religions

Article
Modernity and Caste in Khatri and High-Caste Men’s
Auto/Biographies
Anshu Malhotra

Global Studies Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA; anshumalhotra@ucsb.edu

Abstract: This paper studies the auto/biographies of high-caste middle-class Punjabi Khatri men,
and those of cognate castes like Arora and Baniya, written in the first half of the twentieth century:
men who were born in the second half of the nineteenth century or early twentieth century. While the
discourse on caste under the colonial regime exploded, there was also an embarrassment about caste,
or re-thinking its place in society among the upper-caste groups who invested in ideas of progress,
improvement and scientism. It is argued that caste was referenced in the memoirs, life stories and
self-reflexive writing when these men spoke of their familial backgrounds and admired the deep
religiosity and devotionalism of their fathers even though some paternal practices were incongruent
with the reformism of the sons. Caste is also in play when one traces the advantages of literacy,
education, professional accomplishments, mobility, and reformist activities of men who came to have
an important presence in public life. A number of these men had similar life trajectories, indicative of
how some aspects of colonial educational and administrative structures could be utilized by them.

Keywords: auto/biography; memoir; life-writing; caste; Khatri; education; reform; self-improvement;

progress; science; rationalism; Government College Lahore; Lajpat Rai; Munshi Ram; Ruchi Ram
Sahni; Prakash Tandon; Bhagat Lakshman Singh; Amolak Ram Mehta; K.L. Gauba

1. Introduction
In the first half of the twentieth century many high-caste Punjabi Khatri men, and men
Citation: Malhotra, Anshu. 2024. of the cognate castes of Arora and Baniya, began narrating their lives in auto/biographical
Modernity and Caste in Khatri and writing—memoirs, family biographies, journals—a self-referential fluid genre that sought
High-Caste Men’s Auto/Biographies. to capture history, or record their making of history, through personal accounts.1 A habit of
Religions 15: 1125. https://doi.org/ daily diary writing was reported by many, including the leading Arya Samaj leader Lala
10.3390/rel15091125 Lajpat Rai who referred to his roznamcha (diaries) that were destroyed by his family when he
Academic Editor: Opinderjit
came in the crosshairs of the British regime during the 1907 agrarian agitations in Punjab.2
Kaur Takhar
Another stalwart Arya Samaji, Munshi Ram (later Swami Shraddhanand), wrote a diary,
then published his autobiography in instalments in his weekly journal Saddharm Pracharak
Received: 11 June 2024 under the title Kuch Aap Biti Kuch Jag Biti (Some My Experiences and Some of the World)
Revised: 3 September 2024 (Shraddhanand 1924, p. 3)3 , finally bringing it together in a book form, demonstrating
Accepted: 4 September 2024 the hybridity of the genre.4 However, ordinary men, like Bhola Ram, the grandfather of
Published: 18 September 2024
the author Ved Mehta, also had an everyday private diary writing practice. Mehta tells us
that his diary was like a “commonplace book” where he recorded, among other things, his
favorite Urdu and Persian quotations (Mehta 1972, p. 21). A growing self-awareness and
individuation was signified here: Munshi Ram referred to his atma-chintan or self-reflection
Copyright: © 2024 by the author.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
as motivation for writing. All also noted their portentous memory—signifying a backward
This article is an open access article
look at life from the present moment—in facilitating their endeavors in recollecting and
distributed under the terms and writing their life narratives.
conditions of the Creative Commons Mostly written in English, though Hindi was chosen as the medium of writing by
Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// the two aforementioned Arya Samajis, Rai and Ram, as part of the Arya Samaj’s politics
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ of promoting Hindi as the national language, around half a dozen life narratives will
4.0/). be discussed here. These are necessarily selective texts, chosen for their popularity and

Religions 2024, 15, 1125. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15091125 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/religions

Religions 2024, 15, 1125 2 of 15

appositeness to the topic, though many more life narratives are now available. Literacy, a
hallmark of these men, was a prerequisite to writing memoirs, showing the high-caste bias
of this genre in its early form in Punjab. The primacy of English as a language to express
the self speaks of the newness of the genre, aligned to new education, professions, and
travel, some of the themes that will be elucidated below. As Tim Allender has argued, the
education of the “masses” by the state was abandoned in Punjab from an early period,
and education came to be restricted to “children whose parents pursued occupations that
embraced raj commerce”, driven by administrative practicality (Allender 2006). By 1891,
forty percent of the literate population of Punjab was made up of the trading castes of
Khatris, Aroras and Baniyas (Ibid., p. 7).
As has been observed by many scholars of Indian modernity, autobiographical writing,
along with novels and lyric poetry, was the literary genre through which the idea of the
“modern” life came to be disseminated, along with establishing its economic, rational,
and ethical superiority over earlier social formations (Kaviraj 2015a). In this context, it
is interesting to note that someone like Lajpat Rai had started writing a novel (upanyas)
that would have covered his life—a “faction” genre, a mix of fiction and fact—though he
never finished it (Rai n.d., p. 3).5 An example of faction was the autobiographical poetry of
the courtesan Piro (Ik Sau Sath Kafian), who wrote of an event in her life in allegorical and
performative language (see Malhotra 2017, chap. 2, pp. 55–91). Although narrating the self
was not unknown in the early modern period, as seen in the writings of the likes of Banarasi
Das (Ardhkathanaka) or Mir Taqi Mir (Zikr-i-Mir), it was not common either (Malhotra and
Lambert-Hurley 2015; Arnold and Blackburn 2004, pp. 1–28, 116–43). Besides the novel
form that described fictive lives realistically, though some were autobiographical, it was in
the writing of ordinary lives, made special only by inscribing them in print, that modern
life and its possibilities of individual achievement as against social convention could be
made exemplary for others to admire and emulate. Thus, writing the self into history, as
also viewing history from the stand-point of the self, became more commonplace, especially
among classes/castes that were the early beneficiaries of new education promoted by the
colonial state and the social reform movements.
The peculiarities of Indian men’s auto/biographical writing have been noted by schol-
ars. While there were exceptions, most men eschewed writing of intimate matters, con-
centrating instead on their public lives and personas. Men deployed the genre as a means
of documenting a world seemingly rapidly transforming, writing history through one’s
personal experience and perspective (Kumar 2008, 2016). History writing, the modernist
discipline that distinguished an earlier time from the present, through life history, became a
mode of demonstrating one’s modernity. The crafting of modern subjectivities required that
men distinguish themselves from their “pastness”—the past of colonized peoples critiqued
as degenerate by the colonial state—without necessarily breaking with the privilege that the
past offered. Past was also mined by reform-minded men for uncovering a perfect golden
age, as with the Arya Samajis, underlining a complicated relationship with the past in these
memoirs (Appadurai 1996). Often, the impulse in this writing was to capture the past that
seemed to recede quickly while exulting in the present. At times, the very act of narration
depicted change in organizing lives from earlier habits, what Sudipta Kaviraj has called
“the invention of private life,” as seen in descriptions of transmuting relationships with
parents (fathers here), of conjugality, and of friendships (Kaviraj 2015b). Self-reflexivity
in life narratives was rare; there was generally an absence of an interior dialogue that
uncovered the cogitations of the mind. However, there were notable exceptions, like the
well-known Experiments of M.K. Gandhi, or, here, of Munshi Ram; the latter’s prolix autobio-
graphic inscriptions, as noted, were performatively self-fashioning, a bildungsroman where
the author’s moral and psychological dilemmas were highlighted until being resolved
(Gandhi 2016).6 In most accounts, attention was paid to events, personal and public, that
propelled a life forward towards the goal of having “made it”, of contributing meaningfully
to public life: a transformation from humble beginnings to mature achievement.
Religions 2024, 15, 1125 3 of 15

Such life stories captured the zeitgeist of the age. The dominant emotions of the
period, of newness and progress, rationality, science, and material growth, resonated
with many. Discussed by Margrit Pernau as stimmung, the mood and atmospherics of
the time revolved around fresh potentialities that modern life provided (Pernau 2021,
p. 3). Of course, the colonialist project with its civilizational impetus, its creation of
global hierarchies, categorized the world on “stages of development”, at the apex of which
sat Europe with the varied colonized people perpetually playing catch-up. This could
induce despair and shame, a desire for change, reform, or reviving a “golden” period.
However, it is also noteworthy that for many, modernity’s promise unleashed hope of
a better future, if only the moment could be seized. The new indigenous elites took to
scientism as advocated by the colonial state as an ideology to practice “improvement”, on
the one hand, and, on the other, to propagate it among the masses as an ideology of reform.
These elites, according to Gyan Prakash, “stood on the interstices of Western science and
Indian traditions, embodying and undertaking the reformulation of culture in their reach
for hegemony” (Prakash 1999). The upbeat optimism of these elites is best captured in
the much-quoted words of Prakash Tandon that celebrated “angrezi raj ki barkaten” (the
blessings of the English rule), a school lesson that spoke to his generation of the immense
potential that the future held (Tandon 2011, p. 18).7 Something similar has been discussed
by Pernau in the context of Indian Muslims as josh, fervor, the “masculine” passion that
was a significant conduit for attaining the ideal future, along with the emotion of nostalgia
for the past and that of the humiliation of the present, evoked after the mutiny of 1857,
especially by the Muslim elite (Pernau 2019).
In the life-writing discussed here, the linking of the past and the future, mediated
through the present, could also take different forms. For the Samajis, Lajpat Rai and
Munshi Ram, a golden Vedic past, indeed Vedic universalist scientism, the basis on which
the founder Dayanand Sarasvati organized the Samaj, could be recreated in the future by
the efforts and sacrifices of its members. For others, the past could elicit nostalgia, as, for
example, in the loving description of his ancestral home town, Gujrat, by Prakash Tandon.
It was the future, though that glittered with hope, to be reached via the springboard of
the present. For Ruchi Ram Sahni, who was among the small number of Punjabis in
the Brahmo Samaj in Lahore, an organization that was otherwise dominated by Bengali
professionals in Punjab, and who became a professor of science at the Government College,
the past, marked by superstitions, was to be replaced by the rational scientism of the future.
The future was to be beget by the present via education, brought to the masses by the
indigenous elites (Burra 2017).
In this milieu that came to regard scientific epistemology as shaping futurity, what did
caste mean when it was viewed as a backward relic of the past? Was it to be abandoned,
or re-imagined? Were there subtle ways in which one’s caste privilege and legacy could
be referenced, fed into one’s class ambitions, while its stranglehold, its sedimentation, or
petrifaction, was criticized? What were the advantages that high status bestowed, the push
that led Khatri Punjabi men, among others, to imagine themselves as shaping the world,
that albeit lay in the future?

2. Caste in Colonial Punjab

This is not the place to debate the multiple ways in which caste’s tentacles reach
into Indian society, or how it has constantly evolved and shape-shifted with demands of
modern polity and society. Whether caste is legible through its association with occupation,
ritual, purity–pollution concerns, commensality, endogamy, inheritance, land ownership,
jajmani or client–patronage relations, and other vectors, including political vote-bank
politics, it continues to incite vibrant discussion among scholars.8 Here, I will refer to the
significance of two scholarly views relevant to our purpose, then go on to discuss colonial
administrator Ibbetsonn’s opinion on caste, before I revert the discussion back to high-caste
auto/biographies.
Religions 2024, 15, 1125 4 of 15

Though not an “invention”, as Nicholas Dirks ingeniously put it, the incessant discus-
sion of caste by the colonial state did transmogrify it into an Indian institution that became
a discursive staple for the colonial state, but also for Indian elites (Dirks 2001). From the
manner in which the Arya Samaj reinvented caste based on one’s potential merit, or how
the Singh Sabha’s polemics denied that caste could exist in the Sikh egalitarian ideals as
conceived by the Gurus, or the Brahmo Samaj dismissed its relevance in a future world
underwritten by universalist values, caste was everywhere in Punjabi public life.
Sumit Guha, on the other hand, has directed attention to the importance of the state’s
political intervention on caste matters throughout South Asian history to understand
the dialectic between the fluidity and fixity of caste (Guha 2013). The colonial state’s
governance and discursive interventions on the ontology of caste can be understood as
precisely such political interventions that made caste prominent under its rule. The state
under colonialism, through new institutional practices like the Census and its numerous
ethnographic projects, could be seen as deliberating on caste like its predecessors through
disseminating “knowledge” rather than overtly controlling and fixing caste groups within
a social hierarchy like the pre-modern state.
Good examples of colonialist caste studies are the reports of officers like Denzil
Ibbetson, who became the Lieutenant Governor of Punjab in 1907. His work on Punjabi
society as the Census Commissioner in 1881 is salient with his close observation of society
reflected in his jottings. He rejected the theory of the religious origins of caste, including
any exclusive association of the institution with Hinduism, and instead spoke about caste
being socially embedded, in contravention to the Western Orientalist explanations of caste
as religious and ideological (Ibbetson [1970] 1995, p. 2).9 In his estimation, it would be
difficult to find the normative four-fold division of caste in society, just as it would be a task
to fit someone into Kshatriya or Vaishya categories in Punjab. In Ibbetson’s reading, castes
were highly variable, and any presumption that generations descended from the same
caste, he noted, would be “liable to be defeated by an infinite variety of circumstances”
(Ibbetson [1970] 1995, p. 2). At the same time Ibbetson did absorb some of the Orientalist
bias with regard to Indian society, calling it more “priest-ridden” than the experience of
Europe; and though caste was changeable, the change was slow, over generations, and not
individual-driven. Hence, he wrote, society was not solid, but liquid, i.e., it could change;
however, he stated, “the liquid is viscous”, there was more friction and inertia to overcome
than elsewhere (Ibbetson [1970] 1995, pp. 4–9).
The discussion around caste in public fora grew exponentially under colonialism.
Ordinary people, who could access the new print and associational public sphere, felt
compelled to share their opinion on matters such as caste. An example of such public
interest is an article published in the Indian Antiquary on Khatris by Kashi Nath in 1873
(Nath 1874). Calling himself a “Dehliwal Khatri” from Agra, i.e., the Delhi Khatris who fled
to Agra during Nadir Shah’s massacre in Delhi in the eighteenth century, he went on to trace
the mythological origins of Khatris, and then to link all Khatris to Punjab, designating them
as being of “pure Aryan blood”, in accordance with the new racial typologies prevalent at
the time. Calling them a most religious people (only next to the Brahmans), he connected
them to Guru Nanak, calling Nanak a great Khatri reformer and a patron saint of the
Khatris. Khatri sub-caste divisions and how they came about, their movement outside
Punjab, links with Sikh Gurus, rituals, and prominent Khatris from history were all matters
of interest to him.10
The descriptions of physiognomy and race, occupations, and comparative social
standing among Punjab’s castes were discussed in governmental studies like Ibbetson’s.
He created taxonomies to group castes according to occupations, but also inserted in the
discussion their physical appearance, their ethnological “superior” or “inferior” aspects.
The “Jat, Rajput and Allied Castes” was one category, “Religious, Professional, Mercantile
and Miscellaneous Castes” another, and “Menial and Artisan Castes” yet one more. Among
the “mercantile castes”, comparisons were made between the Baniya, Arora, and the
Khatri. The Khatris, for example, were presented as “superior” to the Aroras in physique,
Religions 2024, 15, 1125 5 of 15

manliness, and energy; were not mere shopkeepers, but claimed Kshatriya descent, though
Ibbetson questioned the validity of such claims (Ibbetson [1970] 1995, p. 247). Similar claims
and counter-claims between land-owning Jats and Rajputs were also noted. A Jat was
lauded as husbandman, peasant, and revenue-payer par excellence, with Ibbetson calling
Jats industrious, honest, sturdy, and manly (Ibid, p. 102). Comparative statements between
castes were also made throughout his discussion: “As a whole they [mercantile castes]
occupy a position superior to that of the landowning classes if measured by religious
standard, for the great mercantile castes come next after the Brahmans in strictness of
religious observance; but indefinitely inferior if the comparison be made from a social or
political standpoint” (Ibid. p. 27).11 Such common-sense knowledge about castes, their
origins, and positions within regional hierarchies came to circulate among those interested
in such issues: reformers and idealogues of various associations, intellectuals, government
employees, and more.
What impact did the prevalence and consumption of such learning, which seemingly
combined intimate knowledge of one’s past with the stamp of authority of the colonial insti-
tutional processes and products like the Census, signify? How did men, brought up under
colonial dispensation, eager to participate in its educational and administrative institutions,
use this knowledge to comprehend and promote themselves in a competitive world where
caste, kinship, and community could enhance one’s career and life circumstances? How did
caste, which assumedly bestowed intrinsic qualities, come to be referenced in their writing,
when, on the surface, associating with it pushed against proclaiming one’s modernity? Let
us turn to the auto/biographies to see how caste was both present and presented in them.

3. Fathers and Sons: Khatri Religiosity, Ritual, and Reformism

The life-writing that I use here covers roughly two generations of Punjabis: men
born around the 1860s, who included Munshi Ram (1856), Lajpat Rai (1865), Ruchi Ram
Sahni (1863), and Bhagat Lakshman Singh (1863), (Singh 1965) and those born around the
turn of the twentieth century, who included Amolak Ram Mehta (1896) (whose biography
is detailed by his son Ved Mehta) and Prakash Tandon (1911), with brief references to
Mulk Raj Anand (1905) (Anand [1946] 1957, pp. 9, 11) and Kanhaiya Lal Gauba (1899)
(Gauba 1974) Among the men, two were Arya Samajis (Munshi Ram and Lajpat Rai, of
two factions within the Samaj), one a Brahmo (Ruchi Ram Sahni), and one a Singh Sabhiya
(Lakshman Singh). The rest speak of some association with the Arya Samaj through their
fathers and families (Mulk Raj Anand, Amolak Ram) or Brahmo Samaj (Gauba’s father,
Lala Harkishen Lal, was an entrepreneur and politician, and close to Brahmos; Gauba
himself became a convert to Islam).
All auto/biographers began their accounts by mentioning the caste of the family
into which they were born. This seemed like a good place to start because this connected
them to their ancestors, to hometowns they had left behind, where caste conglomerations
and brotherhoods—biradaris—were socially important. Besides Prakash Tandon, who
described Gujrat’s mohallas (neighborhoods), others mentioned aspects of their hometowns
or villages—Talwan near Jalandhar for Munshi Ram, Jagraon near Ludhiana for Lajpat Rai,
Bhera near Sargodha for Sahni, Nawankote near Lahore for the Mehtas, and so on. This also
allowed the articulation of how their lives had changed as they had moved to big towns
and cities. Almost all ended up in the most cosmopolitan city of Punjab, Lahore. However,
tracing the family’s beginnings also established their high-caste credentials. At a time when
caste was furiously debated, and when the colonial state associated it with peculiar Indian
religiousness cum backwardness in relation to European civilizational progress, caste could
legitimately enter their writings through the discussion of their pasts. Of course, we need to
bear in mind that caste, despite all the noise around it, was never abandoned: for instance,
the Arya Samaj resurrected caste through “merit”, and not birth, as ingeniously advocated
by Dayanand Sarasvati, the founder of the Samaj in his Satyarth Prakash, although his
advocacy of caste on merit was uneven.12
Religions 2024, 15, 1125 6 of 15

How was caste then mentioned? The opening lines of Tandon’s memoirs were charac-
teristic: “Our family were Khatris from the West Punjab countryside. For two centuries
we had been moving along the banks of the Jhelum river. . ..We know about our past
because in the Punjab it is possible to trace one’s family records at certain holy places. . .”
(Tandon 2011, p. 15). These holy places where some postmortem rituals were performed
included Haridwar, Kurukshetra, and Matan, all places where priests kept records of
the specific Khatri families they served, indicating their statuses. Ved Mehta, similarly,
mentioned his Kshatriya ancestors and family records with the panda (priest) in Matan
(Mehta 1972, pp. 6–9). Bhagat Lakshman Singh wrote that his ancestor was a Kohli Kha-
tri who had migrated to Garhi Habibullah in Hazara and that he could not go further
back in time because the bahi (hand-written record) of his family Pandit was a new one,
having lost the earlier one; however, he underlined his “high” lineage (Singh 1965, p. 1).
Mulk Raj Anand, who described himself as a humanist and a socialist, and was one of the
founding members of the Progressive Writers Association established in the mid-1930s,
and who wrote with great empathy on caste exploitation, began his autobiographical
jottings similarly: “I was born in a Hindu family of Kshatriya, the second highest caste in
the old, four-fold scheme. . ..” (Anand [1946] 1957, p. 9). The conflation between Khatri
and Kshatriya was common in Punjab, as Ibbetson had noted. Lajpat Rai mentioned his
Agrawal Baniya ancestry through a discussion of his grandfather, who had been a patwari
(an important cog as a subordinate revenue official) serving the British after their conquest
of Punjab in 1849 and who had known only the “Mahajani script” (used by mercantile
classes) and was also a Jain (Rai n.d., pp. 16–17). And Gauba spoke about being an Arora
from western Punjab (Lieah, Bhakkar, the two Deras) and, interestingly, of the rivalry
between the Aroras and the Khatris, who, according to him, did not intermarry: “The
Aroras. . .were a kindred branch of the Khatris. Like the Khatris, the Aroras were primarily
traders and, although regarded with disdain by the Khatris, they were the more active and
prosperous of the two. . .” (Gauba 1974, p. 13).
I will utilize a few of these memoirists to show how, in the descriptions of their
ancestors and relationships with their fathers, they provided a glimmer of the forms of
worship and devotionalism that further indexed their high-caste backgrounds, the strictness
of religious observance noted by Ibbetson, declared in the beginnings of their writings as
shown above. This was not deliberately practiced in order to establish high-caste status,
which was obvious given their educational and professional credentials. Rather, it was to
speak of heritage and the respectability of their families according to the sensibilities of the
time. The fathers emerged in this literature as figures of authority until replaced by their
sons, who, after all, wrote from their perspective. Whether our memoirists got along with
their fathers or rebelled against their religious and social beliefs, or when they exceeded
the expectations their fathers had of them, they ended up creating lives different from their
fathers and in tune with the demands of modernity.
In the unsettling of life from traditional paths and places, and as a result of mobility
and experiencing lives in cities like Lahore, reformism and bonding through reform as-
sociations very often became a center-piece among many men’s lives. A class of Punjabi
professionals came to be educated in Lahore, creating a class of a Lahore elite of public men
(van der Linden 2008, pp. 84–85). Lahore, as William Glover has appositely noted, was as
much a material city, as it was one that fueled Punjabis’ imagination of modernity—a hub of
education, administration, and reformist associations (Glover 2008). In a few cases, reform
associations could be replaced by new modes of sociability like clubs, as in the cases of
Amolak Ram Mehta or Kanhaiya Lal Gauba, but lives were beginning to be distinctly lived
from that of their fathers. Below, I will deploy the writings of Lakshman Singh, Ruchi Ram,
and Munshi Ram—a Singh Sabha follower, a Brahmo, and an Arya Samaji—to underscore
how caste-inflected religiosity was elaborated in their writings.
Bhagat Lakshman Singh’s posthumously published autobiography is particularly in-
teresting in this regard as he spent some time in describing the illustrious devotional family
he belonged to.13 He took pride in tracing his descent from his great-grandfather Dayal
Religions 2024, 15, 1125 7 of 15

Chand, whom he described as a Vaishnava Hindu, a Sanskrit scholar, and an Ayurvedic

practitioner. He elucidated his devotional practices in the local thakurdwara (Hindu temple),
his bi-annual visits to Mirpur in Jammu to visit the shrine of Swami Shankaracharya, his
punctilious dietary and cooking habits, his feeding of Brahmans and maintaining a Sanskrit
school, and his fame as a Bhagat (bhakta), a devotee, in that area. One of Dayal Chand’s
sons (though not Lakshman Singh’s grandfather) was Bhagat Jawahir Mall, also called
Sain Sahib, an honorific respecting his renowned devotionalism, who was a devotee of the
Gurbani, the Sikh scripture, and was brought up under Sikh influence. Bhai Balak Singh,
the Guru of Bhai Ram Singh of the Kuka/Namdhari movement, was his disciple. Singh
also referred to his father’s, Bhagat Kahan Chand’s, pernickety eating and cooking habits,
noting his attention to chouka, the cooking square (to keep it free of impurity), and his
regular listening to Katha (religious exposition) in the dharamshala (Sikh temple) before
taking his meals. He also told us of his mother Bhagatani Gurditti, who learnt Gurmukhi
characters at age 20 from Mata Bhan Dai, the wife of Baba Khem Singh Bedi, a prominent
Bedi descendant from Guru Nanak. She read and recited the Gurbani, studied Vedanta,
and cultivated religious friends among devout women. Singh himself was brought up
in a religious manner, made to bathe early in the morning and to fast on the occasions
of Janamashtami, Ramnaumi, Ekadashi, Puranmashi, and Nauratas (all religiously auspicious
days) (Singh 1965, pp. 1–14).14 Though Singh became a Sikh at age 33, impressed by the
teachings and hymns of Guru Gobind Singh, and a member of the Sikh reformist Singh
Sabha, his eclectic Hindu–Sikh background remained ingrained in him insofar as he related
his ancestry, as also his closeness to a “sanatan” Sikh like Baba Khem Singh Bedi, the latter
being unwilling to let go of heterogenous religiosity and kindred relationship with Hindus,
which came under attack from a section of reform-minded Sikhs (Ibid., pp. 102–4).
Unlike Singh, who delineated his prestigious lineage, Ruchi Ram Sahni eulogized
his parents in his lengthy opening chapter “Growing Up in Dera Ismail Khan 1863–1878”
(Burra 2017, pp. 9–73). Though he spent some time in describing his “pious” and “conser-
vative” mother, whose piety centered around fasting frequently, he accorded more attention
to his “revered” and “pious” father Lala Karm Chand Sahni. His adroit businessman father,
well versed in the lande mercantile script, who had taught him mathematical formulae from a
young age, lost his fortune and became penurious when 3–4 of his ships carrying expensive
merchandise sank in the river Indus. Ruchi Ram portrays his father in glowing terms, though
he mentions some of his addictions and idiosyncrasies—his habit of taking an opium pill
daily, his smoking the hookah, and his experiments with a Muslim friend in alchemy. It is his
equanimity in the face of severe misfortune that draws Ruchi Ram’s admiration. It is in the
portrayal of his father’s religiosity, whether his routine of ritual worship or his continuous
generosity towards Brahmans and itinerant sadhus whom he often fed, that he shapes the
personality of his father as a devout man. Elucidating on his father’s mixed Hindu–Sikh
religious inheritance, he calls his father an “extremely orthodox man” who performed “puja
to the idols scrupulously every morning” even as he recited the Sikh prayers Rahoras and
Sukhmani. Sahni commented that his father never felt any inconsistency in worshipping idols
while also saying Sikh prayers: “All I can say is that he was perfectly sincere in his idol
worship as he was in his recitation of Sikh scriptures”. Of course, any notion of inconsistency
was related to Ruchi Ram’s time, when Hindu and Sikh legacies were being separated by
reformers, rather than in that of his father. Indeed, Sahni refers to his family’s close association
with the Bhais of Kariala, descendants from the Sikh martyr Matidass, and the initiation of his
elder brother and also himself by these aforementioned Bhais into being sahajdhari Sikhs.15
His father also routinely read the Bhagavad Gita in Gurmukhi text, and also made Ruchi Ram
read it to him.
Ruchi Ram retold, in some detail, an incident that illustrated his father’s “pious Hindu
heart,” which was a source of inspiration and pride for him. One evening, his father had
come across a Muslim vendor of sugarcane mercilessly beating, with a stick, a cow from
a herd that had snatched a sugarcane stalk from his stall. His father, whose earnings had
been very straitened after his loss of fortune, bought up the whole of the vendor’s stock
Religions 2024, 15, 1125 8 of 15

of sugarcane reeds and fed it the cows, even though this would have meant privation for
his own family. Ruchi Ram noted that “he was happy that he had done that which was
expected of every good Hindu”. The fact that Ruchi Ram chose to write of this incident
that underscored cows as holy animals to Hindus and Sikhs showed his desire to burnish
his father’s image as a religious, honorable man, especially as he was conscious of his
own rationalistic bent and heterodoxy as a Brahmo. If the dominant mood of most of the
memoirs, as noted earlier, was one of optimistic investment in a rationalist future, there
was also, particularly in Sahni’s writing, a nostalgia for a simpler time of noble people like
his revered father, whose pious ethics permeated all aspects of his life (Ibid., pp. 38–39).
Munshi Ram, in his autobiography, also painted a picture of his father as an intensely
devout man. However, here, we come across tension between the father and the son with
regard to religious beliefs and rites. This was expected as Munshi Ram’s steadfast adherence
to the Arya Samaj ideals, once he accepted its tenets, clashed with the more traditional piety
of his father that revolved around idol worship and Brahmanical rituals. The Arya Samaj
condemned the corruption of Hinduism by Brahmans and made the Vedas the bedrock
of the future resurgence of “Aryavarta”. Dissonance between the father and son was also
present in Lajpat Rai’s life-writing, again because his father too disliked the Arya Samaj and
its politics. Rai’s father, unlike Munshi Ram’s, who followed sanatani Hindu practices, was
attracted to Islam, Islamicate culture, and particularly the Farsi language, which he taught
in a school established by the British (Rai n.d., pp. 20–25).16 Munshi Ram self-consciously
constructed his “before” and “after” Arya Samaj selves: a degenerate, decadent youth to
a responsible adulthood, depicted as emerging from darkness to light, in the fashion of
emotions associated with renaissance, a rebirth. Pernau has discussed the centrality of such
an emotional makeup as ubiquitous in this period, a gloom of civilizational decline but also
a hope of utopia (Pernau 2021, pp. 25–47).
Munshi Ram described himself as belonging to a “Kshatri kul”, a clan of Kshatriyas,
and, starting from his great-grandfather, showed his elders as devout men. His grandfather
Gulab Rai had ritualistically bathed early each morning at 4:00 a.m. and recited the
Sukhmani prayer and the Bhagavad Gita, followed by singing Kabir’s songs. His father
Nanak Chandra was a devotee of the god Shiva. He had served the British during the
Mutiny, and was recruited into the police as an inspector, employed through his career in
the various cities of the North-Western Province (United Provinces), so that Munshi Ram
spent his childhood there (Shraddhanand 1924, pp. 1–4). His father also became devoted to
Ram and began to listen to the recitation of the Ramayana regularly. Munshi Ram, as a child,
would say the Hanuman Chalisa, Tulsi Das’s forty verses on the god Hanuman, a hundred
times on Sundays while standing on one leg, eat saltless food, and read the Ramayana. Later,
he described his religious routine in Benares, including regular visits to the Vishwanath
temple and more (Ibid., pp. 10–11, 17). Of course, constructing his religious routine for his
readers was a framing device to contrast it with his later non-idolatrous ideal self; however,
it still gives a glimpse of the daily routines of families like his.
The clash with the idolatrous father in Munshi Ram’s case occurred in his hometown
of Talwan in Punjab when the whole family, including his brothers and nephews, were
expected to keep the Ekadashi fast, perform rituals, and feed Brahmans. His father, who
knew Munshi Ram had turned “Arya”, was annoyed at his disrespect toward idols, as
also toward Brahmans.17 Munshi Ram told his father that he did not believe in the father’s
manner of worshipping Brahmans, though he believed in “Brahman-ness”, i.e., in a person
with noble qualities, a typical Arya Samaj reinterpretation of caste. It seemed, though, that
after a time, his father reconciled with his beliefs (Shraddhanand 1924, pp. 102–3).18
At the time of the death of his father, again, Munshi Ram alluded to dissent within
the family—his brothers, who wanted Puranic rites to be observed—while he insisted on
cremating his father in accordance with Vedic rituals newly minted via the Arya Samaj. His
elder brother, in step with orthodox Hinduism, later organized the reading of the Garuda
Purana, traditionally a text read as part of ancestor rites, while Munshi Ram organized a
reading from the Upanishads (Ibid, pp. 123–26).
Religions 2024, 15, 1125 9 of 15

Interestingly, unlike all the devout Hindu or Hindu–Sikh fathers discussed thus far,
Mulk Raj Anand referred to his father as an adherent of the Ismaili sect of the Agha Khan.
So intense were debates on religiosity at this time in Punjab, and the need to follow a
tradition with roots in India, that Ismaili eclecticism seemed inappropriate for his time;
his father gave it up formally in 1913–1914.19 He joined the Arya Samaj, “a social club for
respectable professional and businessmen”. Though he never became religious, he did
follow the ritual of mentioning various names of God while rubbing himself with the towel
after his bath! (Anand [1946] 1957, p. 11).20
Thus, through a discussion of family heritage, devotional practices, pious rituals, and
relationships with fathers—whether of prayerful admiration or respectful dissent—our mem-
oirists constructed a style of writing that laid bare the privilege of high-caste inheritance.
While some dutifully followed caste conduct into which they were born, others challenged
caste—either because they believed it contradicted their religious teachings, as with Sikhism;
or contravened their scientific temper, as with Brahmos; or required reimagining, as with the
Arya Samaj—and yet, family backgrounds recounted a story of inherited entitlement through
purity rituals and routinized devotion. The patrimony of familial piety in an upper-caste
Hindu–Sikh world, as demonstrated by all our authors, established their elite respectable
status, one they could boast of even as they established their cultural hegemony through
bringing reformist modernity to the people.

4. Education, Professions, and Mobility: Making Modern Selves

Daily rituals of worshipful piety established familial reputations of respectability; how-
ever, modernity, the ability to grasp it and dwell in it, was conceived via educational achieve-
ments. Education in the new institutions that grew multifold under colonialist effort and
reformist impetus became a gateway to new professions, mobility, and travel within the
subcontinent or to Europe for further studies. These were accompanied by fresh family
arrangements, of moving places with transferable jobs, or new ways of organizing households,
which could begin to disregard some older constraints of caste and kinship bonds, though by
no means all.21 Scholars have pointed out the head start that Hindu mercantile and profes-
sional classes had in Punjab when it came to advantageously utilizing new educational and
professional avenues under colonialism so that they came to dominate the lower echelons of
officialdom (Jones 1989). So skewed did Hindu numbers appear to the British in adminis-
tration that they changed their policy from looking with impartiality at all communities to
balancing the Hindu–Muslim numbers from the 1880s onward (Barrier 1968). Hindus had
been able to beneficially put to use their literacy and service–gentry backgrounds to forge
ahead under the colonial dispensation.
It may be most appropriate to begin this section with Ved Mehta’s tribute to his father
Amolak Ram, aka Daddyji, because Amolak Ram’s achievements seemed so extraordinary
to his family. Amolak Ram’s father, Bhola Ram, had already broken off from family
shopkeeping and taken employment as a patwari under the colonial state, which required
low-level revenue officials in numbers as the British went about creating new irrigation
schemes and setting up Canal Colonies, besides the regular revenue work. Amolak Ram
studied in various village schools as the family moved with his father’s transferable job. His
university life was initiated through study at the coveted Government College at Lahore,
where almost all our authors eventually found themselves, a most sought-out rite-de-
passage. From there, Ram went on to study medicine at the King Edward Medical College,
Lahore, and then further afield to England, where he received a Diploma in Public Health
at the University College in London and another in Tropical Medicine and Hygiene from
the London School of Tropical Medicine. Back in Punjab, he became a Municipal Health
Officer in Rawalpindi at the lordly salary of Rupees 600 per month. Here, he successfully
explained why bubonic plague lingered in Rawalpindi’s humid warehouses in a British
journal. He later applied for the Rockefeller Foundation Fellowships and left for New
York, then started pursuing a doctorate at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, which
he left midway to study malaria control in Richmond, Virginia. Then he found himself in
Religions 2024, 15, 1125 10 of 15

London once again, a city he contemplated settling down in, though he abandoned the
idea when he came across a mixed-race couple looking for an abortion, assumedly because
of miscegenation, perhaps unwilling to bring a mixed-race child into the world. Thinking
eugenically, he imagined it would be preferable to return to India in order to “produce pure
kshatriya babies who would grow up in a stable Hindu society” (Mehta 1972, pp. 45–121).
Flamboyant and sociable, Amolak Ram hobnobbed with the British, visited clubs, and rode
phaetons and cars. So lofty seemed his achievements to his father that he advised his son
to banish from family memory their humble beginnings, i.e., that Bhola Ram started his
career as a mere patwari (Ibid. p. 112).
Once again, it is from the facility of Prakash Tandon’s pen that we get the most
dramatic expressions of what education and the new professions meant to young Khatri
boys in the second half of the nineteenth century. In his words, “the Khannas, Kapurs,
Chopras, Malhotras, Sahnis, Dhawans, Talwars, Puris to mention only some among the
Khatris; Batras and Kumars. . .among the Aroras; were soon spread all over the Punjab
government civil list, the medical service of the army. . .and the professions of lawyers,
barristers, doctors, scientists and professors”. He spoke about their hunger for learning,
of boys who tied their topknots with a string to the ceiling to prevent themselves from
sleeping in order to study, “so that each time they nodded with sleep they woke up in
pain when the hair was pulled up with a jerk”. The desire to cram all information in
their brains led them to wish “that they could grind the books into pulp and extract the
knowledge out of them and drink it” (Tandon 2011, pp. 31–32). Tandon’s father Ram Das,
an orphan brought up by an uncle, studied civil engineering at the Roorkee Engineering
College and later served in the Irrigation Department of the government, supervising the
making of canals in different small towns, in the new ambitious engineering projects of
the British. Tandon himself went to the Government College in Lahore, and then on to
Manchester University in Britain to study accountancy, and ended up as the chairman of the
multinational company Hindustan Lever, among other accolades he collected throughout
his career.
The upbeat mood that pervades the two accounts above was also present in Ruchi Ram
Sahni’s memoirs. He framed his personal story of growth as driven by his willpower, where
no obstacle was insurmountable. His early education with a local panda in Dera Ismail
Khan taught him arithmetic and multiplication tables “up to 20 times 35”, fractional tables,
and lande characters used by merchants. He also apprenticed in an ordinary shop, then a
big Marwari firm, and finally went on to work for his father. At age 15, he decided to look
for a better high school than his small town offered and went on foot across a desert and the
Jhelum–Indus river confluence and on camel-back, 106 miles to Adhiwal in Jhang, where
he came to associate with a beloved teacher, Babu Kashi Nath Chatterjee. Later he went to
Lahore and the Government High School. He inevitably ended studying at the Government
College in Lahore, where he later became a Professor of Science. In Lahore, he interacted
with intellectuals and reformers of the time, joining the Brahmo Samaj. Professionally,
however, he felt discriminated against, and when, after many years of service, a younger
Englishman superseded him as the head of the Chemistry Department, Ruchi Ram took
the decision to leave his professorship and study further in Germany to pursue research on
radioactivity. This was interrupted by the First World War, and he left for England, joined
the famous Manchester Laboratory, and worked with stalwarts like Ernest Rutherford and
Niels Bohr on research that was published later. Ruchi Ram did much to popularize science
in Punjab, performing experiments in public and holding lectures. He also got elected to
the Punjab Legislative Council in 1923, working on many public issues, including support
for women’s enfranchisement (Burra 2017, pp. 12–15, 74–150, xi–xxxii).
If there was pride in hard work among men like Ruchi Ram, Amolak Ram, and Ram
Das, who felt it was in their ability to shape their future by investing in the British-given gift
of education, the “barkaten” (blessings) that Tandon exulted in—rather than reflecting on the
advantage of caste and birth—on the other end of the spectrum was someone like Kanhaiya
Lal Gauba, who made no bones about being born with a silver spoon in his mouth.22 The
Religions 2024, 15, 1125 11 of 15

son of the rich industrialist Lala Harkishen Lal, Gauba was brought up in luxury and under
the tutelage of British governesses and teachers. After brief stints at Dyal Singh College
and the Government College in Lahore, Gauba smuggled himself to England without his
father’s knowledge, though he later thrived there due to his generosity. He spent four years
studying and socializing at Cambridge, performing indifferently, academically speaking,
but enjoying the extracurricular life to the hilt before finding his way back to Lahore. Here,
he embarked on a career of journalism, practiced law, and worked in his father’s many
businesses (before these failed) and also politics. The other memoirists described here
exemplified traits of frugality and determination in their quest for success. These attitudes,
learnt from Protestant missionaries, were ethics that had an over-sized influence on crafting
the moral language imbibed by the social reformers, as explicated by van der Linden
(van der Linden 2008, p. 23). Gauba, on the other end of the spectrum, flourished because
of his ability to amplify the inherited profit of his station. He underscored what it meant to
have perquisites of right birth in a hierarchical society (Gauba 1974).23
The acquiring of education was not painless, however. While Gauba could rely on
the social capital and wealth of his family, and others on being diligent students, many
struggled with making something of their lives through schooling and getting into the
coveted professions. Lakshman Singh, for instance, while educated at the American Mission
School in Rawalpindi and the Government College in Lahore, was not zealous about his
studies, and managed to become an Assistant District Inspector of Schools, and later a
District Inspector—low-paying jobs—though he was a dedicated reformer of the Singh
Sabha who edited the Khalsa newspaper. He wrote that he “took five years to get through
my Matriculation examination. I failed to pass my Intermediate Examination and twice I
failed in the Teachership Certificate Examination” (Singh 1965, pp. xi–xii, 51). The rigor
and discipline required to master the new educational system was not conducive for all,
and many stayed in the ranks of the subordinate bureaucracy for which the state had
undertaken to educate them.
The profession that seemed most in demand for being lucrative with a degree of
independence was the legal one as society grew more litigious under the British judicial
system, with Punjab as its most litigious province (van der Linden 2008, p. 85). Our two
Arya Samajis, Lajpat Rai and Munshi Ram, while ultimately successful as legal profession-
als, also faced an uphill task in mastering the varied exams required to reach their goals.
Their progress was slow and incremental, described in excruciating detail in their writing,
though, like the others, the remarkable teachers in their lives received loving mentions.
Despite being a good student, Rai was dogged by ill health, the straitened circum-
stances of his father, an early marriage, and the responsibility of educating his siblings. He
studied for two years at the Government College Lahore, describing the co-occurrence of
exams and fevers; e.g., the first-year law exam—mukhtiyari—was accompanied by jaundice.
He finally was able to clear the exam for his legal degree—vakalat—in his third attempt,
though eventually he was able to set up a successful practice in Hisar, so much so that he
could then move to Lahore to solely take up reformist work in the Arya Samaj, to which
he wished to dedicate his life (Rai n.d., pp. 28–82). Later, during World War I, he traveled
to England as a representative of the Indian National Association, and also to the United
States, meeting with a variety of Indians among India’s growing diaspora.
Since Munshi Ram’s self-construction was, as noted, a conflict between his younger
degraded self and a mature goal-oriented one, educational efforts and repeated failures
were firmly placed in the first, dark half of his life. This rather long phase was presented
as one in which his father attempted to educate him. It was his vagrant and dissipated
self’s carelessness (aavargi)—self-propelled or circumstantial—that inhibited his achieving
the requisite signposts. His father, a police officer and a man with substantial means,
was presented as indulgent towards him; Munshi Ram, because of his many distractions,
was casual about studies. However, his descriptions of his various dedicated teachers
were colorful and entertaining over the years—from Lala Bhaiya, the kayasth munshi who
taught Farsi, to Ralph T.H. Griffith, the Sanskritist, to the kindly Maulvi Sahab to Mathura
Religions 2024, 15, 1125 12 of 15

Master (Shraddhanand 1924, pp. 15–24). His educational journey was depicted as a
continuous whirl of minor successes followed by failures. However, ultimately, Munshi
Ram also reached Lahore, and sequentially was able to pass different stages of acquiring
legal proficiency. He became a mukhtiyar, a pleader, and, finally, a vakil, albeit over a few
years, enrolled with the Government College. He managed to establish a successful practice
in Jalandhar and wrote in detail of his legal career, along with his dedicated work as an
Arya Samaj organizer there. Among our memoirists, Munshi Ram and Bhagat Lakshman
Singh were among the few who did not travel abroad, though they were mobile within
North India.
Thus, education for young Khatri and high-caste men, whether through sheer dogged-
ness or easy facility, became the ticket to new professions and a modern life. An aspect of
being modern was a self-conscious inhabiting of it. As legatees of their fathers, through
caste and respectability, but also as expanding and exceeding the lives of their fathers
through educational achievements and performance in public life, these Khatri men came
to see themselves as progressive and modern. Though it will be difficult to parse the differ-
ent ingredients that made them modern—caste, family patrimony, education, participation
in pubic life, mobility, travel—an effervescent combination of all went into making their
novel lives.

5. Conclusions
Speaking of Brahmans, Prakash Tandon noted, “That they could be the leaders of
society, in a position of privilege, I only discovered when I went to live outside the Punjab.
With us the Brahmins were an unprivileged class and exercised little or no influence on
the community”. Tandon went on to elaborate that Punjabi Brahmans were rarely erudite,
barely literate, had a perfunctory knowledge of ritual, knew only a smattering of mantras
to get by, and often depended on the family of the jajmans, whom they served, for cooked
food or handa. Indeed, they were treated with “mild derision” (Tandon 2011, pp. 73–74).
From these rather well-known lines of Tandon, we can draw three conclusions. Firstly,
as many scholars have noted, caste and jati in India were variable and region-specific, and
the four-fold hierarchy of the religious texts was a textual construct and not a visible reality.
Secondly, Tandon’s peroration also underlined how colonial knowledge circulated within
society and became a point of discussion, and often action, insofar as caste was evoked with
regularity, and cross-local caste organizations came up in society. Thirdly, while Punjab
may not have had powerful Brahmans, it did not mean that “Brahmanical” characteristics,
adjectively speaking—whether in terms of rituals, purity/pollution injunctions, commensal
and matrimonial matters, or inculcating pious lifestyles—were absent in Punjabi society.
Tandon himself noted that “Khatris and Aroras were the two props of our Hindu society. . .”
and went on to discuss the castes that served them, marriage practices where a daughter
was treated as a debt and given away in kanya dan, the gift of a virgin daughter, and
practices wherein one affirmed one’s superiority by pejoratively asserting that one was not
like the Sonars, a service caste seen disparagingly by Khatris like him (Ibid).
Tandon went on to describe many castes, but looked at the caste system as a benign
institution, as behooved a privileged caste member, calling the Hindu society a multi-unit
one “in which each caste had its functional place without oppression by a higher caste”, and
emphasized, rather ingeniously, that there were no untouchable castes in west Punjab. He
said this even though he described how Muslims were served in separate utensils (Ibid., pp.
75–79).24 The privilege of class, closely associated with caste, never entered his reflections.
The auto/biographical genre discussed here has highlighted a prosopography of Khatri
men born under the colonial regime whose lives followed similar trajectories given their
caste–class backgrounds at this time. It has drawn attention to how caste advantage—ritual,
educational, professional—created a class of men who came to occupy positions of power in
modern public life. Piety performed by the fathers established upper-caste status. The sons
either respected these practices or critiqued them as unworthy of a new enlightened push
for self-improvement and progress as they developed a new language of morality, scientism,
Religions 2024, 15, 1125 13 of 15

and modernity. Though in the shadows of the colonial state, they worked to create a society
where they could deploy the rhetoric of reason, and eventually the principles of liberalism
and democracy, to inherit the future that would be India. They set themselves to benefit from
caste despite their discourse that caste was backward and in need of reform, if not erasure.
The colonial state’s governmentality had utilized caste for its own benefit. It had
divided Punjabi peoples into agricultural and non-agricultural castes (Barrier 1966).25 If
the Khatri and cognate castes had an educational advantage, the Jat caste group came
to have land-owning privilege: land ownership that was denied to the mercantile, as
also to Dalit castes. The Partition of the subcontinent disrupted the old, but also the
relatively new, patterns of life that came into being in colonial Punjab, though certain
changes in society were perpetuated. In the post-Partition period, and in the truncated
Indian Punjab, the Jat Sikhs are indubitably the high-status group, being politically and
socially powerful, in contrast to the greater pre-Partition Punjab, where multiple castes
and groups deemed themselves prestigious among Hindus, Sikhs, and Muslims. Many
among the mercantile and professional Hindus and Sikhs of west Punjab migrated to the
cities of a newly created/divided India, just as many Jat and increasingly Dalit castes have
relocated in the Diaspora, definitively changing the caste, class, and political configurations
of postcolonial Punjab.

Funding: This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement: No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is
not applicable to this article.
Conflicts of Interest: The author declares no conflict of interest.

Notes
1 I have preferred to use the compound term auto/biography for this genre. While many were self-referential first-person accounts,
others were biographies by family members, or memoirs of a time, a place, or people, including the self. The fluidity of this genre
is captured better through the use of a slash between self (auto) and life-writing (biography). For the complexity of this genre, see
Smith and Watson (2010).
2 Lajpat Rai explicitly wrote about his long public life and his participating in the making of history (Rai n.d., pp. 1–3).
3 Aap Biti, according to Barbara Metcalf, is an ordinary Hindi term for one’s life story in written or oral form. According to her,
the term connotes “what has happened to one” or “an account of one’s sorrows”. Thus, the English translation does not quite
carry all the nuances of the term (Barbara D. Metcalf, “The Past in the Present: Instruction, Pleasure, and Blessing in Maulana
Muhammad Zakariyya’s Aap Biitii”, in Arnold and Blackburn 2004, pp. 1–28, 116–43).
4 Regarding the hybridity of the genre, see the Introduction in Malhotra and Lambert-Hurley (2015).
5 The autobiographical genre is often considered a mix of fact and fiction. See the discussion in Malhotra and Lambert-Hurley
(2015, p. 22). Also see Milani (1992).
6 This is not the place to discuss in full Munshi Ram’s lengthy and remarkable autobiography. See M. Singh (2018).
7 Tandon’s Punjabi Century: 1857: 1947, which he wrote in 1961, and is referred to here, is now available in this compendium of his
writing. Also see the discussion on Tandon’s writing in the introductory chapter in Malhotra (2024, pp. 1–52).
8 A useful introduction on caste is available in Banerjee-Dube ([2008] 2015).
9 On Orientalists’ understanding of caste, see Guha (2013, p. 1).
10 How Khatri sub-divisions came about, for example between Lahori Khatris and Sarins, was a story that involved discussions
around allowing or not allowing widow remarriage and featured either Emperor Aurangzeb’s or Alauddin Khilji’s intervention
in Khatri social customs. I have seen this story in many colonial publications, including in Ibbetson ([1970] 1995).
11 For a discussion of the colonial state’s broad generalizations on castes see Malhotra (2002).
12 On Arya Samaj and Dayanand refer to Jones’ book (Jones 1989). On not abandoning caste by birth even by Dayanand; to
understand Dayanand’s position on caste by merit and birth see (Malhotra 2006).
13 Ganda Singh, his editor, writes that Lakshman Singh had handed him his manuscript for publication a few months before he
died in 1944, but the volume was published only in 1965.
14 On sanatan Sikhism see Oberoi (1994).
15 Sahajdhari Sikhs referred to Sikhs not initiated into the Khalsa order and therefore not obligated to keep uncut hair, among other
requirements.
Religions 2024, 15, 1125 14 of 15

16 Also see the discussion in the Introduction in Malhotra (2024).

17 Munshi Ram also went through a phase when he was a nastic, an atheist.
18 Lajpat Rai similarly reported that eventually his father too started respecting the Arya Samaj.
19 The question of belonging/not-belonging came to be tied around the “origins” of traditions. See the discussion in Anshu
Malhotra, “The Conversion Loop: Gender, Identity, and Storytelling in Bhai Vir Singh’s Sundari,” in Malhotra and Murphy (2023).
20 The similarities with Lajpat Rai’s father stand out.
21 For novel ways in which marriage and gender relations were organized in Punjab, see Malhotra (2002).
22 That is the title of his first chapter, “The Silver Spoon”, (Gauba 1974, pp. 13–19).
23 Gauba pursued notoriety all his life—he made money by writing the salacious Uncle Sham in retaliation to the American journalist
Katherine Mayo’s scurrilous Mother India, paying her back in her own coin; he later converted to Islam in a public ceremony and
married three Muslim women sequentially in his life, making a splash, at least in his own descriptions.
24 I have argued elsewhere that the Muslims were encompassed within the hierarchic Indic caste customs related to pollution and
(un)touchability (chhua-chhut). See Chapter 6 on the Dalit Sikh reformer Ditt Singh in (Malhotra 2017, pp. 201–36).
25 See the discussion on caste in Chapter 4 in Gill (2024).

References
Allender, Tim. 2006. Ruling through Education: The Politics of Schooling in the Colonial Punjab. Elgin: New Dawn Press.
Anand, Mulk Raj. 1957. Apology for Heroism: A Brief Autobiography of Ideas. Bombay: Kutub-Popular. First published 1946.
Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Arnold, David, and Stuart Blackburn. 2004. Introduction: Life Histories in India. In Telling Lives in India: Biography, Autobiography and
Life History. Delhi: Permanent Black.
Banerjee-Dube, Ishita, ed. 2015. Caste in History. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. First published 2008.
Barrier, Norman G. 1966. The Punjab Alienation of Land Bill of 1900. Monograph and Occasional Paper Series. Durham: Duke University.
Barrier, Norman G. 1968. The Punjab Government and Communal Politics, 1870–1908. Journal of Asian Studies 27: 523–39. [CrossRef]
Burra, Neera, ed. 2017. A Memoir of Pre-Partition Punjab: Ruchi Ram Sahni, 1863–1948. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 9–150,
xi–xxxii.
Dirks, Nicholas B. 2001. Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gandhi, Mohandas K. 2016. An Autobiography: The Story of My Experiments with Truth, 8th ed. New Delhi: Rupa.
Gauba, Khalid Latif. 1974. Friends and Foes: An Autobiography. New Delhi: Indian Book Co, pp. 13–19.
Gill, Navyug. 2024. Labors of Division: Global Capitalism and the Emergence of the Peasant in Colonial Panjab. Stanford: Stanford University
Press, pp. 174–218, chap. 4.
Glover, William. 2008. Making Lahore Modern: Constructing and Imagining a Colonial City. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Guha, Sumit. 2013. Beyond Caste: Identity and Power in South Asia, Past and Present. Leiden: Brill, p. 1.
Ibbetson, Denzil C. J. 1995. Panjab Castes. Patiala: Languages Department, pp. 2, 4–9, 247. First published 1970, abstracted from the
Census of Panjab, 1883.
Jones, Kenneth W. 1989. Arya Dharm: Hindu Consciousness in 19th-Century Punjab. Delhi: Manohar.
Kaviraj, Sudipta. 2015a. Literature and the Moral Imaginations of Modernity. In The Invention of Private Life: Literature and Ideas. New
York: Columbia University Press, pp. 22–39.
Kaviraj, Sudipta. 2015b. The Invention of Private Life: A Reading of Sibnath Sastri’s Autobiography. In The Invention of Private Life:
Literature and Ideas. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 303–36.
Kumar, Udaya. 2008. Autobiography as a Way of Writing History: Personal Narratives from Kerala and the Inhabitation of Modernity.
In History in the Vernacular. Edited by Raziuddin Aquil and Partha Chatterjee. Delhi: Permanent Black, pp. 418–48.
Kumar, Udaya. 2016. Conditions of Self-Writing. In Writing the First Person: Literature, History, Autobiography in Modern Kerala. Ranikhet:
Permanent Black, pp. 1–42.
Malhotra, Anshu. 2002. Gender, Caste and Religious Identities: Restructuring Class in Colonial Punjab. New Delhi: Oxford University Press,
pp. 24–34.
Malhotra, Anshu. 2006. The Body as a Metaphor for the Nation: Caste, Masculinity and Femininity in the Satyarth Prakash of Swami
Dayanand Sarasvati. In Rhetoric and Reality: Gender and Colonial Experience in South Asia. Edited by Avril Powell and Siobhan
Lambert-Hurley. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 121–53.
Malhotra, Anshu. 2017. Piro and the Gulabdasis: Gender, Sect and Society in Punjab. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, chapter 2.
pp. 55–91.
Malhotra, Anshu. 2024. Punjabi Centuries: Tracing Histories of Punjab. Hyderabad: Orient BlackSwan, pp. 1–52.
Malhotra, Anshu, and Anne Murphy, eds. 2023. Bhai Vir Singh (1872–1957): Religious and Literary Modernities in Colonial and Post-Colonial
Indian Punjab. London: Routledge, pp. 65–87.
Malhotra, Anshu, and Siobhan Lambert-Hurley, eds. 2015. Speaking of the Self: Gender, Performance and Autobiography in South Asia.
Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 1–30.
Mehta, Ved. 1972. Daddyji. New Delhi: Penguin Books, pp. 6–9, 21, 45–121.
Religions 2024, 15, 1125 15 of 15

Milani, Farzaneh. 1992. Veiling and Words: The Emerging Voices of Iranian Women Writers. New York: Syracuse University Press,
pp. 203–4.
Nath, Kashi. 1874. Khatris. In The Indian Antiquary Vol. II 1873. Bombay: Education Society’s Press, pp. 26–28. Available online:
https://babel.hathitrust.org (accessed on 1 September 2024).
Oberoi, Harjot. 1994. The Construction of Colonial Boundaries: Culture, Identity and Diversity in the Sikh Tradition. New Delhi: Oxford
University Press.
Pernau, Margrit. 2019. Emotions and Modernity in Colonial India: From Balance to Fervor. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Pernau, Margrit. 2021. Emotions and Temporalities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 2–3, 25–47.
Prakash, Gyan. 1999. Another Reason: Science and the Imagination of Modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press, p. 8.
Rai, Lala Lajpat. n.d. Atmakatha. Lahore: Rajpal & Sons, pp. 1–3, 16–17, 20–25, 28–82.
Shraddhanand, Swami. 1924. Kalyan Marg ka Pathik. Kashi: Gyanmandal Karyalaya, p. 3.
Singh, Bhagat Lakshman. 1965. Autobiography. Edited by Ganda Singh. Calcutta: The Sikh Cultural Centre.
Singh, Mohinder. 2018. ‘A Question of Life and Death’: Conversion, Self and Identity in Swami Shraddhanand’s Autobiography. South
Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 41: 452–67. [CrossRef]
Smith, Sidonie, and Julia Watson, eds. 2010. Reading Autobiography: A Guide for Interpreting Life Narratives. Minneapolis: University of
Minnesota Press.
Tandon, Prakash. 2011. Punjabi Saga 1857–2000: The Monumental Story of Five Generations of a Remarkable Punjabi Family. New Delhi:
Rupa and Company.
van der Linden, Bob. 2008. Moral Languages from Colonial Punjab: The Singh Sabha, Arya Samaj and Ahmadiyahs. Delhi: Manohar.

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.