Assignment
Business Ethics
Submitted By: Rokeya Binte Tonima
ID: 1911647630
Submitted To: Prof. Dr Jasim Uddin
Department of History and Philosophy
Course code: PHI -401
Section: 12
Whistleblowing is an act done by a member or former member of an organization for disclosing
wrongdoing inside or outside through an organization or its employees. It is merely meaning to
the end of correcting or preventing wrong.
A whistleblower is a person who is a member of an organization that discloses necessary
information or data within a private, public or government organization, is considered as illegal,
wrong and unsafe. Whistleblowing can be internal or external so those who become
whistleblowers can choose to highlight wrongdoings either internally or externally. When some
important data is shared with employees inside the organization or authorities is called internal
whistleblowing and if some important information of an organization is shared with outsider of
that organization or competitors of that company is called external whistleblowing.
But it is sometimes argued that external whistleblowing is wrong because as an employee of an
organization its their duty to be loyal with their organization and keep all necessary data
confidential for the benefit of that organization and sometimes it is argued that external
whistleblowing is always morally justified as every employee has their right to speak freely,
expressing their feelings. For instance, when it comes about moral duty for a person to prevent
the wrong either it is a part of that person’s responsibility or he/she the only person who can
prevent that wrong doing which will safe human society then whistleblowing is allowed.
However, whistleblower protection is a significant anti-corruption system. Around the world,
countries like European Union member states, it takes time to handle whistle blowing
incongruously with systems to protect public organization’s member those who reveals data that
is developed for corrupting inspections and undertakings but some countries have fixed out the
right steps. Thus, members who uncover internal data are not able to defense for countering.
Building a protection system for whistleblowers is a challenge for any country as it requires a
fruitful whistle-blower protection. For this, a country will be needed a well-designed legal
system of penal, regulatory and procedural.
For example:
A current employee of an organization saw some unexpected things that have been occurring for
so long.
That particular employee's reaction- They may warn the superior authority of that organization or
the government hierarchy. And his intention to expose all the frauds. But after their initial steps,
they could face problems. Their colleagues may attitude. Differently, their job could be in
danger, and as a whistleblower, their chances of being hired at a new organization near future.
Example:
Even after the Sue against the frauds, what could be the problem of the whistleblower?
- Since these things are a lengthy process, a whistleblower may get success or not. But that
person tried to expose all the illegal things from their perspective. It's their moral right.
Sometimes the government may help you, sometimes not. Even your colleagues may try to
ignore you, and they are not going to help you to go forward with that case. You may fail, and
your jobs could be terminated. So, it depends on luck and the proper visibility of the
wrongdoing. The company may use a lot of strategies to cover its wrongdoing. It's hard to bring
this wrongdoing to the public. So unsuccessfully could be your result.
According to some researchers, whistleblowing laws provoke the member of an organization to
speak out and uncover their reality which is leading them for mistakenly believing that they are
protected in every situation but they do not understand that they are becoming easier targets of
retaliation than. they can be safe if the law did exist. thus, there are many countries in where the
organizational environment is poor, there the anonymous disclosures of information could be the
only solid option for whistleblowers.
During the past years, international discussions held for the foundation of a whistleblower
protection. This system has taken under political, academic and respectful society. The most
concerning argument in favor of whistleblower protection was the protection which would
energize the transparent power in both sectors public and private for discouraging corruption.
Some governments, intergovernmental organizations, and NGOs have been enthusiastically
supported international efforts for promoting this type of a system.
Encouraging the whistleblowing through suspecting corruption is basic in defending public
intrigued and advanced culture of public responsibility and judgment. Public authorities have
access for updating data concerning about their workplaces and are ordinarily the primary to
perceive wrongdoings. In most locales, it is an commitment for them to monitor corruption and
other acts of neglect. In any case, public authorities who monitor wrongdoings may be subjected
to terrorizing, badgering, expulsion and savagery by their individual authorities or bosses. As a
result, encouragement of whistleblowing would be related with the comparing protection for the
whistleblower. Within the public sector, public hirelings got to know what their rights and
commitments are in terms of uncovering genuine or hiding wrongdoing inside the public benefit.
These ought to incorporate clear rules and methods for officials to take after and a formal chain
of duty. Public workers too got to know what protection will be accessible to them for saving in
cases of uncovering wrongdoing.
It is imperative to consider the foremost common boundaries of whistleblowing. According to
current procedure's burden which is imposed on whistleblowers, is additionally a big matter of
concern. For illustration, in Germany, the Government Work Court has upheld in certain
occasions that open hirelings wishing to reveal wrongdoings got to to begin with look for in-
house clarification and decide the suitability of their revelation or they seem confront a lawful
rejection in case they come up short to accurately exceed the open intrigued versus their devotion
obligation. Ordinarily, courts attempt their possess appreciation of circumstances, which in hone
constitutes a disincentive to ended up a whistleblower.
