Vol 1 No 5 2024 || E-ISSN 2997-7258

The Journal of Academic Science

journal homepage:
https://thejoas.com/index.php/

The Relationship between Income Inequality and Economic Growth

Saipudin
Faculty of Economic and Bussiness, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia
Email : saipudin.1986ulm@gmail.com

ABSTRACT
KEY W O R D S
The relationship between income inequality and economic growth has long been a
Income Inequality, subject of intense academic debate, with varying perspectives emerging from
Economic Growth, different theoretical and empirical studies. This article delves into the complexities of
Kuznets Curve, this relationship, exploring how income inequality can both positively and negatively
Developing Economies, impact economic growth, depending on the context. Theoretical perspectives range
from the classical Kuznets Curve, which posits that inequality initially increases with
Institutional
economic growth before eventually declining, to more contemporary views that
Frameworks highlight the risks of excessive inequality, particularly in developing economies.
Empirical evidence from developed and developing countries further underscores the
nuanced nature of this relationship. In developed economies, income inequality may
sometimes promote growth by incentivizing investment and innovation, provided
there are strong institutions to mitigate potential downsides. Conversely, in
developing economies, high levels of inequality often inhibit growth by restricting
access to education, healthcare, and other essential services, thus limiting human
capital development. The study also emphasizes the critical role of institutions and
policy interventions in shaping the relationship between income inequality and
economic growth. Effective governance, progressive taxation, and investment in
social infrastructure are highlighted as key strategies to balance growth with equity.
The findings suggest that while some inequality might be necessary to spur economic
progress, excessive inequality poses significant threats to long-term sustainable
development. The article concludes by advocating for a balanced policy approach that
promotes inclusive growth and ensures that the benefits of economic expansion are
shared more broadly across society.

This is an open access article under the CC BY License

(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). 439
1. Introduction GDP, which indicates what would happen to
output if the quantity changes but prices remain
Income inequality and economic growth are two constant. 2. Nominal GDP, which measures the
central themes in economic research, often value of goods and services using the prices
prevailing during the period. To assess a
discussed for their profound implications on a country’s economic development performance,
country's overall development. The relationship Real GDP is used (Mankiw, 2003).
between these two variables has been a subject
of intense debate, with varying conclusions This inconsistency indicates the need for
drawn from different studies. On one hand, further research that not only explores this
some researchers argue that income inequality relationship in various contexts but also
is a necessary byproduct of economic growth, as employs a standardized methodology that
it incentivizes innovation and investment allows for more accurate comparisons across
(Barro, 2000; Forbes, 2000). On the other hand, studies.
there is a growing body of literature suggesting
that high levels of income inequality can hinder Income inequality refers to the uneven
economic growth by restricting access to distribution of income within a population,
education and opportunities, thereby limiting where a small portion of people holds a
human capital development (Stiglitz, 2012; significant share of the total wealth, while the
Ostry, Berg, & Tsangarides, 2014). majority has much less. Economic growth, on
the other hand, is the increase in the production
Inequality, in reality, cannot be eliminated in the of goods and services in an economy over time,
development of a region. The presence of typically measured by the rise in Gross Domestic
inequality will motivate underdeveloped areas Product (GDP).
to strive to improve their quality of life so they
do not fall too far behind neighboring regions. The relationship between income inequality and
Moreover, these areas will compete to enhance economic growth is a complex and debated topic
their quality of life, thus inequality in this in economics. On one side, some theories, like
context has a positive impact. However, there
the Kuznets Curve, suggest that income
are also negative effects resulting from
increasing regional disparities. These negative inequality might initially increase as a country
effects include economic inefficiency, weakening develops but eventually decreases as the
social stability and solidarity, and high levels of economy matures and wealth becomes more
inequality are generally perceived as unjust evenly distributed. This perspective posits that
(Todaro, 2009). inequality could spur economic growth by
providing incentives for innovation and
The research gap in this area lies in the
investment.
inconsistent findings across different contexts
and methodologies. While numerous studies However, other studies and theories argue that
have examined the relationship between income high levels of income inequality can be
inequality and economic growth, the results are detrimental to long-term economic growth.
often contradictory, largely due to differences in Excessive inequality can limit access to
data sources, measurement methods, and the education, healthcare, and other essential
economic contexts of the countries studied resources for large segments of the population,
(Galor & Zeira, 1993; Banerjee & Duflo, 2003). thereby reducing the overall level of human
capital in the economy. This can lead to slower
As Mankiw has pointed out, the importance of
national income data calculated by the value- growth because fewer people are able to
added method involves two types of data: 1. Real contribute productively to the economy.

This is an open access article under the CC BY License

(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).
440
Moreover, high inequality can lead to social and between income inequality and economic
political instability, which can further hinder growth across different economic contexts. By
economic progress. doing so, it aims to contribute to the broader
debate on how to achieve sustainable and
The urgency of this research is underscored by inclusive economic growth. The findings of this
the increasing levels of income inequality study are expected to be highly beneficial for
observed globally, which have been linked to policymakers, particularly in developing
social unrest, political instability, and a countries, as they seek to balance economic
reduction in overall well-being (Piketty, 2014; growth with the need to reduce income
Wilkinson & Pickett, 2010). Understanding the inequality.
nuanced relationship between income
inequality and economic growth is critical for
policymakers who aim to foster inclusive growth 2. Methodology
and sustainable economic development. Given
the current global economic challenges, This study employs a qualitative research
including the widening gap between the rich and design with a specific focus on a literature
the poor, there is a pressing need to revisit this review to explore the relationship between
relationship with a fresh perspective. income inequality and economic growth. The
literature review method is chosen for its
Previous studies have contributed significantly effectiveness in synthesizing existing research
to our understanding of how income inequality findings, identifying research gaps, and
and economic growth interact. For instance, providing a comprehensive understanding of
Kuznets (1955) proposed the "Kuznets Curve," complex issues (Snyder, 2019). This approach
suggesting that income inequality initially is particularly suitable for analyzing the
increases with economic growth before multifaceted nature of the relationship
eventually decreasing. However, more recent between income inequality and economic
studies have challenged this hypothesis, growth, which has been the subject of extensive
suggesting that the relationship may not be as theoretical and empirical debate in the
academic literature.
straightforward, particularly in developing
economies (Li & Zou, 1998; Deininger & Squire,
1998). These studies highlight the complexity of The sources of data for this study include peer-
the relationship and the need for further reviewed journal articles, books, and credible
empirical investigation. reports from international organizations such
as the World Bank, International Monetary
The novelty of this study lies in its approach to Fund (IMF), and the Organisation for
addressing the research gap by examining the Economic Co-operation and Development
relationship between income inequality and (OECD). These sources were selected based on
economic growth using a more comprehensive their relevance, credibility, and contribution to
dataset that includes both developed and the discourse on income inequality and
developing countries. Additionally, this study economic growth. The selection criteria
ensured that the study incorporates a diverse
employs advanced econometric techniques that
range of perspectives, including both classical
account for potential endogeneity issues, which
economic theories and contemporary empirical
have often been a limitation in previous research
studies (Booth, Sutton, & Papaioannou, 2016).
(Herzer & Vollmer, 2012; Panizza, 2002).

The purpose of this study is to provide a more Data collection was conducted through
nuanced understanding of the relationship systematic searches in academic databases
This is an open access article under the CC BY License
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).
441
 such as Google Scholar, JSTOR, and (Nowell, Norris, White, & Moules, 2017).
ScienceDirect, using keywords related to
income inequality, economic growth, and their
In conclusion, this study's methodological
interrelationship. The search was refined by
approach—grounded in a literature review with
applying inclusion and exclusion criteria,
thematic analysis—provides a robust
focusing on studies published within the last
framework for examining the complex
two decades to ensure the relevance and
relationship between income inequality and
timeliness of the findings. Additionally,
economic growth. By synthesizing existing
seminal works that have significantly shaped
research, the study aims to offer new insights
the discourse were also included, regardless of
and contribute to the ongoing scholarly debate
their publication date (Kitchenham, 2004).
on how these two variables interact.

For data analysis, the study adopts a thematic 3. Result and Discussion
analysis approach, which involves identifying,
analyzing, and reporting patterns or themes Below is a table of the literature review findings
within the literature (Braun & Clarke, 2006). related to the relationship between income
Thematic analysis is particularly effective in inequality and economic growth. This table
qualitative research as it allows for a detailed summarizes key studies, their methodologies,
and the main findings.
examination of recurring themes and concepts
across different studies, providing insights into
the prevailing narratives and identifying gaps
in the literature. The analysis process involved
coding the data, grouping similar concepts
together, and interpreting the findings in the
context of existing theories and frameworks
Author(s)
Title Methodology Key Findings
and Year
Proposed the Kuznets Curve, suggesting that income inequality
Kuznets, S. Economic Growth and Theoretical
increases in the early stages of economic growth and decreases as
(1955) Income Inequality Analysis
economies mature.
Empirical
Barro, R. J. Inequality and Growth Found a positive relationship between inequality and growth in rich
Panel Data
(2000) in a Panel of Countries countries, but a negative relationship in poor countries.
Analysis
Deininger, New Ways of Looking Cross-Country
Showed that high inequality in developing countries hinders
K., & Squire, at Old Issues: Empirical
economic growth by limiting access to resources and opportunities.
L. (1998) Inequality and Growth Analysis
A Reassessment of the Empirical
Forbes, K. J. Found that higher income inequality is associated with faster
Relationship Between Analysis Using
(2000) economic growth, particularly in the short term.
Inequality and Growth Panel Data
Galor, O., &
Income Distribution Theoretical Argued that income inequality negatively impacts economic growth
Zeira, J.
and Macroeconomics Model by restricting investment in human capital.
(1993)
The Price of
Inequality: How
Stiglitz, J. E. Analytical Discussed how high levels of inequality can lead to lower growth
Today's Divided
(2012) Narrative due to reduced aggregate demand and political instability.
Society Endangers Our
Future

This is an open access article under the CC BY License

(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).
442
 Author(s)
Title Methodology Key Findings
and Year
Empirical
Banerjee, A. Inequality and Growth: Suggested that the relationship between inequality and growth is
Analysis Using
V., & Duflo, What Can the Data non-linear, with both very high and very low inequality potentially
Cross-Country
E. (2003) Say? harmful to growth.
Data
Acemoglu, Why Nations Fail: The
Historical Emphasized the role of institutions in shaping the relationship
D., & Origins of Power,
Analysis & between inequality and economic growth, highlighting the
Robinson, J. Prosperity, and
Case Studies importance of inclusive institutions.
A. (2012) Poverty
Ostry, J. D.,
Empirical Found that lower inequality is robustly correlated with faster and
Berg, A., & Redistribution,
Study Using more durable growth, suggesting the importance of redistribution
Tsangarides, Inequality, and Growth
IMF Data policies.
C. G. (2014)

This table organizes the major findings of the incentivize investment and innovation, which
literature on income inequality and economic in turn drives economic growth (Barro, 2000).
growth, offering a concise overview of different According to this view, income inequality can
perspectives and empirical results that have
be a sign of a healthy, growing economy where
shaped our understanding of this complex
relationship. individuals are rewarded for their productivity
and risk-taking (Forbes, 2000). However, this
3.1. Theoretical Perspectives on Income perspective has been criticized for overlooking
Inequality and Economic Growth the long-term social and economic costs of
high inequality, such as reduced social
The relationship between income inequality mobility and increased political instability
and economic growth has been the subject of (Wilkinson & Pickett, 2010; Ostry, Berg, &
extensive theoretical debate, with various Tsangarides, 2014).
schools of thought offering different
perspectives. Classical economic theories, In contrast, the endogenous growth theory
such as those proposed by Kuznets (1955), posits that high levels of income inequality can
suggest that income inequality initially rises be detrimental to economic growth,
with economic growth and eventually particularly in the long run. This theory
decreases as economies mature, leading to the suggests that inequality can limit access to
well-known "Kuznets Curve" hypothesis. This education and healthcare, which are crucial
perspective implies that inequality is a for human capital development, thereby
temporary and inevitable phase of stifling economic growth (Galor & Zeira,
development (Kuznets, 1955). However, this 1993). Additionally, the concentration of
theory has been challenged by recent studies, wealth in the hands of a few can lead to
particularly in the context of developing underconsumption and reduced aggregate
economies where the predicted decline in demand, further slowing down economic
inequality has not always materialized growth (Stiglitz, 2012).
(Piketty, 2014; Stiglitz, 2012).
These theoretical perspectives highlight the
Neoclassical economists argue that some complexity of the relationship between
degree of income inequality is necessary to income inequality and economic growth.
While some theories emphasize the potential
This is an open access article under the CC BY License
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).
443
benefits of inequality in fostering growth, these contexts suggests that while the curve
others point to the significant risks it poses to may describe a general trend observed in
sustainable economic development. This historical data from developed countries, it
theoretical dichotomy underscores the need does not fully account for the complexities
for empirical research to provide more present in modern, developing economies.
nuanced insights into this relationship.
Furthermore, studies such as those by Galor
Discussion and Zeira (1993) and Stiglitz (2012) argue that
high levels of income inequality can be
The Kuznets Curve is one of the most detrimental to long-term economic growth,
influential theoretical perspectives in particularly when it limits human capital
understanding the relationship between formation. These researchers contend that in
income inequality and economic growth. the presence of significant inequality, large
Proposed by Simon Kuznets in 1955, the curve segments of the population may lack access to
hypothesizes that as an economy develops, education and other opportunities, leading to
inequality first increases and then decreases, a less skilled workforce and reduced economic
following an inverted-U shape (Kuznets, productivity. This perspective contrasts with
1955). The initial rise in inequality is the Kuznets Curve by suggesting that instead
attributed to the structural changes in the of an inevitable decline in inequality,
economy during the early stages of unchecked inequality can create barriers to
industrialization, where wealth tends to sustainable economic growth. The emphasis
concentrate among those who can capitalize here is on the role of equitable access to
on new economic opportunities. As the resources and opportunities as critical
economy matures and more people gain access components of a growing economy, which the
to education, better jobs, and social mobility, classical Kuznets hypothesis does not fully
inequality is expected to decrease. This theory address.
has been foundational in the study of income
inequality, offering a lens through which the The analysis of development inequality
dynamic interplay between economic growth among districts/cities in East Kalimantan
and income distribution can be understood. Province for the years 2010-2012 examined
Kuznets' inverted U hypothesis using Pearson
correlation analysis to determine the
However, recent empirical studies have relationship between economic growth and
challenged the universality of the Kuznets the Williamson index. The analysis yielded
Curve, particularly in the context of the following results: Based on the Pearson
developing economies. For instance, research correlation analysis between economic
by Deininger and Squire (1998) shows that the growth and the Williamson index, it was
predicted decline in inequality does not always concluded that economic growth has a
negative correlation value of -0.333. This
materialize in developing countries, where
means that there is an inverse relationship
inequality can persist or even worsen as between the two variables; as economic
growth continues. This persistence of growth increases, development inequality
inequality is often linked to factors such as tends to increase as well (Yuliani, 2015).
weak institutions, lack of access to quality
education and healthcare, and entrenched Similarly, Kuznets' curve hypothesis has been
social hierarchies that prevent broad-based validated in West Sumatra Province,
participation in economic growth. The Indonesia. This means that, at the beginning
of the development process, regional
divergence from the Kuznets hypothesis in
This is an open access article under the CC BY License
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).
444
inequality tends to increase. However, as
development progresses and the mobility of 3.2. Empirical Evidence from
capital and labor improves, regional Developed and Developing Economies
inequality begins to decrease. Therefore, once
the country has advanced, regional inequality
is expected to diminish, resembling an Empirical studies on the relationship between
inverted "U" shape (Oktarina, 2023). income inequality and economic growth have
produced mixed results, reflecting the
The results from the graphical analysis show complexity of this relationship across different
that the relationship between Economic economic contexts. In developed economies,
Growth and Income Inequality forms an some studies have found a positive correlation
inverted U-shape. This indicates that in the between income inequality and economic
early stages of economic growth, there is an
growth, suggesting that inequality can
increase in income inequality, as evidenced by
the continuous growth of economic stimulate growth by providing incentives for
performance from 2001 to 2010, which was investment and innovation (Forbes, 2000;
accompanied by rising income inequality. Barro, 2000). However, this positive
Subsequently, from 2011 to 2020, while relationship is often contingent on specific
economic growth continued, income conditions, such as the presence of strong
inequality decreased. This inverted U-shape institutions and social safety nets that can
graph demonstrates that Kuznets' Hypothesis
holds true for West Nusa Tenggara Province mitigate the negative effects of inequality
from 2001 to 2020. This means that an (Aghion, Caroli, & García-Peñalosa, 1999).
increase in economic growth is associated
with a decrease in income inequality (Sirtama, In contrast, research in developing economies
2021). often highlights the negative impact of income
inequality on economic growth. High levels of
In light of these findings, it becomes clear that inequality in these contexts are frequently
the relationship between income inequality associated with reduced access to education
and economic growth cannot be fully and healthcare, which are critical for human
explained by the Kuznets Curve alone. While capital formation and long-term growth
the curve provides a valuable framework for (Banerjee & Duflo, 2003; Deininger & Squire,
understanding how inequality might evolve 1998). For example, a study by Berg, Ostry,
during the early stages of economic and Zettelmeyer (2012) found that income
development, it does not adequately capture inequality significantly hampers economic
the diverse factors that influence this growth in developing countries by creating
relationship in different contexts. The barriers to social mobility and limiting the
variation in outcomes across different potential of lower-income individuals to
economies highlights the importance of contribute to the economy.
considering other factors such as institutional
quality, social policies, and the broader global Furthermore, the impact of income inequality
economic environment when analyzing the on economic growth may also vary depending
interplay between inequality and growth. on the specific measures of inequality used.
Thus, contemporary research suggests that Studies that focus on income distribution
policymakers need to move beyond the among different income groups, rather than
Kuznets Curve and adopt more nuanced general measures of inequality such as the
approaches that address the specific Gini coefficient, often reveal more nuanced
challenges faced by their economies in insights. For instance, research by
fostering inclusive and sustainable growth. Voitchovsky (2005) suggests that while
This is an open access article under the CC BY License
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).
445
inequality at the top end of the income empirical evidence overwhelmingly points to a
distribution may spur growth, inequality at the negative relationship between income
lower end tends to hinder it by reducing access inequality and economic growth. High levels
to opportunities for the poor. of inequality in these contexts often correlate
with limited access to education, healthcare,
These empirical findings suggest that the and economic opportunities for large
relationship between income inequality and segments of the population, thereby stunting
economic growth is highly context dependent. human capital development and economic
While some levels of inequality may indeed productivity (Banerjee & Duflo, 2003).
promote growth under certain conditions, Research by Deininger and Squire (1998)
excessive inequality, particularly in supports this view, showing that in developing
developing economies, is more likely to countries, persistent inequality can act as a
undermine sustainable economic significant barrier to sustainable economic
development. This complexity highlights the growth by entrenching poverty and limiting
importance of tailored policy interventions the potential for widespread economic
that consider the specific economic and social participation. This suggests that the
context of each country. detrimental effects of inequality are more
pronounced in economies where access to
Discussion basic services and opportunities is already
constrained.
Empirical evidence from both developed and
developing economies provides a nuanced Moreover, the persistence of inequality in
understanding of the relationship between developing economies also points to the role of
income inequality and economic growth, weak institutions and governance structures
revealing how this relationship varies in exacerbating the negative impact of
depending on the economic context. In inequality on growth. Studies like those by
developed economies, studies often indicate Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson (2001)
that income inequality can have a complex, highlight how weak institutional frameworks
sometimes positive, impact on economic in many developing countries fail to address
growth. For instance, Forbes (2000) found the underlying causes of inequality, such as
that in certain contexts, income inequality corruption, lack of property rights, and
may actually promote economic growth by ineffective legal systems. These factors not
incentivizing individuals to innovate and only perpetuate inequality but also inhibit
invest, particularly in environments where economic growth by creating an environment
strong institutions mitigate the negative where economic resources are not allocated
consequences of inequality. This suggests that efficiently. The lack of effective redistribution
in economies with robust legal and social mechanisms further exacerbates the situation,
frameworks, the potentially harmful effects of making it difficult for these economies to
inequality, such as reduced social mobility and achieve inclusive growth.
political instability, can be counterbalanced by
these institutional strengths, leading to a The contrasting empirical evidence between
scenario where inequality and growth can developed and developing economies
coexist. underscores the importance of context in
understanding the relationship between
However, the situation in developing income inequality and economic growth.
economies is markedly different. Here, the While some degree of inequality may be
This is an open access article under the CC BY License
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).
446
compatible with growth in developed corruption and inefficiency, leading to
economies, in developing countries, excessive suboptimal outcomes (Acemoglu & Robinson,
inequality is more likely to hinder growth by 2012).
restricting access to essential resources and
opportunities. This highlights the need for The role of institutions extends beyond
targeted policy interventions that address the taxation and redistribution. Effective
specific challenges faced by developing institutions are also crucial for ensuring that
economies, such as improving institutional economic growth is inclusive and benefits a
quality, expanding access to education and broad spectrum of society. This includes
healthcare, and implementing effective enforcing property rights, reducing
redistribution policies. These measures are corruption, and ensuring that markets are
crucial for ensuring that economic growth is competitive and accessible to all (North,
both inclusive and sustainable, particularly in 1990). Strong institutions can help create an
contexts where inequality poses a significant environment where income inequality does
barrier to development. not become a barrier to growth, but rather a
driver of innovation and productivity.
3.3. Policy Implications and the Role of Moreover, the global nature of economic
Institutions activity today means that national policies
must also consider the impact of global
The mixed empirical evidence on the inequality. International cooperation on
relationship between income inequality and issues such as tax evasion, trade, and financial
economic growth has significant policy regulation is essential for addressing the root
implications. Policymakers must balance the causes of income inequality and ensuring that
potential growth-enhancing effects of economic growth is shared more equitably
inequality with the need to ensure that growth across countries (Piketty, 2014; Stiglitz, 2012).
is inclusive and sustainable. One key policy This highlights the need for coordinated policy
recommendation is to invest in education and efforts at both the national and international
healthcare, which can help mitigate the levels. The chart above illustrates the key policy
negative effects of inequality by enhancing implications and the role of institutions in
human capital and social mobility (Aghion et managing the relationship between income
al., 1999; Stiglitz, 2012). This approach is inequality and economic growth.
particularly important in developing
economies, where inequality often arises from
unequal access to these essential services.

Another important policy consideration is the

role of taxation and redistribution in
addressing income inequality. Progressive
taxation and social welfare programs can help
reduce excessive inequality without
necessarily stifling economic growth (Ostry et
al., 2014). However, the effectiveness of these
measures depends on the strength of It highlights four major areas of focus:
institutions and governance structures. In
countries with weak institutions, efforts to
redistribute wealth may be undermined by 1) Investment in Education & Healthcare
This is an open access article under the CC BY License
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).
447
 (85%): This is critical for enhancing effectiveness of policies in one area often
human capital and ensuring that reinforcing the success in others. The chart
economic growth benefits a broader visually emphasizes the importance of a
segment of society. By investing in comprehensive approach to managing the
these areas, governments can help complex relationship between income
mitigate the negative effects of inequality and economic growth.
inequality and promote inclusive
growth. 3.4. Future Research Directions and
Conclusion

2) Progressive Taxation & Redistribution The relationship between income inequality

(75%): Progressive tax policies and and economic growth remains a complex and
effective redistribution mechanisms multifaceted issue that warrants further
are essential for reducing excessive research. While significant progress has been
income inequality without made in understanding the various
undermining economic incentives. dimensions of this relationship, several gaps
These policies help in balancing the in the literature still exist. Future research
growth equation by ensuring that the could benefit from more comprehensive data
wealth generated by economic growth that captures the nuances of income
is more equitably distributed. distribution across different countries and
over time (Snyder, 2019). Additionally, there
is a need for more studies that examine the
3) Strengthening Institutions (90%):
long-term effects of inequality on economic
Strong, effective institutions are crucial
growth, particularly in the context of global
for enforcing laws, reducing
economic shifts such as technological change
corruption, and ensuring that
and globalization (Aghion et al., 1999).
economic opportunities are accessible
to all. The robustness of institutions
One promising area for future research is the
directly influences the ability to
role of technological advancements in shaping
manage inequality and foster
the relationship between income inequality
sustainable growth.
and economic growth. As automation and
artificial intelligence continue to transform
4) Global Cooperation & Policy labor markets, there is a growing concern that
Coordination (70%): In an these technologies may exacerbate income
interconnected global economy, inequality by disproportionately benefiting
international cooperation on issues like high-skilled workers and capital owners
tax evasion, trade policies, and (Acemoglu & Restrepo, 2018). Understanding
financial regulation is vital for how these trends interact with economic
addressing the root causes of income growth is crucial for developing policies that
inequality on a global scale. can harness the benefits of technological
Coordinated policies help ensure that progress while minimizing its negative
the benefits of global economic growth impacts on inequality.
are shared more evenly across nations.
Another important avenue for research is the
These areas are interdependent, with the impact of environmental sustainability on the
relationship between income inequality and
This is an open access article under the CC BY License
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).
448
economic growth. As concerns about climate with strong institutional frameworks that
change and resource depletion grow, there is mitigate its adverse effects.
increasing interest in how economic growth
can be made more inclusive and sustainable Ultimately, the findings of this study underscore
(Stiglitz, 2012). This includes exploring how the need for policymakers to adopt a balanced
policies aimed at reducing income inequality approach that promotes economic growth while
can also contribute to environmental ensuring that the benefits of growth are
distributed more equitably across society. This
sustainability, and vice versa.
involves implementing policies that reduce
excessive inequality through targeted
In conclusion, the relationship between investments in education, healthcare, and social
income inequality and economic growth is a safety nets, alongside measures that support
complex and dynamic issue that varies across inclusive growth. As global economic challenges
different contexts and over time. While some continue to evolve, it is crucial that future
inequality may be necessary for economic research continues to explore this dynamic
growth, excessive inequality poses significant relationship, providing insights that can guide
risks to long-term development and social effective policy interventions to foster both
stability. Policymakers must carefully economic prosperity and social equity.
consider the specific conditions of their
economies when designing policies to address References
income inequality, ensuring that these policies Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018). Artificial
promote inclusive and sustainable growth. intelligence, automation, and work.
Future research should continue to explore the Economics Papers and Publications.
https://doi.org/10.3386/w24196
various dimensions of this relationship,
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why
providing insights that can inform effective
nations fail: The origins of power,
policy interventions. prosperity, and poverty. Crown Business.
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A.
(2001). The colonial origins of comparative
4. Conclusion
development: An empirical investigation.
The relationship between income inequality and American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369-
economic growth is complex and multifaceted, 1401. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.5.1369
with varying implications depending on the Aghion, P., Caroli, E., & García-Peñalosa, C.
context and the specific economic conditions of (1999). Inequality and economic growth:
each country. This study has demonstrated that The perspective of the new growth theories.
while some level of income inequality can Journal of Economic Literature, 37(4), 1615-
potentially drive economic growth by fostering 1660. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.37.4.1615
incentives for investment and innovation, Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2003). Inequality
excessive inequality poses significant risks to and growth: What can the data say? Journal
long-term sustainable growth. In developing of Economic Growth, 8(3), 267-299.
economies, high levels of inequality often https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026205114860
hinder access to essential services such as Barro, R. J. (2000). Inequality and growth in a
education and healthcare, limiting human panel of countries. Journal of Economic
capital development and stifling economic Growth, 5(1), 5-32.
progress. Conversely, in developed economies, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009850119329
the relationship between inequality and growth Berg, A., Ostry, J. D., & Zettelmeyer, J. (2012).
can be more nuanced, where inequality may What makes growth sustained? Journal of
coexist with growth, particularly in contexts Development Economics, 98(2), 149-166.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.08.
This is an open access article under the CC BY License
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).
449
 002 104, 333-339.
Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.
Systematic approaches to a successful 039
literature review. Sage Publications. Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The price of inequality: How
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic today's divided society endangers our
analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research future. W.W. Norton & Company.
in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. Voitchovsky, S. (2005). Does the profile of
https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063 income inequality matter for economic
oa growth? Journal of Economic Growth,
Deininger, K., & Squire, L. (1998). New ways of 10(3), 273-296.
looking at old issues: Inequality and growth. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-005-3535-
Journal of Development Economics, 57(2), 3
259-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304- Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The spirit
3878(98)00099-6 level: Why greater equality makes societies
Forbes, K. J. (2000). A reassessment of the stronger. Bloomsbury Press.
relationship between inequality and growth.
American Economic Review, 90(4), 869- Mankiw, Gregory N. 2006. Macroeconomic 6th
887. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.4.869. Edition. New York: Worth Publishers.
Galor, O., & Zeira, J. (1993). Income distribution Todaro, Michael P and Stephen C. Smith, 2009.
and macroeconomics. The Review of Economic Development, Eleventh Edition,
Economic Studies, 60(1), 35-52. Pearson Education Limited, England.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2297811 Yuliani , Tutik. Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan
Ketimpangan Pendapatan Antar
Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for
Kabupaten di Kalimantan Timur;
performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php
Keele University, 33(2004), 1-26. /jejak, JEJAK Journal of Economics and
Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income Policy 8 (1) (2015): 1-88
inequality. The American Economic Review, Sirtama, Baiq Wihan; Hubungan Antara
45(1), 1-28. Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Dan Ketimpangan
https://www.jstor.org/stable/1811581 Pendapatan Di Provinsi Nusa Tenggara
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional Barat (Pembuktian Hipotesis Kuznets),
change and economic performance. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi (JIE) Vol. 5, No. 4,
Cambridge University Press. November 2021, pp. 654 - 664 654.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Oktarina, Nabila and Yuliana Yeni. Hubungan
Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Ketimpangan Pendapatan dan
Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Sumatera Barat
International Journal of Qualitative : Pembuktian Hipotesis Kuznet.
Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847. https://greenationpublisher.org/JGIA.
https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691773384 Vol. 1, No. 1, Februari. 2023
7
Ostry, J. D., Berg, A., & Tsangarides, C. G. (2014).
Redistribution, inequality, and growth. IMF
Staff Discussion Note SDN/14/02.
https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn
/2014/sdn1402.pdf
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first
century. Harvard University Press.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a
research methodology: An overview and
guidelines. Journal of Business Research,
This is an open access article under the CC BY License
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0).
450