, Maarten Masselink, Gilles Mourre, Moisés
Orellana, Dino Pinelli, Eric Ruscher, Matteo Salto, Marie-Luise Schmitz, Dominique Simonis, Uwe
Stamm, Andras Tari, Lotte Taylor, Michael Thiel, Roberta Torre, Alessandro Turrini, Anneleen
Vandeplas, Valerie Vandermeulen, Charlotte Van Hooydonk, Florian Wöhlbier, Norbert Wunner and
Javier Yaniz Igal are gratefully acknowledged.
Secretarial support for the finalisation of this report was provided by Maria Symeonidou.
Comments on the report would be gratefully received and should be sent to:
Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs
Unit A3: Economic situation, forecasts, business and consumer surveys
European Commission
B-1049 Brussels
E-mail: ecfin-forecasts@ec.europa.eu
184
Statistical Annex
European Economic Forecast – Spring 2025
Contents
Prices
15. Deflator of GDP 195
16. Deflator of private consumption 195
17. a) Harmonised consumer prices index 196
17. b) All-items HICP, excluding energy, food, alcohol and tobacco 196
18. Harmonised consumer prices quarterly profiles 197
19. Deflator of exports of goods 197
20. Deflator of imports of goods 198
21. Terms of trade of goods 198
Exchange rates
30. Nominal bilateral exchange rates 203
31. Nominal effective exchange rates 203
General Government
32. Total expenditure 204
33. Total revenue 204
186
Statistical Annex
Saving
41. Gross national saving 208
42. Gross saving of the private sector 209
43. Saving rate of households 210
44. Gross saving of general government 210
World economy
53. World GDP 215
54. World exports of goods and services 216
55. Shares of main trading partners in goods export of EU and Member States 216
56. World imports of goods and services 217
57. Shares of main trading partners in goods import of EU and Member States 217
58. World merchandise trade balances (bn USD) 218
59. World current-account balances (bn USD) 219
60. Crude oil prices 219
187
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Table 1: Gross domestic product, volume (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 1.5 1.1 0.4 6.2 4.3 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.5
Germany 1.2 1.7 0.6 3.7 1.4 -0.3 -0.2 0.0 1.1 -0.1 0.7 1.3
Estonia -0.4 3.6 2.6 7.2 0.1 -3.0 -0.3 1.1 2.3 -1.0 1.1 2.6
Ireland 0.4 7.1 6.2 16.3 8.6 -5.5 1.2 3.4 2.5 -0.5 4.0 3.6
Greece -0.1 -4.1 -0.8 8.7 5.7 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.2
Spain 0.9 0.1 -0.3 6.7 6.2 2.7 3.2 2.6 2.0 3.0 2.3 2.1
France 0.9 1.1 -0.2 6.9 2.6 0.9 1.2 0.6 1.3 1.1 0.8 1.4
Croatia 0.7 -0.2 0.8 12.6 7.3 3.3 3.9 3.2 2.9 3.6 3.3 2.9
Italy -0.3 -0.7 -1.0 8.9 4.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.7 1.0 1.2
Cyprus 2.7 -1.7 4.2 11.4 7.2 2.8 3.4 3.0 2.5 3.6 2.8 2.5
Latvia -0.5 3.6 1.5 6.9 1.8 2.9 -0.4 0.5 2.0 0.0 1.0 2.1
Lithuania 0.9 4.3 3.4 6.4 2.5 0.3 2.8 2.8 3.1 2.2 3.0 3.0
Luxembourg 2.8 2.1 2.0 6.9 -1.1 -0.7 1.0 1.7 2.0 1.2 2.3 2.2
Malta 3.3 5.7 4.9 13.3 4.3 6.8 6.0 4.1 4.0 5.0 4.3 4.3
Netherlands 1.4 0.9 1.1 6.3 5.0 0.1 1.0 1.3 1.2 0.8 1.6 1.5
Austria 1.3 1.1 0.4 4.8 5.3 -1.0 -1.2 -0.3 1.0 -0.6 1.0 1.4
Portugal 0.6 -0.9 0.5 5.6 7.0 2.6 1.9 1.8 2.2 1.7 1.9 2.1
Slovakia 5.1 2.5 1.7 5.7 0.4 2.2 2.1 1.5 1.4 2.2 2.3 2.5
Slovenia 1.8 0.4 2.3 8.4 2.7 2.1 1.6 2.0 2.4 1.4 2.5 2.6
Finland 0.9 0.0 1.2 2.7 0.8 -0.9 -0.1 1.0 1.3 -0.3 1.5 1.6
Euro area 0.8 0.8 0.3 6.3 3.5 0.4 0.9 0.9 1.4 0.8 1.3 1.6
Bulgaria 3.5 1.3 1.7 7.8 4.0 1.9 2.8 2.0 2.1 2.4 2.9 3.0
Czechia 2.4 1.6 1.7 4.0 2.8 -0.1 1.1 1.9 2.1 1.0 2.4 2.7
Denmark 0.2 1.2 1.6 7.4 1.5 2.5 3.7 3.6 2.0 2.4 2.5 1.8
Hungary -0.1 2.1 2.5 7.2 4.3 -0.8 0.5 0.8 2.5 0.6 1.8 3.1
Poland 4.6 3.1 3.4 6.9 5.3 0.2 2.9 3.3 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.1
Romania 2.8 2.8 3.4 5.5 4.0 2.4 0.8 1.4 2.2 1.4 2.5 2.9
Sweden 1.6 2.1 1.3 5.9 1.5 -0.1 1.0 1.1 1.9 0.3 1.8 2.6
EU 1.0 1.0 0.6 6.3 3.5 0.5 1.0 1.1 1.5 0.9 1.5 1.8
United Kingdom 0.4 2.0 -0.7 8.6 4.8 0.4 1.1 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.4 1.4
Japan 0.0 1.0 -0.3 2.7 0.9 1.5 0.1 0.7 0.6 0.2 1.2 1.0
United States 1.0 2.1 1.4 6.1 2.5 2.9 2.8 1.6 1.6 2.7 2.1 2.2
Table 2: Profiles (qoq) of quarterly GDP, volume (percentage change from previous quarter, 2024-26) 30.04.2025
2024/1 2024/2 2024/3 2024/4 2025/1 2025/2 2025/3 2025/4 2026/1 2026/2 2026/3 2026/4
Belgium 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.2 -0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4
Germany 0.2 -0.3 0.1 -0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3
Estonia 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.1 0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.1
Ireland 1.6 -0.4 4.1 3.6 3.2 : : : : : : :
Greece 0.1 1.2 0.4 0.9 : : : : : : : :
Spain 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
France 0.1 0.3 0.4 -0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5
Croatia 0.7 1.2 0.4 1.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7
Italy 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Cyprus 1.8 0.0 0.8 0.3 : : : : : : : :
Latvia -0.2 0.0 -0.2 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4
Lithuania 1.3 0.4 1.2 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9
Luxembourg 0.6 0.7 -0.9 1.4 0.9 -0.3 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.1
Malta 1.3 2.8 -0.6 -0.7 : : : : : : : :
Netherlands -0.2 1.0 0.8 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4
Austria 0.0 -0.4 -0.2 -0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4
Portugal 0.6 0.4 0.4 1.5 -0.5 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
Slovakia 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4
Slovenia 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7
Finland 0.5 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4
Euro area 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
Bulgaria 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.8 0.8 1.0
Czechia 0.3 0.2 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7
Denmark -0.1 1.4 1.2 1.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Hungary 0.4 -0.2 -0.7 0.6 -0.2 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
Poland 0.8 1.5 0.1 1.4 : : : : : : : :
Romania -0.4 0.4 -0.1 0.6 : : : : : : : :
Sweden 1.1 0.0 0.5 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
EU 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5
United Kingdom 0.9 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Japan -0.5 0.8 0.4 0.6 0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
United States 0.4 0.7 0.8 0.6 -0.1 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5
Note: See note 10 for aggregation details for the EU and EA aggregates.
188
Statistical Annex
Table 3: Profile (yoy) of quarterly GDP, volume (percentage change from corresponding quarter in previous year, 2024-26) 30.04.2025
2024/1 2024/2 2024/3 2024/4 2025/1 2025/2 2025/3 2025/4 2026/1 2026/2 2026/3 2026/4
Belgium 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.1 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.1 1.4
Germany -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.2 -0.2 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.2
Estonia -1.0 -0.7 -0.2 1.1 1.2 1.2 0.9 0.3 0.9 1.6 2.7 3.8
Ireland -3.8 -3.1 3.0 9.2 10.9 : : : : : : :
Greece 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.6 : : : : : : : :
Spain 2.7 3.3 3.3 3.3 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9
France 1.4 1.0 1.3 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.4 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.7
Croatia 4.4 3.3 4.2 3.8 3.7 3.2 3.4 2.6 2.8 2.9 2.9 3.0
Italy 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7
Cyprus 3.9 3.4 3.6 2.9 : : : : : : : :
Latvia -0.3 0.0 -0.9 -0.4 -0.1 0.2 0.8 1.1 1.7 2.0 2.1 2.1
Lithuania 2.8 1.6 2.6 3.9 3.2 3.1 2.6 2.3 2.5 3.0 3.2 3.4
Luxembourg 0.5 1.6 0.0 1.9 2.2 1.2 2.2 1.2 0.6 1.6 2.4 3.2
Malta 8.4 8.0 5.0 2.8 : : : : : : : :
Netherlands -0.6 0.6 1.9 2.1 2.4 1.6 1.0 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
Austria -1.7 -1.7 -1.1 -0.9 -0.7 -0.4 -0.2 0.1 0.2 0.7 1.2 1.7
Portugal 1.4 1.5 2.0 2.9 1.8 1.9 2.1 1.1 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3
Slovakia 2.9 2.1 1.7 1.6 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.2
Slovenia 2.0 0.9 1.3 1.1 1.6 1.9 2.0 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.8
Finland -1.3 -1.2 0.8 1.2 0.7 0.8 0.5 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.6
Euro area 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.1 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.5 1.7
Bulgaria 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.4 3.0 2.3 1.6 0.8 1.0 1.7 2.4 3.3
Czechia 0.4 0.4 1.4 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.0 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.4
Denmark 2.5 4.1 3.7 4.4 5.0 4.1 3.3 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Hungary 1.6 1.2 -0.8 0.1 -0.4 0.4 1.7 1.7 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
Poland 1.7 3.9 2.1 3.8 : : : : : : : :
Romania 1.9 0.9 0.1 0.5 : : : : : : : :
Sweden 0.0 0.6 0.9 2.2 1.1 1.2 1.1 0.9 1.5 1.9 2.1 2.2
EU 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.6 1.8
United Kingdom 0.7 1.1 1.2 1.5 0.8 0.7 1.1 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.1
Japan -0.8 -0.7 0.7 1.2 1.8 0.9 0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.4 0.7 1.1
United States 2.9 3.0 2.7 2.5 2.0 1.8 1.4 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.9
Note: See note 10 for aggregation details for the EU and EA aggregates.
Table 4: Gross domestic product per capita (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 0.7 0.4 -0.1 5.8 3.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.2
Germany 1.5 1.3 0.2 3.6 0.6 -1.1 -0.5 -0.2 1.0 -0.4 0.5 1.2
Estonia 0.0 3.9 2.4 7.1 -0.1 -5.4 -0.9 1.3 2.5 -1.0 1.1 2.6
Ireland -1.4 6.5 4.7 14.9 6.4 -7.2 -0.5 2.2 1.4 -2.3 2.8 2.6
Greece -0.3 -3.6 -0.6 9.2 6.4 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.6
Spain -0.4 0.2 -0.7 6.7 5.2 1.4 2.2 1.7 1.3 1.8 1.4 1.3
France 0.4 0.6 -0.6 6.5 2.3 0.6 0.8 0.2 1.0 0.8 0.5 1.0
Croatia 0.8 0.3 2.1 13.4 7.4 2.7 4.0 3.3 2.9 3.5 3.4 3.0
Italy -0.9 -0.8 -0.8 9.5 5.0 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.0 0.7 1.2 1.5
Cyprus 0.4 -2.4 3.1 9.7 5.2 0.8 1.8 1.6 1.3 2.2 1.8 1.5
Latvia 0.8 4.9 2.3 7.9 1.7 3.1 0.7 1.2 2.8 1.0 1.7 2.9
Lithuania 2.3 5.6 4.1 6.5 1.7 -1.1 2.2 2.5 3.3 1.7 3.5 3.7
Luxembourg 1.0 -0.2 -0.1 5.3 -3.2 -2.5 -0.6 -0.1 0.3 -0.4 0.5 0.5
Malta 2.7 4.2 1.8 12.7 1.6 2.6 2.7 1.6 2.0 1.4 1.8 2.3
Netherlands 1.0 0.5 0.6 5.7 4.0 -0.9 0.3 0.8 0.8 0.3 1.0 1.0
Austria 1.0 0.4 -0.3 4.4 4.1 -1.8 -1.7 -0.5 0.7 -0.9 0.7 1.2
Portugal 0.5 -0.5 0.5 5.3 6.4 1.6 0.9 1.0 1.6 0.8 1.4 1.9
Slovakia 5.0 2.6 1.5 6.1 0.1 2.2 2.0 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.6 2.7
Slovenia 1.4 0.3 2.0 8.1 2.6 1.6 1.3 1.8 2.2 1.1 2.3 2.4
Finland 0.5 -0.5 1.0 2.5 0.5 -1.3 -0.8 0.6 1.1 -0.9 1.1 1.5
Euro area 0.4 0.6 0.1 6.3 3.0 -0.2 0.5 0.6 1.1 0.4 1.0 1.4
Bulgaria 4.0 2.9 3.1 8.5 4.7 2.2 3.0 2.4 2.7 2.9 3.2 3.6
Czechia 1.9 1.6 1.7 4.0 0.4 -1.1 1.0 1.7 1.9 0.7 2.2 2.5
Denmark -0.3 0.7 1.1 6.9 0.6 1.8 3.2 3.2 1.5 1.9 2.1 1.3
Hungary 0.0 2.5 2.8 7.7 4.6 -0.7 0.8 1.1 2.8 0.8 2.1 3.4
Poland 4.7 3.2 3.8 7.5 3.0 0.6 3.3 3.4 3.1 3.1 3.7 3.2
Romania 3.9 3.2 4.0 6.4 4.4 2.3 0.8 1.5 2.4 1.4 2.6 3.0
Sweden 0.9 1.2 0.2 5.3 0.4 -0.8 0.6 0.8 1.7 0.2 1.6 2.5
EU 0.7 0.9 0.4 6.4 2.8 -0.1 0.7 0.9 1.3 0.6 1.3 1.6
United Kingdom -0.3 1.2 -1.2 8.2 3.9 -0.9 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.7 0.7
Japan -0.1 1.2 -0.1 2.8 1.4 2.1 0.6 1.2 1.1 0.7 1.7 0.5
United States 0.1 1.3 0.8 5.8 1.9 2.0 1.9 0.8 0.8 1.9 1.3 1.4
189
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Table 5: Domestic demand, volume (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 1.7 1.3 0.4 4.6 4.3 1.4 0.9 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.5
Germany 1.0 1.3 1.1 3.0 2.8 -0.4 0.4 1.1 1.2 -0.6 0.8 1.4
Estonia -1.3 4.9 3.5 7.8 0.1 -1.5 -0.8 1.4 2.6 -1.2 0.8 2.6
Ireland -1.3 5.2 8.4 -16.4 8.0 6.0 -11.6 8.4 2.3 -8.5 9.1 2.3
Greece -0.3 -5.0 0.3 7.2 7.7 1.8 4.3 2.9 2.4 3.4 2.6 2.3
Spain 0.2 -0.9 0.1 7.0 3.9 1.7 2.9 2.8 2.2 2.5 2.3 2.2
France 1.2 1.1 0.1 6.0 2.8 0.3 0.3 0.7 1.3 -0.1 0.5 1.2
Croatia -0.2 -0.5 2.4 7.0 7.6 1.5 6.3 4.0 3.3 5.8 3.7 2.8
Italy -0.2 -1.5 -1.0 9.2 5.6 0.1 0.4 0.9 1.1 -0.5 1.2 1.2
Cyprus 4.1 -3.5 4.9 5.6 8.5 5.2 0.6 3.0 2.4 3.0 2.2 2.0
Latvia -2.3 3.5 2.2 10.7 1.1 4.6 -1.0 0.7 2.0 -1.0 1.1 2.2
Lithuania -0.2 4.2 1.5 7.2 2.3 -1.4 3.0 3.4 3.3 1.4 3.5 3.2
Luxembourg 2.6 2.8 1.6 10.0 0.2 1.1 -0.1 2.8 2.8 1.3 3.0 2.5
Malta 1.6 4.6 4.1 12.4 8.1 2.1 5.3 3.8 3.5 5.2 3.9 4.1
Netherlands 1.3 1.0 0.6 6.0 5.0 -1.1 0.9 1.8 1.4 0.6 1.6 1.8
Austria 1.0 0.9 0.3 7.0 3.7 -3.8 -1.5 -0.1 0.9 -0.9 0.9 1.2
Portugal 0.5 -2.2 1.2 5.8 4.7 1.7 2.6 2.9 2.8 2.0 2.3 2.5
Slovakia 3.6 1.3 1.5 6.5 1.7 -4.9 3.9 1.6 1.9 4.3 2.4 1.8
Slovenia 1.3 -1.0 2.3 10.3 4.5 -0.2 2.1 2.0 2.7 3.5 2.7 3.1
Finland 0.9 0.6 1.0 3.1 2.7 -4.0 -0.9 1.0 1.5 -1.0 1.6 1.5
Euro area 0.7 0.4 0.6 5.1 3.8 0.1 0.5 1.5 1.5 0.0 1.4 1.5
Bulgaria 2.6 0.9 2.9 7.2 5.8 -1.9 4.3 2.5 2.5 3.5 3.0 3.5
Czechia 1.9 1.1 1.6 7.3 3.3 -2.7 0.5 3.0 2.9 0.4 3.3 3.1
Denmark 0.2 1.5 1.9 7.7 -0.4 -2.9 0.4 2.4 2.0 0.3 2.9 1.6
Hungary -1.9 1.3 3.9 6.5 4.3 -5.4 -0.1 1.5 3.0 -0.6 2.8 3.5
Poland 5.0 2.5 3.0 8.6 4.8 -3.0 4.2 4.0 3.3 4.2 4.2 3.2
Romania 4.1 2.1 4.7 6.6 4.2 2.0 3.5 1.9 2.4 4.2 2.9 3.1
Sweden 2.2 2.4 1.0 6.0 2.8 -2.5 0.6 1.0 1.6 -0.5 1.7 2.4
EU 0.9 0.6 0.8 5.4 3.7 -0.3 0.7 1.6 1.6 0.3 1.6 1.8
United Kingdom 0.3 2.2 -0.9 9.3 5.0 0.0 2.4 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.3 1.4
Japan -0.5 1.3 -0.3 1.7 1.5 0.5 0.2 0.7 0.6 0.2 1.2 1.0
United States 0.5 2.2 1.6 7.1 2.7 2.3 3.1 1.6 1.4 3.0 2.2 2.2
Table 6: Final demand, volume (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 1.9 1.9 1.1 9.1 5.0 -2.7 -1.1 0.0 1.4 -0.4 1.6 2.0
Germany 1.8 2.1 0.8 5.0 2.9 -0.4 -0.1 0.2 1.2 -0.4 1.0 1.8
Estonia 0.9 5.5 3.1 13.6 2.3 -5.0 -1.0 1.7 2.5 -0.8 1.7 2.8
Ireland 1.4 9.1 8.9 2.8 11.8 -2.3 4.0 3.3 2.6 4.0 3.4 3.3
Greece -0.1 -3.3 0.1 11.1 7.4 1.8 3.3 2.9 2.6 3.1 2.9 2.7
Spain 0.5 0.3 -0.3 8.5 6.6 2.0 3.0 2.7 2.2 2.8 2.5 2.3
France 1.2 1.7 -0.2 7.2 4.1 0.8 0.5 0.8 1.5 0.4 1.1 1.8
Croatia 0.0 0.8 1.5 14.1 13.9 -0.1 4.4 3.4 3.0 3.9 3.4 2.9
Italy -0.1 -0.6 -0.9 10.3 6.6 0.1 0.4 0.9 1.3 -0.3 1.5 1.6
Cyprus 3.3 -0.7 5.9 15.1 17.6 1.0 2.9 3.3 3.0 5.3 2.9 2.2
Latvia -0.3 4.5 2.4 10.1 5.1 0.7 -1.2 1.1 2.0 -1.3 1.3 2.2
Lithuania 1.7 5.2 3.8 11.3 6.9 -2.3 2.6 3.2 3.3 2.3 3.4 3.3
Luxembourg 3.4 4.2 2.9 11.0 1.2 0.0 0.2 3.0 3.1 1.1 3.8 3.4
Malta 4.2 7.1 7.5 4.5 11.4 4.2 5.3 3.6 3.2 4.0 3.5 3.4
Netherlands 1.9 2.9 1.5 6.4 4.7 -0.8 0.7 1.3 1.6 0.3 1.9 2.1
Austria 1.6 1.6 0.6 7.9 6.0 -2.5 -2.6 -0.4 1.3 -1.3 1.4 1.7
Portugal 1.1 -0.2 0.9 7.4 8.3 2.4 2.9 2.5 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.7
Slovakia 5.2 3.9 1.6 8.4 2.2 -2.9 2.2 1.7 1.8 3.2 3.1 2.8
Slovenia 2.5 1.3 2.9 12.2 5.5 -1.0 2.6 2.1 2.9 2.3 2.9 3.2
Finland 1.2 0.5 1.4 3.9 3.2 -2.7 -0.6 1.4 1.7 -0.7 2.1 1.9
Euro area 1.2 1.5 0.8 7.1 5.0 -0.2 0.7 1.1 1.6 0.5 1.6 2.0
Bulgaria 3.4 3.0 2.5 8.8 8.2 -1.1 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.3 3.0 3.3
Czechia 3.7 3.0 1.5 7.7 4.1 -0.4 1.0 2.2 2.7 0.7 2.9 3.0
Denmark 0.8 2.1 1.9 8.1 2.5 3.0 3.4 3.7 2.2 2.2 2.5 1.9
Hungary 2.3 3.1 3.4 7.3 7.1 -2.1 -1.4 0.9 2.9 -1.2 2.7 4.3
Poland 5.7 3.5 3.9 9.9 5.8 -0.4 3.4 3.2 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.1
Romania 5.5 3.9 4.8 8.2 5.6 1.2 1.7 1.8 2.5 2.5 2.7 3.0
Sweden 2.1 2.7 1.5 7.9 3.9 -0.3 1.2 1.3 1.7 0.3 1.8 2.6
EU 1.4 1.7 1.0 7.3 5.0 -0.2 0.9 1.3 1.8 0.7 1.8 2.2
United Kingdom 0.7 2.4 -0.7 8.0 6.7 -0.1 1.5 1.2 1.4 0.8 1.2 1.4
Japan -0.1 1.5 -0.3 3.0 2.1 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.7 0.2 1.5 1.2
United States 1.0 2.3 1.3 7.0 3.2 2.4 3.1 1.6 1.4 3.1 2.3 2.3
190
Statistical Annex
Table 7: Private consumption expenditure, volume (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 2.1 1.2 -0.2 5.6 3.6 0.6 2.0 1.5 1.1 0.9 1.3 1.4
Germany 0.5 1.1 0.0 2.3 5.6 -0.4 0.3 0.7 1.1 0.5 0.7 1.0
Estonia -0.1 4.5 2.9 7.1 2.9 -1.3 -0.3 1.4 2.4 -0.5 0.5 2.8
Ireland 1.5 0.6 0.8 8.9 10.8 4.2 2.3 2.4 2.3 3.0 2.8 2.6
Greece 0.2 -4.1 0.3 5.1 8.6 1.8 2.1 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7
Spain 0.7 -0.8 -0.9 7.1 4.8 1.8 2.9 2.9 2.1 2.5 2.2 2.0
France 1.7 0.7 -0.2 5.3 3.2 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.4 0.8 0.7 1.2
Croatia -0.3 -1.0 1.7 10.7 6.9 3.0 5.6 3.8 3.4 5.5 3.6 2.9
Italy 0.2 -0.7 -1.7 5.8 5.3 0.4 0.4 1.2 1.1 0.0 1.0 1.2
Cyprus 3.9 -1.6 2.8 4.7 9.8 5.9 3.8 2.5 2.2 3.2 2.1 2.0
Latvia 0.5 3.2 1.0 8.1 5.1 -1.0 0.5 1.0 1.9 -0.2 1.1 2.4
Lithuania 0.2 3.8 2.0 8.1 2.0 -0.3 3.5 4.2 4.0 3.8 4.5 4.0
Luxembourg 2.9 2.2 0.7 11.4 6.6 2.0 1.3 2.0 2.4 2.0 2.6 2.4
Malta 1.6 3.0 2.6 11.8 11.1 12.2 5.7 4.1 3.9 4.5 4.3 4.0
Netherlands 0.1 0.4 0.1 4.5 6.9 0.8 1.2 1.9 1.8 0.4 1.6 1.8
Austria 1.3 0.5 -0.5 4.8 4.9 -0.5 0.1 0.3 1.0 0.1 1.0 1.2
Portugal 1.0 -1.3 0.6 4.9 5.6 1.9 3.2 3.3 2.8 2.5 2.1 2.2
Slovakia 4.5 0.6 3.4 3.0 5.1 -3.1 2.9 0.9 1.6 1.8 1.4 2.3
Slovenia 2.8 -0.5 1.8 10.5 5.3 0.1 1.6 2.2 2.3 1.3 2.7 2.5
Finland 1.7 0.9 0.1 3.2 0.9 0.0 -0.1 0.5 1.6 0.1 1.3 1.5
Euro area 0.8 0.2 -0.3 4.7 5.0 0.5 1.1 1.3 1.4 0.9 1.2 1.4
Bulgaria 4.2 1.2 2.7 8.5 3.9 1.4 4.2 3.5 2.5 4.4 3.4 3.3
Czechia 2.4 1.1 1.6 4.2 0.5 -2.8 2.2 3.3 3.0 1.6 2.4 3.2
Denmark 0.5 0.8 2.0 6.8 -2.1 1.4 0.9 1.6 1.7 0.7 1.4 1.8
Hungary -1.3 1.1 3.9 5.1 6.9 -1.0 5.1 3.4 3.2 3.9 3.6 3.9
Poland 4.8 2.1 2.9 6.2 5.2 -0.3 3.0 3.4 2.8 3.8 3.6 2.7
Romania 3.9 2.2 5.3 7.0 5.1 3.0 6.0 2.0 2.3 5.1 2.3 2.8
Sweden 2.4 2.4 0.9 6.0 2.8 -2.1 0.3 1.3 2.1 0.0 2.5 3.0
EU 1.0 0.4 0.0 4.9 4.7 0.4 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.2 1.4 1.6
United Kingdom 0.5 1.9 -1.1 7.2 7.4 0.5 0.6 1.0 1.4 0.6 0.9 1.4
Japan 0.4 0.6 -0.9 0.7 2.1 0.8 0.0 0.6 0.5 0.1 1.3 1.1
United States 1.2 2.1 1.4 8.8 3.0 2.5 2.8 2.0 1.3 2.7 2.1 2.0
Table 8: Government consumption expenditure, volume (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 1.5 0.7 0.7 4.2 3.4 2.9 2.6 2.2 0.6 1.5 1.3 1.6
Germany 2.3 1.7 2.9 3.4 0.1 -0.1 3.5 1.9 1.3 2.0 1.4 1.0
Estonia 2.2 2.6 2.6 3.9 -1.5 0.9 0.3 1.2 2.5 1.2 0.4 0.2
Ireland 0.9 0.6 6.2 6.6 4.1 5.6 4.0 2.9 3.6 3.9 2.6 3.6
Greece 1.5 -3.5 0.2 1.8 0.1 2.6 -4.1 2.6 1.1 0.9 1.1 0.7
Spain 3.7 -0.9 1.9 3.6 0.6 5.2 4.1 2.3 1.6 3.4 1.6 1.5
France 1.7 1.4 0.1 6.6 2.6 0.7 2.1 1.0 1.1 2.1 0.1 0.9
Croatia 3.0 0.5 2.2 2.8 2.2 7.1 7.0 3.9 2.9 3.6 3.2 2.4
Italy 0.2 -1.3 0.3 2.3 0.8 0.6 1.1 0.9 0.9 -0.3 2.3 0.4
Cyprus 4.7 -2.3 5.4 8.9 4.7 1.2 1.5 3.7 2.5 0.1 1.5 2.1
Latvia -1.3 1.9 3.5 3.7 2.4 7.0 7.6 1.7 1.5 5.8 0.9 0.5
Lithuania 0.0 0.4 -0.3 1.2 1.2 -0.2 1.4 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1
Luxembourg 2.4 2.7 4.1 4.8 4.0 1.5 4.9 4.4 2.6 4.3 2.8 2.3
Malta 2.8 5.7 8.5 6.0 0.1 3.1 7.3 4.7 4.2 8.3 2.2 5.3
Netherlands 4.0 -0.2 1.8 4.7 1.3 2.9 3.6 1.8 1.3 2.7 1.9 2.1
Austria 2.1 0.4 0.7 7.6 -0.6 1.2 1.6 -0.4 -0.4 0.4 0.5 0.2
Portugal 0.4 -1.9 0.8 3.8 1.7 0.6 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.5 1.3 1.7
Slovakia 4.7 1.2 1.4 3.7 -2.9 -2.5 3.7 0.9 0.8 3.8 0.4 -0.4
Slovenia 2.4 -0.6 2.3 6.2 -0.7 2.4 8.5 2.8 3.7 9.9 2.5 4.4
Finland 1.1 0.5 1.2 4.3 -0.6 3.4 0.7 -0.2 -0.1 0.4 -0.2 0.0
Euro area 1.9 0.5 1.5 4.4 1.1 1.4 2.7 1.6 1.2 1.9 1.2 1.1
Bulgaria 0.5 0.6 4.4 0.5 8.0 1.1 4.6 0.3 1.9 4.3 1.9 3.3
Czechia 1.2 -0.1 2.9 1.5 0.4 3.4 3.3 2.4 2.2 3.5 2.2 2.2
Denmark 2.3 0.9 0.1 4.9 -2.5 0.2 1.4 4.4 2.1 2.3 3.5 0.8
Hungary 0.2 1.8 2.2 2.0 3.2 3.3 -4.6 0.3 1.5 -0.8 0.4 1.9
Poland 3.8 1.3 3.9 5.0 0.6 4.5 8.2 2.8 3.2 7.8 3.1 2.7
Romania -0.1 1.5 3.7 -0.6 -1.4 6.3 0.7 0.6 1.0 3.8 -0.6 0.9
Sweden 1.4 1.4 0.6 3.4 0.7 1.4 1.2 1.3 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.4
EU 1.9 0.5 1.5 4.2 1.0 1.6 2.7 1.7 1.3 2.1 1.3 1.2
United Kingdom 1.4 1.1 -0.2 14.3 0.6 1.6 3.0 3.3 1.3 2.9 3.9 1.5
Japan 1.1 1.7 1.4 3.4 1.4 -0.3 0.9 1.0 0.8 0.5 0.8 0.7
United States 1.9 -1.1 2.0 0.4 -1.1 2.9 2.5 1.3 1.2 2.4 1.9 1.0
191
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Table 9: Total investment, volume (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 0.7 2.5 1.5 4.3 1.7 3.5 1.4 0.5 1.2 0.6 1.8 1.9
Germany 1.6 2.2 1.8 0.6 -0.2 -1.2 -2.7 0.2 2.6 -3.0 0.3 2.7
Estonia -6.3 7.7 10.6 0.3 -8.1 7.5 -6.9 1.6 3.1 -4.6 1.6 4.0
Ireland -7.7 15.6 17.1 -39.4 3.7 2.8 -25.4 22.4 1.4 -24.8 25.2 1.5
Greece -3.6 -11.6 1.2 21.7 16.4 6.6 4.5 7.8 7.3 7.4 8.9 7.1
Spain -3.4 -1.8 2.1 2.6 3.3 2.1 3.0 3.4 3.1 2.0 3.2 3.7
France 0.6 0.3 1.6 9.7 0.0 0.4 -1.3 -1.0 1.4 -1.9 0.0 2.0
Croatia -1.9 -0.7 3.2 4.8 10.4 10.1 9.9 4.3 3.2 9.1 4.5 3.0
Italy -2.0 -3.8 0.9 21.5 7.4 9.0 0.5 0.8 1.5 2.0 0.2 2.0
Cyprus 3.7 -11.4 14.2 1.9 10.8 10.7 0.1 3.5 3.0 4.9 3.2 1.8
Latvia -9.2 6.0 2.8 6.8 -1.6 9.9 -6.7 -1.2 2.6 -5.6 1.1 3.0
Lithuania -2.7 7.3 5.9 12.6 5.2 9.3 -1.3 3.5 4.0 -4.0 3.5 3.6
Luxembourg 2.4 3.7 1.8 14.6 -13.9 -6.4 -7.3 2.5 3.9 -2.9 4.2 3.0
Malta 3.4 9.0 2.0 22.2 9.8 -17.0 2.4 2.5 2.1 4.4 4.5 3.5
Netherlands 0.2 4.2 0.8 2.4 3.4 1.3 -0.5 0.8 1.5 -1.4 1.2 1.4
Austria -0.5 2.1 2.3 6.0 0.4 -3.2 -3.4 -0.7 1.9 -3.2 1.2 2.1
Portugal -1.2 -5.5 4.6 7.8 3.3 3.6 3.0 3.5 4.3 0.8 3.7 4.2
Slovakia 1.2 5.0 -2.3 5.1 4.3 4.0 1.8 3.6 3.8 0.7 6.1 2.5
Slovenia -2.4 -2.0 2.7 12.3 4.2 3.9 -3.7 0.7 2.8 -0.1 3.2 3.5
Finland 0.7 -0.9 3.2 1.8 1.5 -7.4 -7.1 3.5 3.0 -5.0 4.5 3.4
Euro area -0.6 0.4 2.4 3.7 2.0 1.6 -1.8 1.3 2.2 -1.9 1.8 2.5
Bulgaria 1.1 0.8 1.3 -8.3 6.5 10.2 -1.1 2.0 3.5 -1.5 3.0 4.5
Czechia 2.0 1.3 2.4 6.7 6.3 2.5 -1.2 0.6 3.2 0.8 2.9 3.5
Denmark -1.9 3.1 3.9 9.8 2.8 -6.6 2.7 2.4 2.5 -2.3 2.1 2.0
Hungary -2.6 4.4 5.5 5.7 0.7 -7.7 -11.1 -1.5 4.0 -10.1 3.4 3.9
Poland 6.7 5.3 2.3 1.5 1.7 12.7 -2.2 6.9 5.3 2.3 6.7 5.3
Romania 7.7 3.6 3.0 4.0 5.4 14.5 -3.3 2.3 3.6 5.4 6.7 7.4
Sweden 2.2 3.4 2.4 7.3 0.3 -1.5 -1.1 1.0 2.0 -2.5 1.3 3.7
EU -0.2 0.9 2.4 4.0 2.1 1.8 -1.8 1.5 2.4 -1.6 2.1 2.8
United Kingdom -0.9 3.8 0.0 7.6 5.1 0.3 1.5 0.6 1.5 0.4 0.3 1.4
Japan -3.4 2.7 0.0 0.5 -0.6 1.5 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.6 1.5 1.1
United States -2.7 4.8 2.6 5.4 2.0 3.2 4.3 1.4 1.7 4.3 2.4 3.9
Table 10: Investment in construction, volume (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 1.4 1.7 1.2 2.8 -1.1 2.6 -0.8 0.8 1.2 -0.6 0.4 0.6
Germany 0.6 1.6 2.5 -3.1 -3.9 -3.4 -3.3 -0.1 1.8 -3.5 -0.9 2.2
Estonia -8.4 7.0 7.3 5.8 -0.5 6.4 -10.3 1.4 2.9 2.0 3.4 4.0
Ireland -14.7 2.0 5.0 3.7 2.9 -0.9 -1.9 2.0 2.1 -1.6 4.1 3.6
Greece -6.0 -16.8 -3.2 22.0 22.7 15.6 5.7 13.1 10.3 1.3 4.2 2.3
Spain -5.3 -5.1 3.3 0.5 2.2 3.0 3.5 2.7 3.6 2.6 2.9 3.5
France 0.0 -0.6 1.0 11.6 -2.6 -2.9 -2.0 -1.0 3.0 -2.4 0.5 5.0
Croatia -1.8 -3.0 0.6 3.8 5.4 13.1 14.2 5.4 2.2 10.6 4.4 3.6
Italy -3.2 -6.0 -0.2 32.5 9.2 15.5 2.0 0.5 1.9 3.5 -3.8 2.0
Cyprus 1.2 -14.6 16.1 17.0 4.2 5.0 3.7 3.7 3.4 5.5 2.9 2.0
Latvia -8.7 7.4 -0.2 -2.7 -3.0 19.1 -5.0 2.1 2.7 -5.7 1.3 2.7
Lithuania -2.7 5.4 4.6 2.5 8.8 11.2 1.8 2.0 2.9 0.0 3.3 2.9
Luxembourg 2.2 2.3 1.9 10.4 -8.1 -7.7 -9.4 3.1 3.4 -3.5 2.8 3.0
Malta -2.1 7.7 5.4 5.9 -25.8 -1.1 7.0 4.0 4.0 2.5 3.9 3.9
Netherlands -1.4 -0.8 5.9 3.0 1.6 -0.1 -3.4 3.1 1.3 -3.6 0.6 1.3
Austria -2.2 0.6 1.7 4.1 -1.3 -9.3 -5.4 1.0 2.2 -4.9 2.2 2.3
Portugal -3.4 -8.2 4.7 6.6 0.9 1.3 1.5 4.9 5.1 0.0 2.4 2.8
Slovakia 1.0 3.9 -1.6 3.7 4.6 8.3 -13.5 3.4 5.3 -5.0 5.7 4.8
Slovenia -3.6 -5.2 0.9 7.1 3.5 11.9 -5.3 1.5 2.2 -0.7 4.0 4.6
Finland 1.4 -1.0 3.0 -1.1 -0.5 -12.1 -8.9 2.4 2.9 -8.0 5.4 3.9
Euro area -1.9 -1.7 2.1 6.2 -0.1 0.7 -1.4 0.8 2.4 -1.3 0.1 2.9
Bulgaria 8.1 -4.4 -2.2 -12.5 10.7 2.5 -3.7 1.8 3.9 -3.1 3.5 3.6
Czechia 0.4 -0.8 2.5 2.6 1.1 1.9 -0.7 1.1 6.3 0.7 3.5 4.4
Denmark -5.6 4.2 4.5 10.2 -0.5 -4.5 0.3 2.7 2.1 -2.2 2.5 2.0
Hungary -5.3 2.0 5.9 0.5 1.4 -10.3 -7.9 -0.6 4.1 -10.1 4.3 4.5
Poland 7.4 3.6 2.0 3.7 1.0 8.0 -9.2 0.9 5.5 -4.9 6.9 6.8
Romania 12.1 5.1 6.6 2.3 9.5 9.8 -4.6 3.7 4.1 6.3 8.1 8.8
Sweden 1.7 3.4 2.9 1.9 -0.4 -5.3 -1.1 5.1 1.8 -5.6 0.5 2.4
EU -1.5 -1.1 2.3 5.8 0.2 0.7 -1.9 1.1 2.7 -1.5 0.8 3.3
United Kingdom -3.2 3.7 -0.2 10.3 3.3 -4.5 2.5 1.2 1.6 0.8 -0.1 1.5
Japan -5.4 2.3 0.4 0.0 -2.2 1.3 -1.1 1.0 1.2 -0.4 1.6 1.2
United States -8.4 3.9 1.7 2.5 -4.6 0.9 5.4 1.1 1.5 5.0 1.4 4.1
192
Statistical Annex
Table 11: Investment in equipment, volume (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium -1.8 1.9 1.4 5.5 2.6 8.7 4.6 -1.0 1.1 0.8 3.6 3.8
Germany 1.9 2.7 0.3 3.5 4.5 -0.8 -5.5 -0.3 3.6 -6.2 0.9 3.7
Estonia -6.0 8.4 4.5 11.8 0.5 11.6 -7.4 4.2 3.3 -15.0 -1.2 4.5
Ireland -1.7 9.3 2.5 14.6 24.4 0.1 -7.2 0.5 0.6 0.7 1.2 1.5
Greece 0.0 -7.5 2.4 23.8 16.1 1.7 4.5 5.6 6.1 10.6 12.5 11.7
Spain -2.4 2.0 0.3 3.3 2.9 1.1 2.8 5.5 2.7 1.1 4.2 4.6
France 0.4 0.7 0.9 8.3 -1.4 3.4 -4.4 -4.4 -3.4 -5.8 -5.0 -6.5
Croatia -3.5 2.4 5.7 8.8 15.3 10.5 5.4 3.1 5.9 9.5 5.8 2.9
Italy -1.3 -2.9 1.5 17.4 3.7 2.4 -2.6 0.9 1.1 -1.1 6.4 2.6
Cyprus 8.9 : 13.9 -34.5 -11.6 100.9 -3.7 2.6 2.6 -1.5 3.1 1.0
Latvia -12.3 4.5 6.8 21.8 -2.1 1.4 -9.6 -5.4 2.2 -6.5 0.5 3.5
Lithuania -6.4 11.9 7.3 31.3 0.9 9.2 -6.5 6.9 6.3 -11.5 4.1 5.1
Luxembourg 1.9 6.6 -0.5 26.4 -27.0 -6.4 -3.5 1.9 4.5 -5.5 6.6 1.7
Malta 8.9 12.2 -8.9 64.4 60.6 -43.7 -11.8 : : : : :
Netherlands 1.3 3.5 2.2 1.5 7.0 3.0 3.2 -4.1 1.6 0.4 2.5 1.1
Austria -0.4 2.6 2.1 9.2 -0.2 4.4 -4.5 -3.5 2.9 -6.1 -2.6 0.0
Portugal 1.9 -2.5 3.7 13.3 7.4 9.0 6.1 1.6 3.9 1.7 7.0 7.3
Slovakia -0.9 8.2 -4.5 8.9 1.6 -1.1 23.6 4.3 2.6 9.6 6.9 0.3
Slovenia -3.7 2.1 3.9 21.9 5.2 -0.5 -3.3 -2.7 0.8 -0.9 2.4 3.4
Finland -1.8 3.0 3.9 6.0 3.9 -5.0 -10.1 8.7 3.2 0.0 3.2 2.8
Euro area 0.0 1.2 1.1 8.0 3.7 1.8 -2.4 -0.3 1.6 -2.9 1.8 1.8
Bulgaria -8.3 8.8 2.8 -3.6 2.3 16.3 1.5 4.4 3.0 -1.0 3.0 5.5
Czechia 4.1 2.8 -0.3 11.6 12.3 3.8 -3.0 0.5 -0.6 -0.1 1.3 3.0
Denmark -1.5 4.0 -0.2 14.9 -6.1 -9.7 6.9 10.4 4.0 -2.3 1.3 3.6
Hungary -0.8 6.7 6.5 9.1 2.1 -8.0 -18.2 -2.2 4.2 -10.5 2.5 3.3
Poland 5.2 7.9 1.6 -3.3 2.0 20.9 6.6 12.9 4.9 10.3 6.5 3.9
Romania 2.2 2.8 -3.6 6.6 -5.4 26.0 1.9 1.3 3.1 3.0 4.7 5.6
Sweden 2.9 4.0 0.9 7.6 -0.7 5.5 -1.7 -5.0 1.8 -2.8 1.1 5.7
EU 0.3 1.8 1.0 7.6 3.3 2.9 -2.0 0.5 1.9 -2.2 2.1 2.2
United Kingdom 0.1 5.1 -1.6 6.2 16.0 11.0 0.3 -2.6 1.3 0.1 -0.1 1.2
Japan -2.7 4.0 0.0 1.3 -0.6 0.9 0.7 2.7 1.0 0.7 1.6 1.0
United States 1.3 6.3 0.1 5.2 3.4 3.6 3.2 0.5 0.6 3.8 4.6 4.1
193
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Table 13: Potential GDP, volume (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 1.7 1.1 1.5 1.6 1.9 2.0 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.7 1.6 1.4
Germany 1.1 1.5 1.2 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.5 0.5
Estonia 2.4 1.8 3.3 2.6 0.9 1.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.3
Ireland 1.5 5.2 8.5 4.4 4.2 3.6 2.6 2.8 2.5 2.6 2.9 2.7
Greece 1.3 -2.4 -1.0 -0.6 0.3 0.7 1.2 1.7 1.9 1.2 1.8 2.0
Spain 2.6 0.0 0.6 0.9 1.8 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.3
France 1.5 1.0 0.8 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.0
Croatia 1.7 0.1 1.8 3.4 3.6 4.2 4.3 4.0 3.6 4.2 3.6 3.3
Italy 0.3 -0.3 0.2 0.1 1.2 1.0 1.3 1.0 0.9 1.3 1.1 0.9
Cyprus 3.3 -0.3 3.7 4.6 4.3 4.2 3.9 3.6 3.1 4.0 3.6 3.2
Latvia 2.7 0.9 2.5 2.9 1.6 2.1 0.8 1.3 1.4 1.0 1.4 1.5
Lithuania 3.9 2.0 3.5 4.1 3.4 3.2 2.7 2.8 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.1
Luxembourg 2.8 2.2 2.4 2.2 1.6 1.5 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.9 1.9 1.9
Malta 3.1 5.1 7.1 4.6 6.0 6.0 5.3 4.6 4.5 5.4 4.7 4.6
Netherlands 1.5 0.8 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.1 1.9 1.6 1.5 1.9 1.7 1.5
Austria 1.4 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.1 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.8
Portugal 0.3 -0.6 1.5 2.0 2.3 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.0 2.3 2.1 1.9
Slovakia 4.9 2.7 2.1 1.6 1.4 2.3 2.8 2.1 2.0 2.3 2.3 2.2
Slovenia 2.9 0.9 1.8 2.5 2.4 2.8 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.5
Finland 1.3 0.2 1.0 0.7 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.5
Euro area 1.3 0.8 1.2 1.0 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.2
Bulgaria 3.8 1.4 2.4 2.7 2.4 2.7 3.3 2.9 2.5 3.2 2.8 2.4
Czechia 3.3 1.5 2.4 0.7 1.4 2.0 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.8
Denmark 1.4 1.0 2.1 2.7 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.1 2.1 1.9 1.7
Hungary 1.4 0.9 3.2 3.2 2.6 1.9 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.7
Poland 4.0 3.6 3.7 3.4 4.2 3.0 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.8
Romania 4.8 1.7 4.4 2.0 1.8 2.8 1.9 1.7 1.7 2.3 2.2 2.3
Sweden 2.1 1.7 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.4
EU 1.5 1.0 1.4 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.3
United Kingdom 1.5 1.2 1.3 1.0 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4
Japan : : : : : :: : : : : : :
United States 1.7 1.6 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.6 2.6 2.5
Table 14: Output gap relative to potential GDP ¹ (deviation of actual output from potential output as % of potential GDP, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 0.7 -0.6 -1.0 -1.0 1.2 0.4 -0.2 -0.9 -1.3 -0.4 -0.7 -0.6
Germany -0.5 0.0 0.3 -0.4 0.3 -0.7 -1.4 -1.7 -0.9 -1.6 -1.3 -0.6
Estonia 0.3 -0.4 1.0 0.9 0.1 -3.9 -4.3 -3.4 -1.5 -4.7 -3.8 -1.6
Ireland -0.9 0.3 -2.5 5.4 9.8 0.2 -1.2 -0.6 -0.6 -2.3 -1.2 -0.4
Greece -0.6 -16.4 -10.7 -6.0 -0.9 0.7 1.8 2.4 2.7 1.7 2.3 2.5
Spain -0.5 -7.8 -1.7 -4.0 0.1 0.6 1.5 1.7 1.6 1.3 1.2 1.0
France 0.2 -1.4 -1.0 -1.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -0.2 -0.1 -0.3 0.0
Croatia 3.2 -3.9 -0.8 0.0 3.5 2.6 2.2 1.4 0.7 1.9 1.6 1.2
Italy 0.7 -3.6 -2.9 -1.7 1.8 1.5 1.0 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 1.0
Cyprus 2.8 -6.1 -0.4 1.9 4.7 3.2 2.8 2.2 1.7 2.6 1.9 1.2
Latvia 0.5 -1.7 0.9 -0.3 -0.1 0.7 -0.5 -1.3 -0.7 -0.6 -1.0 -0.5
Lithuania -0.1 -1.8 2.0 1.8 0.9 -1.8 -1.7 -1.8 -0.9 -2.2 -1.8 -0.9
Luxembourg 1.0 -1.9 -0.7 1.3 -1.4 -3.5 -3.6 -3.1 -2.5 -3.7 -3.2 -2.9
Malta 0.0 -0.3 0.4 0.2 -1.5 -0.8 -0.1 -0.5 -1.0 -0.4 -0.7 -1.0
Netherlands -0.1 -2.0 -0.5 -0.6 2.2 0.2 -0.7 -1.0 -1.2 -0.9 -1.0 -1.1
Austria 0.1 -0.6 -0.4 -1.8 2.4 0.3 -1.2 -1.7 -1.1 -1.4 -1.1 -0.5
Portugal -0.5 -2.9 -0.3 -3.4 1.0 1.1 0.7 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.3
Slovakia 2.3 -1.9 0.1 1.6 0.6 0.5 -0.3 -0.8 -1.4 -0.8 -0.7 -0.4
Slovenia 3.1 -6.0 -0.2 2.4 2.7 2.0 1.3 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.3
Finland 0.7 -2.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.6 -2.2 -2.9 -2.5 -1.7 -3.2 -2.4 -1.3
Euro area 0.0 -2.3 -1.1 -1.1 1.0 0.1 -0.3 -0.5 -0.2 -0.5 -0.4 0.0
Bulgaria 1.4 -0.4 -0.9 0.4 2.0 1.2 0.7 -0.1 -0.5 0.2 0.3 0.8
Czechia 2.6 -2.2 0.8 -0.7 0.7 -1.4 -1.7 -1.1 -0.5 -2.1 -1.3 -0.4
Denmark 0.5 -3.0 -1.6 -0.3 -1.7 -1.9 -0.8 0.4 0.3 -0.8 -0.1 0.0
Hungary -1.5 -2.7 1.6 0.8 2.4 -0.3 -1.0 -1.2 0.0 -1.4 -1.1 0.3
Poland 1.7 -0.8 0.2 0.6 1.6 -1.1 -0.8 -0.3 0.0 -1.0 -0.4 0.0
Romania 1.8 -1.8 -1.0 -2.3 -0.2 -0.6 -1.7 -2.0 -1.5 -2.0 -1.7 -1.1
Sweden -0.1 -1.0 -0.4 0.4 0.1 -1.4 -1.7 -1.9 -1.4 -2.3 -1.9 -0.7
EU 0.1 -2.3 -1.0 -1.0 1.0 -0.1 -0.4 -0.6 -0.3 -0.6 -0.5 -0.1
United Kingdom -1.0 -2.0 -1.1 -2.5 0.9 0.0 -0.3 -0.6 -0.7 -0.5 -0.4 -0.5
Japan : : : : : : :
: : : : : :
United States -0.6 -0.9 -0.5 -0.2 0.1 0.6 0.9 0.1 -0.6 0.5 0.1 -0.2
¹ When comparing output gaps between successive forecasts it has to be taken into account that the overall revisions to the forecast may have led to changes in the estimates for potential output.
194
Statistical Annex
Table 15: Deflator of gross domestic product (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 1.7 1.6 1.8 2.7 6.8 4.5 1.9 2.8 2.1 2.7 2.4 2.1
Germany 1.2 1.6 1.7 2.8 6.1 6.1 3.1 2.4 2.2 2.9 2.4 2.2
Estonia 5.8 3.6 3.1 5.4 15.8 8.1 3.7 3.9 2.6 5.1 4.0 3.3
Ireland -0.7 2.9 0.8 1.1 6.8 3.6 3.3 2.7 2.1 3.3 2.1 1.7
Greece 2.9 -0.7 -0.1 1.4 6.5 5.9 3.2 3.4 2.3 3.5 2.4 2.2
Spain 2.1 0.1 1.1 2.6 4.7 6.2 3.0 2.3 2.0 3.1 2.4 2.0
France 1.6 0.9 1.3 1.2 3.2 5.3 2.3 1.7 1.5 2.2 1.6 1.7
Croatia 3.5 0.8 1.2 2.1 8.0 11.7 5.5 4.3 2.6 6.6 3.2 2.1
Italy 1.9 1.2 1.1 1.3 3.5 5.9 2.1 2.2 1.7 1.6 1.9 1.8
Cyprus 2.8 0.0 0.3 3.0 6.7 3.8 3.5 2.6 2.3 3.5 2.3 2.2
Latvia 6.8 2.3 2.7 3.3 9.8 6.0 2.6 3.9 2.8 2.5 2.9 2.1
Lithuania 4.7 1.9 2.6 6.0 16.1 9.0 3.4 3.6 2.4 3.6 3.5 2.2
Luxembourg 4.1 2.8 1.5 5.9 6.2 6.3 5.2 2.5 2.8 3.9 3.0 2.9
Malta 2.6 2.5 2.1 2.4 5.1 5.3 3.2 2.5 2.2 2.6 2.5 2.1
Netherlands 1.6 0.8 2.0 2.7 6.2 7.3 5.2 3.7 2.6 5.0 3.0 2.3
Austria 1.8 2.0 1.7 1.9 4.8 6.6 3.1 3.5 2.2 4.2 2.3 1.9
Portugal 1.9 0.9 1.8 2.0 5.3 7.0 4.4 3.1 2.2 3.8 2.5 2.2
Slovakia 1.3 0.6 1.5 2.2 7.5 10.1 3.6 3.9 3.3 4.4 3.8 2.8
Slovenia 2.6 0.9 1.6 2.7 6.5 10.1 3.1 2.8 2.7 3.0 3.7 2.8
Finland 1.8 2.3 1.2 2.5 6.2 3.5 1.4 1.8 1.7 1.4 2.1 1.9
Euro area 1.6 1.2 1.4 2.1 5.1 6.0 2.9 2.5 2.0 2.9 2.2 2.0
Bulgaria 6.1 2.3 4.4 7.0 15.9 8.0 6.5 5.4 2.5 4.8 2.3 2.8
Czechia 1.7 1.3 2.9 4.0 8.7 8.1 4.0 2.9 2.8 4.0 2.4 2.4
Denmark 2.5 1.1 1.2 2.8 9.1 -3.8 1.8 1.7 1.9 1.6 2.2 1.9
Hungary 4.1 2.8 4.3 6.2 14.2 15.2 7.3 4.9 3.6 7.2 4.1 3.3
Poland 3.0 1.5 2.1 5.3 10.7 9.9 3.6 4.2 3.1 3.9 4.6 3.0
Romania 10.4 2.8 4.9 5.6 12.1 12.8 8.8 6.5 5.8 9.0 5.9 5.3
Sweden 2.3 1.4 2.1 2.7 5.8 6.0 2.8 1.7 1.7 2.3 1.4 1.3
EU 1.9 1.2 1.6 2.4 5.8 6.1 3.1 2.7 2.2 3.1 2.4 2.1
United Kingdom 2.4 1.6 2.6 0.1 5.4 6.9 4.0 3.0 1.9 2.7 2.0 1.8
Japan -1.0 0.2 0.4 -0.2 0.4 4.1 2.9 2.0 1.9 2.8 1.6 1.3
United States 1.9 1.8 1.7 4.6 7.1 3.6 2.4 2.7 2.1 2.4 2.1 2.0
Table 16: Price deflator of private consumption (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 1.9 1.5 1.6 2.7 10.2 6.0 1.6 2.3 1.9 2.2 2.1 1.8
Germany 1.3 1.3 1.2 2.9 6.8 6.7 2.7 1.9 2.0 2.7 2.6 2.6
Estonia 4.8 2.7 2.2 4.1 17.5 8.8 3.2 3.8 1.8 3.1 3.6 2.5
Ireland -0.2 1.2 0.9 2.8 7.5 8.6 4.3 2.0 1.7 3.8 2.2 1.9
Greece 2.9 -0.3 -0.3 1.0 5.8 4.6 3.6 3.1 2.3 2.7 2.4 2.3
Spain 2.3 1.1 0.9 2.2 6.5 5.4 4.0 2.4 2.0 2.8 2.2 1.9
France 1.3 0.8 0.9 1.4 4.8 7.0 2.0 0.9 1.3 2.5 1.6 1.8
Croatia 3.3 1.3 0.6 2.6 10.6 8.7 3.2 2.8 2.0 2.7 2.4 2.0
Italy 1.9 1.4 0.9 1.5 6.8 5.0 1.4 1.6 1.3 1.1 1.7 1.6
Cyprus 3.0 0.4 -0.1 1.3 6.2 3.7 1.8 1.6 1.5 2.2 1.9 1.7
Latvia 6.3 1.5 1.9 2.6 13.8 9.0 3.4 3.0 1.7 1.2 2.2 2.2
Lithuania 5.4 1.5 2.2 4.6 18.6 9.0 0.8 2.6 1.2 0.9 1.7 1.6
Luxembourg 1.7 1.6 1.4 1.6 5.5 4.7 3.2 2.4 2.0 2.2 2.7 2.0
Malta 2.4 1.6 1.2 1.1 5.3 6.3 3.2 2.2 2.0 3.0 2.2 2.0
Netherlands 1.5 1.4 1.8 4.4 7.5 6.9 2.6 2.3 1.6 3.3 2.5 2.1
Austria 1.7 2.1 1.6 2.1 7.7 8.4 3.2 2.9 2.1 3.4 2.5 2.0
Portugal 1.9 1.1 1.1 2.0 7.3 4.4 2.6 2.1 2.0 2.7 2.2 2.1
Slovakia 2.6 1.6 1.4 3.2 11.8 10.3 3.4 4.0 2.7 2.8 4.3 2.6
Slovenia 2.7 0.9 0.8 3.4 9.9 7.5 2.2 2.1 1.9 2.1 3.3 2.1
Finland 2.0 2.1 0.8 2.2 6.5 4.3 2.1 2.0 1.6 1.2 2.0 1.8
Euro area 1.7 1.2 1.1 2.3 6.7 6.3 2.5 1.9 1.7 2.5 2.2 2.1
Bulgaria 3.9 1.8 2.0 6.0 16.0 8.1 4.9 3.5 2.5 5.0 2.0 3.0
Czechia 2.5 1.1 2.6 4.2 14.3 8.1 3.0 2.4 2.0 3.0 2.6 2.2
Denmark 2.2 1.2 0.5 2.0 7.1 2.9 1.6 1.8 1.6 1.8 2.0 1.7
Hungary 4.6 2.3 3.0 5.9 14.8 14.3 5.5 4.1 3.3 4.2 3.6 3.2
Poland 2.7 1.5 1.6 5.6 14.1 9.5 3.4 3.6 3.0 3.8 4.6 2.9
Romania 7.1 2.4 3.0 4.6 13.9 9.8 6.2 5.8 4.7 5.3 4.6 4.3
Sweden 1.6 0.9 1.6 2.2 6.7 6.5 2.8 2.0 1.7 2.4 1.4 1.6
EU 1.8 1.2 1.2 2.5 7.4 6.6 2.7 2.1 1.9 2.6 2.3 2.2
United Kingdom 2.1 1.7 1.4 2.5 8.1 6.8 3.0 2.5 1.9 2.3 2.1 1.9
Japan -0.7 0.3 0.3 0.6 2.9 3.0 2.3 1.9 1.7 2.5 1.8 1.6
United States 2.0 1.6 1.5 4.1 6.6 3.8 2.5 2.7 2.2 2.5 2.0 2.0
195
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Table 17a: Harmonised index of consumer prices (national index if not available), (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 2.2 1.7 1.6 3.2 10.3 2.3 4.3 2.8 1.8 4.4 2.9 1.9
Germany 1.6 1.5 1.1 3.2 8.7 6.0 2.5 2.4 1.9 2.4 2.1 1.9
Estonia 4.9 2.6 1.9 4.5 19.4 9.1 3.7 3.8 2.3 3.6 3.6 2.4
Ireland 1.1 0.8 0.2 2.4 8.1 5.2 1.3 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.9 1.8
Greece 3.3 0.2 0.2 0.6 9.3 4.2 3.0 2.8 2.3 3.0 2.4 1.9
Spain 2.5 1.2 0.8 3.0 8.3 3.4 2.9 2.3 1.9 2.8 2.2 2.0
France 1.7 1.2 1.1 2.1 5.9 5.7 2.3 0.9 1.2 2.4 1.9 1.8
Croatia 3.0 1.6 0.6 2.7 10.7 8.4 4.0 3.4 2.0 4.0 3.4 2.0
Italy 2.0 1.6 0.6 1.9 8.7 5.9 1.1 1.8 1.5 1.1 1.9 1.7
Cyprus 2.3 1.0 -0.1 2.3 8.1 3.9 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.1 2.0
Latvia 6.8 1.5 1.7 3.2 17.2 9.1 1.3 3.0 1.7 1.2 2.2 2.2
Lithuania 5.2 1.6 2.0 4.6 18.9 8.7 0.9 2.6 1.2 0.9 1.7 1.6
Luxembourg 2.5 1.8 1.2 3.5 8.2 2.9 2.3 2.1 1.8 2.3 2.4 1.8
Malta 2.4 1.7 1.2 0.7 6.1 5.6 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.5 2.2 2.0
Netherlands 1.5 1.7 1.4 2.8 11.6 4.1 3.2 3.0 2.0 3.2 2.4 1.9
Austria 1.8 2.1 1.6 2.8 8.6 7.7 2.9 2.9 2.1 2.9 2.1 1.7
Portugal 1.7 1.4 0.7 0.9 8.1 5.3 2.7 2.1 2.0 2.6 2.1 1.9
Slovakia 2.3 1.8 1.6 2.8 12.1 11.0 3.2 4.0 2.9 3.1 5.1 3.0
Slovenia 3.0 1.3 1.0 2.0 9.3 7.2 2.0 2.1 1.9 2.1 3.2 2.1
Finland 2.0 2.0 0.8 2.1 7.2 4.3 1.0 1.7 1.5 1.0 2.0 1.8
Euro area 1.9 1.4 1.0 2.6 8.4 5.4 2.4 2.1 1.7 2.4 2.1 1.9
Bulgaria 6.5 0.7 1.2 2.8 13.0 8.6 2.6 3.6 1.8 2.5 2.3 2.9
Czechia 2.6 1.6 2.2 3.3 14.8 12.0 2.7 2.2 2.0 2.7 2.4 2.0
Denmark 2.1 1.2 0.6 1.9 8.5 3.4 1.3 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.9 1.7
Hungary 5.3 2.3 2.5 5.2 15.3 17.0 3.7 4.1 3.3 3.8 3.6 3.2
Poland 2.9 1.6 1.7 5.2 13.2 10.9 3.7 3.6 2.8 3.8 4.7 3.0
Romania 6.2 2.7 2.1 4.1 12.0 9.7 5.8 5.1 3.9 5.5 3.9 3.6
Sweden 2.1 0.7 1.5 2.7 8.1 5.9 2.0 2.2 1.6 1.9 1.5 1.8
EU 2.2 1.5 1.1 2.9 9.2 6.4 2.6 2.3 1.9 2.6 2.4 2.0
United Kingdom 2.6 2.1 1.7 2.5 7.9 6.8 3.3 3.6 2.6 3.1 2.4 2.0
Japan -0.1 0.7 0.4 -0.2 2.5 3.3 2.7 2.6 2.3 2.5 1.9 1.6
United States 2.2 1.7 1.8 4.7 8.0 4.1 2.9 3.0 2.3 2.9 2.0 2.0
Table 17b: All-items HICP, excluding energy, food, alcohol and tobacco (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.3 4.0 6.0 3.4 2.1 1.8 3.3 2.4 2.0
Germany 1.2 1.3 1.1 2.2 3.9 5.1 3.2 2.7 2.1 3.2 2.7 2.1
Estonia 3.4 1.9 1.5 2.8 10.3 8.7 5.1 4.5 2.5 4.8 4.5 3.0
Ireland 0.6 0.6 0.4 1.7 4.6 4.4 2.3 1.7 1.6 2.3 2.2 2.0
Greece 2.7 -0.7 0.2 -1.1 4.6 5.3 3.6 3.5 2.6 3.4 2.7 2.0
Spain 1.9 0.8 0.9 0.6 3.8 4.1 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.9 2.3 2.0
France 1.4 1.0 0.7 1.3 3.4 4.0 2.3 1.7 1.4 2.3 2.2 2.1
Croatia 2.5 0.6 0.7 1.3 7.6 8.8 4.8 3.4 2.4 4.7 2.9 2.2
Italy 1.8 1.3 0.6 0.8 3.3 4.5 2.2 2.0 1.8 2.3 2.0 1.8
Cyprus 1.3 0.4 0.0 1.3 5.0 3.8 2.6 2.4 2.1 2.6 2.5 2.4
Latvia 3.9 0.6 1.6 1.9 7.6 8.4 3.7 3.1 2.4 3.7 2.7 2.2
Lithuania 2.5 1.3 2.2 3.4 10.5 9.6 3.2 3.0 2.7 3.3 2.3 2.1
Luxembourg 2.0 1.9 1.3 1.5 4.2 3.9 2.5 2.0 1.8 2.6 2.7 2.1
Malta 1.4 1.3 1.1 0.7 5.8 4.9 2.1 2.0 1.9 2.1 1.9 1.8
Netherlands 1.1 1.6 1.2 1.8 4.8 6.4 3.2 2.8 2.0 3.3 2.8 2.1
Austria 1.6 2.1 1.8 2.3 5.1 7.3 3.9 2.9 2.4 3.9 2.3 1.8
Portugal 1.3 0.8 0.6 0.2 5.0 5.4 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.6 2.3 2.2
Slovakia 1.7 1.5 1.7 3.3 8.2 9.5 4.3 5.2 3.0 4.2 4.2 2.9
Slovenia 1.8 0.4 1.0 0.9 5.9 6.7 2.9 2.2 2.2 2.9 3.2 2.8
Finland 1.6 1.6 0.6 1.2 3.6 4.1 2.2 1.9 1.5 2.2 2.6 2.1
Euro area 1.5 1.2 0.9 1.5 4.0 5.0 2.8 2.4 1.9 2.9 2.4 2.0
Bulgaria 5.5 -0.1 0.7 1.4 7.6 8.9 3.1 3.6 1.8 2.9 2.4 3.0
Czechia 1.4 0.6 2.0 3.6 12.0 9.3 4.1 2.4 2.2 4.2 3.0 2.3
Denmark 1.5 1.1 0.6 0.7 4.3 4.6 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.7 1.6
Hungary 3.5 2.1 2.0 3.5 10.7 14.0 5.9 4.9 3.7 6.0 4.0 3.4
Poland 1.5 1.1 1.5 4.8 9.8 9.3 3.9 3.2 2.9 4.0 3.4 3.2
Romania 4.8 2.6 1.6 2.6 6.0 9.7 8.4 5.4 4.3 8.3 4.7 4.1
Sweden 1.4 0.6 1.3 1.8 4.8 6.6 3.2 2.1 1.6 3.1 1.8 1.4
EU 1.6 1.2 1.0 1.8 4.7 5.7 3.1 2.5 2.0 3.2 2.6 2.2
United Kingdom 1.8 1.9 1.8 : : : :
: : : : : :
Japan : : : : : : :
: : : : : :
United States : : : : : :: : : : : : :
196
Statistical Annex
Table 18: Harmonised index of consumer prices (national index if not available), (percentage change on preceding year, 2024-26) 30.04.2025
2024/1 2024/2 2024/3 2024/4 2025/1 2025/2 2025/3 2025/4 2026/1 2026/2 2026/3 2026/4
Belgium 3.0 5.1 4.7 4.6 4.1 2.8 2.2 2.0 1.9 2.0 1.8 1.6
Germany 2.7 2.6 2.2 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.0 2.1 1.8 1.9 1.9
Estonia 4.5 3.0 3.4 4.1 4.4 4.0 3.5 3.2 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.3
Ireland 2.2 1.7 0.9 0.5 1.6 1.4 1.6 2.0 1.7 1.4 1.2 1.2
Greece 3.2 2.7 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.3 2.6 2.4 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4
Spain 3.2 3.6 2.3 2.4 2.7 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8
France 3.0 2.5 2.1 1.7 1.2 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.3 1.3
Croatia 4.8 4.2 3.1 4.0 4.7 3.7 2.9 2.4 1.8 2.2 2.2 1.8
Italy 1.0 0.9 1.2 1.3 1.8 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.7
Cyprus 2.0 2.7 2.1 2.3 2.4 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0
Latvia 0.9 0.9 1.1 2.6 3.4 3.0 3.0 2.5 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.8
Lithuania 0.9 0.8 0.8 1.0 3.4 1.9 2.7 2.6 0.7 1.5 1.1 1.4
Luxembourg 3.1 3.0 1.7 1.2 1.9 2.4 2.2 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8
Malta 3.1 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.0 2.0
Netherlands 3.0 2.9 3.4 3.7 3.3 3.3 2.8 2.4 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9
Austria 4.1 3.3 2.4 2.0 3.3 2.7 2.8 2.8 1.6 2.2 2.3 2.2
Portugal 2.5 3.1 2.3 2.8 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Slovakia 3.6 2.5 3.1 3.5 4.2 4.3 4.0 3.6 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.9
Slovenia 3.4 2.4 1.1 1.2 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.0 1.7 1.6
Finland 0.9 0.5 0.9 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.4
Euro area 2.6 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.7
Bulgaria 3.5 2.7 2.2 2.0 3.9 3.9 3.6 3.1 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.1
Czechia 2.4 2.7 2.6 3.1 2.8 2.3 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.0 2.0 2.2
Denmark 0.8 1.5 1.2 1.7 1.6 1.9 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.7 1.4 1.6
Hungary 3.6 3.7 3.5 4.0 5.4 3.7 3.7 3.7 2.5 3.8 3.5 3.2
Poland 3.6 2.9 4.1 4.0 4.4 4.0 3.2 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.8
Romania 7.1 5.8 5.3 5.3 5.2 4.9 5.4 4.8 4.3 4.0 3.7 3.5
Sweden 2.8 2.1 1.4 1.8 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.5
EU 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9
United Kingdom 3.9 2.9 2.9 3.4 3.8 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.0 2.8 2.3 2.3
Japan 2.5 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.5 3.1 2.6 2.1 1.5
United States 3.2 3.2 2.7 2.7 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.0 2.6 2.2 2.1 2.1
Table 19: Price deflator of exports of goods in national currency (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 1.2 0.4 0.4 8.9 13.5 -0.6 -0.5 1.1 1.1 0.8 1.5 1.8
Germany 0.6 0.8 0.2 4.7 12.7 1.5 0.3 0.9 -0.4 0.2 1.3 1.4
Estonia 3.6 0.3 0.9 10.4 23.9 1.2 0.9 1.6 1.5 0.3 1.3 2.1
Ireland 0.0 1.6 -3.0 -2.3 3.1 0.0 0.7 0.6 0.8 1.4 1.2 1.0
Greece 2.7 -0.9 -1.4 14.5 32.0 -8.7 -0.4 0.5 0.9 0.4 0.4 2.1
Spain 1.9 0.9 0.5 9.0 18.3 0.7 0.0 0.7 0.3 1.7 1.5 1.2
France 0.9 0.9 -0.1 6.4 17.9 -2.4 -2.4 1.5 1.0 -3.6 1.2 1.5
Croatia 2.7 1.4 -1.0 6.8 12.2 2.9 -0.6 0.5 0.7 -0.4 1.5 1.9
Italy 1.5 1.0 0.7 5.3 12.4 1.7 -0.3 1.5 1.5 -0.1 2.0 1.7
Cyprus 2.6 1.2 0.0 2.3 2.9 1.9 1.0 0.6 1.1 0.6 1.9 1.5
Latvia 5.6 3.3 1.6 9.7 17.6 -4.9 -0.9 1.6 2.2 -0.6 2.0 2.0
Lithuania 3.3 0.8 0.0 6.4 12.2 -3.0 0.1 1.4 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.0
Luxembourg 3.6 1.5 0.8 9.7 14.0 0.3 -2.4 -0.5 1.8 -2.5 2.3 3.3
Malta 1.8 1.7 1.0 1.0 7.7 4.9 3.3 2.1 2.0 2.8 2.6 2.1
Netherlands 1.3 0.4 -0.6 11.4 23.9 -3.1 -0.8 0.2 0.7 -0.2 2.8 1.3
Austria 1.3 0.4 0.0 6.7 12.1 -0.1 1.4 1.2 1.2 0.7 1.5 1.4
Portugal 1.5 0.2 -0.1 8.3 17.0 -0.6 -1.5 0.1 0.3 -0.8 1.9 1.6
Slovakia 0.1 -0.5 -0.2 5.4 15.8 4.1 -2.1 3.3 3.3 -2.1 3.5 3.1
Slovenia 1.1 0.5 0.1 5.0 17.5 0.5 -1.6 0.6 1.0 -0.6 1.1 1.0
Finland -0.2 0.1 -0.2 12.9 24.1 -7.2 -3.6 2.0 1.8 -0.5 1.0 1.2
Euro area 1.0 0.8 -0.1 6.4 15.0 -0.3 -0.5 1.0 0.7 -0.2 1.6 1.5
Bulgaria 9.1 0.7 1.5 16.8 26.1 -5.9 -1.4 -0.5 1.0 -1.5 1.3 1.8
Czechia -1.5 1.5 -0.4 4.9 9.5 -0.6 3.6 1.8 1.8 4.2 2.8 2.9
Denmark 2.3 1.2 0.1 1.7 12.8 -0.7 -2.2 1.5 0.5 -0.9 1.9 1.2
Hungary 1.2 1.4 2.0 7.7 22.8 -0.2 1.9 1.3 1.1 1.1 2.8 2.0
Poland 3.4 2.8 1.9 10.1 19.7 -4.7 -8.2 -1.0 0.7 -6.9 1.4 1.4
Romania 8.4 0.9 0.3 11.2 17.0 2.1 0.5 2.9 3.4 1.7 3.5 3.8
Sweden 2.0 -0.7 1.4 5.3 18.4 5.0 -1.1 -2.5 0.1 -1.2 1.1 1.4
EU 1.2 0.8 0.1 6.5 15.4 -0.4 -0.8 0.8 0.7 -0.5 1.7 1.6
United Kingdom 3.8 -0.8 2.9 4.8 17.1 0.4 0.4 1.6 0.9 1.1 1.3 0.9
Japan -2.6 1.7 -2.1 7.1 14.5 4.0 6.8 0.4 1.0 7.5 1.4 0.4
United States 1.8 -0.4 -0.7 14.1 11.6 -4.3 -0.4 1.0 1.3 -0.2 1.1 0.8
197
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Table 20: Price deflator of imports of goods in national currency (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 1.7 0.4 0.2 10.8 19.5 -1.6 -1.0 -0.1 0.8 -0.9 1.2 1.6
Germany 0.5 0.1 -0.5 8.9 18.2 -3.5 -1.4 -1.6 -1.6 -1.3 1.5 1.8
Estonia 3.1 0.9 0.2 9.7 24.0 -2.9 0.3 1.6 1.0 0.1 1.2 1.9
Ireland 1.1 -0.2 -1.6 7.4 7.0 0.3 -3.1 -1.2 -0.2 -2.1 1.0 1.0
Greece 3.2 -1.7 -0.1 15.0 25.3 -12.0 -2.6 -0.2 0.6 -1.1 0.4 2.0
Spain 1.7 1.5 0.2 8.2 25.3 -5.7 -0.4 0.3 0.2 0.7 1.0 1.1
France 0.9 0.0 -0.3 8.8 22.2 -3.8 -3.0 0.2 1.0 -3.0 1.6 1.5
Croatia 1.8 1.3 0.2 7.4 16.1 0.8 -0.5 0.1 0.5 -0.6 1.3 1.8
Italy 2.2 0.2 -0.6 12.2 25.2 -8.2 -3.2 -1.0 0.1 -2.5 2.2 1.7
Cyprus 2.3 -0.4 0.6 2.6 5.1 0.8 0.5 1.2 1.3 0.6 1.8 1.3
Latvia 5.0 2.3 -0.9 9.5 21.6 -7.5 -1.8 1.5 0.9 0.2 1.6 2.2
Lithuania 4.1 0.5 -0.8 13.7 26.2 -8.1 -2.7 1.3 0.9 -0.7 1.3 1.8
Luxembourg 2.3 0.8 0.4 8.4 21.6 -0.7 -1.6 -1.3 0.5 0.1 0.7 1.7
Malta 1.5 1.3 0.2 0.8 6.3 4.2 3.1 2.0 2.0 2.8 2.2 2.2
Netherlands 1.7 0.2 -1.1 12.8 29.1 -6.4 -3.3 -1.3 -0.8 -2.5 2.2 1.2
Austria 1.7 0.5 0.2 8.1 20.3 0.9 -0.9 -1.2 1.0 -0.6 1.3 1.3
Portugal 0.9 -0.5 -0.4 8.2 20.5 -3.9 -3.8 -1.1 0.3 -2.6 1.8 1.6
Slovakia 1.4 0.2 0.4 6.5 21.1 3.7 -3.5 3.1 2.9 -3.9 4.2 3.1
Slovenia 1.6 0.4 -0.1 7.4 21.0 -3.3 -2.5 0.4 0.6 -1.3 1.0 0.9
Finland 0.8 -0.5 -0.4 12.4 23.3 -4.9 -1.2 1.5 1.3 0.0 1.3 1.9
Euro area 1.3 0.3 -0.4 9.8 21.8 -4.3 -2.1 -0.6 -0.1 -1.6 1.6 1.6
Bulgaria 4.8 0.7 -0.7 16.4 23.2 -3.6 -0.6 -0.1 0.3 0.0 2.3 2.8
Czechia -0.7 1.3 -0.8 5.0 14.3 -3.8 2.3 0.9 1.0 3.0 3.0 2.7
Denmark 1.1 0.7 -0.3 6.7 22.1 -2.4 -1.2 1.0 0.6 -0.3 1.3 1.6
Hungary 1.6 1.5 1.4 11.9 31.8 -6.1 1.3 0.7 0.9 0.5 2.8 1.8
Poland 2.8 2.0 1.0 12.3 24.3 -6.3 -6.9 -4.0 0.7 -6.1 1.0 1.9
Romania 3.7 0.9 0.0 10.2 18.7 0.7 -0.8 1.5 1.6 -1.9 1.3 1.8
Sweden 1.3 -1.1 1.0 5.1 24.0 4.3 -1.6 -3.5 -0.1 -0.9 1.0 1.6
EU 1.4 0.4 -0.2 9.7 21.9 -4.0 -2.1 -0.7 0.1 -1.7 1.6 1.6
United Kingdom 2.8 -1.1 2.4 4.7 19.9 -0.4 -2.9 0.2 1.1 -0.7 1.9 0.9
Japan 0.8 2.5 -3.0 17.8 32.1 -2.3 2.9 0.6 1.4 4.9 1.5 0.8
United States 2.1 -1.0 -0.9 7.6 7.5 -3.2 0.5 0.8 1.5 0.5 0.9 0.6
Table 21: Terms of trade of goods (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium -0.5 0.0 0.1 -1.7 -5.0 1.0 0.5 1.1 0.3 1.7 0.3 0.2
Germany 0.1 0.7 0.7 -3.9 -4.7 5.2 1.7 2.5 1.2 1.4 -0.2 -0.4
Estonia 0.4 -0.6 0.6 0.6 -0.1 4.2 0.6 0.0 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.2
Ireland -1.1 1.8 -1.4 -9.1 -3.7 -0.3 4.0 1.8 1.0 3.6 0.2 0.0
Greece -0.5 0.8 -1.3 -0.4 5.3 3.8 2.3 0.7 0.3 1.5 0.0 0.2
Spain 0.2 -0.6 0.3 0.7 -5.6 6.8 0.4 0.4 0.1 1.0 0.5 0.1
France 0.1 0.9 0.1 -2.3 -3.5 1.5 0.6 1.3 0.0 -0.6 -0.4 0.0
Croatia 0.9 0.0 -1.2 -0.5 -3.3 2.0 -0.1 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1
Italy -0.7 0.9 1.3 -6.1 -10.2 10.8 3.0 2.5 1.4 2.5 -0.2 0.0
Cyprus 0.3 1.6 -0.6 -0.3 -2.1 1.1 0.5 -0.6 -0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2
Latvia 0.6 0.9 2.6 0.2 -3.3 2.9 0.9 0.1 1.3 -0.8 0.4 -0.2
Lithuania -0.8 0.3 0.9 -6.4 -11.1 5.4 2.9 0.1 0.3 2.3 0.7 0.2
Luxembourg 1.3 0.7 0.4 1.2 -6.3 1.0 -0.9 0.8 1.3 -2.6 1.6 1.6
Malta 0.3 0.4 0.8 0.2 1.3 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0
Netherlands -0.4 0.2 0.5 -1.2 -4.1 3.6 2.5 1.4 1.6 2.4 0.5 0.1
Austria -0.4 0.0 -0.2 -1.3 -6.8 -1.0 2.3 2.4 0.2 1.3 0.2 0.1
Portugal 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.1 -2.9 3.4 2.4 1.2 0.0 1.8 0.1 0.0
Slovakia -1.4 -0.7 -0.6 -1.1 -4.4 0.5 1.5 0.2 0.4 1.9 -0.7 0.0
Slovenia -0.5 0.1 0.2 -2.3 -2.9 4.0 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.1 0.1
Finland -1.0 0.6 0.2 0.5 0.7 -2.4 -2.5 0.5 0.5 -0.5 -0.3 -0.7
Euro area -0.3 0.5 0.3 -3.1 -5.7 4.4 1.6 1.6 0.8 1.4 0.0 -0.1
Bulgaria 4.1 -0.1 2.2 0.3 2.4 -2.4 -0.8 -0.4 0.7 -1.5 -1.0 -1.0
Czechia -0.7 0.2 0.4 -0.1 -4.2 3.3 1.3 0.9 0.8 1.2 -0.2 0.2
Denmark 1.2 0.5 0.4 -4.7 -7.7 1.7 -1.0 0.5 -0.1 -0.6 0.6 -0.4
Hungary -0.4 -0.1 0.5 -3.7 -6.9 6.3 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.2
Poland 0.5 0.8 0.9 -2.0 -3.7 1.7 -1.4 3.1 0.0 -0.9 0.4 -0.4
Romania 4.5 0.0 0.4 0.9 -1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.8 3.7 2.2 2.0
Sweden 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.1 -4.5 0.7 0.5 1.0 0.2 -0.4 0.1 -0.2
EU -0.2 0.5 0.4 -2.9 -5.4 3.9 1.3 1.6 0.7 1.2 0.1 -0.1
United Kingdom 1.0 0.4 0.5 0.1 -2.3 0.8 3.4 1.4 -0.2 1.8 -0.6 0.0
Japan -3.5 -0.8 1.0 -9.1 -13.3 6.4 3.7 -0.2 -0.4 2.5 0.0 -0.4
United States -0.2 0.6 0.1 6.0 3.8 -1.1 -0.9 0.2 -0.3 -0.6 0.2 0.2
198
Statistical Annex
Table 22: Total population (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.8 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3
Germany -0.3 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.7 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2
Estonia -0.4 -0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 2.6 0.6 -0.2 -0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ireland 1.9 0.6 1.4 1.1 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.2 1.0 1.8 1.2 1.0
Greece 0.2 -0.5 -0.2 -0.5 -0.6 -0.3 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3
Spain 1.3 -0.1 0.4 0.0 0.9 1.3 0.9 0.8 0.7 1.2 1.0 0.8
France 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Croatia -0.1 -0.4 -1.3 -0.7 -0.1 0.6 -0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 -0.1 -0.1
Italy 0.6 0.1 -0.3 -0.5 -0.2 0.0 0.0 -0.1 -0.1 0.0 -0.2 -0.3
Cyprus 2.3 0.8 1.0 1.5 1.9 1.9 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.0 1.0
Latvia -1.3 -1.2 -0.8 -0.8 0.1 -0.2 -1.1 -0.7 -0.8 -1.1 -0.7 -0.8
Lithuania -1.4 -1.2 -0.7 -0.1 0.8 1.4 0.6 0.2 -0.3 0.4 -0.5 -0.7
Luxembourg 1.7 2.3 2.1 1.6 2.2 1.9 1.6 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.7
Malta 0.5 1.4 3.0 0.5 2.7 4.1 3.2 2.5 2.0 3.5 2.5 2.0
Netherlands 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.5 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.4
Austria 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.4 1.1 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2
Portugal 0.1 -0.4 0.0 0.2 0.6 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.9 0.4 0.2
Slovakia 0.2 0.0 0.1 -0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 -0.2 -0.3 0.2 -0.2 -0.3
Slovenia 0.5 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Finland 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.7 0.5 0.1
Euro area 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.2
Bulgaria -0.5 -1.5 -1.3 -0.7 -0.6 -0.3 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6 -0.4 -0.4 -0.6
Czechia 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 1.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2
Denmark 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5
Hungary -0.2 -0.4 -0.3 -0.4 -0.3 -0.1 -0.3 -0.3 -0.2 -0.2 -0.3 -0.3
Poland -0.1 0.0 -0.4 -0.5 2.2 -0.4 -0.4 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1
Romania -1.0 -0.4 -0.5 -0.8 -0.5 0.1 0.0 -0.1 -0.1 0.0 -0.1 -0.1
Sweden 0.8 0.9 1.1 0.6 1.1 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1
EU 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2
United Kingdom 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.9 1.3 1.1 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7
Japan 0.0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.1 -0.4 -0.6 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 0.5
United States 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
Table 23: Total employment in persons (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 1.0 0.5 1.1 1.7 1.9 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.6
Germany 0.9 1.0 0.8 0.2 1.4 0.7 0.2 -0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1
Estonia -2.1 2.6 0.5 0.1 4.6 3.2 0.2 -0.1 0.2 -1.2 -0.2 0.6
Ireland -1.0 1.3 2.1 6.6 6.9 3.5 2.7 1.7 1.2 2.3 1.9 1.6
Greece 0.2 -1.6 1.4 5.1 2.4 1.2 1.2 1.1 0.9 1.1 0.9 0.8
Spain -0.1 -1.0 1.0 2.6 3.5 3.0 2.2 2.1 1.6 2.3 2.1 2.0
France 0.4 0.4 0.8 2.6 2.4 1.1 0.6 -0.2 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.4
Croatia 0.7 -1.3 0.6 1.2 2.2 2.2 6.1 2.6 1.1 3.1 2.0 1.1
Italy 0.2 -0.2 0.4 1.0 1.9 1.9 1.6 0.9 0.3 1.6 0.8 0.2
Cyprus 2.1 -1.9 4.1 2.9 4.0 1.4 2.0 1.3 1.1 1.9 1.3 1.2
Latvia -2.5 1.1 0.6 -1.3 0.2 0.1 -0.9 -0.4 -0.4 -0.3 -0.4 -0.4
Lithuania -2.5 1.5 0.4 1.3 4.9 1.4 1.7 0.4 0.3 1.9 0.1 -0.3
Luxembourg 3.2 2.5 3.1 2.9 3.3 2.1 1.1 1.3 1.7 0.9 1.6 1.7
Malta 1.4 3.4 5.3 2.8 4.9 6.8 5.1 3.1 2.8 4.3 3.1 2.8
Netherlands 1.0 0.0 1.7 1.7 3.9 1.6 1.0 0.3 0.2 0.9 0.4 0.4
Austria 1.1 0.9 0.8 2.0 2.6 0.8 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.6
Portugal -0.7 -1.2 1.3 1.4 3.7 1.0 1.6 1.0 0.9 1.1 0.9 0.8
Slovakia 0.8 0.9 1.2 -0.6 1.8 0.3 -0.2 -0.1 -0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1
Slovenia 0.7 -0.4 1.9 1.3 2.9 1.6 0.1 0.6 0.7 0.3 0.7 0.7
Finland 0.6 0.2 0.6 2.3 3.5 0.9 -0.6 0.2 0.5 -0.6 0.6 0.8
Euro area 0.4 0.2 0.9 1.6 2.4 1.4 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.9 0.6 0.6
Bulgaria 0.7 -0.9 -0.2 0.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.1 0.1
Czechia 0.6 0.5 0.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.2
Denmark 0.1 0.3 1.0 2.3 4.0 1.3 0.8 0.5 0.0 0.8 0.3 0.3
Hungary -0.9 1.8 1.3 1.8 1.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3
Poland 1.8 0.8 1.1 2.9 1.1 0.1 -0.7 0.1 0.3 -0.3 0.2 0.1
Romania -0.9 -0.5 -0.1 0.8 0.7 -1.5 1.8 0.6 0.7 1.5 0.5 0.7
Sweden 0.7 1.4 1.1 1.3 3.5 1.2 -0.3 0.2 0.5 -0.4 0.5 0.8
EU 0.4 0.3 0.9 1.6 2.2 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.5
United Kingdom 0.3 1.4 0.8 0.0 1.2 1.2 0.8 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.6 0.6
Japan 0.0 0.0 0.8 -0.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1
United States -0.6 1.6 0.0 3.3 3.7 1.8 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.8
199
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Table 24: Unemployment rate ¹ (number of unemployed as a percentage of total labour force, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 7.9 8.2 6.5 6.3 5.6 5.5 5.7 6.1 5.8 5.6 5.7 5.6
Germany 7.7 4.9 3.5 3.7 3.2 3.1 3.4 3.6 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.4
Estonia 9.2 8.9 5.9 6.2 5.6 6.4 7.6 7.6 7.3 7.5 7.7 7.2
Ireland 8.8 13.3 6.4 6.2 4.5 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.5
Greece 9.7 24.5 20.2 14.7 12.5 11.1 10.1 9.3 8.7 10.4 9.8 9.2
Spain 13.2 23.8 16.3 14.9 13.0 12.2 11.4 10.4 9.9 11.5 11.0 10.7
France 8.5 10.0 9.0 7.9 7.3 7.3 7.4 7.9 7.8 7.4 7.5 7.6
Croatia 10.1 16.1 9.3 7.5 6.8 6.1 5.0 4.6 4.5 5.1 4.7 4.6
Italy 7.3 11.3 10.6 9.5 8.1 7.7 6.5 5.9 5.9 6.8 6.3 6.2
Cyprus 4.8 13.4 9.5 7.2 6.3 5.8 4.9 4.7 4.6 4.9 4.7 4.5
Latvia 11.7 12.8 8.0 7.6 6.9 6.5 6.9 6.8 6.6 6.7 6.7 6.5
Lithuania 9.5 12.1 7.2 7.1 6.0 6.9 7.1 6.8 6.6 7.5 7.0 6.9
Luxembourg 4.7 5.7 6.0 5.3 4.6 5.2 6.4 6.6 6.4 6.0 6.0 5.8
Malta 6.6 6.0 4.3 3.8 3.5 3.5 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.1 3.0
Netherlands 5.5 7.5 5.4 4.2 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.9 4.0 3.7 3.8 3.9
Austria 5.3 5.6 5.7 6.2 4.8 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.2 5.3 5.3 5.0
Portugal 10.3 15.0 8.3 6.7 6.2 6.5 6.5 6.4 6.3 6.4 6.3 6.2
Slovakia 12.1 13.2 7.3 6.8 6.1 5.8 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.5 5.3 5.1
Slovenia 5.7 9.2 5.8 4.8 4.0 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.5 3.6 3.6
Finland 7.6 8.5 7.9 7.7 6.8 7.2 8.4 8.6 8.3 8.2 7.9 7.5
Euro area 10.0 11.3 8.6 7.8 6.8 6.6 6.4 6.3 6.1 6.5 6.3 6.3
Bulgaria 8.8 12.4 6.7 5.2 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.0 3.8 4.3 4.0 3.8
Czechia 6.2 6.4 2.7 2.8 2.2 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7
Denmark 5.1 7.2 5.5 5.1 4.5 5.1 6.2 6.2 6.3 5.8 5.8 5.8
Hungary 8.5 9.1 4.0 4.0 3.6 4.1 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.5 4.3 4.1
Poland 10.1 9.6 4.3 3.4 2.9 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.8 2.7
Romania 8.2 8.8 5.9 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.4 5.3 5.2 5.5 5.5 5.4
Sweden 7.4 7.9 7.2 8.9 7.5 7.7 8.4 8.7 8.4 8.5 8.4 7.8
EU 8.7 10.8 7.8 7.1 6.2 6.1 5.9 5.9 5.7 6.1 5.9 5.9
United Kingdom 6.4 7.1 4.4 4.5 3.8 4.0 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.2
Japan 4.4 4.0 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.5
United States 6.8 7.2 5.0 5.3 3.6 3.6 4.0 4.3 4.5 4.1 4.4 4.3
¹ Series following Eurostat definition, based on the Labour Force Survey.
Table 25: Compensation of employees per head (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 2.7 2.0 1.1 4.9 7.5 8.0 2.9 3.6 2.2 3.1 2.9 2.5
Germany 1.5 2.7 2.4 3.2 4.3 5.8 5.2 3.4 2.9 4.8 3.1 2.8
Estonia 9.4 4.8 7.0 9.3 8.2 8.2 5.6 4.5 4.0 5.9 4.4 4.1
Ireland 2.4 1.5 3.0 2.9 2.5 6.8 3.5 3.4 3.3 4.4 3.8 3.7
Greece 2.8 -4.1 -1.4 1.6 1.8 3.7 6.0 3.8 3.5 4.1 3.2 3.0
Spain 3.9 0.0 1.3 4.8 4.9 5.8 5.0 3.4 2.6 4.6 3.1 2.2
France 2.5 1.9 0.2 5.0 4.8 4.2 3.2 2.5 2.0 3.0 2.3 2.0
Croatia 3.0 -0.3 1.7 6.1 12.3 15.9 11.2 8.8 5.3 11.2 4.8 3.8
Italy 2.0 0.4 -0.1 6.8 3.7 2.9 3.4 3.4 2.5 4.0 3.0 2.5
Cyprus 3.2 -1.3 1.7 4.6 7.3 5.0 4.5 3.6 3.3 4.4 3.0 2.8
Latvia 10.1 6.3 6.0 7.6 13.1 15.6 9.1 5.5 4.5 9.2 4.5 4.0
Lithuania 7.2 5.2 8.2 11.8 11.6 11.9 9.1 7.6 7.2 7.9 6.5 5.3
Luxembourg 2.9 2.4 2.0 5.3 4.5 2.4 2.2 3.8 3.3 3.0 3.4 3.3
Malta 3.7 3.6 4.1 4.9 5.0 2.3 5.9 4.1 3.5 4.3 4.1 2.7
Netherlands 2.3 1.5 2.4 2.7 3.6 6.3 6.4 5.1 3.7 6.4 4.7 3.6
Austria 2.4 2.1 2.3 2.9 4.9 6.8 8.4 3.2 3.1 7.3 3.2 2.8
Portugal 2.6 -0.6 2.9 5.9 5.6 8.0 8.0 4.9 4.0 6.5 3.6 3.4
Slovakia 6.4 2.5 4.8 6.9 5.9 10.3 7.3 4.9 4.4 6.6 5.8 5.3
Slovenia 4.9 0.7 3.9 8.0 5.0 9.5 6.2 5.6 4.7 7.1 5.6 4.5
Finland 3.1 1.9 0.8 4.1 2.5 3.4 0.5 2.3 2.3 0.2 2.7 2.4
Euro area 2.4 1.6 1.4 4.3 4.5 5.3 4.5 3.3 2.7 4.3 3.0 2.6
Bulgaria 10.7 6.9 8.0 11.3 14.2 13.4 10.4 9.6 6.1 13.7 10.9 8.4
Czechia 3.9 2.1 6.5 6.2 6.9 6.7 5.9 6.5 5.3 6.2 6.5 5.6
Denmark 3.4 1.6 1.8 3.1 2.6 3.1 4.4 3.9 2.9 4.1 4.1 3.4
Hungary 3.5 1.9 5.9 8.6 17.1 14.9 12.6 8.7 7.8 12.9 7.8 7.1
Poland 5.8 3.0 5.7 4.7 12.3 14.4 12.3 6.2 4.8 11.4 5.9 5.5
Romania 10.9 3.5 11.6 6.4 13.7 18.1 16.6 8.9 6.9 12.8 9.9 8.9
Sweden 3.5 2.6 2.7 4.9 2.1 5.4 4.7 3.7 3.5 4.6 3.2 3.1
EU 2.6 1.7 1.8 4.5 5.1 6.0 5.2 3.7 3.0 4.9 3.5 3.0
United Kingdom 3.1 1.6 2.4 4.3 6.3 6.8 5.1 3.7 2.2 4.6 2.9 2.0
Japan -1.4 0.4 0.6 2.0 1.9 1.5 2.8 2.9 2.1 3.9 2.4 2.4
United States 2.9 2.3 3.7 5.1 2.9 3.6 4.1 4.2 3.3 4.4 3.4 3.1
Note: See note 6 on concepts and sources.
200
Statistical Annex
Table 26: Real compensation of employees per head ¹ (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 0.7 0.5 -0.5 2.2 -2.5 1.9 1.3 1.3 0.3 0.9 0.9 0.7
Germany 0.1 1.4 1.1 0.3 -2.3 -0.8 2.4 1.5 0.8 2.0 0.5 0.2
Estonia 4.5 2.0 4.6 4.9 -7.9 -0.5 2.3 0.7 2.2 2.7 0.7 1.6
Ireland 2.6 0.4 2.0 0.0 -4.7 -1.7 -0.7 1.4 1.5 0.6 1.6 1.8
Greece -0.1 -3.8 -1.1 0.6 -3.8 -0.9 2.3 0.7 1.1 1.5 0.8 0.7
Spain 1.6 -1.0 0.5 2.5 -1.5 0.4 0.9 1.0 0.7 1.7 0.9 0.2
France 1.2 1.0 -0.7 3.6 0.0 -2.6 1.2 1.6 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.1
Croatia -0.3 -1.6 1.2 3.3 1.6 6.6 7.8 5.9 3.3 8.2 2.3 1.7
Italy 0.2 -1.0 -0.9 5.2 -2.9 -2.0 2.0 1.7 1.2 2.8 1.2 0.9
Cyprus 0.2 -1.7 1.8 3.2 1.0 1.3 2.7 2.0 1.8 2.2 1.0 1.0
Latvia 3.6 4.7 3.9 4.8 -0.6 6.0 5.4 2.5 2.8 7.9 2.3 1.8
Lithuania 1.8 3.6 5.9 6.8 -5.8 2.7 8.2 4.8 5.9 7.0 4.7 3.7
Luxembourg 1.1 0.7 0.5 3.7 -1.0 -2.1 -1.0 1.3 1.3 0.8 0.7 1.3
Malta 1.3 1.9 2.9 3.8 -0.3 -3.8 2.5 1.8 1.5 1.3 1.8 0.7
Netherlands 0.7 0.1 0.6 -1.6 -3.6 -0.6 3.7 2.7 2.1 3.0 2.1 1.5
Austria 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.8 -2.7 -1.4 5.0 0.3 1.0 3.8 0.7 0.8
Portugal 0.6 -1.7 1.8 3.8 -1.6 3.5 5.3 2.7 1.9 3.7 1.4 1.2
Slovakia 3.7 0.9 3.3 3.6 -5.3 0.1 3.8 0.9 1.6 3.7 1.4 2.6
Slovenia 2.1 -0.2 3.0 4.4 -4.5 1.9 4.0 3.4 2.8 4.9 2.2 2.3
Finland 1.1 -0.2 0.1 1.8 -3.7 -0.8 -1.5 0.3 0.7 -1.0 0.7 0.6
Euro area 0.7 0.4 0.3 2.0 -2.1 -0.9 2.0 1.5 1.0 1.8 0.9 0.5
Bulgaria 6.5 5.1 5.9 5.0 -1.6 4.9 5.2 5.9 3.5 8.2 8.7 5.2
Czechia 1.4 1.0 3.8 1.9 -6.5 -1.3 2.8 4.0 3.2 3.1 3.8 3.3
Denmark 1.3 0.4 1.3 1.0 -4.2 0.2 2.7 2.0 1.3 2.3 2.0 1.7
Hungary -1.0 -0.4 2.8 2.6 2.0 0.5 6.8 4.4 4.3 8.3 4.0 3.8
Poland 3.0 1.5 4.0 -0.8 -1.6 4.5 8.6 2.5 1.7 7.4 1.2 2.6
Romania 3.6 1.1 8.4 1.7 -0.2 7.6 9.8 3.0 2.1 7.2 5.0 4.4
Sweden 1.8 1.7 1.1 2.6 -4.3 -1.1 1.8 1.6 1.8 2.1 1.8 1.5
EU 0.8 0.4 0.7 1.9 -2.2 -0.6 2.3 1.6 1.1 2.2 1.1 0.8
United Kingdom 1.0 -0.1 0.9 1.8 -1.7 0.1 2.0 1.2 0.2 2.2 0.8 0.0
Japan -0.7 0.2 0.3 1.4 -1.0 -1.5 0.5 1.0 0.4 1.3 0.6 0.8
United States 0.9 0.8 2.1 0.9 -3.4 -0.2 1.6 1.5 1.1 1.9 1.4 1.1
¹ Deflated by the price deflator of private consumption.
Note: See note 6 on concepts and sources.
Table 27: Labour productivity (real GDP per occupied person) (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 0.4 0.6 -0.7 4.4 2.3 0.4 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.8 1.0
Germany 0.3 0.7 -0.3 3.5 0.0 -1.0 -0.4 0.1 0.9 -0.5 0.5 1.2
Estonia 1.8 1.0 2.1 7.0 -4.3 -6.0 -0.5 1.2 2.0 0.2 1.3 2.0
Ireland 1.5 5.7 4.0 9.1 1.6 -8.7 -1.4 1.6 1.3 -2.8 2.1 1.9
Greece -0.3 -2.4 -2.1 3.4 3.2 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.0 1.4 1.4
Spain 1.1 1.1 -1.3 4.0 2.6 -0.3 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.1
France 0.5 0.7 -1.0 4.2 0.2 -0.1 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.6 0.7 1.0
Croatia 0.0 1.2 0.2 11.3 5.0 1.1 -2.0 0.6 1.8 0.5 1.3 1.7
Italy -0.6 -0.4 -1.5 7.9 2.8 -1.2 -0.9 -0.3 0.6 -0.9 0.2 1.0
Cyprus 0.6 0.2 0.1 8.2 3.0 1.3 1.4 1.7 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.2
Latvia 2.3 2.6 0.9 8.3 1.6 2.7 0.5 0.9 2.4 0.3 1.4 2.5
Lithuania 3.6 2.8 3.0 5.0 -2.3 -1.1 1.0 2.4 2.8 0.3 2.9 3.3
Luxembourg -0.4 -0.3 -1.0 3.9 -4.3 -2.8 -0.1 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.5
Malta 1.9 2.2 -0.4 10.2 -0.6 0.0 0.8 1.0 1.2 0.7 1.2 1.5
Netherlands 0.4 0.9 -0.5 4.5 1.1 -1.5 -0.1 0.9 1.0 0.0 1.2 1.1
Austria 0.2 0.1 -0.4 2.7 2.6 -1.8 -1.2 -0.4 0.5 -0.8 0.4 0.8
Portugal 1.3 0.3 -0.8 4.1 3.1 1.5 0.3 0.7 1.3 0.6 0.9 1.3
Slovakia 4.3 1.6 0.5 6.3 -1.3 1.9 2.2 1.6 1.5 2.1 2.2 2.4
Slovenia 1.1 0.8 0.4 7.0 -0.2 0.5 1.4 1.4 1.8 1.1 1.8 1.9
Finland 0.3 -0.2 0.6 0.4 -2.7 -1.8 0.4 0.8 0.7 0.3 0.9 0.9
Euro area 0.4 0.6 -0.6 4.7 1.1 -1.0 -0.1 0.3 0.8 -0.2 0.6 1.0
Bulgaria 2.9 2.2 2.0 7.7 3.0 0.8 1.7 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.8 2.9
Czechia 1.9 1.1 1.5 3.0 1.8 -1.1 0.8 1.5 1.8 0.5 1.9 2.5
Denmark 0.1 0.9 0.6 5.0 -2.4 1.1 2.8 3.1 1.9 1.5 2.3 1.4
Hungary 0.7 0.3 1.2 5.3 2.7 -1.1 0.4 0.8 2.2 0.3 1.7 2.7
Poland 2.8 2.4 2.3 3.9 4.1 0.2 3.7 3.2 2.7 3.3 3.4 3.1
Romania 3.8 3.3 3.5 4.8 3.2 4.0 -1.0 0.8 1.5 0.0 1.9 2.2
Sweden 1.0 0.7 0.2 4.6 -2.0 -1.3 1.3 0.9 1.4 0.8 1.3 1.9
EU 0.6 0.8 -0.3 4.7 1.2 -0.7 0.2 0.6 1.0 0.1 0.9 1.3
United Kingdom 0.2 0.6 -1.4 8.6 3.6 -0.8 0.3 0.7 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.8
Japan -0.1 1.1 -1.1 2.8 0.8 1.1 -0.4 0.3 0.4 0.0 1.1 0.9
United States 1.6 0.5 1.5 2.6 -1.2 1.1 2.0 0.9 1.1 2.5 1.8 1.5
Note : See note 6 on concepts and sources.
201
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Table 28: Unit labour costs, whole economy ¹ (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 2.2 1.4 1.8 0.5 5.1 7.5 2.2 3.2 1.9 2.3 2.1 1.5
Germany 1.2 2.0 2.6 -0.3 4.3 6.9 5.7 3.3 2.0 5.3 2.5 1.6
Estonia 7.5 3.7 4.8 2.1 13.1 15.1 6.1 3.3 1.9 5.7 3.0 2.0
Ireland 0.8 -4.0 -1.0 -5.7 0.9 16.9 5.0 1.8 2.0 7.4 1.7 1.8
Greece 3.1 -1.7 0.8 -1.7 -1.4 2.5 4.9 2.6 2.1 3.1 1.7 1.5
Spain 2.8 -1.1 2.6 0.8 2.3 6.2 4.0 3.0 2.2 4.0 2.9 2.0
France 1.9 1.2 1.2 0.8 4.6 4.3 2.6 1.8 1.1 2.3 1.6 1.0
Croatia 3.0 -1.5 1.6 -4.7 7.0 14.6 13.5 8.2 3.5 10.6 3.5 2.0
Italy 2.6 0.8 1.4 -1.0 0.9 4.2 4.3 3.6 1.9 5.0 2.7 1.5
Cyprus 2.6 -1.5 1.6 -3.4 4.1 3.7 3.1 1.9 1.9 2.8 1.5 1.5
Latvia 7.6 3.6 5.1 -0.7 11.3 12.5 8.5 4.6 2.1 8.9 3.1 1.5
Lithuania 3.5 2.4 5.0 6.5 14.2 13.1 8.0 5.0 4.3 7.7 3.5 2.0
Luxembourg 3.2 2.7 3.0 1.3 9.1 5.4 2.3 3.3 3.1 2.7 2.7 2.8
Malta 1.8 1.4 4.5 -4.8 5.7 2.3 5.0 3.1 2.2 3.6 2.9 1.2
Netherlands 1.9 0.6 3.0 -1.6 2.5 7.9 6.5 4.1 2.7 6.4 3.5 2.5
Austria 2.2 2.0 2.7 0.2 2.2 8.7 9.8 3.6 2.6 8.2 2.7 2.0
Portugal 1.3 -0.9 3.7 1.7 2.4 6.4 7.7 4.1 2.6 5.9 2.6 2.1
Slovakia 2.0 0.9 4.2 0.6 7.3 8.3 5.0 3.3 2.9 4.5 3.5 2.8
Slovenia 3.7 -0.1 3.4 0.9 5.2 9.0 4.7 4.2 2.9 6.0 3.7 2.5
Finland 2.8 2.1 0.2 3.7 5.3 5.3 0.1 1.5 1.5 -0.1 1.8 1.6
Euro area 2.0 1.0 2.0 -0.4 3.4 6.4 4.7 3.0 1.9 4.5 2.4 1.6
Bulgaria 7.6 4.6 5.9 3.3 10.9 12.5 8.5 7.8 4.2 11.5 7.9 5.3
Czechia 2.0 0.9 4.9 3.1 5.0 7.9 5.0 4.9 3.4 5.7 4.4 3.0
Denmark 3.3 0.6 1.2 -1.8 5.0 1.9 1.5 0.8 1.0 2.6 1.8 2.0
Hungary 2.7 1.6 4.6 3.2 14.0 16.2 12.2 7.9 5.5 12.5 6.0 4.3
Poland 2.9 0.6 3.3 0.8 7.9 14.2 8.3 2.9 2.0 7.9 2.4 2.4
Romania 6.8 0.2 7.8 1.6 10.2 13.6 17.8 8.0 5.3 12.9 7.8 6.6
Sweden 2.5 1.9 2.5 0.2 4.2 6.7 3.4 2.8 2.0 3.8 1.9 1.2
EU 2.1 0.9 2.1 -0.2 3.8 6.8 4.9 3.1 2.0 4.8 2.5 1.8
United Kingdom 3.0 1.0 3.9 -3.9 2.7 7.7 4.8 3.0 1.3 3.7 2.0 1.1
Japan -1.3 -0.6 1.8 -0.8 1.1 0.3 3.2 2.6 1.7 3.9 1.3 1.5
United States 1.2 1.8 2.1 2.4 4.1 2.4 2.1 3.3 2.2 1.9 1.6 1.6
¹ Compensation of employees per head divided by labour productivity per head, defined as GDP in volume divided by total employment.
Note: See note 6 on concepts and sources.
Table 29: Real unit labour costs ¹ (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 0.5 -0.2 0.0 -2.2 -1.6 2.9 0.2 0.3 -0.2 -0.4 -0.3 -0.6
Germany 0.0 0.3 0.9 -3.0 -1.7 0.7 2.5 0.9 -0.2 2.3 0.2 -0.6
Estonia 1.6 0.1 1.6 -3.1 -2.3 6.6 2.2 -0.6 -0.6 0.5 -1.0 -1.3
Ireland 1.6 -6.7 -1.7 -6.8 -5.5 12.9 1.6 -0.9 -0.1 4.0 -0.4 0.1
Greece 0.2 -1.1 0.9 -3.1 -7.4 -3.2 1.7 -0.7 -0.2 -0.3 -0.7 -0.6
Spain 0.7 -1.2 1.5 -1.7 -2.3 0.0 1.0 0.6 0.1 0.9 0.4 0.1
France 0.4 0.3 -0.1 -0.4 1.4 -0.9 0.3 0.0 -0.4 0.1 -0.1 -0.7
Croatia -0.5 -2.2 0.4 -6.6 -1.0 2.6 7.6 3.7 0.8 3.7 0.3 0.0
Italy 0.7 -0.4 0.3 -2.3 -2.5 -1.7 2.1 1.4 0.2 3.3 0.8 -0.3
Cyprus -0.2 -1.6 1.3 -6.2 -2.4 -0.1 -0.4 -0.7 -0.4 -0.7 -0.9 -0.7
Latvia 0.8 1.3 2.3 -3.9 1.3 6.1 5.8 0.6 -0.7 6.2 0.2 -0.6
Lithuania -1.1 0.5 2.4 0.4 -1.6 3.7 4.4 1.4 1.9 3.9 0.1 -0.2
Luxembourg -0.8 -0.1 1.5 -4.3 2.7 -0.9 -2.8 0.8 0.3 -1.2 -0.2 0.0
Malta -0.7 -1.1 2.4 -7.1 0.6 -2.8 1.7 0.5 0.1 1.0 0.4 -0.8
Netherlands 0.3 -0.2 1.0 -4.3 -3.4 0.5 1.2 0.3 0.1 1.3 0.4 0.2
Austria 0.4 0.0 0.9 -1.7 -2.4 1.9 6.5 0.1 0.3 3.8 0.4 0.1
Portugal -0.7 -1.7 1.8 -0.3 -2.8 -0.6 3.1 0.9 0.3 2.1 0.1 -0.1
Slovakia 0.7 0.2 2.6 -1.6 -0.2 -1.7 1.3 -0.6 -0.4 0.0 -0.3 0.0
Slovenia 1.1 -1.0 1.8 -1.7 -1.2 -1.0 1.6 1.4 0.2 2.9 0.0 -0.3
Finland 1.0 -0.1 -1.0 1.2 -0.8 1.8 -1.3 -0.3 -0.2 -1.5 -0.3 -0.4
Euro area 0.3 -0.2 0.6 -2.4 -1.6 0.4 1.7 0.5 -0.1 1.6 0.1 -0.4
Bulgaria 1.5 2.2 1.4 -3.4 -4.3 4.2 1.9 2.3 1.7 6.4 5.4 2.5
Czechia 0.3 -0.4 2.0 -0.9 -3.4 -0.2 1.0 1.9 0.6 1.6 2.0 0.6
Denmark 0.8 -0.4 0.1 -4.5 -3.7 6.0 -0.3 -0.9 -0.9 1.0 -0.4 0.1
Hungary -1.3 -1.2 0.3 -2.8 -0.1 0.8 4.6 2.9 1.8 5.0 1.9 1.0
Poland -0.1 -0.8 1.3 -4.3 -2.5 3.9 4.6 -1.3 -1.0 3.8 -2.2 -0.5
Romania -3.2 -2.5 2.7 -3.8 -1.7 0.7 8.3 1.4 -0.5 3.5 1.8 1.2
Sweden 0.2 0.5 0.4 -2.4 -1.5 0.6 0.6 1.1 0.3 1.4 0.4 -0.1
EU 0.2 -0.3 0.5 -2.6 -1.9 0.6 1.7 0.4 -0.1 1.7 0.1 -0.4
United Kingdom 0.6 -0.5 1.3 -4.0 -2.6 0.7 0.7 -0.1 -0.6 1.0 0.0 -0.7
Japan -0.3 -0.8 1.4 -0.6 0.7 -3.6 0.3 0.5 -0.2 1.1 -0.3 0.2
United States -0.6 0.0 0.4 -2.1 -2.8 -1.1 -0.3 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -0.5 -0.4
¹ Nominal unit labour costs divided by GDP price deflator.
Note: See note 6 on concepts and sources.
202
Statistical Annex
Table 30: Nominal bilateral exchange rates against ecu/euro (2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium : : : : : : : : : : : :
Germany : : : : : : : : : : : :
Estonia : : : : : : : : : : : :
Ireland : : : : : : : : : : : :
Greece : : : : : : : : : : : :
Spain : : : : : : : : : : : :
France : : : : : : : : : : : :
Croatia : : : : : : : : : : : :
Italy : : : : : : : : : : : :
Cyprus : : : : : : : : : : : :
Latvia : : : : : : : : : : : :
Lithuania : : : : : : : : : : : :
Luxembourg : : : : : : : : : : : :
Malta : : : : : : : : : : : :
Netherlands : : : : : : : : : : : :
Austria : : : : : : : : : : : :
Portugal : : : : : : : : : : : :
Slovakia : : : : : : : : : : : :
Slovenia : : : : : : : : : : : :
Finland : : : : : : : : : : : :
Euro area : : : : : : : : : : : :
Bulgaria 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Czechia 26.5 26.1 26.2 25.6 24.6 24.0 25.1 25.1 25.0 25.1 25.3 25.3
Denmark 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.4 7.4 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
Hungary 264.4 296.5 322.9 358.5 390.8 381.8 395.3 407.3 408.1 393.7 401.3 401.3
Poland 3.9 4.2 4.3 4.6 4.7 4.5 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3
Romania 3.8 4.4 4.7 4.9 4.9 4.9 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Sweden 9.7 9.0 10.1 10.1 10.6 11.5 11.4 11.1 11.0 11.4 11.4 11.4
EU : : : : : : :
: : : : : :
United Kingdom 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8
Japan 140.7 123.0 124.1 129.9 137.9 151.8 163.9 161.6 162.0 163.9 163.3 163.3
United States 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1
Table 31: Nominal effective exchange rates to rest of a group ¹ of industrialised countries (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026)
30.04.2025
203
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Table 32: Total expenditure, general government (as a percentage of GDP, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 51.3 55.3 53.7 54.9 52.3 53.3 54.5 55.5 55.6 53.8 53.8 54.0
Germany 45.9 44.9 46.1 50.7 49.0 48.4 49.5 50.2 50.5 48.9 49.1 48.9
Estonia 38.7 38.4 40.1 42.1 40.0 43.7 44.0 45.2 45.3 44.8 46.3 46.5
Ireland 44.5 38.7 25.6 23.5 20.6 22.7 23.5 23.6 23.9 24.0 24.2 24.2
Greece 50.6 56.6 50.9 56.7 52.8 49.5 48.0 47.5 47.6 48.7 47.5 47.6
Spain 42.2 46.0 43.6 49.5 46.4 45.4 45.4 45.6 45.6 45.4 45.4 45.5
France 55.5 57.9 57.7 59.5 58.4 56.9 57.1 57.6 57.5 57.5 57.4 57.3
Croatia 46.9 48.0 47.0 48.1 45.0 46.8 48.0 49.1 49.2 47.6 48.4 48.4
Italy 48.6 50.3 50.3 56.0 54.9 54.0 50.6 51.0 50.8 50.7 51.1 50.6
Cyprus 42.3 48.2 41.7 42.7 38.1 42.0 40.0 41.2 41.0 40.2 40.4 39.8
Latvia 41.7 40.9 40.6 46.5 44.2 43.7 45.7 47.6 47.5 46.2 47.8 47.7
Lithuania 39.1 36.5 35.7 37.3 36.3 37.4 39.5 41.6 41.9 39.6 40.3 40.4
Luxembourg 39.9 41.1 42.8 42.4 44.3 47.0 46.9 48.0 48.2 48.7 48.8 48.6
Malta 41.4 40.1 35.9 39.5 37.7 36.7 38.3 36.3 36.0 36.9 35.7 35.6
Netherlands 45.8 47.0 43.8 45.9 43.2 43.2 43.9 44.3 45.2 43.4 44.5 45.0
Austria 51.8 51.8 51.2 56.0 53.1 52.7 56.3 56.4 56.3 54.3 54.4 54.1
Portugal 47.5 49.8 45.0 47.3 43.9 42.3 42.8 44.0 45.0 42.9 42.9 43.0
Slovakia 39.0 41.6 41.1 44.9 43.0 48.0 47.1 48.5 49.1 47.2 48.2 47.4
Slovenia 47.0 51.8 46.2 49.9 47.7 46.5 46.8 47.8 48.3 47.7 47.4 47.8
Finland 50.1 56.0 53.9 55.1 52.6 55.9 57.6 57.5 57.2 57.1 56.9 56.2
Euro area 48.4 49.7 48.6 52.0 50.0 49.5 49.6 50.0 50.2 49.5 49.6 49.4
Bulgaria 36.8 37.9 36.9 41.5 41.3 38.8 39.8 41.6 41.2 40.5 41.3 41.6
Czechia 42.1 42.7 40.9 45.0 43.0 43.9 43.0 43.1 42.5 43.3 43.0 42.2
Denmark 52.5 55.9 51.4 49.4 44.9 46.8 46.5 47.8 48.4 47.9 48.3 48.8
Hungary 49.9 49.8 47.2 48.1 48.7 49.2 46.9 47.1 46.8 48.0 47.5 47.2
Poland 44.4 42.9 42.5 43.6 43.2 46.9 49.4 50.2 50.6 49.6 49.5 49.5
Romania 38.0 36.2 36.0 39.8 40.7 40.6 43.5 43.2 42.9 42.9 43.4 43.4
Sweden 50.9 51.2 50.8 50.0 48.9 49.4 50.0 49.5 48.8 50.8 49.9 48.8
EU 48.2 49.3 48.1 51.1 49.2 49.0 49.2 49.6 49.7 49.2 49.3 49.1
United Kingdom 43.7 44.1 43.1 47.9 46.1 46.8 46.4 46.9 46.9 46.6 46.7 46.6
Japan 36.9 39.9 40.0 44.0 43.3 40.6 40.8 41.3 41.5 42.9 42.3 42.0
United States 40.0 39.3 39.8 45.3 38.4 39.1 39.2 39.6 39.5 39.9 39.8 39.6
Table 33: Total revenue, general government (as a percentage of GDP, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 49.2 51.8 50.6 49.5 48.6 49.2 50.0 50.1 50.0 49.2 48.9 48.7
Germany 44.0 45.1 46.4 47.5 46.9 45.9 46.8 47.5 47.6 46.8 47.2 47.2
Estonia 38.7 38.7 38.7 39.5 38.9 40.5 42.5 43.8 42.8 41.7 43.2 43.5
Ireland 34.5 31.9 24.5 22.2 22.3 24.3 27.8 24.3 24.0 28.4 25.7 25.5
Greece 40.6 48.0 49.5 49.7 50.4 48.2 49.3 48.1 49.0 48.1 47.4 47.8
Spain 37.9 38.0 39.0 42.8 41.8 41.9 42.3 42.8 43.1 42.4 42.8 42.9
France 50.7 53.1 53.5 52.9 53.7 51.5 51.3 52.0 51.8 51.3 52.1 51.9
Croatia 42.9 42.6 45.5 45.5 45.1 46.0 45.6 46.4 46.6 45.4 46.3 46.4
Italy 45.2 47.3 46.7 47.2 46.8 46.7 47.1 47.7 47.9 46.9 47.7 47.7
Cyprus 40.7 40.9 40.7 41.1 40.8 43.7 44.3 44.7 44.4 43.8 43.2 42.5
Latvia 36.8 38.8 39.4 39.3 39.4 41.3 43.9 44.4 44.4 43.4 44.6 44.4
Lithuania 35.1 33.7 34.7 36.2 35.5 36.7 38.2 39.3 39.5 37.6 37.9 37.8
Luxembourg 41.7 42.0 44.0 43.4 44.5 46.2 47.9 47.5 47.6 48.1 48.0 48.0
Malta 38.6 38.0 35.6 32.5 32.5 32.0 34.6 33.1 33.2 32.9 32.1 32.5
Netherlands 43.6 44.0 44.0 43.7 43.3 42.8 43.0 42.1 42.4 43.2 42.6 42.6
Austria 48.7 50.0 49.3 50.3 49.7 50.1 51.6 52.0 52.1 50.7 50.7 50.6
Portugal 41.0 43.6 42.8 44.5 43.6 43.5 43.5 44.2 44.4 43.5 43.4 43.3
Slovakia 34.2 38.1 38.9 39.8 41.3 42.8 41.8 43.6 44.0 41.4 43.4 43.3
Slovenia 44.2 45.9 44.6 45.3 44.6 43.9 45.8 46.5 46.8 45.3 45.4 45.7
Finland 51.8 53.8 52.0 52.5 52.5 53.0 53.2 53.8 53.7 53.4 53.9 53.7
Euro area 44.9 46.5 46.5 46.9 46.5 46.0 46.5 46.8 46.9 46.5 46.7 46.6
Bulgaria 36.0 35.8 37.3 37.5 38.3 36.8 36.7 38.8 38.4 37.8 38.5 38.8
Czechia 39.2 40.6 40.4 40.1 39.9 40.2 40.8 40.8 40.3 40.7 40.7 40.3
Denmark 54.2 54.8 52.9 53.5 48.3 50.1 51.0 49.3 49.0 50.2 49.7 49.7
Hungary 44.5 46.8 44.1 41.0 42.5 42.4 42.0 42.5 42.1 42.6 43.0 43.2
Poland 39.7 39.1 40.1 41.8 39.8 41.6 42.8 43.8 44.4 43.8 44.0 44.1
Romania 32.6 33.6 31.8 32.6 34.3 34.0 34.1 34.6 34.5 34.8 35.4 35.4
Sweden 52.2 50.1 50.8 49.8 49.9 48.6 48.5 47.9 48.0 48.8 48.5 48.5
EU 44.9 46.3 46.2 46.5 46.0 45.5 46.0 46.3 46.4 46.1 46.3 46.2
United Kingdom 38.4 38.3 38.8 40.5 41.9 41.1 40.7 41.6 42.4 41.5 42.3 42.7
Japan 31.1 33.1 35.7 37.9 39.1 38.3 38.3 38.5 38.5 36.8 36.9 37.1
United States 31.9 32.2 32.3 33.4 34.7 31.6 31.7 32.9 33.7 32.1 32.4 32.7
204
Statistical Annex
Table 34: Net lending (+) or net borrowing (-), general government (as a percentage of GDP, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium -2.1 -3.5 -3.1 -5.4 -3.6 -4.1 -4.5 -5.4 -5.5 -4.6 -4.9 -5.3
Germany -1.9 0.2 0.3 -3.2 -2.1 -2.5 -2.8 -2.7 -2.9 -2.2 -2.0 -1.8
Estonia -0.1 0.2 -1.3 -2.6 -1.1 -3.1 -1.5 -1.4 -2.4 -3.0 -3.0 -3.0
Ireland -10.0 -6.7 -1.1 -1.4 1.7 1.5 4.3 0.7 0.1 4.4 1.4 1.3
Greece -10.0 -8.6 -1.4 -7.1 -2.5 -1.4 1.3 0.7 1.4 -0.6 -0.1 0.2
Spain -4.3 -8.0 -4.6 -6.7 -4.6 -3.5 -3.2 -2.8 -2.5 -3.0 -2.6 -2.7
France -4.7 -4.8 -4.2 -6.6 -4.7 -5.4 -5.8 -5.6 -5.7 -6.2 -5.3 -5.4
Croatia -4.0 -5.4 -1.5 -2.6 0.1 -0.8 -2.4 -2.7 -2.6 -2.1 -2.1 -1.9
Italy -3.3 -2.9 -3.6 -8.9 -8.1 -7.2 -3.4 -3.3 -2.9 -3.8 -3.4 -2.9
Cyprus -1.6 -7.3 -1.1 -1.6 2.7 1.7 4.3 3.5 3.4 3.5 2.7 2.7
Latvia -4.8 -2.1 -1.2 -7.2 -4.9 -2.4 -1.8 -3.1 -3.1 -2.8 -3.2 -3.2
Lithuania -4.0 -2.9 -1.0 -1.2 -0.7 -0.7 -1.3 -2.3 -2.3 -2.0 -2.4 -2.6
Luxembourg 1.8 0.9 1.2 1.0 0.2 -0.8 1.0 -0.4 -0.5 -0.6 -0.8 -0.6
Malta -2.8 -2.2 -0.3 -7.0 -5.2 -4.7 -3.7 -3.2 -2.8 -4.0 -3.5 -3.1
Netherlands -2.1 -3.0 0.2 -2.2 0.0 -0.4 -0.9 -2.1 -2.7 -0.2 -1.9 -2.4
Austria -3.1 -1.8 -1.9 -5.7 -3.4 -2.6 -4.7 -4.4 -4.2 -3.6 -3.7 -3.5
Portugal -6.4 -6.2 -2.2 -2.8 -0.3 1.2 0.7 0.1 -0.6 0.6 0.4 0.3
Slovakia -4.8 -3.5 -2.2 -5.1 -1.7 -5.2 -5.3 -4.9 -5.1 -5.8 -4.7 -4.1
Slovenia -2.8 -5.9 -1.6 -4.6 -3.0 -2.6 -0.9 -1.3 -1.5 -2.4 -2.1 -2.1
Finland 1.6 -2.2 -1.9 -2.7 -0.2 -3.0 -4.4 -3.7 -3.4 -3.7 -3.0 -2.5
Euro area -3.4 -3.2 -2.1 -5.1 -3.5 -3.5 -3.1 -3.2 -3.3 -3.0 -2.9 -2.8
Bulgaria -0.8 -2.1 0.4 -4.0 -3.0 -2.0 -3.0 -2.8 -2.8 -2.6 -2.8 -2.8
Czechia -2.9 -2.1 -0.5 -5.0 -3.1 -3.8 -2.2 -2.3 -2.2 -2.5 -2.3 -1.9
Denmark 1.8 -1.1 1.5 4.1 3.4 3.3 4.5 1.5 0.6 2.3 1.5 0.9
Hungary -5.5 -3.0 -3.2 -7.1 -6.2 -6.7 -4.9 -4.6 -4.7 -5.4 -4.6 -4.1
Poland -4.7 -3.9 -2.3 -1.7 -3.4 -5.3 -6.6 -6.4 -6.1 -5.8 -5.6 -5.3
Romania -5.4 -2.7 -4.3 -7.1 -6.4 -6.6 -9.3 -8.6 -8.4 -8.0 -7.9 -7.9
Sweden 1.3 -1.1 0.0 -0.2 1.0 -0.8 -1.5 -1.5 -0.8 -1.9 -1.4 -0.3
EU -3.2 -3.0 -2.0 -4.6 -3.2 -3.5 -3.2 -3.3 -3.4 -3.1 -3.0 -2.9
United Kingdom -6.1 -6.2 -4.7 -7.8 -4.6 -6.0 -6.0 -5.3 -4.4 -5.1 -4.4 -3.9
Japan -5.8 -6.8 -4.3 -6.1 -4.2 -2.3 -2.5 -2.8 -3.0 -6.1 -5.4 -4.9
United States -8.0 -7.2 -7.5 -11.8 -3.7 -7.6 -7.5 -6.7 -5.8 -7.8 -7.4 -6.9
Table 35: Interest expenditure, general government (as a percentage of GDP, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 4.0 3.4 2.3 1.7 1.6 2.0 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.3 2.4
Germany 2.6 1.9 0.9 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.1
Estonia 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7
Ireland 1.6 3.6 1.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
Greece 5.0 5.0 3.1 2.5 2.5 3.4 3.5 3.1 3.0 3.5 2.9 3.0
Spain 1.7 3.1 2.4 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.6
France 2.7 2.4 1.7 1.4 1.9 1.9 2.1 2.5 2.9 2.2 2.5 2.8
Croatia 1.9 3.1 2.4 1.5 1.4 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
Italy 4.5 4.6 3.6 3.4 4.1 3.7 3.9 3.9 4.0 3.9 3.9 4.0
Cyprus 2.5 3.0 2.3 1.7 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0
Latvia 1.0 1.6 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.7 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.1 1.3 1.4
Lithuania 1.0 1.8 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 0.8 0.9 1.1
Luxembourg 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4
Malta 3.3 2.7 1.5 1.0 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.4
Netherlands 2.1 1.6 0.9 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
Austria 3.1 2.6 1.7 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.5
Portugal 3.0 4.6 3.4 2.4 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1
Slovakia 1.4 1.8 1.4 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.6
Slovenia 1.4 2.6 2.2 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4
Finland 1.4 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.6 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.7 1.3 1.5 1.6
Euro area 2.9 2.8 1.8 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.1 1.9 2.0 2.1
Bulgaria 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5
Czechia 1.1 1.3 0.8 0.7 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.3
Denmark 1.6 1.5 0.8 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5
Hungary 4.1 4.1 2.5 2.2 2.8 4.7 5.0 4.2 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.0
Poland 2.3 2.3 1.5 1.1 1.5 2.1 2.2 2.5 2.7 2.3 2.6 2.6
Romania 1.2 1.8 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.9 2.3 2.6 2.8 2.0 2.1 2.2
Sweden 1.5 0.9 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.5
EU 2.7 2.6 1.7 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.1 1.9 2.0 2.0
United Kingdom 2.5 3.0 2.5 2.9 4.4 3.3 3.0 3.1 3.2 2.9 2.9 2.9
Japan 1.9 1.9 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4
United States 4.1 4.0 3.9 3.5 3.7 4.3 4.6 4.8 4.9 4.7 4.8 4.7
205
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Table 36: Primary balance, general government ¹ (as a percentage of GDP, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 1.9 -0.2 -0.8 -3.7 -2.0 -2.1 -2.3 -3.0 -3.0 -2.4 -2.6 -2.9
Germany 0.7 2.1 1.2 -2.6 -1.4 -1.6 -1.7 -1.6 -1.7 -1.1 -0.9 -0.7
Estonia 0.1 0.3 -1.3 -2.5 -1.0 -2.8 -0.9 -0.8 -1.8 -2.4 -2.4 -2.3
Ireland -8.4 -3.1 0.5 -0.6 2.3 2.2 4.9 1.3 0.6 5.1 2.0 1.8
Greece -5.0 -3.6 1.7 -4.6 0.0 2.0 4.8 3.8 4.4 2.9 2.9 3.2
Spain -2.6 -4.9 -2.1 -4.5 -2.3 -1.1 -0.7 -0.2 0.1 -0.5 -0.1 -0.1
France -2.1 -2.4 -2.5 -5.2 -2.8 -3.5 -3.7 -3.1 -2.8 -4.1 -2.7 -2.5
Croatia -2.1 -2.3 0.9 -1.0 1.5 0.9 -0.8 -1.2 -1.1 -0.6 -0.6 -0.5
Italy 1.2 1.7 0.0 -5.5 -4.0 -3.6 0.4 0.6 1.1 0.1 0.5 1.1
Cyprus 1.0 -4.2 1.3 0.1 4.0 3.0 5.5 4.7 4.6 4.7 3.8 3.7
Latvia -3.9 -0.5 -0.3 -6.7 -4.4 -1.6 -0.7 -1.8 -1.7 -1.7 -1.9 -1.8
Lithuania -3.0 -1.1 0.0 -0.7 -0.4 -0.1 -0.5 -1.3 -1.2 -1.3 -1.4 -1.4
Luxembourg 2.1 1.4 1.5 1.1 0.3 -0.5 1.3 -0.1 -0.2 -0.2 -0.4 -0.2
Malta 0.6 0.6 1.2 -6.0 -4.3 -3.7 -2.5 -1.9 -1.5 -2.8 -2.2 -1.7
Netherlands -0.1 -1.4 1.2 -1.7 0.6 0.3 -0.2 -1.4 -2.0 0.6 -1.1 -1.6
Austria 0.0 0.8 -0.3 -4.6 -2.5 -1.4 -3.2 -2.7 -2.4 -2.1 -2.2 -2.0
Portugal -3.5 -1.6 1.2 -0.5 1.6 3.3 2.8 2.3 1.7 2.6 2.5 2.5
Slovakia -3.4 -1.7 -0.8 -4.0 -0.6 -4.0 -3.9 -3.3 -3.5 -4.4 -3.3 -2.5
Slovenia -1.5 -3.3 0.6 -3.4 -1.9 -1.3 0.4 -0.1 -0.2 -1.0 -0.7 -0.7
Finland 3.1 -0.8 -1.0 -2.1 0.4 -1.8 -2.8 -2.2 -1.7 -2.5 -1.5 -1.0
Euro area -0.6 -0.4 -0.3 -3.7 -1.8 -1.8 -1.2 -1.2 -1.1 -1.1 -0.9 -0.7
Bulgaria 0.1 -1.3 1.1 -3.5 -2.6 -1.5 -2.5 -2.2 -2.1 -2.0 -2.2 -2.3
Czechia -1.8 -0.9 0.3 -4.2 -2.0 -2.5 -0.9 -1.0 -0.9 -1.1 -0.9 -0.6
Denmark 3.4 0.4 2.3 4.6 4.2 4.0 5.2 2.2 1.3 3.0 2.0 1.5
Hungary -1.4 1.1 -0.6 -4.9 -3.3 -2.1 0.0 -0.4 -0.7 -0.4 -0.6 -0.1
Poland -2.4 -1.6 -0.9 -0.7 -1.9 -3.2 -4.4 -3.8 -3.4 -3.5 -3.0 -2.8
Romania -4.2 -0.9 -3.1 -5.8 -5.1 -4.7 -7.0 -6.0 -5.6 -6.0 -5.8 -5.8
Sweden 2.8 -0.2 0.4 0.0 1.5 -0.1 -0.9 -0.8 -0.2 -1.3 -0.8 0.2
EU -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -3.3 -1.6 -1.7 -1.3 -1.3 -1.3 -1.2 -1.0 -0.9
United Kingdom -3.6 -3.2 -2.2 -4.9 -0.2 -2.7 -3.0 -2.2 -1.3 -2.2 -1.5 -1.0
Japan -3.9 -4.9 -2.7 -4.7 -2.8 -1.0 -1.2 -1.5 -1.6 -4.7 -4.1 -3.5
United States -4.0 -3.1 -3.6 -8.3 0.0 -3.2 -2.9 -1.9 -0.9 -3.0 -2.6 -2.2
¹ Net lending/borrowing excluding interest expenditure.
Table 37: Cyclically-adjusted primary balance, general government¹ (as a percentage of potential GDP, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 1.4 0.2 -0.2 -3.1 -2.8 -2.3 -2.1 -2.5 -2.2 -2.2 -2.2 -2.6
Germany 1.0 2.1 1.0 -2.4 -1.6 -1.3 -1.0 -0.7 -1.3 -0.3 -0.2 -0.4
Estonia -0.1 0.5 -1.8 -3.0 -1.0 -0.9 1.2 0.8 -1.1 -0.1 -0.5 -1.5
Ireland -8.5 -3.4 1.8 -3.4 -2.8 2.1 5.5 1.6 1.0 6.2 2.7 2.0
Greece -4.7 4.9 7.3 -1.5 0.5 1.6 3.9 2.5 3.0 2.0 1.7 1.9
Spain -2.4 -0.3 -1.1 -2.1 -2.3 -1.5 -1.6 -1.2 -0.8 -1.2 -0.8 -0.7
France -2.2 -1.5 -1.9 -4.4 -2.9 -3.5 -3.7 -2.8 -2.7 -4.0 -2.5 -2.6
Croatia -3.5 -0.6 1.3 -1.0 0.0 -0.3 -1.8 -1.8 -1.4 -1.5 -1.3 -1.0
Italy 0.8 3.7 1.6 -4.6 -5.0 -4.4 -0.1 0.3 0.7 -0.2 0.2 0.6
Cyprus -0.5 -1.3 1.4 -0.9 1.6 1.4 4.1 3.6 3.8 3.4 2.8 3.1
Latvia -4.1 0.1 -0.6 -6.6 -4.3 -1.9 -0.5 -1.3 -1.4 -1.5 -1.6 -1.6
Lithuania -3.0 -0.4 -0.8 -1.4 -0.7 0.6 0.2 -0.6 -0.8 -0.4 -0.7 -1.1
Luxembourg 1.7 2.3 1.9 0.5 1.0 1.1 3.0 1.3 0.9 1.5 1.1 1.1
Malta 0.5 0.7 1.0 -6.0 -3.6 -3.3 -2.4 -1.7 -1.0 -2.7 -1.8 -1.2
Netherlands 0.0 -0.2 1.5 -1.3 -0.8 0.2 0.2 -0.8 -1.2 1.1 -0.5 -0.9
Austria 0.0 1.2 -0.1 -3.6 -3.8 -1.6 -2.5 -1.7 -1.8 -1.3 -1.6 -1.7
Portugal -3.3 0.0 1.4 1.4 1.0 2.7 2.4 2.1 1.4 2.4 2.5 2.3
Slovakia -4.3 -1.0 -0.9 -4.6 -0.9 -4.2 -3.8 -3.0 -3.0 -4.1 -3.0 -2.3
Slovenia -3.0 -0.5 0.6 -4.5 -3.2 -2.3 -0.2 -0.5 -0.8 -1.6 -1.3 -1.3
Finland 2.7 0.4 -0.9 -2.0 0.7 -0.5 -1.1 -0.8 -0.7 -0.6 -0.1 -0.2
Euro area -0.6 0.9 0.3 -3.0 -2.4 -1.9 -1.1 -0.9 -1.0 -0.8 -0.7 -0.7
Bulgaria -0.3 -1.2 1.3 -3.6 -3.2 -1.8 -2.7 -2.1 -2.0 -2.1 -2.3 -2.5
Czechia -2.8 0.0 -0.1 -3.9 -2.2 -1.9 -0.2 -0.5 -0.7 -0.3 -0.4 -0.4
Denmark 3.1 2.2 3.2 4.8 5.2 5.1 5.7 2.0 1.1 3.4 2.1 1.5
Hungary -0.7 2.4 -1.4 -5.2 -4.4 -1.9 0.5 0.2 -0.7 0.2 -0.1 -0.2
Poland -3.3 -1.2 -1.0 -0.9 -2.7 -2.6 -4.0 -3.7 -3.4 -3.0 -2.8 -2.8
Romania -4.8 -0.3 -2.9 -5.0 -5.0 -4.5 -6.4 -5.4 -5.1 -5.4 -5.2 -5.4
Sweden 2.8 0.4 0.6 -0.2 1.4 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.6
EU -0.6 0.8 0.3 -2.7 -2.2 -1.7 -1.1 -1.1 -1.1 -0.9 -0.8 -0.8
¹ Cyclically-adjusted variables for Croatia are based on provisional values for fiscal semi-elasticities and subject to further revisions
206
Statistical Annex
Table 38: Structural budget balance, general government¹ (as a percentage of potential GDP, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium : : -2.7 -4.6 -4.4 -4.1 -4.2 -4.8 -4.7 -4.2 -4.4 -4.9
Germany : : 0.2 -2.8 -2.1 -2.1 -2.1 -1.8 -2.4 -1.4 -1.3 -1.5
Estonia : : -1.8 -4.0 -1.3 -1.2 0.6 0.3 -1.7 -0.8 -1.2 -2.2
Ireland : : 0.2 -4.2 -3.5 1.5 2.3 1.0 0.4 2.9 2.1 1.5
Greece : : 3.8 -4.8 -2.5 -1.6 0.6 -0.5 -0.1 -1.3 -1.2 -1.1
Spain : : -3.2 -4.2 -4.6 -3.8 -3.2 -3.2 -3.2 -3.6 -3.2 -3.1
France : : -3.3 -5.7 -4.8 -5.3 -5.7 -5.2 -5.6 -6.1 -5.0 -5.4
Croatia : : -1.1 -2.6 -1.1 -1.9 -3.3 -3.3 -2.9 -3.0 -2.8 -2.4
Italy : : -2.1 -8.4 -9.4 -8.4 -4.1 -3.7 -3.4 -4.3 -3.8 -3.6
Cyprus : : 0.9 -2.6 0.3 0.1 2.9 2.4 2.6 2.2 1.8 2.1
Latvia : : -1.6 -7.3 -4.8 -2.6 -1.6 -2.6 -2.9 -2.6 -2.8 -3.1
Lithuania : : -1.9 -1.9 -1.3 0.0 -0.6 -1.6 -2.0 -1.2 -1.7 -2.2
Luxembourg : : 1.5 0.4 0.8 0.8 2.7 1.0 0.6 1.1 0.7 0.8
Malta : : -0.5 -7.0 -4.5 -4.4 -3.6 -3.0 -2.3 -3.9 -3.2 -2.6
Netherlands : : 0.4 -1.7 -1.2 -1.0 -0.4 -1.5 -1.3 0.2 -0.9 -1.7
Austria : : -1.7 -4.7 -4.8 -2.8 -4.0 -3.4 -3.6 -2.8 -3.1 -3.2
Portugal : : : -1.3 -0.8 1.1 0.3 0.0 -0.8 0.5 0.4 0.2
Slovakia : : -2.2 -5.7 -1.9 -5.4 -5.2 -4.5 -4.6 -5.5 -4.5 -3.9
Slovenia : : -1.4 -5.8 -4.3 -3.0 -1.2 -1.2 -2.1 -2.3 -2.1 -2.7
Finland : : -1.8 -2.5 0.1 -1.7 -2.7 -2.3 -2.5 -1.9 -1.6 -1.8
Euro area : : : -4.5 -4.0 -3.6 -3.0 -2.9 -3.1 -2.8 -2.6 -2.8
Bulgaria : : 0.7 -4.0 -3.5 -2.8 -2.7 -3.2 -2.7 -2.7 -2.9 -3.0
Czechia : : -0.8 -4.7 -3.3 -3.2 -1.6 -1.7 -2.0 -1.7 -1.8 -1.7
Denmark : : 2.4 4.3 4.4 4.6 5.6 1.3 0.4 3.4 1.5 0.9
Hungary : : -3.9 -7.4 -7.3 -6.6 -4.5 -4.0 -4.7 -4.7 -4.1 -4.2
Poland : : -2.5 -2.2 -4.5 -4.7 -6.1 -6.1 -6.1 -5.3 -5.4 -5.3
Romania : : -3.8 -6.4 -6.4 -6.4 -8.8 -7.9 -7.9 -7.4 -7.4 -7.6
Sweden : : 0.2 -0.4 0.9 0.0 -0.5 -0.4 0.0 -0.7 -0.3 0.1
EU : : : -4.1 -3.7 -3.5 -3.0 -3.0 -3.2 -2.8 -2.7 -2.8
207
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Table 40: Gross debt, general government (as a percentage of GDP, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 94.4 104.8 103.4 108.5 102.7 103.2 104.7 107.1 109.8 103.4 105.1 107.2
Germany 69.7 76.3 64.0 68.1 65.0 62.9 62.5 63.8 64.7 63.0 63.2 62.8
Estonia 5.9 10.5 11.3 18.4 19.1 20.2 23.6 23.8 25.4 23.2 24.2 25.5
Ireland 47.6 104.2 62.5 52.6 43.1 43.3 40.9 38.6 38.2 41.6 38.3 36.8
Greece 119.4 176.4 189.4 197.3 177.0 163.9 153.6 146.6 140.6 153.1 146.8 142.7
Spain 45.5 93.2 104.0 115.7 109.5 105.1 101.8 100.9 100.8 102.3 101.3 101.1
France 74.2 93.6 101.7 112.8 111.4 109.8 113.0 116.0 118.4 112.7 115.3 117.1
Croatia 43.8 75.5 77.1 78.2 68.5 61.8 57.6 56.3 56.4 57.3 56.0 56.0
Italy 110.1 129.3 138.1 145.8 138.3 134.6 135.3 136.7 138.2 136.6 138.2 139.3
Cyprus 55.4 96.9 102.0 96.5 81.1 73.6 65.0 58.0 51.9 66.4 61.4 56.7
Latvia 25.1 42.8 40.5 45.9 44.4 44.6 46.8 48.6 49.3 48.1 50.3 51.6
Lithuania 22.5 39.9 38.7 43.3 38.1 37.3 38.2 41.2 43.9 38.3 41.0 44.6
Luxembourg 13.1 20.9 21.8 24.2 24.9 25.0 26.3 25.7 26.2 27.5 27.6 27.5
Malta 63.8 63.0 45.6 49.8 49.5 47.9 47.4 47.6 47.3 49.8 50.4 50.2
Netherlands 51.5 65.0 53.9 50.5 48.4 45.2 43.3 45.0 47.8 43.3 44.3 46.6
Austria 73.6 83.9 78.3 82.4 78.4 78.5 81.8 84.0 85.8 79.5 80.8 81.8
Portugal 81.9 127.4 125.7 123.9 111.2 97.7 94.9 91.7 89.7 95.7 92.9 90.5
Slovakia 33.5 50.9 51.8 60.2 57.7 55.6 59.3 60.9 63.0 58.9 59.8 61.8
Slovenia 28.9 67.2 74.2 74.8 72.7 68.4 67.0 65.5 63.8 67.1 64.4 63.1
Finland 41.0 60.9 68.2 73.2 74.0 77.5 82.1 85.6 87.5 82.6 84.7 85.3
Euro area 73.9 92.8 90.7 95.7 91.2 88.9 88.9 89.9 91.0 89.1 89.6 90.0
Bulgaria 15.8 20.3 24.2 23.8 22.5 22.9 24.1 25.1 27.1 24.5 23.1 24.5
Czechia 30.6 41.7 33.6 40.7 42.5 42.5 43.6 44.5 45.4 43.4 44.4 44.8
Denmark 37.5 47.9 41.0 40.5 34.1 33.6 31.1 29.7 29.4 31.0 29.3 28.3
Hungary 72.0 77.7 71.8 76.2 73.9 73.0 73.5 74.5 74.3 74.5 74.5 73.8
Poland 48.3 53.7 50.9 53.0 48.8 49.5 55.3 58.0 65.3 54.7 58.9 62.4
Romania 17.5 36.5 37.8 48.3 47.9 48.9 54.8 59.4 63.3 52.2 56.1 59.7
Sweden 40.2 41.3 40.0 36.9 33.8 31.6 33.5 33.8 33.3 32.8 32.7 31.7
EU 69.8 86.7 84.2 88.3 83.9 82.1 82.2 83.2 84.5 82.4 83.0 83.4
Table 41: Gross national saving (as a percentage of GDP, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 26.8 24.0 24.4 26.3 25.6 24.8 23.8 22.9 22.6 24.6 24.4 24.4
Germany 25.6 27.2 29.0 29.5 27.7 27.9 27.1 26.6 26.6 27.3 26.8 26.7
Estonia 24.3 27.0 27.6 27.5 25.8 23.3 24.1 23.9 23.9 23.5 24.0 24.8
Ireland 19.7 22.3 34.2 35.2 32.3 34.8 33.8 32.5 31.4 33.6 33.3 33.1
Greece 10.4 8.5 8.5 9.2 9.2 8.7 9.9 10.5 11.4 10.2 10.5 11.5
Spain 20.2 19.5 22.3 22.6 23.0 23.7 23.5 23.3 23.5 25.1 25.5 25.7
France 22.3 21.3 21.8 23.5 22.3 21.1 21.0 21.2 21.1 21.1 21.3 21.3
Croatia 19.2 18.1 23.0 22.2 22.6 24.0 22.4 21.9 21.9 23.7 23.9 24.0
Italy 19.4 18.2 21.0 24.1 22.9 23.1 23.3 23.3 23.6 23.1 23.0 23.4
Cyprus 8.9 12.3 13.7 14.3 15.4 11.0 11.9 12.4 12.9 11.4 11.9 11.5
Latvia 24.1 23.6 23.9 21.7 18.8 19.9 17.8 16.7 17.1 18.9 20.0 20.1
Lithuania 16.2 20.6 22.0 23.3 22.0 23.0 23.0 22.4 22.5 23.2 23.0 23.0
Luxembourg 23.9 21.7 20.3 19.9 13.2 16.8 17.4 15.8 15.5 12.2 12.3 12.6
Malta 16.0 19.8 28.0 27.6 23.2 25.0 22.4 22.2 21.5 25.2 25.1 25.2
Netherlands 26.3 26.8 28.1 32.2 29.5 29.8 29.3 29.5 29.5 30.5 30.4 30.3
Austria 27.0 25.9 27.5 29.5 28.2 26.6 24.0 23.6 23.7 25.6 25.2 25.3
Portugal 11.9 14.9 18.4 20.0 19.1 20.7 21.8 21.4 21.3 20.8 20.8 20.8
Slovakia 22.0 23.4 21.0 18.3 14.0 19.7 18.5 18.6 18.9 19.4 19.6 20.3
Slovenia 25.8 22.3 26.9 25.6 23.3 26.7 25.8 25.5 25.5 25.4 25.2 25.2
Finland 26.9 21.2 23.8 25.1 24.9 22.2 20.8 21.2 21.5 21.1 21.3 21.8
Euro area 22.6 22.6 24.7 26.3 24.9 24.9 24.4 24.2 24.2 24.8 24.7 24.8
Bulgaria 16.0 21.6 22.0 20.5 20.1 20.4 19.5 19.0 19.2 19.9 18.8 17.9
Czechia 24.8 23.5 25.2 27.6 26.8 30.6 27.3 26.6 26.5 30.4 30.2 30.1
Denmark 25.5 26.9 29.2 32.3 36.4 32.7 34.7 35.1 35.1 32.5 32.6 32.4
Hungary 18.6 23.6 26.6 27.0 26.1 26.3 26.0 24.6 24.3 25.6 24.9 25.1
Poland 17.4 17.6 19.7 20.4 19.2 19.1 17.9 18.5 18.6 17.9 18.1 18.5
Romania 21.9 23.6 19.7 19.0 17.4 18.5 15.7 16.6 17.8 16.8 18.4 19.5
Sweden 29.4 26.8 27.9 31.5 31.1 31.6 31.7 31.0 31.0 30.8 30.5 30.9
EU 22.7 22.7 24.7 26.3 25.0 25.0 24.4 24.2 24.3 24.7 24.7 24.8
United Kingdom 13.8 12.9 14.4 17.6 15.8 13.8 15.4 15.0 15.0 15.2 14.9 14.9
Japan 28.1 26.0 28.9 29.7 28.8 30.0 30.6 30.8 30.8 30.9 31.0 31.0
United States 16.1 18.4 18.8 17.6 18.3 17.4 17.3 17.9 18.1 18.3 18.5 18.8
208
Statistical Annex
Table 42: Gross saving, private sector (as a percentage of GDP, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 26.0 24.0 24.7 28.8 26.3 25.8 25.0 24.8 24.7 25.7 26.0 26.4
Germany 24.1 24.1 25.5 28.9 25.5 26.2 25.4 25.0 25.2 25.1 24.6 24.3
Estonia 19.2 22.3 24.1 24.8 21.6 20.4 19.4 18.4 19.8 20.1 19.8 20.2
Ireland 20.8 25.8 33.0 34.5 28.5 30.8 29.2 28.6 28.0 29.2 28.9 28.8
Greece 16.5 11.7 7.0 11.9 8.3 6.2 4.5 5.8 5.7 6.3 6.6 7.5
Spain 19.3 23.8 24.7 25.9 24.9 24.8 23.9 23.1 23.0 25.6 25.7 26.0
France 21.6 20.8 21.0 25.2 22.1 21.7 21.8 21.7 22.0 22.3 21.5 21.6
Croatia 16.0 18.4 20.4 20.3 17.6 19.6 18.9 18.7 18.8 20.4 20.4 20.4
Italy 18.5 17.9 21.1 25.7 23.8 22.3 21.6 21.4 21.7 21.8 21.3 21.4
Cyprus 5.9 12.2 10.3 13.7 10.5 5.2 4.8 6.3 6.8 5.1 6.6 6.6
Latvia 23.5 21.6 20.8 24.0 18.2 16.7 13.9 13.9 14.3 17.6 18.9 18.9
Lithuania 16.3 20.3 19.7 21.3 19.3 19.5 20.0 20.5 20.6 20.8 21.6 21.8
Luxembourg 17.0 16.2 14.0 13.6 7.7 11.7 10.6 10.2 10.1 6.7 6.9 7.1
Malta 16.7 19.8 25.3 31.0 25.5 25.7 20.7 22.1 20.9 24.8 24.4 24.2
Netherlands 24.2 26.0 24.6 30.8 25.9 26.7 26.4 28.2 28.2 27.6 28.9 29.1
Austria 25.7 23.7 25.8 31.1 26.8 24.7 23.7 23.2 23.1 24.6 24.4 24.3
Portugal 14.4 17.7 17.8 20.3 16.4 16.8 18.6 18.3 18.6 17.2 17.4 17.6
Slovakia 22.8 23.6 19.9 20.5 12.7 21.5 19.9 19.0 19.2 22.7 21.1 21.6
Slovenia 23.5 22.3 24.8 25.8 21.1 24.2 21.5 21.8 21.9 22.4 22.3 22.3
Finland 21.8 19.5 21.5 23.4 21.0 21.1 20.8 20.2 20.3 20.8 19.7 19.9
Euro area 21.6 22.0 23.3 27.0 23.9 23.9 23.3 23.1 23.3 23.7 23.4 23.5
Bulgaria 12.3 20.4 18.3 22.4 21.4 19.7 19.8 18.7 19.5 20.2 19.1 18.5
Czechia 22.1 21.2 21.6 28.1 25.3 29.8 25.2 24.6 24.6 28.6 28.0 27.7
Denmark 20.6 23.3 24.0 24.9 29.5 25.4 26.1 28.8 29.7 26.1 27.1 27.3
Hungary 19.6 22.6 23.3 26.7 24.2 26.9 25.5 24.1 24.2 25.6 24.1 23.7
Poland 17.4 17.5 18.3 18.3 18.2 18.6 18.8 19.5 19.4 18.0 18.4 18.1
Romania 21.1 21.9 20.7 22.5 19.5 20.6 19.5 19.4 20.2 20.9 22.3 23.2
Sweden 23.9 23.4 22.9 26.9 24.9 27.1 27.1 26.5 25.6 26.8 26.3 25.4
EU 21.5 21.9 23.0 26.5 23.8 23.9 23.2 23.1 23.2 23.6 23.4 23.4
United Kingdom 16.1 15.8 15.3 21.2 17.1 14.3 15.5 14.2 13.3 14.7 13.7 13.1
Japan 29.6 28.6 29.3 31.2 28.9 28.2 29.2 29.6 29.7 33.2 32.7 32.3
United States 19.8 22.1 23.2 26.0 19.3 21.0 21.2 20.4 19.7 21.9 21.8 21.6
209
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Table 44: Gross saving, general government (as a percentage of GDP, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 0.9 0.0 -0.3 -2.4 -0.7 -1.0 -1.2 -1.9 -2.1 -1.1 -1.6 -2.0
Germany 1.6 3.1 3.5 0.6 2.2 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.3 2.2 2.2 2.3
Estonia 5.1 4.7 3.5 2.7 4.3 2.9 4.7 5.5 4.1 3.3 4.2 4.6
Ireland -1.0 -3.4 1.1 0.7 3.8 4.0 4.6 3.9 3.4 4.4 4.5 4.3
Greece -6.1 -3.2 1.6 -2.7 0.9 2.6 5.4 4.7 5.7 3.9 3.9 4.0
Spain 0.8 -4.3 -2.4 -3.3 -1.9 -1.1 -0.4 0.2 0.5 -0.6 -0.3 -0.3
France 0.8 0.5 0.8 -1.7 0.2 -0.6 -0.8 -0.6 -0.9 -1.2 -0.2 -0.3
Croatia 3.2 -0.3 2.6 1.9 5.0 4.5 3.5 3.1 3.1 3.3 3.5 3.6
Italy 0.9 0.3 -0.1 -1.6 -0.9 0.8 1.6 1.9 2.0 1.3 1.7 2.0
Cyprus 3.0 0.1 3.4 0.5 4.8 5.8 7.1 6.1 6.1 6.3 5.3 4.9
Latvia 0.6 2.1 3.1 -2.3 0.5 3.2 4.0 2.9 2.9 1.3 1.2 1.2
Lithuania -0.1 0.4 2.3 1.9 2.7 3.5 3.0 1.8 1.9 2.4 1.4 1.1
Luxembourg 6.9 5.5 6.3 6.3 5.5 5.1 6.8 5.6 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.5
Malta -0.7 0.1 2.6 -3.4 -2.3 -0.7 1.7 0.0 0.6 0.4 0.7 0.9
Netherlands 2.0 0.8 3.5 1.3 3.5 3.1 2.9 1.3 1.3 2.9 1.5 1.2
Austria 1.3 2.2 1.8 -1.7 1.4 1.9 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.9 0.8 0.9
Portugal -2.5 -2.9 0.7 -0.3 2.7 4.0 3.3 3.1 2.7 3.7 3.4 3.3
Slovakia -0.8 -0.2 1.1 -2.1 1.2 -1.7 -1.4 -0.4 -0.4 -3.4 -1.5 -1.3
Slovenia 2.2 0.0 2.0 -0.3 2.2 2.4 4.2 3.7 3.6 3.0 2.9 2.8
Finland 5.2 1.8 2.2 1.7 3.8 1.1 -0.1 1.0 1.2 0.3 1.6 1.9
Euro area 1.0 0.6 1.4 -0.7 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.3
Bulgaria 3.7 1.3 3.6 -1.9 -1.3 0.7 -0.3 0.3 -0.3 -0.4 -0.3 -0.6
Czechia 2.7 2.3 3.5 -0.5 1.5 0.8 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 2.2 2.3
Denmark 5.0 3.6 5.2 7.4 6.8 7.3 8.5 6.2 5.4 6.4 5.6 5.1
Hungary -1.1 1.0 3.3 0.4 1.9 -0.6 0.5 0.5 0.2 -0.1 0.8 1.3
Poland 0.0 0.1 1.4 2.1 1.0 0.4 -0.9 -1.1 -0.8 -0.1 -0.3 0.4
Romania 0.8 1.7 -1.0 -3.5 -2.1 -2.1 -3.8 -2.9 -2.4 -4.1 -3.9 -3.6
Sweden 5.5 3.4 5.0 4.6 6.2 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.4 3.9 4.1 5.5
EU 1.2 0.8 1.6 -0.3 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.4
United Kingdom -2.2 -2.8 -0.9 -3.6 -1.3 -0.5 -0.1 0.7 1.6 0.4 1.2 1.8
Japan -1.5 -2.6 -0.4 -1.5 -0.1 1.8 1.5 1.2 1.1 -2.3 -1.7 -1.2
United States -3.7 -3.6 -4.4 -8.4 -1.0 -3.6 -3.9 -2.6 -1.6 -3.6 -3.3 -2.8
210
Statistical Annex
Table 45: Exports of goods and services, volume (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 2.1 2.7 1.9 14.7 5.8 -7.1 -3.4 -1.8 1.9 -2.0 1.8 2.6
Germany 3.8 4.0 0.1 10.0 3.1 -0.3 -1.1 -1.9 1.1 0.0 1.4 2.6
Estonia 4.3 6.2 2.6 22.1 5.0 -9.0 -1.1 2.2 2.4 -0.2 2.9 3.0
Ireland 4.3 11.9 9.2 14.1 13.5 -5.8 11.7 1.3 2.8 10.1 1.0 3.8
Greece 0.8 3.5 -0.6 24.4 6.6 1.9 1.0 3.1 3.2 2.3 3.7 3.5
Spain 1.7 4.4 -1.6 13.4 14.3 2.8 3.1 2.4 2.3 3.4 2.9 2.7
France 1.2 3.8 -1.2 11.3 8.2 2.1 1.3 1.1 2.3 1.8 3.0 3.5
Croatia 0.6 4.1 -0.5 32.7 27.0 -2.9 0.9 2.3 2.6 0.2 2.9 3.1
Italy 0.4 2.7 -0.8 14.1 9.9 0.2 0.4 0.9 1.7 0.3 2.3 3.0
Cyprus 1.7 4.5 7.1 27.2 27.1 -2.8 5.3 3.7 3.5 7.7 3.5 2.4
Latvia 4.4 6.4 2.7 9.1 11.4 -4.7 -1.6 1.8 2.0 -1.8 1.6 2.4
Lithuania 5.5 6.5 7.0 16.6 12.4 -3.4 2.1 3.0 3.3 3.5 3.2 3.5
Luxembourg 3.9 4.8 3.3 11.3 1.5 -0.3 0.3 3.1 3.2 1.0 4.1 3.7
Malta 7.7 9.6 10.0 -0.4 13.7 5.6 5.3 3.5 2.9 3.2 3.2 2.9
Netherlands 2.9 5.2 2.5 6.9 4.4 -0.5 0.4 0.7 1.9 0.0 2.3 2.5
Austria 2.8 2.8 1.1 9.5 10.0 -0.4 -4.3 -1.0 1.9 -2.0 2.2 2.7
Portugal 3.2 5.5 0.1 12.0 17.2 3.8 3.4 1.7 2.8 3.8 3.0 3.2
Slovakia 7.4 6.9 1.7 10.7 2.8 -0.7 0.3 1.9 1.8 2.0 3.8 4.0
Slovenia 4.5 4.3 3.7 14.5 6.8 -2.0 3.2 2.2 3.0 0.9 3.0 3.4
Finland 1.6 0.4 2.5 6.0 4.4 0.2 0.1 2.5 2.4 -0.2 3.1 2.8
Euro area 2.5 4.3 1.2 11.5 7.4 -0.8 1.1 0.3 2.0 1.5 2.2 3.0
Bulgaria 5.3 6.7 1.9 11.6 12.1 0.0 -0.8 1.6 2.1 0.5 3.0 2.9
Czechia 6.5 5.6 1.4 8.2 5.1 2.7 1.8 1.1 2.4 1.1 2.4 3.0
Denmark 2.1 3.2 1.9 8.8 7.2 10.4 7.5 5.4 2.5 4.7 2.0 2.5
Hungary 8.0 5.0 2.8 8.3 10.7 1.7 -3.0 0.2 2.8 -1.9 2.5 5.2
Poland 7.5 5.8 5.7 12.3 7.4 3.7 2.0 1.6 2.3 0.9 2.4 3.0
Romania 10.9 9.2 4.7 12.6 9.3 -0.8 -3.1 1.8 2.8 -2.0 2.2 2.4
Sweden 1.7 3.2 2.4 11.9 6.2 3.7 2.3 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.9 2.8
EU 2.9 4.4 1.5 11.3 7.4 0.1 1.2 0.7 2.1 1.4 2.2 3.0
United Kingdom 2.0 2.5 0.3 3.2 12.6 -0.4 -1.2 0.4 1.5 -1.6 0.9 1.3
Japan 3.1 2.6 -0.4 11.9 5.5 3.0 1.0 1.8 1.3 0.2 2.5 2.2
United States 5.4 3.6 -1.2 6.5 7.5 2.8 3.3 1.7 1.6 3.3 2.9 3.1
Table 46: Imports of goods and services, volume (percentage change on preceding year, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 2.5 2.9 1.9 12.8 5.8 -6.8 -3.5 -1.0 2.1 -2.2 1.9 2.7
Germany 3.8 3.3 1.5 9.0 7.0 -0.6 0.2 0.9 1.5 -1.1 1.8 2.9
Estonia 1.5 7.5 4.1 22.7 5.0 -6.7 0.0 2.6 2.9 -0.5 2.5 3.1
Ireland 2.8 10.0 11.2 -8.7 16.0 1.2 6.5 3.2 2.7 8.4 2.8 3.1
Greece -0.3 -1.0 2.5 17.4 11.0 0.9 5.5 4.2 3.5 5.0 4.1 3.5
Spain -0.8 0.9 -0.4 15.0 7.7 0.3 2.4 3.2 2.8 2.2 2.8 3.0
France 2.2 3.8 0.0 8.3 8.8 0.3 -1.2 1.3 2.1 -1.7 2.0 3.0
Croatia -1.6 3.2 3.0 17.3 26.5 -5.3 5.3 3.8 3.3 4.5 3.7 3.0
Italy 1.2 -0.3 -0.4 16.0 12.9 -1.6 -0.7 1.7 2.4 -3.4 2.9 3.1
Cyprus 4.2 0.8 8.2 19.6 29.7 -0.7 2.4 3.6 3.5 7.2 2.9 1.9
Latvia -0.2 6.0 3.9 15.1 9.9 -2.0 -2.3 2.1 2.1 -3.1 1.8 2.5
Lithuania 3.2 6.4 4.5 19.2 12.7 -5.3 2.4 3.9 3.7 2.5 3.9 3.8
Luxembourg 4.0 5.7 3.3 13.4 2.4 0.4 -0.3 3.8 3.8 1.0 4.6 4.1
Malta 5.3 8.7 10.1 -2.8 18.4 2.0 4.7 3.1 2.4 3.0 2.7 2.5
Netherlands 2.8 5.9 2.0 6.5 4.4 -1.8 0.3 1.2 2.2 -0.5 2.5 3.1
Austria 2.2 2.8 1.2 14.1 7.1 -4.6 -5.0 -0.6 1.9 -2.4 2.2 2.3
Portugal 2.5 1.4 2.1 12.3 11.3 1.8 4.9 4.3 4.1 4.6 4.1 4.1
Slovakia 5.4 5.5 1.5 11.7 4.2 -7.6 2.3 2.1 2.4 4.3 3.9 3.2
Slovenia 3.6 2.5 3.7 17.8 9.2 -4.5 3.9 2.2 3.4 3.5 3.3 4.1
Finland 1.7 1.7 2.3 7.0 9.3 -6.7 -2.4 2.6 2.9 -1.0 3.3 2.5
Euro area 2.3 3.3 1.9 9.0 8.4 -1.4 0.3 1.6 2.2 0.0 2.5 3.0
Bulgaria 3.1 5.8 3.7 10.7 15.3 -5.5 1.3 2.4 2.8 2.2 3.2 3.8
Czechia 5.8 5.1 1.3 13.7 5.9 -0.9 0.9 2.5 3.6 0.2 3.8 3.5
Denmark 2.3 4.1 2.6 9.5 4.4 3.7 3.0 4.0 2.6 1.8 2.4 2.3
Hungary 5.5 4.2 4.5 7.4 10.7 -3.4 -4.0 1.1 3.5 -3.5 3.9 6.0
Poland 8.4 4.1 5.1 16.3 6.8 -1.5 4.2 3.0 3.1 2.8 3.6 3.1
Romania 12.3 6.7 7.9 14.6 9.3 -1.1 3.8 2.9 3.2 4.9 3.2 3.1
Sweden 3.2 4.0 1.9 12.8 9.7 -0.8 1.7 1.8 1.3 0.3 1.7 2.4
EU 2.8 3.5 2.2 9.6 8.3 -1.3 0.6 1.7 2.3 0.2 2.6 3.0
United Kingdom 1.8 3.7 -0.9 5.8 13.0 -1.2 2.7 1.6 1.5 0.9 0.6 1.5
Japan 0.3 4.6 0.0 5.2 8.3 -1.5 1.3 1.6 1.3 0.0 2.7 2.2
United States 1.1 3.8 0.3 14.7 8.6 -1.2 5.3 1.4 -0.3 5.6 3.3 2.9
211
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Table 47: Merchandise trade balance¹ (fob-fob, as a percentage of GDP, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 0.7 -0.9 0.6 2.1 -0.2 0.5 1.3 1.4 1.5 2.2 2.3 2.4
Germany 6.5 7.1 6.6 5.1 3.4 5.6 5.7 5.3 5.3 6.5 6.4 6.3
Estonia -10.7 -4.8 -3.6 -4.3 -7.8 -6.0 -6.9 -6.7 -6.4 -5.7 -5.1 -4.8
Ireland 18.8 25.1 35.1 37.5 39.4 30.6 33.1 32.8 31.4 30.5 28.7 27.9
Greece -15.9 -11.2 -11.6 -14.4 -19.0 -14.5 -15.0 -15.0 -14.9 -14.7 -14.8 -14.9
Spain -6.7 -2.4 -1.6 -1.7 -4.4 -2.3 -2.0 -2.4 -2.4 -1.9 -1.8 -1.8
France -1.8 -2.1 -1.7 -2.7 -4.9 -2.8 -1.9 -1.7 -1.7 -2.0 -1.9 -1.8
Croatia -18.8 -14.7 -17.5 -19.5 -26.8 -21.8 -20.4 -19.4 -19.1 -20.4 -20.1 -19.8
Italy -0.4 1.7 3.2 2.5 -1.3 1.7 2.6 2.8 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.8
Cyprus -25.9 -19.1 -21.1 -16.9 -19.7 -23.7 -20.4 -19.9 -19.7 -22.4 -21.8 -20.9
Latvia -17.5 -12.3 -8.2 -8.6 -11.4 -9.3 -8.2 -8.5 -7.9 -8.9 -8.9 -9.1
Lithuania -10.4 -4.3 -4.3 -5.1 -10.9 -6.2 -6.0 -6.7 -6.9 -5.4 -5.4 -5.4
Luxembourg -2.0 3.8 3.5 0.5 -0.6 1.5 1.7 1.5 2.1 -0.1 0.0 0.5
Malta -19.3 -16.6 -11.6 -12.1 -17.5 -15.4 -11.8 -11.5 -11.1 -11.8 -11.4 -11.1
Netherlands 8.0 9.4 9.0 7.3 5.5 8.0 8.7 9.2 9.7 8.5 8.5 8.3
Austria 0.2 -0.3 0.7 0.0 -1.9 0.9 2.1 2.5 2.5 1.6 1.7 1.9
Portugal -11.6 -6.1 -6.9 -7.6 -11.2 -9.7 -9.2 -9.6 -10.0 -9.3 -9.8 -10.3
Slovakia -1.4 2.9 -0.1 -1.4 -6.6 0.6 -0.3 -0.7 -0.9 0.2 -0.4 0.2
Slovenia -3.1 1.2 3.6 1.7 -4.3 0.7 1.0 1.1 0.9 -0.6 -0.9 -1.2
Finland 6.4 1.0 0.6 0.9 -0.1 3.3 2.5 2.4 2.3 3.0 2.9 0.0
Euro area 0.7 2.3 3.1 2.6 0.4 2.2 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.9 2.9 2.8
Euro area, adjusted 2)
: 2.3 2.8 2.3 -0.3 1.8 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.4
Bulgaria -19.1 -7.2 -3.3 -4.0 -5.9 -4.1 -5.2 -5.3 -5.3 -5.9 -6.4 -7.2
Czechia 0.8 3.6 4.6 1.7 -0.3 3.9 5.2 4.9 4.6 5.1 4.3 4.1
Denmark 2.6 4.6 4.7 3.3 2.8 7.4 9.4 10.4 10.4 9.1 9.0 8.9
Hungary -0.3 2.4 -0.3 -2.9 -9.2 -0.2 0.7 0.2 -0.1 1.2 0.3 0.3
Poland -4.4 -1.9 -0.6 -1.3 -3.3 0.6 -0.8 0.0 -0.2 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6
Romania -12.6 -5.5 -7.3 -9.5 -11.4 -8.9 -9.3 -9.2 -8.7 -9.1 -8.5 -7.9
Sweden 5.7 3.6 3.0 4.6 3.7 5.4 5.9 6.1 6.2 5.6 5.8 5.9
EU 0.6 2.1 2.8 2.2 0.0 2.1 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.6
EU, adjusted 2)
-0.1 1.5 2.4 1.8 -0.8 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1
United Kingdom -5.9 -6.7 -6.6 -7.1 -8.2 -7.7 -7.9 -8.1 -8.1 -7.1 -7.0 -7.0
Japan 1.8 -1.0 0.5 0.3 -2.8 -1.1 -0.6 -0.8 -0.9 -0.8 -0.9 -1.0
United States -5.2 -4.5 -4.2 -4.6 -4.6 -3.9 -4.1 -4.0 -3.8 -4.1 -4.1 -4.1
1) See note 7 on concepts and sources.
2) See note 8 on concepts and sources.
212
Statistical Annex
Table 49: Net lending (+) or net borrowing (-) of the nation¹ (as a percentage of GDP, 2006-2026) 30.04.2025
5-year Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
averages Forecast Forecast
2006 - 10 2011 - 15 2016 - 20 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 2.9 0.6 -0.1 2.1 -1.2 -0.4 -0.1 -0.5 -0.9 0.6 0.5 0.4
Germany 5.7 6.9 7.7 6.7 3.9 5.3 5.1 4.4 4.4 6.3 5.9 5.7
Estonia -4.5 2.9 2.0 5.4 -3.5 -0.5 -0.8 -0.7 -0.4 -0.2 0.4 0.8
Ireland -4.7 0.4 -12.4 12.5 8.6 6.4 13.6 9.4 8.5 7.2 7.0 6.6
Greece -10.8 -1.8 -2.6 -5.6 -8.3 -5.7 -7.3 -5.4 -4.2 -5.3 -4.8 -4.1
Spain -6.5 1.2 2.5 1.6 1.3 3.7 4.2 3.9 4.0 5.3 5.6 5.6
France 0.0 -0.6 -0.7 0.4 -1.6 -1.7 -0.6 -0.5 -0.3 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2
Croatia -6.7 -0.1 2.8 2.9 -0.9 3.6 0.7 1.4 1.6 2.7 3.4 3.4
Italy -2.1 0.3 2.9 2.2 -1.2 0.9 0.9 1.6 2.0 1.0 1.1 1.3
Cyprus -15.6 -2.0 -5.4 -5.1 -5.3 -9.6 -6.7 -6.2 -5.6 -8.9 -8.1 -7.9
Latvia -7.5 0.5 2.6 -2.7 -4.7 -2.0 -1.7 -1.9 -1.4 -1.4 0.2 0.0
Lithuania -4.7 2.5 3.7 2.9 -4.6 2.7 4.2 3.7 3.7 4.3 4.2 4.2
Luxembourg 3.6 2.0 0.6 -1.4 -4.6 -1.2 1.6 -0.2 -0.6 -5.6 -5.5 -5.2
Malta -4.2 3.0 8.5 5.1 -0.6 6.0 5.0 4.7 4.4 6.7 6.7 6.9
Netherlands 4.8 6.0 7.0 10.1 17.2 9.6 9.8 10.1 10.5 10.9 10.9 10.9
Austria 3.1 1.9 2.0 1.9 -0.8 1.9 2.5 2.9 2.7 2.1 1.9 1.9
Portugal -9.2 0.4 1.4 0.8 -1.3 1.7 2.9 2.4 2.0 2.4 2.1 1.8
Slovakia -4.0 1.2 -2.1 -4.5 -9.7 -0.4 -2.1 -1.9 -2.3 -1.5 -2.3 -1.7
Slovenia -2.5 2.9 5.9 4.1 -1.4 4.4 4.4 4.6 4.6 2.8 2.7 2.4
Finland 2.9 -1.5 -0.7 0.4 -2.4 -0.7 -0.9 -0.8 -0.8 -0.7 -1.1 -1.0
Euro area 0.4 2.5 3.0 3.8 1.9 2.6 3.1 2.9 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.5
Euro area, adjusted 2)
: 2.4 2.5 2.9 0.7 1.7 2.6 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.7
Bulgaria -13.9 2.2 3.3 0.5 -1.7 1.0 -1.7 -1.4 -0.9 1.0 1.6 0.6
Czechia -3.2 -0.4 0.5 1.1 -3.7 3.5 2.9 2.5 2.0 5.3 4.4 4.1
Denmark 3.5 7.2 7.1 8.7 11.7 9.5 12.7 13.3 13.1 10.2 9.6 9.3
Hungary -3.9 4.7 2.2 -1.5 -6.7 1.4 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.7 2.1 2.1
Poland -4.2 -1.2 0.9 -0.6 -2.7 2.0 0.5 1.3 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1
Romania -6.8 -0.5 -2.3 -5.5 -7.5 -5.0 -7.2 -6.5 -5.5 -6.0 -5.1 -4.3
Sweden 6.5 3.9 3.2 6.3 4.3 6.7 7.1 6.8 7.0 6.5 6.3 6.5
EU 0.3 2.5 2.9 3.5 1.6 2.7 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.5 3.4 3.4
EU, adjusted 2)
0.0 2.2 2.6 3.1 0.9 2.0 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.9 2.8 2.8
United Kingdom -3.3 -4.0 -3.9 -0.5 -2.2 -3.7 -2.8 -2.8 -2.8 -2.6 -2.5 -2.5
Japan 3.5 1.5 3.5 3.8 2.0 3.7 4.7 4.3 4.2 4.4 4.5 4.7
United States -4.3 -2.5 -2.2 -3.7 -3.9 -3.3 -3.7 -3.6 -3.4 -3.6 -3.4 -3.3
1) See note 7 on concepts and sources; 2) See note 8 on concepts and sources.
213
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Table 51: Export markets (a) (percentage change on preceding year, 2018-2026) 30.04.2025
Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
Forecast Forecast
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium 4.2 3.4 -8.6 9.4 8.0 0.1 1.3 1.8 2.2 0.6 2.6 3.1
Germany 4.4 2.1 -8.1 11.2 7.4 0.2 1.5 1.8 2.2 1.4 2.9 3.1
Estonia 5.3 3.0 -6.3 10.7 8.3 -0.6 1.0 2.2 2.5 0.7 2.9 3.0
Ireland 4.4 1.5 -8.9 11.0 7.4 0.1 2.0 1.7 1.9 1.7 2.7 3.0
Greece 4.1 2.4 -8.8 11.1 9.8 0.9 2.0 2.3 2.6 1.8 3.1 3.4
Spain 3.8 2.4 -9.6 10.3 8.8 0.6 1.4 1.9 2.3 0.9 2.7 3.2
France 4.0 2.6 -8.7 10.6 7.8 0.3 1.8 1.8 2.2 1.4 2.8 3.1
Croatia 5.1 3.1 -8.8 12.4 8.9 -0.8 1.4 1.8 2.6 0.9 3.0 3.4
Italy 4.1 2.3 -8.7 10.6 7.8 0.7 1.7 1.8 2.2 1.6 2.8 3.1
Cyprus 5.1 2.9 -8.1 10.8 6.9 2.2 2.7 2.4 2.7 2.1 3.3 3.3
Latvia 5.7 3.9 -6.0 12.6 7.2 0.2 1.9 2.5 2.7 1.4 3.1 3.2
Lithuania 5.4 3.1 -6.6 11.0 7.0 1.2 1.5 2.1 2.5 0.9 2.9 3.1
Luxembourg 3.9 2.2 -9.6 10.2 8.2 -0.4 0.8 1.5 2.1 0.2 2.3 2.9
Malta 4.5 2.5 -8.7 10.1 8.3 0.2 1.8 2.0 2.4 1.5 2.9 3.3
Netherlands 4.0 2.8 -8.8 10.4 8.1 -0.5 1.0 1.5 2.1 0.6 2.5 3.0
Austria 4.6 2.8 -8.0 10.6 7.7 -0.2 1.3 1.6 2.1 0.8 2.7 3.2
Portugal 3.8 2.6 -10.5 10.4 8.3 0.1 1.7 2.0 2.2 1.2 2.6 3.1
Slovakia 5.1 2.7 -7.8 11.3 7.4 -0.2 0.9 1.6 2.4 0.5 2.8 3.3
Slovenia 4.5 2.5 -7.7 11.4 9.1 -0.2 1.0 2.0 2.4 1.1 2.9 3.2
Finland 4.6 2.2 -7.5 11.2 7.4 0.4 1.9 1.8 2.0 1.4 2.7 3.0
Euro area b) 4.2 2.4 -8.6 10.7 7.8 0.2 1.5 1.8 2.2 1.2 2.7 3.1
Bulgaria 5.1 2.9 -7.4 11.6 7.9 0.9 1.8 2.2 2.7 1.6 3.0 3.4
Czechia 4.9 3.0 -7.8 10.6 7.4 -0.7 1.0 1.6 2.2 0.6 2.6 3.1
Denmark 4.4 2.3 -8.2 10.5 8.0 0.2 2.1 1.9 2.1 1.5 2.7 3.1
Hungary 5.0 2.9 -8.1 11.5 7.7 -0.5 1.4 1.7 2.2 1.0 2.7 3.1
Poland 4.8 3.0 -8.0 10.4 7.3 0.1 1.2 1.8 2.3 0.6 2.6 3.1
Romania 4.4 2.5 -8.3 10.7 8.5 0.0 1.0 1.8 2.4 0.4 2.8 3.3
Sweden 4.4 2.6 -8.2 9.7 8.1 0.0 1.8 2.0 2.2 1.2 2.7 3.0
EU (b) 4.3 2.5 -8.5 10.7 7.8 0.1 1.5 1.8 2.2 1.1 2.7 3.1
United Kingdom 3.8 4.1 -7.8 9.8 7.6 0.7 2.6 2.0 2.1 2.5 3.0 3.2
Japan 5.0 -0.2 -8.4 12.6 5.1 1.2 3.2 1.9 2.2 3.3 3.2 3.3
United States 4.1 2.3 -8.9 10.3 7.3 1.6 2.1 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.7 3.0
(a) Imports of goods and services to the various markets (incl. EU-markets) weighted according to their share in country's exports of goods and services.
(b) Intra- and extra-EU trade.
Table 52: Export performance (a) (percentage change on preceding year, 2018-2026) 30.04.2025
Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
Forecast Forecast
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
Belgium -2.6 -0.4 2.9 4.8 -2.0 -7.0 -4.7 -3.6 -0.3 -2.6 -0.8 -0.5
Germany -1.8 -0.1 -1.5 -1.1 -4.1 -0.5 -2.6 -3.6 -1.1 -1.4 -1.5 -0.5
Estonia -2.3 2.0 2.3 10.3 -2.8 -8.0 -2.0 -0.1 -0.1 -0.8 0.1 0.0
Ireland 0.6 9.0 24.8 2.8 5.9 -6.3 9.2 -0.3 0.6 6.7 -1.4 0.8
Greece 4.9 2.5 -15.5 12.0 -2.9 1.0 -1.0 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.1
Spain -2.0 -0.1 -11.8 2.8 5.7 2.7 1.9 0.8 -0.1 2.8 0.2 -0.5
France -0.2 -0.5 -8.6 0.7 0.4 1.8 -0.5 -0.7 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.4
Italy -1.9 -1.0 -5.5 3.1 2.0 -0.4 -1.3 -0.9 -0.5 -1.2 -0.5 -0.2
Cyprus 2.0 5.6 10.6 14.8 18.9 -5.0 2.4 1.2 0.9 5.5 0.2 -0.9
Latvia -1.3 -4.3 6.1 -3.1 4.0 -4.9 -3.5 -0.7 -0.7 -3.2 -1.4 -0.8
Lithuania 1.4 6.9 7.0 5.0 5.0 -4.9 0.1 0.8 0.8 2.1 0.3 0.4
Luxembourg -0.3 3.8 12.8 1.0 -6.3 0.1 -0.5 1.6 1.1 0.9 1.7 0.8
Malta 8.4 4.7 16.2 -9.5 5.0 5.5 3.4 1.4 0.5 1.6 0.3 -0.4
Netherlands 1.0 0.0 5.4 -3.2 -3.2 0.0 -0.5 -0.8 -0.3 -0.6 -0.2 -0.5
Austria 0.5 1.2 -2.8 -1.0 2.2 -0.2 -5.5 -2.5 -0.2 -2.8 -0.4 -0.5
Portugal 0.5 1.3 -9.0 1.6 8.5 3.8 1.6 -0.3 0.6 2.6 0.3 0.1
Slovenia 1.6 1.9 -1.0 2.8 -2.1 -1.7 2.1 0.3 0.6 -0.2 0.2 0.2
Slovakia 0.3 -1.3 1.5 -0.6 -4.3 -0.6 -0.6 0.2 -0.6 1.5 1.0 0.7
Finland -2.7 4.7 -1.3 -4.7 -2.6 -0.4 -1.2 0.8 0.4 -1.4 0.4 -0.2
Euro area (b) -0.8 0.7 -0.3 0.7 -0.3 -0.9 -0.4 -1.4 -0.2 0.2 -0.5 -0.1
Bulgaria -3.1 1.1 -2.4 0.0 4.2 -0.5 -2.6 -0.6 -0.7 -0.9 0.0 -0.4
Czechia -1.3 -1.6 -0.8 -2.2 -2.0 3.5 0.8 -0.5 0.2 0.4 -0.3 -0.2
Denmark -0.8 2.0 1.9 -1.6 -0.9 9.3 5.4 3.6 0.4 3.2 -0.7 -0.6
Croatia -1.4 3.7 -16.5 18.1 16.7 -1.8 -0.6 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -0.1 -0.2
Hungary -0.1 2.5 2.2 -2.9 2.8 2.3 -4.3 -1.5 0.5 -2.7 -0.2 2.1
Poland 1.9 2.3 7.5 1.7 0.2 3.5 0.8 -0.2 0.1 0.3 -0.2 -0.1
Romania 0.8 2.8 -1.3 1.8 1.0 -0.7 -4.2 -0.1 0.4 -2.4 -0.6 -0.8
Sweden 0.1 4.3 2.9 2.0 -1.6 4.0 0.7 0.0 -0.3 0.6 -0.8 -0.2
EU (b) -0.7 0.9 0.2 0.6 -0.3 -0.1 -0.2 -1.1 -0.2 0.2 -0.5 -0.1
United Kingdom -0.7 -2.0 -4.3 -6.0 4.6 -0.7 -3.3 -1.5 -0.6 -3.8 -2.1 -1.9
Japan -1.2 -1.2 -3.5 -0.6 0.4 1.9 -2.1 -0.1 -0.9 -3.0 -0.7 -1.1
United States -1.3 -1.8 -4.7 -3.5 0.3 1.2 1.1 0.2 -0.4 1.2 0.2 0.1
(a) Index for exports of goods and services divided by an index for growth of markets.
(b) Intra- and extra-EU trade.
214
Statistical Annex
Table 53: World GDP, volume (percentage change on preceding year, 2020-2026) 30.04.2025
Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
Forecast Forecast
(a) 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
EU 14.3 -5.6 6.3 3.5 0.5 1.0 1.1 1.5 0.9 1.5 1.8
Euro area 11.6 -6.0 6.3 3.5 0.4 0.9 0.9 1.4 0.8 1.3 1.6
Belgium 0.4 -4.8 6.2 4.3 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.5
Bulgaria 0.1 -3.2 7.8 4.0 1.9 2.8 2.0 2.1 2.4 2.9 3.0
Czechia 0.3 -5.3 4.0 2.8 -0.1 1.1 1.9 2.1 1.0 2.4 2.7
Denmark 0.3 -1.8 7.4 1.5 2.5 3.7 3.6 2.0 2.4 2.5 1.8
Germany 3.1 -4.1 3.7 1.4 -0.3 -0.2 0.0 1.1 -0.1 0.7 1.3
Estonia 0.0 -2.9 7.2 0.1 -3.0 -0.3 1.1 2.3 -1.0 1.1 2.6
Ireland 0.4 7.2 16.3 8.6 -5.5 1.2 3.4 2.5 -0.5 4.0 3.6
Greece 0.2 -9.2 8.7 5.7 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.2
Spain 1.4 -10.9 6.7 6.2 2.7 3.2 2.6 2.0 3.0 2.3 2.1
France 2.2 -7.4 6.9 2.6 0.9 1.2 0.6 1.3 1.1 0.8 1.4
Croatia 0.1 -8.3 12.6 7.3 3.3 3.9 3.2 2.9 3.6 3.3 2.9
Italy 1.8 -8.9 8.9 4.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.7 1.0 1.2
Cyprus 0.0 -3.2 11.4 7.2 2.8 3.4 3.0 2.5 3.6 2.8 2.5
Latvia 0.0 -3.5 6.9 1.8 2.9 -0.4 0.5 2.0 0.0 1.0 2.1
Lithuania 0.1 0.0 6.4 2.5 0.3 2.8 2.8 3.1 2.2 3.0 3.0
Luxembourg 0.1 -0.5 6.9 -1.1 -0.7 1.0 1.7 2.0 1.2 2.3 2.2
Hungary 0.2 -4.3 7.2 4.3 -0.8 0.5 0.8 2.5 0.6 1.8 3.1
Malta 0.0 -3.4 13.3 4.3 6.8 6.0 4.1 4.0 5.0 4.3 4.3
Netherlands 0.7 -3.9 6.3 5.0 0.1 1.0 1.3 1.2 0.8 1.6 1.5
Austria 0.3 -6.3 4.8 5.3 -1.0 -1.2 -0.3 1.0 -0.6 1.0 1.4
Poland 1.0 -2.0 6.9 5.3 0.2 2.9 3.3 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.1
Portugal 0.3 -8.2 5.6 7.0 2.6 1.9 1.8 2.2 1.7 1.9 2.1
Romania 0.5 -3.7 5.5 4.0 2.4 0.8 1.4 2.2 1.4 2.5 2.9
Slovenia 0.1 -4.1 8.4 2.7 2.1 1.6 2.0 2.4 1.4 2.5 2.6
Slovakia 0.1 -2.6 5.7 0.4 2.2 2.1 1.5 1.4 2.2 2.3 2.5
Finland 0.2 -2.5 2.7 0.8 -0.9 -0.1 1.0 1.3 -0.3 1.5 1.6
Sweden 0.4 -2.0 5.9 1.5 -0.1 1.0 1.1 1.9 0.3 1.8 2.6
Candidate Countries 2.4 0.2 9.6 -1.4 5.0 3.3 2.7 3.7 3.2 3.2 4.3
- Albania 0.0 -3.3 9.0 4.8 3.9 4.0 3.6 3.5 3.8 3.6 3.5
- Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.0 -3.0 7.4 4.2 2.0 2.5 2.0 2.3 2.3 2.4 3.0
- Georgia 0.1 -6.3 10.6 11.0 7.8 9.4 6.0 5.2 8.5 5.8 5.3
- Moldova 0.0 -8.3 13.9 -4.6 1.2 0.1 0.9 2.8 2.6 3.8 4.2
- Montenegro 0.0 -15.3 13.0 6.4 6.3 3.0 3.0 3.2 3.9 4.2 3.0
- North Macedonia 0.0 -4.7 4.5 2.8 2.1 2.8 3.0 3.1 2.0 2.6 2.9
- Serbia 0.1 -1.0 7.9 2.6 3.8 3.9 3.2 3.8 3.9 4.2 4.3
- Türkiye 1.8 1.9 11.4 5.5 5.1 3.2 2.8 3.5 3.0 3.2 4.0
- Ukraine 0.3 -3.8 3.4 -28.8 5.5 2.9 2.0 4.7 3.5 2.8 5.9
Iceland 0.0 -6.9 5.0 9.0 5.6 0.5 1.7 2.7 1.1 2.5 2.4
Norway 0.3 -1.3 3.9 3.2 0.1 2.1 1.5 1.4 1.0 1.5 1.8
Switzerland 0.4 -2.1 5.6 3.0 0.7 1.3 0.8 1.5 1.8 1.5 2.0
Australia 1.0 -2.0 5.4 4.1 2.0 1.1 1.9 2.0 1.4 2.0 2.2
Canada 1.3 -5.0 6.0 4.2 1.5 1.5 1.2 1.3 1.2 2.0 2.1
Japan 3.3 -4.2 2.7 0.9 1.5 0.1 0.7 0.6 0.2 1.2 1.0
Korea 1.7 -0.7 4.6 2.7 1.4 2.0 1.1 1.5 2.3 2.1 2.5
United Kingdom 2.2 -10.3 8.6 4.8 0.4 1.1 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.4 1.4
United States 14.9 -2.2 6.1 2.5 2.9 2.8 1.6 1.6 2.7 2.1 2.2
Advanced economies 43.7 -3.8 6.2 2.8 1.8 1.9 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.1
Emerging and Developing Asia 35.6 -0.9 7.5 4.6 5.8 5.2 4.7 4.7 5.3 5.1 5.0
- China 19.5 2.3 8.6 3.1 5.4 5.0 4.1 4.0 4.9 4.6 4.4
- India 8.3 -5.8 9.7 7.6 9.2 6.5 6.4 6.4 7.2 6.9 6.7
- Indonesia 2.4 -2.1 3.7 5.3 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.2 5.1
Eastern Neighbourhood and Central Asia 1.1 -1.8 4.6 3.4 4.6 4.9 4.3 3.8 4.1 4.1 3.5
Russia 3.5 -2.7 5.9 -1.4 4.1 4.3 1.7 1.2 3.5 1.8 1.6
Latin America 7.3 -7.1 7.4 4.0 2.3 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.4 2.6
- Argentina 0.7 -9.9 10.4 5.3 -1.6 -1.7 5.0 3.4 -3.5 3.8 2.9
- Brazil 2.4 -3.3 4.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 2.0 1.5 3.1 2.3 2.4
- Mexico 1.7 -8.4 6.0 3.7 3.3 1.5 -0.6 0.5 1.4 1.4 2.2
MENA 5.5 -2.2 4.6 5.9 2.1 2.2 3.2 3.7 2.3 3.7 3.5
- Saudi Arabia 1.1 -3.6 5.1 7.5 -0.8 1.3 3.1 3.8 1.4 4.5 4.0
Sub-Saharan Africa 3.3 -2.0 4.3 3.6 2.5 2.9 3.7 4.1 2.9 4.1 4.5
- South Africa 0.5 -6.2 5.0 1.9 0.7 0.6 1.4 1.5 1.1 1.6 1.7
Emerging and Developing Economies 56.3 -2.1 6.8 4.2 4.6 4.3 3.9 4.0 4.3 4.4 4.3
World 100.0 -2.9 6.5 3.5 3.4 3.3 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.3 3.3
World excluding EU 85.6 -2.4 6.6 3.5 3.9 3.6 3.1 3.2 3.5 3.6 3.6
World excluding euro area 88.4 -2.4 6.6 3.5 3.8 3.6 3.1 3.2 3.5 3.6 3.6
(a) Relative weights in %, based on GDP (at constant prices and PPS) in 2024.
215
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Table 54: World exports of goods and services, volume (percentage change on preceding year, 2020-2026) 30.04.2025
Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
Forecast Forecast
(a) 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
EU (b) 31.1 -8.2 11.3 7.4 0.1 1.2 0.7 2.1 1.4 2.2 3.0
Euro area (20) (b) 25.7 -8.7 11.5 7.4 -0.8 1.1 0.3 2.0 1.5 2.2 3.0
Candidate Countries 1.7 -13.3 18.6 2.0 -2.0 1.9 1.7 4.7 2.9 3.8 5.6
- Albania 0.0 -27.7 52.1 17.0 9.5 -0.8 3.6 3.6 4.0 5.2 4.9
- Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.0 -14.8 25.4 11.8 -1.2 -3.1 2.4 2.8 0.0 3.3 3.4
- Georgia 0.1 -37.6 23.5 37.4 9.5 5.9 6.4 5.4 6.9 6.9 5.4
- Moldova 0.0 -14.9 17.5 29.7 4.8 -5.2 3.9 5.4 0.5 6.0 7.0
- Montenegro 0.0 -47.6 81.9 22.7 9.0 -3.2 -0.1 3.3 3.4 4.2 4.3
- North Macedonia 0.0 -10.9 14.3 10.6 -0.6 -3.8 2.8 3.9 2.6 3.0 3.1
- Serbia 0.1 -4.6 20.4 17.0 2.7 3.2 3.0 4.4 4.2 4.6 4.9
- Türkiye 1.2 -14.6 25.1 9.9 -2.8 0.9 1.2 3.9 2.0 3.2 5.1
- Ukraine 0.2 -5.8 -8.6 -42.0 -5.9 10.3 1.8 11.4 7.7 5.5 10.7
Iceland 0.0 -30.7 14.8 22.1 6.3 -1.2 2.0 2.8 1.2 3.9 3.8
Norway 0.7 -2.3 6.1 5.2 0.4 5.7 1.2 1.4 2.9 1.9 2.4
Switzerland 2.1 -5.2 13.7 6.1 0.7 -0.3 1.9 2.5 3.0 2.0 3.2
Australia 1.3 -9.6 -2.3 2.6 6.9 2.0 2.2 2.5 2.0 3.6 2.6
Canada 2.3 -9.0 3.3 4.2 4.9 1.1 -0.2 -0.8 1.1 1.2 1.2
Japan 2.9 -11.6 11.9 5.5 3.0 1.0 1.8 1.3 0.2 2.5 2.2
Korea 2.6 -1.7 10.8 3.9 3.6 6.9 1.4 2.0 6.6 1.8 3.4
United Kingdom 3.5 -11.8 3.2 12.6 -0.4 -1.2 0.4 1.5 -1.6 0.9 1.3
United States 10.1 -13.1 6.5 7.5 2.8 3.3 1.7 1.6 3.3 2.9 3.1
Advanced economies 65.6 -8.6 10.0 6.0 1.0 1.9 1.1 2.0 2.0 2.4 2.9
Emerging and Developing Asia 19.3 -5.0 18.8 2.5 1.5 8.1 2.2 2.0 6.5 4.3 3.6
- China 12.0 -3.2 18.5 -0.2 1.8 11.1 1.2 0.4 8.4 4.2 2.9
- India 2.6 -7.0 29.6 10.3 2.2 4.9 5.4 6.0 5.4 6.0 6.2
- Indonesia 1.0 -9.1 20.5 0.9 4.4 0.6 3.5 5.6 0.6 4.0 6.0
Easter Neighbourhood and Central Asia 0.8 -9.8 2.5 7.8 12.0 5.2 3.9 3.9 5.2 6.2 4.1
Russia 1.5 -4.2 3.2 -13.8 -11.0 3.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 3.5 2.5
Latin America 5.4 -9.4 7.7 7.6 -1.2 3.4 0.5 0.9 2.7 3.6 3.4
- Argentina 0.3 -12.8 12.6 -5.2 -13.4 19.4 4.6 3.5 18.9 3.7 4.3
- Brazil 1.2 -1.3 2.3 6.1 9.4 4.6 3.1 2.6 4.2 4.1 4.1
- Mexico 2.2 -7.0 7.1 9.5 -7.2 0.6 -3.0 -2.1 -0.7 3.2 2.8
MENA 6.0 -10.1 5.0 12.6 3.6 2.7 5.1 5.3 1.3 6.2 5.4
- Saudi Arabia 1.1 -14.5 5.7 24.5 -1.6 3.1 7.1 8.3 0.7 10.6 9.1
Sub-Saharan Africa 1.4 -10.1 -0.8 4.6 0.6 4.6 3.9 4.8 3.8 5.0 6.4
- South Africa 0.4 -12.0 9.7 6.8 3.7 2.3 1.3 1.9 2.3 3.7 3.9
Emerging and developing economies 34.4 -6.9 13.2 4.1 1.0 5.9 2.5 2.5 4.5 4.6 4.0
World 100.0 -8.1 11.1 5.3 1.0 3.3 1.6 2.2 2.9 3.1 3.3
World excluding EU 68.9 -8.0 10.9 4.4 1.4 4.2 2.0 2.2 3.5 3.5 3.4
World excluding euro area 74.3 -7.8 10.9 4.6 1.6 4.0 2.0 2.2 3.4 3.4 3.4
(a) Relative weights in %, based on exports of goods and services (at current prices and current exchange rates) in 2024.
(b) Intra- and extra-EU trade.
Table 55: Shares of main trading partners in goods export of EU and Member States (2023) 30.04.2025
EU Euro Area Candidate USA United Japan Other China Rest of Asia Russia MENA Latin Sub-
Countries Kingdom Advanced America Saharan
Economies Africa
EU 61.3 49.0 2.9 7.8 5.3 1.0 7.5 3.7 1.0 0.6 3.1 2.5 1.2
Euro area 59.3 47.8 2.6 8.5 5.6 1.1 7.9 4.0 1.1 0.6 3.2 2.6 1.3
Belgium 69.7 61.7 1.5 5.3 6.2 0.8 4.3 1.5 0.7 0.4 2.6 2.3 2.6
Bulgaria 64.3 45.1 13.6 2.8 1.6 0.2 3.2 2.8 0.8 0.9 5.7 0.7 0.6
Czechia 80.2 65.3 3.1 2.7 3.1 0.5 3.5 1.6 0.4 0.5 1.5 1.1 0.4
Denmark 57.7 38.4 1.6 8.4 5.2 1.6 10.9 4.2 1.5 0.3 2.5 3.4 0.8
Germany 55.0 38.6 2.8 9.7 5.2 1.3 9.6 6.2 1.3 0.7 2.4 2.9 0.9
Estonia 73.7 56.2 2.4 3.3 2.1 0.8 7.6 1.6 0.5 2.1 1.1 1.2 0.6
Ireland 39.6 36.4 0.6 28.2 9.9 2.1 5.6 5.5 2.1 0.3 1.6 2.0 0.5
Greece 52.3 39.2 10.9 3.9 3.8 1.0 4.0 1.1 1.4 0.3 12.7 1.4 1.3
Spain 62.4 55.9 2.8 5.3 5.9 1.0 5.1 2.1 0.8 0.4 5.6 5.1 1.3
France 53.6 46.9 2.4 7.9 6.7 1.3 9.8 4.9 1.4 0.6 4.8 2.4 1.8
Croatia 67.2 53.2 16.9 3.2 1.6 0.3 2.9 0.5 0.6 1.2 1.9 0.6 1.5
Italy 50.6 41.6 3.7 10.9 4.3 1.5 10.4 3.6 1.2 0.9 5.7 3.4 1.1
Cyprus 31.0 24.1 0.9 2.0 5.3 0.0 5.2 0.6 7.4 0.3 27.4 8.9 5.2
Latvia 66.0 50.6 3.8 2.7 4.8 0.3 4.1 1.1 0.4 6.0 1.2 0.7 4.1
Lithuania 63.3 44.6 5.1 5.1 4.0 0.3 5.3 0.4 0.6 3.3 2.3 1.1 2.2
Luxembourg 76.0 68.9 1.8 3.2 3.4 0.4 6.4 1.3 0.5 0.2 2.1 1.9 0.9
Hungary 75.7 58.5 5.1 4.9 2.8 0.7 3.2 2.0 0.5 0.7 1.3 1.7 0.3
Malta 39.7 34.5 1.1 3.1 2.7 3.3 14.9 5.8 1.0 0.2 4.3 2.3 20.3
Netherlands 71.3 60.9 1.2 4.7 6.8 0.5 5.6 2.4 0.6 0.3 1.8 1.7 1.4
Austria 68.3 53.5 2.2 7.6 2.6 0.9 8.5 2.9 0.8 0.6 1.6 2.1 0.6
Poland 74.9 59.5 4.7 3.4 4.9 0.3 3.6 1.1 0.4 0.9 1.6 1.4 0.8
Portugal 65.8 60.4 1.9 7.2 4.8 0.6 5.2 2.2 0.3 0.2 3.8 2.7 3.9
Romania 68.7 52.5 9.1 3.1 3.8 1.1 3.1 1.8 0.7 0.5 5.0 1.1 0.4
Slovenia 59.8 45.9 6.2 3.5 1.2 0.4 22.7 0.7 0.4 1.2 1.6 0.6 0.2
Slovakia 74.7 44.1 3.5 5.7 3.3 0.4 3.4 4.4 0.1 0.6 1.9 1.0 0.3
Finland 55.6 38.7 2.2 9.8 3.4 1.7 9.7 5.2 1.4 1.6 2.2 2.9 1.3
Sweden 55.8 42.6 1.8 9.0 5.1 1.2 13.2 4.2 0.9 0.6 2.7 2.6 1.0
216
Statistical Annex
Table 56: World imports of goods and services, volume (percentage change on preceding year, 2020-2026) 30.04.2025
Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
Forecast Forecast
(a) 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
EU (b) 29.4 -7.6 9.6 8.3 -1.3 0.6 1.7 2.3 0.2 2.6 3.0
Euro area (b) 24.2 -8.2 9.0 8.4 -1.4 0.3 1.6 2.2 0.0 2.5 3.0
Candidate Countries 1.9 0.6 7.0 5.1 9.0 -0.3 2.3 4.0 0.9 3.4 4.9
- Albania 0.0 -19.8 32.5 11.5 0.2 6.0 5.0 3.4 6.3 4.7 4.2
- Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.1 -13.4 20.6 6.2 -1.3 2.8 2.2 3.1 2.3 4.0 2.5
- Georgia 0.1 -16.6 8.8 16.9 10.0 8.5 7.4 5.8 9.6 6.2 5.0
- Moldova 0.0 -9.5 21.2 18.2 -5.1 5.1 6.0 5.3 1.7 3.4 3.8
- Montenegro 0.0 -20.1 13.7 21.3 5.9 5.5 4.4 4.0 3.5 4.4 4.0
- North Macedonia 0.0 -10.9 14.8 13.6 -5.8 -0.6 3.7 4.2 3.5 4.3 4.1
- Serbia 0.2 -4.0 17.7 16.2 -1.6 8.3 4.8 5.5 7.2 5.7 5.9
- Türkiye 1.2 6.8 1.7 8.6 11.8 -4.1 0.6 3.3 -2.2 2.3 4.7
- Ukraine 0.3 -6.4 14.2 -17.4 8.9 7.7 5.5 6.0 7.3 5.8 5.8
Iceland 0.0 -20.6 20.5 20.1 -1.0 2.7 4.2 1.4 2.7 2.9 3.1
Norway 0.5 -9.9 1.8 13.3 -1.5 3.7 2.0 2.5 1.3 2.6 3.4
Switzerland 1.9 -3.2 5.8 5.8 2.7 0.4 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.3 3.1
Australia 1.3 -12.0 5.3 13.7 6.8 4.8 1.9 2.8 4.8 2.2 3.0
Canada 2.4 -9.4 8.3 7.5 0.4 0.6 -0.6 -0.8 0.6 1.1 1.1
Japan 3.1 -6.8 5.2 8.3 -1.5 1.3 1.6 1.3 0.0 2.7 2.2
Korea 2.5 -3.3 10.2 4.2 3.5 2.4 1.7 2.1 2.5 2.8 2.4
United Kingdom 3.8 -15.9 5.8 13.0 -1.2 2.7 1.6 1.5 0.9 0.6 1.5
United States 13.4 -9.0 14.7 8.6 -1.2 5.3 1.4 -0.3 5.6 3.3 2.9
Advanced economies 66.7 -7.8 10.2 7.4 -0.5 2.1 1.7 1.9 1.9 2.6 2.9
Emerging and Developing Asia 18.4 -9.0 14.1 1.3 5.0 3.7 2.2 3.3 3.9 4.0 3.9
- China 10.6 -7.4 11.1 -3.0 6.3 3.3 0.4 1.9 3.3 3.0 3.0
- India 3.0 -12.6 22.1 8.9 13.8 5.9 6.6 6.4 7.1 7.6 6.2
- Indonesia 0.9 -14.5 14.2 8.3 -3.1 4.8 4.5 5.7 4.8 5.4 6.1
Eastern Neighbourhood and Central Asia 0.8 -16.9 -2.9 8.9 23.8 5.8 3.2 3.8 5.6 5.0 3.8
Russia 1.3 -11.9 19.1 -14.3 13.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 -0.5 3.7 2.3
Latin America 5.7 -12.3 18.5 7.1 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.6 1.3 3.3 3.3
- Argentina 0.3 -10.3 29.7 12.7 5.8 -12.9 6.9 4.1 -15.3 6.7 4.1
- Brazil 1.2 -8.5 16.7 0.7 0.8 2.9 2.5 1.9 1.4 2.6 2.5
- Mexico 2.3 -12.0 15.7 8.6 3.7 2.0 -1.6 -0.6 2.6 2.1 2.8
MENA 5.7 -15.5 7.4 11.6 6.4 3.0 3.1 3.7 3.0 4.1 4.0
- Saudi Arabia 1.1 -16.6 5.0 10.6 15.2 7.6 4.4 5.5 5.2 8.2 5.6
Sub-Saharan Africa 1.5 -11.6 -0.4 9.6 -2.8 5.0 4.2 5.2 4.1 5.8 6.5
- South Africa 0.4 -17.6 9.6 15.0 3.9 3.8 2.8 3.0 2.8 4.3 4.6
Emerging and Developing Economies 33.3 -11.1 12.9 3.6 4.9 3.2 2.2 3.1 3.2 4.0 3.9
World 100.0 -8.8 11.0 6.2 1.3 2.4 1.9 2.3 2.3 3.1 3.2
World excluding EU 70.6 -9.4 11.7 5.2 2.4 3.2 2.0 2.2 3.2 3.3 3.3
World excluding euro area 75.8 -9.1 11.7 5.4 2.2 3.1 2.0 2.3 3.1 3.3 3.3
(a) Relative weights in %, based on imports of goods and services (at current prices and current exchange rates) in 2024.
(b) Intra- and extra-EU trade.
Table 57: Shares of main trading partners in goods imports of EU and member states (2023) 30.04.2025
EU Euro Area Candidate USA United Japan Other China Rest of Asia Russia MENA Latin Sub-
Countries Kingdom Advanced America Saharan
Economies Africa
EU 61.7 49.2 2.4 5.2 3.0 1.1 7.0 7.5 2.0 1.5 3.0 1.8 1.3
Euro area 60.1 48.2 2.1 5.8 3.3 1.1 7.1 7.5 2.1 1.5 3.4 2.0 1.5
Belgium 62.5 56.3 1.1 7.1 3.9 1.6 6.8 6.1 1.7 1.0 2.4 1.9 1.6
Bulgaria 62.4 43.3 13.8 1.0 0.9 0.3 2.7 5.2 1.0 5.9 1.6 2.0 0.6
Czechia 74.8 57.8 2.2 1.9 1.3 1.1 3.4 9.9 1.6 1.2 0.3 0.4 0.2
Denmark 65.8 46.8 1.3 4.3 2.4 0.5 12.2 6.4 1.9 0.9 0.4 1.8 0.3
Germany 65.6 45.9 2.2 5.2 2.5 1.3 8.2 6.8 2.2 0.8 1.4 1.4 0.9
Estonia 77.9 59.0 1.2 1.3 1.2 0.6 2.7 3.6 0.6 7.8 0.4 0.4 0.6
Ireland 39.9 35.7 0.7 14.6 23.1 1.4 7.1 5.2 1.6 0.2 0.8 1.3 0.4
Greece 47.9 38.5 5.5 1.9 1.4 0.4 3.5 11.1 0.9 4.1 13.1 1.6 0.9
Spain 56.1 48.9 2.8 5.5 2.5 0.8 3.9 8.5 2.4 0.7 6.3 4.9 2.8
France 65.2 57.5 1.5 5.8 3.5 0.8 6.0 5.5 1.5 0.8 4.7 1.1 1.6
Croatia 73.7 58.1 8.4 2.5 0.4 0.2 1.6 4.4 0.5 1.9 0.9 0.7 1.5
Italy 56.2 46.9 3.0 4.3 1.7 0.9 6.3 7.4 1.9 1.8 7.5 1.7 1.4
Cyprus 60.9 55.0 2.7 1.2 7.1 4.1 4.6 6.4 1.4 0.4 2.7 2.2 0.3
Latvia 73.4 56.6 2.4 2.2 1.3 0.1 4.0 3.4 1.4 7.3 0.3 1.1 0.5
Lithuania 67.3 45.7 2.4 6.1 1.9 0.2 6.1 3.9 0.6 5.7 3.3 0.4 0.2
Luxembourg 85.2 80.7 0.9 5.2 1.6 1.7 2.5 1.2 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.3
Hungary 72.0 55.2 3.8 1.8 1.0 1.2 7.2 7.2 1.4 2.7 0.3 0.4 0.1
Malta 42.5 40.5 5.1 2.3 3.1 1.0 11.9 7.4 1.0 5.2 15.5 1.8 0.2
Netherlands 41.8 35.2 1.1 9.8 4.3 1.6 9.1 13.6 3.9 2.3 2.4 3.8 2.8
Austria 77.8 63.9 2.2 2.5 1.0 0.7 6.8 2.8 1.6 1.8 1.1 0.3 0.1
Poland 66.5 54.4 3.0 2.8 1.7 0.9 6.2 9.1 1.6 2.3 2.9 1.2 0.4
Portugal 73.6 68.3 1.5 2.1 1.3 0.5 3.7 5.0 1.0 0.5 2.2 4.1 2.6
Romania 71.2 50.7 9.5 1.0 1.0 0.4 2.5 5.6 0.7 1.0 2.1 0.6 0.2
Slovenia 49.7 40.9 7.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 22.7 12.1 0.8 0.2 1.9 0.9 0.2
Slovakia 80.4 42.8 2.6 0.5 1.2 0.1 4.4 4.0 1.6 4.0 0.5 0.1 0.0
Finland 67.4 42.6 1.0 3.5 1.9 0.5 10.3 4.2 0.9 7.1 0.4 1.8 0.2
Sweden 68.7 54.0 1.2 4.0 3.2 0.8 11.9 5.2 1.6 0.2 0.7 0.9 0.7
217
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Table 58: World merchandise trade balances (fob-fob, in billions of US dollar, 2019-2026) 30.04.2025
Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
Forecast Forecast
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
EU 396.5 452.0 386.1 4.8 387.6 497.4 533.9 562.7 530.5 530.4 539.8
1)
EU, adjusted 333.6 396.5 317.5 -132.2 293.9 415.8 449.9 477.1 365.5 367.0 375.0
Euro area 379.9 414.9 383.8 51.8 343.4 449.7 471.8 499.0 480.1 485.2 494.9
Euro area, adjusted1) 351.7 390.2 345.4 -48.0 284.9 402.5 423.2 449.5 352.2 358.0 366.2
Candidate Countries -57.1 -67.7 -65.0 -140.8 -151.0 -126.7 -136.9 -157.7 -136.3 -163.7 -186.5
- Albania -3.5 -3.4 -4.5 -4.5 -4.9 -6.0 -6.7 -7.3 -5.9 -6.4 -6.9
- Bosnia and Herzegovina -4.6 -3.7 -4.3 -5.5 -5.7 -6.5 -6.9 -7.4 -6.2 -6.6 -6.8
- Georgia -3.8 -3.2 -3.8 -5.1 -6.1 -6.5 -7.2 -8.2 -6.3 -6.9 -7.5
- Moldova -3.3 -3.1 -4.2 -5.2 -4.9 -5.6 -6.4 -7.1 -5.1 -5.2 -5.3
- Montenegro -2.3 -1.9 -2.3 -2.8 -3.2 -3.5 -3.9 -4.2 -3.5 -3.7 -3.9
- North Macedonia -2.2 -2.1 -2.8 -3.7 -2.8 -3.3 -3.8 -4.1 -3.2 -3.5 -3.9
- Serbia -6.3 -5.8 -6.7 -9.5 -6.9 -8.5 -10.1 -11.8 -8.0 -9.1 -10.3
- Türkiye -16.8 -37.9 -29.7 -90.0 -87.4 -56.2 -57.4 -71.4 -66.5 -85.0 -103.0
- Ukraine -14.3 -6.7 -6.6 -14.7 -29.2 -30.4 -34.4 -36.3 -31.6 -37.3 -38.8
- Iceland -0.8 -0.6 -1.0 -1.5 -2.1 -2.3 -2.8 -3.0 -2.4 -2.7 -2.8
- Norway 16.3 -1.0 72.4 166.9 78.1 70.9 71.5 73.3 81.5 82.8 85.7
- Switzerland 71.4 63.4 116.1 120.7 124.8 126.2 129.7 134.9 124.4 132.7 139.6
Australia 47.6 39.8 86.1 112.2 83.7 45.2 44.8 43.1 81.5 84.4 84.1
Canada -14.2 -30.3 3.0 16.7 -0.5 -5.0 -16.4 -17.0 7.0 8.4 9.2
Japan 1.4 26.0 16.0 -118.3 -46.3 -25.8 -36.5 -40.7 -31.1 -37.7 -42.7
Korea 79.8 80.6 75.7 15.6 37.7 100.1 97.6 89.5 69.8 62.9 71.9
United -185.0 -164.3 -223.1 -254.8 -259.3 -288.9 -315.2 -327.3 -255.7 -265.5 -272.6
Kingdom
United States -871.9 -883.4 -1092.4 -1191.9 -1074.2 -1201.9 -1212.3 -1185.3 -1201.5 -1254.0 -1296.0
Advanced economies -381.6 -310.9 -418.0 -1054.8 -592.3 -569.1 -625.8 -639.0 -491.1 -565.8 -614.3
Emerging and Developing Asia 260.0 501.3 448.4 473.0 418.0 554.3 416.2 295.0 372.9 342.9 328.5
- China 393.0 511.1 562.7 665.0 593.9 767.9 663.0 567.2 581.5 577.5 572.0
- India -157.5 -102.2 -189.5 -265.3 -244.9 -269.5 -283.3 -298.0 -261.1 -282.0 -291.7
- Indonesia 3.5 28.3 43.8 62.7 46.3 39.9 35.4 37.7 37.8 37.7 41.9
Eastern Neighbourhood and Central Asia 16.8 -0.7 25.8 50.9 7.8 4.7 0.1 0.4 8.8 9.2 9.0
Russia 165.9 92.7 192.6 309.2 121.9 133.3 126.1 116.9 121.6 114.9 124.9
Latin America 22.8 75.9 20.7 -23.4 42.0 26.4 -6.3 -23.9 46.6 34.9 24.0
- Argentina 18.2 14.6 18.7 12.4 -2.9 22.4 21.6 21.1 19.1 17.5 17.5
- Brazil 29.6 35.7 42.3 51.5 92.3 65.8 56.1 54.9 85.8 86.5 85.1
- Mexico 5.2 34.2 -10.7 -27.1 -5.5 -8.2 -23.7 -33.2 -13.7 -13.8 -14.5
MENA 234.8 70.8 302.0 546.0 310.2 212.2 169.6 148.3 225.3 206.3 183.6
- Saudi Arabia 121.3 47.9 136.5 235.3 128.2 90.5 83.7 80.5 105.9 108.5 100.1
Sub-Saharan Africa 5.7 -3.5 34.4 30.9 12.5 20.7 20.9 16.9 12.0 6.3 1.8
- South Africa 2.5 17.7 30.7 13.9 5.6 11.8 11.9 11.4 3.8 2.1 0.1
Emerging and Developing Economies 706.0 736.5 1024.0 1386.6 912.3 951.6 726.6 553.5 787.2 714.4 672.0
World 324.4 425.6 606.0 331.8 320.0 382.5 100.8 -85.5 -234.5 -381.8 -482.1
World excluding EU -72.1 -26.5 219.9 327.0 -67.5 -115.0 -433.1 -648.1 -234.5 -381.8 -482.1
World excluding euro area -55.5 10.7 222.1 280.0 -23.4 -67.3 -371.0 -584.5 -184.0 -336.5 -437.2
1) See note 8 on concepts and sources.
218
Statistical Annex
Table 59: World current-account balances (in billions of US dollar, 2019-2026) 30.04.2025
Spring 2025 Autumn 2024
Forecast Forecast
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2024 2025 2026
EU 445.5 371.8 565.9 143.1 484.9 616.2 615.0 650.0 697.8 681.7 698.7
EU, adjusted 1) 385.9 350.0 498.9 20.5 353.5 534.1 530.6 564.0 492.8 481.2 495.6
Euro area 410.0 313.7 529.9 150.6 405.8 539.5 523.8 555.2 619.3 610.2 625.6
1)
Euro area, adjusted 324.6 242.2 406.2 -15.4 263.0 461.0 443.0 472.9 413.1 407.1 420.3
Candidate Countries2) -1.6 -34.5 -18.8 -49.3 -57.6 -39.1 -55.0 -64.2 -45.6 -69.8 -76.7
- Albania -1.2 -1.3 -1.4 -1.1 -0.3 -0.7 -0.7 -0.8 -0.9 -1.0 -1.0
- Bosnia and Herzegovina -0.5 -0.6 -0.3 -1.1 -0.6 -1.1 -1.1 -1.1 -0.8 -1.0 -1.1
- Georgia -1.1 -2.0 -1.9 -1.1 -1.7 -1.5 -1.7 -2.1 -1.4 -1.4 -1.4
- Moldova -0.9 -0.6 -1.3 -2.4 -1.9 -2.9 -3.1 -3.4 -1.9 -1.9 -1.8
- Montenegro -0.8 -1.2 -0.5 -0.8 -0.8 -1.4 -1.6 -1.7 -1.0 -1.1 -1.2
- North Macedonia -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.8 0.1 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4 -0.4
- Serbia -3.6 -2.3 -2.7 -4.4 -2.1 -5.6 -6.0 -6.3 -4.5 -5.2 -5.3
- Türkiye 11.1 -31.2 -6.4 -45.6 -40.4 -10.0 -12.4 -20.3 -18.2 -27.5 -32.6
- Ukraine -4.2 5.1 -3.8 8.0 -9.8 -15.5 -27.9 -28.2 -16.4 -30.4 -31.8
Iceland 1.6 0.4 -0.5 -0.5 0.3 -1.1 -1.5 -1.7 -0.8 -0.7 -1.0
Norway 15.5 4.1 66.8 175.3 80.2 82.7 76.1 74.7 86.5 88.3 92.1
Switzerland 24.7 -0.5 49.9 71.2 51.2 47.5 47.3 53.5 72.1 70.8 75.5
Australia -0.2 25.0 40.2 5.5 -5.4 -34.3 -30.8 -34.3 -5.7 4.4 1.1
Canada -34.0 -33.3 -0.4 -6.3 -13.8 -11.4 -20.2 -20.9 -3.9 -5.2 -6.4
Japan 176.7 149.8 195.5 87.2 160.9 193.1 190.6 191.5 177.9 188.4 199.4
Korea 59.7 75.9 85.2 25.8 32.8 99.0 88.0 80.0 60.6 54.5 61.6
United Kingdom -76.6 -79.2 -13.7 -65.5 -118.2 -96.8 -100.6 -104.0 -84.8 -87.0 -90.8
United States -447.3 -572.9 -879.4 -1020.9 -915.9 -1087.6 -1089.7 -1060.3 -1028.4 -1011.3 -1027.4
Advanced economies 305.2 87.6 323.9 -425.3 -90.5 14.6 -65.6 -50.2 141.5 146.9 158.0
Emerging and Developing Asia 105.8 331.8 302.9 369.6 259.3 412.9 286.2 184.4 200.2 186.6 156.6
- China 102.9 248.8 352.9 443.4 253.0 422.0 317.4 232.9 212.6 212.2 212.3
- India -25.1 27.0 -39.9 -64.6 -20.1 -31.2 -40.3 -48.0 -41.1 -47.2 -51.0
- Indonesia -30.3 -4.4 3.5 13.2 -2.0 -8.9 -14.1 -12.9 -12.5 -15.3 -13.2
Easter Neighbourhood and Central Asia -8.1 -12.8 6.3 31.7 -12.6 -5.1 -8.8 -10.4 -7.7 -7.6 -5.9
Russia 65.7 35.4 124.9 235.8 49.4 62.3 42.3 24.7 59.7 54.9 64.2
Latin America -103.6 -7.3 -89.4 -129.9 -75.6 -75.1 -99.6 -119.2 -68.6 -82.2 -91.7
- Argentina -3.5 2.7 6.6 -4.1 -21.0 6.3 2.1 0.8 4.7 3.3 2.9
- Brazil -65.0 -24.9 -40.4 -42.2 -27.9 -61.2 -58.6 -59.4 -38.3 -40.2 -45.3
- Mexico -3.9 26.9 -4.6 -17.7 -5.6 -6.0 -22.2 -32.5 -13.6 -15.6 -17.3
MENA 89.2 -45.4 163.5 437.6 228.0 137.8 100.6 104.1 130.0 92.6 94.9
- Saudi Arabia 38.5 -25.5 40.5 150.4 35.1 -7.1 -11.5 -10.5 6.6 -19.2 -22.1
Sub-Saharan Africa -44.8 -31.1 -3.3 -23.1 -25.7 -19.3 -20.7 -28.6 -28.2 -39.9 -55.0
- South Africa -10.2 6.8 15.7 -1.9 -6.1 -2.5 -3.5 -4.9 -7.3 -8.9 -10.8
Emerging and Developing Economies 104.2 270.6 505.0 921.7 422.8 513.5 299.9 155.1 285.5 204.5 163.1
World 409.4 358.2 828.9 496.4 332.3 528.2 234.3 104.9 427.0 351.4 321.1
World excluding EU -36.1 -13.5 263.0 353.3 -152.6 -88.1 -380.7 -545.1 -270.8 -330.3 -377.6
World excluding euro area -0.6 44.6 299.0 345.7 -73.5 -11.4 -289.4 -450.2 -192.3 -258.8 -304.5
1) See note 8 on concepts and sources.
2) Data are not fully comparable to the previous forecast for the Candidate Countries, because its composition changed. Georgia was not included in the group of candidate countries in Autumn 2023 Forecast.
219
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
1. The directorate general for economic and financial affairs (DG ECFIN) Typically, intra-EU imports are underestimated compared to intra-EU
produces, under its own responsibility, short-term fully-fledged economic exports, leading to an overestimation of the surplus. For the past the
forecasts in Spring and Autumn. These forecasts cover the principal "adjusted" balances are Eurostat estimates for EU and ECB estimates for the
macroeconomic aggregates for the Member States, the candidate euro area. For the future, they are ECFIN's forecasts based on the
countries, the European Union as a whole, the euro area and the extrapolation of the discrepancies observed in 2022.
international environment.
2. Data for 2024 are based on outturns as far as available at the cut-off date 9. EU and euro area aggregates for general government debt are published
of this forecast. Data for 2025 and 2026 are forecasts. The source for all on a non-consolidated basis (i.e. not corrected for intergovernmental
tables is the European Commission, unless otherwise stated. Historical data loans, including those made through the European Financial Stability
for the Member States are based on the European System of Accounts Facility).
(ESA 2010). US national accounts are based on SNA 2008, whilst the
Japanese accounts use SNA 1993. Due to differences in revision schedules 10. Quarterly EU and euro-area GDP growth rates are aggregated using
of annual and quarterly national accounts, annual and quarterly figures estimates for all Member States, including unpublished quarterly forecasts
may not be fully consistent for some Member States. In order to avoid for IE, EL, CY, MT, PL and RO.
population census induced breaks in series and/or to treat Ukrainian
refugees under temporary protection consistently across Member States, 11 Net expenditure growth, table 39. See Box I.1.1
historical data for the population of working age of CZ, DE, EL, FI, SE, PL
and SK differ from published demographics data.
12 Geographical zones are defined as follows :
Euro area :
EA20 (BE, DE, EE, IE, EL, ES, FR, HR, IT, CY, LV, LT, LU, MT, NL, AT, PT,
3. Tables 5 and 6 on domestic demand and final demand respectively, SI, SK, and FI)
present data including inventories. European Union :
EU (EA20, BG, CZ, DK, HU, PL, RO, and SE).
4. In Tables 17a and 18, the data are based on the national index for the Candidate countries :
United Kingdom, USA and Japan. Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, Moldova,
Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia, Türkiye and Ukraine
5. The potential output gap is calculated with reference to potential output Advanced economies :
as estimated via a production function, where the increase in the capital EU, United Kingdom, candidate countries, Iceland, Norway,
stock and the difference between actual unemployment and the NAWRU Switzerland, Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, New
play a key role. Zealand, Singapore, Taiwan and the United States.
Emerging and developing Asia:
6. Employment data used in tables 25-29 are based on numbers of persons. All countries in that region except the ones included in the
For the EU and EA as well as for countries for which employment was Advanced economies and the Asian MENA countries.
previously reported in full-time equivalents (ES, FR, NL, IT and US), these
tables are now based on employment in persons, limiting the Latin America :
comparability to figures published before Autumn 2023. All countries in that region.
MENA (Middle East and Northern Africa) :
7. Source: National Accounts (ESA 2010), except for US current-account in Algeria, Tunisia, Morocco, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Lybia,
tables 48, 50, and 59 (Balance of Payments). Discrepancies with balance Iraq, Iran, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Oman, United Arab
of payments statistics may arise due to methodological differences and Emirates, Kuwait, and Qatar.
revision schedules.
Sub-Saharan Africa :
8. EU and euro-area data are aggregated using exchange rates. World GDP All countries in that region except the African MENA countries.
is aggregated using Purchasing Power Standards (PPS). In the tables on
world trade and international payments, the aggregation is carried out on
the basis of current exchange rates. Tables 47 - 50 and 58-59 show also EU Eastern Neighbourhood and Central Asia:
and euro-area "adjusted" balances. Theoretically, balances of EU and euro Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan,
area vis-à-vis third countries should be identical to the sum of the balances Turkmenistan.
of the individual countries in the EU or the euro area. However, intra-EU or
intra-euro-area balances are non-zero because of reporting errors. The
creation of the internal market in 1993 reduced border controls and
formalities, and accordingly the scope and precision of intra-EU trade
coverage.
220
Statistical Annex
221
PREVIOUS EUROPEAN ECONOMIC FORECASTS
223
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
Taking into account the key role of natural capital for economic activity Spring 2024
China's impressive rise and its structural slowdown ahead: implications for the May 2024
global economy and the EU
Convergence of new Member States on the 20th anniversary of the 2004
enlargement
Survey on investment – March/April 2024
Fiscal stance: gauging the impact of fiscal policy on aggregate demand
A forecast that is tailored to, and evolves with, the needs of macroeconomic
surveillance
Impact of the Red Sea on the EU economic outlook Winter 2024
EU non-financial corporations in a challenging economic environment February 2024
Household savings and wealth in the euro area – implications for private
consumption
Food inflation in the euro area – what were the driving forces behind the
extraordinary surge in 2022-2023?
A cooling housing market amid mortgage rate increases Autumn 2023
Persistent labour market tightness during a slowdown: a reappraisal of drivers November 2023
Effects of extreme weather events on national accounts and the European
Economic forecasts
Spillover effects to the EU from a potential sharp slowdown in China
Decomposition of inflation
Potential economic repercussions of wider tensions in the Middle East: A stylised
model-based scenario
Insights from the Commission’s consumer survey: how is inflation shaping Summer 2023
consumer confidence and spending. September 2023
Medium-term projections of potential GDP growth in turbulent times Spring 2023
The new candidate countries included in the forecast May 2023
European gas market: recent developments and outlook
Recent developments in bankruptcy declarations in the EU
Profit margins and their role in euro area inflation
Which Factors Shape Growth and Inflation Going Forward? Model-Based Insights
into the Spring Forecast
Global trade fragmentation risks Winter 2023
Selling price expectations and core inflation – insights from the Commission’s February 2023
business surveys
Commodity-driven inflation: Macro effects and risks Autumn 2022
Can the EU labour market withstand a slowdown in economic activity? November 2022
The effect of rising energy and consumer prices on household finances, material
deprivation and energy poverty in the EU
Future prices in forecast assumptions
Household wealth and savings in the euro area – the effect of inflation
Exchange rate pass-through to euro-area consumer price inflation
224
Previous European Economic Forecasts
225
European Economic Forecast, Spring 2025
226
EUROPEAN ECONOMY INSTITUTIONAL PAPERS SERIES
European Economy Institutional Papers series can be accessed and downloaded free of charge from the
following address: Publications (europa.eu).
.
Titles published before July 2015 can be accessed and downloaded free of charge from:
• http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/index_en.htm
(the main reports, e.g. Economic Forecasts)
• http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/occasional_paper/index_en.htm
(the Occasional Papers)
• http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/qr_euro_area/index_en.htm
(the Quarterly Reports on the Euro Area)
GETTING IN TOUCH WITH THE EU
In person
All over the European Union there are hundreds of Europe Direct Information Centres. You can find the
address of the centre nearest you at: http://europa.eu/contact.
Online
Information about the European Union in all the official languages of the EU is available on the Europa
website at: http://europa.eu.
EU Publications
You can download or order free and priced EU publications from EU Bookshop at:
http://publications.europa.eu/bookshop. Multiple copies of free publications may be obtained by contacting
Europe Direct or your local information centre (see http://europa.eu/contact).