EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL OF ESWATINI
Eswatini General Certificate of Secondary Education
__________________________________________________________________________
DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY 6902/01
Paper 1 Design October/November 2019
1 hour 15 minutes
__________________________________________________________________________
Confidential
MARK SCHEME
{6902/01}
MARKS: 50
_______________________________________________________________________________
This document consists of 4 printed pages.
© ECESWA 2019 [Turn over
2
1 (a) Accept any four additional suitable points – resists water, hygienic, easy to
access, sections labelled, matches kitchen style, stable in use, etc. No repeats of question.
1x4 [4]
(b) Accept sketches of any two suitable joints – halving, through/stopped housing, riveting, butt,
hard soldering, dowel, plastic adhesives dovetail, etc. 2x2 [4]
(c) Any suitable ideas. At least three different ideas for maximum marks. Pro rata if fewer.
Communication
Simple drawings displaying a low standard or limited range of techniques 0 - 2
Clear drawings displaying a good standard and a range of techniques –
shading / colour / annotation etc. 3-4
High quality drawings using a wide range of techniques with clear
annotation and detail 5-6
Suitability
Simplicity designs showing outlines only 0-2
Rather more detail, sensible solutions that could work 3-4
Accurate solutions, good fitness for purpose, detailed construction 5-6 [12]
(d) Evaluation of each of the ideas. At least 3 evaluations up to 2 marks
each 0-6
Selection and justification (1 + 1) 2 [8]
(e) Quality of drawing
Poor line quality, proportions, little detail 1
Good line work, use of colour, proportions, some detail 2-3
High standard throughout with a range of techniques that show
clearly all detail 4
Dimensions 2 or 3 overall dimensions only (1)
Additional detail dimensions (2) 2
Construction details
A simplistic approach showing little or no detail of construction to be
used 0-2
Most constructional detail may be obvious from overall views or with
some annotation 3-4
All constructional detail will be clear with good annotation and additional
detail drawings as necessary 5-6 [12]
(f) Suitable specific materials stated 2
Appropriate reason for choice 2 [4]
(g) Suitable method stated 1
Good detailed description of: processes 3
tools 2 [6]
[Total: 50]
© ECESWA 2019 6902/01/O/N/19 [Turn over
3
2 (a) Accept any four additional suitable points – appeals to pupils, compact, stable
on desk, school colours, school name, hold items securely, etc. No repeats of
questions. 1x4 [4]
(b) Accept sketches of any two suitable joints - glue tabs, slide-in corner sections, slots,
Velcro, staples, tape, etc. 2x2 [4]
(c) Any suitable ideas. At least three different ideas for maximum marks. Pro rata if
fewer.
Communication
Simple drawings displaying a low standard or limited range of techniques 0 - 2
Clear drawings displaying a good standard and a range of techniques - shading
/ colour / annotation etc. 3-4
High quality drawings using a wide range of techniques with clear
annotation and detail 5-6
Suitability
Simplicity designs showing outlines only 0-2
Rather more detail, sensible solutions that could work 3-4
Accurate solutions, good fitness for purpose, detailed construction 5-6 [12]
(d) Evaluation of each of the ideas. At least 3 evaluations up to 2 marks
each 0-6
Selection and justification (1 + 1) 2 [8]
(e) Quality of drawing
Poor line quality, proportions, little detail 1
Good line work, use of colour, proportions, some detail 2-3
High standard throughout with a range of techniques that show
clearly all detail 4
Dimensions 2 or 3 overall dimensions only (1)
Additional detail dimensions (2) 2
Construction details
A simplistic approach showing little or no detail of construction to be
used 0-2
Most constructional detail may be obvious from overall views or with
some annotation 3-4
All constructional detail will be clear with good annotation and additional
detail drawings as necessary 5-6 [12]
(f) Suitable specific materials stated 2
Appropriate reason for choice 2 [4]
(g) Suitable method stated 1
Good detailed description of: processes 3
tools 2 [6]
[Total: 50]
© ECESWA 2019 6902/01/O/N/19 [Turn over
4
3 (a) Accept any four additional suitable points - easy to assembly, lightweight, stable in
use, easy to attach net, holds net tightly etc. No repeats of question. 1x4 [4]
(b) Accept any two suitable attachments - eye pins, pulleys, sleeves, nut
and set screws, crank, rack and pinion gears, etc. 2x2 [4]
(c) Any suitable ideas. At least three different ideas for maximum marks.
Pro rata if fewer.
Communication
Simple drawings displaying a low standard or limited range of techniques 0 - 2
Clear drawings displaying a good standard and a range of techniques -
shading / colour / annotation etc. 3-4
High quality drawings using a wide range of techniques with clear
annotation and detail 5-6
Suitability
Simplicity designs showing outlines only 0-2
Rather more detail, sensible solutions that could work 3-4
Accurate solutions, good fitness for purpose, detailed construction 5-6 [12]
(d) Evaluation of each of the ideas. At least 3 evaluations up to 2 marks
each 0-6
Selection and justification (1 + 1) 2 [8]
(e) Quality of drawing
Poor line quality, proportions, little detail 1
Good line work, use of colour, proportions, some detail 2-3
High standard throughout with a range of techniques that show
clearly all detail 4
Dimensions 2 or 3 overall dimensions only (1)
Additional detail dimensions (2) 2
Construction details
A simplistic approach showing little or no detail of construction to be
used 0-2
Most constructional detail may be obvious from overall views or with
some annotation 3-4
All constructional detail will be clear with good annotation and additional
detail drawings as necessary 5-6 [12]
(f) Suitable specific materials stated 2
Appropriate reason for choice 2 [4]
(g) Suitable method stated 1
Good detailed description of: processes 3
tools 2 [6]
[Total: 50]
© ECESWA 2019 6902/01/O/N/19 [Turn over
