COMPANY LAW

PAPER – V
Company Law

Theory 6 Hours/Per Week Marks:100 (External-80; Internal-20)

Unit – I:
Corporate Personality - General Principles of Company Law –Evolution of Company Law in India -
Companies Act, 1956 – Companies Act, 2013 and Recent Amendments - Nature and Definition of
Company - Private Company and Public Company – Characteristics of a Company - Different kinds of
Company - Registration & Incorporation of Company –Advantages and Disadvantages of Incorporation -
Lifting of the Corporate Veil – Company distinguished from Partnership, HUF and LLP.
Unit –II:
Promoters - Memorandum of Association - Doctrine of Ultravires - Articles of Association - Doctrine of
Indoor Management - Prospectus - Civil and Criminal liability for misstatement in Prospectus - Statement
in lieu of Prospectus – Pre-incorporation Contracts - Membership in a Company –Modes of Acquisition of
Membership in Company – Members and Share Holders.
Unit –III:
Shares & Stock - Kinds of shares –Share Capital - Statutory restrictions on allotment of shares –
Interme1diaries – Call on shares for future of shares- Transfer of shares –Transmission of shares –
Reduction on transfer of shares - Rectification of register on transfer - Certification and issue of certificate
of transfer of shares – Limitation of time for issue of certificates - Object and effect of share certificate-
Debentures & Charges - Borrowing Powers of a Company.
Unit –IV:
Directors – Different kinds of Directors - Appointment, position , qualifications and disqualifications -
Powers of Directors - Rights and Duties of Directors – Corporate Governance and Role of Directors -
Meetings and proceedings - Kinds of Meetings - Statutory meeting- Statutory report - Annual General
Meeting - Extraordinary meeting - Power of the Tribunal to order meeting - Class meetings - Requisites for
a valid meeting -Proxy - Resolutions – Minutes- Shareholders Activism-Corporate Social Responsibility.
Unit –V:
Accounts and Audit - Majority Rule and Rights of Minority share holders - Prevention of Oppression and
Mismanagement - Mergers, Amalgamation and Takeover- Dissolution of a company – Winding up of
Companies-Modes of Winding up of Companies – Consequences of winding up –Functions of Liquidator -
Authorities under the Act- Department of Company Affairs - NCLT, NCLAT – Jurisdiction of Courts.
Suggested Readings:
1. Shah : Lectures on Company Law, N.M. Tripathi, Bombay
2. Avtar Sing : Company Law, Eastern Book Company, 2001.
3. Charlesworth : Company Law, Sweet and Maxwell, 1996.
4. Ramaiah : Company Law, Wadhwa & Co., 2001.
 Unit – I
Corporate Personality
Corporate Personality
Corporate Personality refers to the legal concept that a company has a distinct identity separate from its
owners (shareholders) and managers. This principle, established in Salomon v. Salomon & Co. Ltd. (1897),
grants a corporation the following key attributes:
Corporate Personality Under Indian Company Law (Companies Act, 2013)
In India, the principle of corporate personality is well established under the Companies Act, 2013, which
recognizes a company as a separate legal entity distinct from its shareholders and directors.
Key features or Provisions of Corporate Personality in India (under Companies Act, 2013)
1. Separate Legal Entity (Section 9 of Companies Act, 2013)
o A company incorporated under the Act has its own legal identity.
o It can own property, enter into contracts, and sue or be sued in its own name.
o The classic case of Salomon v. Salomon & Co. Ltd. (1897) is followed in Indian law, as reaffirmed
in Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. v. State of Bihar (1964).
2. Limited Liability (Section 4 & 34 of Companies Act, 2013)
o Shareholders’ liability is limited to the unpaid amount on their shares.
o Exceptions exist in cases of fraud, wrongful trading, or misrepresentation.
3. Perpetual Succession (Section 9 of Companies Act, 2013)
o The company continues to exist despite changes in shareholders, directors, or management.
o It is unaffected by the death, insolvency, or exit of its members.
4. Right to Own Property and Contractual Capacity
o The company holds its property in its own name.
o Members have no direct claim over the company’s assets.
5. Right to Sue and Be Sued – The company can enter contracts, own property, and take legal action
in its own name.
Exceptions: Lifting the Corporate Veil Under Indian Law
While a company enjoys separate legal status, courts may pierce the corporate veil to hold individuals
(directors/shareholders) liable in cases of:
1. Fraudulent or Improper Conduct
o Juggi Lal Kamlapat v. CIT (1969) – The Supreme Court lifted the veil where a company was used
to evade taxes.
o Section 339 of the Companies Act, 2013 allows courts to hold directors personally liable for
fraudulent business activities.
2. Tax Evasion and Evasion of Legal Obligations
o Workmen of Associated Rubber Industry Ltd. v. Associated Rubber Industry Ltd. (1986) – Courts
disregarded corporate personality to ensure statutory dues to workers.
3. Public Interest and Government Regulation
o Under environmental, labor, and taxation laws, courts may disregard corporate personality to
enforce compliance.
o Authorities can invoke Section 248 to strike off companies engaged in fraudulent or non-
compliant activities.
4. Agency or Sham Companies
o If a company is merely an agent of its parent company, courts may treat both as a single
entity.
STA 1
Conclusion
Corporate personality is a fundamental principle in Indian company law, ensuring businesses operate as
separate legal entities. However, in cases of fraud, misconduct, or statutory violations, Indian courts and
regulators have the power to lift the corporate veil to prevent abuse.

General Principles of Company Law

The Companies Act, 2013 governs corporate entities in India and establishes several fundamental
principles of company law to ensure legal certainty, transparency, and corporate governance. Below are
the key principles:
1. Separate Legal Entity
A company is an independent legal entity distinct from its owners (shareholders). It can own property,
enter into contracts, and sue or be sued in its own name.
Example: If a company takes a loan and later defaults, creditors cannot directly sue the shareholders for
repayment.
Case Law: Salomon v. Salomon & Co. Ltd. (1897)
 This English case established the principle that a company has a separate legal identity from its
shareholders.
 Recognized in India under Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. v. State of Bihar (1964).
Case Law: Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. v. State of Bihar (1964) – The Supreme Court upheld
the separate identity of a company.
2. Limited Liability
Shareholders are only liable up to the unpaid amount on their shares. Their personal assets are not at risk
beyond their investment.
Example: If a shareholder holds 100 shares of ₹10 each and has paid ₹5 per share, their liability is limited
to ₹500.
Companies Act, 2013: Section 4(1)(d) and Section 34 provide for limited liability.
Case Law: Bacha F. Guzdar v. CIT (1955) – The Supreme Court ruled that shareholders are not the owners
of company property; they have limited liability.
Case Law: Macaura v. Northern Assurance Co. (1925)
 The court held that the company's property belongs to the company, not its shareholders.
3. Perpetual Succession
The company continues to exist despite changes in shareholders, directors , ownership or management,
Death or insolvency of shareholders or resignation of a member does not dissolve the company.
Example: A shareholder in Tata Motors Ltd. dies, but the company continues operating normally.
Companies Act, 2013: Section 9 ensures a company’s uninterrupted existence.
Example: If all directors of a company resign, the company still exists and new directors can be appointed.
**Case Law: Re Noel Tedman Holdings Pty Ltd. (1967)
 The death of all members of a company does not dissolve the company; it continues its existence.
4. Transferability of Shares
Shares of a public company can be freely transferred, promoting liquidity and investment.
 Private companies can restrict transfer under Section 2(68).
Example: An investor in Reliance Industries Ltd. can sell shares on the stock market anytime.
Companies Act, 2013: Section 44 provides that shares are movable property and transferable.
Case Law: V.B. Rangaraj v. V.B. Gopalakrishnan (1992) – The Supreme Court ruled that restrictions on
share transfers must be in the Articles of Association.
STA 2
5. Corporate Veil and Lifting of Corporate Veil
Courts can disregard the company’s separate identity if it is used for fraudulent purposes.
Example: If a company is created only to evade taxes or commit fraud, courts may hold the individuals
behind it personally liable.
Case Law: Workmen of Associated Rubber Industry Ltd. v. Associated Rubber Industry Ltd. (1986)
 The corporate veil was lifted to determine the real employer of workers.
6. Corporate Governance and Fiduciary Duties
Directors and officers owe a fiduciary duty to act in the company's best interests. The Companies Act,
2013 lays down corporate governance principles, especially under:
 Section 166 – Directors' duties
 Section 177 – Audit Committee oversight
 Section 149 – Independent directors' role
Example: Directors must avoid conflicts of interest and act in the best interest of stakeholders.
Case Law: Daimler Co Ltd. v. Continental Tyre & Rubber Co. (1916)
 A company’s legal personality was disregarded when it was found to be controlled by enemy
shareholders during wartime.
7. Doctrine of Ultra Vires
A company must act within its object clause stated in the Memorandum of Association (MOA). Any act
beyond this is void.
Example: If a company registered for textile manufacturing starts a real estate business, such action is
ultra vires and invalid.
Case Law: Ashbury Railway Carriage and Iron Co. Ltd. v. Riche (1875)
 A contract outside the company’s object clause was declared void.
Conclusion
The Companies Act, 2013 establishes strong principles of company law, ensuring legal identity, limited
liability, corporate governance, and statutory compliance. While companies enjoy autonomy, courts can
intervene in cases of fraud or misuse of corporate personality.

Evolution of Company Law in India

The development of company law in India has been a gradual process influenced by British colonial rule,
economic reforms, and globalization. It has evolved from early regulations under British rule to the
modern Companies Act, 2013, ensuring transparency, accountability, and corporate governance.
1. Pre-Independence Era (Before 1947)
1.1. Early British Influence
 Before British rule, businesses in India were primarily family-owned, with no legal framework for
corporate entities.
 The British introduced company law in India to regulate trade and promote British commercial
interests.
1.2. The Companies Act, 1850
 First company law in India, based on the British Joint Stock Companies Act, 1844.
 Allowed registration of companies, but did not provide for limited liability.
1.3. The Companies Act, 1857
 Introduced limited liability, meaning shareholders were only responsible for the unpaid portion of
their shares.
 Encouraged investment and business expansion.

STA 3
1.4. The Companies Act, 1866
 Modeled on the UK Companies Act, 1862.
 Introduced concepts like separate legal entity, winding up, and shareholder rights.
1.5. The Companies Act, 1913
 Based on the UK Companies Act, 1908.
 Defined private and public companies for the first time.
 Introduced director responsibilities and shareholder protections.
 Amended in 1936 to improve corporate governance.
Impact: The 1913 Act remained in force even after independence until it was replaced by the Companies
Act, 1956.
2. Post-Independence Era (After 1947)
2.1. The Companies Act, 1956
 First comprehensive Indian company law, replacing the 1913 Act.
 Based on recommendations of the Bhabha Committee (1950).
 Key Features:
o Defined company types (private, public, and government companies).
o Introduced memorandum and articles of association.
o Regulated directors, auditors, and shareholder rights.
o Established the Registrar of Companies (ROC).
o Provided winding-up procedures.
Impact: The 1956 Act governed corporate India for over 50 years, with multiple amendments.
3. Liberalization and Reforms (1991-2013)
3.1. Economic Reforms of 1991
 India adopted liberalization, privatization, and globalization (LPG) policies.
 Needed a more investor-friendly corporate law.
3.2. Companies Act, 2002 (Amendment)
 Introduced corporate governance reforms.
 Strengthened SEBI’s powers to regulate listed companies.
3.3. Companies Bill, 2008
 Proposed major changes, but was never enacted.
4. Companies Act, 2013 – The Modern Corporate Law
4.1. Need for a New Law
 The 1956 Act had over 650 sections, making it complex and outdated.
 Scams like Satyam (2009) exposed the need for stronger corporate governance.
4.2. Key Features of the Companies Act, 2013
1. Simplification – Reduced sections from 650+ to 470.
2. Corporate Governance – Mandatory independent directors and audit committees.
3. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) – Companies meeting criteria must spend 2% of profits on
CSR.
4. Stronger Director Accountability – Disqualification, penalties, and legal action against fraudulent
directors.
5. Fast-Track Mergers & Insolvency Resolution – Introduced easier merger and winding-up
processes.
6. Enhanced Shareholder Rights – Minority shareholders get better protection from oppression and
mismanagement.

STA 4
 7. Introduction of One-Person Company (OPC) – Allowed single entrepreneurs to register
companies.
Impact: The 2013 Act modernized Indian company law, aligning it with global corporate laws.
5. Recent Amendments and Developments (2015-Present)
5.1. Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015
 Removed the requirement of a common seal.
 Simplified private company regulations.
5.2. Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017
 Introduced ease of doing business provisions.
 Allowed startups to function with fewer compliances.
5.3. Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020
 Decriminalized minor offenses to promote ease of doing business.
 Introduced fast-track insolvency resolution.
6. Case Law Example: Satyam Scam (2009)
Facts:
 Satyam Computer Services, a leading IT company, falsified financial statements.
 ₹7,000 crore fraud was uncovered in 2009.
 Founder B. Ramalinga Raju confessed to inflating profits.
Impact:
 Highlighted corporate governance failures.
 Led to stricter laws in the Companies Act, 2013.
 Independent directors and auditors’ roles were strengthened.
7. Conclusion
The evolution of company law in India reflects the country’s economic and corporate growth. From
British-era laws (1850-1913) to the Companies Act, 2013, India has adopted global best practices in
corporate governance, ease of doing business, and investor protection.
Future Trends:
 Stronger data protection and cybersecurity laws for companies.
 Increased regulations on artificial intelligence and fintech startups.

Companies Act, 1956

The Companies Act, 1956
The Companies Act, 1956 was the first comprehensive company law enacted in independent India,
governing company formation, regulation, and dissolution. It remained in force for over five decades
before being replaced by the Companies Act, 2013.
Key Features of the Companies Act, 1956
1. Company Types Defined
o Private Company – Restricted transfer of shares, limited members (max 50).
o Public Company – No restrictions on share transfer, minimum 7 members.
o Government Company – At least 51% government ownership.
2. Incorporation & Registration
o Companies had to register with the Registrar of Companies (ROC).
o Required Memorandum of Association (MOA) and Articles of Association (AOA).
3. Corporate Governance
o Directors and board responsibilities were defined.

STA 5
 o Mandatory shareholder meetings and financial disclosures.
4. Shareholder Rights & Limited Liability
o Shareholders were not personally liable beyond their shareholding.
o Provided protection against oppression and mismanagement.
5. Auditing & Financial Reporting
o Compulsory audit of accounts.
o Annual financial statements filing with ROC.
6. Winding Up & Liquidation
o Voluntary winding-up by shareholders.
o Compulsory winding-up by the court in cases of fraud or insolvency.
Amendments and Limitations
 Several amendments (e.g., 2002, 2006) were made to modernize the law.
 The Act became outdated due to economic liberalization in 1991, leading to the enactment of the
Companies Act, 2013.
Replacement by Companies Act, 2013
 The 2013 Act introduced better corporate governance, ease of doing business, and CSR
obligations.
 The 1956 Act was repealed in phases between 2013-2017.

Companies Act, 2013 and Recent Amendments

The Companies Act, 2013 is the primary legislation governing corporate entities in India. It replaced the
Companies Act, 1956, introducing modern corporate governance standards, ease of doing business
reforms, and enhanced shareholder protection.
1. Background and Need for the Companies Act, 2013
 The Companies Act, 1956 had over 650 sections, making it complex and outdated.
 Economic liberalization (1991) and corporate frauds like Satyam Scam (2009) highlighted the need
for stricter governance norms.
 The Companies Bill, 2012 was introduced and later enacted as the Companies Act, 2013.
2. Key Features of the Companies Act, 2013
2.1. Structure of the Act
 The Act has 29 chapters, 470 sections, and 7 schedules.
 It applies to public, private, one-person, foreign, and government companies.
2.2. Types of Companies Under the Act
 Private Company – Restricts share transfer, max 200 members.
 Public Company – Minimum 7 members, no limit on shares.
 One Person Company (OPC) – A single entrepreneur can register a company.
 Small Company – Reduced compliance for small firms.
 Section 8 Company – Non-profit organizations.
 Government Company – At least 51% government ownership.
 Foreign Company – Incorporated outside India but operates in India.
2.3. Key Corporate Governance Provisions
1. Board of Directors (BOD)
o Minimum: 1 director (OPC), 2 (Private), 3 (Public).
o Maximum: 15 directors (more allowed with special resolution).

STA 6
 o Independent Directors: At least 1/3rd of the board in listed companies must be
independent.
o Women Director: At least one woman director in large companies.
2. Shareholder Rights & Protection
o E-voting mandatory for listed and large companies.
o Class action suits introduced under Section 245 to protect minority shareholders.
3. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) - Section 135
o Companies with ₹500 crore net worth or ₹1,000 crore turnover or ₹5 crore net profit
must spend 2% of profits on CSR.
o First time in Indian corporate law, making CSR mandatory.
2.4. Compliance and Financial Regulations
1. Audit & Financial Disclosures
o Mandatory rotation of auditors every 5 years (individual) or 10 years (firm).
o Internal Audit mandatory for prescribed classes of companies.
2. Insolvency & Liquidation
o Simplified liquidation process for small companies.
o Strengthened winding-up procedures under the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).
3. Related Party Transactions - Section 188
o Board approval needed for transactions with related entities.
o Shareholder approval required for significant transactions.
2.5. Lifting of Corporate Veil - Section 339
 If a company is used for fraudulent or wrongful trading, courts can hold directors personally
liable.
 Used in cases like fraudulent business practices or tax evasion.
Case Law: Delhi Development Authority v. Skipper Construction (1996) – Supreme Court lifted the veil to
hold directors liable for fraud.
3. Recent Amendments to Companies Act, 2013
The Companies Act, 2013 has been amended multiple times to simplify regulations, ease compliance,
and improve corporate governance.
3.1. Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015
Key Changes:
 Common Seal Made Optional – Companies no longer need a seal for official documents.
 Private Companies Simplified – Exempted many compliance requirements.
 Board Resolutions Filing Removed – Earlier, companies had to file all board resolutions; this was
removed to reduce paperwork.
3.2. Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017
Key Changes:
 Easier Corporate Governance – Strengthened roles of independent directors and auditors.
 Stricter Penalties for Misconduct – Fraudulent activities attract higher fines and imprisonment.
 Ease of Doing Business – Startups and small companies benefit from fewer compliance
requirements.
 Speedier Mergers and Acquisitions – Fast-track merger process introduced.
3.3. Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019
Key Changes:
 Decriminalization of Minor Offenses – Reduces penalties for small compliance mistakes.

STA 7
 CSR Non-Compliance Penalty – Companies must spend CSR funds within 3 years or transfer them
to government funds.
 Ease of Incorporation – Companies can register with fewer documents and within 24 hours.
3.4. Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020
Key Changes:
 Decriminalization of 48 Offenses – Many corporate compliance violations now attract monetary
fines instead of jail terms.
 Easier Listing Rules – Indian companies can now list directly on foreign stock exchanges.
 Producer Companies Introduced – Special companies for farmers and rural industries.
3.5. Companies (Amendment) Act, 2021
Key Changes:
 Small Companies Definition Expanded – Companies with paid-up capital up to ₹2 crore and
turnover up to ₹20 crore are now considered small companies (previously ₹50 lakh and ₹2 crore).
 Easier Resolutions for Startups – Startups get exemptions from certain board resolutions.
 New Incentives for One-Person Companies (OPC) – Easier conversion and foreign ownership
allowed.
3.6. Companies (Amendment) Act, 2022
Key Changes:
 Easier Corporate Governance for Startups and MSMEs.
 Increased Financial Disclosures for transparency.
 Stringent Penalties for Financial Frauds.
4. Key Case Laws Under Companies Act, 2013
Satyam Scam (2009)
 ₹7,000 crore fraud in financial reporting led to stricter auditing laws under the 2013 Act.
Tata Sons v. Cyrus Mistry (2021)
 Supreme Court upheld Tata Sons’ right to remove its Chairman, reinforcing majority shareholder
rights.
Jaypee Infratech Case (2021)
 Applied insolvency provisions under the Act to protect home buyers.
5. Conclusion
The Companies Act, 2013 modernized India’s corporate laws, enhancing corporate governance, investor
protection, and ease of doing business. Recent amendments focus on reducing compliance burdens,
promoting digital governance, and increasing financial transparency.
Future Trends:
 Stronger cybersecurity and data protection laws for companies.
 Greater ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) compliance.
 Further simplification for startups and MSMEs.

Nature and Definition of Company

The Companies Act, 2013 defines and governs the formation, operation, and dissolution of companies in
India. A company is a distinct legal entity that is separate from its owners, provides limited liability to
shareholders, and exists independent of its members.
1. Definition of a Company (Section 2(20) of the Companies Act, 2013)
According to Section 2(20) of the Companies Act, 2013:
"Company means a company incorporated under this Act or under any previous company law."

STA 8
This means a company is an artificial legal entity formed by registration under the Companies Act,
enjoying rights and responsibilities under the law.
Example:
 Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) – A company registered under the Act, having a separate legal
identity from its shareholders.
2. Nature of a Company
A company possesses certain distinct characteristics that differentiate it from other business structures
like sole proprietorships or partnerships.
2.1. Separate Legal Entity
 A company has a distinct legal identity from its shareholders, directors, and employees. This
means that the company itself can own property, enter contracts, sue others, and be sued in its
own name. The liabilities and obligations of the company are not the personal liabilities of its
members. This principle was first established in the landmark case of Salomon v. Salomon & Co.
Ltd. (1897), where the House of Lords held that once a company is incorporated, it becomes an
independent legal person, even if all its shares are held by a single individual. In the Indian
context, this principle was upheld in Macleod & Co. Ltd. v. S. N. E. Group (1898), reinforcing that a
company has a distinct identity separate from its owners.
 Example: If a company, say Reliance Industries Ltd., enters into a contract, it is the company that
is bound by the contract, not its shareholders or directors personally. If the company fails to fulfill
the contract, the directors cannot be held personally liable unless there is evidence of fraud or
misrepresentation.
2.2. Limited Liability of Members
One of the biggest advantages of forming a company is the principle of limited liability. This means that
the liability of shareholders is restricted to the amount unpaid on their shares. Unlike in a partnership,
where partners are personally liable for business debts, in a company, shareholders are not responsible
for the debts beyond their investment in shares. However, in cases of fraud, misrepresentation, or
wrongful acts by directors, courts can lift the corporate veil and hold individuals personally liable.
Example: Suppose a company, XYZ Ltd., takes a loan of ₹10 crore and later goes bankrupt. If the company
is unable to pay its debts, the shareholders will not be required to pay from their personal wealth. They
will only lose the value of their shares. However, if it is found that the directors fraudulently took the
loan, the court may hold them personally liable.
Case Law: Delhi Development Authority v. Skipper Construction (1996) – The Supreme Court lifted the
corporate veil to hold the company’s directors personally liable when they were found to be defrauding
customers.
2.3. Perpetual Succession
A company enjoys continuous existence irrespective of changes in its ownership or management. The
death, retirement, or insolvency of shareholders or directors does not affect the existence of the
company. This ensures stability and continuity, making a company a preferred business structure for large
enterprises. The only way a company ceases to exist is through legal dissolution or winding up.
Example: Tata Motors Ltd. continues to operate even if some of its shareholders sell their shares or if a
director resigns or passes away. The company remains unaffected as long as it is legally registered.
Case Law: Gopalpur Tea Co. Ltd. v. Pench Valley Coal Co. Ltd. – The court ruled that a company does not
cease to exist just because its shareholders change; it remains an independent entity until legally wound
up.
2.4. Artificial Legal Person

STA 9
  A company, unlike a natural person, is an artificial person created by law. While it enjoys certain
legal rights like owning property, entering contracts, and suing or being sued, it does not have
physical existence or emotions. It acts through its directors and officers, who make decisions on its
behalf. However, unlike a natural person, a company does not enjoy fundamental rights such as
the right to life or personal liberty.
 Example: If Infosys Ltd. wants to enter a business contract with another company, it can do so in
its own name, just like an individual. But unlike a human, it cannot vote in elections or get
married.
 Case Law: State Trading Corporation of India v. Commercial Tax Officer (1963) – The Supreme
Court held that a company, though recognized as a legal person, does not enjoy fundamental
rights under the Constitution of India.
2.5. Common Seal (Optional after 2015 Amendment)
Traditionally, a company was required to have a common seal, which acted as its official signature.
Documents, contracts, and agreements executed by a company had to bear this seal, which was used in
the presence of directors or authorized officers. However, after the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015,
the requirement for a common seal was made optional. Companies can now authorize directors or
company officers to sign documents instead of using a seal.
Example: Before 2015, if L&T Ltd. wanted to sign an agreement, it needed to affix its common seal.
Today, the company’s authorized director can sign the document without needing a seal.
2.6. Transferability of Shares
 The ability to transfer ownership easily is one of the defining features of a company. In a public
company, shares are freely transferable, allowing investors to buy and sell shares without
affecting the company’s existence. In a private company, however, there are restrictions on share
transfers to maintain control over ownership.
 Example: If a shareholder of HDFC Bank Ltd. wants to sell their shares, they can easily do so on
the stock market without needing the approval of other shareholders or the company. However,
in a private company like Ola Cabs Pvt. Ltd., the shares cannot be freely transferred without the
approval of existing shareholders.
2.7. Capacity to Sue and Be Sued
 A company, being a legal entity, has the right to initiate legal proceedings against others and can
also be sued in its own name. It can seek compensation, enforce contracts, and defend itself in
court just like an individual.
 Example: If Google India Pvt. Ltd. enters a contract with a supplier and the supplier breaches the
agreement, Google India can sue the supplier in its own name rather than its directors filing a case
personally.
 Case Law: Vodafone India Ltd. v. Union of India (2012) – Vodafone sued the Indian government
over retrospective tax demands, proving that a company has the right to initiate lawsuits to
protect its interests.
3. Types of Companies Under the Act
1. Private Company – Shareholder limit: 200, restricted share transfer. (e.g., Ola Cabs Private Ltd.)
2. Public Company – No limit on shareholders. (e.g., Infosys Ltd.)
3. One Person Company (OPC) – Single owner company. (e.g., Priya Enterprises OPC Ltd.)
4. Section 8 Company – Non-profit organizations. (e.g., CRY Foundation)
5. Foreign Company – Incorporated outside but operates in India. (e.g., Google India Pvt. Ltd.)

STA 10
4. Case Laws for Deeper Understanding
Case 1: Solomon v. Solomon & Co. Ltd. (1897)
Principle: Separate Legal Entity.
Facts: A shoe business was incorporated, and creditors sued the owner.
Judgment: The company was distinct from Solomon, and his personal assets were protected.
Case 2: Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. v. State of Bihar (1964)
Principle: Perpetual Succession.
Facts: A dispute arose regarding company existence after director resignations.
Judgment: A company’s existence is independent of its directors or members.
5. Conclusion
A company, as per the Companies Act, 2013, is a separate legal entity with perpetual succession, limited
liability, and the ability to own property, enter contracts, and sue or be sued. Its distinct nature makes it
a popular choice for businesses, allowing growth, investment, and risk protection.

Private Company and Public Company

The Companies Act, 2013 classifies companies into various types based on their structure, ownership, and
control. The two most common classifications are Private Companies and Public Companies. Both types
of companies serve different business needs and have distinct legal requirements.
1. Definition Under Companies Act, 2013
1.1 Private Company (Section 2(68))
As per Section 2(68) of the Companies Act, 2013, a Private Company is defined as:
"A company having a minimum paid-up share capital as may be prescribed, and which by its articles—
 (i) Restricts the right to transfer its shares
 (ii) Limits the number of its members to 200 (except for One Person Company)
 (iii) Prohibits any invitation to the public to subscribe for any securities of the company."
Example: Ola Cabs Private Limited, Flipkart Private Limited, BYJU’S Private Limited are all private
companies in India.
1.2 Public Company (Section 2(71))
As per Section 2(71) of the Companies Act, 2013, a Public Company is defined as:
"A company which—
 (i) Is not a private company
 (ii) Has a minimum paid-up share capital as prescribed
 (iii) Allows its shares to be freely transferable
 (iv) Can invite the public to subscribe to its shares and debentures."
Example: Reliance Industries Ltd., Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), Infosys Ltd., Wipro Ltd.
2. Key Differences Between Private and Public Companies
Feature Private Company Public Company
A company that restricts share transfer, A company whose shares are freely
Definition limits the number of members, and transferable and can invite the public to
cannot invite the public to invest. subscribe.
Minimum Members 2 7
Maximum Members 200 No limit
Minimum Directors 2 3
STA 11
 Feature Private Company Public Company
Share Transferability Restricted Freely transferable
Public Issue of
Not allowed Allowed via IPO/FPO
Shares
Regulatory
Lesser compliance burden Stricter compliance requirements
Compliance
Use of Suffix in
"Private Limited" (Pvt. Ltd.) "Limited" (Ltd.)
Name
Statutory Meetings No requirement for a statutory meeting Mandatory to hold a statutory meeting
Listing on Stock Can be listed on stock exchanges (NSE,
Cannot be listed on stock exchanges
Exchange BSE)
3. Detailed Analysis of Private Company
3.1 Characteristics of a Private Company
a. Restriction on Share Transfer
A private company cannot freely transfer its shares to outsiders. The Articles of Association (AoA) restrict
share transfers, which helps private companies maintain control over ownership and prevent hostile
takeovers.
Example: If a shareholder of Ola Cabs Pvt. Ltd. wants to sell their shares, they must first offer them to
existing shareholders before selling to outsiders.
b. Limited Number of Members
A private company can have a maximum of 200 members (except for One Person Companies). This
limitation ensures that the company remains closely held and avoids becoming too large.
c. No Public Invitation for Investment
Private companies cannot invite the public to subscribe to shares or debentures. They must raise funds
through private placements, venture capital, or institutional investors.
Example: BYJU’S Pvt. Ltd. raises funds from private investors and venture capitalists rather than issuing
shares to the public.
d. Lesser Regulatory Compliance
Since private companies do not involve public money, they have fewer regulatory requirements
compared to public companies. They do not have to file prospectuses, conduct statutory meetings, or
maintain detailed financial disclosures.
e. Exemptions and Relaxations
The Companies Act provides various exemptions to private companies, such as:
 No mandatory appointment of independent directors.
 Fewer restrictions on managerial remuneration.
 Less stringent corporate governance norms.
Case Law: Daimler Co. Ltd. v. Continental Tyre & Rubber Co. Ltd. (1916) – This case reinforced that a
private company is a distinct entity from its shareholders, even if all shares are held by a single family or a
small group of people.
4. Detailed Analysis of Public Company
4.1 Characteristics of a Public Company
STA 12
a. Free Transferability of Shares
One of the main advantages of a public company is that its shares are freely transferable on the stock
exchange. This provides liquidity to shareholders and helps in raising capital.
Example: If an investor holds Reliance Industries Ltd. shares, they can sell them anytime on the National
Stock Exchange (NSE) or Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE).
b. No Limit on Membership
Unlike private companies, public companies can have unlimited shareholders. This is essential for large
corporations that require substantial capital from public investors.
c. Public Issue of Shares
Public companies can invite the public to buy shares through Initial Public Offerings (IPO) or Follow-on
Public Offerings (FPO). This allows them to raise large amounts of capital.
Example: Zomato Ltd. went public in 2021 through an IPO, raising billions from public investors.
d. Higher Regulatory Compliance
Since public companies deal with public money, they are subject to strict regulations by the Securities
and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and the Companies Act, 2013. They must:
 Disclose financial reports quarterly and annually.
 Hold board meetings and shareholder meetings regularly.
 Appoint independent directors for better governance.
Case Law: Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. v. State of Bihar (1964) – The court ruled that a
public company continues to exist as an independent entity regardless of changes in ownership.
e. Statutory Meetings and Reports
Public companies are required to hold Annual General Meetings (AGMs) and submit financial reports to
regulatory authorities. They must also prepare a prospectus before issuing shares to the public.
Example: Infosys Ltd. conducts an AGM every year where shareholders vote on key company decisions.
5. Choosing Between Private and Public Companies
Factor Private Company Public Company
Capital Requirement Suitable for small or medium businesses Ideal for large-scale capital needs
Ownership Control Closely held Widely held
Regulatory Compliance Less stringent Highly regulated
Fundraising Options Private investments, venture capital IPO, stock markets, institutional investors
Risk and Transparency More private, less exposure to public scrutiny Higher risk due to public scrutiny
6. Conclusion
Both private and public companies play crucial roles in the Indian economy. Private companies are ideal
for closely held businesses that prioritize control and privacy, whereas public companies provide large-
scale capital and investment opportunities by listing shares on stock exchanges.
The Companies Act, 2013, ensures that each type of company functions efficiently by enforcing
appropriate legal and compliance mechanisms. The choice between private and public company depends
on the business goals, ownership preferences, and capital requirements.

STA 13
Characteristics of a Company
A company is a legal entity formed by a group of individuals to engage in commercial or industrial
business activities. It is artificially created by law, enjoys a separate legal identity, and has certain rights
and responsibilities distinct from its members.
Under Section 2(20) of the Companies Act, 2013, a company is defined as:
"A company incorporated under this Act or under any previous company law."
This definition indicates that a company is a registered entity that comes into existence only after
incorporation under the law. It can be private, public, or a one-person company (OPC) depending on its
structure and nature of business.
Example:
 Private Company – Ola Cabs Pvt. Ltd.
 Public Company – Reliance Industries Ltd.
 One Person Company (OPC) – XYZ (OPC) Pvt. Ltd.
Characteristics of a Company
A company has several defining characteristics that distinguish it from other business forms like sole
proprietorships and partnerships. These characteristics ensure stability, limited liability, and a structured
legal framework for its operations.
1. Separate Legal Entity
A company is a distinct legal entity from its shareholders, directors, and employees. This means that the
company can:
 Own property in its own name.
 Enter contracts independently.
 Sue and be sued as a separate legal person.
 Continue its operations even if shareholders change.
Example:
If Infosys Ltd. enters into a contract with a supplier, it is Infosys Ltd., not its directors or shareholders,
that is legally responsible for fulfilling the contract.
Case Law:
Salomon v. Salomon & Co. Ltd. (1897) – Established that a company has an independent existence
separate from its members.
Macleod & Co. Ltd. v. S. N. E. Group (1898) – Applied this principle in India, ruling that a company is a
separate legal entity from its shareholders.
2. Limited Liability
One of the most important advantages of forming a company is limited liability. This means that the
personal assets of shareholders are not at risk in case the company suffers losses or debts.
 In a company limited by shares, the liability of shareholders is restricted to the amount unpaid on
their shares.
 In a company limited by guarantee, members are liable only for the amount they agreed to
contribute in case of winding up.
Example:
If Tata Motors Ltd. goes bankrupt with ₹500 crore in debt, the shareholders only lose their investment in
shares and do not have to pay beyond that.
Case Law:
Delhi Development Authority v. Skipper Construction (1996) – The Supreme Court held that limited
liability applies unless there is fraud.
STA 14
3. Perpetual Succession
A company has continuous existence, irrespective of changes in ownership, death, or departure of its
directors or shareholders. It only ceases to exist when it is legally dissolved.
Example:
Even if the CEO and majority shareholders of Reliance Industries Ltd. pass away, the company will
continue operating without any interruption.
Case Law:
Gopalpur Tea Co. Ltd. v. Pench Valley Coal Co. Ltd. – Ruled that a company continues to exist independent
of its members.
4. Artificial Legal Person
A company is created by law and exists only in the eyes of the law. It is an artificial person that can
perform legal actions like:
 Owning property.
 Signing contracts.
 Filing lawsuits.
However, it does not have physical existence, emotions, or fundamental rights like a natural person.
Example:
Google India Pvt. Ltd. can enter into an agreement, but it cannot vote in elections or marry like a natural
person.
Case Law:
State Trading Corporation of India v. Commercial Tax Officer (1963) – The Supreme Court held that a
company does not enjoy fundamental rights under the Constitution.
5. Common Seal (Now Optional)
Previously, a company was required to have a common seal to authenticate documents. However, after
the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015, the common seal is now optional, and companies can authorize
officers to sign documents.
Example:
Before 2015, Larsen & Toubro Ltd. had to affix its common seal on contracts. Now, an authorized
director’s signature is enough.
6. Transferability of Shares
In a public company, shares are freely transferable, allowing investors to buy or sell shares on the stock
exchange.
However, in a private company, the Articles of Association (AoA) restrict the transfer of shares, ensuring
that control remains within a close group of shareholders.
Example:
 Shares of HDFC Bank Ltd. can be freely bought or sold on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE).
 Shares of Ola Cabs Pvt. Ltd. cannot be freely transferred without approval from existing
shareholders.
7. Capacity to Sue and Be Sued
Since a company is a separate legal entity, it can file lawsuits and can also be sued in its own name.
Example:
 Vodafone India Ltd. sued the Government of India over retrospective tax demands.
 Tata Sons Ltd. v. Cyrus Mistry (2021) – A legal battle over the chairman’s removal.

STA 15
8. Separate Management and Ownership
In a company, ownership and management are separate. Shareholders own the company, but they do
not manage daily operations—this responsibility lies with directors and managers.
Example:
 Shareholders of Infosys Ltd. do not run the company. Instead, a board of directors and a CEO
manage business operations.
9. Statutory Compliance and Regulations
A company must comply with legal requirements under the Companies Act, 2013 and regulations by SEBI
(for listed companies). These include:
 Holding Annual General Meetings (AGMs).
 Filing financial statements with the Registrar of Companies (ROC).
 Maintaining proper accounts and statutory records.
Failure to comply results in penalties, fines, or legal action.
10. Winding Up or Dissolution
A company can only cease to exist through:
1. Voluntary winding up by shareholders.
2. Compulsory winding up by a court due to insolvency or legal violations.
Once a company is wound up, its existence comes to an end, and its assets are distributed among
creditors and shareholders.
Example:
 Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. was dissolved after financial collapse.
 Satyam Computers Ltd. was acquired by Tech Mahindra after a financial fraud case.
Conclusion
A company is a legally recognized business entity with several distinct characteristics, including separate
legal identity, limited liability, perpetual succession, and free transferability of shares. These features
make it an ideal business structure for long-term growth, investor protection, and economic stability.

Different kinds of Company

The Companies Act, 2013 classifies companies based on ownership, liability, incorporation, purpose, and
control. Understanding these classifications helps in selecting the appropriate company structure based
on business needs.
1. Classification Based on Incorporation
1.1. Statutory Companies
Statutory companies are incorporated by a special Act of Parliament or State Legislature to serve public
interests. They function independently under their governing statute, rather than the Companies Act,
2013. These companies often handle infrastructure, finance, and essential services.
Example:
 Reserve Bank of India (RBI) – Established under the RBI Act, 1934.
 Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) – Formed under the LIC Act, 1956.
1.2. Registered Companies
Registered companies are formed under the Companies Act, 2013, and are subject to its provisions. They
include various categories such as private, public, one-person, and non-profit companies.
Example:
 Tata Motors Ltd. – A publicly registered company under the Companies Act, 2013.

STA 16
2. Classification Based on Liability of Members
2.1. Companies Limited by Shares
In a company limited by shares, shareholders' liability is restricted to the unpaid value of their shares.
This structure is the most common and provides financial security to investors, as their personal assets
are not at risk.
Example:
 If a shareholder buys 100 shares at ₹10 each and has paid ₹8 per share, their liability is limited to
the remaining ₹2 per share.
Case Law: Salomon v. Salomon & Co. Ltd. – Reinforced the principle of limited liability for shareholders.
2.2. Companies Limited by Guarantee
A company limited by guarantee does not have share capital. Instead, members guarantee a specific
amount to be paid in case of liquidation. This type is common for non-profit organizations, clubs, and
research institutes.
Example:
 Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) operates as a company limited
by guarantee, ensuring liability is limited to the pledged amount.
2.3. Unlimited Liability Companies
In these companies, members’ liability is not limited to their shareholding; they are personally
responsible for company debts. These companies are rare because they expose shareholders’ personal
assets to business risks.
Example:
 A law firm operating as an unlimited company would make all partners liable for debts beyond
their initial investment.
3. Classification Based on Ownership and Control
3.1. Private Company
A private company is restricted from freely transferring shares and has a maximum of 200 shareholders.
It cannot raise capital from the public through share offerings. Private companies enjoy simpler
compliance requirements compared to public companies.
Example:
 Flipkart Pvt. Ltd. – A leading e-commerce company registered as a private company.
Key Features:
 Minimum 2 and maximum 200 members.
 Cannot invite the public to subscribe to shares.
 Exempt from some corporate governance regulations applicable to public companies.
3.2. Public Company
A public company can raise capital from the public by issuing shares and has no limit on the number of
shareholders. It must comply with strict governance regulations, ensuring transparency and
accountability.
Example:
 Tata Steel Ltd. – A public company whose shares are traded on the stock exchange.
Key Features:
 Minimum 7 members, no maximum limit.
 Can issue shares via IPO (Initial Public Offering).
 Must comply with SEBI regulations for corporate governance.
3.3. One Person Company (OPC)

STA 17
Introduced under the Companies Act, 2013, an OPC is owned by a single individual. It provides the
benefits of a private company with limited liability but without the need for multiple shareholders.
Example:
 A freelance consultant or entrepreneur may establish an OPC to limit personal liability while
running a business alone.
Key Features:
 Only one shareholder and one director required.
 No requirement for board meetings.
 After crossing ₹2 crore turnover, it must convert into a private or public company.
3.4. Holding and Subsidiary Companies
A holding company owns a controlling interest (more than 50%) in another company, called a subsidiary.
The holding company exerts control over the subsidiary’s policies and management.
Example:
 Reliance Industries Ltd. is the holding company of Jio Platforms Ltd.
Key Features:
 Holding companies can centralize management of multiple subsidiaries.
 Subsidiaries operate semi-independently but must follow holding company decisions.
3.5. Government Company
A government company is one where at least 51% of the shares are held by the central or state
government. These companies often operate in infrastructure, finance, and public services.
Example:
 Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) – A government-controlled entity.
Key Features:
 Majority government ownership.
 Subject to CAG (Comptroller and Auditor General) audit.
 More autonomy than government departments but still regulated.
4. Classification Based on Purpose
4.1. Section 8 Company (Non-Profit Organization)
A Section 8 company is formed for charitable purposes, such as education, science, arts, or social
welfare. Profits must be reinvested in the company’s objectives rather than distributed as dividends.
Example:
 Infosys Foundation – A non-profit promoting education and healthcare.
Key Features:
 No minimum share capital requirement.
 Exempt from paying some taxes.
 Strict compliance to ensure funds are used for social work.
4.2. Producer Company
A producer company is formed by farmers or agriculturalists to work collectively in processing, selling, or
exporting agricultural products. This helps eliminate middlemen and ensure fair pricing for farmers.
Example:
 Amul Dairy Cooperative functions similarly to a producer company by collecting and selling dairy
products.
Key Features:
 Owned by primary producers (farmers, artisans, etc.).
 Minimum 10 members and 5 directors required.
 Focused on collective growth and fair trade.
STA 18
4.3. Foreign Company
A foreign company is incorporated outside India but has operations or business activities in India
through a branch office, subsidiary, or representative office.
Example:
 Google India Pvt. Ltd. – A subsidiary of Google Inc. operating under Indian regulations.
Key Features:
 Subject to Indian corporate laws and taxation.
 Can establish offices in India for business expansion.
Comparison of Different Types of Companies
One Person Section 8
Private Public Government Producer Foreign
Basis Company Company
Company Company Company Company Company
(OPC) (Non-Profit)
A company A company
A company A company A company
that can A company A company formed by
with formed for incorporated
raise capital with a single where at least farmers or
restrictions charitable or outside India
from the shareholder 51% of the producers
Definition on share social purposes, but has
public and and director, shares are to process
transfers and without business
has no limit designed for held by the and sell
limited distributing operations in
on entrepreneurs government goods
shareholders profits India.
shareholders collectively
Companies
Governing Companies Companies Companies Companies Act, Companies Companies Act, 2013 (if
Law Act, 2013 Act, 2013 Act, 2013 2013 (Section 8) Act, 2013 Act, 2013 operating in
India)
Minimum
2 7 1 2 1 10 N/A
Members
Maximum
200 No limit 1 No limit No limit No limit N/A
Members
Minimum 1 (for branch
2 3 1 2 3 5
Directors office)
As per foreign
Transfer Freely May be laws and
Restricted Not allowed Not applicable Restricted
of Shares transferable restricted Indian
regulations
Raising Allowed Allowed
Capital Allowed through Not (subject to
Not allowed Not allowed Allowed
from through IPO donations & allowed FEMA and RBI
Public grants regulations)
Perpetual
Successio Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
n

STA 19
 One Person Section 8
Private Public Government Producer Foreign
Basis Company Company
Company Company Company Company Company
(OPC) (Non-Profit)
Limited to Limited to Limited Limited to Limited as per
Liability of Limited to Limited to
unpaid unpaid (guaranteed unpaid incorporation
Members unpaid shares unpaid shares
shares shares amount) shares laws
Profit Not allowed
Distributio Allowed Allowed Allowed (profits used for Allowed Allowed Allowed
n social welfare)
Priya
Flipkart Pvt. Tata Steel Infosys Google India
Examples Enterprises ONGC Ltd. Amul Dairy
Ltd. Ltd. Foundation Pvt. Ltd.
OPC Ltd.
Key Insights from the Chart
1. Private Companies are ideal for closely held businesses, while Public Companies enable large-
scale capital raising.
2. OPCs provide limited liability to solo entrepreneurs, but they must convert into a private/public
company once turnover exceeds ₹2 crore.
3. Section 8 Companies are best for charitable purposes and non-profits as they do not distribute
profits.
4. Government Companies play a crucial role in public sector services and state ownership of
industries.
5. Producer Companies benefit farmers and artisans, allowing collective growth and fair trade.
6. Foreign Companies operate in India under local laws while being controlled by parent
organizations abroad.
Conclusion
The Companies Act, 2013 provides various company structures suited to different business needs. Private
companies are best for limited liability and controlled ownership, while public companies enable large-
scale investments. Non-profits and producer companies cater to social and agricultural sectors,
respectively. Selecting the right type of company is crucial for business success, regulatory compliance,
and financial growth.
Choosing the Right Company Structure
When to Choose Each Type of Company?
Business Need Recommended Company Type
Small-scale startup with controlled ownership Private Limited Company (Pvt. Ltd.)
Large-scale investment and public fundraising Public Limited Company (Ltd.)
Solo entrepreneur wanting limited liability One Person Company (OPC)
Charitable organization or NGO Section 8 Company
Government-controlled operations Government Company
Farmer or producer collective Producer Company
Foreign business presence in India Foreign Company
STA 20
Registration & Incorporation of Company
The registration and incorporation of a company in India is a legal process governed by the Companies
Act, 2013, ensuring that businesses operate with a recognized legal identity. Incorporation is the first and
most crucial step in establishing a company, providing it with a distinct legal personality, limited liability
protection, and perpetual succession. The Registrar of Companies (ROC), under the Ministry of
Corporate Affairs (MCA), is responsible for registering companies and maintaining records.
1. Meaning of Incorporation & Registration
Incorporation is the process through which a company comes into legal existence by filing the necessary
documents and obtaining a Certificate of Incorporation (COI) from the ROC. Registration is the formal
process of entering the company into the official register maintained by the ROC. Once incorporated, the
company becomes a separate legal entity from its owners, capable of owning assets, entering into
contracts, and conducting business in its own name.
2. Steps for Registration & Incorporation of a Company
Step 1: Choose the Type of Company
Before incorporation, the type of company must be determined. Under the Companies Act, 2013, a
company can be:
 Private Limited Company (Pvt. Ltd.) – Restricts share transfer, requires at least two directors and
members.
 Public Limited Company (Ltd.) – Shares can be freely traded on stock exchanges.
 One Person Company (OPC) – Owned by a single person with limited liability benefits.
 Section 8 Company (Non-Profit Organization) – Formed for charitable purposes.
 Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) – Hybrid of partnership and company structure.
Step 2: Obtain Digital Signature Certificate (DSC)
Since company registration is an online process, every director and subscriber to the company’s
Memorandum of Association (MOA) must obtain a Digital Signature Certificate (DSC) issued by
government-certified agencies like eMudhra, Sify, or NSDL. The DSC is used to sign electronic documents
securely.
Step 3: Obtain Director Identification Number (DIN)
Each proposed director must obtain a Director Identification Number (DIN) from the MCA. DIN is a
unique identification number assigned to directors and is required for directorship in any company. It can
be obtained by filing SPICe+ Form (Simplified Proforma for Incorporating a Company Electronically) with
identity and address proof.
Step 4: Name Reservation through RUN (Reserve Unique Name)
A unique company name must be selected and approved by the MCA. The name should comply with
naming guidelines and should not be identical or similar to existing registered businesses. The name
reservation is done through the RUN (Reserve Unique Name) service of MCA. The name must include:
 Private Limited for a private company.
 Limited for a public company.
 OPC (One Person Company) if applicable.
Step 5: Drafting of Memorandum of Association (MOA) & Articles of Association (AOA)
The two most important documents in company registration are:
 Memorandum of Association (MOA): Defines the objectives and scope of the company.
 Articles of Association (AOA): Outlines the rules and internal governance structure of the
company.
Both MOA and AOA must be digitally signed by subscribers and filed electronically with the ROC.

STA 21
Step 6: Filing of Incorporation Documents (SPICe+ Form)
The SPICe+ (Simplified Proforma for Incorporating a Company Electronically) Form is the main
application for company registration. It includes:
 SPICe+ Part A – Name reservation.
 SPICe+ Part B – Incorporation form including details like registered office, directors, and capital
structure.
 AGILE-PRO Form – Used for GST registration, EPFO, ESIC, and bank account opening.
These documents are filed with the Registrar of Companies (ROC).
Step 7: Payment of Registration Fees & Stamp Duty
The company must pay registration fees and stamp duty based on its authorized share capital. Fees vary
depending on the type of company and state of incorporation.
Step 8: Certificate of Incorporation (COI) Issuance
Once the ROC verifies all documents, it issues the Certificate of Incorporation (COI). This document
serves as legal proof of the company’s existence and includes:
 Company Identification Number (CIN) – A unique number assigned by the MCA.
 Date of Incorporation.
 Company’s Registered Name.
After obtaining the COI, the company is legally incorporated and can commence business operations.
3. Post-Incorporation Compliances
After incorporation, a company must complete certain mandatory compliances, including:
3.1. Obtaining PAN & TAN
 A Permanent Account Number (PAN) and Tax Deduction and Collection Account Number (TAN)
must be obtained from the Income Tax Department.
3.2. Bank Account Opening
 A corporate bank account must be opened in the company’s name.
3.3. GST Registration (if applicable)
 If turnover exceeds ₹40 lakh (₹20 lakh for special category states), GST registration is mandatory.
3.4. Compliance with Annual Filings & Audit
 Appointment of Auditor: Within 30 days of incorporation.
 Filing of Financial Statements & Annual Returns: With ROC every year.
 Board Meetings: Minimum 4 per year for public companies.
4. Advantages of Company Incorporation
 Legal Recognition : A company is recognized as a separate legal entity, distinct from its owners.
 Limited Liability: Shareholders are only liable up to their shareholding, protecting personal assets.
 Perpetual Succession: The company continues to exist even if the owner or directors change.
 Easier Access to Capital: A registered company can raise funds through investors, loans, and public
offerings.
 Credibility & Brand Value: A registered company has higher trust and credibility in the market.
Conclusion
The Companies Act, 2013 has simplified the company registration process with digital applications,
making it fast and efficient. Proper incorporation ensures legal recognition, liability protection, and
business continuity. With recent amendments, the government has also made incorporation easier,
encouraging startups and entrepreneurship.

STA 22
Advantages and Disadvantages of Incorporation
The incorporation of a company under the Companies Act, 2013 provides numerous benefits such as
limited liability, perpetual succession, and legal recognition, but it also comes with regulatory
requirements, compliance costs, and legal complexities. Understanding both the advantages and
disadvantages helps businesses make informed decisions about whether incorporation is suitable for
their needs.
Advantages of Incorporation
1. Separate Legal Entity
Once incorporated, a company becomes a distinct legal entity, separate from its owners (shareholders).
It can own property, enter contracts, and sue or be sued in its own name. This ensures the company’s
existence is independent of its founders.
Example: Tata Steel Ltd. owns assets in its own name and can enter contracts without involving
shareholders personally.
2. Limited Liability Protection
The personal assets of shareholders are protected. Shareholders are liable only to the extent of their
unpaid share capital and cannot be held responsible for the company's debts beyond that.
Example: If Reliance Industries Ltd. goes bankrupt, shareholders only lose their investment in shares, but
their personal assets remain untouched.
3. Perpetual Succession
A company continues to exist even if its directors, shareholders, or founders change due to death,
insolvency, or exit. This ensures business continuity.
Example: Infosys Ltd. continues to operate despite multiple changes in its leadership over the years.
4. Ability to Raise Capital
A registered company can raise funds by:
 Issuing equity shares (private/public offering).
 Getting loans from banks and financial institutions.
 Attracting venture capitalists and investors.
Example: Zomato Ltd. raised capital by issuing shares through an Initial Public Offering (IPO).
5. Transferability of Shares
In a public company, shares can be freely transferred from one shareholder to another, making it easy for
investors to exit the business.
Example: Investors can buy and sell shares of HDFC Bank Ltd. on the stock exchange without affecting
the company’s operations.
6. Enhanced Credibility & Brand Value
An incorporated company has higher credibility and is trusted more by:
 Banks and financial institutions for loans.
 Customers and vendors for contracts.
 Government authorities for licenses and approvals.
Example: Infosys Ltd. enjoys high credibility due to its registered status and compliance with corporate
governance norms.
7. Legal Recognition & Protection
A registered company enjoys legal protection and rights under the Companies Act, 2013. It can take legal
action against third parties and claim damages if necessary.
Example: Tata Sons Ltd. v. Greenpeace International – Tata sued Greenpeace for defamation regarding its
environmental policies.
STA 23
8. Tax Benefits & Deductions
Corporations often receive tax benefits such as:
 Deductions on business expenses.
 Lower corporate tax rates for startups and SMEs.
 R&D tax credits for innovation.
Example: Startups registered under the Startup India scheme get a 3-year tax holiday and lower
compliance requirements.
Disadvantages of Incorporation
1. Complex Legal & Compliance Requirements
Incorporation involves extensive legal formalities, documentation, and compliance with various
regulations such as:
 Annual financial statement filings.
 Board meetings and statutory audits.
 Income tax and GST filings.
Example: A private limited company must file an Annual Return (MGT-7) and Financial Statements
(AOC-4) every year with the Registrar of Companies (ROC).
2. Higher Costs of Registration & Maintenance
The process of incorporation involves government fees, legal costs, and professional fees for chartered
accountants, company secretaries, and lawyers. Additionally, annual compliance costs can be expensive
for small businesses.
Example: Filing fees for incorporation and compliance reports can cost between ₹10,000 to ₹50,000 per
year, depending on the company size.
3. Double Taxation
Incorporated companies may face double taxation:
i. The company pays corporate tax on its profits.
ii. Shareholders pay income tax on dividends received.
Example: If Infosys Ltd. makes profits, it first pays corporate tax. When it distributes dividends,
shareholders must pay dividend tax on their earnings.
4. Restriction on Decision-Making
Unlike sole proprietorships, where the owner has full control, a company’s decisions must be approved
by:
 Board of Directors.
 Shareholders (in some cases).
 Regulatory bodies (if applicable).
Example: In a public company, decisions like mergers and acquisitions require shareholder approval
through voting.
5. Public Disclosure of Financial Information
Companies must disclose their financial statements, annual reports, and directors' details to the public,
affecting business privacy.
Example: Wipro Ltd.'s financial data, including profit/loss statements, is publicly available under SEBI
regulations.
6. Risk of Corporate Veil Being Lifted (Personal Liability in Fraud Cases)
Although shareholders enjoy limited liability, courts can lift the corporate veil in cases of:
 Fraud or illegal activities.
 Misrepresentation of financial statements.

STA 24
 Tax evasion.
Example: If a company director commits fraud, the court may hold personal assets liable.
Case Law: Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd. v. State of Bihar (1964)
Principle: Separate Legal Entity & Perpetual Succession.
Facts: A dispute arose over whether Tata Engineering (TELCO) could be taxed separately from its
directors.
Judgment: The Supreme Court ruled that once incorporated, a company is an independent legal entity,
and its tax liability is separate from its shareholders or directors.
Conclusion
Incorporation provides significant advantages such as limited liability, legal recognition, business
credibility, and access to capital. However, it also comes with legal compliance requirements, costs,
double taxation, and restrictions on decision-making. Small businesses should weigh these factors
carefully before choosing to incorporate. While incorporation is ideal for large businesses and startups
looking for investment, sole proprietorships and partnerships may be more suitable for small businesses
with fewer regulatory needs.

Lifting of the Corporate Veil

1. Introduction
The concept of the corporate veil is a fundamental principle in company law. Under the Companies Act,
2013, a company is treated as a separate legal entity, distinct from its shareholders and directors. This
principle was established in the famous case of Salomon v. Salomon & Co. Ltd. (1897), where the court
held that a company has its own legal personality, independent of its owners.
However, in cases of fraud, misconduct, tax evasion, or misuse of corporate structure, courts have the
power to pierce or lift the corporate veil, thereby holding shareholders, directors, or officers personally
liable for the company’s actions.
2. Meaning of Lifting the Corporate Veil
"Lifting the corporate veil" means disregarding the company’s separate legal personality and holding its
members or directors personally liable for the company’s wrongful actions. This is done when the
corporate structure is used as a shield to commit fraud, evade legal obligations, or exploit the law for
personal gains.
In such cases, courts treat the company and its members as one entity and impose personal liability on
those responsible for the misconduct.
3. Legal Provisions under the Companies Act, 2013
The Companies Act, 2013 has several provisions that allow courts and regulatory authorities to lift the
corporate veil. Some of the key provisions include:
(i) Section 2(60) – Officer in Default
This section holds directors and officers liable if they are responsible for non-compliance or legal
violations by the company.
(ii) Section 34 & 35 – Misstatement in Prospectus
If a company issues a false or misleading prospectus to deceive investors, those responsible (directors,
promoters, or officers) can be held personally liable for losses suffered by investors.
Example: If a company misrepresents financial statements to attract investors, courts may lift the
corporate veil to penalize the promoters.
(iii) Section 53 – Prohibition of Shares Issued at a Discount

STA 25
If a company illegally issues shares at a discount, the company’s directors are held personally liable for
the losses incurred.
(iv) Section 121 – Non-Compliance with Annual General Meeting (AGM) Rules
If a listed company fails to hold an AGM as required, the tribunal can hold its directors responsible.
(v) Section 447 – Fraudulent Activities
If a company is involved in fraudulent activities, the corporate veil can be lifted, and those responsible
(directors, promoters, officers) can face criminal charges including imprisonment and fines.
4. Grounds for Lifting the Corporate Veil
Courts in India lift the corporate veil under certain circumstances where the company structure is
misused. The main grounds include:
1. Fraud or Improper Conduct
If a company is used as a tool to commit fraud, illegal activities, or wrongful business conduct, courts can
hold individuals behind the company personally liable.
Case Law: Delhi Development Authority v. Skipper Construction Co. (1996)
The promoters misused the corporate structure to collect money from buyers but failed to deliver the
promised real estate.
The Supreme Court lifted the corporate veil and held the promoters personally liable for fraud.
2. Evasion of Tax
If a company is formed solely to evade tax obligations, courts may lift the corporate veil and hold the real
owners accountable.
Example: If a company is created only to route profits and avoid paying corporate tax, the Income Tax
Department can pierce the corporate veil and tax the real beneficiaries.
Case Law: Juggilal Kamlapat v. CIT (1969)
The Supreme Court held that corporate structures cannot be used as a tax-avoidance device and ruled
against the company.
3. Avoidance of Legal Obligations
If a company is incorporated to escape legal liabilities, such as avoiding payments to creditors or violating
contracts, courts can disregard the corporate entity and hold promoters personally liable.
Example: If a company defaults on loans and transfers assets to a newly created entity to avoid repaying
creditors, the courts can lift the veil to hold the original owners liable.
4. Public Interest & Protection of Stakeholders
If a company’s actions harm public interest, consumers, investors, or the economy, courts may pierce
the corporate veil to protect stakeholders.
Case Law: State of UP v. Renusagar Power Co. (1988)
The court held that subsidiary companies created to manipulate power tariffs must be treated as a
single entity with their parent company.
5. Sham or Bogus Companies
If a company is set up as a dummy entity with no real business operations, courts can lift the corporate
veil and identify the true controllers of the business.
Example: If a businessman sets up multiple companies only to transfer illegal funds, courts may pierce
the corporate veil and hold him liable for money laundering.
5. Case Law: LIC v. Escorts Ltd. (1986)
Facts: LIC (Life Insurance Corporation of India) attempted to block a foreign investment in Escorts Ltd.,
arguing that the investment was controlled by an undisclosed party.

STA 26
Judgment: The Supreme Court ruled that the corporate veil should only be lifted in exceptional cases
such as fraud or national interest. It clarified that merely having multiple shareholders or investors does
not justify piercing the corporate veil.
Significance: This case reinforced that lifting the corporate veil should be done only when a company is
used for fraudulent or illegal purposes.
6. Conclusion
While the principle of separate legal entity is fundamental to company law, it is not absolute. Courts
have the authority to lift the corporate veil when the corporate structure is misused for fraud, tax
evasion, or other illegal purposes. The Companies Act, 2013, along with judicial interpretations, ensures
that corporate entities remain accountable and cannot be used as a tool for wrongful activities.

Company distinguished from Partnership, HUF and LLP.

A company, partnership, Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), and Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) are
different forms of business entities, each governed by distinct laws and having unique features.
Understanding their differences is crucial for choosing the appropriate business structure based on
liability, legal recognition, taxation, and management flexibility.
1. Meaning of Each Business Entity
(i) Company
A company is a separate legal entity formed under the Companies Act, 2013, with limited liability for its
members. It can be private or public and has perpetual succession.
Example: Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) Ltd., Reliance Industries Ltd.
(ii) Partnership
A partnership is an association of two or more persons who agree to share profits and losses of a
business. It is governed by the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 and lacks separate legal existence from its
partners.
Example: A & B start a textile business as partners and share profits equally.
(iii) Hindu Undivided Family (HUF)
A HUF is a joint family business governed by Hindu law, where the business is owned and managed by
the Karta (head of family), and all male members (coparceners) have an equal right to the property.
Example: A family-run business where a father and his sons manage and share profits as a HUF.
(iv) Limited Liability Partnership (LLP)
An LLP is a hybrid structure that combines the features of a partnership and a company. It provides
limited liability to partners and is governed by the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008.
Example: Law firms and consulting firms like Ernst & Young LLP (EY LLP) in India.
2. Key Differences Between Company, Partnership, HUF, and LLP
Feature Company Partnership HUF LLP
Indian Partnership
Governing Law Companies Act, 2013 Hindu Law LLP Act, 2008
Act, 1932
No separate entity, No separate legal entity,
Legal Status Separate legal entity partners are the owned by family Separate legal entity
business members
Minimum Private Co.: 2, Public Minimum 2 coparceners
Minimum 2 partners Minimum 2 partners
Members Co.: 7 (Hindu family members)

STA 27
 Feature Company Partnership HUF LLP
Maximum Private Co.: 200, Public
50 partners No limit No maximum limit
Members Co.: Unlimited
Unlimited, partners Unlimited, Karta is Limited to capital
Liability Limited to investment
are personally liable personally liable contribution
No, dissolves on Yes, continues as long as
Perpetual Yes, unaffected by Yes, continues unless
death/insolvency of there are family
Succession death of members legally dissolved
partners members
Managed by Board of Managed by Karta (head Managed by
Management Managed by partners
Directors of family) designated partners
Partner’s interest Partner’s interest can
Transferability of Shares can be
cannot be transferred No transferability be transferred with
Interest transferred easily
without consent consent
Taxed at corporate Taxed as per Taxed as partnership
Taxation Taxed as HUF entity
rates individual slab rates firm
Mandatory with
Registration Optional but
Registrar of Companies No registration required Mandatory with ROC
Requirement recommended
(ROC)
Low (No mandatory Moderate (Annual
Compliance High (Annual returns,
audits unless turnover Very low compliance filing and financial
Requirements financial audits)
> ₹1 crore) statements)
Only through legal By agreement or Continues as long as By agreement or legal
Dissolution
procedures death of partners there are coparceners process
3. Detailed Comparison and Explanation
(1) Legal Identity & Status
 A company and an LLP are distinct legal entities separate from their owners. They can own property,
sue, or be sued in their name.
 A partnership and HUF do not have a separate legal identity, meaning the partners/coparceners are
personally liable for business debts.
Example: If Reliance Industries Ltd. takes a loan and fails to repay, the personal assets of shareholders are
not affected. But in a partnership, the partners are personally liable.
(2) Liability of Members
 In a company and LLP, liability is limited to the extent of investment.
 In a partnership and HUF, liability is unlimited, meaning personal assets of partners/coparceners can
be used to repay debts.
Example: If a partnership firm is unable to pay its debts, creditors can recover from the personal assets
of partners, but in an LLP or company, they cannot.
(3) Perpetual Succession (Continuity of Business)
 Companies and LLPs have perpetual succession—they continue to exist even if members change.
 Partnerships dissolve upon the death/retirement of a partner unless otherwise agreed.
 HUF continues indefinitely as long as there are family members.

STA 28
Example: If a partner in XYZ & Co. (Partnership Firm) dies, the firm dissolves unless a new agreement is
made. But if a director in TCS Ltd. dies, the company continues as usual.
(4) Transferability of Ownership
 Company shares are freely transferable, allowing easy exit and entry of investors.
 Partnership and HUF interests cannot be transferred without the consent of all members.
 In an LLP, a partner’s interest can be transferred but requires partner consent.
Example: If an investor in Infosys Ltd. wants to exit, they can simply sell their shares on the stock
exchange. But in a partnership, a partner cannot transfer ownership without approval.
(5) Taxation Differences
 Company tax: Corporate tax rates apply, and dividends are taxed separately.
 Partnership & LLP tax: Taxed as a partnership firm, and partners are taxed individually.
 HUF tax: Enjoys special exemptions under Income Tax Act (e.g., separate PAN, tax-free gifts).
Example: A HUF can save taxes by distributing income among family members, reducing individual tax
liability.
(6) Compliance and Regulatory Requirements
 Companies have strict compliance rules, including audits, financial disclosures, and annual reports.
 Partnerships and HUFs have minimal compliance and do not require audits unless revenue exceeds a
certain limit.
 LLPs have moderate compliance, requiring ROC filings and annual returns.
Example: A private limited company must hold board meetings, file annual financial statements, and
comply with SEBI (if listed), whereas a HUF has no such legal formalities.
Which Entity to Choose?
Business Type Best For
Company (Pvt. Ltd./Public Ltd.) Large businesses, startups looking for investments
Partnership Small businesses with low capital
HUF Family-run businesses with inherited wealth
LLP Professional services (law firms, consultancies)
Each entity has its own advantages and limitations, and the choice depends on business goals, liability
concerns, and regulatory compliance willingness.
Decision Flowchart for Choosing a Business Structure
Start
│
▼
Do you want Limited Liability?
┌──────┴──────┐
Yes No
┌────┴────┐ ┌─-─┴────┐
LLP Company Partnership/HUF
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
For small For large For family-run or
businesses businesses low-compliance businesses
(Consulting, IT, Law Firms) (Shops, Retail, etc.)

STA 29
 Unit – II
Promoters

Promoters
A promoter is an individual or a group of individuals who conceive the idea of starting a company and
take necessary steps for its incorporation. They are responsible for setting up the business model,
securing capital, and fulfilling legal formalities before the company becomes operational.
Definition of Promoter Under the Companies Act, 2013
As per Section 2(69) of the Companies Act, 2013, a promoter is:
1. A person who has been named as a promoter in the prospectus or in the annual return of the
company.
2. A person who directly or indirectly controls the company’s affairs or makes decisions regarding
its management or operations.
3. A person who has agreed to be associated with the company in a promotional capacity.
Example: If a group of investors starts a new tech company, registers it, and raises funds for it, they are
the promoters of that company.
Roles & Responsibilities of Promoters
1. Incorporation of the Company – Taking necessary legal steps to register the company.
2. Arranging Capital – Finding investors, arranging initial funding, and issuing shares.
3. Preparing Key Documents – Drafting the Memorandum of Association (MoA) and Articles of
Association (AoA).
4. Appointment of Directors – Selecting and appointing the first directors of the company.
5. Negotiating Contracts – Entering into pre-incorporation agreements (such as property leases or
supplier contracts).
6. Legal Compliance – Ensuring the company complies with Companies Act, 2013 and SEBI
regulations (for listed companies).
Types of Promoters
1. Professional Promoters – Experts who specialize in launching companies but do not stay involved
in management.
2. Financial Promoters – Investors or venture capitalists who fund and promote companies.
3. Occasional Promoters – Individuals who promote a company for personal interest but do not
make it their full-time profession.
4. Entrepreneurial Promoters – Founders who promote their own businesses, such as startup
founders.
Legal Status & Liabilities of Promoters
 A promoter is not an agent or trustee of the company, but they have fiduciary duties to act in
good faith.
 If a promoter engages in fraud, misrepresentation, or insider trading, they can be held liable
under the Companies Act, SEBI Act, and Contract Law.
 Section 35 of the Companies Act, 2013 states that if false information is provided in the
prospectus, the promoter is personally liable.
Example of Promoters in an Indian Startup: Flipkart

STA 30
Background
Flipkart, one of India’s biggest e-commerce companies, was founded in 2007 by Sachin Bansal and Binny
Bansal. They played the role of promoters in setting up and expanding the company.
Role of Promoters in Flipkart’s Growth
1. Conception of Idea – Sachin and Binny Bansal, former Amazon employees, saw an opportunity in
India’s online retail space and decided to start Flipkart.
2. Company Registration – They registered Flipkart as a private limited company under the Companies
Act, ensuring compliance with legal requirements.
3. Arranging Initial Capital – The promoters invested their own money initially and later raised funds
from investors like Accel Partners and Tiger Global.
4. Developing Business Model – They started with selling books online and gradually expanded into
various categories like electronics and clothing.
5. Hiring the First Team – The promoters hired the first employees and structured the company’s
management and operations.
6. Negotiating with Vendors & Partners – They built partnerships with courier services and suppliers to
streamline operations.
7. Exit Strategy – Eventually, the promoters exited Flipkart when Walmart acquired a 77% stake in the
company for $16 billion in 2018.
Conclusion
Promoters play a crucial role in forming a company and shaping its foundation. Their actions have long-
term impacts on the company’s success, and they are legally bound to act in good faith and in the best
interests of the company.

Memorandum of Association
1. Meaning of Memorandum of Association (MoA)
The Memorandum of Association (MoA) is the charter document of a company that defines its
constitution, objectives, and powers. It serves as the foundation upon which a company is established
and governs its relationship with shareholders, creditors, and regulatory authorities.
2. Legal Definition under Companies Act, 2013
As per Section 2(56) of the Companies Act, 2013, a Memorandum of Association (MoA) refers to:
"The charter of the company that defines its scope of operations and powers within which the company
can act."
This means that a company cannot undertake activities beyond what is stated in the MoA. Any action
outside its objects clause is considered ultra vires (beyond powers) and is invalid.
Example: If a company’s MoA states that it is engaged in manufacturing textiles, it cannot legally start a
banking business unless it amends its MoA.
3. Purpose & Importance of MoA
 Defines the Scope of the Company – MoA outlines what a company can and cannot do.
 Guides Shareholders & Investors – Helps potential investors understand the company’s purpose and
operations.
 Legal Protection – Ensures that the company operates within its legal framework and protects
stakeholders from unauthorized activities.
 Essential for Incorporation – Without an MoA, a company cannot be registered under the
Companies Act, 2013.
4. Clauses of Memorandum of Association (MoA) under Companies Act, 2013
The MoA consists of six key clauses, as required by Section 4 of the Companies Act, 2013:
STA 31
 a. Name Clause
 Specifies the name of the company, which should be unique and not misleading.
 Private companies must end with “Private Limited (Pvt. Ltd.)”, and public companies must end
with “Limited (Ltd.)”.
 Example: Reliance Industries Limited (for a public company) and Flipkart Private Limited (for a
private company).
b. Registered Office Clause
 Specifies the state and city where the company’s registered office is located.
 Important for jurisdictional purposes and legal correspondence.
 The company must inform the Registrar of Companies (ROC) if it changes its registered office.
 Example: A company incorporated in Mumbai, Maharashtra must mention this in its MoA.
c. Object Clause (Most Important Clause)
 Defines the main business activities the company is allowed to undertake.
 It consists of:
o Main Objects – The primary purpose for which the company is incorporated.
o Ancillary Objects – Supporting activities that help achieve the main objective.
o Other Objects – Any additional business the company may pursue in the future (subject to
shareholder approval).
 Example:
o A food processing company can state “Manufacturing and selling food products” as its main object.
o “Packaging and transportation of food” can be an ancillary object.
d. Liability Clause
 Specifies whether the liability of members (shareholders) is limited or unlimited.
 Private & Public companies usually have limited liability, meaning members are not personally
liable for company debts.
 Example: If a company goes bankrupt, shareholders only lose their invested amount and are not
liable for additional debts.
e. Capital Clause
 Defines the authorized share capital of the company, i.e., the maximum amount of capital the
company can raise by issuing shares.
 Specifies the number and type of shares (equity, preference, etc.).
 Example: If a company states its authorized capital as ₹10 crores, it cannot issue shares beyond
this amount unless it amends its MoA.
f. Subscription Clause
 Lists the first shareholders (subscribers) of the company at the time of incorporation.
 Specifies how many shares each subscriber is taking.
 A private company needs at least 2 subscribers, while a public company needs at least 7.
 Example: If a company is incorporated with three subscribers, each taking 1,000 shares, this must
be clearly mentioned in the MoA.
5. Amendments to Memorandum of Association (MoA)
 Companies can amend their MoA, but they must follow legal procedures under the Companies
Act, 2013.
Changes require:
o Board and shareholder approval (Special Resolution in a General Meeting).
o Approval from the Registrar of Companies (ROC).
o Approval from the Central Government (for some clauses, like the name clause).
STA 32
Example: If Zomato Limited wants to expand into cloud kitchens, but its MoA only allows food delivery,
it must amend the Object Clause.
7. Conclusion
 The Memorandum of Association (MoA) is the most critical document in a company’s formation.
 It acts as the blueprint defining what the company can and cannot do.
 Companies must carefully draft their MoA to ensure it aligns with their business vision and legal
requirements.

Doctrine of Ultravires
1. Meaning of the Doctrine of Ultra Vires
The Doctrine of Ultra Vires states that if a company performs any act beyond its powers as defined in its
Memorandum of Association (MoA), the act is invalid, illegal, and unenforceable.
 "Ultra Vires" is a Latin term meaning "beyond the powers".
 Any transaction or contract beyond the scope of the company’s objectives (as per the MoA) is
null and void.
 This doctrine ensures that companies operate within their legal boundaries and protect investors
and creditors from unauthorized actions.
2. Legal Basis Under Companies Act, 2013
 Section 4(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013: Every company’s MoA must define its objectives and
must not engage in activities beyond them.
 Section 245 of the Companies Act, 2013: Shareholders can take legal action if the company
engages in Ultra Vires activities.
Example: If a company’s MoA states it is in the "hotel business," but it starts trading in cryptocurrency,
this is Ultra Vires and considered illegal.
3. Key Principles of the Doctrine of Ultra Vires
1. Any act outside the company's MoA is void – No one can enforce an Ultra Vires act in court.
2. The company cannot ratify an Ultra Vires act – Even if all shareholders agree, the company
cannot validate an illegal act.
3. Directors are personally liable – If directors authorize an Ultra Vires act, they may be held
personally responsible.
4. Ultra Vires contracts are unenforceable – Any third party dealing with the company should
ensure the contract aligns with the company’s objectives in MoA.
4. Important Case Laws on Ultra Vires
Case 1: A. Lakshmanaswami Mudaliar v. Life Insurance Corporation of India (1963)
Facts:
 A company was formed to promote businesses and industries.
 The directors donated company funds to a charitable organization that was not related to their
business.
 A shareholder challenged the donation as Ultra Vires.
Judgment:
 The Supreme Court held that the donation was Ultra Vires, as it was not related to the company’s
objectives.
 The company could not legally make the donation because it was beyond its powers.
Key Takeaway:
Companies cannot use their funds for purposes beyond their MoA, even if the action is for a good cause.
STA 33
Case 2: Bharat Commerce & Industries v. Registrar of Companies (1993)
Facts:
 The company was registered for manufacturing and trading goods.
 The directors invested company funds in stock market speculation, which was not mentioned in the MoA.
Judgment:
 The High Court ruled that the stock market speculation was Ultra Vires, making the transaction null and
void.
 The directors were held personally liable for misusing company funds.
Key Takeaway:
Directors cannot use company funds for activities beyond its legal scope, even if they believe it will
benefit the company.
5. Exceptions to the Doctrine of Ultra Vires
1. Acts within the company’s incidental powers – A company can do things reasonably necessary for
its business.
Example: A construction company buying land for projects is valid, even if not explicitly stated in its MoA.
2. If the act is within the Companies Act, 2013 – Some acts, even if not in the MoA, may be allowed if
permitted by law.
Example: A public company issuing shares to raise capital, even if not mentioned in its MoA, is valid.
3. If the act benefits the company indirectly – If an act supports the company's business, it may not be
considered Ultra Vires.
Example: A transport company setting up petrol pumps for its fleet may be considered valid.
6. Impact of Ultra Vires Doctrine in India
 Prevents companies from misusing funds – Protects investors and creditors from risky transactions.
Ensures corporate discipline – Directors and shareholders must operate within the company’s legal
framework.
 Protects third parties dealing with the company – Ensures contracts are legally valid and
enforceable.
7. Conclusion
 The Doctrine of Ultra Vires is a fundamental principle in Indian Company Law that ensures
companies stay within their legal powers.
 Any act beyond the MoA is illegal and void, preventing companies from engaging in unauthorized
activities.
 Courts in India have consistently upheld this doctrine to protect shareholders, creditors, and the
integrity of corporate governance.

Articles of Association
1. Meaning of Articles of Association (AoA)
The Articles of Association (AoA) is a key constitutional document of a company that defines its internal
rules, management structure, and operational framework. It works as a rulebook that governs how the
company will be run, including the rights of shareholders, duties of directors, and decision-making
processes.
Legal Basis: The Companies Act, 2013, under Section 2(5), defines Articles as the regulations governing
the company’s management.
2. Importance of AoA in a Company
 Defines powers and duties of directors and officers.

STA 34
  Regulates the issue and transfer of shares.
 Governs meetings, voting rights, and dividend distribution.
 Acts as a binding contract between the company and its members.
 Helps resolve internal disputes by outlining company policies.
Example: If a company’s AoA states that only existing shareholders can buy new shares (right of first
refusal), then no outsider can directly purchase shares.
3. Legal Position of AoA under Companies Act, 2013
 Mandatory for Every Company: Every company must adopt an AoA except a One Person Company
(OPC), which can rely on model rules prescribed under the Act.
 Section 5 of the Companies Act, 2013: The AoA must be consistent with the Memorandum of
Association (MoA) and the Companies Act. Any contradictory provision in the AoA will be considered
invalid.
 Binding Contract: The AoA serves as a legal agreement between:
o The company and its members.
o Members among themselves.
 Alteration of AoA (Section 14): The company can amend its AoA by passing a special resolution
(requiring at least 75% approval of shareholders).
4. Key Contents of Articles of Association
Key Clause Description
Share Capital Rules regarding the issuance, types, and transfer of shares.
Voting Rights Defines the voting power of shareholders in company decisions.
Board of Directors Duties, powers, and appointment/removal process of directors.
Meetings & Quorum Rules for board meetings, general meetings, and quorum requirements.
Dividend Distribution How and when dividends will be paid to shareholders.
Borrowing Powers Limits and conditions under which the company can raise loans.
Winding Up Process of closing the company in case of insolvency or voluntary winding up.
Example Clause: The board shall meet at least once every three months, and a quorum shall be two
directors.
5. Difference Between Articles of Association (AoA) & Memorandum of Association (MoA)
Feature MoA (Memorandum of Association) AoA (Articles of Association)
Defines the company’s internal management &
Definition Defines the company’s objectives & scope
regulations
Purpose Acts as the charter of the company Acts as the rulebook of the company
Binding
Mandatory for all companies Can be altered with shareholder approval
Nature
Requires approval from the Registrar of
Alteration Can be changed through a special resolution
Companies (ROC)
Example "The company will operate in the e- "Directors shall be appointed for a term of five
Clause commerce sector." years."
STA 35
6. Case Law: V.B. Rangaraj v. V.B. Gopalakrishnan (1992)
Facts: Two shareholders agreed privately to restrict share transfers beyond what was mentioned in the
AoA.
Judgment: The Supreme Court ruled that restrictions on share transfer must be in the AoA to be legally
enforceable.
Key Takeaway: If a company wants to impose specific restrictions on its members, it must be explicitly
stated in the Articles of Association.
7. Conclusion
The Articles of Association (AoA) is a vital document that defines how a company operates. It provides a
structured governance framework and ensures smooth business operations. A well-drafted AoA protects
shareholder interests and prevents internal conflicts.

Doctrine of Indoor Management

1. Introduction
The Doctrine of Indoor Management is a well-established principle in company law that protects
outsiders (third parties dealing with a company) from being affected by the company’s internal
irregularities.
Legal Principle: “Outsiders are not required to inquire into the company’s internal processes if they are
dealing in good faith.”
It is an exception to the Doctrine of Constructive Notice, which assumes that outsiders must be aware of
a company's public documents (Memorandum of Association & Articles of Association).
2. Meaning of Doctrine of Indoor Management
When a third party enters into a contract with a company, they only need to ensure that the company’s
public documents (MoA & AoA) authorize the transaction. The third party is not required to investigate
whether the internal formalities (like board approvals or resolutions) have been properly followed.
Example:
Suppose a company's Articles of Association (AoA) allow the Managing Director (MD) to borrow funds
up to ₹10 crore. If an outsider lends money based on this provision, they do not need to verify whether
the internal approvals (like board meeting resolutions) were taken.
3. Legal Basis Under Indian Company Law
The Doctrine of Indoor Management is based on justice and equity, ensuring that third parties dealing in
good faith are not unfairly penalized due to internal company irregularities.
Judicial Recognition: The Companies Act, 2013 does not explicitly mention this doctrine, but Indian
courts have consistently upheld it in various cases.
4. Key Features of the Doctrine
1. Protects Outsiders – Third parties are not required to check whether a company’s internal rules
were followed.
2. Exception to Constructive Notice – Outsiders are deemed to be aware of public documents but
not internal proceedings.
3. Encourages Business Transactions – Reduces the burden on external parties when dealing with
companies.
4. Applies to All Companies – Whether private or public, this doctrine applies to all companies
registered under the Companies Act.
5. Landmark Case Law: Royal British Bank v. Turquand (1856)
Facts:

STA 36
 A company borrowed money from an outsider.
The company’s Articles required a resolution to authorize such borrowings.
No such resolution was passed, but the company had the power to borrow.
The company refused to repay, arguing the resolution was missing.
Judgment:
The court held that the lender was not required to check internal approvals. Since the borrowing power
was mentioned in the Articles, the company was bound by the contract.
Key Takeaway:
Third parties are entitled to assume that all internal procedures have been duly followed if the
transaction is authorized in public documents.
6. Exceptions to the Doctrine of Indoor Management
The doctrine does not apply in certain situations:
Exception Explanation Example
If the outsider was aware of the company’s A lender knows that the company lacks
Knowledge of
internal breach, they cannot claim board approval for a loan but still
Irregularity
protection. proceeds.
Suspicious If the transaction is suspicious, the outsider A director executes a contract beyond
Circumstances must verify it. his usual authority.
If the company document is forged, the A fake board resolution is presented to
Forgery
doctrine does not apply. take a loan.
If the company does something beyond its A company registered for education
Ultra Vires Acts
MoA, it is void. starts a real estate business.
7. Indian Case Law: Lakshmi Ratan Cotton Mills Co. Ltd. v. J.K. Jute Mills Co. Ltd. (1957)
Facts:
 The company’s director obtained a loan without showing board approval.
 The lender assumed the necessary approvals were taken.
Judgment:
The Allahabad High Court ruled that the lender was protected under the Doctrine of Indoor
Management since they were not required to verify internal company approvals.
Key Takeaway:
As long as the company has the power to borrow, third parties can assume internal approvals have been
followed.
8. Conclusion
The Doctrine of Indoor Management safeguards third parties from internal lapses within a company. It
ensures smooth business transactions and promotes trust in corporate dealings. However, it does not
protect those who are aware of fraud, forgery, or ultra vires acts.

Prospectus
1. Meaning of Prospectus
A prospectus is a formal legal document issued by a company to invite the public to subscribe to its
shares, debentures, or other securities. It provides detailed financial and business information about
the company to help potential investors make informed decisions.
STA 37
Legal Basis: Defined under Section 2(70) of the Companies Act, 2013, a prospectus includes any notice,
advertisement, or document that invites the public to invest in securities of a company.
2. Purpose of a Prospectus
 To attract investors by providing transparent company details.
 To ensure legal compliance before raising capital from the public.
 To protect investors from fraud by disclosing risks and financial data.
 To provide details about the business model, promoters, and financial health.
Example:
When Zomato Ltd. launched its Initial Public Offering (IPO) in 2021, it issued a prospectus detailing its
financial performance, risks, and future growth plans to attract investors.
3. Types of Prospectus Under the Companies Act, 2013
Relevant
Type Description
Section
Red Herring Issued during an IPO before price fixation; contains all details except
Section 32
Prospectus the issue price and quantum of securities.
Used by banks & financial institutions to issue multiple securities over
Shelf Prospectus Section 31
time with a single registration.
Abridged A summary of the full prospectus, containing key details for easy
Section 33
Prospectus investor understanding.
Deemed When a company indirectly offers securities to the public through
Section 25
Prospectus intermediaries.
4. Contents of a Prospectus (As Per SEBI & Companies Act, 2013)
1. Company’s Name & Registered Office
2. Nature of Business & Objectives
3. Details of Directors, Promoters & Key Management Personnel
4. Financial Statements & Profitability Reports
5. Risk Factors & Litigation History
6. Details of the Offer (Price, Shares, Subscription Details)
7. Utilization of Funds Raised
Example Clause:
"The company intends to raise ₹1,000 crores through this IPO to expand its digital payment services and
improve logistics infrastructure."
5. Legal Provisions Related to Prospectus
Provision Explanation
Prospectus must contain true & fair disclosures and be registered with the Registrar of
Section 26
Companies (ROC).
Section 34 Criminal liability for misstatements in the prospectus leading to investor losses.
Section 35 Civil liability of directors & promoters for false information.
Section 36 Punishment for fraud in case of misleading prospectus.

STA 38
6. Case Law: New Brunswick and Canada Railway Co. v. Muggeridge (1860)
Facts:
 The company issued a prospectus with false claims about profitability.
 Investors sued when they faced financial losses.
Judgment:
The court held that companies must disclose all material facts and cannot mislead investors. The
promoters were held liable for damages.
Key Takeaway:
A company must provide full, fair, and truthful disclosures in its prospectus to avoid legal consequences.
Conclusion
The prospectus is a crucial document for companies raising public funds. It provides transparency and
helps investors make informed decisions. Any misleading or false statements can result in legal and
financial penalties under the Companies Act, 2013.

Civil and Criminal liability for misstatement in Prospectus

1. Introduction
A prospectus is a crucial document issued by a company to invite public investments. Under the
Companies Act, 2013, if a company issues a prospectus containing false, misleading, or untrue
statements, it can result in civil and criminal liabilities for those responsible.
Legal Basis: Sections 34, 35, and 36 of the Companies Act, 2013 deal with liabilities for misstatements in a
prospectus.
2. Civil Liability for Misstatements in Prospectus (Section 35)
A person who suffers a loss due to misstatements in the prospectus has the right to claim compensation
from those responsible.
Who is Liable?
The following parties can be held civilly liable:
 Company issuing the misleading prospectus.
 Directors of the company.
 Promoters who prepared or approved the prospectus.
 Experts (e.g., auditors, valuers) if their reports contained misstatements.
Remedies Available for Investors
1. Rescission of Contract – The investor can cancel the contract and demand a refund of their
investment.
2. Compensation for Losses – The investor can sue the company and responsible persons for financial
damages.
Example:
If a company falsely claims in its prospectus that it made a ₹100 crore profit last year but actually made a
₹10 crore loss, investors can sue for compensation when the truth is revealed.
3. Criminal Liability for Misstatements in Prospectus (Section 34 & 36)
Under the Companies Act, misstatements in a prospectus can also result in criminal charges if they
involve fraudulent intent.
Penalties Under Section 34 (False Statements)
 Fine – ₹50,000 to ₹3,00,000.
 Imprisonment – Up to 10 years if fraud is involved.
 Both fine and imprisonment in serious cases.
STA 39
Penalties Under Section 36 (Fraudulent Inducement to Invest)
If a company deliberately makes false claims in a prospectus to deceive investors, the responsible
persons face:
 Imprisonment – Up to 10 years.
 Fine – At least the amount involved in fraud (can extend to three times the amount).
Example:
If a startup falsely claims in its IPO prospectus that it has patents on revolutionary AI technology (which it
does not), this is fraud and could lead to criminal prosecution under Section 36.
4. Case Law: Reliance Petrochemicals Ltd. v. Proprietors of Indian Express Newspapers (1988)
Facts:
 Reliance Petrochemicals issued a prospectus claiming a high growth rate.
 It was later found that financial figures were exaggerated.
 Investors sued for misrepresentation.
Judgment:
The court ruled in favor of investors, stating that any misstatement, even if unintentional, can lead to
civil liability.
Key Takeaway:
A company must ensure accuracy in its prospectus, or it can be held liable for misleading investors.
5. Defenses Against Liability
Not all misstatements lead to liability. The following defenses can be used:
o Withdrawal Before Publication – If the person withdrew consent before the prospectus was issued,
they are not liable.
o Lack of Knowledge – If the director or promoter was unaware of the misstatement despite due
diligence.
o Investor’s Own Negligence – If the investor did not read the prospectus properly.
Conclusion
The Companies Act, 2013 imposes strict civil and criminal liabilities for misstatements in a prospectus to
protect investors. Directors, promoters, and companies must ensure truthfulness and transparency in
public offerings, or they risk legal action, fines, and imprisonment.

Statement in lieu of Prospectus

1. Meaning of Statement in Lieu of Prospectus
A Statement in Lieu of Prospectus (SLP) is a document filed with the Registrar of Companies (ROC) when
a public company does not issue a prospectus to raise capital from the public but still wants to issue
shares.
Legal Basis: Previously covered under Section 70 of the Companies Act, 1956, this requirement was
removed in the Companies Act, 2013. However, the concept is still relevant for understanding company
compliance when shares are issued without a prospectus.
2. Purpose of a Statement in Lieu of Prospectus
 To ensure transparency when a public company does not invite public subscriptions.
 To provide financial and legal information about the company to investors and authorities.
 To act as a substitute for a prospectus when shares are issued privately.
 To comply with legal requirements and avoid fraud.

STA 40
Example:
If a public company raises funds only from its existing shareholders or through private placement, it must
submit an SLP to the ROC instead of issuing a prospectus.
3. When is a Statement in Lieu of Prospectus Required?
A public company must file an SLP with the ROC if:
 It does not issue a public prospectus but still issues shares
 It raises funds through private placement or existing shareholders.
 It wants to comply with company law without inviting public investments.
Not required for private companies, as they cannot invite public investment under the Companies Act.
4. Contents of a Statement in Lieu of Prospectus
An SLP includes:
1. Company Name & Registered Address
2. Capital Structure (Authorized & Issued Share Capital)
3. Details of Directors & Promoters
4. Business Activities & Objectives
5. Financial Position & Auditor’s Report
6. Declaration that the Information is True & Correct
Key Difference from a Prospectus: Unlike a prospectus, an SLP does not invite public investment but still
ensures compliance with disclosure norms.
5. Legal Position in the Companies Act, 2013
 The Companies Act, 2013 removed the requirement of Statement in Lieu of Prospectus.
 Instead, Section 39 mandates that any allotment of securities must be reported to the ROC.
 Section 42 covers private placements, ensuring compliance without the need for an SLP.
Case Law: Rattan Singh v. Managing Director, Punjab National Bank
Facts:
 A company issued shares without a prospectus or an SLP.
 Investors claimed they were misled about the company’s financial health.
Judgment:
The court held that a public company must either issue a prospectus or file an SLP to ensure
transparency.
Key Takeaway:
Even if shares are not publicly offered, companies must disclose their financial position to authorities to
prevent misleading investors.
Conclusion
The Statement in Lieu of Prospectus was an important compliance document under the Companies Act,
1956, ensuring disclosure when a public company did not issue a prospectus. Though abolished in the
Companies Act, 2013, its principles are still followed through private placement regulations.

Pre-incorporation Contracts
1. Meaning of Pre-Incorporation Contracts
A Pre-Incorporation Contract is an agreement entered into by the promoters on behalf of a company
before its legal incorporation. Since a company does not have a legal identity before registration, such
contracts are not automatically binding on the company.

STA 41
Legal Basis: The Companies Act, 2013, does not directly define pre-incorporation contracts, but their
validity is recognized under Section 15 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, and Section 230 of the Indian
Contract Act, 1872.
Example: Suppose the promoters of a company enter into a lease agreement for an office space before
the company is incorporated. This contract is a pre-incorporation contract and will require ratification
once the company is registered.
2. Nature and Legal Status of Pre-Incorporation Contracts
Not Legally Binding on the Company: Since the company does not exist before incorporation, it cannot
be a party to a contract.
Promoters Are Personally Liable: If the company does not adopt the contract post-incorporation,
promoters remain liable for obligations.
Company Can Ratify the Contract: After incorporation, the company may choose to accept and perform
the contract.
Key Rule: Until the company formally adopts the contract, the promoters remain liable for any breach.
3. Enforceability Under Indian Law
Aspect Explanation
Since the company does not exist at the time of agreement, it cannot be a
Indian Contract Act, 1872
party to the contract.
Specific Relief Act, 1963 A company can enforce a pre-incorporation contract only if it adopts it after
(Section 15 & 19) incorporation.
The Act does not explicitly recognize pre-incorporation contracts, but
Companies Act, 2013
companies often adopt them through a board resolution.
4. How Can a Company Adopt a Pre-Incorporation Contract?
A company can ratify (adopt) a pre-incorporation contract in three ways:
1. Express Adoption:
 The company formally approves the contract through a Board Resolution after incorporation.
Example: A company’s board passes a resolution confirming a lease agreement signed by promoters
before incorporation.
2. Implied Adoption:
 The company starts performing the contract (e.g., using rented office space, paying rent).
Example: If a newly incorporated company begins using a property leased by promoters, it implicitly
accepts the pre-incorporation contract.
3. Novation (New Contract):
 A fresh contract is executed between the company and the other party after incorporation,
replacing the original contract.
Example: A software firm signs a new agreement with a vendor after incorporation, replacing a pre-
incorporation deal.
Case Law: Kelner v. Baxter (1866)
Facts:
 A company’s promoters signed a contract to buy goods before incorporation.
 The company never ratified the contract.
 The supplier sued the company, but the company claimed it was not liable as it did not exist at the
time of agreement.
STA 42
Judgment:
The court held that the company was not bound by the contract, and the promoters were personally
liable.
Key Takeaway:
A company cannot be bound by contracts made before incorporation, unless it expressly adopts them.
Otherwise, the promoters remain liable.
Liability of Promoters in Pre-Incorporation Contracts
Situation Who is Liable?
If the company does not adopt the contract Promoters remain personally liable.
If the company adopts the contract after The company becomes liable, and promoters are
incorporation released.
If the contract is made for an illegal purpose The contract is void, and promoters remain liable.

Conclusion
Pre-incorporation contracts are essential for setting up a company, but they are not automatically
binding on the company. Until the company formally adopts them, promoters remain personally liable.
To avoid legal complications, promoters should ensure proper ratification or enter into fresh contracts
after incorporation.

Membership in a Company
1. Meaning of Membership in a Company
A member (or shareholder) of a company is a person or entity that holds shares in the company and is
listed in the Register of Members. Membership gives an individual certain rights, such as voting power,
dividend entitlement, and participation in general meetings.
Legal Basis: Defined under Section 2(55) of the Companies Act, 2013, a member is:
1. A subscriber to the Memorandum of Association (MoA) at the time of incorporation.
2. Any person whose name is entered in the Register of Members after purchasing shares.
3. A person who continues as a member even after a share transfer.
Example: If an individual buys 100 shares of Tata Steel Ltd., they become a member of Tata Steel and
receive certain shareholder rights.
2. Types of Members in a Company
Type of Member Description
Subscribers to MoA Initial members who sign the Memorandum of Association during incorporation.
Equity Shareholders Holders of equity shares with voting rights and dividend eligibility.
Preference
Holders of preference shares, receiving fixed dividends but limited voting rights.
Shareholders
Members holding shares through depositories (like NSDL/CDSL) instead of
Beneficial Owners
physical shareholding.
Corporate Members Companies or legal entities holding shares in another company.

STA 43
3. Modes of Acquiring Membership

A person can become a member through:

 By Subscription to MoA – The founders of the company automatically become its first members.
 By Share Purchase – Buying shares through IPO, stock market, or private transfers.
 By Transfer of Shares – An existing shareholder can transfer shares to another person.
 By Transmission of Shares – Shares inherited by legal heirs in case of a shareholder’s death.
 By Allotment of Shares – A company can allot new shares to employees, promoters, or investors.
Example: If an employee of Infosys receives shares under an Employee Stock Option Plan (ESOP), they
become a member of Infosys Ltd.
4. Rights & Liabilities of Members
Rights of Members
 Voting Rights – Right to vote in general meetings (except preference shareholders in most cases).
 Dividend Entitlement – Right to receive dividends declared by the company.
 Transfer of Shares – Can freely sell or transfer shares (except in private companies).
 Inspection Rights – Can inspect the company’s financial records and reports.
 Right to Sue – Can take legal action if the company violates their rights.
 Right to Participate in Winding Up – If a company is liquidated, members are entitled to a share of
the remaining assets after debts are paid.
Liabilities of Members
Unpaid Share Amount – If shares are partially paid, members must pay the remaining amount when
called.
Limited Liability in Limited Companies – In case of winding up, liability is restricted to the unpaid amount
on shares.
Unlimited Liability in Unlimited Companies – In rare cases, members may have to personally cover
company debts.
Example: If a member buys 100 shares of ₹10 each, but has paid only ₹5 per share, they must pay the
remaining ₹5 per share if the company demands it.
5. Cessation (End) of Membership
Membership in a company can end due to:
 Sale or Transfer of Shares – When a member sells all their shares, they cease to be a member.
 Forfeiture of Shares – If a member fails to pay due amounts, the company may cancel their shares.
 Company Winding Up – If a company is dissolved or liquidated, membership automatically ends.
 Death of Member – In case of an individual’s death, shares are transferred to the legal heir.
 Expulsion (Private Companies Only) – In some private companies, the Articles of Association may
allow removal of a member under specific conditions.
Example: If a member sells all their shares in Reliance Industries, they are no longer a shareholder and
lose all associated rights.
Case Law: Shyam Sundar Jalan v. Kolkata Stock Exchange (1995)
Facts:
 A shareholder of Kolkata Stock Exchange was expelled by the company under its Articles of
Association.
 He challenged this action, claiming it was against the law.
STA 44
Judgment:
The court ruled that a company cannot remove a shareholder arbitrarily unless the Articles of
Association explicitly allow it.
Key Takeaway:
A company cannot expel a member unless it follows due process as per the Articles of Association and
the Companies Act, 2013.
Conclusion
Membership in a company grants ownership rights, voting power, and financial benefits but also comes
with certain liabilities. A company cannot arbitrarily remove a member, and investors have legal
protection under the Companies Act, 2013.

Modes of Acquisition of Membership in Company

1. Introduction
A person becomes a member (shareholder) of a company when their name is entered in the
 Register of Members. The Companies Act, 2013, under Section 2(55), defines a member as:
 A subscriber to the company’s Memorandum of Association (MoA).
 A person who owns shares and is listed in the Register of Members.A person who has legally
acquired shares and remains a member even after share transfers.
There are several modes of acquiring membership, including subscription, purchase, transfer,
transmission, allotment, and holding through depositories.
2. Modes of Acquiring Membership
Mode of Acquisition Explanation Legal Provision
The founding members of a company become its first Section 10 of
By Subscription to MoA shareholders by signing the Memorandum of Association Companies Act,
during incorporation. 2013
A company can issue new shares to investors, employees,
By Allotment of Shares or promoters through an Initial Public Offering (IPO), Section 39
Private Placement, or Rights Issue.
Investors can buy shares of public companies from the
By Share Purchase (Stock
stock exchange (secondary market) or purchase private SEBI Guidelines
Market & Private Sale)
shares from existing shareholders.
An existing member can transfer their shares to another
By Transfer of Shares Section 56
person through a share transfer agreement.
If a shareholder dies or becomes insolvent, shares are
By Transmission of Shares Section 56
transferred to their legal heir, nominee, or successor.
By Holding Shares in Investors holding shares electronically via depositories
Section 2(55)
Dematerialized Form like NSDL/CDSL are considered members.

3. By Subscription to Memorandum of Association (MoA)

 When a company is incorporated, the subscribers to the Memorandum of Association
automatically become its first members.
 They must agree to take at least one share in the company.
STA 45
  Their names are entered in the Register of Members from the start.
Example: If six individuals form a private limited company and subscribe to the MoA, they become its
first shareholders.
4. By Allotment of Shares
 Companies issue new shares to raise capital.
 Modes of Share Allotment:
o Initial Public Offering (IPO) – First-time issue to the public.
o Private Placement – Shares issued to select investors.
o Rights Issue – Existing shareholders get the first right to buy new shares.
Example: When Zomato Ltd. launched its IPO, new investors who bought shares became its members.
5. By Share Purchase (Stock Market & Private Sale)
 Investors can buy shares of a public company from the stock exchange (secondary market).
 Private company shares can be sold through a private agreement between two individuals.
Example: If Rahul buys 100 shares of Infosys Ltd. from the stock exchange, he becomes a member of
Infosys Ltd..
6. By Transfer of Shares
 A current shareholder can transfer shares to another person.
 The new owner must apply to the company to update their name in the Register of Members.
Example: If Amit transfers his 50 shares of Tata Motors to Sunil, Sunil becomes a new member once the
transfer is registered.
7. By Transmission of Shares
 If a member dies, becomes insolvent, or mentally incapacitated, their shares pass to their legal heir,
nominee, or successor.
 Unlike transfer, transmission happens automatically and without consideration (payment).
Example: If a shareholder of Reliance Industries Ltd. passes away, their shares go to their legal heir,
making them a new member.
8. By Holding Shares in Dematerialized Form (Depository System)
 If an investor holds shares electronically through NSDL/CDSL, they are considered a member
under Section 2(55).
 Their name appears in the depository records instead of the company’s Register of Members.
Example: Ramesh buys shares of HDFC Bank Ltd. through his Demat Account on NSE, making him a
member.
Case Law: Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Escorts Ltd. (1986)
Facts:
 LIC acquired a large number of shares in Escorts Ltd. and sought to influence management
decisions.
 Escorts Ltd. challenged LIC’s membership rights.
Judgment:
 The Supreme Court ruled that shareholders, including institutions like LIC, have the right to
acquire membership by purchasing shares.
 A person or entity that legally acquires shares becomes a member, irrespective of company
objections.
Key Takeaway:
 Any person who legally acquires shares can become a member, and companies cannot restrict
shareholding arbitrarily.

STA 46
Conclusion
There are multiple ways to become a member of a company, including subscribing to the MoA,
purchasing shares, transfer, transmission, allotment, and holding Demat shares. Each method is
governed by specific provisions in the Companies Act, 2013 to ensure transparency and legal compliance.

Members and Share Holders

1. Introduction
In corporate law, the terms "Member" and "Shareholder" are often used interchangeably. However, while all
shareholders are members, not all members are necessarily shareholders. The distinction arises due to
different modes of acquiring membership in a company.
Legal Basis:
 Member is defined under Section 2(55) of the Companies Act, 2013.
 Shareholder is not explicitly defined in the Act but refers to a person who owns shares in a company.
2. Meaning of Member in a Company
A member is any person whose name is entered in the Register of Members and who has legally agreed to
become part of the company.
How a Person Becomes a Member
A person can become a member in the following ways:
a. By Subscription to Memorandum of Association (MoA) – The first subscribers of a company
automatically become its members.
b. By Share Acquisition – Buying shares through an Initial Public Offering (IPO) or stock market.
c. By Share Transfer – Receiving shares from an existing shareholder.
d. By Transmission of Shares – Inheriting shares after the death of a shareholder.
e. By Allotment of Shares – Receiving new shares directly from the company.
Example: When Reliance Industries Ltd. issues new shares, individuals who subscribe to them become
members of Reliance Industries after their names are entered in the Register of Members.
Rights of Members
 Right to vote in company meetings.
 Right to receive dividends.
 Right to transfer shares.
 Right to inspect company records.
 Right to participate in winding-up proceedings.
3. Meaning of Shareholder in a Company
A shareholder is a person who owns shares in a company. While shareholders are usually members, they
might not always be entered into the Register of Members.
Key Differences from Members
Basis Member Shareholder
A person who owns shares in the
Definition A person whose name is in the Register of Members.
company.
Membership can exist without shareholding in case of
Legal Status Shareholders must own shares.
companies limited by guarantee.
A person remains a member even after selling shares A person stops being a shareholder
Transferability
(until name is removed from the register). once they sell their shares.
Shareholders have voting rights only
Voting Rights Members can vote at meetings (if authorized).
if they own equity shares.
STA 47
 Basis Member Shareholder
Registration Must be entered in the company’s Register of Does not necessarily have to be
Requirement Members. registered.
Example: If Amit buys 500 shares of Tata Motors Ltd., he becomes a shareholder. But if his name is not
entered in the Register of Members, he is not officially a member.
4. Types of Members and Shareholders
Types of Members
 Subscriber Members – Founders who sign the MoA at the time of incorporation.
 Equity Members – Ordinary shareholders with voting rights.
 Preference Members – Preference shareholders who get fixed dividends but have limited voting
rights.
 Corporate Members – Companies that hold shares in another company.
Types of Shareholders
 Equity Shareholders – Own part of the company and have voting rights.
 Preference Shareholders – Get fixed dividends but have limited control over company decisions.
 Nominee Shareholders – Hold shares on behalf of someone else (like a trustee).
 Beneficial Owners – Shareholders who hold shares through depositories like NSDL/CDSL but are not
directly registered as members.
5. Cessation of Membership and Shareholding
Mode Member Shareholder
Remains a member until their name is removed from Immediately stops being a
Selling Shares
the Register. shareholder.
Death Membership is transferred to legal heirs. Shares are inherited by heirs.
Winding-Up of Shareholding ceases as shares
Membership ends once company is dissolved.
Company become worthless.
Example: If Raj sells all his shares in Infosys, he immediately ceases to be a shareholder. However, he remains a
member until Infosys updates the Register of Members.
Case Law: Balwant Transport Co. Ltd. v. M. K. Singh (1960)
Facts:
 A person owned shares in a company but was not listed in the Register of Members.
 The company refused to recognize him as a member.
 He filed a legal case claiming membership rights.
Judgment:
The court ruled that only persons entered in the Register of Members are legally recognized as members,
even if they own shares.
Key Takeaway:
A shareholder is not automatically a member unless their name is officially registered in the company's
records.
Conclusion
 All shareholders are members only if their names are in the Register of Members.
 A member may not be a shareholder in companies limited by guarantee (which do not issue shares).
 The distinction is important for voting rights, liability, and legal recognition under the Companies Act,
2013.

STA 48
 Unit – III
Shares & Stock

Shares & Stock

1. Introduction
In corporate finance, shares and stock represent ownership in a company. While these terms are
sometimes used interchangeably, they have distinct legal meanings under the Indian Companies Act,
2013.
Legal Basis:
 Shares are defined under Section 2(84) of the Companies Act, 2013.
 Stock is not separately defined in the 2013 Act but refers to a bundle of shares that a company
may convert under certain conditions.
2. Meaning of Shares
A share is the smallest unit of ownership in a company’s capital. By purchasing shares, an individual
becomes a shareholder and a member of the company (if their name is entered in the Register of
Members).
Definition (Section 2(84)):
"Share means a share in the share capital of a company and includes stock."
Example: If Infosys Ltd. has a total capital of ₹1,00,00,000 divided into 10 lakh shares of ₹10 each, then
each share represents 1/10,00,000 ownership in Infosys.
3. Types of Shares (As per Section 43 of Companies Act, 2013)
Type Description Voting Rights Dividend
Ordinary shares representing Yes (proportional to shares Variable (depends on
Equity Shares
ownership. owned). profit).
Preference Shares that receive priority in Limited (only in special Fixed (priority over
Shares dividend payments. cases). equity shares).
Further Classification of Shares
 Equity Shares with Differential Voting Rights (DVRs) – Have different voting rights, often with lower
votes but higher dividends.
 Redeemable Preference Shares – Can be repurchased by the company after a specified period.
 Participating Preference Shares – Get a share in extra profits after dividends are paid to equity
shareholders.
Example:
Tata Motors has issued DVR shares, where investors receive higher dividends but lower voting power
compared to regular equity shares.
4. Meaning of Stock
Stock is a collection of fully paid-up shares that a company consolidates into a single unit. A company
cannot directly issue stock; it must first issue shares and later convert them into stock.
Characteristics of Stock:
 No fixed denomination – Unlike shares (which have a face value), stock represents a total value.
 Transferable in fractions – Unlike shares, stock can be transferred in any amount instead of whole
numbers.

STA 49
 Only Fully Paid-Up Shares Can Be Converted – A company can convert shares into stock but cannot
issue stock directly.
Example: If a company has 10,000 shares of ₹10 each, it may convert them into stock worth ₹1,00,000
without specifying the number of shares.
Legal Rule:
A public company can convert shares into stock only if its Articles of Association permit it.
5. Difference Between Shares and Stock
Basis Shares Stock
Definition A unit of ownership in a company. A consolidated bundle of shares.
Must have a nominal face value
Form No face value, represented as total value.
(e.g., ₹10 per share).
Can only be transferred as whole
Transferability Can be transferred in any fraction.
shares.
Fixed and printed on share
Denomination No fixed denomination.
certificates.
Fully Paid-Up Only fully paid shares can be converted into
May be partly paid or fully paid.
Condition stock.
Yes, companies can issue shares No, companies must first issue shares and later
Issued Directly?
directly. convert them into stock.
Example: If you buy 50 shares of ₹10 each, you own shares worth ₹500. But if the company converts
these shares into stock, you will own ₹500 worth of stock without a fixed number of shares.
6. Legal Provisions Related to Shares & Stock Under Companies Act, 2013
Section Provision
Section 43 Defines types of share capital (Equity & Preference Shares).
Section 44 Shares are movable property and freely transferable unless restricted by the company.
Section 61 Companies can convert shares into stock, subject to approval.
Section 68 Companies can buy back their own shares under certain conditions.

Case Law: Mathur v. Mathur Industries Ltd. (1955)

Facts:
The company converted partly paid-up shares into stock.
Judgment: The court held that only fully paid-up shares can be converted into stock.
Key Takeaway: A company cannot convert unpaid shares into stock until all dues are cleared.
Conclusion
 Shares are the basic unit of ownership in a company, whereas stock is a consolidated form of fully
paid shares.
 Companies cannot issue stock directly; they must first issue shares and later convert them.
 The Companies Act, 2013 sets clear rules for issuing, transferring, and converting shares and stock.

STA 50
Kinds of shares
1. Introduction
Shares represent ownership in a company and entitle shareholders to a proportion of the company's
profits and voting rights. The Companies Act, 2013 (Section 43) classifies shares into two main types:
1. Equity Shares
2. Preference Shares
Each type of share carries different rights and obligations.
2. Types of Shares Under Companies Act, 2013
1 Equity Shares (Ordinary Shares) [Section 43(a)]
Equity shares are the most common type of shares, giving ownership rights and voting power to
shareholders. They do not carry any fixed dividend entitlement but allow investors to benefit from capital
appreciation.
Key Features:
 Represent ownership in the company.
 Carry voting rights (one share = one vote).
 No fixed dividend; shareholders receive dividends only when declared.
 Higher risk but potential for higher returns.
Example: If you buy 100 shares of Infosys, you become an equity shareholder, entitled to dividends and
voting rights in the company.
Types of Equity Shares:
Type Description
Most common; shareholders have voting power in company
Equity Shares with Voting Rights
decisions.
Equity Shares with Differential Voting Offer lower voting power but higher dividends (e.g., Tata
Rights (DVRs) Motors DVR shares).

Case Law: Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Escorts Ltd. (1986)

The Supreme Court held that equity shareholders have full control over the company through voting
rights but are subject to the company’s articles of association.
2 Preference Shares [Section 43(b)]
Preference shares provide priority over equity shares in dividend payments and company liquidation.
However, preference shareholders usually have limited or no voting rights.
Key Features:
 Fixed dividend (paid before equity shareholders).
 Priority in capital repayment in case of liquidation.
 Limited or no voting rights.
 Less risky than equity shares but lower potential returns.
Example: A company issues 10% preference shares at ₹100 each. This means shareholders get a fixed
10% dividend (₹10 per share) before equity shareholders receive anything.

STA 51
Types of Preference Shares:

Type Description
Cumulative Preference Shares Unpaid dividends are carried forward to future years.
Non-Cumulative Preference
Unpaid dividends are not carried forward.
Shares
Redeemable Preference Shares Company buys back shares after a certain period.
Cannot be bought back by the company (not allowed under the 2013
Irredeemable Preference Shares
Act).
Participating Preference Shares Shareholders get fixed dividends + extra profits (if any).
Non-Participating Preference
Only entitled to fixed dividends, no extra profits.
Shares
Convertible Preference Shares Can be converted into equity shares after a fixed period.
Non-Convertible Preference
Cannot be converted into equity shares.
Shares
Case Law: Shanti Prasad Jain v. Kalinga Tubes Ltd. (1965)
The court ruled that preference shareholders have rights only as defined in the Articles of Association
and cannot interfere with management decisions.
3. Difference Between Equity and Preference Shares
Basis Equity Shares Preference Shares
Represent ownership of the Represent preference over equity in dividends
Ownership
company. and liquidation.
Voting Rights Full voting rights. Limited or no voting rights.
Dividend No fixed dividend; depends on Fixed dividend (paid before equity
Payment company profits. shareholders).
Risk Higher risk, higher potential returns. Lower risk, stable returns.
Liquidation
Paid after preference shareholders. Paid first during liquidation.
Priority
Example:
If a company declares ₹1 crore in dividends, it must first pay preference shareholders their fixed dividend
before distributing the remaining amount among equity shareholders.
Conclusion
 Equity shares are ideal for investors seeking growth and voting rights.
 Preference shares are suitable for those looking for fixed income with lower risk.
 The Companies Act, 2013 ensures that companies issue shares in compliance with legal and
financial regulations.
STA 52
Share Capital
1. Introduction
Share Capital refers to the total amount of money raised by a company through the issuance of shares. It
represents the financial foundation of a company and determines the extent of ownership and voting
rights of shareholders.
Legal Basis: Section 2(84) & Section 43-72 of the Companies Act, 2013 govern share capital and its types.
2. Definition of Share Capital
Section 2(84) of the Companies Act, 2013 defines a share as a unit of ownership in the share capital of a
company.
Share Capital = Number of Shares Issued × Face Value per Share
Example: If Tata Steel Ltd. issues 1,00,000 shares at ₹10 each, the total share capital = ₹10,00,000.
3. Types of Share Capital (As per Section 43 of Companies Act, 2013)
The Companies Act, 2013 classifies share capital into the following categories:
a. Authorized Capital (Nominal Capital)
 Maximum amount of capital a company is allowed to raise by issuing shares.
 Specified in the Memorandum of Association (MoA).
 Can be increased with approval from shareholders & Registrar of Companies (RoC).
Example: If a company’s authorized capital is ₹50 crores, it cannot issue shares beyond ₹50 crores unless
it gets approval for an increase.
b. Issued Capital
 Portion of authorized capital that a company has issued to shareholders.
 A company may not issue all authorized capital at once.
Example: If a company’s authorized capital is ₹50 crores but has issued shares worth ₹30 crores, its
issued capital is ₹30 crores.
c. Subscribed Capital
 Portion of issued capital that has been subscribed (purchased) by investors.
 Not all issued shares may be subscribed by investors.
Example: If a company issues shares worth ₹30 crores but investors buy only ₹25 crores, the subscribed
capital is ₹25 crores.
d. Paid-up Capital
 Portion of subscribed capital for which shareholders have fully paid the company.
 It is the actual capital available for the company’s use.
 As per Companies Act, 2013, every company must have minimum paid-up capital of ₹1 for
private companies and ₹5 lakhs for public companies (previous requirement removed in 2015).
Example: If investors have subscribed to ₹25 crores worth of shares but have paid only ₹20 crores, then
the paid-up capital is ₹20 crores.
e. Called-up Capital
 Portion of subscribed capital that the company has asked (called) investors to pay.
 Sometimes, companies do not demand full payment at once but call for payments in installments.
Example: If a company issues shares worth ₹10 crores and asks investors to pay ₹7 crores initially, then
₹7 crores is the called-up capital.
f. Uncalled Capital
 The remaining portion of subscribed capital that the company has not yet demanded from
shareholders.

STA 53
Example: If ₹10 crores is the subscribed capital and the company has only called ₹7 crores, then ₹3
crores is uncalled capital.
g. Reserve Capital
 A portion of unissued capital that a company reserves for future use.
 Can only be used during winding up of the company.
 Created through a special resolution by shareholders.
Example: If a company has an authorized capital of ₹50 crores and issues ₹40 crores, it may reserve ₹10
crores for emergency purposes.
4. Differences Between Various Types of Share Capital
Basis Authorized Capital Issued Capital Subscribed Capital Paid-up Capital
Portion of authorized Portion of subscribed
Maximum capital a Portion of issued capital
Meaning capital issued to capital fully paid by
company can issue. subscribed by investors.
investors. investors.
No direct alteration
Alteration Yes, with shareholder Yes, by issuing more Yes, when unpaid shares
(depends on investor
Possible? and RoC approval. shares. are fully paid.
demand).
₹50 crores (Company ₹30 crores (Shares ₹25 crores (Shares ₹20 crores (Fully paid-
Example
limit). issued). purchased). up).

5. Legal Provisions Related to Share Capital Under Companies Act, 2013

Section Provision
Section 43 Defines types of share capital (Equity & Preference Shares).
Section 61 A company can alter its share capital structure with approval.
Section 62 Governs the process of issuing additional shares to existing shareholders.
Section 66 Reduction of share capital requires approval of the Tribunal.
Section 68 A company can buy back its own shares under specific conditions.

Case Law: Punjab Distilling Industries Ltd. v. CIT (1959)

Facts: A company issued shares at a premium but did not mention it in the books of accounts.
Judgment: The court ruled that share premium must be accounted separately as per legal provisions.
5. Importance of Share Capital
 Determines the financial strength of a company.
 Helps in business expansion by raising funds.
 Ensures legal compliance under corporate laws.
 Protects investor interests by defining clear ownership rights.
Example: If Reliance Industries wants to expand, it can issue new shares to raise funds, increasing its
issued capital and paid-up capital.
Conclusion
 Share Capital is the financial backbone of a company.
 The Companies Act, 2013 provides clear regulations for issuing, altering, and managing share
capital.
 Different types of share capital serve different business and legal purposes.
STA 54
Statutory restrictions on allotment of shares
1. Introduction
The allotment of shares is a crucial step in a company's fundraising process. To protect investors and
ensure fair practices, the Companies Act, 2013 imposes several statutory restrictions on share
allotment. These restrictions ensure transparency, fairness, and compliance with legal requirements.
2. Legal Basis:
The key provisions related to share allotment are found in:
 Section 39 (Allotment after minimum subscription)
 Section 42 (Private placement)
 Section 62 (Further issue of shares)
 SEBI Regulations (For listed companies)
3. Statutory Restrictions on Allotment of Shares
a. Minimum Subscription Requirement (Section 39(1))
A company cannot allot shares unless it receives the minimum subscription amount as stated in the
prospectus.
Key Rules:
 If the minimum subscription is not received within 30 days of the issue, the amount must be
refunded to investors.
 If the company fails to refund the amount within 15 days, it must pay interest at 15% per annum.
Example: If Reliance Ltd. issues shares with a minimum subscription of ₹50 crores but receives only ₹40
crores, it cannot allot shares and must refund the amount.
b. Prohibition on Allotment Before Receiving Application Money (Section 39(2))
A company must not allot shares until it has received the application money.
Key Rules:
 The application money for public issues must be at least 5% of the nominal value (as per SEBI
rules, it is usually 25%).
 The money received must be kept in a separate bank account.
Example: If TCS Ltd. issues shares at ₹100 each, an investor must pay at least ₹5 (5%) as application
money to be eligible for share allotment.
c. Restrictions on Allotment of Shares in Private Placement (Section 42)
Private placement is the process of issuing shares to a select group of investors instead of the public. It is
subject to strict conditions.
Key Rules:
 The company can allot shares to a maximum of 200 investors in a financial year (excluding Qualified
Institutional Buyers and employees under ESOP).
 Private placement must be approved by a special resolution.
 Shares must be allotted within 60 days from receiving application money; otherwise, the company
must refund the amount with 12% interest.
 All details must be filed with Registrar of Companies (RoC) within 15 days.
Example: If Zomato Ltd. wants to issue shares privately to only 50 investors, it must follow the Section 42
rules, ensuring compliance with SEBI regulations.
Case Law: Sahara India Real Estate Corp. Ltd. v. SEBI (2012)
 Sahara issued shares to more than 50 investors without SEBI’s approval.
 The Supreme Court held that Sahara violated private placement norms, and the company was
ordered to refund ₹24,000 crores to investors.

STA 55
d. Restrictions on Allotment in Public Issues (SEBI Guidelines & Section 40)
A company making a public issue must comply with SEBI regulations, which include:
 Appointment of merchant bankers for proper due diligence.
 Listing of shares on a recognized stock exchange.
 No allotment unless a prospectus is filed with the Registrar of Companies (RoC).
 Refund of money if shares are not allotted within the prescribed period.
Example: Before launching an IPO, a company like LIC India Ltd. must file its prospectus with SEBI and
obtain approval.
e. Restrictions on Issue of Sweat Equity Shares (Section 54)
Companies can issue sweat equity shares to employees or directors only after 1 year of incorporation.
Key Rules:
 Approval through a special resolution.
 Cannot exceed 15% of the paid-up capital or ₹5 crore (whichever is higher).
Example: Flipkart Ltd. cannot issue sweat equity shares to its employees immediately after
incorporation; it must wait at least one year.
f. Restrictions on Further Issue of Shares (Section 62)
If a company wants to issue additional shares, it must first offer them to existing shareholders (known as
rights issue).
Key Rules:
 Existing shareholders have the first right to buy additional shares before outsiders.
 If shareholders decline, the company can offer shares to new investors.
 The price of shares must be fair and reasonable.
Example: If HDFC Bank wants to raise funds by issuing new shares, it must first offer them to existing
shareholders before selling them to the public.
g. Prohibition on Fraudulent and Preferential Allotments (Section 447 & 62(1)(c))
Fraudulent allotment of shares or allotment at an unfair price is a criminal offense.
Key Rules:
 Shares must not be issued at an unreasonably low price.
 The company must obtain valuation reports before issuing preferential shares.
 Violators may face imprisonment of up to 10 years under Section 447 (fraud).
Example: If a company issues shares at ₹1 per share when the fair market price is ₹100 per share, SEBI
may investigate the preferential allotment for fraud.
3. Penalties for Violating Share Allotment Rules
Violation Penalty
Failure to return minimum subscription within 15 days 15% interest per annum
Failure to refund private placement money within 60 days 12% interest per annum
Wrongful allotment of shares Fine up to ₹1 crore
Fraudulent allotment (Section 447) 10 years imprisonment + monetary fine

Conclusion
The Companies Act, 2013 and SEBI regulations impose strict rules on share allotment to protect
investors and prevent fraud. Companies must follow minimum subscription requirements, private
placement limits, and fair valuation norms to ensure compliance.
STA 56
Intermediaries
1. Introduction
In corporate and securities law, intermediaries play a crucial role in facilitating transactions between
companies, investors, and regulatory authorities. These entities ensure compliance, transparency, and
smooth functioning of the financial markets and corporate ecosystem.
Legal Basis:
 Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) Act, 1992 governs intermediaries in securities markets.
 Companies Act, 2013 regulates corporate intermediaries like auditors, company secretaries, and legal
professionals.
 SEBI (Intermediaries) Regulations, 2008 provide licensing and compliance requirements for financial
intermediaries.
2. Meaning of Intermediaries
As per SEBI (Intermediaries) Regulations, 2008, an intermediary is:
"Any person who is registered with SEBI and is involved in securities markets in any manner, including
brokers, underwriters, depositories, merchant bankers, and others."
Intermediaries act as a bridge between companies, investors, and regulatory bodies to ensure fair,
efficient, and transparent transactions.
3. Types of Intermediaries in Indian Company Law
a. Financial Market Intermediaries (Regulated by SEBI)
These intermediaries operate in the capital markets and ensure smooth trading, issuance, and settlement
of securities.
Type Role
Stock Brokers & Sub-Brokers Facilitate buying/selling of shares on stock exchanges (e.g., Zerodha, Angel One).
Help companies raise capital through IPOs, FPOs (e.g., ICICI Securities, Kotak
Merchant Bankers
Investment Banking).
Depositories & Depository
Store securities electronically (e.g., NSDL, CDSL).
Participants (DPs)
Registrars & Transfer Agents Maintain records of shareholders and manage IPO applications (e.g., KFintech,
(RTAs) Link Intime).
Underwriters Guarantee share subscriptions in IPOs, reducing risk for companies.
Clearing Corporations Ensure settlement of trades in stock exchanges (e.g., NSE Clearing Ltd.).
Credit Rating Agencies Assess company creditworthiness (e.g., CRISIL, ICRA).
Investment Advisors & Portfolio
Provide financial advice and manage investments.
Managers
Mutual Fund Houses &
Manage and distribute mutual funds (e.g., SBI Mutual Fund, HDFC AMC).
Distributors
Example:
When Zomato launched its IPO, intermediaries like Kotak Mahindra Capital, Morgan Stanley, and ICICI
Securities acted as merchant bankers, while NSDL and CDSL handled electronic share storage.
b. Corporate Compliance & Governance Intermediaries (Regulated by Companies Act, 2013)
These professionals help companies comply with legal and regulatory requirements.

STA 57
 Type Role
Company Secretaries (CS) Ensure compliance with the Companies Act, 2013 (e.g., filing annual returns).
Chartered Accountants (CA)
Conduct financial audits and ensure fair reporting (e.g., Deloitte, EY).
& Auditors
Legal Advisors & Corporate
Handle mergers, acquisitions, and corporate disputes.
Lawyers
Valuers Assess the fair value of assets during business transactions.
Example:
If Reliance Industries Ltd. wants to merge with another company, corporate lawyers and auditors will
handle legal and financial due diligence.
c. Government & Regulatory Intermediaries (Regulated by RBI, SEBI, MCA)
These agencies monitor corporate activities, protect investor rights, and enforce legal provisions.
Regulatory Body Function
Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) Regulates company formation, compliance, and liquidation.
Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) Oversees stock markets and protects investor interests.
Regulates financial intermediaries and foreign exchange
Reserve Bank of India (RBI)
transactions.
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) Handles corporate insolvency and bankruptcy resolution.
Stock Exchanges (NSE, BSE) Provide a platform for securities trading.
Example:
If a company violates insider trading laws, SEBI investigates and penalizes the company and its
intermediaries.
4. Importance of Intermediaries in Indian Corporate Law
 Ensure Transparency – Prevent fraud and misleading financial reporting.
 Facilitate Investment – Help companies raise capital through IPOs, bonds, and mutual funds.
 Regulatory Compliance – Ensure adherence to laws like Companies Act, SEBI Act, and RBI
regulations.
 Investor Protection – Safeguard investor interests and prevent market manipulation.
 Smooth Business Operations – Help companies comply with financial, legal, and governance
requirements.
Case Law: Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Ltd. v. SEBI (2012)
 Facts: Sahara illegally raised funds from investors without SEBI approval.
 Judgment: The Supreme Court ruled that Sahara must refund ₹24,000 crores to investors,
highlighting the importance of SEBI as a regulatory intermediary.
Conclusion
Intermediaries play a critical role in the corporate and financial system, ensuring smooth transactions,
regulatory compliance, and investor protection. The Companies Act, 2013 and SEBI regulations govern
various intermediaries, ensuring that businesses operate transparently and ethically.

STA 58
Call on shares for future of shares
1. Introduction
When a company issues shares, it does not always require shareholders to pay the entire share price
upfront. Instead, the company may demand payments in installments. These installments are called calls
on shares.
Legal Basis:
 Section 49 of the Companies Act, 2013
 Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014
A call on shares is a formal demand issued by the company to its shareholders to pay an unpaid portion
of their shares.
2. Meaning of Call on Shares
A call on shares is a request made by a company to its shareholders to pay the unpaid amount on their
partly paid-up shares.
Example:
If a company issues a share at ₹10 and collects ₹3 during allotment, it may call for the remaining ₹7 in
phases (e.g., ₹3 in the first call and ₹4 in the final call).
3. Procedure for Making Calls on Shares
The procedure for making a call on shares is governed by the Articles of Association (AoA) of the
company. The general steps include:
a. Board Resolution: The Board of Directors passes a resolution approving the call.
Notice to Shareholders: The company issues a call notice specifying:
b. Amount payable
o Due date
o Penalty for non-payment
c. Payment Period: Shareholders must pay within the prescribed time.
d. Failure to Pay (Forfeiture): If a shareholder fails to pay, the company can forfeit shares and resell
them.
Legal Rule:
According to Section 49, a company cannot charge interest exceeding 10% per annum on delayed call
payments unless the AoA specifies otherwise.
4. Types of Calls on Shares
Type Description
First Call The first installment after the allotment of shares.
Second & Subsequent Calls Any further demands made on unpaid shares.
Final Call The last payment required to make shares fully paid-up.
Example of Call on Shares in Phases:
 Share Price: ₹10
 Application Money: ₹3
 First Call: ₹3
 Final Call: ₹4
 Total Paid-Up Capital After All Calls: ₹10
5. Default in Payment: Forfeiture of Shares
If a shareholder fails to pay the call amount:
STA 59
  The company may forfeit shares (cancel ownership).
 The shares can be resold to other investors.
 The defaulting shareholder loses rights & previous payments.
Example: If Ramesh fails to pay the final call of ₹4, the company may forfeit his shares and resell them.
Case Law: Balkrishna Gupta v. Swadeshi Polytex Ltd. (1985)
The Supreme Court ruled that a company must follow fair procedures before forfeiting shares, and
shareholders should get reasonable time to make payments.
6. Importance of Call on Shares for Future of Shares
 Ensures Gradual Fundraising – Companies can raise funds in stages, reducing pressure on investors.
 Reduces Investor Burden – Investors do not need to pay the full amount at once.
 Affects Market Perception – A high number of defaulted calls may indicate financial instability.
 Impact on Stock Market – Call payments affect a company’s liquidity, valuation, and investor
confidence.
Conclusion
 Call on shares allows companies to collect unpaid amounts in installments.
 Shareholders must comply with payment notices to retain their shares.
 Failure to pay may result in forfeiture and reissue of shares.
 Legal compliance is essential to ensure fairness in call notices and forfeiture actions.

Transfer of shares
1. Meaning of Transfer of Shares
Transfer of shares refers to the voluntary transfer of ownership of shares by an existing shareholder to
another person. This process is commonly used in public companies, where shares are freely
transferable, but it is subject to restrictions in private companies.
Legal Basis: Section 56 of the Companies Act, 2013 governs the transfer of shares in Indian companies.
2. Key Features of Share Transfer
 Applicable to both Private & Public Companies (but private companies have restrictions).
 Shares can be transferred voluntarily unless restricted by the Articles of Association (AoA).
 Legal ownership changes after approval and entry in the company’s register.
 Stamp duty is applicable on share transfer transactions.
Example: If Mr. A, a shareholder in Tata Steel Ltd., sells his 100 shares to Mr. B, the company must
register this change in its Register of Members after receiving a share transfer form.
3. Process of Share Transfer
Step Description
Step 1 The transferor (seller) executes a Share Transfer Deed (Form SH-4).
Step 2 The deed is signed by both the transferor & transferee and witnessed.
Step 3 Stamp duty is paid as per Indian Stamp Act.
Step 4 The transferor submits the SH-4 form & share certificate to the company.
Step 5 The board of directors approves the transfer (especially in private companies).
Step 6 The company updates its Register of Members and issues a new share certificate.

STA 60
4. Transferability in Private vs. Public Companies
Feature Private Company Public Company
Transfer Restrictions Yes, subject to AoA & board approval. No, shares are freely transferable.
Approval Requirement Board approval needed. No approval required.
Marketability Not listed on stock exchanges. Listed and tradable on stock exchanges.
5. Legal Restrictions on Share Transfer
 Private Companies can restrict share transfers under their Articles of Association (AoA).
 Public Companies cannot impose restrictions except under SEBI regulations.
 Government Approval is required for share transfers in certain industries (e.g., defense, telecom).
Case Law: Bajaj Auto Ltd. v. N.K. Firodia (1971)
Facts: Bajaj Auto refused to register the transfer of shares without valid reasons.
Judgment: The Supreme Court ruled that refusal to transfer shares must be justified and cannot be
arbitrary.
Key Takeaway: Share transfer can be restricted but not unreasonably denied by the company.
Conclusion
The transfer of shares ensures liquidity in a company’s ownership structure. While public company
shares are freely transferable, private companies can impose restrictions under their Articles of
Association. Any unreasonable refusal to register a share transfer can be legally challenged.

Transmission of shares
1. Meaning of Transmission of Shares
Transmission of shares refers to the transfer of shares from a shareholder to their legal heirs or
representatives due to death, insolvency, or incapacity. It is an automatic process and happens without
any consideration (payment), unlike a regular share transfer.
Legal Basis: Section 56 of the Companies Act, 2013 and Companies (Share Capital and Debentures)
Rules, 2014 govern the process of transmission of shares.
2. Key Features of Transmission of Shares
 Occurs due to operation of law (not a voluntary sale).
 No stamp duty is required (unlike transfer of shares).
 Legal heirs or nominees receive shares after providing necessary documents.
 Board approval is required, but it cannot be refused.
 No monetary consideration is involved.
Example:
If a shareholder of Reliance Industries Ltd. passes away, their shares are transmitted to their legal heir
(as per a will or succession law) without any sale transaction.
3. Legal Provisions & Process of Transmission
Step Description
Step 1 The legal heir or nominee submits a transmission request to the company.
Required documents such as death certificate, succession certificate, or probate are
Step 2
submitted.

STA 61
 Step Description
Step 3 The company verifies documents and processes the transmission.
Step 4 The Board of Directors approves the transmission (approval cannot be denied).
Step 5 The new owner’s name is updated in the company’s register of members.
4. Documents Required for Transmission of Shares
 Death Certificate of the shareholder
 Succession Certificate / Will / Probate (if applicable)
 PAN Card & Identity Proof of legal heir/nominee
 Share Certificates (original)
 Transmission Request Form
5. Key Differences: Transmission vs. Transfer of Shares
Basis Transmission of Shares Transfer of Shares
Reason Death, insolvency, incapacity Voluntary sale of shares
Consideration No consideration (free) Requires payment
Process Done by law Done by agreement
Stamp Duty No stamp duty Stamp duty applicable
Approval Board cannot reject it Board may reject it

Case Law: Suraj Lamp & Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Haryana (2011)
Facts:
 A dispute arose over share ownership due to improper documentation in a transmission case.
Judgment:
 The Supreme Court ruled that proper legal documentation is mandatory for share transmission,
and companies must follow due process.
Key Takeaway:
Legal heirs must submit valid legal documents to claim shares through transmission.
Conclusion
Transmission of shares is a legal process where shares are passed on to legal heirs without a formal
transfer. It ensures that ownership rights are legally inherited in case of a shareholder’s death or
incapacity. Companies must follow due diligence and legal procedures to prevent disputes.

Reduction on transfer of shares

The transfer of shares refers to the voluntary handing over of ownership from one person to another.
However, under certain circumstances, the transfer of shares may be restricted or reduced under the
Companies Act, 2013.
1. Meaning of Reduction on Transfer of Shares
The reduction on transfer of shares occurs when a company imposes restrictions on who can transfer
shares, to whom, and under what conditions. These restrictions are primarily seen in private companies
to maintain control over ownership.
Legal Basis:

STA 62
  Section 44: Shares are freely transferable unless restrictions are imposed by the company's Articles of
Association (AoA).
 Section 56: Prescribes the procedure for share transfer, including documentation and approval.
 Articles of Association (AoA): A company’s internal rules may limit or reduce the transfer of shares.
2. Restrictions on Transfer of Shares
(A) In Private Companies
According to Section 2(68), private companies must include restrictions on share transfers in their Articles
of Association (AoA). These restrictions may include:
1. Right of First Refusal (ROFR) – Existing shareholders get the first right to buy shares before an
outsider.
2. Board Approval – The Board of Directors must approve the transfer before it is executed.
3. Limited Transferability – Shares can only be transferred to specific persons (e.g., family members or
existing shareholders).
Example: A private company’s AoA states that if a shareholder wants to sell shares, they must first offer
them to existing shareholders. If no one is interested, then they can sell to an outsider.
(B) In Public Companies
 Shares in public companies are freely transferable as per Section 58(2).
 However, transfers may be restricted in cases of fraud, regulatory issues, or company resolutions.
3. Reduction in Share Capital vs. Reduction in Transfer of Shares
 Reduction in Transfer of Shares: Imposed by private companies via AoA to control ownership.
 Reduction in Share Capital (Section 66): A company law process where the company itself reduces
its total share capital (e.g., buyback, cancellation of unpaid shares).
Case Law: Bajaj Auto Ltd. v. N.K. Firodia (1971)
Facts: A private company rejected a share transfer without a valid reason.
Judgment: The Supreme Court ruled that companies must provide valid reasons for rejecting share
transfers. Arbitrary rejection is not allowed.
Key Takeaway:
Private companies can restrict share transfers, but they must follow fair and reasonable procedures as
per their Articles of Association.
Conclusion
 Public companies have free transferability, while private companies can impose restrictions via AoA.
 Any restriction must be clearly stated in the Articles of Association and cannot be arbitrary.
 The law ensures fair trade practices while allowing companies to maintain control over ownership.

Rectification of register on transfer

1. Meaning of Rectification of Register
The Rectification of Register on Transfer refers to the legal process under which a person whose name is
wrongly omitted, removed, or incorrectly entered in a company's register of members can seek
correction. This ensures that shareholders' rights are protected and company records remain accurate.
 Legal Basis: Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013 allows a person to apply for rectification of the
register if:
o Their name is wrongly entered or omitted.
o Their share transfer request is unjustly refused by the company.
2. Who Can Apply for Rectification?
1. Aggrieved Shareholder (whose name is omitted or entered wrongly).
STA 63
 2. Legal Representative (if the original shareholder has passed away).
3. Registrar of Companies (ROC) (in case of fraud).
3. Process of Rectification (Under Section 59 of Companies Act, 2013)
Step Description
Step 1 The aggrieved person must request rectification from the company.
If the company refuses or does not respond within 30 days, the aggrieved person can approach
Step 2
the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).
Step 3 The NCLT will examine whether the refusal was justified or illegal.
If the NCLT finds the refusal unjustified, it can order the company to rectify the register and
Step 4
compensate the affected party.
Example:
If a shareholder legally transfers shares to another person but the company fails to update its register,
the buyer can approach the NCLT for rectification.
Case Law: Bajaj Auto Ltd. v. N.K. Firodia (1971)
Facts:
 A shareholder applied for a transfer of shares, but the company refused without valid reasons.
 The aggrieved party approached the court for rectification.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court ruled that companies cannot arbitrarily refuse share transfers and ordered
rectification of the register.
Key Takeaway:
A company must provide valid reasons for rejecting a share transfer request. Otherwise, the NCLT can
intervene and order rectification.
Conclusion
The rectification process protects shareholders' rights and ensures that the company's records reflect
the true ownership. Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides a legal remedy if a company
unfairly denies a share transfer request.

Certification and issue of certificate of transfer of shares

1. Meaning of Share Transfer
The transfer of shares refers to the voluntary transfer of ownership from one shareholder to another. In
the case of public companies, shares are freely transferable, while in private companies, there may be
restrictions as per the Articles of Association (AoA).
Legal Basis: Under Section 56 of the Companies Act, 2013, a company must register a share transfer only
when a proper instrument of transfer is submitted along with the share certificate.
2. Certification of Transfer of Shares
Certification of Transfer is a process where the company confirms that the share certificates submitted
for transfer are genuine and valid.
The company must verify that:
 The transferor has legal ownership of the shares.
 The transfer document is properly executed.
 Stamp duty has been paid.

STA 64
Example:
If Mr. A sells 100 shares of XYZ Ltd. to Mr. B, he submits a share transfer deed and the original share
certificate. The company certifies the documents before issuing a new certificate in Mr. B’s name.
3. Issue of Certificate of Transfer of Shares
Step Procedure
1. Submission of The transferor (seller) submits Form SH-4 (Share Transfer Deed) along with the
Transfer Form original share certificate.
2. Verification by the The company checks the authenticity of the documents and ensures the transfer
Company complies with its AoA.
3. Approval by the
The Board of Directors passes a resolution to approve the share transfer.
Board
4. Issuance of New The company issues a new share certificate in the transferee's (buyer’s) name
Certificate within one month from the date of approval.
5. Updating the
The Register of Members is updated to reflect the new shareholder.
Register

4. Legal Provisions Under the Companies Act, 2013

Section Provision
Section 56 Procedure for transfer and transmission of shares.
Rule 11 of Companies (Share Capital
Specifies details of Form SH-4 and transfer execution.
and Debentures) Rules, 2014
Every share certificate must be duly stamped, signed, and issued
Section 46
within 2 months of allotment.
If the company fails to transfer shares, it may be fined up to
Penalty for Non-compliance
₹5,00,000, and officers responsible may face fines up to ₹1,00,000.

Case Law: Bajaj Auto Ltd. v. N.K. Firodia (1971)

Facts:
 A shareholder requested a share transfer.
 The company refused, citing discretionary powers under its Articles of Association (AoA).
Judgment:
The Supreme Court held that a company cannot unreasonably refuse a valid transfer unless there is a
genuine reason for rejection.
Key Takeaway:
A company must register a transfer unless there are valid legal reasons to deny it.
Conclusion
The certification and issue of a certificate of transfer of shares ensure transparency and legal compliance
in share transactions. Public companies generally allow free transferability, whereas private companies
may have restrictions as per their AoA. Proper documentation and board approval are essential to
protect investor rights and maintain corporate governance.
STA 65
Limitation of time for issue of certificates
1. Introduction
The Companies Act, 2013 prescribes specific time limits for issuing various certificates, including share
certificates and debenture certificates. These time limits ensure corporate transparency, investor
protection, and accountability in company operations.
The relevant provisions are primarily covered under Section 56 of the Companies Act, 2013 and
corresponding Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014.
2. Time Limits for Issuing Certificates
Relevant
Type of Certificate Applicable Time Limit
Section
Section
Share Certificate (Allotment of Shares) Within 2 months from the allotment date
56(4)(a)
Share Certificate (Transfer or Transmission Within 1 month from receipt of the Section
of Shares) transfer request 56(4)(c)
Within 6 months from the date of Section
Debenture Certificate
allotment 56(4)(d)
3. Detailed Explanation of Each Time Limit
(A) Issuance of Share Certificates (Section 56(4)(a))
 When a company allots shares to investors, it must issue the share certificate within 2 months from
the allotment date.
 This applies to both private and public companies.
 The certificate serves as legal proof of ownership of shares.
Example: If Tata Motors Ltd. allots shares to investors on April 1, 2024, it must issue share certificates by
June 1, 2024.
(B) Issuance of Share Certificates on Transfer (Section 56(4)(c))
 When a shareholder sells or transfers shares, the company must issue a new share certificate to the
buyer within 1 month of receiving the transfer application.
 This prevents delays and ensures smooth transfer of ownership.
Example: If a shareholder of Infosys Ltd. sells shares and submits a transfer request on March 15, 2024,
the company must issue the share certificate by April 15, 2024.
(C) Issuance of Debenture Certificates (Section 56(4)(d))
 When a company issues debentures (debt instruments), it must provide debenture certificates
within 6 months from the allotment date.
 This ensures transparency and prevents fraudulent financial practices.
Example: If Reliance Industries Ltd. allots debentures on January 1, 2024, it must issue debenture
certificates by July 1, 2024.
4. Consequences of Non-Compliance
 If a company fails to issue certificates within the prescribed time, it is liable for penalties under
Section 56(6):
o Company’s Penalty – ₹50,000 to ₹5,00,000.

STA 66
 o Officer in Default (Directors, Company Secretary, etc.) – ₹10,000 per officer, increasing up to
₹1,00,000.
Case Law: Mannalal Khetan v. Kedar Nath Khetan (1977)
 The Supreme Court ruled that timely issuance of share certificates is a statutory duty.
 Failure to comply invalidates the share transaction.
Conclusion
The Companies Act, 2013 sets strict time limits for issuing share and debenture certificates to ensure fair
practices and protect investors. Companies must adhere to these timelines or face penalties and legal
consequences.

Object and effect of share certificate

1. Meaning of Share Certificate
A share certificate is a legal document issued by a company to its shareholders as proof of ownership of
shares. It acts as prima facie evidence that the person named in the certificate is the registered owner of
the shares.
Legal Basis:
 Section 46 of the Companies Act, 2013 defines a share certificate as a document that certifies
ownership of shares and the extent of interest in the company.
 It must be issued as per the provisions of Rule 5 of the Companies (Share Capital and
Debentures) Rules, 2014.
2. Object (Purpose) of a Share Certificate
A share certificate serves multiple purposes, both for shareholders and the company:
1. Proof of Ownership – It is prima facie evidence that the person holding the certificate is the legal
owner of the shares.
2. Transfer of Shares – The certificate facilitates the sale, pledge, or transfer of shares.
3. Legal Protection – Helps shareholders protect their rights and claim dividends or bonuses.
4. Loan Security – Shareholders can use share certificates as collateral to secure loans.
5. Avoids Disputes – Prevents fraudulent claims over share ownership.
6. Compliance with Law – Companies must issue share certificates within the prescribed time to
comply with the Companies Act.
Example:
If Tata Steel Ltd. issues shares to an investor, the company must provide a share certificate within two months
from the date of allotment as proof of ownership.
3. Effect of Share Certificate
A share certificate has important legal and financial effects:
Effect Description
Conclusive Evidence of Title The certificate proves absolute ownership, making it difficult to
(Section 46) challenge ownership claims.
Binding on Company & The company cannot deny the ownership of shares once a certificate is
Shareholder issued.
Facilitates Share Transfer Helps shareholders transfer or sell shares to others easily.
Shareholders named in the certificate are entitled to dividends and
Right to Receive Dividends
voting rights.
STA 67
 Effect Description
Shareholders can sue the company if the certificate is not issued on time
Legal Action in Case of Disputes
or if ownership is denied.
Example:
A shareholder of Infosys Ltd. can use the share certificate to sell shares in the stock market or claim
dividends from the company.
4. Legal Provisions Related to Share Certificates
Provision Explanation
Share certificates must be properly stamped and signed by two
Section 46
directors and act as conclusive proof of ownership.
Governs the transfer and transmission of shares based on the
Section 56
certificate.
Rule 5 of Companies (Share Capital Companies must issue a share certificate within 2 months of
and Debentures) Rules, 2014 allotment or within 1 month of a share transfer.
Section 447 (Fraudulent Share Issuing fake share certificates is a punishable offense with fines
Certificates) and imprisonment.
Case Law: Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. v. Madanlal Agrawal (1997)
Facts:
 A company refused to acknowledge a shareholder’s ownership of shares, despite him holding a
valid share certificate.
 The shareholder filed a case, claiming his rights were being denied.
Judgment:
The court held that a duly issued share certificate is conclusive proof of ownership, and the company
cannot deny the shareholder’s rights.
Key Takeaway:
Once a share certificate is issued, the company is legally bound by it and cannot refuse the shareholder's
ownership rights.
Conclusion
A share certificate is a vital document that provides legal proof of share ownership, ensuring
shareholder rights and smooth trading. It has a binding legal effect, meaning the company must honor
the details mentioned in the certificate. Non-compliance can lead to legal action and penalties.

Debentures & Charges

1. Introduction
Companies require substantial funds to operate, expand, and invest in new opportunities. To raise funds,
they either issue debentures to investors or create charges on their assets to secure loans. Both these
financial instruments are governed under the Companies Act, 2013 to ensure transparency, security, and
investor protection.

STA 68
Debentures
Meaning of Debentures
A debenture is a type of debt instrument issued by a company to borrow money from investors. In return,
the company agrees to pay a fixed interest and repay the principal amount after a specified period.
Unlike shares, debentures do not provide ownership in the company but make the holder a creditor.
According to Section 2(30) of the Companies Act, 2013, a debenture includes any instrument that
acknowledges a debt obligation of the company, whether it is secured or unsecured.
For example, if Tata Steel Ltd. issues non-convertible debentures (NCDs) to raise ₹500 crore, it is
borrowing money from the public, promising to repay it after a fixed term along with interest.
Features of Debentures
Debentures serve as a loan to the company and must be repaid with interest. They have a fixed interest
rate and a predefined maturity period. Unlike shareholders, debenture holders do not get voting rights
and have priority in repayment if the company goes bankrupt.
Debentures can be either secured, meaning backed by company assets, or unsecured, where investors
rely on the company's creditworthiness. Additionally, some debentures are convertible, allowing them to
be converted into equity shares, while others are non-convertible, meaning they will only be repaid in
cash.
Legal Provisions on Debentures (Section 71 of Companies Act, 2013)
Under Section 71, a company is permitted to issue debentures with or without creating a charge on its
assets. If secured debentures are issued, the company must appoint a debenture trustee to protect
investors' interests. Additionally, companies issuing debentures must create a Debenture Redemption
Reserve (DRR) to ensure timely repayment.
A famous case highlighting the importance of debenture regulations is N. Narayanan v. Adjudicating
Officer (2013), where SEBI penalized a company for issuing debentures with misleading financial
information, proving that companies must ensure transparency while raising public funds.
Charges
Meaning of Charges
A charge is a legal right or security created on a company’s property or assets to obtain a loan from banks
or financial institutions. It serves as collateral, ensuring that lenders can recover their money if the
company fails to repay.
According to Section 2(16) of the Companies Act, 2013, a charge includes a mortgage, lien, or any
interest created on the company’s property to secure a debt. Unlike debentures, which are issued to
multiple investors, a charge is specifically used to secure a loan from banks or lenders.
For instance, if Infosys Ltd. takes a loan of ₹1,000 crore from HDFC Bank by mortgaging its office
buildings, a fixed charge is created on those assets, meaning they cannot be sold without repaying the
loan.
Types of Charges
A fixed charge is created on specific assets such as land, buildings, or machinery. These assets cannot be
sold or transferred without lender approval until the loan is repaid.
On the other hand, a floating charge applies to general assets like inventory, trade receivables, or stock,
which can change over time. This charge "floats" over the assets and only becomes fixed if the company
defaults.
A mortgage charge is a legal mortgage over real estate, while a lien gives the lender the right to retain
possession of assets until repayment.

STA 69
Legal Provisions on Charges (Sections 77–87 of Companies Act, 2013)
Under Section 77, every company must register a charge with the Registrar of Companies (ROC) within
30 days of creation. If a company fails to do so, under Section 78, the lender has the right to register it on
behalf of the company.
If there are any modifications to the charge, Section 79 allows companies to update it with ROC. Once the
loan is repaid, Section 82 states that the charge must be marked as satisfied and removed from company
records.
The importance of registering charges was emphasized in ICICI Bank Ltd. v. SIDCO Leathers Ltd. (2006),
where the Supreme Court ruled that an unregistered charge cannot be enforced against creditors. This
case highlighted that banks and financial institutions must ensure their charges are legally registered to
protect their claims.
Differences Between Debentures and Charges
Aspect Debentures Charges
A debt instrument issued by a company to raise A security interest created on a company’s assets
Definition
funds from investors. to secure a loan.
Used to raise capital for business operations or Used to secure loans from banks or financial
Purpose
expansion. institutions.
Governed under Section 71 of the Companies Governed under Sections 77–87 of the Companies
Legal Basis
Act, 2013. Act, 2013.
Security Can be secured or unsecured. Always secured on specific or floating assets.
Registration Not mandatory unless secured debentures are Mandatory registration with the Registrar of
Requirement issued. Companies (ROC) within 30 days.
Impact on Debenture holders are creditors, not owners of
A charge creates a legal claim on company assets.
Ownership the company.
Debentures are repaid after a fixed period along
Repayment A charge is satisfied when the loan is repaid.
with interest.
A company issues Non-Convertible Debentures A company mortgages its building to secure a bank
Example
(NCDs) to investors. loan.

Conclusion
Debentures and charges play a crucial role in corporate finance, allowing companies to raise funds while
providing security to lenders. The Companies Act, 2013 ensures proper regulation to protect both
investors and creditors.
While debentures are widely used for public fundraising, charges serve as a means of securing bank loans.
Ensuring compliance with legal provisions is vital to maintaining financial stability and investor
confidence.

Borrowing Powers of a Company

1. Introduction
The borrowing power of a company refers to its ability to raise funds through loans, debentures, or other
financial instruments to meet business needs. The Companies Act, 2013, along with a company's
Memorandum of Association (MoA) and Articles of Association (AoA), governs these powers.
Legal Basis: Sections 179, 180, and 185 of the Companies Act, 2013 regulate a company’s borrowing
powers.

STA 70
2. Sources of Borrowing for Companies
A company can borrow funds from various sources, such as:
 Banks & Financial Institutions – Loans, overdrafts, credit facilities.
 Issue of Debentures – Borrowing from the public through bonds or securities.
 Public Deposits – Raising funds from individuals or investors.
 Loans from Directors & Shareholders – Subject to legal restrictions.
 External Commercial Borrowings (ECB) – Borrowing from foreign institutions (for eligible companies).
Example: Reliance Industries Ltd. issues ₹10,000 crore worth of secured debentures to raise capital for
expansion.
3. Provisions Under the Companies Act, 2013
(i) Section 179(3)(d) – Board’s Power to Borrow
The Board of Directors has the authority to borrow money except in cases where shareholders' approval
is required (Section 180).
(ii) Section 180(1)(c) – Shareholders’ Approval for Borrowing Beyond Limits
If a company borrows beyond its paid-up share capital + free reserves + securities premium, it must
obtain a special resolution (approval of at least 75% of shareholders).
Example:
If Tata Motors has a paid-up share capital of ₹5,000 crore and free reserves of ₹3,000 crore, its borrowing
limit is ₹8,000 crore. If it wants to borrow ₹10,000 crore, shareholder approval is required.
(iii) Section 180(1)(a) – Selling or Mortgaging Assets for Borrowing
If a company wants to mortgage, sell, or lease its assets to secure loans, it must pass a special resolution
in a general meeting.
Example: A real estate company mortgages its land to a bank to secure a ₹500 crore loan.
(iv) Section 185 – Restrictions on Borrowing from Directors
A company cannot directly or indirectly borrow from its directors unless it is a private company or falls
under certain exemptions.
Example: A public company cannot take a loan from its director unless the loan is interest-free and meets
specified conditions.
4. Restrictions on Borrowing
Restriction Explanation
Ultra Vires Borrowing A company cannot borrow if it is not authorized by the MoA.
Fraudulent Borrowing Any borrowing made with false or misleading information is illegal.
Exceeding Limits Borrowing beyond limits without special resolution is invalid.
Non-Compliance with RBI & SEBI Listed and foreign borrowing must follow RBI & SEBI guidelines.
Case Law: A. Lakshmanaswami Mudaliar v. L.I.C. (1963)
Facts: A company borrowed money but used it for a purpose not specified in its MoA.
Judgment: The Supreme Court held that the borrowing was ultra vires (beyond authority) and therefore
invalid.
Key Takeaway: A company cannot borrow for activities beyond its stated objectives in the MoA.
Conclusion: The Companies Act, 2013 provides a structured framework for companies to borrow
responsibly while protecting investor and creditor interests. Borrowing must be authorized by the MoA,
approved by the board, and in some cases, require shareholder consent.

STA 71
 Unit – IV
Directors
Directors
1. Meaning of Directors
A director is an individual appointed to the Board of Directors of a company to manage, control, and
direct its affairs. Directors act as agents, trustees, and representatives of the company and play a crucial
role in decision-making.
Legal Basis: As per Section 2(34) of the Companies Act, 2013, a "director" means a person appointed to
the Board of a company."
2. Key Responsibilities of Directors
 Strategic Decision-Making – Formulating company policies and strategies.
 Compliance & Governance – Ensuring the company follows laws and regulations.
 Fiduciary Duty – Acting in the best interest of shareholders.
 Risk Management – Identifying and mitigating business risks.
 Financial Oversight – Approving budgets, dividends, and financial statements.

Example: Ratan Tata served as a director of Tata Sons, making key business decisions that shaped the
company’s growth.
3. Types of Directors Under Companies Act, 2013
Type Description Relevant Section
Executive Director Actively involved in daily operations and decision-making. General
Non-Executive Director Not involved in daily operations; provides strategic advice. General
Independent Director Ensures corporate governance, free from company influence. Section 149(6)
Nominee Director Appointed by financial institutions or the government. Section 161(3)
Women Director Mandatory for certain companies to promote diversity. Section 149(1)
Managing Director (MD) Responsible for overall management and execution. Section 2(54)
Conclusion
Directors are the key decision-makers in a company, responsible for ensuring compliance, governance,
and business growth. The Companies Act, 2013 defines their roles, duties, and types to ensure
accountability and transparency in corporate operations.

Different kinds of Directors

The Companies Act, 2013 recognizes various types of directors, each having distinct roles and
responsibilities. Below are the key types of directors under the Act:
1. Executive Directors
 These directors are actively involved in the day-to-day operations of the company.
 Example: Managing Director, Whole-time Director.
2. Non-Executive Directors
 They are not involved in daily business activities but participate in policy-making and strategic
decisions.
 Example: Independent Directors, Nominee Directors.

STA 72
3. Managing Director (MD) [Section 2(54)]
 A director with substantial managerial powers of the company.
 Appointed by virtue of an agreement, resolution, or memorandum/articles of the company.
4. Whole-Time Director [Section 2(94)]
 A director in full-time employment of the company.
 Has specific responsibilities as assigned by the board.
5. Independent Director [Section 149(6)]
 Not a promoter or related to the company.
 Must possess relevant expertise and integrity.
 Minimum one-third of the total directors in a listed company should be independent.
6. Nominee Director
 Appointed by financial institutions, banks, or investors to protect their interests.
 Generally seen in companies with external funding.
7. Additional Director [Section 161(1)]
 Appointed by the Board of Directors between two Annual General Meetings (AGMs).
 Holds office until the next AGM.
8. Alternate Director [Section 161(2)]
 Appointed in place of a director who is absent for more than 3 months from India.
 Holds office until the original director returns.
9. Casual Vacancy Director [Section 161(4)]
 Appointed when a director resigns, dies, or is disqualified before completing his term.
 Appointed by the Board if allowed by the Articles of Association.
10. Shadow Director
 A person who is not officially appointed as a director but influences the decisions of the board.
 Not explicitly mentioned in the Act but recognized under judicial interpretations.
11. Residential Director [Section 149(3)]
 At least one director in every company must have stayed in India for a minimum of 182 days in the
previous calendar year.
12. Women Director [Section 149(1)]
 At least one woman director is mandatory for:
o Listed companies.
o Public companies with paid-up capital of ₹100 crore or more or turnover of ₹300 crore or
more.
13. Small Shareholder Director [Section 151]
 Representing small shareholders in listed companies.
 Elected upon request from a significant number of small shareholders.
Conclusion:
The Companies Act, 2013 ensures that different categories of directors fulfill governance, compliance,
and strategic roles effectively. The Act emphasizes transparency, accountability, and diverse
representation in corporate boards.

Directors Appointment
The Companies Act, 2013 provides various modes for the appointment of directors depending on the
type of directorship. The appointment process ensures proper governance, accountability, and
compliance with statutory requirements. Below is a detailed explanation of how different types of
directors are appointed under the Act.
STA 73
1. Appointment by Promoters (First Directors) [Section 152(1)]
 The first directors of a company are usually appointed by the promoters at the time of
incorporation.
 Their names are mentioned in the Articles of Association (AoA).
 If no directors are named, all subscribers to the Memorandum of Association (MoA) are deemed
to be the first directors.
2. Appointment by Shareholders (General Meeting) [Section 152(2)]
 Subsequent directors (other than first directors) are appointed in the Annual General Meeting
(AGM) by the majority of shareholders.
 A resolution is passed by ordinary majority (more than 50% votes).
 Such directors are called rotational directors and non-rotational directors.
Rotational Directors (Section 152(6)):
 In a public company, at least two-thirds of the directors must retire by rotation.
 Retiring directors can be reappointed or replaced in the AGM.
Non-Rotational Directors:
 Remaining one-third of the total directors can be appointed as permanent directors as per the
AoA.
3. Appointment by the Board of Directors
(i) Additional Director [Section 161(1)]
 The Board of Directors can appoint an Additional Director if permitted by the AoA.
 They hold office only until the next Annual General Meeting (AGM).
 If they are not confirmed in the AGM, their term expires.
(ii) Alternate Director [Section 161(2)]
 Appointed by the Board if a director is absent from India for more than 3 months.
 The AoA must allow such an appointment.
 Holds office until the original director returns.
(iii) Nominee Director [Section 161(3)]
 A director appointed by banks, financial institutions, or investors to protect their interests.
 Appointed under any agreement or government regulation.
(iv) Casual Vacancy Director [Section 161(4)]
 If a director resigns, dies, or is disqualified, the Board of Directors can fill the vacancy if the AoA
permits.
 The appointed director holds office only for the remaining tenure of the previous director.
4. Appointment of Independent Directors [Section 149(6) & (7)]
 Listed companies must have at least one-third of their total directors as independent directors.
 Appointed by the shareholders in a General Meeting.
 Tenure: Maximum two consecutive terms of five years each.
 They must be registered with the Independent Directors Data Bank under MCA rules.
5. Appointment of Women Director [Section 149(1)]
Mandatory for:
 Listed companies.
 Public companies with ₹100 crore or more paid-up share capital or ₹300 crore or more turnover.
 Appointed by the shareholders in a General Meeting.
6. Appointment of Small Shareholder Director [Section 151]
 In a listed company, small shareholders can elect one director if:

STA 74
 o They hold shares of ₹20,000 or less.
o At least 1,000 small shareholders or 10% of total small shareholders request the
appointment.
 Such a director is elected in a General Meeting.
7. Appointment by the Central Government / Tribunal [Section 242 & 167]
(i) Government-Appointed Directors (Section 242)
 If there is mismanagement or oppression in a company, the National Company Law Tribunal
(NCLT) can appoint directors.
(ii) Appointment by the Central Government (Section 167(3))
 If all directors of a company resign or vacate office, the Central Government can appoint new
directors.
8. Appointment of Managing Director / Whole-Time Director [Section 196]
 Appointed by the Board of Directors.
 Must be approved by shareholders in a General Meeting within 5 years.
 The company must comply with Schedule V regarding age, qualifications, and remuneration.
9. Appointment of Residential Director [Section 149(3)]
 Every company must have at least one director who has stayed in India for at least 182 days in
the previous calendar year.
 Appointed like any other director in a General Meeting or by the Board.
10. Appointment of Shadow Directors
 Not officially appointed but influences the Board’s decisions.
 They can be held liable under corporate laws if proven to have acted as de facto directors.
Key Documents Required for Appointment
1. Consent to Act as Director (DIR-2).
2. Declaration of Non-Disqualification (DIR-8).
3. Director Identification Number (DIN) – DIR-3 (if not already obtained).
4. Resolution passed in the General Meeting or Board Meeting.
5. Filing of Form DIR-12 with the Registrar of Companies (ROC) within 30 days.
Conclusion
The appointment of directors in India is governed by strict rules to ensure corporate governance. The
Companies Act, 2013 provides different mechanisms for the appointment of various types of directors,
ensuring a balance between shareholder control, regulatory compliance, and board independence.

Directors position
Under the Companies Act, 2013, directors play a crucial role in the management and governance of a
company. Their position is unique, as they are considered:
1. Agents of the Company – They act on behalf of the company and bind it through their actions.
2. Trustees of the Company – They hold assets and make decisions in the best interests of
shareholders.
3. Officers of the Company – They are responsible for statutory compliance and corporate
governance.
4. Employees (in some cases) – Executive directors like Managing Directors (MDs) and Whole-Time
Directors (WTDs) are treated as employees.
Example: Managing Director in a Public Limited Company
A company, XYZ Ltd., appoints Mr. A as the Managing Director (MD).
STA 75
  As MD, Mr. A has significant control over the company's operations, signing contracts and making
decisions.
 He acts as an agent when dealing with third parties.
 He acts as a trustee when managing shareholder funds.
 He also becomes an officer for compliance under the Companies Act.
Relevant Case Law: Lakshmanaswami Mudaliar v. Life Insurance Corporation of India (1963)
Facts:
 The directors of a company donated company funds to a charitable trust.
 Shareholders objected, claiming that the directors misused their position.
Judgment:
 The Supreme Court ruled that directors are trustees of company funds and cannot misuse them
for unauthorized purposes.
 The donation was declared ultra vires (beyond their powers).
Significance:
 Directors must act within their authority and in the best interest of the company.
 They cannot use company funds for personal or unauthorized activities.
Conclusion
Directors hold a fiduciary position in a company and must act honestly, diligently, and within legal limits.
The Companies Act, 2013 ensures that directors remain accountable to shareholders, creditors, and
regulatory authorities.

Directors qualifications and disqualifications

The Companies Act, 2013 specifies qualifications and disqualifications to ensure that only competent and
ethical individuals hold the position of directors. These provisions safeguard corporate governance and
prevent malpractice.
I. Qualifications of Directors
The Companies Act, 2013 does not prescribe specific educational or professional qualifications for
directors. However, certain basic requirements must be met for a person to be eligible for appointment
as a director. These include:
1. Director Identification Number (DIN) [Section 152(3)]
 Every individual proposed to be a director must obtain a Director Identification Number (DIN) from
the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA).
 DIN is mandatory for appointment and must be mentioned in all documents filed by the director.
2. Age Criteria
 A director must be at least 18 years old.
 There is no upper age limit for ordinary directors, but for a Managing Director, Whole-Time Director, or
Manager, the minimum age is 21 years and the maximum age is 70 years (Section 196).
3. Capacity to Contract
 A person must be legally competent to enter into contracts under the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
 This means they should be of sound mind and not disqualified by law.
4. Shareholding Requirement (For Private Companies Only)
 In some private companies, the Articles of Association (AoA) may require directors to hold a minimum
number of shares in the company.
 No such requirement exists for public companies.
5. Additional Requirements for Independent Directors [Section 149(6)]
STA 76
  Should not be a promoter of the company or its holding, subsidiary, or associate company.
 Must not have any pecuniary (financial) relationship with the company.
 Should possess relevant expertise and integrity.
II. Disqualifications of Directors [Section 164]
To prevent unfit persons from managing a company, Section 164 of the Companies Act, 2013 outlines
various grounds for disqualification:
1. Unsound Mind [Section 164(1)(a)]
 A person declared mentally unstable by a court is disqualified.
2. Undischarged Insolvent [Section 164(1)(b)]
 A person who has been declared insolvent and has not yet been discharged by the court is ineligible.
3. Conviction for Criminal Offense [Section 164(1)(d)]
 If a person has been convicted of any offense involving moral turpitude and sentenced to
imprisonment of 6 months or more, they are disqualified for 5 years from the date of release.
 If the imprisonment is for 7 years or more, the person is permanently disqualified.
4. Disqualified by Court or Tribunal [Section 164(1)(e)]
 A person disqualified by a competent court or tribunal cannot be appointed as a director.
5. Non-Payment of Calls on Shares [Section 164(1)(f)]
 If a director has not paid calls on shares (amount due on their shares) for 6 months, they are
disqualified.
6. Failure to File Financial Statements or Annual Returns [Section 164(2)(a)]
 If a director is associated with a company that has not filed financial statements or annual returns
for 3 consecutive financial years, they are disqualified for 5 years.
7. Failure to Repay Deposits, Debentures, or Interest [Section 164(2)(b)]
 If a company fails to repay deposits, debentures, or interest and the director is responsible, they are
disqualified for 5 years.
8. Holding Directorships Beyond Limit [Section 165]
 A person cannot be a director in more than 20 companies at a time.
 Out of these, only 10 can be public companies.
 If a director exceeds this limit, they must resign from excess directorships within 15 days.
9. Conviction for an Offense Under the Companies Act [Section 164(1)(g)]
 If a director is found guilty of an offense under the Companies Act and a court bars them from
holding office, they are disqualified.
III. Consequences of Disqualification
1. Immediate Removal from Directorship
o If a director is disqualified under Section 164(1), they must vacate their position immediately.
2. Company Cannot Reappoint Disqualified Directors
o If a director is disqualified under Section 164(2), they cannot be reappointed in any company for 5
years.
3. Liability for Company Non-Compliance
o Disqualified directors may be held personally liable for any company violations during their tenure.
4. Restrictions on Filing with MCA
o The Director Identification Number (DIN) of disqualified directors may be deactivated,
preventing them from signing or filing documents.

STA 77
IV. Case Law: Vikram Ahuja v. Greenstone Investments (2021)
Facts:
 The Registrar of Companies (ROC) disqualified multiple directors for non-filing of financial
statements under Section 164(2)(a).
 The directors challenged this decision, arguing that the disqualification should only apply to the
specific company in default, not all companies they were part of.
Judgment:
 The Delhi High Court ruled that disqualification under Section 164(2) applies only to future
appointments, not existing directorships.
 This clarified the retrospective application of the law and provided relief to directors.
Significance:
 Reinforced natural justice principles.
 Highlighted the need for directors to ensure timely filing of company financials to avoid
disqualification.
V. Key Takeaways
Aspect Qualifications Disqualifications
Legal DIN, Competency, Age, Shareholding Insolvency, Criminal Conviction, Non-
Requirement (if applicable) Compliance, Director Limit
Disqualification applies to past misconduct,
Applicability All directors must meet basic criteria
company violations
Consequences Eligible for directorship Removal, Ban for 5 years, Personal Liability
Conclusion
The Companies Act, 2013 ensures that only competent, ethical, and responsible individuals serve as
directors. By imposing minimum qualifications and strict disqualifications, the Act maintains corporate
governance and accountability.

Powers of Directors
Directors are the key decision-makers in a company. The Companies Act, 2013 defines their powers,
duties, and limitations to ensure corporate governance. Directors derive their powers from the
Memorandum of Association (MoA), Articles of Association (AoA), and statutory provisions of the Act.
1. General Powers of Directors
(i) Powers as Agents of the Company
 Directors act as agents when they sign contracts, make decisions, and deal with third parties on
behalf of the company.
 The company is bound by their actions, as long as they act within their authority.
(ii) Powers as Trustees
 Directors hold and manage the company's assets in a fiduciary capacity.
 They must act in good faith for the benefit of shareholders and the company.
(iii) Powers as Officers of the Company
 Directors ensure compliance with the Companies Act, 2013 and other applicable laws.
 They are responsible for financial disclosures, audits, and statutory filings.

STA 78
2. Powers of the Board of Directors (Section 179 of the Companies Act, 2013)
The Board of Directors (BoD) collectively exercises the following powers:
(i) General Management Powers
 Direct and control the company's affairs.
 Appoint, remove, and oversee the performance of the Managing Director (MD) and other
executives.
(ii) Financial Powers
 Approve financial statements and company accounts.
 Issue shares, debentures, or securities.
 Borrow money and approve loans.
(iii) Investment and Expansion Powers
 Approve mergers, acquisitions, and expansion projects.
 Invest company funds and approve large capital expenditures.
(iv) Legal and Compliance Powers
 Ensure compliance with taxation, labor laws, and corporate governance.
 Represent the company in legal matters.
(v) Power to Appoint Committees
 The Board can delegate powers to committees (e.g., Audit Committee, Remuneration Committee)
for efficient decision-making.
3. Powers Exercisable Only by the Board in a Board Meeting (Section 179(3))
Certain key decisions can only be taken in a Board Meeting through a resolution. These include:
1. Making calls on shareholders for unpaid share capital.
2. Authorizing buyback of securities.
3. Issuing securities (shares, debentures, bonds, etc.).
4. Borrowing money beyond paid-up share capital and free reserves.
5. Investing company funds.
6. Granting loans, giving guarantees, or providing securities for loans.
7. Approving financial statements and board reports.
8. Diversifying the business of the company.
9. Acquiring or selling significant assets of the company.
Note: These decisions require the approval of a majority of directors present in the meeting.
4. Powers Requiring Shareholders’ Approval (Section 180 of the Companies Act, 2013)
Some powers cannot be exercised by the Board alone and require approval in a General Meeting
(AGM/EGM) through a special resolution:
1. Selling, leasing, or disposing of the whole or a substantial part of the company’s undertaking.
2. Borrowing money beyond the paid-up share capital and free reserves.
3. Giving loans, guarantees, or security that exceeds prescribed limits.
4. Investing company funds in another company beyond specified limits.
Note: These provisions apply to public companies and private companies that are subsidiaries of public
companies.
5. Powers Delegated to Individual Directors
The Board of Directors can delegate some of their powers to:
 The Managing Director (MD)
 The Whole-Time Director (WTD)
 The CEO or other officers

STA 79
Examples of delegated powers:
 Approving routine contracts.
 Hiring and firing employees.
 Managing day-to-day operations.
6. Powers of Specific Types of Directors
(i) Managing Director (MD) [Section 2(54)]
 Has substantial management control over the company.
 Can take decisions independently within limits set by the Board.
(ii) Whole-Time Director (WTD) [Section 2(94)]
 Works full-time for the company and has operational control.
(iii) Independent Director [Section 149(6)]
 Provides oversight and ensures corporate governance.
 Does not have management control but can participate in key decisions.
(iv) Nominee Director
 Represents the interests of investors, financial institutions, or government bodies.
7. Limitations and Restrictions on Directors' Powers
(i) Directors Must Act Within Their Authority (Ultra Vires Doctrine)
 Directors cannot act beyond the powers given by the Companies Act, MoA, or AoA.
 If they do, their actions are void and can be challenged in court.
(ii) Prohibition on Fraudulent Transactions (Section 447 & 448)
 Directors cannot engage in fraudulent activities.
 Violations can lead to imprisonment and fines.
(iii) Restrictions on Loans to Directors (Section 185)
 A company cannot give loans or guarantees to its directors or their relatives, except in specific
circumstances.
(iv) Directors’ Liability for Mismanagement (Section 166)
 Directors must act in good faith and avoid conflicts of interest.
 Failure to do so can lead to legal liability.
Case Law: Nanalal Zaver v. Bombay Life Assurance Co. Ltd. (1950 AIR 172)
Facts:
 Directors of a company attempted to issue new shares to maintain their control over the
company.
 The shareholders challenged the decision.
Judgment:
 The Supreme Court ruled that directors must act in the company’s interest and not for their
personal benefit.
 Any action taken in bad faith can be challenged and declared void.
Key Takeaway:
 Directors must exercise their powers in good faith and for the benefit of all shareholders.
Conclusion
The Companies Act, 2013 provides a well-defined structure for directors’ powers, ensuring transparency,
accountability, and fairness.
 Board powers allow them to manage and make key decisions.
 Certain decisions require shareholder approval to prevent misuse of power.
 Directors must act in good faith and comply with legal and fiduciary duties.

STA 80
Rights and Duties of Directors
Directors play a pivotal role in corporate governance, ensuring that a company operates efficiently while
complying with legal and ethical standards. The Companies Act, 2013 defines their rights and duties to
ensure transparency, accountability, and protection of stakeholders' interests.
Rights of Directors
1. Right to Participate in Board Meetings
Directors have the right to attend and participate in board meetings, express their views, and contribute
to decision-making. This right is essential for corporate governance and operational oversight.
2. Right to Access Company Records and Financials
Directors are entitled to inspect the company's books, records, financial statements, and audit reports.
This right helps them monitor the company’s financial health and compliance status.
3. Right to Exercise Independent Judgment
Independent and non-executive directors have the right to express their opinions freely in board
meetings and to dissent when necessary. This ensures unbiased decision-making and good corporate
governance.
4. Right to Receive Remuneration
Executive and independent directors are entitled to remuneration as per Section 197 of the Act. Their
compensation can be in the form of salary, commission, or profit-based incentives, subject to shareholder
approval.
5. Right to Delegate Authority
A director can delegate tasks and responsibilities to other officers or committees, provided that such
delegation aligns with the Articles of Association (AoA) and board policies.
6. Right to Seek Indemnity and Protection
Under Section 197(13), directors have the right to be indemnified against liabilities arising from actions
taken in good faith on behalf of the company. Companies can also provide Directors and Officers (D&O)
Insurance for protection against legal claims.
7. Right to Be Heard Before Removal
If a director is to be removed, Section 169 mandates that they must be given an opportunity to be heard
before their removal. This ensures fairness and transparency.
8. Right to Call for General Meetings
Directors can call for an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) if necessary. This right is crucial when
urgent shareholder intervention is required.
9. Right to Oppose Unlawful Activities
Directors have the right to challenge and refuse to participate in any fraudulent, illegal, or unethical
activities. If a director resigns due to misconduct in the company, they must ensure their reasons are
documented.
10. Right to Sue for Defamation or Wrongful Removal
If a director is wrongfully removed or defamed in connection with their role, they have the right to take
legal action against the company or individuals responsible.
Duties of Directors (Section 166 of the Companies Act, 2013)
1. Duty to Act in Good Faith
Directors must act honestly and in the best interest of the company, its employees, shareholders, and the
overall business ecosystem.
2. Duty to Exercise Due Care, Skill, and Diligence
STA 81
Directors must use their knowledge, experience, and expertise to make informed decisions. They should
take reasonable steps to ensure that the company operates within the law.
3. Duty to Avoid Conflicts of Interest
Under Section 166(4), directors should disclose their financial interests in company contracts or
transactions. They must not misuse their position for personal gain.
4. Duty to Ensure Compliance with Laws
Directors are responsible for ensuring that the company follows all applicable laws, including labor laws,
taxation laws, environmental laws, and regulatory filings.
5. Duty to Prevent Misuse of Position
Directors should not use their power or confidential company information for personal benefits or for the
advantage of third parties.
6. Duty to Act According to the Articles of Association (AoA)
Directors must act in accordance with the company’s Articles of Association and any shareholder
agreements. They should not overstep their authority.
7. Duty to Maintain Confidentiality
Directors must protect confidential information about the company, its business strategies, and financial
dealings. Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive data can lead to legal consequences.
8. Duty to Avoid Insider Trading
Under SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015, directors must not use undisclosed
company information to trade shares for personal gain or to benefit others.
9. Duty to Act in the Best Interest of Stakeholders
Directors must consider the interests of shareholders, employees, customers, creditors, and society
while making decisions.
10. Duty to Disclose Financial Interests and Related Party Transactions
Directors must disclose their direct or indirect financial interests in company dealings. Under Section 188,
approval from the Board or shareholders may be required for such transactions.
11. Duty Not to Achieve Unlawful Gains
As per Section 166(5), directors must not make any undue gains through their position. Any wrongful
profits must be returned to the company.
12. Duty to Attend Board Meetings
Regular attendance at board meetings is a legal obligation. If a director is absent for more than 12
months, their position may be vacated as per Section 167(1)(b).
13. Duty to Ensure Proper Maintenance of Accounts
Directors must ensure that the company maintains proper books of accounts and financial records as
required under Section 128 of the Companies Act.
14. Duty to Sign Statutory Documents
Directors are responsible for signing important corporate documents, such as financial statements, audit
reports, and regulatory filings, ensuring their accuracy and authenticity.
15. Duty to File Annual Returns and Disclosures
Under Section 92, directors must ensure timely filing of Annual Returns (MGT-7) and other disclosures
with the Registrar of Companies (ROC).
Conclusion:
The Companies Act, 2013 clearly defines the rights and duties of directors to promote corporate transparency,
accountability, and ethical governance. While directors have significant authority, they must always act in the best
interest of the company and its stakeholders. Failure to fulfill their duties can result in penalties, legal liabilities, and
even disqualification from directorship under Section 164 of the Act.
STA 82
Corporate Governance and Role of Directors
Corporate Governance refers to the system of rules, practices, and processes by which a company is
directed and controlled. It ensures transparency, accountability, and fairness in a company’s relationship
with its stakeholders, including shareholders, employees, customers, and the government.
The Companies Act, 2013 introduced several provisions to strengthen corporate governance in India,
emphasizing board independence, ethical management, and shareholder protection.
Key Principles of Corporate Governance
1. Transparency: Ensuring accurate and timely disclosure of financial and operational information.
2. Accountability: Holding the board and management accountable for company decisions.
3. Fairness: Treating all shareholders and stakeholders equitably.
4. Responsibility: Ensuring compliance with legal and ethical standards.
5. Independence: Encouraging the presence of independent directors for unbiased decision-making.
Role of Directors in Corporate Governance (Under the Companies Act, 2013)
Directors play a critical role in corporate governance by making strategic decisions and ensuring
compliance with legal and ethical obligations. The Act defines various responsibilities for directors to
promote good governance.
1. Ensuring Compliance with Laws and Regulations
Directors must ensure that the company adheres to all laws, including the Companies Act, 2013, SEBI
regulations, and tax laws.
2. Duty of Care and Diligence (Section 166)
Directors must act prudently and exercise due diligence while making decisions, ensuring they serve the
best interests of the company.
3. Role in Financial Oversight
The board, particularly audit committees, is responsible for overseeing financial reporting, audits, and
risk management. Directors must ensure that financial statements reflect an accurate picture of the
company’s performance.
4. Maintaining Ethical Standards and Preventing Fraud
Under Section 447, directors can be held liable for fraud if they engage in or fail to prevent corporate
misconduct. Directors must ensure ethical business practices.
5. Appointment of Independent Directors (Section 149(6))
To promote unbiased decision-making, listed companies must appoint at least one-third of their board as
independent directors.
6. Role in Shareholder Protection
Directors must ensure fair treatment of minority shareholders and uphold their rights under Section 241-
242, preventing oppression and mismanagement.
7. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) (Section 135)
Directors must oversee CSR initiatives, ensuring that companies spend at least 2% of their net profits on
social causes, if applicable.
8. Avoiding Conflict of Interest (Section 188)
Directors must disclose any financial interests in company transactions and abstain from voting on related
party transactions.
9. Board Meetings and Decision-Making (Section 173)
Directors must actively participate in board meetings and contribute to strategic decision-making.
10. Insider Trading Prohibition

STA 83
Under SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015, directors must not misuse company
information for personal gain.
Example: Corporate Governance Failure in a Listed Company
Example: Satyam Computer Services (2009 Scam)
 What Happened? The company’s founder, Ramalinga Raju, manipulated financial statements by
inflating profits and falsifying accounts.
 Governance Failure: The board of directors failed to exercise due diligence, and there was a lack
of transparency and independent oversight.
 Outcome: The scandal led to stricter governance norms in India, influencing the provisions of the
Companies Act, 2013.
Case Law: Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. Cyrus Mistry (2021)
Facts:
 Cyrus Mistry was removed as the Chairman of Tata Sons by the board in 2016.
 He alleged corporate governance failures, lack of transparency, and oppression of minority
shareholders.
Judgment:
 The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Tata Sons, holding that Mistry’s removal was lawful and
within the company's board powers.
 It clarified the importance of board autonomy and shareholder governance.
Significance for Corporate Governance:
 The case reinforced that boards have the authority to make strategic decisions, but they must
follow governance norms.
 It highlighted the need for transparency, fair treatment of shareholders, and director
independence.
Conclusion
Corporate Governance ensures ethical and responsible management of a company, protecting
shareholders and stakeholders. The Companies Act, 2013 has significantly strengthened governance
norms in India, with directors playing a pivotal role in ensuring compliance, transparency, and ethical
business practices.

Meetings and proceedings

A meeting is a formal gathering of individuals or groups to discuss, deliberate, and make decisions on
matters of common interest. In the corporate context, meetings are held by shareholders, directors, or
committees to ensure effective decision-making and governance.
Under the Companies Act, 2013, meetings are legally recognized forums where resolutions are passed to
guide the company’s functioning.
Definition of Meetings
A meeting is defined as an official gathering of two or more persons for a lawful purpose, conducted as
per prescribed legal and procedural norms.
According to Section 96 of the Companies Act, 2013, certain types of meetings are mandatory for
companies to ensure compliance and transparency.
Proceedings refer to the discussions, resolutions, and actions taken during a meeting. They are
documented as minutes to serve as an official record of decisions made. The proceedings of company
meetings must follow the Companies Act, 2013, and the company’s Articles of Association (AoA).

STA 84
Overview of Meetings and Proceedings under the Companies Act, 2013
The Companies Act, 2013 regulates various meetings to ensure corporate governance, accountability, and
compliance. These meetings facilitate decision-making by shareholders and directors. The proceedings of
these meetings must adhere to legal requirements, including notice, quorum, voting, and recording of
minutes.
Types of Meetings under the Companies Act, 2013
1. Shareholders’ Meetings
These meetings involve company shareholders and are crucial for approving significant decisions.
(i) Annual General Meeting (AGM) [Section 96]
 Mandatory for every company except One-Person Companies (OPCs).
 Must be held within 6 months of the financial year-end but not beyond 15 months from the
previous AGM.
 Key agendas include approval of financial statements, declaration of dividends, appointment of
directors and auditors.
(ii) Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) [Section 100]
 Called for urgent matters that require shareholder approval before the next AGM.
 Can be convened by the Board of Directors or shareholders holding at least 10% of voting power.
(iii) Class Meetings
 Held for a particular class of shareholders (e.g., preference shareholders) when their rights are
affected.
 Decisions require a special resolution.
2. Board Meetings
These involve the company’s directors and are essential for strategic and operational decision-making.
(i) Board Meetings [Section 173]
 The first board meeting must be held within 30 days of incorporation.
 A minimum of 4 board meetings must be held every year, ensuring a gap of no more than 120
days between two meetings.
(ii) Committee Meetings
 Specialized committees like Audit Committee, Nomination and Remuneration Committee, and
CSR Committee hold meetings for specific governance functions.
3. Creditors’ Meetings
 Held when the company needs approval from creditors, especially in cases of compromise,
arrangement, or winding up.
 Governed by Section 230-232 of the Companies Act.
4. Statutory and Regulatory Meetings
Certain companies may need to hold statutory meetings as required by regulatory authorities, such as
SEBI for listed companies.
Key Aspects of Proceedings in Company Meetings
1. Notice of Meeting [Section 101]
 A minimum 21-day notice is required for general meetings.
 Must include agenda, date, time, and venue.
2. Quorum [Section 103]
 The minimum number of members required to legally conduct a meeting.
 For private companies: 2 members.

STA 85
  For public companies:
o Up to 1000 members → 5 members.
o 1001-5000 members → 15 members.
o Above 5000 members → 30 members.
3. Voting and Resolutions [Section 110]
 Decisions in meetings are made through ordinary resolutions (simple majority) or special
resolutions (75% majority).
 Voting can be conducted via show of hands, electronic voting (e-voting), or postal ballot.
4. Recording of Minutes [Section 118]
 The proceedings of a meeting must be documented in the Minutes Book within 30 days of the
meeting.
 Signed by the Chairperson and preserved for future reference.
Example: AGM of Reliance Industries Limited (RIL)
Reliance Industries Ltd. holds an Annual General Meeting (AGM) every year where its Chairman, Mukesh
Ambani, presents the company’s financial results, future plans, and dividends. Shareholders vote on key
resolutions, ensuring corporate accountability.
Case Law: Bajaj Auto Ltd. v. N.K. Firodia (1971)
Facts:
 A dispute arose regarding the rejection of a shareholder’s nomination for the company’s board.
 The shareholder alleged that the board’s decision was biased and unfair.
Judgment:
 The Supreme Court ruled that board meetings and proceedings must be conducted in good faith,
ensuring transparency and fairness.
 Directors cannot reject nominations arbitrarily and must act in the company’s best interest.
Significance:
 Reinforced the importance of fair governance and transparency in corporate meetings.
 Ensured that shareholders' rights are protected during company meetings.
Conclusion
Meetings and proceedings are vital for corporate governance, ensuring that key decisions are taken
democratically and legally. The Companies Act, 2013 lays down clear provisions regarding different types
of meetings, quorum, voting, and documentation of proceedings to promote transparency,
accountability, and compliance in corporate decision-making.

Kinds of Meetings
Meetings play a crucial role in the corporate decision-making process, ensuring transparency,
accountability, and legal compliance. The Companies Act, 2013 prescribes different types of meetings for
shareholders, directors, and creditors to facilitate proper governance.
These meetings can be broadly categorized into:
1. Shareholders’ Meetings
2. Board Meetings
3. Creditors’ and Debenture Holders’ Meetings
4. Other Statutory and Regulatory Meetings
1. Shareholders’ Meetings
Shareholders’ meetings involve members (shareholders) of the company and are held to approve key
corporate decisions.
STA 86
(i) Annual General Meeting (AGM) [Section 96]
The AGM is a mandatory meeting for all public and private companies (except One-Person Companies -
OPCs).
Purpose of AGM
 Approval of financial statements.
 Declaration of dividends.
 Appointment or reappointment of directors.
 Appointment or reappointment of auditors.
 Review and approval of board reports.
Timeframe for Holding AGM
 First AGM: Within 9 months from the end of the first financial year (no need if held within this
time).
 Subsequent AGMs: Must be held within 6 months from the end of the financial year, and the gap
between two AGMs should not exceed 15 months.
Notice Requirement
A 21-day clear notice must be sent to all members, directors, and auditors before the AGM.
(ii) Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) [Section 100]
An EGM is held when urgent decisions need to be taken before the next AGM.
Who Can Call an EGM?
 The Board of Directors.
 Shareholders holding at least 10% of paid-up capital (or voting rights).
 The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) can order an EGM if the board fails to call one.
Common Agendas in EGM
 Approval of mergers and acquisitions.
 Alteration of Articles of Association (AoA) or Memorandum of Association (MoA).
 Raising additional capital.
(iii) Class Meetings
Class meetings are held when decisions affect a specific class of shareholders, such as preference
shareholders or debenture holders.
Key Features
 Only shareholders of the concerned class attend.
 Typically required when modifying the rights, privileges, or liabilities of a specific class.
 Resolutions must be passed by a special majority (75% approval).
2. Board Meetings
Board meetings involve directors and are crucial for strategic decision-making and compliance.
(i) Board Meetings [Section 173]
Board meetings are held for directors to discuss company policies, financial performance, and future
strategies.
Rules for Board Meetings
 The first board meeting must be held within 30 days of incorporation.
 At least four board meetings per year, ensuring that the gap between two meetings does not
exceed 120 days.
Notice Requirement
A minimum 7-day notice must be sent to all directors before the meeting.
(ii) Committee Meetings
STA 87
Certain companies must constitute specific committees to oversee governance matters.
Key Committees and Their Meetings
 Audit Committee Meeting [Section 177]: Reviews financial reports, internal controls, and auditor
performance.
 Nomination and Remuneration Committee Meeting [Section 178]: Decides on director
appointments and executive compensation.
 Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Committee Meeting [Section 135]: Reviews and monitors
CSR initiatives.
3. Creditors’ and Debenture Holders’ Meetings
(i) Creditors’ Meeting [Sections 230-232]
Held when the company plans restructuring, mergers, or arrangements affecting creditors.
Purpose
 To approve debt restructuring plans.
 To negotiate terms for loan settlements.
 To discuss winding-up proceedings.
A majority (75%) of creditors must approve any restructuring or settlement plan.
(ii) Debenture Holders’ Meeting
Debenture holders invest in the company's debt instruments (debentures) and have specific rights.
Purpose
 To approve changes in debenture terms.
 To discuss repayment schedules.
4. Other Statutory and Regulatory Meetings
(i) Statutory Meeting (for Public Companies) [Repealed but relevant historically]
Previously required for public companies to inform members about financial status and business
progress.
(ii) Meeting of Creditors and Contributors (During Winding Up) [Section 287]
When a company is being liquidated, meetings of creditors and contributors (shareholders) are called to:
 Discuss asset distribution.
 Approve settlement agreements.
(iii) National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) Meetings
 Called for company disputes, shareholder grievances, or oppression cases.
 NCLT can order a meeting in case of corporate mismanagement.
Proceedings and Legal Compliance in Meetings
1. Notice of Meetings
 AGM & EGM: 21-day clear notice.
 Board Meeting: 7-day notice.
 Sent via registered post, electronic means, or hand delivery.
2. Quorum (Minimum Attendance Required) [Section 103]
For Shareholders' Meetings:
 Private company: Minimum 2 members.
 Public company:
o Up to 1000 members → 5 members.
o 1001-5000 members → 15 members.
o Above 5000 members → 30 members.

STA 88
For Board Meetings:
 1/3rd of total directors or minimum 2 directors, whichever is higher.
3. Voting and Resolutions [Section 110]
Decisions in meetings are made by:
 Ordinary Resolution (Simple Majority – More than 50%).
 Special Resolution (Super Majority – 75% Approval).
 Voting methods: Show of hands, poll voting, electronic voting (e-voting), and postal ballot.
4. Recording of Minutes [Section 118]
 Minutes must be recorded within 30 days of the meeting.
 Signed by the Chairperson and stored for future legal reference.
Example: Reliance Industries AGM
Reliance Industries Ltd. conducts AGMs annually, where Mukesh Ambani presents the company’s
financial reports, new projects, and dividends. Shareholders participate in e-voting for major decisions.
Case Law: Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) v. Escorts Ltd. (1986)
Facts:
 LIC, a major shareholder in Escorts Ltd., wanted to call an EGM to remove certain directors.
 Escorts Ltd. challenged LIC’s right to call an EGM.
Judgment:
 The Supreme Court upheld LIC’s right to call an EGM, reinforcing shareholder rights.
Significance:
 Strengthened the importance of corporate democracy.
 Highlighted the power of shareholders in decision-making.
Conclusion
Meetings are a fundamental part of corporate governance, ensuring transparency, compliance, and
accountability. The Companies Act, 2013 provides clear guidelines on conducting different types of
meetings, ensuring that companies function legally and ethically.

Statutory meeting
A Statutory Meeting was a mandatory meeting required under the Companies Act, 1956, for all public
limited companies. It had to be held once in the company's lifetime, within a specified period after
incorporation. However, under the Companies Act, 2013, the statutory meeting requirement has been
removed.
Why is it Important?
Even though the statutory meeting is no longer a requirement under the Companies Act, 2013,
understanding its purpose is crucial, as it was designed to ensure early corporate transparency and
governance.
Purpose of Statutory Meeting
The main objective of a statutory meeting was to provide shareholders with a clear understanding of the
company’s financial position and business prospects at an early stage.
Key Purposes:
1. Informing Shareholders About Initial Business Progress
 Allowed shareholders to review the financial performance and business activities shortly after
incorporation.
 Provided a report on how initial funds were utilized.

STA 89
2. Reviewing Share Capital and Business Status
 Gave an overview of issued, allotted, and paid-up share capital.
 Ensured proper utilization of capital for the company’s objectives.
3. Ensuring Transparency and Accountability
 Enabled shareholders to ask questions and seek clarifications from directors.
 Helped in identifying financial discrepancies early.
4. Discussing Future Plans and Strategies
 Provided an opportunity for the Board of Directors to share future plans, expansions, and
objectives.
 Helped shareholders align their expectations with company policies.
5. Allowing Shareholders to Raise Concerns
 Shareholders could suggest changes, raise concerns, or seek improvements.
 Strengthened corporate governance and investor confidence.
Requirements of a Statutory Meeting (Under Companies Act, 1956)
1. Applicability
o Applied only to public limited companies.
o Private companies and One Person Companies (OPCs) were exempt.
2. Timeframe
o Had to be conducted within 6 months but not earlier than 1 month from the company’s
commencement of business.
3. Statutory Report
o The company had to send a "Statutory Report" to all members at least 21 days before the
meeting.
o This report included details on shares allotted, cash received, directors, contracts, and
financial status.
4. Filing with the Registrar of Companies (ROC)
o A copy of the Statutory Report had to be filed with the Registrar of Companies (ROC) for
legal compliance.
5. Quorum
o A minimum number of shareholders (as per the Articles of Association) had to be present
to validate the meeting.
Abolition of Statutory Meeting in Companies Act, 2013
The Companies Act, 2013 removed the requirement of a statutory meeting. Instead, it strengthened
Annual General Meetings (AGMs) and Board Meetings to ensure continuous corporate governance.
Why was it Removed?
 It was considered redundant since AGMs and Board Meetings already fulfilled its objectives.
 To reduce compliance burden on companies.
 Technological advancements (e.g., electronic disclosures, regulatory filings) made it unnecessary.
Conclusion
Although the statutory meeting no longer exists under the Companies Act, 2013, its purpose remains
relevant. Companies now ensure transparency through AGMs, Board Meetings, and regulatory filings.
The shift reflects a move towards more dynamic, ongoing governance rather than a one-time
compliance requirement.

STA 90
Statutory report
A Statutory Report is a mandatory report that was previously required under the Companies Act, 1956
for public companies before their first Annual General Meeting (AGM). It provided details about the
company's financial position, share capital, business operations, and management affairs.
However, under the Companies Act, 2013, the requirement for a Statutory Report has been abolished.
Instead, companies must comply with other disclosure requirements, such as the Board’s Report (Section
134), Annual Financial Statements (Section 129), and Directors’ Report.
Even though the specific requirement of a statutory report has been removed, understanding its historical
importance helps in grasping how corporate governance and transparency have evolved in India.
Process Involved in Preparing the Statutory Report
Before its repeal, the process for preparing and presenting a Statutory Report involved several key steps:
1. Preparation of the Report
 The Board of Directors prepared the Statutory Report.
 It contained details of the company’s capital, shares allotted, receipts, payments, business
operations, and financial health.
2. Certification by Auditors
 The report had to be certified by the company’s auditors to ensure its accuracy and compliance
with accounting standards.
3. Sending the Report to Members
 The Statutory Report was sent to all shareholders at least 21 days before the statutory meeting.
4. Filing with the Registrar of Companies (ROC)
 A copy of the report was submitted to the ROC to ensure regulatory compliance.
5. Discussion at the Statutory Meeting
 The report was discussed in detail at the statutory meeting.
 Shareholders had the right to ask questions and seek clarifications on the company’s financial
position and business plans.
Key Contents of a Statutory Report
The statutory report included:
1. Total number of shares allotted and details of shareholders.
2. Receipts and payments made by the company.
3. Balance in hand (cash and bank balances).
4. Names, addresses, and occupations of directors, auditors, and key managerial personnel
(KMPs).
5. Contracts and agreements entered into by the company.
Statutory Report Under the Companies Act, 2013
Though the specific statutory report requirement was removed in the Companies Act, 2013, companies
must still prepare and submit various reports to ensure transparency and regulatory compliance, such as:
1. Board’s Report (Section 134)
 Includes financial performance, risk management, corporate governance details, and compliance
with laws.
2. Annual Return (Section 92)
 Filed with the Registrar of Companies (ROC), containing company details such as shareholding
pattern, directors, and business activities.
3. Financial Statements (Section 129)
 Companies must prepare and file audited financial statements annually.

STA 91
Conclusion
The Statutory Report was a crucial document under the Companies Act, 1956 for ensuring corporate
transparency, but it has been replaced by more detailed disclosures under the Companies Act, 2013.
Companies must still comply with regulations by submitting financial reports, board reports, and annual
returns to maintain transparency and accountability.

Annual General Meeting

An Annual General Meeting (AGM) is a mandatory yearly meeting held by a company to update
shareholders on financial performance, approve key decisions, and comply with legal requirements. It
provides a platform for shareholders to engage with management, approve financial statements, and
make important decisions regarding the company’s future.
Applicability of AGM (Section 96 of Companies Act, 2013)
 Applicable to:
o Private Limited Companies (except One-Person Companies - OPCs).
o Public Limited Companies.
 Not Applicable to:
o One-Person Companies (OPCs).
Purpose of an Annual General Meeting (AGM)
The AGM serves several key purposes, ensuring corporate transparency, governance, and compliance
with legal regulations.
1. Approval of Financial Statements
 Companies present their financial statements, including the Balance Sheet, Profit & Loss
Account, and Cash Flow Statement.
 Shareholders review and approve the financial performance of the company.
2. Declaration of Dividends
 The Board of Directors recommends dividends (if any) to shareholders for approval.
 Ensures fair distribution of profits among shareholders.
3. Appointment or Reappointment of Directors
 Retiring directors (as per rotation rules) may be reappointed or replaced.
 Shareholders vote to confirm new directors or extend the tenure of existing ones.
4. Appointment or Reappointment of Auditors
 Shareholders appoint or reappoint the statutory auditors who audit the company’s financial
statements.
 As per Section 139(1), auditors are appointed for five years, but their appointment is subject to
shareholder approval at each AGM.
5. Review and Approval of Board Reports
 The Board of Directors presents the Director’s Report, which provides insights into the company’s
business performance, future strategies, and governance practices.
 Shareholders may raise concerns or suggestions based on the report.
6. Discussion on Corporate Governance and Compliance
 Ensures that the company adheres to corporate governance norms and regulatory compliance.
 Shareholders may discuss issues like insider trading, business ethics, and regulatory changes.
7. Decision on Key Business Resolutions
 Certain business matters require shareholder approval through ordinary or special resolutions.
 Examples include:

STA 92
 o Alteration of Articles of Association (AoA) or Memorandum of Association (MoA).
o Changes in share capital structure.
o Approval of mergers, acquisitions, or joint ventures.
8. Addressing Shareholder Queries and Concerns
 Shareholders can ask questions about the company’s performance, strategy, and future plans.
 The Board and Management address shareholder concerns and provide clarifications.
9. Approval of Executive Compensation
 Shareholders approve the remuneration of directors, key managerial personnel (KMP), and
executives.
 Ensures that compensation aligns with company performance and governance standards.
Legal Provisions Related to AGM Under Companies Act, 2013
1. Timeframe for Holding AGM
 First AGM:
o Must be held within 9 months from the end of the first financial year.
o If held within this period, no need to hold another AGM in the same year.
 Subsequent AGMs:
o Must be held within 6 months from the end of the financial year.
o The gap between two AGMs should not exceed 15 months.
2. Notice of AGM (Section 101)
 A 21-day clear notice must be given to:
o All shareholders.
o Directors.
o Auditors.
 The notice must include:
o Date, time, and venue of the meeting.
o Agenda of the meeting.
o Resolutions to be passed.
3. Quorum for AGM (Section 103)
The minimum number of members (quorum) required to conduct an AGM:
 Private Companies: Minimum 2 members.
 Public Companies:
o Up to 1000 members → 5 members.
o 1001-5000 members → 15 members.
o Above 5000 members → 30 members.
4. Voting and Passing of Resolutions (Section 110)
 Resolutions can be passed through:
o Ordinary Resolution: Simple majority (>50%).
o Special Resolution: Super majority (≥75%).
 Voting methods:
o Show of hands.
o E-voting (mandatory for listed companies and large private companies).
o Postal ballot.
5. Filing with the Registrar of Companies (ROC)
 Post-AGM, companies must file:
o Financial statements (AOC-4) within 30 days.
o Annual return (MGT-7) within 60 days.
STA 93
Example: Reliance Industries AGM
Reliance Industries Ltd. conducts AGMs annually, where its chairman, Mukesh Ambani, presents the
company’s financial performance, new projects, and dividend declarations. Shareholders participate in
e-voting on key resolutions related to executive compensation, strategic business decisions, and
mergers.
Case Law: LIC v. Escorts Ltd. (1986)
Facts:
 LIC, a major shareholder of Escorts Ltd., sought to remove certain directors through an AGM
resolution.
 Escorts Ltd. challenged LIC’s voting rights in the AGM.
Judgment:
 The Supreme Court ruled that shareholders have the right to vote and express their will through
AGMs.
 The company must respect shareholder decisions made in AGMs, ensuring democratic
governance.
Significance:
 Strengthened shareholder rights in corporate decision-making.
 Reinforced the legal validity of AGM resolutions.
Conclusion
The Annual General Meeting (AGM) is a crucial event for companies under the Companies Act, 2013. It
ensures financial transparency, accountability, and corporate governance by allowing shareholders to
review company performance, approve key decisions, and raise concerns.

Extraordinary meeting
An Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) is a special meeting convened to discuss urgent or important
matters that cannot be postponed until the next Annual General Meeting (AGM).
While the AGM is mandatory, an EGM is called only when required. It allows shareholders to participate
in critical decisions that could impact the company’s future.
Purpose of an EGM
The EGM is held to address urgent business matters that need immediate shareholder approval.
Common Reasons for Holding an EGM:
1. Approval of Mergers & Acquisitions
o If the company plans to merge with another company or acquire a new business,
shareholder approval is required.
2. Alteration of Memorandum of Association (MoA) or Articles of Association (AoA)
o Any changes in the company’s objectives, share capital, or governance structure require
shareholder approval.
3. Appointment or Removal of Directors
o If a director is to be removed or appointed before the next AGM, an EGM is called.
4. Raising Additional Capital
o Companies may need shareholder approval to issue additional shares, debentures, or
borrow funds.
5. Declaration of Special Dividends
o If a company wants to distribute dividends beyond the usual AGM timeline, an EGM may
be called.
STA 94
 6. Legal or Regulatory Compliance
o If a company needs shareholder approval to comply with new laws, regulations, or court
orders, an EGM is necessary.
Process of Calling and Conducting an EGM Under the Companies Act, 2013
1. Who Can Call an EGM?
An EGM can be called by:
1. The Board of Directors (Section 100(1))
o The board may call an EGM whenever necessary to discuss urgent matters.
2. Shareholders (Members) [Section 100(2)]
o Shareholders holding at least 10% of the company’s paid-up share capital (with voting
rights) can request an EGM in writing.
3. The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) [Section 98]
o If the board fails to call an EGM despite a valid request, shareholders can approach the
NCLT to order the meeting.
2. Notice of EGM [Section 101]
 A clear 21-day notice must be given before the meeting.
 The notice must be sent to:
o All shareholders.
o Directors.
o Auditors of the company.
 The notice must include:
o Date, time, and venue of the meeting.
o Agenda of the meeting (business to be discussed).
o Explanatory statement explaining the rationale for calling the EGM.
3. Quorum for an EGM [Section 103]
The minimum number of members required to conduct an EGM is:
 Private company → At least 2 members.
 Public company:
o Up to 1000 members → At least 5 members.
o 1001-5000 members → At least 15 members.
o More than 5000 members → At least 30 members.
4. Voting and Resolutions at an EGM
Decisions at an EGM are made through voting.
 Ordinary Resolution: Requires a simple majority (more than 50%) of votes cast.
o Example: Appointment of directors or auditors.
 Special Resolution: Requires at least 75% of votes in favor.
o Example: Amendments to the MoA/AoA or approval of mergers.
Voting Methods:
 Show of hands.
 Poll voting.
 Electronic voting (e-voting) (mandatory for listed companies).
 Postal ballot (for companies with large shareholder bases).
5. Recording of Minutes [Section 118]
 The minutes of the EGM must be recorded and signed by the Chairperson within 30 days.
 The minutes serve as legal proof of the decisions made.

STA 95
Example: Tata Sons EGM (2016) - Removal of Cyrus Mistry
Tata Sons conducted an EGM in 2016 to remove Cyrus Mistry as Chairman. The decision was taken
urgently due to differences in business strategy.
 The board of directors recommended his removal.
 Shareholders approved the removal through voting at the EGM.
 The EGM was legally valid under the Companies Act, 2013.
Case Law: LIC v. Escorts Ltd. (1986)
Facts:
 LIC, a shareholder in Escorts Ltd., requested an EGM to remove certain directors.
 Escorts Ltd. refused to call the meeting.
 LIC approached the court to enforce its right to call an EGM.
Judgment:
 The Supreme Court ruled that shareholders have the right to call an EGM if they meet the legal
requirements.
 It reaffirmed shareholders’ powers in corporate decision-making.
Significance:
 Strengthened shareholder democracy.
 Ensured that the board cannot arbitrarily deny an EGM.
Conclusion
An Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) is a crucial tool for handling urgent business matters that
cannot wait for the next AGM. The Companies Act, 2013 provides clear guidelines for calling, conducting,
and documenting EGMs, ensuring transparency and shareholder rights.

Power of the Tribunal to order meeting

Under the Companies Act, 2013, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has the power to order a
meeting of members, creditors, or any other stakeholders when it is necessary to resolve company
matters. The key provisions governing this power are:
1. Section 97 – Tribunal’s Power to Call an Annual General Meeting (AGM)
2. Section 98 – Tribunal’s Power to Call Other Meetings (Including Extraordinary General Meetings
– EGM)
3. Section 230(1) – Tribunal-Ordered Meeting for Compromise or Arrangement
1. Tribunal’s Power to Call an AGM [Section 97]
When Can the Tribunal Order an AGM?
 Every company (except a One-Person Company) must hold an AGM every year as per Section 96
of the Act.
 If a company fails to hold an AGM within the prescribed time, any member (shareholder) of the
company can apply to the NCLT to order the meeting.
 The Tribunal may direct the company to hold the AGM within a specified time and may also give
further directions regarding the conduct of the meeting.
Legal Consequences for Non-Compliance
 If a company fails to comply with the Tribunal’s order, the company and its officers may be fined
up to ₹1,00,000, with an additional fine of ₹5,000 per day for continued failure.
2. Tribunal’s Power to Call an EGM or Other Meetings [Section 98]
When Can the Tribunal Order an EGM?

STA 96
  If it is impractical to call an EGM in the normal way (as per Section 100), the Tribunal can step in.
 Shareholders or members can apply to NCLT to order a meeting, especially when the board
refuses to call it.
 The Tribunal can set the date, time, venue, and method of conducting the meeting.
Purpose of Tribunal-Ordered EGMs
 To address shareholder grievances when the board refuses to act.
 To ensure urgent decisions are made without unnecessary delays.
 To protect minority shareholders from board misconduct.
Example:
If a company’s board ignores a valid shareholder request for an EGM (even if shareholders collectively
hold 10% of shares), they can approach NCLT under Section 98 to order the meeting.
3. Tribunal-Ordered Meetings for Compromise and Arrangements [Section 230(1)]
When Can the Tribunal Intervene?
 If a company proposes a merger, acquisition, or restructuring, it may need shareholder and
creditor approval.
 If the company fails to organize a meeting, the Tribunal can order a meeting of creditors or
members to approve the scheme.
Role of NCLT in Such Meetings
 The Tribunal ensures that all stakeholders get a fair chance to participate.
 It can modify the quorum, voting process, and timeline of the meeting to prevent deadlocks.
Example:
If a company fails to arrange a creditors' meeting for approving a merger, creditors can apply to NCLT to
direct the company to conduct the meeting.
Case Law: LIC v. Escorts Ltd. (1986)
Facts:
 LIC, a major shareholder in Escorts Ltd., requested an EGM to remove certain directors.
 The board refused to call the meeting.
 LIC approached the court (now NCLT would handle such matters) to enforce its rights.
Judgment:
 The Supreme Court ruled in favor of shareholder democracy.
 The Tribunal (or court) has the power to order meetings if justified.
Impact:
 Strengthened shareholder rights.
 Ensured that companies cannot arbitrarily refuse meetings.
Conclusion
The NCLT plays a crucial role in corporate governance by ensuring that companies hold AGMs, EGMs, and
creditor meetings when required. Sections 97, 98, and 230(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, give the
Tribunal broad powers to ensure that meetings are conducted fairly, shareholders' rights are upheld,
and corporate democracy is maintained.

Class meetings
A Class Meeting is a special meeting convened for a particular class of shareholders (such as preference
shareholders or equity shareholders) when decisions impact their rights, privileges, or obligations.
Unlike Annual General Meetings (AGMs) or Extraordinary General Meetings (EGMs), Class Meetings are
not for all shareholders but only for a specific category whose interests are directly affected.

STA 97
These meetings are governed under various provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, including Section 48
and Section 232(6), which deal with the variation of shareholder rights and compromise arrangements.
Purpose of Class Meetings
Class Meetings are conducted to seek approval or consent from a specific category of shareholders when:
1. Variation of Shareholders’ Rights (Section 48)
o If a company wishes to alter or change the rights attached to a particular class of shares, it
must obtain approval from that class in a meeting.
o Example: If preference shareholders are entitled to a fixed dividend rate, but the company
proposes to reduce it, their approval is required.
2. Approval for Mergers, Amalgamations, or Arrangements (Section 232(6))
o When a company is undergoing a merger, acquisition, or corporate restructuring,
approval from different classes of shareholders may be required separately.
o Example: Equity and preference shareholders may have different stakes in a merger, so
each class must approve the scheme individually.
3. Issuance of Additional Shares (Preferential Allotment)
o If a company issues new shares or convertible securities, existing shareholders' rights
might be affected, requiring a Class Meeting for approval.
4. Changes in Terms of Debentures or Bonds
o If a company wants to modify the interest rate, repayment period, or other conditions for
debenture holders, it must call a Class Meeting of debenture holders.
Process of Conducting a Class Meeting
1. Calling the Meeting
 The Board of Directors initiates the meeting when required.
 Court or Tribunal (NCLT) may also order a Class Meeting if shareholders raise a dispute regarding
their rights.
2. Notice of Class Meeting (Section 101)
 A clear 21-day notice must be given to the shareholders of that specific class.
 The notice must include:
o Date, time, and venue of the meeting.
o Agenda specifying the proposed variation of rights or other matters.
o Explanatory Statement explaining the rationale for the meeting.
3. Quorum Requirement (Section 103)
 At least two members of that class must be present to constitute a valid meeting.
 If the meeting is adjourned due to lack of quorum, the company may hold a second meeting with
no quorum requirement.
4. Voting and Approval
 Resolutions in Class Meetings are passed by:
o Ordinary Resolution – Simple majority (more than 50% votes).
o Special Resolution – At least 75% approval (required for major changes).
 Voting methods:
o Show of hands (for smaller companies).
o Poll voting (for larger shareholder groups).
o Electronic voting (e-voting) for listed companies.
5. Filing with the Registrar of Companies (ROC)
 If rights are altered, the company must file the resolution with the ROC within 30 days for
approval.
STA 98
Example: Tata Motors Class Meeting (2017)
Tata Motors issued differential voting rights (DVR) shares to raise capital. Since this decision affected
existing equity shareholders, a Class Meeting of equity shareholders was held to approve the plan.
Case Law: Miheer H. Mafatlal v. Mafatlal Industries Ltd. (1997)
Facts:
 A Class Meeting of shareholders was held to approve a merger.
 Some shareholders challenged the fairness of the merger and sought Tribunal intervention.
Judgment:
 The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Class Meetings if conducted fairly.
 Minority shareholders’ rights must be considered in such meetings.
Impact:
 Reinforced shareholder protection in restructuring cases.
 Ensured that Class Meetings remain transparent and fair.
Conclusion
Class Meetings are vital for protecting the rights of specific shareholder groups. The Companies Act,
2013, ensures that such meetings are conducted fairly, allowing affected shareholders to have a say in
critical decisions.

Requisites for a valid meeting

For any company meeting (AGM, EGM, Board Meeting, or Class Meeting) to be considered legally valid, it
must meet specific requirements laid down under the Companies Act, 2013. These requisites ensure
transparency, compliance, and fairness in decision-making.
The key requisites are:
1. Proper Authority to Convene the Meeting
A meeting must be called by a proper authority to be legally valid.
Who Can Call a Meeting?
 Board of Directors – Calls AGMs, EGMs, and Board Meetings.
 Shareholders (Members) – Can call an EGM if they hold at least 10% of the voting rights (Section
100).
 Tribunal (NCLT) – Can order a meeting if the company fails to convene it (Sections 97 & 98).
 Auditors – Can call a meeting in certain cases.
If a meeting is called without proper authority, it is invalid.
2. Proper Notice of the Meeting (Section 101)
A valid meeting requires a clear and timely notice to be sent to all eligible participants.
Key Requirements of a Valid Notice:
 Minimum 21 clear days' notice (excluding the day of sending and receiving).
 Sent to all shareholders, directors, and auditors.
 Must include:
o Date, time, and venue of the meeting.
o Agenda (business to be discussed).
o Explanatory Statement for special business (Section 102).
 Notice can be sent via email, registered post, courier, or hand delivery.
Failure to give proper notice invalidates the meeting and its decisions.

STA 99
3. Quorum (Section 103) – Minimum Attendance Required
A valid meeting requires a minimum number of members (quorum) to be present.
Quorum Requirements for Shareholders' Meetings:
 Private Company → At least 2 members.
 Public Company:
o Up to 1000 members → At least 5 members.
o 1001-5000 members → At least 15 members.
o More than 5000 members → At least 30 members.
Quorum for Board Meetings (Section 174):
 Minimum 2 directors or 1/3rd of the total number of directors (whichever is higher).
If the quorum is not met, the meeting must be adjourned and reconvened later.
4. Chairman of the Meeting (Section 104)
A meeting must have a Chairman to:
 Conduct the meeting fairly.
 Maintain order and discipline.
 Ensure that resolutions are properly discussed and voted upon.
Who Can Be the Chairman?
 Appointed as per the Articles of Association (AoA).
 If no provision is given, members can elect a Chairman during the meeting.
Without a Chairman, decisions made in the meeting may be challenged.
5. Proper Agenda and Business to Be Conducted
 The agenda should be clearly mentioned in the notice.
 Any new matter outside the agenda cannot be discussed unless permitted.
 Special Business requires an explanatory statement (Section 102).
If business not listed in the agenda is conducted, the meeting may be invalid.
6. Valid Voting and Passing of Resolutions
Decisions in a meeting are taken by voting.
Types of Resolutions:
1. Ordinary Resolution – Passed by more than 50% votes (e.g., appointment of directors).
2. Special Resolution – Requires at least 75% votes (e.g., amendments to MoA/AoA).
Voting Methods:
 Show of Hands – Used for small meetings.
 Poll Voting – Used when members demand a more accurate count.
 E-voting – Mandatory for listed companies.
 Postal Ballot – Used for companies with large shareholder bases.
Invalid voting procedures can make a meeting’s decisions null and void.
7. Recording of Minutes (Section 118)
After the meeting, minutes must be recorded to provide an official record.
Key Requirements for Minutes:
 Must include key discussions, decisions, and resolutions passed.
 Signed by the Chairman.
 Filed with the Registrar of Companies (ROC) when required.
If minutes are not recorded or are manipulated, the meeting’s validity can be challenged.
8. Compliance with Legal and Regulatory Requirements
All meetings must comply with:
STA 100
  Companies Act, 2013.
 Articles of Association (AoA) of the company.
 Secretarial Standards issued by ICSI.
If a meeting violates legal provisions, its decisions can be legally challenged.
Case Law: Shanti Prasad Jain v. Kalinga Tubes Ltd. (1965)
Facts:
 A shareholder challenged the validity of a meeting due to improper notice.
 The court ruled that "Proper Notice is mandatory for a valid meeting."
Judgment:
 Any decision made in a meeting without proper notice or quorum is invalid.
Conclusion
For a company meeting to be legally valid, it must meet several essential conditions, including proper
notice, quorum, voting, and record-keeping. Failure to comply can result in legal challenges and
nullification of decisions.

Proxy
A proxy is a person appointed by a shareholder to attend and vote on their behalf at a company meeting.
This provision allows shareholders who cannot be physically present to participate in decision-making
through an authorized representative.
The Companies Act, 2013, provides legal recognition to proxies, ensuring that shareholders’ rights are not
affected due to their absence.
Legal Provisions Governing Proxy (Section 105 of the Companies Act, 2013)
1. Who Can Appoint a Proxy?
 Any member of a company who is entitled to attend and vote at a meeting can appoint a proxy.
 The proxy need not be a member of the company, meaning a shareholder can appoint any
person to vote on their behalf.
2. Number of Proxies a Member Can Appoint
 A member can appoint only one proxy for each meeting.
 However, in the case of joint shareholders, the proxy is appointed by the shareholder whose
name appears first in the register.
3. How to Appoint a Proxy?
 The appointment must be made in writing using a proxy form.
 The form must be signed by the shareholder or their duly authorized representative.
 The proxy form must be submitted to the company at least 48 hours before the meeting.
4. Rights of a Proxy
 A proxy has the right to attend and vote at the meeting in the same manner as the shareholder.
 A proxy cannot speak at the meeting unless specifically authorized in the company's Articles of
Association (AoA).
5. Proxy for Private and Public Companies
 Private Companies: Can restrict proxy rights through their Articles of Association.
 Public Companies: Cannot restrict the proxy's rights as long as they comply with the Act.
6. Voting by Proxy
 The proxy can vote by show of hands or poll as per the voting procedure of the company.
 In e-voting cases, proxies may also vote electronically if permitted.

STA 101
Purpose of Proxy
 Ensures shareholder participation even when they cannot attend.
 Protects investor rights by allowing representation.
 Useful for institutional investors with large shareholdings who may not attend every meeting.
Example: Proxy Voting in Tata Sons Ltd.
In the Tata Sons boardroom battle (2016), many institutional shareholders used proxies to vote on the
removal of Cyrus Mistry as Chairman. The proxy system allowed absentee shareholders to influence
major decisions.
Case Law: Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund v. Kartik Das (1994)
Facts:
 A shareholder challenged the voting process, claiming proxies were not given proper rights.
Judgment:
 The Supreme Court held that proxies must be properly registered and their voting rights upheld,
as per Section 105 of the Act.
Impact:
 Reinforced legal sanctity of proxy voting.
 Ensured fair participation of absentee shareholders.
Conclusion
The concept of proxy under the Companies Act, 2013 is essential for maintaining shareholder democracy. It
ensures that shareholders can exercise their voting rights even when they cannot personally attend a meeting.
Proper procedures must be followed, including timely submission and valid authorization, to ensure the proxy’s
vote is legally recognized.

Resolutions
A resolution is a formal decision taken by a company’s shareholders or Board of Directors during a
general meeting or board meeting. It is passed after a discussion and a voting process, ensuring that
important decisions are recorded and legally binding.
Resolutions are essential for authorizing corporate actions like appointing directors, approving financial
statements, or making structural changes in a company.
Significance of Resolutions Under the Companies Act, 2013
1. Ensures Legal and Regulatory Compliance
 Certain corporate decisions, such as alteration of Articles of Association (AoA) or Memorandum of
Association (MoA), require approval by resolution as per the Companies Act, 2013.
 Ensures that companies follow proper governance procedures and remain compliant with the law.
2. Provides Clarity and Record of Decisions
 Resolutions document important company decisions, creating a formal record that can be
referred to later.
 Protects the company from legal disputes by proving that decisions were made lawfully.
3. Protects Shareholders’ Rights
 Shareholders participate in decision-making through voting on resolutions.
 Resolutions prevent arbitrary decisions by the Board, ensuring shareholder interests are
protected.
4. Mandatory for Corporate Actions
Many significant corporate actions require resolutions, such as:
 Issuing shares or debentures.
 Approving mergers and acquisitions.
STA 102
  Changing the company’s registered office.
5. Helps in Conflict Resolution
 Resolutions help resolve disputes by providing a structured way for decision-making through voting.
 Ensures transparency in cases where there are disagreements among directors or shareholders.
Types of Resolutions Under the Companies Act, 2013
1. Ordinary Resolution (Section 114(1))
 Passed by a simple majority (more than 50%) of the members present and voting.
 Used for routine decisions like:
o Appointment or removal of directors.
o Approval of annual accounts.
o Declaration of dividends.
2. Special Resolution (Section 114(2))
 Requires at least 75% of members’ approval.
 Necessary for significant corporate decisions, including:
o Alteration of MoA or AoA.
o Change in the company’s name.
o Reduction of share capital.
o Approval of mergers and acquisitions.
3. Board Resolution
 Passed by the Board of Directors in a board meeting.
 Used for decisions not requiring shareholder approval, such as:
o Appointment of key managerial personnel (KMP).
o Approval of contracts and borrowing limits.
o Opening a bank account.
4. Unanimous Resolution
 Requires 100% approval of members present and voting.
 Generally used for critical decisions like the removal of an auditor before the term ends.
Example: Reliance Industries' Special Resolution (2020)
In 2020, Reliance Industries Limited passed a special resolution to approve the sale of a 20% stake in its oil-to-
chemicals business to Saudi Aramco. This decision was significant as it required shareholder approval due to the
scale of the deal.
Case Law: Bajaj Auto Ltd. v. N.K. Firodia (1971)
Facts:
 A company passed a resolution rejecting a shareholder’s application for additional shares.
 The shareholder challenged the decision, arguing it was not passed with proper reasoning.
Judgment:
 The Supreme Court ruled that resolutions must be passed in good faith and in the interest of the company.
Impact:
 Ensured that companies cannot misuse resolutions to favor certain shareholders over others.
Conclusion: Resolutions play a vital role in corporate governance under the Companies Act, 2013. They ensure
legally valid decision-making, protect shareholders’ rights, and maintain transparency in company operations.

Minutes

STA 103
Minutes are the official written record of the proceedings of a meeting. They provide an accurate and
permanent record of the discussions, resolutions, and decisions taken during a company's meetings,
including Board Meetings, General Meetings, and Committee Meetings.
Under the Companies Act, 2013, maintaining proper minutes is a legal requirement to ensure
transparency, accountability, and compliance with corporate governance norms.
Legal Provisions Governing Minutes (Section 118 of the Companies Act, 2013)
1. Applicability of Minutes
Minutes must be recorded for the following meetings:
 Board Meetings (as per Section 173).
 General Meetings (AGMs, EGMs, and Class Meetings).
 Committee Meetings (Audit Committee, CSR Committee, etc.).
2. Manner of Recording Minutes
 Written Format: Minutes must be recorded in a bound book or stored electronically with proper
security measures.
 Chronological Order: Entries should be made date-wise for easy reference.
 Clarity and Accuracy: No alterations or manipulations are allowed once recorded.
3. Approval and Signing of Minutes
 Minutes of Board Meetings → Signed by the Chairman of the meeting or the next meeting.
 Minutes of General Meetings → Signed by the Chairman of the meeting.
 Timeframe for Signing → Within 30 days of the meeting.
4. Filing with the Registrar of Companies (ROC)
 Certain resolutions passed in meetings (such as those related to share capital, mergers, or
appointments) must be filed with the ROC within 30 days.
5. Inspection of Minutes
 Shareholders can inspect minutes of General Meetings.
 Minutes of Board Meetings are confidential and not accessible to shareholders unless required by
law.
Significance of Minutes in Corporate Governance
1. Legal Compliance and Record Keeping
Minutes serve as legal evidence of decisions taken in meetings. If a dispute arises, properly maintained
minutes act as proof of compliance with the law.
2. Transparency and Accountability
Minutes ensure that the decision-making process is clear and fair, protecting the interests of
shareholders and directors.
3. Protection in Legal Disputes
In case of litigation or investigation, minutes serve as a key document to verify that the company
followed proper procedures.
4. Reference for Future Decisions
Companies can refer to past minutes to understand the rationale behind previous decisions and maintain
continuity in governance.
5. Investor and Stakeholder Confidence
Properly maintained minutes enhance investor confidence, as they demonstrate that the company
follows corporate governance best practices.

STA 104
Example: Tata Sons Board Meeting Minutes (2016)
During the removal of Cyrus Mistry as Chairman of Tata Sons, the board meeting minutes played a
crucial role in legal proceedings. The content of the minutes helped validate the legality of the decision,
reinforcing their importance in corporate governance.
Case Law: S. Subramanian v. SICCL (2015)
Facts:
 A shareholder challenged a company decision, arguing that it was not recorded in the minutes
properly.
Judgment:
 The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) ruled that minutes are legally binding and should be
maintained accurately and transparently.
Impact:
 Reinforced the importance of maintaining proper records.
 Emphasized that failure to record minutes correctly can make decisions legally unenforceable.
Conclusion
Minutes are a crucial corporate document that ensures compliance, transparency, and accountability in
company decision-making. Under the Companies Act, 2013, properly maintained minutes help avoid legal
disputes, maintain corporate integrity, and serve as a reference for future governance.

Shareholders Activism
Shareholder activism refers to the efforts of shareholders to influence a company's decisions, policies,
or management actions to protect their interests. Activist shareholders use their voting rights, legal
provisions, and public influence to ensure corporate transparency, accountability, and value
enhancement.
This activism can take various forms, such as voting against board decisions, proposing resolutions,
engaging in negotiations, or even legal action.
Legal Framework of Shareholder Activism in India
The Companies Act, 2013, and regulations set by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI)
provide mechanisms for shareholder activism.
1. Shareholders’ Rights Under the Companies Act, 2013
 Right to Vote (Section 47): Shareholders can vote on key decisions, including mergers,
acquisitions, and director appointments.
 Right to Call an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) (Section 100): Shareholders holding at
least 10% of voting power can demand an EGM.
 Right to Inspect Books of Accounts (Section 171): Ensures transparency in financial matters.
 Right to File Class Action Suits (Section 245): Minority shareholders can sue for mismanagement
or oppression.
2. SEBI Regulations for Shareholder Protection
 SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015 ensure that listed companies follow strict governance norms.
 SEBI mandates e-voting for shareholders to express their views on resolutions.
 SEBI allows institutional investors to engage with company management through their
Stewardship Code.
Forms of Shareholder Activism
1. Voting at General Meetings
 Shareholders use their voting rights to approve or reject key corporate decisions.

STA 105
  Example: Rejecting excessive executive compensation or opposing an unfair merger.
2. Demanding Management Changes
 Activists may seek the removal of underperforming directors or CEOs.
 Example: In Tata Sons vs. Cyrus Mistry (2016), shareholders played a key role in leadership
changes.
3. Filing Class Action Suits (Section 245)
 Shareholders can sue for fraud, oppression, or mismanagement.
 Example: PNB Nirav Modi Scam (2018) – shareholders demanded accountability for financial
fraud.
4. Engaging in Public Campaigns
 Activists may raise concerns in the media or file petitions with regulators to push for corporate
governance reforms.
 Example: YES Bank Crisis (2020) – shareholders demanded stricter governance after financial
irregularities surfaced.
5. Proxy Battles
 Shareholders appoint proxies to influence voting outcomes at general meetings.
Example: Tata Sons vs. Cyrus Mistry (2016)
What Happened?
 Shareholders, led by Ratan Tata, voted to remove Cyrus Mistry as chairman of Tata Sons.
 Mistry’s supporters challenged the removal, citing mismanagement and lack of transparency.
 The case went to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) and later the Supreme
Court.
Outcome
 The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Tata Sons, stating that shareholder decisions must follow due
process and Articles of Association.
Case Law: Reliance Industries Ltd. (RIL) Shareholder Dispute (2021)
Facts:
 A group of shareholders opposed the merger of Reliance Retail with Future Group, citing unfair
terms.
 The dispute went to the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) and SEBI.
Judgment:
 SEBI ruled that shareholders must be given complete information before voting on mergers.
Impact:
 Strengthened shareholder rights in merger approvals.
Conclusion
Shareholder activism is a powerful tool for corporate accountability. The Companies Act, 2013, and SEBI
regulations provide multiple avenues for shareholders to challenge mismanagement, vote on key issues,
and influence corporate strategy.

STA 106
Corporate Social Responsibility
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) refers to a company’s ethical responsibility to contribute to social,
environmental, and economic development. It is a self-regulation mechanism where businesses
voluntarily undertake initiatives for social good, such as education, healthcare, poverty alleviation, and
environmental sustainability.
In India, CSR is legally mandated under the Companies Act, 2013, making it one of the first countries in
the world to do so.
Legal Framework: Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013
Applicability of CSR Provisions
CSR provisions apply to companies meeting any of the following criteria in a financial year:
1. Net worth of ₹500 crore or more, OR
2. Turnover of ₹1000 crore or more, OR
3. Net profit of ₹5 crore or more.
Such companies must:
 Spend at least 2% of their average net profits (last 3 years) on CSR activities.
 Form a CSR Committee to plan and oversee CSR initiatives.
Key Provisions of CSR (Companies Act, 2013 & CSR Rules, 2014)
1. CSR Committee (Section 135(1))
 Companies must form a CSR Committee with at least 3 directors, including one independent
director.
 The committee formulates and recommends the CSR policy and budget.
2. CSR Spending Requirement (Section 135(5))
 Companies must spend at least 2% of their average net profits on CSR activities.
 If a company fails to spend the required amount, it must provide an explanation in the Board’s
report.
 Unspent CSR funds must be transferred to a government-approved fund or used for CSR within 3
years.
3. CSR Activities (Schedule VII)
CSR spending must be directed towards activities such as:
 Eradicating hunger, poverty, and malnutrition.
 Promoting education and skill development.
 Ensuring environmental sustainability.
 Providing healthcare and sanitation.
 Women empowerment and gender equality.
 Supporting sports and rural development projects.
4. Reporting and Disclosure (Section 135(4))
 The company must disclose its CSR activities in the Board’s Annual Report.
 A detailed CSR policy must be published on the company’s website.
Significance of CSR in India
1. Legal Compliance & Corporate Accountability
With CSR made mandatory, companies are legally required to give back to society, ensuring better
corporate accountability.
2. Enhancing Brand Reputation
CSR initiatives boost corporate goodwill and customer trust, making companies more socially
responsible.
STA 107
3. Promoting Inclusive Growth
Companies contribute to nation-building by addressing social and environmental challenges.
4. Sustainability and Environmental Protection
CSR ensures businesses adopt sustainable practices, reducing their carbon footprint.
5. Employee and Investor Engagement
Companies engaged in CSR attract responsible investors and skilled employees who value ethical
businesses.
Example: Reliance Industries CSR Initiative
Reliance Industries Ltd. (RIL) runs the Reliance Foundation, which has spent ₹1,000+ crore on CSR
projects, including:
 Rural transformation projects benefiting 5,500+ villages.
 Healthcare initiatives like the Sir H.N. Reliance Foundation Hospital.
 Women empowerment programs promoting self-employment.
Case Law: Tech Mahindra Foundation Case
Facts:
 Tech Mahindra Ltd. was required to spend on CSR but failed to fully utilize the amount.
 The Registrar of Companies (ROC) questioned the company about unspent CSR funds.
Judgment:
 The company had to justify the shortfall and adjust the spending in the following financial year.
Impact:
 Strengthened CSR accountability and legal enforcement.
Conclusion
CSR under the Companies Act, 2013 ensures that businesses actively contribute to social welfare and
sustainability. By making CSR mandatory, India has set a global precedent in corporate responsibility.
Proper compliance with CSR laws benefits both businesses and society, fostering sustainable economic
growth.

STA 108
 Unit – V:
Accounts and Audit
Accounts and Audit
 Accounts refer to the financial records of a company that track its business transactions, profits,
losses, and financial position. Proper accounting ensures transparency and financial discipline.
 Audit is the examination and verification of financial statements to ensure accuracy, compliance with
laws, and prevention of fraud.
The Companies Act, 2013, provides a comprehensive framework for the preparation, maintenance, and
audit of financial statements to uphold corporate accountability.
1. Accounts Under the Companies Act, 2013
Legal Provisions (Sections 128-137)
A. Books of Accounts (Section 128)
 Companies must maintain books of accounts that:
o Provide a true and fair view of the company's financial position.
o Contain details of all receipts, payments, assets, liabilities, and sales.
 Books of accounts must be kept at the registered office or any other place approved by the Board
of Directors.
 Records must be preserved for 8 years.
B. Financial Statements (Section 129)
 Companies must prepare financial statements annually, including:
o Balance Sheet (financial position of the company).
o Profit and Loss Account (revenues and expenses).
o Cash Flow Statement (movement of cash).
o Statement of Changes in Equity (for specified companies).
 Financial statements must comply with accounting standards issued by the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India (ICAI).
C. Board’s Report (Section 134)
 The Board of Directors must prepare a report to accompany the financial statements, including:
o The company’s performance and future outlook.
o Details of dividends, CSR activities, and risk management.
o Disclosure of frauds and financial irregularities.
 The report must be signed by the chairman or directors.
D. Filing of Financial Statements (Section 137)
 Companies must file audited financial statements with the Registrar of Companies (ROC) within
30 days of the Annual General Meeting (AGM).
 Non-compliance leads to penalties for the company and directors.
2. Audit Under the Companies Act, 2013
Legal Provisions (Sections 139-148)
A. Appointment of Auditor (Section 139)
 Every company must appoint a Statutory Auditor at the first AGM, who will hold office for 5
years.
 The auditor must be a Chartered Accountant (CA) registered with ICAI.
 Listed and certain large companies must also appoint an Independent Auditor.
B. Duties of Auditor (Section 143)
 Examine financial statements and ensure compliance with Indian Accounting Standards.
STA 109
  Report any fraud, misstatements, or non-compliance to the shareholders and government
authorities.
 Verify compliance with corporate governance regulations.
C. Types of Audits Under the Act
1. Statutory Audit – Mandatory for all companies to ensure financial accuracy.
2. Internal Audit (Section 138) – Large companies must appoint an internal auditor to evaluate risk
and compliance.
3. Cost Audit (Section 148) – Required for companies in regulated sectors (e.g., manufacturing,
pharmaceuticals) to track production costs.
4. Secretarial Audit (Section 204) – Listed companies and large public firms must appoint a Company
Secretary to audit compliance with corporate laws.
D. Auditor’s Report (Section 143(2))
 The auditor must submit a report to shareholders, highlighting:
o Whether the financial statements give a true and fair view.
o Any irregularities or fraud detected.
o Recommendations for improving financial reporting.
E. Penalty for Non-Compliance (Section 147)
 If a company fails to comply with audit regulations, penalties can include:
o Fines up to ₹25 lakh for the company.
o Auditor disqualification for fraudulent reporting.
3. Importance of Accounts and Audit
A. Ensuring Financial Transparency
Proper accounting and auditing prevent fraud and misrepresentation, ensuring that a company’s
finances are accurate and reliable.
B. Compliance with Laws
The Companies Act, 2013, makes it mandatory for companies to maintain proper records and conduct
audits, ensuring compliance with financial laws.
C. Protection of Investors and Stakeholders
Audited financial statements help shareholders, creditors, and investors make informed decisions about
their investments.
D. Prevention of Corporate Fraud
Audits detect and prevent financial irregularities, protecting companies from scandals like Satyam Scam
(2009).
E. Enhancing Business Reputation
Companies with clean audit reports gain trust and credibility in the market, attracting more investors
and customers.
Example: Infosys Accounting and Audit Compliance
Infosys follows strict accounting and auditing standards as per the Companies Act. It regularly publishes
audited financial statements, increasing investor confidence and maintaining corporate integrity.
Case Law: Satyam Scam (2009) – Importance of Audit
Facts:
 Satyam Computers manipulated financial records and overstated profits by ₹7,000 crore.
 The fraud went undetected due to weak auditing practices.
Judgment:
 Auditors (Price Waterhouse) were held liable for negligence.
STA 110
  The government introduced stricter audit regulations in the Companies Act, 2013.
Impact:
 Strengthened audit standards and penalties for fraud.
 Made independent auditing mandatory for large companies.
Conclusion
Accounts and Audit under the Companies Act, 2013, play a critical role in ensuring financial accuracy,
legal compliance, and investor protection. By enforcing strict audit requirements, the law prevents
fraud, enhances corporate governance, and builds trust in the corporate sector.

Majority Rule and Rights of Minority shareholders

1. Meaning of Majority Rule
The majority rule is a fundamental principle of corporate law that states that decisions of the majority
shareholders bind the company and all its shareholders, including the minority. This rule is based on the
idea that a company operates as a democratic entity where the majority has control over corporate
decisions.
The principle was established in the famous case Foss v. Harbottle (1843), which held that:
 The company itself, not individual shareholders, is the proper party to sue for wrongs done to it.
 The majority decision prevails in corporate matters unless there is fraud, oppression, or
mismanagement.
Application Under the Companies Act, 2013
 Majority shareholders can appoint directors, approve mergers, and make key financial decisions.
 The Articles of Association (AoA) and Memorandum of Association (MoA) empower the majority
to run the business efficiently.
 Courts avoid interfering in corporate decisions unless there is fraud or oppression of minority
shareholders.
2. Problems Arising from Majority Rule
Although the majority rule ensures smooth corporate governance, it may lead to oppression or
mismanagement, where majority shareholders act unfairly towards minority shareholders.
Abuse of Majority Power
 Unfair dilution of shares to reduce minority influence.
 Unjust removal of minority shareholders from the Board.
 Denial of dividends or misallocation of company funds.
To protect minority shareholders, Indian corporate law provides several legal safeguards.
3. Rights of Minority Shareholders Under the Companies Act, 2013
A. Protection Against Oppression and Mismanagement (Sections 241-246)
 Minority shareholders can file a complaint with the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) if:
o Company affairs are being conducted in a manner oppressive to them.
o There is mismanagement or misuse of company assets.
 The NCLT can intervene to stop oppressive actions and restore fair corporate governance.
B. Right to File a Class Action Suit (Section 245)
 Minority shareholders can file a Class Action Suit against:
o The company for fraudulent or oppressive acts.
o The Board of Directors for mismanagement.
 This provision strengthens corporate accountability and gives shareholders a legal remedy against
wrongdoing.
STA 111
C. Right to Call an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) (Section 100)
 If shareholders holding at least 10% of voting power demand an EGM, the company must
convene the meeting.
 This right ensures minority shareholders can voice their concerns on critical issues.
D. Right to Inspect Books of Accounts (Section 171)
 Minority shareholders have the right to access financial records to check for mismanagement or
fraud.
E. Right to Oppose Oppressive Mergers (Section 230)
 If a merger or restructuring is unfair to minority shareholders, they can raise objections before
the NCLT.
 This prevents forced mergers or takeovers that benefit only the majority.
F. Right to Receive Fair Value in Takeovers (SEBI Takeover Code, 2011)
 If a company undergoes a takeover, minority shareholders must be given a fair exit price for their
shares.
4. Case Law: Needle Industries India Ltd. v. Needle Industries Newey (1981)
Facts:
 The majority shareholder (a foreign company) tried to dilute the minority’s shareholding by
issuing additional shares to itself.
 The minority shareholders challenged the act as oppressive.
Judgment:
 The Supreme Court ruled in favor of minority shareholders, stating that such actions were
oppressive and unfair.
 The court ordered compensation to the minority and prevented unjust share dilution.
Impact:
 Strengthened the protection of minority shareholders in India.
 Established that majority power cannot be used to undermine minority rights.
5. Example: Tata Sons vs. Cyrus Mistry (2016)
What Happened?
 Cyrus Mistry, a minority shareholder (18.4% stake), was removed as Chairman of Tata Sons by
the majority shareholders (Tata Trusts).
 Mistry claimed oppression and mismanagement, arguing that his removal was unfair.
Legal Battle & Outcome
 The NCLT dismissed Mistry’s case, ruling that Tata Sons acted within their rights.
 The Supreme Court upheld the decision, stating that the majority had the right to remove Mistry.
Key Takeaway:
 Majority rule prevails unless there is clear evidence of oppression or mismanagement.
Conclusion
The majority rule ensures smooth corporate governance, but minority shareholders have legal rights to
prevent oppression and mismanagement. The Companies Act, 2013, provides multiple safeguards, such
as class action suits, the right to call EGMs, and protection against unfair mergers, to ensure fairness.

STA 112
Prevention of Oppression and Mismanagement
1. Meaning of Oppression and Mismanagement
 Oppression refers to unfair treatment or prejudice against minority shareholders by the majority,
leading to violations of their rights.
 Mismanagement refers to the misuse of company funds, poor governance, or fraudulent actions
that harm the company and its shareholders.
Example of Oppression
 Majority shareholders denying dividends to minority shareholders.
 Unfair removal of minority shareholders from the Board of Directors.
Example of Mismanagement
 Directors using company funds for personal expenses.
 Engaging in fraudulent transactions that harm the company’s financial health.
To prevent such practices, the Companies Act, 2013, provides legal remedies under Sections 241 to 246.
2. Legal Framework for Prevention of Oppression and Mismanagement
A. Who Can File a Complaint? (Section 241)
A complaint can be filed with the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) by:
1. Members (Shareholders)
o If the company has more than 50 members, at least 100 members or 10% of total members
(whichever is lower) can file a case.
o If the company has less than 50 members, a single shareholder can file a case.
2. Central Government
o The government can intervene if it believes the company’s affairs are prejudicial to public interest.
3. Depositors (Section 245 – Class Action Suit)
o A group of depositors can file a case against fraudulent or negligent company actions.
B. When Can NCLT Intervene? (Grounds Under Section 241)
A petition can be filed if:
 The company’s affairs are conducted in a way oppressive to minority shareholders.
 The company is involved in fraud, mismanagement, or financial misdeeds.
 The Board of Directors is acting against the interests of the company or shareholders.
C. Powers of the Tribunal (Section 242)
If NCLT finds oppression or mismanagement, it can:
 Terminate or modify any agreement that is oppressive to minority shareholders.
 Regulate the company’s affairs to prevent further oppression.
 Remove or appoint new directors.
 Order the purchase of minority shares at a fair price.
 Wind up the company if it is beyond recovery.
3. Remedies for Oppression and Mismanagement
A. Appointment of Independent Directors
NCLT can order the appointment of independent directors to ensure fair decision-making.
B. Class Action Suits (Section 245)
 Shareholders or depositors can sue directors and management for fraudulent activities.
 The court can order compensation for affected members.
C. Investigation and Government Intervention (Section 246)
 The Central Government can conduct an investigation and take control of company affairs.
D. Right to Demand an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) (Section 100)

STA 113
  Minority shareholders can demand an EGM if they hold at least 10% of the voting power to
discuss and address grievances.
Case Law: Shanti Prasad Jain v. Kalinga Tubes Ltd. (1965)
Facts:
 A minority shareholder complained that the majority took control of the company unfairly and
excluded them from decision-making.
Judgment:
 The Supreme Court ruled that the majority’s actions were oppressive and ordered remedies to
protect the minority shareholders.
Impact:
 Strengthened shareholder protection laws.
 Set guidelines on what qualifies as oppression and mismanagement.
Example: Tata Sons vs. Cyrus Mistry (2016-2021)
What Happened?
 Cyrus Mistry, a minority shareholder, was removed as Chairman of Tata Sons by the majority
shareholders (Tata Trusts).
 He alleged oppression and mismanagement and approached the NCLT.
Outcome:
 The NCLT ruled in favor of Tata Sons, stating that majority shareholders had the right to remove
him.
 The Supreme Court upheld this decision, reinforcing majority rule unless clear evidence of
oppression exists.
Conclusion
The Companies Act, 2013, provides strong safeguards against oppression and mismanagement, allowing
shareholders and the government to take legal action through NCLT, class action suits, and independent
investigations. These measures ensure corporate transparency, protect minority rights, and prevent
financial misconduct.

Mergers
A merger is a corporate restructuring process where two or more companies combine to form a single
entity. The objective is to achieve business expansion, cost efficiency, and market dominance.
The Companies Act, 2013, regulates mergers under Sections 230 to 240, ensuring fair procedures and
protecting stakeholders.
Types of Mergers
1. Amalgamation – Two or more companies combine to form a new entity.
2. Absorption – One company takes over another, and the acquired company ceases to exist.
3. Horizontal Merger – Merger between competitors in the same industry.
4. Vertical Merger – Merger between a supplier and a manufacturer.
5. Conglomerate Merger – Merger between companies in different industries.
Process of Merger Under the Companies Act, 2013
1. Drafting a Merger Scheme – The companies prepare a merger proposal detailing terms and
conditions.
2. Approval by Board of Directors – The Board of both companies must approve the merger.
3. Approval by Shareholders and Creditors – At least 75% of shareholders and creditors must
approve the scheme.

STA 114
 4. Filing with NCLT (Section 230) – The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) must sanction the
merger.
5. Approval from Regulatory Bodies – If required, the merger must be cleared by:
o Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) (for listed companies).
o Competition Commission of India (CCI) (if it affects market competition).
6. Implementation and Transfer of Assets – Once approved, assets and liabilities are transferred to
the merged entity.
Legal Safeguards in Mergers
 Protection of Minority Shareholders (Section 232): Ensures fair valuation of shares.
 Objection by Creditors (Section 230(4)): Creditors can object if the merger affects their rights.
 Fast-Track Mergers (Section 233): Small companies can merge without NCLT approval.
Example: Merger of HDFC Ltd. & HDFC Bank (2023)
 HDFC Ltd. merged with HDFC Bank, creating India’s largest financial services entity.
 The merger followed NCLT and SEBI approvals, ensuring compliance with the Companies Act.
Case Law: Reliance Industries Ltd. & Reliance Petroleum Ltd. (2009)
 RIL merged with its subsidiary, Reliance Petroleum, to simplify operations.
 The merger was approved by NCLT, ensuring fairness to all stakeholders.
Conclusion
Mergers under the Companies Act, 2013, ensure legal compliance, protection of stakeholders, and
business efficiency. The NCLT, SEBI, and CCI play key roles in approving and regulating mergers to
prevent unfair practices.

Amalgamation and Takeover

1. Amalgamation and Takeover
A. Amalgamation
Amalgamation refers to the merging of two or more companies into a single entity, where the merging
companies lose their identity and a new company is formed. It is usually done to:
 Expand business operations.
 Reduce competition.
 Achieve financial and operational efficiency.
Example: HDFC Ltd. and HDFC Bank merger (2023) – The two entities merged to create a larger banking
institution with improved financial strength.
B. Takeover
A takeover occurs when one company acquires control over another company by purchasing a
significant portion of its shares or assets. Unlike amalgamation, in a takeover:
 The acquired company may or may not cease to exist.
 The acquiring company gains decision-making power over the target company.
Example: Tata Steel’s takeover of Bhushan Steel (2018) – Tata Steel acquired 73% of Bhushan Steel’s
shares through a resolution process under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).
2. Legal Provisions Under the Companies Act, 2013
A. Amalgamation (Sections 230-232)
The Companies Act, 2013, provides a framework for mergers and amalgamations, ensuring compliance
and protection of shareholder rights.
Process of Amalgamation
1. Approval of the Scheme (Section 230)
STA 115
 o The Board of Directors of the companies involved draft a merger scheme.
o The scheme is approved by at least 75% of shareholders and creditors.
2. Application to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) (Section 231)
o Companies must seek NCLT approval before implementing the merger.
o NCLT ensures that the merger is fair, legal, and beneficial to stakeholders.
3. Approval from Regulatory Authorities
o Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) (for listed companies).
o Competition Commission of India (CCI) (if the merger affects competition).
4. Implementation of Amalgamation
o Once approved, the assets, liabilities, and operations of the merging companies are
transferred to the new entity.
o The merging companies cease to exist, and a new company is formed.
B. Takeover (Section 230(11) and SEBI Takeover Code, 2011)
A takeover is mainly regulated under the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers)
Regulations, 2011, which governs how listed companies can be acquired.
Process of Takeover
1. Open Offer by Acquiring Company
o If an entity acquires 25% or more shares of a listed company, it must make an open offer
to purchase additional shares from public shareholders.
2. Regulatory Compliance (SEBI and CCI)
o The acquiring company must comply with SEBI regulations and CCI rules to ensure a fair
takeover process.
3. Completion of Acquisition
o If successful, the acquiring company takes control of the target company.
o The acquired company may either continue as a subsidiary or merge into the acquiring
company.
3. Types of Amalgamation and Takeover
A. Types of Amalgamation
1. Merger by Absorption – One company absorbs another, and the absorbed company ceases to
exist.
o Example: Reliance Industries absorbing Reliance Petroleum.
2. Merger by Formation of a New Company – Two or more companies merge to form a completely
new entity.
o Example: A merger of Bank of Baroda, Vijaya Bank, and Dena Bank (2019) into one entity.
3. Reverse Merger – A private company merges with a public company to become publicly listed
without an IPO.
o Example: ICICI Ltd. merged into ICICI Bank.
B. Types of Takeovers
1. Friendly Takeover – The target company agrees to the acquisition.
o Example: Disney’s takeover of Marvel (2009).
2. Hostile Takeover – The acquiring company forcefully takes control of the target company, often
against the wishes of the management.
o Example: L&T’s hostile takeover of Mindtree (2019).
3. Reverse Takeover – A smaller company acquires a larger company.
o Example: Tata Tea’s acquisition of Tetley (2000).

STA 116
 4. Bailout Takeover – A financially strong company acquires a financially weak company to rescue
it.
o Example: Tata Steel acquiring Bhushan Steel under the IBC.
Case Law: Reliance Industries Ltd. v. Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) (2010)
Facts:
 Reliance Industries was accused of violating takeover regulations by acquiring a large stake in
Reliance Petroleum without making a mandatory open offer.
Judgment:
 SEBI imposed a penalty on Reliance Industries, stating that the acquisition violated fair market
rules.
Impact:
 Strengthened SEBI’s regulations on open offers and takeover transparency.
Example: HDFC Ltd. and HDFC Bank Merger (2023)
What Happened?
 HDFC Ltd. (a housing finance company) merged with HDFC Bank to create a stronger banking
institution.
Significance:
 Increased HDFC Bank’s loan portfolio and financial strength.
 Removed regulatory constraints on housing finance lending.
Conclusion
Amalgamation and takeover are key business strategies used for growth, expansion, and survival. The
Companies Act, 2013, along with SEBI regulations, ensures fairness, transparency, and protection of
stakeholder interests in these processes.

Dissolution of a company
1. Dissolution
Dissolution of a company is the final stage in the life of a company, where its legal existence comes to an
end. Once a company is dissolved:
 It ceases to exist as a legal entity.
 Its name is removed from the Register of Companies (ROC).
 The company cannot carry out business or enter into legal contracts.
Dissolution usually happens after liquidation (when the company’s assets are sold to pay debts), but it
can also occur voluntarily.
2. Process of Dissolution of a Company
A company can be dissolved through various methods under the Companies Act, 2013.
A. Voluntary Dissolution by Members (Section 248)
If a company is not carrying on any business or the owners want to close it, they can apply for voluntary
dissolution.
Process:
1. Board Resolution – The company’s Board of Directors passes a resolution approving the closure.
2. Approval from Shareholders – 75% of shareholders must approve the decision.
3. Filing with the ROC – The company files an application with the Registrar of Companies (ROC)
under Section 248.
4. Public Notice – The ROC publishes a notice in an official gazette and gives time for objections.

STA 117
 5. Final Removal from Register – If no objections arise, the ROC removes the company’s name from
the register, completing the dissolution.
Example: A startup that never started operations can dissolve voluntarily through ROC filing.
B. Compulsory Dissolution by the Tribunal (Section 271-272)
If a company is engaged in fraud, mismanagement, or illegal activities, the National Company Law
Tribunal (NCLT) can order its dissolution.
Grounds for Compulsory Dissolution:
 The company is unable to pay debts.
 The company acted against the public interest.
 The company violated legal provisions or engaged in fraudulent activities.
Process:
1. Petition for Winding Up – The Central Government, ROC, creditors, or shareholders can file a
petition with the NCLT.
2. NCLT Hearing – The tribunal reviews the case and decides whether dissolution is necessary.
3. Appointment of Liquidator – If the petition is approved, an official liquidator is appointed to sell
assets and pay debts.
4. Settlement of Liabilities – The liquidator sells company assets and pays off creditors.
5. Final Order by NCLT – Once debts are settled, the NCLT passes an order dissolving the company.
Example: Kingfisher Airlines was dissolved due to financial mismanagement and unpaid debts.
C. Dissolution through Liquidation under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016
If a company is unable to repay debts, it may go through the corporate insolvency resolution process
(CIRP) under the IBC, 2016.
Process:
1. Initiation of CIRP – Creditors file an insolvency petition against the company.
2. Resolution Professional Appointed – A professional examines the company’s finances to find a
revival plan.
3. Liquidation Order by NCLT – If no revival is possible, the NCLT orders liquidation.
4. Asset Sale and Debt Repayment – Assets are sold to pay creditors.
5. Dissolution Order – Once liabilities are cleared, the company is dissolved.
Example: Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd. (DHFL) was liquidated under the IBC and sold to
Piramal Group.
D. Striking Off by Registrar of Companies (Section 248)
If a company fails to file financial statements or annual returns for two consecutive years, the ROC can
strike off its name.
Process:
1. ROC Issues a Notice – The Registrar sends a notice to the company asking why it should not be
removed.
2. Company’s Response – If the company fails to respond, the ROC proceeds with removal.
3. Publication in the Gazette – The removal is published in the official gazette, confirming the
company’s dissolution.
Example: Thousands of shell companies were struck off by the ROC in 2017-18 for failing to file returns.
Case Law: Meghal Homes Pvt. Ltd. v. Shree Niwas Girni K.K. Samiti (2007)
Facts:
 A company was facing financial trouble, and shareholders wanted it dissolved.
 Some stakeholders opposed the move, arguing that the company could still be revived.

STA 118
Judgment:
 The Supreme Court ruled that if a company has no viable future, the tribunal can order
dissolution.
Impact:
 Strengthened the power of tribunals in company dissolution cases.
Key Differences Between Winding Up and Dissolution
Winding Up Dissolution
Process of closing company affairs Final termination of company’s existence
Company still exists legally Company ceases to exist completely
Liquidator handles asset distribution No further legal existence after dissolution
Ordered by NCLT, creditors, or voluntary action Only after all debts and obligations are settled
Conclusion
Dissolution of a company permanently ends its existence and can happen voluntarily, by tribunal order,
through insolvency, or by ROC action. The Companies Act, 2013, provides a clear legal framework to
protect creditors, shareholders, and the public interest.

Winding up of Companies
1. Winding Up
Winding up is the legal process of closing a company and bringing its operations to an end. During
winding up:
 The company’s assets are sold.
 Debts and liabilities are cleared.
 The remaining funds, if any, are distributed among shareholders.
 The company ceases to exist after the winding-up process is completed.
Example:
If a company is unable to pay its debts and has no financial viability, it may undergo winding up to
liquidate assets and repay creditors.
2. Legal Provisions Under the Companies Act, 2013
The process of winding up is governed by Sections 270 to 365 of the Companies Act, 2013 and is
overseen by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).
There are two types of winding up:
1. Compulsory Winding Up by the Tribunal (Involuntary).
2. Voluntary Winding Up by Shareholders.
3. Types of Winding Up
A. Compulsory Winding Up (Section 271-273)
A company can be forced to wind up by an order of the NCLT under specific conditions.
Grounds for Compulsory Winding Up
1. Company is unable to pay its debts (Section 271(1)(a)).
2. Company has acted against national security, public interest, or law.
3. Tribunal believes it is just and equitable to wind up (e.g., deadlock in management).
4. Company has engaged in fraud or unlawful business activities.
5. Registrar of Companies (ROC) or any government authority recommends winding up due to
violations.
STA 119
Process of Compulsory Winding Up
1. Petition for Winding Up
o Filed by creditors, shareholders, company, government, or ROC to the NCLT.
2. Hearing and Order by NCLT
o If the tribunal finds valid reasons, it issues a winding-up order.
3. Appointment of Liquidator
o The official liquidator is appointed to manage asset sales and debt repayment.
4. Asset Liquidation and Debt Settlement
o Company assets are sold, and debts are paid off in priority order.
5. Final Dissolution Order
o Once all dues are settled, the company’s name is removed from the register, and it ceases
to exist.
B. Voluntary Winding Up (Section 304-323)
A company may choose to wind up voluntarily if its members decide to do so.
Reasons for Voluntary Winding Up
 Company has achieved its business objectives and is no longer needed.
 Shareholders want to close the company due to a lack of profitability.
 The company is being merged or restructured into another entity.
Process of Voluntary Winding Up
1. Board Resolution
o The Board of Directors propose a resolution to wind up the company.
2. Approval by Shareholders
o A special resolution (75% majority) is passed in a General Meeting.
3. Appointment of Liquidator
o A Company Liquidator is appointed to manage the process.
4. Declaration of Solvency
o Directors must declare that the company can pay all its debts.
5. Notice to ROC and Public
o The company informs the Registrar of Companies (ROC) and creditors.
6. Settlement of Liabilities
o Assets are sold and debts are cleared.
7. Dissolution Order
o The liquidator files a report with NCLT, and after approval, the company is officially
dissolved.
4. Priority of Debt Settlement in Winding Up
During liquidation, payments are made in the following order:
1. Secured Creditors (Banks, financial institutions with collateral).
2. Employees' Unpaid Salaries and Provident Fund.
3. Unsecured Creditors (Vendors, suppliers).
4. Government Dues (Taxes, penalties, etc.).
5. Shareholders (Preference shareholders before equity shareholders).
5. Case Law: Madura Coats Ltd. v. Modi Rubber Ltd. (2016)
Facts:
 Madura Coats Ltd. filed a petition for winding up against Modi Rubber Ltd. due to unpaid dues.
Judgment:
STA 120
 The court ruled that mere financial difficulty does not automatically lead to winding up.
The company was given time to settle its dues before ordering liquidation.
Impact:
 NCLT ensures that winding up is not misused by creditors.
6. Example: Jet Airways Liquidation (2019)
What Happened?
 Jet Airways failed to pay its debts due to financial losses.
 Creditors, led by State Bank of India, filed for compulsory winding up.
 NCLT appointed a liquidator to sell assets and repay debts.
Outcome:
 The airline’s assets were auctioned, and creditors received partial payments.
 The company was removed from the ROC’s register.
Difference Between Winding Up and Insolvency
Winding Up Insolvency
Process of closing a company permanently. Financial state where a company cannot pay its debts.
Can be voluntary or compulsory. May lead to restructuring or liquidation.
Governed by Companies Act, 2013. Governed by Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016.
Conclusion
Winding up is the final step in a company’s life cycle, ensuring that assets are liquidated, debts are paid,
and operations are lawfully closed. The Companies Act, 2013, and NCLT oversee the process to ensure
fairness and legal compliance.

Modes of Winding up of Companies

1. Introduction
Winding up is the legal process of dissolving a company, where its assets are sold, liabilities are settled,
and the company ceases to exist. Under the Companies Act, 2013, a company can be wound up through
two main modes:
1. Compulsory Winding Up by the Tribunal (NCLT)
2. Voluntary Winding Up
Each mode has specific procedures, conditions, and legal requirements.
2. Modes of Winding Up
A. Compulsory Winding Up by the Tribunal (Sections 271-273)
Compulsory winding up happens when the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) orders a company to
be dissolved. This is usually due to financial distress, legal violations, or mismanagement.
Grounds for Compulsory Winding Up (Section 271)
The Tribunal may order winding up in the following cases:
1. Inability to Pay Debts
o If a company fails to repay debts of ₹1 lakh or more within 21 days of a demand notice,
creditors can file for winding up.
o Example: Jet Airways liquidation (2019) due to unpaid debts.
2. Fraudulent or Unlawful Business Activities
o If a company is involved in fraud, money laundering, or illegal activities, the Tribunal can
order winding up.

STA 121
 o Example: Sahara Group’s fraudulent investment schemes led to legal actions.
3. Company Acting Against National Interest or Security
o If a company is involved in anti-national activities or terrorism financing, the government
may seek its dissolution.
4. Just and Equitable Grounds
o If the company’s management is deadlocked, minority shareholders are oppressed, or
there is a loss of purpose, the Tribunal can order winding up.
o Example: Tata Sons v. Cyrus Mistry (2016) – Mistry sought winding up citing
mismanagement, though the case resulted in his removal instead.
5. Registrar of Companies (ROC) or Government Recommendation
o The ROC or the Central Government can recommend winding up if the company violates
laws, fails to file annual returns, or is inactive for a long period.
Process of Compulsory Winding Up
1. Petition to the Tribunal (NCLT)
o Filed by creditors, shareholders, ROC, government, or company itself.
2. Hearing and Investigation
o NCLT examines the company’s financial records, activities, and responses.
3. Appointment of Liquidator
o If approved, NCLT appoints an Official Liquidator to handle asset distribution.
4. Settlement of Liabilities
o Company assets are sold, and proceeds are used to repay creditors, employees, and
shareholders.
5. Final Dissolution Order
o Once all dues are cleared, NCLT removes the company’s name from the register, officially
dissolving it.
B. Voluntary Winding Up (Sections 304-323)
A company can voluntarily wind up if its members decide it is no longer feasible or necessary to continue
its business.
Types of Voluntary Winding Up
1. Members’ Voluntary Winding Up
o When the company is solvent (can pay all debts) and decides to close operations.
o Requires a Declaration of Solvency by directors.
2. Creditors’ Voluntary Winding Up
o If the company is insolvent (unable to pay debts), it must consult creditors before winding up.
o Creditors play a key role in appointing the Liquidator.
Process of Voluntary Winding Up
1. Board Resolution
o The Board of Directors passes a resolution recommending winding up.
2. Special Resolution by Shareholders
o 75% of shareholders must approve the winding up in a General Meeting.
3. Appointment of Liquidator
o A Company Liquidator is appointed to manage asset disposal and debt repayment.
4. Notice to Registrar of Companies (ROC)
o The company informs the ROC and the public about winding up.
5. Asset Liquidation and Debt Clearance

STA 122
 o Assets are sold, and liabilities are cleared in order of priority.
6. Final Dissolution Order
o The liquidator submits a report, and the company is officially dissolved.
3. Special Cases of Winding Up
A. Winding Up Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016
 For companies that are bankrupt, creditors can approach the National Company Law Tribunal
(NCLT) under the IBC, 2016.
 The company is placed into a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), where efforts are
made to restructure or sell it before liquidation.
Example: Essar Steel’s resolution under IBC (2019) – Instead of liquidation, the company was acquired by
ArcelorMittal.
B. Fast-Track Exit (Strike Off) Under Section 248
 If a small company is inactive for two years, the ROC can strike off its name from the register.
 This is a simplified process for companies that have no debts or liabilities.
Example: Startup companies that never commenced operations often apply for strike-off instead of full
winding up.
4. Priority of Payments in Winding Up
During winding up, payments are made in the following order:
1. Secured Creditors (banks, financial institutions with collateral).
2. Workmen’s Dues and Employee Salaries.
3. Unsecured Creditors (suppliers, vendors, etc.).
4. Government Taxes and Dues.
5. Preference Shareholders.
6. Equity Shareholders (only if surplus remains).
5. Case Law: Madura Coats Ltd. v. Modi Rubber Ltd. (2016)
Facts:
 Madura Coats filed a winding-up petition against Modi Rubber for non-payment of dues.
 Modi Rubber argued financial difficulty but refused to wind up.
Judgment:
 The court ruled that financial hardship alone is not enough to order winding up.
 The company was given time to restructure and repay debts.
Impact:
 This case clarified that winding up is not a default solution for financial troubles.
6. Example: Kingfisher Airlines Liquidation (2012-2018)
What Happened?
 Kingfisher Airlines failed to pay its debts of over ₹9,000 crore.
 Creditors and employees filed a winding-up petition.
 The company’s assets were sold, and it was dissolved by the NCLT.
Key Takeaways:
 Inability to pay debts is a major reason for winding up.
 Banks and employees get priority over shareholders.
Conclusion
The Companies Act, 2013, provides a structured process for winding up, ensuring fair settlement of
debts, protection of stakeholders, and proper closure of businesses. Depending on the financial status
and reasons for closure, a company can opt for compulsory or voluntary winding up.
STA 123
Consequences of winding up
1. Introduction
Winding up of a company is the legal process of closing its operations and distributing its assets to
creditors and shareholders. Once the process is completed, the company ceases to exist.
The consequences of winding up affect:
 The Company (Legal Status & Business Operations)
 Directors & Officers
 Shareholders
 Creditors & Employees
2. Consequences of Winding Up
A. Effect on the Company
1. Cessation of Business Operations
o The company cannot carry on business except for the purpose of liquidation.
o All business activities are restricted to settling liabilities and selling assets.
2. Loss of Corporate Legal Status
o The company is dissolved and ceases to exist after winding up.
o Its name is removed from the Register of Companies by the Registrar of Companies (ROC).
3. Transfer of Management to Liquidator
o The Board of Directors loses control, and a Liquidator is appointed to handle the process.
o The Liquidator sells assets, pays debts, and distributes surplus (if any).
4. No Legal Proceedings Against the Company
o Once winding up starts, no new legal cases can be filed against the company without court
approval.
o Ongoing lawsuits continue only with the Tribunal’s permission.
B. Effect on Directors & Officers
1. Directors Lose Powers & Control
o Once winding up begins, directors lose their powers to run the company.
o They must cooperate with the Liquidator and provide all financial records.
2. Legal and Financial Liabilities
o If fraud or mismanagement is found, directors may be personally liable.
o Example: In the Kingfisher Airlines case, Vijay Mallya faced legal action for mismanagement.
3. Restriction on New Business
o Directors of a wound-up company may be restricted from starting a new business under certain
conditions.
C. Effect on Shareholders
1. Loss of Investment
o Shareholders may lose their investments if the company's assets are not enough to pay debts.
o Equity shareholders are paid last, only if surplus remains after settling all liabilities.
2. Priority of Payment
o Preference shareholders get priority over equity shareholders.
D. Effect on Creditors & Employees
1. Creditors' Rights & Debt Settlement
o Creditors receive payments based on priority:
 Secured creditors (banks, financial institutions) get paid first.
 Unsecured creditors (vendors, suppliers) get paid if funds remain.
STA 124
 2. Employee Dues Are Cleared
o Employees' salaries, provident funds, and gratuity are settled before shareholders.
o Example: In Jet Airways’ liquidation (2019), employee salaries were given priority.
E. Effect on Legal Proceedings
1. Pending Cases Are Suspended
o No new lawsuits can be filed against the company unless approved by NCLT.
o Ongoing cases may continue but only for debt recovery.
2. Company Cannot Be Sued or Enter New Contracts
o Once winding up begins, the company cannot enter into new contracts or take on new
obligations.
3. Priority of Payments in Winding Up
During liquidation, debts are paid in the following order:
1. Secured Creditors (banks, lenders with collateral).
2. Workmen’s Compensation & Employee Salaries.
3. Unsecured Creditors (vendors, suppliers).
4. Government Dues (taxes, penalties).
5. Preference Shareholders.
6. Equity Shareholders (only if funds remain).
4. Case Law: Official Liquidator v. United Bank of India (2000)
Facts:
 A company was ordered to wind up due to financial losses.
 The bank filed a claim for loan repayment, but employees also claimed unpaid wages.
Judgment:
 The court ruled that employees’ dues must be settled before unsecured creditors.
 This case reinforced the priority of payment rules in winding up.
5. Example: Kingfisher Airlines Liquidation (2012-2018)
What Happened?
 Kingfisher Airlines failed to pay ₹9,000 crore in debts.
 The company’s assets were sold, and banks recovered some dues.
 Employees lost their salaries, and shareholders lost their investments.
Key Takeaways:
 Banks & secured creditors are paid first.
 Shareholders often get nothing in liquidation.
Conclusion
Winding up has serious legal, financial, and operational consequences. It results in the end of the
company’s existence, loss of investment for shareholders, and settlement of debts in a priority order.
Directors lose control, and legal proceedings are restricted.

Functions of Liquidator
1. Introduction
A Liquidator is an official appointed to manage the winding-up process of a company. The Liquidator
ensures that:
 The company's assets are identified and sold.
 Debts are paid in order of priority.
 The company is legally dissolved.

STA 125
Under the Companies Act, 2013, the Liquidator can be appointed by:
 National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) (for compulsory winding up).
 Company Members & Creditors (for voluntary winding up).
2. Functions of a Liquidator
A. Taking Control of the Company
1. Assumes Full Control Over Company Operations
o The Board of Directors loses power, and the Liquidator takes over.
o The company can only carry out activities related to liquidation.
2. Secures the Company’s Assets
o Identifies, safeguards, and values all assets of the company.
o Prevents unauthorized asset transfers or mismanagement.
3. Verifies Company’s Financial Position
o Reviews financial statements, pending liabilities, and legal obligations.
o Ensures all books of accounts, records, and documents are preserved.
B. Settlement of Liabilities
4. Examines and Prioritizes Claims
o Creditors file claims with the Liquidator.
o Claims are examined to ensure authenticity and proper documentation.
5. Pays Off Debts in Order of Priority
o Follows the legally mandated payment order:
1. Secured creditors (banks, financial institutions).
2. Workmen’s dues & employee salaries.
3. Unsecured creditors (suppliers, vendors).
4. Government dues (taxes, penalties, etc.).
5. Preference shareholders.
6. Equity shareholders (if funds remain).
6. Manages Employee Settlements
o Ensures employees’ wages, provident fund, gratuity, and compensation are settled
before unsecured creditors.
C. Selling and Distributing Assets
7. Conducts Sale of Assets
o Identifies assets for sale, including land, machinery, intellectual property, and stock.
o Uses auction or direct sale methods to get the best value.
8. Distributes Proceeds to Stakeholders
o Once assets are sold, the Liquidator ensures funds are distributed legally.
o Ensures that equity shareholders receive funds only if all debts are cleared.
D. Legal and Compliance Responsibilities
9. Represents the Company in Legal Matters
o Handles ongoing lawsuits, tax disputes, and creditor claims.
o Ensures all legal proceedings comply with the Companies Act, 2013.
10. Submits Reports to the Tribunal & ROC
 Prepares progress reports on liquidation status.
 Files final accounts and dissolution reports with the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and
Registrar of Companies (ROC).
11. Ensures Compliance with Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016

STA 126
  If the company is under Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), the Liquidator follows
IBC regulations.
E. Final Dissolution of the Company
12. Applies for Company Dissolution
 Once all debts are settled and assets are distributed, the Liquidator:
o Submits a Final Report to NCLT.
o Seeks approval for company dissolution.
13. Removes the Company’s Name from ROC
 After approval, the Registrar of Companies (ROC) removes the company’s name from the
register.
 The company ceases to exist legally.
3. Example: Jet Airways Liquidation (2019-Present)
 Jet Airways’ Liquidator was appointed by NCLT due to insolvency.
 The Liquidator sold assets, cleared some debts, and is still working on resolving remaining claims.
 Creditors and employees received partial settlements, but shareholders lost their investments.
Case Law: Meghal Homes Pvt. Ltd. v. Shree Niwas Girni K.K. Samiti (2007)
Facts:
 A company was ordered to wind up due to financial losses.
 The Liquidator failed to distribute assets fairly, leading to a legal dispute.
Judgment:
 The Supreme Court ruled that the Liquidator must act in fairness and ensure equitable
distribution.
 Reinforced that creditors must be paid before shareholders.
Conclusion
The Liquidator plays a crucial role in ensuring a smooth and legally compliant winding-up process.
Their main duties include:
 Taking control of the company
 Identifying and selling assets
 Paying off debts in legal order
 Settling employee claims
 Dissolving the company properly

Authorities under the Act

The Companies Act, 2013 establishes several regulatory authorities to ensure the proper functioning,
regulation, and governance of companies in India. These authorities oversee various aspects such as
incorporation, compliance, dispute resolution, and liquidation.
1. Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA)
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) is the primary regulatory body overseeing the implementation
and administration of the Companies Act, 2013.
Functions of MCA:
 Administers the Companies Act, 2013.
 Regulates corporate laws, competition laws, and corporate governance.
 Supervises the Registrar of Companies (ROC), NCLT, and other regulatory bodies.
 Implements corporate social responsibility (CSR) policies.
Example: MCA orders company investigations for non-compliance.
STA 127
2. Registrar of Companies (ROC)
The Registrar of Companies (ROC) is responsible for company registration and compliance monitoring.
There are multiple ROCs across different states and union territories.
Functions of ROC:
 Registers companies and LLPs (Limited Liability Partnerships).
 Maintains company records, financial reports, and annual returns.
 Ensures compliance with the Companies Act, 2013.
 Can strike off companies that are non-compliant or dormant.
Example: In 2017, ROC struck off over 2 lakh shell companies for non-compliance.
3. National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) is a quasi-judicial authority that handles disputes related to
companies, insolvency, and mismanagement.
Functions of NCLT:
 Handles company law disputes (e.g., shareholder disputes, mismanagement).
 Approves corporate mergers, demergers, and restructuring.
 Oversees insolvency resolution under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016.
Orders winding up of companies if necessary.
Example: NCLT ordered the liquidation of Kingfisher Airlines due to non-payment of loans.
4. National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT)
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) is the appeals authority for decisions made by
NCLT and Competition Commission of India (CCI).
Functions of NCLAT:
 Reviews appeals against NCLT decisions.
 Hears appeals from the Competition Commission of India (CCI).
 Has the power to overturn or modify NCLT orders.
Example: Tata Sons vs. Cyrus Mistry case (2020) – NCLAT initially reinstated Cyrus Mistry as chairman of
Tata Sons, which was later overturned by the Supreme Court.
5. Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO)
The Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) is a specialized body that investigates serious financial
frauds involving companies.
Functions of SFIO:
 Conducts forensic investigations into corporate fraud.
 Investigates fraudulent activities, including money laundering and mismanagement.
 Can recommend prosecution under the Companies Act and other laws.
Example: SFIO investigated the IL&FS financial scam, leading to arrests and legal actions.
6. Competition Commission of India (CCI)
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) ensures fair competition and prevents monopolistic
practices.
Functions of CCI:
 Prevents anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant positions.
 Regulates mergers and acquisitions to ensure fair competition.
 Imposes penalties on companies engaging in unfair trade practices.
Example: CCI fined Google ₹1,337 crore for anti-competitive practices in 2022.

STA 128
7. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI)
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) regulates the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
(IBC), 2016, which governs corporate insolvency and resolution processes.
Functions of IBBI:
 Regulates insolvency professionals and resolution professionals.
 Supervises corporate insolvency resolution and liquidation processes.
 Issues guidelines for bankruptcy proceedings.
Example: IBBI supervised the insolvency process of Jet Airways and Essar Steel.
8. Official Liquidator
An Official Liquidator is appointed by the NCLT to oversee the winding-up of a company.
Functions of the Official Liquidator:
 Takes control of company assets after a winding-up order.
 Settles claims of creditors, employees, and shareholders.
 Distributes remaining assets and files dissolution reports.
Example: The Official Liquidator handled the liquidation of Sahara Group’s defunct companies.
9. Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) (For Listed Companies)
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) regulates companies that are listed on stock
exchanges.
Functions of SEBI:
 Regulates stock market transactions and securities laws.
 Ensures corporate governance in listed companies.
 Protects investor interests and prevents fraud.
Example: SEBI penalized Reliance Industries for insider trading violations.
10. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Committee
The CSR Committee ensures compliance with CSR obligations under Section 135 of the Companies Act,
2013.
Functions of CSR Committee:
 Ensures companies spend at least 2% of their average net profits on CSR activities.
 Approves and monitors CSR initiatives.
 Reports CSR activities in the Board’s annual report.
Example: Tata Group spends a significant portion of its profits on CSR projects.
11. Investor Education and Protection Fund Authority (IEPFA)
The Investor Education and Protection Fund Authority (IEPFA) manages unclaimed dividends, shares,
and deposits.
Functions of IEPFA:
 Refunds unclaimed dividends, shares, and debenture amounts to rightful owners.
 Spreads awareness about investor rights and protections.
Example: IEPFA refunded unclaimed dividends of defunct companies to investors.
12. Company Law Committee (CLC)
The Company Law Committee (CLC) advises the MCA on amendments to corporate laws and governance
regulations.
Functions of CLC:
 Suggests reforms to the Companies Act.
 Reviews corporate governance and compliance policies.

STA 129
Example: CLC recommended the decriminalization of minor company law violations.
Conclusion
The Companies Act, 2013 establishes a strong regulatory framework with multiple authorities
overseeing different aspects of corporate governance. These bodies ensure that companies comply with
laws, protect investor interests, and follow fair business practices.

Department of Company Affairs

1. Introduction
The Department of Company Affairs (DCA) was a government body responsible for regulating corporate
affairs in India. It was later renamed as the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) in 2004. The department
played a crucial role in implementing corporate laws, overseeing company regulations, and ensuring
compliance with the Companies Act.
2. Functions of the Department of Company Affairs (DCA)
The DCA's primary functions included:
A. Administration of Corporate Laws
 Implemented and enforced the Companies Act, 1956 (now replaced by the Companies Act, 2013).
 Framed rules and regulations for company formation, management, and governance.
 Monitored corporate compliance and financial disclosures.
B. Regulation of Companies
 Registered companies and ensured compliance with corporate laws.
 Investigated fraudulent corporate activities and financial irregularities.
 Supervised company liquidations and mergers.
C. Protection of Investor Interests
 Ensured corporate transparency and disclosure of financial information.
 Took action against unfair trade practices and fraudulent companies.
D. Coordination with Other Regulatory Bodies
 Worked closely with SEBI, RBI, and other financial regulators.
 Provided legal assistance in cases of corporate disputes and mismanagement.
3. Evolution into the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA)
In 2004, the DCA was renamed the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) to enhance its scope and
effectiveness.
Key Changes After Renaming:
 Strengthened regulatory framework under the Companies Act, 2013.
 Established new authorities like NCLT (National Company Law Tribunal) and SFIO (Serious Fraud
Investigation Office).
 Introduced online compliance systems (MCA21 portal) for company filings.
4. Significance of the DCA
 Helped streamline corporate governance and prevent fraud.
 Improved investor confidence by ensuring transparency.
 Laid the foundation for the modern Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA).
Conclusion
The Department of Company Affairs (DCA) played a crucial role in India's corporate sector, laying the
groundwork for modern corporate governance and regulation under the Ministry of Corporate Affairs
(MCA).

STA 130
NCLT
1. Introduction
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) is a quasi-judicial body established under the Companies
Act, 2013 to adjudicate disputes and matters related to corporate laws in India. It was constituted on 1st
June 2016, replacing the Company Law Board (CLB), Board for Industrial & Financial Reconstruction
(BIFR), and other corporate adjudicating bodies.
The NCLT plays a crucial role in company law matters, corporate governance, insolvency resolution, and
company disputes under the Companies Act, 2013 and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016.
2. Legal Framework of NCLT
 Governing Law: Companies Act, 2013 (Chapter XXVII) and Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC),
2016.
 Constitutional Validity: Upheld by the Supreme Court of India in the case of Madras Bar
Association v. Union of India (2015).
 Hierarchy:
1. National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) – First level of adjudication.
2. National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) – Hears appeals against NCLT orders.
3. Supreme Court of India – Final authority for appeals against NCLAT decisions.
3. Composition of NCLT
The NCLT consists of:
1. President – Appointed by the Central Government (Must be a retired/serving High Court Judge).
2. Judicial Members – Retired High Court Judges or legal experts.
3. Technical Members – Experts in corporate laws, finance, accountancy, or management.
NCLT has multiple benches across India, with the principal bench located in New Delhi.
4. Powers and Functions of NCLT
The NCLT has wide-ranging powers under the Companies Act, 2013 and IBC, 2016. Some of the key
powers include:
A. Corporate Disputes and Governance Issues
 Deals with company disputes related to mismanagement, oppression, and fraud.
 Has the power to remove directors or auditors in cases of misconduct.
 Can investigate company affairs and order freezing of assets in fraudulent cases.
B. Corporate Restructuring and Mergers
 Approves mergers, demergers, compromises, and arrangements between companies.
 Ensures that restructuring is done fairly, without harming creditors or shareholders.
C. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Proceedings
 Acts as the Adjudicating Authority for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under IBC,
2016.
 Appoints resolution professionals (RP) for handling insolvent companies.
 Orders liquidation if no viable resolution plan is found.
D. Winding Up of Companies
 Orders compulsory winding up of companies if necessary.
 Appoints official liquidators to oversee the winding-up process.
 Ensures creditors and employees get paid in a legally defined priority order.
E. Revival of Struck-Off Companies
 Can restore companies that have been struck off by the Registrar of Companies (ROC).
 Ensures that genuine companies are not wrongly dissolved.

STA 131
F. Class Action Suits
 Shareholders or depositors can file class action suits against companies for fraud,
mismanagement, or oppression.
 Ensures corporate accountability and investor protection.
G. Investigation and Fraud Prevention
 Orders investigations into companies suspected of fraud.
 Can direct SFIO (Serious Fraud Investigation Office) to take action.
 Freezes company assets to prevent further fraud.
5. NCLT vs. Traditional Courts
Aspect NCLT Regular Courts
Jurisdiction Only corporate matters Handles all types of disputes
Speed of Resolution Faster due to specialized focus Slower due to backlog of cases
Judges have corporate law & financial Judges may not be corporate law
Expertise
expertise specialists
Appeal Process NCLAT → Supreme Court High Court → Supreme Court
6. Landmark Cases of NCLT
Case 1: Tata Sons v. Cyrus Mistry (2016-2021)
Facts:
 Cyrus Mistry, former chairman of Tata Sons, was removed from his position.
 Mistry claimed oppression and mismanagement and challenged his removal in NCLT.
NCLT Decision:
 Ruled in favor of Tata Sons, stating Mistry’s removal was valid.
NCLAT Decision (Appeal):
 Reinstated Mistry as chairman, ruling that his removal was oppressive and illegal.
Supreme Court (Final Appeal):
 Overturned NCLAT’s decision, upholding Tata Sons’ right to remove Mistry.
Significance:
 Clarified the role of NCLT in corporate governance disputes.
Case 2: Essar Steel Insolvency (2017-2019)
Facts:
 Essar Steel defaulted on loans, and creditors filed for insolvency proceedings before NCLT.
NCLT Decision:
 Admitted Essar Steel into CIRP (Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process) under IBC, 2016.
 Approved ArcelorMittal’s resolution plan, ensuring creditors received payments.
Supreme Court Decision:
 Upheld the NCLT ruling, setting a precedent for insolvency resolution in India.
Significance:
 Strengthened the IBC framework and NCLT’s role in insolvency cases.
7. Advantages of NCLT
 Specialized expertise in company law and corporate disputes.
 Faster resolution compared to traditional courts.
 Unified authority replacing multiple corporate regulatory bodies.
 Better investor protection through class action suits.
STA 132
  Improved insolvency resolution mechanism under IBC, 2016.
8. Challenges and Criticism
 Overburdened with pending cases due to a high number of insolvency and company disputes.
 Delays in the appointment of judicial members lead to slower case resolution.
 Need for better enforcement of its orders in certain corporate fraud cases.
Conclusion
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) is a crucial institution for corporate dispute resolution,
insolvency cases, and company law matters in India. Since its establishment in 2016, it has played a
significant role in improving corporate governance and insolvency resolution.

NCLAT
1. Introduction
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) is a quasi-judicial body established under
Section 410 of the Companies Act, 2013. It functions as an appellate authority that hears appeals from:
 National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)
 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI)
 Competition Commission of India (CCI)
NCLAT ensures fair adjudication in corporate disputes, insolvency cases, and competition law matters.
2. Establishment of NCLAT
 Created under the Companies Act, 2013, replacing the Company Law Board (CLB).
 Became operational on 1st June 2016.
 Based in New Delhi.
Composition of NCLAT
The tribunal consists of:
1. Chairperson – A retired Supreme Court judge or Chief Justice of a High Court.
2. Judicial Members – Former High Court or Supreme Court judges.
3. Technical Members – Experts in corporate affairs, finance, and law.
Currently, the Chief Justice (Retd.) Ashok Bhushan serves as the Chairperson of NCLAT.
3. Jurisdiction and Powers of NCLAT
A. Appellate Authority for NCLT Orders
 Hears appeals against decisions given by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).
 Deals with matters like corporate mismanagement, oppression of minority shareholders, and
company liquidation.
 Can modify, uphold, or overturn NCLT decisions.
B. Appellate Authority under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016
 Reviews corporate insolvency and bankruptcy cases.
 Handles appeals from insolvency resolution professionals (IRPs), creditors, and corporate
debtors.
 Can stay or reject liquidation orders passed by NCLT.
C. Appellate Authority for Competition Law Cases
 Hears appeals from Competition Commission of India (CCI) rulings.
 Reviews penalties imposed by CCI on companies for anti-competitive practices (e.g., abuse of
dominant position, cartelization).
 Ensures fair trade practices in business.
D. Other Powers and Responsibilities
STA 133
  Can review and amend its own decisions under exceptional circumstances.
 Can summon witnesses, demand documents, and conduct inquiries.
 Issues binding judgments that can be appealed in the Supreme Court.
4. NCLAT Appeal Process
Step 1: Filing an Appeal
 Affected parties must file an appeal within 30 days of the NCLT or CCI order.
 Appeals are filed before the Registrar of NCLAT.
Step 2: Hearing the Case
 The case is presented before a bench of NCLAT judges.
 Legal representatives argue based on facts, precedents, and statutory laws.
Step 3: NCLAT Decision
 NCLAT reviews all evidence and legal provisions.
 Issues a final decision that can be enforced.
 If a party is dissatisfied, they can appeal to the Supreme Court of India within 60 days.
5. Notable Case Laws Handled by NCLAT
A. Cyrus Mistry vs. Tata Sons (2020)
 Issue: Cyrus Mistry was removed as Chairman of Tata Sons. He challenged the decision at NCLAT.
 NCLAT Verdict: Reinstated Mistry as Chairman, stating that his removal was illegal.
 Final Outcome: Supreme Court later overturned NCLAT’s decision, upholding Tata Sons' decision to
remove Mistry.
B. Essar Steel Insolvency Case (2019)
 Issue: Essar Steel defaulted on ₹54,000 crore loans, and lenders approached NCLT for insolvency
proceedings.
 NCLAT Verdict: Approved the sale of Essar Steel to ArcelorMittal under the IBC framework.
 Significance: Strengthened India’s insolvency laws by ensuring that lenders get priority over other
stakeholders.
6. Significance of NCLAT in Corporate Governance
 Ensures fair corporate dispute resolution by acting as an independent appellate authority.
 Speeds up insolvency resolution, boosting investor confidence.
 Prevents abuse of market dominance by reviewing CCI rulings.
 Strengthens minority shareholder rights by providing a mechanism to challenge mismanagement.
Conclusion
The NCLAT is a crucial institution that upholds corporate transparency, fair business practices, and
insolvency regulations. Its judgments significantly impact corporate governance and business operations
in India.

Jurisdiction of Courts
1. Introduction
Jurisdiction refers to the legal authority of a court to hear and decide cases. Under the Companies Act,
2013, different courts and tribunals have jurisdiction over various corporate matters, including disputes
related to company incorporation, governance, mergers, insolvency, and winding up.
2. Types of Jurisdiction in Company Law
A. National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) – Primary Jurisdiction

STA 134
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) is the main adjudicating authority for corporate disputes. It
handles:
 Company incorporation and governance issues.
 Oppression and mismanagement cases (Section 241-242 of the Companies Act, 2013).
 Corporate mergers, acquisitions, and demergers.
 Corporate insolvency under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016.
 Winding-up petitions for companies.
Example: NCLT ordered the insolvency resolution of Jet Airways under IBC.
B. National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) – Appellate Jurisdiction
 The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) hears appeals against decisions of:
 NCLT (on company law and insolvency matters).
 Competition Commission of India (CCI) (on anti-competitive practices).
 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) (on bankruptcy resolutions).
Example: NCLAT overturned an NCLT decision in the Tata Sons vs. Cyrus Mistry case but was later
overruled by the Supreme Court.
C. High Courts – Limited Jurisdiction
High Courts have jurisdiction in specific company law matters, such as:
 Appeals against orders of NCLT before 2016 (before NCLAT was created).
 Matters related to oppression, mismanagement, or company liquidation (if pending before the
court before NCLT was formed).
 Interpretation of constitutional validity of company law provisions.
Example: High Courts earlier handled winding-up cases, which are now transferred to NCLT.
D. Supreme Court – Final Appellate Authority
The Supreme Court of India hears:
 Appeals against NCLAT decisions (under Section 423 of the Companies Act, 2013).
 Significant constitutional and legal challenges related to corporate laws.
Example: Essar Steel Insolvency Case – Supreme Court upheld NCLAT’s decision regarding distribution of
funds to creditors under IBC.
E. Special Courts (For Corporate Fraud and Criminal Offenses)
 The Companies Act, 2013 (Section 435-438) establishes Special Courts to handle:
 Corporate frauds and violations of company law provisions.
 Criminal offenses like false financial statements, insider trading, and misrepresentation.
Example: Special Court heard the Satyam Scam case, which involved financial fraud by company officials.
F. District Courts – Limited Civil Jurisdiction
 Handle minor civil cases related to company matters, such as contract disputes and consumer
complaints.
 Do not have jurisdiction over corporate insolvency or mismanagement cases.
Conclusion
The jurisdiction of courts under the Companies Act, 2013 is well-defined, with NCLT and NCLAT playing
key roles in corporate dispute resolution. The Supreme Court remains the final authority, while High
Courts and Special Courts handle specific cases.

STA 135