Library Progress International Print version ISSN 0970 1052

Vol.44 No.3, Jul-Dec 2024: P. 22893-22897 Online version ISSN 2320 317X

Original Article Available online at www.bpasjournals.com

A Comparative Review of Construction Project Management Software: Enhancing Efficiency and

K.V.G.D.Prasad1, A.Aravindan2, Nadigatla Naveen Kumar3

1,2,3
Department of civil engineering, KLEF(Deemed to be University),Vaddeswaram, India.
Corresponding Author Email: kolaprasad121@gmail.com

How to cite this article: K.V.G.D.Prasad, A.Aravindan, Nadigatla Naveen Kumar (2024) A Comparative Review
of Construction Project Management Software: Enhancing Efficiency and Overcoming Integration Challenges.
Library Progress International, 44(3), 22893-22897.

ABSTRACT
The construction industry faces increasing challenges in maintaining cost accuracy due to dynamic market
variables, unique project requirements, and complex scope changes. Advances in cost estimation technologies,
including modern software and data analytics, have created tools to enhance estimation accuracy, streamline
budgeting, and improve cost control. This article reviews key construction cost estimation software, such as Sage
Estimating and ProEst, analyzing their impact on cost control and prediction. The study also highlights the benefits
of predictive modelling, real-time data integration, and cloud collaboration, alongside the challenges of
maintaining accuracy in a rapidly changing environment. The findings underscore the critical role of technology
in managing costs effectively while navigating common obstacles, including material price volatility, labour
market fluctuations, and data management complexities.
Keywords: Construction cost estimation, Predictive analytics, Real-time data integration, Cloud-based
collaboration, Cost control.
1. Introduction
In construction, accurately estimating project costs is fundamental to successful project management. Estimation
accuracy impacts not only the financial outcomes but also the project’s feasibility, profitability, and client
satisfaction. The evolution of cost estimation technologies has introduced advanced software and data analytics
that improve precision, streamline workflows, and provide actionable insights for better decision-making. As
construction projects become more complex, traditional estimation methods often fall short in accuracy and
responsiveness, creating a demand for more robust and adaptable estimation tools.
This article explores how modern cost estimation software and data analytics are reshaping construction cost
estimation. It investigates the accuracy, efficiency, and challenges associated with using these tools and examines
their benefits in dynamic construction environments.
2. Objective
The objectives of this study are to:
1. Review key modern construction cost estimation software used within the industry.
2. Analyze the impact of data analytics tools on improving cost estimation accuracy and control.
3. Examine the benefits of advanced cost estimation tools on project success.
4. Identify common challenges in maintaining estimation accuracy and propose strategies to address them.
3. Scope
This study focuses on construction cost estimation software such as Sage Estimating, PlanSwift, ProEst, and
Builder trend, covering their functionalities, impact on accuracy, and effectiveness in cost control. It also delves
into data analytics tools used in cost estimation, highlighting how they help tackle project-specific challenges and
adapt to dynamic project needs. This study is relevant to industry professionals, including project managers,
contractors, estimators, and finance teams, aiming to improve their cost estimation practices.
4. Literature Review
Research has increasingly explored the role of advanced software and data analytics in construction cost
estimation. Ali and Mohammad (2021) emphasize the role of machine learning and data analytics in improving
estimation accuracy, showing how predictive models can identify cost patterns and account for labour fluctuations.
Studies by Autodesk (2022) and Jones (2017) underscore the importance of cloud-based platforms, like ProEst,

Library Progress International| Vol.44 No.3 |Jul-Dec 2024 22893

for collaboration and streamlined estimation. In addition, Hegazy and Ayed (1998) and Baccarini (2004)
emphasize that scenario planning and risk management tools can reduce cost overruns by proactively addressing
potential project risks.
Other studies, such as Ford and Moghaddam (2016), address automation’s impact on error reduction, especially
when using integrated tools like Sage Estimating and PlanSwift. Fouchal et al. (2015) have also discussed the role
of simulation models in estimation, showing that they account for project uncertainties. Despite these benefits,
Eschenbruch and Cox (2018) and Jarkas and Bitar (2012) highlight the ongoing challenges of labour and material
cost fluctuations, even when using advanced estimation software.
5. Accurate cost estimation
Accurate cost estimation is essential for the success of construction projects, influencing not only budgets but also
schedules, profitability, and client satisfaction. Rapid advancements in technology are transforming the cost
estimation landscape, bringing a range of modern software and data analytics capabilities to improve estimation
accuracy and control. However, as complex as these technologies are, dynamic construction environments still
present challenges that complicate the estimation process.
This article reviews key software platforms, the impact of data analytics on construction cost prediction and
control, and the challenges of maintaining accuracy in cost estimates.
6. Modern Cost Estimation Software:
Construction cost estimation has evolved with the development of software that leverages data for more accurate,
streamlined estimates. Prominent platforms in this area include:
1. Sage Estimating: Known for its ability to integrate with accounting systems, Sage Estimating automates access
to cost databases, providing real-time updates on labour and material prices. Its functionality supports data
integration across different project phases, aligning with Ford and Moghaddam's (2016) findings on automation’s
role in reducing estimation errors.
2. PlanSwift: This tool offers digital take-off capabilities, allowing users to measure quantities on digital blueprints.
With features to customize cost databases, PlanSwift is adaptable to various project types, and its emphasis on
user-friendliness aligns with Cerri's (2022) conclusions about the importance of ease-of-use in modern estimation
software.
3. ProEst: ProEst operates in a cloud environment, enhancing collaborative estimation work. With automatic cost
updates and CRM integration, it provides estimators with flexibility and accessibility across locations, which
reflects Jones’s (2017) observations on the importance of cloud-based collaboration in construction.
4. Builder trend: Combining scheduling, cost estimation, and project management, Builder trend is popular with
small- to mid-sized contractors. The platform integrates with accounting software, tracking expenses like labour
and materials, which aligns with Bimberg and Bruns' (2017) findings on the advantages of integrated project tools.
5. Trimble’s WinEst: Built for large, complex projects, WinEst allows estimators to create detailed and data-driven
estimates, using construction-specific data sources. This platform’s focus on enterprise-level projects is consistent
with Eschenbruch and Cox’s (2018) work on estimation accuracy for large-scale projects.
Each of these platforms has unique features, but collectively they emphasize cloud accessibility, real-time data
integration, and compatibility with project management tools—advances that make cost estimation faster, more
accurate, and adaptable to changing variables (Ali & Mohammad, 2021).
7. The Impact of Advanced Data Analytics on Cost Prediction and Control
Advanced data analytics has significantly improved the ability to predict and control costs in construction projects.
By harnessing data from various sources, analytics enable a more sophisticated approach to understanding and
managing cost variables. Key areas of impact include:
1. Predictive Modelling: Machine learning models leverage historical project data to predict future costs, providing
estimators with greater accuracy by accounting for seasonal fluctuations and regional factors (Lee & Kim, 2018).
Predictive analytics also helps identify project risks by analyzing patterns in previous cost performance (Gurevich
& Sacks, 2020).
2. Real-Time Data Integration: IoT devices on construction sites provide immediate feedback on materials usage,
equipment efficiency, and labour productivity. This real-time data feeds into estimation software, allowing for
more dynamic and accurate updates as conditions change (Fouchal et al., 2015).
3. Risk Assessment and Scenario Planning: Data analytics facilitates scenario modelling, enabling estimators to
simulate various project scenarios. This process helps teams plan for contingencies, especially in high-risk
environments, as highlighted by Baccarini (2004) in his analysis of cost estimation accuracy.

Library Progress International| Vol.44 No.3 |Jul-Dec 2024 22894

4. Enhanced Transparency: Analytics provides granular data breakdowns, giving stakeholders a clearer picture of
project costs at each phase. Increased transparency strengthens client relationships and supports better project
planning, as noted by Jrade and Jalaei (2013) in their study on project transparency and trust.
Overall, data analytics enables construction professionals to not only estimate costs more precisely but also
anticipate potential budget overruns, making the estimation process more reliable and adaptable to changes
(Deloitte, 2020).
The adoption of modern cost estimation technologies has transformed the industry, with benefits for profitability,
project timelines, and stakeholder relationships. Enhanced cost control improves client satisfaction and reduces
the likelihood of budget overruns, as stated by Elinwa & Buba (1993). With reduced manual workload, estimators
can focus more on project planning, improving overall project execution.
8.Challenges of Maintaining Cost Accuracy in Dynamic Construction Environments
Despite technological advances, the construction industry faces inherent challenges that complicate cost
estimation accuracy. Major challenges include:
1. Material Price Volatility: Unpredictable changes in global supply chains can cause material prices to fluctuate
significantly, impacting project costs. Tools with real-time cost updates partially mitigate this issue, but keeping
pace with rapid market shifts remains a challenge (Gallaher et al., 2004).
2. Labor Costs and Availability: Labor availability varies widely based on regional markets, union requirements,
and seasonal demand. Labor cost forecasting tools are beneficial, but sudden shifts in the labour market can still
disrupt estimation accuracy (Jarkas & Bitar, 2012).
3. Complex Project Variables: Large-scale projects often require specialized materials, regulatory approvals, or
unique logistical arrangements. These variables complicate cost estimation and may require additional manual
adjustments beyond software capabilities (Hegazy & Ayed, 1998).
4. Scope Creep and Change Orders: As projects progress, scope changes are often introduced, leading to
unexpected costs. Although cloud-based tools facilitate adjustments, accurately reflecting each change in the
budget remains complex, particularly for projects with multiple interdependencies (Moselhi & Messner, 2021).
5. Data Management and Integration: Integrating and maintaining consistent data across platforms is essential but
challenging, especially with data from multiple stakeholders. Discrepancies in data management can result in
estimation errors (Frolova & Markova, 2017).
9. Benefits of Construction Cost Estimation Technologies
Modern cost estimation technologies provide numerous benefits, including:
 Accuracy and Reliability: Real-time updates and automated calculations improve accuracy, reducing human
error (Cheung et al., 2012).

 Time Savings: Automation and pre-set cost databases decrease the time needed for estimates, allowing teams to
focus on strategic tasks (Byrd & Mapp, 2019).

 Enhanced Decision-Making: Data integration enables better-informed decisions by revealing cost trends and
potential risks (Azhar et al., 2011).

 Improved Collaboration: Cloud-based platforms facilitate collaboration across project teams and stakeholders,
as documented by Becerik-Gerber & Kensek (2010).

 Budget Adherence: With improved accuracy, construction professionals can better adhere to budgets, avoiding
costly overruns (Akintoye & Fitzgerald, 2000).

 Flexibility: Adjustable parameters in software allow it to adapt to various project types, increasing its utility across
different construction applications (Ibrahim & Moselhi, 2015).

 Scalability: Cloud-based tools can scale to fit the needs of both small and large firms (National Institute of
Building Sciences, 2016).

 Integration: Many modern estimation tools integrate with project management software, providing a
comprehensive project view (Love & Li, 2000).
Cost estimation technologies, combined with data analytics, have brought transformative changes to construction
budgeting, enabling greater accuracy, efficiency, and adaptability. Platforms like Sage Estimating, ProEst, and
PlanSwift integrate real-time data and predictive modeming, offering valuable solutions to longstanding industry
challenges. Yet, material price volatility, labour market instability, and data management issues still complicate

Library Progress International| Vol.44 No.3 |Jul-Dec 2024 22895

cost accuracy. By addressing these challenges, construction firms can unlock the full potential of these
technologies, setting a new standard for precision and project success in construction.
10. Benefits of Construction Cost Estimation Technologies
1. Increased Accuracy: Real-time data integration improves the accuracy of estimates by considering the latest
information on labour, materials, and other costs (Cheung et al., 2012).
2. Time Savings: Automated calculations and pre-built cost databases streamline the estimation process, allowing
project teams to focus on strategic aspects (Byrd & Mapp, 2019).
3. Improved Decision-Making: With predictive analytics and trend analysis, estimators can make better-informed
decisions that align with project goals and anticipated risks (Azhar et al., 2011).
4. Enhanced Collaboration: Cloud-based platforms, like ProEst, allow for real-time access and updates, supporting
collaboration among project stakeholders (Becerik-Gerber & Kensek, 2010).
5. Risk Mitigation: Predictive models and scenario planning features help construction teams anticipate and plan
for potential risks, reducing the likelihood of cost overruns (Baccarini, 2004).
11. Advantages of Cost Estimation Technologies
1. Budget Adherence: Improved accuracy aids in adherence to project budgets, reducing unanticipated costs
(Akintoye & Fitzgerald, 2000).
2. Flexibility: Advanced tools offer customizable parameters, making them adaptable to various project types and
scopes (Ibrahim & Moselhi, 2015).
3. Scalability: Many cloud-based platforms are scalable, suitable for both small and large firms handling diverse
project sizes (National Institute of Building Sciences, 2016).
4. Integration with Project Management Tools: Most cost estimation tools integrate with broader project
management software, enabling seamless workflows (Love & Li, 2000).
12. Impact of Cost Estimation Technologies on Construction Projects
The adoption of modern cost estimation technologies has improved project planning accuracy, shortened project
timelines, and strengthened stakeholder relationships. By supporting better cost control and reducing estimation
errors, these tools contribute to overall project profitability and client satisfaction (Elinwa & Buba, 1993). As
automation decreases manual workload, estimators can focus more on project execution, improving team
efficiency and project outcomes.
13.Challenges of Maintaining Cost Accuracy in Dynamic Construction Environments
Despite the advancements, maintaining accuracy remains challenging in the volatile construction industry. Major
challenges include:
1. Material Price Volatility: Global supply chain issues and fluctuating market demands can lead to sudden changes
in material costs, impacting project budgets. While some platforms provide real-time updates, adapting to price
volatility remains difficult (Gallaher et al., 2004).
2. Labor Market Instability: Labor costs fluctuate due to regional availability, union requirements, and seasonal
demand, complicating cost forecasting efforts (Jarkas & Bitar, 2012).
3. Complex Project Variables: Large projects may require special materials, regulatory compliance, or custom
features, complicating estimation processes (Hegazy & Ayed, 1998).
4. Scope Creep and Change Orders: Project modifications often result in unplanned cost adjustments. While
cloud-based software aids in real-time adjustments, accurately capturing these changes is still challenging
(Moselhi & Messner, 2021).
5. Data Management and Integration: Consistent data integration across platforms is essential yet challenging,
especially with input from multiple stakeholders (Frolova & Markova, 2017).
14. Conclusion
Advances in construction cost estimation technologies have significantly improved project cost accuracy and
efficiency. Tools like Sage Estimating, ProEst, and PlanSwift provide real-time data integration, predictive
modelling, and cloud-based collaboration, creating a more agile and data-informed approach to project budgeting.
However, the construction industry still faces challenges, including material price volatility, labour market
fluctuations, and data management complexities. Addressing these issues will enable firms to leverage
technology’s full potential, improve cost estimation practices, and achieve project success.

Library Progress International| Vol.44 No.3 |Jul-Dec 2024 22896

15. References
1. Ali, A., & Mohammad, A. (2021). Machine Learning in Construction Cost Estimation. International Journal of
Construction Engineering, 9(2), 45-63.
2. Aibinu, A., & Pasco, T. (2008). The accuracy of pre-tender building cost estimates in Australia. Construction
Management and Economics, 26(12), 1257-1269.
3. Akintoye, A., & Fitzgerald, E. (2000). A survey of current cost estimating practices in the UK. Construction
Management & Economics, 18(2), 161-172.
4. Autodesk. (2022). Improving Cost Accuracy with Construction Software. Retrieved from Autodesk Resources.
5. Azhar, S., Carlton, W., Olsen, D., & Ahmad, I. (2011). Building information modeling for sustainable design and
LEED® rating analysis. Automation in Construction, 20(2), 217-224.
6. Baccarini, D. (2004). Accuracy in project cost estimating. Proceedings of the Project Management Institute
Australia National Conference, Sydney.
7. Becerik-Gerber, B., & Kensek, K. M. (2010). Building Information Modeling in Architecture, Engineering, and
Construction: Emerging Research Directions and Trends. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering
Education and Practice, 136(3), 139-147.
8. Bimberg, M., & Bruns, S. (2017). Cost Estimation Techniques in Construction Management. Springer.
9. Byrd, H. R., & Mapp, C. (2019). Leveraging Data Analytics for Accurate Construction Cost Estimation.
Construction Research Review, 13(5), 117-134.
10. Cerri, D. (2022). Cost Estimation Technologies in Large-Scale Projects. Journal of Construction Project
Management, 8(4), 214-230.
11. Cheung, F., Rihan, J., Tah, J., Duce, D., & Kurul, E. (2012). Early stage multi-level cost estimation for sustainable
building design. Automation in Construction, 27, 99-112.
12. Deloitte. (2020). Data Analytics in the Construction Industry. Deloitte Insights.
13. Egan, J. (1998). Rethinking Construction: The Report of the Construction Task Force. HMSO.
14. Elinwa, U., & Buba, S. (1993). Construction cost factors in Nigeria. Journal of Construction Engineering and
Management, 119(4), 698-713.
15. Eschenbruch, K. A., & Cox, R. F. (2018). Cost Estimation Accuracy and Precision in Construction. Journal of
Cost Engineering, 60(3), 23-32.
16. Ford, G. & Moghaddam, J. (2016). Risk Assessment and Cost Control in Construction Projects. Construction
Industry Press.
17. Fouchal, F., Abourezk’s, S., & Nassar, K. (2015). A simulation-based model for construction cost estimation
under uncertainty. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(3).
18. Frolova, A., & Markova, L. (2017). Challenges of Implementing Construction Software in Cost Management.
Construction Journal, 6(1), 14-28.
19. Gallaher, M. P., O’Connor, A. C., Dettbarn, J. L., & Gilday, L. T. (2004). Cost Analysis of Inadequate
Interoperability in the U.S. Capital Facilities Industry. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
20. Gurevich, U., & Sacks, R. (2020). Improving accuracy in cost estimation through machine learning models.
Journal of Building Engineering, 29, 101123.
21. Hegazy, T., & Ayed, A. (1998). Neural network model for parametric cost estimation of highway projects. Journal
of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(3), 210-218.
22. Ibrahim, M., & Moselhi, O. (2015). Impact of risk management practices on the accuracy of construction cost
estimates. Journal of Construction Engineering, 10(2), 235-252.
23. Jarkas, A. M., & Bitar, C. G. (2012). Factors affecting construction labor productivity in Kuwait. Journal of
Construction Engineering and Management, 138(7), 811-820.
24. Jones, S. A. (2017). Digital Transformation in Construction: The Path Forward. McGraw Hill Construction.
25. Jrade, A., & Jalaei, F. (2013). Integrating building information modelling with sustainability to design building
projects at the conceptual stage. Building Simulation, 6(4), 429-444.
26. Kim, G. H., An, S. H., & Kang, K. I. (2004). Comparison of construction cost estimating models based on
regression analysis, neural networks, and case-based reasoning. Building and Environment, 39(10), 1235-1242.
27. Lee, S. H., & Kim, J. H. (2018). Machine learning approach for construction cost estimation. Automation in
Construction, 94, 16-24.
28. Love, P. E., & Li, H. (2000). Quantifying the causes and costs of rework in construction. Construction
Management and Economics, 18(4), 479-490.
29. Moselhi, O., & Messner, J. (2021). Using advanced analytics for project cost control. Engineering, Construction
and Architectural Management, 28(4), 920-936.
30. National Institute of Building Sciences. (2016). Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Cost Estimation:
Current Practice and Future Direction.

Library Progress International| Vol.44 No.3 |Jul-Dec 2024 22897