To Print Rflib
To Print Rflib
ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING ACT OF 2001                     other similar entities and all other
                                                                    RA 9160 AS AMENDED                             persons and their subsidiaries and
                                                                                                                   affiliates supervised or regulated by the
                                                                                                                   Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP);
                                                             The Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2001
                                                                                                                2. Insurance       companies,        pre-need
                                                             (AMLA) according to Sec 2; Declaration of
                                                                                                                   companies and all other persons
                                                             Policy it is hereby declared the policy of the        supervised or regulated by the
                                                             State to protect and preserve the integrity and       Insurance Commission (IC);
   PAMANTASAN NG LUNGSOD NG MAYNILA                          confidentiality of bank accounts and to ensure     3. (i) Securities dealers, brokers, salesmen,
         (University of the City of Manila)                  that the Philippines shall not be used as a           investment houses and other similar
 General Luna, corner Muralla St., Intramuros, Manila        money laundering site for the proceeds of any         persons      managing      securities   or
                 1002 Metro Manila                                                                                 rendering services as investment agent,
                                                             unlawful activity. Consistent with its foreign
                                                                                                                   advisor, or consultant,
                                                             policy, the State shall extend cooperation in
                                                             transnational investigations and prosecutions         (ii) Mutual funds, close-end investment
                                                             of persons involved in money laundering               companies, common trust funds, and
In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the subject                                                         other similar persons,
  Regulatory Framework and Legal Issues in Business          activities wherever committed
                                                                                                                   (iii) Transfer companies and other
                      (ACN 2210A-4)
                                                                         POLICY OF THE LAW                         similar entities; and
                                                                                                                   (iv) Other entities administering or
                                                                1. To protect and preserve the integrity           otherwise     dealing   in    currency,
                                                                   and confidentiality of bank accounts            commodities or financial derivatives
                Finals Reviewer:                                   and to ensure that the Philippines shall        based thereon, valuable objects, cash
  ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING ACT                                        not be used as a money laundering site
                                                                   for the proceeds of any unlawful
                                                                                                                   substitutes and other similar monetary
                                                                                                                   instruments or property supervised or
        OF 2001 (RA 9160)                                          activity.                                       regulated by the Securities and
                                                                2. To pursue the State's foreign policy to         Exchange Commission (SEC);
         AS AMENDED                                                extend cooperation in transnational
                                                                   investigation and prosecutions of            4. Jewelry dealers in precious metals, who,
                                                                   persons involved in money laundering            as a business, trade in precious metals,
                                                                   activities wherever committed as well as        for transactions in excess of One
                                                                   the     implementation    of   targeted         million pesos (P1,000,000.00);
                  Submitted by:                                                                                 5. Jewelry dealers in precious stones, who,
                                                                   financial sanctions related to the
               Adlawan, Reymar                                     financing of the proliferation of               as a business, trade in precious stones,
              Matabang, Rochelle                                   weapons of mass destruction, terrorism,         for transactions in excess of One
         Sergida, Ma. Joyce Ann Theresa                            and financing of terrorism, pursuant to         million pesos (P1,000,000.00);
                                                                   the resolutions of the United Nations        6. Company service providers which, as a
                                                                   Security Council. (RA 9160, Sec. 2 as           business, provide any of the following
                                                                   amended by R.A.11521)                           services to third parties:
                                                                                                                      a. Acting as a formation agent of
                                                                                                                          juridical persons;
                                                                        COVERED PERSONS                               b. Acting as (or arranging for
                    Submitted to:
                                                             NOTE: Covered "Institutions" was changed to                  another person to act as) a
             Atty. Aloi Renz P. Santos                                                                                    director or corporate secretary of
                                                             Covered "Persons" under RA 10365.
                                                                                                                          a company, a partner of a
                                                             Covered persons, natural or juridical, refer to:             partnership, or a similar position
                                                                                                                          in relation to other juridical
                                                                1. Banks, non-banks, quasi-banks, trust
                       May 2024                                                                                           persons;
                                                                   entities, foreign exchange dealers,
                                                                                                                      c. Providing a registered office of
                                                                   pawnshops,       money     changers,
                                                                                                                          business         address        or
                accommodation correspondence                                                                     customer or to any person in his/her
                or administrative address for a       REQUISITES FOR EXCLUSION:                                  behalf; and                                      3. Reporting     of     Covered      and
                company,a partnership or any            1. They must be acting as independent                 5. 'Gaming operations' refer to the                    Suspicious Transactions.
                other      legal     person      or
                                                           legal professionals;                                  activities of the casino offering games      GR: Covered persons shall report to the AMLC
                arrangement’,and
             d. Acting as (or arranging for             2. Authorized     to practice in the                     of chance and any variations thereof         all covered transactions and suspicious
                another person to act as) a                Philippines;                                          approved       by    the     appropriate     transactions within five (5) working days
                nominee        shareholder      for     3. Continue to be subject to the provisions              government authorities. (RA 10927, Sec.      from occurrence thereof.
                another person; and                        of their respective codes of conduct                  3, amending RA 9160, Sec. 3).
   7.    Persons who provide any of the                    and/or professional responsibility or                                                              XPN: The AMLC prescribes a different period
         following services:                               any of its amendments (Ibid).                     OBLIGATIONS OF COVERED PERSONS                   not exceeding fifteen (15) working days.
             a. Managing of client money,                                                                     1. Customer Identification Covered
                securities or other assets;
                                                      NOTE: Lawyers and accountants acting as                    persons shall:                               NOTE: Should a transaction be determined to
             b. Management of bank, savings or
                securities accounts;                  independent legal professionals are not                       a. Establish and record the true          be both a covered transaction and a suspicious
             c. Organization of contributions         required to report covered and suspicious                        identity of its clients based on       transaction, the covered person shall be
                for the creation, operation or        transactions if the relevant information was                     official documents.                    required to report the same as a suspicious
                management of companies; and          obtained in circumstances where they are                      b. Maintain a system of verifying         transaction. (RA 10365, Sec. 7, amending RA
             d. Creation,        operation       or   subject to professional secrecy or legal                         the true identity of their clients;    9160, Sec. 9)
                management of juridical persons
                                                      professional privilege. (RA 10365, Sec. 7,                       and
                or arrangements, and buying
                and selling business entities.        amending RA 9160, Sec. 9)                                     c. In case of corporate clients,          NO LIABILITY IN REPORTING COVERED
   8.    Casinos,     including    internet and                                                                        require a system of verifying          AND SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTIONS (SAFE
         ship-based casinos, with respect to          For purposes of covered persons under Section                    their     legal  existence     and     HARBOR PROVISIONS)
         their casino cash transactions related to    3(a)(8), the following terms are hereby defined                  organizational structure, as well             No administrative, criminal or civil
         the gaming operations. (RA 10365, Sec.       as follows:                                                      as      the     authority      and     proceedings shall lie against any person for
         1, amending RA 9160, Sec. 3[a])                  1. 'Casino' refers to a business authorized                  identification of all persons          having made a covered transaction report or a
   9.    Real estate developers and brokers. (RA              by the appropriate government agency                     purporting to act on their behalf.     suspicious transaction report in the regular
         1152, Sec. 2, amending RA 9160, Sec. 3               to engage in gaming operations;                                                                 performance of his duties and in good faith,
         [a])                                             2. 'Internet-based casinos' shall refer a        NOTE: The BSP may conduct annual testing           whether or not such reporting results in any
   10.   Offshore gaming operators, as well as                casinos in which persons participate by      solely limited to the determination of the         criminal prosecution under the Act or any
         their service providers, supervised,                 the use of remote communication              existence and true identity of the owners of       other Philippine law. (Rule 9.c.5. Implementing
         accredited or regulated by the                       facilities such as, but not limited to,      such accounts.                                     Rules and Regulations of R.A. 9160, as
         Philippine Amusement and Gaming                      internet, telephone, television, radio or    Anonymous       accounts,     accounts     under   amended)
         Corporation      (PAGCOR)       or    any            any other kind of electronic or other        fictitious names, and all other similar accounts          When reporting covered or suspicious
         government agency. (RA 10365, Sec. 1,                technology          for       facilitating   shall be absolutely prohibited. Peso and           transactions to the AMLC, covered persons
         amending RA 9160, Sec. 3[a])                         communication; and                           foreign currency non-checking numbered             and their officers and employees shall not be
                                                          3. 'Ship-based casino' shall refer to            accounts shall be allowed.                         deemed to have violated:
The term "covered persons" shall exclude                      casinos, the operation of which is                                                                  1. The Law on Secrecy of Bank Deposits
lawyers and accountants                                       undertaken on board a vessel, ship,             2. Record Keeping - All records of all                 or Ra 1405, as amended;
       These persons must be acting as                        boat or any other water-based craft                transactions of covered persons shall be         2. Foreign Currency Deposit Act or RA
independent legal professionals in relation to                wholly or partly intended for gambling;            maintained and safely stored for five (5)           No. 6426, as amended,
information concerning their clients or where             4. 'Casino cash transaction' refers to                 years from the date of transactions.             3. General Banking Laws or RA 8791; and
disclosure of information would compromise                    transactions involving the receipt of                                                               4. Other similar laws. (RA 10365, Sec 7.
client confidences or the attorney-client                     cash by a casino paid by or on behalf of     NOTE: With respect to closed accounts, the                amending RA 9160, Sec. 9)
relationship. (RA 10365, Sec. 1, amending RA                  a customer, or transactions involving        records shall be preserved and safely stored for
9160, Sec. 3[a])                                              the payout of cash by a casino to a          at least five (5) years from the dates when they
                                                                                                           were closed.
PROHIBITED COMMUNICATIONS                          covered persons under Section 3(a) (9), a               1. transacts said monetary instrument or            4. Plunder under Republic Act No. 7080,
Officers and employees of covered persons          single cash transaction involving an amount in              property;                                           as amended;
shall not:                                         excess of Seven Million Five Hundred                    2. converts, transfers, disposes of, moves,         5. Robbery and extortion under Articles
   1. Communicating, directly or indirectly,       Thousand Pesos (P7,500,000.00) or its                       acquires, possesses or uses said                    294, 295, 296, 299, 300, 301 and 302 of
       in any manner or by a means, to any         equivalent in any other currency. (RA 11521,                monetary instrument or property;                    the Revised Penal Code, as amended;
       person, the fact that a covered or          Sec. 2, amending RA 9160, Sec. 3[b])                    3. conceals or disguises the true nature,           6. Jueteng and Masiao punished as illegal
       suspicious transaction report was made,                                                                 source, location, disposition, movement             gambling under Presidential Decree No.
       the contents thereof, or any other                 SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTIONS                              or ownership of or rights with respect              1602;
       information in relation thereto.                                                                        to said monetary instrument or                  7. Piracy on the high seas under the
                                                         A transaction with covered persons,                   property;                                           Revised Penal Code, as amended and
NOTE: If the reporting is done by any person       regardless of the amounts involved, where any           4. attempts or conspires to commit money                Presidential Decree No. 532;
in the regular performance of his duties in        of the following circumstances exist:                       laundering offenses referred to in              8. Qualified theft under Article 310 of the
good faith, no administrative, criminal or civil       1. There is no underlying legal or trade                paragraphs (a), (b) or (c);                         Revised Penal Code, as amended;
proceedings shall lie against said person,                 obligation, purpose or economic                 5. aids, abets, assists in or counsels the          9. Swindling under Article 315 and Other
whether or not such reporting results in any               justification;                                      commission of the money laundering                  Forms of Swindling under Article 316 of
criminal prosecution under this Act of any             2. The client is not properly identified;               offenses referred to in paragraphs (a),             the Revised Penal Code, as amended;
other law (Safe harbor provision).                     3. The       amount     involved      is  not           (b) or (c) above; and                           10. Smuggling under Republic Act Nos. 455
                                                           commensurate with the business or               6. performs or fails to perform any act as a            and 1937;
    2. Communicating, directly or indirectly,              financial capacity of the client;                   result of which he facilitates the offense      11. Violations of Republic Act No. 8792,
        in any manner or by any means, to any          4. Taking into account all known                        of money laundering referred to in                  otherwise known as the Electronic
        person or entity, the media, the fact              circumstances, it may be perceived that             paragraphs (a), (b) or (c) above.                   Commerce Act of 2000;
        that a covered or suspicious transaction           the client's transaction is structured in   Money laundering is also committed by any               12. Hijacking and other violations under
        has been reported or is about to be                order to avoid being the subject of        covered person who, knowing that a covered                  Republic Act No. 6235; destructive
        reported, the contents of the report, or           reporting requirements under the Act;       or suspicious transaction is required under                 arson and murder, as defined under the
        any other information in relation              5. Any circumstances relating to the            this Act to be reported to the Anti-Money                   Revised Penal Code, as amended;
        thereto.                                           transaction which is observed to            Laundering Council (AMLC), fails to do so.              13. Terrorism and conspiracy to commit
    3. Publishing or airing in any manner or               deviate from the profile of the client      (Sec. 4, RA 10365, amending Sec. 4, RA 9160)                terrorism as defined and penalized
        form by the mass media, electronic                 and/or the client's past transactions                                                                   under Sections 3 and 4 of Republic Act
        mail, or other similar devices.                    with the covered person;                     UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES OR PREDICATE                           No. 9372;
In case of violation of these prohibitions, the                                                                     CRIMES                                     14. Financing of terrorism under Section 4
                                                       6. The transactions is in a way related to
concerned officer and employee of the covered              an unlawful activity or offense under                                                                   and offenses punishable under Sections
person and media shall be held criminally                                                                     Unlawful activity refers to any act or               5, 6, 7 and 8 of Republic Act No. 10168,
                                                           this Act that is about to be, is being or
liable. (Sec. 7, RA 10365 amending Sec. 9, RA                                                          omission or series or combination thereof                   otherwise known as the Terrorism
                                                           has been committed; or
9160)                                                                                                  involving or having direct relation to the                  Financing Prevention and Suppression
                                                       7. Any transactions that are similar or
                                                                                                       following:                                                  Act of 2012:
                                                           analogous to any of the foregoing. (RA
        COVERED TRANSACTIONS                                                                               1. Kidnapping for ransom under Article              15. Bribery under Articles 210, 211 and 211-A
                                                           9160 as amended by RA 9194, Sec. 3[b-1])
                                                                                                              267 of Act No. 3815, otherwise known as              of the Revised Penal Code, as amended,
      A transaction in cash or other equivalent                                                               the Revised Penal Code, as amended;                  and Corruption of Public Officers under
                                                         MONEY LAUNDERING, HOW IT
monetary instrument involving a total amount                    COMMITTED                                  2. Sections 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15       Article 212 of the Revised Penal Code, as
in excess of Five hundred thousand pesos                                                                      and 16 of Republic Act No. 9165,                     amended;
(P500,000.00) within one (1) banking day; for             Money laundering is committed by any                otherwise known as the Comprehensive             16. Frauds and Illegal Exactions and
covered persons under Section 3(a)(8), a single    person who, knowing that any monetary                      Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002;                         Transactions under Articles 213, 214, 215
casino transaction involving an amount in          instrument or property represents, involves, or         3. Section 3 paragraphs B, C, E, G, H and I             and 216 of the Revised Penal Code, as
excess of Five million pesos (P5,000,000.00) or    relates to the proceeds of any unlawful activity:          of Republic Act No. 3019, as amended,                amended;
its equivalent in any other currency. For                                                                     otherwise known as the Anti-Graft and
                                                                                                              Corrupt Practices Act;
17. Malversation of Public Funds and              27. Violation of Presidential Decree No.                cause by the competent authority:                 for assistance from a foreign State, or
    Property under Articles 217 and 222 of            1612,    otherwise      known as the                Provided, further, that there must be a           believed by the Council, on the basis for
    the Revised Penal Code, as amended;               Anti-Fencing Law;                                   finding        of      fraud,      willful        substantial evidence, to be, in whole or
18. Forgeries and Counterfeiting under            28. (Violation of Section 6 of Republic Act             misrepresentation or malicious intent             in part, wherever located, representing,
    Articles 163, 166, 167, 168, 169 and 176 of       No. 8042, otherwise known as the                    on the part of the taxpayer: Provided,            involving, or related to directly or
    the Revised Penal Code, as amended;               Migrant      Workers       and   Overseas           finally, that in no case shall the AMLC           indirectly, in any manner or by any
19. Violations of Sections 4 to 6 of Republic         Filipinos Act of 1995, as amended by                institute forfeiture proceedings to               means, the proceeds of an unlawful
    Act No. 9208, otherwise known as the              Republic Act No. 10022;                             recover monetary instruments, property            activity.
    Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act of 2003;      29. Violation of Republic Act No. 8293,                 or proceeds representing, involving or       3.   To institute civil forfeiture proceedings
20. Violations of Sections 78 to 79 of                otherwise known as the Intellectual                 relating to a tax crime, if the same has          and all other remedial proceedings
    Chapter IV, of Presidential Decree No.            Property Code of the Philippines;                   already been recovered or collected by            through the Office of the Solicitor
    705, otherwise known as the Revised           30. Violation of Section 4 of Republic Act              the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) in           General;
    Forestry Code of the Philippines, as              No. 9995, otherwise known as the                    a separate proceeding; and                   4.   To cause the filing of complaints with
    amended;                                          Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act of           36. Felonies or offenses of a similar nature          the Department of Justice or the
21. Violations of Sections 86 to 106 of               2009;                                               that are punishable under the penal               Ombudsman for the prosecution of
    Chapter VI, of Republic Act No. 8550,         31. Violation of Section 4 of Republic Act              laws of other countries. [Sec. 2, RA              money laundering offenses;
    otherwise known as the Philippine                 No. 9775, otherwise known as the                    11521, amending Sec 3(i) of RA 9160]         5.   To investigate suspicious transactions
    Fisheries Code of 1998;                           Anti-Child Pornography Act of 2009;                                                                   and covered transactions deemed
22. Violations of Sections 101 to 107, and 110    32. Violations of Sections 5, 7, 8, 9, 10(c),      ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING COUNCIL                          suspicious after an investigation by
    of Republic Act No. 7942, otherwise               (d) and (e), 11, 12 and 14 of Republic Act                 (AMLC)                                     AMLC, money laundering activities and
    known as the Philippine Mining Act of             No. 7610, otherwise known as the                                                                      other violations of this Act;
    1995;                                             Special Protection of Children Against       The AMLC shall be composed of:                      6.    To apply before the Court of Appeals,ex
23. Violations of Section 27(c), (e), (f), (g)        Abuse,           Exploitation         and       1. The Governor of the Bangko Sentral ng              parte, for the freezing of any monetary
    and (i), of Republic Act No. 9147,                Discrimination;                                    Pilipinas (BSP) as Chairman;                       instrument or property alleged to be
    otherwise known as the Wildlife               33. Fraudulent       practices    and    other      2. The Commissioner of the Insurance                  laundered,      proceeds      from,    or
    Resources Conservation and Protection             violations under Republic Act No. 8799,            Commission as member; and                          instrumentalities used in or intended
    Act;                                              otherwise known as the Securities               3. The Chairman of the Securities and                 for use in any unlawful activity as
24. Violation of Section 7(b) of Republic             Regulation Code of 2000;                           Exchange      Commission     (SEC) as              defined in Section 3(i) hereof;
    Act No. 9072, otherwise known as the          34. Violations of Section 19 (a)(3) of                 member.(RA 9160, as amended by RA             7.   To implement such measures as may be
    National Caves and Cave Resources                 Republic Act No. 10697, otherwise                  9194, Sec. 7)                                      necessary and justified under this Act
    Management Protection Act;                        known as the ‘Strategic Trade                                                                         to counteract money laundering;
25. Violation of Republic Act No. 6539,               Management Act’, in relation to the                          FUNCTIONS                           8.   To receive and take action in respect of,
    otherwise        known         as      the        proliferation of weapons of mass                                                                      any request from foreign states for
    Anti-Carnapping Act of 2002, as                   destruction and its financing pursuant       The AMLC shall act unanimously in the                    assistance in their own anti-money
    amended;                                          to United Nations Security Council           discharge of its functions as defined                    laundering operations provided in this
26. Violations of Sections 1, 3 and 5 of              Resolution Numbers 1718 of 2006 and          hereunder:                                               Act;
    Presidential Decree No. 1866, as                  2231 of 2015;                                    1. To require, receive and analyze covered      9.   To develop educational programs on
    amended, otherwise known as the               35. Violations of Section 254 of Chapter II,            or suspicious transaction reports from            the pernicious effects of money
    decree Codifying the Laws on                      Title X of the National Internal Revenue            covered persons;                                  laundering,      the     methods      and
    Illegal/Unlawful               Possession,        Code of 1997, as amended, where the              2. To issue orders addressed to the                  techniques used in the money
    Manufacture, Dealing In, Acquisition or           deficiency basic tax due in the final               appropriate Supervising Authority or              laundering, the viable means of
    Disposition of Firearms, Ammunition               assessment is in excess of Twenty- five             the covered persons to determine the              preventing money laundering and the
    or Explosives;                                    million pesos (P25,000,000.00) per                  true identity of the owner of any                 effective ways of prosecuting and
                                                      taxable year, for each tax type covered             monetary instrument or property                   punishing offenders;
                                                      and there has been finding of probable              subject of a covered transaction or
                                                                                                          suspicious transaction report or request
10. To enlist the assistance of any branch,             including funds and assets derived or                                                       explanation,    the     freeze    order     shall
    department, bureau, office, agency, or              generated therefrom, by individuals or    ISSUANCE OF FREEZE ORDER                          automatically be dissolved.
    instrumentality of the government,                  entities designated and listed under             The Court of Appeals may issue a freeze
    including     government-owned        and           United Nations Security Council           order which shall be effective immediately, for   EXTENSION: The fifteen (15)-day freeze order
    -controlled        corporations,        in          Resolution Numbers 1718 of 2006 and       a period of twenty (20) days:                     of the AMLC may be extended upon order of
    undertaking any and all anti- money                 2231 of 2015 and their successor             a. Upon a verified ex parte petition by the    the court, provided that the fifteen (15)-day
    laundering operations, which may                    resolutions as well as any binding               AMLC; and                                  period shall be tolled pending the court’s
    include the use of its personnel,                   resolution of the Security Council; and      b. After determination that probable           decision to extend the period.
    facilities and resources for the more           16. To preserve, manage or dispose assets            cause exists that any monetary
    resolute prevention, detection, and                 pursuant to a freeze order, asset                instrument or property is in any way       PERIOD OF THE FREEZE ORDER
    investigation of money laundering                   preservation order, or judgment of               related to an unlawful activity as                The total period of the freeze order
    offenses and prosecution of offenders;              forfeiture: Provided, however, that              defined in Section 3(i) hereof             issued by the Court of Appeals under this
11. To impose administrative sanctions for              pending their turnover to the national                                                      provision shall not exceed (6) months
    the violation of laws, rules, regulations,          government, all expenses incurred in      SECTION 10 OF R.A. NO. 9160 -                     depending upon the circumstances of thecase:
    and orders and resolutions issued                   relation to the duties herein mentioned   AUTHORITY TO FREEZE
    pursuant thereto.                                   shall be deducted from the amount to        Two requisites for the issuance of a            NOTE: if there is no case filed against a person
12. To require the Land Registration                    be turned over to the national govern.    freeze order:                                     whose account has been frozen within the
    Authority and all its Registries of Deeds           (Sec. 3 of RA 11521 amending Sec. 7 of        (1) the application ex-parte by the AMLC      period determined by the court, the freeze
    to submit to the AMLC, reports on all               RA 9160)                                          and                                       order shall be deemed ipso facto lifted:
    real estate transactions involving an                                                             (2) the determination of probable cause by
    amount in excess of Five hundred             FREEZING OF MONETARY INSTRUMENT                          the CA                                      AUTHORITY TO INQUIRE INTO BANK
    thousand pesos (P500,000.00) within                    OR PROPERTY                                                                                           DEPOSITS
    fifteen (15) days from the date of                                                            PROBABLE CAUSE
    registration of the transaction, in a        PURPOSE                                                Refers to the sufficiency of the relation          The AMLC may inquire into or examine
    form to be prescribed by the AMLC.                   To give the government the necessary     between an unlawful activity and the property     any particular deposit or investment,
    The AMLC may also require the Land           time to prepare its case and to file the         or monetary instrument.                           including related accounts, with any banking
    Registration Authority and all its           appropriate charges without having to worry                                                        institution or non-bank financial institution
    Registries of Deeds to submit copies of      about the possible dissipation of the assets     EFFECTIVITY                                       provided
    relevant documents of all real estate        that are in any way related to the suspected            Under Section 10 of R.A. no. 1960 the          1. It is upon order of any competent court;
    transactions. (Sec. 6, RA 10365              illegal activity.                                issuance of freeze order shall be effective           2. Based on an ex parte application; and
    amending Sec. 7, RA 9160)                                                                     immediately, on the account for a period not          3. In cases of violations of this Act, when
13. To apply for a search and seizure order      OBJECTIVE OF A FREEZE ORDER                      exceeding fifteen (15) days. Notice to the               it has been established that there is
    with any competent court in the                      To temporarily preserve monetary         depositor that his account has been frozen               probable cause that the deposits or
    conduct of its investigation.                instruments or property that are in any way      shall be issued simultaneously with the                  investments, including related accounts
14. To apply for the issuance of subpoena        related to an unlawful activity or money         issuance of the freeze order.                            involved, are related to an unlawful
    ad testificandum and/or subpoena             laundering, by preventing the owner from                                                                  activity as defined in Section 3(i) hereof
    duces tecum with any competent court         utilizing them during the duration of the        To the Depositor: shall have seventy-two                 or a money laundering offense under
    in the conduct of its investigation.         freeze order.                                    (72) hours upon receipt of the notice to                 Section 4 hereof
15. To implement targeted financial                                                               explain why the freeze order should be lifted.
    sanctions in relation to proliferation of    JURISDICTION        IN    CHARGE         FOR                                                               The CA is mandated to resolve the
    weapons of mass destruction and its          VIOLATIONS OF AMLA                               AMLC: has seventy-two (72) hours to               application within 24 hours from receipt of
    financing, including ex parte freeze,           1. RTC – all cases on money laundering        dispose of the depositor’s explanation.           the application. A resolution denying the
    without delay, against all funds and            2. Sandiganbayan – Those committed by                                                           application “must state the specific reasons
    other assets that are owned and                    public officers and private persons in     NOTE: If it fails to act within seventy-two       for such dismissal” and dismissal orders can
    controlled, directly or indirectly,                conspiracy with them. (Sec. 5 R.A. 9160,   (72) hours from receipt of the depositor’s        be appealed before the SC through a petition
                                                       as amended)                                                                                  for certiorari (a special civil action).
                                                      3. Drugs- violation of Dangerous Drugs                This petition must be submitted to          (1) Track down, freeze, restrain, and seize
   DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN A BANK                           Act.                                          the court that rendered the conviction and           assets that are believed to be the
   INQUIRY ORDER AND A FREEZER                        4. Arson                                         forfeiture order within 15 days of the               proceeds of unlawful activities,
   ORDER (RA 9160, SEC. 10 VS. SEC. 11)               5. Murder (RA 10167, Sec. 2, amending RA         order, or else the forfeiture order                  following the procedures laid out in
                                                         9160, Sec.11)                                 becomes final and enforceable. This                  the Act.
              BANK INQUIRY          FREEZE                                                             provision applies to both civil and              (2) Provide necessary information to the
                 ORDER              ORDER          RELATED ACCOUNTS                                    criminal forfeitures.                                foreign state, as per the procedures in
DEFINITION      a provisional     a provisional           Refers to accounts, the funds and                                                                 the Act.
                remedy that          remedy        sources of which originated from and/or are     c. PAYMENT IN LIEU OF FORFEITURE                     (3) Apply for an order of forfeiture in
                  allows the        aimed at       materially linked to the monetary instrument            If the court has issued an order of              court, provided that the application is
                  AMLC to          blocking or     or property subject of the freeze order.           forfeiture for monetary instruments or                accompanied by an authenticated
                 examine or        restraining                                                        property related to money laundering                  copy of the order of a court in the
                inquire into        monetary       LIMITATIONS ON EXAMINATION                         offenses under Section 4, but the assets              requesting state for the forfeiture of
               particular bank    instruments
                                                           The authority to inquire into or           cannot be located, altered, destroyed, or             the monetary instrument or property
                 accounts or      or properties
              investment with      in any way      examine the main account and the related           worthless due to the offender's actions, or           of a person convicted of money
                  a bank or       related to an    accounts shall comply with the requirements        if they are concealed, transferred, or                laundering in the requesting state.
                  non-bank          unlawful       of Sec. 2 and 3, Art. III of the 1987              located outside the court's jurisdiction,         NOTE: a certification or affidavit from a
                   financial       activity, as    Constitution. (RA 9160, as amended by RA           the court can order the convicted offender            competent officer of the requesting
                 institution,         herein       10167, Sec. 11)                                    to pay an amount equal to the value of the            state must be submitted, confirming
              notwithstanding        defined,                                                         forfeited assets instead of enforcing the             that the conviction and forfeiture
              the provisions of    from being
                                                   FORFEITURE PROVISIONS (Sec.12 of R.A.              forfeiture order. This provision also                 order are final and no further appeal
              Republic Act No.     transacted,
                    1405, as       converted,                    9160)                                applies to both civil and criminal                    is possible.
                  amended;         concealed,                                                         forfeitures.
              Republic Act No.      moved or       a. CIVIL FORFEITURE                                                                              C. OBTAINING          ASSISTANCE        FROM
                   6426, as         disposed               Occurs when a covered transaction         MUTUAL ASSISTANCE AMONG STATES                    FOREIGN STATES
                  amended;           without          report is made, and the court orders the              (Sec.13 of R.A. 9160)                      The AMLC may make a request to any
              Republic Act No.    affecting the       seizure of any monetary instrument or                                                            foreign State for assistance in
               8791; and other     ownership          property in whole or in part, directly or    Mainly about giving assistance to other states
                bank secrecy         thereof                                                                                                            (1) tracking down, freezing, restraining
                                                      indirectly, connected to the report. The     and at the same time requesting for it in                and seizing assets alleged to be
                     laws.
                                                      Revised Rules of Court on civil forfeiture   relation to money-laundering offenses.                   proceeds of any unlawful activity;
APPLICATION      does not               The           will then be applied in these situations.                                                         (2) obtaining information that it needs
              contemplate ex       applications                                                    A. REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE FROM A                         relating to any covered transaction,
                   parte             for freeze    b. CLAIM PROCESS ON FORFEITURE                     FOREIGN STATE                                         money laundering offense or any
              proceedings in         orders be
                                                      ASSETS                                                 AMLC may execute the request or                other matter directly or indirectly
              applications for    filed ex parte
               bank inquiry                                When a court orders the forfeiture of      refuse to execute the same and inform the             related
                  orders                              monetary instruments or property in a           foreign State of any valid reason for not         (3) to the extent allowed by the law of the
                                                      criminal    prosecution     for    money        executing the request or for delaying the             foreign State, applying with the
                                                      laundering offenses under Section 4 of the      execution thereof. The principles of                  proper court therein for an order to
CASES WHERE NO COURT ORDER SHALL
BE REQUIRED IN ORDER FOR THE AMLC                     Act, the offender or anyone claiming            mutuality and reciprocity shall, for this             enter any premises belonging to or in
     TO INQUIRE INTO DEPOSIT,                         ownership can file a verified petition for      purpose, be at all times recognized.                  the possession or control of, any or all
 INVESTMENT OR RELATED ACCOUNTS                       a declaration that the assets belong to                                                               of the persons named in said request,
                                                      them and request the separation or           B. POWERS OF THE AMLC TO ACT ON A                        and/or search any or all such persons
No need of court order in cases of (HKMAD)            exclusion of the relevant monetary              REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE FROM A                         named therein and/or remove any
   1. Kidnapping                                      instrument or property.                         FOREIGN STATE.                                        document, material or object named
   2. Hijacking                                                                                       AMLC can:                                             in said request:
        Provided, That the documents                      laundering or provide details of their
        accompanying the request in support               conviction.                                    GLOSSARY (DEFINITION OF TERMS)
        of the application have been duly             (3) Include sufficient details about the
                                                          person's identity.                          BANK INQUIRY ORDER - a provisional
        authenticated in accordance with the
                                                      (4) Provide specifics to identify any
        applicable law or regulation of the                                                           remedy that allows the AMLC to examine or
                                                          covered institution that may have
        foreign State; and                                relevant information, documents,            inquire into particular bank accounts or
    (4) applying for an order of forfeiture of            materials, or objects.                      investment with a bank or non-bank financial
        any monetary instrument or property           (5) Ask the concerned covered institution       institution
        in the proper court in the foreign                for any information, documents,
        State:                                            materials, or objects that could assist     FREEZE ORDER - a provisional remedy aimed
                                                          in the investigation or prosecution.        at    blocking   or restraining monetary
        Provided, That the request is
                                                      (6) Specify how and to whom the obtained
        accompanied by an authenticated                                                               instruments or properties in any way related to
                                                          information, documents, materials, or
        copy of the order of the regional trial           objects should be produced.                 an unlawful activity, as herein defined, from
        court ordering the forfeiture of said         (7) Provide all necessary details for the       being transacted, converted, concealed, moved
        monetary instrument or property of a              requested state's court to issue the        or disposed without affecting the ownership
        convicted offender and an affidavit of            necessary writs, orders, or processes       thereof
        the clerk of court stating that the               needed by the requesting state.
                                                      (8) contain such other information as may
        conviction and the order of forfeiture                                                        PROBABLE CAUSE - refers to the sufficiency
                                                          assist in the execution of the request.
        are final and that no further appeal                                                          of the relation between an unlawful activity
        lies in respect of either.                 F. AUTHENTICATION OF DOCUMENTS                     and the property or monetary instrument.
                                                      ● A         document      is      considered
D. LIMITATIONS ON REQUEST FOR                             authenticated when it is signed or
   MUTUAL ASSISTANCE.                                     certified by a judge, magistrate, or
           The AMLC may refuse to                         equivalent officer in or of the
   cooperate with a request for assistance if             requesting state.
   the requested action contradicts the               ● The document must be authenticated
   Philippine Constitution or if it is likely to          by the oath or affirmation of a witness
   harm the national interest of the                      or sealed with an official or public seal
   Philippines. However, this refusal may be              of a minister, secretary of state, or
   overridden if there is a treaty between the            officer in or of the requesting state's
   Philippines and the requesting state                   government or department.
   concerning mutual assistance in money              NOTE: The certificate of authentication
   laundering cases                                   can be made by a representative of the
                                                      Philippines'    embassy      or     legation,
E. REQUIREMENTS FOR REQUESTS for                      consulate, or consular agent in the foreign
   MUTUAL          ASSISTANCE         FROM
                                                      state where the record is kept, and it
   FOREIGN STATES.
   A request for mutual assistance from a             should be authenticated by the seal of
   foreign State must                                 their office.
   (1) Confirm that an investigation or
       prosecution is ongoing or that the          G. EXTRADITION
       person named in the request has been                  The Philippines shall negotiate for
       convicted of a money laundering                the inclusion of money laundering
       offense.
                                                      offenses as herein defined among
   (2) State the grounds for investigating or
       prosecuting the person for money               extraditable offenses in all future treaties.
         GLOSSARY (REQUISITES)                       2. Communicating, directly or indirectly,        When reporting covered or suspicious              CASES WHERE NO COURT ORDER SHALL
                                                        in any manner or by any means, to any         transactions to the AMLC, covered persons         BE REQUIRED IN ORDER FOR THE AMLC TO
COVERED PERSONS                                         person or entity, the media, the fact         and their officers and employees shall not        INQUIRE INTO DEPOSIT, INVESTMENT OR
REQUISITES FOR EXCLUSION:                               that a covered or suspicious transaction      be deemed to have violated:                       RELATED ACCOUNTS
  1. They must be acting as independent                 has been reported or is about to be               1. The Law on Secrecy of Bank Deposits        No need of court order in cases of
     legal professionals;                               reported, the contents of the report, or             or Ra 1405, as amended;                    (HKMAD)
  2. Authorized     to practice in the                  any other information in relation                 2. Foreign Currency Deposit Act or RA            1. Kidnapping
     Philippines;                                       thereto.                                             No. 6426, as amended,                         2. Hijacking
  3. Continue to be subject to the provisions        3. Publishing or airing in any manner or             3. General Banking Laws or RA 8791; and          3. Drugs- violation of Dangerous Drugs
     of their respective codes of conduct               form by the mass media, electronic                4. Other similar laws. (RA 10365, Sec 7.            Act.
     and/or professional responsibility or              mail, or other similar devices.                      amending RA 9160, Sec. 9)                     4. Arson
     any of its amendments (Ibid).                                                                                                                         5. Murder (RA 10167, Sec. 2, amending RA
                                                  MONEY LAUNDERING IS COMMITTED BY:                   The AMLC shall be composed of:                          9160, Sec.11)
OBLIGATIONS OF COVERED PERSONS:                     (1) any person who, knowing that any                1. The Governor of the Bangko Sentral ng
  1. Customer Identification Covered                    monetary instrument or property                    Pilipinas (BSP) as Chairman;
     persons shall:                                     represents, involves, or relates to the         2. The Commissioner of the Insurance
         a. Establish and record the true               proceeds of any unlawful activity:                 Commission as member; and
            identity of its clients based on               (a) transacts       said      monetary       3. The Chairman of the Securities and
            official documents.                                instrument or property;                     Exchange      Commission     (SEC) as
         b. Maintain a system of verifying                 (b) converts, transfers, disposes of,           member.(RA 9160, as amended by RA
            the true identity of their clients;                moves, acquires, possesses or               9194, Sec. 7)
            and                                                uses said monetary instrument
         c. In case of corporate clients,                      or property;
            require a system of verifying                  (c) conceals or disguises the true
            their     legal  existence     and                 nature,       source,      location,   ISSUANCE OF FREEZE ORDER
            organizational structure, as well                  disposition,      movement        or          The Court of Appeals may issue a freeze
            as      the     authority      and                 ownership of or rights with            order which shall be effective immediately, for
            identification of all persons                      respect     to said monetary           a period of twenty (20) days:
            purporting to act on their behalf.                 instrument or property;                   a. Upon a verified ex parte petition by the
  2. Record Keeping - All records of all                   (d) attempts or conspires to commit               AMLC; and
     transactions of covered persons shall be                  money       laundering      offenses      b. After determination that probable
     maintained and safely stored for five (5)                 referred to in paragraphs (a), (b)            cause exists that any monetary
     years from the date of transactions.                      or (c);                                       instrument or property is in any way
  3. Reporting        of    Covered        and             (e) aids, abets, assists in or counsels           related to an unlawful activity as
     Suspicious Transactions.                                  the commission of the money                   defined in Section 3(i) hereof
                                                               laundering offenses referred to
PROHIBITED COMMUNICATIONS                                      in paragraphs (a), (b) or (c)
Officers and employees of covered persons                      above; and                             Two requisites for the issuance of a freeze
shall not:                                                 (f) performs or fails to perform any       order:
   1. Communicating, directly or indirectly,                   act as a result of which he               1. the application ex-parte by the AMLC
       in any manner or by a means, to any                     facilitates the offense of money              and
       person, the fact that a covered or                      laundering      referred to in            2. the determination of probable cause by
       suspicious transaction report was made,                 paragraphs (a), (b) or (c) above.             the CA
       the contents thereof, or any other
       information in relation thereto.
                                                                  A. DATA PRIVACY ACT (RA 10173)                 It also guarantees the freedom of expression
                                                                                                                 and speech under Article III, Sec.4, which
                                                             Declaration of Policy                               states:
                                                             It is the policy of the State to protect the        No law shall be passed abridging the freedom of
                                                             fundamental human right of privacy, of              speech, of expression, or of the press, or the
                                                             communication while ensuring free flow of           right of the people peaceably to assemble and
                                                             information to promote innovation and               petition the government for redress of
   PAMANTASAN NG LUNGSOD NG MAYNILA                          growth. The State recognizes the vital role of      grievances.
         (University of the City of Manila)                  information and communications technology
 General Luna, corner Muralla St., Intramuros, Manila        in nation-building and its inherent obligation              PERSONAL INFORMATION
                 1002 Metro Manila                           to ensure that personal information in
                                                             information and communications systems in           Any information whether recorded in a
                                                             the government and in the private sector are        material form or not from which the identity
In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the subject   secured and protected. (Sec. 2, RA 10173)           of an individual is apparent or can be
  Regulatory Framework and Legal Issues in Business                                                              reasonably and directly ascertained by the
                      (ACN 2210A-4)                            B. NATIONAL PRIVACY COMMISSION                    entity holding the information or when put
                                                                                                                 together with other information would directly
                                                             This comprehensive privacy law established          and certainly identify an individual. [Sec. 3(g),
                                                             the National Privacy Commission (‘NPC’)             RA 10173]
                                                             tasked with administering and implementing
            Finals Reviewer:
                                                             the provisions of the Data Privacy Act (‘DPA’).     It must be:
       Data Privacy Act (R.A. 10173)                         The NPC is headed by a Privacy Commissioner             1. Collected for specified and legitimate
                                                             and assisted by two Deputy Commissioners. It               purposes determined and declared
                                                             is attached to the Department of Information               before, or as soon as reasonably
                                                             and Communications Technology (‘DICT’),                    practicable after collection, and later
                  Submitted by:                              which itself was only created in 2016 or about             processed in a way compatible with
              Franco, Angeline S.                            four years after the enactment of the DPA. The             such declared, specified and legitimate
          Padojinog, Princess Dianne                         creation of DICT created a kind of legal                   purposes only;
           Viñas, Mireille Richelle V.                       anachronism since the DPA had provided that
                                                             the NPC would be attached to       the    then         2. Processed fairly and lawfully;
                                                             non-existent DICT.
                                                                                                                    3. Accurate, relevant and, where necessary
                                                                      CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS                             for purposes for which it is to be used
                                                                                                                       the processing of personal information,
                    Submitted to:
                                                             The      Right      to      Information      and          kept up to date; inaccurate or
             Atty. Aloi Renz P. Santos                       Communications Privacy is            recognized           incomplete data must be rectified,
                                                             under Article III, Sec. 3(1) of the Constitution,         supplemented, destroyed or their
                                                             which states:                                             further processing restricted;
                                                             The     privacy    of    communication       and
                                                             correspondence shall be inviolable except upon         4. Adequate and not excessive in relation
                       May 2024                              lawful order of the court, or when public safety          to the purposes for which they are
                                                             or order requires otherwise, as prescribed by             collected and processed;
                                                             law.
                                                                                                                    5. Retained only for as long as necessary
                                                                                                                       for the fulfillment of the purposes for
      which the data was obtained or for the         4. Specifically established by an executive           transferred to third parties: Provided,     Requisites:
      establishment, exercise or defense of             order or an act of Congress to be kept             finally, That consent of the data subject   ProNE-Act
      legal claims, or for legitimate business          classified. [Sec. 3(l), RA 10173]                  was obtained prior to processing;              1. It must involve any processing of
      purposes, or as provided by law; and                                                                                                                   personal information
                                                  GR: The processing of sensitive personal              5. The processing is necessary for                2. By either natural or juridical persons
   6. Kept in a form which permits                information and privileged information shall             purposes of medical treatment, is              3. Whether or not found in the
      identification of data subjects for no      be prohibited,                                           carried out by a medical practitioner or          Philippines that uses equipment or
      longer than is necessary for the                                                                     a medical treatment institution, and an           maintains an office, branch or agency in
      purposes for which the data were            XPNs:                                                    adequate level of protection of personal          the Philippines.
      collected and processed: Provided, that       1. The data subject has given his or her               information is ensured; or                     4. Either acting as a controller or
      personal information collected for                consent, specific to the purpose prior to                                                            processor
      other purposes may lie processed for              the processing, or in the case of               6. The processing concerns such personal
      historical, statistical or scientific             privileged information, all parties to the         information as is necessary for the         This Act does not apply to the following:
      purposes, and in cases laid down in law           exchange have given their consent prior            protection of lawful rights and interests      1. Information about any individual who
      may be stored for longer periods:                 to processing;                                     of natural or legal persons in court              is or was an officer or employee of a
      Provided, further, that adequate                                                                     proceedings, or the establishment,                government institution that relates to
      safeguards are guaranteed by said laws         2. The processing of the same is provided             exercise or defense of legal claims, or           the position or functions of the
      authorizing their processing. (Sec. 11,           for by existing laws and regulations:              when provided to government or public             individual, including:
      RA 10173)                                         Provided,     That   such    regulatory            authority. (Sec. 13, RA 10173)                        a. The fact that the individual is or
                                                        enactments guarantee the protection of                                                                       was an officer or employee of the
  SENSITIVE PERSONAL INFORMATION                        the sensitive personal information and       NOTE:                                                           government institution;
                                                        the privileged information: Provided,        Confidential information- Generally, the                    b. The title, business address and
Any information:                                        further, That the consent of the data        effect of confidentiality will result in the                    office telephone number of the
   1. About an individual’s race, ethnic                subjects is not required by law or           information being inadmissible in any court,                    individual;
       origin, marital status, age, color, and          regulation permitting the processing of      in any proceeding.                                          c. The classification, salary range
       religious, philosophical or political            the sensitive personal information or                                                                        and responsibilities of the
       affiliations.                                    the privileged information;                  Privileged information- any and all forms of                    position held by the individual;
                                                                                                     data which under the Rules of the Court                         and
   2. About an individual’s health, education,       3. The processing is necessary to protect       and other pertinent laws constitute privileged              d. The name of the individual on a
      genetic or sexual life of a person, or to         the life and health of the data subject or   communication. [Sec.3(k), RA 10173]                             document prepared by the
      any proceeding for any offense                    another person, and the data subject is                                                                      individual in the course of
      committed or alleged to have been                 not legally or physically able to express                       SCOPE                                        employment         with       the
      committed by such person, the disposal            his or her consent prior to the                                                                              government;
      of such proceedings, or the sentence of           processing;                                  This Act applies to the processing of all types
      any court in such proceedings;                                                                 of personal information and to any natural and       2. Information about an individual who is
                                                     4. The processing is necessary to achieve       juridical person involved in personal                   or was performing service under
   3. Issued by government agencies peculiar            the    lawful    and     noncommercial       information processing including those                  contract for a government institution
      to an individual which includes, but not          objectives of public organizations and       personal     information    controllers     and         that relates to the services performed,
      limited to, social security numbers,              their associations: Provided, That such      processors who, although not found or                   including the terms of the contract, and
      previous or current health records,               processing is only confined and related      established in the Philippines, use equipment           the name of the individual given in the
      licenses or its denials, suspension or            to the bona fide members of these            that are located in the Philippines, or those           course of the performance of those
      revocation, and tax returns; and                  organizations or their associations:         who maintain an office, branch or agency in             services;
                                                        Provided, further, That the sensitive        the Philippines subject to the immediately
                                                        personal     information     are    not      succeeding paragraph: Provided, That the
                                                                                                     requirements of Section 5 are complied with.
3. Information      relating    to      any              including any applicable data privacy                    the Philippines and the parent          4. Adequate and not excessive in relation
   discretionary benefit of a financial                  laws, which is being processed in the                    or affiliate of the Philippine             to the purposes for which they are
   nature such as the granting of a license              Philippines. (Sec. 4, RA 10173)                          entity has access to personal              collected and processed;
   or permit given by the government to                                                                           information; and
   an individual, including the name of                      Sec. 5, RA 10173                                                                             5. Retained only for as long as necessary
   the individual and the exact nature of               PROTECTION AFFORDED TO                          3. The entity has other links in the                 for the fulfillment of the purposes for
   the benefit;                                      JOURNALISTS AND THEIR SOURCES                         Philippines such as, but not limited to:          which the data was obtained or for the
                                                                                                              a. The entity carries on business in           establishment, exercise or defense of
                                                  Nothing in this Act shall be construed as to
4. Personal information processed for                                                                             the Philippines; and                       legal claims, or for legitimate business
                                                  have amended or repealed the provisions of
   journalistic, artistic, literary or research                                                               b. The personal information was                purposes, or as provided by law; and
                                                  Republic Act No. 53, which affords the
   purposes;                                                                                                      collected or held by an entity in
                                                  publishers, editors or duly accredited reporters
                                                                                                                  the Philippines. (Sec.6, RA 10173)      6. Kept in a form which permits
                                                  of any newspaper, magazine or periodical of
5. Information necessary in order to carry                                                                                                                   identification of data subjects for no
                                                  general circulation protection from being
   out the functions of public authority                                                                   C. PROCESSING OF PERSONAL                         longer than is necessary for the
                                                  compelled to reveal the source of any news                      INFORMATION
   which includes the processing of                                                                                                                          purposes for which the data were
                                                  report or information appearing in said
   personal data for the performance by                                                                                                                      collected and processed: Provided, That
                                                  publication which was related in any               General Data Privacy Principles
   the independent, central monetary                                                                                                                         personal information collected for
                                                  confidence to such publisher, editor, or           The processing of personal information shall
   authority and law enforcement and                                                                                                                         other purposes may lie processed for
                                                  reporter.                                          be allowed, subject to compliance with the
   regulatory      agencies   of      their                                                                                                                  historical, statistical or scientific
   constitutionally     and     statutorily                                                          requirements of this Act and other laws                 purposes, and in cases laid down in law
                                                     EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICATION                    allowing disclosure of information to the
   mandated functions. Nothing in this                                                                                                                       may be stored for longer periods:
   Act shall be construed as to have                                                                 public and adherence to the principles of               Provided, further, That adequate
                                                  This Act applies to an act done or practice        transparency,    legitimate  purpose    and
   amended or repealed Republic Act No.                                                                                                                      safeguards are guaranteed by said laws
                                                  engaged in and outside of the Philippines by       proportionality.
   1405, otherwise known as the Secrecy of                                                                                                                   authorizing their processing. (Sec. 11,
                                                  an entity if:
   Bank Deposits Act; Republic Act No.                                                                                                                       RA 10173)
   6426, otherwise known as the Foreign                                                              Personal information must, be:
                                                     1. The act, practice or processing relates         1. Collected for specified and legitimate
   Currency Deposit Act; and Republic Act                                                                                                              NOTE: The personal information controller
                                                        to personal information about a                    purposes determined and declared
   No. 9510, otherwise known as the                                                                                                                    must ensure implementation of personal
                                                        Philippine citizen or a resident;                  before, or as soon as reasonably
   Credit Information System Act (CISA);                                                                                                               information processing principles set out
                                                                                                           practicable after collection, and later     herein.
                                                     2. The entity has a link with the                     processed in a way compatible with
6. Information necessary for banks and
                                                        Philippines, and the entity is processing          such declared, specified and legitimate
   other financial institutions under the                                                                                                                  PRINCIPLES OF TRANSPARENCY,
                                                        personal information in the Philippines            purposes only;                                    LEGITIMATE PURPOSE, AND
   jurisdiction of the independent, central
                                                        or even if the processing is outside the                                                                PROPORTIONALITY
   monetary authority or Bangko Sentral
                                                        Philippines as long as it is about              2. Processed fairly and lawfully;
   ng Pilipinas to comply with Republic
                                                        Philippine citizens or residents such as,                                                      The processing of personal data shall be
   Act No. 9510, and Republic Act No.
                                                        but not limited to, the following:              3. Accurate, relevant and, where necessary     allowed subject to adherence to these 3
   9160, as amended, otherwise known as
                                                           a. A contract is entered in the                 for purposes for which it is to be used     principles below:
   the Anti-Money Laundering Act and
                                                               Philippines;                                the processing of personal information,
   other applicable laws; and
                                                           b. A juridical entity unincorporated            kept up to date; inaccurate or                 1. Transparency.
                                                               in the Philippines but has                  incomplete data must be rectified,                No surprises in how the data collected
7. Personal      information   originally
                                                               central management and control              supplemented, destroyed or their                  is being processed.
   collected from residents of foreign
                                                               in the country; and                         further processing restricted;
   jurisdictions in accordance with the
                                                           c. An entity that has a branch,                                                                ● Data subject must be aware of the
   laws of those foreign jurisdictions,
                                                               agency, office or subsidiary in                                                              nature, purpose, and extent of the
      processing of their personal data,         The processing of personal info is necessary:          SENSITIVE PERSONAL INFO &                                organizations        or      their
      including the:                                1. As the data subject has given their                     PRIVILEGED INFO                                   associations:
          ○ Risks and safeguards involved,              consent.                                  [SEC 13]                                                    b. Provided, further, that the
          ○ Identity of personal information                                                      GR: The processing of sensitive personal                       sensitive personal information is
             controller,                            2. For contract                               information and privileged information shall                   not transferred to third parties:
          ○ Rights as a data subject, and                 a. related to fulfillment of a          be prohibited,                                              c. Provided, finally, that consent of
             how these can be exercised.                      contract with data subject or                                                                      the data subject was obtained
                                                          b. in order to take steps at the        XPN: following cases below.                                    prior to processing;
   ● Any info and communication relating                      request of the data subject prior
     to the processing of personal data                       to entering into a contract.        Where the processing:                                5. Is necessary for medical treatment, is
     should be easy to access and                                                                   1. Is because data subject has given their            carried out by a medical practitioner or
     understand, using clear and plain              3. For compliance with a legal obligation           consent,                                          a medical treatment institution, and an
     language.                                         to which the personal information                   a. specific to the purpose prior to            adequate level of protection of personal
                                                       controller is subject;                                  the processing, or                         information is ensured; or
   2. Legitimate purpose                                                                                   b. if privileged information, all
      Required by law and not contrary to           4. To protect vitally important interests                  parties to the exchange have            6. Personal info as is necessary for the
      public morals.                                   of the data subject, including life and                 given their consent prior to               protection of lawful rights and interests
         ● The processing of info shall be             health;                                                 processing;                                of natural or legal persons in court
             compatible with a declared and                                                                                                               proceedings, or the establishment,
             specified purpose which must           5. In order to                                   2. Is provided for by existing laws and              exercise or defense of legal claims, or
             not be contrary to law, morals,               a. respond to national                       regulations:                                      when provided to government or
             or public policy.                                emergency,                                   a. Provided,      such     regulatory          public authority.
                                                           b. comply with requirements of                      enactments      guarantee the
   3. Proportionality                                         public order and safety, or                      protection of the sensitive             SUBCONTRACT OF PERSONAL INFO
      Collect only what is needed and                      c. fulfill functions of public                      personal information and the
      required to commensurate to the                         authority which necessarily                      privileged information:              A personal information controller may
      benefits.                                               includes the processing of                   b. Provided, further, that consent       subcontract the processing of personal info
         ● The processing of info shall be                    personal data for the fulfillment                of the data subjects is not          Provided: [SEC 14]
             adequate, relevant, suitable,                    of its mandate; or                               required by law or regulation           1. Personal info controller shall be
             necessary, and not excessive in                                                                   permitting the processing of the            responsible for
             relation to a declared and             6. For the purposes of the legitimate                      sensitive personal info/privileged             a. ensuring proper safeguards are
             specified purpose.                        interests pursued by the personal                       info;                                             in place to ensure confidentiality
         ● (Sec. 18, IRR of RA 10173)                  information controller or by a third                                                                      of the personal info processed,
             Personal data shall be processed          party or parties to whom the data is          3. Is necessary to protect the life and                  b. prevent its use for unauthorized
             only if the purpose of the                disclosed,                                       health of the data subject or another                    purposes, and generally, comply
             processing could not reasonably                                                            person, and the data subject is not                      with the requirements of this
             be fulfilled by other means.              XPN: such interests are overridden by            legally or physically able to express                    Act and other laws for
                                                       fundamental rights and freedoms of the           their consent prior to the processing;                   processing       of      personal
  CRITERIA FOR LAWFUL PROCESSING                       data subject which require protection                                                                     information.
         OF PERSONAL INFO                              under the Philippine Constitution.            4. Is necessary to achieve the lawful and
                                                                                                        noncommercial objectives of public             2. The personal information processor
The processing of personal info shall be                                                                organizations and their associations:             shall comply with all the requirements
permitted only if (1) not otherwise prohibited                                                              a. Provided, that such processing is          of this Act and other applicable laws.
by law,and (2) when at least one of the ff.                                                                    only confined and related to the
conditions exists: [SEC 12]                                                                                    bona fide members of these
       EXTENSION OF PRIVILEGED                        ●   organization,                                        g. The period for which the                         be made as the sole basis for any
           COMMUNICATION                              ●   storage,                                                information will be stored;                      decision significantly affecting or
                                                      ●   updating or modification,                            h. The existence of their rights                    will affect the data subject;
Personal information controllers may invoke           ●   retrieval,                                              [right to access, correction, to              g. Date when his or her personal
the principle of privileged communication             ●   consultation,                                           lodge a complaint before the                     information concerning the data
over privileged information that they lawfully        ●   use,                                                    Commission]                                      subject were last accessed and
control or process. Subject to existing laws and      ●   consolidation,                                                                                           modified; and
regulations, any evidence gathered on                 ●   blocking,                                  GR: Any info supplied to the data subject on               h. The designation, or name or
privileged information is inadmissible. [SEC          ●   erasure or destruction                     these matters shall not be amended without                    identity and address of the
15]                                                                                                  prior notification of data subject (a.1).                     personal information controller;
                                                          D. RIGHTS OF DATA SUBJECT                  XPN:
Personal Information Controller [PIC]                                                                    ● Personal info be needed pursuant to a      d. RIGHT TO RECTIFICATION/ OBJECT/
It refers to a person or organization who          Rights of the Data Subject [SEC 16]: The data            subpoena or                               CORRECT
controls the collection, holding, processing or    subject is entitled to: (FAI-REI)                     ● If the collection and processing are for      4. Rectification
use of personal information, including a                                                                    obvious purposes,                         To dispute the inaccuracy or error in the
person or organization who instructs another       a . RIGHT TO BE INFORMED                                     ○ For performance/ in relation to a   personal info and have PIC correct it
person or organization to collect, hold,               1. Information - Be informed whether                         contract or service or            immediately and accordingly unless the
process, use, transfer or disclose personal               personal info pertaining to him or her                ○ Necessary/ desirable in the         request is vexatious or unreasonable.
information on his or her behalf.                         shall be, are being or have been                          context            of        an      ● If the personal info has been corrected,
                                                          processed;                                                employer-employee relationship,         the PIC shall ensure the accessibility
The term excludes:                                                                                                  between the collector and the           of both the new and the retracted info
   1. A person or organization who performs           2. Before entering their personal info into                   data subject,                           and the simultaneous receipt of the
       such functions as instructed by another           the processing system of the PIC, or at                ○ Info is being collected and               new and the retracted info by recipients
       person or organization; and                       the next practical opportunity, its PIC                    processed as a result of legal          thereof:
   2. An individual who collects, holds,                 obligation for data subject be                             obligation;                                  ○ Provided, 3rd parties who have
       processes or uses personal information            informed of the ff:                                                                                        previously      received   such
       in connection with the individual’s                  a. Description of the personal           c. RIGHT TO ACCESS                                             processed personal information
       personal, family or household affairs.                   information to be entered into           3. Access - Reasonable access to, need                     shall he informed of its
       [Sec. 3(h), RA 10173]                                    the system;                                 upon demand, the following:                             inaccuracy and its rectification
                                                            b. Purposes of info to be                                                                               upon reasonable request of the
Personal Information Processor [PIP]                            processed;                                     a. Contents of their personal info                   data subject;
Any natural or juridical person qualified to act            c. Scope and method of the                            that were processed;
as such under this Act to whom a personal                       personal info processing;                      b. Sources from which personal         e. RIGHT TO ERASE
information controller may outsource the                    d. The recipients or classes of                       information were obtained;              5. Erasure/Blocking/Objection
processing of personal data pertaining to a                     recipients to whom info may be                 c. Names       and  addresses    of    To Suspend, withdraw or order the blocking,
data subject. [Sec. 3(i), RA 10173]                             disclosed;                                        recipients of the personal          removal or destruction of his or her personal
                                                            e. Methods utilized for automated                     information;                        information from the PIC’s filing system upon
Processing                                                      access, if the same is allowed by              d. Manner by which such data           discovery and substantial proof that the
It refers to any operation or any set of                        the data subject, and the extent                  were processed;                     personal info are:
operations performed upon personal info [Sec.                   to which such access is                        e. Reasons for the disclosure of                 ○ incomplete,
3(j), RA 10173]                                                 authorized;                                       the personal information to                   ○ outdated,
                                                            f. The identity and contact                           recipients;                                   ○ False,
Including, but not limited to the data:                         details      of   the     personal             f. Info on automated processes                   ○ unlawfully obtained,
    ● collection,                                               information controller or its                     where the data will or likely to              ○ used for unauthorized purposes
    ● recording,                                                representative;
        ○ not necessary for purposes for                     NON-APPLICABILITY                              there is no other legal ground for the         DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF
             which they were collected.                                                                     processing;                                  PERSONAL INFORMATION CONTROLLER
   ● PIC may notify 3rd parties who have          Limitations on the Transmissibility of the
     previously received such processed           Right and Right to Portability [SEC19]                2. The data subject objects to the               Under R.A. No. 10173 or the Data Privacy Act
     personal information; and delete it on                                                                processing and there are no overriding        of 2012, these are the duties and
     the file system.                             The provisions on transmissibility of rights &           legitimate grounds for the processing;        responsibilities of a Personal Information
                                                  right to portability are not applicable:                                                               Controller:
f. RIGHT TO DAMAGES                                                                                     3. The personal data have to be erased for          1. To      implement    reasonable     and
    6. Indemnification – To be indemnified           a. If the processed personal information              compliance with a legal obligation in               appropriate organizational, physical,
       for any damages sustained due to such            are used only for the needs of scientific          Union or Member State law to which                  and technical measures intended for
       inaccurate, incomplete, outdated, false,         and statistical research plus,                     the controller is subject;                          the protection of personal information
       unlawfully obtained, or unauthorized                 ○ On this basis, no activities are                                                                 against any accidental or unlawful
       use of personal information.                            carried out & no decisions are           4. The personal data have been collected               destruction,       alteration       and
                                                               taken regarding the data subject:           in relation to the offer of information             disclosure, as well as against any other
      RIGHTS OF DATA SUBJECT ARE                               plus,                                       society services.                                   unlawful processing.
           TRANSMISSIBLE                                    ○ Provided, the personal info shall
                                                                                                                                                            2. To    implement      reasonable   and
                                                               be      held     under      strict    Where the controller has made the personal
The lawful heirs and assigns of the data                                                                                                                       appropriate measures to protect
                                                               confidentiality and used only for     data public and obliged to erase the personal
subject may invoke the rights of the data                                                                                                                      personal information against natural
                                                               the declared purpose.                 data, the controller shall take reasonable steps,
subject for: [SEC 17]                                                                                                                                          dangers such as accidental loss or
                                                                                                     to inform controllers which are processing the
   a. which he or she is an heir or assignee at                                                                                                                destruction, and human dangers such
                                                     b. If processing of personal info is for the    personal data that the data subject has
       any time after the death of the data                                                                                                                    as unlawful access, fraudulent misuse,
                                                        purpose of investigations in relation        requested the erasure by such controllers of
       subject or                                                                                                                                              unlawful destruction, alteration, and
                                                        to any criminal, administrative or tax       any links to, or copy or replication of, those
   b. when the data subject is incapacitated                                                                                                                   contamination.
                                                        liabilities of a data subject.               personal data.
       or incapable of exercising the rights as
       enumerated     in the immediately                                                                                                                    3. The       determination        of     the
                                                  These limitations on rights shall only be to the   XPN Right to be Forgotten:
       preceding section.                                                                                                                                      appropriate level of security under
                                                  minimum extent necessary to achieve the              1. Freedom        of      expression       and
                                                                                                                                                               this section must consider
                                                  purpose of the research or investigation.               information;
                                                                                                                                                                   a. the nature of the personal
                                                                                                       2. Compliance with a legal obligation
g. RIGHT TO DATA PORTABILITY [SEC 18]                                                                                                                                  information to be protected
                                                          RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN                           which requires processing by Union or
The data subject, whose personal data is                                                                                                                           b. the risks represented by the
                                                                                                          Member State law to which the
processed electronically and in a structured      This is the term for Right to Erasure in SEC                                                                         processing
                                                                                                          controller is subject or for the
& commonly used format, shall have the right      16e that is used in other parts of the world.                                                                    c. the size of the organization and
                                                                                                          performance of a task carried out in the
to obtain from the PIC a copy of their data       This is a term and right contained in Article 17                                                                     complexity of its operations
                                                                                                          public interest or in the exercise of
undergoing processing in an electronic or         of the General Data Protection Regulation                                                                        d. current data privacy best
                                                                                                          official authority vested in the
structured format, which is commonly used         (GDPR), for those who live and outside of the                                                                        practices
                                                                                                          controller;
and allows for further use by the data subject.   European Union (EU). [SEC 16e]                                                                                   e. the      cost       of     security
                                                                                                       3. Reasons of public interest in the area of
                                                                                                                                                                       implementation
                                                                                                          public health;
   ● The Commission may specify the               The ff are additional points here that allow a
                                                                                                       4. Archiving purposes in the public                     Subject   to   guidelines  as   the
     electronic format referred to above, as      data subject to the right erase their personal
                                                                                                          interest, scientific or historical research          Commission may issue from time to
     well as the technical standards,             data and the controller shall have the
                                                                                                          purposes or statistical purposes                     time, the measures implemented must
     modalities, and procedures for their         obligation to erase these data without undue
                                                                                                       5. Establishment, exercise, or defense of               include:
     transfer.                                    delay:
                                                                                                          legal claims.
                                                     1. The data subject withdraws consent                                                                         a. Safeguards to protect its
EXAMPLE: request bank statement                          on which the processing is based, and                                                                        computer   network against
         accidental,      unlawful,       or   Commission and affected data                              of a criminal investigation                not more than Two million pesos
         unauthorized         usage       or   subjects when sensitive personal                          related to a serious breach.               (Php2,000,000.00) shall be imposed on
         interference with or hindering of     information or other information that                                                                persons who, due to negligence,
         their functioning or availability.    may, under the circumstances, be used       Period to report: If there is likelihood of risk         provided access to personal information
      b. A security policy with respect        to enable identity fraud are reasonably     to individuals, the data processor must report           without being authorized under the Act
         to the processing of personal         believed to have been acquired by an        data breaches within 72 hours.                           or any existing law.
         information                           unauthorized person, and the
                                                                                                            PENALTIES                            b. A penalty of imprisonment ranging
      c. A process for identifying and         personal information controller or the
                                                                                                                                                    from three (3) years to six (6) years and
         accessing             reasonably      Commission      believes   (but    such     Section 25. Unauthorized Processing of                   a fine of not less than Five hundred
         foreseeable vulnerabilities in        unauthorized acquisition is likely to       Personal Information and Sensitive                       thousand pesos (Php500,000.00) but
         its computer networks, and for        give rise to a real risk of serious         Personal Information                                     not more than Four million pesos
         taking preventive, corrective and     harm to any affected data subject.
                                                                                              a. A penalty of imprisonment ranging                  (Php4,000,000.00) shall be imposed on
         mitigating      action     against
                                               Notification to the Commission: The               from one (1) year to three (3) years and           persons who, due to negligence,
         security incidents that can lead
                                               notification shall at least describe the          a fine of not less than Five hundred               provided access to sensitive personal
         to a security breach.
                                               nature of the breach, the sensitive               thousand pesos (Php500,000.00) but                 information without being authorized
      d. Regular       monitoring        for
                                               personal      information       possibly          not more than Two million pesos                    under the Act or any existing law.
         security breaches and a process
         for taking preventive, corrective     involved, and the measures taken by               (Php2,000,000.00) shall be imposed on
                                                                                                                                              Section 27. Improper Disposal of Personal
         and mitigating action against         the entity to address the breach.                 persons     who     process     personal
                                                                                                                                              Information and Sensitive Personal
         security incidents that can lead      Notification may be delayed only to the           information without the consent of the
                                                                                                                                              Information
         to a security breach.                 extent necessary to determine the scope           data subject, or without being
                                               of the breach, to prevent further                 authorized under the Act or any                 a. A penalty of imprisonment ranging
4. The personal information controller         disclosures, or to restore reasonable             existing law.                                      from six (6) months to two (2) years
   must further ensure that third parties      integrity to the information and                                                                     and a fine of not less than One hundred
   processing personal information on its      communications system.                                                                               thousand pesos (Php100,000.00) but
                                                                                              b. A penalty of imprisonment ranging
   behalf shall implement the security                                                                                                              not more than Five hundred thousand
                                                  a. In evaluating if notification is            from three (3) years to six (6) years and
   measures required by this provision.                                                                                                             pesos     (Php500,000.00)       shall be
                                                     unwarranted, the Commission                 a fine of not less than Five hundred
                                                                                                                                                    imposed on persons who knowingly or
                                                     may     take    into    account             thousand pesos (Php500,000.00) but
5. The       employees,      agents      or                                                                                                         negligently     dispose,     discard, or
                                                     compliance by the personal                  not more than Four million pesos
   representatives       of   a   personal                                                                                                          abandon the personal information of an
                                                     information controller with this            (Php4,000,000.00) shall be imposed on
   information controller who are involved                                                                                                          individual in an area accessible to the
                                                     section and existence of good               persons who process sensitive personal
   in    the    processing of personal                                                                                                              public or has otherwise placed the
                                                     faith in the acquisition of                 information without the consent of the
   information shall operate and hold                                                                                                               personal information of an individual in
                                                     personal information.                       data subject, or without being
   personal information under strict                                                                                                                its container for trash collection.
                                                                                                 authorized under the Act or any
   confidentiality      if  the   personal        b. The Commission may exempt a
                                                                                                 existing law.                                   b. A penalty of imprisonment ranging
   information are not intended for public           personal information controller
                                                                                                                                                    from one (1) year to three (3) years and
   disclosure.    This obligation shall              from notification where, in its
                                                                                           Section 26. Accessing Personal Information               a fine of not less than One hundred
   continue even after leaving the public            reasonable     judgment,      such
                                                                                           and Sensitive Personal Information Due to                thousand pesos (Php100,000.00) but
   service, transfer to another position or          notification would not be in the
                                                                                           Negligence                                               not more than One million pesos
   upon termination of employment or                 public interest or in the interests
                                                                                                                                                    (Php1,000,000.00) shall be imposed on
   contractual relations.                            of the affected data subjects.           a. A penalty of imprisonment ranging
                                                                                                                                                    persons who knowingly or negligently
                                                  c. The Commission may authorize                from one (1) year to three (3) years and
                                                                                                                                                    dispose, discard or abandon the
6. The personal information controller               postponement of notification                a fine of not less than Five hundred
                                                                                                                                                    sensitive personal information of an
   shall   promptly    notify     the                where it may hinder the progress            thousand pesos (Php500,000.00) but
                                                                                                                                                    individual in an area accessible to the
     public or has otherwise placed the                 sensitive   personal   information    are          immediately preceding section without              If the offender is an alien, he or she
     sensitive personal information of an               stored.                                            the consent of the data subject, shall be          shall, in addition to the penalties herein
     individual in its container for trash                                                                 subject to imprisonment ranging from               prescribed, be deported without further
     collection.                                  Section 30. Concealment of Security                      one (1) year to three (3) years and a fine         proceedings after serving the penalties
                                                  Breaches Involving Sensitive Personal                    of not less than Five hundred thousand             prescribed.
Section 28. Processing of Personal                Information                                              pesos (Php500,000.00) but not more
Information and Sensitive Personal                                                                         than        One       million       pesos          If the offender is a public official or
Information for Unauthorized Purposes                a. A penalty of imprisonment ranging                                                                     employee and he or she is found guilty
                                                                                                           (Php1,000,000.00).
                                                        from one (1) year and six (6) months to                                                               of acts penalized under Sections 54 and
  a. A penalty of imprisonment ranging                  five (5) years and a fine of not less than                                                            55 of these Rules, he or she shall, in
                                                                                                        b. Any personal information controller or
     from one (1) year and six (6) months to            Five     hundred       thousand      pesos                                                            addition to the penalties prescribed
                                                                                                           personal information processor, or any
     five (5) years and a fine of not less than         (Php500,000.00) but not more than                                                                     herein, suffer perpetual or temporary
                                                                                                           of its officials, employees or agents, who
     Five     hundred       thousand      pesos         One million pesos (Php1,000,000.00)                                                                   absolute disqualification from office, as
                                                                                                           discloses to a third party sensitive
     (Php500,000.00) but not more than                  shall be imposed on persons who, after                                                                the case may be.
                                                                                                           personal information not covered by
     One million pesos (Php1,000,000.00)                having knowledge of a security breach
                                                                                                           the immediately preceding section
     shall be imposed on persons processing             and of the obligation to notify the                                                             Section 35. Large-Scale
                                                                                                           without the consent of the data subject,
     personal information for purposes not              Commission pursuant to Section 20(f)
                                                                                                           shall be subject to imprisonment                a. The maximum penalty in the
     authorized by the data subject, or                 of the Act, intentionally or by omission
                                                                                                           ranging from three (3) years to five (5)           corresponding scale of penalties
     otherwise authorized under the Act or              conceals the fact of such security
                                                                                                           years and a fine of not less than Five             provided for the preceding offenses
     under existing laws.                               breach
                                                                                                           hundred             thousand         pesos         shall be imposed when the personal
  b. A penalty of imprisonment ranging
                                                  Section 31. Malicious Disclosure                         (Php500,000.00) but not more than                  data of at least one hundred (100)
     from two (2) years to seven (7) years
                                                                                                           Two million pesos (Php2,000,000.00).               persons are harmed, affected, or
     and a fine of not less than Five hundred
                                                     a. Any personal information controller or                                                                involved, as the result of any of the
     thousand pesos (Php500,000.00) but                                                              Section 33. Combination or Series of Acts
                                                        personal information processor, or any                                                                above-mentioned offenses.
     not more than Two million pesos
                                                        of its officials, employees or agents,
     (Php2,000,000.00) shall be imposed on                                                              a. Any combination or series of acts as
                                                        who, with malice or in bad faith,
     persons processing sensitive personal                                                                 defined in Sections 25 to 32 shall make
                                                        discloses    unwarranted     or   false
     information      for     purposes      not                                                            the person subject to imprisonment
                                                        information relative to any personal
     authorized by the data subject, or                                                                    ranging from three (3) years to six (6)
                                                        information or sensitive personal
     otherwise authorized under the Act or                                                                 years and a fine of not less than One
                                                        information obtained by him or her,
     under existing laws.                                                                                  million pesos (Php1,000,000.00) but not
                                                        shall be subject to imprisonment
                                                                                                           more     than Five million pesos
Section 29. Unauthorized          Access    or          ranging from one (1) year and six (6)
                                                                                                           (Php5,000,000.00).
Intentional Breach                                      months to five (5) years and a fine of
                                                        not less than Five hundred thousand          Section 34. Extent of Liability
  a. A penalty of imprisonment ranging                  pesos (Php500,000.00) but not more
     from one (1) year to three (3) years and           than       One       million     pesos          a. If the offender is a corporation,
     a fine of not less than Five hundred               (Php1,000,000.00).                                 partnership or any juridical person, the
     thousand pesos (Php500,000.00) but                                                                    penalty shall be imposed upon the
     not more than Two million pesos              Section 31. Unauthorized Disclosure                      responsible officers, as the case may be,
     (Php2,000,000.00) shall be imposed on                                                                 who participated in, or by their gross
                                                     a. Any personal information controller or
     persons who knowingly and unlawfully,                                                                 negligence, allowed the commission of
                                                        personal information processor, or any
     or violating data confidentiality and                                                                 the crime. Where applicable, the court
                                                        of its officials, employees, or agents,
     security data systems, breaks in any way                                                              may also suspend or revoke any of its
                                                        who discloses to a third party personal
     into any system where personal and                                                                    rights under this Act.
                                                        information not covered by the
         GLOSSARY (REQUISITES)                                  personal data for the fulfillment        GLOSSARY (DEFINITION OF TERMS)                  Filing system- any act of information relating
                                                                of its mandate; or                                                                       to natural or juridical persons to the extent
Data Privacy Act                                     12. For the purposes of the legitimate           Commission-     The      National      Privacy     that, although the information is not
ProNE-Act                                                interests pursued by the personal            Commission created by virtue of this Act.          processed       by     equipment       operating
   1. It must involve any processing of                  information controller or by a third                                                            automatically in response to instructions given
      personal information                               party or parties to whom the data is         Confidential       information-     specifically   for that purpose, the set is structured, either
   2. By either natural or juridical persons             disclosed,                                   protected under the Rules of Court (such as        by reference to individuals or by reference to
   3. Whether or not found in the                        XPN: such interests are overridden by        doctor-patient or attorney-client privilege) or    criteria relating to individuals, in such a way
      Philippines that uses equipment or                 fundamental rights and freedoms of the       statute (such as arbitration proceedings and       that specific information relating to a
      maintains an office, branch or agency              data subject which require protection        awards under the Domestic Arbitration Law).        particular person is readily accessible.
      in the Philippines.                                under the Philippine Constitution.           Generally, the effect of confidentiality will
   4. Either acting as a controller or                                                                result in the information being inadmissible in    Information and Communications System-
      processor                                   Subcontract of Personal Information [SEC            any court, in any proceeding.                      system for generating, sending, receiving,
                                                  14]                                                                                                    storing or otherwise processing electronic data
Criteria for Lawful Processing of Personal            3. Personal info controller shall be            Consent of the data subject- any freely given,     messages or electronic documents and
Information [SEC 12]                                     responsible for                              specific, informed indication of will, whereby     includes the computer system or other similar
The processing of personal info shall be                     a. ensuring proper safeguards are        the data subject agrees to the collection and      device by or which data is recorded,
permitted only if (1) not otherwise prohibited                   in place to ensure confidentiality   processing of personal information about           transmitted or stored and any procedure
by law,and (2) when at least one of the ff.                      of the personal info processed,      and/or relating to him or her. Consent shall be    related to the recording, transmission or
conditions exists:                                           b. prevent its use for unauthorized      evidenced by written, electronic or recorded       storage of electronic data, electronic message,
                                                                 purposes, and generally, comply      means. It may also be given on behalf of the       or electronic document.
The processing of personal info is necessary:                    with the requirements of this        data subject by an agent specifically
   7. As the data subject has given their                        Act and other laws for               authorized by the data subject to do so.           National Privacy Commission- commission
       consent.                                                  processing       of      personal                                                       created by virtue of this act.
   8. For contract                                               information.                         Data Privacy Act (RA 10173)- It is the policy
           a. related to fulfillment of a             4. The personal information processor           of the State to protect the fundamental human      Personal Information- Any information
              contract with data subject or              shall comply with all the requirements       right of privacy, of communication while           whether recorded in a material form or not
           b. in order to take steps at the              of this Act and other applicable laws.       ensuring free flow of information to promote       from which the identity of an individual is
              request of the data subject prior                                                       innovation and growth. The State recognizes        apparent or can be reasonably and directly
              to entering into a contract.        Rights of Data Subject Are Transmissible            the    vital    role   of    information  and      ascertained by the entity holding the
   9. For compliance with a legal obligation      [SEC 17]                                            communications             technology       in     information or when put together with other
       to which the personal information          The lawful heirs and assigns of the data            nation-building and its inherent obligation to     information would directly and certainly
       controller is subject;                     subject may invoke the rights of the data           ensure     that    personal information in         identify an individual. [Sec. 3(g), RA 10173]
   10. To protect vitally important interests     subject for:                                        information and communications systems in
       of the data subject, including life and       c. which he or she is an heir or assignee at     the government and in the private sector are       Personal information- any information
       health;                                           any time after the death of the data         secured and protected. (Sec. 2, RA 10173)          whether recorded in a material form or not,
   11. In order to                                       subject or                                                                                      from which the identity of an individual is
           a. respond         to       national                                                       Data subject- individual whose personal            apparent or can be reasonably and directly
                                                     d. when the data subject is incapacitated
              emergency,                                                                              information is processed.                          ascertained by the entity holding the
                                                         or incapable of exercising the rights as
           b. comply with requirements of                enumerated     in the immediately                                                               information, or when put together with other
                                                                                                      Direct marketing- communication by
              public order and safety, or                preceding section                                                                               information would directly and certainly
                                                                                                      whatever means of any advertising or
           c. fulfill functions of public                                                                                                                identify an individual.
                                                                                                      marketing material which is directed to
              authority which necessarily
                                                                                                      particular individuals.
              includes the processing of
Personal Information Controller [PIC] - A           order or an act of Congress to be kept
person or organization who controls the             classified. [Sec. 3(l), RA 10173]
collection, holding, processing or use of
personal information, including a person or         Subcontract- a contract between a party to an
organization who instructs another person or        original contract and a third party
organization to collect, hold, process, use,        especially: one to provide all or a specified part
transfer or disclose personal information on        of the work or materials required in the
his or her behalf.                                  original contract. Essentially engage a third           PAMANTASAN NG LUNGSOD NG MAYNILA
                                                    party to do your work.                                        (University of the City of Manila)
Personal Information Processor [PIP] - Any                                                                General Luna, corner Muralla St., Intramuros, Manila
natural or juridical person qualified to act as                                                                           1002 Metro Manila
such under this Act to whom a personal
information controller may outsource the
processing of personal data pertaining to a
data subject. [Sec. 3(i), RA 10173]                                                                      In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the subject
                                                                                                           Regulatory Framework and Legal Issues in Business
Privileged Information- refers to any and all                                                                                  (ACN 2210A-4)
forms of data which under the Rules of the
Court and other pertinent laws constitute
privileged communication. [Sec.3(k), RA 10173]
Penalties:
Hacking or Crackling
                                                                                                                         May 2024
FINANCIAL REHABILITATION AND                      2. Jurisdiction over all persons        GROUP OF DEBTORS UNDER FRIA                  commencement date, which can either
INSOLVENCY ACT OF 2010 ( R.A No.                     affected shall be acquired upon                                                   be secured or unsecured.
            10142)                                   publication of the notice of         Group of Debtors refers to:
                                                     commencement in a newspaper             1. Financially related corporations          1. Unsecured creditors -          are
DECLARATION OF POLICY BEHIND                                                                    – parent, subsidiary or affiliates
                                                     of general circulation in the                                                           those whose claim or a portion
            FRIA
                                                     Philippines.                            2. Partnerships – more than 50% of              thereof is neither secured,
                                                  3. Proceedings shall be summary               which is owned by the same                   preferred nor subordinated.
It is the policy of the State to encourage
                                                     and non-adversarial. (Section 3)           person                                    2. Secured creditors - are those
debtors, both juridical and natural
                                                                                             3. Single Proprietorships                       whose claims are secured by a
persons, and their creditors to
                                                             PURPOSE                                                                         lien (either by law, agreement or
collectively and realistically resolve and
                                                                                          EXCLUDED DEBTORS UNDER FRIA                        by judicial judgment) which
adjust competing claims and property
                                                  1. To encourage debtors and                                                                legally entitled a creditor to
rights.
                                                     creditors to collectively and           1.   Banks                                      resort to the property subject of
                                                     realistically resolve and adjust        2.   Pre-need companies                         a lien for payment of his claim.
In furtherance thereof, the State shall
                                                     competing claims and property           3.   Insurance companies and                    Example: loan secured by a
ensure a timely, fair, transparent,
                                                     rights through rehabilitation.          4.   Government Agencies or units –             mortgage. Lien of workers and
effective and efficient rehabilitation or
                                                  2. If not feasible, to facilitate               governed by their respective               suppliers       on      inventory.
liquidation of debtors.
                                                     speedy and orderly liquidation of            special laws.                              Attachment issued by the court.
                                                     debtor’s     assets   and      the
The rehabilitation or liquidation shall
                                                     settlement of their obligations.     Note: Government Financial Institutions         WHAT IS MEANT BY “CLAIM” ?
be made with a view to ensure or
                                                                                          other than banks and Government
maintain certainty and predictability in
                                                      DEBTOR UNDER FRIA                   Owned and Controlled Corporations            Refers to all claims or demands of
commercial affairs, preserve and
                                                                                          (GOCCs) are covered by FRIA unless           whatever nature or character against
maximize the value of the assets of
                                               Debtor as defined under the law are        their charter provides otherwise.            the debtor or its property, whether for
these debtors, recognize creditor rights
                                               insolvent:                                                                              money or otherwise, liquidated or
and respect priority of claims, and
                                                  1. Sole proprietorship registered        QUALIFICATIONS AS INSOLVENT                 unliquidated, fixed or contingent,
ensure equitable treatment of creditors                                                            UNDER FRIA
                                                      with the DTI;                                                                    matured or unmatured, disputed or
who are similarly situated.
                                                  2. Partnership registered with the                                                   undisputed, including, but not limited
                                                      SEC                                 Shall refer to the financial condition of    to:
When rehabilitation is not feasible, it is                                                a debtor that is generally:
                                                  3. Corporations organized and                                                            1. All claims of the government,
in the interest of the State to facilitate a                                                 1. Unable to pay its or his liabilities
                                                      existing under the laws of the                                                          whether national or local,
speedy and orderly liquidation of these                                                          as they fall due; or
                                                      Philippines; or                                                                         including taxes, tariffs and
debtor's assets and the settlement of                                                        2. Has liabilities greater than its or
                                                  4. Individual debtors which are                                                             customs duties; and
their obligations. (Section 2)                                                                   his assets.
                                                      natural    persons   who   are                                                       2. Claims against directors and
                                                      residents and citizens of the                                                           officers of the debtor arising
NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS UNDER                                                                       CREDITORS UNDER FRIA
                                                      Philippines.                                                                            from acts done in the discharge
            FRIA
                                                                                                                                              of their functions falling within
                                                                                          Creditors include natural or juridical              the scope of their authority.
   1. In rem. Meaning it is a                                                             persons which have a claim against the
      proceeding which binds the                                                          debtor that arose on or before
      whole world.                                                                                                                     This inclusion does not, however,
                                                                                                                                       prohibit the creditors or third parties
from filing cases against the directors      2. The purpose is to suspend or                  SUSPENSION ORDER                          commerce or industry in which
and officers acting in their personal           delay the payment of debts.                                                             the petitioning individual is
capacities.                                  3. The amount of indebtedness is         Suspension Order - Upon motion filed              engaged
                                                not affected (not reduced or          by the individual debtor, the court may        2. Making any payment outside of
 PROCEEDING COVERED BY FRIA                     discharged).                          issue an order suspending any pending             the necessary or legitimate
                                             4. The number of creditors is            execution against the individual debtor.          expenses of his business or
   1. Rehabilitation – voluntary or             immaterial.                                                                             industry
      involuntary                                                                     GR: As a rule, no creditor shall sue or
   2. Pre-negotiated rehabilitation            DISTINCTION BETWEEN                    institute to collect his claim from the     REQUIREMENTS FOR CREDITOR’S
   3. Liquidation – voluntary or           SUSPENSION OF PAYMENTS FROM                debtor from the time of the filing of the            MEETING
      involuntary                                 REHABILITATION                      petition for suspension of payments
   4. Suspension of payments                                                          and for as long as the proceedings          Creditors’ Meeting - the debtor shall
                                           SUSPENSION                                 remain pending.                             attach to his petition a proposed
                                                               REHABILITATION
    SUSPENSION OF PAYMENTS                 OF PAYMENTS                                                                            agreement with creditors, which shall
                                                                                      XPN:                                        be approved in a creditors’ meeting.
This involves calling the creditors to a   Applies only to     Applies to business                                                    1. Quorum: presence of creditors
                                                                                      1. Those creditors having claims for:
                                             individual        organizations also.
meeting to propose and agree on a                                                         A. Personal labor                              holding at least 3/5 of the
                                              debtors.
schedule of payments and to prevent                                                       B. Maintenance                                 liabilities of the debtor.
the debtor from making any payment           Debtor has        Debtor is insolvent.       C. Expense of last illness and              2. Approval: double majority is
outside the necessary or legitimate        sufficient assets                                 funeral of the wife or children of          required:
expenses of the business, and the            to cover its                                                                                    a. 2/3 of the creditors
                                                                                             the debtor
                                              liabilities.
issuance of a suspension order to                                                            If incurred in the 60 days                           voting; and
prevent pending executions against the     Secured Debtors     Secured debtors are           immediately prior to the filing of              b. Claims of the majority
debtor.                                    are not affected.     affected by stay            the petition.                                        vote amount to at least
                                                                      order.                                                                      3/5 of the total liabilities
    COVERAGE SUSPENSION OF                                                            2. Secured creditors
                                           Filed by debtor.      Maybe filed by
          PAYMENTS                                                creditors.                                                      A creditor whose claim is incurred
                                                                                      Note: The suspension order shall lapse      within 90 days prior to the filing of the
It is an action available only to           No minimum         When creditors file,   when 3 months shall have passed             petition for suspension is not entitled
Individual Debtors.                        requirement for     the claims must be:                                                to vote.
                                                                                      without the proposed agreement being
                                            the amount of         1. at least 1M or
                                                claims.           2. at least 25%     accepted by the creditors or as soon as
Note: Not available as a remedy to                                                    such agreement is denied.                   Creditors   not    affected   by the
                                                                      of        the
insolvent juridical debtors.                                          subscribed                                                  suspension order may refrain from
                                                                      capital stock    PROHIBITED ACTS OF DEBTORS                 attending the meeting and voting
 KEY FEATURES OF SUSPENSION                                           or partners’                                                therein and he shall not be bound by
         OF PAYMENTS                                                  contribution,   After filing and during pendency, the       any agreement determined in the
                                                                      whichever is
                                                                                      debtor cannot:                              meeting. However, if they should join in
   1. The debtor has sufficient                                       higher.
                                                                                         1. Sell, transfer, encumber or           the voting they shall be bound in the
      properties to cover all his debts                                                      dispose in any manner his            same manner as are other creditors.
      but he foresees the impossibility                                                      property, except those used in
      of meeting his debts when they                                                         the ordinary operations of
      respectively fall due.
      3. Disapproval: the proceedings                               Majority of                                                   no substantial likelihood for         the
      shall be terminated and the            Partnership                                     THE COURT ISSUES A                   debtor's successful rehabilitation.
                                                                    partnership
      creditors shall be at liberty to                                                    COMMENCEMENT WITH A STAY
      enforce their rights.                                       Majority of the                  ORDER                          "Claims" - in rehabilitation refer to all
                                                                    directors or
                                                                                                                                  demands against the debtor or its
                                                                  trustees; AND            1. Suspends      all    actions  or
        COURT-SUPERVISED                                                                                                          property, including those from the
                                             Corporation           Stockholders
         REHABILITATION                                                                       proceedings,      in   court  or    government       and   claims    against
                                                                representing 2/3 of
                                                                                              otherwise, for the enforcement      directors and officers related to their
                                                                   outstanding
         REHABILITATION                                         capital/members of            of claims against the debtor.       official duties.
                                                                     non-stock
Refers to the restoration of the debtor                             corporation            2. Suspends all actions to enforce     However, creditors can still pursue legal
to a condition of successful operation                                                        any judgment, attachment, or        action against directors and officers in
and solvency. If it is shown that its         2. Involuntary – initiated by the               other    provisional   remedies     their personal capacities.
continuance      of     operation     is         creditor or group of creditors, if:          against the debtor.
economically feasible; and its creditors            a. There is no genuine issue                                                              STAY ORDER
can recover by way of the present value                 of fact or law on the              3. Prohibits the debtor from
of payments projected in the plan, more                 claim/s         of        the         selling,            encumbering,    Preserves the preference of secured
if the debtor continues as a going                      petitioner/s;                         transferring, or disposing of any   creditors, but enforcement of this
concern than if it is immediately                   b. No payments on the due                 of its properties except in the     preference is temporarily suspended.
liquidated.                                             and demandable debts                  ordinary course of business.
                                                        have been made for at                                                        EXCEPTIONS TO STAY ORDER
 TYPES OF REHABILITATION FOR                            least 60 days;                     4. Prohibits the debtor from
     INSOLVENT JURIDICAL                            c. The debtor has failed                  making any payment of its              1. Cases pending appeal in the
                                                        generally to meet its                 liabilities outstanding as of the         Supreme Court as of the
   1. Court-Supervised Rehabilitation                                                         commencement date except as               commencement date.
                                                        liabilities as they fall due;
   2. Pre-Negotiated (Out-of-Court)                                                           may be provided for by law.
                                                        or
      Rehabilitation                                                                                                                 2. Cases pending or filed           at
                                                    d. A creditor, other than
                                                        petitioner/s has initiated            COMMENCEMENT DATE                         specialized       courts         or
  TYPES OF COURT-SUPERVISED                                                                                                             quasi-judicial agencies.
                                                        foreclosure proceedings
        REHABILITATION                                                                  The date when the court issues the
                                                        against the debtor that
                                                        will prevent the debtor         Commencement Order, retroactive to           3. Enforcement of claims against
   1. Voluntary – initiated by the                                                      the filing date of the petition for
                                                        from paying its debts as                                                        sureties and others solidarily
      debtor, upon showing that:                                                        voluntary or involuntary proceedings,
                                                        they become due or will                                                         liable with the debtor, and
         a. The debtor is insolvent;                                                    usually within 5 days of filing.
                                                        render it insolvent.                                                            third-party or accommodation
             and
                                                                                                                                        mortgagors.
         b. The        viability  of                                                        COMMENCEMENT ORDER
                                                      WHO WILL FILE
             rehabilitation
                                                                                                                                     4. Actions by customers or clients
           WHO WILL FILE                   Creditors with claims or aggregate of        Remains effective throughout the entire         of securities market participants
                                           whose claim is at least P1M or 25% of        duration    of     the   rehabilitation         to recover moneys and securities
      Sole           Owner/Proprietor                                                   proceeding but may be lifted if there's
 Proprietorship                            the subscribed capital stock or partners’                                                    entrusted to them.
                                           contributions, whichever is higher.
   5. Actions by securities market                    d. The debtor committed          viability, prepare and recommend a         the rehabilitation receiver and the
      participants     or    regulatory                  acts of misrepresentation     Rehabilitation Plan, and implement the     creditors.
      agencies to settle such claims or                  in fraud of creditors.        approved plan.
      liabilities.                                                                                                                Note: They cannot act on behalf of any
                                               3. Converting the proceedings to              QUALIFICATIONS OF A                  creditor or give consent without written
   6. Actions by licensed brokers to              liquidation if there is no                   REHABILITATION                     authorization from the creditor.
      sell pledged securities for                 substantial     likelihood for
      settlement of transactions.                 successful rehabilitation.           Qualifications of a Rehabilitation         Acts of Debtors/Owners/Partners/
                                                                                       Receiver:                                  Directors or Officers which may
   7. Clearing and settlement of                                                          1. Filipino citizenship                 subject him/them to liability:
      financial transactions through        MANAGEMENT OF THE DEBTOR’S                    2. Six-month residency in the
      clearing agencies.                            BUSINESS                                 Philippines             preceding       1. Dispose or cause to be
                                                                                             nomination                                 disposed of - any property of the
   8. Criminal     actions     against      During rehabilitation:                        3. Knowledge of insolvency and                debtor other than in the
      individual debtors or associated        1. Managed by the existing board               commercial laws                            ordinary course of business or
      persons, which are not affected            and/or management.                       4. No conflict of interest                    authorize or approve any
      by proceedings under the FRIA.                                                                                                    transaction in fraud of creditors
                                               2. Court      may  appoint  a               MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE                         or in a manner grossly
          COURT ACTIONS                           rehabilitation receiver or                                                            disadvantageous to the debtor
                                                  management committee upon            Replaces management and governing                and/or creditors; or
under the Act:                                    motion.                              body of the debtor, assuming their
   1. Giving due course to the petition                                                rights and responsibilities, when             2. Conceal or authorize or
       if the debtor is insolvent and       Grounds     for    Appointment        of   appointed by the court.                          approve concealment - from
       there is a substantial likelihood    Rehabilitation                                                                              the creditors, or embezzles or
       for successful rehabilitation.       Receiver/Management Committee:             Creditors from specific classes have the         misappropriates, any property
   2. Denying or dismissing the                1. Actual or eminent danger of          option to formally establish a                   of the debtor.
       petition if:                               dissipation, loss, wastage, or       committee, or they may collectively
           a. The      debtor    is   not         destruction of the debtor’s assets   create a committee representing each         THE EXTENT OF THE LIABILITY
              insolvent.                          or properties.                       class of creditors, including:
                                                                                           1. Secured creditors                   Whichever is higher between:
          b. The petition is a sham            2. Paralyzation of the business             2. Unsecured creditors                   1. Double the value of the property
             filing intended to delay             operations of the debtor.                3. Trade creditors and suppliers            sold, embezzled or disposed; or
             creditor           rights         3. Gross mismanagement, fraud, or           4. Employees of the debtor               2. Double the value of the
             enforcement.                         other wrongful conduct by                                                            transaction involved
                                                  existing management of the               ROLE OF THE CREDITORS’
          c. The               petition,          debtor.                                        COMMITTEE                              REHABILITATION PLAN
             rehabilitation plan, or
             attachments        contain        REHABILITATION RECEIVER                 To assist the rehabilitation receiver in   A plan by which the financial
             materially     false     or                                               communicating with the creditors and       well-being and viability of an insolvent
             misleading statements.         Appointed by the court to preserve         shall be the primary liaison between       debtor can be restored using various
                                            asset value, assess rehabilitation                                                    means including, but not limited to:
   1. Debt forgiveness                                  objecting     class   of            CONFIRMATION OF THE                   Note: If no plan is confirmed within the
   2. Debt rescheduling                                 creditors           with            REHABILITATION PLAN                   said period, the proceedings may upon
   3. Reorganization or                                 compensation which has                                                    motion, or motu propio, be converted
       quasi-reorganization                             a net present value            The court shall issue an order             into one for the liquidation of the debtor.
   4. Dacion en pago                                    greater than that which        confirming the Rehabilitation Plan
   5. Debt-equity conversion                            they would have received       if:                                          EFFECT OF CONFIRMATION OF
   6. Sale of the business (or parts of                 if the debtor were under           1. No objections are filed within         THE REHABILITATION PLAN
       it) as a going concern; or                       liquidation.                          the relevant period or;
   7. Setting up of new business entity                                                                                           The      confirmation       of the
   8. Other similar arrangements                  SUBMISSION OF THE                       2. If objections are filed, the court   Rehabilitation Plan by the court
As may be approved by the court or               REHABILITATION PLAN                         finds them lacking in merit, or      shall result in the following:
creditors
                                           Upon approval of the Rehabilitation            3. The court determines that the           1. The Rehabilitation Plan and its
       REQUIRED APPROVAL                   Plan, the receiver must submit it to              basis for the objection has been           provisions shall be binding upon
                                           the court for confirmation. Within 5              cured, or                                  the debtor and all persons who
   1. Creditors representing more          days of receiving the plan, the court                                                        may be affected by it, including
      than 50% of total claims and         will inform creditors of its submission        4. The court determines that the              the creditors, whether or not
      the confirmation of the court; or    for confirmation, provide access to the            debtor has complied with an               such persons:
                                           plan, and allow creditors to file                  order to cure the objection.                 a. Have participated in the
   2. The court even without               objections.                                 “The     court    may     confirm   the                 proceedings
      approval of the creditors or                                                     Rehabilitation Plan notwithstanding                 b. Opposed                the
      even over the objections of the       GROUNDS FOR THE OBJECTION                  unresolved disputes over claims if the                  Rehabilitation Plan
      creditors, in the following cases:        OF THE CREDITORS                       Rehabilitation Plan has made adequate               c. Whether or not their
         a. The Rehabilitation Plan                                                    provisions for paying such claims.”                     claims      have     been
             complies        with    the   Objection of creditors - may be filed                                                               scheduled
             requirements of the FRIA;     within 20 days from receipt of notice       Note: The court has the authority to
                                           from the court that the Rehabilitation      approve or execute the Rehabilitation         2. The debtor shall comply with
          b. The        rehabilitation     Plan   has     been     submitted   for     Plan, even without consent from the              the     provisions  of    the
             receiver     recommends       confirmation, on the following grounds:     owners, partners, or stockholders of the         Rehabilitation Plan and shall
             the confirmation of the                                                   insolvent debtor, if the terms are               take all actions necessary to
             Rehabilitation Plan;             1. The creditors’ support         was    essential for restoring the financial            carry out the Plan
                                                 induced by fraud;                     stability and viability of the debtor,
          c. The         shareholders,                                                 regardless of conflicting provisions in       3. Payments shall be made to the
             owners or partners of            2. Documents or data relied upon         other laws.                                      creditors in accordance with the
             the juridical debtor lose           in the plan are materially false or                                                    provisions of the Rehabilitation
             at least their controlling          misleading; or                           PERIOD OF CONFIRMATION                        Plan
             interest as a result of the
             Rehabilitation Plan; and         3. The plan is in fact not supported     It must be within 1 year from the date
                                                 by the voting creditors.              of filing the petition.
          d. The rehabilitation plan
             would likely provide the
         PRE-NEGOTIATED                     OUT-OF-OF COURT OR INFORMAL                                                             An     approved      restructuring    or
         (OUT-OF-COURT)                      RESTRUCTURING AGREEMENTS                                      May be agreed upon       rehabilitation plan under an informal
                                              OR REHABILITATION PLANS                                          by the parties       workout framework carries the same
Pre-negotiated Rehabilitation - a                      (OCRA)                                              pending negotiation      legal weight as the previously discussed
pre-approved rehabilitation plan by the                                                                     and finalization of     confirmed plan.
insolvent debtor and some creditors         This one is similar to a pre-negotiated       Standstill        the out-of-court or
awaits    court   supervision    before     rehabilitation plan, but such plan has          Period               informal
                                                                                                                                    The      confirmation       of the
                                            been pre-approved by a larger majority                            restructuring/
enforcement.                                                                                                                        Rehabilitation Plan by the court
                                            of the debtor's creditors.                                     workout agreement
                                                                                                             or Rehabilitation      shall result in the following:
  HOW TO FILE A PETITION FOR                                                                                Plan, effective and
     THE APPROVAL OF A                          MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS                                       enforceable against      The Rehabilitation Plan and its
      PRE-NEGOTIATED                                                                                       all parties involved.    provisions are binding on the debtor and
    REHABILITATION PLAN                        1. The debtor must agree to the
                                                                                                                                    all affected parties, including creditors,
                                                  out-of-court      or    informal
                                                                                                                                    regardless of their status.
Petition by Debtor:                               restructuring/           workout    Standstill period; but also against               a. Have      participated   in    the
   1. An insolvent debtor, alone or               agreement or rehabilitation plan    the other creditors, if:                              proceedings,
       with any creditor, can submit a         2. Approved by creditors:                 1. Such agreement is approved by               b. Opposed the Rehabilitation
       verified petition to the court for             a. Representing at least 67%          creditors representing more                     Plan, or
       approval of a pre-negotiated                      of      the       secured          than 50% of the total liabilities           c. Whether or not their claims
       Rehabilitation Plan.                              obligations;                       of the debtor;                                  have been scheduled
   2. The plan must be endorsed or                    b. Representing at least 75%
                                                                                                                                    Note: This applies to all types of
       approved by creditors with at                     of     the    unsecured         2. Notice is published in a                rehabilitation.
       least ⅔ or two-thirds of the                      obligations                        newspaper      of     general
       debtor's total liabilities.                    c. Holding at least 85% of            circulation in the Philippines             PUBLICATION REQUIREMENT
   3. This includes secured creditors                    the total liabilities,             once a week for 2 consecutive
       with over 50% of the total                        secured and unsecured.             weeks;                                  The notice of the Rehabilitation Plan or
       secured claims and unsecured
                                                                                                                                    restructuring agreement or Plan shall
       creditors with over 50% of the          STANDSTILL AGREEMENT vs.                  3. The standstill period does not          be published once a week for at least
       total unsecured claims.                    STANDSTILL PERIOD
                                                                                            exceed 120 days from the date           3 consecutive weeks in a newspaper of
                                                                                            of effectivity.                         general circulation in the Philippines.
 PERIOD FOR APPROVAL OF THE                                     An extrajudicial
  SUBMITTED PRE-NEGOTIATED
                                                              agreement between       Note: The notice should invite creditors        THE EFFECTIVITY OF THE PLAN
     REHABILITATION PLAN
                                                                 the debtor and       to join negotiations for out-of-court
The court shall have a maximum period          Standstill
                                                               creditors outlining    rehabilitation or restructuring, clarifying   The      Rehabilitation    Plan     or
of 120 days from the date of the filing        Agreement          the terms for       that the resulting agreement will bind        restructuring agreement shall take
                                                                negotiating and       all creditors upon meeting the required       effect upon the lapse of 15 days from
of the petition to approve the
                                                                entering into an      majority vote.                                the date of the last publication of
Rehabilitation Plan.
                                                              OCRA (Out-of-Court                                                    the notice thereof.
                                                                  Restructuring               CRAM DOWN EFFECT
If the court fails to act within the said
                                                                  Agreement).
period, the Rehabilitation Plan shall
be deemed approved.
            LIQUIDATION                                               more than                                 himself)         to avoid its being attached or
                                                                     P500,000 in                                                 taken on legal process;
Liquidation is the proceeding where:                                 involuntary        Posting of bond      May be initiated
   1. Claims are filed                                               liquidation        by creditors not     by the creditors    e. That he has suffered his
   2. The assets of the insolvent                                                           required
                                                                                                                                 property to remain under
                                                 Rules on             Applicable
      debtor are disposed                                                               Liquidation order   Liquidation order    attachment or legal process
                                             concurrence and
   3. Proceeds are divided among the           preference of                             issued without      issued only after   for 3 days for the purpose of
      creditors                              credits DO NOT                                   trial                trial         hindering or delaying the
                                                   apply                                                                         liquidation or of defrauding his
                                                                                           Number of        Must be 3 or more
             LIQUIDATOR                                                                                                          creditors;
                                                                                            creditors        creditors whose
                                                SIMILARITIES BETWEEN                       immaterial        claim is at least
It is one appointed by the court who         VOLUNTARY AND INVOLUNTARY                                        P1M or at least    f. That he has confessed or
will    facilitate   the    liquidation             LIQUIDATION                                                 25% of the       offered to allow judgment in
proceedings. He may likewise be                                                                             subscribed capital   favor of any creditor or
appointed by the creditors who have           1. Debtor is insolvent                                        stock or partners’   claimant for the purpose of
filed their claims within the period set                                                                      contributions,
                                              2. P500,000 – is the qualifying                                                    hindering or delaying the
                                                                                                               whichever is
by court.                                        amount:                                                                         liquidation or of defrauding any
                                                                                                            higher. (same with
                                                    a. More than P500,000 – for                               rehabilitation)    creditors or claimant;
    DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN                                voluntary liquidation
 LIQUIDATION AND SUSPENSION                         b. At least P500,000 – for                                                   g. That he has willfully
         OF PAYMENTS                                                                         ACTS OF INSOLVENCY
                                                        involuntary liquidation                                                  suffered judgment to be taken
                                                 DIFFERENCE BETWEEN                          a. That such person is about to     against him by default for the
 SUSPENSION OF           LIQUIDATION         VOLUNTARY AND INVOLUNTARY                                                           purpose of hindering or delaying
                                                                                             depart or has departed from
   PAYMENTS                                           LIQUIDATION                                                                the liquidation or of defrauding
                                                                                             the     Republic       of  the
     Debtor has         Debtor is already                                                    Philippines, with intent to         his creditors;
 sufficient assets to      insolvent           VOLUNTARY          INVOLUNTARY                defraud his creditors;
   cover liabilities                                                                                                             h. That he has suffered or
                                             Acts of insolvency    Creditors must
                                                                                             b. That being absent from the       procured his property to be
    Payment of           Obligations are        need not be         prove acts of
                                                alleged and          insolvency              Republic of the Philippines,        taken on legal process with
   obligations is         discharged
      stayed                                       proved                                    with intent to defraud his          intent to give a preference to one
                                                                                             creditors, he remains absent;       or more of his creditors and
   Applies only to       Also applies to      The individual          A creditor or                                              thereby hinder or delay the
 individual debtors         business          debtor files the    group of creditors
                                                                                             c. That he conceals himself to      liquidation or defraud any one of
                         organizations           petition          files the petition
                                                                                             avoid the service of legal          his creditors;
    Filed by the         May be initiated    The debtor is not Apples even in the            process for the purpose of
       debtor            by the creditors    absent as he is the case of an absent                                               i. That he has made any
                                                                                             hindering or delaying the
                                              one who files the   debtor (one who                                                assignment,       gift,    sale,
   No minimum                Debt of the          petition         resides or has            liquidation or of defrauding his
                                                                                             creditors;                          conveyance or transfer of his
    amount of           individual must be                       departed from the
     liabilities         at least P500,000                          Philippines,                                                 estate, property, rights or
                            in voluntary                          cannot be found            d. That he conceals, or is          credits with intent to hinder or
                          liquidation and                           or conceals              removing, any of his property
      delay the liquidation or defraud                                                                                               than 45 days from the date of the
      his creditors;                               1.   When      a    petition for    c. Order the sheriff to take                  last publication.
                                                   rehabilitation is filed and it is   possession and control of all the
      j. That he has, in contemplation             established that the debtor is      property of the debtor, except               THE RIGHTS OF SECURED
      of    insolvency,     made      any          indeed insolvent but there is no    those that may be exempt from                      CREDITORS
      payment, gift, grant, sale,                  substantial likelihood for the      execution;
      conveyance or transfer of his                debtor to be successfully                                                   The liquidation order will not affect
      estate, property, rights or credits;         rehabilitated.                      d. Order the publication of the         the right of a secured creditor to
                                                                                       petition or motion in a                 enforce his lien in accordance with the
      k. That being a merchant or                  2. If no rehabilitation plan is     newspaper of general circulation        applicable contract or law. He may:
      tradesman, he has generally                  confirmed within a period of 1      once a week for 2 consecutive
      defaulted in the payment of his              year from the filing of the         weeks;                                     1. Waive his right under the
      current obligations for a period             petition for rehabilitation.                                                      security or lien, prove his claim
      of 30 days;                                                                      e. Direct payments of any claims              in the liquidation proceedings
                                                   3. Failure of rehabilitation or     and conveyance of any property                and share in the distribution of
      l. That for a period of 30 days,             dismissal of the petition for       due the debtor to the liquidator;             assets of the debtor; or
      he has failed, after demand, to              rehabilitation  on     technical                                               2. Maintain his rights under the
      pay any moneys deposited with                grounds; or                         f. Prohibit payments by the                   security or lien. In which case:
      him or received by him in a                                                      debtor and the transfer of any                   a. The value of the property
      fiduciary; and                               4. Upon filing of the verified      property by the debtor;                              may be fixed in a manner
                                                   motion of the debtor during the                                                          agreed upon by the
      m. That an execution having                  pendency         of          the    g. Direct all creditors to file their                creditor       and      the
      been issued against him on                   court-supervised              or    claims with the liquidator within                    liquidator.
      final judgment for money, he                 pre-negotiated    rehabilitation    the period set by the rules of
      shall have been found to be                  proceedings.                        procedure;                                              i.   Value is less than
      without    sufficient property                                                                                                                the claim – the
      subject to execution to satisfy        Thereupon, the court shall issue the      h. Authorize the payment of                                  liquidator     may
      the judgment                           Liquidation Order mentioned in            administrative expenses as they                              convey          the
                                             Section 112 hereof.                       become due;                                                  property to the
      THE COURT CONVERT                                                                                                                             creditor and the
 REHABILITATION PROCEEDINGS                        LIQUIDATION ORDER                   i. State that the debtor and                                 latter    will   be
 TO LIQUIDATION PROCEEDINGS                                                            creditors      who     are  not                              admitted in the
                                             Section 112. Liquidation Order: The       petitioner/s may submit the                                  liquidation
Conversion by the court into                 Liquidation Order shall:                  names of other nominees to the                               proceedings as a
liquidation proceedings: During the                                                    position of liquidator; and                                  creditor for the
pendency of court-supervised or                    a. Declare the debtor insolvent;                                                                 balance
pre-negotiated            rehabilitation                                               j. Set the case for hearing for the
proceedings, the court may order the               b. Order the liquidation of the     election and appointment of the                        ii.   Value exceeds the
conversion       of       rehabilitation           debtor and, in the case of a        liquidator, which date shall not                             claim      –  the
proceedings       to       liquidation             juridical debtor, declare it as     be less than 30 days nor more                                liquidator   may
proceedings, in the following cases:               dissolved;                                                                                       convey        the
                     property to the        number of votes cast in terms of            GROUNDS FOR THE REMOVAL OF                  debt shall be set off against the other,
                     creditor and waive     amount of claims, and who is qualified            A LIQUIDATOR                          and only the balance, if any shall be
                     the debtor’s right     shall be appointed as the liquidator.                                                   allowed in the liquidation proceedings.
                     of      redemption                                                 Removal: He may be removed at any
                     upon receiving the     COURT-APPOINTED LIQUIDATOR                  time by the court for cause, either motu     OPPOSITION OR CHALLENGE TO
                     excess from the                                                    propio or upon motion of any creditor                  CLAIMS
                     creditor.              The court may appoint the liquidator if:    entitled to vote for the election of the
                                               a. On the date set for the election      liquidator.                                 Within 30 days from the expiration of
          b. The liquidator may sell              of the liquidator, the creditors                                                  the period for filing of applications for
             the property and satisfy             do not attend;                        REGISTRY OF CLAIMS UNDER THE                recognition    of claims, creditors,
             the secured creditor’s            b. the creditors who attend, fail or      DETERMINATION OF CLAIMS IN                 individual debtors, owner/s of the sole
                                                  refuse to elect a liquidator;                 LIQUIDATION                         proprietorship-debtor, partners of the
             entire claim from the
             proceeds of the sale; or          c. after    being      elected,    the                                               partnership-debtor and shareholders or
                                                                                        Within twenty (20) days from his            members of the corporation-debtor and
                                                  liquidator fails to qualify; or
                                                                                        assumption into office the liquidator       other interested parties may submit a
          c. The secured creditor may          d. a vacancy occurs for any reason
                                                                                        shall prepare a preliminary registry of     challenge to claim or claims to the
             enforce the lien and                 whatsoever, In any of the cases
                                                                                        claims of secured and unsecured             court, serving a certified copy on the
             foreclose on the property            provided herein, the court may
                                                                                        creditors.                                  liquidator and the creditor holding the
             pursuant to applicable               instead set another hearing of
             laws.                                the election of the liquidator.                                                   challenged claim.
                                                                                        Secured creditors who have waived
                                                                                        their security or lien, or have fixed the   Upon the expiration of the 30-day
    ELECTION OF LIQUIDATOR                  Note: A rehabilitation receiver, who
                                                                                        value of the property subject of their      period, the rehabilitation receiver shall
                                            was administering the debtor prior to
                                                                                        security or lien by agreement with the      submit to the court the registry of
Only creditors who have filed their         the commencement of the liquidation,
                                                                                        liquidator and is admitted as a             claims containing the undisputed
claims within the period set by the         may also be appointed as a
                                                                                        creditor for the balance, shall be          claims that have not been subject to
court, and whose claims are not             liquidator.
                                                                                        considered as unsecured creditors.          challenge. Such claims shall become
barred by the statute of limitations,
will be allowed to vote in the election          QUALIFICATIONS OF THE                                                              final upon the filling of the register and
                                                      LIQUIDATOR                        The liquidator shall make the registry      may be subsequently set aside only on
of the liquidator.
                                                                                        available for public inspection and         grounds of fraud, accident, mistake or
                                            The      liquidator   shall    have the     provide publication notice to               inexcusable neglect.
A secured creditor will not be
                                            qualifications enumerated above for         creditors, individual debtors owner/s of
allowed to vote, unless:
                                            rehabilitation receivers, as follows:       the sole proprietorship-debtor, the         Submission of Disputed Claims to
    a) he waives his security or lien; or
                                               1. Citizen of the Philippines            partners of the partnership-debtor and      the Court
    b) has the value of the property
                                               2. Resident of the Philippines in        shareholders or members of the              The liquidator shall resolve disputed
       subject of his security or lien
                                                    the 6 months immediately            corporation-debtor, on where and when       claims and submit his findings thereon
       fixed by agreement with the
                                                    preceding the nomination            they may inspect it. All claims must be     to the court for final approval. The
       liquidator, and is admitted for
                                               3. Has the requisite knowledge of        duly proven before being paid.              liquidator may disallow claims.
       the balance of his claim.
                                                    insolvency and commercial laws
                                               4. No conflict of interest                      RIGHT OF OF SET-OFF
The creditors entitled to vote will
elect the liquidator in open court.
                                                                                        If the debtor and creditor are mutually
The nominee receiving the highest
                                                                                        debtor and creditor of each other one
        LIQUIDATION PLAN                           satisfaction of the court, and       Order Removing the Debtor from
                                                   shall be conclusive evidence of      the List of Registered Entities at the
Within      3    months      from   his            that fact.                           Securities       and        Exchange
assumption         into   office,   the                                                 Commission
Liquidator shall submit a Liquidation        SALE OF ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION                     Upon determining that the
Plan to the court. The Liquidation Plan                                                 liquidation has been completed, the
shall, as a minimum enumerate:               The     liquidator   may     sell the      court shall issue an Order approving
   1. All the assets of the debtor           unencumbered assets of the debtor and      the report and ordering the SEC to
   2. A schedule of liquidation of the       convert the same into money.               remove the debtor from the registry of
        assets and                                                                      legal entities.
   3. Payment of the claims                  General Rule: The sale shall be made
                                             at public auction.                          TERMINATION OF PROCEEDINGS
Exempt Property to be Set Apart              Exceptions: A private sale may be
   a. It shall be the duty of the court,     allowed with the approval of the court     Upon receipt of evidence showing that
      upon petition and after hearing,       if;                                        the debtor has been removed from the
      to exempt and set apart, for the           a. the goods to be sold are of a       registry of legal entities at the SEC. The
      use and benefit of the said                   perishable nature, or are liable    court shall issue an Order terminating
      insolvent, such real and personal             to quickly deteriorate in value,    the proceedings.
      property as is by law exempt                  or     are     disproportionately
      from execution, and also a                    expensive to keep or maintain;
      homestead;                                    or
   b. but no such petition shall be              b. the private sale is for the best
      heard as aforesaid until it is first          interest of the debtor and his
      proved that notice of the hearing             creditors. With the approval of
      of the application therefor has               the     court,    unencumbered
      been duly given by the clerk, by              property of the debtor may also
      causing such notice to be posted              be conveyed to a creditor in
      it at least 3 public places in the            satisfaction of his claim or part
      province or city at least 10 days             thereof.
      prior to the time of such
      hearing, which notice shall set              With the approval of the court,
      forth the name of the said                   unencumbered property of the
      insolvent debtor, and the time               debtor may also be conveyed to a
      and place appointed for the                  creditor in satisfaction of his
      hearing of such application, and             claim or part thereof.
      shall    briefly   indicate     the
      homestead       sought    to     be
      exempted or the property sought
      to be set aside;
   c. and the decree must show that
      such proof was made to the
    GLOSSARY (DEFINITION OF                 Management Committee - replaces             the plaintiff to the defendant.
            TERMS)                          management and governing body of the
                                            debtor, assuming their rights and           Secured creditors - are those whose
Claims - in rehabilitation refer to all     responsibilities, when appointed by the     claims are secured by a lien (either by
demands against the debtor or its           court.                                      law, agreement or by judicial judgment)
property, including those from the                                                      which legally entitled a creditor to
government       and  claims    against     Pre-negotiated Rehabilitation - a           resort to the property subject of a lien
directors and officers related to their     pre-approved rehabilitation plan by the     for payment of his claim.
official duties.                            insolvent debtor and some creditors
                                            awaits   court   supervision     before     Suspension of Payments - This
Cram down effect - An approved              enforcement.                                involves calling the creditors to a
restructuring or rehabilitation plan                                                    meeting to propose and agree on a
under an informal workout framework         Rehabilitation - refers to the              schedule of payments and to prevent
carries the same legal weight as the        restoration of the debtor to a condition    the debtor from making any payment
previously discussed confirmed plan.        of successful operation and solvency.       outside the necessary or legitimate
                                                                                        expenses of the business, and the
Creditor - Creditors include natural or     Rehabilitation plan - a plan by which       issuance of a suspension order to
juridical persons which have a claim        the financial well-being and viability of   prevent pending executions against the
against the debtor that arose on or         an insolvent debtor can be restored         debtor.
before commencement date, which can         using various means
either be secured or unsecured.                                                         Suspension Order - Upon motion filed
                                            Standstill     Agreement       -     an     by the individual debtor, the court may
                                            extrajudicial agreement between the
Debtor - Under FRIA, a debtor is:                                                       issue an order suspending any pending
                                            debtor and creditors outlining the
  1. Sole proprietorship registered         terms for negotiating and entering into     execution against the individual debtor.
     with the DTI;                          an OCRA (Out-of-Court Restructuring
  2. Partnership registered with the        Agreement).                                 Unsecured creditors -    are those
     SEC                                                                                whose claim or a portion thereof is
  3. Corporations organized and             Standstill Period - may be agreed           neither   secured, preferred   nor
                                            upon      by    the   parties  pending      subordinated.
     existing under the laws of the
                                            negotiation and finalization of the
     Philippines; or                        out-of-court or informal restructuring/
  4. Individual debtors which are           workout agreement or Rehabilitation
     natural    persons    who    are       Plan, effective and enforceable against
     residents and citizens of the          all parties involved.
     Philippines.
                                            Stay Order - preserves the preference
                                            of secured creditors, but enforcement of
Liquidator - It is one appointed by the
                                            this    preference     is    temporarily
court who will facilitate the liquidation   suspended.
proceedings. He may likewise be
appointed by the creditors who have         Set-off - counterclaim made by a
filed their claims within the period set    defendant against a plaintiff for
by court.                                   reduction or discharge of a debt by
                                            reason of an independent debt owed by
      GLOSSARY (REQUISITES)                  Grounds     for    Appointment        of         creditors with over 50% of the
                                             Rehabilitation                                   total unsecured claims.              Required Approval
QUALIFICATIONS AS INSOLVENT                  Receiver/Management Committee:              Minimum         requirements        in      1. Creditors representing more
UNDER FRIA                                      1. Actual or eminent danger of           Rehabilitation Plan                            than 50% of total claims and
Shall refer to the financial condition of          dissipation, loss, wastage, or          1. The debtor must agree to the              the confirmation of the court; or
a debtor that is generally:                        destruction of the debtor’s assets         out-of-court      or    informal              a.
   1. Unable to pay its or his liabilities         or properties.                             restructuring/           workout       2. The court even without
       as they fall due; or                                                                   agreement or rehabilitation plan          approval of the creditors or
   2. Has liabilities greater than its or       2. Paralyzation of the business            2. Approved by creditors:                    even over the objections of the
       his assets.                                 operations of the debtor.                      a. Representing at least 67%          creditors, in the following cases:
                                                                                                      of      the      secured              a. The Rehabilitation Plan
KEY FEATURES OF SUSPENSION OF                   3. Gross mismanagement, fraud, or                     obligations;                             complies        with    the
PAYMENTS                                           other wrongful conduct by                      b. Representing at least 75%                 requirements of the FRIA;
   1. The debtor has sufficient                    existing management of the                         of    the     unsecured                     i.   =
      properties to cover all his debts            debtor.                                            obligations                           b. The         rehabilitation
      but he foresees the impossibility                                                           c. Holding at least 85% of                   receiver      recommends
      of meeting his debts when they         Grounds for Rehabilitation Plan                          the total liabilities,                   the confirmation of the
      respectively fall due.                    1. The creditors’ support was                         secured and unsecured.                   Rehabilitation Plan;
   2. The purpose is to suspend or                 induced by fraud;
      delay the payment of debts.               2. Documents or data relied upon         Qualifications of a Rehabilitation                  c. The         shareholders,
   3. The amount of indebtedness is                in the plan are materially false or   Receiver:                                              owners or partners of
      not affected (not reduced or                 misleading; or                           1. Filipino citizenship                             the juridical debtor lose
      discharged).                              3. The plan is in fact not supported        2. Six-month residency in the                       at least their controlling
   4. The number of creditors is                   by the voting creditors.                    Philippines             preceding                interest as a result of the
      immaterial.                                                                              nomination                                       Rehabilitation Plan; and
                                             How to File a Petition for the                 3. Knowledge of insolvency and
                                             Approval of a Pre-Negotiated                      commercial laws                     The      confirmation       of the
Confirmation of Rehabilitation Plan          Rehabilitation Plan                            4. No conflict of interest             Rehabilitation Plan by the court
The court shall issue an order               Petition by Debtor:                                                                   shall result in the following:
confirming the Rehabilitation Plan              1. An insolvent debtor, alone or         Rehabilitation Plan
if:                                                 with any creditor, can submit a      but not limited to:                          1. The Rehabilitation Plan and its
    1. No objections are filed within               verified petition to the court for      1. Debt forgiveness                          provisions shall be binding upon
       the relevant period or;                      approval of a pre-negotiated            2. Debt rescheduling                         the debtor and all persons who
    2. If objections are filed, the court           Rehabilitation Plan.                    3. Reorganization or                         may be affected by it, including
       finds them lacking in merit, or          2. The plan must be endorsed or                 quasi-reorganization                     the creditors, whether or not
    3. The court determines that the                approved by creditors with at           4. Dacion en pago                            such persons:
       basis for the objection has been             least ⅔ or two-thirds of the            5. Debt-equity conversion                       a. Have participated in the
       cured, or                                    debtor's total liabilities.             6. Sale of the business (or parts of                proceedings
    4. The court determines that the            3. This includes secured creditors              it) as a going concern; or                  b. Opposed                the
       debtor has complied with an                  with over 50% of the total              7. Setting up of new business entity                Rehabilitation Plan
       order to cure the objection.                 secured claims and unsecured            8. Other similar arrangements
          c. Whether or not their            3. The standstill period does not
             claims    have been                 exceed 120 days from the date
             scheduled                           of effectivity.
                                          The       confirmation        of    the
   2. The debtor shall comply with        Rehabilitation Plan by the court
      the     provisions  of    the       shall result in the following:
      Rehabilitation Plan and shall          1. Have       participated    in the
      take all actions necessary to              proceedings,                          PAMANTASAN NG LUNGSOD NG MAYNILA
      carry out the Plan                     2. Opposed the Rehabilitation                   (University of the City of Manila)
                                                 Plan, or                            General Luna, corner Muralla St., Intramuros, Manila
   3. Payments shall be made to the          3. Whether or not their claims                          1002 Metro Manila
      creditors in accordance with the           have been scheduled
      provisions of the Rehabilitation    The extent to the liability
      Plan                                Whichever is higher between:
                                                                                    In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the subject
         d. The rehabilitation plan          1. Double the value of the property
                                                                                      Regulatory Framework and Legal Issues in Business
             would likely provide the            sold, embezzled or disposed; or
                                                                                                          (ACN 2210A-4)
             objecting     class     of      2. Double the value of the
             creditors            with           transaction involved
             compensation which has
             a net present value
             greater than that which
                                                                                            Finals Reviewer:
             they would have received                                               Government Procurement Reform Act
             if the debtor were under                                                           (RA 9184)
             liquidation.
                                                                                                      Submitted by:
Standstill period; but also against
                                                                                                Academia, Julia Mikaella S.
the other creditors, if:
                                                                                                Delos Santos, Lady Jean C.
   1. Such agreement is approved by                                                                 Hantic, Mariela D.
      creditors representing more
      than 50% of the total liabilities
      of the debtor;
   2. Notice is published in a                                                                          Submitted to:
      newspaper          of    general                                                           Atty. Aloi Renz P. Santos
      circulation in the Philippines
      once a week for 2 consecutive
      weeks;
                                                                                                           May 2024
GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT REFORM                                COMPETITIVE BIDDING                       Utilization of G-EPS                             Types of APP
         ACT (R.A. 9184)                                                                                  ● Procurement of common supplies                 1. Indicative APP
                                                   Competitive Bidding - refers to the method                 - G-EPS established by GPPB                  2. Approved APP
R.A. 9184, entitled “An Act Providing for the      of procurement that is open to participation           ● Procurement of non-common use
Modernization,       Standardization      and      by any interested party.                                   items, infrastructure projects, and       Factors to be Considered in Preparing APP
Regulation of the Procurement Activities of                                                                   consulting services, agencies              a. The APP should include all procurement
the Government and for other Purposes,”            Processes in Competitive Bidding                           - may hire service providers to                activities planned for the year
otherwise known as the Government                     ● Advertisement                                            undertake      their     electronic     b. The APP shall include only those
Procurement Reform Act                                ● Prebid conference                                        procurement                                 procurements that are considered crucial
                                                      ● Eligibility screening of prospective                                                                 to the efficient discharge of governmental
Government Procurement                                     bidders                                            PROCUREMENT PLANNING                           functions.
The process by which the government acquires          ● Receipt and opening of bids                                                                      c. The APP shall include provisions for
the goods and services it needs by purchasing         ● Evaluation of bids                             All procurement should be within the budget of        foreseeable emergencies based on
from commercial businesses. Since taxpayer’s          ● Post-qualification                             the Procuring Entity and should be                    historical records
money is being used, there are regulations on         ● Award of contract                              meticulously and judiciously planned by the       d. Scheduling of procurement activities
how to use it properly and responsibly.            (Sec 5.e, RA 9184)                                  Procurement Entity. (Sec 7, RA 9184)                  should be done to efficiently manage the
                                                                                                                                                             conduct of procurement transactions
Governing Principles on Government                 GR. All Procurement shall be done through           Project Procurement Management Plan
Procurement                                        Competitive Bidding                                 (PPMP)                                                BIDS AND AWARDS COMMITTEE
   a) Transparency - procurement process                                                                  - a      component   of   the  Project
      and implementation                           XPN. When Alternative Modes of Procurement                Management Plan                            Bids and Awards Committee (BAC)
   b) Competitiveness - equal opportunity to       applies                                                - serves as a guide document in the           A committee established in accordance with
      those eligible and qualified to               (Sec 1o, RA 9184)                                        procurement       and      contract        Article V of R.A. No. 9184, which refers to the
      participate in public bidding                                                                          implementation process                     body responsible for the procurement
   c) Streamlined procurement process -            PHILIPPINE GOVERNMENT ELECTRONIC                    Types of PPMP                                    activities   from     the    pre-procurement
      procurement process shall be simple                 PROCUREMENT SYSTEM                              1. Initial PPMP                               conference up to the recommendation of
      and adaptable in order to ensure an                                                                 2. Revised PPMP                               award.
      effective and efficient method               Philippine        Government          Electronic
   d) System of accountability                     Procurement System (PhilGEPS)                       Preparation of the PPMP                          BAC Structure:
   e) Public monitoring of the procurement            - Single portal that shall serve as the           ● Development of Project Requirements           Each Procuring Entity shall establish in its
      process and the implementation of                    PRIMARY & DEFINITIVE source of the           ● Writing the Technical Specifications,         head office a single BAC to undertake the
      awarded contracts                                    government procurement.                         Scope of Work, and Terms of Reference        functions     in    order   to      facilitate
                                                      - authorized to approve changes in the            ● Determining the Approved Budget for           professionalization and harmonization of
Scope of Application                                       procurement process to adapt to                 the Contract                                 procedures and standards.
This Act shall apply to the Procurement of                 improvements in modern technology            ● Scheduling of Significant Activities
Infrastructure Projects, Goods, and Consulting             (modifications should be consistent             during Procurement                           The BACs may be organized either according
Services, regardless of source of funds,                   with Sec 3, RA 9184)                         ● Method of Procurement (Sec 10, RA 9184)       to:
whether local or foreign, by all branches and         - Shall include a feature that provides for       ● Formatting the PPMP                               (a) geographical location of PMO or
instrumentalities     of    government,      its           an audit trail for on-line transactions                                                              end-user or implementing units of the
departments, offices and agencies, including               and allow the CoA to verify the security    Annual Procurement Plan (APP)                            Procuring Entity;
government-owned         and/or     -controlled            and integrity of the systems at any time.     - A document that consolidates the                 (b) nature of procurement
corporations and local government units,           (Art. III, RA 9184)                                     various PPMPs submitted by the various
subject to the provisions of Commonwealth                                                                  PMOs and end-user units within the           BAC Composition:
Act No. 138.                                                                                               Procuring Entity                             The Head of Procuring Entity (HoPE) shall
                                                                                                                                                        designate at least five (5) but not more than
seven (7) members to the BAC of                    i. One representative each from the regular                                                                    THE PROCUREMENT PROCESS
unquestionable integrity and procurement           offices under the Office of the Local Chief          BAC Secretariat
proficiency.                                       Executive (Office of the Administrator, Budget       To assist the BAC in the conduct of its              I.   Preparation of Bidding Documents
                                                   Office, Legal Office, Engineering Office,            functions, the HoPE shall create a Secretariat
The BAC for NGAs, departments, bureaus,            General Services Offices)                            that will serve as the main support unit of the    The bidding documents shall be prepared by
offices, or instrumentalities of the GoP,          ii. A representative from the end user unit          BAC.                                               the Procuring Entity following the standard
including the judicial and legislative branches,                                                                                                           forms and manuals prescribed by the GPBB.
constitutional commissions, SUCs, GOCCs, and       b.) For Barangays                                    Honoraria of BAC Members
GFIs shall be composed of the following:                                                                The Procuring Entity may grant payment of          The Procuring Entity may require additional
                                                   i. The BAC shall be composed of at least five        honoraria to the BAC members in an amount          documents requirements or specifications
Regular Members:                                   (5), but not more than seven (7) regular             not to exceed twenty five percent (25%) of         necessary to complete the information
   a) Chairperson, at least third (3rd) ranking    members of the Sangguniang Barangay, except          their respective basic monthly salary subject to   required for the bidders to prepare and submit
      permanent official of the Procuring          the Punong Barangay                                  availability of funds. The Department of           their respective bids.
      Entity;                                      ii. The Punong Barangay, being the Local Chief       Budget and Management (DBM) shall
   b) An officer, who is at least a fifth (5th)    Executive, shall designate the Chairperson,          promulgate the necessary guidelines.               Access to Information - In all stages of the
      ranking permanent official                   Vice-Chairperson, and members of the BAC                                                                preparation of the Bidding Documents, the
                                                                                                                                                           procuring entity shall ensure equal access to
       if not available, an officer of the next                                                                   BIDDING DOCUMENTS                        information. No aspect of the Bidding
       lower rank with knowledge or                Functions of the BAC:                                                                                   Documents shall be released on any
       experience in procurement who                  a) advertise and/or post the invitation to        Bidding Documents                                  prospective bidder or having direct or indirect
       represents the legal or administrative            bid;                                           Documents issued by the Procuring Entity as        interest in the project to be procured.
       area of the Procuring Entity;                  b) conduct pre-procurement and pre-bid            the basis for Bids, furnishing all information
                                                         conferences;                                   necessary for a prospective bidder to prepare a     II.   Invitation to Bid
   c) An officer, who is at least a fifth (5th)       c) determine the eligibility of prospective       bid for the Goods, Infrastructure Projects, and
      ranking permanent official                         bidders;                                       Consulting Services to be provided.                A. Pre-Procurement Conference
                                                      d) receive and open bids;
       if not available, an officer of the next       e) conduct the evaluation of bids;                The Bidding Documents shall include the            GR: Prior to issuance of the invitation to bid,
       lower rank with knowledge or                   f) undertake               post-qualification     following:                                         the BAC is mandated to hold a
       experience in procurement who                     proceedings;                                       a) Approved Budget for the Contract;           pre-procurement conference on each and
       represents the finance area of the             g) resolve requests for reconsideration;              b) Instructions to Bidders, including          every procurement
       Procuring Entity                               h) recommend award of contracts to the                   criteria for eligibility, bid evaluation
                                                         HoPE      or    his    duly   authorized              and post qualification;                     XPN: Contracts below a certain level or
Provisional Members:                                     representative;                                    c) Terms of Reference;                         amount specified in the IRR.
   d) An officer who has technical expertise          i) recommend        the     imposition     of         d) Eligibility Requirements;
       relevant to the procurement;                      sanctions, and perform other related               e) Plans and Technical Specifications;         This process shall assess the readiness of the
   e) A representative from the end-user or              functions including the creation of                f) Form of Bid, Price Form, and List of        procurement in terms of confirming the
       implementing unit who has knowledge               Technical Working Group (TWG)                         Goods or Bill of Quantities;                certification of availability of funds, as well as
       of procurement laws and procedures                                                                   g) Delivery Time or Completion Schedule;       reviewing all relevant documents in relation to
                                                   Observers                                                h) Form and Amount of Bid Security;            their adherence to law.
The BAC for Local Government Units shall be        To enhance the transparency of the process,              i) Form and Amount of Performance
composed of the following:                         the BAC shall, in all stages of the procurement             Security and Warranty; and                  B. Advertising and          Contents     of   the
                                                   process,    invite,   in addition to the                 j) Form of Contract, and General and           Invitation to Bid
a) For Provinces, Cities, and Municipalities       representative of the Commission on Audit, at               Special Conditions of Contract
                                                   least two (2) observers to sit in its proceedings.                                                      In line with the principle of transparency and
                                                                                                                                                           competitiveness, all bidding shall be
advertised in such manner and for such length      shall be submitted in a sealed envelope,             BAC   shall    evaluate        the        FINANCIAL     FAILURE OF BIDDING
of time as may be necessary under the              identified as a modification of the original bid     component of the bids.                                  There shall be a failure of bidding if:
circumstances, in order to ensure the widest       and stamped received by the BAC.                                                                                1. No bids are received
possible dissemination such as posting in:                                                              The bids that passed the preliminary                       2. No bid qualifies as the Lowest
    1. The Procuring Entity’s premises             WITHDRAWAL OF BIDS: A bidder may                     examination shall be ranked from lowest to                     Calculated Responsive Bid/ Highest
    2. The newspapers of general circulation       withdraw his bid, provided this is done              highest in terms of their corresponding                        Rated Responsive Bid
    3. The PHILGEPS and the website of the         BEFORE the deadline for the receipt of bids. In      calculated price shall be referred to as the               3. Whenever the bidder with highest
       Procuring entity                            such case he shall n longer be allowed to            “Lowest Calculated Bid”                                        rated/ lowest calculated responsive bid
                                                   submit another Bid for the same contract,                                                                           refuses, without justifiable cause to
C. Pre-bid conference                              directly or indirectly.                              BID EVALUATION OF SHORT LISTED                                 accept the award of contract.
                                                                                                        BIDDERS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES:
At least one pre-bid conference shall be           BID SECURITY: All bids shall be accompanied          shall be evaluated and ranked using numerical           Under any of the above circumstances, the
conducted for each procurement, unless             by a Bid security, which shall serve as              ratings                                                 contract may be re-advertised and re-bid.
otherwise provided in the IRR.                     guarantee that, after receipt of the Notice of
                                                   Award, the winning bidders shall enter into             1.   Experience                                      After the second failed bidding; the BAC may
III.   Receipt and Opening of Bids                 contract with the Procuring Entity with the             2.   Performance                                     resort to an alternative procurement;
                                                   procuring entity within the stipulated time             3.   Quality or Personnel                            negotiated procurement.
The BAC or, under special circumstances shall      and furnish the required performance security.          4.   Price
determine the eligibility of prospective bidders   The specific amounts and allowable forms of             5.   Methodology                                     Single Calculate/ Rated and Responsive
for the procurement of Goods and                   the Bid security shall be prescribed in the IRR.                                                             Bid Submission
Infrastructure Projects, based on the bidders’                                                          The Bid with the highest calculated rating              A single calculate/ rated and responsive bid
compliance with the eligibility requirements.      BID VALIDITY: Bids and Bid securities shall          shall be the “Highest Rated Bid.”                       shall be considered for award if it falls under of
                                                   be valid for such a reasonable period of time                                                                the following:
A bid shall have two (2) components, namely:       indicated in the documents.                           V.     Post Qualification                                 1. After       advertisement,     Only one
   1. Technical components                                                                                      This is the stage where the bidder with                 prospective bidder submits a letter of
   2. Financial components                         BID OPENING: The BAC shall publicly open                     the Lowest Calculated Bid, in the case                  intent and meets the eligibility
                                                   all bids at the time, date, and place specified in           of Goods and Infrastructure Projects, or                requirements or criteria.
Subject to the following rules:                    the bidding document.                                        the Highest Rated Bid, in the case of              2. After advertisement, More than one
   a. Bids’ components should be in                                                                             Consulting Services, WILL undergo                       prospective bidder applies for
      separate         sealed      envelopes,      IV.    Bid Evaluation                                        verifications and validation whether he                 eligibility check, but only one bidder
      submitted simultaneously                                                                                  has passed all the requirements and                     meets the eligibility requirements
   b. Bids shall be received by the BAC on         The BAC shall examine first the technical                    conditions.                                        3. After the eligibility check, more than
      such date, time, and place specified in      components of the bids using PASS/ FAIL                                                                              one bidder meets the eligibility
      the invitation to bid.                       criteria. Only the bids that passed shall be         If the Bid passes all the criteria for                          requirements, BUT only one bidder
   c. Deadline for the receipt of bids shall be    considered for opening and evaluation of their       post-qualification, his Bid shall be considered:                submits a bid.
      fixed by the BAC, giving prospective         financial component.
      bidders sufficient time to prepare their                                                             1. Lowest Calculated Responsive Bid - in             VI.    Award,    Implementation,             and
      bids                                         ABC shall be the upper limit or ceiling for the            the case of Goods and Infrastructure.                    Termination of contract
   d. Bids submitted after the deadline shall      Bid prices, Bid prices that exceed this ceiling         2. Highest Rated Responsive Bid - in the
      not be accepted.                             shall be disqualified.                                     case of Consulting Services.                      NOTICE AND EXECUTION OF AWARD
MODIFICATION OF BIDS: A bidder may                 BID FOR THE PROCUREMENT OF GOODS                     If the Bid didn’t pass,              he    shall   be   Within a period not exceeding fifteen (15)
modify his bid, provided that this is done         AND INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS: the                     “POST-DISQUALIFIED”.                                    calendar days from the determination and
BEFORE the deadline for the receipt of bids. It                                                                                                                 declaration by the BAC of the Lowest
Calculated Responsive Bid or Highest Rated         If no action on the contract is taken by the         VII.   Contract    implementation        and               days after the receipt of the
Responsive Bid, and the recommendation of          head of the procuring entity, or by his duly                termination                                         notice.
the award, the HoPE or his duly authorized         authorized representative, or by the concerned
representative shall approve or disapprove the     board, in the case of government owned               The     rules   and    guidelines for   the             c. Supplier fails to perform any
said recommendation.                               and/or -controlled corporations, within the          implementation and termination of contracts                other obligations under the
                                                   periods specified in the preceding paragraph,        awarded pursuant to the provisions shall be                stipulations of the contract.
NOTICE OF AWARD: In case of approval, the          the contract concerned shall be deemed               prescribed in the IRR.
Head of the Procuring Entity or his duly           approved.                                                                                                II. In contracts for infrastructure
authorized representative shall immediately                                                             SPLITTING          OF         GOVERNMENT            projects- the entity shall TERMINATE
issue the Notice of Award to the bidder with the   PERFORMANCE SECURITY                                 CONTRACTS: this means the division or               a contract for default when ANY of the
Lowest Calculated Responsive Bid or Highest        Prior to the signing of the contract, the            breaking up of government of the Philippine         following    conditions    attend   its
Rated Responsive Bid.                              winning bidder shall, as a measure of                contracts into smaller quantities and amount,       implementation:
                                                   guarantee for the faithful performance and           or dividing contract implementation into
ENTERING INTO THE CONTRACT                         compliance with his obligations under the            artificial phases or sub-contracts for the       a. Due to the contractor’s fault and while
  1. Within ten (10) calendar days from            contract, be required to post a performance          purpose of EVADING or CIRCUMVENTING the             the project is on-going; it incurred a
     receipt of the Notice of Award, the           security in such form and amount as specified        requirements of the law and it IRR.                 negative slippage of 15% or more
     winning bidder shall formally enter into      in the Bidding Documents.
     contract with the Procuring Entity.                                                                Absolute rule: splitting of Government           b. Due to the contractor’s fault, and after
                                                   FAILURE TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT                       Contracts is NOT allowed.                           the contract time has expired; it
   2. When further approval of higher              AND POST PERFORMANCE SECURITY                                                                            incurred a negative slippage of 10% or
      authority is required, the approving         If the bidder with the Lowest Calculated             GROUNDS FOR TERMINATION                             more.
      authority for the contract shall be given    Responsive Bid or Highest Rated Responsive
      a maximum of twenty (20) calendar days       Bid fails, refuses or unable to enter into              1. Termination for Default                    c. The contractor:
      to approve or disapprove it.                 contract with the Procuring Entity, or if the              I. in contracts for Goods:                       1. Abandons the work, refuses or
   3. In the case of government-owned              bidder fails to post the required performance                   a. Outside of force majeure; the               fails to comply with a valid
      and/or -controlled corporations, the         security within the period stipulated in the                       supplier fails to deliver or                instruction or fails to proceed
      concerned board shall take action on         Bidding Documents, the BAC shall disqualify                        perform any or all of the Goods             expeditiously and without delay
      the said recommendation within thirty        the said bidder and shall undertake                                within the period/s specified in            despite a written notice by the
      (30) calendar days from receipt thereof.     post-qualification for the next-ranked                             the contract.                               procuring entity.
                                                   Lowest Calculated Bid or Highest Rated                                                                      2. Does not actually have on the
NOTICE TO PROCEED: The Procuring Entity            Bid.                                                              Or within any extension thereof              project site the minimum
shall issue the Notice to Proceed to the                                                                             granted by the Procuring Entity              essential equipment listed in the
winning bidder not later than seven (7)            This procedure shall be repeated until an                         pursuant to a request made by                Bid.
calendar days from the date of approval of the     award is made. However, if no award is                            the supplier prior to the delay,          3. Does not execute the works in
contract by the appropriate authority.             possible, the contract shall be subjected to a                    and such failure amounts to at               accordance with the contract or
                                                   new bidding.                                                      least 10 % of the contract price.            blatantly neglects to carry out its
PERIOD OF ACTION ON PROCUREMENT                                                                                                                                   obligations.
ACTIVITIES                                         RESERVATION CLAUSE                                            b. As a result of force majeure, the          4. Neglects or refuses to remove
                                                   The head of the Agency reserves the right to                     supplier is unable to deliver or              materials or to perform a new
The procurement process from the opening of        (1) reject any and all Bids, (2) declare a failure               perform any or all of the Goods,              work that has been rejected as
bids up to the award of contract shall not         of bidding, or (3) not award the contract.                       amounting to at least 10 % of the             defective or unsuitable.
exceed three (3) months.                                                                                            contract price, for a period of            5. Sub-lets any part of the contract
                                                                                                                    NOT LESS THAN 60 calendar                     works w/o the approval of the
                                                                                                                                                                  procuring entity.
                                                        with the P.E. if the works are completely          ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF                     b) Direct Contracting or Single Source
III. In contracts for consulting Services-              stopped for a continuous period of AT                   PROCUREMENT                              Procurement        – a method of
                                                        LEAST 60 DAYS.                                                                                   Procurement that does not require
   a. Outside of force majeure, the                                                                 Conditions for Use of Alternative Methods            elaborate Bidding Documents because
      consultant fails to deliver or perform            i. Failure of the procuring entity to       of Procurement                                       the supplier is simply asked to submit a
      the Outputs and Deliverables within               deliver,   within   reasonable   time,                                                           price quotation or a pro-forma invoice
      the periods stipulated, or with any               supplies, materials,right of way, or        a. The BAC recommended the use of                    together with the conditions of sale,
      extension.                                        other items it is obligated to furnish         alternative methods to the Head of the            which    offer    may     be    accepted
   b. As a result of force majeure, consultant          under the terms of the contract                Procuring Entity (HoPE)                           immediately or after some negotiations.
      is unable to deliver or perform a                                                             b. HoPE or his duly authorized representative
      material portion of the Outputs and               ii. Prosecution of the work is disrupted       has given prior approval of the use of any     c) Repeat Order – a method of
      Deliverables for a period of not less             by the adverse peace and order                 of the alternative methods of procurement;        Procurement that involves a direct
      than 60 days after the consultant’s               situation, as certified by the AFP, and     c. The      conditions    surrounding     the        Procurement of Goods from the
      receipt of the notice form the procuring          approved by the Secretary of National          procurement at hand justify the use of any        previous winning bidder, whenever
      entity stating that the circumstances of          Defense.                                       of the alternative methods of procurement,        there is a need to replenish Goods
      force majeure is deemed to have ceased.                                                          as provided for in Sections 48-54, Article        procured under a contract previously
   c. The consultant fails to perform any            b. Contracts for consulting services- the         XVI of R.A. 9184 and Sections 48-54, Rule         awarded through Competitive Bidding.
      other obligations.                                consultant may terminate its contract if       XVI of its 2016 IRR
                                                        the procuring entity is in material                                                           d) Shopping – a method of Procurement
2. Termination for Convenience: procuring               breach of its obligations pursuant to       Subject to the prior approval of the HoPE or         whereby the Procuring Entity simply
entity may terminate the contract, in whole or          the contract and has not remedied the       his duly authorized representative, and              requests for the submission of price
in part, at any time of its convenience.                same within 60 days following its           whenever justified by the conditions provided        quotations     for  readily    available
                                                        receipt of the consultant’s notice of       in this Act, the Procuring Entity may resort to      off-the-shelf Goods or ordinary/regular
3. Termination for insolvency: procuring                specifying such breach.                     any of the following alternative methods of          equipment to be procured directly from
entity shall terminate the contract if the                                                          Procurement:                                         suppliers of known qualification.
Supplier/ Contractor/ Consultant is declared      DISCLOSURE OF RELATIONS
BANKRUPT or INSOLVENT as determined by                                                                 a) Limited Source Bidding or Selective         e) Negotiated Procurement – a method
a court of competent jurisdiction.                All bidding documents shall be accompanied              Bidding – a method of Procurement              of Procurement that may be resorted
                                                  by a sworn affidavit of the bidder that he or           that involves direct invitation to bid by      under extraordinary circumstances
4. Termination for Unlawful Acts: procuring       she or any officer of their corporation in not          the Procuring Entity from a set of             whereby the Procuring Entity directly
entity may terminate the contract in case it is   related to the Head of the Procuring Entity by          preselected suppliers or consultants           negotiates a contract with a technically,
determined prima facie that the Supplier/         consanguinity or affinity up to the third civil         with known experience and proven               legally and financially capable supplier,
Contractor/ Consultant has engaged, before or     degree.                                                 capability relative to the requirements        contractor or consultant.
during the implementation of the contract;                                                                of a particular contract.
such as                                           Failure to this provision; AUTOMATIC
    1. Corrupt, fraudulent, collusive and         DISQUALIFICATION OF THE BID.                      Limited Source Bidding may be resorted to
       coercive practices                                                                           only in any of the following conditions:
    2. Drawing up or using forged documents                                                            1. Procurement of highly specialized types
    3. Any other acts                                                                                      of Goods and Consulting Services
                                                                                                           which are known to be obtained only
5. Termination by Contractor/ Consultant                                                                   from a limited number of sources
                                                                                                       2. Procurement         of    major    plant
   a. Contracts for infrastructure projects:                                                               components where it is deemed
      contractor may terminate its contract                                                                advantageous.
   GLOSSARY (DEFINITION OF TERMS)                                                                           GLOSSARY (REQUISITES)
                                                  Limited Source Bidding - also known as
Annual Procurement Plan (APP) - a                 Selective Bidding is a method of Procurement      Governing Principles on Government
document that consolidates the various            that involves direct invitation to bid by the     Procurement
PPMPs submitted by the various PMOs and           Procuring Entity from a set of preselected           a) Transparency
end-user units within the Procuring Entity        suppliers or consultants with known                  b) Competitiveness
                                                  experience and proven capability relative to         c) Streamlined procurement process
Bidding Documents - documents issued by           the requirements of a particular contract.           d) System of accountability
the Procuring Entity as the basis for Bids,                                                            e) Public monitoring of the procurement
furnishing all information necessary for a        Negotiated Procurement – a method of                    process and the implementation of
prospective bidder to prepare a bid for the       Procurement that may be resorted under                  awarded contracts
Goods, Infrastructure Projects, and Consulting    extraordinary circumstances whereby the
Services to be provided.                          Procuring Entity directly negotiates a contract   Advertising of the Invitation to Bid
                                                  with a technically, legally and financially         1. The Procuring Entity’s premises
Bids and Awards Committee (BAC) - a               capable supplier, contractor or consultant.         2. The newspapers of general circulation
committee established in accordance with                                                              3. The PHILGEPS and the website of the
Article V of R.A. No. 9184, which refers to the   Post Qualification - a stage where the bidder           Procuring entity
body responsible for the procurement              with the Lowest Calculated Bid, in the case of
activities   from     the    pre-procurement      Goods and Infrastructure Projects, or the         Bid Components
conference up to the recommendation of            Highest Rated Bid, in the case of Consulting         1. Technical components
award.                                            Services, WILL undergo verifications and             2. Financial components
                                                  validation whether he has passed all the
Competitive Bidding - refers to the method        requirements and conditions.                      Types of PPMP
of procurement that is open to participation                                                           1. Initial PPMP
by any interested party.                          Project Procurement Management Plan                  2. Revised PPMP
                                                  (PPMP) - serves as a guide document in the
Direct Contracting - also known as Single         procurement and contract implementation           Types of APP
Source Procurement is a method of                 process                                              1. Indicative APP
Procurement that does not require elaborate                                                            2. Approved APP
Bidding Documents because the supplier is         Repeat Order – a method of Procurement
simply asked to submit a price quotation or a     that involves a direct Procurement of Goods       Processes in Competitive Bidding
pro-forma invoice together with the conditions    from the previous winning bidder, whenever           ● Advertisement
of sale, which offer may be accepted              there is a need to replenish Goods procured          ● Prebid conference
immediately or after some negotiations.           under a contract previously awarded through          ● Eligibility screening of prospective
                                                  Competitive Bidding.                                    bidders
Government     Electronic    Procurement                                                               ● Receipt and opening of bids
System (G-EPS) - the primary and definitive       Shopping – a method of Procurement                   ● Evaluation of bids
source of information on government               whereby the Procuring Entity simply requests         ● Post-qualification
procurement                                       for the submission of price quotations for           ● Award of contract
                                                  readily available off-the-shelf Goods or
Government Procurement - the process by           ordinary/regular equipment to be procured
which the government acquires the goods and       directly from suppliers of known qualification.
services it needs by purchasing from
commercial businesses with regulations on
how to use it properly and responsibly.
                                                                             INSURANCE                        Insurance as an Uberrimae Fides contract
                                                                                                              (1993 Bar)
                                                             Laws governing contracts of insurance in
                                                             the Philippines                                  The contract of insurance is one of perfect
                                                                1. R.A. 10607 (July 23, 2012)                 good faith (uberrimae fidei) not for the
                                                                2. New Civil Code                             insured alone, but equally so for the insurer; in
                                                                3. Special Laws                               fact, it is more so for the latter, since its
   PAMANTASAN NG LUNGSOD NG MAYNILA                                                                           dominant bargaining position carries with it
         (University of the City of Manila)                  ________________________________________         stricter responsibility (Qua Chee Gan vs. Law
 General Luna, corner Muralla St., Intramuros, Manila                                                         Union and Rock Insurance, Co. Ltd., GR No.
                                                                     CONCEPT OF INSURANCE                     L-4611, December 17, 1955).
                 1002 Metro Manila                           ________________________________________
To prevent the risk of increasing moral or         Must    be     strictly Only       substantial   The coverage can only be avoided after a
physical hazards caused by the actions of the      complied with.          proof is required.       violation, and the insured can claim:
insured or changes in the property's condition.
                                                                                                       1. If the contract is breached after its
                                                   Its falsity or non- Its falsity renders the
Basis of warranties                                                                                       start, the premium paid will be
                                                   fulfillment operates as policy void on the
                                                   a breach of contract.   ground of fraud.               returned pro-rata.
The insurer considered the condition of the
                                                                                                       2. If a contract is broken at its beginning,
property when the policy became effective.
                                                                                                          all premiums will be affected.
Kinds of warranties                                Presumed material.      Insurer must show its
                                                                           materiality in order     Effect of breach of warranty with fraud:
   1. Affirmative warranty – one which                                     to defeat an action
                                                                           on the policy.              1. Policy is avoided from the beginning
      relates to matters which exist at or
                                                                                                          and never becomes binding.
      before the issuance of the policy.
                                                                                                       2. The insured is not entitled to a refund
                                                                                                          of the premium.
        GLOSSARY (DEFINITIONS)                                                                       Land transportation operator (LTO) - The             the necessity of proving fault or negligence on
                                                   Fidelity Bonds - They pay an employer for         owner or owners of motor vehicles for                the part of the insured.
Assured - a person designated by the terms         loss growing out of a dishonest act of his        transportation     of     passengers  for
                                                                                                                                                          Omission- If one party fails to provide facts
of the policy to receive the proceeds of the       employee.                                         compensation, including school buses.
                                                                                                                                                          that might establish a guarantee is untrue, the
insurance.
                                                   Group Insurance       - Essentially a single      Life Insurance - It is insurance on human            other party may cancel the insurance
                                                   insurance contract that provides coverage for     lives and insurance appertaining thereto or          arrangement.
Burglary and theft insurance - an
                                                   many individuals.                                 connected therewith.
insurance against loss of property by the                                                                                                                 Open or loss payable clause - an insurance
depredations of burglars and thieves.              Health insurance - an indemnity to persons        Limited payment – Insured pays premium for           provision authorizing payment in the event of
                                                   for expense and loss of time occasioned by        a limited period.                                    loss to a person or entity other than the
Change of interest - is an absolute transfer of    disease.                                                                                               named insured with an insurable interest in
the insured’s entire interest in the property                                                        Misrepresentation - During negotiations,             the covered property or, in some cases, jointly
insured to one not previously interested or        Incontestability clause - A life insurance
                                                                                                     one party makes a false or misleading                to the insured and the other person or entity.
insured.                                           policy shall be incontestable after two years
                                                                                                     statement of fact to another in order to induce      (IRMI)
                                                   from the date of issuance, regardless of any
                                                                                                     the other party to enter into a contract.
Compulsory Insurance Coverage for                  mistake,      fraud,      concealment        or                                                        Ordinary life, general life or old-line policy
Agency-hired workers - It is an insurance          misrepresentation of the insured or his agent.                                                         - Insured is required to pay a certain fixed
                                                                                                     Motor Vehicle - any vehicle propelled by any
mechanism made available by the law to                                                                                                                    premium annually or at more frequent
                                                   Industrial bond - required by private             power other than muscular power using the
provide insurance protection for the OFWs.                                                                                                                intervals throughout his entire life and the
                                                   employers to cover loss through dishonesty of     public highways except vehicles which run
                                                                                                                                                          beneficiary is entitled to receive payment
Concealment - Is a failure to convey what a        employees.                                        only on rail or tracks and vehicles used in
                                                                                                                                                          under the policy only after the death of the
party knows and ought to communicate.                                                                agricultural purposes.
                                                                                                                                                          insured.
                                                   Industrial life – entitles the insured to pay
Contract bonds - These are connected
                                                   premiums weekly, or where premiums are            Motor vehicle liability insurance - is a
with construction and supply contracts.                                                                                                                   Passenger - Any fare-paying person being
                                                   payable monthly or often.                         contract of insurance against passenger and
                                                                                                                                                          transported and conveyed in and by a motor
                                                                                                     third-party liability for death or bodily injuries
Contract of Insurance - It is an agreement                                                                                                                vehicle for transportation of passengers for
                                                   Insurable Interest - Interest which a person      and damage to property arising from motor
whereby one undertakes for a consideration to                                                                                                             compensation, including persons expressly
                                                   is deemed to have in the subject matter           vehicle accidents.
indemnify another against loss, damage or                                                                                                                 authorized by law or by the vehicle’s operator
                                                   insured, such that the person will derive
liability arising from an unknown or                                                                                                                      or his agents to ride without fare.
                                                   pecuniary benefit or advantage from the           Motor Vehicle Liability Insurance - It is a
contingent event.                                                                                                                                         Performance bond - covers the faithful
                                                   preservation of the subject matter insured and    protection coverage that will answer for legal
                                                                                                                                                          performance of the contract.
Contract of life annuity - It is a contract to     will suffer pecuniary loss or damage from its     liability for losses and damages for bodily
pay the insured, or a named person or persons,     destruction, termination, or injury by the        injuries or property damage that may be
                                                                                                                                                          Personal accident insurance - a form of
a sum or sums periodically during life or          happening of the event insured against.           sustained by another arising from the use and
                                                                                                                                                          insurance which undertakes to indemnify
certain period.                                                                                      operation of a motor vehicle by its owner.
                                                                                                                                                          the assured against the expense, loss of
                                                   Insured - person in whose favor the contract
Double insurance - exists where the same                                                                                                                  time, and suffering resulting from accidents
                                                   is operative and is indemnified.                  Motor Vehicle Owner (MVO) - Actual legal
person is insured by several insurers                                                                                                                     causing him physical injury.
                                                                                                     owner of a motor vehicle, whose name such
separately, in respect to the same subject and
                                                   Insurer - party who assumes or accepts the        vehicle is duly registered with the Land
interest.                                                                                                                                                 Plate glass insurance - an insurance against
                                                   risk of loss.                                     Transportation Office.
                                                                                                                                                          loss from accidental breaking of plate-glass
Endowment – insured pays premium for
                                                                                                                                                          windows, doors, showcases, etc.
specified period. If he outlives the period, the   Judicial bonds - required in connection           No Fault Indemnity Clause - It is a clause
face value of the policy is paid to him; If not,   with judicial proceedings                         where the insurer is required to pay a third         Policy of insurance - It is the written
his beneficiaries receive the benefit.                                                               party injured or killed in an accident without       document embodying the terms and
stipulations of the contract of insurance          Third-party - Any person other than a                    GLOSSARY (REQUISITES)                      Persons prohibited from being designated
between the insured and insurer.                   passenger                                                                                           as beneficiaries (CAP)
                                                                                                   The insurer in Life Insurance contract
Premium - It is an agreed price for assuming                                                                                                              1. Those made between persons found
                                                   Warranty - A written guarantee offered to the   shall be liable in case of suicide if: (ASI)
                                                                                                                                                             guilty of the same Criminal offense, in
and carrying the risk that is, the consideration
                                                   purchaser of a product by its maker that                                                                  consideration thereof.
paid to an insurer for undertaking to                                                                 1. The suicide is committed After the               2. Those made between persons who were
                                                   promises to repair or replace it if necessary
indemnify the insured against a specified peril.                                                          policy has been in force for a period of 2         guilty of Adultery or concubinage at the
                                                   within a certain period of time.
                                                                                                          years from the date of its issue or of its         time of donation.
Professional Insurer - any person,
                                                                                                          last reinstatement;                             3. Those made to a Public officer or his
partnership, association or corporation that                                                                                                                 wife, descendants or ascendants by
transacts solely and exclusively reinsurance                                                          2. The suicide is committed within a
                                                                                                                                                             reason of his office.
business in the Philippines.                                                                              Shorter period as provided in the
                                                                                                          policy; or                                   Beneficiary willfully brought about the
Public official bond - required of public                                                             3. The suicide is committed in the state of      death of the insured
officers for the faithful performance of their                                                            Insanity regardless of the date of
duties and as a condition of entering upon the                                                            commission.                                  GR: The interest of a beneficiary in a life
duties of their offices.                                                                           Insurance upon one’s life - are those taken         insurance policy shall be forfeited
Public utility insurance - indemnifies                                                             out by the insured upon his own life for the
                                                                                                                                                       XPNs: (IUD)
against liability on account of injuries to the                                                    benefit of: (HET)
person or property of another. It may                                                                 a. Himself                                          a. Insanity of the beneficiary at the time
extend to automobiles, elevators, flywheels,                                                          b. His Estate, in case it matures only at his          he killed the insured.
libel, theaters, and vessels.                                                                             death                                           b. The        insured’s     death      was
                                                                                                      c. Third person who may be designated as               Unintentionally caused.
Rider - an attachment to an insurance policy                                                              beneficiary                                     c. The beneficiary acted in self-Defense.
that modifies the conditions of the policy by                                                                                                          Requisites of double insurance (STRIP)
expanding or restricting its benefits or                                                           Insurance upon life of another
excluding certain conditions from the                                                                 - are those taken out by the insured upon           1. Subject matter is the same
coverage.                                                                                                the life of another.                             2. Two or more insurers insuring
                                                                                                      - This class includes the following:                   separately
Standard or union clause - an insurance                                                                  (SELD)                                           3. Risk or peril insured against is the same
provision that covers the mortgage lender but                                                         a. His Spouse and of his children.
                                                                                                                                                          4. Interest insured is the same
not the borrower for a loss involving the                                                             b. Any person on whom he depends
                                                                                                         wholly or in part for Education or               5. Person insured is the same
mortgaged property. (Insuranceopedia)
                                                                                                         support, or in whom he has a pecuniary        Devices used to prevent the forfeiture of a
Suretyship - a credit accommodation which                                                                interest.
                                                                                                                                                       life insurance after the payment of the first
includes official recognizances, stipulations,                                                        c. Of any person under a Legal obligation
                                                                                                         to him for the payment of money, or           premium; (C-PAGER)
bonds or undertakings.                                                                                                                                     1. Cash surrender value – The amount the
                                                                                                         respecting property or services, of
Term insurance – insured pays premium only                                                               which death or illness might delay or                 insurer agrees to pay to the
once, and he is insured for a specified period.                                                          prevent the performance.                              policyholder if he surrenders the policy
                                                                                                      d. Of any person upon whose life any                     and discharges his claim against it.
Theft Clause - Where a car is unlawfully and                                                             estate or interest vested in him
                                                                                                                                                           2. Paid up Insurance – The insured has
wrongfully taken without the knowledge and                                                               Depends.
                                                                                                                                                               the right, upon default, after paying at
consent of the owner, such taking constitutes                                                                                                                  least three yearly payments, to have the
“theft” and it is the theft clause, not the                                                                                                                    policy remain in force from the date of
authorized driver clause which should apply.                                                                                                                   default for the remainder of the
                                                                                                                                                               insurance period without further
        premium payment. It reduces the                     insurer in violation of the Insurance      2. Promissory warranty – one in which the
        original sum of insurance, but for the              Code                                          insured undertakes that something
        same duration as originally specified.         4.   Physical changes in the property              shall be done or omitted after the
   3.   Automatic Loan Clause - states that if a            insured which result in the property          policy takes effect and during its
        premium is not paid on time, it will be             becoming uninsurable                          continuance.
        deducted from the policy's loan value          5.   Discovery of fraud or material             3. Express warranty – a statement in a
        until it is used up. If the insured pays            misrepresentation                             policy, of a matter relating to the
        the premiums from other sources, the           6.   Discovery of other insurance coverage         person or thing insured, or to the risk,
        insurance remains in full validity and              that makes the total insurance in excess      as a fact.
        effect.                                             of the value of the property insured       4. Implied warranty – an agreement or
   4.   Grace period – After paying the initial        7.   Discovery of willful or omissions or          stipulation not expressed in the policy
        premium, the insured has a grace                    reckless acts increasing the hazard           but the existence of which is admitted
        period of 30 days to pay subsequent                 insured against.                              or presumed from the fact that the
        installments.                                                                                     contract of insurance has been
                                                    Requisites   of                 Concealment:
   5.   Extended insurance – After paying at                                                              executed.
                                                    (NeD-NoW-NomMa)
        least three full yearly payments,[IC,
        Sec.233 (f)] the insured has the right to      1. A party knows a fact which he neglects
        keep the policy in effect for a period            to communicate or disclose to the other
        equal to or more than the net value of            party;
        the insurance purchased with a single          2. Such party concealing is duty bound to
        premium upon default.                             disclose such fact to the other;
   6.   Reinstatement - The policyholder has           3. Such party concealing makes no
        the right to reinstate the contract               warranty as to the fact concealed;
        within 3 years of defaulting on                4. The other party has no means of
        premium payments, unless the cash                 ascertaining the fact concealed; and
        surrender value is paid. Once the              5. The fact must be material.
        extension term has elapsed, the
                                                    Characteristics        of      representation
        corporation will accept adequate
                                                    (COW-DAW-BA)
        documentation of insurability and
        payment. Please pay any outstanding            1. Not a part of the contract but merely a
        premiums or debts owed to the firm                collateral inducement to it
        under this insurance.                          2. Oral or written
                                                       3. Must be presumed to refer to the date
Instances wherein a contract of insurance                 the contract goes into effect
may be canceled by the insurer                         4. Altered or withdrawn before the
(NCDP-Discovery of FraME WOR
                                                          insurance is effected but not afterwards
                                                       5. Made before or at the time of issuing
   1. Nonpayment of premium                               the policy and not after.
   2. Conviction of a crime arising out of acts
      increasing the hazard insured against         Kinds of warranties (APEI)
   3. A determination by the Commissioner              1. Affirmative warranty – one which
      that the continuation of the policy                 relates to matters which exist at or
      would violate or would place the                    before the issuance of the policy.
                                                                                                                 countries, particularly those within the
                                                               PHILIPPINE COMPETITION ACT (PCA,                  Association of SouthEast Asian Nations
                                                                         R.A NO. 10667)                          (ASEAN) region. (Lim and Recalde, 2016)
                        April 2024
Pearl and Dean Inc. discovered an exact copy         Leon's patent and the Court found that De               2. A patent office and the information was        property of a known substance which does not
installed in SM City and SM Cubao by SMI and         Leon's process was an improvement of the old               contained:                                     result in the enhancement of the known
North Edsa Marketing Inc. (NEMI), which              process of tile-making and therefore                           a. In another application filled by        efficacy of that substance.(Sec 26.2 as
after, the court ruled that there was no patent      patentable.                                                       the inventor and should have            amended by R.A 9502)
infringement because they only registered for                                                                          not have been disclosed by the
                                                                       PRIOR ART                                                                               JESSIE G.CHING        vs. WILLIAM SILINAS
trademark so they could not legally prevent                                                                            office,or
anyone from manufacturing or commercially                                                                           b. In an application filed without         [G.R . NO. 161295]
using the contraption.                                  1. Everything which has been made a                            the knowledge or consent of the
                                                                                                                       inventor by a third party which         Jessie G. Ching holds the position of owner
                                                           available to the public anywhere in the
         PATENTABLE INVENTION                                                                                          obtained      the    information        and      general    manager     at    Jeshicris
                                                           world, before the filling date or the
                                                                                                                       directly or indirectly from the         Manufacturing Co., which produces a Utility
                                                           priority date of the application claiming
Any technical solution of any problem in any                                                                           inventor.                               Model referred to as the "Leaf Spring Eye
                                                           the invention.
field of human activity which is new, involves                                                               3. A third party which obtained the               Bushing for Automobiles.” The main issue in
an inventive step and industrially                                                                              information directly or indirectly from        this case revolves around whether the
                                                        2. The whole contents of a published                                                                   petitioner's model qualifies for copyright
applicable. It may be,or may relate to a                                                                        the inventor. (Sec 25 IPC)
                                                           application, filed or effective in the                                                              protection. The Court ruled that since the
product or process or an improvement of any
                                                           Philippines, with a filling or priority          THE BURDEN OF PROVING WANT OF                      works were utility models rather than artistic
of the foregoing. (Sec. 21)
                                                           date that is earlier than the filling or            NOVELTY OF AN INVENTION                         or literary creations, they did not fall under
 THE CONDITIONS FOR PATENTABILITY                          priority        date          of         the                                                        copyright protection. Both the Leaf Spring Eye
                                                           application.Provided         that        the                                                        Bushing and Vehicle Bearing Cushion were
                                                           application which has validity claimed         The burden of proving want of novelty is on
NIA                                                                                                                                                            deemed practical articles lacking in artistic
                                                           the filling date of an earlier application     him who avers it and the burden is heavy one
                                                                                                                                                               design or value.
   1. Novelty - An invention shall not be                  under Section 31 of the IPC, there shall       which is met only by clear and satisfactory
      considered new if it forms part of prior             be a prior art with effect as of the filling   proof which overcomes every reasonable                   THE TEST OF NON-OBVIOUSNESS
      art. (Sec. 23 IPC)                                   date of such earlier application.              doubt.(Manzano v CA, G.R No. 113388)
                                                                                                                                                               If any person possessing ordinary skill in the
   2. Involves an inventive step - If having
                                                            Provided further that the applicant or        MANZANO, A. vs. CA & MADOLARIA, M.                   art was able to draw the inferences and he
      regard, to the prior art, it is not obvious
                                                            the inventor identified in both               [G.R . NO. 113388]                                   constructs that the supposed inventor drew
      to a person skilled in the art at that
                                                            applications are not one and the same.                                                             from prior art, then the latter did not really
      time of filling date or priority date of
                                                            (Sec. 24 IPC)                                 Angelita Manzano sought to cancel Melecia            invent.
      the application claiming the invention.
                                                                                                          Madolaria's patent for a gas burner, claiming it
   3. Industrially Applicable - An invention         THE “MADE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC’                                                                             A PERSON OF ORDINARY SKILL
                                                                                                          was not new and she was not the true and
      that can be produced and used in any                    AND ITS EFFECTS                                                                                  A person who is presumed to:
                                                                                                          actual owner; however, the Philippine Patent
      industry,      shall   be       industrially
                                                                                                          Office finds Madolaria's invention novel and            1. Be an ordinary practitioner aware of
      applicable. (Sec. 27 IPC)
                                                     To be “made available to the public” means           patentable, with the Court affirming the                   what was common general knowledge
AGUAS vs. DE LEON AND CA.,[G.R. No.                  atleast one member of the public has been            decision and emphasizing the importance of                 in the art at the relevant date
L-32160]                                             able to access knowledge of the inventions           supporting oral testimony and allegations with          2. Have knowledge of all references that
                                                     without any restriction on passing the               substantial evidence, which the petitioner has             are sufficiently related goods to one
Conrado G. De Leon, was granted and issued
                                                     knowledge on the others.                             failed to provide, the petition was denied.                another and to pertinent art and to
Letters Patent No. 658 by the Philippines
Patent Office for his invention of certain new                                                                                                                       have knowledge of all parts reasonably
                                                     When a work has already been made                                  INVENTIVE STEPS
and useful improvements in the process of                                                                                                                            pertinent to the particular problems
                                                     available to    the   public,it  shall be
making mosaic pre-cast tiles and he then filed                                                                                                                       with which the inventor was involved.
                                                     non-patentable for absence of novelty.
a complaint for infringement of patent against                                                            An invention involves an inventive step                 3. Have has at his disposal the normal
petitioner Domiciano Aguas and F.H. Aquino                NON PREJUDICIAL DISCLOSURE                      if,having regard to prior art,it is not obvious to         means and capacity for routine work
& Sons. On the hand, Aguas argued that De                                                                 a person skilled in the art at that time of the            and experimentation. (Rules and
Leon's patent was unlawfully secured through                                                              filling date or priority date of the application           Regulations on Inventions, Rule 207)
                                                     When the disclosure of information contained
misrepresentations and that his own products,        in the application during the 12 month period        claiming the invention.(Sec 26 IPC)
which had been duly patented, were different         before the filing date or the priority date of the   Note: In the case of drugs and medicines there
from those of De Leon. The Supreme Court             application if such disclosure was made by:          is no inventive step if the invention results
held that Aguas' evidence did not overcome
                                                        1. The inventor                                   from the mere discovery of a new form or new
the legal presumption of the validity of De
     OTHER FORMS OF PATENTABLE                            NON‐PATENTABLE INVENTIONS                        3. 2 or more persons invented separately        “aerial fuze”, however the Court of Appeals
            INVENTIONS                                                                                        and independently of each other - To         affirms that legal basis and the right to the
                                                     PAD‐SCAD                                                 person who FILED an application              patented “aerial fuze” will fall to whom person
                                                       1. Discoveries, scientific     theories and         4. 2 or more applications are filed - the       registered it first therefore the Court confirms
Other Forms of Patentable Inventions
                                                          mathematical methods                                applicant who has the EARLIEST               that the right to a patent was in favor to Floro
   1. Industrial Design – any composition                                                                     filing date, or the EARLIEST                 International Corp.
      of    lines   or    colors      or     any        2. In the case of Drugs and medicines,                PRIORITY date. (First to file rule).
                                                                                                                                                           PERSON WHO MAY APPLY FOR A PATENT
      three-dimensional form, whether or                   mere discovery of a new form or new                (Sec. 29, IPC)
      not associated with lines or colors.                 property of a known substance which             5. Inventions created pursuant to a
                                                                                                                                                           Any person who is a national or who is
      Provided that such composition or form               does not result in the enhancement of              commission         -     Person      who
                                                                                                                                                           domiciled or has a real and effective industrial
      gives a special appearance to and can                the efficacy of that substance                     commissions the work, unless
                                                                                                                                                           establishment in a country which is a party to
      serve as pattern for an industrial                                                                      otherwise provided in the contract
                                                                                                                                                           any convention, treaty, or agreement relating
      product or handicraft. (Sec. 112, IPL)            3. Schemes, rules and methods of                      (Sec. 30.1, IPC)
                                                                                                                                                           to intellectual property rights or the repression
                                                           performing mental acts, playing games           6. Employee made the invention in the
                                                                                                                                                           of unfair competition, to which the Philippines
   2. Integrated circuit – a product, in its               or doing business, and programs for                course of his employment contract:
                                                                                                                                                           is also a party, or extends reciprocal rights to
      final form, or an intermediate form, in              computers                                              a. The      EMPLOYEE,        if   the
                                                                                                                                                           nationals of the Philippines by law. (Sec. 3,
      which the elements, at least one of                                                                            inventive activity is NOT a part
                                                                                                                                                           IPC)
      which is an active elements and some              4. Methods for treatment of the human or                     of his regular duties even if
                                                                                                                                                               STEPS IN THE REGISTRATION OF A
      of all of the interconnections are                   Animal body                                               the employee uses the time,
                                                                                                                                                                               PATENT
      integrally formed in and or on a piece                                                                         facilities, and materials of the
                                                                                                                                                               1. Filing of the application
      of material, and in which is intended to          5. Plant varieties or animal breeds or                       employer.
                                                                                                                                                               2. Accordance of the filing date
      perform an electronic function.                      essentially biological process for the                 b. The      EMPLOYER,         if   the
                                                                                                                                                               3. Formality examination
                                                           production of plants or animals. This                     invention is the result of the
                                                                                                                                                               4. Classification and search
   3. Layout design/topography – the                       provision    shall    not   apply   to                    performance            of       his
                                                                                                                                                               5. Publication of application
      three-dimensional disposition, however               microorganisms and non‐biological                         regularly-assigned          duties,
                                                                                                                                                               6. Substantive examination
      expressed, of the elements, at least one             and microbiological processes                             unless there is an agreement,
                                                                                                                                                               7. Grant of patent
      of which is an active element, and of                                                                          express or implied, to the
                                                                                                                                                               8. Publication upon grant
      some or all of the interconnections of            6. Aesthetic creations                                       contrary. (Sec. 30.2, IPC)
                                                                                                                                                               9. Issuance of certificate (Salao, Essentials
      an integrated circuit, or such a
                                                                                                                   FIRST TO FILE RULE                              of Intellectual Property Law: A
      three-dimensional disposition prepared            7. Anything which is Contrary to public
                                                                                                                                                                   Guidebook on Republic Act No. 8293 and
      for an integrated circuit intended for               order or morality. (Sec. 22, IPC as
                                                                                                           1. 2 or more persons have made the                      related goods Law., 2008)
      manufacture. Registration is valid for               amended by R.A. 9502)
                                                                                                              invention separately and independently
      10 years without renewal counted from                                                                   of each other - the person who FILED         DISCLOSURE AND DESCRIPTION OF THE
      date of commencement of protection.                 PATENTABILITY OF COMPUTER                           for an application for such invention,                   INVENTION
                                                                  PROGRAMS                                    or
   4. Utility model – A name given to                                                                                                                         1. The application shall disclose the
                                                                                                           2. 2 or more applications are filed for the
      inventions in the mechanical field.            GR: Computer programs are not patentable                                                                    invention in a manner sufficiently clear
                                                                                                              same invention - the applicant who has
                                                     but are copyrightable.                                                                                      and complete for it to be carried out by
THE QUALIFICATION OF AN INVENTION                                                                             the EARLIEST filing date. (Sec. 29,
                                                                                                                                                                 a person skilled in the art. (Sec. 35.1,
       AS A UTILITY MODEL                            XPN: They can be patentable if they are part             IPC)
                                                                                                                                                                 IPC)
                                                     of a process (e.g. business process with a step    CRESER PRECISION INC. VS CA, FLORO
If it is new and industrially applicable. A model    involving the use of a computer program).          INTERNATIONAL CORP. [G.R. No. 118708]                 2. Where the application concerns a
of implement or tools of any industrial                                                                                                                          microbiological process or the product
                                                             OWNERSHIP OF A PATENT                      Creser Precision invents and manufactures
product even if not possessed of the quality of                                                                                                                  thereof and involves the use of a
invention but which is of practical utility. (Sec.                                                      “aerial fuze” and any other military                     micro-organism which cannot be
                                                     Persons entitled to a patent                       ammunition, however the Floro International
109.1, IPC)                                                                                                                                                      sufficiently disclosed in the application
                                                        1. Inventor, his heirs, or assigns              subsequently created the same “aerial fuze”              in such a way as to enable the
The term of a utility model                                                                             and registered it with the BPTTT or Bureau of
                                                        2. Joint invention - jointly         by   the                                                            invention to be carried out by a person
                                                           inventors. (Sec. 28, IPC)                    Patent, Trademarks, and Technology Transfer              skilled in the art, and such material is
7 years from date of filing of the application                                                          and suddenly Creser Precision claims that                not available to the public, the
(Sec. 109.3, IPC).                                                                                      they are the actual and true inventory of the
   application shall be supplemented by a         2. If several independent inventions              E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND CO. vs                         published application being identified
   deposit of such material with an                  which do not form a single general             DIR. FRANCISCO, DIR. VELASCO, AND                         in the saide notice by its serial number.
   international depository institution.             inventive concept are claimed in one           THERAPHARMA, INC. [G.R. No. 174379]
                                                                                                                                                       Note: That the action may not be filed until
   (Sec. 35.1, IPC)                                  application, the Director may require
                                                                                                    E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Co.'s patent            after the grant of a patent on the published
                                                     that the application be restricted to a
3. The Regulations shall prescribe the                                                              application for Angiotensin II Receptor            application and within four (4) years from the
                                                     single invention. A later application
   contents of the description and the                                                              Blocking Imidazole (losartan) was abandoned,       commission of the acts complained of (Sec.
                                                     filed for an invention divided out shall
   order of presentation. (Sec. 14, R.A. No.                                                        and its petition for revival was denied for        46, IPC).
                                                     be considered as having been filed on
   165a)                                             the same day as the first application:         being filed out of time; however, it argued that              PATENT TAKE EFFECT
                                                     Provided, That the later application is        its prior filing in the United States was
             THE CLAIMS
                                                     filed within four (4) months after the         protected from becoming part of the public         Shall take effect on the date of the publication
                                                     requirement to divide becomes final or         domain, which was then concluded by the            of the grant of the patent in the IPO Gazette.
1. The application shall contain one (1) or          within such additional time, not               Supreme Court that the right of priority was       (Sec. 50.3, IPC)
   more claims which shall define the                exceeding four (4) months, as may be           not applicable in the case of revival of an
                                                                                                                                                          DURATION OF A PATENT, UTILITY
   matter for which protection is sought.            granted: Provided further, That each           abandoned patent and only relevant if
                                                                                                                                                          MODEL, AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGN
   Each claim shall be clear and concise,            divisional application shall not go            Therapharma, Inc. had a conflict with its
   and shall be supported by the                     beyond the disclosure in the initial           application for a patent with the Intellectual
   description. (Sec. 36.1, IPC)                     application. (Sec. 38.2, IPC)                  Property Office.
   GROUNDS FOR CANCELLATION OF                      Note: Where the grounds for cancellation are          RIGHTS CONFERRED TO A PATENT                              c. The invention may only be used
    UTILITY MODELS (Sec. 104; IPC)                  established with respect only to a part of the                                                                     experimentally for scientific or
                                                    layout-design, only the corresponding part of         1. Subject matter is a product - right to                    educational purposes.
FICQ                                                the registration shall be cancelled.                     restrain, prohibit, and prevent any
   a. The      claimed invention does not                                                                    unauthorized person or entity from                     d. Bolar Provision - In the case of
      Qualify for registration as a utility          REMEDY OF PERSON NOT HAVING THE                         making, using, offering of sale, selling                  drugs and medicines, the act
      model and does not meet the                        RIGHT TO PATENT (SEC. 67.1)                         or importing the product.                                 includes testing, using, making,
      requirements of registrability.                                                                                                                                  or    selling    the    invention,
   b. That the description and the claims do        If a person other than the applicant is declared      2. Subject matter is a process - right to                    including any related data, solely
      not Comply with the prescribed                by final court order or decision as having the           restrain, prohibit, and prevent any                       for    the     development      of
      requirements;                                 right to a patent, he may within 3 months after          unauthorized person or entity from                        information and issuance of
   c. That any drawing which is necessary for       such decision has become final:                          manufacturing, dealing in, using,                         approvals      by     government
      the understanding of the invention has                                                                 offering of sale, selling or importing any                regulatory agencies required
      not been Furnished;                           PRFS                                                     product obtained directly or indirectly                   under any law in the Philippines
   d. That the owner of the utility model             a. Prosecute the application as his own                from such process.                                        or    another     country     that
      registration is not the Inventor or his         b. File the new patent application                                                                               regulates     the    manufacture,
      successor in title.                             c. Request the application to be refused;           3. Right to assign the patent, to transfer                   construction, use, or sale of any
   GROUNDS FOR CANCELLATION OF                           or                                                  by succession, and to conclude                            product.
   INDUSTRIAL DESIGN (Sec. 120, IPC)                  d. Seek cancellation of the patent.                    licensing contract.
                                                      REMEDY OF THE TRUE AND ACTUAL                                                                                 e. The act involves preparing
REN                                                          OWNER (Sec. 68)                           PHILIPPINE PHARMAWEALTH, INC. vs.                               medicine for individual cases in
  a. The subject matter of the industrial                                                              PFIZER, INC. [G.R. No. 167715]                                  a pharmacy or by a medical
     design is not Registerable.                    If a person, who was deprived of the patent                                                                        practitioner,  based     on    a
  b. The subject matter is Not new; or              without his consent or through fraud is            In a patent infringement case between Pfizer                    prescription.
  c. The subject matter of the industrial           declared by final court order or decision to be    and Phil Pharmawealth, the Supreme Court
     design Extends beyond the content of           the true and actual inventor,                      ruled in favor of Phil Pharmawealth, stating                  f. When a ship, vessel, airplane, or
     the application as originally filed.            CCA                                               that Pfizer's patent had already expired,                        land vehicle from another nation
                                                                                                       rendering injunctive relief invalid, affirmed                    inadvertently or briefly enters
Note: If the grounds for cancellation relate to        a. the Court shall order for his                the CA's jurisdiction to review BLA-IPO's                        Philippine territory, tests using
some of the claims or parts of the claim,                 substitution as patentee, or                 orders, and found Pfizer guilty of forum                         the invention.
cancellation may be effected to such extent            b. at the option of the true inventor, Cancel   shopping, dismissing the case filed with the       2. Prior user
only. The restriction may be effected in the              the patent, and Award actual damages         RTC.                                                      Person other than the applicant, who in
form of an alteration of the effected features of         in his favor if warranted by the                  LIMITATION OF PATENT RIGHTS                          good faith, started using the invention
the design. (Sec. 120.2, IPC)                             circumstances.                                                                                         in the Philippines, or undertaken
                                                                                                          1. In general:                                         serious preparations to use the same,
   GROUNDS FOR CANCELLATION OF                      SECTION 67.1 vs. SECTION 68                                 a. GR: If the owner of the patent                before the filing date or priority date of
   LAYOUT- DESIGN OF INTEGRATED
                                                                                                                   puts it on the public market of               the application shall have the right to
       CIRCUITS (Sec. 120.3, IPC)
                                                         Section 67.1            Section 68                        the Philippines, or if it is with             continue the use thereof, but this right
PRF                                                                                                                his/her consent.                              shall only be transferred or assigned
                                                     2 or more persons      A person who was                                                                     further with his enterprise or business.
                                                     have    made     the   deprived     of   the                   XPN: Drugs and medications
   a. The layout-design is not Protectable
                                                     invention separately   patent without his                      may be introduced in the              3. Use by Government
      under this Act;
                                                     and independently of   consent       through                   Philippines or anyplace in the
   a. The Right holder is not entitled to                                                                                                                        A government agency or third person
                                                     each other.            fraud and is declared                   world by the patent owner or                 authorized by the government may
      protection under this Act; or
                                                                            by the final court                      approved parties.
       exploit     invention    even    without           DOCTRINE OF EXHAUSTION                      necessary and sufficient to constitute             Corporation. It differs from the patented
       agreement of a patent owner where:                                                             equivalency that the same function can be          substance in terms of structure and function.
          a. Public interest, as determined by     Doctrine of first sale                             performed in substantially the same way or         Thus, it does not fall within the doctrine of
               the appropriate agency of the                                                          manner, or by the same or substantially the        equivalents’ scope.
               government, so requires; or         The owner of the patent loses control over any     same, principle or mode of operation; but
          b. A judicial or administrative body     further sales or resales of a product once it      where these tests are satisfied, mere                     DOCTRINE OF MECHANICAL
               has determined that the manner      has been sold in the domestic market for the       differences of form or name are immaterial.                    EQUIVALENTS
               of exploitation by the owner of a   first time, either with or without the holder's
               patent is anti‐competitive.         consent (Sec 72.1, IPC)                               2. Doctrine     of       Equivalents            Patent infringement occurs if the substitute
                                                                                                            Function-means-and-result test               performs the same function and was well
4. Reverse reciprocity of foreign law              GR: Patent rights are Exhausted by first sale in                                                      known at the date of the patent as a proper
       States that any requirement, penalty,       the Philippines (Domestic exhaustion)              Occurs when a device appropriates a prior          substitute for the omitted ingredient (Gsell v.
       diminution, restriction, limitation, or                                                        invention by adopting its original idea and,       Yap‐Jue, G.R. No. L‐4720, Jan. 19, 1909)
       other similar burden imposed by a           XPN: Except however on drugs and medicines:        although with some modification and change,
       foreign law on a Philippine national        first sale in any jurisdiction exhausts.           performs substantially the same function in        Thus, a patent infringement occurs when the
       seeking protection for intellectual         (International exhaustion)                         substantially the same way to achieve              alleged infringer has substituted in lieu of
       property rights in that nation shall also                                                      substantially the same result. (Smith Kline        some unessential part of the patented process,
       be reciprocally enforceable against                   PATENT INFRINGEMENT                      Beckman Corp. v. CA, GR. No. 126627, August        a well-known mechanical equivalent.
       nationals of that nation within                                                                14, 2003)                                                     EQUIVALENT DEVICE
       Philippine jurisdiction.                    MOUSI
                                                     - Making, Using, Offering for sale,              PASCUAL GODINES VS. COURT                   OF     It is such that a mechanic of ordinary skill in
SMITH KLINE BECKMAN CORPORATION                         Selling, or Importing a patented              APPEALS [G.R. No. 97343, ibid]                     construction of similar machinery, having the
VS. CA [G.R. No. 126627]                                product or a product obtained directly                                                           forms, specifications and machine before him,
                                                        or indirectly from a patented process,        SV-agro enterprise bought a power tiller from      could substitute in the place of the
Smith Kline Beckman Corp., with a Letters               or                                            Magdalena Villaruza. In a later date, the sale     mechanism described without the exercise of
Patent for its invention which contains a            - Use of a patented process without the          of SV-Agro declined by 50% that’s why they         the inventive faculty.
method utilizing a compound as an active                authorization of the patentee. (Sec.          held an investigation and found out that                DOCTRINE OF THE FILE WRAPPER
ingredient in fighting infections caused by             76, IPC)                                      Pascual Godines sold the same power tiller                           ESTOPPEL
gastrointestinal parasites and lungworms in           TEST FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT                    without authorization.
animals, sued Tryco Pharma Corp., which                                                                                                                  This doctrine balances the doctrine of
manufactures, distributes, and sells Impregon          1. Literal Infringement Test                   SMITH KLINE BECKMAN CORPORATION                    equivalents. Patentee is precluded from
for    patent     infringement    and    unfair    Resort must be had, in the first instance, to      VS. COURT OF APPEALS, [G.R. NO. 126627]            claiming as part of patented product that
competition. Impregon contains Albendazole,        words of the claim. If the accused matter                                                             which he had to excise or modify in order to
which is intended for combating worm or            clearly falls within the claim, infringement is    Tyco Pharma is sued by Smith Kline Beckman         avoid patent office rejection, and he may omit
parasite infestations in animals. The Caloocan     committed.                                         for infringing a patent along with an allegation   any additions that he was compelled to add by
City RTC and CA denied the case, hence the                                                            of       unfair      competition.        Methyl    patent office regulations.
petition. The Supreme Court ruled that Smith       PASCUAL GODINES VS. COURT OF                       5-propylthio-2-benzimidazolecarbamate has                DOCTRINE OF CONTRIBUTORY
Kline has no rights over Albendazole since the     APPEALS, G.R. No. 97343                            been awarded a Philippines Patent Office’s                        INFRINGEMENT
Letters Patent granted to the entity fails to      SV Agro Industries investigated their              Letter Patent no. 14561; Albendazole was used
yield anything regarding the compound.             Zamboanga Del Sur Branch after finding out         in a drug called Impregon by Tyco Pharma that      Anyone who actively induces the infringement
Therefore, Smith Kline does not have the right     they are suffering a more than 50% decline on      deals with veterinary products produced in the     of a patent or provides the infringer with a
to sue Tryco Pharma Corp. for patent               their sales. It was found out that Godines is      country. Smith Kline’s complaint was               component of a patented product or of a
infringement and unfair competition.               producing power tillers substantially similar to   dismissed and the said letter was revoked. The     product produced because of a patented
            PARALLEL IMPORTER                      the patent and produces substantially the          decision was reversed by the Court of Appeals      process knowing it to be especially adopted
                                                   same result when used. The Supreme Court           who noted that Tyco Pharma could not be held       for infringing the patented invention and not
One which imports, distributes, and sells          used the Literal infringement test and ruled       liable for featuring an Impregon tablet with       suitable for substantial non-infringing use
genuine     products    in    the     market,      that Godines committed patent infringement         the same active ingredient. Tyco Pharma did        shall be liable as a contributory infringer and
independently of an exclusive distributorship      after careful examination between the two          not commit patent infringement, according to       shall be jointly and severally liable with the
or agency agreement with the manufacturer.         power tillers and showed that they operate on      The Supreme Court. Albendazole is a drug           infringer. (Sec. 42, R.A. No. 165a)
                                                   the same fundamental principles. It is             that was produced by Smith Klein
 REMEDIES OF THE OWNER OF THE                        WHO CAN FILE AN ACTION FOR                                     LICENSING                           5. If the patented invention is not being
 PATENT AGAINST INFRINGEMENT                              INFRINGEMENT?                                                                                    worked in the Philippines on a
                                                                                                   Modes of obtaining license to exploit                   commercial scale, although capable of
 1. Civil action for infringement - The            1. The patentee or his successors-in-           patent rights.                                          being worked, without satisfactory
    owner may bring a civil action with the           interest may file an action for                                                                      reason after the expiration of 4 years
    appropriate Regional Trial Court to               infringement.      (Creser       Precision      1. Voluntary licensing (Sec. 85, IPC) and            from the date of filing of the
    recover from infringer the damages                Systems, Inc. v. CA, G.R. No. 118708, Feb.      2. Compulsory licensing (Sec. 93, IPC)               application or 3 years from the date of
    sustained by the former, plus attorney’s          2, 1998)                                                                                             the patent whichever is later. (Sec. 93 in
    fees and other litigation expenses, and                                                                  VOLUNTARY LICENSING                           relation to Sec. 94)
    to secure an injunction for the                2. Any foreign national or juridical entity                                                          6. Where the demand for patented drugs
    protection of his rights.                         who meets the requirements of Sec. 3         The grant by the patent owner to a third                and medicines is not being met to an
                                                      and not engaged in business in the           person of the right to exploit a patented               adequate extent and on reasonable
 2. Criminal action for infringement - If             Philippines, to which a patent has been      invention.                                              terms, as determined by the Secretary
    the infringement is repeated, the                 granted or assigned, whether or not it is                                                            of the Department of Health (Sec. 10,
    infringer shall be criminally liable and          licensed to do business in the               Rights of a licensor in voluntary                       R.A 9502)
    upon      conviction,    shall     suffer         Philippines. (Sec. 77, IPC)                  licensing?                                         GROUNDS FOR CANCELLATION OF THE
    imprisonment of not less than six (6)                                                                                                                      COMPULSORY LICENSE
    months but not more than three (3)                DEFENSES IN AN ACTION FOR                    In the absence of any provision to the               1. Ground for the grant of the
    years and/or a fine not less than                      INFRINGEMENT                            contrary in the technology transfer                     compulsory license no longer exists
    P100,000.00 but not more than                                                                  arrangement, the grant of a license shall               and is unlikely to recur;
    P300,000.00.                                   1. Invalidity of the patent; (Sec. 81, IPC);    not prevent the licensor from granting               2. Licensee has neither begun to supply
                                                   2. Any of the grounds for cancellation of       further licenses to third person nor from               the domestic market nor made serious
 3. Administrative remedy - Where the                 patents:                                     exploiting the subject matter of the                    preparation therefore;
   amount of damages claimed is not less                 a. That what is claimed as the            technology transfer arrangement himself              3. Licensee has not complied with the
   than P200,000.00, the patentee may                        invention is not new or               (Sec. 89, IPC).                                         prescribed terms of the license.
   choose to file an administrative action                   patentable                                WHO CAN GRANT A COMPULSORY
   against the infringer with the Bureau of                                                                           LICENSE                         PRICE ET. AL VS. UNILAB [166 SCRA 133]
   Legal Affairs (BLA). The BLA can issue                 b. That the patent does not
   injunctions, direct infringer to pay                      disclose the invention in a              1. The Director of Legal Affairs                Price et al. owns “aminoalkyl furan derivatives”
   patentee damages, but unlike regular                      manner sufficiently clear and            2. R.A. 9502 (Universally Accessible            which was granted by compulsory license to
   courts, the BLA may not issue search                      complete for it to be carried out            Cheaper and Quality Medicines Act of        UNILAB by the Director General with a 2.5%
   and seizure warrants or warrants of                       by any person skilled in the art;            2008) however amended Sec. 93               of net sales royalty fee which Price et al.
   arrest.                                                   or                                          GROUNDS FOR COMPULSORY                       petitioned with the thought that it is unfair
LIMITATION TO THE CIVIL/CRIMINAL                                                                       LICENSING AND THE PERIOD FOR                   and should be lowered, however the decision
               ACTION                                     c. That the patent is contrary to                    FILING A PETITION                      of the CA reflects on Section 34 of the IPO
                                                             public order or morality. (Sec. 61,                                                      gazette which renders the royalty fee just.
                                                             IPC)                                  Grounds for compulsory licensing and the            ASSIGNMENTS AND TRANSMISSION OF
 1. No damages can be recovered for acts of
                                                                                                   period for filing a petition?                                          RIGHTS
    infringement committed more than
    four (4) years before the filing of the     ROSARIO MAGUAN vs. COURT                    OF        1. National emergency
    action for infringement. (Sec. 79, IPC)     APPEALS AND SUSANA LUCHAN,                            2. Where the public interest, at any time       Forms of Assignment
                                                [G.R. L-45101]                                           after the grant of the patent                   1. Total – assignment of entire right, title
 2. The criminal action prescribes in three                                                           3. Where a judicial or administrative                 or interest in and to the patent and the
    (3) years from the commission of the        Rosario Maguan claims that the powder puffs              body has determined that the manner                invention covered thereby.
    crime. (Sec. 84, IPC)                       Susana Luchan manufactures and sells are                 of exploitation by the owner of the             2. Partial
                                                identical to her patented powder puffs                   patent      or     his     licensee     is             a. Separate rights – assignment of a
                                                resulting in issuance of preliminary injunction          anti‐competitive at any time after the                    specific right
                                                which was later on set aside by the CA on the            grant of the patent                                    b. Pro Indiviso – assignment of an
                                                ground of lack of novelty upon judicial               4. In case of public non‐commercial use                      aliquot part which results in
                                                examination of the invalidity of the patents.            of the patent by the patentee, without                    co‐ownership
                                                                                                         satisfactory reason at any time after the
                                                                                                         grant of the patent
How is transfer of right affected?               Functions of Trademarks                           ECOLE DE CUISINE MANILLE (CORDON                    Collective Mark
  1. By inheritance or bequest                      1. To point out distinctly the origin or       BLEU OF THE PHILIPPINES), INC. vs.
  2. License contract                                  ownership of the articles to which it is    RENAUS COINTREAU [G.R. NO. 185830]                  A "collective mark" or "collective trade name" is
                                                       affixed.                                                                                        a mark or trade name used by the members of
Effect of an assignment of a patent                 2. To secure to him who has been                  Ecole De Cuisine Manille, Inc. (Ecole)           a cooperative, an association or other
                                                       instrumental in bringing into market a      opposed Cointreau's trademark application for       collective group or organization. (Sec. 40, R.A.
The assignment works as an estoppels by                superior article or merchandise the         the mark "LE CORDON BLEU & DEVICE” for              166)
deed, preventing the assignor from denying             fruit of his industry and skill.            goods falling under "Nice Classification"
the novelty and utility of the patented             3. To prevent fraud and imposition.            (subject mark) in the Philippines, claiming         It is any visible sign designated as such in the
invention when sued y the assignee for                 (Etepha v. Director of Patents, G.R. No.    they were the owner of the mark "LE                 application for registration and capable of
infringement.                                          L‐20635, Mar. 31, 1966)                     CORDON BLEU, ECOLE DE CUISINE                       distinguishing the origin or any other
                                                                                                   MANILLE" and had been using it since 1948.          common characteristics, including the quality
Form of Assignment                                                                                 Cointreau, however, argued that they were the       of goods or services of different enterprises
                                                 Trade Name
   1. In writing                                                                                   true and lawful owner of the mark, as they had      which use the sign under the control of the
                                                        A name or designation identifying or
   2. Acknowledged and certified before a                                                          filed applications for the mark's registration in   registered owner of the collective mark.
                                                 distinguishing an enterprise.
      notary public or other officer                                                               various      jurisdictions,     including     the
                                                                                                                                                       Salient Features of the Paris Convention
      authorized to perform notarial acts                                                          Philippines, and had a worldwide acclaimed
                                                                                                                                                       Trademarks
   3. Recorded in the IPO                        COFFEE PARTNERS vs SAN MIGUEL                     culinary school named Le Cordon Bleu since
                                                 COFFEE ROASTERY [G.R. No. 169504]                 1895.                                                  1.   National Treatment Principle – foreign
Effect if the assignment was not recorded                                                          The      Court’s decision was in favor of                   nationals are to be given the same
in the IPO                                       Petitioner's opening of "SAN FRANCISCO            Cointreau, stating that Cointreau had been                  treatment in each         of the member
The assignment works as an estoppel by deed,     COFFEE" in Libis, Quezon City resulted in         using the subject mark in France since 1895,                countries as that country makes
preventing the assignor from denying the         confusion and a complaint from respondent to      before Ecole's claimed first use in the                     available in its own citizens.
novelty and utility of the patented invention    the BLA-IPO for infringement. Petitioner          Philippines in 1948. Additionally, Ecole had no        2.   Right of Priority – any person who has
when sued by the assignee for infringement.      argues    that    without     registration,  an   certificate of registration for the subject mark,           duly filed registration for trademark
                                                 infringement suit is not viable, alleging         declaring Cointreau as the true and lawful                  shall enjoy a right of priority of 6
Licensee Maintains a suit for infringement       respondent's trade name abandonment due to        owner of the subject mark and allowed its                   months (Rule 203, Trademark Rules)
                                                 expired registration in June 2000 and late        registration in the Philippines                        3.   Protection against Unfair Competition
GR: Only the patentees, his heirs, assignee,     renewal in 2001, while emphasizing the                                                                   4.   Protection of Trade names – protected
grantee or personal representatives may bring    likelihood of confusion among purchasers and      DIFFERENCE        OF    TRADEMARK           AND             in all countries without obligation of
an action for infringement.                      the necessity of consent for trademark or trade   TRADE NAME                                                  filing or registration.
                                                 name usage.                                           TRADEMARK               TRADE NAME                 5.   Protection of Well‐Known Marks
XPN: If the licensing agreement provides that
the licensee may bring an action for             FREDCO            MANUFACTURING                      Goods or services     A natural or artificial    ACQUISITION OF OWNERSHIP OF MARK
infringement or if he was authorized to do so    CORPORATION VS PRESIDENT AND                            offered by a         person who does
by the patentee through a special power of       FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE [G.R No.                    proprietor or           business and           Marks are acquired solely through registration.
attorney.                                        185917, ibid]                                          enterprise are           produces or           (Sec. 122, IPC)
               TRADEMARKS                                                                               designated by        performs the goods
                                                 Fredco Manufacturing Corporation petitioned         trademark (goods)           or services           Marks that may be registered
                                                 to cancel Harvard University's trademark             or service marks          designated by
   MARKS, COLLECTIVE MARKS, AND                                                                                                                        Any word, name, symbol, emblem, device,
                                                 "Harvard Veritas Shield Symbol" (Registration           (services).        trademark or service
           TRADE NAMES                                                                                                                                 figure, sign, phrase, or any combination
                                                 No. 56561) in Classes 16, 18, 21, 25, and 28,                                      mark.              thereof except those enumerated under
                                                 alleging prior usage of the mark "Harvard" for
Trademarks                                                                                                                    Refers to business       Section 123, IPC.
                                                 apparel items; however, the Court of Appeals        Refers to the goods
                                                 affirmed Harvard's ownership of the mark and                                  and its goodwill.       Requirements for a mark to be registered
Any visible sign capable of distinguishing the   invalidated Fredco's registration, citing
goods (trademark) or services (service mark)     Harvard's global recognition and protection          Acquired only by           Need not be              1. A visible sign (not sounds or scents);
of an enterprise.                                                                                       registration.            registered.                 and
                                                 under the Paris Convention, preventing
                                                 unauthorized usage of the "Harvard" name or                                                              2. Capable of distinguishing one’s goods
It shall include a stamped or marked             mark in the Philippines.                                                                                    and services from another.
container of goods
  DOCTRINE OF SECONDARY MEANING                     Laboratory was indeed invalid. The Court           and alleged conflicts with local IP law, the      Philippine Shoe Expo failed to file the required
                                                    found that the patent did not meet the             Supreme Court dismissed the petition,             10th Year Declaration of Actual Use, resulting
This doctrine is to the effect that a word or       requirements for novelty, inventive step, and      affirming the compatibility of Madrid Protocol    in the cancellation of their mark. Despite
phrase originally incapable of exclusive            industrial applicability, as prescribed by         procedures with the IP Code, emphasizing the      initial rulings of the BLA of the IPO and the
appropriation with reference to an article on       Philippine intellectual property laws.             distinctiveness of IPOPHL's registration          CA in favor of Philippine Shoe Expo, the
the market, because it is geographical or                                                              process, and highlighting the protocol's          Birkenstock Orthopaedie GmbH is the
otherwise descriptive, may nevertheless be          E.Y INDUSTRIAL SALES VS. SHEN DAR                  adherence to national law in trademark            true and lawful owner of the mark
used exclusively by one producer with               ELECTRICITY AND MACHINERY CO. [G.R.                examination, leading to the dismissal of the      “Birkenstock and Devices”. Under Section 12
reference to his article so long as in that trade   No. 184850]                                        petition and ordering the petitioner to cover     of RA 166, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of
and to that branch of the purchasing public,                                                           legal expenses.                                   Birkenstock, emphasizing that registration of
the word or phrase has come to mean that the        Both companies claimed to have the right to
                                                    register the trademark "VESPA" for air                                                               the trademark, by itself, is not a mode of
article was his product.                                                                               SUPERIOR COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISES,
                                                    compressors. Shen Dar filed a Petition for                                                           ownership, especially when requirements like
                                                                                                       INC. VS KUNNA ENTERPRISES, INC. AND
       FILING AN OPPOSITION TO A                    Cancellation of EYIS’ COR. Shen Dar primarily                                                        the 10th Year Declaration are not met.
                                                                                                       SPORTS CONCEPT & DISTRIBUTOR [G.R.
       TRADEMARK REGISTRATION                       argued that the issuance of the COR in favor       194307]
                                                    of EYIS violated Section 123.1 paragraphs (d),                                                       TAIWAN KOLIN CORPORATION, LTD. vs.
                                                    (e) and (f) of Republic Act No. (RA) 8293,         Upon the appointment of Sports Concept &          KOLIN ELECTRONICS CO., INC (G.R No.
Any person who believes that he would be                                                               Distribution as the new exclusive distributor     209843)
                                                    otherwise known as the IP Code, having first
damaged by the registration of a mark may,                                                             in the Philippines of Kunnan Enterprises LTD,
                                                    filed an application for the mark. E.Y.
upon payment of the required fee and within                                                            Superior Commercial Enterprise, Kunnan’s          On February 29, 1996, Taiwan Kolin filed with
                                                    Industrial is the true owner of the mark.
30 days after the publication referred to in                                                           former distributor, filed a complaint of          the Intellectual Property Office (IPO), a
                                                    Ownership should not be based merely on an
Subsection 133.2, file with the Office an                                                              trademark      infringement     and     unfair    trademark application, for the use of “KOLIN”
                                                    earlier filing date. The Court found that
opposition to the application. (Sec. 134, IPC)                                                         competition for the disputed trademarks           however respondent Kolin Electronics Co., Inc.
                                                    continuous use of a trademark can outweigh
                                                                                                       “Kennex” and “Pro Kennex'' against Kunnan         (Kolin Electronics) opposed petitioner’s
                                                    the assumed ownership of the person who
                                                                                                       and Sports Concept. On March 31, 1998, the        application, As argued, the mark Taiwan Kolin
                                                    registered it and establishes the user as the
                                                                                                       RTC hold KUNNAN liable for trademark              seeks to register is identical, if not confusingly
ELIDAD C. KHO VS. COURT OF APPEALS,                 actual owner.
                                                                                                       infringement     and     unfair  competition.     similar, with its “KOLIN” mark. Is Taiwan
ET. AL. [GR. No. 115758]
                                                    PRIBHDAS J. MIRPURI vs CA [G.R. No.                KUNNAN and SPORTS CONCEPT appealed                Kolin entitled to its trademark registration of
Elidad C. Kho owned and operated KEC                114508]                                            the RTC’s decision to the CA. The CA reversed     “KOLIN” over its specific goods? The Court
Cosmetics Laboratory, involved in the                                                                  and set aside the RTC’s decision. It dismissed    ruled that the products covered by the
                                                    Lolita Escobar filed a trademark application                                                         trademark sought to be registered by Taiwan
cosmetics industry, filed a complaint for                                                              SUPERIOR’s Complaint ruling that SUPERIOR
                                                    for "Barbizon" for brassieres and ladies'                                                            Kolin, on the one hand, and those covered by
injunction and damages with a prayer for the                                                           was a mere distributor and had no right to the
                                                    undergarments, opposed by the US-based                                                               the prior issued certificate of registration in
issuance of a writ of preliminary injunction,                                                          registration of the disputed trademarks since
                                                    Barbizon Corporation due to potential                                                                favor of Kolin Electronics, on the other, fall
against      the     Summerville       General                                                         the right to register a trademark is based on
                                                    confusion with its own trademark; after the                                                          under the same categories in the NCL is not
Merchandising and Company (Summerville,                                                                ownership.
                                                    opposition was dismissed and the registration                                                        the sole and decisive factor in determining
for brevity). The complaint alleges that KHO,
                                                    granted to Escobar but later cancelled due to                                                        a possible violation of Kolin Electronics’
is the registered owner of the copyrights Chin                                                         BIRKENSTOCK ORTHOPAEDIE GMBH &
                                                    failure to file an affidavit of use, the Supreme                                                     intellectual     property        right     should
Chun      Su    and   Oval     Facial   Cream                                                          CO. KG. vs. PHILIPPINE SHOE EXPO
                                                    Court affirmed the decision, citing the Paris                                                        petitioner’s application be granted.
Container/Case, and has patent rights on                                                               MARKETING CORPORATION [G.R NO.
                                                    Convention, an international treaty protecting
medicated cream. Summerville in their                                                                  194307]
                                                    industrial property rights.                                                                             ACQUISITION AND OWNERSHIP OF
defense claim that they’re the sole and
authorized importer, distributor of Chin Chun       INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ASSOCIATION                  Birkenstock, a German company, applied for                    TRADE NAME
Su products made by Taiwan's Shun Yi                OF THE PHILIPPINES VS. PAQUITO                     trademark registrations “Birkenstock and
Factory; and gave Summerville permission to         OCHOA [G.R No. 204605]                             Devices” with the IPO however their               Trade names or business names are acquired
register Chin Chun Su Medicated Cream as its                                                           application were suspended due to an existing     through adoption and use. Registration is not
                                                    The Madrid System, a centralized trademark         registration by Shoe Town International           required. (Sec. 165, IPC)
trade name with the Philippine Patent Office
                                                    registration system, allows for global             Industrial Corporation, predecessor-in-interest           NON-REGISTRABLE MARKS
and other relevant governmental agencies.
                                                    trademark protection through a single              of the Philippine Shoe Expo Marketing
The Court dismissed the petition filed by and       application and fee, governed by the Madrid        Corporation who has been using the said trade        1. Consists of immoral, deceptive or
upheld the decision of the Court of Appeals,        Agreement and Protocol; despite challenges         mark for 16 years. Birkenstock filed a                  scandalous matter or falsely suggest a
ruling that the patent held by KEC Cosmetics        by IPAP on the Philippines' ratification of the    cancellation case, on the other hand
                                                    Madrid Protocol without Senate agreement
   connection with persons, institutions,         9. Consists exclusively of signs that have      KENSONIC, INC., PETITIONER, VS.                  MATTEL, INC. VS. FRANCISCO, ET AL [G.R.
   beliefs, or national symbols                      become customary or usual to                 UNI-LINE MULTI-RESOURCES, INC.,                  NO. 166886]
                                                     designate the goods or services in           (PHIL.), RESPONDENT [G.R. NO. 211820]
2. Consists of the flag or coat of arms or           everyday language and established                                                             Mattel Inc, the trademark holder of “Barbie”
   other insignia of the Philippines or any          trade practice                               The application of Uni-Line Multi-Resources,     doll products filed against Jimmy A. Uy's
   of its political subdivisions, or of any                                                       Inc. to register the trademark "SAKURA" for a    trademark application for the trademark
   foreign nation                                 10. Consists exclusively that may serve in      variety of appliances and electronics was        "Barbie" confectionary products stating the
                                                      trade to designate the kind, quality,       opposed by Kensonic Inc. Kensonic argued         likelihood of confusion however, the Director
3. Consists of a name, portrait or                    quantity, intended purpose, value,          that Uni-Line's use of the mark would confuse    of the Bureau of Trademarks (BOT) had
   signature identifying a particular living          geographical origin, time or production     customers because they had previously used       already declared Uy’s trademark application
   individual except by his written                   of the goods or rendering of the            "SAKURA" for electronics. The court decided      abandoned due to his failure to file the
   consent, or the name, signature, or                services, or other characteristics of the   that although Kensonic and Uni-Line's            required Declaration of Actual Use (DAU)
   portrait of a deceased President of the            goods or services                           products were sufficiently distinct to prevent   within three years from filing date of
   Philippines, during the life of his widow                                                      confusion, "SAKURA" may be trademarked           application thus, the petition is dismissed for
   except by written consent of the widow         11. Consists of shapes that may be              since it was not generic for the goods. While    being moot and academic with no
                                                      necessitated by technical factors or by     Uni-Line's Class 9 items were replacement        pronouncement as to costs.
4. Identical with a registered mark                   the nature of the goods themselves or       components like voltage regulators, Kensonic's
   belonging to a different proprietor or a           factors that affect their intrinsic value   electronics were primarily finished products         TEST TO DETERMINE CONFUSING
   mark with an earlier filing or priority                                                        like DVD players.                                     SIMILARITY BETWEEN MARKS
   date, in respect of:                           12. Consists of color alone, unless defined              PRIOR USE OF MARK AS A
                                                                                                                 REQUIREMENT                          1. Dominancy test - infringement occurs
      a. The same goods or services, or               by a given form; or
                                                                                                                                                         if a competing trademark shares the
      b. Closely related goods goods or
                                                                                                  Actual prior use in commerce in the                    dominant features of another, leading
           services, or                           13. Is contrary to public order or morality.
                                                                                                  Philippines has been abolished as a condition          to confusion.
      c. If it nearly resembles such a                (Sec. 123)
           markas to be likely to deceive or                                                      for the registration of a trademark. (RA 8293)
                                                                                                                                                      2. Totality or holistic test - confusing
           cause confusion;                    SOCIETE DES PRODUITS, NESTLE, S.A. vs.
                                                                                                  Exceptions:                                            similarity is assessed based on visual,
                                               PUREGOLD PRICE CLUB, INC. [G.R. No.
                                                                                                     1. If caused by circumstances arising               aural, and connotative comparisons,
5. Is identical with an internationally        217194]
                                                                                                        independently of the will of the owner.          along with overall impressions from
   well-known mark, whether or not it is
                                                                                                                                                         encountering the marks in the
   registered here, used for identical or      Nestle filed an opposition against Puregold's
                                                                                                     2. A use which does not alter its                   marketplace.
   similar goods or service                    application for registration claiming that there
                                               is a confusing similarity between Nestle's               distinctive character though the use is
                                                                                                        different from the form in which it is     SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE, S.A. vs.
6. Is identical with an internationally        "COFFEE-MATE" and Puregold's "COFFEE
                                                                                                        registered.                                COURT    OF   APPEALS      AND  CFC
   well-known mark which is registered in      MATCH" trademark that would suggest that
                                                                                                                                                   CORPORATION [G.R. NO. 112012]
   the Philippines with respect to             they were associated and would probably
   non‐similar goods or services.              mislead the public into believing that the            3. Use of mark in connection with one or      Nestle has a product called MASTER ROAST
   Provided, that the interests of the         mark originated from Nestle, which would                 more of the goods/services belonging to    and MASTER BLEND, on the other hand, CFC
   owner of the registered mark are likely     incur damages if the application were                    the class in which the mark is             corporation also registered its own "FLAVOR
   to be damaged by such use                   approved.                                                registered.                                MASTER," the court ruled that the trademark
                                                                                                                                                   "FLAVOR MASTER" for instant coffee was a
7. Is likely to mislead the public as to the   The court denied the petition. It concluded           4. The use of a mark by a company-related     colorable imitation of Nestle's trademarks
   nature, quality, characteristics or         that the word "COFFEE", a dominant feature               goods to the applicant/registrant.         "MASTER ROAST" and "MASTER BLEND,"
   geographical origin of the goods or         of both marks, is a generic or descriptive word                                                     using the dominancy test to determine
   services                                    that cannot be exclusively appropriated.              5. The use of a mark by a person              confusing similarity because the word
                                               However, with the marks between “-MATE"                  controlled by the registrant. (Section     "MASTER" was prominently featured in
8. Consists exclusively of signs that are      and "MATCH" they are not confusingly similar             152, IPC)                                  Nestle's marks, emphasizing its significant
   generic for the goods or services that      and that there is no likelihood of confusion                                                        association with Nestle's good.
   they seek to identify                       between the two marks.
                                                                                                                                                   MCDONALD’S CORPORATION vs.L.C BIG
                                                                                                                                                   MAK BURGER [G.R . NO. 143993]
McDonald's owns the "Big Mac" trademark in         ornamental plants, with the same amount of          IPO-BLA, IPO-DG, and CA believed that there         but they filed for motion of cancellation on the
the US and the Philippines. L.C. Big Mak           dosage and application manner.                      was no similarity between the mentioned             grounds of non-use, despite the lack of physical
Burger, a domestic corporation operating                                                               marks. However, the Supreme Court ruled             locations, the court maintained Starwood's
                                                   PHILIP MORRIS, INC vs. FORTUNE                                                                          ownership of the "W" trademark in the
fast-food outlets, attempted to to register the                                                        otherwise, stating that the similarity was
                                                   TOBACCO CORPORATION G.R. No. 158589,                                                                    Philippines, finding that the company's online
"Big Mak '' mark for their burgers, leading to                                                         proved through the application of the
                                                   JUNE 27, 2006                                                                                           presence through registered domain names
objections from McDonald's due to its                                                                  dominancy test. According to the Court, the
                                                                                                                                                           constituted legitimate commercial use of the mark.
similarity to their Big Mac mark. The Court                                                            conflicting marks have exactly the same
                                                   Philip Morris, Inc, is a foreign corporation.
ruled in favor of Mcdonalds and through using                                                          dominant element and have the potential to          SERI SOMBOONSAKDIKUL vs. ORLANE
                                                   They didn’t secure their license in the
dominancy test and through the evidence                                                                deceive consumers into thinking that OK             S.A., [G.R. No. 188996]
                                                   Philippines. It has a trademark “MARK VII,
presented, it showed that L.C. Big Mak Burger                                                          Hotdog Inasal is associated with Mang Inasal.
                                                   MARKTEN, AND LARK”. On the other hand,
used "Big Mak" on their sandwich packaging,                                                            Therefore, the court orders that the                Seri Somboonsakdikul’s application for
                                                   Fortune Tobacco has a trademark “MARK”.
which closely resembled those used by                                                                  application to register the mark be denied.         registration of the mark LOLANE was rejected
                                                   Foreign Corporation saying that Fortune
McDonald's.                                                                                                                                                by the Bureau of Legal Affairs (BLA) while
                                                   Tobacco committed Trademark Infringement
                                                                                                       CITIGROUP, INC. vs. CITYSTATE SAVINGS               respondent filed an opposition to the
MCDONALD’S CORPORATION vs. MACJOY                  by using “MARK”.
                                                                                                       BANK, INC. [G.R. No. 205409]                        application claiming that the mark LOLANE
FAST FOOD CORPORATION [G.R. No.                                                                                                                            was similar to ORLANE in which the CA
166115]                                            Note: The dominancy test focuses solely on
                                                                                                       The trademark dispute between Citigroup, Inc.       concluded that the two marks are confusingly
                                                   visual comparisons, while the totality or
                                                                                                       and Citystate Savings Bank, Inc. involved the       similar by using the dominancy test, that is
MacJoy Fastfood Corporation, a corporation         holistic test considers visual, aural, and
                                                                                                       similarity between their marks, "CITI" and          reversed since the visual and aural aspects of
engaged in the sale of fast food products in       connotative elements, as well as overall
                                                                                                       "CITY," respectively, with Citigroup claiming       the two marks showed that there is no
Cebu City, applied for the registration of the     impressions between trademarks.
                                                                                                       confusion, however, the Supreme Court ruled         colorable imitation resulting to the petitioner’s
trademark "MACJOY & DEVICE" and                                                                        in favor of Citystate, denying Citigroup's          application of mark LOLANE being granted.
McDonald’s Corporation, a corporation under        SKECHERS, USA vs INTER PACIFIC
                                                                                                       petition, emphasizing the prevalent feature of
the laws of the State of Delaware, USA, filed a    INDUSTRIAL CORP. [G.R No. 164321]                                                                       VICTORIO DIAZ vs. PEOPLE OF THE
                                                                                                       Citystate which is the golden lion's head
verified Notice of Opposition against MacJoy                                                           device and the limited similarity between the       PHILIPPINES, [G.R. NO. 180677]
                                                   Skechers USA file an application for a search
Fastfood Corporation for having a resemblance                                                          marks, concluding that they were not
                                                   warrant at RTC Branch 24 of Manila against
for their logo, an identical or related goods,                                                         confusingly similar, especially in the context of   Diaz was reportedly selling fake LEVI'S 501
                                                   outlets operated by Inter Pacific Industrial
and the trademark applied for would confuse                                                            ATM services.                                       jeans in his tailoring shops and this
                                                   Corp, however the NBI confiscated 6,000 pairs
or deceive purchasers into believing that the                                                                                                              information made Levi's Philippines employ a
                                                   of shoes with mark of stylized “S” which is
goods originate from the same source or                                                                                                                    private detective agency for confirmation. The
                                                   similar to the registered stylized “S” mark of
origin, which then, the IPO used the                                                                   SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE, S.A. vs.               NBI took away many fake LEVI'S 501 trousers
                                                   Skechers but Inter Pacific file a petition to
dominancy test in concluding that there was                                                            DY, M. [G.R. No. 172276]                            from the premises arguing that they were done
                                                   overturn the warrant as they claim that their
confusing similarity between the two (2)                                                                                                                   and traded without any authority from Levi's
                                                   shoes are not similar to what Skechers
trademarks in question as it took note of the                                                          Nestle complained about Martin Dy's                 and bore registered marks. They found Diaz’s
                                                   manufactures and RTC favors the Inter Pacific
appearance of the predominant features "M",                                                            unregistered trademark "NANNY" resembling           use of his brand LS Jeans Tailoring as evidence
                                                   and directs NBI to return the confiscated
"Mc" and/or "Mac" in both the marks.                                                                   their registered trademark "NAN," alleging          against him saying he used Levi’s jeans as a
                                                   goods,     nonetheless Skechers file for
                                                                                                       potential public confusion, and the Court,          reference point when designing. It was not
BERRIS AGRICULTURAL CO., INC. vs                   reconsideration and Supreme Court corrects
                                                                                                       using the dominancy test, affirmed the RTC's        necessary to use a linguistic point since it was
ABYADANG, N. [G.R. No. 183404]                     the decision of the RTC and CA with the use
                                                                                                       first ruling that "NANNY" is confusingly            general knowledge that Levi’s is always
                                                   of Holistic or Totality test, that the product of
                                                                                                       similar to the prevalent feature of Nestle's        different from any other brand. Similarly there
Berris Agricultural Co., Inc. filed a Verified     both parties are significantly similar, therefore
                                                                                                       "NAN" trademark and could cause public              was no point in entering into classification
Notice of Opposition in contrast with the          Supreme court declares that Inter Pacific was
                                                                                                       confusion, particularly because they have the       since there were two independent identifiers
trademark application filed by Norvy               guilty for Trademark infringement.
                                                                                                       same product classification, establishing           according to judgment which were Diaz and
Abyadang for "NS D-10 PLUS," as it is
                                                   MANG INASAL PHILIPPINES, INC. VS IFP                infringement.                                       Levi’s..
confusingly similar to Berris' registered
                                                   MANUFACTURING CORP [G.R. No. 221717]
trademark "D-10 80 WP," which was affirmed                                                             W LAND HOLDINGS, INC. vs. STARWOOD
                                                   Mang Inasal Philippines Inc. opposed the                                                                UFC PHILIPPINES vs. FIESTA BARRIO
by the Supreme Court, applying the                                                                     HOTELS AND RESORTS WORLDWIDE,
                                                   application to register the mark, OK Hotdog                                                             CORP. [GR No. 198889]
Dominancy Test and with the fact that both                                                             INC.[ G.R. NO. 222366]
                                                   Inasal Cheese Hotdog Flavor Mark, of IFP
have the same type of goods—fungicide (Class                                                                                                               The “PAPA” mark by UFC contested Barrio
                                                   Manufacturing Corp., arguing that the OK
5) with 80% Mancozeb and are used for                                                                  Starwood filed trademark ‘W’ which W Land           Fiesta’s “PAPA BOY & DEVICE” claiming that it
                                                   Hotdog Inasal mark shares similar features to
similar groups of fruits, crops, vegetables, and                                                       holdings also registered ‘W’, which was rejected,   could cause confusion seeing as their product
                                                   their registered Mang Inasal mark. The
is lechon sauce which might cause a possibility    REVERSIBLE WAVE LINE" and "DOUBLE                   alternative products. If the public does not      and La Campana for trademark infringement
to confuse customers who have an                   CURVE LINES." The Court emphasized the              expect the plaintiff to create or sell the same   and unfair competition claiming that Mighty
accumulated goodwill to “PAPA”, in line with       importance of consistency in judicial decisions     goods as the defendant, there is no               and La Campana ride on the reputation and
this the IPO Director General used the             and the need to protect the rights of               trademark infringement.                           popularity of the Gallo trademark by using it
dominancy test while the CA used the holistic      trademark owners.                                                                                     for their product in the Philippines, Gallo
test, however the ruling of the Supreme Court                                                                   RULE OF IDEM SONANS                      Cigarettes. The Court determined that
is that the dominancy test must be used since      EMERALD GARMENT MANUFACTURING                                                                         petitioners cannot be held responsible for
the dominancy features of well-known “PAPA”        CORPORATION V. H.D. LEE COMPANY,                    Two names are said to be “idem sonantes” if       trademark infringement or unfair competition,
already established a good reputation and that     INC., [G.R. No. 100098]                             the attentive ear finds difficulty in             stated that Gallo cigarettes and Gallo wines are
“PAPA” is not a generic name for it is based on    HD LEE Company, a foreign corporation               distinguishing them when pronounced.              not identical, similar or related goods for the
the name of the founder itself.                    behind the mark “LEE” filed a petition to           (Martin v. State, 541 S.W 2d 605)                 reason alone that they were purportedly forms
                                                   BPTTT a cancellation of registration of                                                               of vice and emphasized the principle that the
DERMALINE,    INC.      vs.      MYRA              Emerald         Garment          Manufacturing      Note: Similar sound suffices for confusion if     mere use of an identical mark does not
PHAMACEUTICALS, INC. [G.R. No. 190065]             Corporation’s “STYLISTIC MR. LEE” due to the        used on similar goods. (Marvex Commercial v.      automatically        constitute       trademark
                                                   word “Lee” on their trademark. Director of          Director of Patent, G.R. No. L‐19297, Dec. 22,    infringement. Furthermore, there is no
Dermaline, Inc. filed an application for           BPTTT used the Test of dominancy and                1966)                                             substantiated proof that the petitioners acted
registration of the trademark "DERMALINE           holistic and erred that was confusingly similar.     TYPES OF CONFUSION ARISE FROM THE                with malice, bad faith, or fraud, nor did they
DERMALINE, INC." with the IPO. Myra                The CA affirmed the decision of Director of             USE OF SIMILAR OR COLORABLE                   have any intention to exploit the reputation of
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. filed a Verified             BPTTT. However, Supreme Court ruled that it                     IMITATION MARKS                       the respondents' Gallo brand by using it for
                                                   is not confusingly similar since the requisite is                                                     their unrelated cigarette products.
Opposition,     claiming     that Dermaline's
                                                   Colorable Imitation. Although on its label the         1. Confusion of goods (product confusion)
trademark is likely to cause confusion with        word "LEE" is prominent, the trademark                 2. Confusion of business (source or origin     SEHWANI,   INCORPORATED AND/OR
their own trademark "DERMALIN" and argued          should be considered as a whole and not                   confusion)                                  BENITA’S FRITES, INC. vs. IN-N-OUT
that the marks are practically identical, with     piecemeal                                                   COLORABLE IMITATION                       BURGER, INC. [G.R NO. 171053]
the first eight letters being the same and the             RELATED GOODS PRINCIPLE
                                                                                                       A close or ingenious imitation that deceives      IN-N-OUT Burger, California, USA based
pronunciation       being      identical.   The                                                                                                          corporation, and not doing business in the
                                                   Goods are related goods when they;                  ordinary persons or an ordinary purchaser into
IPO-Bureau of Legal Affairs sustained Myra's                                                                                                             Philippines filed an administrative complaint,
                                                     1. Belong or share identical descriptive          mistaking it for the original.
opposition      and     rejected     Dermaline's                                                                                                         thereby demand for the cancellation of
                                                         properties
application.The Court applied the Dominancy          2. When they share identical physical                INTERNATIONALLY WELL-KNOWN                     trademark registration and ceasing use of the
Test and the Holistic or Totality Test and held          attributes or essential characteristics in                 MARKS                                mark with the BLA of the IPO against Sehwani
that the rejection of Dermaline's application            form, composition, texture, or quality.                                                         Inc. for violation of Intellectual Property
                                                                                                                                                         Rights, for using the trade name and
was justified due to the likelihood of confusion                                                          1. The Philippines' competent authority
                                                   MIGHTY CORP. AND LA CAMPANA vs. E. &                                                                  trademarks duly owned by IN-N-OUT Burger
with Myra's previously registered trademark.                                                                 considers a "well-known" mark as
                                                   J. GALLO WINERY AND ANDRESONS                                                                         and registered in the United States as well in
                                                                                                             belonging to someone other than the
                                                   GROUP, INC. [G.R. No. 154342]                                                                         global since 1948 up to the present. The BLA
EMERALD GARMENT MANUFACTURING                                                                                applicant     or     registrant,    both
                                                                                                                                                         ruled in favor of IN-N-OUT and canceled the
CORPORATION V. H.D. LEE COMPANY,                                                                             internationally and in the Philippines.
                                                   E. & J. Gallo sued Mighty Corporation for                                                             registration of Sehwani, hereby reversed the
INC., [G.R. No. 210693]                                                                                   2. Need not be used or registered in the
                                                   trademark       infringement     and     unfair                                                       decision of the CA whereby properly dismissed
                                                                                                             Philippines
                                                   competition, when one of their employees saw                                                          as it was filed out of time. IN-N-OUT Burger,
The Supreme Court granted the petition and                                                                3. Not required to be widely known, but
                                                   the Gallo cigarettes displayed together with                                                          Inc.'s     trademarks       are   well-known
denied the registration of the trademark "LEE                                                                only by the pertinent segment of the
                                                   Gallo wines in a supermarket. Wines and                                                               internationally, and the Sehwani Inc. use
& OGIVE CURVE DESIGN" by H.D. Lee. The                                                                       public.
                                                   cigarettes are neither identical or competitive                                                       of the mark "IN-N-OUT" misrepresents the
Supreme Court emphasized that the issues in                                                                                                              source of the goods and services,
                                                   items, nor do they belong to the same class of      MIGHTY    CORPORATION        AND LA
the present case were the same as those in the                                                                                                           wherefore In-N-Out Burger, Inc. had the
                                                   goods. Wine and cigarette relatedness cannot        CAMPANA FABRICA DE TABACO, INC. vs.
previous case, and that the previous decisions                                                                                                           legal capacity to sue for the protection
                                                   be determined by product classification alone.      E&J GALLO WINERY AND THE ANDERSON
had already established Emerald's rights over                                                                                                            of its trademarks. The SC affirmed the
                                                   The focus should be on product similarities,        GROUP, INC. [G.R NO. 154342]
the registration of their marks. The Court                                                                                                               cancellation of Sehwani, Inc.'s trademark
upheld the rights of Emerald Garment               not classification or broad description. If one
                                                                                                       E&J Gallo Winery Company, a well known            registration and the order to cease and desist
Manufacturing      Corporation    over   their     individual uses a trademark for their goods, it
                                                                                                       foreign corporation, sued Mighty Corporation      from using the mark 'IN-N-OUT'.
previously    registered   marks    "DOUBLE        does not restrict others from using it for
FREDCO            MANUFACTURING                           regardless of whether the goods or            THE EFFECT OF USE OF INDICATIONS                       (McDonald’s Corporation v. L.C. Big
CORPORATION vs. PRESIDENT AND                             services indicated in the application are     BY THIRD PARTIES FOR PURPOSES                          Mak Burger, Inc., G.R. No. 143993, Aug
FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE [GR No.                        identical or similar to those of the         OTHER THAN THOSE FOR WHICH THE                          18, 2004)
185917]                                                   worldwide well-known mark.                             MARK IS USED                                    NON-COMPETING GOODS
                                                              RIGHTS CONFERRED BY
Fredco claimed that Harvard University had
                                                                  REGISTRATION                        Registration of the mark shall not confer on      Goods though they’re not in actual
no right to register the mark in class 25, since
                                                                                                      the registered owner the right to preclude        competition, they are related to each other
its Philippine registration was based on a
                                                    A certificate of trademark registration has a     third parties from using bona fide their          that might reasonably be assumed that they
foreign registration. Thus, Harvard University
                                                    term of 10 years and can be renewed for an        names, addresses, pseudonyms, a geographical      originate from one manufacturer.
could not have been considered as a prior
                                                    additional 10 years. Renewal requests must be     name, or exact indications concerning the
adopter and user of the mark in the                                                                                                                     May also be those which, being entirely
                                                    submitted within a period of 6 months before      kind, quality, quantity, destination, value,
Philippines. Harvard University, on the other                                                                                                           unrelated, could not reasonably be assumed to
                                                    or after the registration's expiration.           place of origin, or time of production or of
hand claimed that the marks “Harvard” and                                                                                                               have a common source.
                                                                                                      supply, of their goods or services.
“Harvard Veritas Shield Symbol,” had been
                                                    BERRIS AGRICULTURAL CO., INC. VS.                                                                   Infringement     in           relation       to
used in commerce since 1872, and was                                                                        TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
                                                    NORVY ABYADANG [G.R. No. 183404, ibid]                                                              non-competing goods
registered in more than 50 countries. Is there
trademark infringement? Under Article 8 of                                                            Infringement of a trademark occurs when           There is no infringement in relation to
                                                    A trademark dispute arises between Berris
the Paris Convention, as well as Section 37 of                                                        someone uses someone else's mark or trade         non-competing goods, except:
                                                    Agricultural Co., Inc. and Norvy Abyadang
R.A. No. 166, Harvard University is entitled to                                                       name in a way that could confuse or mislead
                                                    over the similarity of their fungicide marks,                                                          1. If it prevents the natural expansion of
protection in the Philippines of its trade name                                                       consumers or others about where the goods or
                                                    with the Supreme Court ruling in favor of                                                                 his business and,
“Harvard” even without registration of such                                                           services are coming from or who the business
                                                    Berris and reinstating the rejection of                                                                2. by having his business reputation
trade name in the Philippines. This means that                                                        is without the owner's permission. This could
                                                    Abyadang's trademark application.                                                                         confused with and put at the mercy of
no educational entity in the Philippines can                                                          include using someone else's mark or trade
                                                    There was a likelihood of confusion, and                                                                  the second user.
use the trade name “Harvard” without the                                                              name on labels, signs, prints, packages,
                                                    Abyadang's mark could be mistaken as an
consent of Harvard University. There is no                                                            wrappers, receptacles, advertisements, or         HICKOK MANUFACTURING vs. CA [G.R.
                                                    upgraded version of Berris' mark. Berris had
question then, and this Court so declares, that                                                       reproductions of other marks.                     No. L-44707]
                                                    established its ownership of the mark "D-10 80
"Harvard" is a well-known name and mark not
                                                    WP" through prior use and registration with                                                         The decision overturns the Court of Appeals'
only in the United States but also
                                                    the IPO. The protection of trademarks aims to                                                       dismissal of the petitioner's petition to cancel
internationally, including the Philippines.                                                           ASIA BREWERY, INC. vs THE HON. COURT
                                                    preserve the goodwill and reputation of                                                             the private respondent's "HICKOK" trademark
                                                                                                      OF    APPEALS   AND     SAN   MIGUEL
       LAW PROVIDE AS REGARDS                       businesses and safeguard the public against                                                         registration for Marikina shoes, clarifying that
                                                                                                      CORPORATION [G.R. No. 103543]
    INTERNATIONALLY‐WELL KNOWN                      confusion. The Court accorded great respect to                                                      while identical trademarks aren't mandated by
               MARKS                                the findings of the IPO, as the administrative    San Miguel Corporation filed a complaint          law, the overall similarity in appearance on
                                                    agency with expertise in trademark matters.       against Asia Brewery Inc. due to trademark        respective labels concerning associated goods
GR: The restriction on subsequent registration      Therefore, the Court reinstated the IPO's         infringement of Beer Pale Pilsen or Beer na       must      be    considered     to     determine
does not include services and goods of              rejection of Abyadang's trademark application     Beer from San Miguel Pale Pilsen, which was       infringement.
different nature or kind.                           and upheld Berris' ownership of the mark          proved wrong through the Dominancy Test,
                                                    "D-10 80 WP.                                                                                        FABERGE,      INC vs. INTERMEDIATE
                                                                                                      and that the words "pale pilsen" are generic
XPN:                                                      RIGHTS OF A REGISTERED MARK                                                                   APPELLATE COURT AND CO BENG KAY
                                                                                                      words descriptive of a type of beer originated
       1. In the Philippines, the application for                      OWNER                                                                            [G.R No. 71189]
                                                                                                      from Pilsen City, Czechoslovakia, thus the
       registration of a subsequent or similar                                                        ABI's petition for review was granted by the      Faberge Inc. sought to register the trademark
       mark may only be denied if the                  1. Protection against reproduction, or         Supreme Court.                                    "BRUT 33 and DEVICE" for various products,
       products or services mentioned in the              imitation or unauthorized use of the                                                          while Co Beng Kay applied for "BRUTE"
       application bear resemblance to those              mark (infringement of mark)                 Elements to be established in Trademark           specifically for briefs; despite Faberge's
       of the internationally well-known mark,         2. To stop entry of imported merchandise       Infringement                                      objection based on similarity with their own
       provided that the mark itself is not               into the country containing a mark          VPU                                               trademark "BRUT," the Director of Patents
       registered in the country.                         identical or similar to the registered         1. Validity of the Mark                        granted Co Beng Kay permission, a decision
       2. The registration of a subsequent or             mark.                                          2. Plaintiff's ownership of the Mark           initially reversed by the court but later upheld
       similar mark in the Philippines may be          3. To transfer or license out the mark.           3. Use of the mark or its colorable            due to clear distinctions between the products,
       denied      if     the     internationally                                                           imitation by the alleged infringer result   as emphasized by Justice Escolin's principle
       well-known mark is already registered,                                                               in “likelihood of confusion”                that using the same trademark for different
products is permissible, leading to the                an administrative action against the           while a cancellation request was pending. The      passes off his goods or business or services for
dismissal of the petition without addressing           infringer with the Bureau of Legal Affairs     court decided that both lawsuits may proceed       those of one who has already established
expense payments.                                                                                     independently. Shangri-La's challenge to the       goodwill thereto. (IPC, Sec. 168.2)
                                                    COURT WHO HAS JURISDICTION OVER
                                                                                                      registration did not hinder the Developers
CANON KABUSHIKI KAISHA vs. NSR                      VIOLATIONS    OF   INTELLECTUAL
                                                                                                      Group from suing for infringement as long as       It is passing off (or palming off) or attempting
RUBBER CORP. [GR. No. 120900]                       PROPERTY RIGHTS
                                                                                                      the registration remained valid.                   to pass off the goods or business of one person
                                                            R.A. 8293 and R.A. 166 are special laws                                                      as the goods or business of another to deceive
On January 15, 1985, NSR Rubber Corporation                                                           LEVI STRAUSS & CO. AND LEVI STRAUSS
                                                    conferring jurisdiction over violations of                                                           the public. By imitating the good's appearance,
filed an application for registration of the                                                          (PHILS.) VS. CLINTON APPARELLE INC.
                                                    intellectual property rights to the Regional                                                         the defendant misleads purchasers into buying
mark CANON for sandals (class 25) in the                                                              [G.R NO. 138900]
                                                    Trial Court. The penalty therefore is                                                                his goods under the belief that they are
(BPTTT). a Japanese corporation, filed a
                                                    imprisonment of less than 6 years, or from 2 to                                                      purchasing his competitors'. Thus, the
Verified Notice of Opposition, arguing that                                                           The Court of Appeals held that the petitioner
                                                    5 years and a fine ranging from P50,000 to                                                           defendant disguises his goods as his
registration of the trademark CANON use in                                                            Levi Strauss & Co.’s trademark consists of two
                                                    P200,000.                                                                                            competitor's to deceive the public. (Republic
goods covering in class 2 (paints, chemical                                                           elements, "Dockers" and the wing-shaped            Gas Corporation v. Petron Corporation, G. R.
products, toner, dyestuff) in NSR Rubber            CONRAD AND COMPANY, INC. vs. COURT                design, registered as a single unit while the      No. 194062, June 17, 2013)
Corporation's name would cause damage to            OF APPEALS [G.R No. 115115]                       respondent Clinton Apparelle’s “Paddocks”
their business. However, the court ruled                                                              uses only a portion of the registered trademark        TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT VS.
against the Japanese corporation, stating that      Fitrite filed for the registration of the         and not the entire registered mark thus is not             UNFAIR COMPETITION
their use of the mark covered different product     trademark "SUNSHINE" in the Bureau of             proven as a substantial invasion of the owner's
classes, and thus the exclusive right to use the    Patents, Trademarks and Technology Transfer       right therefore, the injunctive relief sought by
trademark CANON is limited to the products          (BPTTT) which was approved and authorized         the petitioners was refused.                          TRADEMARK                 UNFAIR
covered by its certificate of registration, their   Victoria Biscuits Co. to use the trademark on                                                          INFRINGEMENT             COMPETITION
opposition was unmerited.                           its products. Later on, they discovered that        LIMITATIONS ON THE ACTIONS FOR
    REMEDIES OF THE OWNER OF THE                                                                                 INFRINGEMENT                             Unauthorized use of The passing off of
                                                    Conrad was using the trademark without their
    TRADEMARK AGAINST INFRINGERS                                                                                                                          a trademark.        one's goods as those
                                                    consent.
                                                                                                      Under Intellectual Property Code, Section 159                           of another.
                                                    The Supreme Court affirmed the preliminary          1. Right of prior user – registered mark
1. Civil- The owner of the registered mark                                                                                                                Fraudulent intent is Fraudulent intent is
                                                    injunction against Conrad. Recognize the                shall be without affect against any
   may ask the court to issue a preliminary                                                                                                               unnecessary.         essential.
                                                    urgent necessity to protect Fitrite's rights to         person who, in good faith, before filing
   injunction to quickly prevent the infringer                                                              or priority date, was using the mark for
                                                    prevent further damage to their business.                                                             GR:               Prior Registration is not
   from causing damage to his business. The                                                                 purposes of his business.
                                                    Costs against petitioner. A registered mark's                                                         registration of the necessary
   court will then require the infringer to pay
                                                    validity and registrant's exclusive use rights                                                        trademark      is     a
   damages to the owner of the mark                                                                      2. Relief against publisher     – injunction
                                                    can be used for infringement actions, granting                                                        prerequisite to the
   provided the defendant is shown to have                                                                  against future printing       against an
                                                    the registrant court protection and relief.                                                           action.
   had notice of the registration of the mark                                                               innocent infringer who        is engaged
   and stop him permanently from using the                                                                                                                XPN:      Well-known
                                                                                                            solely in the business of    printing the     marks
   mark.                                            SHANGRI-LA INTERNATIONAL HOTEL                          mark.
                                                    MANAGEMENT LTD., ET AL. vs. COURT OF
2. Criminal - the owner of the trademark            APPEALS, 359 SCRA 273 (2001) [G.R. NO.               3. Relief     against    newspaper      –       NOTE: There can be unfair competition and
   may ask the court to issue a search warrant      111580]                                                 injunction against the presentation of       infringement at the same time
   and in appropriate cases, remedies                                                                       advertising matter in future issues of
   available shall also include the seizure,        The Shangri-La hotel chain and the                                                                   CATERPILLAR  INC        vs. MANALO
                                                    Developers Group both claimed ownership of              the newspaper, magazine or in
   forfeiture, and destruction of the infringing                                                            electronic communications in case the        P.SAMSON [G.R . 205972 and 164352]
   goods and of any materials and                   the "Shangri-La'' trademark and logo in the
                                                    Philippines. Shangri-La tried to cancel the             infringement    complained       of is
   implements the predominant use of which                                                                  contained in or is part of paid              Caterpillar,   Inc.,     a   foreign  company
   has been in the commission of the offense.       Developers Group's registration with the
                                                    Bureau     of   Patents,  Trademarks, and               advertisement in such materials.             specializing in footwear, clothing, and related
                                                    Technology Transfer (BPTTT) and filed a                                                              goods, and Samson, who operates retail stores
3. Administrative - if the amount of                                                                            UNFAIR COMPETITION
   damages claimed is not less than                 lawsuit to claim ownership. Developers Group                                                         in the Philippines selling similar products
   P200,000.00, the registrant may choose to        counter-sued for trademark infringement. The                                                         under Caterpillar, Inc.'s trademark which led
                                                    question was whether a lawsuit may proceed        Employing deception or any other means
   seek redress against the infringer by filing                                                       contrary to good faith by which a person           Caterpillar, Inc. to file an unfair competition
claim against Samson. The Supreme Court, in        REPUBLIC GAS CORPORATION, et.al vs.                GREENSTONE was registered at the time the           competition, wherein the BLA, CA, and
G.R. No. 164352, sided with Caterpillar, Inc.,     PETRON CORPORATION, et. al. [G.R. NO.              acts took place.                                    Supreme Court all affirmed that there was
determining that the civil case for damages        194062]                                                                                                indeed unfair competition since it is evident
                                                                                                      REPUBLIC GAS CORPORATION, et.al vs.                 enough that CDO imitated SMFCI marketing.
and trademark cancellation didn't pose a
                                                   REGASCO's appeal to the Court aimed to             PETRON CORPORATION, et. al. [G.R. NO.
prejudicial question to halt the criminal          counter Petron's accusations of trademark          194062, ibid]                                           UNFAIR COMPETITION VIOLATES
proceedings for unfair competition.                infringement    and     unfair   competition                                                                     PROPERTY RIGHTS
                                                   concerning LPG containers bearing the              Shell and Petron are known to sell, refill, use,
DEL   MONTE    CORPORATION         AND             respondents' trademark but the Court denied        and distribute LPG cylinders. On the other          A person who has identified in the mind of the
PHILIPPINE PACKING CORPORATION vs.                                                                    hand, REGASCO refills and sells LPG cylinders       public the goods he manufactures or deals in, his
                                                   the appeal, highlighting that REGASCO had
COURT OF APPEALS [G.R. NO. L-78325]                                                                   with the trademarks of the former without           business or services from those of others, whether
                                                   engaged in infringement by refilling and                                                               or not a registered mark is employed, has a
                                                   selling  LPG     containers    without   the       authorization. The former accusing of unfair
Del Monte Corporation granted Philpack the                                                                                                                property right in the goodwill of the said goods,
                                                   respondents' consent, thereby, potentially         competition                                         business or services so identified, which will be
right to manufacture, distribute, and sell Del
                                                   deceiving the public into believing that                                                               protected in the same manner as other property
Monte products, including catsup, and the Del                                                         ABS-CBN PUBLISHING INC. VS DIRECTOR
                                                   "GASUL" and "SHELLANE" are products of                                                                 rights. (IPC, Sec. 168.1)
Monte trademark and logo in the Philippines                                                           OF THE BUREAU OF TRADEMARKS [G.R.
                                                   REGASCO, when they are not.
while the Sunshine Sauce Manufacturing                                                                NO. 217916]                                                PERSONS GUILTY OF UNFAIR
Industries used various bottles for its            SHANG      PROPERTIES          REALTY                                                                              COMPETITION
products, including the Del Monte bottle that      CORPORATION AND SHANG PROPERTIES                   ABS-CBN applied to register the Trademark
she acquired from junk shops for recycling,        INC. VS. ST FRANCIS DEVELOPMENT                    "METRO" for magazines with the IPO or                  1. Any person who sells their products
however, the court recognizes the differences      CORPORATION, [G.R. NO. 190706]                     Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines,          and intentionally makes them look like
but it does not agree with the conclusion that                                                        however Examiner Arlene M. Icban, rejected                the products of another manufacturer
there was no infringement or unfair                St Francis Development Corporation sued            the application as it has identical marks that            or dealer, whether it be the actual
competition because the person who infringes       Shang Properties Realty Corporation for            already register which are "METRO" and                    goods themselves, the packaging, the
a trademark does not normally copy out but         infringing their intellectual property rights.     "METRO" (Logo) by Metro International and                 labels, or any other feature.
only makes colorable changes, employing            ‘THE ST. FRANCIS TOWERS’ mark could not            "Inquirer Metro" by Philippine Daily Inquirer
enough points of similarity to confuse the         be registered in their names because of unfair     even      the     subsequent       appeal    and       2. Any person who by any artifice, or
public with enough points of differences to        competition and false declarations. The            reconsideration are still rejected by Examiner            device, or who employs any other
confuse the courts.                                allegation of unjust competition through use       Icban and Director of the Bureau of Trademark             means calculated to induce the false
                                                   of the trademark was dismissed. In the             but ABS-CBN file an application for                       belief that such person is offering the
COCA-COLA BOTTLERS PHILIPPINES                     Philippines trademark code, one cannot             reconsideration with the Office of the Director
INC., (CCBPI), NAGA PLANT VS. QUINTIN                                                                                                                           services of another who has identified
                                                   register a trademark containing the phrase ‘St.’   General, yet ODG still finds it appeals with no           such services in the mind of the public;
GOMEZ, ET, AL. [G.R. NO. 154491]                   while it also ruled that the usage of ‘THE ST.     merit, moreover petitioner files extensions of
                                                   FRANCIS TOWERS’ mark amounts to unfair             time to file a petition for review with the Court      3. Any person who shall make any false
Coca-Cola applied for a search warrant against
                                                   competition if done by other people. The           of Appeals, however ABS-CBN did not                       statement in the course of trade or who
Pepsi for hoarding Coke empty bottles, an act
                                                   petition is hereby granted, and the decision by    accomplish the application as it fails to meet            shall commit any other act contrary to
allegedly penalized as unfair competition
                                                   the Court of Appeals is therefore reversed.        the deadline given, to conclude, the Court of             good faith of a nature calculated to
under the IP Code. concludes that the
                                                                                                      Appeals upheld the decision of rejection of the           discredit the goods, business or services
“hoarding” – as defined and charged by the         ROBERTO CO vs KENG HUAN JERRY                      registration of trademark by ABS-CBN                      of another. (IPC, Sec. 168.3)
petitioner – does not fall within the coverage     YEUNG AND EMMA YEUNG, [G.R. No.                    Publishing Inc.
of the IP Code and of Section 168 in particular.   212705]
It does not relate to any patent, trademark,                                                                                                              ASIA BREWERY, INC. VS. COURT OF
trade name or service mark that the                Spouses Yeung filed a civil complaint for unfair                                                       APPEALS   AND       SAN         MIGUEL
                                                                                                      SAN MIGUEL PURE FOODS COMPANY,
respondents have invaded, intruded into or         competition and trademark infringement                                                                 CORPORATION [G.R. No. 103543], ibid
                                                                                                      INC. VS. FOODSPHERE, INC. [G.R. No.
used without proper authority from the             against Ling Na Lau, Pinky Lau and Roberto         217781]
petitioner. However, Pepsi,        hoarding for    Co for conspiring in the sale of counterfeit                                                           San Miguel Corp. filed a complaint against
purposes of destruction is liable to another       Greenstone Medicated Oil products in which         Foodsphere aka CDO imitates SMPFCI                  Asia Brewery, Inc. for trademark infringement
law, which is R.A. No. 623 covers.                 the CA upheld the RTC decision that the Laus       “Purefoods Fiesta Ham” which was advertised         and unfair competition on the SMC’s BEER
                                                   and Co have engaged in unfair competition          on christmas by advertising their own which is      PALE PILSEN or BEER NA BEER products. The
                                                   but are not liable for trademark infringement      “PISTA” which strike an obvious resemblance         RTC ruled in favor of Asia Brewery while the
                                                   since there is no evidence that the trademark      and question whether there was unfair               CA reversed the decision, and made ABI liable
for the claims of SMC. ABI brought the case to       Universal Rubber Products, GR No. L‐27425,            1. The application shall designate the                   e. If the registered mark is being
the Supreme Court. The Court believed that           L‐30505, April 28, 1980)                                 mark as a collective mark.                               used by, or with the permission
ABI has neither infringed SMC's trademark                                                                                                                              of, the registrant so as to
nor committed unfair competition with the            Change in the ownership of a trade name              2. Accompanied by a copy of the                              misrepresent the source of the
latter's SAN MIGUEL PALE PILSEN product.             made                                                    agreement, if any, governing the use of                   goods or services on or in
According to the SC, the fact that BEER PALE                                                                 the collective mark. (Sec. 167.2, IPC)                    connection with which the mark
PILSEN like SAN MIGUEL PALE PILSEN is                It shall be made with the transfer of the          GROUNDS FOR THE CANCELLATION OF                                is used;
bottled in amber-colored steinie bottles of 320      enterprise or part thereof identified by that                COLLECTIVE MARKS                                  f. Non‐use of the mark within the
ml. capacity and is also advertised in print,        name. (Sec. 165.4, IPC)                                                                                           Philippines, without legitimate
broadcast, and television media, does not                                                                  1. The court shall cancel the registration                  reason, for an uninterrupted
necessarily constitute unfair competition.           Limitations on the use of Tradenames or                  of a collective if the person requesting                 period of 3 years.
Also, the names of the competing products are        Business names                                           the cancellation proves that only the                      COPYRIGHTS
clearly different and their respective sources       A person may not:                                        registered owner uses the mark.
are prominently printed on the label and on             1. Use any name or designation contrary                                                           A right over literary and artistic works which
other parts of the bottle, mere similarity in the          to public order or morals                       2. Or that he uses or permits its use in       are original intellectual creations in the
shape and size of the container and label, does         2. Use a name if it is liable to deceive              contravention of the agreements             literary and artistic domain protected from the
not constitute unfair competition.                         trade circles or the public as to the              referred to in Subsection 166.2.            moment of creation. (Sec. 171.1, IPC)
                                                           nature of the enterprise identified by                                                                       BASIC PRINCIPLES
MCDONALD’S CORPORATION vs. L.C. BIG                        that name. (Sec. 165.1, IPC)                    3. Or that he uses or permits its use in a
MAK BURGER, INC. [G.R. No. 143993, ibid]                3. Subsequently use a trade name likely to            manner liable to deceive trade circles or   Elements of copyrightability:
                                                           mislead the public as a third party. (Sec.         the public as to the origin or any other
In a trademark dispute, McDonald's                         165.2, b, IPC)                                     common characteristics of the goods or         1. Originality – Must have been created
Corporation successfully sued L.C. Big Mak              4. Copy or simulate the name of any                   services concerned. (Sec 167.3)                   by the author’s own skill, labor, and
Burger for trademark infringement and unfair               domestic product). (for imported                                                                     judgment without directly copying or
competition, as the Supreme Court reinstated            5. Copy or simulate a mark registered in        Note: The registration of a collective mark, or         evasively imitating the work of another.
the RTC ruling, finding L.C. Big Mak Burger is             accordance with the provisions of IPC        an application therefore shall not be the               (Ching Kian Chuan v. CA, G.R. No.
liable for using the "Big Mak" mark, similar to            (for imported products).                     subject of a license contract.                          130360, Aug. 15, 2001)
McDonald's "Big Mac," on hamburgers,                    6. Use a mark or trade name calculated to                   CRIMINAL PENALTIES                       2. Expression – Must be embodied in a
causing confusion among consumers and                      induce the public to believe that the                                                                medium sufficiently permanent or
engaging in unfair competition.                            article      is manufactured in the          A penalty of imprisonment from 2 years to               stable to permit it to be perceived,
                                                           Philippines, or that it is manufactured      5and a fine ranging from P50,000 to P200,000            reproduced or communicated for a
 ELEMENTS OF AN ACTION FOR UNFAIR                          in any foreign country or locality other     (Sec. 170, IPC.)                                        period more than a transitory duration.
           COMPETITION                                     than the country or locality where it is          CANCELLATION OF TRADEMARK
                                                           in fact manufactured.                                         REGISTRATION                     Elements of originality:
   1. Confusing similarities in the general                                                                                                                  1. It is independently created by the
       appearance of the goods.                      Note: Items 4, 5 and 6 only apply to imported      Any person who believes that he will be                 author, and
   2. Intent to deceive the public and               products and those imported articles shall not     damaged by the registration of the mark:             2. It possesses some minimal degree of
       defraud a competitor.                         be admitted to entry at any customhouse of the                                                             creativity.
(Superior Commercial Enterprises, Inc. vs.           Philippines (Sec. 166, IPC).                          1. Within 5 years, from the date of the
Kunnan Enterprises Ltd. And Sports Concept &                      COLLECTIVE MARK                             registration of the mark; or                MANLY SPORTSWEAR, MFG., INC. VS.
Distributor, Inc., G.R. No. 169974, 20 April 2010)                                                                                                        DADOTTE ENTERPRISES [G.R. NO. 165306]
                TRADE NAMES                          A “collective mark” or “collective trade-name”        2. At any time;
                                                     is a mark or trade-name used by the members                 a. If the registered mark becomes        Dadotte Enterprises was issued a search
Trade names or business names are any                of a cooperative, an association or other                       the generic name for the goods       warrant for allegedly possessing copyrighted
individual name or surname, firm name,               collective group or organization. (Sec. 40, R.A.                or services, or a portion thereof,   items that were claimed to belong to Manly
device nor word used by manufacturers,               166)                                                            for which it is registered;          Sportswear, therefore violating RA 8293. The
industrialists, merchants, and others to                                                                         b. If the mark has been abandoned;       court ruled that the petitioner is not eligible
identify their    businesses, vocations or           APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF A                           c. If its registration was obtained      for the protection offered by RA 8293, despite
occupants (Converse rubber Corp. vs.                          COLLECTIVE MARK                                    d. Fraudulently or contrary to the       being granted a copyright certificate of
                                                                                                                     provisions of the IPC;               registration. The certificate serves solely as
prima facie evidence of the copyright's validity             a. Books, pamphlets, articles and           protection of the original works. (Sec. 173.2,        1. Idea, procedure, system, method or
and ownership. Therefore, if there is ample                     other writings                           IPC)                                                     operation, concept, principle, discovery
evidence suggesting that the copyrighted                     b. Lectures, sermons, addresses,                                                                     or mere data as such
products are not original creations and can be                  dissertations prepared for Oral          UNITED FEATURE SYNDICATE, INC. vs.                    2. News of the day and other items of
readily found in the market under multiple                      delivery, whether or not reduced         MUNSINGWEAR             CREATION                         press information
brands, the presumption of validity and                         in writing or other material form        MANUFACTURING COMPANY [G.R NO.                        3. Any Official text of a legislative,
originality will not be established.                         c. Letters                                  76193]                                                   administrative or legal nature, as well as
             COPYRIGHT VEST                                  d. Dramatic, choreographic works                                                                     any official translation thereof
                                                             e. Musical compositions                     United Feature Syndicate Inc. filed for               4. Pleadings
Works are protected from the time of their                   f. Works of Art                             cancellation of the registration of trademark         5. Decisions of courts and tribunals -
creation, irrespective of their mode or form of              g. Periodicals and Newspapers               “Charlie Brown” in the name of Munsingwear               this refers to original decisions and not
expression, as well as of their content, quality             h. Works relative to Geography,             Creation Manufacturing Company. Alleged                  to annotated decisions such as the
and purpose.                                                    topography,        architecture    or    that United Feature Syndicate Inc. is the                SCRA or SCAD as these already fall
                                                                science                                  exclusive owner of the copyright to the said             under the classification of derivative
FERNANDO JUAN VS ROBERT JUAN [G.R                            i. Works of Applied art                     character since 1950 up to the present. The              works, hence copyrightable
NO. 221372]                                                  j. Works of a Scientific or technical       Director of the Philippine Patent Office ruled        6. Any work of the Government of the
                                                                character                                in     favor    of    Munsingwear       Creation         Philippines
Robert Juan filed a complaint of copyright                   k. Photographic works                       Manufacturing      Co.    that     a   copyright
                                                                                                                                                            Note: Conditions imposed prior to the approval
infringement,     unfair   competition     and               l. Audiovisual           works      and     registration may not provide a cause of action
                                                                                                                                                            of the government agency or office wherein the
cancellation of trademark against his brother,                  cinematographic works                    for the cancellation of a trademark
                                                                                                                                                            work is created shall be necessary for
Fernando Juan, for alleged fraudulent                        m. Pictorial       illustrations    and     registration, and CA held that the decision of
                                                                                                                                                            exploitation of such work for profit. Such an
registration of the mark “Lavandera Ko”. After                  advertisements                           Philippine Patent Office is final and executory.
                                                                                                                                                            agency or office, may, among other things,
discovering Santiago S. Suarez as the true                   n. Computer programs; and                   United Feature Syndicate is the true owner
                                                                                                                                                            impose as condition the payment of royalties.
originator of the “Lavandera Ko” mark in a                   o. Other        literary,      scholarly,   of the said trademark “Charlie Brown” and
1942 musical composition, the RTC dismissed                     scientific and artistic works.           its pictorial representations were covered         No prior approval or conditions shall be
the petition from both parties. Fernando                        (Sec. 172.1, IPC)                        by a copyright registration way back 1950.         required for the use of any purpose of statutes,
elevated the case to the CA through a notice of                                                          The SC ruled under PD No. 49 in favor of           rules and regulations, and speeches, lectures,
appeal contending that a mark is different            2. Derivative Works                                United Feature Syndicate due to its prior          sermons,     addresses,     and     dissertations,
from a copyright and not interchangeable. The              a. Dramatizations,        translations,       registration with the Patent’s Office.             pronounced, read, or rendered in courts of
Court ordered that no one of the herein                        adaptations,        abridgements,                                                            justice, before administration agencies, in
parties has the right to use and enjoy                         arrangements,       and      other        Collection of work vs. Collective work             deliberative assemblies and in meetings of
"Lavandera Ko", considering that the herein                    alterations of literary or artistic                                                          public character. (Section 176, IPC)
parties had made misrepresentation before the                  works;
                                                                                                           COLLECTION OF             COLLECTIVE                7. TV programs, format of TV programs
court when they declared that they had                     b. Collections of literary, scholarly,
                                                                                                               WORK                    WORK                       (Joaquin v. Drilon, G.R. No. 108946, Jan.
created the subject mark and name making it                    or      artistic    works      and
clear that the parties could have not coined                   compilations of data and other                                                                     28, 1999)
                                                                                                         It is not necessary     There      is     an
and created the subject mark and work since                    materials which are original by                                                                 8. Systems of bookkeeping; and
                                                                                                         that there is an        agreement whereby
these parties were not yet born when the                       reason of the selection or                                                                      9. Statutes
                                                                                                         agreement.              the authors bound
subject mark and work had been created and                     coordination or arrangement of            Individual              themselves not to be       Note: The copyright law enumerates the
used in 1942. The heirs of Mr. Santiago S.                     their contents. (Sec. 173)                contribution      is    identified with the        classes of work entitled to copyright
Suarez are the rightful owners of subject mark                                                           capable of copyright    work.                      protection. Copyright, in the strict sense of the
and work- "Lavandera ko"                           Note: Derivative works are considered as              protection.                                        term, is purely a statutory right. It is a new or
                                                   independent creations and are thus protected                                                             independent right granted by the statute, and
         COPYRIGHTABLE WORKS                       as new works. However, the protection of these                                                           not simply a pre‐existing right regulated by
                                                   new works does not impact the copyright of                  NON‐COPYRIGHTABLE WORKS                      the statute. Being a statutory grant, the rights
Works that are copyrightable                       the original works used in their creation.                                                               are only as the statute confers, and may be
                                                   Additionally, creating a derivative work does         The Subjects that are not protected are:           obtained and enjoyed only with respect to the
   1. Literary and  Artistic             Works     not imply any entitlement to use the original                                                            subjects and by the persons, and on terms and
      BOLD‐MAN‐GAS‐PAP‐CO                          works or to prolong or enhance the copyright                                                             conditions specified in the statute.The
                                                                                                                                                            Intellectual    Property     Code       mandates
originality as a prerequisite for copyright        or science, to be properly classified as a        Moral rights – For reasons of professionalism             proceeds of the production. (Sec. 201,
protection.                                        copyrightable class "I" work, what was            and propriety, the author has the right:                  IPC)
                                                   copyrighted were their sketches/drawings only,                                                       COLUMBIA PICTURES, INC. VS. COURT OF
FRANCISCO JOAQUIN, JR., AND BJ
                                                   and not the actual hatch doors themselves.           a. To require that the authorship of the        APPEALS, 261 SCRA 144 (1996) [G.R. NO.
PRODUCTIONS, INC vs. FRANKLIN
                                                                                                           works be attributed to him (attribution      110318]
DRILON, ET. AL. [G.R. NO. 108946]
                                                   PEARL & DEAN (PHILIPPINE), INC. VS.                     right)
Petitioner BJPI is the holder / grantee of         SHOEMART, INC. [G.R. No. 148222, ibid]                                                               Sunshine Home Video was charged by many
Certificate of Copyright of Rhoda and Me, a                                                             b. To make any alterations of his work          film companies for distributing illegal versions
dating game show. While IXL produced a             Trademark, copyright and patents are different          prior to, or to withhold it from             of their productions. After obtaining a search
dating show named It's a Date. Petitioner          intellectual property rights that cannot be             publication                                  warrant, the NBI raided Sunshine Home
wrote a letter informing Zosa that BJPI had a      interchanged with one another. A trademark is                                                        Video, but Sunshine Home Video disputed the
copyright to Rhoda and Me and demanding            any visible sign capable of distinguishing the       c. To preserve integrity of work, object to     warrant's legitimacy. The question was
that IXL discontinue airing It's a Date. Is the    goods (trademark) or services (service mark)            any distortion, mutilation or other          whether there had been copyright violation.
format or mechanics of the petitioner's            of an enterprise and shall include a stamped or         modification      which      would     be    The court decided that there had been
television show entitled to copyright              marked container of goods. In relation thereto,         prejudicial to his honor or reputation;      copyright violation. Copyright protection is in
protection? The Court ruled that the format of     a trade name means the name or designation                                                           place from the time of invention, and filing a
the show is not copyrightable. Sec. 2 of PD No.    identifying or distinguishing an enterprise.         d. To restrain the use of his name with         lawsuit for infringement does not need
49, otherwise known as the Decree on               Meanwhile, the scope of a copyright is                  respect to any work not of his own           registration. On the other hand, copyright
Intellectual Property, enumerates the classes      confined to literary and artistic works which           creation or in a distorted version of his    proprietors who register can avoid fines for
of work entitled to copyright protection. The      are original intellectual creations in the              work. (IPC, Sec. 193)                        noncompliance and get full damages.
provision is substantially the same as Sec. 172    literary and artistic domain protected from the                                                              NATURE OF MORAL RIGHTS
of the Intellectual Property Code of the           moment of their creation. Patentable              Droit de suite or “art proceeds right” is the
                                                   inventions, on the other hand, refer to any       artist’s resale right, which requires that a       These are personal rights independent from
Philippines (RA 8293). The format or
                                                   technical solution of a problem in any field of   percentage of the resale price of an artistic      economic rights. Being a personal right, it can
mechanics of a television show is not included
                                                   human activity which is new, involves an          work is paid to the author.                        only be given to a natural person. Hence, even
in the list of protected works in Sec. 2 of PD
                                                   inventive step and is industrially applicable.                                                       if he has licensed or assigned his economic
No. 49. For this reason, the protection afforded
                                                        RIGHTS OF A COPYRIGHT OWNER                  The right is exercisable even after the author’s   rights,   he    continues    to    enjoy    the
by the law cannot be extended to cover them.
                                                                                                     death, provided the work is still in copyright.    above‐mentioned moral rights. (Amador,
                                                   Economic rights – the exclusive right to carry    (David Bainbridge, Intellectual Property, 3rd      Intellectual Property Fundamentals, 2007)
SISON OLAÑO v. LIM ENG CO [G.R. No.                out, authorize or prevent the following acts:     Ed., p.220 1996, also cited in Copyright Law of
195835]                                                                                                                                                 Term of moral rights
                                                                                                     the Philippines by D. Funa)
                                                      a. Reproduction of the work or substantial                                                        It shall last during the lifetime of the author
LEC was invited by the architects of the                 portion thereof                             In every sale or lease of an original work of
Manansala Project to submit design/drawings                                                                                                             and for fifty (50) years after his death and shall
                                                      b. Carry-out         derivative       work     painting or sculpture or of the original           not be assignable or subject to license. (Sec.
and specifications for interior and exterior             (dramatization, translation, adaptation,    manuscript of a writer or composer.
hatch doors and Metrotech was also                                                                                                                      198, IPC)
                                                         abridgment, arrangement or other            Subsequent to the frist disposition thereof by
subcontracted to the Project. LEC demanded               transformation of the work)                 the author, the author or his heirs shall have     Note: The person/s to be charged with the
that Metrotech cease from infringing its              c. First distribution of the original and      an inalienable right to participate in the gross   posthumous enforcement of moral rights shall
intellectual property rights, but Metrotech              each copy of the work by sale or other      proceeds of the sale or lease to the extent of     be named in writing to be filed with the
argued that no copyright infringement was                forms of transfer of ownership              five percent (5%). (IPC, Sec. 200)                 National Library. In default of such a person or
committed.                                            d. Rental right                                                                                   persons, such enforcement shall devolve upon
                                                      e. Public display                              Rights which are not covered under a               either the author's heirs, and in default of the
The petition is hereby granted and reinstating        f. Public performance                          “Droit de suite”                                   heirs, the Director of the National Library.
the complaint against the petitioners. There is       g. Other communications to the public             1. Print                                        (ibid.)
no proof that the respondents reprinted the              (IPC, Sec 177)                                 2. Etchings
copyrighted sketches/drawings of LEC's hatch                                                            3. Engravings                                   Exception to moral right
doors since the hatch doors cannot be              Note: Assignment of rights must be in writing        4. Works of applied art
considered as either illustrations, maps, plans,   to be valid                                          5. Similar works wherein the author                A. Absent any special contract at the time
sketches, charts and three dimensional works                                                               primarily derives gain from the                    creator licenses/permits another to use
relative to geography, topography, architecture                                                                                                               his work, the following are deemed not
      to contravene creator’s moral rights,                  b. Fixation     of    their    unfixed   compensation he or she received for the first        APPLICABILITY OF NEIGHBORING
      provided they are done in accordance                      performance                           communication or broadcast (#3 scope of                         RIGHTS
      with reasonable customary standards or        2.   Direct or indirect reproduction of their     performance rights).
      requisites of the medium:                          performances fixed in sound recordings,                                                        Provisions of Chapter VIII shall apply mutatis
              a. Editing                                 in any manner or form;                       Exception: Unless otherwise provided in the       mutandis to the rights of the performers,
              b. Arranging                          3.   First public distribution of the original    contract                                          producers     of     sounds recordings and
              c. Adaptation                              and copies of their performance fixed in                                                       broadcasting organizations, as an exception to
              d. Dramatization                           the sound recording through sale or                     SOUND PRODUCERS                        infringement and allow the following:
              e.      Mechanical and electric            rental or other forms of transfer of                                                               1. Exclusive use of a natural person for
                                                                                                      Scope of Rights: exclusive rights (Sec 208)
                  reproduction                           ownership;                                                                                            own personal purposes
   B. Complete       destruction   of    work       4.   Commercial rental to the public of the       The right to authorize the:                           2. Short excerpts for reporting current
      unconditionally transferred by creators.           original    and      copies     of   their                                                            events
      (Sec. 197, IPC)                                    performances fixed in sound recordings,         1. Direct or indirect reproduction of their        3. Sole use for the purpose of teaching or
    MORAL RIGHTS CAN BE WAIVED                           even after distribution of them by, or             sound recordings, in any manner or                 for scientific research
                                                         pursuant to the authorization by the               form;      the     placing   of    these        4. Fair use of the broadcast (Sec. 212, IPC,
General Rule:                                            performer;                                         reproductions in the market and the                as amended by R.A 10372)
Moral rights can be waived in writing,              5.   Making available to the public of their            right of rental or lending;                           TERMS OF PROTECTION
expressly stating such waiver.                           performances fixed in sound recordings,         2. First public distribution of the original
                                                         by wire or wireless means, in such a               and copies of their sound recordings          1. For performances not incorporated in
Exceptions:                                              way that members of the public may                                                                  recordings, 50 years from the end of the
                                                                                                            through sale or rental or other forms of
Even in writing, waiver is not valid if:                 access them from a place and time                                                                   year in which the performance took
                                                                                                            transferring ownership; and
                                                         individually chosen by them.                    3. Commercial rental to the public of the           place; and
1. Use the name of the author, title of his
                                                                                                            original and copies of their sound            2. For sound or image and sound
   work, or his reputation with respect to any   Moral Rights of Performers: Sec 204                        recordings, even after distribution by           recordings and for performances
   version/adaptation of his work, which
                                                                                                            them by or pursuant to authorization             incorporated therein, 50 years from the
   because of alterations, substantially tend    General Rule: Have the right to claim to be
                                                                                                            by the producer                                  end of the year in which the recording
   to injure literary/artistic reputation of     identified as the performer of his performances,                                                            took place.
   another author.                               as regards his live aural performances or            NOTE: Sec 184 Limitations and Sec 185 Fair          3. In case of broadcasts, the term shall be
                                                 performances fixed in sound recordings.              Use of copyrights shall apply mutatis mutandis         20 years from the date the broadcast
2. Use name of author in a work that he did
   not create.                                                                                        (with the necessary changes) to the producer           took place. The extended term shall be
                                                 Exception: The omission is dictated by the
                                                                                                      of sound recordings.                                   applied only to old works with
                                                 manner of the use of the performance, and to
Neighboring Rights                                                                                                                                           subsisting protection under the prior
                                                 object to any distortion, mutilation or other            BROADCASTING ORGANIZATIONS                         law. (Sec. 215, IPC)
                                                 modification of his performances that would
These are the rights of performers, producers                                                                                                            PERSON WGHOM THE NEIGHBORING
                                                 be prejudicial to his reputation.                    Scope of Rights: exclusive rights (Sec 211)
of sound recording and broadcasting                                                                                                                              RIGHTS ARE GRANTED
organizations.                                   Limitation on Right - When Performance               The right to carry out/authorize/prevent
 RIGHTS OF PERFORMERS, PRODUCERS                 Rights are lost: Sec 205                             the:
      OF SOUND RECORDINGS AND                                                                                                                              1. For Works
    BROADCASTING ORGANIZATIONS                   Once the performer has authorized the                   1. Rebroadcasting of their broadcasts;                  a. Works of authors who are
                                                 broadcasting or fixation of his performance             2. Recording in any manner, including the                  nationals of, or have their
          PERFORMANCE RIGHTS                                                                                making of films or the use of video                     habitual     residence in, the
                                                 Note: Sec 184 Limitations and Sec 185 Fair Use             tape, of their broadcasts for the                       Philippines;
Scope of Performance Rights: exclusive           of copyrights shall apply mutatis mutandis                                                                      b. Audio‐visual works the producer
                                                                                                            purpose of communication to the
rights (Sec 203)                                 (with the necessary changes) to performers                                                                         of which has his headquarters
                                                                                                            public of television broadcasts of the
                                                                                                            same; and                                               or habitual residence in the
The right of authorizing the:                    Additional Remuneration for Subsequent
                                                                                                         3. Use of such records for fresh                           Philippines;
                                                 Communications or Broadcasts: Sec 206                                                                           c. Works of architecture erected in
   1. (As to performances)                                                                                  transmissions or for fresh recording
         a. Broadcasting       &     other                                                                                                                          the Philippines or other artistic
                                                 General Rule: Performer shall be entitled to
             communication to the public of                                                                                                                         works incorporated in a building
                                                 an additional remuneration equivalent to at
             their performance                   least five percent (5%) of the original
            or other structure located in the   Philippines is a party. (Sec. 221.2 and 224.2,
                                                                                                                    GR : Publishers shall                                 regularly‐assigned
            Philippines;                        IPC
                                                                                                                         be deemed                                      duties, unless there
         d. Works first published in the
                                                                                                                     representatives of                                    is an agreement,
            Philippines; and                    RULES ON OWNERSHIP OF COPYRIGHT
                                                                                                                    the author in case of                                express or implied,
         e. Works first published in another
                                                                                                                      anonymous and                                     to the contrary. (Sec.
            country but also published in                                                                             pseudonymous                                             178.3, IPC)
            the Philippines within thirty         TYPE OF WORK               OWNER                                         works.
            days,      irrespective of the                                                       Anonymous and                                                          Writer – in respect of
            nationality or residence of the       Original literary     Author of the work                                                                               letters subject to
                                                                                                 pseudonymous          XPN : When the
            authors. (Sec. 221, IPC)             and artistic works      (Sec 178.1, IPC)                                                            Letters             the provisions of
                                                                                                     works           contrary appears or
                                                                                                                          where the                                      Article 723, Civil
   2. For Performers                                                        Co‐authors;
                                                                                                                        pseudonym or                                           Code.
         a. Performers who are nationals of                              in the absence of
                                                                                                                        adopted name                                      (Sec. 178.6, IPC)
            the Philippines;                                             agreement, their
                                                                           rights shall be                          leaves no doubt as to
         b. Performers     who    are    not                                                                             the author’s
            nationals of the Philippines but                              governed by the
                                                                              rules on                                identity; or author      COLLECTIVE WORK vs. JOINT WORK
            whose performances:
                                                                           co‐ownership                             discloses his identity.
            i. Take place in the Philippines;
                                                                                                                        (Sec. 179, IPC)        COLLECTIVE WORK vs. JOINT WORK
            or
            ii. Are incorporated in sound         Joint Ownership         NOTE: If work of                                                       COLLECTIVE                JOINT WORK
                                                                                                                       The person who
            recordings that are protected                                  joint authorship                                                        WORK
                                                                                                                     commissioned the
            under IPC; or                                                 consists of parts
                                                                                                                     work shall own the
            iii. Which has not been fixed in                               that can be used                                                   Work created by 2         Work prepared by 2
                                                                                                                         work but the
            sound recording but are carried                             separately, then the                                                  or more people at         or more authors
                                                                                                 Commissioned         copyright thereto
            by broadcast      qualifying for                             author of each part                                                  the initiative and        with the intention
                                                                                                    work              shall remain with
            protection under IPC. (Sec. 222,                            shall be the original                                                 under the direction       that           their
                                                                                                                     the creator, unless
            IPC)                                                             owner of the                                                     of another, with the      contributions      be
                                                                                                                      there is a written
   3. Of sound Recordings                                               copyright in the part                                                 understanding that        merged          into
                                                                                                                      stipulation to the
         a. Sound recordings the producers                               that he has created.                                                 it will be disclosed      inseparable        or
                                                                                                                    contrary. (Sec. 178.4,
            of which are nationals of the                                  (Sec. 178.2, IPC)                                                  by the latter under       independent parts of
                                                                                                                             IPC)
            Philippines;                                                                                                                      his own name and          the unitary whole.
                                                                        GR : Producer, the                                                    that       of      the
         b. Sound recordings that were first                                                                           Contributor is
                                                                           author of the                                                      contributions        of
            published in the Philippines.                                                                              deemed to have
                                                                            scenario, the                                                     others will not be
            (Sec. 223, IPC)                                                                      Collective Works      waived his right
                                                                          composer of the                                                     identified (Sec. 171.2,
                                                                                                                     unless he expressly
                                                                          music, the film                                                     IPC)
   4. For broadcast                                                                                                 reserves it. (Sec. 196,
                                                                         director, and the
         a. Broadcasts     of    broadcasting                                                                               IPC)
                                                                        author of the work                                                      When an author          Joint authors shall
            organizations the headquarters
                                                  Audiovisual work          so adapted –                            The employee, if not      contributes to a          be both entitled to
            of which are situated in the
                                                                         audiovisual work.                          a part of his regular     collective work, his      the acknowledgment
            Philippines; and
                                                                                                 In the course of     duties even if the      right to have his         as authors of the
         b. Broadcasts transmitted from
                                                                             XPN : The             employment        employee uses the        contribution              work.
            transmitters situated in the
                                                                          producers shall                            time, facilities and     attributed to him is
            Philippines. (Sec. 224, IPC)                                                                                                                                If, however, a work
                                                                            exercise the                               materials of the       deemed          waived
                                                                          copyright to an                                 employer.           unless he expressly       of joint authorship
NOTE: The provisions of IPC shall also apply                                                                                                                            consists of parts that
                                                                        extent required for                                                   reserves it. (Sec. 196)
to works, performers, producers of sound                                                                                                                                can      be      used
                                                                       the exhibition of the                        The employer, if the
recordings and broadcasting organizations                                                                                                                               separately and the
                                                                       work in any manner.                          work is the result of
that are to be protected by virtue of and in                                                                                                                            author of each part
                                                                         (Sec. 178.5, IPC)                          the performance of
accordance with any international convention                                                                                                                            can be identified,
or other international agreement to which the                                                                                his
                                                                                                                                                                        the author of each
                          part shall be the                                                                political, social, economic, scientific or         giving of professional advice by a legal
                          original owner of the       Works of Applied      25 years from the date         religious topic, lectures, addresses and           practitioner.
                          copyright in the part             art             of making                      other works of the same nature
                          that he has created                                                                                                           ABS-CBN BROADCASTING CORPORATION
                          (Sec. 178.2.)                                     50      years      from     4. As part of reports of current events         VS. PHILIPPINE MULTI-MEDIA SYSTEM,
                                                                            publication of work.           (e.g. music played or tunes on the           INC., ET AL [G.R. NO. 175769-70]
                                                        Photographic            ● If unpublished,          occasion of a sporting event and such
                                                           works                   50 years from                                                        The Philippine Multi-Media System, Inc.
  AUTOMATIC PROTECTION PRINCIPLE                                                                           tunes were picked up during a new
                                                                                   the    date    of       coverage of the event).                      (PMSI)’s program line-up includes ABS-CBN
                                                                                   making.                                                              Channels 2 and 23 which ABS-CBN filed a
Works are protected by the sole fact of their                               50 years from the date      5. For teaching purposes, provided that         complaint for an infringement on its
creation irrespective of their content, quality, or     Audio-visual        of publication.                the source and of the name of the            broadcasting rights and copyright however,
purpose.                                              works (including          ● If unpublished,          author, if appearing in the work, are        PMSI is engaged in cable retransmission
                                                      those produced               50 years from           mentioned.                                   instead, which isn’t rebroadcasting or
Such rights are conferred from the moment of
creation.
                                                          by process               the    date    of                                                    infringement, and isn’t under copyright
                                                        analogous to               making.              6. Recording made in educational                protection furthermore, the carriage of
 TERM OF PROTECTION OF COPYRIGHT                      photography or                                                                                    ABS-CBN’s signals by virtue of the must-carry
                                                                                                           institutions of a work included in a
                                                       any process for                                     broadcast for the use of such                rule in Memorandum Circular No. 04-08-88 is
                                                           making                                          educational institutions, provided that      under the direction and control of the
 TYPE OF WORK                DURATION                   audio-visual                                                                                    government though the NTC therefore, PMSI
                                                                                                           such recording must be deleted within
                                                         recordings)                                       a reasonable period after they were first    is not engaged in rebroadcasting and thus
                                                                                                           broadcast.                                   cannot be considered to have infringed
                       Lifetime of the author
                                                                                                                                                        ABS-CBN’s broadcasting rights and copyright.
 Single Creation       and for 50 years after         The term of protection subsequent to the
                       his death.                     death of the author provided in the preceding     7. The making of ephemeral recordings
                                                                                                                                                         OTHER LIMITATIONS ON COPYRIGHT
                                                      Section shall run from the date of his death or      by a broadcasting organization by
                                                      of publication, but such terms shall always be       means of its own facilities and for use
  Works of Joint       Life    of  the    last                                                                                                             1. The fair use of a copyrighted work for
                                                      deemed to begin on the first day of January          in its own broadcast.
   Authorship/         surviving author and                                                                                                                   criticism, comment, news reporting,
                                                      of the year following the event which gave                                                              teaching including multiple copies for
  Joint Creation       for 50 years after his                                                           8. The use made of a work by or under
                                                      rise to them. (Sec. 214, IPC)                                                                           classroom use, scholarship, research,
                       death.                                                                              the direction or control of the
                                                                                                                                                              and similar purposes is not an
                                                             LIMITATION ON COPYRIGHT                       government, by the National Library
                                                                                                                                                              infringement of copyright. (Sec. 185,
                                                                                                           or by educational, scientific, or
                       50 years from the date                                                                                                                 IPC)
                                                                                                           professional institutions where such
                       which the work was             General Limitations on Copyright                     use is in the public interest and is
                       first lawfully published.                                                                                                           2. Copyright in a work of architecture
 Anonymous or                                         The following acts shall not constitute an           compatible with fair use.
                                                                                                                                                              shall include the right to control the
 Pseudonymous          XPN:                           infringement of copyright:                                                                              erection of any building which
     Work                ● If the author's                                                              9. The public performance of a work, in
                                                         1. Performance of a work, once it has                                                                reproduces the whole or a substantial
                            identity          is                                                           a place where no admission fee is
                                                            been lawfully made accessible to the                                                              part of the work either in its original
                            revealed or is no                                                              charged.
                                                            public, if done privately and free of                                                             form or in any form recognizably
                            longer in doubt                                                                                                                   derived from the original, provided,
                                                            charge or for a charitable or religious     10. Public display of the original or a copy
                            before the said                                                                                                                   that the copyright in any such work
                                                            institution or society.                         of the work not made by means of a
                            period, the first                                                                                                                 shall not include the right to control
                            two rules apply;                                                                film, slide, television image or
                                                         2. The making of quotations from a                                                                   the reconstruction or rehabilitation in
                            or                                                                              otherwise on screen or by means of any
                                                            published work if they are compatible                                                             the same style as the original of a
                         ● If     the     work                                                              other device or process (e.g. public
                                                            with fair use and only to the extent                                                              building to which that copyright
                            remains                                                                         display using posters mounted on walls
                                                            justified for the purpose.                                                                        relates. (Sec. 186, IPC)
                            unpublished,                                                                    and display boards).
                            copyright      also                                                                                                            3. Individuals are permitted to privately
                                                         3. Communication to the public by              11. Any use made of a work for the purpose
                            lasts for 50 years.                                                                                                               reproduce a published work in a single
                                                            mass media of articles on current               of any judicial proceedings or for the
                                                                                                                                                              copy for research and private study
   without      the    copyright      owner's           program, provided, the copy or                         DOCTRINE OF FAIR USE                    Philippine Multimedia System, G.R. No. 175769‐
   authorization, with certain exceptions:              adaption is necessary for:                                                                     70, Jan. 19, 2009)
      a. Architectural works in the form                    a. The use of the computer                Fair use” permits a secondary use that “serves
          of      buildings      or     other                   program in conjunction with a         the copyright objective of stimulating           GMA NETWORK INC. VS. CENTRAL CATV
          constructions.                                        computer for the purpose, and         productive thought and public instruction        INC. [G.R No. 176694]
      b. Entire books or substantial parts                      to the extent, for which the          without excessively diminishing the incentives
                                                                                                                                                       In February 2000, the petitioner, alongside
          thereof, or musical works in                          computer program has been             for creativity”.
                                                                                                                                                       other organizations, filed a complaint with the
          graphic        form,       through                    obtained; and                                                                          NTC against the respondent, seeking to
          reprographic means.                               b. Archival purposes, and, for the        Fair Use of a Copyright Work
                                                                                                                                                       prevent the broadcasting of advertisements on
      c. Compilations of data and other                         replacement of the lawfully                                                            its CATV system, citing Executive Order No.
                                                                                                      The fair use of a copyrighted work for
          materials.                                            owned copy of the computer                                                             205; however, the NTC and Court of Appeals
                                                                                                      criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching
      d. Computer programs, except as                           program in the event that the                                                          rulings permitting such advertisements were
                                                                                                      including limited number of copies for the
          provided in Section 189.                              lawfully obtained copy of the                                                          overturned by the Supreme Court, clarifying
                                                                                                      classroom use, scholarship, researched and
      e. Any work where reproduction                            computer program is lost,                                                              that Executive Order No. 436 does not
                                                                                                      similar purposes is not an infringement of
          would unreasonably conflict                           destroyed or rendered unusable.                                                        constitute a law and does not modify the
                                                                                                      copyright.
          with its normal exploitation or                       (Sec. 187, IPC)                                                                        relevant regulations, thereby affirming the
          unreasonably       prejudice    the        6. The importation of a copy of a work by        Factors that should be considered in order       respondent's right to broadcast commercials
          legitimate interests of the                   an individual for his personal purposes       to determine “fair use”                          on its CATV networks.
          author.                                       shall be permitted without the
4. Libraries or archives that operate on a              authorization of the author of, or other         1. The purpose and character of the use,                  PUBLISHED WORKS
   nonprofit basis are allowed to make a                owner of copyright in, the work under               including whether such use is of a
   single copy of a work through                        the following circumstances:                        commercial nature or is for non‐profit     Those works which, with the consent of the
   reprographic reproduction without the                    a. When copies of the work are not              educational purpose;                       authors, are made available to the public by
   permission of the copyright owner                            available in the Philippines and:        2. The nature of the copyrighted work;        wire or wireless means in such a way that
                                                   7.
   under the following circumstances:             I.    Not more than one copy at one time is            3. The amount and substantiality of the       members of the public may access these works
      a. If the original work is too fragile            imported for strictly individual use                portion used in relation to the            from a place and time individually chosen by
          or rare to be lent out.                       only; or                                            copyrighted work as a whole; and           them: provided, that availability of such copies
      b. When the work consists of               II. The importation is by authority of and              4. The effect of the use upon the potential   has been such, as to satisfy the reasonable
          isolated articles from composite              for the use of the Philippine                       market for or value of the copyrighted     requirement of the public, having regard to
          works or brief portions of other              Government; or                                      work.                                      the nature of the work. (Sec. 171.7, IPC)
          published         works,       and    III. The importation, consisting of not
          reproducing them is necessary                 more than three such copies or                      Note: The fact that a work is                  DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PUBLIC
          for research or study purposes                likenesses in any one invoice, is not for           unpublished shall not by itself bar a       PERFORMANCE AND COMMUNICATION
          instead of lending out the entire             sale but for the use only of any                    finding of fair use if such finding is       TO THE PUBLIC OF A PERFORMANCE
          volume.                                       religious, charitable, or educational               made upon consideration of all the
      c. When making a copy is                          society or institution duly incorporated            above factors. (Sec. 182.2, IPC)
          necessary      for    preservation            or     registered,    or   is    for    the                                                                             COMMUNICATION
          purposes, such as replacing a                                                                           MUST-CARRY RULE                           PUBLIC               TO THE PUBLIC
                                                        encouragement of the fine arts, or for
          lost, destroyed, or unusable                  any state school, college, university, or                                                        PERFORMANCE                 OF A
                                                                                                      Must‐carry rule is another limitation on                                   PERFORMANCE
          copy,     or    adding to the                 free public library in the Philippines.       copyright. It obligates operators to carry the
          permanent collection of another
                                                                                                      signals of local channels within their            Performance at a        The transmission to
          similar library or archive.                         b. When such copies form parts
                                                                                                      respective systems. This is to give the people    place or at places      the public, by any
                                                              of libraries and personal baggage
                                                                                                      wider access to more sources of news,             where        persons    medium, otherwise
5. The reproduction in one back-up copy                       belonging to persons or families
                                                                                                      information, education, sports event and          outside the normal      than by broadcasting,
   or adaptation of a computer program                        arriving from foreign countries
                                                                                                      entertainment programs other than those           circle of a family      of sounds of a
   shall    be    permitted,    without                       and are not intended for sale,
                                                                                                      provided for by mass media and afforded           and that family’s       performance or the
   authorization of, or other owner of                        provided, that such copies do
                                                                                                      television programs to attain a well informed,    closest        social   representations    of
   copyright in a computer program, by                        not exceed three. (Sec. 190, IPC)
                                                                                                      well‐versed and culturally refined citizenry      acquaintances are       sounds fixed in a
   the lawful owner of that computer
                                                                                                      and enhance their socio‐economic growth.          or can be present.      sound recording.
                                                                                                      (ABS‐CBN Broadcasting Corporation v.
                                                       LIMITATION REGARDING SUBMISSION                  PACITA HABANA, ET. AL. vs. FELICIDAD               The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Tan and
                                                        OF A LITERARY, PHOTOGRAPHIC OR                  ROBLES AND GOODWILL TRADING CO.,                   affirmed the decision of the lower court. The
 It is performed at a The communication                  ARTISTIC WORK FOR PUBLICATION                  INC. [G.R. NO. 131522]                             Court held that Tan did not infringe upon the
 specific time and can        be   accessed                                                                                                                Copyright Law. While there were public
                                                      Unless a greater right is expressly granted,      The petitioners are the authors and owners of
 place.               through wired or                                                                                                                     performances for profit, Tan cannot be held
                                                      such submission shall constitute only a license   copyrighted books, College English for Today
                      wireless means at a                                                                                                                  liable for copyright infringement. The Court
                                                      to make a single publication. (Sec. 180.3, IPC)   (CET). However, the respondents, Felicidad
                      time     and    place                                                                                                                relied on Section 3(c) of the Copyright Law,
                                                      Note: If two or more persons jointly own a        Robles, also published and sold a book called
                      convenient to the                                                                                                                    which grants the exclusive right to exhibit,
                                                      copyright or any part thereof, neither of the     "Developing English Proficiency" (DEP) Books
                      viewer.                                                                                                                              perform, represent, produce, or reproduce
                                                      owners shall be entitled to grant licenses        1 and 2. The petitioners discovered striking
                                                                                                                                                           copyrighted works for profit or otherwise.Tan
                                                      without the prior written consent of the other    parallels between their CET book and the
                                                                                                                                                           did not infringe upon the Copyright Law and
                                                      owner or owners. (Ibid.)                          respondents' DEP book while examining their
                                                                                                                                                           could not be held liable for copyright
          MAY A COPYRIGHT BE                                                                            own contributions.
                                                                                                                                                           infringement. Under the circumstances, it is
        TRANSFERRED/ASSIGNED?
                                                             COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT                     These parallels included examples, drawings,       clear that the musical compositions in
It may be assigned in whole or in part. Within                                                          and the substance as well as the presentation      question had long become public property,
                                                      It is the doing by any person, without the        style. The petitioners perceived plagiarism and    and are therefore beyond the protection of the
the scope of the assignment, the assignee is
                                                      consent of the owner of the copyright, of         copyright infringement when they discovered        Copyright Law.
entitled to all the rights and remedies which
                                                      anything the sole right to do which is            multiple pages in DEP that appeared to be
the assignor had with respect to the copyright.                                                                                                                           PLAGIARISM
                                                      conferred by statute on the owner of the          straight copies of their own writing. Does
(Sec. 180.1, IPC)
                                                      copyright. The act of lifting from another’s      Robles committed infringement in the
                                                      book substantial portions of discussions and      production of DEP? YES, To constitute              The practice of claiming or implying original
    COPYRIGHT VS. MATERIAL OBJECT
                                                      examples and the failure to acknowledge the       infringement, it is not necessary that the         authorship of (or incorporating material from)
Copyright is distinct from the property in the        same is an infringement of copyright. (Habana     whole or even a large portion of the work shall    someone else’s written or creative work, in
material object subject to it. Consequently, the      v. Robles, G.R. No. 131522, July 19, 1999)        have been copied. If so much is taken that the     whole or in part, into one’s own without
transfer or assignment of the copyright shall                                                           value of the original is sensibly diminished, or   adequate acknowledgment.
not itself constitute a transfer of the material      COLUMBIA PICTURES, INC., ET. AL. vs.              the labors of the original author are
object. Nor shall a transfer or assignment of         COURT OF APPEALS, SUNSHINE HOME                   substantially and to an injurious extent
                                                      VIDEO INC. [G.R. No. 110318]                                                                           DIFFERENCE BETWEEN COPYRIGHT
the sole copy or of one or several copies of the                                                        appropriated by another, that is sufficient in        INFRINGEMENT AND PLAGIARISM
work imply transfer or assignment of the                                                                point of law to constitute piracy. The final
copyright. (Sec. 181, IPC)                            Columbia      Pictures   Inc.    and      other   product of an author's toil is her book. To
                                                      complainants accused Sunshine Home Video          allow another to copy the book without
                                                      Inc. of violating the Philippines' intellectual                                                          COPYRIGHT               PLAGIARISM
    REQUISITES FOR A TRANSFER OF                                                                        appropriate acknowledgment is injury enough.
                                                      property laws by selling, leasing, and                                                                 INFRINGEMENT
     COPYRIGHT TO TAKE EFFECT
                                                      distributing copyrighted films without proper                                                           The unauthorized
   1. If inter vivos, must be in writing; and         permission. NBI conducted a search based on            SUBSTANTIAL REPRODUCTION
                                                                                                                                                              use of copyrighted
   2. Filed in National Library upon payment          a warrant and found pirated video tapes, and                                                          material in a manner
      of prescribed fees. (Sec. 182, IPC)             equipment related to the unlawful activities.     It is not necessarily required that the entire
                                                                                                                                                             that violates one of   The use of another’s
                                                                                                        copyrighted work, or even a large portion of it,
                                                                                                                                                                 the copyright          information,
     FILING OF THE ASSIGNMENT OR                      The court’s decision was in favor of the          be copied. If so much is taken that the value of
                                                                                                                                                               owner’s exclusive    language, or writing,
         LICENSE OF COPYRIGHT                         complainants, determining that there was          the original work is substantially diminished,
                                                                                                                                                              rights, such as the    when done without
                                                      indeed copyright infringement. The video          there is an infringement of copyright and to an
                                                                                                                                                            right to reproduce or          proper
Section 182 uses the permissive word “may” in         tapes found in Sunshine Home Video Inc.'s         injurious extent, the work is appropriated. In
                                                                                                                                                                  perform the        acknowledgment of
reference to the filing of the deed of                possession were exact reproductions of            cases of infringement, copying alone is not
                                                                                                                                                            copyrighted work, or     the original source.
assignment or transfer of copyright, this filing      copyrighted films owned by the complainants,      what is prohibited. The copying must produce
                                                                                                                                                              to make derivative
should not be understood as mandatory for             and they were distributed without proper          an “injurious effect”.
                                                                                                                                                               works that build
validity and enforceability. The filing is entirely   consent. The court upheld the validity of the                                                                 upon it.
optional for the parties and may be useful only       search warrant and the actions taken by the       FILIPINO SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS,
for evidentiary and notification purposes.            NBI in this case.                                 AUTHORS, AND PUBLISHERS, INC. vs.
(Amador, Intellectual Property Fundamentals,                                                            BENJAMIN TAN[G.R. No. L- 36402]                           Copyright         Plagiarism is specific
2007)                                                                                                                                                         infringement is a      as it refers only to
                                                       5. Moral and exemplary damages (Sec.                    GLOSSARY (REQUISITES)                           for an application for such invention,
 very broad term that     using someone else’s
                                                          216.1); or                                                                                           or
 describes a variety of   work without proper
                                                       6. Seizure and impounding of any article,      Application for registration of a collective          2. 2 or more applications are filed for the
     acts. It may be       acknowledgement.
                                                          which may serve as evidence in the          mark                                                     same invention - the applicant who has
    duplication of a
                                                          court proceedings. (Sec. 216.2)               1. The application shall designate the                 the EARLIEST filing date.
   work, rewriting a
  piece, performing a                                                                                       mark as a collective mark.
                                                        CRIMINAL PENALTIES IN CASE OF                                                                    Forms of Assignment
    written work or                                                                                     2. Accompanied by a copy of the
                                                          COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT                                                                            1. Total
  doing anything that                                                                                       agreement, if any, governing the use of
                                                                                                                                                            2. Partial
      is normally                                                                                           the collective mark.
                                                                                                                                                         Functions of Trademarks
   considered to be                                    1. Imprisonment of one (1) year to three
                                                                                                                                                            1. To point out distinctly the origin or
 the exclusive right of                                   (3) years plus a fine ranging from Fifty    Colorable Imitation mark
                                                                                                                                                               ownership of the articles to which it is
 the copyright holder.                                    thousand pesos (P50,000) to One                1. Confusion of goods (product confusion)
                                                                                                                                                               affixed.
                                                          hundred        fifty   thousand     pesos      2. Confusion of business (source or origin
                                                                                                                                                            2. To secure to him who has been
                                                          (P150,000) for the first offense.                 confusion)
                                                                                                                                                               instrumental in bringing into market a
      There is no          Public documents            2. Imprisonment of three (3) years and         Conditions for patentability
                                                                                                                                                               superior article or merchandise the
       copyright          can be plagiarized so           one (1) day to six (6) years plus a fine
                                                                                                         1. Novelty                                            fruit of his industry and skill.
   infringement on          long as it is not             ranging from One hundred fifty
                                                                                                         2. Involves an inventive step                      3. To prevent fraud and imposition.
  public documents.          acknowledged.                thousand pesos to Five hundred
                                                                                                         3. Industrially Applicable                      Grounds for cancellation of Collective
                                                          thousand (P500,000) for the second
                                                                                                                                                         Marks
                                                          offense.                                    Copyrightable works
                                                                                                                                                            1. The court shall cancel the registration
                                                       3. Imprisonment of six (6) years and one          1. Literarcy and Artisic works
NBI-MICROSOFT        CORPORATION              vs.                                                                                                              of a collective if the person requesting
                                                          day to nine (9) years plus a fine ranging      2. Deratives works
HWANG,J., et. al. [G.R. No. 147043 ]                                                                                                                           the cancellation proves that only the
                                                          from Five hundred thousand pesos            Elements of an action for Unfair
                                                                                                                                                               registered owner uses the mark.
                                                          (P500,000) to P1,500,000 for the third      Competition
Microsoft discovered Beltron's illegal activities                                                                                                           2. Or that he uses or permits its use in
                                                          offense.                                       1. Confusing similarities in the general
of copying and selling Microsoft software,                                                                                                                     contravention of the agreements
                                                       4. In all cases, subsidiary imprisonment in           appearance of the goods.
prompting the NBI to seize numerous                                                                                                                            referred to in Subsection 166.2.
                                                          cases of insolvency.                           2. Intent to deceive the public and
CD-ROMs containing unauthorized Microsoft                                                                                                                   3. Or that he uses or permits its use in a
                                                                                                             defraud a competitor.
software, which led to legal action for                        AFFIDAVIT EVIDENCE                                                                              manner liable to deceive trade circles or
                                                                                                      Elements to be established in Trademark
copyright     infringement      and       unfair                                                                                                               the public as to the origin or any other
                                                                                                      Infringement
competition; consequently, the Court granted        An affidavit made before the notary public in                                                              common characteristics of the goods or
                                                                                                      VPU
the petition, affirming the copyright               actions for infringement, reciting the facts                                                               services concerned. (Sec 167.3)
                                                                                                         1. Validity of the Mark
infringement due to Beltron's unauthorized          required to be stated under the IPC. (Sec.           2. Plaintiff's ownership of the Mark
actions and the deceptive similarity of the         216.1)                                                                                               Grounds for cancellation of Patent
                                                                                                         3. Use of the mark or its colorable
CD's packaging to genuine Microsoft                                                                                                                      CIND
                                                    Note: As a prima facie proof, the affidavit              imitation by the alleged infringer result
products.                                                                                                                                                   1. The invention is Not new or patentable
                                                    shifts the burden of proof to the defendant, to          in “likelihood of confusion”
                                                                                                                                                            2. The patent does not Disclose the
Remedies     in       case     of     copyright     prove the ownership of the copyrighted work.      Elements of copyrightability
                                                                                                                                                               invention clearly and completely for it
infringement                                                                                             1. Originality
                                                                                                                                                               to be carried out by any person skilled
                                                                                                         2. Expression
   1. Injunction                                                                                                                                               in art; or
                                                                                                      Elements of originality
   2. Damages, including legal costs and                                                                                                                    3. Contrary to public order or morality
                                                                                                         1. It is independently created by the
      other expenses, as he may have                                                                                                                        4. Patent is found Invalid in an action for
                                                                                                             author, and
      incurred due to the infringement as                                                                                                                      infringement.
                                                                                                         2. It possesses some minimal degree of
      well as the profits the infringer may                                                                                                              Grounds for cancellation of Utilitiy Models
                                                                                                             creativity.
      have made due to such infringement
                                                                                                      First to file rule                                 FICQ
   3. Impounding during the pendency of
      the action sales invoices and other                                                                1. 2 or more persons have made the                 1. The     claimed invention does not
      documents evidencing sales                                                                            invention separately and independently             Qualify for registration as a utility
   4. Destruction without any compensation                                                                  of each other - the person who FILED               model and does not meet the
      all infringing copies                                                                                                                                    requirements of registrability.
   2. That the description and the claims do           patent      or      his     licensee     is   Limitation on Copyright                                   use is in the public interest and is
      not Comply with the prescribed                   anti‐competitive at any time after the        The following acts shall not constitute an                compatible with fair use.
      requirements;                                    grant of the patent                           infringement of copyright:
   3. That any drawing which is necessary for      4. In case of public non‐commercial use                                                                 9. The public performance of a work, in
                                                                                                        1. Performance of a work, once it has
      the understanding of the invention has           of the patent by the patentee, without                                                                 a place where no admission fee is
                                                                                                           been lawfully made accessible to the
      not been Furnished;                              satisfactory reason at any time after the                                                              charged.
                                                                                                           public, if done privately and free of
   4. That the owner of the utility model              grant of the patent
                                                                                                           charge or for a charitable or religious
      registration is not the Inventor or his      5. If the patented invention is not being                                                               10. Public display of the original or a copy
                                                                                                           institution or society.
      successor in title.                              worked in the Philippines on a                                                                          of the work not made by means of a
Grounds for cancellation of Industrial                 commercial scale, although capable of                                                                   film, slide, television image or
                                                                                                        2. The making of quotations from a
Design                                                 being worked, without satisfactory                                                                      otherwise on screen or by means of any
                                                                                                           published work if they are compatible
REN                                                    reason after the expiration of 4 years                                                                  other device or process (e.g. public
                                                                                                           with fair use and only to the extent
   1. The subject matter of the industrial             from the date of filing of the                                                                          display using posters mounted on walls
                                                                                                           justified for the purpose.
      design is not Registerable.                      application or 3 years from the date of                                                                 and display boards).
   2. The subject matter is Not new; or                the patent whichever is later. (Sec. 93 in
                                                                                                        3. Communication to the public by
   3. The subject matter of the industrial             relation to Sec. 94)                                                                                11. Any use made of a work for the purpose
                                                                                                           mass media of articles on current
      design Extends beyond the content of         6. Where the demand for patented drugs                                                                      of any judicial proceedings or for the
                                                                                                           political, social, economic, scientific or
      the application as originally filed.             and medicines is not being met to an                                                                    giving of professional advice by a legal
                                                                                                           religious topic, lectures, addresses and
                                                       adequate extent and on reasonable                                                                       practitioner.
Grounds for cancellation of Layout-design                                                                  other works of the same nature
                                                       terms, as determined by the Secretary
of integrated circuits                                                                                                                                  Limitations on the use of Tradenames or
                                                       of the Department of Health (Sec. 10,
PRF                                                                                                     4. As part of reports of current events         Business names
                                                       R.A 9502)
                                                                                                           (e.g. music played or tunes on the           A person may not:
                                                Internationally well-known marks
   1. The layout-design is not Protectable                                                                 occasion of a sporting event and such           1. Use any name or designation contrary
                                                   1. The Philippines' competent authority
      under this Act;                                                                                      tunes were picked up during a new                   to public order or morals
                                                       considers a "well-known" mark as
   2. The Right holder is not entitled to                                                                  coverage of the event).                         2. Use a name if it is liable to deceive
                                                       belonging to someone other than the
      protection under this Act; or                                                                                                                            trade circles or the public as to the
                                                       applicant      or      registrant,    both
   3. The application for registration of the                                                           5. For teaching purposes, provided that                nature of the enterprise identified by
                                                       internationally and in the Philippines.
      layout-design was not Filed within two                                                               the source and of the name of the                   that name. (Sec. 165.1, IPC)
                                                   2. Need not be used or registered in the
      (2) years from its first commercial                                                                  author, if appearing in the work, are           3. Subsequently use a trade name likely to
                                                       Philippines
      exploitation anywhere in the world.                                                                  mentioned.                                          mislead the public as a third party. (Sec.
                                                   3. Not required to be widely known, but
                                                                                                                                                               165.2, b, IPC)
Grounds      for   cancellation      of  the           only by the pertinent segment of the
                                                                                                        6. Recording made in educational                   4. Copy or simulate the name of any
compulsory licensing                                   public.
                                                                                                           institutions of a work included in a                domestic product). (for imported
   1. Ground for the grant of the               Limitations       on      the     actions     for
                                                                                                           broadcast for the use of such                   5. Copy or simulate a mark registered in
      compulsory license no longer exists       infringement
                                                                                                           educational institutions, provided that             accordance with the provisions of IPC
      and is unlikely to recur;                    1. Right of prior user
                                                                                                           such recording must be deleted within               (for imported products).
   2. Licensee has neither begun to supply         2. Relief against publisher
                                                                                                           a reasonable period after they were first       6. Use a mark or trade name calculated to
      the domestic market nor made serious         3. Relief against newspaper
                                                                                                           broadcast.                                          induce the public to believe that the
      preparation therefore;                                                                                                                                   article      is manufactured in the
   3. Licensee has not complied with the        Limitation to the civil/criminal action
                                                                                                        7. The making of ephemeral recordings                  Philippines, or that it is manufactured
      prescribed terms of the license.             1. No damages can be recovered for acts of
                                                                                                           by a broadcasting organization by                   in any foreign country or locality other
                                                      infringement committed more than
                                                                                                           means of its own facilities and for use             than the country or locality where it is
Grounds for compulsory licensing and the              four (4) years before the filing of the
                                                                                                           in its own broadcast.                               in fact manufactured.
period for filing a petition                          action for infringement. (Sec. 79, IPC)
                                                                                                                                                        Note: Items 4, 5 and 6 only apply to imported
   1. National emergency
                                                                                                        8. The use made of a work by or under           products and those imported articles shall not
   2. Where the public interest, at any time       2. The criminal action prescribes in three
                                                                                                           the direction or control of the              be admitted to entry at any customhouse of the
      after the grant of the patent                   (3) years from the commission of the
                                                                                                           government, by the National Library          Philippines (Sec. 166, IPC).
   3. Where a judicial or administrative              crime. (Sec. 84, IPC)
                                                                                                           or by educational, scientific, or
      body has determined that the manner
                                                                                                           professional institutions where such         Modes of obtaining license to exploit
      of exploitation by the owner of the
                                                                                                                                                        patent rights
  1. Voluntary licensing                             1. Indusrtial Design                            Rights of a copyright owner                          6.   Substantive examination
  2. Compulsory licensing                            2. Integrated circuit                                                                                7.   Grant of patent
                                                                                                        1. Economic right
Non-copyrightable works                              3. Layout design/topography                                                                          8.   Publication upon grant
                                                                                                        2. Moral right
  1. Idea, procedure, system, method or                                                                                                                   9.   Issuance of certificate
                                                  Patent Infringement
     operation, concept, principle, discovery                                                        The right to authorize the (Broadcasting          Test of Patent Infringement
     or mere data as such                         MOUSI                                              organization)
  2. News of the day and other items of              1. Making                                                                                            1. Literal Infringement Test
     press information                               2. Using                                           1. Direct or indirect reproduction                2. Doctrine          of      Equivalents
  3. Any Official text of a legislative,             3. Offering for sale                               2. First public distribution of the original         Function-means-and-result test
     administrative or legal nature, as well as      4. Selling or;                                        and copies
     any official translation thereof                                                                                                                  Transfer of Copyright to take effect
                                                     5. Importing a patented product or a               3. Commercial rental to the public of the
  4. Pleadings                                          product obtained directly or indirectly            original and copies                            1. If inter vivos, must be in writing; and
  5. Decisions of courts and tribunals -                from a patented process                                                                           2. Filed in the National Library upon
     this refers to original decisions and not    Remedies of the owner of the patent                The right to carry out/authorize/prevent                payment of prescribed fees. (Sec. 182,
     to annotated decisions such as the           against infringement                               the (Broadcasting organization)                         IPC)
     SCRA or SCAD as these already fall
     under the classification of derivative          1. Civil action for infringement                   1. Rebroadcasting of their broadcasts;         Transfer of right affected
     works, hence copyrightable                      2. Criminal action for infringement                2. Recording in any manner, including the
                                                     3. Administrative remedy                                                                             1. By inheritance or bequest
  6. Any work of the Government of the                                                                     making of films or the use of video
                                                                                                                                                          2. License contract
     Philippines                                  Remedy of person not having the right to                 tape, of their broadcasts for the
  7. TV Programs                                  patent                                                   purpose of communication to the             Who can file an action for infringement
  8. System of bookkeeping                                                                                 public of television broadcasts of the
                                                  PRFS                                                                                                    1. The patentee or his successors-in-
  9. Statutes                                                                                              same; and
                                                                                                                                                             interest may file an action for
                                                                                                        3. Use of such records for fresh
Non-patentable Inventions                            1. Prosecute the application as his own                                                                 infringement.
                                                                                                           transmissions or for fresh recording
PAD‐SCAD                                             2. File the new patent application
  1. Discoveries, scientific theories and            3. Request the application to be refused;       Rights which are not covered under a                2. Any foreign national or juridical entity
      mathematical methods                              or                                           “Droit de suite”                                       who meets the requirements of Sec. 3
  2. In the case of Drugs and medicines,             4. Seek cancellation of the patent                 1. Print                                            and not engaged in business in the
      mere discovery of a new form or new         Remedy of the true and actual owner                   2. Etchings                                         Philippines, to which a patent has been
      property of a known substance which                                                               3. Engravings                                       granted or assigned, whether or not it is
      does not result in the enhancement of       CCA                                                                                                       licensed to do business in the
                                                                                                        4. Works of applied art
      the efficacy of that substance                                                                    5. Similar works wherein the author                 Philippines.
                                                     1. the Court shall order for his                                                                  Who can grant a compulsory license
  3. Schemes, rules and methods of                                                                         primarily derives gain from the
                                                        substitution as patentee, or                                                                     1. The Director of Legal Affairs
      performing mental acts, playing games                                                                proceeds of the production. (Sec. 201,
                                                     2. at the option of the true inventor, Cancel                                                       2. R.A. 9502 (Universally Accessible
      or doing business, and programs for                                                                  IPC)
                                                        the patent, and Award actual damages                                                                Cheaper and Quality Medicines Act of
      computers                                                                                      Salient Features of the Paris Convention
                                                        in his favor if warranted by the                                                                    2008) however amended Sec. 93
  4. Methods for treatment of the human or                                                           Trademarks
                                                        circumstances.
      Animal body
  5. Plant varieties or animal breeds or                                                                1.   National treatment principle              Related Goods Principle
                                                  Requirements for a mark to be registered              2.   Right of priority
      essentially biological process for the                                                                                                              1. Belong or share identical descriptive
      production of plants or animals. This          1. A visible sign (not sounds or scents);          3.   Protection against unfair competition
                                                                                                        4.   Protection of trade names                       properties
      provision     shall    not    apply to            and
                                                                                                        5.   Protection of well-known marks               2. When they share identical physical
      microorganisms and non‐biological              2. Capable of distinguishing one’s goods
                                                                                                                                                             attributes or essential characteristics in
      and microbiological processes                     and services from another                    Steps in the registration of a Patent                   form, composition, texture, or quality.
  6. Aesthetic creations                          Rights conferred to a Patent
  7. Anything which is Contrary to public                                                               1.   Filing of the application                 Test to determine confusing similarity
      order or morality. (Sec. 22, IPC as            1. Subject matter is a product                     2.   Accordance of the filing date             between marks
      amended by R.A. 9502)                          2. Subject matter is a process                     3.   Formality examination
Other Forms of Patentable Inventions                 3. Right to assign the patent                      4.   Classification and search                    1. Dominancy test
                                                                                                        5.   Publication of application                   2. Totality or holistic test
   GLOSSARY (DEFINITION OF TERMS)                     and that contributing natural persons will not    shall be liable as a contributory infringer and     Dominancy test - infringement occurs if a
                                                      be identified. (Sec. 171.2)                       shall be jointly and severally liable with the      competing trademark shares the dominant
Abstract - A concise summary of the                                                                     infringer.                                          features of another, leading to confusion.
disclosure of the invention as contained in the       Colorable imitation - a close or ingenious
description, claims and merely serves as              imitation that deceives ordinary persons or an    Doctrine of Equivalents - Occurs when a             Equivalent Device - It is such that a mechanic
technical information.                                ordinary purchaser into mistaking it for the      device appropriates a prior invention by            of ordinary skill in construction of similar
                                                      original.                                         adopting its original idea and, although with       machinery, having the forms, specifications
Affidavit Evidence - an affidavit made before                                                           some modification and change, performs              and machine before him, could substitute in
the notary public in actions for infringement,        Communication to the public of a                  substantially    the    same    function   in       the place of the mechanism described without
reciting the facts required to be stated under        performance or a sound recording - the            substantially the same way to achieve               the exercise of the inventive faculty.
the IPC. (Sec. 216.1)                                 transmission to the public, by any medium,        substantially the same result.
                                                      otherwise than by broadcasting, of sounds of a                                                        Fixation -the embodiment of sounds, or of
Audiovisual work or fixation - work that              performance or the representations of sounds      Doctrine of Exhaustion - The owner of the           the representations thereof, from which they
consists of a series of related images which          fixed in a sound recording. This term includes    patent loses control over any further sales or      can    be     perceived,    reproduced,   or
impart the impression of motion, with or              making the sounds or representations of           resales of a product once it has been sold in       communicated through a device.
without accompanying sounds, susceptible of           sounds fixed in a sound recording audible to      the domestic market for the first time, either
being made visible and, where accompanied             the public.                                       with or without the holder's consent. (Sec 72.1,    Idem sonans - Similarity of sound is sufficient
by sounds, susceptible of being made audible.                                                           IPC)                                                to rule that the two marks are confusingly
                                                      Copyrights- A right over literary and artistic                                                        similar when applied to merchandise of the
Automatic Protection Principle - Works are            works which are original intellectual creations   Doctrine of Fair Use - “Fair use” permits a         same descriptive properties.
protected by the sole fact of their creation          in the literary and artistic domain protected     secondary use that “serves the copyright
irrespective of their content, quality, or purpose.   from the moment of creation. (Sec. 171.1, IPC)    objective of stimulating productive thought         Industrial Design – any composition of lines
                                                                                                        and public instruction without excessively          or colors or any three-dimensional form,
Broadcasting organization -shall include a            Copyright Infringement - It is the doing by       diminishing the incentives for creativity”.         whether or not associated with lines or colors.
natural person or a juridical entity duly             any person, without the consent of the owner                                                          Provided that such composition or form gives
authorized to engage in broadcasting; and             of the copyright, of anything the sole right to   Doctrine of Mechanical Equivalents - a              a special appearance to and can serve as
                                                      do which is conferred by statute on the owner     patent infringement occurs when the alleged         pattern for an industrial product or
Broadcasting - the transmission by wireless           of the copyright. The act of lifting from         infringer has substituted in lieu of some           handicraft. (Sec. 112, IPL)
means for the public reception of sounds or of        another’s book substantial portions of            unessential part of the patented process, a
images or of representations thereof; such                                                                                                                  Integrated circuit – A product, in its final
                                                      discussions and examples and the failure to       well-known mechanical equivalent.
transmission by satellite is also “broadcasting”                                                                                                            form, or an intermediate form, in which the
                                                      acknowledge the same is an infringement of        Doctrine of Secondary Meaning - a word or           elements, at least one of which is an active
where the means for decrypting are provided           copyright.
to the public by the broadcasting organization                                                          phrase originally incapable of exclusive            element and some of all of the
or with its consent.                                                                                    appropriation with reference to an article on       interconnections are integrally formed in and
                                                      Copyright Vest- Works are protected from the
                                                                                                        the market, because it is geographical or           or on a piece of material, and in which is
                                                      time of their creation, irrespective of their
Claim - Defines the matter for which                                                                    otherwise descriptive, may nevertheless be          intended to perform an electronic function.
                                                      mode or form of expression, as well as of their
protection is sought. Each claim shall be clear                                                         used exclusively by one producer with
                                                      content, quality and purpose.                                                                         Joint Work - Work prepared by 2 or more
and concise, and shall be supported by the                                                              reference to his article so long as in that trade
                                                                                                                                                            authors with the intention that their
description.                                          Criminal    Penalties-   A    penalty    of       and to that branch of the purchasing public,
                                                                                                                                                            contributions be merged into inseparable or
                                                      imprisonment from 2 years to 5and a fine          the word or phrase has come to mean that the
Collective Mark - is a mark or trade name                                                                                                                   independent parts of the unitary whole.
                                                      ranging from P50,000 to P200,000 (Sec. 170,       article was his product.
used by the members of a cooperative, an              IPC.)                                                                                                 Layout      design/topography        –    The
association or other collective group or                                                                Doctrine of the File Wrapper - This doctrine
                                                                                                                                                            three-dimensional     disposition,     however
organization. (Sec. 40, R.A. 166)                                                                       balances the doctrine of equivalents. Patentee
                                                      Doctrine of Contributory Infringement -                                                               expressed, of the elements, at least one of
                                                                                                        is precluded from claiming as part of patented
                                                      Anyone who actively induces the infringement                                                          which is an active element, and of some or all
Collective Work - is a work which has been                                                              product that which he had to excise or modify
                                                      of a patent or provides the infringer with a                                                          of the interconnections of an integrated
created by two (2) or more natural persons at                                                           in order to avoid patent office rejection, and
                                                      component of a patented product or of a                                                               circuit, or such a three-dimensional
the initiative and under the glossdirection of                                                          he may omit any additions that he was
                                                      product produced because of a patented                                                                disposition prepared for an integrated circuit
another with the understanding that it will be                                                          compelled to add by patent office regulations.
                                                      process knowing it to be especially adopted for                                                       intended for manufacture.
disclosed by the latter under his own name            infringing the patented invention and not
                                                      suitable for substantial non-infringing use
Literal Infringement Test - Occurs if an           first fixation of the sounds of a performance or    Trademarks - Any visible sign capable of
accused item pertains directly within the          other sounds, or the representation of sounds.      distinguishing the goods (trademark) or
scope of the claims.                                                                                   services (service mark) of an enterprise.
                                                   Publication of a fixed performance or a
Must carry rule - Must‐carry rule is another       sound recording - the offering of copies of         Trade Name - a name or designation
limitation on copyright. It obligates operators    the fixed performance or the sound recording        identifying or distinguishing an enterprise.
to carry the signals of local channels within      to the public, with the consent of the right
their respective systems.                          holder: Provided, That copies are offered to        Unfair Competition - It is passing off (or
                                                   the public in reasonable quality.                   palming off) or attempting to pass off the
Mutatis Mutandis – aka 'all necessary                                                                  goods or business of one person as the goods
changes having been made' or 'with the             Public Performance - Performance at a place         or business of another to deceive the public.
necessary changes’. It means making necessary      or at places where persons outside the normal
alterations while not affecting the main point     circle of a family and that family’s closest        Unity of Invention - The application shall
at issue/the main point remains the same.          social acquaintances are or can be present. It is   relate to one invention only or to a group of
                                                   performed at a specific time and place.             inventions forming a single general inventive
Non-Competing Goods - Goods though                                                                     concept. (Sec. 38.1)
they’re not in actual competition, they are        Published works - Those works which, with
related to each other assuming that they           the consent of the authors, are made available      Utility model – A name given to inventions in
originate from one manufacturer.                   to the public by wire or wireless means in such     the mechanical field.
                                                   a way that members of the public may access
Patent Infringement - making, using,               these works from a place and time individually
offering of sale, selling, or importing a          chosen by them: provided, that availability of
patented product or a product obtained             such copies has been such, as to satisfy the
directly or indirectly from a patented process,    reasonable requirement of the public, having
or the use of a patented process without the       regard to the nature of the work.
authorization of the patentee. (Sec. 76, IPC)
                                                   Sound recording - the fixation of the sounds
Performers - actors, singers, musicians,           of a performance or of other sounds, or
dancers, and other persons who act, sing,          representation of sound, other than in the
declaim, play in, interpret, or otherwise          form of a fixation incorporated in a
perform literary and artistic work.                cinematographic or other audiovisual work.
Prior user - Person other than the applicant,      Trademark Infringement – It occurs when
who in good faith, started using the invention     someone uses someone else's mark or
in the Philippines, or undertaken serious          tradename in a way that could confuse or
preparations to use the same, before the filing    mislead consumers or others about where the
date or priority date of the application shall     goods or services are coming from or who the
have the right to continue the use thereof, but    business is without the owner's permission.
this right shall only be transferred or assigned   This could include using someone else's mark
further with his enterprise or business.           or tradename on labels, signs, prints,
                                                   packages,        wrappers,       receptacles,
Producer of a sound recording - the person,        advertisements, or reproductions of other
or the legal entity, who or which takes the        marks.
initiative and has the responsibility for the