1

REGIONAL TEAM EXCELLENCE

[RTEx]
C O N V E N T I O N
NORTHERN [PULAU PINANG]
11 JULY 2019
2

CRITERIA 1
Introduction

1.1 Background of the company,

members selection explained
team and

1.2 The team highlights the evidence of

participation and effective planning of the
project
3 C1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the company, team and members selection explained

Company Profile
Incorporated in 1998 by the Ministry of Finance,
the Government-Owned Prasarana
Malaysia Berhad (Prasarana) was set
up to facilitate, undertake and
expedite public infrastructure
Owns and operates projects. Prasarana drives the
the country’s urban transformation of Malaysia’s public
rail services that transport systems and services.
include two LRT lines
and the KL Monorail,
in addition to Undertakes key
operating the public transport
MRT line. infrastructure
projects in the
country.
Owns and operates the
stage bus services in Kuala Undertakes commercial
Lumpur, Selangor, Penang, and transit-oriented
Perak and Pahang. development projects within
its assets
Provides
management and
engineering
consultancy
services locally and
abroad
4 C1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the company, team and members selection explained

Vision, Mission & Values

VISION MISSION
Connectivity and To increase Public
Mobility for All Transportation Usage Through
Reliable, Affordable, Proficient,
Integrated and Dynamic
Services on a Sustainable Basis

Integrity & Honesty Mutual Respect

VALUES

Openness Resourcefulness

Freedom Through
Responsibility
5 C1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the company, team and members selection explained

Company Organizational Structure

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

CHIEF INTEGRITY PRESIDENT & CHIEF RISK

OFFICER GCEO OFFICER

CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER

(OPERATIONS) (STRATEGY & TRANSFORMATION)

BUSINESS PROJECT INFRASTRUCTURE

PACE FINANCE
VENTURES (LRT3) SERVICES

GROUP
SAFETY
COMMS.

CORPORATE PROGRAM DIGITAL & GENERAL COUNSEL HUMAN

SAFETY MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY & SECRETARIAL CAPITAL
6 C1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the company, team and members selection explained

Division Organizational Structure

CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
(STRATEGY & TRANSFORMATION)

PROJECT
DEPUTY CHIEF
PROJECT OFFICER

HEAD OF HEAD OF HEAD OF HEAD OF

INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS CONTRACTS PROJECT CONTROL

SAFETY, ENVIRONMENT
EAST TWK & PSDS CONTRACTS
& HEALTH
WEST COMMS. EAC & IT DOCUMENTATION

DEPOT SIGNALING & AFC

LRV & DEMV

7 C1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the company, team and members selection explained

Team Profile

Team Name:
PIONEERS
Office:
WISMA MONORAIL

Establishment of ICC Team:

JULY 2016
ICC Members:
7 Personnel
8 C1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the company, team and members selection explained

Team Organization Chart

IR. ABDUL BASER
ABDUL GHANI
FACILITATOR
AZIRINDA
MOHD SULTAN
LEADER
MOHD FIRDAUZ
SUHAIMI MOHD HAFIDZ
MEMBER AYOB
MEMBER

MUHAMMAD AFIQ ROQHIB

ABDUL RAHIM ROSHIDAN
MEMBER MEMBER

WAN MOHD ZAMANI

WAN ABDULLAH
MEMBER
9 C1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the company, team and members selection explained

Team Members Profile

EXECUTIVE VICE Expertise: LRT Train

PRESIDENT Systems
Experience in Railway:
12 Years ICC Skills:

VICE PRESIDENT I VICE PRESIDENT II

Experience in Railway: 10 Years Experience in Railway: 10 Years
Expertise: Signalling, Power & Comms. Expertise: Power Supply & Distribution
ICC Skills: ICC Skills:

VICE PRESIDENT II
VICE PRESIDENT II Experience in Railway: 10
Experience in Railway: 6 Years Years
Expertise: Signalling & Comms. Expertise: Light Rail Vehicle
& Depot Equipment
ICC Skills:
ICC Skills:

ASSOCIATE ASSOCIATE
Experience in Railway: 5 Years Experience in Railway: 5 Years
Expertise: Light Rail Vehicle Expertise: Light Rail Vehicle
ICC Skills: ICC Skills:
10 C1 INTRODUCTION
1.2 The team highlights the evidence of participation and effective planning of the project

Plan – Do – Check – Act (PDCA)

Brainstorming Problem

1
Identify Possible Causes
Problem Selection
Identify Members’ Roles
Identify Target/ Objective
PLAN
Data Collection
Problem Analysis
Identify Solutions 2
Selection of Best Solution
DO
Conduct Simulation
Improvement
Prototype Development 3
Prototype Testing & Inspection
CHECK
Verify Compliance & Identify Weakness
Propose Improvement & Countermeasure
Improvement Applied 4
“Improved Design” Documented,
Verify & Validate ACT
Adoption to Manufacturing
11 C1 INTRODUCTION
1.2 The team highlights the evidence of participation and effective planning of the project

Project Milestone Method – Gantt Chart

2016 2017 2018 2019
Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
ACTIVITY
Brainstorming Problem 100%

Identify Possible Causes 100%

LEGENDS
PLAN

Problem Selection 100% Plan

Identify Members’ Roles 100%
Actual
Identify Target/ Objective 100%

Data Collection 100%

Problem Analysis 100%

Identify Solutions 100%

DO

Selection of Best Solution 100%

Conduct Simulation 100%

Improvement 100%

Prototype Development 100%

Prototype Testing & Inspection 100%

Verify Compliance & Identify

CHECK

100%
Weakness
Propose Improvement &
Countermeasure 100%

Application of Improvement 100%

Documentation of Improved
ACT

Design 100%

Adoption to Manufacturing 100%

12 C1 INTRODUCTION
1.2 The team highlights the evidence of participation and effective planning of the project

Group Members Attendance Record

MEMBERS ATTENDANCE

TOTAL TOTAL

AZIRINDA
MEETING AGENDA

FIRDAUZ
ZAMANI

ROQHIB
ATTENDING ABSENT

HAFIDZ
BASER

AFIQ
Meeting No. 1 AUG 2016 7 0 Kick Off Meeting – PIONEERS Team
Meeting No. 2 OCT 2016 7 0 Problem Identification
Meeting No. 3 NOV 2016 6 1 Identifying Possible Causes
Meeting No. 4 DEC 2016 7 0 Problem Selection
Meeting No. 5 FEB 2017 7 0 Problem Selection
Meeting No. 6 MAR 2017 6 1 Identify Target/ Objective
Meeting No. 7 APRIL 2017 7 0 Identify Target/ Objective
Meeting No. 8 MAY 2017 6 1 Data Collection
Meeting No. 9 JUL 2017 7 0 Data Collection
Meeting No. 10 SEP 2017 7 0 Data Collection & Problem Analysis
Meeting No. 11 OCT 2017 6 1 Data Collection & Problem Analysis
Meeting No. 12 DEC 2017 7 0 Problem Analysis
Meeting No. 13 JAN 2018 6 1 Problem Analysis & Identify Solutions
Meeting No. 14 MAR 2018 7 0 Identify Solutions
Meeting No. 15 APR 2018 6 1 Selection of Best Solutions
Meeting No. 16 MAY 2018 6 1 Conduct Simulation
Meeting No. 17 JUL 2018 7 0 Conduct Simulation & Improvement
13 C1 INTRODUCTION
1.2 The team highlights the evidence of participation and effective planning of the project

Group Members Attendance Record

MEMBERS ATTENDANCE

TOTAL TOTAL

AZIRINDA
MEETING AGENDA

FIRDAUZ
ZAMANI

ROQHIB
ATTENDING ABSENT

HAFIDZ
BASER

AFIQ
Meeting No. 18 AUG 2018 7 0 Improvement
Meeting No. 19 SEP 2018 6 1 Prototype Development
Meeting No. 20 DEC 2018 6 1 Prototype Testing & Inspection
Meeting No. 21 JAN 2019 7 0 Verify Compliance, Identify Weakness
Meeting No. 22 FEB 2019 6 1 Propose Improvement
Meeting No. 23 MAR 2019 7 0 Application of Improvement
Meeting No. 24 APR 2019 7 0 Documentation of Improved Design
Meeting No. 25 JUNE 2019 7 0 Preparation for ICC Presentation
TOTAL 165 10
 14 C1 INTRODUCTION
1.2 The team highlights the evidence of participation and effective planning of the project

Group Members Attendance Record Method – Control Chart

6
NO. OF MEMBERS ATTENDED

0
M01

M02

M03

M04

M05

M06

M07

M08

M09

M10

M11

M12

M13

M14

M15

M16

M17

M18

M19

M20

M21

M22

M23

M24

M25
MINIMUM MEETING ATTENDANCE
Absence:
Minimum meeting attendance is set at 80% to
5.71%
ensure high productivity thus MEMBERS > 5 Attendance
Percentage
No. of Meeting : 25
Total Attend : 165 Attend:
Total Absence : 10 94.29%
15

CRITERIA 2
Project Selection &
Definition
2.3 The team clearly explained how and why the
project was selected

2.4 The project terminologies used were clearly

defined and explained

2.5 The project terminologies used were clearly

defined and explained
16 C2 PROJECT SELECTION & DEFINITION
2.3 The team clearly explained how and why the project was selected

Problem Identification & Listing Brainstorming Method

In centralized UPS System within the train High power consumption in railway system due to
system control inefficient electricity usage

Vandalism and abuse incident by Costly cash management service dealt

public inside train/ station with managing token
01
High Maintenance cost of 18 02
Internet connectivity not available
physical server in train system 17 03

16 04 Security issues at train stations

Insufficient Signboard
due to criminal activities etc.
within stations
15 05

Project Cost - Over budget Uneven power consumption

14 06 distribution at all TPSS
Integrated tourist
information not available 13 07 Passenger HP battery drain
12 08 Insufficient centralize data
Lack integration between
11 09 monitoring i.e. project dashboard
Infrastructure and System team 10

Attrition issue which involves skilled Excessive Automatic Train Supervision (ATS)
manpower going for the industry competitor workstations at unnecessary locations

Inconsistent tagging for asset transfer from project High energy cost due to improper time table
to operation causing difficulty & consume time management and inefficient driving of train
17 C2 PROJECT SELECTION & DEFINITION
2.3 The team clearly explained how and why the project was selected

Classification of Problems Affinity Diagram

CATEGORY 1 CATEGORY 2 CATEGORY 3

Public Comfort Project Management Design Optimization

Passenger HP battery drain Inconsistent tagging for asset High power consumption in railway
transfer from project to operation system due to inefficient electricity
Security issues at train stations due to causing difficulty and consume time usage
criminal activities etc.
Attrition issue which involves skilled Costly cash management service
Internet connectivity not available manpower going for the industry dealt with managing token
competitor
Integrated tourist information Excessive Automatic Train
not available Lack integration between Supervision (ATS) workstations at
Insufficient signboard within Infrastructure and System team unnecessary locations
stations
Insufficient centralise data Vandalism and abuse incident by
monitoring i.e. project dashboard public inside train/ station

High Maintenance cost of physical

Project Cost – Over budget
server in train system
Uneven power consumption In centralized UPS System within the
distribution at all TPSS train system control
High energy cost due to improper
time table management and
inefficient driving of train
18 C2 PROJECT SELECTION & DEFINITION
2.3 The team clearly explained how and why the project was selected

Classification of Problems Explanation of Category

Seamless Journey
CATEGORY 1

TO INCREASE Safety & Security

PUBLIC Therapeutic Landscape
COMFORT Stakeholder Management
Continuous Communication

Cost Optimization
CATEGORY 2

TO IMPROVE Time Control

PROJECT
MANAGEMENT Quality Control

Employee Satisfaction

OPEX Optimization
CATEGORY 3

TO PERFORM Quality Control

DESIGN
OPTIMIZATION Ease of Operation & Maintenance

Asset and Data Management

19 C2 PROJECT SELECTION & DEFINITION
2.3 The team clearly explained how and why the project was selected

Problems Shortlisting #1 Category vs KPI Matrix

KPI CRITERIA WEIGHTAGE

01 Achieved Organization Mission 5
02 Customer Satisfaction 4
03 Project Management Enhancement 3
04 OPEX Optimization 2
05 Design Optimization 1

CATEGORY KPI 01 KPI 02 KPI 03 KPI 04 KPI 05 TOTAL

CATEGORY 1: Increase 35 8 9 14 1 67
Public Comfort 7x5 2x4 3x3 7x2 1x1
CATEGORY 2: Improve 35 12 21 10 5 83
Project Management 7x5 3x4 7x3 5x2 5x1
CATEGORY 3: Perform 35 28 12 8 7 90
Design Optimization 7x5 7x4 4x3 4x2 7x1

CATEGORY 3 was chosen i.e. to Perform Design Optimization

20 C2 PROJECT SELECTION & DEFINITION
2.3 The team clearly explained how and why the project was selected

Summary of Problems from Category 3 Design Optimization

HIGH POWER CONSUMPTION IN

COSTLY CASH MANAGEMENT SERVICE
P01 RAILWAY SYSTEM DUE TO INEFFICIENT
DEALT WHEN MANAGING TOKEN P02
ELECTRICITY USAGE

Electricity is the most important factor of LRT Various mode of payment is beneficial for
operation the commuter

However, it is a chaotic processes for the

operator to collect, transport and manage
The usage shall be efficient and optimized at
the token
all time

ENERGY
EFFICIENCY
21 C2 PROJECT SELECTION & DEFINITION
2.3 The team clearly explained how and why the project was selected

Summary of Problems from Category 3 Design Optimization

EXCESSIVE AUTOMATIC TRAIN

VANDALISM & ABUSE INCIDENT BY
P03 SUPERVISION (ATS) WORKSTATIONS AT
PUBLIC INSIDE TRAIN / STATION P04
UNNECESSARY LOCATIONS

ATS workstation is
planned to be
installed at all Station
Control Room (SCR) at
each station
The function is to just
monitor without any
control permitted

Vandalism and abuse might be affecting

operation and corporate image of the
company.

Hence, since the criticality to have it to be

installed at each station is unnecessary as it is
essentially needed only at interlocking
station where it has the control permission if
there is incident.
22 C2 PROJECT SELECTION & DEFINITION
2.3 The team clearly explained how and why the project was selected

Summary of Problems from Category 3 Design Optimization

IN CENTRALIZED UNINTERRUPTIBLE
HIGH MAINTENANCE COST OF
P05 PHYSICAL SERVER IN TRAIN SYSTEM
POWER SYSTEM (UPS) WITHIN THE TRAIN P06
SYSTEM CONTROL

UPS centralizing will have more cons than

pros for example failure of the centralized
UPS.

High maintenance cost due to too many

physical server produce and worsen by
obsolete equipment

Maintenance can
only be done
during engineering
hours for the whole
system
23 C2 PROJECT SELECTION & DEFINITION
2.3 The team clearly explained how and why the project was selected

Summary of Problems from Category 3 Design Optimization

HIGH ENERGY COST DUE TO IMPROPER

TIME TABLE MANAGEMENT AND P07
INEFFICIENT DRIVING OF TRAIN

Operation is bonded with headway and

capacity. Regenerative Energy is not
efficiently distributed due to limited train and
configuration during off-peak period

PROBLEM
SOLVING

creative ideas
24 C2 PROJECT SELECTION & DEFINITION
2.3 The team clearly explained how and why the project was selected

Problems Shortlisting #2 Force Ranking Method

TOP LESS
CODE PROBLEM IDEA PRIORITY
PRIORITY PRIORITY

High power consumption in railway

P01 system due to inefficient electricity Baser 8 6 1
usage

Costly cash management service dealt

P02 Azirinda 5 5 2
when managing token

Excessive Automatic Train Supervision

P03 (ATS) workstations at unnecessary Zamani 7 6 1
locations

Vandalism and abuse incident by public

P04 Afiq 4 3 4
inside train/ station

High maintenance cost of physical

P05 Hafidz 4 2 2
server in train system

In centralized UPS System within the train

P06 Roqhib 3 2 1
system control

High energy cost due to improper time

P07 table management and inefficient Firdauz 6 5 3
driving of train
25 C2 PROJECT SELECTION & DEFINITION
2.3 The team clearly explained how and why the project was selected

Problems Shortlisting #2 Force Ranking Chart

10

8
8

7
6
SCORE

6
5

3
2

0
P01 P02 P03 P04 P05 P06 P07

MINIMUM PASSING SCORE

Minimum acceptable passing marks for the
priority is set at 50% thus SCORE ≥ 5
26 C2 PROJECT SELECTION & DEFINITION
2.3 The team clearly explained how and why the project was selected

Analysis of Shortlisted Problems

P01 HIGH POWER CONSUMPTION IN RAILWAY SYSTEM DUE TO INEFFICIENT ELECTRICITY USAGE

TOTAL
LINE
(RM)

LRT KLJ Line 4,361,442.01

LRT AMG Line 2,193,178.32

Existing design does
not promote energy
optimization which
MRT SBK Line 4,806,955.99
lead to high
operation cost.
AVERAGE COST PER
3,787,192.10
MONTH
27 C2 PROJECT SELECTION & DEFINITION
2.3 The team clearly explained how and why the project was selected

Analysis of Shortlisted Problems

P01 COSTLY CASH MANAGEMENT SERVICE DEALT WHEN MANAGING TOKEN

CAPEX & OPEX COST

Additional token handling
module & token boxes required,
thus higher CAPEX. Higher OPEX
as more Automatic Gate with
token handling module need to
USE OF TOKEN be maintained
SECURITY
High risk of robbery to
occur as more cash will
be stored in station.
Station security cost
increase
INCONVENIENCE
Station congestion especially
during peak hour as passenger
queuing to purchase token.
Difficult to integrate token with
other transport service provider
to provide seamless travel
28 C2 PROJECT SELECTION & DEFINITION
2.3 The team clearly explained how and why the project was selected

Analysis of Shortlisted Problems

EXCESSIVE AUTOMATIC TRAIN SUPERVISION (ATS) WORKSTATIONS AT UNNECESSARY

P03 LOCATIONS

REDUNDANCY
ATS Workstation at each station
create excessive and unnecessary
redundancy with the potential to
create error on operation when
each station has the ability to
control ATS

CAPEX & OPEX COST

Excessive ATS workstation resulted
in higher CAPEX. Higher OPEX as
more power needed to operate
the ATS workstation as well as
maintaining them.
29 C2 PROJECT SELECTION & DEFINITION
2.3 The team clearly explained how and why the project was selected

Analysis of Shortlisted Problems

HIGH ENERGY COST DUE TO IMPROPER TIME TABLE MANAGEMENT AND INEFFICIENT DRIVING
P07 OF TRAIN

Time table is derived by headway of train which have direct impact

to energy consumption in railway operation. Therefore, improper
time table management lead to high energy cost
30 C2 PROJECT SELECTION & DEFINITION
2.3 The team clearly explained how and why the project was selected

Shortlisting of Main Problems Feasibility VS Criticality Matrix

CODE PROBLEM IDEA FEASIBILITY CRITICALITY

High power consumption in railway

P01 system due to inefficient electricity Baser 8 8
usage
Costly cash management service dealt
P02 Azirinda 3 4
when managing token
Excessive Automatic Train Supervision
P03 (ATS) workstations at unnecessary Zamani 4 5
locations
High energy cost due to improper time
P07 table management and inefficient Firdauz 4 6
driving of train

Scoring : 10 – Excellent ------------ 5 – Fair ------------- 1 – Very Poor

31 C2 PROJECT SELECTION & DEFINITION
2.3 The team clearly explained how and why the project was selected

Shortlisting of Main Problems Feasibility VS Criticality Graph Matrix

CODE FEASIBILITY CRITICALITY

10
P01 8 8

Most Critical
P02 3 4
8 P01

P03 4 5

CRITICALITY
P07 4 6 6 P07

P03
RESULT
The most critical
problem with the 4 P02

highest feasibility
is identified as
Least Critical

PROBLEM NO. 01: 2

High Power
Consumption in
Railway System
due to Inefficient
Electricity Usage
0 2 4 6 8 10
Least Feasible Most Feasible
FEASIBILITY
32 C2 PROJECT SELECTION & DEFINITION
2.4 The project terminologies used were clearly defined and explained

Problem Definition Further Term Explanation

High POWER CONSUMPTION in RAILWAY SYSTEM due to INEFFICIENT ELECTRICITY usage

Electricity

P01
a form of energy resulting from the existence of charged particles (such
as electrons or protons), either statically as an accumulation of charge
or dynamically as a current
Inefficiency
the state of not achieving maximum productivity; failure to make the
best use of time or resources
Railway System
a network of tracks with the trains, organization, and personnel required
for its working. Modern train usually powered by electricity and runs on a
track that is raised above the street level or sometimes underground.
Consumption
the action of using up a resource
Power
energy that is produced by mechanical, electrical, or other means and
used to operate a device
33 C2 PROJECT SELECTION & DEFINITION
2.4 The project terminologies used were clearly defined and explained

Problem Definition Definition of Electricity Efficiency

High power consumption in railway system due to inefficient electricity usage

Electricity Efficiency
The efficiency of an entity (a device, component,
or system) in electronics and electrical engineering
is defined as useful power output divided by the
total electrical power consumed (a fractional
expression), typically denoted by the Greek small
letter eta (η).

If energy output and input are expressed in the

same units, efficiency is a dimensionless number.
Where it is not customary or convenient to
represent input and output energy in the same
units, efficiency-like quantities have units
associated with them. For example, the heat rate
of a fossil-fuel power plant may be expressed in BTU
per kilowatt-hour. Luminous efficacy of a light
source expresses the amount of visible light for a
certain amount of power transfer and has the units
of lumens per watt.

Lovin's Rocky Mountain Institute points out that in

industrial settings, "there are abundant
opportunities to save 70% to 90% of the energy and
cost for lighting, fan, and pump systems; 50% for
electric motors; and 60% in areas such as heating,
cooling, office equipment, and appliances."
34 C2 PROJECT SELECTION & DEFINITION
2.4 The project terminologies used were clearly defined and explained

Abbreviation
AC Alternating Current LRT Light Rail Transit
AMG Ampang Line MOF Ministry of Finance
ANSI American National Standards Institute MRCBGK Turnkey Contractor
ARU Automatic Assured Receptivity Unit MD Maximum Demand
ATS Automatic Train Supervision MP Master Programme
BEE Bureau of energy efficiency MRT Mass Rail Transit
BMS Building management system MV Multi-Vehicle
CFL Compact Fluorescent Light MWh MegaWatt per hour
CO2 Carbon Dioxide NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration
DC Direct Current O&M Operation & Maintenance
DRS Design Review Sheet OEM Original Equipment Manufacturer
EN European Standards OPEX Operational Expenditure
ERS Energy Recovery System PIR Pyroelectric Infra Red
FAI First Article Inspection RM Ringgit Malaysia
HP Horse power RSD Revenue Service Date
Hz Hertz SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
IEC International Electrotechnical Commission SCR Station Control Room
IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers SOP Standard Operational Procedures
ICE Independent Checking Engineer Sub-DPM Sub- Digital Power Meter
ICP Industrial Collaboration Programmes TDA Technology Depository Agency
ISA Independent Safety Assessor TNB Tenaga Nasional Berhad
IVTE Independent Verification & Test Engineer UPS Uninterruptible Power System
KLJ Kelana Jaya Line V Volt
kW kiloWatt VAC Ventilation Air-Conditioning
kWh kiloWatt per hour WPC Work Package Contractor
LED Light Emitting Diode
35 C2 PROJECT
PROEJCT SELECTION & DEFINITION
2.4 The project terminologies used were clearly defined and explained

Project’s Objective Relationship Between Company’s, Department’s and Project’s Objective

To increase COMPANY'S
Public Transportation MISSION
Usage Through Reliable,
Affordable, Proficient, DEPARTMENT’S
Integrated and Dynamic OBJECTIVE
Services on a Sustainable PROJECT’S
Basis OBJECTIVE
36 C2 PROJECT SELECTION & DEFINITION
2.4 The project terminologies used were clearly defined and explained

Problem Analysis Method – 5W1H

High power consumption in railway system due to inefficient electricity usage

WHAT WHERE WHEN 06

1. High electricity Across all LRT Train operation starting from 6 AM
bill for railway Lines (KLJ, AMG), until 12 AM (18 hours).
systems
operation
MRT Line and
Monorail Line
Peak hours during
morning and evening
05
2. Inherit design
reduce the
possibility to
04
save energy

1. Evaluate the
existing power
consumption at
Railway LRT & MRT lines.
Operator 2. Conduct study
03 Existing
equipment do not able
(Rapid Rail).
LRT, MRT and
Monorail
on the existing
power saving
technology
02 to provide energy
efficiency. Unable to
recuperate and reuse braking
passengers

01 energy
WHY WHO HOW
37 C2 PROJECT SELECTION & DEFINITION
Target setting was explained and justified based on appropriate analysis or benchmark data/
2.5 information

Project Assessment Measurement Method – Project Triangulation Management

COST
Significant railway
operational cost
reduction

ENVIRONMENT
Reduce environmental impact
and promotes green technology

Description QUALITY
We chose Project Triangulation Management Enhancement to the current
Method to evaluate the effectiveness of technology which improve
technology used in addressing the high power quality of work
consumption in railway systems. We have
identified COST, ENVIRONMENT and QUALITY as
our reference to measure the value of our
innovation.
38 C2 PROJECT SELECTION & DEFINITION
Target setting was explained and justified based on appropriate analysis or benchmark data/
2.5 information

Analysis of Survey Method – Respondent Survey

Survey on OLD vs NEW technology based on PROJECT TRIANGULATION

Description OLD TECHNOLOGY NEW TECHNOLOGY
Total of 100 respondent from
Prasarana Malaysia Berhad staffs COST
participated in this survey to evaluate 43.0% 83.0%
and compare between existing

PROJECT TRIANGULATION
technology used and new technology
to introduce energy efficiency. 3 ENVIRONMENT

criteria are set to measure the 38.0% 72.0%

effectiveness of the said technologies:
RESULTS QUALITY

All respondents agreed that new 51.0% 79.0%

technology to promote energy
efficiency, met all the criteria set
for this study 100 80 60 40 20 0 20 40 60 80 100
PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS AGREED
39 C2 PROJECT SELECTION & DEFINITION
Target setting was explained and justified based on appropriate analysis or benchmark data/
2.5 information

Operational Cost for Existing Line Operational Power Consumption and Cost per Month

TARIFF E1 – MEDIUM VOLTAGE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL TARIFF

For each kilowatt of maximum demand per month RM29.60/ kW

For all kWh 33.70 cents/ kWh

Existing
Electricity Bill The minimum monthly charge is RM600.00

AVERAGE POWER CONSUMPTION PER MONTH

ENERGY CONSUMPTION MAXIMUM DEMAND CONNECTED
TOTAL
LINE LOAD CHARGE
KWH RM KWH RM (RM)
(RM)

LRT KLJ Line 10,142,211 3,417,924.94 28,122 832,420.08 111,096.99 4,361,442.01

LRT AMG Line 5,381,268 1,813,487.28 12,827 379,691.04 - 2,193,178.32

MRT SBK Line 11,681,494 3,936,663.37 29,402 870,292.62 - 4,806,955.99

AVERAGE COST PER MONTH 3,787,192.10

Source:
TNB Electricity Bill for each line
40 C2 PROJECT SELECTION & DEFINITION
Target setting was explained and justified based on appropriate analysis or benchmark data/
2.5 information

Project Target and Justification Improvement Target for the Main Problem

TARGET SETTING
Based on LRT3 Deputy Chief Project Officer’s Key Performance Index (KPI)

TARGET SETTING
To reduce train
sub-system
operational cost
by 10% per
annum
ESTIMATED SAVING PER MONTH:

*Average Existing TARGET

= Electricity Bill - Electricity Bill
(-10%)

RM RM
= 3,787,192.10
- 3,408,472.89

= RM 378,719.21 per Month Note:

*Average existing electricity
bill taken from previous slide
41

CRITERIA 3
Improvement
Opportunities Analysis
3.6 Improvement opportunities were identified
based on sufficient data/ information which is
gathered through various means and
appropriate tools

3.7 Systematic analysis and evaluation of potential

causes were conducted to identify root causes
with appropriate use of tools

3.8 Verification and validation of selected

improvement opportunities/ root causes were
carried out using various methods
42 C3 IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES ANALYSIS
Improvement opportunities were identified based on sufficient data/ information which is
3.6 gathered through various means and appropriate tools

Root Causes Listing and Identification Method – Cause and Effect Diagram

MATERIAL MACHINE MAN

High Cost Old Technology Awarness

Heat Absorbent Equipment Utilization Training

Long Operational High Power
Hours Mentality
Consumption
in Railway
System due to
Maintenance Inefficiency of
Global Warming Electricity
Managing Wastage
Usage
Extreme Climate
Standards
Change
Research &
Development

ENVIRONMENT METHOD

CAUSES EFFECT
43 C3 IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES ANALYSIS
Improvement opportunities were identified based on sufficient data/ information which is
3.6 gathered through various means and appropriate tools

Root Causes Relationship Analysis Method – Relational Diagram

Heat Absorbent
Cost

Wastage Equipment
Management Utilization

Standards
Operational
High Power Hour
Consumption MACHINE
Maintenance
in Railway
System due to Technology
Inefficiency
Research & of Electricity
Development Usage
Mentality

Extreme Climate
Change Awareness
Note: Input
Global Warming Training
Output Output

Input
44 C3 IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES ANALYSIS
Improvement opportunities were identified based on sufficient data/ information which is
3.6 gathered through various means and appropriate tools

Root Causes Relationship Result Method – Ranking of Relationship Diagram

High power consumption in railway system due to inefficient electricity usage

NO CATEGORY DESCRIPTION INPUT OUTPUT TOTAL

1 Wastage Mismanagement IIII I IIII I 12
2 Standards vs Specification I II 3
METHOD
3 Lack in Research & Development I II 3
4 Improper Maintenance II - 2
5 Lack & Improper Training III - 3
6 MAN Lack of Awareness IIII - 4
7 Mentality II - 2
8 High Heat Absorbent II IIII 6
MATERIAL
9 High Cost I III 4
10 Extreme Climate Change - IIII I 6
ENVIRONMENT
11 Global Warming IIII I - 6
Lack of Energy Efficient Equipment
12 IIII I III 9
Utilization
MACHINE
13 Long Operational Hour IIII III 7
14 Old Technology - IIII I 6
Criteria in identifying potential root cause:
50% of the highest point (input + output) and more than will be considered
for the next process, thus SCORE ≥ 6 (Total of 7 out of 14)
45 C3 IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES ANALYSIS
Improvement opportunities were identified based on sufficient data/ information which is
3.6 gathered through various means and appropriate tools

Root Causes Relationship Result Root Causes Description

NO CATEGORY DESCRIPTION IDEA

Excessive energy from the system is not properly manage
1 METHOD and not efficiently return into the system causing wastage
BASER

Station roofing and train carbody are meeting the

2 MATERIAL requirement and international standard. The heat FIRDAUZ
absorbent is met at min level.
Extreme climate change from extreme hot to heavy rain,
clear sky to cloudy, all impacting operation system when all
3 equipment are set to the max setting for example lighting
AZIRINDA

ENVIRONMENT and air conditioning

Global warming for example increasing in earth
4 temperature gradually by year, will impacting our system to ROQHIB
maintain the comfort level of the commuter
Lack of energy efficient equipment utilization such as
5 sensors, timer, inverter that are still new and not widely used HAFIDZ
in the system
The equipment will be utilized for Long operational hour of
6 MACHINE 18 hours daily throughout the year plus 4 hours of ZAMANI
maintenance.
Some of the equipment are more than 20 years which is
7 low in efficiency but still fit for operation thus the old AFIQ
technology still being use in the system.
46 C3 IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES ANALYSIS
Improvement opportunities were identified based on sufficient data/ information which is
3.6 gathered through various means and appropriate tools

Shortlisted Root Causes Method – Cause and Effect Diagram

MATERIAL MACHINE MAN

High Cost Old Technology Awarness

Heat Absorbent Equipment Utilization Training

Long Operational High Power
Hours Mentality
Consumption
in Railway
System due to
Maintenance Inefficiency of
Global Warming Electricity
Managing Wastage
Usage
Extreme Climate
Standards
Change
Research &
Development

ENVIRONMENT METHOD

CAUSES EFFECT
47 C3 IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES ANALYSIS
Verification and validation of selected improvement opportunities/ root causes were carried
3.8 out using various methods

Identifying the Most Probable Causes Verification & Validation

High power consumption in railway system due to inefficient electricity usage

RESPONSIBILITY:
ITEM DESCRIPTION
BASER
METHOD: Excessive energy from the system is not properly manage and not efficiently return into the
Cause system causing wastage
1. Regenerative Braking Energy from train will be collected via AARU
and disperse as heat energy where else can be returned to the
system.
Validation 2. The illuminance of train lighting is fix through out the operation by
100%
mean day and night while the operation is longer during day time.

1. Case Study – Malaysia KLJ Line Power Supply System Result

2. Train lighting system (day and night)

Source
48 C3 IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES ANALYSIS
Verification and validation of selected improvement opportunities/ root causes were carried
3.8 out using various methods

Identifying the Most Probable Causes Verification & Validation

High power consumption in railway system due to inefficient electricity usage

RESPONSIBILITY:
ITEM DESCRIPTION
FIRDAUZ
MATERIAL: Station roofing and train carbody are meeting the requirement and international
Cause standard. The heat absorbent is met at min level.

Existing material used is already comply with the system requirement

and international standard. The usage of better and low heat
absorbent material is good for the efficiency but will increase cost and
Validation train loading specifically and to the system generally.
56%

1. LRV spec of body and heat insulation, plus Standard Result

2. Putra Heights Station

Source
49 C3 IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES ANALYSIS
Verification and validation of selected improvement opportunities/ root causes were carried
3.8 out using various methods

Identifying the Most Probable Causes Verification & Validation

High power consumption in railway system due to inefficient electricity usage

RESPONSIBILITY:
ITEM DESCRIPTION
AZIRINDA
ENVIRONMENT: Extreme climate change from extreme hot to heavy rain, clear sky to cloudy, all
Cause impacting operation system when all equipment are set to the max setting for example lighting and
air conditioning
From LRT3 ER, average recorded temperature range is between 21°C to
36°C while relative humidity range between 62 – 97. Since Malaysia is a
tropical country that receives 12 hour of daylight throughout the year,
86%
Validation worsen by high humidity, passenger comfort such lighting and AC are
set at maximum level at all the time.
In LRT3 scope, green technology such as natural lighting and ventilation
is included to support the system as a whole.
Data from LRT3 requirement on temperature, humidity, lux Result

Source
50 C3 IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES ANALYSIS
Verification and validation of selected improvement opportunities/ root causes were carried
3.8 out using various methods

Identifying the Most Probable Causes Verification & Validation

High power consumption in railway system due to inefficient electricity usage

RESPONSIBILITY:
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ROQHIB
ENVIRONMENT: Global warming for example increasing in earth temperature gradually by year, will
Cause impacting our system to maintain the comfort level of the commuter
Based on data from NASA, since 1906, the global average surface
temperature has increased almost 1 degrees of Celsius. Our LRT
operation which already more than 20 years sooner or later will receive
Validation the impact. More energy generated and utilized means more carbon 57%
footprint will be produced. Based on Greenhouse reporting, for each
kWh, 0.28307kg CO2 will be produced.

1. NASA Global Surface Temperature Data Result

2. Rail & Road Rate emission factor Report by Turley

Source
51 C3 IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES ANALYSIS
Verification and validation of selected improvement opportunities/ root causes were carried
3.8 out using various methods

Identifying the Most Probable Causes Verification & Validation

High power consumption in railway system due to inefficient electricity usage

RESPONSIBILITY:
ITEM DESCRIPTION
HAFIDZ
MACHINE: Lack of energy efficient equipment utilization such as sensors, timer, inverter that are still
Cause new and not widely used in the system

KL LRT system begins in 1996, awareness in energy efficiency that time is

probably low but now becoming better and better. Lighting system for
example gradually change to LED type with timer control, AC system
Validation with inverter and the installation of Train Regenerative Braking Recycle
70%
System

1. LED lighting at stations and Train. Result

2. Train Regenerative Braking Recycle System
3. AC system with inverter

Source
52 C3 IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES ANALYSIS
Verification and validation of selected improvement opportunities/ root causes were carried
3.8 out using various methods

Identifying the Most Probable Causes Verification & Validation

High power consumption in railway system due to inefficient electricity usage

RESPONSIBILITY:
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ZAMANI
MACHINE: The equipment will be utilized for Long operational hour of 18 hours daily throughout the
Cause year plus 4 hours of maintenance.

Operation hours is fixed and will remain unchanged starting from 6AM
to 12AM as per the Regulatory instruction.

Validation
100%

Raid Rail Website Result

Source
53 C3 IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES ANALYSIS
Verification and validation of selected improvement opportunities/ root causes were carried
3.8 out using various methods

Identifying the Most Probable Causes Verification & Validation

High power consumption in railway system due to inefficient electricity usage

RESPONSIBILITY:
ITEM DESCRIPTION
AFIQ
MACHINE: Some of the equipment are more than 20 years which is low in efficiency but still fit for
Cause operation thus the old technology still being use in the system.

In new project (LRT3), these technology which include green

technology, sustainable and renewable energy were included in the
scope to increase energy efficiency and to be a benchmark for future
Validation projects.
100%

LRT3 ER related with Green tech Result

Source
54 C3 IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES ANALYSIS
Improvement opportunities were identified based on sufficient data/ information which is
3.6 gathered through various means and appropriate tools

Root Causes Verification & Validation Result

NO CATEGORY DESCRIPTION IDEA

Excessive energy from the system is not properly manage
1 METHOD and not efficiently return into the system causing wastage
Station roofing and train carbody are meeting the
2 MATERIAL requirement and international standard. The heat
absorbent is met at min level.
Extreme climate change from extreme hot to heavy rain,
clear sky to cloudy, all impacting operation system when all Qualified for
3 equipment are set to the max setting for example lighting the Next
and air conditioning Stage
ENVIRONMENT
Global warming for example increasing in earth
4 temperature gradually by year, will impacting our system to
maintain the comfort level of the commuter
Lack of energy efficient equipment utilization such as
5 sensors, timer, inverter that are still new and not widely used
in the system
The equipment will be utilized for Long operational hour of
6 MACHINE 18 hours daily throughout the year plus 4 hours of Not Qualified
maintenance.
Some of the equipment are more than 20 years which is Qualified for
7 low in efficiency but still fit for operation thus the old the Next
technology still being use in the system. Stage
55 C3 IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES ANALYSIS
Systematic analysis and evaluation of potential causes were conducted to identify root
3.7 causes with appropriate use of tools

Analysis of Probable Causes Method – 5W1H

High power consumption in railway system due to inefficient electricity usage

WHAT WHERE WHEN 06

Data for high Prasarana and 3 week period
power its subsidiary Start date: 1 April 19
consumption
in railway system
End date: 19 April 19 05
due to
inefficiency of
electricity usage
04
Online survey
form involving
58 respondents
Group
members and

03 To analyse
other relevant
parties
the six (6) shortlisted
02 probable cause

01 WHY WHO HOW

56 C3 IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES ANALYSIS
Systematic analysis and evaluation of potential causes were conducted to identify root
3.7 causes with appropriate use of tools

Analysis of Probable Causes Method – Survey Form Check Sheet

100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
CODE DESCRIPTION

20
40
60
80
Excessive energy from the system is not properly manage and not
A efficiently return into the system causing wastage 257
Station roofing and train carbody are meeting the requirement
B and international standard. The heat absorbent is met at minimum
level.
230
Extreme climate change from extreme hot to heavy rain, clear sky
C to cloudy, all impacting operation system when all equipment are
set to the max setting for example lighting and air conditioning
116
Global warming causing increasing in earth temperature
D gradually by year, impacting our system to maintain the comfort
level of the commuter
229
Lack of energy efficient equipment utilization such as sensors,
E timer, inverter that are still new and not widely used in the system 227
Some of the equipment are more than 20 years which is low in
F efficiency but still fit for operation thus the old technology still
being use in the system.
120
Note:
Online google survey form was used
57 C3 IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES ANALYSIS
Systematic analysis and evaluation of potential causes were conducted to identify root
3.7 causes with appropriate use of tools

Analysis of Probable Causes Method – Frequency Ranking (Total & Cumulative)

FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
RANK CODE DESCRIPTION
TOTAL CUMULATIVE TOTAL CUMULATIVE

Excessive energy from the system is not properly manage and not
1 A efficiently return into the system causing wastage
257 257 21.8% 21.8%

Station roofing and train carbody are meeting the requirement and
2 B international standard. The heat absorbent is met at minimum level.
230 486 19.5% 41.3%

Global warming causing increasing in earth temperature gradually

3 D by year, impacting our system to maintain the comfort level of the 229 716 19.4% 60.7%
commuter

Lack of energy efficient equipment utilization such as sensors, timer,

4 E inverter that are still new and not widely used in the system
227 943 19.3% 80.0%

Some of the equipment are more than 20 years which is low in

5 F efficiency but still fit for operation thus the old technology still being 120 1063 10.2% 90.2%
use in the system.
Extreme climate change from extreme hot to heavy rain, clear sky
6 C to cloudy, all impacting operation system when all equipment are 116 1179 9.8% 100.0%
set to the max setting for example lighting and air conditioning

C: 9.8% A: 21.8% Total frequency: 1179

Total % Accumulative: 100%
F: 10.2% Overall
B: 19.5% Note:
Pareto’s observations about the factor of
E: 19.3% D: 19.4% sparsity which states that 80% of the effects
are coming from 20% of the causes
 58 C3 IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES ANALYSIS
Systematic analysis and evaluation of potential causes were conducted to identify root
3.7 causes with appropriate use of tools

Shortlisting of Probable Causes Method – Pareto

TARGET: Rearrange and Prioritize the Root Causes based on the Frequency
100.0%
1179 100.0%
1100 CODE ROOT CAUSES
To focus on root 90.2% A Managing Wastage
1000 90.0%
cause with high Heat Absorbent
frequency based 80.0% B
Material
900 on Pareto chart 80.0%
method > 80.0% D Global Warming
800 70.0% E Equipment Utilization

PERCENTAGE
60.7%
FREQUENCY

700 F Old Technology

60.0%
Extreme Climate
C
600 Change
41.3% 50.0%
500
40.0% RESULT
400 First 4 root causes with
21.8% 30.0% the highest frequency
300 will be selected for
20.0% next process
200

100 10.0%

0 0.0%
A B D E F C
ROOT CAUSES
59

CRITERIA 4
Creative & Innovative
Solutions
4.9 The team has identified various potential
creative and innovative actions/ solutions

4.10 The team has carefully

alternative solution prior to
evaluated each
the final selection
based on appropriate criteria

4.11 The team has assessed the final creative and

innovative solution(s) against targeted
objectives

4.12 The team has carried out and implemented

creative and innovative solution successfully
60 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has identified various potential creative and innovative actions/ solutions
4.9
Proposed Alternative Solutions Method – Tree Diagram
PROPOSED SOLUTIONS
ROUTE CAUSES
Install SCADA & BMS - Monitor & control
E Lack of energy I
system status and performance
efficient equipment
FACTORS utilization used in the Adopt LED Lighting & Sensor - Sensor can
system II
regulate and control lighting inside train
MACHINE
High power consumption in railway system

Existing Material only Install Solar Panel - Provide renewable

met the minimum III
electricity to station and depot
due to inefficient electricity usage

requirement set by
standard and does Upgrade Train External Material - Use
not fully optimize IV material which reduce heat absorption &
B energy saving dissipation

D Improvise Station Design - Enhance

Global warming, will V natural lighting and ventilation
impact our system to
ENVIRONMENT maintain the comfort
Install Air Conditioning with Inverter –
level of the
commuter
VI Can regulate and control electricity used
by air conditioning inside train

Adopt Traction Energy Recuperation

A Excessive energy VII System - Allow energy from braking to be
from the system is not recycled and optimized
METHOD
properly manage
causing wastage Install Sub-DPM - Monitor and optimize
VIII energy usage by zone i.e. lighting,
escalator, lift etc.
61 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has identified various potential creative and innovative actions/ solutions
4.9
Criteria for the Proposed Solutions Main Criteria for Evaluation of the Proposed Solutions

STAKEHOLDER
SATISFACTION
REDUCE
COST
ENERGY
SAVING
06 05 04 03 02 01

NEW SMART
TECHNOLOGY
COMMERCIAL
VALUE
GREEN
IMPACT
62 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has identified various potential creative and innovative actions/ solutions
4.9
Shortlisting the Proposed Solutions Scoring Matrix with Criteria
SCORING MATRIX
Criteria

SCORE
- Energy Saving

- New Smart PROPOSED SOLUTIONS

Technology

- Reduce Cost I Install SCADA & BMS 3 4 2 3 4 3 19

- Commercial
Value
Adopt LED Lighting &
- Stakeholder
II
Sensor
5 4 4 5 3 4 25
Satisfaction
- Green Impact
III Install Solar Panel 5 3 3 4 3 5 23
HIGH POWER
Upgrade Train External
CONSUMPTION
RAILWAY SYSTEM DUE
IV
Material
2 4 1 3 2 2 14
TO INEFFICIENT
ELECTRICITY USAGE
V Improvise Station Design 4 4 2 3 5 5 23
Scoring Install Air Conditioning
VI
with Inverter – 4 3 4 4 5 4 24
5 - Excellent
4 - Good Adopt Traction Energy
3 - Fair VII
Recuperation System
5 4 3 4 4 4 24
2 - Poor
1 - Very Poor VIII Install Sub-DPM 2 2 4 3 3 4 18
63 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has identified various potential creative and innovative actions/ solutions
4.9
Shortlisting the Proposed Solutions Method - Graph Matrix with Criteria
SCORE
0 10 20 30
I Install SCADA & BMS 19
HIGH POWER CONSUMPTION RAILWAY SYSTEM DUE

Adopt LED Lighting &

II 25
TO INEFFICIENT ELECTRICITY USAGE

Sensor

III Install Solar Panel 23

Upgrade Train External
IV
Material 14

V Improvise Station Design 23

Install Air Conditioning
VI
with Inverter & Sensors – 24
Adopt Traction Energy
VII
Recuperation System 24

VIII Install Sub-DPM 18

MINIMUM PASSING SCORE - Minimum acceptable passing marks for
the criteria is set at 75% thus SCORE ≥ 23
64 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has identified various potential creative and innovative actions/ solutions
4.9
Choosing the Most Practical Solutions Method - Matrix on Practicality vs. Impact

NO PROPOSED SOLUTIONS PRACTICALITY IMPACT

Install solar panel to provide renewable

II
electricity to station and depot
2 4

Install LED Lighting and Develop Sensor to

III
regulate and control lighting inside train
4 5

Improvise station design to enhance

V
natural lighting and ventilation
1 3

Install Air Conditioning with Inverter &

VI Sensors to regulate and control electricity 5 4
used by air conditioning inside train
Adopt Traction Energy Recuperation
VII System to allow energy from braking to be 4 4
recycled and optimized

Scoring : 5 – Excellent; 4 – Good; 3 – Fair; 2 – Poor; 1- Very Poor

65 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has identified various potential creative and innovative actions/ solutions
4.9
Shortlisting the Proposed Solutions Method - Graph Matrix on Practicality vs. Impact

NO PRACTICALITY IMPACT

Highest Impact
II 2 4
5 III
III 4 5
V 1 3 4 II VII VI

IMPACT
VI 5 4
3 V
VII 4 4

2
RESULT
Lowest Impact

The Most Practical Solution

identified is 1
SOLUTION NO. III, VI & VII

0 1 2 3 4 5
Least Practical Most Practical
PRACTICALITY
66 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has identified various potential creative and innovative actions/ solutions
4.9
Final Proposed Solutions

Install LED Lighting

and Develop
Sensor to regulate
and control lighting
01 III
Install Air
inside train Conditioning
with Inverter &
Sensors to
regulate and
02 control
electricity used
VI
by air
conditioning
inside train
Adopt Traction Energy VII
Recuperation System
to allow energy from
braking to be recycled
03
and optimized
67 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

Project Stages

A B C

IDENTIFY & ASSESS VERIFY & VALIDATE IMPLEMENT

68 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

Identify & Assess: Value Engineering Processes

PROOF OF CONCEPT
Case Study on Existing Technology

COMPLIANCE
Specification’s Compliance &
Theoretical Calculation

COST ASSESSMENT
Project & Operation Cost

TIMELINE ASSESSMENT
Project Timeframe & Interfacing Impact
ANALYSIS SUMMARY
SWOT, Risk Identification &
Mitigation Measures

1 2 3 4 5

IDENTIFY VALUE ENGINEERING VERIFY &

& ASSESS VALIDATE
69 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

1 2 3 4 5
PROOF OF
COMPLIANCE
COST TIMELINE ANALYSIS SOLUTION1:
CONCEPT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY SMART Lighting System

What is LED?

The LED is a light source which

uses semiconductors and
electroluminescence to create
light.

LEDs create light by

electroluminescence in a
semiconductor material.

Electroluminescence is the phenomenon of a material

emitting light when electric current or an electric field is
passed through it - this happens when electrons are sent
through the material and fill electron holes.

LEDs use less power (watts) per

unit of light generated
(lumens). LEDs help reduce
greenhouse gas emissions and
can help lower electric bills.
70 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

1 2 3 4 5
PROOF OF
COMPLIANCE
COST TIMELINE ANALYSIS SOLUTION1:
CONCEPT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY SMART Lighting System

BULB INFORMATION
Incandescent Fluorescent Halogen CFL Bulb Fluorescent LED Bulb
Lumens 850 2600 1200 800 2800 800
Watts 60 40 50 13 32 9.5
Lumens per Watt 14 65 24 62 88 84
Life Span 1000 20000 2000 8000 20000 25000
10 13 8 20 13 26
ANALYSIS 60W 40W 4’-0” T-12 50W Bi-Pin 13W 32W 4’-0” T-8 9.5W
Power of Electricity Used over
1500 1000 1250 325 800 238
25,000 Hours (kWh)
Cost of Electricity to Operate over
505.50 337.00 421.25 109.53 269.60 80.21
25,000 hours (RM)
No. of Bulbs Needed for
25 1.3 12.5 3.1 1.3 1
25,000 Hours Used
Cost to Buy Light Bulbs for
250 16.9 100 62 16.9 26
25,000 Hours Used (RM)
Cost to Operate
755.50 353.90 521.25 171.53 286.50 106.21
25,000 Hours (RM)
Cost Savings to Operate
85.94% 69.99% 79.62% 38.08% 62.93% 0.00%
25,000 hours (%)
Energy Savings to Operate
84.13% 76.20% 80.96% 26.77% 70.25% 0.00%
25,000 hours (%)
71 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

1 2 3 4 5
PROOF OF
COMPLIANCE
COST TIMELINE ANALYSIS SOLUTION1:
CONCEPT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY SMART Lighting System

ELECTRICITY USE BY BULB TYPE

160
Below table shows the power wattage
needed to produce same luminance by
ELECTRICAL CONSUMPTION (W)

Standard
140
Halogen different type of light source and its. LED
CFL
120
LED need 85% less power wattage
100 compared to standard lighting.
80

60
Brightness in
220+ 400+ 700+ 900+ 1300+
40 Lumens
20

0 Standard 25 W 40 W 60 W 75 W 100 W
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
INITIAL LUMINOUS FLUX (Im)
Halogen 18 W 28 W 42 W 53 W 70 W
Above graph shows the electrical
consumption against the luminance
CFL 6W 9W 12 W 15 W 20 W
produced by different type of light
source.
Based on the graph, LED’s energy LED 4W 6W 10 W 13 W 18 W
consumption reduced by at least 66%
or 75% compared to Halogen or
Standard light.
72 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

The
1 Proof2 of Concept
PROOF OF
3
COST
4
TIMELINE
5
ANALYSIS SOLUTION1:
COMPLIANCE
CONCEPT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY SMART Lighting System

HOW IT HELPS REDUCE ENERGY CONSUMPTION

Sensor is the heart of the smart lighting in the current research. In order to reduce the power bill,
smart lighting makes use of the sensors. Whenever there is sufficient illumination available, lighting
control can be achieved by using ambient lighting sensors.
Based on available light and occupancy, the dimming of light in a room can be controlled by
using Pyroelectric Infra Red (PIR) sensor, ultrasonic or its combination. For longer range, infrared
sensors are also preferable.
These solution is inexpensive and easy to install with microcontrollers and power management to
provide the low cost, low power control systems which reduces the energy consumption and
money.
70
R123, Standard Lighting
ENERGY CONSUMPTION (kWh)

60 R122, KNX Control

50

40

30

20

10

0
0 8 15 22 29 36

TIME (DAYS)
73 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

1 2 3 4 5
PROOF OF
COMPLIANCE
COST TIMELINE ANALYSIS SOLUTION1:
CONCEPT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY SMART Lighting System

Concept / Method Ref:

KNX Solutions on Smart Building
CASE STUDY :
Reference made to a Case Study carried
out by ABB on an office block which initially
had traditional lighting controls and later a
complete Smart Lighting Control was
installed

STANDARD:
Controller using KNX System comply to world
open standard which considers standards
such as IEC, EN, ANSI, Chinese Standard
(GB/T 20965), etc.

Percentage of
Estimated Saving/year
= Existing System Energy Cost - New System Energy Cost Saving Achieved
= RM 287,712.00 – RM 105,597.00
= RM181,114.70 63%
CONCLUSIONS:
Lighting installation are operated more efficiently using sensors and timer programs.
Besides, the fact that the integrated Automation system links with daylight systems, sun
protection, ventilation and other systems which shown further energy savings
opportunities can be exploited.
74 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

1 2 3 4 5
PROOF OF
COMPLIANCE
COST TIMELINE ANALYSIS SOLUTION 2:
CONCEPT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY INVERTER Air Conditioning System

How Normal Air Conditioning Works? Cooling coils remove

heat and humidity from
the air using refrigerant

Condenser Evaporator

HOT COOL
AIR AIR

Accumulator

Compressor
Hot coils release the A filtering unit that
collected heat into remove debris, oil
the outside air and moisture from
the system, as well
Sight
as prevent any
Glass
remaining liquid
refrigerant from
returning to the
Filter Dryer compressor
Expansion
Valve
A filtering unit that adsorb
system contaminants, such A control system to A pump that moves refrigerant
as water, which can regulate the amount between the evaporator and
create acids, and two, to of cool air that is the condenser to chill the
provide physical filtration distributed indoor air
75 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

1 2 3 4 5
PROOF OF
COMPLIANCE
COST TIMELINE ANALYSIS SOLUTION 2:
CONCEPT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY INVERTER Air Conditioning System

What's an inverter? An inverter is energy saving technology that eliminates wasted operation in air
conditioners by efficiently controlling motor speed
Air conditioners maintain set temperature by cooling when room
Source:
temperature rises above the set temperature
Daikin.com

Non-Inverter Type Inverter Type

Air Conditioner Air Conditioner
Motor speed in non-inverter type air conditioners In inverter type air conditioners, temperature is
remains constant and temperature is adjusted by adjusted by changing motor speed without
turning the motor ON and OFF, which consumes turning the motor ON and OFF.
more energy.

Starting and stopping hard running, resting, then When an appropriate pace is maintained, a
starting and stopping once again uses more runner can continue without wasting energy
energy
 76 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

1 2 3 4 5
PROOF OF
COMPLIANCE
COST TIMELINE ANALYSIS SOLUTION 2:
CONCEPT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY INVERTER Air Conditioning System

TYPE OF 0.75 HP 1.00 HP 1.50 HP 2.00 HP

AIR-COND AIR-COND AIR-COND AIR-COND AIR-COND
Non-Inverter Type 627 kWh 843 kWh 1246 kWh 1648 kWh
Inverter Type 450 kWh 554 kWh 840 kWh 1113 kWh
-32% Average Energy Saving
1600
Non-Inverter Type
32%
POWER CONSUMPTION (kWh)

1400 Inverter Type -33%

100%

68%
1200

1000 -34% Non-Inverter Inverter

Type Type
800 Notes:
-28% 1. Non-inverter type air-conditioner
used in the study is classified as 1-star
600
energy rating by BEE.
2. Inverter type air-conditioner used in
400 the study is classified as 5-star energy
rating by BEE
200 Source:
Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE)
Report 2018

0.75 HP 1.00 HP 1.50 HP 2.00 HP AIR-CONDITIONING CAPACITY

 77 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

1 2 3 4 5
PROOF OF
COMPLIANCE
COST TIMELINE ANALYSIS SOLUTION 2:
CONCEPT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY INVERTER Air Conditioning System

SPECIFICATIONS Non-Inverter Type Inverter Type

Horse Power (HP) 1.5 1.5
Cooling Capacity (kW) 3.51 3.66
Power Input (W) 1,160 1,040
Refrigerant Type R410A R410A
EER (Btu/Hw)@(W/W) 10.3@3.0 12.0@3.5
Energy Star 3 5
Retail Sales Price 1,488.00 2,068.00

10,400
TOTAL COMPOUNDING
TOTAL COMPOUNDING COST (RM)

COST:
9,400 Non-Inverter Type • Initial & Installation Cost
8,400 • Energy Cost
Inverter Type 30% • Repair Cost
7,400 • Maintenance Cost
Note:
6,400
The operating hours for
5,400
26% both air-conditioners were
set at 12 hours daily
4,400
Source:
3,400 Sukri, Jamali (2018), ARPN
Journal of Engineering and
2,400 Applied Sciences

1,400 YEAR
0 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
78 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

1 2 3 4 5
PROOF OF
COMPLIANCE
COST TIMELINE ANALYSIS SOLUTION 3:
CONCEPT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY Energy RECOVERY System

Regenerative Energy Flow in Urban Rail Trains

Used by auxiliary systems
The regenerative energy is primarily consumed Distribution of
Consumed by
by auxiliary systems of the braking train itself. Regenerative train itself
Energy
The surplus regenerative energy is fed back Absorbed by on-board
storage devices
into the power rail which will be used by other Regenerative
accelerating trains in the same power section Energy
Used to accelerate other
trains
If the feedback regenerative energy cannot Fed back into
be utilized timely, it will be wasted by heating the power rail
Absorbed by wayside
storage devices
contact line
resistors, absorbed by wayside storage device
or fed-back into substation and converted Wasted by heating resistors
back into AC power distribution system for
reuse
Illustration of Regenerative Energy Flow

Source:
IEEE Article – A
survey on
Energy-
Efficient Train
Operation for
Urban Rail
Transit
79 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

1 2 3 4 5
PROOF OF
COMPLIANCE
COST TIMELINE ANALYSIS SOLUTION 3:
CONCEPT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY Energy RECOVERY System

AUTOMATIC ASSURED RECEPTIVITY UNIT ENERGY RECOVERY SYSTEM

01 (ARU) (ERS) 02
ARU system dissipates all surplus regenerative energy Inverter-based Energy Recovery System (ERS)
that cannot be absorbed by onboard loads and converts all surplus regenerative energy into AC
adjacent accelerating trains Power and feeds it back to MV Grid

It senses the rising line voltage caused by surplus

regenerative energy and connects appropriate
resistive load (converting the surplus energy into
heat) to maintain the voltage within operating limit

The surplus converted energy can be utilized for the

station loads and can be fed back to the grid
(reduced energy consumption from TNB)
ENERGY
EFFICIENCY Under normal traction the inverter works as an active
Currently being used in our existing lines (LRT KLJ, MRT power filter
SBK)
Source:
Source: Secheron; Journal of Electrical & Electronics Systems Research
ABB Article
80 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

1 2 3 4 5
PROOF OF
COMPLIANCE
COST TIMELINE ANALYSIS SOLUTION 3:
CONCEPT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY Energy RECOVERY System

Automatic Energy
Assured Recovery
Receptivity System
Unit (AARU) (ERS)

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Convert to Convert to
HEAT AC POWER
81 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

1 2 3 4 5
PROOF OF
COMPLIANCE
COST TIMELINE ANALYSIS SOLUTION 3:
CONCEPT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY Energy RECOVERY System

Energy Recovery System (ERS) consists of one unit of Inverter and

Inverter Transformer connected to DC busbar and MV busbar
through DC Switchgear and MV Switchgear respectively
This concept has been adopted and proven under commercial
service conditions in Milan Metro (22% Energy Saving)
Currently being installed and tested in Sydney Light Rail and
Riyadh Metro

ERS Single Line Diagram

Source:
A Review of Energy Efficiency Improvement in DC Railway Systems by Mihaela
Popescu and Alexandru Bitoleanu
82 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

1 2 3 4 5
PROOF OF COST TIMELINE ANALYSIS SOLUTION1:
CONCEPT
COMPLIANCE
ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY SMART Lighting System Simulation Data

LED DRIVERS SPECIFICATION Simulation Study has been carried out prior implement stage.
Study Objective:
LLE 24x 560 mm LLE 24x 280 mm
SEPCIFICATION 2400 Im HV ADV 5 1250 Im HV ADV5  To have efficient light control, assures the train lighting are
dim as necessary subjected to sufficient daylight received
Max. Output 75 W280
50 W throughout 18hours of operation service; while conforming
Power mm to specifications and lux standard.
Rated Supply  Optimize the energy usage without scarifying public comfort
220 V – 240 V and peace of mind.
Voltage
Typical Efficacy 92% LED MODULE SPECIFICATIONS
LLE 24x 560 mm LLE 24x 280 mm LLE 24x140 mm
Power Factor 0.98 SEPCIFICATION 2400 Im HV ADV 5 1250 Im HV ADV5 650 Im HV ADV5

Total Harmonic Module Length 560 mm 280 mm 140 mm

< 9%
Distortion
Ambient
-40°C ~ +65°C
Main Surge Temperature
1 kV
Capacity (L-N)
CRI > 80
Lifetime (B50L70) 100,000 hours
Small Colour
MacAdam3
Warranty 5 years Tolerance
Lifetime (B50L70 72,000 hours
Warranty 5 years

Lighting installations are operated more efficiently using sensors

and programs. The integrated automation systems linked with
daylight systems, sun protection, ventilation and other systems
whereby further energy savings opportunities can be exploited.
83 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

1 2 3 4 5
PROOF OF COST TIMELINE ANALYSIS SOLUTION 2:
CONCEPT
COMPLIANCE
ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY INVERTER Air Conditioning System Simulation Data

SPECIFICATIONS
LRT KELANA JAYA LINE MRT SBK LINE LRT3
Rated Air Volume 4000m3/h 5800m3/h 4000m3/h
Cooling Capacity (kW) 28 38 29 (max 35)
Refrigerant Type R407c R407c R407c
VVVF No No Yes
84 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

Compliance
1
PROOF OF
2 3
COST
4
TIMELINE
5
ANALYSIS SOLUTION1: Theoretical Load
COMPLIANCE
CONCEPT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY SMART Lighting System Calculation

Estimated Max.
3-Car Train Under Normal Mode Operation
Lighting Load

POWER M1 CAR T1 CAR T2 CAR M2 CAR OVERALL LOAD

PER
EQUIPMENT
UNIT QTY
POWER
QTY
POWER
QTY
POWER
QTY
POWER DIVERSITY POWER
(KW) (kW) (kW) (kW) (kW) FACTOR (kW)

Saloon Light 0.475 1 0.475 1 0.475 0 0 1 0.475 1 1.425

Ceiling Light 0.028 1 0.028 1 0.028 0 0 1 0.028 1 0.084
TOTAL LIGHTING LOAD 0.503 0.503 0 0.503 1.509
Total Energy Consumption per Day - Lighting 27 kWh

Estimated Max.
4-Car Train Under Normal Mode Operation
Lighting Load

POWER M1 CAR T1 CAR T2 CAR M2 CAR OVERALL LOAD

PER
EQUIPMENT
UNIT QTY
POWER
QTY
POWER
QTY
POWER
QTY
POWER DIVERSITY POWER
(KW) (kW) (kW) (kW) (kW) FACTOR (kW)

Saloon Light 0.475 1 0.475 1 0.475 1 0.475 1 0.475 1 1.900

Ceiling Light 0.028 1 0.028 1 0.028 1 0.028 1 0.028 1 0.112
TOTAL LIGHTING LOAD 0.503 0.503 0.503 0.503 2.012
Total Energy Consumption per Day - Lighting 36 kWh
85 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

Compliance
1
PROOF OF
2 3
COST
4
TIMELINE
5
ANALYSIS SOLUTION1:
CONCEPT
COMPLIANCE
ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY SMART Lighting System Control Topology

Constant Light Control Light Level Sensors turn on, off or

dim lights, and adjust shades automatically in relation
to natural light to maintain light lever approx. 320 lux.
Position Light Sensors to be installed at the front, back
and each or the cars, next to the glass window. Lux
reading will be based on average reading from 3
sensor points.
Dimming Speed 1 second every 10% Up or Down. Smart
lighting systems that allow areas and groups of lamps
to communicate with each other and turn off or dim
depending on light in the surrounding areas.
Energy Saving Energy savings with constant light
control from 40-70% could be achieved based on the
optimisation of lights.

CONCLUSION & IMPROVEMENT

Lighting installations are operated
more efficiently using sensors and
programs.
The integrated automation systems
linked with daylight systems, sun
protection, ventilation and other
systems whereby further energy
savings opportunities can be
exploited.
86 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

1 2 3 4 5
PROOF OF
COMPLIANCE
COST TIMELINE ANALYSIS SOLUTION 2: Theoretical Load
CONCEPT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY INVERTER Air Conditioning System Calculation

Estimated Max. Note:

3-Car Train Under Normal Mode Operation The load calculation is based on
VAC Load Single Train

POWER PER M1 CAR T1 CAR T2 CAR M2 CAR OVERALL LOAD

EQUIPMENT UNIT POWER POWER POWER POWER DIVERSITY POWER
(KW) QTY QTY QTY QTY
(kW) (kW) (kW) (kW) FACTOR (kW)
Compressor Motor 6.5 4 26 4 26 0 0 4 26 1 78
Supply Air Fan 0.7 4 2.8 4 2.8 0 0 4 3 1 8
Condenser Fan 1.05 4 4.2 4 4.2 0 0 4 4 1 13
VAC Unit 0.14 2 0.28 2 0.28 0 0 2 0.28 1 0.84
VAC Controller 0.04 1 0.04 1 0.04 0 0 1 0.04 1 0.12
TOTAL AIR-CONDITIONING LOAD 33.32 33.32 0 33.32 99.96

Estimated Max.
4-Car Train Under Normal Mode Operation
VAC Load

POWER PER M1 CAR T1 CAR T2 CAR M2 CAR OVERALL LOAD

EQUIPMENT UNIT POWER POWER POWER POWER DIVERSITY POWER
(KW) QTY QTY QTY QTY
(kW) (kW) (kW) (kW) FACTOR (kW)
Compressor Motor 6.5 4 26 4 26 4 26 4 26 1 104
Supply Air Fan 0.7 4 2.8 4 2.8 4 2.8 4 3 1 11
Condenser Fan 1.05 4 4.2 4 4.2 4 4.2 4 4 1 17
VAC Unit 0.14 2 0.28 2 0.28 2 0.28 2 0.28 1 1.12
VAC Controller 0.04 1 0.04 1 0.04 1 0.04 1 0.04 1 0.16
TOTAL AIR-CONDITIONING LOAD 33.32 33.32 33.32 33.32 133.28
87 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

1 2 3 4 5
PROOF OF
COMPLIANCE
COST TIMELINE ANALYSIS SOLUTION 2: Electrical Circuit &
CONCEPT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY INVERTER Air Conditioning System Configuration

DC ±375V DC 120V

SIV Power
Stabilizer
Power Load &
Booster Temperature
DC 600V Sensor
AC 400 V/
50 Hz

Inverter 1 Inverter 2 Inverter 3

Condenser
Evaporator
Fan 2
Fan 2
Components
Condenser Compressor Compressor Evaporator for Control
Fan 1 1 2 Fan 1 Circuits in VAC
88 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

1 2 3 4 5
PROOF OF
COMPLIANCE
COST TIMELINE ANALYSIS SOLUTION 3: Employer’s
CONCEPT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY Energy RECOVERY System Requirement

EMPLOYER’S REQUIREMENT

AUTOMATIC ASSURED RECEPTIVITY UNIT (AARU)

Automatic Assured
ENERGY RECOVERY SYSTEM
Receptivity Unit (AARU)
Complied with (ERS) – Innovative Solution
to be included
Employer’s Requirement
To ensure 100% Complied with
receptivity of trains No Energy Saving Employer’s Requirement
regeneration power in (Wastage)
the event it cannot be Energy Saving with
consumed by adjacent Recycle Power
trains Monitoring Facilities
89 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

Compliance
1
PROOF OF
2 3
COST
4
TIMELINE
5
ANALYSIS SOLUTION 3:
CONCEPT
COMPLIANCE
ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY Energy RECOVERY System Simulation Results

Energy Recovery System (ERS) for LRT3:

DC Traction Power Simulation
RESULTS
From the simulation results
• Total Maximum Power Usage
Estimated without ERS
• = 34,344kW
• Total Estimation of Maximum
Regenerative Power Return
with ERS
= 7,143kW
• Estimation Net Power
Consumption
= 27,201kW

Percentage Power Saving

in Milan Metro

22%
90 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

1 2 3 4 5
PROOF OF COST TIMELINE ANALYSIS SOLUTION 3:
CONCEPT
COMPLIANCE
ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY Energy RECOVERY System Schematic Diagram

Positive DC Switchgear
Panel
Inverter
Transformer

Inverter Unit

Negative DC Switchgear
Panel
91 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

1 2 3 4 5
PROOF OF
COMPLIANCE
COST TIMELINE ANALYSIS SOLUTION1:
CONCEPT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY SMART Lighting System

Energy & Operational Cost

LIGHTING ( EXISTING SYSTEM) 3-CAR TRAIN 4-CAR TRAIN LIGHTING ( NEW SYSTEM) 3-CAR TRAIN 4-CAR TRAIN

Total Load (kW) 2.039 2.719 Total Load (kW) 2.039 2.719
Hours per day 18 18 26% Savings via LED 1.509 2.012
kWh per day 37 49 Total Load (kW) 1.509 2.012
kWh per month (30 days) 1,101 1,468 Hours per day 18 18
kWh per year 13,214 17,619 kWh per day 27 36
Carbon Emission/ year (kgC02) 9,792 13,055.38 kWh per month (30 working days) 815 1,086
Cost Energy (RM) 0.337 0.337 kWh per year 9,778 13,038
Cost Energy per Year for Single Train (RM) 4,453.10 5,937.47 10% Dimmed Savings kWh per year 8,800 11,734
PIR/Daylight Savings (35%)kWh per year 5,720 7,627
Project Cost Carbon Emission/ year (kgC02) 4,239 5,652
Cost Energy (RM) 0.337 0.337
Cost Energy per Year for Single Train (RM) 1,927.75 2,570.33

Energy Saving/month (kWh) 624.47 832.63

Carbon Emission /month (kgC02) 463 617
Cost Saving /month for Single Train (RM) 210.45 280.59

Energy Saving/year (kWh) 7,493.63 9,991.50

Carbon Emission /year (kgC02) 5,553 7,404
Cost Saving /year for Single Train (RM) 2,525.35 3,367.14
92 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

1 2 3 4 5
PROOF OF
COMPLIANCE
COST TIMELINE ANALYSIS SOLUTION 2:
CONCEPT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY INVERTER Air Conditioning System

Energy & Operational Cost

VAC (EXISTING SYSTEM) 3-CAR TRAIN 4-CAR TRAIN VAC ( NEW SYSTEM) 3-CAR TRAIN 4-CAR TRAIN
Total Load (kW) 147.000 196.000 Total Load (kW) 147.000 196.000
Hours per day 18 18 32% Savings with Inverter 99.96 133.28
kWh per day 2,646 3,528 Total Load (kW) 99.96 133.28
kWh per month (30 days) 9,380 105,840 Hours per day 18 18
kWh per year 952,560 1,270,080 kWh per day 1,799 2,399
Carbon Emission/ year (kg C02) 705,847 941,129.28 kWh per month (30 working days) 53,978 71,971
Cost Energy (RM) 0.337 0.337 kWh per year 647,741 863,654
Cost Energy per Year for Single Train (RM) 321,012.72 428,016.96 Carbon Emission/ year (kg C02) 479,976 639,968

Project Cost
Cost Energy (RM) 0.337 0.337
Cost Energy per Year for Single Train (RM) 218,288.65 291,051.53

Energy Saving/ month (kWh) 25,401.60 33,868.80

Carbon Emission/ month (kg C02) 18,823 25,097
Cost Saving/ month for Single Train (RM) 8,560.34 11,413.79

SYSTEM
93 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

1 2 3 4 5
PROOF OF
COMPLIANCE
COST TIMELINE ANALYSIS SOLUTION 3:
CONCEPT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY Energy RECOVERY System

Energy & Operational Cost

ENERGY CONSUMPTION MAXIMUM DEMAND MONTHLY BILL
POWER SYSTEM
(kW) (RM) (kW) (RM) (RM)
Without ERS 11,462,310 3,862,798.47 33,344 1,016,582.40 4,879,380.87
With ERS 9,078,334 3,057,398.47 27,201 805,149.60 3,864,548.07
SAVING 2,383,976 803,400.00 7,143 211,432.80 1,014,832.80

Project Cost LINES MONTHLY BILL

LRT KELANA RM 4.3 Million

JAYA LINE (AARU)

MRT RM 4.8 Million

SBK LINE (AARU)

RM 4.9 RM 3.9
LRT3 Million Million
(AARU) (ERS)
94 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

1 2 3 4 5
PROOF OF
COMPLIANCE
COST TIMELINE ANALYSIS
ALL SOLUTIONS
Implementation
CONCEPT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
Timeline

TIMELINE 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

SMART
Lighting

INVERTER
Air-Cond.

Energy
RECOVERY NO PROTOTYPE DEVELOPMENT
System

RTEx CONVENTION 2019

LEGENDS
Theoretical Calculation Full simulation for the ERS solution has been carried
& Simulation Study
out and proven to meet the target. However, the
Prototype Development
& Testing
implementation cannot be done in small scale and
development of prototype is not possible.
Mass Manufacturing &
Site Installation Therefore the team has agreed that this solution is
TAKEN OUT from ICC Scope.
95 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

Final
1 Proposed
PROOF OF
2 3Solutions
TIMELINE
4
COST
5
ANALYSIS
CONCEPT
COMPLIANCE
ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
FINAL SOLUTIONS Overall Concept

EXISTING LINES DESIGN LRT3 WITH NEW TECHNOLOGY LRT3 WITH SMART TECHNOLOGY

Power Intake from Power Intake from Power Intake from

TNB TNB TNB

AC 33kV AC 33kV
AC 33kV
DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
SYSTEM SYSTEM

750V DC SYSTEM 750V DC SYSTEM 750V DC SYSTEM

LIGHTING LIGHTING LIGHTING

Fluorescent & LED Type • LED Type

LED Type • Dimming
Sensor &
Controller
AIR- AIR- AIR-
CONDITIONING CONDITIONING CONDITIONING
• Normal Type Inverter Type • Inverter Type
• Timer • Temperature
Sensor
• Load Sensor
• Timer
96 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

1 2 3 4 5
PROOF OF TIMELINE COST ANALYSIS
CONCEPT
COMPLIANCE
ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
FINAL SOLUTIONS SWOT Analysis

INTERNAL
• Increase energy efficiency
and optimize energy • Components incompatibility with other
consumption relevant onboard equipment
• Reduce operational cost • Unproven in Malaysia’s Railway System
• Environment-friendly
• Longer lifecycle STRENGTHS
WEAKNESSES
S W

NEGATIVE
POSITIVE

• Contractual impact if

O T
OPPORTUNITIES
contractor consider
implementation of these
solutions as additional
• Collaboration with agency/ third party THREATS scope
with green building technology expertise. • Unclear scope
• Operation & Maintenance personnel to demarcation between
learn new technology and new skills solution provider and train
• As a benchmark in Malaysia’s railway manufacturer
system
EXTERNAL
97 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

1 2 3 4 5
PROOF OF TIMELINE COST ANALYSIS
CONCEPT
COMPLIANCE
ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
FINAL SOLUTIONS Risk Identification

LIKELI-

Almost Certain
NO RISK IMPACT 11 16 20 23 25
HOOD 5 II I
Components incompatibility
7 12 17 21 24
I with other relevant onboard 4 5 4
equipment III

LIKELIHOOD
4 8 13 18 22
Unproven in Malaysia’s
II Railway System 2 5 3 IV
2 5 9 14 19
Contractual impact if
contractor consider 2
4 4

Very Unlikely
III implementation of these
solutions as additional scope 1 3 6 10 15
1
Unclear scope demarcation
IV between solution provider 4 3 1 2 3 4 5
and train manufacturer Minimal Critical
IMPACT
RISKS were derived
from WEAKNESSES RISK CATEGORY
& THREATS from Code 1 [Score ≤ 7] Code 3 [16 ≤ Score ≤ 22]

previous SWOT
Code 2 [8 ≤ Score ≤ 15] Code 2 [23 ≤ Score ≤ 25]
Analysis
98 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carefully evaluated each alternative solution prior to the final selection based
4.10 on appropriate criteria

1 2 3 4 5
PROOF OF TIMELINE COST ANALYSIS
CONCEPT
COMPLIANCE
ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
FINAL SOLUTIONS Mitigation Measures

LIKELI-

Almost Certain
NO MITIGATION MEASURES IMPACT 11 16 20 23 25
HOOD 5
Shared relevant specifications
and drawings of train 7 12 17 21 24
I manufacturer with solution 2 1 4
provider

LIKELIHOOD
Development of engineering 4 8 13 18 22
II prototype and performing 2 2 3
engineering simulation
2 5 9 14 19
Engagement with TDA to 2 IV II

Very Unlikely
establish industrial
III collaboration program to 1 1 1 3 6 10 15
avoid any additional cost to
the project
1 III I
Conducted technical
workshop and interfacing
1 2 3 4 5
IV meeting between train 1 2 Minimal Critical
manufacturer and solution IMPACT
provider

MITIGATION MEASURES were derived from Source:

STRENGTHS & OPPORTUNITIES of the SWOT Risk Matrix Score based
on LRT3 Project Risk
Analysis. All risk have been mitigated Management Plan
and minimized to Code 1.
99 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has assessed the final creative and innovative solution(s) against targeted
4.11 objectives

Project Stages

A B C

IDENTIFY & ASSESS VERIFY & VALIDATE IMPLEMENT

100 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has assessed the final creative and innovative solution(s) against targeted
4.11 objectives

Verification & Validation Method - Matrix on Practicality vs. Impact

Am I Building Am I Building
VERIFICATION the Product Right? the Right Product? VALIDATION

Verify Simulation
Validate Energy
Compliance to
Saving against Target
Specification

IVTE & ISA to verify COST

and validate Final IVTE & ISA
Design Compliance to ASSESSMENT
Specification
SITE
VISIT
ICE to verify that the
new technology Validate Stakeholders
appropriate for the Satisfaction against
LRT3 Project Target

Site Visit to Engineering Mock-up Train to Verify the

Site Visit to Air-Conditioning Factory at China to
Feasibility of the Sensor and Controller Installation
carry out physical inspection
and to Validate the Lighting Circuit Diagram
101 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has assessed the final creative and innovative solution(s) against targeted
4.11 objectives

Verification Smart LED Lighting

Mounting Height 2.4 m

Lighting Components:
Working Plane 1.2 m Ring Lamp 1
Reflectance Ceiling 60%, Wall Glass, Floor 10% LLE 24x560 mm 2400 Im HV
2 Pcs
ADV5
NUMERIC SUMMARY
LLE 24x280 mm 1250 Im HV
Lux Requirement Min./ 2 Pcs
ADV5
Description Units Avg. Max. Min.
(Avg.) Avg. LCA 50 W 100mA-400mA
1 Pc
Train Lux 325 928.03 1488 261 0.28 one4all Ip PRE

Lighting Components :
Ring Lamp 2 & 3
LLE 24x560 mm 2400 Im HV
8 Pcs
ADV5
LLE 24x140 mm 650 Im HV
2 Pcs
ADV5
LCA 75 W 100mA-400mA
2 Pc
one4all Ip PRE

Lighting Components :
Semicircular Lamp
LLE 24x560 mm 2400 Im HV
2 Pcs
ADV5
LLE 24x280 mm 1250 Im HV
1 Pc
ADV5
LLE 24x140 mm 650 Im HV
2 Pcs
ADV5
LCA 75 W 100mA-400mA
2 Pc
one4all Ip PRE
102 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has assessed the final creative and innovative solution(s) against targeted
4.11 objectives

Verification Air Conditioning Final Design Approval

Air Cond System Final Design Verification and Validation by Independent Validation and Testing
Engineer (IV&TE) and Independent Safety assessor (ISA)
103 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has assessed the final creative and innovative solution(s) against targeted
4.11 objectives

Verification Independent Checking Engineer (ICE)

ICE verification on the new Smart Technologies appropriate

for the LRT3 Project

To alleviate the issue on inefficient electricity usage, several noteworthy quantum

achievement and value creation in this project include;
1. Improved technology of the train air-cond system with high-efficiency inverter to
reduce energy consumption
2. Smart lighting system inside trains by having LED lights and control feature,
utilizing natural daylight in order to avoid continuous 100% lighting consumption
throughout 18 hours of train operation; and
3. Optimising train regenerative energy by recycling back DC power to AC usage
through inverter system which indirectly reduce global warming impact from
wastage of direct burning energy of existing technology (AARU)

BRIAN WONG YEW KENG

Project Manager
LRT3 ICE Project (System)

TUV RHEINLAND (TUV) is a certified International Consultant has

assessed and validates the new technologies design.

TUV as ICE has assessed and VERIFIED the new technology.

104 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has assessed the final creative and innovative solution(s) against targeted
4.11 objectives

Validation Target Achievement

LRT AMPANG LINE MRT SUNGAI BULOH-KAJANG LINE
4-Car Train 4-Car Train
(AMG) (SBK)
Total Load (kW) - Air- Conditioning 146.79 Total Load (kW) - Air- Conditioning 85.28
Total Load (kW)- Fluorescent Light 2.74 Total Load (kW)- Fluorescent Light 5.68
26% Savings via LED 4.20
Total Load (kW) 149.53 Total Load (kW) 189.48
Return Trip Time (Hr) 1.93 Return Trip Time (Hr) 1.93
Energy (kw/H) 289.08 Energy (kw/H) 366.33
Carbon Emission (kgC02) 214.21 Carbon Emission (kgC02) 271.45

Cost Energy (RM) 0.337 Cost Energy (RM) 0.337

Cost/ Trip for Single Train (RM) 97.42 Cost/ Trip for Single Train (RM) 123.45

Energy Saving for Single Train New Smart System – LRT3 4-Car Train Energy Saving for Single Train
= 29.13 kWh = 106.38kw/H
Total Load (kW) - Air- Conditioning 196.00
Carbon Emission Saving for Single Train
Carbon Emission Saving for Single Train 32% Savings via Inverter 133.28
= 78.83kgC02
= 21.59 kgC02
Total Load (kW) - Fluorescent Light 2.72
Cost/ Trip Saving for Single Train
Cost/ Trip Saving for Single Train 26% Savings via LED 2.01 = RM 35.85
=RM 9.82
10% Dimmed Savings (kW) 1.81
35% PIR/Daylight Savings (kW) 1.18
Assumptions:
• Cost Energy (Tariff E1)
Total Load (kW) 134.46
= 0.337 10% Return Trip Time (Hr) 1.93 29%
• Green tech SAVINGS
Malaysia Carbon SAVINGS Energy (kw/H) 259.95
Calculator
Carbon Emission (kg C02) 192.62
1kWh = 0.741kgC02)
• Constant LED Saving Cost Energy (RM) 0.337
• Constant RTT
Cost/ Trip for Single Train (RM) 87.60
105 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has assessed the final creative and innovative solution(s) against targeted
4.11 objectives

Validation Stakeholders’ Satisfaction Against Target

Solution 1 #Install LED Lighting and develop Sensor to regulate and control lighting inside train
QUESTION RAISED:
i. Do you agree new technology of Smart Lighting System (inside train) with LED and automatic control features to
adjust light brightness based on natural daylight received shall be adopted for railway system improvement?

ii. Do you agree improve technology of the train air-conditioning system by adopting high efficiency inverter will
reduce the energy consumption?

37 STAKEHOLDERS

Percentage of Acceptance
Asset Owner / Operator
60 Consultant/ Contractor/ Manufacturer
Public
Regulator/ Authority/ Agency
12
16

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
AIRCOND 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.6% 2.3% 3.1% 7.0% 8.6% 76.6%
REGEN 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.8% 1.6% 2.3% 8.6% 10.2% 76.6%

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree

Target: >70% Acceptance AIRCOND REGEN
106 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carried out and implemented creative and innovative solution successfully
4.12
Project Stages

A B C

IDENTIFY & ASSESS VERIFY & VALIDATE IMPLEMENT

107 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carried out and implemented creative and innovative solution successfully
4.12
Implementation Constraints & Solutions

ITEM CONSTRAINTS SOLUTIONS

LRT3 Project completion SMART Lighting • Prototype was developed to confirm smart lighting system workability
has been revised from System • Installation in Train Engineering Mocked-up was carried to confirm physical
Year 2020 to Year 2024 system workability and interfacing impact with other systems
T I M E L I N E

by the Government.

This has impacted the Air Conditioning with • Prototype was developed to confirm smart air conditioning system
ICC Project Inverter workability
implementation & • Design completed and Factory Acceptance Inspection (FAI) has been
become a major conducted last year
challenge to suit the LRT3
revised Master Program
(MP)
LRT3 Project approach SMART Lighting • The smart lighting system proposal only been introduced after Fixed
and budget has been System Contract establishment. Therefore, additional financing is required.
revised by the • Project team has carried out discussion with MRCBGK and TDA in order for
Government, the cost the requirement to be considered as ICP Program and the cost will be
cutting process has fully transfer under MRCBGK
ended with Fixed • ICP Program will help to enhance local players knowledge and transfer
C O S T

Contract approach. technology. Besides, the solution will support National Green Technology
effort.
Air Conditioning with • No Cost Impact to the Fixed Contract Project Cost since the requirements
Inverter has been considered as value engineering and adopted during design
development

Lim said following the agreement today, the new completion date
for the Bandar Utama-Klang line project was set for Feb 28, 2024

The Cabinet has given the go-ahead for the

continuation of the 37 km long light rail transit line 3 (LRT3)
project but the final cost has been reduced by 47% to
RM 16.63 Bil.
108 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carried out and implemented creative and innovative solution successfully
4.12
Implementation Original LRV Interior Lighting Design

REQUIREMENT
 Power Supply: 110VDC
 Level of Average
Illumination ≥ 325 lux at a
height of 1.2m above
floor level
 The luminance of
operator console ≥ 320
INTERIOR LIGHTING LAYOUT lux
FOR A CAR TRAIN  Emergency Lighting
provides at least 50% of
LEGEND normal lighting level
 No single point failure will
1: Ring Lamp #1 6: Semi-Circular Lamp #6
cause the loss of more
2 & 12: Semi-Circular Lamp #1 7: Semi-Circular Lamp #7 than 50%
 Lighting System: LED
3 & 8: Ring Lamp #2 10: Ring Lamp #3  Lighting System and
components to meet the
4 & 9: Semi-Circular Lamp #2 13 & 14: Ambient Lamps Standard IP20
5 & 11: Semi-Circular Lamp #3 15, 16, 17 & 18: Power Drivers
Source:
CRRC FDR Document
109 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carried out and implemented creative and innovative solution successfully
4.12
Implementation Original LRV Interior Lighting Design

POWER DRIVER POWER DRIVER/LED DRIVER

(SIDE VIEW)
 Power Driver is directly connected to Auxiliary Power Supply (APS)
 Power Driver has voltage/current protection
 The dimming switch uses PWM modulation for controlling the brightness
in 4 stages:
 Switches 4 & 3 are pressed, the brightness of the lightings will be 100%
of full ratings
 Switches 4 & 2 are pressed, the brightness of the lightings will be 90% of
full ratings
 Switches 1 & 2 are pressed, the brightness of the lightings will be 80% of
full ratings
 Switches 1 & 3 are pressed, the brightness of the lightings will be 70% of
full ratings
 Under emergency condition, the PWM output voltage will drop to 50% of
rated output voltage and so does the brightness

DIMMING
SWITCHES

Source:
CRRC Lighting FDR Document POWER DRIVER (FRONT VIEW)
110 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carried out and implemented creative and innovative solution successfully
4.12
Implementation Original LRV Interior Lighting Design

LIGHTING CIRCUIT CONTROL

 Power Driver 1 supplies to

Ring Lamp 1, Ring Lamp 2,
Semi-Circular Lamp 3 &
Ambient Lamp
 Power Driver 2 supplies to
Semi-Circular Lamp 1, Semi-
Circular Lamp 2, Semi-
Secular Lamp 4 & 6
 When Power Driver 1 fails,
Power Driver 2 will supply to
Ring Lamp 1, Ring Lamp 2,
Semi-Circular Lamp 3 &
Ambient Lamp, Semi-
Circular Lamp 1, Semi-
Circular Lamp 2, Semi-
Secular Lamp 4 & 6. Vice
versa.
 Power Driver 3 supplies to Semi-Circular 5 & 7, Semi-Circular Lamp 3 & Ambient Lamp Source:
CRRC FDR
 Power Driver 4 supplies to Ring Lamp 2, Ring Lamp 3, Semi-Secular Lamp 1
Document
 When Power Driver 3 fails, Power Driver 4 will supply Semi-Circular 5 & 7, Semi-Circular
Lamp 3 & Ambient Lamp, Ring Lamp 2, Ring Lamp 3, Semi-Secular Lamp 1. Vice
versa.
 All lamps are in parallel and will not affect other lamps due to failure
111 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carried out and implemented creative and innovative solution successfully
4.12
Implementation Innovative SMART Lighting Solution

PROJECT : LRT3 Innovative SMART Lighting Solution REQUIREMENT

MOUNTING HEIGHT : 2.4 m
WORKING PLANE : 1.2 m  Level of Average Illumination
REFLECTANCE : Ceiling 60%, Wall Glass, Floor 10% ≥ 325 lux at a height of 1.2m
SYMBOL LABEL DESCRIPTION LUMES LLF QTY. above floor level
 The luminance of operator
LLE 24x140 mm 1 X 3.3W/840 TRIDONIC
650 0.800 24 Pcs console ≥ 320 lux
650 Im ADV5 HV ADV5 LED STRIP
 Emergency Lighting provides
LLE 24x280 mm 1 X 6.6W/865 TRIDONIC
1250 0.800 8 Pcs at least 50% of normal lighting
1250 Im ADV5 HV ADV5 LED STRIP
level
LLE 24x560 mm 1 X 13.2W/865 TRIDONIC
2400 0.800 54 Pc  No single point failure will
2400 Im ADV5 HV ADV5 LED STRIP
cause the loss of more than
50%
NUMERIC SUMMARY  Lighting System: LED
DESCRIPTION UNITS LUX REQUIREMENT AVG. MAX. MIN. MIN./ AVG.  Lighting System and
components to meet the
LRT3 TRAIN Lux 325 928.03 1488 261 0.28 Standard IP20

INTERIOR LIGHTING LAYOUT FOR 1 CAR

112 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carried out and implemented creative and innovative solution successfully
4.12
Implementation SMART Lighting Prototype Layout

LED LAMP

GND LED DRIVER

N
-
L GND + LUX SENSOR

DALI – GATEWAY PLUS - +

- +
- + - +
POWER SUPPLY LUX CONTROLLER
113 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carried out and implemented creative and innovative solution successfully
4.12
Implementation SMAR Lighting Wiring Diagram

LIGHTING CONTROL TOPOLOGY

 Constant Light Control
Light level sensors turn on,
off or dim lights, and adjust
shades automatically in
relation to natural light to
maintain light level approx.
320 lux
 Sensor Position
Light sensor to be installed
at the front, back and each
of the car, next to the glass
window. Lux reading will be
based on 3 sensor points
 Dimming
Dimming speed 1s every
10% Up or Down. Smart
Lighting Systems that allow
areas and groups of lamps
to communicate with each
other and turn off or dim
depending on light in the
LIGHTING WIRING DIAGRAM surrounding areas
114 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carried out and implemented creative and innovative solution successfully
4.12
Implementation Smart LED Lighting & Sensor - Prototype

Power Supply 640 mA S KNX

Brand : Theben
Model : 9070924

LUX Controller KNX

Brand : Theben LUX Sensor
Model : 1349200 Brand : Theben
Model : 1349200

Dali – Gateway KNX Plus

Brand : Theben
Model : 9070929
115 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carried out and implemented creative and innovative solution successfully
4.12
Implementation Train Engineering Mockup – Lighting Layout
116 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carried out and implemented creative and innovative solution successfully
4.12
Implementation Air Conditioning with Inverter – Final Design Document

Source:
CRRC Air-Conditioning FDR
Document
117 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carried out and implemented creative and innovative solution successfully
4.12
Implementation Air Conditioning with Inverter – Technical Parameters

ARRANGEMENT OF THE VAC UNIT

MAIN TECHNICAL PARAMETERS

 Weight of Unit : ≤ 680 kg
 Enclosure Material : Aluminium Alloy
 Main Loop : DC-375, DC+375V, three-phase
AC400V/50Hz
 Control Loop : DC 110V (+25%, -30%)
VVVF Technology
 Rated Air Volume :
3,500 m³/h/unit
 Max. Air Supply Volume:
4,000 m³/h/unit
 Fresh Air Volume:
270 m³/h/unit
 Emergency Ventilation Air
Vol.: 1,520 m³/h/unit
 Rated Cooling Capacity :
29 kW
 Max. Cooling Capacity:
35 kW
 Refrigerant: R407C

Source:
CRRC Air-Conditioning FDR
Document
118 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carried out and implemented creative and innovative solution successfully
4.12
Implementation Air Conditioning with Inverter – Schematic Diagram

 DC 750V power will input into the DC

Source: regulated power supply in the air
CRRC Air- conditioning unit via a main connector.
Conditioning
 The DC regulated power supply
FDR Document
will convert the DC 750V power
to DC 600V into VVVF three-
VAC phase source, then supply to the
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM compressors and supply air fans
OF CONTROL CIRCUIT to make the motors operate with
specified rotate speed.
 The condensate fan
will be powered by
three-phase 400V
source by SIV.
 Under cooling mode,
both the supply air fan
and condenser fan
will work. Under initial
cool down mode or
when the temperature
of the passenger
compartment is higher
than the target
temperature by 3℃ or
more, the compressors
will work with high
frequency to achieve
quick cooling.
119 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carried out and implemented creative and innovative solution successfully
4.12
Implementation Air Conditioning with Inverter – Air Distribution

Source: AIR DISTRIBUTION SIMULATION

CRRC Air-
Conditioning  The air velocity measuring at 350 mm below
FDR the diffusers will not exceed 0.4 m/s.
Document
 After door
opening, the VAC
will be able to
bring the interior
temperature to
the target
condition within 80
seconds at AW3
loading
120 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carried out and implemented creative and innovative solution successfully
4.12
Implementation Air Conditioning with Inverter – Final Design Drawing

Air Conditioning System Final

Design Drawing
121 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carried out and implemented creative and innovative solution successfully
4.12
Implementation Air Conditioning with Inverter – First Article Inspection (FAI)
122 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The team has carried out and implemented creative and innovative solution successfully
4.12
Implementation Air Conditioning with Inverter – First Article Inspection (FAI)
123

CRITERIA 5
Monitoring &
Standardization
5.13 The team has carried out a systematic and
sufficient monitoring to ensure the improvement
action is in place

5.14 The team

adjustments
is able to make appropriate
to ensure the improvement is in
place and maintained

5.15 Steps were

procedures
taken to ensure that the new
were endorsed, adopted,
documented and shared

5.16 Actions were taken to ensure that the

adopted procedures were standardized
new
and
maintained
124 C5 MONITORING & STANDARDIZATION
The team has carried out a systematic and sufficient monitoring to ensure the improvement
5.13 action is in place

Prototype Testing & Monitoring Smart Lighting First Article Inspection

Smart Lighting Prototype

After completion of design phase &
lighting simulation, Prototype of the
smart lighting unit was built. Testing &
Inspection was carried out to assess the
performance of the smart lighting
125 C5 MONITORING & STANDARDIZATION
The team has carried out a systematic and sufficient monitoring to ensure the improvement
5.13 action is in place

Prototype Testing & Monitoring Smart Lighting Test

Testing was conducted

and assisted by
Industrial Specialist
System Integrator from
Seikou Systec Sdn. Bhd.

Testing Output:

i. Functional test
ii. Sensor test
iii.Circuiting test
126 C5 MONITORING & STANDARDIZATION
The team has carried out a systematic and sufficient monitoring to ensure the improvement
5.13 action is in place

Prototype Testing & Monitoring Air Conditioning First Article Inspection

Air Conditioning with Inverter Prototype

After completion of design phase,
Prototype of the air conditioning unit
was built and ready for inspection
First Article Inspection (FAI)
FAI is a part of manufacturing phases
to agree on the manufacturing quality,
workmanship, major physical
parameters such as dimension, weight,
etc., prior to the commencement of
mass production of the equipment
127 C5 MONITORING & STANDARDIZATION
The team has carried out a systematic and sufficient monitoring to ensure the improvement
5.13 action is in place

Prototype Testing & Monitoring Air Conditioning Type Test

Prototype Test Programme

LRT3 Project Passenger Compartment Air
Conditioning UnitCK29L/BPG-E20 is tested and
assessed for performance in accordance with
the requirements of the Technical Specifications
and the “TB/T 1804-2009 Air Conditioning Unit for
Railway Passenger Car”.
128 C5 MONITORING & STANDARDIZATION
The team is able to make appropriate adjustments to ensure the improvement is in place and
5.14 maintained

Feedback & Improvement Design Feedback & Comments

Feedback from the Inspection and Testing

Inspection parties involved in the inspection made
comments for improvement in a checklist.

Prototype improvement
Response time was improvised
by recalibrating the controller’s
input and output time. Upon
completion of smart lighting
system inside the engineering
mock up, further improvement
can be achieved during lux
measurement verification.
129 C5 MONITORING & STANDARDIZATION
The team is able to make appropriate adjustments to ensure the improvement is in place and
5.14 maintained

Feedback & Improvement Design Feedback & Comments

Feedback from the Inspection and Testing

Inspection parties involved in the inspection made

comments for improvement and documented it in the
Design Review Sheet (DRS).

Prototype Improvement
Improvement proposed were
discussed, and further studied to make
the necessary modifications to ensure
and maintain the effectiveness of
improvements.
The OEM (Longertek) agreed to made
improvement which will reflect to the
final product before mass production.
130 C5 MONITORING & STANDARDIZATION
The team is able to make appropriate adjustments to ensure the improvement is in place and
5.14 maintained

Feedback & Improvement Improvement Applied

Wiring cable Wiring cable

under stress and properly
not properly installed and
insulated insulated
BEFORE

Power cable

AFTER
Power Cable
installed
properly
through small
installed from
space causing
the side
cable stress

Fuse box were

Fuse box were
arranged
vertically arranged
horizontally for
causing
ease of
difficulty in
maintenance maintenance
131 C5 MONITORING & STANDARDIZATION
The team is able to make appropriate adjustments to ensure the improvement is in place and
5.14 maintained

Feedback & Improvement Improvement Applied

The metal
clamp hoop Replace
is not tight metal
enough to clamp type
hold the with fixed/
drain pipe screw hoop
and will to ensure
become the drain
BEFORE

AFTER
loose after pipe can
multiple be tighten
dismantling
132 C5 MONITORING & STANDARDIZATION
Steps were taken to ensure that the new procedures were endorsed, adopted, documented
5.15 and shared

Report Endorsement Final Test Report

Final test report incorporate

changes on dimming setting
and percentage for the
Smart Lighting system was
signed and verified by KNX
Specialist. Baser
133 C5 MONITORING & STANDARDIZATION
Steps were taken to ensure that the new procedures were endorsed, adopted, documented
5.15 and shared

Report Endorsement First Article Inspection Report

FAI report for the Air

Conditioning system was
signed and verified by
manufacturer’s consultant.
134 C5 MONITORING & STANDARDIZATION
Actions were taken to ensure that the new adopted procedures were standardized and
5.16 maintained

Correspondence Meeting & Workshops with Train Manufacturer and Third Parties

Series of meetings &

workshops with Air-
Conditioning OEM
(Longertek), Smart
Lighting Solution Provider
(Seikou Systec), train
manufacturer (CRRC)
and other third parties
were initiated by project
team.
The final test report were
assessed by the project
team prior manufacturing
Engagement with TDA on and procuring parts for
Industrial Collaboration Program train system.
(ICP)

CRRC is the train

manufacturer responsible
for implementation of both
Smart Lighting & Smart
Inverter Air-Conditioning
System
135 C5 MONITORING & STANDARDIZATION
Actions were taken to ensure that the new adopted procedures were standardized and
5.16 maintained

Correspondence Manufacturing Plan

CRRC was given the ‘green light’ to
proceed with the production of train
with the smart system.
Procurement, Manufacturing and
Delivery Plan was established to
oversee the manufacturing activity
on or off the Site. Manufacturing
method statements, specific
allocations of responsibility as well as
interfacing and coordination
requirement is included.
This is to ensure that new procedures
and improvements agreed can be
translated into production line.
136

CRITERIA 6
Achievement & Value
Creation
6.17 Description of the types and
achievement and value creation
quantum of

6.18 Reconciliation
achievement
of
were
target
made
and
(cost
actual
incurred
explained)

6.19 The solution selected is recognized for its

uniqueness at company/ industry/ national and
international levels

6.20 The impacts of

creation to the
the achievement and value
environment, community and
team members was stated

6.21 The team provided evidence of verification and

validation of achievement and value creation
137 C6 ACHIEVEMENT & VALUE CREATION
6.17 Description of the types and quantum of achievement and value creation

Summary of Problem & Solutions

Problem Identified

High Power Consumption in Railway System due to

Inefficient Electricity Usage

Initiatives
Taken
Improved Technology
Adopt Smart Lighting of the Train Air
System Inside Train by Conditioning System
having LED Lighting and by Adopting High
Dimming Control Efficiency Inverter,
Features Load & Temperature
This will utilise natural daylight to Sensors
avoid continuous 100% lighting The new technology adopted
consumption throughout 18 hours will reduce the energy
of train operation consumption by regulating
the compressor motor to
maintain at comfort level
138 C6 ACHIEVEMENT & VALUE CREATION
6.17 Description of the types and quantum of achievement and value creation

Criteria & Target Setting

CRITERIA & To reduce train sub-system operational cost by
TARGET 10% per annum
Reduce Cost VALUE
1 Min 10% Cost Reduction per
annum CREATED

New Smart Technology

2 Have not been adopted by

existing Malaysia’s Railway
Product
Development

Commercial Value
3 Recognized by min 80% of
Railway Industrial Players
Quality of
Life

Stakeholder Satisfaction
4 Minimum 70% Satisfaction
Index achieved
Sustainability &
Reliability

Energy Saving
5 Minimum 10% Energy
Saving per Annum
Knowledge

Green Impact
6 Minimum 10% CO2 Emission
Reduction per annum
139 C6 ACHIEVEMENT & VALUE CREATION
6.18 Reconciliation of target and actual achievement were made (cost incurred explained)

Cost
CRITERIA & VALUE
TARGET CREATED

Reduce Cost
1 Min 10% Cost Reduction per
annum
Product
Development

Sustainability &
Reliability

TOTAL COST SAVING = REDUCTION IN

PROJECT COST + OPERATION COST

As LRT3 is a Fixed Price Design & Build

Contract, NO variation shall be anticipated
on the Project. Therefore, Target Set on
saving only refer to Operational Cost.
 140 C6 ACHIEVEMENT & VALUE CREATION
6.18 Reconciliation of target and actual achievement were made (cost incurred explained)

TARGET SET: To reduce train sub-system

operational cost by 10% per annum

In order to have "Zero Project Cost” for the Smart Lighting

Implementation , team has engaged Various Partners
and successfully eliminated the RM 870,840* Project Cost
through Industrial Collaboration Program (ICP)

Technology
Depository Agency
(TDA)
ICP Program

Prasarana
Project Initiator

MRCBGK Sdn. Bhd.

Turnkey Partner
(Implementer &
Financing Body

Seikou Systec
Sdn. Bhd.
Industrial
Note: Specialist System
*Project cost taken from slide 91 Integrator
(Detail project cost breakdown)
141 C6 ACHIEVEMENT & VALUE CREATION
6.18 Reconciliation of target and actual achievement were made (cost incurred explained)

TARGET SET: To reduce train sub-system

operational cost by 10% per annum

The Smart Air Conditioning System is consider as

having "Zero Project Cost” since the proposal is
identified as VALUE ENGINEERING during design
development which is not entitle for cost variation as
per contract.
142 C6 ACHIEVEMENT & VALUE CREATION
6.18 Reconciliation of target and actual achievement were made (cost incurred explained)

TARGET SET: To reduce train sub-system

operational cost by 10% per annum

COST/ TRIP COST / TRIP

SMART TRAIN SYSTEM

Existing Design without
New Smart System - LRT3 3-Car Train 4-Car Train

EXISTING TRAIN
3-Car Train 4-Car Train
Smart System LRT3
Total Load (kW) - Air- Conditioning 147.00 196.00 Total Load (kW) - Air- Conditioning 147.00 196.00

DESIGN
DESIGN
Total Load (kW) - Fluorescent Light 2.04 2.72 32% Savings via Inverter 99.96 133.28
Total Load (kW) 149.04 198.72 Total Load (kW) - Fluorescent Light 2.04 2.72
Return Trip Time (hr) 1.93 1.93 26% Savings via LED 1.51 2.01
Energy (kWh) 288.14 384.19 10% Dimmed Savings (kW) 1.36 1.81
Cost Energy (RM) 0.337 0.337 35% PIR/Daylight Savings (kW) 0.88 1.18
Cost/ Trip for Single Train (RM) 97.10 129.47 Total Load (kW) 100.84 134.46
Return Trip Time (hr) 1.93 1.93

Smart Lighting
ELECTRICITY COST ESTIMATION
Energy (kWh) 194.96 259.95
Existing Design without
3-Car Train 4-Car Train Cost Energy (RM) 0.337 0.337
Smart System LRT3
Cost/ Trip for Single Train (RM) 65.70 87.60
Energy (kWh) per Single Trip 288.14 384.19
ELECTRICITY COST ESTIMATION
No pf max Return Trip per day 6 6
Total no of Train 20 56 New Smart System - LRT3 3-Car Train 4-Car Train

Total Energy (kWh) per day 34,577.09 129,087.81

Energy (kWh) per Single Trip 194.96 259.95
Total Energy (kWh) per month 1,037,312.76 3,872,634.29
No pf max Return Trip per day 6 6
Smart Air-Cond.

Total Energy (kWh) per annum 12,447,753.08 46,471,611.50

Total no of Train 20 56
Total Energy (kWh) per day 23,395.52 87,343.28
Energy Cost per day (RM) 11,652.48 43,502.59
Total Energy (kWh) per month 701,865.64 2,620,298.41
Energy Cost per month (RM) 349,574.40 1,305,077.76
Total Energy (kWh) per annum 8,422,387.73 31,443,580.87
Energy Cost per annum (RM) 4,194,892.79 15,660,933.08

Energy Cost per day (RM) 7,884.29 29,434.69

Note:
Operation Cost has been calculated based on “Train Cost per Trip “. Energy Cost per month (RM) 236,528.72 883,040.56
Comparison assessment between “Existing Train Design” and “ Smart Train Energy Cost per annum (RM) 2,838,344.67 10,596,486.75
System Design” has been carried out.
143 C6 ACHIEVEMENT & VALUE CREATION
6.18 Reconciliation of target and actual achievement were made (cost incurred explained)

TARGET SET: To reduce train sub-system

operational cost by 10% per annum

ESTIMATED SAVING PER MONTH: Estimated Cost Reduction

32%
Energy Energy
Demand Demand with

RM 1.305 M /
= based on - Smart Train

Month

RM 883 K /
Existing Design System

Month
RM RM
= 1,305,077.76
- 883,040.56 Existing Energy Smart Train
Demand System Energy
Demand

= RM 422,037.20 per Month

144 C6 ACHIEVEMENT & VALUE CREATION
The solution selected is recognized for its uniqueness at company/ industry/ national and
6.19 international levels

Recognition
CRITERIA & VALUE
TARGET CREATED

New Smart Technology

2 Have not been adopted by

existing Malaysia’s Railway
Product
Development

Commercial Value
3 Recognized by min 80% of
Railway Industrial Players
Quality of
Life

Stakeholder Satisfaction
4 Minimum 70% Satisfaction
Index achieved
Sustainability &
Reliability

Knowledge

The solutions/ initiatives with

above criteria and values
have been recognized by
various parties
145 C6 ACHIEVEMENT & VALUE CREATION
The solution selected is recognized for its uniqueness at company/ industry/ national and
6.19 international levels

TARGET SET: Have not been adopted

by existing Malaysia’s Railway

EXISTING LINES

NO TECHNOLOGY

KLJ AMG MRT KOMUTER ERL

Smart Lighting System with LED &

1
Dimming Sensors Inside Train
High Efficiency Air Conditioning
2
System with Inverter & Sensors

Product New technology

development enhance
enhanced project VALUE operator and
team talents and project Team
creativity with the knowledge on
output of creating technology
better environment CREATED evolution and
and operation new operation
friendly regime
146 C6 ACHIEVEMENT & VALUE CREATION
The solution selected is recognized for its uniqueness at company/ industry/ national and
6.19 international levels

TARGET SET: Recognized by minimum

80% of Railway Industrial Players
Notes:
1. The data below is confirmed via survey
carried out on 125 people with various
railway related background
INITIATIVES COMMERCIAL VALUES 2. Commercial value with score marks >80%
considered recognized and accepted by
Railway Industrial Players

SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE
An investment with foreseen high returns. Smart
Less energy demand, less C02 released to
Lighting in Train will set a benchmark in Malaysian
atmosphere. Technologies adopted will not
/Asian Railway Industry. It will be assessed to
harm people or planet
become “Patented Design”
37
88% 60 84%
RELIABILITY 12 EFFICIENCY
Design enhancement validated & verified by IVTE 16 Adopted Technologies utilising product with high
& ICE. Technologies adopted will not jeopardizing efficiency which optimize energy consumption
other systems during operation regime and reduce operating cost

80% 86%
Recognized as Practical and Having High Commercial
Value by Railway Industrial Players
Regulator/ Authority/ Consultants/ Contractors/
Asset Owner Public
Agencies Manufacturers
TOTAL
147 C6 ACHIEVEMENT & VALUE CREATION
The solution selected is recognized for its uniqueness at company/ industry/ national and
6.19 international levels

TARGET SET: Minimum 70%

Satisfaction Index achieved

The initiatives to reduce energy

“I have perused your consumption, which indirectly
ICC proposal and
assist in controlling global
agreed with the idea of
energy efficiency and warming impact and increase
reducing high electricity quality of life to community are
consumption in Railway fully supported by
System and I will support LRT3 DEPUTY CHIEF PROJECT
and cooperate to DIRECTOR;
realize the objective” EN. LOKMAN HAMID
148 C6 ACHIEVEMENT & VALUE CREATION
The solution selected is recognized for its uniqueness at company/ industry/ national and
6.19 international levels

TARGET SET: Minimum 70%

Satisfaction Index achieved

ACHIEVEMENT ACKNOWLEDGED PARTY :

Technology Depository Agency (TDA) ICP Partner
TDA create collaborative platforms with partners
leveraging on Industrial Collaborations Program (ICP) as a Smart Lighting System inside train
technology and economic development tool contributing
to the national economic growth and the organizational Implementation Partner
financial sustainability. • Inverter type air-conditioning inside train
• Train recycle energy back to AC system
149 C6 ACHIEVEMENT & VALUE CREATION
The solution selected is recognized for its uniqueness at company/ industry/ national and
6.19 international levels

TARGET SET: Minimum 70%

Satisfaction Index achieved

STAKEHOLDERS SATISFACTION ON TARGET CRITERIA

Public/ Others 12.70%

11.10%
Asset Owner/ Operator 48.40%

Consultant/ Contractor/
Manufacturer
29.40%

Regulator/ Authority/ Agencies 9.50% 88.90%

YES NO

TOTAL
150 C6 ACHIEVEMENT & VALUE CREATION
The impacts of the achievement and value creation to the environment, community and
6.20 team members was stated

Environment & Community

CRITERIA & VALUE
TARGET CREATED

Energy Saving
5 Minimum 10% Energy
Saving per Annum
Product
Development

Green Impact
6 Minimum 10% CO2 Emission
Reduction per annum
Quality of
Life

Sustainability &
Reliability

GREEN The solutions / initiatives

CITY provide positive impacts on
Energy Saving and Reduction
of CO𝟐 Emission to the
Environment and Community
151 C6 ACHIEVEMENT & VALUE CREATION
The impacts of the achievement and value creation to the environment, community and
6.20 team members was stated

TARGET SET: Min. 10% Energy Saving &

10% CO𝟐 Emission Reduction annually

Reliable Engineering
Power Intake
Reduce Operation Cost to Operator
from TNB
AC 33kV DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM V A L U E C R E A T E D

750V DC SYSTEM Smart Train System saved 32% Energy

Notes: = 15,028 MWh per annum
1. Greentech Malaysia Carbon
Calculator: (1kWh = 0.741 kg CO2)
2. Energy Saving input refer to slide 143
SMART AIR-
SMART LIGHTING CONDITIONER
SYSTEM SYSTEM
AIR- INSIDE TRAIN
LIGHTING INSIDE TRAIN
CONDITIONING
• LED Type • Inverter Type
• Dimming • Temperature REGENERATIVE EXCESS
Sensor & Sensor ENERGY
Controller • Load Sensor
• Timer
Smart Train System reduced 32% C02 Emission
release to air = 11, 135 Ton Tonne per annum
LESS 45% from released to air.
on Lighting
System LESS 30%
on Air-
V A L U E C R E A T E D
Conditioning
System
Quality of Life
Better Environments for Communities
152 C6 ACHIEVEMENT & VALUE CREATION
The impacts of the achievement and value creation to the environment, community and
6.20 team members was stated

Impact Assessment to Group Members Method - Radar Chart

PIONEER Impact Assessment Average Analysis

Before & After

PROBLEM
ANALYSIS
5
4
3
CREATIVITY TEAMWORK
2
1 IMPACT BEFORE AFTER
0 Problem Analysis 3.0 4.8
Teamwork 3.0 5.0
Commitment 3.0 4.0
RESOURCEFULNESS COMMITMENT
ICC Knowledge 2.0 4.5
Resourcefulness 3.0 4.3
Creativity 2.0 4.3
ICC KNOWLEDGE
153 C6 ACHIEVEMENT & VALUE CREATION
The impacts of the achievement and value creation to the environment, community and
6.20 team members was stated

Learning Effect & Achievement PIONEERS Group Members

Develop Commitment Improve ICC KNOWLEDGE,

through RESPONSIBILITY, APPLICATION &
INTEGRITY & HONESTY PROCEDURES

Boost CRITICAL,
Cultivate TEAMWORK CREATIVE &
& OPENNESS INNOVATIVE Thinking
Skill

Enhance Problem ANALYSIS Expand NETWORKING Circle

& RESEARCH Capability & IDEAS with Stakeholder
154 C4 CREATIVE & INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
The impacts of the achievement and value creation to the environment, community and
6.20 team members was stated

Difficulties & Challenges PIONEERS Group Members

NO LIMITATION CAUSE SOLUTION ACTION

1 Inefficient method Lack of experience and proper Research and applying as Facilitator and
and technique usage much as technic available Team Leader
2 Difficulties to Insufficient knowledge and skill Divide task based on Team Leader
complete task capability and strength
3 Difficulties to find Every member is having Using communication Team Leader
time for group individual work, real job and medium as much as possible
discussion task
4 Lack of experience Each PIONEER member is first Consultation by Mentor and Facilitator and
timer in ICC and probably the ICC experience colleague Team Leader
first team which is not from the
Operation and Maintenance
side to join ICC
5 Lack of resource Innovation requires a lot of Internet research and Facilitator and
research otherwise vise versa meeting with solution Team Leader
provider.
155 C6 ACHIEVEMENT & VALUE CREATION
The impacts of the achievement and value creation to the environment, community and
6.20 team members was stated

Difficulties & Challenges PIONEERS Group Members

Development of Skills & Unleashing Potential of PIONEERS’s Team Members

Participation in Innovation project product Research and Development (R&D). Each member have
own role and task to ensure this project to be successful and to gain knowledge and experience as
much as possible which shall be valuable in the future

Problem & Root Cause Analysis

There is an essential QC tools to be applied to
determine any problem and root cause analysis

Internet of Thing, Digital Design & Software

Simulation
The application of online survey form (Google
form), cloud sharing, QR code; and few simulation
and design software were applied and practiced
in this project which is the new experience to us.

Knowledge in Operation and Maintenance

(O&M) Processes
As a team from Project background, this project
allow us to learn, understand and appreciate the
process and procedure of RapidKL as O&M of LRT
system.
156 C6 ACHIEVEMENT & VALUE CREATION
The team provided evidence of verification and validation of achievement and value
6.21 creation

Verification & Validation of Value Creation

Smart Train System will save at least New Technology enhance Operator,
15,028 MWh of Energy Consumption Project Team and Local Manufacturer
per annum. knowledge on technology evolution
Reliable Engineering Concept and new operation regime
which reduce operation cost to
Operator

Less energy demand leads to less TNB

generation which indirectly reduce
C02 emission to atmosphere. This will
Product Development enhanced project reduce global warming impact. With
team talents and creativity, output Smart Train System, at least 11,135 Ton
created better Environment & Operation C02 saved from released per annum
Friendly lead to better environments for
Communities
157 C6 ACHIEVEMENT & VALUE CREATION
The team provided evidence of verification and validation of achievement and value
6.21 creation

Value Creation Verification and Validation of Achievement

The initiatives to reduce energy consumption, which indirectly assist in controlling global warming
impact and increase Quality of Life to community are fully supported by Green Building Malaysia (GBI)
Facilitators. They also agreed that further steps shall be taken to develop a dedicated measurement
parameter to be incorporated in GBI Tools & Module for Transportation Sector.

“Initiatives to reduce the energy “As a GBI facilitator, I fully support

consumption of railway system is the initiatives by Prasarana
a win-win strategy for both the towards reducing energy
operator as well as the consumption in train system. As a
environment. It would be very start, a BASE train system energy
useful if GBI can develop a tool consumption needs to be
that is customized for transit measured as a benchmark. then,
station and system as a whole, the UPGRADED train system may
integrating both the station and be simulated / calculated to
the train system into one tool. This compare with the BASE train
would provide a more holistic tool system. This could then be stated
that can assess the transport as a train energy usage index as
system (station and the train opposed to Building Energy
system itself) as a whole” Intensity”

REGINA NG. IR AHMAD MASYHUR JAHAYA

She was among the first person in Qualifications:
Malaysia to obtain the American • Bachelor of Electrical &
LEED (Leadership in Energy & Mechanical Engineering (Joint
Environmental Design) accreditation Hons), University of Strathclyde,
and among the first person to obtain Scotland
the Green Building Index (GBI) • Member, Association of Consulting
accreditation. Engineers Malaysia
Regina was the green building • Facilitator, Green Building Index Sdn
consultant for first building to obtain Bhd
the highest environmental
rating(Platinum) under LEED..
158 C6 ACHIEVEMENT & VALUE CREATION
The team provided evidence of verification and validation of achievement and value
6.21 creation

Value Creation To reduce train sub-system

Verificationoperational
and Validation
cost of
10%Achievement
per annum

INDEPENDENT CHECKING
ENGINEER (ICE)
TUV RHEINLAND is a certified
International Consultant has
assessed and validates the
new technologies design. TUV via the letter
has verified the three initiatives as Smart
Technology application. The solutions and
design will set a benchmark for other new KNOWLEDGE
coming line in Railway System within
Malaysia / Asia

VALUE
PRODUCT
CREATION
DEVELOPMENT
VERIFIED

RELIABILITY QUALITY OF
ENGINEERING LIFE

TUV Rheinland as ICE has assessed and checked the abovementioned new technologies. They are
found to be appropriate to be implemented for the project and befitting of the project’s vision of smart
technology application
159 C6 ACHIEVEMENT & VALUE CREATION
The team provided evidence of verification and validation of achievement and value
6.21 creation

Conclusion To reduce train sub-system

Verificationoperational
and Validation
cost of
10%Achievement
per annum

HIGH POWER CONSUMPTION IN RAILWAY SYSTEM DUE TO

INEFFICIENT ELECTRICITY USAGE
Prasarana Malaysia Berhad aim to increase Public
Transportation usage through Reliable, Affordable,
Proficient, Integrated and Dynamic Services on a
Sustainable Basis.

LRT3 Project Target to reduce train sub-system

operational cost by 10% per annum have driven the
initiatives to reduce energy consumption through
design optimization which was successfully achieved.
With 32% less energy consumed and CO2 emission to
the atmosphere, the global warming impact can be
reduced leading to better environment and
sustainability for the community.

PIONEERS aim to patent the smart system as well as

customize the system at existing train lines and other
modes of public transport.
160

END
THANK YOU