Hematogenous Osteomyelitis in Children: Evaluation and Diagnosis
Hematogenous Osteomyelitis in Children: Evaluation and Diagnosis
All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete.
Literature review current through: May 2022. | This topic last updated: Jul 13, 2020.
INTRODUCTION
The evaluation and diagnosis of hematogenous osteomyelitis in children will be discussed here.
The epidemiology, pathogenesis, microbiology, clinical features, complications, and
management of osteomyelitis in children osteomyelitis are discussed separately:
Osteomyelitis also may result from direct inoculation of bone with bacteria in association with
an open fracture or as a complication of puncture wounds or the placement of orthopedic
hardware (such as pins or screws). (See "Infectious complications of puncture wounds".)
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 1/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH
The diagnosis often is unclear at the initial evaluation. The initial presentation may be delayed,
and signs and symptoms nonspecific. A high index of suspicion and monitoring of the clinical
course are essential to establishing the diagnosis. We suggest that an orthopedic surgeon or
interventional radiologist be consulted as early as possible to assist in obtaining specimens
from the site of infection and assessing the need for surgical intervention. (See 'Microbiology'
below and "Hematogenous osteomyelitis in children: Management", section on 'Indications for
surgery'.)
The diagnosis is probable in a child with compatible clinical, laboratory, and/or radiologic
findings ( table 1) in whom a pathogen is isolated from blood or joint fluid or, if cultures are
negative, detection of S. aureus, S. pneumoniae, or K. kingae by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
in bone aspirates, subperiosteal collections, or synovial fluid. We also consider the diagnosis to
be probable in a child with compatible clinical, laboratory, and radiologic findings and negative
cultures and PCR if he or she responds as expected to empiric antimicrobial therapy.
The diagnosis is unlikely if advanced imaging studies (particularly magnetic resonance imaging
[MRI]) are normal throughout the evaluation.
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 2/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
Clinical suspicion — Based upon the history and physical examination, acute hematogenous
osteomyelitis should be suspected in infants and children with findings suggestive of bone
infection, including:
● Focal symptoms and signs of bone inflammation (eg, warmth, swelling, point tenderness)
that typically progress over several days to a week; symptoms and signs in infants and
small children may be poorly localized
● Limitation of function (limited use of an extremity; limp; refusal to walk, crawl, sit, or bear
weight)
Osteomyelitis also should also be considered in children who are found to have bacteremia or
an abnormal imaging study of bone in the evaluation of trauma or nonspecific signs or
symptoms (eg, irritability, fever without a source).
Risk factors that may raise suspicion for osteomyelitis include (see "Hematogenous
osteomyelitis in children: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and microbiology", section on 'Risk
factors'):
● Bacteremia or sepsis
● Immune deficiency (eg, sickle cell disease, chronic granulomatous disease)
● Recent or current indwelling vascular catheter, including hemodialysis catheter
● For neonates – Prematurity, skin infection, complicated delivery, urinary tract anomalies,
late onset neonatal sepsis
Initial evaluation — The initial evaluation for children with suspected osteomyelitis includes
blood tests and radiographs of the affected area(s).
Blood tests — Initial blood tests for children with suspected osteomyelitis include a complete
blood count (CBC) with differential, ESR, and/or CRP [3]. To avoid multiple venipunctures, at
least one blood culture should be obtained at the same time as these studies. Blood cultures
are discussed below. (See 'Microbiology' below.)
At the time of presentation, elevation of ESR (>20 mm/h) and/or CRP (>10 to 20 mg/L [1 to 2
mg/dL]) is sensitive (approximately 95 percent) in cases of culture-proven osteomyelitis in
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 3/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
children, but ESR and CRP are nonspecific [4-6]. Elevated ESR and/or CRP support the diagnosis
of osteomyelitis but do not exclude other conditions in the differential diagnosis. ESR and CRP
may be normal early in the infection in some patients, and repeat testing may be warranted
within 24 hours in children in whom osteomyelitis is strongly suspected. CRP and, to a lesser
extent, ESR also are important markers for evaluating the response to therapy. (See
"Hematogenous osteomyelitis in children: Management", section on 'Response to therapy'.)
Elevation of the white blood cell (WBC) count is neither a sensitive nor a specific indicator of
osteomyelitis. In a 2012 systematic review of >12,000 patients, the WBC was elevated in only 36
percent [5]. However, the CBC and differential are helpful in evaluating other considerations in
the differential diagnosis of children with bone pain (eg, vaso-occlusive crisis in sickle cell
disease, leukemia). (See 'Differential diagnosis' below.)
However, these findings generally are not apparent at the onset of symptoms. The timing and
typical sequence of radiographic changes of osteomyelitis varies depending on which bones are
affected and the age of the patient.
● Long bones – The typical sequence of radiographic changes in long bones of children is as
follows [11,12]:
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 4/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
• Approximately three days after symptom onset – Small area of localized, deep, soft-
tissue swelling in the region of the metaphysis ( image 2)
• Three to seven days after symptom onset – Obliteration of the translucent fat planes
interposed within muscle by edema fluid
● Membranous, irregular bones – Bone destruction and periosteal elevation generally are
apparent two to three weeks later than in long bones.
● Pelvic bones – Radiographs usually are not useful in the diagnostic evaluation of
osteomyelitis of the pelvis; in one large series, they were abnormal in only 25 percent of
patients [13].
● Discitis – The radiographic changes of discitis are first noted several weeks after the onset
of symptoms, with the following sequence:
• Narrowing of the disc space two to four weeks after the onset of symptoms
Despite the delay in radiographic changes, findings suggestive of discitis often are
apparent at the time of presentation (because of the indolent course). In one series, as an
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 5/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
example, radiographic changes were present on initial evaluation in more than 70 percent
of cases [14].
Normal radiographs — A normal radiograph early in the course (eg, within seven days of
symptom onset) does not exclude osteomyelitis. Children with suspected osteomyelitis (eg,
localized bone pain, limited function, elevated ESR or CRP) and normal initial radiographs
generally should receive empiric antibiotic therapy pending additional imaging and the results
of microbiologic studies. However, school-age children who are afebrile and have equivocal
physical examination findings, and normal radiographs may occasionally be followed closely
without antimicrobial therapy pending additional evaluation. (See "Hematogenous
osteomyelitis in children: Management", section on 'Empiric parenteral therapy' and 'Advanced
imaging' below and 'Microbiology' below.)
Further imaging, usually with MRI or scintigraphy, should be performed as soon as possible in
any child with suspected osteomyelitis whose initial radiographs are normal, regardless of
whether antibiotic therapy is initiated ( image 3). (See 'Advanced imaging' below.)
Advanced imaging — Most children with suspected osteomyelitis undergo additional imaging
with MRI, scintigraphy, computed tomography (CT), and/or ultrasonography ( table 2).
Indications for these imaging studies may include:
Magnetic resonance imaging — If it is available, MRI is the imaging modality of choice when
imaging other than radiography is needed to establish the diagnosis of osteomyelitis (eg, early
in the course) or to delineate the location and extent of bone and soft tissue involvement (
table 2) [3,7,8]. Intravenous contrast is not generally required but may help define
intramedullary abscess or intramuscular abscesses [15]. Osteomyelitis is unlikely if MRI is
negative.
● Early changes in the bone marrow cavity (before changes in cortical bone are apparent on
radiographs) [16]
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 6/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
● Involvement of the vertebral body and the adjacent disc in children with vertebral
osteomyelitis
● Areas that may require surgical drainage (eg, sinus tracts, intraosseous abscesses,
subperiosteal or soft-tissue collections of pus) ( image 4) (see "Hematogenous
osteomyelitis in children: Management", section on 'Indications for surgery')
● Contiguous septic arthritis (especially in the evaluation of young children with possible
septic arthritis of the hip or femoral osteomyelitis)
● Associated pyomyositis
The major advantages of MRI compared with other imaging modalities include accurate
identification of subperiosteal or soft-tissue collections of pus and avoidance of exposure to
ionizing radiation [23]. In addition, the efficacy of MRI does not appear to be affected by
diagnostic or surgical intervention. However, repeat MRI may be of limited value after surgical
drainage because it can be difficult to distinguish between postsurgical changes and recurrent
or persisting infection. Repeat MRI seldom leads to management changes in patients with
clinical improvement. In a retrospective review of 60 cases of acute osteomyelitis, only 11 of 104
repeat MRIs resulted in a change in treatment; in all 11 cases, the CRP was persistently elevated
or rising [24].
Disadvantages of MRI include a longer scanning time than CT and the need for sedation or
general anesthesia for an adequate study in most young children, which may be a limiting
factor in some institutions. MRI is less useful when multiple sites of involvement are suspected
or there are no localized clinical findings. Finally, MRI is not always readily available.
MRI demonstrates excellent anatomic detail and differentiation among soft tissue, bone
marrow, and bone ( image 5).
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 7/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
● The penumbra sign (high-intensity-signal transition zone between abscess and sclerotic
bone marrow in T1-weighted images ( image 6)) is characteristic of subacute
osteomyelitis and in one study was helpful in differentiating between indolent infections
and neoplasms [26].
● The signal from infected bone marrow can be enhanced with intravenous gadolinium
contrast [27], but this is seldom necessary for diagnostic purposes [15,28]. Because of the
risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, imaging with gadolinium should be avoided, if
possible, in patients with moderate or advanced renal failure. (See "Nephrogenic systemic
fibrosis/nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy in advanced kidney disease".)
MRI abnormalities in discitis include reduction of disc space, increased T2 signal in the adjacent
vertebral end plates, and signal intensity changes in the intervening discs [14,16].
The sensitivity and specificity for the detection of bone involvement in children with suspected
osteomyelitis with MRI are high (80 to 100 percent and 70 to 100 percent, respectively, in a 2012
systematic review) [5]. Given the high sensitivity, osteomyelitis is unlikely if the MRI is negative
[7], although rare patients lack MRI abnormalities at the time of presentation. False-positive
results may occur in patients with adjacent soft tissue infection; adjacent soft tissue infection
can cause edema of the bone that may be interpreted as "consistent with osteomyelitis" but
represents sympathetic inflammation rather than bone infection. False-positive MRI results also
may occur in children with vitamin C deficiency [29-32]. (See 'Other noninfectious conditions'
below.)
Scintigraphy is helpful early in the course, readily available, relatively inexpensive, and requires
sedation less frequently than MRI in young children. However, it does not provide information
about the extent of purulent collections that may require drainage (eg, intramedullary abscess,
muscular phlegmon) [7]. Scintigraphy may be falsely negative if the blood supply to the
periosteum is disrupted (eg, subperiosteal abscess) and during the transition between
decreased and increased activity [33,34]. In addition, scintigraphy involves exposure to ionizing
radiation [35].
The three-phase bone scan utilizing technetium 99m (99mTc) usually is performed as the initial
nuclear medicine procedure in the evaluation of osteomyelitis. It consists of:
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 8/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
● A nuclear angiogram (the flow phase), obtained two to five seconds after injection
● The blood pool phase, obtained 5 to 10 minutes after injection
● The delayed phase, specific for bone uptake, obtained two to four hours after injection
Increased uptake of tracer in the first two phases can be caused by anything that increases
blood flow and is accompanied by inflammation. Osteomyelitis causes focal uptake in the third
phase; the intensity of the signal reflects the level of osteoblastic activity. Localization of a lesion
near a growth plate can complicate interpretation.
The sensitivity and specificity for the detection of bone involvement in children with suspected
osteomyelitis with scintigraphy generally are high, but the range is wider than MRI (53 to 100
percent and 50 to 100 percent, respectively in a 2012 systematic review) [5]. Sensitivity is
variable in neonates but appears to be lower than in older children [9,36,37]. Scintigraphy has
been shown to have poor sensitivity (53 percent) in cases of osteomyelitis caused by methicillin-
resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) [7].
MRI generally is preferred if the results of the three-phase 99mTc bone scan are equivocal.
Scintigraphy with inflammation imaging tracers (eg, gallium or indium) may be helpful but
involve additional exposure to radiation.
● Delineation of the extent of bone injury in chronic osteomyelitis or planning the surgical
approach to debridement of devitalized bone (sequestra) ( image 7)
CT is less time consuming than MRI, and young children usually do not require sedation.
However, CT exposes children to ionizing radiation.
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 9/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
Ultrasonography findings consistent with osteomyelitis include fluid collection adjacent to the
bone without intervening soft tissue, elevation of the periosteum by more than 2 mm, and
thickening of the periosteum. (See "Approach to imaging modalities in the setting of suspected
nonvertebral osteomyelitis", section on 'Ultrasonography'.)
Microbiology
General principles — Isolation of a pathogen from bone, subperiosteal fluid collection, joint
fluid, or blood or PCR detection of pathogens in bone, subperiosteal fluid collection, or joint
fluid establishes a diagnosis of confirmed or probable osteomyelitis in children with compatible
clinical and/or radiologic findings and speciation and susceptibility testing are essential for
planning treatment. (See "Hematogenous osteomyelitis in children: Management", section on
'Antimicrobial therapy'.)
Sites to culture — Specimens for culture should be obtained from blood and as many
potential sites of infection as possible. An orthopedic surgeon and/or interventional radiologist
should be consulted as early as possible in the evaluation of children with suspected
osteomyelitis to assist in obtaining specimens for histopathology and/or culture and assessing
the need for surgical intervention. In a retrospective review of 250 cases of osteomyelitis from a
single institution, blood cultures were positive in 46 percent of cases in which they were
obtained, cultures obtained in the operating room (OR, bone, subperiosteal abscess, adjacent
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 10/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
septic arthritis) were positive in 82 percent, and cultures obtained in interventional radiology
(IR) were positive in 52 percent [40]. OR/IR cultures were positive in 80 patients who had
negative blood cultures; among these cases, results of OR/IR cultures prompted a change in
antibiotic therapy in 68 (85 percent).
● Blood cultures – We recommend at least one, and preferably two, blood cultures be
obtained before administration of antibiotics to children with osteomyelitis. Although less
frequently positive than cultures from bone or adjacent abscesses, blood cultures may be
the only positive source of identification of the pathogen [5,40,42,43].
● Bone culture – Bone samples for culture, Gram stain, and histopathology should be
obtained whenever possible [40,43]. Culture specimens may be obtained by percutaneous
needle aspiration (which may be guided by ultrasonography, fluoroscopy, or other
imaging modality) or open biopsy (particularly if surgery is required for therapeutic
drainage and debridement). (See "Hematogenous osteomyelitis in children:
Management", section on 'Indications for surgery'.)
● Other cultures – Subperiosteal exudate, joint fluid, and pus from adjoining sites of
infection should be obtained and sent for Gram stain and culture whenever possible, as
directed by imaging studies [40]. Specimens may be obtained by percutaneous needle
aspiration (which may be guided by ultrasonography, fluoroscopy, or other imaging
modality). Injection of bone aspirates or periosteal collections into blood culture bottles is
recommended to enhance recovery of K. kingae [44,45]. (See "Hematogenous
osteomyelitis in children: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and microbiology", section on
'Kingella kingae'.)
Percutaneous techniques are less successful in older children and adolescents, who may
require bone aspiration or drilling to obtain culture specimens. In such cases, the risk of
epiphyseal damage and further destruction of bone must be weighed against the benefit
of obtaining a specimen.
percent of cases [5]. The yield of cultures of bone tissue or pus is greater than that from blood
cultures (70 versus 40 percent).
Other microbiologic studies — Other microbiologic studies may be helpful in the detection of
specific pathogens. PCR (if available) can be particularly helpful for detecting K. kingae in
purulent materials or bone specimens, particularly when Kingella-specific methods are used
[46-48].
In children with normal MRI and/or scintigraphy, a lack of clinical response to empiric therapy
and the results of blood cultures help to direct additional evaluation for other conditions in the
differential diagnosis. (See 'Osteomyelitis unlikely (advanced imaging studies normal)' below
and 'Differential diagnosis' below.)
DIAGNOSTIC INTERPRETATION
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 12/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
blood or joint fluid, or if cultures are negative, detection of S. aureus, S. pneumoniae, or K. kingae
by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in bone aspirates, subperiosteal collections, or synovial
fluid. We also consider the diagnosis to be probable in a child with compatible clinical,
laboratory, and radiologic findings and negative cultures and PCR if he or she responds as
expected to empiric antimicrobial therapy.
Given the potential morbidity of delayed treatment, children with probable osteomyelitis should
be managed in the same manner as children in whom infection has been confirmed by isolation
of an organism from bone or blood [49]. (See "Hematogenous osteomyelitis in children: Clinical
features and complications", section on 'Complications' and "Hematogenous osteomyelitis in
children: Management", section on 'Empiric parenteral therapy'.)
● Positive blood culture, improvement with empiric therapy – A source of infection other
than osteomyelitis must be sought (see 'Other infections' below)
● Negative blood culture, improvement with empiric therapy – The child may have a more
superficial source of infection (eg, cellulitis); a shorter course of antimicrobial therapy may
be warranted (see 'Other infections' below)
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 13/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
Other infections — Infections that do not involve bone may cause fever, pain, and tenderness
overlying bone, mimicking hematogenous osteomyelitis. These infections usually are
distinguished from osteomyelitis by imaging studies that lack the characteristic features of
osteomyelitis ( table 1). (See 'Advanced imaging' above.)
Other infections that may share features of osteomyelitis (and may complicate or be
complicated by osteomyelitis) include:
● Septicemia (see "Clinical features, evaluation, and diagnosis of sepsis in term and late
preterm infants", section on 'Clinical manifestations' and "Systemic inflammatory response
syndrome (SIRS) and sepsis in children: Definitions, epidemiology, clinical manifestations,
and diagnosis", section on 'Clinical manifestations')
● Deep abscesses (eg, psoas abscess) (see "Psoas abscess", section on 'Clinical
manifestations')
Noninfectious conditions
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 14/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
an abscess or sinus tract. Microbiologic and pathologic studies from bone biopsy specimens are
generally necessary to differentiate CNO from infectious osteomyelitis. The evaluation and
treatment of CNO are discussed in detail separately. (See "Chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis
(CNO)/chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO)".)
● Malignancy – Tumor growth can cause bone pain, and some children with malignancies
(particularly leukemia and Ewing sarcoma) have fever as part of their initial presentation.
Unlike those with osteomyelitis, symptoms can be intermittent in children with cancer.
Affected children also fail to respond to empiric antibiotic therapy. Osteomyelitis and
cancer involving bone are usually differentiated with bone biopsy. (See "Overview of
common presenting signs and symptoms of childhood cancer", section on 'Bone and joint
pain' and "Overview of the clinical presentation and diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic
leukemia/lymphoma in children", section on 'Presentation' and "Clinical presentation,
staging, and prognostic factors of the Ewing sarcoma family of tumors", section on 'Signs
and symptoms' and "Bone tumors: Diagnosis and biopsy techniques".)
Radiographs, scintigraphy, and MRI all show similar results in both conditions. Unlike bone
disease with hemoglobinopathy, osteomyelitis does not respond to hydration and other
supportive measures. (See "Acute and chronic bone complications of sickle cell disease".)
● Vitamin C deficiency – Vitamin C deficiency (scurvy) may cause musculoskeletal pain and
refusal to bear weight, particularly in children with autism spectrum disorder (the
prevalence of which has increased since the early 2000s), intellectual disability, food
aversion, or limited food preferences [29,30,32]. Additional findings of vitamin C
deficiency, which do not always accompany the musculoskeletal findings, include
petechiae, ecchymoses, bleeding gums, coiled hairs, and hyperkeratosis ( picture 2).
(See "Overview of water-soluble vitamins", section on 'Deficiency' and "Autism spectrum
disorder: Terminology, epidemiology, and pathogenesis", section on 'Prevalence'.)
● Gaucher disease – Children with Gaucher disease can have painful bone crises similar to
those that occur in patients with sickle cell disease. During bone pain crises, ischemia can
be detected by technetium bone scan. Radiographs of the distal femur may demonstrate
deformities caused by abnormal modeling of the metaphysis that are characteristic of
Gaucher disease. However, the possibility of osteomyelitis should be considered in febrile
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 15/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
patients with Gaucher disease who do not improve with hydration and other supportive
measures. (See "Gaucher disease: Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis"
and "Gaucher disease: Treatment", section on 'Skeletal disease'.)
● Caffey disease – Caffey disease (infantile cortical hyperostosis) is an inherited disease that
usually presents in early infancy with fever, subperiosteal bone hyperplasia, and swelling
of overlying soft tissues. It is a rare disorder caused by a subset of mutations in the type 1
collagen gene COL191 [58] and is difficult to distinguish from osteomyelitis on initial
presentation. Caffey disease can be distinguished from infectious osteomyelitis by bone
biopsy and genetic testing. (See "Differential diagnosis of the orthopedic manifestations of
child abuse", section on 'Infantile cortical hyperostosis (Caffey disease)'.)
Radiographic mimics — Benign and malignant bone tumors and tumors involving bone can
have radiographic appearance similar to osteomyelitis. The acute clinical features and response
to antibiotics in children with osteomyelitis usually distinguish osteomyelitis from these
conditions. However, bone biopsy can be performed if necessary for histopathologic
differentiation.
Bone lesions that can have radiographic appearance similar to osteomyelitis include ( table 4
):
● Fibrous dysplasia (see "Nonmalignant bone lesions in children and adolescents", section
on 'Fibrous dysplasia')
● Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma (see "Nonmalignant bone lesions in children and
adolescents", section on 'Bone-forming lesions')
Links to society and government-sponsored guidelines from selected countries and regions
around the world are provided separately. (See "Society guideline links: Septic arthritis and
osteomyelitis in children".)
The diagnosis often is unclear at the initial evaluation. A high index of suspicion and
monitoring of the clinical course are essential to establishing the diagnosis. An orthopedic
surgeon and/or interventional radiologist should be consulted as early as possible in the
evaluation to assist in obtaining specimens for culture and/or histopathology. (See
'Overview' above.)
• Focal findings of bone inflammation (eg, warmth, swelling, point tenderness) that
typically progress over several days to a week
• Limitation of function (eg, limited use of an extremity; limp; refusal to walk, crawl, sit,
or bear weight)
Osteomyelitis should also be suspected in children who are found to have bacteremia or
an imaging study with characteristic findings during the evaluation of other conditions
(eg, fever, trauma). (See 'Clinical suspicion' above.)
● The initial evaluation of children with suspected osteomyelitis includes complete blood
count with differential, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, blood culture,
and radiographs. (See 'Initial evaluation' above.)
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 17/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
● Specimens for Gram stain and culture should be obtained from as many sites of infection
as possible. Isolation of a pathogen from bone, periosteal collection, joint fluid, or blood is
necessary for diagnosis and speciation and susceptibility testing are essential for planning
for the prolonged treatment required for osteomyelitis. (See 'Microbiology' above.)
The diagnosis is probable in a child with compatible clinical, laboratory, and/or radiologic
findings ( table 1) in whom a pathogen is isolated from blood or joint fluid, or if cultures
are negative, detection of S. aureus, S. pneumoniae, or K. kingae by polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) in bone aspirates, subperiosteal collections, or synovial fluid. We also
consider the diagnosis to be probable in a child with compatible clinical, laboratory, and
radiologic findings and negative cultures and PCR if he or she responds as expected to
empiric antimicrobial therapy. (See 'Probable osteomyelitis' above.)
REFERENCES
1. Faust SN, Clark J, Pallett A, Clarke NM. Managing bone and joint infection in children. Arch
Dis Child 2012; 97:545.
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 18/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
2. Krogstad P. Osteomyelitis. In: Feigin and Cherry’s Textbook of Pediatric Infectious Diseases,
8th ed, Cherry JD, Harrison G, Kaplan SL, et al (Eds), Elsevier, Philadelphia 2018. p.516.
3. Saavedra-Lozano J, Falup-Pecurariu O, Faust SN, et al. Bone and Joint Infections. Pediatr
Infect Dis J 2017; 36:788.
4. Harris JC, Caesar DH, Davison C, et al. How useful are laboratory investigations in the
emergency department evaluation of possible osteomyelitis? Emerg Med Australas 2011;
23:317.
6. Pääkkönen M, Kallio MJ, Kallio PE, Peltola H. Sensitivity of erythrocyte sedimentation rate
and C-reactive protein in childhood bone and joint infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;
468:861.
7. Browne LP, Mason EO, Kaplan SL, et al. Optimal imaging strategy for community-acquired
Staphylococcus aureus musculoskeletal infections in children. Pediatr Radiol 2008; 38:841.
8. Jaramillo D, Dormans JP, Delgado J, et al. Hematogenous Osteomyelitis in Infants and
Children: Imaging of a Changing Disease. Radiology 2017; 283:629.
9. Wong M, Isaacs D, Howman-Giles R, Uren R. Clinical and diagnostic features of
osteomyelitis occurring in the first three months of life. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1995; 14:1047.
10. Knudsen CJ, Hoffman EB. Neonatal osteomyelitis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990; 72:846.
11. Capitanio MA, Kirkpatrick JA. Early roentgen observations in acute osteomyelitis. Am J
Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1970; 108:488.
12. Overturf GD. Bacterial infections of the bones and joints. In: Infectious diseases of the fetus
and newborn infant, 7th, Remington JS, Klein JO, Wilson CB, et al (Eds), Elsevier Saunders, P
hiladelphia Vol 2011, p.296.
13. Mustafa MM, Sáez-Llorens X, McCracken GH Jr, Nelson JD. Acute hematogenous pelvic
osteomyelitis in infants and children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1990; 9:416.
14. Fernandez M, Carrol CL, Baker CJ. Discitis and vertebral osteomyelitis in children: an 18-
year review. Pediatrics 2000; 105:1299.
15. Averill LW, Hernandez A, Gonzalez L, et al. Diagnosis of osteomyelitis in children: utility of
fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192:1232.
16. Saigal G, Azouz EM, Abdenour G. Imaging of osteomyelitis with special reference to
children. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2004; 8:255.
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 19/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
17. Connolly LP, Connolly SA, Drubach LA, et al. Acute hematogenous osteomyelitis of children:
assessment of skeletal scintigraphy-based diagnosis in the era of MRI. J Nucl Med 2002;
43:1310.
20. Mazur JM, Ross G, Cummings J, et al. Usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging for the
diagnosis of acute musculoskeletal infections in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1995; 15:144.
21. Pöyhiä T, Azouz EM. MR imaging evaluation of subacute and chronic bone abscesses in
children. Pediatr Radiol 2000; 30:763.
22. Jaramillo D, Hoffer FA. Cartilaginous epiphysis and growth plate: normal and abnormal MR
imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 158:1105.
23. Kan JH, Hilmes MA, Martus JE, et al. Value of MRI after recent diagnostic or surgical
intervention in children with suspected osteomyelitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191:1595.
24. Courtney PM, Flynn JM, Jaramillo D, et al. Clinical indications for repeat MRI in children with
acute hematogenous osteomyelitis. J Pediatr Orthop 2010; 30:883.
25. Guillerman RP. Osteomyelitis and beyond. Pediatr Radiol 2013; 43 Suppl 1:S193.
26. Shih HN, Shih LY, Wong YC. Diagnosis and treatment of subacute osteomyelitis. J Trauma
2005; 58:83.
27. Schmit P, Glorion C. Osteomyelitis in infants and children. Eur Radiol 2004; 14 Suppl 4:L44.
28. Kan JH, Young RS, Yu C, Hernanz-Schulman M. Clinical impact of gadolinium in the MRI
diagnosis of musculoskeletal infection in children. Pediatr Radiol 2010; 40:1197.
29. Kinlin LM, Blanchard AC, Silver S, Morris SK. Scurvy as a mimicker of osteomyelitis in a child
with autism spectrum disorder. Int J Infect Dis 2018; 69:99.
30. Harknett KM, Hussain SK, Rogers MK, Patel NC. Scurvy mimicking osteomyelitis: case
report and review of the literature. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2014; 53:995.
31. Gulko E, Collins LK, Murphy RC, et al. MRI findings in pediatric patients with scurvy. Skeletal
Radiol 2015; 44:291.
32. Duggan CP, Westra SJ, Rosenberg AE. Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital.
Case 23-2007. A 9-year-old boy with bone pain, rash, and gingival hypertrophy. N Engl J
Med 2007; 357:392.
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 20/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
33. Allwright SJ, Miller JH, Gilsanz V. Subperiosteal abscess in children: scintigraphic
appearance. Radiology 1991; 179:725.
34. Tuson CE, Hoffman EB, Mann MD. Isotope bone scanning for acute osteomyelitis and septic
arthritis in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994; 76:306.
35. The Alliance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Imaging. www.imagegently.org (Accessed on S
eptember 03, 2016).
36. Mok PM, Reilly BJ, Ash JM. Osteomyelitis in the neonate. Clinical aspects and the role of
radiography and scintigraphy in diagnosis and management. Radiology 1982; 145:677.
37. Bressler EL, Conway JJ, Weiss SC. Neonatal osteomyelitis examined by bone scintigraphy.
Radiology 1984; 152:685.
38. Hoffer FA, Emans J. Percutaneous drainage of subperiosteal abscess: a potential treatment
for osteomyelitis. Pediatr Radiol 1996; 26:879.
39. Llewellyn A, Jones-Diette J, Kraft J, et al. Imaging tests for the detection of osteomyelitis: a
systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2019; 23:1.
40. McNeil JC, Forbes AR, Vallejo JG, et al. Role of Operative or Interventional Radiology-Guided
Cultures for Osteomyelitis. Pediatrics 2016; 137.
41. Ratnayake K, Davis AJ, Brown L, Young TP. Pediatric acute osteomyelitis in the postvaccine,
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus era. Am J Emerg Med 2015; 33:1420.
42. Yeo A, Ramachandran M. Acute haematogenous osteomyelitis in children. BMJ 2014;
348:g66.
43. Zhorne DJ, Altobelli ME, Cruz AT. Impact of antibiotic pretreatment on bone biopsy yield for
children with acute hematogenous osteomyelitis. Hosp Pediatr 2015; 5:337.
44. Yagupsky P. Kingella kingae: from medical rarity to an emerging paediatric pathogen.
Lancet Infect Dis 2004; 4:358.
45. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Osteomyelitis/septic arthritis caused by
Kingella kingae among day care attendees--Minnesota, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly
Rep 2004; 53:241.
46. Chometon S, Benito Y, Chaker M, et al. Specific real-time polymerase chain reaction places
Kingella kingae as the most common cause of osteoarticular infections in young children.
Pediatr Infect Dis J 2007; 26:377.
47. Verdier I, Gayet-Ageron A, Ploton C, et al. Contribution of a broad range polymerase chain
reaction to the diagnosis of osteoarticular infections caused by Kingella kingae: description
of twenty-four recent pediatric diagnoses. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005; 24:692.
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 21/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
51. Perlman MH, Patzakis MJ, Kumar PJ, Holtom P. The incidence of joint involvement with
adjacent osteomyelitis in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Orthop 2000; 20:40.
52. Pääkkönen M, Kallio MJ, Kallio PE, Peltola H. Shortened hospital stay for childhood bone
and joint infections: analysis of 265 prospectively collected culture-positive cases in 1983-
2005. Scand J Infect Dis 2012; 44:683.
53. Fox L, Sprunt K. Neonatal osteomyelitis. Pediatrics 1978; 62:535.
54. Panders AK, Hadders HN. Chronic sclerosing inflammations of the jaw. Osteomyelitis sicca
(Garré), chronic sclerosing osteomyelitis with fine-meshed trabecular structure, and very
dense sclerosing osteomyelitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1970; 30:396.
55. Tong AC, Ng IO, Yeung KM. Osteomyelitis with proliferative periostitis: an unusual case.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102:e14.
56. Kannan SK, Sandhya G, Selvarani R. Periostitis ossificans (Garrè's osteomyelitis)
radiographic study of two cases. Int J Paediatr Dent 2006; 16:59.
57. Padwa BL, Dentino K, Robson CD, et al. Pediatric Chronic Nonbacterial Osteomyelitis of the
Jaw: Clinical, Radiographic, and Histopathologic Features. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;
74:2393.
58. Gensure RC, Mäkitie O, Barclay C, et al. A novel COL1A1 mutation in infantile cortical
hyperostosis (Caffey disease) expands the spectrum of collagen-related disorders. J Clin
Invest 2005; 115:1250.
Topic 6067 Version 30.0
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 22/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
GRAPHICS
Imaging
Abnormal findings
modality
Three-phase bone Focal uptake of tracer in the third phase (delayed phase)
scan
Periosteal purulence
Thickening of periosteum
Periosteal elevation
* The timing and typical sequence of radiographic changes may vary with the site of infection and
age of the patient.
References:
1. Browne LP, Mason EO, Kaplan SL, et al. Optimal imaging strategy for community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus
musculoskeletal infections in children. Pediatr Radiol 2008; 38:841.
2. Jaramillo D, Treves ST, Kasser JR, et al. Osteomyelitis and septic arthritis in children: Appropriate use of imaging to
guide treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165:399.
3. Saigal G, Azouz EM, Abdenour G. Imaging of osteomyelitis with special reference to children. Semin Musculoskelet
Radiol 2004; 8:255.
4. Schmit P, Glorion C. Osteomyelitis in infants and children. Eur Radiol 2004; 14 Suppl 4:L44.
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 23/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 24/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
Acute osteomyelitis
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 25/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 26/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
Chronic osteomyelitis
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 27/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
Lateral (A) and frontal (B) radiographs of the right lower extremity demonstrate an
ovoid lucent lesion in the medullary cavity of the proximal metadiaphysis of the tibia
(arrows) with associated periosteal reaction (arrowheads). The lateral radiograph (A)
also demonstrates irregular cortical lucency anteriorly suggesting an area of focal
cortical disruption (dashed arrow).
Reproduced with permission from: Abdulhadi MA, White AM, Pollock AN. Brodie abscess. Pediatr Emerg
Care 2012; 28:1249. Copyright © 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 28/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
(A) Plain radiographs (after one week of swelling and pain in the calf)
were initially interpreted as normal.
(B) A plain radiograph obtained four days after the initial films
demonstrates periosteal reaction and cortical thickening.
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 29/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 30/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
(A) Radiograph at the initial evaluation of a nine-year-old with fever and limp
demonstrates a lytic lucency in the distal femoral metaphysis.
(B, C) Axial and coronal magnetic resonance (MR) images delineate the area
of osteomyelitis and adjacent marrow edema.
Reproduced with permission from Jeanne Chow, MD. Children's Hospital-Boston, Copyright ©
Jeanne Chow, MD.
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 31/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 32/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 33/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
* Values for sensitivity and specificity are from: Dartnell J, Ramachandran M, Katchburian M.
Haematogenous acute and subacute paediatric osteomyelitis: A systematic review of the literature. J
Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94:584.
¶ Preferred imaging study when imaging other than plain radiographs are necessary to establish
the diagnosis of osteomyelitis.
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 35/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
References:
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 36/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 37/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
(A) The proximal shaft and metaphysis of the left tibia show an
abnormal mottled appearance.
(B) The marrow signal from the left tibia is abnormal. In addition,
there is soft tissue inflammation surrounding the left tibia.
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 38/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
Reproduced with permission from: Shih HN, Shih LY, Wong YC. Diagnosis and
treatment of subacute osteomyelitis. J Trauma 2005; 58:83. Copyright © 2005
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 39/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 40/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
Clinical features
Gram-positive bacteria
Staphylococcus aureus All ages; possible associated skin or soft tissue infection; MRSA may
be associated with venous thromboembolism and pulmonary disease
Group A Streptococcus More common in children younger than 4 years; may occur as a
complication of concurrent varicella-zoster virus infection
Streptococcus pneumoniae Children younger than 2 years who are incompletely immunized;
children older than 2 years with underlying medical conditions (eg,
sickle cell disease, asplenia, splenic dysfunction, immunodeficiency,
chronic heart disease, chronic lung disease, diabetes mellitus)
Actinomyces May affect the facial bones, the pelvis, or vertebral bodies
Gram-negative bacteria
Nonsalmonella gram- Birth to 3 months; children with sickle cell disease; instrumentation of
negative bacilli (eg, the gastrointestinal or urinary tract; immunocompromised host (eg,
Escherichia coli, Serratia) CGD)
Haemophilus influenzae Incompletely immunized children in areas with low Hib immunization
type b rates
Bartonella henselae Children with cat exposure; may affect the vertebral column and
pelvic girdle; may cause multifocal infection
Mycobacterium Birth in, travel to, or contact with a visitor from, a region endemic for
tuberculosis M. tuberculosis
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 41/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
Polymicrobial infection
MRSA: methicillin-resistant S. aureus; CGD: chronic granulomatous disease; Hib: H. influenzae type b.
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 42/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
Other infections
Septic arthritis
Deep abscess
Pyomyositis
Noninfectious conditions
Bone infarction in patients with Improvement with hydration and other supportive
hemoglobinopathy measures
Vitamin C deficiency (scurvy) Dietary history of limited vitamin C intake (eg, restricted
feeding behavior in children with autism spectrum
disorder)
Petechiae, ecchymoses, bleeding gums, coiled hair,
hyperkeratosis
Radiographic mimics*
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 43/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
* Refer to UpToDate topics on benign bone tumors, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, and malignant
bone tumors for additional information about the radiographic appearance of these conditions.
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 44/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
Reproduced with permission from: Hirschmann JV, Raugi GJ. Adult scurvy. J Am Acad
Dermatol 1999; 41:895. Copyright © 1999 Elsevier.
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 45/46
6/19/22, 6:16 PM 6067
Contributor Disclosures
Paul A Krogstad, MD No relevant financial relationship(s) with ineligible companies to disclose. Sheldon
L Kaplan, MD Grant/Research/Clinical Trial Support: MeMed Diagnostics [Bacterial and viral
infections];Merck [Staphylococcus aureus];Pfizer [Streptococcus pneumoniae]. Consultant/Advisory
Boards: MeMed Advisory Board [Diagnostics bacterial and viral infections]. Other Financial Interest:
Elsevier [Pediatric infectious diseases];Pfizer [PCV13]. All of the relevant financial relationships listed have
been mitigated. William A Phillips, MD No relevant financial relationship(s) with ineligible companies to
disclose. Mary M Torchia, MD No relevant financial relationship(s) with ineligible companies to disclose.
Contributor disclosures are reviewed for conflicts of interest by the editorial group. When found, these are
addressed by vetting through a multi-level review process, and through requirements for references to be
provided to support the content. Appropriately referenced content is required of all authors and must
conform to UpToDate standards of evidence.
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/6067/print 46/46