1 s2.0 S1359835X99000810 Main
1 s2.0 S1359835X99000810 Main
Abstract
This paper includes an experimental study and a mathematical analysis of the shear deformation of woven fabrics by using picture-frame
type shear testing. Four types of weaves were tested and compared: a loose plain weave, a tight plain weave, a twill and a satin weave. The
locking shear angle was determined both in picture-frame tests and manual shear tests. The experimental data presented for each fabric
include curves of shear load–shear stress as a function of either the shear angle or the shear rate, and measured locking shear angles. The
shear deformation data were analysed by following elasticity principles and taking into account the effects of fibre inextensibility. A
microstructural analysis was carried out in all four fabrics to investigate the shear locking on the basis of a geometrical approach and the
maximum packing fibre fraction. q 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: A. Fabrics; Shear; B. Elasticity; C. Micromechanics
Fig. 1. (a) KES-F shear test; (b) FAST shear test; and (c) picture frame shear test.
shearing is non-uniform throughout the specimen due to the satin weave. In each case, shear curves are presented and
distortion of width uniformity [13]. analysed. A material model including theory of elasticity
Another type of proposed shear test for fabrics involves and the effects of fibre inextensibility is applied to the
the shearing of a fabric specimen, usually 200 × 200 mm; analysis of shear data. Data of locking shear angle for all
held within a picture hinged frame [13–16] (see Fig. 1(c)). the weaves are presented from both manual shear tests and
Two diagonally opposite corners of the picture frame are the picture frame experiments. With the aid of micro-
pulled apart at a constant rate in a tensile testing machine. If structural analysis, a geometrical analysis of the shear of
it is assumed that the fabric is inextensible in the two fibre the unit cell of each weave is carried out, aiming at predict-
directions, there is only in-plane shear before wrinkling ing the shear-locking angle. The predictions are then
starts. It has been suggested [16] not to clamp individual compared with the experimental data.
fibre bundles in the frame but to let their ends rotate freely;
otherwise it has been observed [16] that fibres bend
severely, slip out of the clamping frame or stretch to form
2. Materials
an S during deformation.
The elastic behaviour model is often used to describe the Four E-glass woven fabrics were tested: a loose plain
shear deformation of fabrics before wrinkling. Many inves- weave (LPW), a tight plain weave (TPW), a twill weave
tigators use the shear tests to calculate the shear rigidity of
the fabric [4,9,14,17]. The shear modulus of fabrics calcu-
lated from such tests has been used as input data for finite
element, elastic solid mechanics simulations of draping
[18,19]. The elasticity theory has also been adopted in
micromechanical analyses [20,21].
The purpose of this study is to present shear deformation
data of fabrics from picture frame experiments for different
types of weaves, namely two plain weaves, a twill and a
Table 1
Specifications of the tested woven fabrics
Fig. 6. Shear test curves for the twill fabric (TWILL) at different crosshead
speeds of the tensile testing machine.
Fig. 5. Shear test curves for the tight plain weave fabric (TPW) at different
crosshead speeds of the tensile testing machine.
fabrics at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. As can be seen
The effect of the crosshead speed on the two plain weaves the satin weave is easily deformed with minimum amount of
(Figs. 4(a) and 5(a)) may be considered to be small, within shear, as expected. The LPW displays a little higher initial
the experimental error of the testing. The effect of the cross- rigidity due to the regular yarn crossovers, but can reach
head speed is more pronounced on the twill and the satin large deformations without excessive shear energy require-
weave (Figs. 6(a) and 7(a)), although no consistent trend of ments due its large open pores and the absence of shear
the load with the crosshead speed is obvious for the range of locking. The TPW is the most difficult to deform in shear
crosshead speeds used. It must be mentioned that the twill and is associated with early wrinkling.
and satin weaves were very difficult to handle and lay on the Table 2 presents the data of the shear-locking angle from
picture frame, which must have increased the experimental both the picture frame shear test and the manual shear test.
error and might account for the observed differences in the The agreement between the two tests for the TPW, the twill
above load-deformation curves. Inconsistent trends in the and the satin weave is very good. In the case of the LPW the
load-deformation curves at different crosshead speeds of shear-locking angle in the picture frame test is larger by 78
the tensile testing machine were also observed in some of than that from the manual shear test (without smoothing).
the data of McGuinness and O’Bradaigh [16]. Figs. 4(b)– This is probably due to the pronounced difference between
7(b) present the results of the shear tests in the form of the free rotation of the bundles at the pins in the picture
applied total load, Fx, versus rate of shear, determined by frame, and possibly even slip, and the firm clamping of
Eq. (6). In this case, there is a clear trend where the shear the two opposite edges of fabric in the manual test. It
curves move to the right, i.e. to higher shear rates, as the seems that this difference was enlarged due to the looseness
crosshead speed increases for all tested fabrics. of the weave.
The load data were translated into mean shear stress However, during the manual shear test experiments it was
values along the fibre direction and Fig. 8 displays shear realised that it was possible to achieve much higher shear-
stress versus shear angle curves for the four tested woven locking angles if the wrinkles were smoothed out. So
U. Mohammed et al. / Composites: Part A 31 (2000) 299–308 303
Table 2
Values of the maximum shear angle above which wrinkling appears
Fabric Picture-frame test (8) Manual test (8) Manual test 1 smoothing (8)
frame of reference x is then given by the equation (basket weave), and for the satin (5HSW) and twill (TWILL)
X weaves up to g 258: The analysis was not applied to the
s 2pI 1 2E1 1 Ti Fii ^ Fii 16
TPW, because it wrinkled very early at g 108:
where p is an arbitrary hydrostatic pressure to satisfy the The measured shear stress, t s, in Fig. 8 has been analysed
incompressibility constraint, E is the modulus matrix and into the orthogonal components of the Cauchy stress tensor
the last term in Eq. (16) denotes the yarn extensibility limit s11 s22 ts sin g=2 21
in the fibre directions Fii. Qiu and Pence [24] wrote the last
term with the aid of a standard reinforcing model as s12 s21 ts cos g=2 22
X 0
s 2pI 1 2E1 1 ti f C11 Fii ^ Fii 17 where each fabric is considered symmetric and balanced in
the two in-plane directions.
where ti is a material parameter for each fibre direction ti
By also taking into account Eqs. (15)–(20) and the
0 corresponds to neo-Hookean material response and
geometry of the picture-frame experiment in Fig. 3, it
ti ! / corresponds to totally inextensible fibre yarns)
follows:
and (C11) 1/2 is the stretch in the fibre direction Fii and an
element of the matrix C: f 0 C11 f 0 C22 sec4 g 1 sin2 g sec4 g 2 1 23
C FT F 18 " #
X 1 sin g
0
f (C11) is the first derivative of f(C11) where from the Fii × Fii 24
sin g 1
standard reinforcing model [24]
f C11 1
2 C11 2 12 19 s12 s21 E12 sec g tan g 1 t sin g
and sec4 g 1 sin2 g sec4 g 2 1 f 12 g 25
f 0 C11 C11 2 1 20 and
Eqs. (11)–(20) have been used for the analysis of the s11 s22 E11 1 2 sec2 g
experimental data of Fig. 8. The analysis has been applied
before the limit of shear locking and wrinkling of fabric. 1 ti sec4 g 1 sin2 g sec4 g 2 1 f 11 g 26
Since, according to Table 2 and Fig. 8, the LPW, did not
wrinkle within the range of experimental data presented in A regression analysis was carried out to determine E11,
Fig. 8 whereas the satin (5HSW) and twill (TWILL) weaves E12 and ti from the data of s 12 and s 11 as functions of g . Fig.
wrinkled around a shear angle, g , of 258, the theoretical 9 demonstrates the applied linear data fitting when s 12 is
analysis was applied to the whole data range for the LPW plotted against the function f12(g ) for the LPW (basket
weave), twill (TWILL) and satin (5HSW). Table 3 presents
the determined values for the moduli and the material para-
meter ti from the regression analysis of the experimental
data for the three investigated fabrics. Figs. 10–12 illustrate
the agreement between the experimental data (relations (21)
Table 3
Values for E11, E12 and ti determined from the regression analysis of the data
of shear deformation of a loose plain weave (LPW), a twill (TWILL) and a
5 harness satin (weave)
LPW 13 20 0.050
TWILL 35 31 17
Fig. 9. Fitting of the experimental shear data according to Eqs. (22) and (25) 5HSW 31 12 12
for the loose plain weave, the twill and the satin weave.
U. Mohammed et al. / Composites: Part A 31 (2000) 299–308 305
Vfo wc
f 2 wc 30
Vf;max CR
where Vfo and Vf, max are the initial (unsheared state) and
maximum packing volume fractions, respectively, and CR
is the maximum compression ratio of the fibre yarn.
Relations (28)–(30) lead to the prediction of a locking
Fig. 11. Experimental data and predictions of the shear stress (in-plane, shear angle of 258 which agrees with the experimental data
orthogonal directions) versus shear angle for the twill weave. of Table 2 for 5HSW. If the same relations are applied to the
306 U. Mohammed et al. / Composites: Part A 31 (2000) 299–308
7. Conclusions
Fig. 12. Experimental data and predictions of the shear stress (in-plane, This paper included a study of the shear deformation of
orthogonal directions) versus shear angle for the satin weave. fabrics covering both mechanical and microstructural
aspects. Mechanical testing involved shear testing in
Fig. 13. Microstructural changes in fabrics during shear: (a) unsheared state; and (b) locking shear angle.
U. Mohammed et al. / Composites: Part A 31 (2000) 299–308 307
Fig. 14. (a) Basic cell in a plain weave as considered in the microstructural References
analysis of shear deformation. (b) Unit cell in unsheared and sheared state
as considered in the analysis of the shear locking effect for the satin weave [1] Potter KD. The influence of accurate stretch data for reinforcements
and the twill weave. on the production of complex structural mouldings. Composites
1970;10:161–7.
[2] Kawabata S. The standardisation and analysis of hand evaluation, 2.
picture-frame type of experiments. The non-linear curves of Japan: HESC, The Textile Machinery Society of Japan, 1980.
shear stress in the fibre direction versus shear angle were [3] Hu J-L, Zhang Y-T. The KES shear test for fabrics. Textile Research
fitted with polynomial functions which are symmetric about Journal 1997;67(9):654–64.
the origin. No clear trend has been concluded for the depen- [4] Yu JZ, Cai Z, Ko FK. Formability of textile preforms for composite
applications. Part 1: characterisation experiments. Composites
dence of the elastic shear deformation curves on the cross- Manufacturing 1994;5(2):113–22.
head speed of the tensile testing machine. On the contrary, [5] Kothari VK, Tandon SK. Shear behaviour of woven fabrics. Textile
when the mechanical testing data were plotted in the form of Research Journal 1989;March:142–50.
shear stress as a function of shear rate, there was an obvious [6] Andrews P, Paton R, Wang J. In: Scott ML, editor. The drape forming
and consistent trend in all fabrics for the viscous shear of a rudder tip preform, Proceedings of the ICCM-11, Gold Coast
Australia, IV. Melbourne: Australian Composites Structures Society,
curves to move to higher shear as the crosshead speed was 1997. p. 411–21.
increased. [7] Ly NG, Tester DH, Buckenham P, Rocznoik AF, Adriaanson AL,
A mathematical elasticity analysis was applied to the data Scaybrook F, De Jong S. Simple instruments for quality control by
of shear mechanical testing. The aim was to evaluate the finishers and taylors. Textile Research Journal 1991;61:402.
orthogonal, in-plane, shear and normal stresses as a function [8] Yick K-L, Chen KPS, Dhingra RC, How YL. Comparison of mechan-
ical properties of shirting materials measured on the KES-F and FAST
of shear angle when taking into account the effects of instruments. Textile Research Journal 1996;66(10):622–33.
changing fibre directions on the strain tensor and the effects [9] Buckenham P. Bias-extension measurements on woven fabrics.
of constraints in yarn extensibility. The modelling in combi- Journal of the Textile Institute 1997;88(1):33–40.
nation with data fitting yielded values for the moduli and the [10] Boisse P, Buet K, Gasser A, Hanklar S, Launay J. Biaxial mechanical
inextensibility parameter for the three types of weave (plain, behaviour of textile composite reinforcements. Mecanique
Industrielle et Materiaux 1997;50(3):140–4.
satin and twill) before wrinkling. From that it was concluded [11] Boisse P, Barr M. Experimental study of biaxial behaviour in fabrics
that the yarn inextensibility plays an important role in the Comptes Rendus de l Academie de Sciences, Serie II. Mecanique
elasticity analysis of the satin and twill fabrics. The shear Physique Chimie Astronomie 1996;323(8):503–9.
stress varies non-linearly with shear angle due mainly to the [12] ASTM D3518 Standard test method for in-plane shear response of
change of the angle between the fibre directions during polymer matrix composite materials by tensile test of a ^45 of
laminate, 1994;14.01:151–7.
shear and its effects on the values of orthogonal stress and [13] McGuinness GB, O’Bradaigh CM. Development of rheological
strain. models for forming flows and picture-frame shear testing of fabric
Relatively good agreement was reached between the reinforced thermoplastic sheets. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid
picture frame test and the manual shear test (without fabric Mechanics 1997;73:1–28.
smoothing) used in the determination of the maximum shear [14] Gelin JC, Cherouat A, Boisse P, Sabhi H. Manufacture of thin compo-
site structures by the RTM process: a numerical simulation of the
angle before wrinkling occurred in each fabric. The LPW shaping operation. Composites Science and Technology
was easily sheared without wrinkling. The five harness satin 1996;56:711–8.
weave had the lowest initial shear modulus. Both the satin [15] Prodromou AG, Chen J. On the relationship between shear angle and
308 U. Mohammed et al. / Composites: Part A 31 (2000) 299–308
wrinkling of textile composite preforms. Composites Part A predicted moduli and stresses in plain weave composites. Journal of
1997;28A:491–503. Composite Materials 1995;29(16):2134–59.
[16] McGuinness GB, O’Bradaigh CM. Characterisation of thermoplastic [21] Vandeurzen Ph, Ivens J, Verpoest I. A three-dimensional micro-
composite melts in rhombus-shear: the picture-frame experiment. mechanical analysis of woven fabric composites. II: elastic analysis.
Composites Part A 1998;29A:115–32. Composites Science and Technology 1996;56:1317–27.
[17] Potturi P, Atkinson J, Porat I. A robotic flexible test syetem (FTS) for [22] Delaloye S, Niedermeier M. Optimisation of the diaphragm forming
fabrics. Mechatronics 1995;5(2/3):245–78. process for continuous fibre-reinforced advanced thermoplastic
[18] Boisse P, Cherouat A, Gelin JC, Sabhi H. Experimental study and composites. Composites Manufacturing 1995;6(3/4):135–44.
finite element simulation of a glass fibre fabric shaping process. [23] O’Bradaigh CM, McGuinness GB, Pipes RB. Numerical analysis of
Polymer Composites 1995;16(1):83–95. stresses and deformations in composite materials sheet forming:
[19] Mohammed U, Lekakou C, Bader MG. In: Visconti IC, editor. central indentation of a circular sheet. Composites Manufacturing
Mathematical and experimental studies of the draping of woven 1993;4(2):67–83.
fabrics in resin transfer moulding (RTM), Proceedings of ECCM-8, [24] Qiu GY, Pence TJ. Remarks on the behaviour of simple directionally
2. Abington, UK: Woodhead, 1998. p. 683–90. reinforced incompressible non-linearly elastic solids. Journal of
[20] Chapman C, Whitcomb J. Effect of assumed tow architecture on Elasticity 1997;49:1–30.