ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Evaluation of Impact Strength of Dental Acrylic Resins by
Incorporation of TiO2 Nanoparticles Using Two Different
Processing Techniques
Chippalapally Arun Kumar1, C Ravi Kumar2, Kanchiradasu Vamshikiran3, Gaddam Deepthi4, G Naveen Kumar5, M Akhilesh6
 A b s t r ac t
 Aim: The present study aims to evaluate the impact strength of PMMA incorporated with TiO2nanoparticles by two different processing
 techniques i.e. water bath and microwave processing techniques.
 Materials and methods: A total of 80 samples made of PMMA were divided into four groups. Each group includes 20 samples with group I and
 II comprising of samples made of normal acrylic resin and acrylic resin reinforced with 1 wt% TiO2nanoparticles processed with conventional
 water bath technique respectively, groups III and IV include normal acrylic resin and acrylic resin reinforced with 1 wt% TiO2processed using
 microwave technique respectively. The specimens were tested for impact strength using IZOD pendulum impact tester. The impact energy
 values obtained were analyzed statistically.
 Results: The results through one-way ANOVA showed a high mean impact strength with group IV samples (23.13) and lowest with respect
 to group I (19.42) with highest statistical significance (p < 0.001). A post hocTukey test intergroup analysis showed a statistically significant
 difference between group I and other groups, whereas there was no statistical significance associated with other intergroup comparisons.
 Conclusion: PMMA with its current drawbacks in the physical and mechanical properties requires modifications to make it an ideal denture
 base material. The current investigation evaluates that a high mean impact strength with samples made of PMMA incorporated with TiO2
 nanoparticles processed by microwave technique was obtained when compared with normal acrylic resins processed by water bath technique.
 Clinical significance: The methodology of current study can be used while processing of denture bases for patients to evaluate the effect of
 oral environment on inclusion of TiO2nanoparticles with microwave processing in a clinical setup. This could help in reducing the amount of
 fractures associated with heavy load masticatory stresses and improving the mechanical properties in denture bases.
 Keywords: Acrylic denture base, Impact strength, Microwave, TiO2 nanofillers.
 The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (2019): 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2655
Introduction                                                                        1,3,5
                                                                                        Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Government
A breakthrough in the field of prosthetics was the invention                        Dental College and Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and is considered as                            2
                                                                                     Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Mamatha
                                                                                     
an ideal denture base material compared to many. PMMA is a                          Dental College, Khammam, Telangana, India
routinely used material in the fabrication of removable partial                     4
                                                                                     Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Government Dental
and complete dentures as it possesses a wide range of beneficial                    College and Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
properties like ease of handling, inexpensive fabrication, and                      6
                                                                                      Department of Orthodontics, Government Dental College and
                                                                                      
stability in oral environment, lack of toxicity, color matching                     Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
ability, biocompatibility and accurate fit. Despite the favorable                   Corresponding Author: Gaddam Deepthi, Department of Oral and
properties, masticatory forces have a deforming effect on PMMA                      Maxillofacial Pathology, Government Dental College and Hospitals,
during function and it lacks particularly in terms of transverse                    Hyderabad, Telangana, India, Phone: +91 7799357588, e-mail:
and impact strength. So, any factor that increases the distortion                   drdeepthireddy999@gmail.com
of the denture base and alters the stress distribution may lead to                  How to cite this article: Kumar CA, Kumar CR, Vamshikiran K, et al.
denture fracture.1,2 Even though PMMA is an excellent denture                    Evaluation of Impact Strength of Dental Acrylic Resins by Incorporation
base material, it has few disadvantages like low in strength                        of TiO2 Nanoparticles Using Two Different Processing Techniques.
resulting in denture fractures. Fracture may occur because of                       J Contemp Dent Pract 2019;20(10):1184–1189.
unsatisfactory impact strength, transverse strength, or fatigue                     Source of support: Nil
resistance. 3                                                                      Conflict of interest: None
    However, due to its poorer physical and mechanical properties,
PMMA structure is further modified by rubber copolymerization or
by reinforcement with different types of fillers like metallic wires,               dioxide (TiO2) are used along with PMMA, among which TiO2 is
fibers (glass, aramid, nylon, polyurethane and carbon)4,5 and use                routinely used as they could improve the flexural strength, fracture
of metallic oxides to reduce the drawbacks and to improve the                       toughness, hardness, thermal conductivity, antimicrobial property,
fracture resistance of PMMA denture based resins.6,7 Metal oxides                impact strength and a substantial decrease in water sorption and
such as aluminum oxide, zinc oxide, zirconium oxide and titanium                    solubility.8
© The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.
org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to
the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain
Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
                                   Effect of TiO2Nanoparticles on PMMA Using Microwave Processing
     Nanotechnology is a growing field which determines the                Table 1: Study groups
future of science and technology. It is based on the idea of creating       Group            Method                                   Sample size
functional structures by controlling molecules on a structural basis        Group I          Normal acrylic resin processed with      20
and manipulating the matter at billionth of meters or nanometers.9                          conventional water bath technique
According to the definition of the National Nanotechnology
                                                                            Group II         Acrylic resin reinforced with 1 wt%      20
Initiative, nanotechnology is the direct manipulation of materials                           TiO2nanoparticles processed with
at the nanoscale.10This term defines a technology that enables                              conventional water bath technique
almost complete control of the structure of matter at nanoscale
                                                                            Group III        Normal acrylic resin processed using     20
dimensions. It will give us the ability to arrange atoms as we desire                        microwave technique
and subsequently to achieve effective, complete control of the
                                                                            Group IV         Acrylic resin reinforced with 1 wt%      20
structure of matter. These advances in nanotechnology provided
                                                                                             TiO2processed using microwave
suitable changes in dentistry from diagnosing the disease to varying                         technique
treatment options.11
     The approaches in which nanotechnology can be used in
dentistry can be on therapeutic basis, regeneration of dental tissues      M at e r ia l s   and     Methods
or by incorporating them in dental materials.12 As mentioned              In the present study, the concentrations of TiO2 incorporated
earlier, the usage of these nanoparticles in PMMA denture base             into PMMA was restricted to 1 wt%. A total of 80 samples divided
is by alteration and addition of TiO2 filler size to improve the          into four groups with 20 samples each with dimensions of
performance of the material. The nanomaterials present with variety        60 mm × 12 mm × 3 mm were prepared as per ASTM (American
of morphologies such as particles, flowers, cubes, rods, tubes etc.8      Standards for Testing and Material). The sample size and
     A number of processing techniques like compression molding,           methodology in each group are summarized in Table 1.
injection molding or fluid resin techniques are proposed in                    A total of 40 metal sample analogs with the above-mentioned
the fabrication of denture bases using acrylic resins. Variable            dimensions were invested into flasks through two pour technique
dimensional changes tend to occur in PMMA, which is attributed to          using dental plaster as the investing medium in conventional
the type of processing technique.13Recently, various studies were         water bath technique (groups I and II). After the investing medium
conducted using microwave processing, the principle of which               has reached its final set, the two portions of the flask were gently
depends on the effect of microwave energy on the monomer                   separated. The metal sample analogs were also lifted from investing
components promoting an uniform and immediate heating of                   medium along the beveled edges, thereby creating mold space
the polymer mass, that activates the decomposition of benzoyl              into which acrylic resin was packed (Fig. 1A). For microwave
peroxide, and quickly yields free radicals for the polymerization          oven processing (groups III and IV), separate microwavable flasks
process, which decreases in the same proportion as polymerization          were used. The above mentioned procedure was repeated with
increases.14                                                              microwavable flasks (Fig. 1B).
     Studies conducted on TiO2nanoparticles incorporation into                To pack acrylic resin into the mold space, a selected acrylic
denture base resins showed improved physical and mechanical                material was mixed according to manufacturer’s recommended
properties. The other studies conducted on comparison of                   polymer: monomer ratio and packing was done. Then curing of
various processing techniques have shown improved mechanical               samples in water bath technique was done in an acrylizer at 74°C for
properties of denture bases with microwave curing technique by             8 hours with no terminal boiling. Following which, the flasks were
decreasing the residual monomer content.15Hence, considering              allowed to cool to room temperature and removed from the water
the above said facts, the present study was conducted to evaluate          bath and bench, cooled for 30 minutes. Subsequently the flask was
the effect of TiO2nanoparticles on impact strength of dental acrylic      immersed under cold tap water for 15 minutes. The same procedure
resins using microwave processing and conventional water bath              was repeated for microwavable flasks and cured at 540 watts for
methods.                                                                   10 minutes in microwave oven (Fig. 2).
Figs 1A and B: (A) Metal analogs invested in brass varsity flask; (B) Nonmetallic (microwavable) flasks
                                                             The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, Volume 20 Issue 10 (October 2019)   1185
                                    Effect of TiO2Nanoparticles on PMMA Using Microwave Processing
Fig. 2: Microwave oven                                                      Fig. 3: Amalgamator
Fig. 4: Test samples from various groups
     TiO2nanoparticles were incorporated into the polymer with a           clamped upright in the anvil with a v-notch at the level of clamp.
concentration of 1 wt% i.e., 1 g of nanoparticles to 99 g of polymer        The dimensions of the sample were entered in the display box.
and mixed using an amalgamator (Fig. 3) to achieve a homogeneous            The pendulum was released after entering the data. The test piece
mixture. Polymer and monomer were mixed according to                        was hit by pendulum which was aerodynamically controlled. It
manufacturer’s recommendations (3:1 by volume).                             was allowed to fall freely from fixed height, to give a blow of 120
     After completing the process, the cured samples were retrieved         ft lb. energy. After fracturing the test piece, the height to which
from the flask by deflasking. The samples were trimmed of the               the pendulum rises was recorded by a friction pointer from which
excess resin flash using tungsten carbide burs and fine abrasive of         absorbed energy was read. The impact energy of the test specimen
grit size 120/240 microns without altering the specimen surfaces and        was displayed in J/m. The results obtained for each test specimen
dimensions. Samples from all the groups are depicted in Figure 4.           were analyzed statistically using SPSS version 22. Descriptive
     Specimens from all the four groups were tested for impact              analysis for scale data, one-way ANOVA and independent t test
strength using a pendulum impact tester—IZOD (Tinius Olsen                  for intergroup comparison are the statistical analysis done with
IZOD/Charpy Impact Tester Model IT504, USA) (Fig. 5). It conforms           a pvalue of <0.05 was considered significant and <0.01 as highly
to ASTM standards D256 and D6110; ISO standards 179 and 180. It             significant.
has a pendulum, a digital display and an anvil for supporting the
specimen Model IT 504.
     The fabricated samples were notched in the middle, with                R e s u lts
a notch cutter (Fig. 6) as in ISO 179:1993 to a depth of 0.2 mm             The present study was conducted to evaluate the impact strength
leaving a residual depth of 2.8 mm beneath the notch. In this test,         of PMMA incorporated with TiO2nanoparticles by two different
the sample piece was used as a cantilever i.e., the specimen was            processing techniques. The test samples of different groups
1186     The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, Volume 20 Issue 10 (October 2019)
                                   Effect of TiO2Nanoparticles on PMMA Using Microwave Processing
                                                                          Fig. 6: Notch cutter
Fig. 5: Izod impact tester
Table 2: Mean and SD of impact strength in various groups
 Group                       N                Minimum                   Maximum                  Mean                     Std. deviation
 Group I                     20                17.000                    27.398                   19.42                    2.47
 Group II                    20                19.200                    27.398                   22.53                    2.06
 Group III                   20                19.300                    27.000                   21.73                    1.92
 Group IV                    20                19.333                    32.400                   23.13                    2.96
                                                                          one-way ANOVA (Table 3), which showed a highly significant
                                                                          difference between the groups with a “p” value of 0.001.
                                                                               The comparisons between the individual groups was
                                                                          statistically using post hocTukey test (Table 4). Post hoc Tukey
                                                                          analysis showed statistically significant differences in the mean
                                                                          impact strength values between group I with all other groups
                                                                          individually (p < 0.05). The analysis of mean impact strength
                                                                          between group II with group III (p = 0.716), group II with group IV
                                                                          (p = 0.856), group III and group IV (p = 0.256) showed no statistical
                                                                          significance. A negative value (−) in the mean difference indicates
                                                                          that the second variable has higher mean value than first variable
                                                                          in that comparison.
                                                                          Discussion
                                                                          PMMA is widely used to fabricate denture bases due to various
                                                                          desirable properties. Despite having these, it lacks physical
                                                                          and mechanical strength that could support the masticatory
Fig. 7: Mean impact strengths between the four groups
                                                                          stresses.16A study conducted by Johnston et al. on flexure fatigue
                                                                          of 10 commonly used denture base resins concluded that 68%
mentioned in Table 1 were subjected to pendulum impact tester.            of dentures break within their first year of clinical service.17 Few
The mean values and standard deviation obtained in various groups         other studies also showed varied reports on fractures of denture,
were summarized in Table 2 and Figure 7. The mean impact strength         with fatigue and impact resulting in maxillary dentures to break
was highest in group IV with mean value of 23.13 and lowest in            in the midline and with impact as a cause in 80% of mandibular
group I with 19. 42. The results were analyzed statistically through      denture fractures.18Due to the above said facts, there are various
Table 3: Overall comparison of mean impact strength in various groups by one way ANOVA test
Comparison               Sum of squares        df                        Mean square              F                       Sig.
Between groups           158.423                3                        52.808                   9.276                    <0.001*
Within groups            432.658               76                         5.693
Total                    591.081               79
*Highly significant
                                                            The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, Volume 20 Issue 10 (October 2019)   1187
                                     Effect of TiO2Nanoparticles on PMMA Using Microwave Processing
Table 4: Post hocTukey test for individual intergroup comparisons           themselves. Nishii et al. in 1968 first proposed the use of microwave
Comparison                 Mean difference        p value                   energy as an alternative PMMA processing method.25Kimura et al. in
Group I–Group II           −3.106650*                0.001**
                                                                             their studies concluded that a similar behavior is exhibited by acrylic
                                                                             resins processed through both conventional water bath method
Group I–Group III          −2.307950*                0.016*
                                                                             and using microwave technique , but with early processing time
Group I–Group IV           −3.707800*             <0.001**
                                                                             using microwave processing.15Jadhav et al. investigated the impact
Group II–Group III          0.798700                 0.716 NS
                                                                             strength of denture base resins polymerized by various processing
Group II–Group IV          −0.601150                 0.856 NS                techniques. Their results showed denture bases polymerized by
Group III–Group IV         −1.399850                 0.256 NS                microwave processing technique had highest impact strength
*Significant; **Highly significant                                           compared to water bath technique.24In microwave processing, the
NS, nonsignificant                                                           polymer and monomer mixer is heated directly before the flask is
new interventions put forth into PMMA by adding nanofillers and              heated, so the heat generated gets dissipated to the investment and
also introduced newer processing techniques alternative to the               flask. In water bath method, water gets heated first followed by the
conventional methods. TiO2nanofillers compared to others are                heating of the flask, investment polymer and monomer mass. This
proved to have good mechanical and antimicrobial properties.19              delay in the heating of polymer and monomer mass results in longer
     In the present study, the evaluation of impact strength of PMMA         processing times.25The limitations of the present study includes:
material incorporated with TiO2nanofillers was done and also                even though the dimensions of the specimens were standardized,
comparison between acrylic resins with/without TiO2 nanofillers             the strength of the reinforced PMMA orally in the presence of the
using two different processing techniques (microwave processing              saliva cannot be anticipated and the simulation with the clinical
and conventional water bath methods) was done. The test samples              conditions is not done. Another limitation was that surface of acrylic
were divided into four groups (Table 1) and all the specimens were           samples were flat when compared to any removable prostheses
tested for impact strength. The obtained results showed that impact          which has curved surfaces.
strength was increased by adding TiO2 nanoparticles. Highest
impact strength was observed for group IV (23.13) followed by                C o n c lu s i o n
group II (22.53), group III (21.73), group I (19.42). i.e. PMMA reinforced   Specimens of heat cured acrylic resin materials fabricated with
with 1 wt% TiO2using microwave technique showed higher impact               incorporation of TiO2nanoparticles showed high impact strength
strength compared to others because in this technique microwaves             compared to the normal acrylic resins. Among the groups tested,
are used to generate heat inside the resin.                                  the acrylic resins processed with microwave technique with
     The concentration of TiO2in the present study was restricted           incorporation of TiO2particles showed highest impact strength.
to 1 wt%, because in a study conducted by Shirkavand et al.                  Further tests can be done to evaluate the effect of oral environment
on the effect of various concentrations of (0.5, 1 and 2 wt%)                on inclusion of TiO2nanoparticles with microwave processing of
TiO2 nanoparticles on tensile strength of dental acrylic resins,            denture bases in a clinical setup.
incorporation of 1 wt% of TiO2 to PMMA showed improved
mechanical properties. 20Increased concentrations of TiO2 (5%)
will lead to worsening in impact strength of the resin material. On          References
increasing the filler content above the saturation point, the resin            1. Asli HN, Moradian S, et al. Comparison of transverse strength of
cannot incorporate more filler particles leading to saturation of                 three different types of heat cured resin acrylics. Biosci Biotech Bioch
the material and further leads to deterioration. Further attempts                 Communi 2017 Apr 1;10(2):248–251. DOI: 10.21786/bbrc/10.2/42.
to add filler particles above saturation point leads to disruption             2. Gurbaz O, Unalan F, et al. Composition of transverse strength of six
                                                                                  acrylic denture resins. OHDMBSC 2010;9(1):21–24.
of resin matrix causing decreased strength of specimens. 21 The
                                                                               3. Salman TA, Khalaf HA. The influence of adding of modified ZrO2
other theory is that, the nanoparticles incorporated into PMMA                    -TiO2nanoparticles on certain physical and mechanical properties of
will take up the applied load and the resin matrix will distribute                heat polymerized acrylic resin. J Baghdad College of Dentistry 2015
the load and provides structural integrity. 20The present study                  Sep;325(2221):1–5.
showed that the impact strength was comparatively higher in                    4. Aydinc C, Yilmaz H, et al. Effect of glass fiber reinforcement on the
the test specimens belonging to group II and IV (the acrylic resins               flexural strength of different denture base resins. Quintessence Int
incorporated with 1 wt% TiO2) than group I and III (the normal                   2002;33:457–462.
acrylic resins). These results are in concordance with the studies             5. Cappacio G, Ward H. Properties of ultra‑high modulus polyethylene
                                                                                  fibre. J Nat PhysSci 1973;243:143–145.
conducted by Shirkavand et al.,20Ahmed et al.,21Ghahremani et al.22
                                                                               6. Goldberg AJ, Burnstone CJ. The use of continuous fibre reinforcement
and Acosta-Torres et al.23The study of Acosta-Torres et al. on the
                                                                                  in dentistry. Dent Mater 1992;8:197–202. DOI: 10.1016/0109-
effect of nanotechnology on the improvement of conventional                       5641(92)90083-O.
prosthetic acrylic resins proved that TiO2nanofillers improved the            7. Mowade TK, Dange SP. Effect of fiber reinforcement on impact
mechanical properties of the resin materials.                                     strength of heat polymerized polymethyl methacrylate denture base
     The impact strength of a material also depends on the                        resin: in vitrostudy and SEM analysis. J Adv Prosthodont 2012;4:30–36.
processing technique used. Conventional water bath method                         DOI: 10.4047/jap.2012.4.1.30.
has been in use for a very long time because of its easy and cost              8. Gad MM, Fouda SM, et al. PMMA denture base material enhancement:
effective procedure; however, due to exothermic polymerisation                    a review of fiber, filler, and nanofiller addition. Int J Nanomedicine
                                                                                  2017;12:3801. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S130722.
reaction, there is evidence of porosities and low impact strength
                                                                               9. Saravana KR, Vijayalakshmi R. Nanotechnology in dentistry. Ind J
and it takes longer processing times to prevent the formation of                  Dent Res 2006;17:62–65. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.29890.
voids within the denture.24Microwave processing of denture based             10. Kong LX, Peng Z, et al. Nanotechnology and its role in the
resins is based on the generation of electromagnetic field inside                 management of periodontal diseases. Periodontol 2000 2006;40:
the microwave oven which allows the acrylic molecules to orient                   184–196. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2005.00143.x.
1188      The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, Volume 20 Issue 10 (October 2019)
                                     Effect of TiO2Nanoparticles on PMMA Using Microwave Processing
11. Ozak ST, Ozkan P. Nanotechnology and dentistry. Eur JDent 2013                     with high-impact acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:274–280. DOI:
    Jan;7(1):145.                                                                      10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.12.023.
12. Bhardwaj A, Bhardwaj A, et al. Nanotechnology in dentistry: Present          19.   Aziz HK. TiO2- Nanofillers Effects on Some Properties of Highly-
    and future. J Int Oral Health 2014 Feb;6(1):121.                                   Impact Resin Using Different Processing Techniques. Open Dent J
13. Chintalacheruvu VK, Balraj RU, et al. Evaluation of three different                2018;12:202. DOI: 10.2174/1874210601812010202.
    processing techniques in the fabrication of complete dentures. J Int         20.   Shirkavand S, Moslehifard E. Effect of TiO2nanoparticles on tensile
    Soc Prev Community Dent 2017 Jun;7(1):S18–S23. DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.                strength of dental acrylic resins. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects
    JISPCD_102_17.                                                                     2014;8(4):197–203. DOI: 10.5681/joddd.2014.036.
14. Palaskar J, Mittal S, et al. Comparative evaluation of surface porosities    21.   Ahmed MA, El-Shennawy M, et al. Effect of titanium dioxide nano particles
    in conventional heat polymerized acrylic resin cured by water bath                 incorporation on mechanical and physical properties on two different
    and microwave energy with microwavable acrylic resin cured by                      types of acrylic resin denture base. World Journal of Nano Science and
    microwave energy. Contemp Clin Dent 2013;4(2):147–151. DOI:                        Engineering 2016 Jul 5;6(03):111. DOI: 10.4236/wjnse.2016.63011.
    10.4103/0976-237X.114844.                                                    22.   Ghahremani L, Shirkavand S, et al. Tensile strength and impact strength
15. Kimura H, Teraoka F, et al. Applications of microwave for dental                   of color modified acrylic resin reinforced with titanium dioxide
    technique: dough forming and curing curing of acrylic resins.                      nanoparticles. J Clin Exp Dent 2017 May;9(5):e661. DOI: 10.4317/jced.53620.
    J JapanSoc Dent Mat Dev 1983;2:253–257.                                      23.   Acosta-Torres LS, López-Marín LM, et al. Biocompatible Metal-Oxide
16. Nazirkar G, Bhanushali S, et al. Effect of anatase titanium dioxide                Nanoparticles: Nanotechnology Improvement of Conventional
    nanoparticles on the flexural strength of heat cured poly methyl                   Prosthetic Acrylic Resins. J Nanomater 2011;2011:1–8. DOI:
    methacrylate resins: An in vitroStudy. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2014              10.1155/2011/941561.
    Dec 1;14(1):144–149. DOI: 10.1007/s13191-014-0385-8.                         24.   Jadhav R, Bhide S, et al. Assessment of the impact strength of the
17. Johnston EP, Nicholls JI, et al. Flexure fatigue of 10 commonly                    denture base resin polymerized by various processing techniques.
    used denture base resins. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46:478–483. DOI:                    Indian J Dent Res 2013;24(1):19–25. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.114926.
    10.1016/0022-3913(81)90232-8.                                                25.   Rizzatti-Barbosa CM, Cury AA, et al. The use of microwave energy in
18. Kim S-H, Watts DC. The effect of reinforcement with woven                          dental prosthesis. In Advances in Induction and Microwave Heating
    Eglassfibers on the impact strength of complete dentures fabricated                of Mineral and Organic Materials, IntechOpen; 2011 Feb 14.
                                                                 The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, Volume 20 Issue 10 (October 2019)            1189