Kumar
Kumar
www.springerlink.com/content/1738-494x
                                                                                                                    DOI 10.1007/s12206-014-0637-x
(Manuscript Received October 6, 2013; Revised January 16, 2014; Accepted February 27, 2014)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract
   In the present study, electric discharge machining process was used for machining of titanium alloys. Eight process parameters were
varied during the process. Experimental results showed that current and pulse-on-time significantly affected the performance characteris-
tics. Artificial neural network coupled with Taguchi approach was applied for optimization and prediction of surface roughness. The
experimental results and the predicted results showed good agreement. SEM was used to investigate the surface integrity. Analysis for
migration of different chemical elements and formation of compounds on the surface was performed using EDS and XRD pattern. The
results showed that high discharge energy caused surface defects such as cracks, craters, thick recast layer, micro pores, pin holes, resid-
ual stresses and debris. Also, migration of chemical elements both from electrode and dielectric media were observed during EDS analy-
sis. Presence of carbon was seen on the machined surface. XRD results showed formation of titanium carbide compound which precipi-
tated on the machined surface.
Keywords: Electric discharge machining (EDM); Titanium; Machining; Taguchi; ANOVA; Surface roughness (SR); Artificial neural network (ANN)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EDM of Ti-6Al-4V alloy to study the effect of different ma-              heating based on laminated plate theory in combination with
chining parameters on tool wear and surface roughness. The               Finite Element Method. Sidhu et al. [27] implemented ANN
results show that electrode wear ratio reduced up to 27% and             model to predict the residual stresses during EDM of an Alu-
smoother surface finish was obtained. Venugopal et al. [10]              minum metal matrix composite. Rahman [28] utilized radial
studied the effect of uncoated carbide inserts under dry, wet            basis function neural network to develop ANN model for
and cryogenic cooling environments while turning Ti-6Al-4V               MRR, TWR and SR during EDM of TI-6Al-4V and observed
alloy, and observed that cryogenic cooling by jet liquid nitro-          a good agreement with the experimental results. Kao et al.
gen showed substantial improvement in tool life.                         [29] used Taguchi technique with grey relational analysis for
                                                                         optimization of parameters for multiple performance charac-
                                                                         teristics in EDM of TI-6Al-4V. A detailed literature review as
2. Literature review
                                                                         described above show that optimization of process parameters
   In the past few decades, various modeling tools correlating           using ANN technique can be successfully implemented for
the input variables and surface finish have been developed.              predicting machining performance.
Soni and Chakraverti [11] developed the general mathematical                There have been several other studies reporting the machin-
model for the selected process variables during EDM of tita-             ing efficiency of Ti with EDM. Tan et al. [30] reported an
nium, and observed higher surface roughness when rotating                improvement in surface roughness by mixing SiC and Al2O3
electrode was used. Jain and Jain [12] optimized the machin-             nano-powders with dielectric during micro-EDM process.
ing parameters for abrasive flow machining using neural net-             Yadav and Yadvaa [31] investigated the improvement in sur-
work model. Wang et al. [13] and Bharti et al. [14] developed            face roughness of metal matrix composites using diamond
and applied a hybrid ANN with genetic algorism (GA) meth-                grinding along with EDM process. Yan et al. [32] reported
odology for modeling and optimization of input parameters                that by adding the urea solution in water, surface roughness of
for MRR and SR in EDM. Kao and Tarng [15] applied the                    titanium deteriorated when peak current increased. Jabbari-
feed-forward neural network in EDM to establish the relation-            pour et al. [33] carried out the experiments on Ti-6Al-4V at
ship for inter electrode gap signal and pulse. Fenggou and               different values of pulse current and pulse-on-time to explore
Dayong [16] proposed a method to automatically determine                 their effects on surface topography and recast layer. Hascalik
and optimize the input parameters in EDM with the applica-               and Caydas [34] achieved the EDMed damaged free surface
tion of ANN. Cao and Zhang [17] conducted experiments on                 on Ti-6Al-4V alloy using the abrasive electrochemical grind-
explosive electric discharge grinding and optimized the results          ing process with EDM and reported that surface roughness has
using genetic algorithm approach with neural network. Tzeng              the tendency to increase with increase in the current density
and Chen [18] used fuzzy logic technique coupled with Ta-                and the pulse-duration. The machining performance of tita-
guchi methodology to optimize the process parameters. Assar-             nium and its alloys can be improved by cryogenic treatment of
zadeh and Ghoreishi [19] developed a back propagation neural             the workpiece and/or electrode. This technique improves the
network (BPNN) model to assess the MRR and surface                       physical, mechanical, and thermal properties of the materials
roughness during EDM using current, pulse period, and source             such as metals, alloys, plastics and composites [35, 8].
voltage. Markopoulos et al. [20] used ANN models for pre-                   A comprehensive literature review of machining of Ti and
dicting surface roughness in EDM of different grade of steels.           its alloys with EDM show no or minimal work has been done
Fonda et al. [21] used response surface methodology to find              to examine the effect of shallow and deep cryogenic treatment
the best optimal solution for metal removal rate, electrode              on titanium alloys as well as tool-electrodes. The present study
wear ratio, gap size and surface finish. The effect of the               has been completed to explore the effect of cryogenic treat-
thermo-electrical properties of workpiece material titanium              ment of different grades of titanium alloys and the electrode
alloy Ti-6Al-4V was investigated during EDM. Rao et al. [22]             on surface roughness during EDM. Cryogenic treatment re-
developed hybrid model using ANN and GA techniques for                   quires very slow cooling of materials (@1°C/min) from room
optimizing the SR of different materials Ti6Al4V, HE15,                  temperature to the temperature of liquid nitrogen (LN2), fol-
15CDV6 and M-250. Rahman et al. [23] developed a mathe-                  lowed by soaking for a suitable time and heated back to the
matical model to establish the effect of process parameters              room temperature. The cooling rate, heating rate and soak
(peak current, pulse on time, pulse off time) using copper-              time are important parameters in cryogenic processing which
tungsten electrode during EDM of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Patowari               may alter the properties of the parts. Also, manganese (Mn)
et al. [24] utilized the ANN model for the surface modification          and tungsten (W) powder was mixed with the dielectric fluid
using tungsten-copper powder metallurgy sintered electrodes              to study their effect on surface roughness and their impact in
in EDM. Tzeng and Chen [25] applied a hybrid method                      improving the finish or material removal rate has not been
(BPNN, GA, and RSM) to determine optimal input parameter                 studied in the literature. The effect of input parameters such as
settings for EDM on MRR, relative electrode wear ratio                   pulse-on-time (Ton), peak current (A), pulse-off-time (Toff),
(REWR), SR and purposed that genetic algorism methodology                and cryogenic treatment on surface roughness has been stud-
predict better. Nguyen et al. [26] used feed-forward ANN                 ied. In order to predict and generalize the results for surface
model to predict the positions and sizes of induction triangle           roughness, artificial neural network (ANN) has been used.
                               S. Kumar et al. / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 28 (7) (2014) 2831~2844                          2833
(a) (b)
                (c)                               (d)                       Fig. 2(a). Further, in the same pattern the temperature is lower
Fig. 1. Experimental setup for EDM of titanium alloys: (a) EDM ma-          down to -184°C with cooling rate 1°C/min for DCT. This
chine; (b) fabricated set up for PMEDM; (c) dialing of electrode; (d)       temperature was maintained in the cryo- processor for 24
EDM using side flushing.                                                    hours and then, temperature raise up to room temperature
                                                                            gradually with 1°C/min. Moreover, tempering of materials
                                                                            was carried out at temperature 150°C with a heating rate of
3. Detailed description of the experimental methodology
                                                                            1°C/min and soaked at this temperature for two hours; subse-
3.1 Experimental setup                                                      quently it is brought back to room temperature for relieve the
                                                                            developed stresses, as shown in Fig. 2(b). Tempering is re-
   The experiments were performed on die- sinking CNC
                                                                            quired only for titanium and its alloys, not for copper and its
EDM machine (OSCAR MAX S 645) as shown in Fig. 1(a).
                                                                            alloys.
A separate small metal container of 09 liter capacity was fab-
ricated using 03 mm thick mild steel sheet for mixing of pow-               3.2 Material used in the experiments
der and was attached with a motorized stirrer for proper blend-
ing and to avoid settling of powder particles at the bottom of                 Three grades of titanium alloy were used as work material
the tank as well as between the workpiece and electrode as                  in this study: (i) Ti alloy, ASTM grade II, TITAN 15 (99.83%
shown in Fig. 1(b). Manganese and tungsten two powder were                  Ti, 0.015%C, 0.106%O, 0.0052%N, 0.0005H, 0.04Fe), (ii)
suspended in EDM oil with a concentration of 10g/liter.                     Ti-5Al-2.5Sn titanium alloy, ASTM grade VI, TITAN 21
Ferrolac 3M EDM oil with a flash point of 100°C, break down                 (91.8%Ti, 0.013%C, 0.0689%O, 0.0033%N, 0.00145%H,
voltage 70 KV (rms) was used as the dielectric fluid for the                0.025%Fe, 5.32%Al, 2.76%Sn) and (iii) Ti-6Al-4V titanium
experimentation. Fig. 1(c) shows the dialing of electrode and               alloy, ASTM grade V, TITAN 31 (89.60% Ti, 0.012%C,
Fig. 1(d) shows EDM in dielectric fluid without powder using                0.01744%O, 0.0032%N, 0.0035%H, 0.07%Fe, 6.19%Al,
side flushing.                                                              4.04%V). Three different types of electrode material with
   Cryogenic-treatment was applied on both workpiece and                    diameter 18 mm and length 40 mm were used namely (i) cop-
tool-electrode at low temperature, to enhance the properties of             per (99.5%Cu, 0.175%Zn, 0.0837%Fe); (ii) copper-
materials by reliving the residual stresses, promotes a more                chromium (99.2%Cu, 0.605Cr, 0.0294%Fe) and (iii) cop-
uniform micro-structure and precipitates the eta- carbides in               per-tungsten (29.27%Cu, 68.1%W, 0.46%Fe).
steels for increased resistant to wear. In present study, two
types of cryogenic- treatment is applied such as; shallow
                                                                            3.3 Experimental design and data analysis
cryogenic treatment (SCT) and deep cryogenic treatment
(DCT).                                                                         Based on the available information from the literature and a
   The workpiece and electrode materials were cryogenically                 pilot study, total of eight machining parameters with their
treated at-110°C for SCT and -184°C for DCT by passing                      levels were identified for the present study. One factor pulse-
liquid nitrogen. Cooling rate and heating rate is the important             off-time varied at two levels and the remaining factors (i) peak
issue which directly influenced the properties of cryogenically             current, (ii) pulse-on-time, (iii) dielectric fluid, (iv) electrode
treated materials. In SCT material is cooled down from room                 material, (v) cryo-treatment of electrode material, (vi) work-
temperature with cooling rate 1°C/min to -110°C and hold                    piece material and (vii) cryo-treatment of workpiece material
(soaked) at this temperature for 6 hours and then heated back               were varied at three levels each to understand their impact on
to room temperature slowly at the rate of1°C/min, as shown in               the surface roughness. The selected factors, their symbols and
2834                             S. Kumar et al. / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 28 (7) (2014) 2831~2844
their levels are listed in Table 1. Taguchi’s technique was used              3.3.2 Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
to select orthogonal array for assignment of different levels of                 The analysis of variance was used to breakdown total vari-
factors for experimentation [38]. The degree of freedom of                    ability of the experimental observed results into various com-
selected factors are 15, hence L18 mixed-level orthogonal ar-                 ponents of variance, to further assess their significance. The
rays (21×37) was identified as the most appropriate array for                 total variation observed in the experimental results is the sum
the present study. MINITAB statistical software, version 16                   of variance due to the different controlled input parameters
was used for assigning factors to the array. The L18 mixed-                   and their interactions and variation due to experimental error.
level orthogonal arrays (21×37) contains 18 experimental runs                 Furthermore, information can be obtained about the controlled
at various combinations of input parameters. The assignment                   parameters that how much individual parameter is significant
of actual parameter values with trial run conditions is shown                 which affects the response characteristics. The ANOVA for
in Table 5. For performing the experimentation, positive po-                  S/N data and raw data was performed to identify the signifi-
larity was applied to the electrode and negative to the work                  cant parameters by comparing the calculated F-ratio value
material. Throughout the experimentation, side flushing with a                with tabulated F-ratio (F0.05f1f2) value at 95% confidence level
pressure of 0.5 kg/cm2 was used.                                              (see Table 3). Those parameters are called significant if the
                                                                              calculated F-ratio grater than the tabulated F-ratio (F0.05f1f2).
3.3.1 Screening procedure                                                     The current was observed to be the most significant parameter
   Taguchi’s screening procedure was used to identify the sig-                with contribution 54.38% followed by pulse-on-time with
nificant parameters. Different methods are available for meas-                18% affecting surface roughness. Pulse-on-time is the time
uring the surface roughness values of the machined work-                      which indicates the time period for which energy is supplied
pieces. After, the experimentation, all the machined samples                  to the machining zone. The pulse-off-time shows their impact
were cleaned with acetone solution. The surface roughness of                  on surface roughness with percent contribution of 8.74%.
all the samples were measured with MITUTOYO Surface                           During this period machining cycle is completed. However, if
Roughness Tester (Model: Surftest SJ-400) at a cut of length                  the off-time is too short, the ejected workpiece material will
of 0.8 mm. All the experiments were repeated three times to                   not be swept away by the flow of the dielectric fluid and it will
minimize the effect of random error, which occurs due to the                  affect the surface finish. The types of workpiece material and
effect of noise and uncontrollable factors. During the present                electrode material also influence the surface texture. Here,
study, surface roughness values in terms of arithmetic average                work material affects the surface roughness with 7.59% and
deviation of the assessed profile (Ra), root mean square devia-               electrode material with 4.38%. The other parameters such as
tion of the assessed profile (Rq) and average maximum height                  powder mixed dielectric fluid, cryogenic treatment of elec-
of the profile (Rz) was measured for machined samples after                   trode material contributes approximately 3% each. The indi-
each trial. However, the analysis has been done using the                     vidual influence of all the process parameters and their signifi-
arithmetic average roughness expressed in terms of Ra ex-                     cance is shown in Table 3 for S/N data and raw data.
pressed in microns. The three values of surface roughness
R1,R2 and R3 for Ra are shown in Table 2. Standard deviation                  3.3.3 Assessment of the main effects
of the three roughness readings after each of the 18 experi-                     The main effect of the parameters on surface roughness was
ments was calculated with the help of MINITAB 16 and is                       studied by the level average response analysis of raw data and
given in Table 2. The variance and reliability coefficient                    S/N data. The analysis was carried out by considering the
(Cronbach Alpha = 0.891) was calculated using SPSS. Since,                    average of SR (raw data) and S/N ratios for each parameter at
surface roughness is a “smaller the better” response, the sig-                levels 1, 2 and 3 as shown in Table 4. The obtained values
nal-to-noise ratio (S/N ratio) was also calculated using                      were plotted in graphical form. The main effects of raw data
MINITAB and the results are given in Table 2. R1, R2, and                     and the S/N ratio (dB) of surface roughness for each parame-
R3 shows repetition of the experiments.                                       ter are shown in Figs. 3(a)-(h). The average of response levels
                                  S. Kumar et al. / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 28 (7) (2014) 2831~2844                                         2835
   Trial           Surface roughness (Rz)            Surface roughness (Rq)                     Surface roughness (Ra)                            Std.     S/N ratios
   No.                                                                                                                                            Dev.       (dB)
               R1           R2          R3          R1         R2          R3          R1              R2             R3           Avg.
    1         22.4         23.6        25.5        4.52        4.72       5.66        3.60           3.70           4.53           3.94           0.511     -11.96
    2         32.3         29.8        27.1        7.27        7.03       5.64        5.53           5.71           4.46           5.23           0.676     -14.42
    3         25.4         27.5        24.8        5.93        6.35       5.85        4.82           5.07           4.79           4.89           0.154     -13.79
    4         24.4         26.0        31.7        5.59        4.86       6.35        4.60           3.67           4.86           4.38           0.626     -12.88
    5         40.9         40.8        43.4        10.55       9.92       9.73        8.52           7.96           7.44           7.97           0.540     -18.05
    6         31.4         28.2        43.1        7.93        6.16       11.46       6.33           4.79           9.42           6.85           2.358     -17.04
    7         35.9         38.5        40.7        8.72        9.83       9.13        7.02           8.19           7.28           7.49           0.614     -17.52
    8         29.9         38.3        30.4        6.58        8.40       7.08        5.19           6.62           5.66           5.82           0.729     -15.35
    9         46.27        43.0        44.0        11.52       10.7       11.07       9.52           8.84           9.12           9.16           0.342     -19.24
    10        26.6         27.3        19.8        4.95        5.66       3.80        3.66           4.37           3.01           3.68           0.680     -11.41
    11        22.0         23.8        24.4        4.90        4.78       5.66        3.97           3.76           4.61           4.11           0.443     -12.32
    12        27.2         26.9        28.7        5.21        5.69       5.96        4.13           4.36           4.43           4.31           0.157     -12.69
    13        26.0         24.1        30.9        6.78        4.37       7.08        4.90           3.30           5.60           4.60           1.179     -13.44
    14        37.4         31.3        34.4        7.93        7.31       7.27        6.14           5.93           5.54           5.87           0.304     -15.38
    15        40.4         27.7        26.5        9.17        6.61       6.66        7.21           5.36           5.50           6.02           1.031     -15.68
    16        31.2         28.1        30.7        6.91        6.62       6.94        5.42           5.48           5.54           5.48           0.060     -14.77
    17        34.8         40.6        31.3        8.17        9.18       6.99        6.38           7.20           5.68           6.42           0.761     -16.19
    18        37.0         41.0        33.1        9.13        9.20       7.27        7.59           7.18           5.66           6.81           1.017     -16.73
help in studying the trend of the performance characteristic                     craters on the surface, which deteriorates the surface finish.
with respect to the variation of the selected factors.                           Similarly, pulse-on-time affects the SR. Longer on time re-
   Fig. 3(a) shows that surface roughness improves as pulse-                     duces the surface finish because energy is applied for longer
off-time increased from 30 μs to 45 μs because debris particles                  time. At short pulse-on-time better surface finish is produced
flushed away from the gap with pressurized dielectric. Fig.                      as shown in Fig. 3(c). Fig. 3(d) explores the effect of powders
3(b) shows the trend of peak current. The curve shows that as                    on the surface finish. Tungsten powder mixed dielectric im-
current increases, surface roughness also increases. The mini-                   proves the surface finish as compared to manganese powder
mum surface roughness is observed at 6A current and maxi-                        mixed dielectric. The electrode material copper-tungsten pro-
mum at 14A current. At higher current 14A more energy is                         duced the poorer surface finish than copper, where copper-
applied to the machining zone resulted in larger and deeper                      chromium improves the surface finish as shown in Fig. 3(e).
2836                             S. Kumar et al. / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 28 (7) (2014) 2831~2844
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
(e) (f)
(g) (h)
The alloy Ti-6Al-4V gives the better surface finish than other                condition of input process parameters is (A2B1C1D3E2F1G3H3).
two grades of titanium alloy as shown in Fig. 3(g). The effect
of cryogenic treatment of work material and electrode material
                                                                              4. Artificial neural network (ANN)
is less on the surface finish as presented in Figs. 3(f) and (h).
   From Figs. 3(a)-(h) and Table 4 it was observed that the                     ANN is a flexible modeling tool which has the capabilities
second level of pulse-off-time (45 μs), first level of current                of learning the mapping between the input parameters and the
(6A), first level of pulse-on-time (90 μs), third level of dielec-            output characteristics to solve non- linear problems using a
tric fluid (mixed with tungsten powder), second level of elec-                software computing technique. An artificial neural network
trode material (Cu-Cr), first level of cryogenic treatment of                 based multi layered algorithm is used for the validation of
electrode material i.e. without cryo-treatment (WCT), third                   surface roughness. The ANN validation has been developed
level of work material (Ti-6Al-4V) and third level of work                    using the neural network tool box of Matlab 7.12.0 software.
material’s cryogenic treatment i.e. deep cryo-treatment (DCT)                 A multilayer feed-forward network was used, where as back
gives the best value of surface roughness. Hence, the optimum                 propagation algorithm was used to train the network [22, 24,
                               S. Kumar et al. / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 28 (7) (2014) 2831~2844                        2837
Table 4. Response table for mean and S/N values of parameters for SR.
                                     Average value
 Process parameters      Levels                        S/N Ratio (dB)
                                         (Ra)
                           1              6.19             -15.58
  Pulse-off-time (A)
                           2              5.25             -14.29
                                                                            Fig. 4. A multi-layer tansig-purelin network with eight input neurons,
                           1              4.36             -12.77
                                                                            one output neuron, and one hidden layer of twenty neurons.
   Peak current (B)        2              5.95             -15.41
                           3              6.86             -16.63
                           1              4.93             -13.67
  Pulse-on-time (C)        2              5.91             -15.28
                           3              6.34             -15.86
                           1              5.67             -14.71
 Dielectric fluid (D)      2              6.07             -15.47
                           3              5.43             -14.63
                           1              5.85             -15.16
 Electrode materials
                           2              5.21             -14.30
         (E)
                           3              6.12             -15.36
                           1              5.32             -14.45
 Cryogenics of elec-
 trode materials (F)       2              5.85             -15.01
                           3              5.99             -15.36           Fig. 5. Configuration of the FFBP neural network model for the EDM
                                                                            process on response SR.
                           1              6.12             -15.35
 Workpiece materials
                           2              5.95             -15.38
        (G)
                           3              5.10             -14.09
                                                                            during training such that the difference between the sampled
                           1              5.71             -14.86
 Cryogenics of work                                                         outputs and target is kept low. The adjustments are computed
    materials (H)          2              5.91             -15.21           by the propagation algorithm. The network has been trained
                           3              5.56             -14.74           using Lavenberg-Marquardt algorithm, i.e. trainlm algorithm
                                                                            of neural network tool box of Matlab 7.12.0 software. The
                                                                            error goal and learning rate was set to be 0.001 and 0.1, re-
28]. A total of 18 experiments with two repetitions were per-               spectively. The transfer functions which were preferred are
formed to measure change in surface roughness due to vari-                  tansig and purelin in hidden and output layer respectively.
able level setting of the eight input process parameters. Thus,                The transfer function tansig is mathematically equivalent to
54 (18x3) experiments were performed for this study. Table 5                hyperbolic tangent (tanh) sigmoid transfer function, where as
shows the experimental conditions, actual experimental result,              purelin is a linear transfer function. Tansig runs faster than the
ANN predicted results and % relative error between experi-                  MATLAB® implementation of tanh, but the results can have
mental and ANN predicted results for all the 54 observations.               very small numerical differences. This function is a good
Out of these 54 observations, 38 (which are roughly 70% of                  tradeoff for neural networks, where speed is important and the
the total number of data sets) were taken for training purpose,             exact shape of the transfer function is not. Trainlm is a net-
another 08 (about 15%) were taken for validation and the re-                work training function that updates weight and bias values
maining 08 (15%) were taken for testing. The generated data                 according to Levenberg-Marquardt optimization. Trainlm is
was preferred for testing as well training of neural network for            often the fastest back propagation algorithm in the toolbox,
feed-forward back propagation (FFBP) algorithm. The feed-                   and is highly recommended as a first-choice supervised algo-
forward back propagation algorithm consists of eight input                  rithm, although it does require more memory than other algo-
layer, twenty hidden layer and one output layer (SR). A two                 rithms. The tansig and purelin transfer functions shown by
layer transig - purelin neural network with eight input neurons,            Eqs. (1) and (2) calculate their output as follows [24,
one output neuron, and a single hidden layer of twenty neu-                 MATLAB, 7.12.0 software]:
rons was used as shown in Fig. 5 for prediction of surface
roughness.                                                                                          2
   The neural network architecture used in this study is a feed-                transig (n) =                -1                                (1)
                                                                                                1 + exp-2n
forward back propagation network is shown in Fig. 4. The
FFBP propagation algorithm considers gradient decent                           purelin (n) = n                                                 (2)
method for learning and to train the ANN process. The ANN
method automatically adjusts its threshold and weights values               where n is input to the function.
2838                            S. Kumar et al. / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 28 (7) (2014) 2831~2844
Table 5. Experimental conditions and results of experimental and ANN predicted for surface roughness.
                                                                                                                             ANN
                                                                         Cryogenic      Work        Cryogenic      Exp.
  Exp.   Pulse-off-    Peak     Pulse-on-   Dielectric    Electrode                                                        Predicted   % Relative
                                                                         treatment      Piece        treatment     Value
  N0.      time       current     time        fluid       material                                                          Value        Error
                                                                        of electrode   material    of workpiece    (Ra)
                                                                                                                             (Ra)
    1       30           6         90           oil          Cu            WCT          Ti15          WCT           3.60    3.6028       -0.825
    2       30           6        120        oil+Mn         CuCr           SCT          Ti 21         SCT           5.53    5.5618       -0.116
    3       30           6        150        oil+W          CuW            DCT          Ti 31         DCT           4.82    4.8092       -0.753
    4       30          10         90           oil         CuCr           SCT          Ti 31         DCT           4.60    4.6020       -0.182
    5       30          10        120        oil+Mn         CuW            DCT          Ti15          WCT           8.52    8.5383       0.328
    6       30          10        150        oil+W           Cu            WCT          Ti 21         SCT           6.33    6.2950       0.202
    7       30          14         90           oil          Cu            DCT          Ti 21         DCT           7.02    6.9695       2.217
    8       30          14        120        oil+Mn         CuCr           WCT          Ti 31         WCT           5.19    5.1623       -0.401
    9       30          14        150           oil         CuW            SCT          Ti15          SCT           9.52    9.5327       -0.552
   10       45           6         90        oil+W          CuW            SCT          Ti 21         WCT           3.66    3.6734       0.615
   11       45           6        120           oil          Cu            DCT          Ti 31         SCT           3.97    3.9712       -0.591
   12       45           6        150        oil+Mn         CuCr           WCT          Ti15          DCT           4.13    4.1250       0.033
   13       45          10         90        oil+Mn         CuW            WCT          Ti 31         SCT           4.90    4.9093       0.041
   14       45          10        120        oil+W           Cu            SCT          Ti15          DCT           6.14    6.1619       0.726
   15       45          10        150           oil         CuCr           DCT          Ti 21         WCT           7.21    7.2917       -0.259
   16       45          14         90        oil+W          CuCr           DCT          Ti15          SCT           5.42    5.4099       0.447
   17       45          14        120           oil         CuW            WCT          Ti 21         DCT           6.38    6.3729       -0.267
   18       45          14        150        oil+Mn          Cu            SCT          Ti 31         WCT           7.59    7.6526       -0.716
   19       30           6         90           oil          Cu            WCT          Ti15          WCT           3.70    3.7043       -0.286
   20       30           6        120        oil+Mn         CuCr           SCT          Ti 21         SCT           5.71    5.7530       -0.421
   21       30           6        150        oil+W          CuW            DCT          Ti 31         DCT           5.07    5.0792       0.915
   22       30          10         90           oil         CuCr           SCT          Ti 31         DCT           3.67    3.6579       0.264
   23       30          10        120        oil+Mn         CuW            DCT          Ti15          WCT           7.96    7.9439       -0.395
   24       30          10        150        oil+W           Cu            WCT          Ti 21         SCT           4.79    4.6838       0.456
   25       30          14         90           oil          Cu            DCT          Ti 21         DCT           8.19    8.2228       -2.346
   26       30          14        120        oil+Mn         CuCr           WCT          Ti 31         WCT           6.62    6.6565       0.208
   27       30          14        150           oil         CuW            SCT          Ti15          SCT           8.84    8.7856       -0.120
   28       45           6         90        oil+W          CuW            SCT          Ti 21         WCT           4.37    4.3958       0.292
   29       45           6        120           oil          Cu            DCT          Ti 31         SCT           3.76    3.7588       -0.018
   30       45           6        150        oil+Mn         CuCr           WCT          Ti15          DCT           4.36    4.3582       -0.316
   31       45          10         90        oil+Mn         CuW            WCT          Ti 31         SCT           3.30    3.2760       0.006
   32       45          10        120        oil+W           Cu            SCT          Ti15          DCT           5.93    5.9454       -1.286
   33       45          10        150           oil         CuCr           DCT          Ti 21         WCT           5.36    5.3360       0.049
   34       45          14         90        oil+W          CuCr           DCT          Ti15          SCT           5.48    5.4946       0.251
   35       45          14        120           oil         CuW            WCT          Ti 21         DCT           7.20    7.2516       -0.340
   36       45          14        150        oil+Mn          Cu            SCT          Ti 31         WCT           7.18    7.2005       0.458
   37       30           6         90           oil          Cu            WCT          Ti15          WCT           4.53    4.5491       0.866
   38       30           6        120        oil+Mn         CuCr           SCT          Ti 21         SCT           4.46    4.4192       -0.825
   39       30           6        150        oil+W          CuW            DCT          Ti 31         DCT           4.79    4.7773       -0.116
   40       30          10         90           oil         CuCr           SCT          Ti 31         DCT           4.86    4.8792       -0.753
   41       30          10        120        oil+Mn         CuW            DCT          Ti15          WCT           7.44    7.4061       -0.182
   42       30          10        150        oil+W           Cu            WCT          Ti 21         SCT           9.42    9.6409       0.328
   43       30          14         90           oil          Cu            DCT          Ti 21         DCT           7.28    7.2649       0.202
   44       30          14        120        oil+Mn         CuCr           WCT          Ti 31         WCT           5.66    5.6668       2.217
   45       30          14        150           oil         CuW            SCT          Ti15          SCT           9.12    9.1196       -0.401
   46       45           6         90        oil+W          CuW            SCT          Ti 21         WCT           3.01    3.0105       -0.552
   47       45           6        120           oil          Cu            DCT          Ti 31         SCT           4.61    4.6246       0.615
   48       45           6        150        oil+Mn         CuCr           WCT          Ti15          DCT           4.43    4.4297       -0.591
   49       45          10         90        oil+Mn         CuW            WCT          Ti 31         SCT           5.60    5.6720       0.033
   50       45          10        120        oil+W           Cu            SCT          Ti15          DCT           5.54    5.5373       0.041
   51       45          10        150           oil         CuCr           DCT          Ti 21         WCT           5.50    5.4862       0.726
   52       45          14         90        oil+W          CuCr           DCT          Ti15          SCT           5.54    5.5588       -0.259
   53       45          14        120           oil         CuW            WCT          Ti 21         DCT           5.68    5.6540       0.447
   54       45          14        150        oil+Mn          Cu            SCT          Ti 31         WCT           5.66    5.6109       -0.267
                                    S. Kumar et al. / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 28 (7) (2014) 2831~2844                                           2839
Table 6. Mean square error and regression error for results of training, validation and testing.
Table 7. Correlation between the experimental value and ANN predicted value.
         Variables              No. of exp. (N)              Mean          Standard deviation Standard error mean              Correlation            Significance
    Experimental value                 54                    5.7250                1.6422                   0.2235                1.00                     0.000
   ANN predicted value                 54                    5.7306                1.6557                   0.2253
Table 8. Paired sample t- test for experimental value and ANN model value.
                                                                        Paired differences
          Pair
                                                                      Standard error        95% confidence interval of the difference        t-test       Significance
        (N = 54)              Mean        Standard deviation
                                                                          mean                 Lower                 Upper
Experimental and ANN
                             -0.0056            0.0439                   0.00598              -0.01759               0.00638              -0.938             0.353
   predicted value
   The comparison of the experimental results and the pre-                               Fig. 6. Performance result of FFBP algorithm developed for model of
dicted results by the FFBP neural network for surface rough-                             surface roughness.
ness is illustrated in Fig. 7 which shows a good agreement
between the experimental results and the ANN predicted re-
sults for SR. From the Table 5, it is clear that the maximum
error is -2.346% for trial number 25, minimum is 0.006 % for
trial number 31 and overall mean of % relative error is 0.502.
Fig. 8 shows the convergence or gradient of mean square error
(MSE) for surface roughness with the number of epochs dur-
ing training of the selected network. In addition, for analyzing
the capabilities of the network, a linear regression between the
network response and the experimental target value was per-
formed. For the present case, the entire data of SR was put
through for training, validation and testing to perform the re-
gression analysis. The obtained regression results are been
presented separately for the output, which are shown in Fig. 9.
The correlation coefficients (R) are 0.89 for training, 0.95 for
validation, 0.94 for testing and 0.89 for overall in simulating
the Ra. The network can be considered more accurate and                                  Fig. 7. Comparison between the experimental results and the neural
powerful from statistical point of view if the value of correla-                         network predicted results.
2840                           S. Kumar et al. / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 28 (7) (2014) 2831~2844
                                                                                                          6000
                     5000         TiC                                                                                         TiC
                                        TiC                                                               5000
                     4000                     TiC                                                                       TiC
                                                                                                          4000     Al2Ti4C
                                                                                                 Counts
                     3000                                                                                                                 TiC
            Counts
formation of white recast layer on the machined surface dur-                         in yield stresses which results in formation of cracks [1]. Figs.
ing the cooling period thus degrading the SR [36, 37]. The                           10(a) and 11(a) show cracks developed on the machined sur-
formation of craters of smaller and larger dimensions, recast                        face. In addition to that, machining at 14A current along with
layer and un-flushed debris particles are clearly visible in the                     pulse-on-time 150 μs, the width of the surface cracks in-
Fig. 10(a) which makes the surface finish poorer. On the other                       creased (see Fig. 10(a)) as compared to 6A current and 90 μs.
hand, machining with low current gives a better surface finish
because of the low discharge energy in the machining zone.
                                                                                     5.2 Chemical composition analysis by EDS
The machined surface with minimum Ra value 3.68 μm for
trial number 10 (Table 2) of L18 array was machined at current                          The EDS analysis was performed to provide information
6A, pulse-on 90 μs, pulse-off 45 μs, and WCT Ti-5-2.5 alloy                          about the constituents of the machined surface. The EDS
with SCT Cu-W electrode in the presence of suspended tung-                           analysis shows the presence of various elements on the work
sten powder in dielectric. Due to low discharge energy (cur-                         materials, because of the elements that migrate from the elec-
rent and pulse-on-time) smaller size of craters were formed on                       trode materials as well as from dielectric media. Presence of
the surface, which resulted in improved surface finish (refer                        the different elements is represented by peaks on the EDS
Fig. 11(a)).                                                                         spectra. Thus, high peaks represent the higher values of that
   During the EDM process, heat energy is applied in the form                        particular element present in the spectrum. Fig. 10(b) presents
of bombardment of electrons between the gaps for each and                            the EDS spectrum of machined Ti titanium and shows the
every discharge pulse. Due to this mechanism, temperature                            presence of different chemical elements such as carbon (C),
goes very high usually within the range of 8000°C to 12000°C                         titanium (Ti), copper (Cu) and tungsten (W). In this case, Ti
at the closet point between the two electrodes. This high tem-                       element is the base material, Cu and W elements migrated
perature is responsible for developing the thermal / residual                        from the Cu-W electrode. Carbon transferred from the dielec-
stresses at the machined surface during the EDM process.                             tric fluid after its decomposition into chemical components
Further, when the magnitude of these developed stresses ex-                          due to high temperature. As FERROLAC 3M EDM dielectric
ceeds the ultimate tensile strength of the workpiece materials,                      oil is hydrocarbon composition, thus after decomposition car-
cracks areformed on the surface. The continuous heating and                          bon precipitated on the surface and is responsible for the for-
cooling of the machined surface contributes in rapid increase                        mation of titanium carbide compound on the machined sur-
2842                        S. Kumar et al. / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 28 (7) (2014) 2831~2844
face. In another case, when WCT Ti-5Al-2.5Sn alloy was                   The other phases of aluminum titanium carbide (Al2Ti4C2)
machined with SCT copper-tungsten electrode in the presence              were also observed at the different 2θ position. The maximum
of tungsten powder, different elements were observed on the              count of Al2Ti4C2 was obtained 18.164 at 2θ position 53. 580.
surface. Peaks of titanium (Ti), aluminum (Al), Tin (Sn), car-           The number of counts of Al2Ti4C2 was very less as compared
bon (C) and tungsten (W) were noticed on the surface. Migra-             to TiC. Further, some other chemical compound also observed
tion of small amount of Cu, from the tool material and W                 such as tin titanium carbide (SnTi2C), tin titanium tungsten
from electrode as well as tungsten powder mixed dielectric               oxide (Sn2TiWO7), copper titanium oxide (Cu2TiO3), gallium
was also noticed. Large percentage of carbon migrated from               titanium carbide (Ga2Ti4C2), titanium zinc carbide (Zn2Ti4C),
the dielectric fluid was observed. Fig. 11(b) shows the EDS              rutile (TiO2) and titanium oxide (TiO). Due to their very low
spectra of machined Ti-5-2.5 alloy.                                      weightage, these compounds are not shown in the XRD pat-
   The duration for which element remain in molten state de-             tern.
pends on the temperature of the elements. The higher meting                 The various phases and compounds discussed above were
temperature elements remain for longer time as compared to               formed on the machined surface due to interaction with the
the lower melting temperature element in molten state. There-            parent metal elements of workpiece and dielectric fluid with-
fore, it is clear that element of lower range of melting tem-            out powder or with suspended powder particles.
perature solidify first [11]. All these elements which are ob-
served in EDS analysis contribute to formation of different
                                                                         6. Conclusions
types of compounds. The major compound titanium carbide
(TiC) was formed on the machined surface due to the large                   In the present study, the objective function was to study the
amount of transferred carbon from EDM oil dielectric [34].               surface characteristics of three types of cryogenically treated
Further, the developed layer of hard and brittle TiC required            titanium alloys. A total of eight factors were considered for
more dicharge energy to melt it, because melting temperature             studying their impact on surface roughness. A combination of
of TiC is very high. Hence, it is responsible for low machining          optimum input parameters (A2B1C1D3E2F1G3H3) for minimiz-
efficiency with degradation of surface finish.                           ing surface roughness were identified using Taguchi approach.
                                                                         ANOVA analysis has been conducted to know the impact of
                                                                         each parameter on SR. Peak current was the most significant
5.3 Analysis using X-ray diffraction (XRD)
                                                                         factor followed by pulse-on- time and pulse-off -time and
   X-Ray Diffraction analyses were conducted on the ma-                  workpiece material. The contribution of dielectric fluid (Mn
chined workpiece surface to find out the chemical compounds              and W powder), electrode material and their cryogenic treat-
precisely. The XRD analysis was performed between 2θ range               ment was observed as less significant. The effect of cryogenic
of 20.0084 to 119.9854 with step size (2θ) 0.0170 and scan               treatment of workpiece material was found to be negligible.
time 20.9550 sec using Cu K-Alpha anode material on 10 mm                The structural design of neural network was selected, trained,
specimen length. The outcome of XRD analysis (experiment                 validated, tested and then used for simulation to optimize the
9) for machined SCT Ti grade II alloy surface is presented in            surface roughness. Experimental results and ANN predicted
Fig. 10(c). Due to the penetration of carbon on the machined             results showed good agreement. The maximum percentage
Ti surface, major formation of titanium carbide (TiC) was                relative error of 2.346% and a minimum of 0.006% were ob-
noticed on the workpiece surface. The pattern shows the                  tained. Surface topography analysis was carried out using
phases of TiC at position-2 theta values 36.100, 41.891,                 SEM, EDS and XRD on two grades of titanium material. The
60.626, 72.521, 76.286, 90.911, 101.843 and 105.605. The                 SEM pictures show that high discharge energy was responsi-
highest peak of titanium carbide with maximum counts 4490                ble for the surface defects such as; surface or thermal cracks,
was observed at 2θ values 41.891 (Cu K-alpha). The TiC                   craters, thick recast layer, micro pores, pin holes, residual
compounds have the highest score of 71. Moreover, some                   stresses and debris. Migration of different chemical elements
other compounds were also formed such as germanium tita-                 from electrode and dielectric media were observed in EDS
nium carbide (Ge2Ti4C2) and titanium oxide (TiO), but due to             spectrum. Presence of large % of carbon was noticed in EDS
a very low score, these compounds are not shown on the XRD               analysis. XRD results shows major formation of TiC com-
plot.                                                                    pound which precipitated on the machined surface. The study
   For another case, Fig. 11(c) shows the XRD pattern of                 provides an insight into the migration of different elements
without cryo-treated titanium alloy Ti-5Al-2.5Sn machined in             from the tool and the powder mixed dielectric fluid on to the
the presence of tungsten powder mixed dielectric fluid with              machined surface thereby improving the surface properties.
shallow cryo-treated Cu-W electrode, 6A current, 90μs pulse-
on-time and 45 μs pulse-off-time. The carbides of titanium
                                                                         References
were exposed on the XRD pattern at different 2-theta position
36.091, 40.536, 41.874, 60.683, 72.480, 76.263, 90.896,                  [1] A. Hascalik and U. Caydas, Electric discharge machining of
101.801, 102.246 and 105.615. TiC compound has maximum                       titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V), Applied Surface Scence, 253
peak height with 5002.6 counts obtained at 41.874 2θ position.               (2007a) 9007-9016.
                             S. Kumar et al. / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 28 (7) (2014) 2831~2844                    2843
[2] E. O. Ezugwu and Z. M. Wang, Titanium alloys and their                    parameters optimization of increased explosive electric dis-
    machinability - a review, Journal of Materials Processing                 charge grinding process for large area polycrystalline dia-
    Technology, 68 (1997) 262-274.                                            mond, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 149
[3] S. Pervaiz, I. Deiab and B. Darras, Power consumption and                 (2004) 106-111.Y.
    tool wear assement when machining titanium alloys, Inter-             [18] Tzeng and F. Chen, Multi-objective optimisation of high-
    national Journal of Precision Engineering Manufacturer, 14                speed electrical discharge machining process using a Ta-
    (6) (2013) 925-936.                                                       guchi fuzzy-based approach, Materials and Design, 28
[4] D. A. Dornfeld, J. S. Kim, H. Dechow, J. Hewsow and L. J.                 (2007) 1159-1168.
    Chen, Drilling burr formation in titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V,            [19] S. Assarzadeh and M. Ghoreishi, Neural-network-based
    Annals of CIRP., 48 (1999) 73-76.                                         modeling and optimization of the electro-discharge machin-
[5] M. A. Norliana, D. G. Solomon and Md. F. Bahari, Areview                  ing process, International Journal of Advanced Manufactur-
    on current research trends in electrical discharge machining              ing Technology, 39 (2008) 488-500.
    (EDM), International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufac-              [20] A. P. Markopoulos, D. E. Manolakos and N. M. Vaxevani-
    ture, 47 (2007) 1214-1228.                                                dis, Artificial neural network models for the prediction of
[6] B. H. Yoo, B. K. Min and J. S. Lee, Analysis of the machin-               surface roughness in electrical discharge machining, J. Intell
    ing characteristics of EDM as functions of the mobilities of              Manuf., 19 (2008) 283-292.
    electrons and ions, International Journal of Precision Engi-          [21] P. Fonda, Z. Wang, K. Yamazaki and Y. Akutsu, A funda-
    neering Manufacturer, 11 (4) (2010) 629-632.                              mental study on Ti-6Al-4V’s thermal and electrical proper-
[7] K. H. Ho and S. T. Newman, State of the art electrical dis-               ties and their relation to EDM productivity, Journal of Mate-
    charge machining, International Journal of Machine Tools                  rials Processing Technology, 202 (2008) 583-589.
    & Manufacture, 43 (2003) 1287-1300.                                   [22] G. Rao, G. Krishna Mohana, D. Rangajanardhaa, H. Rao
[8] S. S. Gill and J. Singh, Effect of deep cryogenic treatment on            and M. S. Rao, Development of hybrid model and optimiza-
    machinability of titanium alloy (Ti-6246) in electric dis-                tion of surface roughness in electric discharge machining us-
    charge drilling, Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 25                ing artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm, Journal
    (2010) 378-385.                                                           of Materials Processing Technology, 209 (2009) 1512-1520.
[9] S. Abdulkareem, A. A. Khan and M. Konneh, Reducing                    [23] M. M. Rahman, Md. Khan, A. Rahman, K. Kadirgama, M.
    electrode wear ratio using cryogenic cooling during electri-              M. Noor and R. A. Bakar, Modeling of material removal on
    cal discharge machining, International Journal of Advanced                machining of Ti-6Al-4V through EDM using copper tung-
    Manufacturing Technology, 45 (2009) 1146-1151.                            sten electrode and positive polarity, International Journal of
[10] K. A. Venugopal, S. Paul and A. B. Chattopadhyay, Tool                   Mechanical Material Engineering, 1 (3) (2010) 135-140.
    wear in cryogenic turning of Ti-6Al-4V alloy, Cryogenics,             [24] P. K. Patowari, P. Saha and P. K. Mishra, Artificial neural
    47 (2007) 12-18.                                                          network model in surface modification by EDM using tung-
[11] J. S. Soni and G. Chakraverti, Machining characteristics of              sten-copper powder metallurgy sintered electrodes, Interna-
    titanium with rotary electro-discharge machining, Wear, 171               tional Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 51
    (1994) 51-58.                                                             (2010) 627-638.
[12] R. K. Jain and V. K. Jain, Optimum selection of machining            [25] C. J. Tzeng and R. Y. Chen, Optimization of electric dis-
    conditions in abrasive flow using neural network , Journal of             charge machining process using the response surface meth-
    Materials Processing Technology, 108 (2000) 62-67.                        odology and genetic algorithm approach, International
[13] K. Wang, H. L. Gelgele, Y. Wang, Q. Yuan and M. Fang,                    Journal of Precision Engineering Manufacturer, 14 (5)
    hybrid intelligent method for modelling the EDM process,                  (2013) 709-717.
    International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 43              [26] T. T. Nguyen, Y. S. Yang and J. W. Kim, An artificial
    (2003) 995-999.                                                           neural network system for predicting the deformation of
[14] P. S. Bharti, S. Maheshwari and C. Sharma, Multi-objecttive              steel plate in triangle induction heating process, Interna-
    optimization of electric-discharge machining process using                tional Journal of Precision Engineering Manufacturer, 14
    controlled elitist NSGA-II, Journal of Mechanical Science                 (4) (2013) 551-557.
    and Technology, 26 (6) (2012) 1875-1883.                              [27] S. S. Sidhu, A. Batish and S. Kumar, Neural-network-based
[15] J. Y. Kao and Y. S. Tarng, A neutral-network approach for                modeling to predict residual stresses during electric dis-
    the online monitoring of the electrical discharge machining               charge machining of Al/SiC-MMCs., Proceedings of the In-
    process, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 69 (1-               stitution of Mechanical Engineers Part B-Journal of Engi-
    3) (1997) 112-119.                                                        neering Manufacture (2013) doi: 10. 7/0954405413492505.
[16] Fenggou and Y. Dayong, The study of high efficiency and              [28] M. M. Rahman, Modeling of machining parameters of Ti-
    intelligent optimization system in EDM sinking process,                   6Al-4V for electric discharge machining: A neural network ap-
    Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 149 (1-3)                     proach, Scientific Research and Essays, 7 (8) (2012) 881-890.
    (2004) 83-87.                                                         [29] J. Y. Kao, C. C. Tsao, S. S. Wang and C. Y. Hsu, Optimi-
[17] Fenggou and Q. Zhang, Neural network modeling and                        zation of the EDM parameters on machining Ti-6Al-4V with
2844                         S. Kumar et al. / Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 28 (7) (2014) 2831~2844
    multiple characteristics, International Journal of Advanced               ters on the performance of EDM process with ultrasonic as-
    Manufacturing Technology, 47 (2010) 395-402.                              sisted cryogenically cooled electrode, Journal of Manufac-
[30] P. C. Tan, S. H. Yeo and Y. V Tan, Effects of nano powder                turing Processes, 14 (3) (2012) 393-402.
    additives in micro electrical discharge machining, Interna-           [37] H. T. Lee and T. Y. Tai, Relationship between EDM pa-
    tional Journal of Precision Engineering Manufacturer, 9                   rameters and surface crack formation, Journal of Materials
    (3) (2008) 22-26.                                                         Processing Technology, 142 (3) (2003) 676-683.
[31] R. N. Yadav and V. Yadava, Experimental study of erosion             [38] P. J. Ross, Taguchi techniques for quality engineering,
    and abrasion based hybrid machining of hybrid metal matrix                USA 2nd ed., McGraw hill, New York (1996).
    composite, International Journal of Precision Engineering
    Manufacturer, 14 (8) (2013) 1293-1299.
[32] B. H. Yan, H. C. Tsai and F. Y. Huang, The effect in EDM                                       Sanjeev Kumar received B.E. (1996)
    of a dielectric of a urea solution in water on modifying the                                    degree in Mechanical Engineering from
    surface of titanium, International Journal of Machine Tools                                     NIT, Kurukshetra, India and M.Tech.
    & Manufacture, 45 (2005) 194-200.                                                               (2007) in Production Engineering from
[33] B. Jabbaripour, M. H. Sadeghi, S. Faridvand and M. R.                                          GNDEC, Ludhiana, India. He is pursu-
    Shabgard, Investigating the effects of EDM parameters on                                        ing his Ph.D. in the Department of Me-
    surface integrity, MRR and TWR in Machining of Ti-6Al-                                          chanical Engineering at Thapar Univer-
    4V, Machining Science and Technology: AnInternational                                           sity (Deemed University), Patiala, India.
    Journal, 16 (2012) 419-444.
[34] A. Hascalik and U. Caydas, A comparative study of surface                                     Ajay Batish is working as a Professor
    integrity of Ti-6Al-4V alloy machined by EDM and AECG,                                         and Head in the Department of Me-
    Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 190 (2007b)                                        chanical Engineering Thapar Univer-
    173-180.                                                                                       sity (Deemed University), Patiala, India.
[35] S. Kalia, Cryogenic processing: a study of materials at low
    temperatures, Journal of Low Temperature Physics, 158
    (2010) 934-945.
[36] V. Srivastava and M. P. Pandey, Effect of process parame-