”AI Answer Evaluator”
Mini Project Progress Seminar
                                         By
                                 Sathvik Shetty
                                  Vignesh Vane
                                 Prajwal Lolekar
                                Name of the Guide
                Department of Electronics and Computer Science
         Pillai HOC College of Engineering and Technology, Rasayani
Prajwal Sathvik Vignesh          ”AI Answer Evaluator”     July 18, 2025   1 / 17
Outline
  1     Introduction
  2     Motivation
  3     Literature Survey
  4     Problem Statement
  5     Objectives
  6     Design Methodology
  7     Implementation
  8     Results
  9     Conclusion
 10     References
      Prajwal Sathvik Vignesh   ”AI Answer Evaluator”   July 18, 2025   2 / 17
Introduction
    Automated Answer Evaluation: This project focuses on developing
    an AI-based system to assess subjective answers with high accuracy[1].
    Reducing Manual Effort: By detecting the simple digital text, the
    system minimizes human intervention in grading, making evaluations
    more efficient.
    Ensuring Fairness & Consistency: AI-based evaluation eliminates
    bias and maintains uniformity in scoring across different responses [2].
    Enhancing Learning Systems: The project aims to improve digital
    education by providing instant and reliable feedback to students.
  Prajwal Sathvik Vignesh     ”AI Answer Evaluator”       July 18, 2025   3 / 17
Motivation
    Automating Answer Evaluation – Eliminates manual grading
    delays, bias, and inconsistency, making assessment faster and more
    objective.
    AI-Powered Accuracy – Uses YOLO for answer detection and OCR
    for text extraction, ensuring fair and precise evaluation.
    Scalable Efficient – Can evaluate answer sheets instantly, reducing
    workload for educators and supporting online learning platforms.
    Education – Enhances remote learning, integrates with EdTech
    platforms, and enables personalized feedback for students.
  Prajwal Sathvik Vignesh    ”AI Answer Evaluator”      July 18, 2025    4 / 17
Literature Survey
    Traditional vs. AI-Based Evaluation: Research shows that manual
    grading is time-consuming and subjective, whereas AI-driven grading
    enhances efficiency.[4]
    Role of LLM in Answer Assessment: Studies indicate that Large
    language Model (LLM) is effective in understanding and scoring
    textual responses.[3]
    Machine Learning for Pattern Recognition: Prior work
    demonstrates how ML models can recognize answer structures and
    patterns for better grading accuracy.
    Challenges in Automated Grading: Research highlights challenges
    like understanding contextual meaning and handling diverse writing
    styles.[5]
  Prajwal Sathvik Vignesh   ”AI Answer Evaluator”      July 18, 2025   5 / 17
Literature Survey
                            Figure: Flowchart of Answer Evaluator
  Prajwal Sathvik Vignesh              ”AI Answer Evaluator”        July 18, 2025   6 / 17
Problem Statement
    The manual evaluation of subjective answers is time-consuming,
    inconsistent, and prone to human biases. This project aims to develop
    an AI-driven answer evaluation system that leverages Large Language
    Model (LLM) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques to assess
    responses accurately, ensuring fairness, efficiency, and scalability in
    grading.
  Prajwal Sathvik Vignesh     ”AI Answer Evaluator”      July 18, 2025   7 / 17
Objectives
    To automate the evaluation of printed answer sheets using object
    detection and OCR techniques.
    To accurately detect and extract question-answer regions from
    scanned documents.
    To map extracted answers to their respective questions for reliable
    assessment.
    To integrate the evaluation system into a backend API for seamless
    and scalable deployment.
    To enhance grading speed and consistency while reducing manual
    errors in descriptive answer evaluation.
  Prajwal Sathvik Vignesh    ”AI Answer Evaluator”       July 18, 2025    8 / 17
Design Methodology
    Software Requirements:
           React Native – for mobile frontend development.
           Flask – backend server to handle all processing logic.
           Python – for running YOLO, OCR, and LLM models.
           Firebase – to store uploaded sheets and results.
    Model Selection and Processing:
           YOLO: Detects answer regions in the uploaded image.
           Custom OCR: Extracts handwritten text from detected regions.
           Custom LLM: Evaluates answers based on the provided answer key.
           PDF Generator: Creates final result PDF with scores and feedback.
    UI/UX Design Principles:
           User-friendly interface for uploading images and selecting answer keys.
           Visual feedback with bounding boxes for detected regions.
  Prajwal Sathvik Vignesh         ”AI Answer Evaluator”         July 18, 2025   9 / 17
Implementation
                       Figure: Block diagram of Answer Evaluator
  Prajwal Sathvik Vignesh           ”AI Answer Evaluator”          July 18, 2025   10 / 17
Result I
  Extracted Text, Detected Question-Answer Pairs, and Score Allocation
   Prajwal Sathvik Vignesh   ”AI Answer Evaluator”     July 18, 2025   11 / 17
Result II
 Detected Q&A Regions with Confidence Scores for Accurate Extraction
   Prajwal Sathvik Vignesh   ”AI Answer Evaluator”   July 18, 2025   12 / 17
Result III
  Marks Assigned to Each Answer Based on Comparison with Reference
                              Answers
   Prajwal Sathvik Vignesh   ”AI Answer Evaluator”   July 18, 2025   13 / 17
Result IV
                            PDF Format after download
  Prajwal Sathvik Vignesh         ”AI Answer Evaluator”   July 18, 2025   14 / 17
Conclusion
    The Answer Evaluator Project presents a major advancement in
    automating answer sheet evaluation using object detection, OCR, and
    LLM. It accurately identifies and pairs printed answers with questions,
    enabling consistent, fast, and objective grading. While currently
    limited to printed text, the system is scalable and shows potential for
    future enhancements like handwritten text support, advanced NLP
    models, and cloud-based deployment, making it a valuable tool for
    modern educational assessment.
  Prajwal Sathvik Vignesh     ”AI Answer Evaluator”      July 18, 2025   15 / 17
References I
  1     [1] Raghava Prasad C., Kishore P.V.V., Morphological differential
        gradient active contours for rolling stock segmentation in train
        bogies,2016, ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol:
        11Issue: 5, pp: 2799 - 2804, ISSN 18196608
  2     [2] Hari Priya D., Sastry A.S.C.S., Rao K.S., FPGA based design and
        implementation for detecting Cardiac arrhythmias ,2016, ARPN
        Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol: 11, Issue: 5,
        pp:3513 - 3518, ISSN 18196608
  3     [3] Ur Rahman M.Z., Mirza S.S., Process techniques for human
        thoracic electrical bio-impedance signal in remote healthcare systems
        ,2016, Healthcare Technology Letters, Vol: 3, Issue: 2, pp: 124 - 128,
        ISSN 20533713
      Prajwal Sathvik Vignesh    ”AI Answer Evaluator”       July 18, 2025   16 / 17
References II
  4     [4]Sinha, R., et al., ”Automated Evaluation System Using Object
        Detection and OCR,” Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2021.
  5     [5]Kumar, A. Shah, P., ”A Scalable Backend API for Image-based
        Answer Evaluation,” International Conference on Artificial Intelligence
        Applications, 2022.
      Prajwal Sathvik Vignesh     ”AI Answer Evaluator”      July 18, 2025   17 / 17