Internal Report
Internal Report
A PROJECT REPORT
     submitted for the fulfillment of the requirements for the award of
             BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
                        in
      ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING
                                         By
                      DEPARTMENT OF
              ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION
                       ENGINEERING
            RAGHU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
                                   (AUTONOMOUS)
    (Approved by AICTE, New Delhi & Permanently Affiliated to JNTU-GV, Vizianagaram
   Accredited by NAAC with 'A' Grade, Re-Accredited by NBA, Listed u/s 2(f) & 12(B) of UGC
                                         Act 1956)
            Dakamarri (V), Bheemili (M), Visakhapatnam-531162, Andhra Pradesh
                                       APRIL 2024
                                          i
         RAGHU INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
                                (AUTONOMOUS)
 (Approved by AICTE, New Delhi & Permanently Affiliated to JNTU-GV, Vizianagaram
Accredited by NAAC with 'A' Grade, Re-Accredited by NBA, Listed u/s 2(f) & 12(B) of UGC
                                      Act 1956)
         Dakamarri (V), Bheemili (M), Visakhapatnam-531162, Andhra Pradesh
              DEPARTMENT OF
ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING
                                 CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that this project report “4 X 4 PLANAR ANTENNA ARRAY
FOR ENHANCED GAIN” is the bonafied work of B. LOHITHA SIRI
VARSHINI (203J1A0422), A. N. V. S. ANIRUDH (203J1A0402), G. VINEELA
(203J1A0447), A. YASWANTH (203J1A0401), who carried out the project work
under my supervision.
        Apart from the efforts from us, the success of any project depends largely on the
encouragement and guidelines of many others. We take this opportunity to express our gratitude
to the people who have been instrumental in the successful completion of this project.
        We take immense pleasure in thanking Sri. Kalidindi Raghu, Chairman of Raghu
Educational Institutions for having permitted as to carry out this project work.
        We are grateful in thanking Sri. Kalidindi Rahul, Vice-Chairman of Raghu
Educational Institutions for having permitted as to carry out this project work.
        We would like to extend our thanks to Prof. S. Satyanarayana, Ph. D, Principal, of
Raghu Institute of Technology who had been source of inspiration and for his kind permission
to use the infrastructure in the college and carry out the project work in the college.
        We truthfully acknowledge the help and moral support from Prof. P.S.R.Chowdary, PhD,
Dean, Student Affairs of Raghu Institute of Technology for his support and encouragement.
        As a token of our feeling, we would like to acknowledge my sincere thanks to Prof. K.P.
Vinay, PhD, Head of the Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering of Raghu
Institute of Technology for allowing us to take upthis project. (Check this sir)
        We are extremely thankful to our project supervisor Dr. V. V. S. S. S.
CHAKRAVARTHY, M. Tech, Ph. D Assistant Professor of Electronics & Communication
Engineering of Raghu Institute of Technology, who had been source of inspiration and for
her kindly guidance in the conduct of our project and having permitted us to carry out this project
work.
        We wish to express our deep sense of gratitude to teaching staff and non-teaching staff
ofour ECE department for their help and wishes for the successful completion of this project.
Finally, at importantly, we would like to express our heart full thanks to our beloved Parents
for their blessings, our friends/classmates for their help and wishes for the successful
completion of this project.
                                                 iii
                                    DECLARATION
                                                iv
                                      ABSTRACT
This project focuses on the design and optimization of a 4x4 planar antenna array tailored for
operation within the X-band frequency range 7 GHz to 12 GHz. The antenna occupies a space
of 60.5 x 60.5 x 1.6. The antenna configuration, optimized for broadband performance, enables
spatial diversity, offering enhanced reliability and increased data rates. The proposed design
demonstrates its efficacy in the 7 GHz to 12 GHz frequency band, and the gain of the antenna
is 9.7 dB which helps in catering to the evolving needs of wireless communication networks.
The objective is to enhance signal strength, gain, and overall performance for applications in
communication systems, radar systems, and aerospace platforms. RT/Duroid substrate material
was carefully chosen for its favorable dielectric properties, low loss characteristics, and
dimensional stability, aiming to maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of the antenna
design within the X-band frequency range.
The design process involved meticulous consideration of substrate material selection, antenna
configuration, and feed network design. Through iterative simulation and optimization,
parameters were fine-tuned to achieve desired performance metrics such as impedance
matching, radiation pattern, and gain. Experimental validation was conducted to confirm
simulated results, ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the design approach.
                                               v
                               LIST OF CONTENTS
                                                      PAGE
  TITLE
                                                     NUMBER
ABSTRACT                                              -v
LIST OF FIGURES - ix
LIST OF TABLES -x
1.7 Objectives - 16
                                            vi
           3.2.5   Properties Window                    - 37
4.1.1 Introduction - 41
4.2.1 Introduction - 44
                                            vii
          5.2.3   Gain                    - 50
    6.1   Conclusion                      - 51
    6.2   Future Scope
                                          -52
REFERENCES
                                          - (54–55)
                             viii
                          LIST OF FIGURES
 Figure                                                   Page
                            Figure Details
Number                                                   Number
    1.1   Variation of Impedance versus Frequency          -5
4.2 Port - 43
LIST OF TABLES
                                     ix
 Table                                               Page
                  Table Details
Number                                              Number
   1.1            Frequency bands                     -6
                         x
                                      CHAPTER - 1
INTRODUCTION TO ANTENNA
1.1. Overview of Antenna:
       The antenna is a metallic structure used for receiving and radiating radiowaves. It is
also a transitional structure between free-space and a guiding structure. As per the reciprocity
principle, the transmission and reception characteristics of an antenna are identical. The same
antenna can be used in two-way communication for both transmission and reception using
suitable receiver protection. The ever-expanding realm of wireless communication relies
heavily on a fundamental component – the antenna.
       These specialized devices act as the bridge between the electrical world of signals and
the electromagnetic realm of radio waves, microwaves, and other portions of the
electromagnetic spectrum. Their critical role lies in efficiently transmitting and receiving
electromagnetic waves, enabling seamless data transfer across a vast array of applications, from
mobile communication to satellite systems. This section delves into the essence of antennas,
exploring their core principles, key parameters, and their significance in wireless
communication. Antennas serve as the vital link between the electromagnetic spectrum and our
modern communication systems, acting as conduits for transmitting and receiving
electromagnetic waves. These devices play a crucial role in various fields, including
telecommunications, broadcasting, radar systems, and satellite communications. Antennas
come in a myriad of shapes, sizes, and configurations, each tailored to specific applications
and operating frequencies. From the iconic rooftop TV antenna to sophisticated parabolic
dishes used in deep-space exploration, antennas showcase a diverse range of designs
engineered to optimize signal reception and transmission.
       Their functionality extends beyond mere signal propagation; antennas are integral
components in wireless networks, enabling seamless connectivity for smartphones, IoT
devices, and wireless routers. Through the principles of electromagnetism and wave
propagation, antennas convert electrical signals into electromagnetic waves and vice versa,
facilitating the transfer of information over vast      distances. The evolution of antenna
technology has been pivotal in shaping the landscape of modern communication, enabling
global connectivity and fostering innovation across industries. Antenna design continues to
G = KD (1.1)
iv.    Impedance: The opposition an antenna presents to the flow of current at a specific
       frequency is termed impedance. It is measured in ohms (Ω) and plays a crucial role in
       efficient power transfer between the antenna and the connected circuitry. Imagine
       impedance as a kind of resistance in the antenna that the electrical signal has to
       overcome. For optimal performance, the antenna's impedance needs to be matched to
       the impedance of the transmission line or receiver to minimize signal reflection and
       maximize power transfer.
 v.    Bandwidth: The range of frequencies over which the antenna operates effectively is
       called its bandwidth. Within this bandwidth, the antenna exhibits consistent
       performance in terms of gain, directivity, and radiation pattern. The bandwidth is crucial
       for applications where a wide range of frequencies needs to be transmitted or received.
                                             BW = fH – fL                                   (1.4)
vii.    Return Loss: is the measure of power loss due to reflections caused by a mismatch
        of antenna impedances. It is given by the ratio of radiated power to the reflected
        power.
        The return loss is also called the S11 parameter, the reflection coefficient for single
        input and a single output. Similarly, S21, S31 and so on represents the multiple inputs
        and multiple outputs. The return loss is measured in dB.
                                             S11 = 10 log (pi / po)                       (1.6)
viii.   Antenna Resonance: The microstrip patch antenna is an equivalent tuned circuit of
        inductance and capacitance. At resonant frequency (fr) the inductive reactance is
        equal to capacitive reactance. Hence the antenna impedance is purely resistive at
        resonance; the resistance is the sum of radiation resistance and radiation loss
        resistance.
 ix.       Beam width: The parameter beam width indicates the pattern of the antenna. Beam
           width is defined as an angular representation between two similar sources on opposite
           sides of the pattern. Half power beam width (HPBW) is defined by IEEE as "In a
           plane containing the direction of beam maximum, the angular separation between
           two paths in which radiation intensity is the one-half value of the beam.”.
 x.        Antenna aperture: The total area in which the power is radiated or received refers
           to the aperture of an antenna. For the receiving antenna, it is the area that captures
           energy from a passing EM wave. Large aperture antennas have more gain than that
           of smaller aperture antennas.
Classification of Antenna:
A classification of antennas can be based on:
       •   Frequency and size
       •   Directivity
       •   Physical construction.
       •   Application
Frequency and size: Antennas used for HF are different from antennas used for VHF, which
in turn are different from antennas for microwave. The wavelength is different at different
frequencies, so the antennas must be different in size to radiate signals at the correct
wavelength. We are particularly interested in antennas working in the microwave range,
especially in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequencies.
             HF Band                             3 – 30 MHz
             VHF Band                            30 – 300 MHz
             UHF Band                            300 – 1000 MHz
             L Band                              1 – 2 GHz
             S Band                              2 – 4 GHz
             C Band                              4 – 8 GHz
             X Band                              8 – 12 GHz
             Ku Band                             12 – 18 GHz
             K Band                              18 – 27 GHz
             Ka Band                             27 – 40 GHz
             V Band                              40 – 75 GHz
             W Band                              75 – 110 GHz
             mm Band                             110 – 300 GHz
       Microstrip patch antenna (MPA) is one of the most widely used antennas in the
microwave frequency range. The planar microstrip patch antenna is a low profile, low cost,
less weight, easily printable onto circuit board (PCB) and comfortably fabricated patch
antenna, suitable for wireless communication devices. Microstrip patch antennas were first
proposed by G. A. Deschamps in 1953. The first practical antenna was developed in 1970’s by
Robert E. Munson and John Q. Howell. Since then, extensive research is in progress and
enhancement of MPA characteristics as per current demand for wireless and mobile
communication systems. Presently, the wideband performance of communication system
requires a compact wideband antenna to accommodate a large frequency spectrum with
improved gain and bandwidth.
                      Patch
                                                          Substrate
                Ground plane
                        Fig. 1.2 Basic structure of microstrip patch antenna
    •    Ground Plane: is a thin flat good conducting metallic region on the other side of the
         substrate, which is usually much larger than a patch for better radiations. The
         complete ground plane or partial ground plane (printed monopole MPA) can be
         employed.
The patch in MPA can be of any shape as depicted in Fig. 1.4. Depending onthe type of
application, suitable patch can be chosen among rectangular, circular, square, dipole,
triangular, elliptical, and circular ring, etc.
Patch Arrays: Patch arrays consist of a grid of patch antennas, which are small, low-profile
antennas typically printed on a substrate. They are commonly used in applications requiring
compact size and planar integration, such as in mobile devices, RFID systems, and wireless
sensor networks.
Balanced Feeding: Balanced feeding involves feeding antenna elements with balanced
transmission lines, such as twin-lead or twisted-pair cables. This method helps minimize
common-mode radiation and interference, making it suitable for planar array antennas
operating in environments with high electromagnetic interference (EMI) levels.
1.7. Objectives
These are the main project objectives which concisely outline our project’s goals and
intentions.
   ➢ Develop a 4x4 planar antenna array to achieve substantial gains in signal strength and
       overall antenna performance.
   ➢ Explore and analyze the performance of the antenna array across different frequency
       bands, ensuring versatility and applicability in various communication systems.
   ➢ Find the best way to set up the antenna array elements so that the signal strength is as
       high as possible.
4x4 Circularly Polarized Antenna Array for Ambient RF Energy Harvesting [1]
This paper proposes a 4x4 circularly polarized (CP) antenna array for ambient RF energy
harvesting. It utilizes a sequentially rotated feeding network to achieve CP in a 2x2 array, which
is then repeated to form the 4x4 array. The proposed design offers wide axial ratio bandwidth
(1.53 GHz) and is suitable for harvesting RF energy from various directions due to its radiation
pattern.
The paper proposes a 4x4 circularly polarized (CP) antenna array for ambient RF energy
harvesting. It utilizes a sequentially rotated feeding network to achieve CP in 2x2 sub-arrays
and employs microstrip-to-CPW transitions for connection. The design offers wide axial ratio
bandwidth (1.53 GHz) and harvests energy from various directions due to its pattern with
multiple lobes. While the gain is low (2.22 dBi), it is suitable for the target application due to
the uncertain source direction. Existing works focus on single frequencies or lack CP for
ambient energy harvesting.
This paper discusses research on planar antenna arrays for satellite communication. The authors
propose several design techniques to improve performance, including reducing cross
polarization and increasing gain and efficiency. They discuss single-band and dual-band
antenna arrays with various polarization techniques. Calibration methods for large arrays are
also presented.
This paper proposes a planar antenna array design for an ultra-wideband (UWB) microwave
imaging system for breast cancer detection. The array uses corrugated tapered slot antennas to
achieve wide bandwidth and operates in a coupling medium to improve matching with the
imaged object. The design achieves good return loss and low mutual coupling between
elements through simulations.
The paper describes the design of a 4x4 microstrip patch antenna array for wind profiling
radars. The array is designed to operate at 1.28 GHz and achieve a gain of 32 dBi. A coaxial
feed is used to connect the inner conductor to the radiating patch. The design process is carried
out using IE3D simulation software. A single element antenna is first designed and optimized,
and then a 2x2 and a 4x4 array are designed using the single element as the building block. The
measured results show good agreement with the simulated results.
Characterization of 4x4 Planar Antenna Arrays for the Frequencies 77 GHz and 94 GHz
Using an Antenna Scanning System [6]
The paper presents a design and characterization of 4x4 planar phased-array patch antennas
operating at 77 GHz and 94 GHz. The antennas are designed for millimetre wave
communication applications. A high-precision antenna scanning system was developed to
measure the radiation patterns of the antennas. The measured results show good agreement
with simulations.
This paper proposes a new circular array antenna design that achieves dual polarization in two
separate frequency bands without using a complex crossed structure. The antenna offers
compactness and weight reduction. Simulations show the design works as intended with
vertical polarization in VHF_I and horizontal polarization in VHF_II. The study also explores
digital beamforming algorithms to improve the array's performance.
4x4 Circularly Polarized Antenna Array for Ambient RF Energy Harvesting [9]
This paper proposes a 4x4 circularly polarized (CP) antenna array for ambient RF energy
harvesting. It utilizes a sequentially rotated feeding network to achieve CP in a 2x2 array, which
is then repeated to form the 4x4 array. The proposed design offers wide axial ratio bandwidth
(1.53 GHz) and is suitable for harvesting RF energy from various directions due to its radiation
pattern.
The paper proposes a 4x4 circularly polarized (CP) antenna array for ambient RF energy
harvesting. It utilizes a sequentially rotated feeding network to achieve CP in 2x2 sub-arrays
and employs microstrip-to-CPW transitions for connection. The design offers wide axial ratio
bandwidth (1.53 GHz) and harvests energy from various directions due to its pattern with
multiple lobes. While the gain is low (2.22 dBi), it is suitable for the target application due to
the uncertain source direction. Existing works focus on single frequencies or lack CP for
ambient energy harvesting.
High gain and Wide bandwidth Filtering Planar Antenna Arrays Based Solely on
Resonators [11]
This paper proposes a new method for designing wide-bandwidth planar antenna arrays using
resonator coupling theory. The arrays are designed to integrate filtering functionality,
eliminating the need for external bandpass filters. The design approach is validated by
constructing two prototype filtering antenna arrays, one with a 7th-order and 39 resonators, and
another with a 4th-order and 25 resonators. Both arrays achieve good agreement between
simulated and measured results.
This paper proposes a new design for a non-uniform planar antenna array to address mutual
coupling issues in MIMO systems. The key aspects are, Rows are shifted with an angle change
to reduce mutual coupling, achieves high directivity, radiation efficiency, and gain with reduced
sidelobe level, Ideal for MIMO and other applications due to low isolation between elements.
The proposed design offers a potential solution for high data rate wireless communication by
mitigating mutual coupling and enhancing array performance.
This article presents a new dual-band dual-polarized array antenna for airborne applications.
The antenna is designed to operate at X-Band (3 GHz) and X-band (10 GHz). It is made up of
two separate antenna arrays, one for each band, printed on different layers of a substrate. The
X-Band antenna array is on the top layer, and the X-band antenna array is on the bottom layer.
A foam layer is placed between the two antenna arrays to isolate them from each other.
High Gain Series fed Planar Microstrip Antenna Array using printed L –probe feed [14]
This paper proposes a series-fed microstrip antenna array design using a printed L-probe feed
technique. The L-probe feed offers additional design parameters for impedance tuning,
achieving a good balance between bandwidth and gain. A 5x1 linear array achieves 15.5 dBi
gain and 5.75-6.23 GHz bandwidth. A 5x5 planar array design achieves 18.6 dBi gain and 5.5-
6.42 GHz bandwidth. The proposed design offers advantages in reduced feed network
complexity compared to conventional microstrip antenna arrays.
The paper discusses the development of two types of millimetre-wave planar array antennas
for electronic beam-scanning systems. It explores the design and performance of microstrip
and waveguide antennas arranged in sub-arrays for high-gain beamforming. The antennas are
optimized for automotive radar systems, aiming to achieve high angular resolution and wide
coverage. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of both antenna types, with the
microstrip comb-line antenna achieving 20.3 dBi gain and 55% efficiency, while the narrow-
wall slotted waveguide antenna achieves 21.3 dBi gain and 52% efficiency at 77 GHz.
This paper designs a spherical conformal microstrip antenna array by projecting a planar
microstrip array. The planar array is fed by a corporate feed network and achieves good
performance. Projecting the planar array onto a sphere creates a conformal antenna. The
simulation results show the conformal antenna has comparable performance to the planar array.
This paper proposes a design for a circularly polarized planar antenna array using slotted
waveguides. The design offers low mechanical height and avoids complex feeding networks
compared to microstrip designs. The simulations show good agreement with the fabricated
linear array antenna. A planar array antenna is achievable based on this approach. Future work
will focus on mitigating limitations in scanning angle and polarization purity.
The paper investigates designing linear and planar microstrip patch antenna arrays for 5G
applications. Rogers RT/Duroid 5880 substrate is used. The arrays achieve multiband
resonance frequencies between 24 GHz and 80 GHz. The linear array has higher gain (up to
14.22 dB) while the planar array has wider bandwidth and better return loss.
The paper proposes a design for UWB pulse antennas and antenna arrays. It analyses UWB
signals, antenna designs, radio links, and MIMO UWB systems. The designed antennas are
applicable in modern radiocommunication systems. Their design offers advantages such as
compactness, low-cost fabrication, and high-gain over a wide bandwidth. They achieve this by
using a two-layer structure with SIW feeding network on the bottom layer and radiating patches
on the top layer.
This paper proposes a complex design approach for UWB pulse antennas and antenna arrays.
It analyses UWB signals, single/two-element antenna designs, radio links, and MIMO UWB
systems. Designed antennas may be used in modern radiocommunication systems.
This paper describes a design of a sequentially rotated broadband circularly polarized stacked
patch array antenna for data and voice communication. The authors achieved wide bandwidth
by using stacked patches and sequential rotation technique. A corporate feed network is used
to excite the patches with equal amplitude and 90° phase difference. Measured results show
good agreement with simulated results. The antenna offers wide bandwidth, low axial ratio,
and good gain.
The document describes a design of an 8x8 phased array antenna tile for Ku-band mobile
satellite communications. The array features low-profile, high-gain, and wide-angle scanning
properties. Prior research has investigated single-feed dual-band antennas and dual-band
antenna arrays for various applications. This design uses a multilayer patch structure to achieve
wideband performance. The radiating element consists of a parasitic patch, a radiating patch,
feeding lines, and ground planes. Simulations show that the array meets the requirements for
gain, scan range, and polarization matching.
Design of a Dual-Band High Gain Antenna Array for WLAN and WiMAX Base Station
[23]
The paper describes a dual-band high gain antenna array for WLAN and WiMAX base stations.
It consists of folded dipole antennas and a microstrip feedline network. The array achieves dual
10-dB RL bands covering WLAN and WiMAX bands. It has a high gain in +z direction, low
cross-polarization, and a high front-to-back ratio. These properties make it suitable for WLAN
and WiMAX applications. Prior work has investigated single-feed dual-band antennas and
dual-band antenna arrays for various applications.
This paper describes a novel robotic scanner for characterizing active phased array antennas.
It measures surface features, electromagnetic properties, and thermal response under controlled
temperatures. Robotic arms are increasingly used for antenna measurements due to their
4x4 Rectangular Patch Array Antenna for Bore Sight Application of Conical Scan X-
Band Tracking Radar [25]
This paper proposes a design for a 4x4 rectangular patch array antenna operating at X-Band
(2.73 GHz) for boresight application in a tracking radar. Corporate feed network is used to
achieve uniform excitation for high gain and moderate side lobes. Inset-fed patches with
quarter wave impedance transformers are used on a substrate with εr=2.2 and h=3.175 mm.
The simulated results show an impedance bandwidth of 250 MHz, a gain of 18.4 dB, and
sidelobe levels below -6.5 dB. CST Microwave Studio 2006 was used for simulations.
A Flip-Chip Packaged Design of Planar Antenna Array Based on Dual-feed Network for
77-GHz Automotive Radar [26]
This paper proposes a 77 GHz flip-chip packaged antenna array design for automotive radar.
The design utilizes a dual-feed network to combine power from multiple PAs on-antenna,
eliminating the need for lossy power combiners or bulky antenna arrays. A series-fed linear
antenna array is used as an example. The dual-feed network is implemented using a
combination of SIW and microstrip lines with a broadband transition for minimal insertion
loss. Simulations show the design achieves good reflection coefficients, desired radiation
patterns, and potential for use in automotive radar systems.
The paper proposes a new design for millimeter-wave antenna arrays with circular polarization.
The design uses a printed planar antenna with two open rings on opposite sides of the substrate.
The antenna elements are arranged in an 8x8 array and fed by a synphase network. The
fabricated antenna achieves a gain of 20 dBi and a bandwidth of 25% around 60 GHz. It is
simple to fabricate and shows good reproducibility.
This paper investigates a 2x2 microstrip antenna array feeding an offset reflector antenna at 20
GHz. The authors use geometrical optics (GO) to analyse the effect of separation distance
between the array elements on cross-polarization and sidelobe levels. They find a separation of
0.8 wavelengths offers the best trade-off. HFSS simulations are used to validate the GO results
for the secondary radiation pattern. Future work will explore more complex array
configurations.
Design of Planar 8-by-16 Butler Matrix for 16-Element Switch-Beam Antenna Array [29]
This paper proposes a new design for a 16-element switched-beam antenna array operating at
9.4 GHz. The key innovation is an 8x16 Butler matrix implemented using microstrip
technology. This matrix combines a conventional 8x8 Butler matrix with 180-degree hybrid
couplers to expand the number of output ports to 16. This allows the antenna array to generate
16 switchable beams instead of the usual 8.
Synthesizing Shaped Power Patterns for Linear and Planar Antenna Arrays Including
Mutual Coupling by Refined Joint Rotation/Phase Optimization [30]
This article proposes a method using joint rotation/phase optimization to achieve shaped
patterns without requiring multiple unequal power dividers, simplifying the feeding network.
Antenna arrays with desired power pattern shapes are crucial in various applications like
satellite communication and sensing systems. Existing methods for shaped pattern synthesis
often involve optimizing both excitation amplitudes and phases, leading to complicated feeding
networks.
This paper proposes a new design for a CP antenna array that offers wide axial ratio (AR)
bandwidth and high efficiency at Ka-band frequencies. Circularly polarized (CP) antennas are
desirable due to their ability to mitigate multipath interference and ease of polarization
matching.
The paper proposes a 2x2 slot dipole array antenna for 2.4 GHz band applications. It utilizes a
coplanar waveguide (CPW) feed and a reflector to achieve high gain and sharp beam. The
design offers easy fabrication on a PCB and achieves 9.39 dBi gain with good bandwidth and
front-to-back ratio. Simulations and measurements validate the antenna performance. Existing
research on patch antennas and slot antennas for high gain at 2.4 GHz is referenced.
The impact of different power dividers used in a non-uniform planar antenna array [33]
The paper investigates the impact of power divider isolation on a circularly polarized antenna
array. Wilkinson power dividers with resistors provide isolation between output ports, leading
to better performance and wider bandwidths for the array compared to using T-junctions
(without resistors).
Planar switchable 3D-coverage phased array antenna for 28 GHz mobile terminal
applications [34]
The paper proposes a planar switchable 3D-coverage phased array antenna for 28 GHz mobile
terminal applications. The design utilizes chassis surface waves to achieve 3D coverage with
three subarrays. The user effects on the proposed antenna are studied in talk mode and data
mode.
This paper proposes a novel design for a microstrip planar array antenna operating at Ka-band
frequencies (26.5 GHz to 29.5 GHz) for Local Multipoint Communication Systems (LMCS)
applications. This paper presents a promising design approach for millimeter-wave microstrip
antenna arrays. The series-parallel feed network offers potential benefits, but further research
is needed to compare its performance with existing solutions and address the gain discrepancy
between simulations and measurements.
A 60 GHz 8x8 Planar Array Antenna with Corporate Feed Network using Meandered
Probe Fed Patch in LTCC Technology [37]
This paper presents a compelling design for a high-gain antenna array at 60 GHz using LTCC
technology. The design leverages Low-Temperature Co-fired Ceramic (LTCC) technology and
the use of meandered probe fed patches and a corporate feed network contributes to achieving
a wide bandwidth and efficient power distribution. The simulations indicate promising
performance for 5G applications.
Wideband Circularly Polarized 2×2 Array Antenna Fed by 3D Meandering Probes [38]
This paper proposes a design for a wideband circularly polarized (CP) antenna array using a
novel 3D meandering probe (3D M-Probe) feeding technique. This work presents a novel
feeding technique (3D M-Probe) for wideband CP antenna arrays. The design offers advantages
over previous approaches by achieving good impedance and AR bandwidth while maintaining
a compact size. This makes it suitable for applications requiring high gain and wideband
performance, such as satellite communication.
This research tackles limitations of circuit board Vivaldi antennas for airplanes. These antennas
are ideal for radar due to their wide frequency range, but suffer from signal loss, complex
installation, and weak structure. The study proposes a new all-metal Vivaldi design that boasts
lower signal loss, simpler construction, increased strength, and lighter weight - perfect for
aircrafts. Simulations and tests confirm the antenna's wide operational range (6-12 GHz) and
ability to steer radio waves. This metal design offers advantages over traditional antennas,
making it suitable for applications requiring wide bandwidth and durability.
This study tackles signal loss in millimeter-wave antenna arrays for communication systems.
It proposes a new design with a series-parallel feed network to reduce losses and improve
performance. Simulations show promising results with high gain and wide bandwidth. A
prototype array was built and tested, confirming the radiation pattern but showing lower gain
than simulations. Future work will compare this design to others and address the
gain difference.
       HFSS is a commercial finite element method solver for electromagnetic structures from
Ansys. It is one of several commercial tools used for antenna design, and the design of complex
RF electronic circuit elements including filters and transmission lines. HFSS Ansoft HFSS
software is used to design an antenna in a 3D geometry. HFSS is abbreviated as High-
Frequency Structure Simulator. The basics of HFSS are studied below.is a high-frequency
structure simulator it is a high-performance full-wave electromagnetic field simulator 3D
volumetric passive device modelling that takes advantage of the familiar Microsoft Windows
graphical user interface. It integrates simulation, visualization, solid modelling, and automation
in easy to learn environment.
HFSS uses a numerical technique called the finite element method (FEM). This is a procedure
where a structure is subdivided into many smaller subsections called finite elements. The finite
elements used by HFSS are tetrahedral, and the entire collection of tetrahedral is called Mesh.
A solution is found for the fields within the finite elements, and these fields are interrelated so
that Maxwell's equations are satisfied across inter-element boundaries. Yielding a field section
for the entire original structure, once the field solution has been found, the generalized S-
matrix is determined.
There are six general steps to creating and solving a proper HFSS simulation, they are:
1.   Create model/geometry
2.   Assign boundaries
3.   Assign excitations
4.   Set up solution
5.   Solve
6.   Post-process the results
Step 1: The initial task in creating an HFSS model consists of the creation of ten physical model
that a user wishes to analyse. This model creation can be done in HFSS using a 3D modeler.
The 3D modeler is fully and will allow a user to create a structure that is variable concerning
geometric dimensions and material properties.
Step 2: The assignment of "boundaries" generally is done next. Boundaries are applied to
specifically created 2D (sheet) objects or specific surfaces of 3D Objects.
Step 3: After the boundaries have been assigned, the excitations (or port) should be applied.
As with boundaries, the excitations have a direct impact on the quality of the results that HFSS
will yield for a given model. While the proper creation and use of excitations are important to
obtaining the most accurate HFSS results, there are several convenient rules of thumb that user
can follow.
Step 4: Once boundaries and excitations have been created, the next step is to create a solution
setup. During this setup, a user will select a solution frequency, the desired convergence
Step 5: When the initial four steps have been completed by an HFSS user, the model is now
ready to be analysed. The time required for an analysis is highly dependent upon the model
geometry, the solution frequency, and available computer resources. A solution can be
beneficial to use the remote solve capability of HFSS to send a particular simulation run to
another computer that is local to the user's site. This will free up the user's PC so it can be used
to perform other work.
Step 6: Once the solution has finished, a user can post-process the results. Post-processing of
results can be as simple as examining the S-parameters of the device modelled or plotting the
fields in and around the structure. Users can also examine the far fields created by an antenna.
In essence, any field quantity or S, Y, and Z parameters can be plotted in the post-processor.
Additionally, if a parameterized model has been analysed, families of curves can be created.
The HFSS desktop consists of several windows, a menu bar, toolbars, a project manager, a
property window, a message manager, a progress window, a 3D modeler window, status bar.
The Menu bar enables you to perform all HFSS tasks, such as managing projects, customizing
the desktop, drawing objects, and setting and modifying all project parameters. HFSS contains
the following menus, which appear at the top of the desktop
File menu: Use the file menu commands to manage HFSS project files and printing options
Edit menu: Use the Edit menu commands to modify the objects in the active model and undo
and redo actions.
View menu: Use the view menu commands to display or hide desktop components and model
objects, modify 3D modeler window visual settings, and modify the model view.
Project menu: Use the project menu commands to add an HFSS design to the active project
view, define data sets and define the project variables.
3D Modeler menu: Use the 3D Modeler menu commands to import, export, and copy Ansoft
2D modeler files and 3D modeler files; assign materials to objects; manage the 3D Modeler
window's grid settings; define a list of objects; control surface settings; perform Boolean
operations on objects and set the units for the active design.
HFSS Menu: Use the HFSS menu to set up and manage all the parameters for the active
Project. Most of these project properties also appear in the project tree.
Tools Menu: Use the Tools menu to modify the active project's material library, arrange the
material libraries, run and record scripts, update project definitions from libraries, customize
the desktop toolbars, and modify many of the software's default settings.
Window menu: Use the window menu commands to rearrange the 3D model window and
toolbar icons.
Help menu: Use the window menu commands to access the online help system and view the
current HFSS version information
The toolbar buttons and shortcut pull-down lists act as shortcuts for executing various
commands.
Drawing objects: We can draw one, two, or three-dimensional objects using the Draw
commands. You can alter objects Individually or together to create the geometry of your
structure. In the toots>3D modeler Options, drawing tab, you can set a default to either draw
objects directly with the mouse or by invoking a properties dialog in which you can enter the
values for the objects directly with the mouse or by invoking a properties dialog in which you
can enter the values for the object dimensions. The dialog mode drawing feature works with
the equation- based line and all 3-dimensional objects.
One dimensional: Object sine HFSS including straight-line arc line spelling segments or a
combination of these called polylines. One-dimensional objects are open objects; their
boundaries do not enclose a region unless you connect their endpoints. They have length, but
no surface volume; generally, they are used as temporary objects from which to create a 2D
object.
Two dimensional: Objects in HFSS include objects such as arcs, rectangles, ellipse, circles,
and regular polygons. Two-dimensional objects are closed sheet object boundaries enclosed by
a region. You can create a 2D sheet object by covering by enclosed region. By default, the
history tree organizes sheet objects around their boundary assignments. To change this, select
the sheet icons and click to display the
Drawing a three-point arc line: In HFSS, a three-point arc line segment is an arced line
defined by three points on its curve. Use the Draw>Arc>3-points command to create a polyline
object with one or more arc line segments.
Drawing a center-point arc line: In HFSS, a center-point arc line segment is an arced line
defined by a center point, start point, and angle Use the Draw>Arc>Centre Point command to
create a polyline object with one or more center-point arc line segments.
Drawing a polyline: A polyline is a single object that includes any combination of a straight
line, or spline segments. The endpoint of one segment is the start point for the next segment.
Use the shortcut menu's Set Edge Type commands to switch between straight line, arc line, or
spline segments while drawing a polyline.
Drawing an equation-based curve: Any line that can be described by an equation in three
dimensions can be drawn.
Drawing a Sphere: Draw a sphere, a 3D circle, by selecting a center point and a radius.
Spheres are drawn as true sur- faces in the modeler.
Drawing a Bond wire: A bond wire is a thin metal wire that connects a metal signal trace with
a chip. Please see the topic Bond wires in the Technical Notes before drawing a bond wire.
Drawing a Point: Drawing a point object within the problem region enables you to plot fields
or perform field computations at that point. Points are always considered on-model objects by
the modeler.
Drawing a Plane: A plane object is a cut plane through the problem region. You can plot fields
or perform field computations on their surface. Planes are always considered non-model objects
by the modeler.
Mirroring objects: Mirror an object about Edit>Arrange>Mirror command a plane using the
Edit>Arrange>Mirror command.
The status bar is located at the bottom of the application window. It displays information about
the command currently being performed.
Depending on the command being performed, the status bar can display the following:
The Project Manager window displays the open project's structure, which is referred to as the
project tree The Project Manager window displays details about all open HFSS projects. Each
project ultimately includes a geometric model, its boundary conditions and material
assignments, and field solution and post-processing information To show or hide the Project
Manager window, do one of the following:
A check box appears next to this command if the Project Manager window is Visi Right-click
in the toolbars area on the desktop, and then click Project Manager on the short cut menu.
Once you insert an HFSS design into a project, it is listed as the second node in the project tree.
It is named HFSS Model by default, where n is the order in which the design was added to the
project. Expand the design icon in the project tree to view all of the specific data about the
model, including its boundary conditions and material assignments, and field solution and post-
processing information. The HFSS Model node contains the following project details:
Boundaries: Displays the boundary conditions assigned to an HFSS design, which specify the
field behaviour at the edges of the problem region and object interfaces.
Perfect H: Represents a surface on which the tangential component of the H-field is the same
on both sides.
Radiation: Represents an open boundary using an absorbing boundary condition (ABC) that
absorbs outgoing waves.
Master: Represents a surface on which the E-field at each point is matched to another surface
within a phase difference.
Slave: Represents a surface on which the E-field at each point has been forced to match the E-
field of another surface to within a phase difference.
Excitations: Displays the excitations assigned to an HFSS design, which are usedto specify
the sources of electromagnetic fields and charges, currents, or voltages on objects or surfaces
in the design. Excitations in HFSS are used to specify the sources of electromagnetic fields and
charges, currents, or voltages on objects or surfaces in the design.
Wave Port: Represents the surface through which a signal enters or exits the geometry.
Lumped Port Represents an internal surface through which a signal enters or excites the
geometry.
Magnetic Bias: Used to define the net internal field that biases a saturated ferrite object.
Mesh Operations: Displays the mesh operations specified for objects or object faces. Mesh
operations are optional mesh refinement settings that are specified before a mesh is generated.
The Properties window displays the attributes, or properties, of an item selected in the project
tree, the history tree, or the 3D Modeler window. The Properties window enables you to edit
an item's properties. The properties, and the ability to edit them in the Properties window, will
vary, depending on the type of item selected.
The Progress window monitors a simulation while it is running. To display or hide the Progress
window, do one of the following:
A check box appears next to this command if the Progress window is visible. Right-click the
history tree, and then click Progress on the shortcut menu. A check box appears next to this
command if the Progress window is visible.
The Message Manager displays messages associated with a project's development, such as
error messages about the design's setup or \informational messages about the progress of
analysis. Error messages contain timestampswitha precision of seconds
A check box appears next to this command if the Message Manager is visible.
The 3D Modeler window is the area where you create the model geometry. It appears to the
right of the Project Manager window after you insert an HFSS design to a project. The 3D
Modeler window consists of the model view area, or grid, and the history tree as shown.
The model you draw is saved with the current project when you click
File>Save. Objects are drawn in the 3D Modeler window. You can create 3D
objects by using HFSS's Draw menu commands or you can draw ID and 2D
objects, and then manipulate them to create 3D objects. For more information, see Drawing a
Model.
History Tree lists all the active model's structure and grid details
Objects: Displays all the model's objects and the history of the commands carried out on each
object. By default, HFSS groups object by material. you can change this by selecting the
Objects icon in the history tree and right-click to display the shortcut menu with the Group
Objects by Material checkbox.
Sheets: Displays all the sheets in the model 3D design area. By default, HFSS groups sheet
objects by boundary assignment. You can change this by selecting the Sheet icon in the history
tree and right-click to display the shortcut menu with the Group Sheets by Assignment
checkbox.
Lines: Displays all line objects included in the active model. See Drawing a Straight Line for
information on how to draw a line object.
Points: Displays all point objects included in the active model. See Drawing a Point for
Coordinate Systems: Displays all the coordinate systems for the active model. See Setting
Coordinate Systems for more information on this model detail.
Planes: Displays the planes for all the coordinate systems. When you create a coordinate
system, default planes are created on its XY, YZ, and XZ planes
In our project, we aim to simulate a 4x4 planar antenna array within the frequency range of 7
GHz to 12 GHz, with a focus on applications in the X-Band. To enhance the gain and optimize
the performance of our antenna array, we have chosen RT/Duroid as the substrate material.
Reduced Dielectric Losses: RT/Duroid boasts a low dielectric constant (εr) which translates to
lower capacitance in the antenna. This directly reduces dielectric losses within the substrate,
allowing more signal energy to be radiated outward, contributing to higher gain.
Improved Efficiency: The low loss tangent (tan δ) of RT/Duroid minimizes resistive losses that
would otherwise dissipate signal power as heat within the substrate. This translates to a more
efficient antenna that can convert more input power into radiated energy, again leading
to enhanced gain.
Parameter Dimensions
Parameter Dimensions
In our project, we intend to simulate a 4x4 planar antenna array operating in the X-Band
frequency range of 7 GHz to 12 GHz. To optimize the antenna array's performance, we have
selected RT/Duroid as the substrate material due to its favourable dielectric properties, low loss
characteristics, and dimensional stability. By utilizing RT/Duroid as the substrate, we aim to
capitalize on its exceptional electrical properties to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of
our antenna design.
RT/Duroid offers several advantages for our antenna design. Firstly, its low dielectric constant
(εr) results in reduced capacitance within the antenna, leading to lower dielectric losses and
higher signal energy radiation, consequently contributing to increased gain. Secondly, the low
loss tangent (tan δ) of RT/Duroid minimizes resistive losses, ensuring that more input power is
converted into radiated energy, thus further enhancing gain. Additionally, RT/Duroid's
excellent dimensional stability ensures that the antenna elements maintain their intended shapes
and spacing, crucial for consistent antenna performance and maintaining the gain enhancement
achieved through the array design. Overall, the selection of RT/Duroid as the substrate material
In the simulation and results section, we explore how simulation helps us understand our
antenna's behaviour before physical testing. Using electromagnetic simulation software, we
input our design parameters to predict radiation pattern, impedance matching, and gain. We
present the outcomes, including graphs and data, and analyse them to evaluate our antenna's
performance against specifications. Comparing simulated and experimental results ensures
accuracy. This section provides valuable insights into our antenna's performance, guiding
further optimizations and discussions.
The reflection coefficient, denoted as S11, serves as an indicator of the extent to which radio
frequency (RF) waves undergo reflection upon transmission through an antenna. A reduced
S11 value signifies enhanced performance, indicating minimized power reflection. Conversely,
an elevated S11 value implies increased power reflection, indicative of a less efficient system.
The return loss characteristics for single microstrip patch antenna shows that the antenna
resonating at 11.93GHz. The return loss characteristics show that the single microstrip patch
antenna is resonating for multiple frequencies at 11.93GHz and 11.51GHz with        gains of
       -47.77dB        and       -9.92dB.
The radiation pattern of an antenna is a graphical representation of the power radiated by the
antenna in different directions. It is typically plotted in a polar coordinate system, with the
antenna at the centre and the angle from the antenna axis on the horizontal axis. The power
radiated in a particular direction is represented by the distance from the centre of the plot to the
curve. The radiation pattern of 4x4 planar patch antenna array is shown below Fig.
Fig. 5.2 The Radiation Pattern at 00 Fig. 5.3 The Radiation Pattern at 900
The return loss characteristics for single microstrip patch antenna shows that the antenna
resonating at 8.6 GHZ. The return loss characteristics show that the single microstrip patch
antenna is resonating for multiple frequencies at gains of 9.7 dB.
Radiation pattern is plot of radiated power density to angle. The radiation pattern is a 3D plot
or 2D plot. i.e., 𝑃𝑟𝑎𝑑 𝑉𝑠 𝜃,or 𝑃𝑟𝑎𝑑 𝑉𝑠 𝜑.
Fig. 5.6 The Radiation Pattern at 00 Fig. 5.7 The Radiation Pattern at 900
5.2.3 Gain
The ratio of the intensity, in a given direction, to the radiation intensity that would be obtained
if the power accepted by the antenna were radiated isotopically. If the efficiency is not 100
percent, the gain is less than the directivity. The 4 X 4 Planar Array Antenna has a gain of 9.7.
       Our project also highlighted the importance of substrate selection in antenna design,
with RT/Duroid emerging as a favourable choice due to its excellent dielectric properties, low
loss characteristics, and dimensional stability. By utilizing RT/Duroid as the substrate material
for our antenna array, we were able to maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of our design,
particularly in the X-Band frequency range.
       Additionally, our decision to first design and simulate a single microstrip patch antenna
provided valuable insights into the expected performance of the larger antenna array. Through
careful analysis and comparison of the results obtained from the microstrip patch antenna with
those expected from the planar antenna array, we were able to validate the suitability of our
design approach and substrate selection.
   •   Wireless Communication: Our antenna array can improve signal strength, coverage,
       and reliability in wireless networks, Wi-Fi systems, and cellular networks.
   •   Satellite Communication: In satellite communication systems, our antenna array can
       facilitate reliable communication links between satellites and ground stations, enabling
       the transmission of voice, data, and video signals over long distances.
   •   Radar Systems: Our antenna array's beamforming capabilities can enhance target
       detection, tracking, and surveillance in radar systems, benefiting both civilian and
       defence applications.
   •   Aerospace Platforms: The versatility of our antenna array makes it suitable for
       deployment in aerospace platforms such as UAVs and satellites, enabling efficient
       communication and sensing capabilities.
   •   Internet of Things (IoT): Our antenna array can be integrated into IoT networks, smart
       grids, and autonomous vehicles, where robust and efficient communication systems are
       essential for data transmission and connectivity.
[1] L. Wang, J. Wang and J. Shi, "Design of 4×4 meandering-fed stacked patch antenna array,"
2018 International Workshop on Antenna Technology (iWAT), Nanjing, China, pp. 1-3, 2018.
[2] P. Mathur and M. Arrawatia, "High Gain Series fed Planar Microstrip Antenna Array using
printed L—probe feed," 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation
and North American Radio Science Meeting, Montreal, QC, Canada, pp. 589-590, 2020.
[3] P. Aggarwal, S. Pani and P. Saxena, "Design and Analysis of 2 x4 Planar Array Antenna
with Beam Steering Facility," 2018 International Conference on Emerging Trends and
1-4, 2018.
[4] T. Zhang, L. Chen, A. U. Zaman and J. Yang, "Ultra- Wideband Millimeter-Wave Planar
Array Antenna With an Upside-Down Structure of Printed Ridge Gap Waveguide for Stable
Performance and High Antenna Efficiency," in IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation
-L. Yang and Y. -P. Li, "Compact Planar Antenna Array for X-Band Communication
[7] N. Parthasarathy and R. Abhari, "A Compact 2 by 2 Printed Yagi-Uda Antenna Array with
Enhanced Isolation and Gain," 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and
Propagation and USNC-URSI Radio Science Meeting, Atlanta, GA, USA, pp. 1761-1762,
2019.
Array for 5G Cellular Applications," in IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol.
[9] S. Kim and J. -I. Kim, "A Circularly Polarized High- Gain Planar 2 × 2 Dipole-Array
Antenna Fed by a 4-Way Gysel Power Divider for WLAN Applications," in IEEE Antennas
and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1051-1055, May 2019.