REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS

Panay-Guimaras-Negros Island Bridges Project

March 27, 2025
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
1. Project Overview
Project Descriptions
▪ Section A : Panay ~ Guimaras
Section A
- total length: 13.004km
▪ Section B : Guimaras ~ Negros
- total length: 19.470km
Design Period : 30 months
21st Dec. 2023 ~ 21st Jun 2026
Project Executing Agency :
DPWH RMC I - UPMO
Consultant : YOOSHIN JV
Section B

Design Cost
USD 45,900,000 (EDCF Loan)

2
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
2. Target of PED / DED in PGN Project

⮚ Shortening the Design and Construction Schedule

Section A
(12months) ⮚ Construction Period of Section A is just 38 months
PED 7months
⮚ Selection of Optimal Structural type for shortening the
DED 5months
construction period of Cable Stayed Bridge.

⮚ The total bridge length is 13km

Section B
⮚ Selection of the optimum structural type considering
(21months)
PED 9months structural safety, quality, construction time as well as
DED 13months
economic

3
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
3. F/S Review and Enhancement.
a. Typical Cross Section
Road Class Design Speed Road Width Remark

Expressway 80 km./ h. 20.7 m.

Classification Geometry (DGCS) Application

Carriageway Width ( m.) 2 @ 3.65 = 7.3 7.3

Shoulder Width( m.) 1.5 (Without Sidewalk) 1.5

Median ( m.) 1.2 ~ 1.8 (Restricted Rural Condition) 1.6

<Typical section of Road> <Typical section of Bridge>

4
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
3. F/S Review and Enhancement.
b. Review of Road (Typical Cross Section)

F/S DGCS Volume4 DED

Classifications
(2019) (2015) (2024)
Grade of road Expressway Expressway Expressway
Average Daily Traffic
8,047 More Than 2,000 Preparation Traffic Survey
(ADT)
Design speed 80 kph. 70~90 kph. 80 kph.

Typical Cross
Section

Lane width (m.) 3.65 m. 3.0 ~ 3.65 m. 3.65 m.

Pavement width (m.) 3.65 × 4 = 14.6 m. 3.65 × 4 = 14.6 m. 3.65 × 4 = 14.6 m.
Median Strip (m.) 1.6 m. 1.5 ~ 24.0 m. 1.81 m.
Shoulder (m.) 1.50 × 2 = 3.00 m. 3.00 × 2 = 6.00 m. 3.00 × 2 = 6.00 m.
Yooshin JV proposed Typical Cross Section: Total 22.41 m. width
[Shoulder width: F/S(3.0 m.) → DED (6.0 m.)]
5
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
3. F/S Review and Enhancement.
c. Section A

6
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
3. F/S Review and Enhancement.
d. Section B

7
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
3. F/S Review and Enhancement.
f. Enhancement of Section A Minimize soil
cutting
@30m → @50m @100m → @150m
(Eco friendly)

Maximize
Navigation Clearance
50.3 m. →51.4 m.

⮚ Maximize the Navigational Clearance

→ Secure the safety of Vessel through
⮚ Increasing span length of the App. Br.
→ Shortening of Geo.Survey & Construction period
⮚ Exclusion interference of B.P.
→ Compliance with stakeholder’s requirement
⮚ Minimize the earthwork of E.P. area
→ Eco-friendly Design

8
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
3. F/S Review and Enhancement.
g. Enhancement of Section B Applied mid-span
Joint
@30m → (Aesthetics of Br.)
@50m @100m → @150m

Adjustment for
vertical alignment

⮚ Alt. of superstructure type for CSB to orthotropic St. box girder → Improvement of Seismic resistance and
Structural safety
⮚ Increasing span length of the App. Br.
→ Shortening of Geo.Survey & Construction period

9
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
4. Review of Bridge
4.1 Cable-stayed Bridge (Section A)
a. Pier b. Shear Block of Pier

 Depend on the Calculations

 It could be needed both of
End and Mid piers.

10
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
4. Review of Bridge
4.1 Cable-stayed Bridge (Section A)
c. Pylon

 A-type Pylon
 Steel anchorage box is applied

11
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
4. Review of Bridge
4.1 Cable-stayed Bridge (Section A)
 Based on the case study of foundation types considering deep water depth and weak ground conditions, the
consultant has outlined some conditions for selecting the foundation type as follows:
• No connection between pile and footing. (Considering the high water depth)
• To secure on the resistance capacity of the seabed, apply the Deep Cement Mixing (DCM) Method among
the piles.
• To reduce construction period, it will be necessary to prepare a method that does not require a dry dock.
 Recommended Foundation Type – Steel Caisson Method

Plan view of sea bed level

12
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
4. Review of Bridge
4.1 Cable-stayed Bridge (Section A)
✔ As indicated in the geotechnical investigation data, the ground condition of Section A is too poor to resist the
CSB load. To address this issue, the Consultant investigated three (3) samples of pylon foundations installed in
deep sea conditions as shown the Table below.
Items Rion-Antirion Bridge Izmit-Bay Suspension Bridge Bataan-Cavite Bridge

Figure 1

Bridge
• Multi-span Cable-Stayed Br. • Suspension Bridge • Cable-Stayed Bridge
Type
Main Span
• 560 m • 1550 m • 900 m
Length
Water
• 60.0 m • 40.4 m • 37.3 m
Depth
Ground • Undrained shear strength • Shear strength • Shear strength
Condition : 30~50 kPa at the sea bed : 55~69 kPa at the 51.5m depth : 20~50 kPa at the sea bed (PY1)
PGA
• 0.48 g (2,000 years) • 0.87 g (2,475 years) • 0.942 g (2,500 years)
(Return period)
13
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
4. Review of Bridge
4.2 PSC Box (Section A)
a. Review of PSC Box Segments Configuration
Item Profile of PSC Box Bridge

Alt 1

• Maximum Segment Weight : 3.0m(2,374kN), 3.5m(2,346kN), 4.0m(2,207kN)

• F/T Weight : 1,400kN(60% of Maximum segment weight)

Alt 2

• Maximum Segment Weight : 3.5m(2,770kN), 4.5m(3,032kN)

• F/T Weight : 1,800kN(60% of Maximum segment weight)

· To reduce F/T(Form Traveller) and Derrick Crain weight for the optimal design of superstructure,
the composition of Alt 1 is more appropriate than Alt 2
14
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
4. Review of Bridge
4.2 PSC Box (Section A)
b. Review of Alternative Bridge Plans Due to Ground Conditions
- Section A initially planned a 150m PSC Box bridge. but regarding to F/S and recent surveys, the soil
conditions are too weak to support the heavy self-weight of the PSC Box bridge.

- Therefore, the Consultant are now exploring alternative bridge types suitable for these ground conditions by
span lengths, superstructure types, and foundation types, as shown below.
1. PSC Box Girder Case (L=150 m.)

2. Steel Deck Girder Case (L=100 m.)

15
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
4. Review of Bridge
4.2 PSC Box (Section A)
c. Result of the foundation Reaction(Pile Diameter=3.0 m.)
1. PSC Box Girder(L=150 m.) 2. PSC Box Girder(L=100 m.)
50,000 50,000
45,000 Pile Reaction Force 45,000 Pile Reaction Force
47,385
40,000 40,000
38,198
Pile Reaction Force[kN]

Bearing Capacity Bearing Capacity

Pile Reaction Force[kN]

33,338
35,000 35,000
27,472 28,806
30,000 30,000 24,843
25,000 24,543 25,000 22,852
20,000 20,000
15,000 19,934 15,000 19,934
10,000 10,000
5,000 5,000
0 0
3X3

4X4

5X5

6X6

3X3

4X4

5X5

6X6
Pile Array Pile Array

3. General Steel Deck Girder(L=100 m.) 4. HiTAB Girder with Steel Deck (L=100 m.)
50,000
50,000
45,000 Pile Reaction Force
45,000 Pile Reaction Force
40,000
Pile Reaction Force[kN]

Bearing Capacity
40,000 Bearing Capacity

Pile Reaction Force[kN]

35,000 It can reduce to 4x3
35,000
30,000
23,266 30,000
25,000 20,542 25,000 20,731 19,934
20,000
20,000
15,000 19,934 19,606 17,622
15,000 17,584 16,342 15,709
10,000
10,000
5,000
5,000
0
0
3X3

4X4

5X5

6X6

3X3

4X4

5X5

6X6
Pile Array
Pile Array 16
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
4. Review of Bridge
4.2 PSC Box (Section A)
d. Cases for reviewing construction costs
CASE 1 : The initially planned
bridge type, PSC Box
Girder, with 150 m.
span length
Heavy self-weight case

CASE 2 : Reduce the span

length from 150 m.
to 100 m. with same
girder type to CASE 1

Heavy self-weight case

CASE 3 : General Steel Deck

Girder with 100 m.
span length

Light self-weight case

CASE 4 : Advanced Steel

girder with 100 m.
span length

Light self-weight case

17
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
e. Result in terms of Construction Cost
1. Superstructure 2. Substructure(Pier)
70,000 7,000
60,000 Thousand Dollar [$] Slightly 6,000 Thousand Dollar [$] Little
50,000 5,000
40,000
higher 4,000 effect
30,000 3,000
20,000 2,000
10,000 1,000
0 0

CASE 1

CASE 2

CASE 3

CASE 4
CASE 1

CASE 2

CASE 3

CASE 4
3. Foundation(Pile Cap & Pile) 4. Total Sum
700,000
700,000 600,000 Thousand Dollar [$]
600,000 Thousand Dollar [$] Fairly 500,000 Fairly
500,000
400,000 low 400,000 low
300,000 300,000
200,000 200,000
100,000 100,000
0 0
CASE 1

CASE 2

CASE 3

CASE 4

CASE 1

CASE 2

CASE 3

CASE 4
CASE3 is $20 million
(4X
(8X

(4X
(9X

3)
8)

4)
9)

( ) pile array more than CASE4

c. Summary of Construction Cost Ratio for Each Part
CASE 4
CASE 1 CASE 2 CASE 3
PART Advanced Steel
PSC Box Girder (L=150m) PSC Box Girder (L=150m) Steel Deck Girder (L=100)
Girder(L=100)
Superstructure 7.0% 8.9% 32.7% 36.5%

Substructure(Pier) 0.7% 0.8% 2.5% 2.9%

Foundation(Pile cap & Pile) 92.3% 90.3% 64.8% 60.6%

Component SUM 100.0% 100% 100% 100%

Economic 452% 365% 117% 100%

18
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
f. Comparison table of Approach bridge at Section A Cost

Division Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4

PSC Box Girder (L=150) PSC Box Girder (L=100) Steel Deck Girder (L=100) Advance Steel Girder (L=100)

Cross section

Pile Layout

Pile Reaction Rmax=18,731 < Pd=19,934 kN Rmax=18,523 < Pd=19,934kN Rmax=19,523 < Pd=19,934kN Rmax=18,711kN < Pd=19,934kN

• Heavy superstructure weight • Heavy superstructure weight • Light superstructure weight • Light superstructure weight
• Huge foundation size • Huge foundation size • Small foundation size • Smallest foundation size
Features
• High cost • High cost • Relatively low cost • Lowest cost
• Long construction period • Long construction period • Short construction period • Short construction period

Economic 452% 365% 117% 100%

Proposal ◎
• Total construction costs for Cases 1 and 2 are significantly higher due to increased foundation costs. Considering
the weak soil conditions, a concrete long span bridge type is not suitable for Section A of the offshore bridge.
Opinion
• Advanced Steel Girder (Case 4) is the most cost-effective solution compared to Case 3, with a cost reduction of
17%

19
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
4. Review of Bridge
4.2 PSC Box (Section A)
g. Conclusion of Bridge Plan Alternatives

1. Considering the weak ground conditions, the PSC Box Grider Bridge with a 150 m. span does not guarantee
the stability of the foundation due to it’s heavy self-weight.
2. Several bridge types were reviewed based on the minimum span length of 100 m. Among them, the
possibility has been confirmed in steel girder bridges with light self-weight, and the superstructure type that
can optimize the foundation type is the HiTAB Grider with steel deck bridge.
3. The patented HiTAB Girder Bridge not only ensures economic and constructability by optimizing the
foundation size but also is superior to other types in terms of landscape plan, so the Consultant recommends
the HiTAB Girder with steel deck Bridge.
HiTAB Girder Bridge PSC Box Bridge

20
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
5. Detailed Engineering Design
5.1. Road Alignment of Section A

I.C No. 2

I.C No. 1

1. Alignment: Increase in length of approach 2. Typical Cross Section

by 520m.
Approach Road 8.769 km.
Approach Bridge 1 3.167 km.
Main Bridge 1.400 km.
Approach Bridge 2 0.280 km.
Sub-total 13.616 km.

21
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
5.2. Road Alignment of Section B

I.C No. 2 I.C No. 3

I.C No. 1

1. Alignment: Same as F/S, 2019 2. Typical Cross Section

Approach Road 6.28km.

Approach Bridge 1 7.32km.

Main Bridge 1.40km.

Approach Bridge 2 4.47km.

Sub-total 19.47km.

22
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
5.3. Main Bridge (Cable-stayed Bridge) of Section A

Item Description Item Description

Span L = 100 + 260 + 680 + 260 + 100 = 1,400 m. Superstructure Steel Box with Orthotropic Deck / H=3.2 m.

Navigation Clearance 480 m. X 51.0 m. Pylon A Type / H=225.2 m.(above Tower base)

Main Cable Total Cable No. = 144 EA / MS Type Intermediate/End Pier H-Type / H=44~40 m, Bored Pile (D=2.5 m.)

Tie-Down Cable Total Cable No. = 16 EA / MS Type Pylon Foundation Bored Pile (D=2.5m)

23
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
5.3. Main Bridge (Cable-stayed Bridge) of Section A

EP1 MP1 PY1 PY2 MP2 EP2

PYLON (PY) Description Intermediate and End Pier (MP and EP) Description

Foundation Foundation

Steel Casing Bored Pile Steel Casing Bored Pile

(Reinforced Concrete) (Reinforced Concrete)

Pile Length Pile Length

L=134m / 147m EP1 / 2 L=131m / 134m

MP1 / 2 L=131m / 140m

Pile Diameter and Nos. Pile Diameter and Nos.

D=Φ2.5m / Φ2.5m D=Φ2.5m / Φ2.5m

Num.=112ea / 112ea Num.=30ea (EP1, 2, MP 1, 2)

PileCap PileCap

48.75m×86.25mx5.0m EP 1 & 2: 30m×36.25mx4.0m

/34m×29m×5m-2ea MP 1 & 2: 18.200m x 30.38m x 2.5m

24
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
5.4. Approach Bridge (Advanced Steel Girder Bridge) of Section A

Item Description Item Description

Superstructure Advanced Steel Girder with a steel deck Girder Height 2.5m ~ 5.0m

L = (72.5 + 4@100 + 72.5) + (72.5 + 4@100 + 72.5)

Span Lenth Pier D3.5m Two Columns
= 1090 m.

Deck Width B= 23.410m. Foundation Bored Pile (Pier: D=2.5m.)

25
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
5.4. Approach Bridge (Advanced Steel Girder Bridge) of Section A

Pier of ASG Bridge Description

Foundation
CL OF ROAD
BORED PILE
(D=2.500)

2.500 400
Steel Casing Bored Pile
(Reinforced Concrete)

Pile Length
CL OF PIER

3@6.250=18.750

L=116 to 130 m.
23.750

Pile Diameter and Nos.

D=Φ2.5m
400 2.500

Num.=16 ea
PC HOUSE
fck=36MPa
400 2.500 3@6.250=18.750 2.500 400

23.750 PileCap

23.75m×23.75mx3.0m

26
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
5.5. Approach Bridge (PSC Beam Bridge) of Section A
Sta. 1+042 to Sta. 3+120 at Panay site

Sta. 5+610 to Sta. 5+890 at Guimaras site

Item Description Item Description

Span at Panay site L = 69@30 = 2,070 m.(2,077 m.) Superstructure PSC I-Girder

Span at Guimaras site L = 4@40 + 3@40 = 280 m. Girder Spacing 2.35m.

Deck Width B= 23.410m. Foundation Bored Pile (Pier: D=2.0/2.5m.,Abutment: D=1.5m.)

27
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
5.5. Approach Bridge (PSC Beam Bridge) of Section A
Sta. 1+050 to Sta. 3+120 at Panay site
Type2

Pier of PSC Beam (Panay) Type1 Description Pier of PSC Beam (Panay) Type2 Description

Foundation Foundation

Steel Casing Bored Pile Steel Casing Bored Pile

(Reinforced Concrete) (Reinforced Concrete)

Pile Length Pile Length

L=99 to 125 m. L=111 to 119 m.

Pile Diameter and Nos. Pile Diameter and Nos.

D=Φ2.0m D=Φ2.0m
Num.=10 ea Num.=11 ea

PileCap PileCap

19.0m×14.0mx3.0m Type 2: Pier08 to 18 19.0m×14.0mx3.0m

28
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
5.5. Approach Bridge (PSC Beam Bridge) of Section A
Sta. 5+610 to Sta. 5+890 at Guimaras Type1 (Pier 85, 86, 87) Description
Foundation
Cast In Place Bored Pile
Type2 (Reinforced Concrete)
Pile Length
L=77 / 71 / 71 m.

Pile Diameter and Nos.

D=Φ2.5m, Num.=12 ea
PileCap

17.5mx23.75mx3.0m

Type 2 (Pier 88, 89) Description

Foundation
Cast In Place Bored Pile
(Reinforced Concrete)

Pile Length
L=70 / 27 m.

Pile Diameter and Nos.

D=Φ2.5m, Num.=8 ea
PileCap

11.25m×23.75mx3.0m

29
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
5.6. Main Bridge (Cable-stayed Bridge) of Section B

Item Description Item Description

Span L = 100 + 260 + 680 + 260 + 100 = 1,400 m. Superstructure Steel Box with Orthotropic Deck / H=3.2 m.

Navigation Clearance 440 m. X 57.5 m. Pylon Diamond Type / H=233.5 m.

Main Cable Total Cable No. = 144 EA / MS Type Intermediate/End Pier H-Type / H=52~54 m.

Tie-Down Cable Total Cable No. = 16 EA / MS Type Foundation Bored Pile D=3.0 m.

30
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
5.7. Approach Bridge (PSC Box Girder Bridge) of Section B

Item Description Item Description

Guimaras side: L = (85+150+75) Superstructure PSC Box Girder

Bridge + 9@(75+3@150+75) + (75+3@150+85) = 6,320m
Length Negros side: L = (85+3@150+75)+3@(75+3@150+75) I-Type and Bored Pile
Substructure
+ (75+2@150+75) + (75+150+85) = 3,170m (D=2.5 m.)

31
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
e. Approach Bridge (PSC Box Girder Bridge) of Section B

Pier of PSC Box Girder Bridge Description

Foundation

Steel Casing Bored Pile

(Reinforced Concrete)

Pile Length

L=86 m. (Average)

Pile Diameter and Nos.

D=Φ2.5m
Num.=12 ea

PileCap

27.5m×20.0mx4.0m

32
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
f. Approach Bridge (PSC Beam Bridge) of Section B

Sta. 2+600 to Sta. 3+660 at Guirmaras site

Sta. 14+550 to Sta. 15+850 at Negros site

Item Description Item Description

Span at Guimaras site L = 20@50 = 1,000 m. Superstructure PSC I-Girder

Span at Negros site L = 26@50 = 1,300 m. Girder Spacing 2.55m.

Deck Width B= 23.410m. Foundation Bored Pile (Pier: D=2.5m.,Abutment: D=1.5m.)

33
 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT
f. Approach Bridge (PSC Beam Bridge) of Section B
Sta. 2+600 to Sta. 3+660 at Guirmaras site

Sta. 14+550 to Sta. 15+850 at Negros site

Pier of PSC Beam Description

Foundation

Cast In Place Bored Pile

(Reinforced Concrete)

Pile Length

L=65 m. (Average)

Pile Diameter and Nos.

D=Φ2.5m
Num.=6 ea

PileCap

20.0mx12.5mx3.0m

34
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS
Panay-Guimaras-Negros ISLAND BRIDGES PROJECT

Thank you!
감사합니다!