0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views46 pages

Lecture 2 Alt

The document discusses various types of characteristic stress-strain (σ-ε) plots for metals, including their behaviors during elastic and plastic deformation. It also covers hardness testing methods, modes of fracture in metals, and the concept of fracture mechanics, emphasizing the importance of understanding defects and stress concentration in predicting material failure. Additionally, it highlights the differences in fracture toughness among materials, particularly between metals and ceramics.

Uploaded by

keshavkumaran127
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views46 pages

Lecture 2 Alt

The document discusses various types of characteristic stress-strain (σ-ε) plots for metals, including their behaviors during elastic and plastic deformation. It also covers hardness testing methods, modes of fracture in metals, and the concept of fracture mechanics, emphasizing the importance of understanding defects and stress concentration in predicting material failure. Additionally, it highlights the differences in fracture toughness among materials, particularly between metals and ceramics.

Uploaded by

keshavkumaran127
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 46

Characteristic ‐ plots for metals

35
Characteristic ‐ plots for metals
Typ I

Continuous transition from elastic to plastic deformation.


Typically observed in fcc metals and their alloys like
aluminum, nickel, copper, austenitic stainless steel etc.
36
Characteristic ‐ plots for metals
Typ II

Characterized by the presence of lower yield point and an


almost horizontal region.
Sporadically observed in some solid solution strengthened
Cu‐ and Al‐based alloys 37
Characteristic ‐ plots for metals
Typ III

Characterized by both upper and lower yield point followed


by almost horizontal region.
Typically observed in low carbon steels
38
Characteristic ‐ plots for metals
Typ IV

Characterized by elastic, ideal plastic behavior with little or


no strain hardening.
Sporadically observed in heavily pre‐worked materials and
in certain materials deformed at high temperatures. 39
Characteristic ‐ plots for metals
Typ V

Characterized by almost brittle behavior with little plastic


strain, no necking.
Observed in alloyed and unalloyed steel in martensitic
condition 40
Characteristic ‐ plots for metals
Typ VI

Characterized by serrated stress‐strain curves.


Typically observed plain carbon steels in the temperature
range of 250–400 °C
41
Un‐ and reloading in plastic region
 Unloading in plastic region
traces a straight line with
slope virtually equal to the
loading Young‘s modulus.
 Elastic portion of the total
strain is recovered
 Reapplication of load
traverses the same path as
during unloading
 Yielding at reloading occurs
at the initial unloading
stress level
42
Toughness
 Toughness is the ability of a material to absorb energy
before fracturing
 It is the area under the ‐ plot upto the point of
fracture

43
Toughness

Question: Why are metals more popular than ceramics as


structural components? 44
Hardness testing
Defined as resistance of a material against localized plastic
deformation (indentation or scratch).
Basic principle
 An indenter is forced into the test surface under
controlled loading conditions
 Depth/size of the indentation is measured and hardness
is calculated therefrom
Most used materials analysis technique, because:
 Simple, inexpensive – no special sample preparation
 The procedure is quasi non‐destructive
 Can often be easily correlated to other material
properties like tensile strength 45
Schematic of typical hardness test

46
Different hardness test methods

47
Brinell hardness test
 Hard, spherical indenter made of
either hardened steel or
tungsten carbide is used
 Standard loads range between
500 and 3000 kg in 500 kg
intervals.
 After load application for a specific time, the indentation
diameter is measured using low power microscope
 Hardness (denoted as BHN) is calculated using load,
indenter and indentation diameter
48
Vickers hardness test
 Indenter is a square
based diamond
pyramid.
 Careful sample
preparation is
necessary.
 Applied loads usually vary between 1 kg. And 120 kg.
 Lengths of the two diagonals of the indenter are
measured under a microscope
 Vickers hardness (VHN or DPH) is calculated from the
applied load and the measured average length of the
two indentation diagonals 49
Rockwell hardness test

 Most common method due to ist simplicity


 Several scales based on indenter type and load are used
 A unitless hardness number is determined from the
difference of depth of penetration resulting from a
minor load and subsequent major load 50
Fracture
Fracture is defined as the separation of a body into two or
more parts in response of an external load. Fracture is the
ultimate failure of a component and design should avoid it.
Modes of fracture in metals
Ductile fracture: Involves
substantial plastic deformation
with high energy absorption
before fracture

Brittle fracture: Involves little


or no plastic deformation with
very little energy absorption. 51
Ductile fracture
The most common feature of ductile fracture is the
appearance of a moderate to significant amount of
necking
Stages of ductile fracture
Stage I
After the initiation of necking, small cavities
or microvoids form at local inhomogeneities
at the neck region.

52
Ductile fracture
The most common feature of ductile fracture is the
appearance of a moderate to significant amount of
necking
Stages of ductile fracture
Stage II
With continuing deformation the
microvoids grow and coalesce to form
elliptical crack with long axis normal to
loading direction.

53
Ductile fracture
The most common feature of ductile fracture is the
appearance of a moderate to significant amount of
necking
Stages of ductile fracture
Stage III
Final fracture occurs by rapid propagation of
the crack around the outer periphery of the
neck by shear deformation at an angle of
45° with the tensile axis.

54
Brittle fracture
The direction of crack propagation is nearly perpendicular
to the direction of applied stress. Fracture surfaces are
macroscopically flat and shiny.
Broad classes of brittle fracture
Transgranular fracture: The
cracks pass through grains with
little or no change of direction

Intergranular fracture: Crack


propagation occurs mostly
along the grain boundaries
55
Fractography
Detailed study of the microscopic features of the fracture
process, normally using scanning electron microscope
(SEM). SEM is used due to its higher resolution and depth
of field.
Fractographic appearance of ductile fracture
 Fracture surface consists of
numerous spherical
dimples
 Each dimple correspond to
one half of a microvoid
formed before crack
nucleation 56
Fractography
Detailed study of the microscopic features of the fracture
process, normally using scanning electron microscope
(SEM). SEM is used due to its higher resolution and depth
of field.
Fractographic appearance of brittle transgranular fracture

57
Fractography
Detailed study of the microscopic features of the fracture
process, normally using scanning electron microscope
(SEM). SEM is used due to its higher resolution and depth
of field.
Fractographic appearance of brittle intergranular fracture

58
Real world examples of fracture

59
Real world examples of fracture

60
Real world examples of fracture

61
Real world examples of fracture

62
Theoretical fracture strength

 Curve showing the variation of cohesive force as a


function of interatomic spacing
 Maximum of the curve  theoretical fracture strength
Approximately (E/10)
63
Theoretical strength & actual strength

Theoretical fracture strength of materials is approx. 35 – 70


times higher than the real strength of materials
64
Concept of fracture mechanics
The actually observed lower fracture strength of materials
can be attributed to defects like
 Preexisting surface/interior cracks
 Flaws introduced by microscopic or macroscopic plastic
deformation
 Macroscopic discontinuities like voids, inclusions,
notches, sharp corners, scratches etc.
The defects cause stress concentration in their vicinity,
thereby significantly raising the local stress values to much
higher values fracture occurs at lower applied stress
Due to this stress raising effect, these flaws are also called
stress raisers 65
Stress concentration at crack tip

For an elliptical internal crack of length 2a, tip radius of


curvature t, oriented normal to the applied stress 0
1
 a  2 m = Maximum stress at the crack
 m  2 0    tip
  66
Stress concentration at crack tip
1
m a 2
Kt   2   
0  t 

 The quantity Kt is known as – stress concentration factor


 Stress concentration factor increases with increasing
crack length and decresing crack tip radius
 The maximum stress at the crack tip for an internal crack
with length 2a is identical to that of a surface crack of
length a
Surface cracks are more deleterious than internal
cracks
67
Fracture of a brittle material
Griffith theory of brittle fracture
Under tensile stress a crack propagates to cause brittle
fracture when the decrease in elastic strain energy is at
least equal to the energy increase necessary to create the
new crack surface.
For thin plates, the fracture stress in a brittle solid is
denoted as:
1
 2 E  2
E = Young‘s modulus
F   c = Half length of an internal crack
  c 

 is defined as the surface energy per unit area and for


completely brittle solids,
Material toughness, c = 2 68
Fracture involving plastic deformation
 Any plastic deformation corresponds to additional work
expended for crack propagation crack extension is
hindered and higher fracture stress than that predicted
for truly brittle solids is necessary.
 Stress intensity at the crack tip causes local yielding at
the crack tip and the plastic zone extends a distance
above and below the fracture plane.
 The toughness in Griffitth equation becomes:
c = 2( + p)
 p is a function of material yield strength and also
temperature.
69
Fracture involving plastic deformation

70
Crack propagation modes

Mode I, tensile Mode II, shear Mode III, shear


stress normal to stress normal to stress parallel to
crack surface crack surface crack leading edge
 Toughness corresponding to each crack propagation
mode is different
 A combination of three modes observed in general case
 Mode I is most common and this will be the focus of
further discussion 71
Fracture toughness
Defined as the resistance to brittle fracture in a material
containing cracks.

௖ ௖

c = Critical stress for crack propagation


a = Crack length
Y = Dimensionless constant with value almost unity
Kc = Fracture toughness

 Fracture toughness has a unit of MPa√m


 For relatively thin specimens, fracture toughness is a
function of material thickness and generally increases
with thickness.
72
Fracture toughness
The fracture toughness value for thick specimens (under
plain strain conditions) is constant.
KIc, defined as the plane strain fracture toughness for Mode
I loading, is a material constant and is most commonly cited
as the fracture toughness of a material
Factors affecting Kic
 KIC  as Temperatur  and strain rate 
 Within a class of alloys, KIc  as yield strength 
 As grain size of a material , KIc 

73
Fracture toughness & material class

Material design aims for both high yield strength and high
fracture toughness 74
Fracture toughness & material class

Fracture toughness of ceramics are rather low, they are


inherently brittle 75
Fracture toughness & material class

Metals have high fracture toughness


76
Fracture toughness & material class

Steels have both high toughness and high yield strength 


reason behind their widespread use as structural material 77
Fracture mechanics design philosophy
 Design presupposes that cracks are present in the
structure
 The size of the cracks needs to be estimated
 The largest crack that may be present is taken as that
crack size that is not detected by Non‐Destructive
Testing (NDT) e.g.
‐ ultrasonic testing (UT)
‐ Magnetic testing (MT)
‐ X‐ray imaging (RT)
‐ Computer tomography (CT)
 Using fracture toughness definition, the fracture
strength is determined based on this crack length  the
operating stress must be less than this stress 78
Fracture mechanics design philosophy

79
Impact testing
Prior to the advent of fracture mechanics, impact testing
was the preferred testing method.

Fracture toughness testing Impact testing


 Relatively new method  Much older method and
is still widely used
 Results are more  Mainly qualitative
quantitative
 Test equipment, sample  Rather inexpensive
preparation and testing method of testing
are expensive
80

You might also like