P1: GDL/FXB P2: FXY/FXB QC: aaa

April 11, 2001 17:40 Annual Reviews AR129-06

Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 2001. 52:139–62

Copyright °c 2001 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved

CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS IN PLANTS

C Robertson McClung
Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org

03755-3576; e-mail: mcclung@dartmouth.edu

Key Words biological clocks, cryptochrome, flowering time, photoperiodism,

phytochrome
■ Abstract Circadian rhythms, endogenous rhythms with periods of approximately
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

24 h, are widespread in nature. Although plants have provided many examples of rhyth-
mic outputs and our understanding of photoreceptors of circadian input pathways is
well advanced, studies with plants have lagged in the identification of components of
the central circadian oscillator. Nonetheless, genetic and molecular biological studies,
primarily in Arabidopsis, have begun to identify the components of plant circadian
systems at an accelerating pace. There also is accumulating evidence that plants and
other organisms house multiple circadian clocks both in different tissues and, quite
probably, within individual cells, providing unanticipated complexity in circadian
systems.

CONTENTS
DEDICATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140
A BASIC MODEL OF THE PLANT CIRCADIAN SYSTEM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
RHYTHMIC OUTPUTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
Movement and Growth Rhythms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
Stomatal Aperture, Gas Exchange and CO2 Assimilation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
Hormone Production and Responsiveness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
Calcium . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
Rhythms in Gene Expression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143
ENTRAINMENT (INPUT) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145
Light . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145
Temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
Imbibition and Others . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148
THE OSCILLATOR: A Negative Feedback Loop . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148
Single Myb Domain DNA-Binding Proteins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148
TOC Genes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149
WHEN DOES TIMING BEGIN? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151
HOW MANY CLOCKS? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152

1040-2519/01/0601-0139$14.00 139
P1: GDL/FXB P2: FXY/FXB QC: aaa
April 11, 2001 17:40 Annual Reviews AR129-06

140 MCCLUNG

ARE CIRCADIAN CLOCKS OF ADAPTIVE SIGNIFICANCE? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153

CONCLUDING REMARKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154

DEDICATION

This review is dedicated to the memory of Richard C Crain (1951–1998),

Dartmouth Class of 1973, a pioneer in the study of inositol phospholipids in
Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org

plant signal transduction and an enthusiastic advocate of second messenger

and circadian rhythms research.

INTRODUCTION
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

It is often opined that death and taxes are the only two inescapable aspects of
the human existence, but Ernest Hemingway correctly noted that “The Sun Also
Rises” (50). Indeed, the daily rotation of the earth on its axis has meant that bio-
logical evolution has occurred in an environment that changes drastically every
day. It should come as no surprise that, since much of an organism’s biochemistry,
physiology, and behavior is temporally organized with respect to the environmen-
tal oscillation of day and night, most organisms express diurnal rhythms. It is less
obvious that many of these rhythms should persist in the absence of environmen-
tal time cues (e.g. light:dark or temperature cycles). However, organisms from
cyanobacteria to humans endogenously measure time and temporally regulate as-
pects of their biology. This review focuses on recent advances in our understanding
of the molecular bases of plant circadian rhythms.
Circadian rhythms are defined by three fundamental parameters: periodic-
ity, entrainability, and temperature compensation. Although daily environmen-
tal changes drive diurnal rhythms, a true circadian rhythm persists in the
absence of environmental time cues with a free-running period of approximately
24 h (Figure 1). Environmental time information from the daily rotation of the
Earth on its axis, such as light:dark and temperature cycles, entrains the oscil-
lation to precisely 24 h. Experimentally, one can entrain circadian oscillations
to non-24 h periods with imposed environmental cycles. An intriguing char-
acteristic of circadian rhythms is that the period of the rhythm is temperature-
compensated and remains relatively constant over a range of physiological tem-
peratures, in sharp contrast to the temperature dependence of most biochemical
processes.
The earliest known account of a circadian rhythm dates from the fourth century
BC, when Androsthenes, in descriptions of the marches of Alexander the Great,
described diurnal leaf movements of the tamarind tree (101). The endogenous na-
ture of leaf movement rhythms was experimentally demonstrated in the eighteenth
century (24, 28). The deviation of the endogenous period from exactly 24 h was
P1: GDL/FXB P2: FXY/FXB QC: aaa
April 11, 2001 17:40 Annual Reviews AR129-06

CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS 141

first described for the free-running period of leaf movements in the nineteenth cen-
tury (23). Now, at the dawn of the twenty-first century, we are finally unraveling
the molecular details of plant circadian systems.

A BASIC MODEL OF THE PLANT CIRCADIAN SYSTEM

Formally, one can divide the circadian system into three conceptual parts: input
Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org

pathways that entrain the clock, the central oscillator (clock), and output pathways
to generate overt rhythms (Figure 2). I first address the output pathways in order
to introduce the assays that feature in the analysis of plant clocks. Then I discuss
input pathways and consider the central oscillator and the exciting recent progress
in elucidating the oscillator mechanism in plants.
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

RHYTHMIC OUTPUTS

One of the attractions of plants as model clock systems is the myriad rhythmic
outputs, or “hands” of the clock. The clock times (gates) different overt rhythms
to distinct times of day (phase angle). I do not attempt an exhaustive survey as
plant rhythmic processes have been reviewed in detail (89, 94, 139, 148).

Movement and Growth Rhythms

These include the classic system of pulvinar leaf movements, in which cells in the
extensor and flexor regions of the pulvinus swell in antiphase (180◦ out of phase)
to drive a circadian oscillation in leaf position (32). Swelling is driven by volume
changes resulting from ion fluxes (69). This provides an excellent system in which
to study the roles of second messengers including calcium and phosphoinositides
(43, 93).
There are also rhythms that reflect growth rate, chiefly cell elongation. For
example, inflorescence stems of Arabidopsis (66) exhibit a circadian oscillation
in elongation rate that is correlated with the level of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA)
in rosette leaves, although IAA levels in the inflorescence stem do not oscillate.
Decapitation of the inflorescence stem abolishes elongation but application of
IAA to the decapitated stem restores rhythmic elongation, implicating a rhythm
either in polar transport of IAA or in the ability to elongate in response to IAA and
excluding rhythmic synthesis of IAA in the shoot apex (65). Inhibition of IAA polar
transport blocks elongation, but this does not distinguish between either rhythmic
IAA transport or sensitivity as critical for the overt rhythm in elongation rate.
Arabidopsis also exhibits a circadian rhythm in the rate of hypocotyl elongation
(27). Although defective inhibition of hypocotyl elongation has been a staple of
screens for photoperception mutants, the hypocotyl elongation defect may also
P1: GDL/FXB P2: FXY/FXB QC: aaa
April 11, 2001 17:40 Annual Reviews AR129-06

142 MCCLUNG

result from a primary dysfunction in the circadian system with a resulting failure
to impose a daily period of growth arrest (27).
There is also a circadian rhythm in the elongation rate of the abaxial and adaxial
cells of the petiole that confers an oscillation in position of cotyledons and leaves
(32). Leaf movements of individual seedlings are easily monitored by video imag-
ing, providing the basis of a search for natural alleles that contribute quantitatively
(quantitative trait loci, or QTLs) to period length in Arabidopsis (147).
Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org

Stomatal Aperture, Gas Exchange and CO2 Assimilation

Circadian rhythms in stomatal aperture are well documented (157) and are cor-
related with a circadian rearrangement of guard cell cytoskeleton (40). In beans
there is circadian control of Calvin cycle reactions in addition to control of stom-
atal aperture and gas exchange (51). Arabidopsis exhibits a circadian rhythm in the
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

rate of CO2 assimilation (EV Kearns & CR McClung, unpublished), but circadian
regulation of the Calvin cycle has not been investigated. Circadian rhythms of
CO2 assimilation in Crassulacean Acid Metabolism (CAM) have been extremely
well studied, and the molecular mechanism is understood in considerable detail
(111). There is a rhythm in the transport of malate across the tonoplast (111). In
addition, flux through PEP carboxylase (PEPc) is regulated by reversible phos-
phorylation; at night PEPc is phosphorylated and less sensitive to inhibition by
malate. Although second messengers typically regulate kinases, PEPc kinase from
Kalanchoë fedtschenkoi is unusual in that it lacks regulatory domains. The circa-
dian oscillation in PEPc kinase activity stems purely from a rhythm in protein
abundance that requires de novo protein synthesis, which reflects a circadian os-
cillation in transcript accumulation (47, 48).

Hormone Production and Responsiveness

In addition to the circadian oscillations in auxin levels and transport/sensitivity
described above (65, 66), ethylene production exhibits circadian rhythmicity in a
number of species (34, 56). In sorghum there are underlying rhythms in mRNA
abundance for the SbACO2 gene encoding 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid
(ACC) oxidase and in ACC oxidase activity (35). It is possible, although not es-
tablished, that the diurnal oscillation demonstrated in gibberellic acid levels in
sorghum is truly circadian (36). It is likely that more hormones will exhibit cir-
cadian rhythms in production. More interesting and challenging is the potential
rhythmicity of hormonal responsiveness. Components of the biosynthetic ma-
chinery, of the perception and signaling mechanisms, or of the response pathways
could be targets of circadian regulation.

Calcium
Ca2+ plays a critical role in guard cell signaling (79, 136) and so is suspected in
the circadian regulation of stomatal aperture and gas exchange. Because Ca2+ is
P1: GDL/FXB P2: FXY/FXB QC: aaa
April 11, 2001 17:40 Annual Reviews AR129-06

CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS 143

a ubiquitous second messenger in plant signaling pathways (132) and has been
implicated in red and blue light signal transduction (6, 7, 39, 87), it is possible
that Ca2+ plays a role in the entrainment of the circadian oscillator as well as in
the regulation of clock-controlled gene expression. Indeed, external application
of either Ca2+ or a Ca2+ ionophore phase shifts the leaflet movement rhythm of
Robinia pseudoacacia (43). Intriguingly, free cytosolic and possibly chloroplastic
Ca2+ levels, monitored by aequorin luminescence, oscillate with a circadian rhythm
in tobacco and Arabidopsis (62). The light to dark transition stimulates a spike in
Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org

chloroplast stromal Ca2+ levels (62), although whether this signals the circadian
clock is not known.

Rhythms in Gene Expression

The list of plant clock-controlled genes (CCGs; see 33, 94, 139) has expanded
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

considerably since Kloppstech’s (71) original observation of a circadian oscilla-

tion in mRNA abundance of a chlorophyll a /b binding protein gene (LHCB or
CAB). This list continues to grow (75, 95) and it seems likely that microarray
analysis should soon identify most genes showing circadian oscillations in mRNA
abundance. Initial estimates suggest that from 5% to 6% of Arabidopsis genes are
rhythmically expressed (46a). This is a far cry from the apparent universality of
circadian regulation of transcription in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus (85),
but suggests that there are between ∼1250 and 1500 Arabidopsis CCGs, based on
a current estimate of ∼25,000 Arabidopsis genes (154). Of course, the biological
material used to generate the hybridization probes limits the detection of oscil-
lating transcripts to those that are regulated in those tissues at the developmental
stage under the specific growth conditions sampled, and it will take many itera-
tions to exhaustively sample all possible developmental stages and environmental
conditions. Nor will these initial experiments identify genes whose induction or
repression in response to environmental or biological stimuli is gated by the clock.
Although most genes exhibiting circadian oscillations are nuclear, a number of
Chlamydomonas plastid transcripts show circadian oscillations (55, 129) that are
correlated with a circadian oscillation in DNA supercoiling in the plastid genome
(130). The plastid-encoded psbD gene oscillates robustly in wheat (107). This
oscillation, as well as light regulation, is dependent on an atypical −35 pro-
moter element and it is hypothesized that transcription of this gene requires a
plastid-encoded RNA polymerase and a nuclear-encoded sigma factor that it-
self is a CCG (107). Consistent with this hypothesis, transcription of nuclear-
encoded sigma factor genes is circadian in Arabidopsis and wheat (67, 102). This
echoes the clock regulation of a Synechococcus sigma factor (153) and, moreover,
offers a mechanism for temporal coordination between the nuclear and plastid
genomes.
Circadian oscillation of LHCB mRNA abundance is widespread, if not univer-
sal, among angiosperms (33, 116), although not gymnosperms (11). Both nuclear
run-on experiments and transcriptional gene fusions establish a transcriptional
P1: GDL/FXB P2: FXY/FXB QC: aaa
April 11, 2001 17:40 Annual Reviews AR129-06

144 MCCLUNG

component to this regulation in several angiosperms (33, 116). Typical reporters

are unsuitable for circadian studies. Even though mRNA abundance oscillates in
response to clock-gated transcription, the reporter activity (e.g. β-glucuronidase
or chloramphenicol acetyltransferase) is too stable to allow turnover within a cir-
cadian cycle, and the accumulation of reporter activity obscures the underlying
rhythm in transcription. Luciferase (LUC) protein is stable and accumulates over
time, but LUC activity (light production) is unstable; activity over time requires
translation of new LUC protein and provides a reliable assessment of LUC tran-
Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org

scription (99). The measurement of LUC activity is nondestructive and quantitative

and allows both temporal and spatial resolution of gene expression in real time
in vivo.
Minimal nuclear promoters sufficient to confer maximal circadian transcription
at a mid-morning phase have been identified for several LHCB genes (33, 116),
tomato LHCA genes (68), and the Arabidopsis RCA gene (86). Of course, the
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

rates of maximal transcription of different genes occur at distinct circadian pha-

ses (times of day) and a number of different phase angle markers are available
(Figure 1). For example, mRNA abundance of the CAT2 and CAT3 catalase genes
of Arabidopsis peaks at dawn and dusk, respectively (162). We have defined a
minimal CAT3 promoter sufficient to confer evening-specific circadian transcrip-
tion (TP Michael & CR McClung, unpublished; see Figure 1). Evening-specific
promoters have also been defined for the Arabidopsis genes encoding a glycine-
rich RNA-binding protein (ATGRP7/CCR2) and a germin-like protein (AtGER3)
(142–144). As is discussed below, many genes implicated in the input and central
oscillator mechanisms are themselves CCGs. It will soon be possible to target the
expression of one’s favorite gene to a particular time of day with the same precision
that sets of tissue- and cell type–specific promoters afford for spatial expression.
In vivo functional analysis of progressively truncated LHCB1∗ 1 (CAB2) pro-
moter fragments fused to luciferase defined a 36-bp region sufficient to confer cir-
cadian transcription. In vitro analysis of DNA binding by electrophoretic mobility
shift assays and DNA footprinting identified binding sites for multiple complexes
in this short fragment (16, 33). The CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1)
gene that had been previously implicated in phytochrome regulation (155) encodes
a single Myb domain protein that shows circadian binding to an element (consensus
AAa/cAATCT) within the functionally defined region of the LHCB1∗ 1 promoter
(156). This CCA1-binding element is also found in the functionally defined mini-
mal LHCA and RCA promoters (68, 86), although the functional importance of
CCA1 binding to the circadian transcription of LHCA or RCA has not yet been
established. Curiously, sequences closely related to the CCA1-binding consensus
are also found in the functionally defined minimal evening-specific AtGRP7/CCR2
(142) and CAT3 promoters (TP Michael & CR McClung, unpublished). Again, the
functional significance of these elements has not been established, but that CCA1
binding sites are in promoters that are transcribed nearly 180◦ out of phase sug-
gests that the mechanism by which the phase of transcription is determined will
not necessarily be the simple solution of a series of phase-specific transcriptional
activators.
P1: GDL/FXB P2: FXY/FXB QC: aaa
April 11, 2001 17:40 Annual Reviews AR129-06

CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS 145

Not all regulation of gene expression is transcriptional. In addition to the oscil-

lation in phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of PEPc in CAM plants (111),
sucrose phosphate synthase activity in tomato is regulated circadianly by a pro-
tein phosphatase (63). The rhythm in nitrate reductase (NR) mRNA abundance in
Arabidopsis reflects posttranscriptional control, as shown by the failure to detect
transcriptional oscillations in nuclear run-on experiments (117). In tomato, the
circadian oscillation in NR mRNA is blocked by a protein phosphatase inhibitor,
although the precise targets of phosphorylation and dephosphorylation remain
Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org

unknown (64).

ENTRAINMENT (INPUT)

Circadian rhythms persist in the absence of external time cues but are entrainable
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

to the environment. It has long been clear that clock response to environmental
stimuli varies over the circadian cycle. A plot of the magnitude of the phase shift
resulting from the application of a given stimulus at a series of discrete times
spanning a circadian cycle yields the phase response curve (PRC), a powerful tool
with which to study the circadian oscillator (59, 60).

Light
Although many environmental parameters provide stimulus to the clock, the most
potent and best-characterized entraining stimulus in plants is light. Light percep-
tion in plants has been studied and reviewed in detail (17, 26, 82, 105, 108). The
Arabidopsis genome includes five phytochrome genes (PHYA-PHYE ) and two
cryptochrome genes (CRY1 and CRY2). There are other blue light receptors, in-
cluding phototropin (NPH1) and possibly zeaxanthin, thought to be the stomatal
blue light receptor (10).
Period length is inversely related to light intensity (parametric, or continuous,
entrainment) in plants and animals that are active in the light (3). In Arabidopsis,
PHYA and PHYB as well as CRY1 and CRY2 contribute to the establishment of
period length (100, 139a). PHYB is important at high intensities of red light
whereas PHYA functions at low intensities (139a). CRY1 functions at high in-
tensities of blue light and both PHYA and CRY1 function at low intensities (139a).
Double mutant studies also demonstrate a role for CRY2 in the establishment of pe-
riod, although that role is redundantly specified by CRY1 (PF Devlin & SA Kay,
personal communication). PHYA and CRY1 interact at the molecular level and
CRY1 can be phosphorylated by PHYA (2). Direct interaction between PHYB and
CRY2 in vivo has been established by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer
(91a).
Red light pulses (nonparametric, or discrete, entrainment) phase shift clock-
controlled gene expression by a very low fluence PHYA response (73, 104). Far
red light pulses phase shift in a PHYA-dependent fashion (160). A bacteriophy-
tochrome, CikA, provides light input to the cyanobacterial clock, and cikA
P1: GDL/FXB P2: FXY/FXB QC: aaa
April 11, 2001 17:40 Annual Reviews AR129-06

146 MCCLUNG

mutants show dramatic alterations in phase angle of multiple gene expression

rhythms (135). Similarly, novel alleles of Arabidopsis PHYB and CRY1 do not
affect the period but instead alter the phase angle of multiple rhythms, indicating
that PHYB and CRY1 contribute to the establishment of circadian phase as well as
period (PA Salomé & CR McClung, unpublished). Light phase response curves
are available for a number of angiosperms (60). Two types of light phase response
curves have recently been generated in Arabidopsis. High-intensity red light pulses
given upon a dim red background shift the phase of LHCB::LUC transcription
Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org

(S Panda & SA Kay, personal communication). AtGRP7/CCR2 transcription oscil-

lates in extended dark without damping (144), which has allowed the generation of
a phase response curve for pulses of red, blue, or white light over a dark background
(S Panda & SA Kay, personal communication).
One mechanism by which the sensitivity of the oscillator to light might vary
over the circadian cycle would be clock regulation of components of the light input
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

pathway. Indeed, PHYB expression (both mRNA accumulation and transcription,

as monitored with PHYB::LUC fusions) is rhythmic in tobacco and Arabidopsis,
although it is important to note that bulk PHYB protein abundance does not
oscillate (9). Recently, this result has been extended to other photoreceptors:
In Arabidopsis, expression of PHYA, PHYC, and CRY1 shows robust circadian
oscillations at both mRNA abundance and transcriptional levels. Expression of
CRY2 is not rhythmic whereas PHYD and PHYE expression is, at most, weakly
rhythmic (L Kozma-Bognár & F Nagy, personal communication). That the clock
may regulate its own sensitivity to entraining stimuli complicates use of the PRC
to probe the state of the oscillator.
The understanding of the downstream signaling pathways from PHY and CRY
is incomplete. Various signaling intermediates (e.g. cGMP and Ca2+-calmodulin)
and phosphorylation are implicated (10, 26, 82), and a number of signaling com-
ponents downstream from the photoreceptors have been identified (10, 26, 82).
In particular, red-illuminated PHYB (PfrB) interacts with PIF3, a bHLH protein
that binds directly to the G box in a number of phytochrome-regulated promoters
(91), which establishes that light signaling pathways can be unexpectedly short.
This is relevant to light input to circadian clocks because the targets of PIF3 in-
clude the promoters of CCA1 and LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY ) (91),
two putative oscillator components (see below). The plant G box (CACGTG) is
related to the animal E box (CANNTG) targeted by heterodimeric transcription
factors of Drosophila and mammalian central oscillators (29, 46). However, the
binding of PIF3 to G boxes of light and clock-regulated promoters is likely to
represent only part of a complicated signaling network entailing multiple path-
ways and targets. For example, it has recently been established that PHYA and
PHYB signaling target distinct regions of the Arabidopsis LHCB1∗ 2 promoter
(160). Similarly, phytochrome and circadian regulation target distinct elements of
the tomato LHCA3 gene (120).
The timing of flowering in many species is regulated by photoperiod as well
as by light quality and vernalization (81, 138). Bünning (14) hypothesized that
circadian timekeeping was essential for photoperiodic time measurement and many
P1: GDL/FXB P2: FXY/FXB QC: aaa
April 11, 2001 17:40 Annual Reviews AR129-06

CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS 147

mutations that affect circadian rhythms in gene expression and leaf movement also
affect flowering timing (81, 138). Conversely, flowering timing mutants constitute
a reservoir of potential circadian clock mutants. Null mutations of FLOWER-
ING LOCUS C, in the autonomous flowering pathway, confer early flowering and
shorten the circadian period in leaf movement (147). Two mutations in the Ara-
bidopsis photoperiodic pathway, early flowering 3 (elf3) and the late flowering
gigantea (gi), confer defects in the circadian timing and define components of the
light input pathway.
Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org

elf3 loss-of-function alleles yield early flowering, hypocotyl elongation, and

conditional arrhythmicity in continuous light (53). ELF3 is a CCG encoding a
nuclear protein that contains a glutamine-rich motif, suggesting it is a transcription
factor; both mRNA and protein abundance oscillate (84). Genetic experiments
suggest substantial redundancy in ELF3 and PHYB function (123). Interestingly,
ELF3 interacts with PHYB in the yeast two-hybrid assay (21) and plays a key role
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

in the regulation of light input to the clock (95a).

GI is a CCG whose transcript abundance oscillates with a circadian rhythm
that is altered in a number of mutants affected in clock function, including elf3.
gi mutants are altered in leaf movement and gene expression rhythms of GI itself
and of other CCGs, including LHCB, LHY, and CCA1 (38, 114). In gi-2, a null
allele, the period of leaf movement is shortened but the period of gene expression
rhythms gradually lengthens (114). The period shortening effect of gi-1 on gene
expression rhythms is less severe in extended dark than in continuous light, and the
extension of period length seen in light of decreasing fluence is less pronounced
in gi-1 than in wild type. Collectively, these data are consistent with GI acting in
light input rather than in a central oscillator (114). gi was independently identified
on the basis of a defect in inhibition of hypocotyl elongation in red but not in
far red light, which implicates GI in PHYB signaling (54). GI is localized to the
nucleoplasm, which is consistent with a role in early PHYB signaling and in the
transcriptional regulation of CCGs, although the GI sequence lacks any motifs that
might suggest it is a transcription factor (54). However, the effects of loss of GI
function on hypocotyl elongation are the same as seen in phyB loss of function,
which suggests that GI is a positive mediator of PHYB signaling yet gi mutants
are late flowering, which is opposite to the early flowering phenotype of phyB null
alleles. This may suggest that GI plays different roles at different developmental
stages or may simply indicate our incomplete knowledge of the signaling pathways
leading to the hypocotyl and flowering responses (54).

Temperature
Although the circadian oscillator is temperature compensated, temperature pulses
or temperature steps are potent entraining stimuli. Temperature pulse PRCs have
been generated for several plants (60). Temperature cycles entrain Arabidopsis
rhythms in LHCB (141) and CAT3 transcription (TP Michael & CR McClung,
unpublished). Curiously, the temperature step associated with release from strati-
fication at 4◦ C to growth at 22◦ C was ineffective in phase resetting in Arabidopsis
P1: GDL/FXB P2: FXY/FXB QC: aaa
April 11, 2001 17:40 Annual Reviews AR129-06

148 MCCLUNG

(163), suggesting a refractory period before temperature is capable of entraining the

Arabidopsis oscillator. This is quite similar to observations that a light-insensitive
circadian oscillator is detected shortly after germination of tobacco and Arabidop-
sis (72, 73).

Imbibition and Others

Although germinating seedlings are refractory to temperature and light input, the
Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org

timing of imbibition (hydration) of the dried seed serves as a novel entraining

stimulus synchronizing the clocks within populations of Arabidopsis seedlings
(163). Other entraining stimuli that have been used to generate PRCs in various
plants include abscisic acid, cAMP, and various antimetabolites and amino acid
analogs (60).
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

THE OSCILLATOR: A Negative Feedback Loop

Genetic and molecular biological analyses in a variety of systems suggest that the
central oscillator is a negative feedback loop (29, 57, 161) or, as emerging evidence
from eukaryotic systems indicates, two interlocked feedback loops (42, 80, 137).
Rhythmic transcription of key clock genes is inhibited by the nuclear (in eukary-
otes) accumulation of the protein products of these genes (29, 94). For example, in
Neurospora, FREQUENCY (FRQ) negatively autoregulates by preventing its own
transcriptional activation by the WHITE COLLAR (WC-1/WC-2) heterodimer.
However, FRQ also positively regulates rhythmic WC-1 translation from nonoscil-
lating WC-1 mRNA (80). Protein stability, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and
degradation via the proteasome also play roles in the intertwined negative feedback
loops (29, 57, 94).
This leaves the clear expectation that the plant clock will emerge as a nega-
tive feedback loop or, more likely, interlocked loops, although this model almost
certainly represents an oversimplification (57, 78, 96, 125). There is a great deal
of conservation among the components of the fly and mammalian clocks (29) but
the PAS domain, a protein-protein interaction domain (149), is the only element
that has been found in all clock systems. Happily, a growing number of putative
components of plant clocks have recently been identified. No clear picture has yet
emerged, but it is apparent that many of the themes of other clock systems are con-
served in plants (Figure 3). At present, two myb transcription factors, CCA1 and
LHY, and a pseudo response regulator, TOC1, are strong candidates as canonical
clock components of interlocked feedback loops, although the molecular details
of these loops remain unknown.

Single Myb Domain DNA-Binding Proteins

CCA1 and LHY are closely related single Myb domain DNA-binding proteins
(134, 155, 156). Additional members of this family, termed REVEILLE (RVE),
P1: GDL/FXB P2: FXY/FXB QC: aaa
April 11, 2001 17:40 Annual Reviews AR129-06

CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS 149

have been identified, and a single Myb domain related to that of CCA1 has been
identified in an Arabidopsis pseudo response regulator, APRR2 (90). CCA1, LHY
(134, 156), and at least some RVEs (CR Andersson & SA Kay, personal communi-
cation) are CCGs and oscillate at both mRNA and protein levels. CCA1 binds in
circadian fashion to a short element of the LHCB1∗ 1 (CAB2) promoter sufficient to
confer phytochrome responsiveness and circadian transcription. Overexpression
of CCA1 or LHY or several RVEs results in elongated hypocotyls, late flowering,
and abolishes several circadian rhythms, including LHCB transcription and leaf
Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org

movement. Consistent with roles as components of negative feedback loops, both

CCA1 and LHY negatively autoregulate, although the mechanism is unknown
(134, 156). CCA1 loss of function shortens the circadian period of several CCGs
but does not confer arrhythmicity, suggesting that there is redundancy of CCA1-
specified clock functions (45). Thus CCA1/LHY/RVE may represent components
of the central oscillator as well as components of the output pathway by which the
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

clock regulates transcription (134, 156). That PIF3 binds to the CCA1 and LHY
promoters provides a mechanism for phytochrome input into the clock (91).
CCA1 DNA binding is affected by phosphorylation by casein kinase II (CK2)
(145), which also phosphorylates LHY in vitro (146). Phosphorylation by ca-
sein kinase I is critical in Drosophila and mammalian clocks (29, 88, 161), and
autophosphorylation of the cyanobacterial clock protein, KaiC, is essential for
rhythmicity (57). Overexpression of the regulatory CKB3 subunit increases CK2
activity, which would be presumed to enhance CCA1 activity. However, CKB3
overexpression results in period shortening and early flowering, similar to that seen
in plants with reduced CCA1 activity (146). This apparent inconsistency probably
indicates our incomplete understanding of the role of CCA1/LHY/RVE proteins in
the circadian system. For example, promoters transcribed at different phases (e.g.
LHCB versus CAT3 or AtGRP7/CCR2) contain very similar CCA1 binding tar-
gets. The specification of circadian phase may entail differential binding by differ-
ent members of this family of proteins at distinct circadian phases. Alternatively,
phase specification may involve differential modification (quite likely by phos-
phorylation but other modifications are possible) of family members at distinct
circadian phases. There may also be different interacting partners recruited to
the promoters that modulate CCA1/LHY/RVE function. Finally, it has long been
known that Drosophila Krüppel, for example, can act either as an activator or as a
repressor of transcription when present at different concentrations (133). Clearly,
a great deal remains to be learned about CCA1, LHY, and their relatives.

TOC Genes
A genetic screen on the basis of alterations in rhythmic expression of a CAB2
(LHCB)::LUC transgene in Arabidopsis has identified a series of timing of CAB
(toc) mutations that disrupt clock function (97). toc1-1 shortens the period of
multiple rhythms, including LHCB transcription, leaf movement, and stomatal
conductance, and results in early flowering (141). Interestingly, the early flowering
P1: GDL/FXB P2: FXY/FXB QC: aaa
April 11, 2001 17:40 Annual Reviews AR129-06

150 MCCLUNG

phenotype of toc1 is rescued in 21 h light:dark cycles that mimic the shortened

toc1 period (144). The period-shortening effect of toc1-1 is independent of light
intensity and is seen in extended darkness, which argues that TOC1 does not act
in light input. TOC1 mRNA abundance oscillates in continuous light, peaking
late in the day; the period of this oscillation is shortened by the toc1-1 mutation,
indicating that TOC1 feeds back to control its own oscillation (144). Collectively,
these data suggest that TOC1 is likely to be a component of an oscillator, although it
is curious that TOC1 mRNA oscillations damp rapidly in extended darkness (144),
Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org

yet a number of gene expression rhythms, including AtGRP7/CCR2 (76, 144) and
CAT3 (164; TP Michael & CR McClung, unpublished), persist robustly in the dark.
TOC1 encodes an Arabidopsis pseudo-response regulator (APRR1) (90, 144),
which implicates signal transduction through two-component systems (128) in
clock function. Typically, a sensor histidine kinase responds to an environmental
stimulus, autophosphorylates, and transfers the phosphate to a response regula-
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

tor, which then effects a response. However, TOC1, like other APRRs, lacks
the invariant phosphor-accepting Asp residue and is unlikely to function in the
conventional His-Asp relay (90, 144). Nonetheless, this suggests a mechanistic
link to cyanobacterial clocks (57, 61), in which the sensory histidine kinase, SasA,
interacts with the oscillator component KaiC (58).
TOC1 also has a carboxy-terminal motif seen in the CONSTANS family of
transcriptional activators (121) and an acidic region often found in transcriptional
activators. TOC1/APRR1 interacts with a PIF3-like protein (90), which suggests
a mechanism by which the clock might regulate acute induction by light or gate its
sensitivity to light input (98, 163). Moreover, TOC1/APRR1 was also identified
as an ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE 3-interacting protein (77), which might
indicate an interaction of the clock with abscisic acid (ABA) as an input or provide
clock regulation of ABA responses.
The gene identified by a second of these toc mutants, ZEITLUPE (ZTL, identi-
fied as toc7 ), has recently been cloned (70a, 140) and is a member of a three-gene
family including FKF (FLAVIN-BINDING KELCH REPEAT F-BOX ) (109) and
LKP2 (LOV DOMAIN KELCH PROTEIN ). ztl mutants exhibit lengthened period
length (140) whereas fkf mutants exhibit altered waveform in CCA1 and LHCB
mRNA oscillations (109). Both mutants flower late. FKF but not ZTL mRNA abun-
dance oscillates with an evening-specific maximum. These proteins have an amino-
terminal PAS (also called LOV, for light oxygen voltage) domain most similar
to those of NPH1, the phototropism blue light receptor (19), an unusual phy-
tochrome from a fern (112) and Neurospora WC-1 (4). In NPH1, this domain
binds the flavin chromophore (20), suggesting that these proteins may serve as
photoreceptors or on a light input pathway. This is supported by the fluence rate
dependence of the ztl phenotype (140).
ZTL, FKF, and LKP2 also contain multiple kelch repeats, which define a
propeller-like structure that functions in protein-protein interaction (1). A sig-
nificant clue to the function of these three proteins is that they each contain an
F-box, a domain that recruits target proteins to E3 ubiquitination complexes (115).
P1: GDL/FXB P2: FXY/FXB QC: aaa
April 11, 2001 17:40 Annual Reviews AR129-06

CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS 151

Although a role in ubiquitination has not been functionally established for ZTL,
FKF, or LKP2, such evidence has been collected for other plant F-box proteins that
function in flower development (UFO; 131) and auxin responses (TIR; 44). That
the ZTL/FKF/LKP2 proteins are involved in the light-regulated ubiquitination and
degradation of critical clock proteins is an attractive hypothesis. For example,
Drosophila TIM is degraded in the light by an ubiquitin-proteasome mechanism;
TIM degradation is correlated with changes in phosphorylation (106), which is re-
quired for substrate recognition by F-box proteins (22). As described above, Ara-
Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org

bidopsis CCA1 is phosphorylated by CK2, a serine-threonine kinase (145, 146).

Is phosphorylation and degradation of CCA1, LHY or another key target part of
the circadian oscillation (Figure 3) and might this explain the phenotypic results
(short period and late flowering) of CKB3 overexpression?

WHEN DOES TIMING BEGIN?

by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

The circadian clock regulates multiple outputs throughout plant growth and de-
velopment. How early in development can one demonstrate clock activity? In
mammals, the circadian clock starts to function during late fetal and early postna-
tal life and is entrained by maternal signals (124). In zebrafish, mRNA abundance
of the clock gene Per3 exhibits circadian oscillations throughout embryonic de-
velopment (as early as 40 h postfertilization), although rhythmic expression of an
output gene, Rev-erbα, exhibits a developmental delay (25). In plants, a circadian
rhythm has been detected in the respiration rate of dry onion seeds in continuous
dark (13), although we have been unable to detect similar rhythms in Arabidopsis
(EV Kearns & CR McClung, unpublished). However, a variety of studies confirm
that a circadian clock is functioning upon germination. For example, circadian
oscillations have been detected in transcription and mRNA abundance of a num-
ber of genes in both etiolated and light-grown seedlings (33), and as little as a
single light pulse is sufficient to induce circadian oscillations of LHCB mRNA
abundance in etiolated seedlings (33). Moreover, light inducibility of LHCB and
CAT2 in etiolated Arabidopsis seedlings is gated by the clock (98, 163). As men-
tioned above, imbibition entrains Arabidopsis seedlings, although it is not known
whether it initiates clock function or synchronizes oscillators that were functioning
embryonically (163). Nonetheless, this means that the circadian clock is running
from the time of imbibition. Interestingly, temperature steps capable of entraining
the clocks of older plants (76, 141) have no effect in these young seedlings (163).
It is well established that seed germination of many species is affected by light
treatment mediated through phytochrome. Thus, one of the critical sensory trans-
duction systems that provides input to the clock is functional in the seed. However,
phytochrome-regulated expression of LHCB genes in Arabidopsis seedlings is pre-
ceded by a period in which expression is light independent (12). LHCB genes in
very young tobacco seedlings are regulated by two circadian rhythms with distinct
phases of maximal transcription and mRNA accumulation, only one of which is
phytochrome responsive (72, 73). The light-independent oscillation is expressed
P1: GDL/FXB P2: FXY/FXB QC: aaa
April 11, 2001 17:40 Annual Reviews AR129-06

152 MCCLUNG

from germination, and short light pulses from 12 to 44 h after sowing induce a
second oscillation without affecting the first light-independent oscillation. Re-
peated red light pulses given 60 h after sowing synchronize the two rhythms,
but earlier pulses that induced the second oscillation fail to synchronize the two
oscillations. Apparently, the light-insensitive clock of very young seedlings either
acquires light-responsiveness during development or is supplanted by the light-
responsive clock that becomes active after germination (73).
Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org

HOW MANY CLOCKS?

Considerable evidence supports the existence of multiple oscillators in multicellu-
lar plants. Most of the evidence takes the form of multiple rhythms running with
different periods (internal desynchronization), which was demonstrated in Phase-
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

olus coccineus (92) and Chenopodium rubrum (70) in the 1970s. In Phaseolus
vulgaris, rhythms in CO2 assimilation and stomatal aperture exhibit a different
period from the rhythm in leaf movement (52). Similarly, in Arabidopsis the
free-running periods in leaf movement and LHCB (CAB) expression are differ-
ent, although both are shortened by the toc1-1 mutation (97). Moreover, the gi-2
mutation shortens the period in leaf movement but lengthens the period in gene ex-
pression (114). In extended darkness, the period of LHCB transcription lengthens
to ∼30 h whereas the oscillations in AtGRP7/CCR2 and AtGRP8/CCR1 (15, 144),
and CAT3 (164; TP Michael & CR McClung, unpublished) mRNA abundance
and transcription retain 24 h periods, again suggesting that they are driven by
distinct oscillators. Tobacco seedlings exhibit rhythms in cytosolic Ca2+ and
LHCB transcription with different periods (127). In each case, it is difficult to es-
tablish that these two rhythms are expressed in the same cells, but it is nonetheless
clear that the rhythms are responding to distinct circadian oscillators. Although
these data indicate that distinct oscillators drive the rhythms with different periods,
they cannot distinguish between the presence of two distinct molecular oscillators
within a single cell or a single oscillator that exhibits organ- or cell type–specific
differences in period. The demonstration of two oscillators within a single cell
is not simple, but has been achieved in the dinoflagellate, Gonyaulax polyedra
(103, 126). First, these authors established in long time courses that two distinct
rhythms with different periods actually showed phase crossings (126) and second,
they showed that the two rhythms could be independently reset by a single stimulus
(103).
A recent study has unambiguously demonstrated that explants of different or-
gans retain rhythmicity in LHCB, CHS, and PHYB transcription in culture, estab-
lishing firmly the existence of multiple self-sustaining and entrainable circadian
oscillators (150). Furthermore, the two cotyledons of intact Arabidopsis and to-
bacco seedlings could be entrained to novel phases that are antiphase to one another
and, in tobacco, distinct from the initial phase retained by the shoot apex, indi-
cating that the clocks were not coupled. Similar results were obtained with two
P1: GDL/FXB P2: FXY/FXB QC: aaa
April 11, 2001 17:40 Annual Reviews AR129-06

CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS 153

primary tobacco leaves or with roots versus aerial tissues of Arabidopsis. Col-
lectively, these experiments argue compellingly for autonomy of the clocks of
different organs and tissues.
The circadian rhythms of cyanobacteria and of unicellular eukaryotes, such as
Chlamydomonas and Gonyaulax, make it clear that a circadian clock (or clocks)
can exist within a single cell and several mammalian cell types retain a functional
circadian oscillator in culture (5, 30, 151). Thus, we can assume that every cell in a
multicellular plant potentially contains a clock. Are these clocks coordinated or are
Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org

they cell-autonomous? Thain et al (150) showed that distal and proximal areas of a
single primary tobacco leaf could be entrained to distinct phases! This suggests that
clock autonomy at all levels of the circadian system, from photoperception through
gene expression output rhythms, exists at a cellular level. However, the authors
note that short-range signaling like that induced by phytochrome (8) remains to
be addressed. Nonetheless, there quite clearly is no systemic phototransduction
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

signal that coordinates the plant circadian system on an organismal scale. This
contrasts sharply with the situation in animals, where a central neural oscillator
(e.g. the mammalian suprachiasmatic nucleus or the ventral lateral brain neurons of
Drosophila) regulates behavioral rhythms (29). In recent years, it has become clear
that peripheral tissues of a variety of animals, including Drosophila, iguanas, and
zebrafish, contain multiple additional clocks that can be independently entrained in
culture (41, 119, 152, 158). In vivo, these peripheral clocks are probably entrained
by coupling pathways from the central neural oscillator (159).

ARE CIRCADIAN CLOCKS OF ADAPTIVE

SIGNIFICANCE?
Why are circadian rhythms ubiquitous? Is adaptive fitness enhanced by the syn-
chronization of an organism’s internal clock with the diurnal cycle imposed by
its environment? The “escape from light” hypothesis (118) posits advantage in
phasing sunlight-sensitive cellular events to the night. Cell division in unicellular
organisms is frequently gated to the dawn, with DNA replication occurring in the
preceding night (31). The adaptive fitness of aspects of circadian biology such as
dawn anticipation has been addressed by recent studies with cyanobacteria (113)
and green algae (110).
Mutants of the cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942 with
alterations in period length have been identified on the basis of the rhythmic
expression of a photosynthetic gene fused to bacterial luciferase (74). Strains with
wild type (25 h), short (23 h), or long (30 h) period grow at essentially the same rate
in pure culture in either continuous light or in light:dark cycles. However, when
these strains are mixed and competed against each other in light:dark cycles of 22,
24, or 30 h, in each case the strain whose period most closely matches that of the
imposed cycle rapidly eliminates the competitor (113). Although the mechanism
of this fitness enhancement in Synechococcus remains poorly understood (61),
P1: GDL/FXB P2: FXY/FXB QC: aaa
April 11, 2001 17:40 Annual Reviews AR129-06

154 MCCLUNG

the “escape from light” hypothesis has received strong support from recent studies
with the green alga Chlamydomonas. Chlamydomonas exhibits circadian rhythms
in cell division and in sensitivity to UV irradiation (110). Maximal UV sensitivity
occurs at the end of the day and beginning of the night, coincident with DNA divi-
sion. This is entirely consistent with the idea that circadian clocks evolved under
selective pressure to time DNA replication to the night. The widespread role of
cryptochrome in circadian systems of mammals, flies, and plants is also consistent
with this reasoning. Cryptochromes are related to and probably evolved from DNA
Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org

photolyases, which play a critical role in the repair of UV-induced DNA damage
(18). Although it remains speculative, it seems plausible that an ancestral protein
that contributed to the daily repair of UV-induced DNA damage was recruited into
the circadian system.
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

CONCLUDING REMARKS
The study of plant circadian clocks has matured in recent years and a great deal
of progress has been made, particularly in the identification of molecular compo-
nents. The next and more difficult phase will be to assemble the components into
a coherent molecular model. Obviously, the relatively simple models of the cir-
cadian system presented in Figures 2 and 3 are inadequate. Some clock functions
are redundantly specified, as shown by the loss-of-function cca1 and lhy alleles. In
addition, there are likely to be many interconnections among both input and output
pathways. We now have good evidence that some genes encoding light input path-
way components are themselves CCGs whose abundance and, probably, activity
are modulated over the circadian cycle; outputs can feed back to affect input to the
clock. Components can play multiple roles on input and output pathways, and per-
haps in the central oscillator(s). Moreover, we do not yet have reliable criteria with
which to unambiguously assign molecules to roles as input, output, or oscillator
components (37, 96, 125). Indeed, even the concept of a single central oscillator is
inadequate, as it is certain that a single cell can contain two self-sustaining circa-
dian oscillators (103, 126) as well as non-self-sustaining oscillators (49), and there
is good evidence in plants as well as in animals for tissue- and cell-specific oscil-
lators that can run independently (150). We can anticipate this breakneck pace of
advancement in our understanding of plant clocks will continue; the timing could
not be better.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I thank many colleagues for sharing unpublished information and apologize to
those whose work could not be cited due to space limitations. I particularly thank
Todd Michael, Patrice Salomé, Tom Jack, and Mary Lou Guerinot for helpful
discussion. Work in my lab is supported by grants from the National Science
Foundation (MCB 9723482 and IBN-9817603).
P1: GDL/FXB P2: FXY/FXB QC: aaa
April 11, 2001 17:40 Annual Reviews AR129-06

CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS 155

Visit the Annual Reviews home page at www.AnnualReviews.org

LITERATURE CITED
1. Adams J, Kelso R, Cooley L. 2000. The Menzel H, et al. 2000. Different Lhc mRNA
kelch repeat superfamily of proteins: pro- stabilities and diurnal/circadian mRNA ac-
pellers of cell function. Trends Cell Biol. cumulation patterns in angiosperm and
10:17–24 gymnosperm plant species. Plant Mol.
Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org

2. Ahmad M, Jarillo JA, Smirnova O, Cash- Biol. In press

more AR. 1998. The CRY1 blue light pho- 12. Brusslan JA, Tobin EM. 1992. Light-
toreceptor of Arabidopsis interacts with independent developmental regulation of
phytochrome A in vitro. Mol. Cell 1:939– cab gene expression in Arabidopsis thali-
48 ana seedlings. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
3. Aschoff J. 1960. Exogenous and endoge- 89:7791–95
nous components in circadian rhythms. 13. Bryant TR. 1972. Gas exchange in dry
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. seeds: circadian rhythmicity in the ab-
XXV:11–28 sence of DNA replication, transcription,
4. Ballario P, Macino G. 1997. White collar and translation. Science 178:634–36
proteins: PASsing the light signal in Neu- 14. Bünning E. 1936. Die endogene Tages-
rospora crassa. Trends Microbiol. 5:458– rhythmik als Grundlage der photoperi-
62 odischen Reaktion. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges.
5. Balsalobre A, Damiola F, Schibler U. 1998. 54:590–607
A serum shock induces circadian gene ex- 15. Carpenter CD, Kreps JA, Simon AE. 1994.
pression in mammalian tissue culture cells. Genes encoding glycine-rich Arabidopsis
Cell 93:929–37 thaliana proteins with RNA-binding mo-
6. Barnes SA, McGrath RB, Chua N-H. 1997. tifs are influenced by cold treatment and an
Light signal transduction in plants. Trends endogenous circadian rhythm. Plant Phys-
Cell Biol. 7:21–26 iol. 104:1015–25
7. Baum G, Long JC, Jenkins GI, Trewavas 16. Carré IA, Kay SA. 1995. Multiple DNA-
AJ. 1999. Stimulation of the blue light protein complexes at a circadian-regulated
phototropic receptor NPH1 causes a tran- promoter element. Plant Cell 7:2039–51
sient increase in cytosolic Ca2+. Proc. Natl. 17. Casal JJ. 2000. Phytochromes, cryptoch-
Acad. Sci. USA 96:13554–59 romes, phototropin: photoreceptor interac-
8. Bischoff F, Millar AJ, Kay SA, Furuya tions in plants. Photochem. Photobiol. 71:
M. 1997. Phytochrome-induced intercellu- 1–11
lar signalling activates cab::luciferase gene 18. Cashmore AR, Jarillo JA, Wu Y-J, Liu D.
expression. Plant J. 12:839–49 1999. Cryptochromes: blue light receptors
9. Bognár LK, Hall A, Ádám É, Thain SC, for plants and animals. Science 284:760–
Nagy F, Millar AJ. 1999. The circadian 65
clock controls the expression pattern of 19. Christie JM, Reymond P, Powell GK,
the circadian input photoreceptor, phy- Bernasconi P, Raibekas AA, et al. 1998.
tochrome B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Arabidopsis NPH1: a flavoprotein with
96:14652–57 the properties of a photoreceptor for pho-
10. Briggs WR, Huala E. 1999. Blue-light pho- totropism. Science 282:1698–701
toreceptors in higher plants. Annu. Rev. 20. Christie JM, Salomon M, Nozue K, Wada
Cell Dev. Biol. 15:33–62 M, Briggs WR. 1999. LOV (light, oxygen,
11. Brinker M, Jäschke K, Klaff P, Wissel K, or voltage) domains of the blue-light
P1: GDL/FXB P2: FXY/FXB QC: aaa
April 11, 2001 17:40 Annual Reviews AR129-06

156 MCCLUNG

photoreceptor phototropin (nph1): binding dian ethylene production in sorghum. Plant

sites for the chromophore flavin mononu- Physiol. 116:17–25
cleotide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 35. Finlayson SA, Lee I-J, Mullet JE, Mor-
8779–83 gan PW. 1999. The mechanism of rhythmic
21. Covington MF, Liu XL, Kay SA, Wagner ethylene production in sorghum. The role
DR. 2000. ELF3 gates input to the cir- of phytochrome B and simulated shading.
cadian clock. Int. Conf. Arabidopsis Res., Plant Physiol. 119:1083–89
11th, Abstr. 428 36. Foster KR, Morgan PW. 1995. Genetic
Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org

22. Craig KL, Tyers M. 1999. The F-box: a regulation of development in Sorghum bi-
new motif for ubiquitin dependent prote- color. IX. The ma3R allele disrupts diurnal
olysis in cell cycle regulation and signal control of gibberellin biosynthesis. Plant
transduction. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 72: Physiol. 108:337–43
299–328 37. Foster RG, Lucas RJ. 1999. Clocks, criteria
23. de Candolle AP. 1832. Physiologie Vege- and critical genes. Nat. Genet. 22:217–19
tale. Paris: Bechet Jeune 38. Fowler S, Lee K, Onouchi H, Samach
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

24. de Mairan J. 1729. Observation botanique. A, Richardson K, et al. 1999. GIGAN-

Hist. Acad. R. Sci. 35–36 TEA: a circadian clock-controlled gene that
25. Delaunay F, Thisse C, Marchand O, Laudet regulates photoperiodic flowering in Ara-
V, Thisse B. 2000. An inherited functional bidopsis and encodes a protein with sev-
circadian clock in zebrafish embryos. Sci- eral membrane-spanning domains. EMBO
ence 289:297–300 J. 18:4679–88
26. Deng X-W, Quail PH. 1999. Signalling in 39. Frohnmeyer H, Bowler C, Zhu J-K, Yam-
light-controlled development. Semin. Cell agata H, Schäfer E, Chua N-H. 1998. Dif-
Dev. Biol 10:121–29 ferent roles for calcium and calmodulin in
27. Dowson-Day MJ, Millar AJ. 1999. Circa- phytochrome and UV-regulated expression
dian dysfunction causes aberrant hypocotyl of chalcone synthase. Plant J. 13:763–72
elongation patterns in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 40. Fukuda M, Hasezawa S, Asai N, Nakajima
17:63–71 N, Kondo N. 1998. Dynamic organization
28. Duhamel duMonceau HL. 1759. La Physi- of microtubules in guard cells of Vicia faba
que des Arbres. Paris: Guerin & Delatour L. with diurnal cycle. Plant Cell Physiol.
29. Dunlap JC. 1999. Molecular bases for cir- 39:80–86
cadian clocks. Cell 96:271–90 41. Giebultowicz JM, Stanewsky R, Hall JC,
30. Earnest DJ, Liang F-Q, Ratcliff M, Cas- Hege DM. 2000. Transplanted Drosophila
sone VM. 1999. Immortal time: circadian excretory tubules maintain circadian clock
clock properties of rat suprachiasmatic cell cycling out of phase with the host. Curr.
lines. Science 283:693–95 Biol 10:107–10
31. Edmunds LN. 1988. Cellular and Molecu- 42. Glossop NRJ, Lyons LC, Hardin PE.
lar Bases of Biological Clocks. New York: 1999. Interlocked feedback loops within
Springer-Verlag the Drosophila circadian oscillator. Sci-
32. Engelmann W, Johnsson A. 1998. Rhythms ence 286:766–68
in organ movement. See Ref. 89, pp. 35–50 43. Gómez LA, Simón E. 1995. Circadian
33. Fejes E, Nagy F. 1998. Molecular analy- rhythm of Robinia pseudoacacia leaflet
sis of circadian clock-regulated gene ex- movements: role of calcium and phyto-
pression in plants: features of the ‘output’ chrome. Photochem. Photobiol. 61:210–15
pathways. See Ref. 89, pp. 99–118 44. Gray WM, Estelle M. 2000. Function of the
34. Finlayson SA, Lee I-J, Morgan PW. 1998. ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in auxin re-
Phytochrome B and the regulation of circa- sponse. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25:133–38
P1: GDL/FXB P2: FXY/FXB QC: aaa
April 11, 2001 17:40 Annual Reviews AR129-06

CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS 157

45. Green RM, Tobin EM. 1999. Loss of 54. Huq E, Tepperman JM, Quail PH. 2000.
the circadian clock-associated protein 1 GIGANTEA is a nuclear protein involved
in Arabidopsis results in altered clock- in phytochrome signaling in Arabidopsis.
regulated gene expression. Proc. Natl. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:9654–58
Acad. Sci. USA 96:4176–79 55. Hwang S, Kawazoe R, Herrin DL. 1996.
46. Hao H, Glossop NRJ, Lyons L, Qiu J, Transcription of tufA and other chloroplast-
Morrish B, et al. 1999. The 69 bp circa- encoded genes is controlled by a circa-
dian regulatory sequence (CRS) mediates dian clock in Chlamydomonas. Proc. Natl.
Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org

per-like developmental, spatial, and cir- Acad. Sci. USA 93:996–1000

cadian expression and behavioral rescue 56. Ievinsh G, Kreicbergs O. 1992. Endoge-
in Drosophila. J. Neurosci. 19:987–94 nous rhythmicity of ethylene production
46a. Harmer SL, Hogenesch JB, Straume M, in growing intact cereal seedlings. Plant
Chang H-S, Han B, et al. 2000. Orches- Physiol. 100:1389–91
trated transcription of key pathways in 57. Iwasaki H, Kondo T. 2000. The current
Arabidopsis by the circadian clock. Sci- state and problems of circadian clock stud-
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

ence. In press ies in cyanobacteria. Plant Cell Physiol.

47. Hartwell J, Gill A, Nimmo GA, Wilkins 41:1013–20
MB, Jenkins GI, Nimmo HG. 1999. Phos- 58. Iwasaki H, Williams SB, Kitayama Y,
phoenolpyruvate carboxylase kinase is a Ishiura M, Golden SS, Kondo T. 2000. A
novel protein kinase regulated at the level KaiC-interacting sensory histidine kinase,
of expression. Plant J. 20:333–42 SasA, necessary to sustain robust circadian
48. Hartwell J, Smith LH, Wilkins MB, Jenk- oscillation in cyanobacteria. Cell 101:223–
ins GI, Nimmo HG. 1996. Higher plant 33
phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase kinase 59. Johnson CH. 1999. Forty years of PRCs–
is regulated at the level of translatable What have we learned? Chronobiol. Int.
mRNA in response to light or a circadian 16:711–43
rhythm. Plant J. 10:1071–78 60. Johnson CH. 2000. PRC Atlas. http://
49. Heintzen C, Nater M, Apel K, Staiger D. johnsonlab. biology. vanderbilt. edu/
1997. AtGRP7, a nuclear RNA-binding prcatlas/prcatlas.html
protein as a component of a circadian- 61. Johnson CH, Golden SS. 1999. Circa-
regulated negative feedback loop in Ara- dian programs in cyanobacteria: adaptive-
bidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. ness and mechanism. Annu. Rev. Micro-
USA 94:8515–20 biol. 53:389–409
50. Hemingway E. 1926. The Sun Also Rises. 62. Johnson CH, Knight MR, Kondo T, Mas-
New York: Scribner’s son P, Sedbrook J, et al. 1995. Circadian
51. Hennessey TL, Field CB. 1991. Oscilla- oscillations of cytosolic and chloroplastic
tions in carbon assimilation and stomatal free calcium in plants. Science 269:1863–
conductance under constant conditions. 65
Plant Physiol. 96:831–36 63. Jones TL, Ort DR. 1997. Circadian regula-
52. Hennessey TL, Field CB. 1992. Evidence tion of sucrose phosphate synthase activity
of multiple circadian oscillators in bean in tomato by protein phosphatase activity.
plants. J. Biol. Rhythms 7:105–13 Plant Physiol. 113:1167–75
53. Hicks KA, Millar AJ, Carré IA, Somers 64. Jones TL, Tucker DE, Ort DR. 1998. Chill-
DE, Straume M, et al. 1996. Condi- ing delays circadian pattern of sucrose
tional circadian dysfunction of the Ara- phosphate synthase and nitrate reductase
bidopsis early-flowering 3 mutant. Sci- activity in tomato. Plant Physiol. 118:149–
ence 274:790–92 58
P1: GDL/FXB P2: FXY/FXB QC: aaa
April 11, 2001 17:40 Annual Reviews AR129-06

158 MCCLUNG

65. Jouve L, Gaspar T, Kevers C, Greppin H, independent rhythms in a developmentally

Agosti RD. 1999. Involvement of indole- regulated fashion. Plant J. 13:563–69
3-acetic acid in the circadian growth of 74. Kondo T, Tsinoremas NF, Golden SS,
the first internode of Arabidopsis. Planta Johnson CH, Kutsuna S, Ishiura M. 1994.
209:136–42 Circadian clock mutants of cyanobacteria.
66. Jouve L, Greppin H, Agosti RD. 1998. Science 266:1233–36
Arabidopsis thaliana floral stem elon- 75. Kreps JA, Muramatsu T, Furuya M, Kay
gation: evidence for an endogenous cir- SA. 2000. Fluorescent differential display
Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org

cadian rhythm. Plant Physiol. Biochem. identifies circadian clock-regulated genes

36:469–72 in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biol. Rhythms
67. Kanamaru K, Fujiwara M, Seki M, Kata- 15:208–17
giri T, Nakamura M, et al. 1999. Plastidic 76. Kreps JA, Simon AE. 1997. Environmen-
RNA polymerase sigma factors in Ara- tal and genetic effects on circadian clock-
bidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 40:832–42 regulated gene-expression in Arabidopsis
68. Kellmann J-W, Hoffrogge R, Piechulla thaliana. Plant Cell 9:297–304
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

B. 1999. Transcriptional regulation of os- 77. Kurup S, Jones HD, Holdsworth MJ. 2000.
cillating steady-state Lhc mRNA levels: Interactions of the developmental regulator
characterization of two Lhca promoter ABI3 with proteins identified from devel-
fragments in transgenic tobacco plants. oping Arabidopsis seeds. Plant J. 21:143–
Biol. Rhythm Res. 30:264–71 55
69. Kim HY, Coté GG, Crain RC. 1993. Pota- 78. Lakin-Thomas PL. 2000. Circadian rhy-
ssium channels in Samanea saman proto- thms new functions for old clock genes?
plasts controlled by phytochrome and the Trends Genet. 16:135–42
biological clock. Science 260:960–62 79. Leckie CP, McAinsh MR, Montgomery L,
70. King RW. 1975. Multiple circadian Priestley AJ, Staxen I, et al. 1998. Sec-
rhythms regulate photoperiodic flowering ond messengers in guard cells. J. Exp. Bot.
responses in Chenopodium rubrum. Can. 49:339–49
J. Bot. 53:2631–38 80. Lee K, Loros JJ, Dunlap JC. 2000. Inter-
70a. Kiyosue T, Wada M. 2000. LKP1 (LOV connected feedback loops in the Neuros-
kelch protein 1): a factor involved in the pora circadian system. Science 289:107–
regulation of flowering time in Arabidop- 10
sis. Plant J. 23:807–15 81. Lin C. 2000. Photoreceptors and regulation
71. Kloppstech K. 1985. Diurnal and cir- of flowering time. Plant Physiol. 123:39–
cadian rhythmicity in the expression of 50
light-induced nuclear messenger RNAs. 82. Lin C. 2000. Plant blue-light receptors.
Planta 165:502–6 Trends Plant Sci. 5:337–42
72. Kolar C, Ádám É, Schäfer E, Nagy F. 83. Deleted in proof
1995. Expression of tobacco genes for 84. Liu XL, Covington MF, Fankhauser C,
light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b binding Chory J, Wagner DR. 2000. ELF3 encodes
proteins of photosystem II is controlled a circadian-regulated nuclear protein that
by two circadian oscillators in a devel- functions in an Arabidopsis PHYB signal
opmentally regulated fashion. Proc. Natl. transduction pathway. Int. Conf. Arabidop-
Acad. Sci. USA 92:2174–78 sis Res., 11th, Abstr. 317
73. Kolar C, Fejes E, Ádám É, Schäfer E, Kay 85. Liu Y, Tsinoremas NF, Johnson CH,
S, Nagy F. 1998. Transcription of Ara- Golden SS, Ishiura M, Kondo T. 1995. Cir-
bidopsis and wheat Cab genes in single cadian orchestration of gene expression in
tobacco transgenic seedlings exhibits cyanobacteria. Genes Dev. 9:1469–78
P1: GDL/FXB P2: FXY/FXB QC: aaa
April 11, 2001 17:40 Annual Reviews AR129-06

CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS 159

86. Liu Z, Taub CC, McClung CR. 1996. 95. McClung CR, Hsu M, Painter JE, Gagne
Identification of an Arabidopsis Rubisco JM, Karlsberg SD, Salomé PA. 2000. In-
Activase (RCA) minimal promoter regu- tegrated temporal regulation of the pho-
lated by phytochrome and the circadian torespiratory pathway: circadian regula-
clock. Plant Physiol. 112:43–51 tion of two Arabidopsis genes encoding
87. Long JC, Jenkins GI. 1998. Involvement serine hydroxymethyltransferase. Plant
of plasma membrane redox activity and Physiol. 123:381–92
calcium homeostasis in the UV-B and UV- 95a. McWatters HG, Bastow RM, Hall A,
Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org

A/blue light induction of gene expression Millar AJ. 2000. The ELF3 zeitnehmer
in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 10:2077–86 regulates light signalling to the circadian
88. Lowrey PL, Shimomura K, Antoch MP, clock. Nature 408:716–20
Yamazaki S, Zemenides PD, et al. 2000. 96. Merrow M, Brunner M, Roenneberg T.
Positional syntenic cloning and func- 1999. Assignment of circadian function
tional characterization of the mammalian for the Neurospora clock gene frequency.
circadian mutation tau. Science 288:483– Nature 399:584–86
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

91 97. Millar AJ, Carré IA, Strayer CA, Chua

89. Lumsden PJ, Millar AJ, eds. 1998. Bio- N-H, Kay SA. 1995. Circadian clock
logical Rhythms and Photoperiodism in mutants in Arabidopsis identified by lu-
Plants. Oxford: Bios Sci. Publ. 284 pp. ciferase imaging. Science 267:1161–63
90. Makino S, Kiba T, Imamura A, Hanaki N, 98. Millar AJ, Kay SA. 1996. Integration
Nakamura A, et al. 2000. Genes encoding of circadian and phototransduction path-
pseudo-response regulators: insight into ways in the network controlling CAB gene
His-to-Asp phosphorelay and circadian transcription in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl.
rhythm in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Acad. Sci. USA 93:15491–96
Cell Physiol. 41:791–803 99. Millar AJ, Short SR, Chua N-H, Kay SA.
91. Martı́nez-Garcı́a JF, Huq E, Quail PH. 1992. A novel circadian phenotype based
2000. Direct targeting of light signals to on firefly luciferase expression in trans-
a promoter element-bound transcription genic plants. Plant Cell 4:1075–87
factor. Science 288:859–63 100. Millar AJ, Straume M, Chory J, Chua
91a. Más P, Devlin PF, Panda S, Kay SA. 2000. N-H, Kay SA. 1995. The regulation of
Functional interaction of phytochrome B circadian period by phototransduction
and cryptochrome 2. Nature 408:207–11 pathways in Arabidopsis. Science 267:
92. Mayer W, Sadleder D. 1972. Different 1163–66
light intensity dependence of the free-run- 101. Moore-Ede MC, Sulzman FM, Fuller CA.
ning periods as the cause of internal des- 1982. The Clocks That Time Us: Phys-
ynchronization of circadian rhythms in iology of the Circadian Timing System.
Phaseolus coccineus. Planta 108:173–78 Cambridge, MA: Harv. Univ. Press
93. Mayer W-E, Hohloch C, Kalkuhl A. 102. Morikawa K, Ito S, Tsunoyama Y,
1997. Extensor protoplasts of the Phase- Nakahira Y, Shiina T, Toyoshima Y.
olus pulvinus: light-induced swelling 1999. Circadian-regulated expression of
may require extracellular Ca2+ influx, a nuclear-encoded plastid σ factor gene
dark-induced shrinking inositol 1,4,5 (sigA) in wheat seedlings. FEBS Lett.
triphosphate-induced Ca2+ mobilization. 451:275–78
J. Exp. Bot. 48:219–28 103. Morse D, Hastings JW, Roenneberg T.
94. McClung CR. 2000. Plant circadian 1994. Different phase responses of the
clocks: a millennial view. Physiol. Plant. two circadian oscillators in Gonyaulax. J.
109:359–71 Biol. Rhythms 9:263–74
P1: GDL/FXB P2: FXY/FXB QC: aaa
April 11, 2001 17:40 Annual Reviews AR129-06

160 MCCLUNG

104. Nagy F, Fejes E, Wehmeyer B, Dallman dian rhythms and photoperiodic flower-
G, Schafer E. 1993. The circadian oscil- ing by the Arabidopsis GIGANTEA gene.
lator is regulated by a very low fluence Science 285:1579–82
response of phytochrome in wheat. Proc. 115. Patton EE, Willems AR, Tyers M. 1998.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:6290–94 Combinatorial control in ubiquitin-depe-
105. Nagy F, Schafer E. 2000. Nuclear and ndent proteolysis: Don’t Skp the F-box
cytosolic events of light-induced, phy- hypothesis. Trends Genet. 14:236–43
tochrome-regulated signaling in higher 116. Piechulla B. 1999. Circadian expression
Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org

plants. EMBO J. 19:157–63 of the light-harvesting complex protein

106. Naidoo N, Song W, Hunter-Ensor M, genes in plants. Chronobiol. Intl. 16:115–
Sehgal A. 1999. A role for the proteasome 28
in the light response of the Timeless clock 117. Pilgrim ML, Caspar T, Quail PH, Mc-
protein. Science 285:1737–41 Clung CR. 1993. Circadian and light reg-
107. Nakahira Y, Baba K, Yoneda A, Shiina T, ulated expression of nitrate reductase in
Toyoshima Y. 1998. Circadian-regulated Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 23:349–64
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

transcription of the psbD light-responsive 118. Pittendrigh CS. 1993. Temporal organi-
promoter in wheat chloroplasts. Plant zation: reflections of a Darwinian clock-
Physiol. 118:1079–88 watcher. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 55:17–54
108. Neff MM, Fankhauser C, Chory J. 2000. 119. Plautz JD, Kaneko M, Hall JC, Kay SA.
Light: an indicator of time and place. 1997. Independent photoreceptive circa-
Genes Dev. 14:257–71 dian clocks throughout Drosophila. Sci-
109. Nelson DC, Lasswell J, Rogg LE, Co- ence 278:1632–35
hen MA, Bartel B. 2000. FKF1, a clock- 120. Pott MB, Kellman JW, Piechulla B. 2000.
controlled gene that regulates the tran- Circadian and phytochrome control act at
sition to flowering in Arabidopsis. Cell different promoter regions of the tomato
101:331–40 Lhca3 gene. J. Plant Physiol. 157:449–52
110. Nikaido SS, Johnson CH. 2000. Daily and 121. Putterill J, Robson F, Lee K, Simon R,
circadian variation in survival from ultra- Coupland G. 1995. The CONSTANS gene
violet radiation in Chlamydomonas rein- of Arabidopsis promotes flowering and
hardtii. Photochem. Photobiol. 71:758– encodes a protein showing similarities
65 to zinc finger transcription factors. Cell
111. Nimmo HG. 2000. The regulation of 80:847–57
phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase in 122. Deleted in proof
CAM plants. Trends Plant Sci. 5:75–80 123. Reed JW, Nagpal P, Bastow RM, Solomon
112. Nozue K, Kanegae T, Imaizumi T, KS, Dowson-Day MJ, et al. 2000. Inde-
Fukuda S, Okamoto H, et al. 1998. A pendent action of ELF3 and phyB to con-
phytochrome from the fern Adiantum trol hypocotyl elongation and flowering
with features of the putative photorecep- time. Plant Physiol. 122:1149–60
tor NPH1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 124. Reppert SM. 1995. Interaction between
95:15826–30 the circadian clocks of mother and fetus.
113. Ouyang Y, Andersson CR, Kondo T, In Circadian Clocks and Their Adjust-
Golden SS, Johnson CH. 1998. Resonat- ment, CIBA Found. Symp. Vol. 183, ed.
ing circadian clocks enhance fitness in DJ Chadwick, K Ackrill, pp. 198–211.
cyanobacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Chichester, UK: Wiley
95:8660–64 125. Roenneberg T, Merrow M. 1998. Molec-
114. Park DH, Somers DE, Kim YS, Choy YH, ular circadian oscillators: an alternative
Lim HK, et al. 1999. Control of circa- hypothesis. J. Biol. Rhythms 13:167–79
P1: GDL/FXB P2: FXY/FXB QC: aaa
April 11, 2001 17:40 Annual Reviews AR129-06

CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS 161

126. Roenneberg T, Morse D. 1993. Two cir- terial circadian clock. Science 289:765–
cadian oscillators in one cell. Nature 68
362:362–64 136. Schroeder J. 2001. Guard cell signal
127. Sai J, Johnson CH. 1999. Different circa- transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol.
dian oscillators control Ca2+ fluxes and Plant Mol. Biol. 52 In press
Lhcb gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. 137. Shearman LP, Sriram S, Weaver DR,
Sci. USA 96:11659–63 Maywood ES, Chaves I, et al. 2000.
128. Sakakibara H, Taniguchi M, Sugiyama Interacting molecular loops in the
Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org

T. 2000. His-Asp phosphorelay signaling: mammalian circadian clock. Science

a communication avenue between plants 288:1013–19
and their environment. Plant Mol. Biol. 138. Simpson GG, Gendall AR, Dean C.
42:273–78 1999. When to switch to flowering.
129. Salvador ML, Klein U, Bogorad L. 1993. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 15:519–50
Light-regulated and endogenous fluctu- 139. Somers D. 1999. The physiology and
ations of chloroplast transcript levels molecular bases of the plant circadian
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

in Chlamydomonas. Regulation by tran- clock. Plant Physiol. 121:9–19

scription and RNA degradation. Plant J. 139a. Somers DE, Devlin P, Kay SA. 1998.
3:213–19 Phytochromes and cryptochromes in the
130. Salvador ML, Klein U, Bogorad L. 1998. entrainment of the Arabidopsis circadian
Endogenous fluctuations of DNA topol- clock. Science 282:1488–90
ogy in the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas 140. Somers DE, Schultz TF, Milnamow M,
reinhardtii. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:7235– Kay SA. 2000. ZEITLUPE encodes a
42 novel clock-associated PAS protein from
131. Samach A, Klenz JE, Kohalmi SE, Ris- Arabidopsis. Cell 101:319–29
seeuw E, Haughn GW, Crosby WL. 1999. 141. Somers DE, Webb AAR, Pearson M,
The UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS gene Kay SA. 1998. The short-period mutant,
of Arabidopsis thaliana is an F-box pro- toc1-1, alters circadian clock regulation
tein required for normal patterning and of multiple outputs throughout develop-
growth in the floral meristem. Plant J. ment in Arabidopsis thaliana. Develop-
20:433–45 ment 125:485–94
132. Sanders D, Brownlee C, Harper JF. 1999. 142. Staiger D, Apel K. 1999. Circadian
Communicating with calcium. Plant Cell clock-regulated expression of an RNA-
11:691–706 binding protein in Arabidopsis: char-
133. Sauer F, Jäckle H. 1991. Concentration- acterisation of a minimal promoter el-
dependent transcriptional activation or re- ement. Mol. Gen. Genet. 261:811–19
pression by Krüppel from a single binding 143. Staiger D, Apel K, Trepp G. 1999.
site. Nature 353:563–66 The Atger3 promoter confers circadian
134. Schaffer R, Ramsay N, Samach A, Cor- clock-regulated transcription with peak
den S, Putterill J, et al. 1998. LATE ELON- expression at the beginnning of night.
GATED HYPOCOTYL, an Arabidopsis Plant Mol. Biol. 40:873–82
gene encoding a MYB transcription fac- 144. Strayer C, Oyama T, Schultz TF, Ra-
tor, regulates circadian rhythmicity and man R, Somers DE, et al. 2000. Cloning
photoperiodic responses. Cell 93:1219– of the Arabidopsis clock gene TOC1,
29 an autoregulatory response regulator ho-
135. Schmitz O, Katayama M, Williams SB, molog. Science 289:768–71
Kondo T, Golden SS. 2000. CikA, a bacte- 145. Sugano S, Andronis C, Green RM,
riophytochrome that resets the cyanobac- Wang Z-Y, Tobin EM. 1998. Protein
P1: GDL/FXB P2: FXY/FXB QC: aaa
April 11, 2001 17:40 Annual Reviews AR129-06

162 MCCLUNG

kinase CK2 interacts with and phospho- the phytochrome regulation of an Ara-
rylates the Arabidopsis circadian clock- bidopsis Lhcb gene. Plant Cell 9:491–
associated 1 protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. 507
Sci. USA 95:11020–25 156. Wang Z-Y, Tobin EM. 1998. Con-
146. Sugano S, Andronis C, Ong MS, Green stitutive expression of the CIRCA-
RM, Tobin EM. 1999. The protein ki- DIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1)
nase CK2 is involved in regulation of gene disrupts circadian rhythms and
circadian rhythms in Arabidopsis. Proc. suppresses its own expression. Cell
Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org

Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:12362–66 93:1207–17

147. Swarup K, Alonso-Blanco C, Lynn JR, 157. Webb AAR. 1998. Stomatal rhythms.
Michaels SD, Amasino RM, et al. 1999. See Ref. 89, pp. 69–79
Natural allelic variation identifies new 158. Whitmore D, Foulkes NS, Sassone-
genes in the Arabidopsis circadian sys- Corsi P. 2000. Light acts directly on or-
tem. Plant J. 20:67–77 gans and cells in culture to set the verte-
148. Sweeney BM. 1987. Rhythmic Phenom- brate circadian clock. Nature 404:87–91
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

ena in Plants. New York: Academic 159. Yamazaki S, Numano R, Abe M, Hida A,
149. Taylor BL, Zhulin IB. 1999. PAS do- Takahashi R, et al. 2000. Resetting cen-
mains: internal sensors of oxygen, re- tral and peripheral circadian oscillators
dox potential, and light. Microbiol. Mol. in transgenic rats. Science 288:682–85
Biol. Rev. 63:479–506 160. Yanovsky MJ, Izaguirre M, Wagmaister
150. Thain SC, Hall A, Millar AJ. 2000. JA, Gatz C, Jackson SD, et al. 2000. Phy-
Functional independence of multiple cir- tochrome A resets the circadian clock
cadian clocks that regulate plant gene ex- and delays tuber formation under long
pression. Curr. Biol. 10:951–56 days in potato. Plant J. 23:223–32
151. Tosini G, Menaker M. 1996. Circadian 161. Young MW. 1998. The molecular con-
rhythms in cultured mammalian retina. trol of circadian behavioral rhythms and
Science 272:419–21 their entrainment in Drosophila. Annu.
152. Tosini G, Menaker M. 1998. Multioscil- Rev. Biochem. 67:135–52
latory circadian organization in a verte- 162. Zhong HH, McClung CR. 1996. The
brate, Iguana iguana. J. Neurosci. 18: circadian clock gates expression of two
1105–14 Arabidopsis catalase genes to distinct
153. Tsinoremas NF, Ishiura M, Kondo T, and opposite circadian phases. Mol.
Andersson CR, Tanaka K, et al. 1996. Gen. Genet. 251:196–203
A sigma factor that modifies the circa- 163. Zhong HH, Painter JE, Salomé PA,
dian expression of a subset of genes in Straume M, McClung CR. 1998. Imbibi-
cyanobacteria. EMBO J. 15:2488–95 tion, but not release from stratification,
154. Wambutt R, Murphy G, Volckaert G, sets the circadian clock in Arabidopsis
Pohl T, Dusterhoft A, et al. 2000. Pro- seedlings. Plant Cell 10:2005–17
gress in Arabidopsis genome sequencing 164. Zhong HH, Resnick AS, Straume M,
and functional genomics. J. Biotechnol. McClung CR. 1997. Effects of syn-
78:281–92 ergistic signaling by phytochrome A
155. Wang Z-Y, Kenigsbuch D, Sun L, Harel and cryptochrome 1 on circadian clock-
E, Ong MS, Tobin EM. 1997. A Myb- regulated catalase expression. Plant Cell
related transcription factor is involved in 9:947–55
P1: FQP
April 18, 2001 12:30 Annual Reviews AR129-06-COLOR

Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

Figure 1 Characteristics of circadian rhythms illustrated using the circadian oscillation in

luciferase activity of Arabidopsis seedlings carrying either a CAB2::LUC transgene (yellow)
or a CAT3::LUC transgene (orange). Under entraining conditions (12 h light:12 h dark,
indicated by the white and black bars, respectively) the rhythms exhibit 24 h periods. The
peak in luciferase activity for each rhythm maintains constant phase relationship with dawn.
The peak in CAB2::LUC activity occurs ∼4–6 h after dawn whereas the peak in CAT3::LUC
activity occurs ∼10–12 hours after dawn. The amplitude of the rhythm is defined as one
half of the peak to trough difference. Both rhythms persist when the seedlings are released
into continuous conditions (constant dim light), although the period lengthens to reveal the
endogenous free-running period of ∼25 h. This results in the peaks in luciferase activity
shifting with respect to subjective dawn as defined by the entraining 12:12 light:dark cycle
(indicated by the gray and white bars, respectively).
 Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.
P1: FQP
April 18, 2001
12:30
Annual Reviews
AR129-06-COLOR

Figure 2 A simple (linear) conceptual model of a simple circadian system consisting of a set of input (entrainment) pathways, multiple central
oscillators, and sets of output pathways. Entraining stimuli include light, mediated through phytochromes (PHY) and cryptochromes (CRY), tem-
perature, and imbibition (not shown). Although the input pathways are drawn as discrete linear pathways, there are multiple phytochromes and
cryptochromes as well as interaction among them and their downstream signaling pathways. Each central oscillator is illustrated as a loop includ-
ing positive and negative components that yields a self-sustaining oscillation with a period of approximately 24 h. The double-headed arrows indi-
cate possible coupling between the oscillators. Multiple output pathways are drawn as each regulating an overt rhythm with a distinct phase.
Although not indicated, different oscillators may drive separate rhythms with distinct periods. The number of output pathways and the degree of
interaction among them is not known, although some cross talk among output pathways is possible. Some outputs may be driven by individual
oscillators whereas others may receive input from more than one oscillator.
P1: FQP
April 23, 2001 18:20 Annual Reviews AR129-06-COLOR

Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

Figure 3 A speculative model of an Arabidopsis circadian clock. Light input via phy-
tochromes and cryptochromes (PHYA/CRY1 and PHYB/CRY2 complexes are shown, al-
though other configurations are likely to occur) is mediated through ELF3 and GI, or through
PIF3. PHYA-PIF3 and PHYB-PIF3 interactions are known to occur. PIF3 binds to CCA1
and LHY promoters and possibly to other targets in the clock. The pathway downstream of
GI is not known. Although the input pathways are drawn as discrete linear pathways, there
may be interaction among them. For simplicity, a single central oscillator is illustrated with a
number of putative oscillator components indicated. CCA1/LHY/RVE and FKF/LKP2/ZTL
are clustered, although there is no evidence that they form molecular complexes. Compo-
nents on the internal circular arrows oscillate in mRNA or protein abundance. FKF but not
ZTL mRNA oscillates, so FKF is indicated closest to the circular arrows. CCA1 and LHY
are phosphorylated by CK2, which may make them substrates for the F-box proteins (ZTL,
FKF and LKP2) and target them for ubiquitination and degradation by the proteasome
(trash can). Output pathways emanate from the oscillator to input components known to be
regulated by the clock at transcriptional, mRNA abundance or protein abundance levels.
 Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology
Volume 52, 2001

CONTENTS
FIFTY YEARS AS A PLANT PHYSIOLOGIST, James HM Henderson 1
ALKALOID BIOSYNTHESIS IN PLANTS: Biochemistry, Cell Biology,
Molecular Regulation, and Metabolic Engineering Applications, Peter J
Facchini 29
HOW GIBBERELLIN REGULATES PLANT GROWTH AND
DEVELOPMENT: A Molecular Genetic Analysis of Gibberellin
Signaling, Donald E Richards, Kathryn E King, Tahar Ait-ali, Nicholas P
Harberd 67
Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org

CYTOKININ METABOLISM AND ACTION, David WS Mok,

Machteld C Mok 89
ONE-CARBON METABOLISM IN HIGHER PLANTS, Andrew D
Hanson, Sanja Roje 119
CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS IN PLANTS, C Robertson McClung 139
MACRONUTRIENT UTILIZATION BY PHOTOSYNTHETIC
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.

EUKARYOTES AND THE FABRIC OF INTERACTIONS, Arthur

Grossman, Hideki Takahashi 163
PLANT PHOSPHOLIPASES, Xuemin Wang 211
ENDOSPERM DEVELOPMENT: Cellularization and Cell Fate
Specification, Odd-Arne Olsen 233

MECHANISTIC FEATURES OF THE MO-CONTAINING

NITROGENASE, Jason Christiansen, Dennis R Dean, Lance C Seefeldt 269
MOLECULAR ENGINEERING OF C4 PHOTOSYNTHESIS, Makoto
Matsuoka, Robert T Furbank, Hiroshi Fukayama, Mitsue Miyao 297
THE PLASTID DIVISION MACHINE, Katherine W Osteryoung,
Rosemary S McAndrew 315
VARIATIONS IN THE BIOSYNTHESIS OF SEED-STORAGE LIPIDS,
Toni Voelker, Anthony J Kinney 335

CHLAMYDOMONAS AS A MODEL ORGANISM, Elizabeth H Harris 363

ISOPRENE EMISSION FROM PLANTS, Thomas D Sharkey, Sansun
Yeh 407
BIOSYNTHESIS OF ASCORBIC ACID IN PLANTS: A Renaissance,
Nicholas Smirnoff, Patricia L Conklin, Frank A Loewus 437
TONOPLAST TRANSPORTERS: Organization and Function,
Masayoshi Maeshima 469
PROBING PLANT METABOLISM WITH NMR, R George Ratcliffe,
Yair Shachar-Hill 499

FUNCTION AND MECHANISM OF ORGANIC ANION EXUDATION

FROM PLANT ROOTS, PR Ryan, E Delhaize, DL Jones 527
PLANT MITOCHONDRIA AND OXIDATIVE STRESS: Electron
Transport, NADPH Turnover, and Metabolism of Reactive Oxygen
Species, Ian M Møller 561
PHOTOSYSTEM I: Function and Physiology, Parag R Chitnis 593

GUARD CELL SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION, Julian I Schroeder, Gethyn

J Allen, Veronique Hugouvieux, June M Kwak, David Waner 627
 TRANSPORTERS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE UPTAKE AND
PARTITIONING OF NITROGENOUS SOLUTES, LE Williams, AJ
Miller 659
DEFENSIVE RESIN BIOSYNTHESIS IN CONIFERS, Susan Trapp,
Rodney Croteau 689
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF FRUIT MATURATION AND
RIPENING, Jim Giovannoni 725

CYTOKINESIS AND BUILDING OF THE CELL PLATE IN PLANTS,Desh Pal S Verma 751
RIBOSOME-INACTIVATING PROTEINS: A Plant Perspective, Kirsten
Nielsen, Rebecca S Boston 785
PLANT PLASMA MEMBRANE H+-ATPases: Powerhouses for Nutrient
Uptake, Michael G Palmgren 817
THE COHESION-TENSION MECHANISM AND THE ACQUISITION
OF WATER BY PLANT ROOTS, Ernst Steudle 847
Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 2001.52:139-162. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org
by Cornell University on 05/22/12. For personal use only.