The Perceptions of First Time Voter’s Among Senior High

School Students to the Senatorial Candidates with a Higher

A Senior High School Research Paper Presented to the Faculty of

In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Subject in Practical

Ms. Mary Josephine De Jesus

April 2025

1
 Acknowledgement

First and foremost, we offer our deepest gratitude to Almighty God for His unwavering

grace and guidance throughout this research journey. We recognize that without His

blessings, our efforts would have been in vain. We would also like to express our heartfelt

gratitude to the senior high school students of AMA College Cavite who shared their time

and thoughts with us during the interviews. We appreciate their willingness to participate and

provide valuable insights into their perceptions of senatorial candidates. We would also

extend our sincerest thanks to the teachers who supported us during our practical research,

providing guidance and assistance throughout the data collection process. Their help and

encouragement were instrumental in making this study possible. Thank you to everyone who

contributed to this research.

2
 ABSTRACT

The study "The Perceptions of First-Time Voter's Among Senior High School Students to the

Senatorial Candidates With a Higher Degree" delves into the crucial question of how first-time

voters, specifically senior high school students in the Philippines, evaluate senatorial candidates,

particularly those with higher degrees. This research addresses a critical gap in understanding how

young voters perceive and assess leadership credentials, which can significantly influence their

voting decisions and ultimately shape the trajectory of Philippine democracy. The study, employing

a qualitative research design utilizing questionnaires and interviews, aimed to determine whether

students believe a higher degree makes a candidate more qualified, competent, or trustworthy. The

findings revealed a strong preference among the respondents for candidates with advanced degrees,

suggesting a belief that higher education correlates with increased competence and informed

decision-making. However, the research highlights the importance of fostering a more refined

understanding of candidate qualifications beyond academic credentials. To address this, the study

emphasizes the need for comprehensive voter education programs that equip students with the skills

to evaluate candidates holistically. Additionally, it proposes that political parties should strive for

diverse candidate slates representing a wider range of backgrounds and experiences, moving beyond

a sole focus on educational attainment. By understanding the perceptions of first-time voters,

policymakers and educators can develop targeted initiatives to enhance civic awareness and promote

informed decision-making among young Filipinos, ultimately leading to a more active and informed

citizenry.

Keywords: Senatorial candidates,Higher education, First-time voters, Political perceptions, Voting

3
preferences, Educational attainment, Philippines,Voter education,Civic engagement

Table of Contents

TITLE PAGE............................................................................................................................i

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT.......................................................................................................ii

ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................... iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................................................................................iv

CHAPTER I.............................................................................................................................1

A. Introduction..........................................................................................................................2

B. Current Literature.................................................................................................................2

C. Research Gap.......................................................................................................................4

D. Objective..............................................................................................................................4

E. Statement of the problem.....................................................................................................5

F. Significance of the study......................................................................................................7

G. Scope and Delimitation........................................................................................................8

H. Definition of Terms ..................................................................................................................

4
CHAPTER II..........................................................................................................................11

Review of the Related Literature and Studies..........................................................................11

Theoretical Framework .................................................................................................................

5 Foreign Literature ....................................................................................................................

5 Local Literature ........................................................................................................................

5 Foreign Studies ........................................................................................................................

5 Local Studies ............................................................................................................................

Synthesis .....................................................................................................................................

CHAPTER III……………..……………..……………..……………..……………..…………

Research Methodology and Design……………..……………..……………..…………………

Introduction……………..……………..……………..……………..……………..……………

Research Design……………..……………..……………..……………..……………..……….

Research Locale……………..……………..……………..……………..……………..……….

Respondents of the Study……………..……………..……………..……………..…………….

Data Gathering Procedures……………..……………..……………..……………..…………...

Research Instruments……………..……………..……………..……………..……………..…..

5
6
 Chapter 1
Introduction

The question of whether a senator's higher degree actually indicates that they are

better able to lead the state has been developing like a storm on the horizon in the busy

world of Philippine politics, where every Senate decision has the potential to affect the

country's destiny. This is not simply an intellectual interest; rather, it is a topic that is

essential to democratic governance and the Philippines' future. As the nation progresses,

the Senate's job becomes more and more important. According to Novak, T. (2020) That

the duties of senators include enacting laws, speaking for the people, and making sure the

government runs well. But what qualities should we look for in these leaders? Is a higher

degree a necessary prerequisite for success, or are there other factors that matter more?

Several studies have explored the relationship between education and various aspects

of political participation and leadership. For instance, research on voter turnout has

shown a correlation between educational attainment and likelihood of voting Yeaji Kim

(2023) Both studies center on education's political influence. The US study on voter

turnout offers context for Philippine students' views of senators' education, bridging

research gaps. Other studies have examined the educational backgrounds of elected

1
officials, revealing trends in representation across different levels of government Gaurav

Joshi (2022) The study on Indian local officials examines education's impact on their

efficiency. This is relevant in our research on Philippine students' views of senators. It

offers a comparison, helping understand how students might see education's role in a

senator's effectiveness. However, few studies directly address the public's perception of

the link between a senator's education and their effectiveness. This research directly

addresses this gap by focusing on the perceptions of a key demographic: senior high

school students. According to Jochem Van Noord (2023) This provides insights into how

senior high school students' perceptions of a senator's effectiveness might be influenced

by their own educational background and the candidate's perceived competence.

According to Almond (2020), numerous studies have investigated the factors

influencing voters' perceptions of politicians, yet a significant gap remains in

understanding the relationship between a senator's educational attainment and their

effectiveness in the eyes of young voters. According to Dalton (2020), the existing

literature has primarily focused on adult voters, neglecting the perspectives of young

voters, particularly Senior High School students, who will soon become a significant part

of the electorate. This oversight is concerning, as recent studies have highlighted the

importance of understanding the political socialization and voting behavior of young

adults.

2
 For instance, Huddy Et al. (2022) edited a comprehensive handbook on political

psychology, which explores the cognitive, emotional, and social factors that influence

political attitudes and behaviors, including those of young voters. Furthermore, Kim Lee

Et al (2023) conducted a study on political socialization and voting behavior among

young adults, which revealed that family, education, and social media play significant

roles in shaping their political orientations and voting decisions. Limited research has

also explored the perceptions of Senior High School students regarding the importance of

educational attainment in politics Kumar (2020).

Statement of the Problem:

This study aims to comprehensively understand the perceptions of the first-time voters

among senior high school students towards senatorial candidates with a higher degree. It

seeks to explore how these students view the significance of a candidate’s higher

educational attainment in the context of the senatorial election and how it influences their

voting preferences.

The following research questions will guide this study:

1. What are the overall perceptions of first-time senior high school voters regarding

senatorial candidates who possess a higher degree? Do they generally view these

candidates as more qualified, competent, or trustworthy compared to those without a

3
higher degree?

2. In what specific ways do senior high school students believe that a senator's higher

degree impacts their ability to perform their duties effectively? For example, do they

think it enhances the candidate's policy-making skills, understanding of complex issues,

or ability to represent the people's interests?

3. How do other factors, such as the candidate's political platform, party affiliation, and

personal charisma, interact with the perception of a higher degree among first-time senior

high school student voters? Do these factors override or complement the influence of

educational attainment in their voting decisions?

4. To what extent do senior high school students believe that a senator with an advanced

degree is more effective than one without?

5. What factors do senior high school students consider when evaluating the effectiveness

of a senator, and how does educational attainment rank among these factors?

Significance of the Study:

This study has significant effects for the Philippines' political and educational systems.

It is important to understand how future voters, or senior high school students, view the

relationship between a senator's perceived efficacy and level of education for a number of

reasons. Informed Citizenry: This study clarifies the elements that young voters take into

4
account when assessing political candidates, providing insight into their decision-making

processes. Fostering knowledgeable and involved individuals who are capable of making

thoughtful decisions during elections depends on this realization.

Political Discourse: This study adds to a more complex knowledge of how the general

public evaluates leadership credentials by investigating the opinions of senior high school

students. This information can help with policymaking and political debate, especially

when it comes to how education shapes good governance. Educational Policy: The

results of the study can help guide educational practices and policies, especially those that

seek to encourage civic engagement and equip the next generation to participate

responsibly in politics. Teachers can use it as a guide for creating curriculum that give

students the information and abilities, they need to assess political candidates. The

present study lays the groundwork for future investigations into the intricate connections

among public perception, political leadership, and education.

Scope and Delimitations

Area of the Study:

This study explores the perceptions of senior high school students regarding the

connection between a senator’s higher educational attainment and their effectiveness as a

political leader. It aims to determine whether students believe that holding an advanced

5
academic degree contributes to a senator’s competence in fulfilling legislative duties.

The respondents are limited to senior high school students from Ara Vista AMA School.

Data will be gathered through qualitative methods, start and end of the interview.

Limitations:

This study is limited to the perceptions of senior high school students and does not

include insights from other population groups such as college students, educators, or

political experts. It focuses specifically on the perceived value of academic attainment.

The scope is geographically restricted and conducted within a specific timeframe, which

may limit the generalizability of the findings to broader or future contexts.

Definition of terms:

Democratic Governance: Rule by the people, either directly or through elected leaders.

It means the government is responsible to its citizens and protects their rights.

- Senate Decision: A decision made by the Senate, the upper house of a country's

legislature (like the Philippine Senate). These decisions affect laws and policies.

- Senator: An elected official in the Senate who represents the people in their area. Their

job is to make laws, represent their constituents, and make sure the government works

properly.

- Political Efficacy: The feeling that you can make a difference in politics. This includes

6
believing you understand politics and that the government listens to the people.

Chapter 2

Review of Related Literature

Foreign Literature:

First-time voters and youth

According to Council of Europe (2021) This report discusses the challenges faced by

first-time voters, particularly young people, in new democracies. It highlights the limited

understanding of state functions and the importance of civic participation among high

school graduates. The findings emphasize the need for educational initiatives to raise

awareness about democratic processes, which can inform your research on the

perceptions of senior high school students regarding senatorial candidates.

Information, perceptions, and electoral behavior of young voters: A randomized

controlled experiment

According to Bruno P. Carvalho et. Al (2023) This study examines how young voters

process politically relevant information and its impact on their electoral behavior. It finds

that first-time voters are particularly sensitive to negative information, which can

7
significantly influence their perceptions and turnout. The insights from this research can

help understand how information affects the perceptions of senior high school students

towards senatorial candidates.

Political Socialization of Young Voters: The Impact of Parents and Peers

According to Jan Germen Janmaat et. al., (2022) This article examines how family

and peer discussions influence the political socialization of young voters, particularly

first-time voters. It provides a theoretical framework for understanding the influences on

senior high school students’ perceptions of candidates, which is essential for your

research.

Begin Again: Election Campaign and Own Opinions Among First‐Time Voters in

Romanian

According to Sergiu Gherghina et. al,. (2021) This study analyzes the influence of

election campaigns on first-time voters in Romania, examining how their pre-campaign

opinions affect their voting behavior. It highlights the role of trust in politicians and

perceptions of campaign informativeness, which could be relevant to understanding

similar dynamics among Filipino senior high school students.

8
Activating Effects of Elections: Changes in Young Voters’ Political Engagement

Over the Course of an Election Year (2024)

According to Katharina Eckstein et. al,. (2024) This research investigates how

national elections activate political engagement among young voters, including first-time

voters, in Germany, the Czech Republic, and Sweden. It discusses the socio-political

factors that influence young voters’ engagement and perceptions, which can be insightful

for your study on perceptions among Filipino youth.

Local Literature

A Study on the Voting Preferences of First-Time Voters in the 2022 Presidential

Elections.

According to Abasolo, Emmanuel John P. et al,. (2023). Philippine presidential

elections considered several key factors when choosing a candidate. These factors

included the candidate’s educational background, experience in government service, and

cultural background, which were seen as indicators of competence and ability to lead the

country. The study also found that social media played a significant role in influencing

first-time voters’ decisions, serving as a primary source of information and a platform for

online political participation. Furthermore, the study revealed that family and friends had

a substantial impact on voting decisions, as first-time voters engaged in political

9
 discussions with their loved ones. These findings provide valuable insights into the

voting preferences of first-time voters in the Philippines and highlight the importance of

voter education and critical thinking.

Attitudes and Considerations of Voters in the Philippine National Elections.

According to Jeremy Javines (2024). Attitudes and Considerations of Voters in the

Philippine National Elections. Laguna State Polytechnic University,” voters in the

Philippines demonstrated a collective understanding of the country’s electoral structures.

The study, conducted at Laguna State Polytechnic University, found that voters generally

expressed non-disturbance about voting scenarios and individual views and opinions.

However, they placed significant emphasis on their demographic profiles, indicating that

personal characteristics play a role in shaping their attitudes and considerations.

The study also revealed that voters' attitudes and considerations are influenced by their

experiences and perceptions of the electoral process. The extent of problems encountered

by voters during elections, such as vote-buying and electoral violence, can impact their

voting behavior and attitudes. Furthermore, the study found that voters’ attitudes are

shaped by their values and moral foundations, which are considered essential for rational

voting decisions

10
Understanding Voters’ Preference for Candidates in the Philippine Elections

According to Mark Christian Roble Almazan et al,(2023). Understanding Voters’

Preference for Candidates in the Philippine Elections, tend to prioritize popularity and

media influence over a candidate’s competence. This suggests that voters’ preferences are

significantly shaped by how well-known a candidate is and how they are portrayed in the

media, rather than their actual qualifications and policies. The study highlights the

importance of understanding voter behavior and attitudes in the Philippine electoral

context, where factors such as demographics, social networks, and media influence can

all play a role in shaping voter preferences. By examining these factors, researchers and

policymakers can gain valuable insights into how to promote informed and engaged

citizenship, and ensure the integrity of the electoral process.

Factors Affecting Youth Voting Preferences in the Philippine Senatorial Elections.

According to Enrique B. Batara et al./(2021). Factors Affecting Youth Voting

Preferences in the Philippine Senatorial Elections. These factors include party

identification, which refers to the voter’s loyalty to a particular political party; issue

orientation, which involves the voter’s stance on specific issues; and candidate

orientation, which focuses on the voter’s perception of the candidate’s character and

qualifications. Additionally, pre-election surveys also play a significant role in shaping

youth voting preferences, as they provide valuable information about the candidates and

11
their platforms. The study employed a quantitative approach and structural equation

modeling to analyze the relationships between these factors and voting preferences. By

understanding these factors, policymakers and stakeholders can develop targeted

strategies to engage young voters and promote informed decision-making in the electoral

process.

Voting Preferences in the National Election: A Case among First-Time Voters

According to Mary Angelie C. Abiera et al. (2022) A study of “Voting Preferences in

the National Election: A Case among First-Time Voters,” the research aimed to

understand the preferences of first-time voters in the national election. The study focused

on a small group of 12 respondents, divided into three age groups ranging from 18 to 21

years old. Although the study’s specifics are not extensively detailed, it likely explored

factors influencing first-time voters’ decisions, such as demographic characteristics,

social networks, and media influence. In the context of Philippine elections, first-time

voters’ preferences are shaped by various factors, including their levels of awareness,

knowledge, attitudes, and practices concerning national elections.

12
Foreign Studies

The Forming of First-Time Voters’ Political Preference in Indonesia

According to Sukri, et al, (2021), This paper analyzes how first-time voters in

Makassar, Indonesia shapes their political preferences and influence their future political

behavior. Through in-depth interviews, forty-five students from various high schools who

identified as first-time voters were found to be heavily influenced by their parents’

preferences.

First-time voters and honest political leaders: evidence from the 2019 presidential

election in Romania

According to Sergiu Gherghina, et al,. (2021), Voters prefer certain personal attributes

of political leaders over others. This paper identifies why first-time voters choose honest

political leaders. It is based on an original survey performed following the 2019

Romanian presidential election. Our analysis argues and analyzes the explanatory power

of three types of determinants: trust in political institutions, voting for non-political

candidates, and electoral campaigns. We discovered that first-time voters’ preferences

for honest leaders are based on positive sentiments such as faith in institutions and a

rejection of negative campaigns.

13
Understanding the Electoral Preferences of Beginner Voters in the 2020 Bulukumba

Local Elections

According to Nurul Fitriana Harsyaf, et al, (2023). The study’s goal is to determine

novice voters’ preferences for the 2020 Bulukumba regional elections. The research was

conducted qualitatively, using a case study approach. The informants for this study were

six (6) members of the Bulukumba KPUD, political parties, and first-time voters.

The findings of the study on the Political Preferences of Beginner Voters. Beginner

voters often follow family and community influences due to limited political knowledge.

Emotional connections with candidates can encourage new voters to engage in campaign

activities. Voter knowledge impacts political choices, with few relying on detailed

analysis or candidate profiles.

Student First-Time Voters’ Perception in Jakarta Toward Election System in

Indonesia: Through Their Participation in Election

According to Efridani Lubis (2020), General elections are a frequent mechanism in the

democratic political systems used by 237 countries throughout the world. Indonesia has

been devoted to implementing democracy since its first general election in 1955. In the

system, first-time voters play a major role. A large portion of first-time voters are first-

year college students. This is the primary rationale for conducting research on the

14
perception and participation of first-time voters. Similar studies have already been

conducted, particularly in Jakarta, but the primary difference in this study is that it uses a

mix approach to measure perception and involvement, followed by qualitative analysis

Begin again: Election campaign and own opinions among first‐time voters in

Romania

According to Sergiu Gherghina, et al, (2021), This article examines whether first-time

voters are influenced by election campaigns or their pre-campaign opinions while making

voting decisions. The study indicates the existence of unique causal pathways for young

voters who are influenced at the polls by either the election campaign or their own pre-

campaign attitudes. This highlights the importance of including the presence of an

opinion prior to the campaign in future analytical frameworks for voting behavior.

Local Studies

Examining How Candidate Attributes Shape Gen Z Perceptions for the 2025

Philippine Senate Elections Using Conjoint Analysis.

According to Sumatra (2025), the perceptions of first-time voters among senior high

school students regarding senatorial candidates with higher educational qualifications,

examining factors such as candidate orientation, party identification, issue orientation,

and the influence of pre-election surveys. The study suggests that young voters may

15
prioritize candidates’ educational backgrounds and perceived competence over

personality traits, reflecting a broader trend in the Filipino electoral landscape. By

analyzing the voting behaviors of young, educated demographics, the research provides

insights into their distinct priorities and how they shape electoral decisions.

What matters most to student voters?: A conjoint analysis of political candidate

attributes.

According to Anabo, F. D. (2021), the study primarily discusses presidential

candidates and their attributes, it also provides insights applicable to senatorial

candidates. Specifically, it highlights that student voters prioritize educational

qualifications, favoring candidates with higher degrees, such as a master’s over a

bachelors. This preference suggests that educational attainment is perceived as a measure

of a candidate’s competence and leadership capability. Consequently, having a higher

degree may be beneficial for senatorial candidates, as it aligns with voter preferences that

emphasize education as a crucial attribute in political leaders.

Voting Preferences in the National Election: A Case among First-Time Voters.

According to Moreto et al. (2022), the study highlights those first-time voters consider

educational background an important factor when selecting a political candidate,

16
believing that a good education equips politicians with essential leadership qualities and

the ability to address complex issues effectively. While educational qualifications are not

a constitutional requirement for public office in the Philippines, the study suggests that

voters should seek candidates with more than just the bare minimum level of education,

as it reflects their capability to govern and positively influence the country’s future.

Factors Affecting Youth Voting Preferences in the Philippine Senatorial Election: A

Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) Analysis.

According to Batara et al., (2021), a candidate’s educational background, particularly

their level of education, positively influences voter decisions, as higher educational

attainment is often associated with greater capability and trustworthiness, increasing

electoral success. Research, including studies in the Philippines, suggests that voters

value strong educational credentials when assessing candidates. However, while the study

affirms the importance of education in elections, it also highlights those other factors,

such as party identification and pre-election surveys, can shape voter preferences in the

Philippine electoral landscape.

Voting Preferences in the National Election: A case among First-Time Voters.

According to Abiera et al,. (2022), that the perspective of first-time voters in the

Philippines, education is a crucial factor in evaluating candidates for the Senate, as it

17
signifies competence, credibility, and effective governance. They view a relevant

educational background in politics and humanitarian services as essential, believing that

it equips candidates with the knowledge needed for informed decision-making.

Furthermore, first-time voters associate education with trust and credibility, as they are

more inclined to support candidates whose qualifications inspire confidence in their

leadership abilities. Beyond candidate selection, education also plays a vital role in

fostering civic engagement, as schools help young voters understand their political rights

and responsibilities, shaping their decision-making process. Ultimately, first-time voters

prioritize education as a fundamental attribute in candidates, reinforcing their belief that

well-educated leaders contribute to effective governance and national development.

Senior High School Students’ Political Participation in the Emerging Social Issues.

According to Ibardeloza (2021), the study examines the political participation of

senior high school students, particularly as first-time voters. It highlights their growing

awareness of the political landscape and their evaluation of senatorial candidates based

on youth-centered issues like education, governance, and the economy. Beyond voting,

they engage in discussions, civic activities, and social media advocacy. However,

challenges such as time constraints, fear of repercussions, and limited knowledge hinder

their full participation. The study emphasizes the role of education in fostering political

awareness, critical thinking, and engagement among young voters.

18
Synthesis

The studies highlights various aspects affecting first-time young voters. The Council

of Europe (2021) emphasizes the need for educational initiatives to boost civic

participation among high school graduates in new democracies. Carvalho et al. (2023)

find that young voters are particularly influenced by negative information, impacting

their electoral behavior. Janmaat et al. (2022) explore how family and peer discussions

shape young voters' political socialization, essential for understanding candidate

perceptions. Gherghina et al. (2021) analyze how election campaigns influence voting

behavior, noting the importance of trust in politicians. Finally, Eckstein et al. (2024)

examine how national elections enhance political engagement among young voters,

providing insights relevant to Filipino senior high school students’ perceptions.

Influencing first-time voters in the Philippines. Abasolo et al. (2023) found that

candidates' educational backgrounds and social media significantly affect voting

decisions, with family discussions also playing a key role. Javines (2024) noted that

voters understood the electoral process but emphasized personal demographics and

experiences, including issues like vote-buying, affecting their attitudes. Almazan et al.

(2023) highlighted the prioritization of candidate popularity over qualifications, stressing

19
the impact of media on voter preferences. Batara et al. (2021) identified factors like party

loyalty and issue orientation shaping youth voting preferences, while Abiera et al. (2022)

investigated first-time voters' decisions based on demographic characteristics and media

influence, underscoring the importance of awareness and knowledge in the electoral

process. Sukri et al. (2021) found that in Indonesia, parents significantly shape the

political preferences of first-time voters. Gherghina et al. (2021) highlight that Romanian

first-time voter favor honest leaders, influenced by trust in institutions and negative

campaigning. Harsyaf (2023) noted that novice voters often rely on family and

community influences due to limited political knowledge. In Indonesia, Lubis (2020)

emphasized the importance of first-year college students in elections and their

perceptions of the electoral system. Local studies by Sumatra (2025) and Anabo (2021)

indicate that Filipino first-time voters prioritize candidates' educational backgrounds,

perceiving higher qualifications as indicators of competence. Moreto et al. (2022) and

Batara et al. (2021) also underscored education as a crucial factor for voters, while Abiera

et al. (2022) linked education to trust and credibility in candidates. Lastly, Ibardeloza

(2021) examined senior high school students' political participation, noting their growing

awareness and engagement despite facing challenging.

20
 Chapter 3

Research Methodology and Design

Introduction

This chapter aims to explore the perceptions of first-time voters among senior high

school students towards senatorial candidates with higher degrees. To achieve this

objective, a well-designed research methodology is crucial. This chapter outlines the

research approach, methods, and procedures employed to gather and analyze the data,

providing a comprehensive understanding of the research design, population, sampling

strategy, data collection instruments, and data analysis techniques used in this study.

Research Design

This study will use Qualitative research design. (Utah (n.d)), Qualitative research is a

process of naturalistic inquiry that seeks an in-depth understanding of social phenomena

within their natural setting. It focuses on the “why” rather than the “what” of social

phenomena and relies on the direct experiences of human beings as meaning-making

agents in their everyday lives.

21
Research Locale

This study was conducted at AMA Cavite ARA Vista Village, Brgy. Biclatan, General

Trias, Cavite. The researchers of this study were carefully chosen to provide a sincere and

honesty response from the senior high school students. The researchers ensured that a

varied group of senior high school students were chosen to represent various academic

paths and backgrounds. This method attempted to collect a well-rounded perspective on

the topic under consideration. Furthermore, the researchers made an attempt to create a

welcoming environment, encouraging individuals to discuss their ideas openly.

22
Respondents of the Study

The respondents of this study are the Grade 11 and 12 senior high school students

from AMA College Cavite, who are first-time voters in the upcoming elections. These

students were selected as they represent young voters who are experiencing the voting

process for the first time and are beginning to form their political preferences. The study

aims to gather their perceptions regarding senatorial candidates with higher educational

attainment, exploring factors that influence their opinions, such as political awareness

and personal values. Additionally, the research will examine how these students assess

the qualifications of candidates. By analyzing their insights, the study seeks to understand

the factors shaping the political choices of first-time voters and the importance they place

on educational background in selecting their preferred senatorial candidates.

Data Gathering Procedure

The study will collect data start and end in interviews with senior high school students

in AMA college Cavite who are first-time voters The interviews will be conducted from

April 3, 2025 to April 4, 2025. A structured questionnaire will be used to gather their

perceptions of senatorial candidates with higher degrees. Additionally, 20 participants

will be interviewed to gain deeper insights into their views.

23
The participants will be chosen using a purposive sampling method to ensure a diverse

range of opinions. The collected data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics for

survey responses and thematic analysis for interview transcripts. Ethical considerations,

such as informed consent and data confidentiality, will be strictly followed throughout

the research process.

Research Instrument

The research instrument for exploring the perceptions of first-time voters among

senior high school students regarding senatorial candidates with higher academic degrees

will consist of open-ended questions. This format allows participants to freely express

their views, insights, and decision-making factors when evaluating candidates.

Through this qualitative approach, students can describe the key considerations

influencing their perceptions, such as the significance of educational attainment in

political leadership, trust in highly educated candidates, and expectations of their

governance abilities. Additionally, participants can share their sources of political

information, the role of academic qualifications in their voting preferences, and other

attributes they find important in a senatorial candidate. This research instrument aims to

24
gather in-depth responses, providing a comprehensive understanding of how first-time

voters in senior high school assess the relevance of higher education in political

Chapter 4

Result, Presentation and Analysis

This chapter presents the findings and interpretation of qualitative data gathered from

the 20 questionnaires completed by the 20 senior high school students of AMA College

Cavite through interviews. The results are organized according to the major themes that

emerged during the data analysis process. This chapter also provides an analysis and

interpretation of the data in relation to the research questions and objectives.

RESULT

A total of twenty respondents in senior high school, all of whom are first-time voters,

participated in this study. The findings suggest that the majority of the respondents tend

to favor senators who possess a higher level of education, particularly those with

advanced degrees. This preference reflects the respondents' belief that a higher degree

may indicate better qualifications and the ability to make informed decisions for the

country.

25
PRESENTATION DATA & INTERPRETATION

There are 20 senior high school first time voter’s respondents that answers the

questionnaires.

This graph shows that 80% of the respondents are 18 years old, 1 % was the 19 years old,

0% was the 20 years old and 10% were 21 years old.

26
This graph shows that the 55% of the respondents are female and 45% are male.

1. What are the overall perceptions of first-time senior high school student voters

regarding senatorial candidates who possess a higher degree? Do they generally view

these candidates as more qualified, competent, or trustworthy compared to those without

a higher degree?

- Most of senior high school student voters believe that having a higher degree may

suggest that a senator is more competent or knowledgeable, but they also recognize that it

doesn't automatically make someone more effective or trustworthy. Some students

27
mentioned that even those without formal education can be smart and capable leaders,

while others think that having a degree makes it easier for candidates to gain entry and

public trust.

2. In what specific ways do senior high school students believe that a senator's higher

degree impacts their ability to perform their duties effectively? For example, do they

think it enhances the candidate's policy-making skills, understanding of complex issues,

or ability to represent the people's interests?

- The researchers interview 20 senior high school students. Some students of senior high

school agree and believe that a senator's higher degree will more effectively fulfill their

duties as a senatorial candidate. Some students that they're stand that voting a senator's

candidate isn't just about having a higher degree but having a more experience and

knowing what they need to implement no just because they want to implement.

3. How do other factors, such as the candidate's political platform, party affiliation, and

personal charisma, interact with the perception of a higher degree among first-time senior

high school student voters? Do these factors override or complement the influence of

educational attainment in their voting decisions?

- Mostly of the respondent’s senior high school students that some candidate does

the political platform, party and other activities to gain the trust but to gain the

votes. One respondent says "they seem to be blinding people's perspective" it's

28
 noted that candidates sometimes use these elements to gain public trust and votes

implying that flashy campaigns or strong party ties can sometimes overshadow

actual qualifications. Another respondent highlighted that charisma is especially

important to young voters, as they are often drawn to candidates who appear

relatable and genuine. This suggests that while educational attainment plays a role

in shaping voter decisions, other factors such as charisma and party loyalty may

override or complement the influence of education in determining voting

4. To what extent do senior high school students believe that a senator with an advanced

degree is more effective than one without?

- Senior high school students believe that senators with advanced degrees are often

more effective because they are seen as more knowledgeable and prepared in crafting

laws. However, others argue that effectiveness is not solely based on education, as

some senators without degrees can still be highly capable due to their life

experiences and strong connection with the community. While many prefer

candidates with a higher degree, others emphasize that both education and practical

experience are important for effectiveness.

5. What factors do senior high school students consider when evaluating the

effectiveness of a senator, and how does educational attainment rank among these

29
factors?

- The students of senior high school consider the knowledgeable ang pure senator

when they evaluating the effectiveness of a senator, however some students didn't

much agree that the lack of a high level of education is not a hindrance if one has

more experience and is more effective for being senator, and some students agree

and support for those senators should have a high degree.

Chapter 5
Summary, Conclusion, Recommendation

Summary

This research explored the perceptions of first-time voters among senior high school

students regarding senatorial candidates with higher educational qualifications. A total of

twenty participants, all first-time voters, provided insights through questionnaires. The

findings indicate a significant preference for candidates holding advanced degrees,

reflecting the belief among respondents that higher education correlates with better

30
qualifications and decision-making capabilities. Additionally, demographic data revealed

that 80% of respondents were 18 years old, with a gender distribution of 55% female and

45% male.

Conclusion

The study concludes that educational attainment plays a crucial role in shaping the

perceptions of first-time voters among senior high school students. The overwhelming

preference for candidates with advanced degrees suggests that these voters associate

higher education with competence, integrity, and the ability to address the complex issues

facing the country. This research may also indicate a growing awareness among young

voters about the importance of informed decision-making in political leadership. The

demographic data highlights the youthfulness of the respondent group, which is important

as it reflects the perspectives of a generation that is becoming increasingly engaged in the

electoral process.

Recommendations

This research highlights the significant influence of perceived educational qualifications

on the voting preferences of first-time voters. To enhance informed decision-making

among young voters, comprehensive voter education programs should be implemented in

31
 schools, focusing on the electoral process and the importance of evaluating candidates

beyond just their degrees.

These programs should foster critical thinking skills, enabling students to analyze candidate

platforms effectively. Furthermore, political parties should strive for diverse candidate slates

representing varied backgrounds and experiences, not solely focusing on high educational

attainment. Targeted engagement initiatives, such as interactive events and social media

campaigns, are crucial for connecting with young voters. Finally, further research should

explore the underlying reasons for this preference and track its evolution as these voters gain

more electoral experience. These recommendations aim to empower young voters and

promote a more informed and engaged electorate.

Appendix A;

Introduction:

This appendix presents the instrument used to gather qualitative data for the research study,

"The Perceptions of First-Time Voters Among Senior High School Students to the Senatorial

Candidates with a Higher Degree." The data collection method employed semi-structured

interviews with twenty (20) senior high school students who are first-time voters. Informed

consent was obtained from all participants, and pseudonyms have been used to maintain

32
anonymity.

The interview questions were designed to explore the respondents' perceptions of the

importance of a senator's higher education level in relation to their perceived qualifications,

effectiveness, and ability to represent their constituents. The questions aimed to understand

not only their beliefs about the direct link between education and senatorial performance, but

also the influence of other factors such as political platforms, party affiliations, and personal

characteristics on their voting decisions. The open-ended nature of the questions facilitated in-

depth exploration of their perspectives and reasoning.

Interview Questions:

1. Could you share your thoughts on the significance of a senator having a higher degree? Do you

believe it automatically makes them more qualified, competent, or trustworthy compared to

candidates without one?

2. In your opinion, how does a senator's higher degree specifically enhance their ability to

perform their duties effectively? For instance, do you think it improves their policy-making

skills, understanding of complex issues, or ability to represent the people's interests?

3. Can you recall a situation where a candidate's higher degree influenced your perception of

them? How did it impact your decision-making process?

33
4. How do the candidate's political program, party affiliation, and charisma affect first-time senior

high school student voters' opinion of a higher degree?

5. To what extent do you believe that a senator with an advanced degree is more effective than

one without? Can you provide any examples or reasoning to support your answer?

6. What factors do you consider when evaluating the effectiveness of a senator? How does

educational attainment rank among these factors?

7. Have you ever discussed the importance of a senator's higher degree with your peers or family?

How did these conversations influence your perspective?

8. Do you think that a senator's higher degree should be a determining factor in their ability to

represent their constituents? Why or why not?

9. Can you think of any potential drawbacks or limitations to relying solely on a senator's higher

degree as an indicator of their effectiveness?

10. In your opinion, what role does education play in shaping a senator's ability to make informed

decisions and serve the public interest? How does this relate to their higher degree?

34
20 Respondents Senior High School Students in AMA College Cavite

Name: Masa, John Basti

Age:18. Gender: male

Grade 11

PR - Interviewer

JB - Respondent

PR: are you a first time voters?

JB: Yes

PR: Okay, first question. Could you share your thoughts on the significance of a senator having a

higher degree? Do you believe it automatically makes them more qualified, competent, or

trustworthy compared to candidates without one?

JB: For me, you can also trust those who didn't finish because they know things too, and

sometimes, it's those who didn't finish who are the smart ones.

35
PR: But isn't it true that when they become senators, they are the ones who make the laws? So for

you, it's better if they are uneducated?

JB: Yes, but those who have studied, because they have graduated, find it easier to get in.

PR: So-

JB; So, those who are uneducated, even if they are intelligent, will still have a hard time getting

in.

PR: Question number two. In your opinion, how does a senator's higher degree specifically

enhance their ability to perform their duties effectively? For instance, do you think it

improves their policy-making skills, understanding of complex issues, or ability to represent

the people's interests?

JB: For me, yes, because they already know what they need to do, they also know where they can

get through or how they will identify the problems and how they will resolve them.

PR: So for you, they are really more effective in performing those tasks is okay, question number

three Can you recall a situation where a candidate's higher degree influenced your perception

of them? How did it impact your decision-making process?

For example, Leni and Marcos, and your side is with Marcos, but didn't Leni accomplish

something while Marcos didn't? Did that change your perspective?

36
JB: For me No, based on my observation, I just noticed that Leni seems a bit out of it, hehehe.

Then, Marcos seems to think fairly well, but it's just a little bit, that's all.

PR: So, question number four How do the candidate's political program, party affiliation, and

charisma affect first-time senior high school student voters' opinion of a higher degree?

JB: It's just that they seem to be blinding people's perspectives; if they're going to be voted for,

they'll be voted for me, whoever I think is right and has a good party, that's who I'll vote for.

PR: So, question number five to what extent do you believe that a senator with an advanced

degree is more effective than one without? Can you provide any examples or reasoning to

support your answer? For example, rate 1-10 how much you believe that a person with a high

degree is more important than those without

JB: 10 because those who finish find it easier to get jobs and their advancement is faster because

there are... What do you call that?

PR: Background

JB: yeah background

PR: question number six What factors do you consider when evaluating the effectiveness of a

senator? How does educational attainment rank among these factors?

37
JB: As a first time voters, because everyone is showing kindness now, what I will look for and

see is who is genuine.

PR: So, number seven Have you ever discussed the importance of a senator's higher degree with

your peers or family? How did these conversations influence your perspective?

JB: So far, my family and I haven't had any conflicts yet because we all want to vote for the same

candidates.

PR: For example, your friend told you about a candidate you didn't know, so did this change your

perspective to, "Oh, this one is okay too"?

JB: No

PR: Question number eight Do you think that a

senator's higher degree should be a determining factor in their ability to represent their

constituents? Why or why not?

JB: Yes, because you are the one in a higher position and you should really lead those under your

authority.

PR: Question number nine Can you think of any potential drawbacks or limitations to relying

solely on a senator's higher degree as an indicator of their effectiveness?

38
JB: It's just that you should continue doing what you're doing and nothing will hinder your

progress.

PR: Okay last question number ten In, your opinion, what role does education play in shaping a

senator's ability to make informed decisions and serve the public interest? How does this

relate to their higher degree?

JB: Hmm...because they already know what they need to do, and of course, you are not only

shaped by education but also by those around you, especially your family. So, for me, it's not

just the school that shapes a person, but it also helps in further shaping a person.

PR: Okay, that's all thank you very much!

Name: Kent Ycer Viado

Age: 18 Gender: Male

Grade And Section 1

PR: interviewer

KV: Respondent

39
PR: are you a first time voters?

KV: Yes

PR: Okay, first question. Could you share your thoughts on the significance of a senator having a

higher degree? Do you believe it automatically makes them more qualified, competent, or

trustworthy compared to candidates without one?

KV: For me it's yes, because for me a senator has a higher degree was more qualified and thrust

worthy for that position and because those who have higher education have a significant

impact as a senator, especially since they are among those who create laws that will benefit

our country.

PR: Question number two. In your opinion, how does a senator's higher degree specifically

enhance their ability to perform their duties effectively? For instance, do you think it

improves their policy-making skills, understanding of complex issues, or ability to represent

the people's interests?

KV: In my opinion, it's more and much effectively the senators that a higher degree, because they

don't have only a experience but also have a knowledge about being a good senator.

PR: Okay, question number three Can you recall a situation where a candidate's higher degree

influenced your perception of them? How did it impact your decision-making process?

40
KV: Yes, because they much knowledgeable and knows very well about the laws and other task

or work on senator.

PR: So question number four How do the candidate's political program, party affiliation, and

charisma affect first-time senior high school student voters' opinion of a higher degree?

KV: It can affect the perception of a firs time voters because they like brainwashing and the

people get easily blind for those political program

PR: So, question number five to what extent do you believe that a senator with an advanced

degree is more effective than one without? Can you provide any examples or reasoning to

support your answer?

KV: I must say that I really much prefer the senators that a higher degree, because they don't

implement what they want to but implement because it's the right thing to do.

PR: Question number six What factors do you consider when evaluating the effectiveness of a

senator? How does educational attainment rank among these factors?

KV: As a firsttime voters I'm looking forward to the candidate of senators that has a genuinely

and true desire for our country and the one who not just make a promise but the one that

making action for being a worthy candidate.

41
PR: So, number seven Have you ever discussed the importance of a senator's higher degree with

your peers or family? How did these conversations influence your perspective?

KV: Yes, same age because they political aware and sometimes it, change my perception about

the candidates of senators.

PR: Question number eight Do you think that a senator's higher degree should be a determining

factor in their ability to represent their constituents? Why or why not?

KV: It's a big yes for me, because if people choose you in that position you should act like one,

and also your standing up as a leader that should rule the in your constituents.

PR: Question number nine Can you think of any potential drawbacks or limitations to relying

solely on a senator's higher degree as an indicator of their effectiveness?

KV: You should know how to stand in your self ang don't always reply in the government.

PR: Okay last question number ten In your opinion, what role does education play in shaping a

senator's ability to make informed decisions and serve the public interest? How does this

relate to their higher degree?

KV: For me, education had a big impact of shaping rhe future senator, because they learning and

gaining knowledge.

42
PR: Okay, that's all thank you very much!

Venus Caolie

STEM 12 Section 1,

18 years old

Female

1. Not necessarily. While a higher degree can certainly indicate a certain level of expertise or

commitment to learning, it doesn't automatically mean someone is a better senator. Some of

the most effective senators might not have advanced degrees, while others with degrees may

struggle to connect with the issues or voters. It's more about the individual's experiences,

values, and ability to work for the people. Education helps, but it's not the be-all and end-all.

2. A higher degree might improve a senator’s understanding of complex topics, like economics,

law, or public policy, making it easier for them to grasp intricate issues or come up with

thoughtful solutions. But the real value comes from their ability to communicate and translate

that knowledge into actionable policies that serve the people. So, education can enhance their

43
 skills, but it’s the practical application of that knowledge that matters most in serving the

public.

3. Honestly, a degree might catch my attention at first, but it's not the only thing I consider. I tend

to focus more on how they connect with the issues and how well they understand the real-life

concerns of their constituents. For instance, if a candidate has a law degree, they might come

off as more knowledgeable about legal matters, but if they don’t show they can advocate for

policies that matter to everyday people, it doesn’t make much of an impact on me.

4. For younger voters, things like a candidate’s political program or the party they belong to

might have more weight than their academic credentials. Charisma can also play a huge role

because younger voters are often drawn to someone who seems genuine and relatable. But a

higher degree might still add a layer of respectability to a candidate’s image, especially if

they can present themselves in a way that resonates with the issues the students care about.

5. Not necessarily. While a senator with an advanced degree might have a deeper understanding

of certain issues, effectiveness often depends on other factors like emotional intelligence,

political strategy, and the ability to build relationships with colleagues. It’s about how well

they use their skills to advocate for the people. Some of the most effective senators might not

have a degree but excel in other areas like communication and leadership.

6. I look at their track record—what they’ve actually done for their constituents, how they’ve

44
 voted, and how they communicate and collaborate with others. Their educational background

is definitely a factor, but it’s not at the top of my list. I’d say the ability to communicate

effectively and understand the real needs of their community is more important.

7. I have, and the conversations usually lead to interesting debates. Some of my friends feel like

education is super important because it shows dedication, while others argue that experience

in the real world and a strong connection with the people should matter more. It’s made me

realize that education is just one part of the equation, and it’s not the only thing that makes

someone qualified to represent us.

8. I don’t think it should be the determining factor. While it can be helpful, there are many other

qualities that make someone an effective representative. A senator needs to have empathy, the

ability to listen, and the desire to make a positive impact, which doesn’t always correlate with

having a higher degree.

9. Yes, definitely. Education alone doesn’t tell the whole story. A senator with a higher degree

might be out of touch with everyday people or might lack the practical skills needed to pass

legislation. Relying too much on a degree could overlook candidates who might have great

experience or unique perspectives but don’t fit the traditional educational mold.

10. Education can be a helpful tool, especially when it comes to understanding complex issues

and policies. However, a senator’s ability to make informed decisions isn’t just about what’s

45
 in their degree—it's about their ability to listen to experts, engage with constituents, and make

decisions based on what will truly benefit the people. So while education is important, it’s

how they apply that knowledge that matters most.

Name: Sabrina M. Toryo

Age: 18 Gender: female

Grade: 12 ABM

PR: interviewer

ST: Respondent

PR: are you a first time voters?

ST: Yes

PR: Okay, first question. Could you share your thoughts on the significance of a senator having a

46
 higher degree? Do you believe it automatically makes them more qualified, competent, or

trustworthy compared to candidates without one?

ST: uhm...I wouldn't say that it's not just the highly educated who can do good, but as far as I

know, if you have learned a lot, like if you have studied that field, you can do more and

implement more that is really suited for that position. But if we say that those who haven't

studied but have experience, why not? So that's it.

PR: Question number two. In your opinion, how does a senator's higher degree specifically

enhance their ability to perform their duties effectively? For instance, do you think it improves

their policy-making skills, understanding of complex issues, or ability to represent the

people's interests?

ST: Because, right, when you're already at a high level in the Senate, of course, you have a lot of

experience, so you already know how the tasks work there, you know the keys. It's not like

when you're still a beginner, of course, you'll have to feel your way around first before you

can implement laws, right? So for me, it's more important to have someone who knows, so

there.

PR: Okay, question number three Can you recall a situation where a candidate's higher degree

influenced your perception of them? How did it impact your decision-making process?

ST: So there you have it, my stance remains the same because if I were to vote now, I would

47
 choose someone knowledgeable about the government. Is it okay if I name-drop? ...

PR: Yes, it's okay

ST: So let's consider Bam Aquino and Kiko Pangilinan, who have already accomplished a lot.

You know they can still do more and implement even more, but I can't say that they are the

only ones who can do those things 100%. There is still a chance for us to give way to people

without experience, but we should choose wisely. So that's my stand on that.

PR: So question number four How do the candidate's political program, party affiliation, and

charisma affect first-time senior high school student voters' opinion of a higher degree?

ST: So participating in a party is a big deal because when you look at a party, you're not just

judging one person, right? You're judging many, including their companions. There are

parties that might have one good candidate but the rest are just mediocre, so you might be put

off by that party. Of course, when choosing a candidate and a party, they should stand as one

and all be good. As for the political program, it should be the same; they need to have

credentials that have done good for the country. That's all. As a new voter, that's what I'm

looking for.

PR: So question number five To what extent do you believe that a senator with an advanced

degree is more effective than one without? Can you provide any examples or reasoning to

support your answer?

48
ST: For me, 100%, I really want someone who is well-educated as much as possible because I

can base my preferences on that, and my heart will also be assured with this candidate

because they have an education and they know the field they are running for. They won't just

run to implement laws without knowing the risks and the pros and cons of implementing

those laws. For example, Bam Aquino with the state colleges and what he has done, he has

more projects that will make job searching easier. For me, because he understands how the

Senate system works, he can do more good than those who are inexperienced. I'm not saying

they can't do anything, but for me, I prefer someone who is 100% sure of what they are

doing.

PR: Question number six What factors do you consider when evaluating the effectiveness of a

senator? How does educational attainment rank among these factors?

ST: For me, what I'm looking for is someone who is decisive, knows how to lead, not just

someone who talks a lot, and knows how to implement things properly. And of course,

because of their achievements, they gain more knowledge in that position.

PR: So number seven Have you ever discussed the importance of a senator's higher degree with

your peers or family? How did these conversations influence your perspective?

ST: Same age Yes, because I have friends who are politically aware of what is happening in the

49
 Philippines right now, so of course, as first-time voters, we want to vote for someone we are

sure can do a good job. So there.

PR: So they can change your perspective?

ST: Yes, big time of course.

PR: Question number eight Do you think that a senator's higher degree should be a determining

factor in their ability to represent their constituents? Why or why not?

ST: Of course, because they should be the ones who are really knowledgeable and you know they

really know what they're doing.

PR: Question number nine Can you think of any potential drawbacks or limitations to relying

solely on a senator's higher degree as an indicator of their effectiveness?

ST: Yes, because we shouldn't just rely on the government, so you also need to do something for

yourself. It's good to take advantage of what the government provides, but it shouldn't be

abused and you shouldn't rely on it 100%.

PR: Okay last question number ten In your opinion, what role does education play in shaping a

senator's ability to make informed decisions and serve the public interest? How does this

relate to their higher degree?

50
ST: Of course, basically speaking, education and knowledge are really necessary when running

for the Senate. It's not just because you want something to happen in the Philippines; it

shouldn't be like that. You should also consider the risks, pros, and cons, so you need to know

what to do before you implement what you want to implement.

PR: So do you think in school, the future senators are being shaped.

ST: Yes, of course, in school you learn, right? So when you learn, your knowledge and

experience in that certain field increase, so I say yes.

PR: Okay, that's all thank you very much!

Name of Respondents: Lucien Rei

Age:18

Grade: 11 Gender:female

Strand: Stem

PR: Interviewer

ST: LR

51
PR:1. Could you share your thoughts on the significance of a senator having a higher degree? Do

you believe it automatically makes them more qualified, competent, or trustworthy compared

to candidates without one?

LR: No, Hindi naman lahat na may higher degree ay nagagawa ng tama ang kanilang obligasyon.

Ang importante pa rin ay kung paano nila pinapakita ang kanilang malasakit sa mga tao at

kung anong resulta ng kanilang trabaho.

PR:2. In your opinion, how does a senator's higher degree specifically enhance their ability to

perform their duties effectively? For instance, do you think it improves their policy-making

skills, understanding of complex issues, or ability to represent the people's interests?

LR:Kahit may degree, hindi pa rin garantisado na magiging mahusay siya sa paggawa ng mga

desisyon.

PR:3. Can you recall a situation where a candidate's higher degree influenced your perception of

them? How did it impact your decision-making process?

May mga kandidato na may mataas na degree pero sa totoo lang, hindi ko nararamdaman na

epektibo sila. Kung ang basehan lang ay degree, baka maraming maling desisyon na

maganap.

PR: 4. How do the candidate's political program, party affiliation, and charisma affect first-time

52
 senior high school student voters' opinion of a higher degree?

LR:Para sa mga first-time voters, mas tumitingin sila sa karakter ng kandidato at sa programang

inaalok. Hindi lang degree ang mahalaga, kundi ang malasakit at kakayahan.

PR:5. To what extent do you believe that a senator with an advanced degree is more effective

than one without? Can you provide any examples or reasoning to support your answer?

Hindi ako naniniwala na mas effective ang senador dahil lang sa advanced degree.

PR:6. What factors do you consider when evaluating the effectiveness of a senator? How does

educational attainment rank among these factors?

LR:Mahalaga pa rin sa akin kung may track record sila ng mga gawa at kung ano ang ginawa nila

para sa tao.

PR:7. Have you ever discussed the importance of a senator's higher degree with your peers or

family? How did these conversations influence your perspective?

LR: Oo, pero karamihan sa amin nakikita rin na hindi sapat ang degree para maglingkod ng tama.

PR: 8. Do you think that a senator's higher degree should be a determining factor in their ability

53
 to represent their constituents? Why or why not?

LR: Hindi, kasi kung puro degree lang, paano kung hindi siya marunong makinig o makialam sa

mga tunay na isyu? Dapat may malasakit siya sa pangangailangan ng mga tao.

PR9.Can you think of any potential drawbacks or limitations to relying solely on a senator's

higher degree as an indicator of their effectiveness?

LR:Oo, baka may tendency ang mga may degree na mag-focus lang sa mga teorya at hindi

marunong mag-apply sa reality.

PR:10. In your opinion, what role does education play in shaping a senator's ability to make

informed decisions and serve the public interest? How does this relate to their higher degree?

LR:Education ay importanteng factor, pero hindi ito lang ang magpapa-tama ng mga desisyon.

Name of Respondents:Carl Daniel Joaquin

Age:18

Gender:Male

Grade:12 A

1. Oo, mahalaga ang higher degree pero hindi ibig sabihin na siya na agad ang pinaka-qualified.

54
2. Pwedeng makatulong ang degree sa paggawa ng batas pero hindi ito assurance na magiging

epektibo siya.

3. Oo, minsan naiisip ko na mas magaling siya dahil may degree pero tinitingnan ko pa rin ang

kanyang track record.

4. Malaki ang epekto ng charisma at plataporma sa pagtingin ng kabataan kaysa sa educational

background lang.

5. Hindi laging mas effective ang may advanced degree, depende pa rin sa galing at intensyon ng

tao.

6. Para sa akin, mas mahalaga ang performance at paninindigan kaysa sa degree.

7. Oo, pero napagkasunduan namin na hindi sapat ang diploma para maging mahusay na lider.

8. Hindi, kasi may mga senador na mahusay kahit walang mataas na pinag-aralan.

9. Oo, kasi minsan napapabayaan ang simpleng solusyon dahil masyadong teknikal ang approach

nila.

10. Education ay guide lang sa decision-making pero dapat may tunay na concern sa public

interest.

55
Name of Respondents:KEHISHA GARCIA

Grade: 12-A

Age:18

Gender: female

1. A higher degree is not a sufficient qualification for a senator; other factors are equally

important.

2. While a higher degree can aid in understanding complex issues, it does not automatically

translate to effective senatorial service.

3. It did not significantly influence my final decision.

4. A candidate's platform, party affiliation, and charisma often hold more sway over voters.

56
5. Possessing a higher degree is not a guarantee of a senator's effectiveness.

6. When evaluating a senator, experience, integrity, their political platform, and their ability to

connect with the public are crucial factors to consider.

7. My perspective was influenced by considering the importance of a senator's higher education.

8. A senator's educational attainment should not be the sole determining factor in assessing their

suitability for office.

9. Focusing solely on a senator's higher degree risks overlooking potentially qualified candidates

who may possess extensive practical experience despite having less formal education.

10. While education plays a significant role, it is not the only determinant of a senator's ability to

make informed decisions and serve the public interest effectively; experience and integrity

are equally vital.

Name of Respondents: Dweyn Marcel

Age: 18

Grade Level: 12

57
Strand: section A

Gender: Male

1. Para sa akin, mahalaga ang higher degree kasi ibig sabihin may sapat siyang kaalaman. Pero

hindi ibig sabihin nun na automatic na siya ang pinaka-qualified. Kailangan din tingnan kung

paano siya kumilos at maglingkod.

2. Nakakatulong ang higher degree sa pag-intindi ng batas at mga komplikadong isyu. Mas

maayos siyang makakagawa ng policies na makakabuti sa lahat. Pero dapat may puso rin sa

serbisyo.

3. Oo, minsan napapaisip ako na mas okay yung may degree kasi parang mas alam niya ang

ginagawa niya. Pero hindi lang ako doon nagbabase. Tinitingnan ko pa rin kung tunay siyang

naglilingkod.

4. Malaki ang epekto ng charisma at party affiliation sa mga first-time voters gaya namin. Minsan

doon kami nabibigyan ng impression kung gaano kagaling ang isang kandidato. Yung higher

degree, second priority na lang minsan.

5. Mas may edge talaga ang may advanced degree lalo na kung kailangan ng technical

knowledge. Pero kung walang malasakit, parang wala ring silbi ang degree. Kailangan

balance ng talino at puso.

58
6. Tinitingnan ko kung paano siya bumoboto sa mga isyu, kung may malasakit siya sa masa, at

kung consistent siya. Education ay mahalaga pero hindi siya top priority para sa akin. Gusto

ko yung may gawa, hindi lang diploma.

7. Oo, minsan napag-uusapan namin sa bahay kung importanteng may mataas na pinag-aralan

ang senador. Nakakaisip ako na advantage siya, pero hindi siya sapat. Dapat may pakialam

din talaga sa tao.

8. Hindi dapat ito maging only basis. Mas importante kung marunong siyang makinig at kumilos

para sa nakararami. Degree ay tool lang, hindi sukatan ng buong pagkatao.

9. Oo, kasi may mga edukado na disconnected sa totoong buhay ng mga tao. Pwedeng book smart

pero hindi street smart. Kaya kailangan din ng karanasan at empathy.

10. Malaki ang tulong ng education sa paggawa ng informed decisions. Pero mas importante pa

rin yung intensyon niya para sa bayan. Kung may higher degree siya at may malasakit, mas

okay.

Name of Respondents:Kylie Nicole G. Dela Cruz

Age:18 Years Old

Gender: Female

59
Grade:12-A

1. Could you share your thoughts on the significance of a senator having a higher degree? Do

you believe it automatically makes them more qualified, competent, or trustworthy compared

to candidates without one?

- Honestly, I think a higher degree can be a real asset for a senator. It often means they've put in

the work to gain specialized knowledge, which is super useful when you're dealing with

complex policy issues. However, I definitely don't think it automatically makes someone

more qualified. You know, some of the most effective people I've seen have learned

everything through real-world experience. Competence and trustworthiness? Those come

from character, not just a piece of paper.

2. In your opinion, how does a senator's higher degree specifically enhance their ability to

perform their duties effectively? For instance, do you think it improves their policy-making

skills, understanding of complex issues, or ability to represent the people's interests?

- I think it helps a lot with understanding those really dense, complicated issues that come up in

the Senate. Like, if you've got a senator with a background in economics, they're probably going

to have a better grasp of the financial implications of a bill. Or someone with a law degree?

They can probably dissect legal jargon way faster. As for representing people's interests, well,

that's more about empathy and listening. A degree doesn't guarantee that, but it can give them

60
 a stronger foundation for analyzing the data and understanding the potential impact of

policies on their constituents.

3. Can you recall a situation where a candidate's higher degree influenced your perception of

them? How did it impact your decision-making process?

- Yeah, I remember one candidate who had a really impressive background in public health.

Initially, I thought, 'Wow, they must really know their stuff.' It made me pay closer attention

to their stance on healthcare. But, as I looked into their actual track record, I realized that

their actions didn't always align with their supposed expertise. It made me realize that I

couldn't just rely on their credentials; I had to look at the whole picture.

4. How do the candidate's political program, party affiliation, and charisma affect first-time senior

high school student voters' opinion of a higher degree?

- I think for a lot of first-time voters, especially those still in high school, the flashier stuff is

what catches their attention. Like, a candidate with a really exciting political program or

someone who's super charismatic. Party affiliation plays a big role too, especially if their

friends and family are already aligned with a certain party. I think the higher degree is more

of a 'nice-to-have' for them, something that adds to the overall package, but not the main selling

point.

5. To what extent do you believe that a senator with an advanced degree is more effective than

61
 one without? Can you provide any examples or reasoning to support your answer?

- I really don't think it's a simple 'yes' or 'no' answer. I've seen senators with advanced degrees

who were brilliant but totally out of touch, and I've seen senators without degrees who were

incredibly effective because they had a deep understanding of their communities. It's more

about how they use their knowledge and experience. For example, someone with years of

experience dealing with small businesses might be more effective at crafting economic policy

than someone with a theoretical degree but no practical experience.

6. What factors do you consider when evaluating the effectiveness of a senator? How does

educational attainment rank among these factors?

- For me, it's a mix of things, have they actually gotten anything done, are they responsive to the

people they represent? are they honest and transparent? And can they explain complex issues

in a way that people understand? Educational attainment is definitely a factor, but it's just one

piece of the puzzle. It's not the most important, but it is a factor.

7. Have you ever discussed the importance of a senator's higher degree with your peers or family?

How did these conversations influence your perspective?

- Yeah, I've had a lot of those conversations. We usually end up agreeing that education is

important, but it's not the be-all and end-all. We talk about how some of the best leaders have

come from really diverse backgrounds, and how real-world on their creden

62
8. Do you think that a senator's higher degree should be a determining factor in their ability to

represent their constituents? Why or why not?

- No, absolutely not. I think that would be a huge mistake. Representing people is about

understanding their needs, listening to their concerns, and fighting for their interests. That

requires empathy, compassion, and a genuine connection with the community. You can't get

that from a textbook. Focusing only on degrees would exclude a lot of qualified, dedicated

people who have the right heart for public service.

9. Can you think of any potential drawbacks or limitations to relying solely on a senator's higher

degree as an indicator of their effectiveness?

- Definitely. It can lead to elitism, where people think that only those with fancy degrees are

qualified to lead. It can create a disconnect from the real-world problems that ordinary people

face. And it can make us overlook really talented individuals who have valuable experience

but didn't follow the traditional academic path.

10. In your opinion, what role does education play in shaping a senator's ability to make informed

decisions and serve the public interest? How does this relate to their higher degree?

- Education provides a foundation for critical thinking, analysis, and understanding complex

issues. A higher degree can enhance those skills, giving a senator a deeper understanding of

specific policy areas. But, ultimately, it's how they use that education that matters. If they use

it to serve the public interest, to make informed decisions that benefit their constituents, then

63
 it's a valuable asset. But if they use it for personal gain or to promote their own agenda, then

it's meaningless.

Name of Respondents: Jeff Ramos

Name of Interviewer: Jenelyn Clor

Age:18

Grade:11

Gender: Male

Strand: Stem

JC: 1.Could you share your thoughts on the significance of a senator having a higher degree? Do

you believe it automatically makes them more qualified, competent, or trustworthy compared

to candidates without one?

-JR:Oo, nakakabilib talaga kapag may higher degree ang isang senador kasi ibig sabihin nag-

invest siya sa education. Pero hindi ibig sabihin nun na mas magaling siya kaysa sa iba agad-

64
 agad.

JC:2. In your opinion, how does a senator's higher degree specifically enhance their ability to

perform their duties effectively? For instance, do you think it improves their policy-making

skills, understanding of complex issues, or ability to represent the people's interests?

-JR:Hindi porket may higher degree, magaling na agad gumawa ng batas o humawak ng isyu.

Kailangan pa rin ng experience, wisdom, at tunay na malasakit sa tao.

JC:3. Can you recall a situation where a candidate's higher degree influenced your perception of

them? How did it impact your decision-making process?

-JR:May isang kandidato dati na ang ganda ng credentials pero hindi ko naramdaman na sincere

siya. Kaya hindi naging big factor ang degree sa choice ko.

JC:4. How do the candidate's political program, party affiliation, and charisma affect first-time

senior high school student voters' opinion of a higher degree?

-JR:Mas pinapansin ng first-time voters yung kung paano mag-salita ang kandidato at kung

relatable ba siya. Degree ay parang bonus na lang, hindi priority.

JC:5. To what extent do you believe that a senator with an advanced degree is more effective than

one without? Can you provide any examples or reasoning to support your answer?

65
-JR:Hindi ko nakikita na automatic na mas effective ang may advanced degree. Marami akong

kilala na mas nakakaintindi ng masa kahit hindi highly educated.

JC:6. What factors do you consider when evaluating the effectiveness of a senator? How does

educational attainment rank among these factors?

-JR:Mahalaga sa akin kung paano siya tumugon sa isyu at kung may integridad siya. Education

ay nasa dulo lang ng listahan ko.

JC:7. Have you ever discussed the importance of a senator's higher degree with your peers or

family? How did these conversations influence your perspective?

-JR:Napag-uusapan namin ng barkada, pero kadalasan hindi education ang topic—mas yung track

record ng kandidato. Kaya hindi masyadong nakaapekto sa pananaw ko.

JC:8. Do you think that a senator's higher degree should be a determining factor in their ability to

represent their constituents? Why or why not?

-JRHindi ako naniniwala na dapat basehan ang degree para sabihing kaya niyang i-represent ang

mga tao. Dapat basehan yung connection niya sa mga problema ng karaniwang Pilipino.

JC:9. Can you think of any potential drawbacks or limitations to relying solely on a senator's

higher degree as an indicator of their effectiveness

66
-JR:Oo, kasi baka puro teoriya lang ang alam niya at hindi practical ang mga solusyon. Pwede

ring detached siya sa realidad ng mga botante.

JC:10. In your opinion, what role does education play in shaping a senator's ability to make

informed decisions and serve the public interest? How does this relate to their higher degree?

-JR: Education helps, pero hindi siya ang sukatan ng galing. Ang tunay na leader ay marunong

makinig, umintindi, at kumilos para sa nakararami.

Name of Respondents: Lance Legaspi

Age:18

Grade: 11 Humss

Gender: Male

1. Hindi ibig sabihin na may higher degree ang isang senador ay automatic na siyang qualified,

kasi mahalaga pa rin ang tunay na malasakit at gawa.

2. Nakakatulong ang higher degree sa kaalaman pero hindi ito guarantee na magiging effective

67
 siya sa kanyang tungkulin.

3. Oo, minsan naaapektuhan ang perception ko pero hindi ito naging basehan ng final decision ko.

4. Mas naaapektuhan ang opinion ng kabataan ng plataporma at personality ng kandidato kaysa sa

educational background niya.

5. Hindi ko masasabi na mas effective ang may advanced degree dahil maraming factors ang

kailangang isaalang-alang.

6. Mas tinitingnan ko ang track record, leadership, at values kaysa sa degree.

7. Oo, pero karamihan sa amin naniniwala na hindi sapat ang degree para masabing magaling ang

isang senador.

8. Hindi, kasi ang representasyon ay dapat base sa pagkakaintindi sa pangangailangan ng tao,

hindi lang sa pinag-aralan.

9. Oo, kasi pwedeng mataas ang degree pero disconnected sa totoong buhay ng mga tao.

10. Mahalaga ang education para sa decision-making pero mas mahalaga pa rin ang karanasan at

intensyon.

Name of Respondents:Honey Sarmiento

68
Grade: 12A

Gender:Female

Age:18

1. No, I do not believe in the case. Knowledge is a great start to a senator's credential. Despite

this, it does not automatically make them competent or trustworthy compared to other

candidates. A degree, whether bachelors or masters, does not define the way a senator leads

or thinks. It will always depend on their mindset, values, and morals as a citizen to lead.

2. Having background knowledge in a field certainly helps with how one will approach a

situation. However, despite the fact that a senator may have ahold of this information, hindi

lagi tumutugma ang nagiging desisyon nila para sa ikabubuti o solusyon ng isang issue. Kahit

may alam sila sa iba't ibang bagay, hindi ibig sabihin non magaling na sila bilang isang

senador at tsaka hindi naman porket may alam sila ibig sabihin non their decision represents

the whole of the citizens affected or involved.

3. I don't have an in-depth knowledge about politics or politican yet, since I'm only getting into it

as an officially registered voter, besides the biggest issues like FPRRD's case so I can't really

recall a situation like that.

4. Usually by name and by word of mouth. It can be influenced by family or if it's a celebrity-

turned-politician like Manny Pacquiao, Ai Ai Delas Alas, or Bong Revilla. Today, platforms

69
 that truly benefit the Filipino Youth like Bam Aquino's advocacy for Education or Atty. Chel

Diokno's advocacy for Justice, have piqued the interests of the youth by spreading the word

on social media.

5. Ika nga "Education is key." When you know something on a deeper level, it challenges your

critical-thinking basically guiding you to the path of solution. But, hindi lahat ng cases ganon.

There are some politicans who have not finished a degree but because of their values, morals,

and mindset, it allows them to be a good (great even) politician. Considering that, for a

country like the Philippines, it's better to have a degree than without because of that fact that

the country is developing. Every decision, especially when it is labeled for the country and its

citizens as a whole, must be carefully evaluated if it'll benefit or only endanger its citizens

and the structure of law.

6. First their credentials, then their educational background, their advocacy, who they're affiliated

to, and their platforms.

7. No, I don't. Everyone has a different view on politics and sometimes, the opinion of one person

is far more controversial than the rest which leads to destroyed relationships.

8. Yes, I think it should be. Education teaches the basics even if it doesn't apply directly. When

you learn the basics, you learn to teach yourself independently and learn so many basic traits

like being able to analyze a situation better then finding a solution for it that'll actually benefit

70
 those affected.

9. Despite a politician's great educational background (i.e. PhD, Master), education doesn't cover

the mindset of a person. Hindi natin alam na porket ang ganda ng educational attainment

niya, 'yun pala ang true colors niya corrupt, nangungupit sa pera ng taumbayan, o kaya

pinagsasamantalahan lang yung titulo niya as senador o congressman. Hindi porket

"matalino" ang isang tao, mapagkakatiwalaan na siya.

10. Likewise, it provides them with the basics. Kapag may alam ka kasi sa isang bagay, madali

nalang ilagay yung sarili mo sa shoes ng apektado. When you're able to understand the

perspective of the affected, you'll be able to get a sense of what the solution should be so that

it'll help the affected kne way or another. It doesn't relate to a higher degree that much kasi

education is education. Basta may alam ka, kahit mas malalim pa 'yun kaysa sa iba, malaking

tulong na din 'yun sa pagdedesisyon mo bilang tao sa politika.

Name: Jonathan Serafin

Age: 19 years old

Gender: Male

Strand: Humss

71
1. Could you share your thoughts on the significance of a senator having a higher degree? Do you

believe it automatically makes them more qualified, competent, or trustworthy compared to

candidates without one?

Answer: Para sa'kin, oo kase sila yung may mas pinag aralan tungkol sa batas na pinapatupad sa

ating bansa kase sila yung maymas maging kwalipikado sa posisyon na iyon.

2. In your opinion, how does a senator's higher degree specifically enhance their ability to

perform their duties effectively? For instance, do you think it improves their policy-making

skills, understanding of complex issues, or ability to represent the people's interests?

Answer: Mas pinapa buti nila ang kanilang mga kasanayan sa paggawa ng batas para kumatawan

sa mga interes ng mga tao.

3. Can you recall a situation where a candidate's higher degree influenced your perception of

them? How did it impact your decision-making process?

Answer: Para sa'kin, hindi naman siya nakakaapekto dahil lang sa naimpluwensyahan ng aking

perspective, hindi naman nakakaapekto sa akin sa paggawa ng desisyon.

4. How do the candidate's political program, party affiliation, and charisma affect first-time senior

high school student voters' opinion of a higher degree?

Answer: Para sa'kin nalilito ako dahil first-time voter ako at hindi ko pa alam yung takbo ng

72
politika at dahil sa mga programa ay nakakaapekto ito sa desisyon bilang isang botante.

5. To what extent do you believe that a senator with an advanced degree is more effective than

one without? Can you provide any examples or reasoning to support your answer?

Answer: Hindi naman ako naka depende kung sa...or wala or meron kang natapos, tinitignan ko

kung bilang isa kang senador ay dapat na may gawa kesa mataas nga pinag aralan mo pero

wala naman alam sa politika.

6. What factors do you consider when evaluating the effectiveness of a senator? How does

educational attainment rank among these factors?

Answer: Mga kadahilanan na dapat mong isa-alang-alang para epiktibo ang isang senador ay

yung may malasakit sa bayan at may gawa.

7. Have you ever discussed the importance of a senator's higher degree with your peers or family?

How did these conversations influence your perspective?

Answer: Para sakin ay hindi pa kade ako... ako'y isang firs-time voter at wala pa'kong ideya.

8. Do you think that a senator's higher degree should be a determining factor in their ability to

represent their constituents? Why or why not?

Answer: Hindi naman ito nasusukat sa antas, para sa akin is yung kahit hindi naman mataas na

73
antas na senador ay may kakayahan para gampanan ang tungkulin bilang senador.

9. Can you think of any potential drawbacks or limitations to relying solely on a senator's higher

degree as an indicat or of their effectiveness?

Answer: Ang pag-asa lamang sa pormal na mas mataas na edukasyon tulad ng pagsasanay o mga

kahalagang kasanayan at kaalaman.

10. In your opinion, what role does education play in shaping a senator's ability to make informed

decisions and serve the public interest? How does this relate to their higher degree?

Answer: Ang papel na ginagampanan ay edukasyon para sa paghukom ay sa mga senador or sa

mga tatakbo sa politika ay para mas magampanan nila ang kanilang tungkulin bilang politiko

o senator.

Name: Xiekel Coruno

Age:18 Gender: male

Grade: 11

PR: interviewer

74
XC: Respondent

PR: Before we start, are you a first time voters?

XC: Yes

PR: Okay, first question. Could you share your thoughts on the significance of a senator having a

higher degree? Do you believe it automatically makes them more qualified, competent, or

trustworthy compared to candidates without one?

XC: For me, yes, because they are more prepared here, they have more quality and also have the

capability and intelligence when it comes to making laws.

PR: Question number two. In your opinion, how does a senator's higher degree specifically

enhance their ability to perform their duties effectively? For instance, do you think it

improves their policy-making skills, understanding of complex issues, or ability to represent

the people's interests?

XC: Yes, because they are more, you know, more educated and they can do that.

PR: Okay, question number three Can you recall a situation where a candidate's higher degree

influenced your perception of them? How did it impact your decision-making process?

XC: Yes, because they have extensive knowledge in politics and they will better understand

75
 which laws they need to implement.

PR: So question number four How do the candidate's political program, party affiliation, and

charisma affect first-time senior high school student voters' opinion of a higher degree?

XC: Maybe the one I would vote for is the one who knows how to engage the citizens, like, for

example, they could have bands perform so the voters won't get bored, and they could also

create campaign advocacy for the people, so they know who they are voting for, something

like that.

PR: So question number five To what extent do you believe that a senator with an advanced

degree is more effective than one without? Can you provide any examples or reasoning to

support your answer?

XC: If I rate it maybe nine, because I'm more prepared for it since they know the laws they

will make, and if they really have... what they will do, they won't do anything that will harm

them.

PR: Question number six What factors do you consider when evaluating the effectiveness of

a senator? How does educational attainment rank among these factors?

XC: Maybe he really loves the people and also... He is loving towards his people and he

really knows how to win their hearts, not just through intelligence, but also through how he

handles the citizens.

76
PR: So number seven Have you ever discussed the importance of a senator's higher degree

with your peers or family? How did these conversations influence your perspective?

XC: Sometimes, but of course, I scrutinize more who is really the more qualified one among

those I will vote for.

PR: Question number eight Do you think that a senator's higher degree should be a

determining factor in their ability to represent their constituents? Why or why not?

XC: Yes, because they are the ones leading and governing their people. So, they need to be

the leading leaders so that the youth know that they are the foundation, that they are the ones

to vote for.

PR: Question number nine Can you think of any potential drawbacks or limitations to relying

solely on a senator's higher degree as an indicator of their effectiveness?

XC: Maybe it's because of being blinded by money, because when you're really blinded by

money... like, of course, when you work on a project, for example, you might lose sight of

your responsibilities, and it seems like you're more blinded by the money.

PR: Okay last question number ten In your opinion, what role does education play in shaping

a senator's ability to make informed decisions and serve the public interest? How does this

relate to their higher degree?

XC: Maybe, in education, they are more shaped by giving... if the citizens treat you well,

they are also shaped by that because sometimes they know that the previous senators were

77
not suitable, so they are encouraged to run to set a better example for the citizens, maybe

that's how they are shaped to run.

PR: Do you think the school really plays a significant role for future candidates?

XC: Yes, because of course they are becoming aware that this country, or if they don't want

to, that the previous leaders' governance was wrong. So, they are more encouraged to run or

step up to improve the situation in the Philippines.

PR: Okay, that's all thank you very much!

Interview with : Carl Harvey Guston

Name:Carl Harvey Guston

Age: 18

Gender: Male

Grade: 11

Interviewer (PR): Before we start, are you a first-time voter?

Respondent (CH): Yes.

VMP: Okay, first question. Could you share your thoughts on the significance of a senator

having a higher degree? Do you believe it automatically makes them more qualified,

competent, or trustworthy compared to candidates without one?

78
CH: A higher degree shows dedication to learning, which is positive. However, it's not the

only measure of a candidate's suitability.

VMP: Question number two. In your opinion, how does a senator's higher degree specifically

enhance their ability to perform their duties effectively? For instance, do you think it

improves their policy-making skills, understanding of complex issues, or ability to represent

the people's interests?

CH: A senator's education can help them grasp complex legislation and policy debates more

effectively.

VMP: Okay, question number three. Can you recall a situation where a candidate's higher

degree influenced your perception of them? How did it impact your decision-making

process?

CH: One candidate's PhD in economics influenced my perception positively. It made me

believe they would better understand economic issues.

VMP: Question number four. How do the candidate's political program, party affiliation, and

charisma affect first-time senior high school student voters' opinion of a higher degree?

CH: Political programs and charisma heavily influence first-time voters. Party affiliation

matters less than the candidate's individual platform.

VMP: Question number five. To what extent do you believe that a senator with an advanced

degree is more effective than one without? Can you provide any examples or reasoning to

support your answer?

79
CH: A senator with an advanced degree might be slightly more effective due to their deeper

understanding of policy, but it’s not a guarantee.

VMP: Question number six. What factors do you consider when evaluating the effectiveness

of a senator? How does educational attainment rank among these factors?

CH: Honesty, responsiveness to constituents, and effective problem-solving are my

priorities. Education is a secondary factor.

VMP: Question number seven. Have you ever discussed the importance of a senator's higher

degree with your peers or family? How did these conversations influence your perspective?

CH: Discussions with family emphasized the importance of researching candidates

thoroughly, considering their entire background, not just their education.

VMP: Question number eight. Do you think that a senator's higher degree should be a

determining factor in their ability to represent their constituents? Why or why not?

CH: It shouldn't be a primary factor, but it's a positive attribute showing commitment to

learning and growth.

VMP: Question number nine. Can you think of any potential drawbacks or limitations to

relying solely on a senator's higher degree as an indicator of their effectiveness?

CH: Someone with a higher degree could still be out of touch with the needs of ordinary

people.

80
VMP: Okay, last question, number ten. In your opinion, what role does education play in

shaping a senator's ability to make informed decisions and serve the public interest? How

does this relate to their higher degree?

CH: Education provides a strong foundation for effective leadership, but it's only one

component of a successful senator

Interview with : Mac Subido

Name: Mac Subido

Age: 18

Gender: Male

Grade: 11

Interviewer (PR): Before we start, are you a first-time voter?

Respondent (MS): Yes.

VMP: Okay, first question. Could you share your thoughts on the significance of a senator

having a higher degree? Do you believe it automatically makes them more qualified,

competent, or trustworthy compared to candidates without one?

MS: I don't think a higher degree automatically makes someone a better senator. It's more

about their experience and their ability to connect with people.

81
VMP: Question number two. In your opinion, how does a senator's higher degree specifically

enhance their ability to perform their duties effectively? For instance, do you think it

improves their policy-making skills, understanding of complex issues, or ability to represent

the people's interests?

MS: A higher degree might help them understand policy better, but it doesn't guarantee

they'll use that knowledge effectively.

VMP: Okay, question number three. Can you recall a situation where a candidate's higher

degree influenced your perception of them? How did it impact your decision-making

process?

MS: A candidate's law degree didn't significantly influence my opinion. I focused more on

their proposed policies.

VMP: Question number four. How do the candidate's political program, party affiliation, and

charisma affect first-time senior high school student voters' opinion of a higher degree?

MS: Their political program is most important to me. Party affiliation and charisma are

secondary.

VMP: Question number five. To what extent do you believe that a senator with an advanced

degree is more effective than one without? Can you provide any examples or reasoning to

support your answer?

MS: I don't think a higher degree makes a senator significantly more effective. It's about

their actions and their commitment to their constituents.

82
VMP: Question number six. What factors do you consider when evaluating the effectiveness

of a senator? How does educational attainment rank among these factors?

MS: Integrity, responsiveness, and a clear understanding of the issues are crucial. Education

is less important than these.

VMP: Question number seven. Have you ever discussed the importance of a senator's higher

degree with your peers or family? How did these conversations influence your perspective?

MS: Discussions with friends focused on the candidates' platforms and their potential impact

on our lives.

VMP: Question number eight. Do you think that a senator's higher degree should be a

determining factor in their ability to represent their constituents? Why or why not?

MS: It shouldn't be a deciding factor. It's just one aspect of a larger picture.

VMP: Question number nine. Can you think of any potential drawbacks or limitations to

relying solely on a senator's higher degree as an indicator of their effectiveness?

MS: A higher degree doesn't guarantee good judgment or effective leadership.

VMP: Okay, last question, number ten. In your opinion, what role does education play in

shaping a senator's ability to make informed decisions and serve the public interest? How

does this relate to their higher degree?

MS: Education is helpful, but it needs to be combined with real-world experience and a

genuine desire to serve the public.

83
Interview with: Sabrinna Torio

Name: Sabrinna Torio

Age: 18

Gender: Female

Grade: 11

Interviewer (PR): Before we start, are you a first-time voter?

Respondent (ST): Yes.

VMP: Okay, first question. Could you share your thoughts on the significance of a senator

having a higher degree? Do you believe it automatically makes them more qualified,

competent, or trustworthy compared to candidates without one?

ST: A higher degree is a good indicator of intelligence and dedication, but it's not a guarantee

of effectiveness.

VMP: Question number two. In your opinion, how does a senator's higher degree specifically

enhance their ability to perform their duties effectively? For instance, do you think it

improves their policy-making skills, understanding of complex issues, or ability to represent

the people's interests?

ST: It can improve their understanding of complex issues and their ability to craft effective

policies.

84
VMP: Okay, question number three. Can you recall a situation where a candidate's higher

degree influenced your perception of them? How did it impact your decision-making

process?

ST: I don't recall a specific instance where a candidate's degree significantly influenced my

opinion.

VMP: Question number four. How do the candidate's political program, party affiliation, and

charisma affect first-time senior high school student voters' opinion of a higher degree?

ST: The candidate's platform and their ability to connect with voters are the most important

factors.

VMP: Question number five. To what extent do you believe that a senator with an advanced

degree is more effective than one without? Can you provide any examples or reasoning to

support your answer?

ST: An advanced degree might offer a slight

advantage, but it's not the most important factor.

VMP: Question number six. What factors do you consider when evaluating the effectiveness

of a senator? How does educational attainment rank among these factors?

ST: I value a senator's integrity, their commitment to their constituents, and their ability to

solve problems effectively.

VMP: Question number seven. Have you ever discussed the importance of a senator's higher

degree with your peers or family? How did these conversations influence your perspective?

85
ST: Discussions with family members focused on the candidates' platforms and their

potential impact on our community.

VMP: Question number eight. Do you think that a senator's higher degree should be a

determining factor in their ability to represent their constituents? Why or why not?

ST: It shouldn't be the sole determining factor. Other qualities are just as important.

VMP: Question number nine. Can you think of any potential drawbacks or limitations to

relying solely on a senator's higher degree as an indicator of their effectiveness?

ST: Someone with a higher degree could still be out of touch with the needs of ordinary

people.

VMP: Okay, last question, number ten. In your opinion, what role does education play in

shaping a senator's ability to make informed decisions and serve the public interest? How

does this relate to their higher degree?

ST: Education is important for informed decision-making, but it's not a substitute for

experience, empathy, and a commitment to serving the public.

Name of Respondents: Pacantara, Angel Salve A.

Gender:Female Age:18

Grade level & section: 11-programming

86
 1. Having a higher degree doesn’t automatically make a Senator more qualified, competent

or trustworthy. A fancy degree doesn’t guarantee good judgement or integrity

2. It might improve their analytical skills and ability to grasp nuanced arguments. However,

it doesn't automatically translate to better policy-making or better representation of the

people. Strong communication skills and empathy are also crucial.

3. I haven't personally experienced a situation where a candidate's degree significantly

influenced my opinion. Their platform, commitment to issues I care about, and their ability

to connect with voters are far more important to me.

4. A higher degree might be a minor factor, but it's overshadowed by their stances on issues

and their ability to connect with us.

5. Effectiveness depends on numerous factors, including experience, leadership skills,

integrity, and ability to collaborate. Many successful senators throughout history did not

possess advanced degrees.

6. When evaluating senators, I consider their voting record, public statements, community

engagement, and re to constituents. Educational attainment is one factor among many, not

necessarily the most crucial one.

7. Well yes, sometimes. And that’s kinda make me think that whoever be a senator
should do their parts and/or promises because that promises bring him/her into that
position.

87
8. A senator's higher degree shouldn't be the primary factor in determining their ability to

represent constituents. Experience, empathy, and a commitment to public service are far

more important.

9. Relying solely on a senator's higher degree is shortsighted. It ignores crucial qualities like

leadership, communication, integrity, and consensus-building.

10. Education plays a vital role in shaping a senator's ability to make informed decisions. A

higher degree can provide a strong knowledge base, but it doesn't guarantee good judgment

or effective leadership. Practical experience and a dedication to public service are equally

crucial.

Interview with: Ceane Jamyle Pascual

Name: Ceane Jamyle Pascual

Age: 18

Gender: Male

Grade: 11

Interviewer (PR): Before we start, are you a first-time voter?

Respondent (CJP): Yes.

88
VMP: Okay, first question. Could you share your thoughts on the significance of a senator

having a higher degree? Do you believe it automatically makes them more qualified,

competent, or trustworthy compared to candidates without one?

CJP: A higher degree suggests intelligence and the ability to learn, which are valuable traits

for a senator.

VMP: Question number two. In your opinion, how does a senator's higher degree specifically

enhance their ability to perform their duties effectively? For instance, do you think it

improves their policy-making skills, understanding of complex issues, or ability to represent

the people's interests?

CJP: . It could improve their policy-making skills and their ability to analyze complex

issues.

VMP: Okay, question number three. Can you recall a situation where a candidate's higher

degree influenced your perception of them? How did it impact your decision-making

process?

CJP: A candidate's MBA influenced my perception positively. I thought they'd have a better

grasp of economic policies.

VMP: Question number four. How do the candidate's political program, party affiliation, and

charisma affect first-time senior high school student voters' opinion of a higher degree?

89
CJP: The candidate's political program is paramount. Party affiliation and charisma are

secondary considerations.

VMP: Question number five. To what extent do you believe that a senator with an advanced

degree is more effective than one without? Can you provide any examples or reasoning to

support your answer?

CJP: A senator with an advanced degree might be slightly more effective, but other factors

are more important.

VMP: Question number six. What factors do you consider when evaluating the effectiveness

of a senator? How does educational attainment rank among these factors?

CJP: I value a senator's commitment to their constituents, their ability to listen, and their

track record. Education is one factor among many.

VMP: Question number seven. Have you ever discussed the importance of a senator's higher

degree with your peers or family? How did these conversations influence your perspective?

CJP: Conversations with peers focused on the candidates' platforms and their stances on key

issues.

VMP: Question number eight. Do you think that a senator's higher degree should be a

determining factor in their ability to represent their constituents? Why or why not?

CJP: It shouldn't be the only factor, but it's a positive indicator

90
VMP: Question number nine. Can you think of any potential drawbacks or limitations to

relying solely on a senator's higher degree as an indicator of their effectiveness?

CJP: A higher degree doesn't guarantee a senator will be effective or responsive to the needs

of their constituents.

VMP: Okay, last question, number ten. In your opinion, what role does education play in

shaping a senator's ability to make informed decisions and serve the public interest? How

does this relate to their higher degree?

CJP: Education plays a significant role in shaping a senator's ability to make informed

decisions, but it must be complemented by other qualities.

Interview with: Shaira Brimbuela

Name: Shaira Brimbuela

Age: 21

Gender: Female

Grade: 11

Interviewer (PR): Before we start, are you a first-time voter?

Respondent (SB): Yes.

91
VMP: Okay, first question. Could you share your thoughts on the significance of a senator

having a higher degree? Do you believe it automatically makes them more qualified,

competent, or trustworthy compared to candidates without one?

SB: A higher degree might suggest better problem-solving skills, but it doesn't guarantee

better leadership. Experience and genuine concern for the people are equally important.

VMP: Question number two. In your opinion, how does a senator's higher degree

specifically enhance their ability to perform their duties effectively? For instance, do you

think it improves their policy-making skills, understanding of complex issues, or ability to

represent the people's interests?

SB: A higher degree could lead to a more nuanced understanding of complex issues,

potentially resulting in better-informed policies. However, practical experience is crucial.

VMP: Okay, question number three. Can you recall a situation where a candidate's higher

degree influenced your perception of them? How did it impact your decision-making

process?

SB: I can't recall a specific instance where a candidate's degree directly swayed my opinion.

Their platform and values mattered more.

VMP: Question number four. How do the candidate's political program, party affiliation, and

charisma affect first-time senior high school student voters' opinion of a higher degree?

SB: A candidate's platform and how well they connect with voters are more influential than

their degree. Party affiliation plays a role, but less so for first-time voters.

92
VMP: Question number five. To what extent do you believe that a senator with an advanced

degree is more effective than one without? Can you provide any examples or reasoning to

support your answer?

SB: An advanced degree isn't automatically better. Effective representation depends on

multiple factors, including empathy and responsiveness.

VMP: Question number six. What factors do you consider when evaluating the effectiveness

of a senator? How does educational attainment rank among these factors?

SB: I value a senator's commitment to their constituents, their ability to listen, and their track

record. Education is one factor among many.

VMP: Question number seven. Have you ever discussed the importance of a senator's higher

degree with your peers or family? How did these conversations influence your perspective?

SB: I've discussed candidates with friends, and we often focused on their stances on issues

rather than their educational background.

VMP: Question number eight. Do you think that a senator's higher degree should be a

determining factor in their ability to represent their constituents? Why or why not?

SB: A senator's degree shouldn't be the sole deciding factor. It's just one piece of the

puzzle.

VMP: Question number nine. Can you think of any potential drawbacks or limitations to

relying solely on a senator's higher degree as an indicator of their effectiveness?

93
SB: Over-reliance on a degree ignores other vital qualities like integrity, empathy, and

strong communication skills.

VMP: Okay, last question, number ten. In your opinion, what role does education play in

shaping a senator's ability to make informed decisions and serve the public interest? How

does this relate to their higher degree?

SB: Education is important for informed decision-making, but it's not the only factor. Real-

world experience and understanding of people's needs are equally crucial.

References

Abasolo, E. J. P., Almazan, B. S., & Feliciano, L. E. C. (2022). A Study on the Voting

Preferences of First-Time Voters in the 2022 Presidential Elections.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?

hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=.A+Study+on+the+Voting+Preferences+of+First-

Time+Voters+in+the+2022+Presidential+Elections.&btnG=&rlz=#d=gs_qabs&t=17441

92026289&u=%23p%3DgZfqPwONuOEJ

Abasolo, E. J. P., Almazan, B. S., & Feliciano, L. E. C. (2023). A study on the voting

preferences of first-time voters in the 2022 presidential elections.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?

hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=.A+Study+on+the+Voting+Preferences+of+First-

Time+Voters+in+the+2022+Presidential+Elections.&btnG=&rlz=#d=gs_qabs&t=17441

92165240&u=%23p%3DgZfqPwONuOEJ

94
Abiera et al,. (2022). Voting Preferences in the National Election: A Case among First-Time

Voters https://scholar.google.com/scholar?

hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Voting+Preferences+in+the+National+Election%3A+A+

+case+among+First-Time.voters

%E2%80%9D&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&t=1744191304614&u=%23p%3Dv7A0_25h-aEJ

Almazan, M. C. R., Orzal, L. B., Toring, L. A. G., & Coton, M. A. A. (2023, October).

Understanding Voters' Preference for Candidates in the Philippine

.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/

374975725_Understanding_Voters'_Preference_for_Candidates_in_the_Philippine_Pre

sidential_Elections

Almond, G. A. (2020). Voter perceptions and political image: A psychological perspective.

Anabo, F. D. (2021), “What matters most to student voters?: A conjoint analysis of political

candidate attributes”. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?

hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=What+matters+most+to+student+voters%3F

%3A+A+conjoint+analysis+of+political+candidate+attributes

%E2%80%9D.&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&t=1744191534868&u=%23p

%3Dnn7D_dMjoMYJ Banaria et. Al (2020) What are they up to?”: The Pre-Election

Mindset and Behavior of Young Filipino Voters

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=+The+Pre-

Election+Mindset+and+Behavior+of+Young+Filipino+Voter&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&t=17

95
44191096641&u=%23p%3DlzWjvtLyN6IJ

Batara, E. B., Labadan, A. K. E., & Roa, M. B. (2021). Factors Affecting Youth Voting

Preferences in the Philippine Senatorial Elections. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?

hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Factors+Affecting+Youth+Voting+Preferences+in+the+Phil

ippine+Senatorial+Elections.&btnG=

Carvalho, B. P., et al. (2023). Information, perceptions, and electoral behavior of young

voters: A randomized controlled experiment.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/

340849393_Information_Perceptions_and_Electoral_Behaviour_of_Young_Voters_A_

Randomised_Controlled_Experiment

Council of Europe. (2021). First-time voters and youth.

https://www.coe.int/en/web/electoral-assistance/first-time-voters

Dalton, R. J. (2020). Youth in electoral politics: Gaps in the literature and new directions.

Eckstein, K., et al. (2024). Activating Effects of Elections: Changes in Young Voters’

Political Engagement Over the Course of an Election Year.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380037960_Activating_effects_of_elections_c

hanges_in_young_voters'_political_engagement_over_the_course_of_an_election_year

Gherghina, S., Tap, P., & Stan, S. (2021).Election campaign and own opinions among first-

time voters in Romania. European Political Science Review.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351316809_Begin_Again_Election_Campaign

96
_and_Own_Opinions_Among_First-Time_Voters_in_Romania

Gherghina, S., Tap, P., & Stan, S. (2021). First-time voters and honest political leaders:

Evidence from the 2019 presidential election in Romania. East European Politics and

Societies.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351316809_Begin_Again_Election_Campaign

_and_Own_Opinions_Among_First-Time_Voters_in_Romania?

_sg=lY5GSnFbzqruirKT4PJ2On81wwVHdv2kuhZcOCZgLGZsUQk0xPydA_QO7Xv4

WC5VHhRekeO2ogJmkmk&_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6InB1Ymxp

Y2F0aW9uIiwicGFnZSI6Il9kaXJlY3QifX0

Huddy, L., Sears, D. O., & Levy, J. S. (Eds.). (2022). The Oxford handbook of political

psychology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-oxford-handbook-of-political-psychology-

9780199760107?cc=ph&lang=en

Ibardeloza (2021), the study examines the political participation of senior high school

students, particularly as first-time voters. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?

hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Senior+High+School+Students

%E2%80%99+Political+Participation+in+the+Emerging+Social+Issues.

%E2%80%9D&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&t=1744191193109&u=%23p%3DFtrO56p7ThUJ

Janmaat, J. G., et al. (2022). Political Socialization of Young Voters: The Impact of Parents

and Peers.

97
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?

hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Political+Socialization+of+Young+Voters

%3A+The+Impact+of+Parents+and+Peers+

%282022%29&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&t=1744191893375&u=%23p%3D7cju5xzR09IJ

Javines, J. (2024, January). Attitudes and Considerations of Voters in the Philippine National

Elections.

https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=22461

Joshi, G. (2022). The educational background of elected officials and its impact on

governance.

https://www.google.com/m?hl=en-US&ie=UTF-8&source=android-browser&q=Joshi

%2C+G.+

%282022%29.+The+educational+background+of+elected+officials+and+its+impact+on

+governance.+International+Review+of+Public+Administration

%2C+18%283%29%2C+90%E2%80%93105.&client=ms-android-vivo-

rvo2#vhid=zephyr:0&vssid=atritem-https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/api/file/

viewByFileId/1893799

Kim, L., et al,. (2023). Political socialization and voting behavior among youth: The

influence of family, education, and social media. Journal of Youth Political Engagement

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/7/402

98
Kim, Y. (2023). Educational attainment and voting behavior: A correlational analysis. Asian

Journal of Political Studies, 15(2), 112–128.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11205-023-03146-1

Kumar, A. (2020). Student perceptions on educational attainment in politics: A study of

senior high school learners. South Asian Journal of Civic Studies, 8(3), 101–115. Lubis, E.

(2020). Student first-time voters’ perception in Jakarta toward election system in Indonesia:

Through their participation in election. Journal of Social and Political Inquiry, 7(3), 200–213.

https://kneopen.com/KnE-Social/article/view/7893/

Moreto et al. (2022),highlight that first-time voters consider educational background an

important factor when selecting a political candidate, believing that a good education

jhttps://scholar.google.com/scholar?

hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Voting+Preferences+he+National+Election

%3A+A+Case+among+First-Time+Voters.

%E2%80%9D&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&t=1744191397771&u=%23p%3Dv7A0_25h-aEJ

Novak, T. (2020). The role and responsibilities of senators: Legislative duties and public

representation. Nurul Fitriana Harsyaf, et al. (2023), The study’s goal is to determine novice

voters’ preferences for the 2020 Bulukumba regional elections.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?

hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Understanding+the+Electoral+Preferences+of+Beginner+V

99
oters+in+the+2020+Bulukumba+Local+Elections&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&t=174419169046

0&u=%23p%3DOx5DZU8VfuwJ

Sukri, M., Asmal, M., & Amir, A. (2021). The forming of first-time voters’ political

preference in Indonesia.

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Sukri%2C+M.

%2C+Asmal%2C+M.%2C+%26+Amir%2C+A.+

%282021%29.+The+forming+of+first-time+voters

%E2%80%99+political+preference+in+Indonesia.+Journal+of+Political+Studies

%2C+18%282%29%2C+112%E2%80%93125.&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&t=1744188256084

&u=%23p%3D9in8AULQausJ

Sumatra (2025). Examining How Candidate Attributes Shape Gen Z Perceptions for the 2025

Philippine Senate Elections Using Conjoint Analysis”

Appendix B:

Introduction:

This appendix presents the findings from interviews conducted with first-time voters—

senior high school students—to understand their perceptions of senatorial candidates holding

100
higher degrees. The interviews explored the significance they attribute to advanced education

in a candidate's qualifications, competence, and trustworthiness. This section delves into the

nuanced perspectives of these young voters, examining how a candidate's higher education

influences their decision-making process, considering other factors like political platforms,

party affiliations, and charisma. The analysis investigates whether a higher degree is viewed

as a crucial factor in a senator's effectiveness and explores potential limitations of using

education as the sole metric for evaluating a candidate's suitability.

101
102