He Bling 1999
He Bling 1999
of
Dentistry
Journal of Dentistry 27 (1999) 557–564
www.elsevier.com/locate/jdent
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the pulpo-dentin complex response to a dentin adhesive application in deep cavities performed in human teeth.
Methods: Deep class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surface of 46 premolars. The remaining dentin of the axial wall received 10%
phosphoric acid and dentin adhesive (group DA), or was protected before the acid and dentin adhesive application with calcium hydroxide
cement (group CH). Half of the teeth, which received the acid application directly over the axial wall, were contaminated prior to the
procedures with dental plaque collected from the patient’s own teeth (group DAC). The plaque was placed on the dentin for 5 min and then
the cavity was washed. All teeth were restored with a light-cured composite resin. The teeth were extracted after 7, 30 or 60 days and
prepared according to normal histologic techniques. Serial sections were stained with H/E, Masson’s trichrome and Brown & Brenn
technique for demonstration of bacteria.
Results: The histopathologic evaluation showed that in groups DA and DAC, the inflammatory response was more evident than in group
CH. Also, the intensity of the pulp reaction increased as the remaining dentin thickness decreased. There was no statistical difference in the
inflammatory response between the groups DA and DAC.
Conclusion: Based on the experimental conditions, we concluded that the All Bond 2 adhesive system, when applied on dentin in deep
cavities, showed an acceptable biocompatibility. However, the intensity of the pulpo-dentin complex response depends on the remaining
dentin thickness. q 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Biocompatibility; Adhesive resin; Dentin; Human tooth
Table 1 Table 3
Teeth distribution according to groups and experimental periods Tissue disorganization
Table 4 in which the RDT had 291 and 280 mm, respectively, there
Reactionary dentin formation could be seen a persistent moderate inflammatory response,
Reactionary Characterization consisting predominantly of macrophages and hydropic
dentin formation degeneration of pulp cells (Fig. 4(B)).
At the last period of evaluation, only one specimen of
Score 0 Absence
group DA presented persistent pulp tissue disorganization
Score 1 Modest hard tissue deposition beneath the axial wall
Score 2 Moderate hard tissue deposition beneath the axial wall associated with moderate inflammatory response mediated
Score 3 Intense hard tissue deposition beneath the axial wall by macrophages. All other specimens showed pulp repair
with a thin layer of reactionary dentin laid down on pulp
tissue subjacent to cavity floor (Fig. 5(A)). However, in
was evaluated by light microscope (Carl Zeiss 62774, Ober-
specimens from group CH, the pulp tissue exhibited normal
kachen-West Germany), using the criteria defined in the
histologic characteristics and no reactionary dentin (Fig.
Tables 2–5. The RDT between the cavity floor and pulp
5(B)).
tissue (Fig. 1(A)) was measured for each specimen using a The application of ANOVA analysis (Table 8) to the data
light microscope (DIASTAR—Cambridge Instruments,
present in Table 7 did not show those both factors, Group or
Buffalo, NY, USA) adapted to a video camera (DXC—
Period, and the interaction between them were significant
107A/107AP—Sony electronics Inc., Tokyo, Japan), and
(p , 0.05). Thus, the RDT mean among the groups for each
to a microcomputer and software (Mocha, Jondel Scientific,
period could be considered the same. The results showed an
San Rafael, CA, USA).
inverse relationship between the RDT and the pulp inflam-
For statistical analysis, ANOVA and Fisher’s test were
matory response. Therefore, the intensity of the pulp
performed to determine if there was a statistically signifi-
response increased as the RDT decreased.
cant difference (p , 0.05) among ranked groups and peri- The statistical model application of the criteria evaluated
ods.
showed a significant difference only among groups when the
inflammatory cell response was analyzed (p , 0.05). The
Fisher’s analysis showed that the groups DA and DAC (Fig.
3. Results 6(A)) presented greater inflammatory responses than group
CH but there was no significant difference between the DA
The scores observed for every criterion according to and the DAC groups. The Fig. 6(A) showed that the inflam-
groups and periods are shown on Table 6 and the matory response continued from 7 to 60 days time periods.
individual 1 mean RDT values are presented in Table 7. For both tissue disorganization (Fig. 6(B)) and bacterial
Overall, the histological features showed that the pulp presence (Fig. 6(D)), only the treatments presented signifi-
response for groups DA and DAC were quite similar. In cant differences (p , 0.05). The Fisher’s analysis showed
one specimen for group DA at 7 day period, the RDT was significant differences between groups DA and DAC when
240 mm. In this specimen, odontoblasts had been displaced compared with group CH for tissue disorganization. For
into the dentinal tubules and inflammatory response with bacterial presence, group DAC presented scores significantly
neutrophils and macrophages occurred in the pulp tissue
adjacent to cavity floor (Fig. 1(B)). The hyaline alteration
of extracellular matrix associated with hydropic degenera-
tion occurred in the pulp horn (Figs. 1(B), 2(A) and (B),
3(A)). In this specimen, long resin tags formed within the
dentinal tubules, where globules of resin were seen floating
through the dentinal tubules (Fig. 3(B)).
At 30 days, a thin layer of reactionary dentin was present
in the pulp tissue area subjacent to cavity floor (Fig. 4A).
Although in one specimen of each of groups DA and DAC,
Table 5
Stained bacteria
Bacteria Characterization
presence
Score 0 Absence
Score 1 Presence of stained bacteria along the cavity lateral walls Fig. 1. (A) Relationship between cavity preparation and pulp tissue (X).
Score 2 Presence of stained bacteria along the cavity lateral and H&E; 56 ×. (B) All Bond 2–7 days. Remaining dentin between cavity floor
axial walls and pulp tissue was 240 mm thick (X). The odontoblast layer is disrupted
Score 3 Presence of stained bacteria along the cavity walls and and the cells were displaced into the dentinal tubules (vertical arrow).
within the cut dentin tubules Moderate number of inflammatory cells is present in the area previously
occupied by odontoblasts (horizontal arrow). H&E; 125 ×.
560 J. Hebling et al. / Journal of Dentistry 27 (1999) 557–564
Table 6
Number of teeth for each score according to groups and periods
Groups
Inflammatory cell response DA 4 1 1 0 3 2 1 0 1 4 1 0 18
DAC 0 6 0 0 0 5 1 0 1 3 0 0 16
CH 2 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 12
Tissue Disorganization DA 2 3 1 0 0 5 1 0 1 4 1 0 18
DAC 2 4 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 4 0 0 16
CH 2 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 12
Bacterial presence DA 4 1 0 0 2 2 1 1 3 1 2 0 18
DAC 1 3 1 1 2 3 1 0 0 1 3 0 16
CH 3 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 3 0 0 12
Dentin formation DA 6 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 18
DAC 6 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 2 2 0 0 16
CH 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 12
higher than groups DA and CH. Fig. 6(B) and (C) shows the cavity configuration. Although many authors believe that
interaction between groups and periods for these two pulp tissue response is caused only by the presence of
criteria, respectively. In contrast, in the Fisher’s analysis, bacteria, several in vitro studies have demonstrated that
both Group and Period exerted influence over reactionary resin monomers diffuse through dentin tubules [8] and
dentin formation (p , 0.05), where groups DA and DAC cause cytotoxicity [9].
presented more reactionary dentin formation (Fig. 6(C)) Some studies have demonstrated an inverse relationship
than group CH, with increase in this formation with time. between the remaining dentin thickness and the inflamma-
tory pulp response [3,4], which agree with the results
observed in the present work. Our findings agree with the
results observed by Hanks et al. [10], who demonstrated that
4. Discussion
0.5 mm of dentin seems enough to provide protection to
The divergence of results observed in the literature pulp tissue against toxic substances diffusion. Pashley [11]
concerning the biocompatibility of adhesive systems can
be explained by facts such as adhesive chemistry, methods Table 7
Remaining dentin thickness (mm)
of application, operator consistency, dentin wetting and
Group Specimens Periods
7 days 30 days 60 days
Fig. 2. (A) All Bond 2–7 days. Inflammatory pulp reaction underlying the CH 1 853 770 737
dentinal tubules related with cavity floor. Note the cells displaced into the 2 857 615 513
dentinal tubules (arrow) and the hyaline alteration of extracellular matrix 3 736 790 353
adjacent to inflammatory pulp reaction (X). H&E; 160 ×. (B) high magni- 4 528 372 369
fication of Fig. 2(A) showing the central zone of pulp tissue which demon- Mean 743.5 636.7 493.0
strate the hyaline alteration of extracellular matrix (X). H&E; 210 ×.
J. Hebling et al. / Journal of Dentistry 27 (1999) 557–564 561
Fig. 3. (A) All Bond 2–7 days. Higher magnification of Fig. 2(A), demon- Fig. 5. (A) All Bond 2–60 days. Reactionary dentin formation with odon-
strating the aspiration of cells into the dentinal tubules associated with toblast layer underlying. Note a discrete disorganization of superficial pulp
inflammatory response of underlying pulp tissue. Note a large number of tissue but with no remarkable inflammatory response. H&E; 148 ×. (B)
macrophages and neutrophils in degeneration. H&E; 240 ×. (B) All Bond calcium hydroxide–7 days. Pulp tissue showing the odontoblast layer
2–7 days. Presence of hybrid layer on cavity floor (X) and long resin tags with no deposition of reactionary dentin. A slight disorganization of super-
into the dentinal tubules (vertical arrow). Note fragments of resin diffusing ficial pulp zones can be seen in spite of absence of inflammatory pulp
through the dentinal tubules (head arrow). H&E; 210 ×. reaction. H&E; 148 ×.
Table 8
ANOVA analysis
Fig. 4. (A) All Bond 2–30 days. Detail of pulp tissue related to cavity
preparation where the remaining dentin thickness between cavity floor and DF Sum of squares Mean square f-value p-value
pulp tissue is 584 mm. Observe the reactionary dentin layer deposited (B),
slight disorganization of superficial pulp tissue (X) and large number of Group 2 123985.36 61992.68 1.360 a 0.269
small blood vessels. H&E; 160 ×. (B) All Bond 2–30 days. Pulp tissue Period 2 115644.37 57822.18 1.268 a 0.293
adjacent to cavity preparation with 291 mm of remaining dentin thickness. Gr. × Pr. 4 207020.42 51755.10 1.135 a 0.355
Note the reactionary dentin formation (B) with hydropic degeneration of Residual 37 140687.70 45597.07
adjacent pulp cells (arrow). Persistent chronic inflammation can be seen
beside the pulp cell and blood vessel proliferation. H&E; 160 ×.
a
Not significant values, significance level p , 0.05.
562 J. Hebling et al. / Journal of Dentistry 27 (1999) 557–564
Fig. 6. Fisher’s analysis showing interaction between groups and periods for the criteria evaluated: (A) inflammatory cell response; (B) tissue disorganization;
(C) reactionary dentin; and (D) bacteria.
Reactionary dentin is laid down by primary odontoblast inflammatory response when the authors applied All Bond 2
cells in response to specific stimuli, which is not strong on to deep cavities prepared in human teeth. The authors
enough to kill those primary pulp cells [13]. Consequently, demonstrated by TEM the movement of resin particulates
the reactionary dentin deposition seems to be the result of through dentinal tubules. The presence of resin components
slight to moderate irritation and can be inhibited when in the pulp tissue promoted a persistent chronic inflamma-
severe irritation (toxicity) is present. Thus, there is a gradi- tory response, with reaction of macrophages or giant cells.
ent effect related to concentration of the irritant. Therefore, The irritating action of resin particulates, which are not
while the presence of reactionary dentin may be the soluble and cannot be digested, may continue for a long
evidence of the presence of an irritating agent [3], it may time, as seen in this present study, and is proportional to
also help to promote the protection of the pulp. Deposition the depth of cavity preparation. Luster [17] reported that
of hard tissue (reactionary dentin) is often observed in 28 resin monomers may affect the immune system and induce
days [14]. In the present study it was observed in groups DA immunosuppresion, resulting in decreased host resistance to
and DAC at 30 days. The presence of this tissue demon- infectious agents. Consequently, according to Jontell et al.
strates variable degrees of irritation promoted by the dentin [18] immunosuppression of pulpal immune competent cells
adhesive system tested, capable of causing synthesis as well elicited by resin components may enhance the potential for
as deposition of reactionary dentin matrix. bacterial injury to the pulp tissue. Thus, increased incidence
The persistent inflammatory reaction observed in one and severity of pulpal infection are justifiable concerns
specimen for group DA at 60 days showed that the pulp following exposure of the tissue to immunotoxic chemicals.
tissue cannot be repaired when resin components reach In addition, such as demonstrated by Gerzina and Hume
the connective tissue, as has been demonstrated when the [8] and according to Gwinnett and Tay [16], the present
same material was implanted into subcutaneous tissue of study showed that neither the hybrid layer nor a thin remain-
rats [15]. Gwinnett and Tay [16] showed a similar chronic ing dentin between the cavity floor and pulp tissue is totally
J. Hebling et al. / Journal of Dentistry 27 (1999) 557–564 563
capable of preventing resin monomer diffusion across the the use of staining methods to evaluate the bacteria presence
dentinal tubules. Following dentin etching, faster outward has one more disadvantage. This method gives no informa-
dentinal fluid movement seems to interfere with complete tion about species, pathogenicity or viability of the bacteria
polymerization of fluid resin [11]. According to Hussey present.
[19], the heating caused during the light curing of composite According to the histological findings in the present study
resin reverses the dentinal fluid movement and, as conse- and those reported from relevant literature, we have been
quence, the inward fluid movement may carry the unpoly- able to determine that the RDT is an important factor to
merized resin particulates through dentinal tubules to reach protect the pulp tissue from the cytotoxic effects of the
the pulp tissue. Bouillaguet et al. [5] demonstrated the diffu- adhesive system tested. The persistent inflammatory pulp
sion of HEMA through dentinal tubules even against inter- response seems to occur when the dental cavities have a
nal pulp pressure. In addition, after local anesthesia RDT of less than 300 mm. No strong relationship between
including vasoconstrictor, such as was used in this present bacteria and intensity of pulp response could be found in the
study, pulp pressure is decreased [11] and the inward dent- present study. In this way, the application of biocompatible
inal fluid can be increased [20], making easier the diffusion material on cavity floor of deep cavities is important to
of noxious substances across the dentinal tissue, especially protect the pulpo-dentin complex against chemical irritation
substances of small molecular size. Based on our findings promoted by dental materials which can release unpolymer-
and reports in the literature we suggest that the monomers, ized monomeric globules and dissolved resin to diffuse
which reached the pulp tissue, were responsible for the through dentinal tubules.
persistent inflammatory reaction observed through the last
period of evaluation.
Acknowledgements
Special attention has been paid to bacterial presence at the
tooth-restoration interface and its possible role in irritation
The authors thank Dr. Carl Thomas Hanks, Department
of the pulp tissue. While a strong relationship between
of Oral Pathology-University of Michigan, for reviewing
bacterial presence and inflammatory pulp response has
the manuscript and for the wise suggestions and also
been reported [21], it could not be demonstrated in the
Pedro Carlos Oprime, Technological Center of information
present study. Pulp inflammation with absence of bacteria
in Materials-University of São Carlos (Brazil), for the statis-
as well as the reverse, i.e. large number of bacteria but no
tical analysis.
pulp inflammation was shown at all periods of evaluation.
Several workers seem to believe that bacterial presence at
the tooth-restoration interface usually result in pulp necrosis References
since these bacteria reach the pulp tissue [1,2,21]. Logically,
in a caries lesion there are billions of bacteria into the dentin [1] Snuggs HM, Cox CF, Powell CF, et al. Pulp healing and dentinal
tubules and many of these microorganisms must be able to bridge formation in an acidic environment. Quintessence Interna-
tional 1993;24:501–510.
find their way to the pulp tissue. Despite this, the pulp is still [2] Cox CF. Biocompatibility of dental materials in the absence of bacter-
able to survive. By the same logic, we cannot attribute cases ial infection. Operative Dentistry 1987;12:146–152.
of pulp necrosis only to the presence of few bacteria at the [3] Elbaum R, Remusat M, Brouillet JL. Biocompatibility of an enamel
tooth-restoration interface. In this study, there were no cases and dentin adhesive. Quintessence International 1992;23:773–782.
of pulp necrosis although we could identify bacteria in dent- [4] Franquin JC, Brouillet JL. Biocompatibility of an enamel and dentin
adhesive under different conditions of application. Quintessence
inal tubules and in the cavity floor in many specimens. The International 1989;19:813–826.
microscopic evaluation of bacteria present is dependent [5] Bouillaguet S, Wataha JC, Hanks CT, et al. In vitro citotoxicity and
upon a number of factors that make the results fairly subjec- dentin permeability of HEMA. Journal of Endodontics 1996;22:244–
tive. It has been demonstrated that estimation of the number 248.
of bacteria and their affinity for staining are changed by the [6] Hanks CT, Wataha JC, Parsell RR, et al. Delineation of cytotoxic
concentration of two dentin bonding agents in vitro. Journal of Endo-
agents used during the specimens decalcification process dontics 1992;18:589–596.
[22]. When EDTA is used only five bacteria are stained [7] Ratanasathien S, Wataha JC, Hanks CT, et al. Cytotoxic interactive
for each 15 bacteria present. With formic acid, only one effects of dentin bonding componentes on mouse fibroblasts. Journal
of 15 is stained and consequently observed under the micro- of Dental Research 1995;74:1602–1606.
scope [22]. In contrast, Stanley [23] reported that microor- [8] Gerzina TM, Hume WR. Diffusion of monomers from bonding resin–
resin composite combinations through dentine in vitro. Journal of
ganisms are less likely to wash out if they have invaded Dentistry 1996;24:125–128.
dentin tubules, as compared with those located in soft tissue [9] Hanks CT, Strawn SE, Wataha JC, et al. Cytotoxic effects of resin
or on cavity walls. Consequently, in the present study the components on cultured mammalian fibroblasts. Journal of Dental
bacteria present and stained on cavity walls probably Research 1991;70:1450–1455.
represented those microorganisms, which were not lost [10] Hanks CT, Craig RG, Diehl ML, et al. Cytotoxicity of dental compo-
sites and other materials in a new “in vitro” device. Journal of Oral
during the laboratory processing of samples. Therefore, if Pathology 1988;17:396–403.
no bacteria were stained within the dentinal tubules, this [11] Pashley DH. Dynamics of the pulpo-dentin complex. Critical Review
would suggest that probably they were not there. Finally, of Oral Biology and Medicine 1996;7:104–133.
564 J. Hebling et al. / Journal of Dentistry 27 (1999) 557–564
[12] Stanley HR. Pulpal consideration of adhesive materials. Operative [18] Jontell M, Hanks CT, Bratel J, et al. Effects of unpolymerized resin
Dentistry (suppl. 5) 1992;17:151–164. componentes on the function of accessory cells derived from the rat
[13] Lesot H, Begue-Kirn C, Kubler JD, Meyer JM, Smith AJ, Cassidy N, incisor pulp. Journal of Dental Research 1995;74:1162–1167.
Ruch JV. Experimental induction of odontoblast differentiation and [19] Hussey DL, Biagioni PA, Loney PJ. Thermographic measurement of
stimulation during reparative processes. Cells and Materials temperature change during resin composite polymerization in vivo.
1993;3:201–217. Journal of Dentistry 1995;23:267–271.
[14] Tobias RS, Plant CG, Browne RM. Reduction in pulpal inflammation [20] Brown AC, et al. Tooth pulp transcapillary osmotic pressure in the
beneath surface-sealed silicates. International Endodontic Journal dog. Archives of Oral Biology 1969;14:491–502.
1982;15:173–180. [21] Cox CF, Hafez AA, Akimoto N, et al. Biocompatibility of primer,
[15] Costa CAS, Hebling J, Teixeira MF. Estudo preliminar da compati- adhesive and resin composite systems on non-exposed and exposed
bilidade biológica dos adesivos dentinários All Bond 2 e Scothbond pulps of non-human primate teeth. American Journal of Dentistry
MP. Avaliação histológica de implantes subcutâneos em ratos. 1998;10:S55–S63.
Revista de Odontologia da Universidade de São Paulo 1997;11:11– [22] Wijnbergrn M, Van Mullem PJ. Effect of histological decalcifying
18. agents on number and stainability of gram-positive bacteria. Journal
[16] Gwinnett AJ, Tay FR. Early and intermediate time response of the of Dental Research 1987;66:1029–1031.
dental pulp to a acid etched technique in vivo. American Journal of [23] Stanley HR. Criteria for standardizing and increasing credibility of
Dentistry 1998;10:35–44. direct pulp capping studies. American Journal of Dentistry
[17] Luster MI. Immunotoxicology and the immune system. Health Envir- 1998;11:S17–S34.
onment 1989;22:713–731.