Introduction
In forensic science, accurate identification and authentication are critical processes in
criminal investigations, disaster victim identification, and civil cases. Two vital aspects in
these procedures are estimating the age of deceased individuals and verifying the authenticity
of documents. Determining the biological age of a person after death involves multiple
scientific methods depending on the state of the remains—ranging from dental and skeletal
analysis to advanced biochemical techniques. Equally significant is the ability to detect
forged documents, as fake identification, certificates, and records are frequently used in
fraudulent or criminal activities. This paper outlines the primary methods used in age
estimation and document authentication, emphasizing techniques used in modern forensic
practice.
Determining the Age of a Deceased Person
Estimating the age of deceased individuals is a cornerstone of forensic anthropology and
pathology. The approach depends on whether the remains are fresh, decomposed, or skeletal.
Dental Analysis
Dental characteristics provide reliable indicators for age estimation. In subadults, the
sequence of tooth eruption and development is well-documented. In adults, features such as
tooth wear, root transparency, and secondary dentin formation are commonly assessed.
Advanced imaging techniques and analytical tools have expanded the accuracy of dental
assessments in forensic cases.
Skeletal Development
Ossification centers and the fusion of epiphyseal plates follow a predictable sequence,
making them essential indicators of age in children and adolescents. The degree of fusion can
help narrow down age ranges with significant accuracy, especially when multiple skeletal
sites are examined simultaneously.
Cranial Suture Closure
The sutures between skull bones gradually close with age, which can help estimate age in
adult individuals. Although this method is subject to individual variation, it remains a useful
supplementary tool, particularly when used with other skeletal indicators.
Pubic Symphysis and Rib End Morphology
The surfaces of the pubic symphysis and the sternal ends of the ribs undergo distinct
morphological changes as a person ages. These changes are categorized and scored using
standardized systems to provide age estimates for adult remains.
Histological and Advanced Biochemical Analyses
Bone tissue changes over time at the microscopic level, including patterns of remodeling and
osteon density. Histological analysis, combined with biochemical techniques such as isotopic
and DNA methylation analysis, can enhance the accuracy of age estimation, especially in
cases involving older individuals or when traditional markers are absent or degraded.
Detecting a Fake Document
Detecting counterfeit documents is an essential part of forensic investigation, security
protocols, and legal verification processes. Several physical and digital methods are used to
identify forged or altered documents.
Visual Inspection
The first step in document examination involves checking for inconsistencies such as
mismatched fonts, alignment errors, and unusual formatting. Authentic documents usually
follow strict formatting guidelines, which are often not replicated in forgeries.
UV and Infrared Analysis
Many official documents contain invisible security features, such as UV-reactive inks,
watermarks, or embedded fibers. These can be detected using ultraviolet or infrared light
sources, helping verify authenticity without altering the document.
Paper and Ink Examination
Laboratory testing can determine the composition of paper and ink to identify inconsistencies
with the claimed origin or production date of the document. This includes detecting different
ink batches or chemical markers that may indicate tampering.
Barcode and QR Code Verification
Modern documents often include barcodes or QR codes that link to verification databases.
Scanning these codes allows investigators to validate the document’s authenticity. Codes that
fail to link to official sources are strong indicators of forgery.
Digital Metadata Analysis
For electronic documents, metadata such as creation date, editing history, and file origin can
reveal evidence of manipulation. Tools like ExifTool and PDF analyzers help forensic
experts identify signs of digital tampering.
Contacting the Issuing Authority
The most definitive verification method is to directly contact the issuing authority. Whether it
is a government office, university, or licensing body, confirmation from the source ensures
that the document matches their records and has not been fraudulently altered or fabricated.
References
Adserias-Garriga, J., & Zapico, S. C. (2018). Age assessment in forensic cases:
Anthropological, odontological and biochemical methods for age estimation in the dead.
Mathews Journal of Forensic Research, 1(1), 001.
Çeker, D. (2018). Age estimation methods in forensic anthropology. Anthropology Journal,
35, 35–54.
Neves, J. A., Lopes, L. B., Machado, V., Botelho, J., Delgado, A. S., & Mendes, J. J. (2023).
Evidence of age estimation procedures in forensic dentistry: Results from an umbrella
review. Medicina, 60(1), 42.
Phulari, R. G. S., & Dave, E. J. (2021). Evolution of dental age estimation methods in adults
over the years from occlusal wear to more sophisticated recent techniques. Egyptian Journal
of Forensic Sciences, 11, Article 36.
Wetzel, W. (2025, January 9). Spectroscopy techniques unveil new methods for detecting
forged documents. Spectroscopy Online.
