NARENDRA MODI MEDICAL COLLEGE
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD
DISSERTATION TITLE:
“A COMPARITIVE STUDY OF TEMPORALIS FASCIA GRAFT AND
TRAGAL CARTILAGE GRAFT IN TYPE 1 TYMPANOPLASTY IN
CHRONIC SUPPURATIVE OTITIS MEDIA”
NAME OF THE DEPARTMENT : OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
NAME OF THE STUDENT : DR. MUSKAN VIRENDRA MEHTA
NAME OF PG TEACHER : DR. HIREN DOSHI
NAME OF HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT : DR.HIREN DOSHI
CONTACT NUMBER OF STUDENT : +91 9033399273
CONTACT NUMBER OF PG TEACHER : +91 99245 75751
DATE & SIGN OF PG TEACHER:
DATE & SIGN OF HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT
INTRODUCTION:
• Tympanic membrane is a membranous partition separating the external auditory
meatus from the tympanic cavity measuring 9-10 mm vertically and 8-9 mm
horizontally. Tympanic membrane perforation is caused by variety of causes, the
most common being trauma and infections. Trauma (Barotrauma, temporal bone
fracture), infections (Acute otitis media, Chronic otitis media, TB), iatrogenic
(ventilation tubes).[1]
• Inactive Mucosal chronic otitis media is defined as permanent perforation of the
pars tensa but the middle ear and mastoid are not inflamed.[2]
• Tympanoplasty is "a procedure to eradicate disease in middle ear and to reconstruct
the hearing mechanism, with or without tympanic membrane grafting".[3]
• It is important to diagnose and treat tympanic membrane perforation as early as
possible as untreated tympanic membrane perforation leads to ongoing destructive
changes in the middle ear, thus adding to further hearing loss. Tympanic membrane
perforation leads to varying degree of conductive hearing loss.[4]
• Loss of hearing is a national health problem with significant physical and psycho
social problem. [4]
• Several graft materials have been used for tympanic membrane repair such as
temporalis fascia, tragal cartilage and perichondrium, conchal cartilage, fascia lata
etc. [5]
• Using temporalis fascia as graft, there is a good improvement in hearing and
higher tympanic membrane closure rate. However this approach is associated with
physical scar and long term numbness around the ear after surgery. [6]
• Cartilage offers the advantage of higher mechanical stability compared with
membranous transplant thus preventing retraction of tympanic membrane in long
run. [7]
• The greatest advantage of cartilage grafts was initially thought to be their very
low metabolic rate. However, this tissue can receive nutrition by diffusion; it is
easy to work with because it is pliable and can resist deformation by pressure
variations. The major advantage of cartilage grafts is their stiffness and
bradytrophic metabolism. [8]
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
• To compare the efficacy in terms of graft uptake or graft displacement between
temporalis fascia graft and tragal cartilage graft groups.
• To compare the efficacy in terms of audiological outcomes - pure-tone
audiometry results preoperatively and postoperatively, between temporalis fascia
graft and tragal cartilage graft groups.
METHODOLOGY
STUDY DESIGN:
Hospital based prospective study.
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
● All patients diagnosed clinically with mucosal type of chronic otitis media.
● Age of more than 12 years .
● Patients with dry ear.
● Patient willing to give consent for study and surgery.
● Type 1 Tympanoplasty
EXCLUSION CRITERIA :
● Patient with active disease / pure sensorineural hearing loss / squmosal type of
chronic otitismedia .
● History of previous ear surgery,systemic disease which may affect the ear
(collagen vascular or granulomatous diseases).
● Patient not fit for surgery.
STUDY PLACE:
ENT Department, LG Hospital, Narendra Modi Medical College, Ahmedabad.
STUDY DURATION:
October 2023 to May 2026
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
• All patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be included in the study.
• The patients are allocated to the two study groups randomly, considering the
inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patients who underwent tympanoplasty
with tragal cartilage were included in Group A and patients who underwent
tympanoplasty with temporalis fascia graft were included in group B.
• A detailed clinical history to be obtained and a complete otorhinolaryngologic
and systemic examination will be performed.
• Preoperative audiometry will be performed in all patients.
• A preoperative haematological and radiological assessment of patient will be
performed.
• Surgery will be performed for the respective group (Group A Tympanoplasty
with tragal cartilage graft, Group B tympanoplasty with temporalis fascia graft)
by the surgeon.
• Post operative follow up examinations 1 week, 1 month and 3 months and
PTA would be done for all patients at post op 1 months and 3 months
duration.
• Results will be analyzed using appropriate statistical methods.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
Appropriate statistical methods will be applied on the collected data base.
PROPOSED PUBLICATION PLANS:
The study will be used for publication after completion of my dissertation and attainment
of my M.S ENT Degree, in the indexed journal.
ETHICAL ASPECTS:
Consent of the patients to participate in the study (format enclosed) will be taken and its
confidentiality will be maintained.
CONSENT FORM
I _______________________________________________________, the undersigned,
have been explained about the study “A COMPARITIVE STUDY OF TEMPORALIS
FASCIA GRAFT AND TRAGAL CARTILAGE GRAFT IN TYPE 1
TYMPANOPLASTY IN CHRONIC SUPPURATIVE OTITIS MEDIA”. At Sheth L.G.
General Hospital, Ahmedabad.
I understand that this study includes collection of data related to my disease and
treatment given to me. I have been given affirmation that confidentiality of all data,
photographs and identity will be maintained and they may be used for the purpose of
publication and education.
I hereby give my consent to be included in the study.
Signature of Participant : Signature of Researcher :
Signature of witness : Date :
સંમતીપત્રક
મને __________________________________________________,નીચે
હસ્તાક્ષરિત, “ ક્રોનનક સુપ ૂિે રિવ ઓિાઇરિસ મીરિયામાાં િાઇપ 1 રિમ્પેનોપ્લાસ્િીમાાં
િેમ્પોિાલલસ ફેનિયા ગ્રાફ્િ અને ટ્રેગલ કારિિલેજ ગ્રાફ્િનો તુલનાત્મક અભ્યાસ“ નવિે
સમજાવવામાાં આવ્ુાં છે . િેઠ એલ.જી. જનિલહોસ્સ્પિલ, અમદાવાદ.
હુ ાં સમજુ ાં છાં કે આ અભ્યાસમાાં માિા િોગ અને મને આપવામાાં આવેલી સાિવાિ
સાંબનાં િત િેિાના સાંગ્રહનો સમાવેિ થાય છે . મને ખાતિી આપવામાાં આવી છે કે
તમામ િેિા, ફોિોગ્રાફ્સ અને ઓળખની ગુપ્તતા જાળવવામાાં આવિે અને તેનો
ઉપયોગ પ્રકાિન અને નિક્ષણના હેત ુ માિે થઈ િકે છે .
હુ ાં આથી અભ્યાસમાાં સામેલ થવા માિે માિી સાંમનત આપુાં છાં.
દદીની સહી : સાંિોિકની સહી :
સાક્ષીની સહી : તાિીખ :
सहमतिपत्र
मैं____________________________________________________________
_________________________को अध्ययन “क्रोननक सपरु े टिव ओटिटिस मीडिया
में िाइप 1 टिम्पेनोप्लास्िी में िे म्पोरललस फेलियाग्राफ्ि और ट्रै गल काटििलेज ग्राफ्िका
तुलनात्मक अध्ययन “ के बारे में बताया गया है। िेठ एल.जी. अस्पताल, अहमदाबाद।
मैं समझता हूं कक इस अध्ययनमें मेरी बीमारी और मझ
ु े टदए गए उपचारसे सूंबूंधित
िेिाका सूंग्रह िालमल है । मुझे आश्वासन टदया गया है कक सभी िेिा, तस्वीरों और
पहचानकी गोपनीयता बनाए रखी जाएगी और उनका उपयोग प्रकािन और लिक्षाके
उद्देश्यसे ककया जा सकता है।
मैं इस अध्ययनमें िालमल होने के ललए अपनी सहमनत दे ता हूं।
मरीज़ के हस्ताक्षर : सुूंिोिक के हस्ताक्षर :
साक्षी के हस्ताक्षर : तारीख :
PROFORMA
History taken by:
History given by:
• Name:
• Age:
• Sex:
• Residence :
• Occupation:
• Phone Number:
• Indoor registration Number:
• Date of Admission:
• Date of Operation:
• Date of Discharge:
COMPLAINTS
EAR DISCHARGE : Yes / No
Side : Right / Left / Both
Duration : ……………...Months / Year
Amount : Scanty / Moderate / Profuse
Colour : Yellowish / White / Green
Consistency : Watery / Mucoid / Purulent / Mucopurulent
Blood stained : Yes / No
Foul Smelling : Yes / No
Aggravating factors :
Reliving factors :
Associated with : Decreased Hearing / Tinnitus / Other complaints
EAR ACHE : Yes / No
Side : Right / Left / Both
Duration :………..………Months / Years
Type of Pain : Dull-aching / Throbbing
Severity of Pain : Mild / Moderate / Severe
Aggravating factors :
Relieving factors :
Associated with :
DECRASED HEARING : Yes / No
Side : Right / Left / Both
Duration :………………..Months / Years
Degree of hearing loss : Mild / Moderate / Severe
Decreased hearing at time of Discharge : Yes / No
Associated with:
VERTIGO : Yes / No
If Yes then since how long :………………..Months / Years
Type of Vertigo:
Vertigo with Deafness or not :
Associated with Neck movement : Yes / No
TINNITUS : Yes / No
Since how long :....................Months / Years
Type of Tinnitus :
Unilateral / Bilateral :
AUTOPHONY :
FACIAL SYMMETRY :
NOSE :
NASAL BLOCKAGE : Yes / No
Duration :
Unilateral / Bilateral :
Occasional / Persistent :
Relieving / Aggravating factor :
NASAL DISCHARGE : YES / NO
Duration :
Unilateral / Bilateral :
Consistency :
OTHER COMPLAINTS
PAST HISTORY
History of Hypertension / DM / TB / Jaundice /Any major illness
History of Similar Surgery / Any Surgery
History of Blood Transfusion
History of Hospitalization
History of Immunocompromised state like HIV-AIDS / Malignancy
FAMILY HISTORY
History of Hypertension / DM / TB / Jaundice / Any major illness
PERSONAL HISTORY
Diet :
Appetite :
Bowel :
Bladder :
Addiction :
H/O Drug reaction :
H/O Allergy :
MENSTRUAL HISTORY
LMP:
GENERAL EXAMINATION
Built / Nourishment
VITAL DATA
Temperature :
Pulse :
Blood Pressure :
Respiratory Rate :
SIGNS
Pallor :
Icterus :
Cyanosis :
Clubbing :
Pedal Oedema :
GENERALIZED LYMPHADENOPATHY
LOCAL EXAMINATION
EAR
Pre auricular Region :
Pinna :
Post auricular Region :
Tragal Tenderness :
Mastoid Tenderness :
External Auditory Canal :
Tympanic Membrane :
Tuning Fork Test :
RINNE TEST
WEBER TEST
ABSOLUTE BONE CONDUCTION TEST
Fistula test :
Facial Nerve Examination :
NOSE
External Appearance :
Vestibule :
Anterior Rhinoscopy :
1. Septum :
2. Floor :
3. Mucosa :
4. Cavity :
5. Inferior Turbinate :
6. Middle Turbinate :
7. Middle Meatus :
8. Discharge :
9. Polyp :
10. Mass :
11. Bleeding :
12. Crusts :
13. Pus :
Posterior Rhinoscopy :
Para nasal sinus Tenderness :
ORAL CAVITY
Tongue :
Floor of Mouth :
RetromolarTrigone :
Teeth :
Hard Palate :
Buccal Mucosa :
Gum :
OROPHARYNX
Anterior Pillar :
Tonsil :
Posterior Pillar :
Soft Palate :
Uvula :
Base of Tongue :
Posterior Pharyngeal wall :
INDIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY
NECK
PROVISIONAL DIAGNOSIS
PRE-OPERATIVE
INVESTIGATIONS
HEMATOLOGICAL
1. Hemogram:
2. Blood Sugar:
3. Bleeding Profile:
4. Renal Function Test:
5. Liver Function Test:
6. Blood Group Cross Matching:
7. HIV:
8. HbsAg:
ECG:
RADIOLOGICAL FINDING
Chest X ray (PA View):
X ray Mastoid:
AUDIOLOGICAL:
Pure Tone Audiometry:
INTRAOPERATIVE:
Type of Graft Material:
OT NOTE:
POST OPERATIVE:
Ear Examination
At 1 week:
At 1 month:
At 3 months:
● Graft Uptake
● Graft displacement
Pure Tone Audiometry
At 1 months
At 3 months
REFERENCES:
1. Donaldson JA, Duckert LG (1991) Anatomy of the ear. In: Paparella MM,
Shumrick DA (eds) Otolaryngology. Basic sciences and related principles,
3rdedn. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia
2. Scott brown otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery 8th edition chapter
83;980
3. Glasscock shambaugh 6th edition chapter 28; page 465-488
4. Pannu K, Chadha S, Kumar D (2011) Preeti: Evaluation of Hearing Loss in
Tympanic Membrane Perforation. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surgery
63(3):208-2
5. Jain A, Samdani S, Sharma MP, Meena V. Island cartilage vs temporalis fascia
in type 1 tympanoplasty: a prospective study.
ActaOtorrinolaringoEsp.2018;69(6):311-317 doi: 10.1016/j.otorri.2017.10.004
6. Myringoplasty With an Ultrathin Cartilage-Perichondrium Complex Graft
Versus Temporalis Fascia Graft: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Yi-Bo
Huang, MD, PhD1*, Lu-lu Hu, MD2*, Dong-Dong Ren, “hD1, and Zhao Han,
MD, PhD3Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 1-7Ó American Academy of
Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation2020Reprint. And
permission:Sage.pub.com/ournalsPermisions.nayD0I:10.1177/01945998209659
40
7. Comparison of results of graft uptake using tragal cartilage perichondrium
composite graft versus temporalis fascia in patients undergoing surgery for
chronic otitis media – squamous type.S Khalilullah1, Shankar P. Shah2*, D.
Yadav3, R. P. Shrivastav4 and H 3hattarai4.Khalilullah et al.Head& Face
Medicine(2016) DOI 10.1186/s13005-016-0123-z
8. Levinson RM. Cartilage-perichondrial composite graft tympanoplasty in the
treatment of posterior marginal and attic retraction pockets. Laryngoscope
1987;97:1069–74