Scribd
Upload
44 views1 page

CBM353 MDD PT 1 QP

This document is a practice test for the Biomedical Engineering department at Selvam College of Technology, focusing on medical device design. It includes questions on user problem identification, the benefits of brainstorming in product development, the importance of intellectual property protection, and the implications of insurance reimbursement on medical device adoption. The test is structured into two parts, with a total of 40 marks available.

Uploaded by

SCT HOD - Mechanical
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
44 views1 page

CBM353 MDD PT 1 QP

This document is a practice test for the Biomedical Engineering department at Selvam College of Technology, focusing on medical device design. It includes questions on user problem identification, the benefits of brainstorming in product development, the importance of intellectual property protection, and the implications of insurance reimbursement on medical device adoption. The test is structured into two parts, with a total of 40 marks available.

Uploaded by

SCT HOD - Mechanical
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Selvam College of Technology

(Autonomous),
“A” Grade by NAAC, UGC recognized 2(f) Status, Approved by AICTE – New Delhi, Affiliated to Anna University
Namakkal – 03. www.selvamtech.edu.in

DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING


CBM353 MEDICAL DEVICE DESIGN
SEM/YEAR:V/III
Practice Test I- Question paper (Total Marks: 40)
DATE:..25

PART A (5X2=20marks)
Q1.A Startup team is developing a wearable device to monitor
heart rate in elderly patients. During the early design stage, they
skip detailed user interviews and fail to identify key user
challenges. How could proper problem identification have
impacted the success of this medical device?

Q2.A medical device company is designing a portable insulin


delivery system. Initially, the design team worked in isolation
without conducting brainstorming sessions. How might including
brainstorming have benefited the product development process?

Q3.A company developed a novel handheld diagnostic device after


years of research but did not file for any intellectual property (IP)
protection. Later, a competitor released a similar product and
captured the market. How could IP protection have changed the
outcome for the original developer?

Q4.A medical start-up launched an advanced wound care device in


hospitals, but sales remained low despite clinical effectiveness. Feedback
revealed that the device was not covered under any insurance
reimbursement scheme. Analyze the potential long-term consequences of
a lack of reimbursement for the sustained adoption of this medical device
within the healthcare system

PART B(2X15=30 MARKS)

Page 1 of 1

You might also like