IN THE COUNTY COURT OF VICTORIA Revised

AT MELBOURNE Not Restricted

CRIMINAL DIVISION Suitable for Publication

Case No. CR-17-01070

DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS

PETER STOICOS

---

JUDGE: HER HONOUR JUDGE LAWSON

WHERE HELD: Melbourne
DATE OF HEARING: 29 August & 21 November 2018
DATE OF SENTENCE: 22 January 2019
CASE MAY BE CITED AS: DPP v Stoicos
MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: [2019] VCC 53

REASONS FOR SENTENCE

---

Subject: CRIMINAL LAW

Catchwords: Sentencing – obtain financial advantage by deception (rolled-up
charge) – no prior criminal history – gross breach of trust – significant
delay - Verdin’s principles 5 & 6 enlivened - Community Correction
Order imposed

---

APPEARANCES: Counsel Solicitors

For the DPP Mr Hardjadibrata (Plea) John Cain, Solicitor for

Ms L. Gurry (Sentence) Public Prosecutions

For the Accused Ms Seoud Victoria Legal Aid

COUNTY COURT OF VICTORIA i-1

250 William Street, Melbourne

HER HONOUR:

1 Peter Stoicos, you have pleaded guilty before me to one charge of obtain

financial advantage by deception, contrary to s82(1) of the Crimes Act 1958.

2 This is a rolled-up charge representing 13 transactions between 1 November

2013 and 6 June 2014 in total and involves the sum of $195,500.

3 The fact that this is a rolled-up charge means that this was not isolated

offending, and I have taken that into account.

4 The charge is serious and that is reflected in the maximum penalty that is

prescribed by Parliament for the charge, and that is 10 years’ imprisonment.

5 You are a person who comes before the Court with no prior convictions. You

are now aged 50, and the offending subject to the charge occurred whilst you

were aged between 44 to 45 years of age.

6 The background to the matter is that you, by deception, obtained money - that

is, $195,500 - from the Family Trust of Aspasia and Paul Laouris, as a

consequence of representing to them falsely that you would forward the

moneys to the Australian Taxation Office ("the ATO”) as payment for a tax debt

that they owed.

7 None of the money that was deposited into your account was ever paid to the

ATO.

8 At the time of the offending, you operated a business and finance consultancy

under the name of Stoia Corporation Pty Ltd, and you had been engaged by

the Laourises to assist them in relation to providing them with assistance

finding suitable finance to repay a debt to ATO.

9 Paul Laouris operated a plumbing business in the Northern Territory known as

“Leanyer Plumbing Pty Ltd”. His wife, Aspasia, worked as an administrator for

the business. The Polydoros Family Trust, of which both Paul and Aspasia

1 SENTENCE
VCC:LW
DPP v Stoicos
 Laouris and their children were beneficiaries, owned the business and traded

under the name of “Leanyer Plumbing Pty Ltd”. Paul Laouris was the trustee

of the trust.

10 Over a period of seven years, between 2006 and 2013, the plumbing business

had incurred a large debt to the ATO. Prior to receiving notification of court

proceedings in respect to the tax debt, Aspasia and Paul Laouris approached

a local Darwin mortgage broker, Rick Jackson, NT Mortgage Brokers, in early

2013, seeking to obtain finance to repay the debt. They met with him in early

2013, and through him, they were introduced to you. You were made aware

of the Laourises' situation and offered to assist them in providing them with

assistance finding suitable finance to repay the debt.

11 On 28 June 2013, court proceedings were commenced against Paul Laouris

as trustee of the Family Trust by the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation in the

District Court of South Australia claiming a tax debt in excess of $500,000.

Mr Laouris was notified of the court proceedings against him by both letter

and court summons.

12 On 29 July 2013, the Laourises entered into a formal agreement with you to

enable you to secure finance to pay the tax debt. You also advised them that
you could deal with the ATO debt for which you received consultancy fees for

your services in dealing with the ATO on their behalf.

13 You told Aspasia Laouris that to assist in dealing with the ATO, it was

necessary for them to make payments to the ATO as soon as possible. You

provided them with your personal Westpac bank account details, into which

moneys totalling $195,500 were paid in 13 separate transactions over the

period charged.

14 The monies ultimately were not paid by you to the ATO in reduction of the tax

debt, but were used for you for your own purposes.

2 SENTENCE
VCC:LW
DPP v Stoicos
 15 Eventually, your deception was uncovered when the Laourises’ usual

bookkeeper returned to work in 2014 and the accountants for the business

were changed.

16 On 13 June 2014, Aspasia Laouris attended the Northern Territory police and

made a complaint about your conduct. The Victorian Police took over the

investigation in early 2015, and ultimately, on 15 July 2015, you were arrested

and a record of interview was conducted, during which you made some

admissions but made no comment in respect to the allegations.

17 In the meantime, the Deputy Commission of Taxation obtained judgment

against the Laourises in respect of the debt owed on 15 January 2014.

On 4 April 2014, a bankruptcy notice against Paul Laouris, personally, was

issued. It is unclear from the material that was provided to the Court whether,

in fact, Mr Laouris was made bankrupt.

18 There is no doubt, however, that by your actions and gross breach of trust,

you would caused great anxiety to the Laouris family.

19 No victim impact has been filed. However, I have had regard to what was said

by Aspasia Laouris in her statement contained within the depositions, that

your actions forced her family to face financial adversity.

20 In sentencing you, there is a need for the court to emphasise both general and

specific deterrence and for the court to formally denounce your behaviour and

to impose just punishment.

21 Ms Seoud, on your behalf, conceded the offending is serious and would

ordinarily warrant a term of imprisonment to be imposed. She submitted that

the Court ought consider a substantial and lengthy Community Correction

Order or, alternatively, if that submission is rejected, a combination sentence

of imprisonment to be followed by a Community Correction Order.

22 Mr Hardjadibrata, on behalf of the Crown, emphasised this was serious

3 SENTENCE
VCC:LW
DPP v Stoicos
 offending involving as it does a rolled-up charge that involved offending that

was protracted, deliberate, and premeditated, and motivated by greed.

Your conduct constituted a gross breach of trust. You exploited vulnerable

victims who were relying upon you to assist them with their financial affairs.

There has been no restitution. In all the circumstances, he submitted that the

only appropriate disposition was an immediate term of imprisonment to be

served.

23 Whilst you have no prior criminal history, there has been subsequent

offending.

24 On 26 August 2015, you were dealt with in respect to an unrelated matter at

the Melbourne Magistrates Court on one an unlawful assault charge relating

to a former partner. You were placed on a without conviction adjourned

undertaking which I note was successfully completed.

25 On 12 September 2014, at Melbourne Magistrates Court, you were dealt with

in respect to a charge of obtaining property by deception for which you were

convicted and placed on a Community Correction Order for 18 months with

the condition that you perform 200 hours’ community work and undergo

treatment and rehabilitation, and mental health assessment and treatment. I

note that you complied with that order. That charge of obtain property by

deception involves similar offending. The victim in that matter was a client

whose monies were deposited with you, and you used them for a purpose -

namely, your own personal use. The amount involved was $65,000.

26 I have taken into account your personal history and background. You are a

person who has Greek heritage. Your parents migrated from Greece in the

1950s. They are elderly and live in the western suburbs of Melbourne. You

are their third child of four children. You have an older sister, an older brother

and a younger sister. You have a supportive relationship with your youngest

sister.

4 SENTENCE
VCC:LW
DPP v Stoicos
 27 Your childhood was unremarkable, and your parents were very supportive and

raised you in a very traditional Greek nurturing family.

28 Having completed schooling, you then obtained a Law Degree from the

University of Melbourne and a Bachelor of Business, Bachelor of Finance

from the Melbourne Business School. You were able to obtain employment as

a licensed mortgage broker.

29 You married when you were 21, and that marriage lasted for 20 years. There

are two children, both daughters, born of that marriage, who are in their mid to

late 20s. Following your divorce from your wife and the revelation of offending,

you have become estranged from your daughters and that situation continues.

30 Over the years, you worked successfully to build up your business career.

That situation changed dramatically in the period from 2012 to 2014 when

your life unravelled attributable to the breakdown of your marriage, the end of

a same-sex relationship that you became involved in that was destructive and

abusive, and mental health issues. You incurred large debts due to a serious

gambling addiction that had become out of control. You started to steal

money from your clients that you used for gambling, hoping that you would

have a big win so that you could pay back the debts. Eventually, because of
your situation, your businesses failed.

31 You have had a number of difficult personal issues in your past, and I have

referred to some of them already.

32 From about age 16, you struggled with your sexuality, and it was not until

2012 that you came out and had a same-sex relationship while still married.

That partner was abusive, and you suffered sexual assault and rape at that

partner's hands.

33 In 2009, you were diagnosed with a heart condition, namely, angina. In 2013,

you had a heart attack, following which you had an operation for stents to be

5 SENTENCE
VCC:LW
DPP v Stoicos
 inserted. And following that surgery, you have continued to be reviewed by

your Dr Salvatore Rametta who is your cardiac physician. You have ongoing

issues with high blood pressure. Recently, there have been further tests and

there possibility of further heart surgery remains.

34 You had a “breakdown” in 2014 and you were admitted to the Albert Road

Clinic in respect to severe depression. Dr Okedar, psychiatrist, treated you for

two years.

35 Dr Okedar described you at review on 20 February 2014 as having “a chronic

history of dysphoric mood over many years” with an exacerbation of

depressive symptoms over the previous 4 years in the context of “multiple

stressors including business related issues and marital issues.” He noted that

you presented with anxiety and suicidal thinking.

36 Currently, you are still being treated for your depression. You are prescribed

Zoloft, an antidepressant, and you regularly see a counsellor, Nina Hancox,

under a mental health treatment program for management of your low mood

and mental health issues.

37 You are now in a healthy same-sex relationship with your partner, Darren
Hogeboom, who has been present supporting you at the plea hearings.

38 You were assessed at the request of the Court by Dr Amanda Nielson, senior

forensic psychologist, whose report dated 30 November 2018 states during

her assessment you disclosed ongoing suicidal ideation but no intention to act

on this, and on self-report, you endorsed high levels of anxiety and depressive

symptoms in the extremely severe range.

39 She considered that any term of imprisonment will weigh heavily upon your

mental health and that you were at higher risk of self-harm or suicide than the

average prisoner. Her expressed opinion reflects that of Dr Okedar’s who was

the treating psychiatrist who cared for you in the past. She states that you

6 SENTENCE
VCC:LW
DPP v Stoicos
 come across as quite naïve and emotionally labile. You have a history of

sexual trauma and are generally pro-social and would be particularly

vulnerable in the prison system with the risk that you would be taken

advantage of by other prisoners.

40 On your behalf, Ms Seoud submitted that limbs 5 and 6 of the Verdins

principles were enlivened.

41 At the plea hearing, Mr Hardjadibrata disputed this on the basis that the

material relied upon was dated.

42 Having considered both the historic material from Dr Okedar, taken together

with the findings of Dr Neilson, I accept the submissions made by Ms Saoud

concerning the Verdins principles, limbs five and six. That is, I accept that

prison would be more onerous because of your health issues as compared to

a person of normal health, and also, that imprisonment would have a

significant adverse affect on your mental health and would increase your

suicidal risk. I have taken that into account and your sentence is moderated

accordingly.

43 You ceased working effectively in 2016 and you are currently in receipt of
Centrelink benefits. You have applied for a Disability Support Pension for the

diagnosis of anxiety and depression.

44 I have had regard to the significant delay in the prosecution of these

proceedings.

45 Notwithstanding a statement detailing the nature and extent of your criminality

was provided to the Northern Territory police on 9 July 2014, the matter did

not come to the attention of the Victorian police until early 2015. It was not

until 15 July 2015 that you were interviewed by the informant. Thereafter,

further statements were required to be taken from the Laourises bookkeeper,

Ms Hay, and the accountant. Those statements were not taken until

7 SENTENCE
VCC:LW
DPP v Stoicos
 September 2015.

46 A search warrant was executed on the relevant bank - that is, the Westpac

Bank - on 4 November 2015.

47 A computer was seized from your premises on 15 July 2015 that was copied

on 18 January 2016 and later analysed.

48 The ATO material took some time to be released and it was not until June

2016 that the Victorian police were in a position to file charges.

49 The prosecution accept that the delay in these circumstances is a mitigating

factor.

50 I have taken into account in your favour the long delay. You have experienced

the anxiety of having charges being laid hanging over your head following

your arrest on 15 July 2015, and thereafter, the delay in the matter proceeding

in court. During the period of time, you have taken positive steps towards

your ultimate rehabilitation, undertaking counselling, stopping gambling and

importantly, you have not reoffended. The fact of this delay is, I accept, a form

of punishment in itself.

51 The pre-sentence report assessment prepared by Jenny Tiv, Court

Assessment and Prosecution Officer, Dandenong Community Correction

Services, assessed you as being a high risk of reoffending according to the

level of service/risk need responsivity tool.

52 In contrast, Dr Nielson assessed you as being a low range risk for general

offending according to the same tool. Given the passage of time and the fact

you have been compliant with treatment and have not reoffended, I prefer and

adopt Dr Nielson’s assessment.

53 I am satisfied in all the circumstances that you have very good prospects for

rehabilitation.

8 SENTENCE
VCC:LW
DPP v Stoicos
 54 I have taken into account in formulating the appropriate sentence all the

mitigating factors that were highlighted on your behalf by

Ms Seoud.

55 I accept that you entered a plea of guilty at an early stage, once proper

charges were formulated. I note that there was a contested committal and

one of the victims was required to give evidence, but once the committal was

completed, the formulation of the charges was narrowed and thereafter,

parties were able to resolve the matters so that the matter proceeded with a

plea without the necessity for a trial. Through your plea, you spared the State

the cost and inconvenience of a trial and you have facilitated justice. The

sentence will be discounted accordingly. I am satisfied that your plea does

also indicate genuine remorse.

56 Notwithstanding the objectively serious criminal conduct involved in your

offending, I have come to the conclusion that all the purposes of sentencing

can be sufficiently achieved by a Community Correction Order being imposed,

and the order will be of three years' duration with conditions tailored to your

particular circumstances and directed to your ultimate rehabilitation in a

community setting.

57 You have been assessed as being suitable for such an order, and I have

adopted the conditions that have been recommended by the assessor. I

consider that in all the circumstances, a Community Correction Order, so

formulated, is appropriate and just punishment.

58 The Court of Appeal in this State, in the guideline judgement of Boulton v R1,

has made it clear in an appropriate case such an order can provide a

sentencing option that is flexible, that enables both the punitive and

rehabilitative purposes to be served simultaneously, and such an order can be

fashioned to address the particular circumstances of the offender and the

causes of the offending, aimed at minimising the risk of re-offending by

1
[2014] VSCA 342.

9 SENTENCE
VCC:LW
DPP v Stoicos
 promoting the offender’s rehabilitation. 2

59 In Boulton, the Court also acknowledged that such an order may remain open,

even in cases of very serious offending 3 where a term of imprisonment is

otherwise warranted.

60 You have had explained to you the nature of such an order that is to be

imposed, and you have indicated through your counsel that you understand

and consent to such an order and understand the consequences of non-

compliance.

61 Contravention of any condition attached to such an order is itself an offence

punishable by up to three months’ imprisonment. Contravention also carries

with it the prospect that you will be resentenced on the original offence.

Furthermore, if you do commit further offending, such breaching offence will

be also dealt with and subject to other penalties itself.

62 I will now announce the formal court orders. Could you please stand,

Mr Stoicos?

63 In respect to the one charge of obtain property by deception, you will be

convicted, and a Community Correction Order will be imposed for three years'
duration with the requirements that you be under supervision, that you

undertake 250 hours of community work and have assessment and treatment

for mental health issues and offender behaviour programs. All hours of

treatment and rehabilitation satisfactorily undertaken are to be counted as

hours of unpaid community work for the purpose of the community work

condition.

64 I make the Compensation Order sought in the sum of $195,500.

65 I make the order pursuant to s.464ZF for the taking of a forensic sample,

having regard to the seriousness of the circumstances of the offending, and

2
Boulton, 311 [2].
3
Ibid, 338 [131].

10 SENTENCE
VCC:LW
DPP v Stoicos
 I consider it is in the public interest to make such an order. Such an order is

not opposed.

66 Finally, in respect to s.6AAA, but for your plea of guilty, I would have imposed

a term of imprisonment of three years to serve 18 months.

67 I will now provide to Mr Stoicos the Community Correction Order that is to

commence from today's date and end on 21 January 2022. He is to attend

the Dandenong Community Correctional Services. Is that the one most

appropriate?

68 MS SEOUD: Yes, Your Honour.

69 HER HONOUR: Yes. Which is at 46-50 Walker Street, Dandenong, within

two clear days of today's date. And that sets out the terms, including the

mandatory core conditions and the conditions I have announced.

70 MS SEOUD: As Your Honour pleases.

71 HER HONOUR: If you could assist your client in completing that document,

that would be appreciated.

72 MS SEOUD: Yes, Your Honour.

73 HER HONOUR: All right. When I leave the Bench, I will ask that my

associate provide copies to the parties, of the Community Correction Order.

74 MS SEOUD: Thank you, Your Honour.

75 HER HONOUR: Have you got the forensic sample order there?

76 MS GURRY: I do, Your Honour. I just wanted to make sure that you had what

you needed. I did notice in the compensation order that there was a date that

was incorrect in the one - so I have redrafted that. If I could just hand - - -

77 HER HONOUR: All right. You can provide that.

11 SENTENCE
VCC:LW
DPP v Stoicos
 78 MS GURRY: Thank you. It just had the date of the convicted part of it that

was one of the offence dates, so I'm not sure how that happened. If that

makes sense.

79 HER HONOUR: All right. I will sign that order.

80 MS GURRY: Thank you, Your Honour. This is the forensic sample.

81 HER HONOUR: The non-custodial one?

82 MS GURRY: Yes. There's notice of the application and the order.

83 HER HONOUR: It is the 22nd today, is it not?

84 MS GURRY: Yes, it is.

85 HER HONOUR: Have you got that?

86 MS GURRY: I do, Your Honour. I have a feeling, however, that it's printed out

double-sided with the custody version on one side and the non-custody

version on the order.

87 HER HONOUR: I have got one that is non-custodial.

88 MS GURRY: If you're able to do that one, that would be most appreciated.

89 HER HONOUR: All right. Mr Stoicos, the only thing I need to tell you further

in relation to the orders that I have made today is that the taking of a forensic

sample involves you attending a police station and providing them with a

sample which is a scraping from the mouth. You will be provided with a little

cotton bud from the police, and you just rub it on the side of your mouth.

And provided you do that, and give it back to them, that completes the taking

of the sample. But in the event that you are not cooperative, police do have

the power to do the sample by way of blood sample. But hopefully that will

not be required.

12 SENTENCE
VCC:LW
DPP v Stoicos
 90 All right. I have signed the order and that sets out the police stations where

you can attend for you to comply with that last order.

91 So that completes everything. That is now completed, and we can adjourn

the court.

92 MS GURRY: As Your Honour pleases.

93 HER HONOUR: Thank you.

---

13 SENTENCE
VCC:LW
DPP v Stoicos