Indian Council Act 1892
Indian Council Act 1892
/
X Executive Council.
-incial
COUNCI
It considerably
increased the size of
110 to 16 Mezber) the legislative
councils, both Central
(6 to 12 Member) It increased the
number of and provincial. The
Viceroy should additional (non- number of members in
nominate some official) members in the Central legislative
Indians as non- the Central and council was raised
official members of provincial legislative from 16 to 60
his expanded councils
MINTO REFORM
Chart10Acq REVOLT OF 1857
council.
INDIAN COUNCIL ACTIOGINDIAN
COUNCILACT 1892
MORLEY
INDIAN COUNCIL ACT1909
1
1773 "goa
I 1
1005
11
1833 1853 1857
1858 161 1892
INC formed
Gout of India
Regulating Charter Act
↑
Decentralisation
* Process started ↑
Act1773 1853 Act 1858
of
It separated, for the first
time, the legislative and 6 + o12(40) Member
executive functions of the
Nominate Additional official
Non-officialsee
Governor-General’s council.
-
#
Executive Council Indian not allowed
came to be known as the
-
#A+105/99
Erecline are. CoMewbe Legislative
Council
(Povincial Legislature
Power
-nice
Law
Making
Executive Crust.
#05 Formed
Indian National Congress
increased.
Number the Additional Member should be
*
of
nominated
* Additional Member should beelected father than being
by Viceroy.
Related Council.
* INC wanted Finance Discussion allowed in
Legislative
He firmly believed that the association of Indians representing the enlightened public opinion in the proposed reformed Councils would mean that
Government of India had the support of Indian people.
Therefore, during his entire tenure Lord Dufferin tried hard to persuade the Secretary of State to agree to the reformation of Legislative Councils and
he appointed a Committee consisting of Sir George Chesney, Sir Charles Aitchison and James Westland to plan out a scheme for the re-
organization of the Councils.
Lord Dufferin made it clear that the scheme of reforms was intended to raise the status of the Councils and to introduce into them, the elective
principle.'
After the Government of India's recommendations on reforms, Lord Dufferin left India and was succeeded by Lord Lansdowne.
The Secretary of State, Lord Cross was willing to enlarge the Provincial Councils but was opposed to the introduction of elective principle.
In fact, he severely criticised Lord Dufferin for making such a recommendation without first ascertaining the views of the Home Government.
The British Prime Minister Lord Salisbury also expressed dissatisfaction with Dufferin's suggestion for elective principle and called it a dangerous step.
The Secretary of State, therefore, invited Lord Lansdowne's fresh proposals on reforms.
Lord Lansdowne in 1889 supported the suggestions of his predecessor and recommended expansion of the Provincial Councils.
He wanted that the Councils should consist of partly elected and partly nominated members. He, however, suggested that the number of
elected members should not exceed that of nominated members
As a result of Lansdowne's proposal, the Secretary of State agreed to the expansion of Councils but he rejected the introduction of elective
principle
1.CAc+1892
change in Legislative Guncil
heral
homas
IC Act 1892
in FC
X ↓
Executive Council change
Executive or
one
viceroy ->
INDIAN COUNCIL ACT 1892
Governar
Legislative
Council (Povincial Legislature
-
X Executive Crust.
-incial
The Act provided for an increase in the number of 'Additional Members' in the
Supreme Legislative Council.
It was now to consist of six official and ten non-official Additional members.
different different
When the Councils were constituted for Punjab and Burma, they returned one
#Member Postatio
Member each.
↑
↑->
-
(10 to 15)
>
->
members (6)
official
Non-official Member (10)
is
member-6
official
ori
+
Executive
Conet-6
FnahNon-official
-
More
General
viceroy/Governor aviceron o
of India minted
It could discuss annual financial statement under certain conditions.
But no question could be asked without serving six days prior notice.
The President could disallow any question without assigning any reason.
Additional Member
ButIndian Become
Indian Notallowed
Governar
Legislative
Council (Povincial Legislature
20)
- Additional Member (Max.
X Executive Crust.
20
um
im
ax
rM
Legislative
Bovincial
em
#
M
al
ion
dit
8 to 20
Ad
->
12 to 20
->
X Executive Crust.
They could interpret on matters of public interest and had right to discuss policies
of the Government of India.
Questions could be asked in the Council after giving six days' prior notice.
The President, however, had the power to disallow any question without assigning
reasons.
On financial matters, the discussion in the Provincial Legislative Council was limited
only to those branches of revenue and expenditure which were under the control of
Provincial Government.
Similarly, the members were precluded from asking questions on matters which
were not within the control of local Government and on matters which were subject
of controversy between the local Government and the Governor General-in-Council
or the Secretary of State.
The most striking feature of the Councils Act of 1892 was that it cautiously introduced elective element in the Councils.
Though the framers of the Act deliberately avoided the use of the word 'election' in the Act but the provisions of the Act
contained a scheme which required that all the members of the Legislative Councils were not to be nominated by the
Government.
A certain number of them were to be non-official members nominated by the Head of the Government from amongst the
panel recommend by the local bodies, such as, Municipal Committees, District Boards, Chamber of Commerce, Zamindars
and University Senates.
The central Legislative Council was to accept the non-official members recommended by the Provincial Council of Madras,
Bombay. Bengal and North-West Province and also one representative of the Chamber of Commerce at Calcutta.
Thus, the system of indirect election was introduced by the Act of 1892 for the inclusion of non-official members in the
Legislative Councils of India.