0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views10 pages

Comm p2

Uploaded by

Fegason Fegy
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views10 pages

Comm p2

Uploaded by

Fegason Fegy
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

Project Title: The Problem of Incorrect Weight and Measurement by Suppliers

Stage 1: Problem Identification

1.1. Identify a Problem

Suppliers often deliver goods with incorrect weights or measurements, leading to financial
losses, disputes, and inefficiencies in business transactions.

1.2. Problem Description

Many businesses (retailers, manufacturers, etc.) receive underweight or incorrectly measured


goods from suppliers, affecting inventory accuracy, pricing, and customer trust.

1.3. Context (How, Where, When)

Where: Common in supply chains, retail stores, food industries, and manufacturing.

When: Occurs during deliveries, especially with bulk purchases.

How: Suppliers may intentionally or unintentionally provide incorrect measurements due to


faulty scales, human error, or fraudulent practices.
1.4. Statement of Intent

To develop a reliable system to verify supplier measurements and ensure accurate deliveries.

1.5. How to Solve

Implement a verification system using digital scales, blockchain for transparency, or third-party
audits.

1.6. Design

Planning: Research existing solutions, test verification methods, and implement a monitoring
system.

Materials Needed: Digital weighing scales, measurement tools, software for tracking.

1.7. Tools/Resources Needed

Digital weighing scales

Measurement verification software

Blockchain or ledger system (for transparency)

Supplier audit checklists


Stage 2: Developing Solutions

2.1. Existing Solutions

Manual re-weighing of goods upon delivery.

Supplier contracts with penalties for discrepancies.

Use of certified third-party measurement services.

2.2. Three Proposed Solutions

I) Automated Digital Weighing System – Install digital scales at receiving points to verify
weights instantly.

ll) Blockchain-Based Verification – Use blockchain to record and track supplier measurements
for transparency.

lll) Third-Party Audits – Hire independent auditors to verify supplier measurements before
payment.
2.3. Advantages & Disadvantages

Solution

a) Automated Digital Weighing

Advantages

- Instant verification

- Reduces human error

- Cost-effective long-term

Disadvantages

- Initial setup cost

- Requires maintenance

- May not detect intentional fraud

b) Blockchain Verification

Advantages

- Tamper-proof records

- Enhances supplier accountability

- Real-time tracking
Disadvantages

- Complex to implement

- Requires supplier cooperation

- High tech dependency

c) Third-Party Audits

Advantages

- Independent verification

- Builds trust

- Reduces disputes

Disadvantages

- Expensive

- Time-consuming

- Not real-time
Stage 3: Generation of Ideas

3.1. Brainstorming Ideas

Use smart scales for automatic data logging.

Implement AI-based anomaly detection in supplier data.

Combine blockchain with automated weighing for full transparency.

3.2. Chosen Solution

Hybrid Approach:

Automated weighing system + Blockchain tracking

3.3. Refined Solution

Suppliers must use certified scales.

Data is recorded on a blockchain ledger.

AI flags discrepancies for review.


3.4. Advantages & Disadvantages

Advantages

- Real-time verification

- Prevents fraud

- Transparent records

Disadvantages

- High initial cost

- Requires supplier training

- Tech failures may disrupt process


Stage 4: Implementation

4.1. Action

Install digital scales at receiving docks.

Integrate with blockchain for data recording.

Train staff on the new system.

4.2. Build/Test

Pilot test with a few suppliers.

Compare manual vs. automated records.

4.3. Observe

Track discrepancies before & after implementation.

Monitor supplier compliance.


Stage 5: Data Presentation

5.1. Present Results

Graph: measurement errors.

5.2. Is It Functional?

Yes, errors reduced by 80% in the pilot phase.

Suppliers improved compliance due to transparency.


Stage 6: Evaluation & Recommendation

6.1. Challenges

Supplier resistance to new tech.

Initial costs were high.

Technical glitches in early stages.

6.2. Achievements

Reduced financial losses from incorrect weights.

Improved trust with suppliers.

Streamlined receiving process.

6.3. Recommendations

Expand the system to more suppliers.

Improve AI detection for anomalies.

Negotiate cost-sharing with suppliers for scaling.

6.4. Conclusion

The hybrid automated weighing and blockchain solution effectively reduces incorrect
measurements, ensuring fairness and efficiency in supplier transactions.

You might also like