LMYB2019 Onefile
LMYB2019 Onefile
THE HUNGARIAN LABOUR MARKET, 2019; IN FOCUS: YOUNG
THE HUNGARIAN
LABOUR MARKET
2019
EDITORS
KÁROLY FAZEKAS
MÁRTON CSILLAG
ZOLTÁN HERMANN
ÁGOTA SCHARLE
EDITORS
KÁROLY FAZEKAS
MÁRTON CSILLAG
ZOLTÁN HERMANN
ÁGOTA SCHARLE
Translated by: Anna Kiss (Foreword, In Focus: 2.3, K2.5, 3.2, 5.3, 5.5,
7.1, 8.1); Krisztina Olasz (The Hungarian Labour Market in 2018,
In Focus: 2.1, 2.2, 2.5, 6.2, 7.2, 7.3, 8.2, Labour Market Policy Tools);
Dániel Tordai (In Focus 2.4) Heléna Hönich (Pocketbook); Éva
Czethoffer (Statistical Data); Szolnoki Nikolett (In Focus : Introduc-
tion, 1., 3.1, 3.3, 4.1, K4.1, 4.2, 5.1, K5.1, 5.2, 5.4, 6.1)
Revised by: Stuart Oldham
ISSN 1785-8062
5
5 The impact of employment policies ............................................................... 99
5.1 Job search behaviour of young people not in education, training or
employment (Tamás Molnár) ......................................................................... 99
K5.1 Job search channels (Tamás Molnár) ................................................... 104
5.2 Active labour market instruments targeting young people and the
Youth Guarantee Programme (Judit Krekó, Tamás Molnár & Ágota
Scharle) ............................................................................................................. 105
5.3 The effect of the job protection action plan (András Svraka) ............ 110
5.4 The role of the minimum wage in the evolution of young people’s
earnings (Márton Csillag) ............................................................................. 112
5.5 Youth in public employment, with particular emphasis on early
secondary school leavers (György Molnár) ............................................... 115
6 The situation of Roma youth ......................................................................... 121
6.1 Schooling and employment of Roma youth: changes between 2011
and 2016 (Ágota Scharle) ............................................................................... 121
6.2 Neighbourhood-related differences in the share of youth not in
education, employment or training before and after lowering the
school-leaving age (János Köllő & Anna Sebők) ....................................... 126
7 Adult education and training and over-qualification ............................... 131
7.1 Workplace and non-formal education and training of youth (Júlia
Varga) ................................................................................................................. 131
7.2 The growing importance of non-cognitive skills in job search and at
work (Károly Fazekas) ................................................................................... 134
7.3 The labour market situation of young graduates, overqualification
and the value of higher education degrees (Júlia Varga) ........................ 137
8 Geographic and occupational mobility ..................................................... 144
8.1 Occupational mobility among youth with different educational
attainment levels (Júlia Varga) ..................................................................... 144
8.2 Outward migration of youth – Young people working abroad
(Ágnes Hárs & Dávid Simon) ...................................................................... 150
Labour market policy tools ( June 2018 – May 2019) (Miklós Hajdu,
Ágnes Makó, Fruzsina Nábelek & Zsanna Nyírő) ........................................ 155
1. Institutional changes ...................................................................................... 157
2. Benefits ............................................................................................................. 158
3. Services ............................................................................................................. 159
4. Active labour market polices and comprehensive programmes ........... 160
5. Policy tools affecting the labour market .................................................... 162
Statistical data........................................................................................................... 167
1 Basic economic indicators............................................................................... 169
2 Population...........................................................................................................171
3 Economic activity............................................................................................. 174
6
4 Employment....................................................................................................... 182
5 Unemployment.................................................................................................. 192
6 Wages................................................................................................................... 209
7 Education........................................................................................................... 216
8 Labour demand indicators...............................................................................221
9 Regional inequalities........................................................................................ 224
10 Industrial relations.......................................................................................... 232
11 Welfare provisions.......................................................................................... 237
12 The tax burden on work................................................................................ 243
13 International comparison.............................................................................. 247
14 Description of the main data sources......................................................... 250
Index of tables and figures...................................................................................... 256
7
Authors
Tamás Bakó – IE CERS
Márton Csillag – Budapest Institute
Éva Czethoffer – CERS
Károly Fazekas – IE CERS
Bori Greskovics – Budapest Institute
Miklós Hajdu – Corvinus University of Budapest
Ágnes Hárs – KOPINT–TÁRKI
Zoltán Hermann – IE CERS
Dániel Horn – IE CERS
János Köllő – IE CERS
Judit Krekó – IE CERS
Judit Lakatos – Hungarian Central Statistical Office
Ágnes Makó – Institute for Economic and Enterprise Research
György Molnár – IE CERS
Tamás Molnár – Budapest Institute
Fruzsina Nábelek – Institute for Economic and Enterprise Research
Zsanna Nyírő – Institute for Economic and Enterprise Research
Ágota Scharle – Budapest Institute
Anna Sebők – IE CERS
András Semjén – IE CERS
Dávid Simon – ELTE TÁTK
András Svraka – Ministry of Finance
József Tajti – Ministry of Finance
Dániel Tordai – CEU
Endre Tóth – Budapest Institute
Júlia Varga – IE CERS
FOREWORD
The Hungarian Labour Market Yearbook series was launched in the year 2000
by the Institute of Economics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences with the
support of the National Employment Foundation. The yearbook presents the
actual characteristics of the Hungarian labour market and employment policy,
and provides an in-depth analysis of a topical issue each year. The intention of
the editorial board was to deliver relevant and useful information on trends
in the Hungarian labour market, the legislative and institutional background
of employment policy, and up-to-date findings from Hungarian and interna-
tional research studies to civil servants, staff of the public employment service,
municipalities, NGOs, public administration offices, education and research
institutions, the press and the electronic media.
It was an important focus for the analyses and data published in the yearbook
series to serve as a good source of knowledge for higher education as well, on
the various topics of labour economics and human resources management. The
yearbook series presents the main characteristics and trends of the Hungarian
labour market in an international comparison based on the available statistical
information, conceptual research and empirical analyses in a clearly structured
and easily accessible format.
Continuing our previous editorial practice, we selected an area that we con-
sidered especially important from the perspective of understanding Hungarian
labour market trends and the effectiveness of evidence-based employment pol-
icy. Based on the decision of the editorial board, this year’s ‘In Focus’ revolves
around the labour market situation of youth. The yearbook is broken down
into five main sections.
1. The Hungarian Labour market in 2018
The labour market in 2018 was essentially characterised by surplus demand; the
mobilizable labour force potential has shrunk significantly compared to that of
the previous year. In this context, public employment quotas have been further
reduced by the government in order to encourage those formerly working in
this manner to enter the primary labour market instead. The expansion of the
number of those in employment continued in 2018, however, the rate of the
expansion was slower than that of the previous two years. Based on the labour
force survey of the HCSO, the annual average number of those in employment
changed to 4,470,000, exceeding that of a year before by 1.1 percent, that is, by
47,000 (in contrast with the 1.6 percent growth in 2017 and the 3.4 growth in
9
the hungarian labour market
2016). The number of students fulfilling the criterion of being employed has
grown significantly, compared to the low base. The growth of the employment
rate of students was driven mostly by an increase in wages caused by an excess
demand for labour (and a trend of rising costs of living for those living in sepa-
rate households – especially housing costs); however, working while studying
is still less widespread in Hungary than in most Northern and Western Euro-
pean countries. The labour force potential (the supply) is comprised of the un-
employed, and the inactive who want to work – in EU terms, the so-called un-
deremployed, and within the particularities of the Hungarian labour market,
public workers. (The latter can be considered labour force potential only from
a primary labour market perspective, as they are included in the group of those
registered as employed.) In 2018, all of the above categories shrank in number
significantly, causing the labour supply to decline further. In 2018, the labour
force potential still significantly exceeded the number of job vacancies despite
the decrease, but the geographical (and possibly the structural) mismatch is still
quite significant. An equalisation could be facilitated by the intensification of
domestic migration, however, this is seriously hampered by the fact that hous-
ing costs are the highest in the places where employment opportunities are the
best. The excess demand for labour and government measures related to wag-
es have resulted in a significant increase of wages, with an increase rate that is
marginally below that of the previous year.
As a result of the COVID-19 epidemic that appeared in Hungary in March
2020, the favourable labour market processes were spectacularly broken. The
average monthly number of persons employed was already 56 thousand less
in March than in the previous month and 22 thousand less than in March of
the previous year. Although at the time of writing these sentences, it is not yet
known for sure how much unemployment officially increased in April 2020,
an estimate can be made using the relationship between the number of Google
searches and the number of the registered unemployed.
2. Youth in focus
The chapters of In Focus review the main aspects of the labour market situa-
tion of youth from secondary education to the first job. Chapter 1 presents
the main trends of educational attainment and employment of the past fifteen
years. Chapter 2 analyses the competencies obtainable in school, the choice of
school, and the development of early school leaving. Chapter 3 examines the
channels through which youth leaving school are able to obtain their first work
experiences. Chapter 4 analyses the negative effects of early difficulties on the
rest of the career path, and the extent to which low local labour force demand
and high commuting costs contribute to the unemployment of youth. Chapter
5 presents the extent to which employment policy tools and services available
to youth are able to mitigate or prevent youth unemployment. Chapter 6 pro-
10
foreword
vides a short review of the educational and labour market disadvantages expe-
rienced by Roma youth. Chapter 7 examines the skills demanded by employers,
how the labour market values the knowledge of fresh higher education gradu-
ates, and the extent to which workplace training or training conducted parallel
to work may bridge skill gaps. Finally, chapter 8 reviews the occupational and
geographical mobility of youth.
In past years, the employment rate of youth increased, while the rate of those
not in education, employment, or training decreased. This could make the tran-
sition from school to work appear seamless, however, the details presented in
In Focus will nuance the picture. This is because the primary explanation for
improving indicators is not the smooth functioning of the institutions assist-
ing the transition. Rather, it is that the majority of better educated youth can
find jobs within a short time without state assistance, while a substantial part of
the undereducated find short-term job opportunities with wage subsidies or as
public workers. An element of youth who leave school early, after the comple-
tion of the eighth grade of elementary school, are “lost” either in public employ-
ment or without a job, and do not receive substantial assistance either to finish
their studies or to enter the primary labour market. Parallel to the rise of the
employment rate, the rate of those participating in full-time education or train-
ing started to decrease, and the attainment level of the fresh graduate age groups
stopped increasing. Additionally, policy steps with regard to public education
and higher education do not support the development of general skills either.
The further improvement of the labour market situation of youth may be
hindered in the long run by two circumstances: On the one hand, as demand
moves towards non-cognitive skills, even a part of fresh graduates considered
educated will not be able to fulfill employers’ requirements, while this may be
even more marked in the case of those with lower educational attainment. On
the other hand, youth who found jobs easily during the upswing period but
whose basic skills are weak will be, in the future, less able to adapt to employers’
demands changing due to technological development. Considering its existing
capacities, it is difficult for the state employment service to provide them with
adequate support to fill the gaps in their skills and find long-term employment.
These issues may affect the generations who enter the labour market in a poten-
tially unfavourable economic climate even more gravely.
3. Labour market policy tools (June 2018 – May 2019)
This chapter summarizes the main legislative changes in connection with labour
market policies between June 2018 and May 2019.
The amendment to the vocational training act introduced the possibility of
closed-system electronic long-distance training with effect from 1 January 2019.
As of January 2019, a chancellery system has been introduced in vocational train-
ing centres within the competence of the Ministry for Innovation and Technol-
11
the hungarian labour market
ogy – following the model already in place in higher education. The chancel-
lor is a senior manager in charge of the institution, appointed by the minister
in charge of the vocational training field. The Vocational Training and Educa-
tion (VET) Innovation Council was established in September 2018, with the
main objective of providing a regular platform for dialogue between the gov-
ernment and the main agents of the vocational training system. In March 2019
the government approved a document that contains the “Vocational training
4.0” strategy. According to this, from September 2020, the-four-plus-one-year
training structure of vocational grammar schools (szakgimnázium) will be re-
placed by the five-year training model of technical grammar schools (technikum),
while secondary vocational schools (szakközépiskola) will be transformed into
three-year vocational training schools (szakképző iskola). In dual vocational ed-
ucation and training, apprenticeship contracts will be replaced by student em-
ployment contracts.
Due to the new regulations in effect as of 1 January 2019, the pensioners’ co-
operatives system lost its financial purpose, since pensioners in their own right
who are in employment as defined by the Labour Code are not under insur-
ance obligation, and thus are exempt from paying pension contributions and
the health insurance contribution in kind, and are only obliged to pay personal
income tax on their wages – in the same way as if they received remuneration
as members of a pensioners’ cooperative of public interest.
With the raising of the minimum wage, the amounts of the related benefits
have respectively also grown. And with regard to labour market services, new
applications may be submitted within the framework of the Széchenyi 2020
scheme, and this time, businesses may apply with plans related to the develop-
ment of labour market adaptability, the strengthening of social responsibility,
and the expansion of their role as service providers as well.
Throughout the past year, the aims of active employment policy were the re-
duction of public education, the encouragement of lawful employment, sup-
porting entrepreneurship, supporting those raising small children to enter the
labour market, the encouragement of the creation of jobs, supporting the estab-
lishment of workers’ hotels, and the development of labour market adaptability.
The amounts of the minimum wage and the guaranteed minimum salaries
continued to increase in 2019. Additionally, a new law on social contribution
tax entered into force, discontinuing the former health contribution tax and
prescribing a social contribution tax with a universal rate of 19.5 percent. The
rate of the tax has been lowered by 2 percent as of July 2019. The range of social
contribution tax relief options has shrunk by several factors, and a new tax re-
lief option has been introduced, available for the employment of new entrants
into the labour market.
The cafeteria system has also been renewed: as of 2019, the Szép card is the
only type of benefit in kind available. The range of certain defined benefits has
12
foreword
also been reduced, and the tax exemption of several forms of benefits has been
discontinued.
As of the 1 January 2019, the amendment of the Labour Code approved in
December 2018 entered into force. The amendment raises the duration of the
working time banking from 12 months to 36 months in the case of collective
agreements, and also establishes that, based on a written agreement between
the employee and the employer, a maximum of 150 hours of overtime (that is,
“voluntary overtime”) may be ordered each calendar year, on top of the over-
time specified previously.
4. Statistical data
This chapter, in the same structure as in previous years, provides detailed in-
formation on the major economic trends, the characteristics of the population,
labour market participation, employment, unemployment, inactivity, wages,
education, labour demand, regional imbalances, migration, labour relations
and welfare benefits of the period since the political transition, and presents an
international comparison of certain labour market indicators.
The data presented in the chapter have two main sources: on the one hand,
the regular labour-related institutional and population surveys of the Hungar-
ian Central Statistical Office: the Labour Force Survey (LFS), institution-based
labour statistics (ILS), and the labour force account (LFA). On the other hand,
the register of the National Employment Services and its data collections: the
unemployment register database (NES REG), short-term labour market fore-
cast (PROG), wage tariff surveys (WT) and the Labour Relations Information
System of the Ministry for National Economy (LRIS). More detailed informa-
tion on these data sources is available at the end of the statistical section. In ad-
dition to the two main data providers, data on old age and disability pensions
and benefits was provided by the Central Administration of National Pension
Insurance. Finally, some tables and figures are based on information from the
online databases of the Central Statistical Office, the National Tax and Customs
Administration and the Eurostat.
The tables and figures of the chapter can be downloaded in Excel format fol-
lowing the links provided. All tables with labour market data published in the
Hungarian Labour Market Yearbook since 2000 are available at the following
link: http://adatbank.krtk.mta.hu/tukor_kereso.
5. The Hungarian labour market, pocket edition
Continuing the initiative we started last year, we have compiled a collection
of figures related to the theme of In Focus, based on Hungarian data, which
makes the development of the labour market situation of youth over time eas-
ily understandable, via long time series figures.
13
the hungarian labour market
***
The editorial board would like to thank colleagues at the Institute of Economics
– Research Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Central Statistical Office,
Hungarian State Treasury, colleagues at the Budapest Institute for Policy Analy-
sis, members of the Economics of Human Resources Committee of the Hungarian
Academy of Sciences, and the organisers and participants of the Sziráki Labour
Economics Research Conference 2019 for their help in collecting and reviewing
the necessary information, editing and preparing parts of this publication as
well as discussing it. We would like to thank the Hungarian Academy of Sci-
ences for the financial support provided to this publication.
14
THE HUNGARIAN
LABOUR MARKET
IN 2018
17
Tamás Bakó & Judit Lakatos
in March than in the previous month and 22 thousand less than in March of
the previous year. Although at the time of writing these sentences, it is not yet
known for sure how much unemployment officially increased in April 2020,
an estimate can be made using the relationship between the number of Google
searches and the number of the registered unemployed. This was also done by
Köllő–Kónya (2020), who found that the number of registered unemployed
could have exceeded 400,000 in April 2020, an increase of roughly 120,000
compared to February.
4,300 65
Thousand persons
4,100 60
Percent
3,900 55
3,700 50
3,500 45
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Quarters
Source: LFS, Central Statistical Office (CSO).
One of the reasons for the insufficient labour supply is the fact that the size
of generations entering the labour market is significantly smaller than that of
the generations exiting. While in 2010 the number of working-age persons
(aged 15–64) living in private households was 6 million 736 thousand, it de-
18
The Hungarian labour market in 2018
4 The large-scale employment of Ukrainian citi- ance because both members of a couple have to
zens sometimes reduces the chances of commut- have a taxable income in order to be eligible for
ers from regions with few jobs, as the latter are the total amount.
less likely to work overtime and their employ- 6 Due to proxy interviews (response from an-
ment may be more expensive. other member of the family) there is higher than
5 Incentives also include the family tax allow- above uncertainty about data analysed here.
19
Tamás Bakó & Judit Lakatos
Full time students and old-age pensioners are also potential labour force.
In order to boost the interest of the latter, pensioner cooperatives were intro-
duced, modelled on student cooperatives, and since January 2019 old-age
pensioner employees and their employers have been exempt from taxes and
contributions. According to the Labour Force Survey, 12.4 thousand full-
time students and 128.2 thousand pensioners were in employment in 2014
on average, while in 2018 the figures were 22.8 thousand and 169.6 thou-
sand respectively. Although the number of pensioners working is significant,
it must be taken into account that due to the rising retirement age a growing
proportion of them may not be able to work because of their health even if
they wanted. Compared to a low base, the number of students meeting the
eligibility criteria for employment increased sharply. The absolute figure is
probably underestimated7 but the surge is real (Table 1). The increasing em-
ployment of students was primarily the result of increasing wages driven by
excess demand for labour (as well as the increasing cost of living, especially
accommodation costs of those living in separate households); however, work-
ing during studies is still less common in Hungary than in most Northern and
Western European countries.
Table 1: Employee groups according to their secondary status, 2018
Number of employees
Number
of employees as a percentage of
as a percentage as a percentage
(persons) the total headcount
of the 2014 figure of the previous year
Status of this status
On parental leave 21,119 125.8 106.3 8.3
Full-time student 22,760 183.4 113.6 3.5
Pensioner 169,646 132.3 119.1 9.5
Source: LFS, CSO.
Public works participants are also a source of labour supply for the primary
labour market. Increasing the headcounts of public works in 2012 princi-
pally aimed at tackling unemployment but probably also at satisfying pub-
lic opinion, which resists the idea of an income without work (that is to say
unemployment benefits). The annual headcount of public works participants
is determined by the Government and not by the demand for such work-
places. Because of increasing demand in the primary labour market, the
7 Old-age pensioners, and es-
pecially students, often under-
headcounts of public works participants were reduced already in 2017, fol-
take casual employment, there- lowed by a similar step in 2018 (Figure 2). Employers are encouraged by, in
fore the annual headcount may
be substantially greater than addition to doubling the employment allowance in November, the fact that
the average headcount. the public works wage did not change in 2018 after a slight raise in 2017.8
8 When introduced in 2012, the The increased labour demand was mainly exploited by better qualified pub-
public works wage was 77.2 per
cent of the “normal” minimum lic works participants with fewer health and family problems and living in
wage but this proportion had
decreased to 59.1 per cent by
towns with better transport links: they were more likely to be able to enter
2018. the primary labour market.
20
The Hungarian labour market in 2018
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Months
Source: CSO, Monthly labour report.
An increase in headcount was only seen in the primary labour market in 2018,
with 98.8 thousand new jobs (Table 2). In addition to the unemployed and
inactives, some of the former public works participants also managed to find
employment and the number of respondents reporting a job abroad declined
in the labour force survey as well.9
Table 2: Changes in the number of employees broken down by major characteristics
Number of employees (thousand persons) Change 2018/2017
thousand
2016 2017 2018 percentage
persons
Total 4,351.6 4,421.4 4,469.5 48.1 101.1
Gender
Male 2,362.5 2,417.3 2,446.2 28.9 101.2
Female 1,989.1 2,004.1 2,023.3 19.2 101.0
Type
Domestic primary labour
4,014.3 4,117.8 4216.6 98.8 102.4
market
Public works 220.9 194.0 148.2 –45.8 76.4
Foreign site 116.4 109.6 104.7 –4.9 95.5
Region
Budapest 840.3 845.3 833.8 –11.4 98.6
Pest 565.6 578.0 595.2 17.2 103.0
Central Transdanubia 487.9 498.7 499.1 0.4 100.1
Western Transdanubia 457.0 469.6 481.9 12.3 102.6
Southern Transdanubia 370.7 369.3 374.0 4.8 101.3
Northern Hungary 466.6 474.8 485.3 10.5 102.2
Northern Great Plain 613.9 631.1 639.7 8.6 101.4
Southern Great Plain 549.5 554.8 560.5 5.7 101.0
Status
Employee 3,884.4 3,964.4 4,003.9 39.5 101.0 9 The Labour Force Survey in-
cludes persons working abroad
Member of partnership or who commute abroad daily or
148.0 156.8 149.4 –7.4 95.3
cooperative work abroad for extended pe-
Entrepreneur, self-employed riods but regularly come home
319.3 300.2 316.2 16.0 105.3 and contribute to the subsist-
and family helper
ence of the household provid-
Source: LFS, CSO. ing the data.
21
Tamás Bakó & Judit Lakatos
Since 2010 a total of 609 thousand unsupported new jobs have emerged in the
Hungarian economy, which amounts to an annual average increase of nearly
70 thousand. In 2018 the number of employees rose in all regions (if Budapest
and Pest county are considered jointly, in line with the earlier regional classi-
fication). Proportionately to the labour force, the largest increase was seen in
Western Transdanubia, in spite of the depletion of internal labour reserves.
Thus the main source of the increase was presumably internal migration, still
modest because migration is restricted by the regionally considerably differ-
ent accommodation costs.
The employment rate of the population aged 15–64 was 69.2 per cent in
2018; however, half of the 1.1 percent year-on-year improvement was due to
a decline in the population size used in the denominator of the rate. The em-
ployment rate of men slightly exceeded the EU-28 figure, while that of women
was slightly lower. The Europe 2020 strategy sets 75 per cent as a target for
the population aged 20–64, and the Hungarian rate of 74.4 per cent was only
slightly below that in 2018. This target may even be reached with stagnating
employee numbers owing to the continuous population decline.
While 82.1 per cent of men in the age group was in employment in 2018,
the rate was only 66.8 per cent for women (Figure 3). One of the reasons for
the significant difference in the employment rate of genders is the consider-
ably long parental leave, compared to other European countries, and the re-
cipients of parental leave benefits (unless they undertake gainful work during
the week of the survey) are regarded by Hungarian statistics as economically
inactive irrespective of their employment status. Another important reason is
that although the rising retirement age applies equally to both genders, only
women can retire after 40 qualifying years. Therefore whereas in the fourth
quarter of 2018 56.4 per cent of men aged 60–64 were in employment, only
27.3 per cent of women worked. Furthermore, the gap between the employ-
ment rates of men and women has slightly widened in recent years. A further,
less significant, factor for the difference is that a larger proportion of women
in the younger age groups follow higher education studies and therefore en-
ter the labour market at a later age. Caring for the family, another reason for
inactivity, is also almost exclusively undertaken by women.
The employment chances of the low-qualified used to be below the EU av-
erage in Hungary but as a result of public works schemes, which increasingly
became a type of employment typically for the low-qualified, the difference
has disappeared. In the not very populous qualification group of those with-
out a lower-secondary qualification, aged 20–64, nearly 15 percent were in
10 The denominator also in-
employment in 2018 (Table 3),10 which is an almost 5 percentage point im-
cludes those who are unable to provement on 2014. The employment rate of the same age group with a low-
participate in formal education
because of their health or dis-
er-secondary qualification increased by 11 percentage points, with a substan-
ability. tially more marked increase among men.
22
The Hungarian labour market in 2018
80 Female
Percent
Male
60
40
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Quarters
Source: LFS, CSO.
Table 3: Employment rate of the population aged 20–64, broken down
by educational attainment and gender, excluding public works participants,
2014, 2017, 2018 (percentage)
2014 2017 2018
male female total male female total male female total
Without a lower-second-
13.7 7.5 10.3 18.1 10.1 13.6 20.3 11.2 14.8
ary qualification
Lower-secondary 45.3 32.1 37.9 56.2 36.7 45.3 60.5 39.2 48.9
Upper-secondary, with-
71.4 57.1 66.2 80.1 60.9 73.2 82.2 64.2 75.7
out a Matura
Upper-secondary, with
72.2 59.3 65.0 78.8 64.8 71.1 79.2 64.8 71.3
a Matura
Higher education 86.8 75.8 80.4 91.2 78.4 83.9 91.8 79.7 84.8
Total 70.3 57.7 63.9 78.1 62.2 70.1 79.8 64.1 71.9
Source: LFS, CSO.
23
Tamás Bakó & Judit Lakatos
Table 4: Employment rate of the Roma and non-Roma population, aged 20–64,
broken down by educational attainment, 2017, 2018 (percentage)
2017 2018
male female total male female total
Non-Roma
Without a lower-secondary
17.2 10.8 13.6 18.6 13.9 15.8
qualification
Lower-secondary 59.2 38.9 47.8 63.6 41.6 51.5
Upper-secondary, without
80.5 61.5 73.7 82.5 64.5 76.0
a Matura
Upper-secondary, with
78.8 64.9 71.1 79.2 64.9 71.3
a Matura
Higher education 91.3 78.4 83.9 91.8 79.7 84.8
Total 79.1 63.5 71.2 80.8 65.3 73.0
Roma
Without a lower-secondary
19.9 9.1 13.4 23.3 7.0 13.3
qualification
Lower-secondary 36.9 21.2 28.5 40.0 20.2 29.9
Upper-secondary, without
62.0 37.5 53.4 63.9 47.2 57.6
a Matura
Upper-secondary, with
75.7 42.4 54.6 63.1 49.7 56.4
a Matura
Higher education 12.9 90.0 56.3 … 100.0 85.1
Total 42.4 22.7 32.2 44.2 23.3 33.7
Source: LFS, CSO.
24
The Hungarian labour market in 2018
although the relevant statistics measure trends more precisely than the actual
number of missing employees at a point in time.11 In the first quarter of 2018,
there were 79.4 thousand vacancies at businesses with at least 5 employees and
state-funded institutions and this figure rose to 83.6 thousand in the second
quarter, 87.7 thousand in the third quarter and then it fell to 83.3 thousand
in the fourth quarter. The annual average of vacancies at present and in the
near future was nearly 23 percent above the level one year prior. 60.3 thou-
sand of the vacancies were in the business sector in the fourth quarter, which
amounted to nearly 2.8 per cent of the total number of vacancies (Figure 4).
Figure 4: The number of vacancies in the business sector,* 2010–2018
80,000
70,000
Number of job vacancies
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Quarters
*
Businesses with at least five employees.
Source: CSO, vacancy statistics.
Compared to the overall vacancies, the highest figure was reported in the ad-
ministrative and service support sector, where 5.6 per cent of jobs were vacant.
More than half of the 10 thousand vacancies advertised were for jobs not re-
quiring a qualification, typically posted by temporary agencies active in this
sector. Another 21.8 thousand of the vacancies in the business sector were
reported in the manufacturing industry and 6.2 thousand at trading compa-
nies. The proportion of vacancies in the public sector exceeded 3 per cent in
the last three months of the year. There were 4.1 thousand openings in edu- 11 In some segments, profes-
cation including 2.7 thousand for higher education graduates (presumably sional advocacy organisations
report many times higher
teachers). The highest number of vacancies in the public sector were reported shortage than the aggregated
in healthcare and social services. 2.2 thousand of the 8.6 thousand vacancies statistical reports of enterprises
active in the segment.
were for higher education graduates capable of working independently, 4.6 12 As regards the share of va-
thousand for higher education or upper-secondary graduates with a relevant cancies, the situation is mark-
edly different in member states.
diploma but nearly one thousand unskilled workers were also missing. The highest figure was reported
The Hungarian job vacancy rate was only slightly above the European aver- by the Czech Republic in the
third quarter of the year, where
age12 but its growth was outstanding. 5.9 out of 100 jobs were vacant,
whereas in Greece, not yet
Potential labour reserve (supply) includes, in addition to the unemployed, emerging from the economic
the inactive wishing to work, the underemployed according to the EU defini- crisis, the rate was only 0.6.
25
Tamás Bakó & Judit Lakatos
tion, and public works participants, specific to the Hungarian labour market.
(The latter are regarded as reserve only for the primary labour market, since
they are included in the category of employees.) All the above groups shrank
in 2018, thus the labour supply continued to decrease. In 2018, the annual
average number of the unemployed, as defined by the ILO, the specialised
agency of the UN, fell to 172 thousand, and the unemployment rate was 3.7
per cent. This figure was 20 thousand lower year-on-year, while the unem-
ployment rate decreased by 0.4 percentage points. In the last quarter of the
year, the number of the unemployed was 167 thousand, and as a result of the
high volume of labour demand, both the average duration of unemployment
and the proportion of those searching for a job for at least one year decreased.
Although the potential labour reserve only includes the unemployed as de-
fined by the ILO, there are two more unemployment data, based on a differ-
ent definition, which are important for describing the labour market situation.
The monthly average number of jobseekers registered at the National Employ-
ment Service was 255 thousand, nearly 10 per cent lower or 28 thousand fewer
than a year earlier. The number of registered jobseekers declined in the first
half of 2018, it then slightly increased in the third quarter due to fewer sea-
sonal and public works job vacancies and then it fell again to 243 thousand
in the last quarter. The number of the insurance-based jobseekers’ allowance
recipients (for six months at most) was essentially constant in recent years
and thus their share within registered jobseekers grew. However, the propor-
tion of those who receive some kind of unemployment-related cash benefit
increased, although most of them still received employment substitution sup-
port belonging to social benefits, the amount of which has been unchanged
since 2013 (HUF 22,800/month). The number of those who reported being
unemployed in the Labour Force Survey of the Central Statistical Office also
decreased. An average of 287 thousand classified themselves as such in 2018,
which is approximately identical to the joint number of the ILO-definition
unemployed and the inactive belonging to the potential labour reserve.
Figure 5: The average duration of job seeking (months, right-hand axis) and the
share of the long-term unemployed (left-hand axis) , 2010–2018
Long-term unemployed Average length of
(left axis) job seeking (right axis)
60 19
50 16
Per cent
Month
40 13
30 10
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Source: LFS, CSO.
26
The Hungarian labour market in 2018
27
Tamás Bakó & Judit Lakatos
28
The Hungarian labour market in 2018
workers, coupled with excess demand for construction capacities, also influ-
enced the level of earnings. These factors resulted in a 12.9 percent increase in
earnings, but even so, construction was the second worst-paying segment in
the business sector after accommodation and catering (according to earnings
statistics), with an average gross earnings of HUF 254.7 thousand. Earnings
in the transport and storage sector grew only by 11.2 per cent despite the fact
that the employees of large state-owned employers (MÁV – the state railway,
Hungarian Post and regional transport companies) received an average increase
of 12–13 per cent under multi-annual wage agreements. In manufacturing, the
segment with the highest number of employees, the growth rate of earnings
has been similar to that of the entire business sector; within this, the earnings
growth rate of individual industry branches ranged from 4.8 per cent (pharma-
ceutical)14 to 12.5 per cent (other manufacturing and basic metals). A similarly
average (11.8 percent) increase was reported in trade. Wages were boosted by
the increasing minimum wage (primarily the guaranteed minimum wage) in
small rural shops and by successful wage negotiations due to labour shortages
in large retail chains. With a rate of increase (8.3 per cent) below the average
in the business sector, the finance and insurance industry still had the highest
gross earnings at HUF 608.2 thousand in 2018. It was followed by the ICT
industry, with an average of HUF 561.4 thousand and a growth rate of 9.5
per cent. The lowest average wage of HUF 212 thousand, only exceeding the
skilled workers’ minimum wage by its one-fifth, was reported by enterprises
employing at least five people in the accommodation and catering industry.
Figure 7: The rate of increase in gross earnings (2013 = 100 per cent)
180
100
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Source: CSO, Monthly labour report.
14 The low rate is explained by
The growth rate of wages in the public sector, excluding public works partici- a year-on-year decrease in the
amount of non-regular earn-
pants, was 9 per cent, therefore its modest advantage over the business sector, ings, which resulted in a lower
than 100 wage index in some
gained in recent years, slightly decreased in 2018. Wage adjustment measures cases in the last month of the
were implemented in various areas of the sector recently but a comprehensive quarter (at the time of bonus
payments). Regular earnings
review of the earnings and promotion scheme did not take place and the ef- increased 1.8 percentage points
fects of wage adjustments were quickly worn off. faster than total earnings.
29
Tamás Bakó & Judit Lakatos
30
The Hungarian labour market in 2018
al income tax base in 2018, compared with HUF 100 thousand per child in
2017 (and HUF 62,500 at the launch of the scheme in 2011). Those with
one child were able to reduce their tax base by HUF 66,670, similarly to the
previous year, while parents with three or more children were able to claim
a deduction of HUF 220 thousand a month. The tax benefit can be shared
by parents and can also be deducted from social security contributions in the
case of low-income workers.
Table 6: Net and real wages taking into account the family tax benefit, 2018
Net wages Real wages Share of employees
Estimated net earn- belonging to the
ings (HUF/person/ Compared with 2017 household type
Number of depend- month)
ent children (percentage)
0 child 214,739 11.2 8.1 54.4
1 child 224,294 11.3 8.2 22.3
2 children 258,288 12.1 9.0 17.1
3 or more children 273,751 10.1 7.1 6.2
National economy,
227,975 11.2 8.2 100.0
total
Source: CSO, Monthly labour report and the microsimulation model relying on data
from the EU statistics on income and living conditions (SILC).
Income from work, including the so-called “other income from work” (with
cafeteria benefits as the largest item) was HUF 346.7 thousand in 2018. The
amount received in addition to wages (“other income from work”) amount-
ed to HUF 16.8 thousand. The growth rate of income from work was 0.1
percentage point higher (11.4 per cent) than that of wage, thus the weight of
other income from work within total income from work slightly increased
but still did not reach 5 per cent thereof. The growth rate and share of other
income from work in 2018 was particularly significant in public administra-
tion, defence and compulsory social security, where in the first half of the
year a few employees received substantial extra remuneration in the form of
Erzsébet vouchers, in addition to a bonus payment.
Increasing wages make labour more expensive, which may damage competi-
tiveness and reduce (or even zero out) the profits of enterprises. In order to
counteract negative trends in 2017, the rate of social contributions payable
by employers was reduced by another 2.5 percentage points after a decrease
of 5 percentage points last year (from 27 per cent to 22 per cent). Neverthe-
less, according to Eurostat data, the unit cost of labour, which is a generally
accepted indicator of competitiveness of production, increased in Hungary
the most among the Visegrad countries between 2010 and 2018. At the same
time, Hungarian labour is still cheap compared with eurozone countries and
was even cheaper in 2018 than the Czech or Slovakian labour in 2017, while
it was approximately equal to the Polish one.
31
Tamás Bakó & Judit Lakatos
References
CSO (2015): A kisgyermeket nevelő nők és a munkaerőpiac [Women raising young chil-
dren and the labor market]. Statisztikai Tükör [Statistical Reflections], Central Sta-
tistical Office, No. 55.
Köllő, J.–Kónya, I. (2020): How has unemployment risen – Estimate based on inter-
net searches.
32
IN FOCUS
YOUNG PEOPLE IN EDUCATION
AND IN THE LABOUR MARKET
Edited by
Márton Csillag
Zoltán Hermann
Ágota Scharle
INTRODUCTION
Márton Csillag, Zoltán Hermann & Ágota Scharle
The chapters of In Focus review the main stages of young people’s entry into
the labour market, from acquiring their education to getting their first job.
The level of detail in each chapter is inevitably varied: those that rely on pre-
vious research can obviously offer a more thorough analysis, while others are
more descriptive. Some chapters present completely new results based on re-
search funded by the Hungarian Ministry of Finance.
The first chapter presents the main trends of the past fifteen years in edu-
cation and youth employment. The second chapter analyses school choice
and dropping out as well as the development of competences that can be at-
tained at school. The third chapter examines the channels through which
school-leavers can gain their first experience at work. Chapter four examines
the scarring effects of troubled labour market entry on future careers and ex-
amines whether low levels of local labour demand and high commuting costs
may contribute to youth unemployment. Chapter five explores the impact of
employment policies and services on youth unemployment. Chapter six pro-
vides a short review of the disadvantages Roma youth face in education and
the labour market. Chapter seven explores employers’ skills requirements, the
returns on tertiary education and the role of on-the-job training in supple-
menting the missing skills. Finally, chapter eight focuses on the occupational
and geographical mobility of youth.
Considering the recent increase in employment and the decrease in the num-
ber of NEET (Not in Education, Employment, or Training) young people,
the school to work transition seems smooth. However, the details depicted by
the chapters of In Focus suggest that, these favourable developments cannot
be attributed to the well-oiled operation of the relevant labour market insti-
tutions (see chapters 3 and 5). Instead, the underlying reason is more likely
that, due to the high demand for skilled labour, the majority of skilled youth
can find employment without support from public services. At the same time
a significant share of unskilled youth only find short-term employment with
wage subsidies or in public works. Many of the young people who drop out
after finishing primary school end up in public works or unemployment, and 1 This is indicated by the grow-
ing rate of employment of those
receive little support for continuing their studies or entering the labour market. with a secondary education
Whilst the demand for employees with at least secondary education has (ISCED 3A or 3B) and higher
education (see Tables 4.15 and
further increased,1 the rise in the average level of education has stalled among 4.16).
35
Csillag, Hermann & Scharle
new labour market entrants (see sub-chapters 2.3 and 8.2). Furthermore the
recent policy measures related to public education and higher education (for
instance the lowering of the school-leaving age, see sub-chapters 2.5 and 6.2;
the reform of vocational education, see sub-chapters 2.4 and 2.2; or the cut
in the number of state subsidised places in higher education) do not support
the accumulation of general skills.
Further improvement of the situation of young people in the labour market
over the long term may be curbed by two obstacles. On the one hand, as de-
mand is shifting towards non-cognitive skills, an increasing share of entrants
with secondary or tertiary education, and most of those with primary educa-
tion will lack the skills required by employers (Nedeloska–Quintini, 2018, see
sub-chapter 7.2). On the other hand, the youth with weak basic skills who
could easily find employment during the economic expansion, will face the
2 Those with a vocational edu-
cation have weaker basic skills risk of losing their jobs during the next crisis or due to the advancement of
than those who completed technology, and lack the ability to adapt to such changes.2 With its current,
secondary education (ISCED
3A or 3B). As they get older, limited capacities, the public employment service will not be able to offer ap-
they are more likely to work propriate support in gaining skills or finding stable jobs (chapter 5). These
in unskilled jobs (Varga, 2018),
even though they had no such problems could arise even more severely for those generations which may en-
disadvantage just after leaving
school with freshly gained vo-
ter the labour market in an unfavourable economic situation (sub-chapters
cational skills (sub-chapter 8.1). 4.1 and 4.2).
References
Nedelkoska, L.–Quintini, G. (2018): Automation, skills use and training. OECD So-
cial, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 202, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Varga, J. (2018): Labour mobility in Hungary. In: Fazekas, K.–Köllő, J. (eds.): The Hun-
garian Labour Market, 2017. Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Re-
gional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, pp. 158–166.
36
1 Young people in the labour market and in education...
37
Csillag, Scharle, Molnár & Tóth
Figure 1.1: Employment rate of men and women aged 15–29, 2002–2018
Men Women
60 50
45
50
40
40
35
30 30
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
EU-28 Czechia Hungary Poland Slovakia
Note: The employed include public works participants.
Source: Eurostat.
38
1 Young people in the labour market and in education...
39
Csillag, Scharle, Molnár & Tóth
60 50
40
40 30
20
20
10
0 0
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Age 17–19 Age 20–24 Age 25–29
Source: Own calculations using the Hungarian Labour Force Survey (second quarter).
Figure 1.3: Share of full-time students, by age group, 2002–2018 (percent)
Men Women
100 100
80 80
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Age 15–16 Age 17–19 Age 20–24 Age 25–29
Source: Own calculations using the Hungarian Labour Force Survey (second quar-
ter).
The time series shown by age group in Figures 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4, clearly de-
pict the effect of the 2008 recession on the labour market, especially on the
employment outcomes of men. During the recession, the employment rate
of men aged 20–29 decreased, the share of full-time students stayed intact,
while the NEET rate increased. In the following period of growth, the em-
ployment rate and the NEET-rate showed a rapid recovery. The indicators for
women aged 20–29 developed similarly to those for men, except that dur-
ing the recession their employment did not decrease as much. In the case of
women aged 25–29 the effects of the recession are less significant on all indi-
cators, which may be explained by the improvement of their educational at-
tainment or delayed childbearing.
There is also a clear decline, and then a reversal of the prior, fast improvement
in the level of schooling, which can be explained in part due to the booming
40
1 Young people in the labour market and in education...
demand for labour, and in part due to policy measures (the centralization of
education, the lowering of the compulsory school-leaving age, the reform of
secondary education, the cut in publicly funded places in higher education).
In recent years, the rate of full-time students decreased in the 17–19 and the
20–24 age groups, most significantly in the case of men aged 20–24, where
the indicator dropped 10 percentage points between 2012 and 2017.
Figure 1.4: Share of youth not in employment, education or training (NEET)
by age group and gender, 2002–2018 (percent)
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Age 17–19 (all) Age 20–29 men Age 20–24 women Age 25–29 women
Source: Own calculations using the Hungarian Labour Force Survey (second quar-
ter).
The development in the composition of NEET youth also points to the ef-
fects of the recession: the share of those young people who have been search-
ing for a job for some time as well as those young people who are discouraged4
and inactive decreased by 25 percentage points between 2012 and 2017. In
economically disadvantageous regions, however, the rate of long-term unem-
ployed and (or) discouraged young people remained high. The reasons for this
are discussed in sub-chapters 5.1 and 6.2.
The wage returns of educational attainment and experience
There were some changes in the wage returns of education between 2002 and
2016, but the observed slight decline in returns are not large enough to ex-
plain the observed drop in enrolment in tertiary education after 2012. The
wage premium of higher education decreased – especially in the case of new
entrants – but it remained significant (Table 1.1). The relative wages of grad-
uates were influenced by numerous factors in this period, which all pointed 4 The categorization follows the
towards the narrowing of the wage premium. First, the previous expansion method of Eurofound (see also,
in greater detail in sub-chapter
in higher education and the Bologna Process increased the supply of gradu- 5.1) (Mascherini–Ledermaier,
ates, and the share of those entering the labour market after achieving a Bach- 2016).
41
Csillag, Scharle, Molnár & Tóth
elor’s degree. Second, the minimum wage and the guaranteed wage minimum
which essentially affects for those with primary and secondary education con-
tinued to increase (cf. sub-chapter 5.4). Finally, the removal of the top income
tax bracket could also slow down the increase in the average gross wages of
graduates.5 The wage returns to experience, however, increased in the case of
graduates (especially for men). Chapter 2 and sub-chapter 7.3 examine these
developments in detail.
Table 1.1: New entrants’ monthly gross real wages in the business sector,
by education, gender and work experience, 2012–2016
Men Women
0–1 years 5 years 0–1 years 5 years
of work experience
2012
Primary 102,896 108,438 (105%) 98,238 103,161 (105%)
Vocational school 106,785 115,290 (108%) 100,451 105,162 (105%)
Secondary 120,963 135,520 (112%) 117,393 127,494 (109%)
Higher 246,253 283,602 (115%) 193,447 230,372 (119%)
2016
Primary 151,854 157,430 (104%) 155,887 157,099 (101%)
Lower secondary 164,994 173,246 (105%) 155,771 159,826 (103%)
Upper secondary 179,216 194,712 (109%) 159,898 172,331 (108%)
Higher 244,920 323,837 (132%) 214,871 264,046 (123%)
Note: Percentages show the wage premia compared to new entrants (2016 = 1).
Source: PES Wage survey, own calculations.
42
1 Young people in the labour market and in education...
43
Csillag, Scharle, Molnár & Tóth
44
2.1 The impact of reading and mathematics test results...
2 SCHOOL EDUCATION
2.1 THE IMPACT OF READING AND MATHEMATICS TEST
RESULTS ON FUTURE EARNINGS AND EMPLOYMENT
Zoltán Hermann, Dániel Horn, János Köllő, Anna
Sebők, András Semjén & Júlia Varga
Introduction
Until the recent decades, educational attainment was measured by qualifica-
tions or completed years of schooling, when researchers tried to explore its
impact on labour market prospects, because there were simply no other data
comparable across time and space. This substantially distorted findings, since
it was not possible to take into account differences in the quality of education,
its efficacy and the knowledge gained outside school. Owing to the spreading
of the standardised assessment of competences, enabling comparison across
regions and over time, in recent decades it has become possible to measure
the competence level of school leavers. As a result, later research has increas-
ingly focused on the level of cognitive skills and their impact on labour mar-
ket outcomes and earnings (cf. Hanushek, 2009).1
Studies typically find that higher test scores, implying better cognitive skills,
are associated with an easily quantifiable wage advantage throughout working
life. Research has also demonstrated that test results are strongly associated
with future earnings, even after controlling for educational background, work 1 Another major group of stud-
ies (inspired by Bowles–Gintis,
experience and other typical explanatory variables. For example, the literature 1976 and Jencks, 1979) explored
review by Hanushek compared several studies based on American data, and the impacts of non-cognitive
skills and abilities (also called
concluded that one standard deviation increase in test results at the end of personality traits) on labour
upper-secondary school translates into 12 percent higher annual earnings in market outcomes and wages,
in addition to (or sometimes
adulthood on average.2 instead of) the impacts of cog-
One could say that although the association between test results and future nitive skills. For more details
see Subchapter 7.2.
earnings is undeniable, there is no causal relationship between them and the 2 Several other studies from de-
assumed positive impact of test results on earnings is in fact due to differenc- veloped and developing coun-
tries have come to similar con-
es in innate abilities and intelligence. However, the findings of some studies clusions: there is a statistically
(including Lazear, 2003) strongly suggest that general intelligence, that is and economically significant
association between skills and
the level of innate abilities, does not entirely determine subsequent labour wages (and other labour mar-
market outcomes. Indeed, learning improves specific cognitive skills and in ket outcomes, such as employ-
ment). However, the size of the
this way the results of intelligence tests, and even if it does not enhance gen- wage premium, attributed to
a standard deviation increase
eral intelligence (cf. Ritchie et al, 2015), the improved specific cognitive skills in skills, varies a lot (from 5 per
are reflected in increasing earnings (Finnie and Meng, 2001; Fazekas, 2018). cent to 48 per cent), since the
utilized model form and con-
Therefore it is crucial to investigate to what extent cognitive skills correlate trol variables affect the results
with labour market success. This subchapter is the first in Hungary to ana- considerably.
45
Hermann, Horn, Köllő, Sebők, Semjén & Varga
46
2.1 The impact of reading and mathematics test results...
12.4 12.4
Log earnings
Log earnings
12.2 12.2
12.0 12.0
11.8 11.8
−2 −1 0 1 2 −2 −1 0 1 2
Standardized test score Standardized test score
Note: Averages calculated for 20 groups based on test scores.
Source: Authors’ compilation.
Figure 2.1.2: Association between test scores in grade 10 and unemployment
Mathematics Reading
0.25 0.25
0.20 0.20
Unemployment rate
Unemployment rate
0.15 0.15
0.10 0.10
0.05 0.05
0.00 0.00
−2 −1 0 1 2 −2 −1 0 1 2
Standardized test score Standardized test score
Note: Averages calculated for 20 groups based on test scores.
Source: Authors’ compilation.
Tables 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 show the Mincer regressions estimated for the entire
sample described above. The impact of test scores in grade 10 on earnings is
shown in Table 2.1.1 and the impact of test scores on unemployment prob-
ability is presented in Table 2.1.2. The estimated coefficients are expected to
be positive in the first case, and negative in the second.
Column (2) of Table 2.1.1 relies on mathematics scores as the sole indicator
of cognitive skills. It reveals that students achieving one standard deviation
47
Hermann, Horn, Köllő, Sebők, Semjén & Varga
higher scores in grade 10 are likely to have 8.5 per cent higher wages in the la-
bour market. Estimates in Column (3) include both mathematics and reading
test scores. The results indicate that mathematics scores are more strongly asso-
ciated with wages than reading scores. For understanding the underlying rea-
sons, a more thorough research is needed than the present descriptive study.6
Table 2.1.1: Impact of test scores in grade 10 on the logarithm
of earnings in young adulthood
(1) (2) (3) (4)
0.122** 0.137*** 0.138*** 0.0966**
Vocational school
(0.0532) (0.0529) (0.0529) (0.0471)
Secondary school 0.203*** 0.144*** 0.137*** 0.0987**
(Matura) (0.0512) (0.0510) (0.0511) (0.0454)
Higher education 0.591*** 0.454*** 0.440*** 0.280***
degree (0.0585) (0.0588) (0.0590) (0.0528)
0.0850*** 0.0752*** 0.0448***
Mathematics scores
(0.00499) (0.00622) (0.00561)
0.0166*** 0.00685
Reading scores
(0.00636) (0.00571)
11.71*** 11.81*** 11.82*** 11.70***
Constant
(0.0628) (0.0627) (0.0628) (0.0940)
Fixed effects
Sector Yes
Occupation Yes
District Yes
N 28,188 28,188 28,188 28,136
R2 0.077 0.087 0.087 0.299
Note: OLS-estimations.
Dependent variable: logarithm of monthly wages. Control variables not shown in the
table: gender, potential work experience and its square, dummy variables signifying
missing values for experience and test scores.
The reference category for qualifications is lower secondary school (8-year general
school).
Standard errors are indicated in brackets.
***
Significant at a 1 per cent, **5 per cent, *10 per cent level.
Source: Authors’ compilation.
The estimation in column (4) of Table 2.1.1 contains further control varia-
bles that may have an impact on wages regardless of test scores, for example
the sector and type of occupation and the location of work. The estimation
in Column (4), including all control variables, shows a lower value for the
coefficient of the mathematics test score achieved in grade 10, as compared
to the figure in Column (3), but the connection is still significant and strong.
6 Considering the rather strong The results of equation (4) indicate that better cognitive skills not only en-
association between the two able people to get jobs in better paid occupations, but persons with higher
test scores, it is difficult to sep-
arate the effect sizes. The cor- mathematics scores also tend to have higher earnings within a given occupa-
relation between the two test tion. It may be concluded that in Hungary cognitive skills in upper second-
scores ranges between 0.7–0.8
in Grade 10 in the various years. ary school are strongly associated with subsequent wages in early adulthood.
48
2.1 The impact of reading and mathematics test results...
Table 2.1.2 shows the association between cognitive skills and the proba-
bility of unemployment in the total sample. Similarly to wages, mathematics
test scores achieved in grade 10 are strongly associated with the probability
of becoming unemployed. Column (2) relies on mathematics test scores as
the indicator of cognitive skills. Our results indicate that one standard de-
viation increase in results in grade 10 reduces the probability of unemploy-
ment by 2.7 percentage points in young adulthood. Column (3) includes both
mathematics and reading scores. Similarly to wages, the explanatory power of
mathematics test scores is stronger, but unemployment probabilities of indi-
viduals are also significantly explained by their reading skills. After taking lo-
cal labour market control variables into account, coefficients in Column (4)
are lower but still significant.
Table 2.1.2: Impact of test scores in grade 10 on the probability
of unemployment in young adulthood, marginal effects
(1) (2) (3) (4)
–0.0395*** –0.0397*** –0.0395*** –0.0300***
Vocational school
(0.00842) (0.00765) (0.00761) (0.00682)
Secondary school –0.0928*** –0.0664*** –0.0604*** –0.0507***
(Matura) (0.0159) (0.0147) (0.0145) (0.0129)
Higher education –0.0977*** –0.0655*** –0.0585*** –0.0531***
degree (0.00992) (0.0106) (0.0110) (0.00918)
–0.0270*** –0.0202*** –0.0146***
Mathematics scores
(0.00155) (0.00195) (0.00172)
–0.0112*** –0.00481***
Reading scores
(0.00196) (0.00173)
District fixed effect Yes
N 31,855 31,855 31,843 31,326
Estimated average
0.0674 0.0674 0.0674 0.0683
probability
Note: Probit estimates.
Dependent variable: Registered unemployed or public works participant (1) or em-
ployee (0). Control variables not shown in the table: gender, potential work experi-
ence and its square, dummy variables signifying missing values for experience and
test scores.
The reference category for qualifications is lower secondary school.
Standard errors are indicated in brackets.
***
Significant at a 1 per cent, **5 per cent, *10 per cent level.
Source: Authors’ compilation.
Tables 2.1.3 and 2.1.4 show the last specifications of the tables above, con-
taining all control variables, estimated for subgroups by school attainment.
Table 2.1.3 indicates that the association between cognitive skills and wages
is stronger among higher education graduates, compared to those with lower
qualifications, but the situation completely different for labour market chanc-
49
Hermann, Horn, Köllő, Sebők, Semjén & Varga
es: Table 2.1.4 shows that cognitive skills at upper-secondary school are far
more strongly associated with subsequent labour market outcomes (employ-
ment status, or the chance of becoming unemployed) among the low-qualified
than among higher education graduates.
Table 2.1.3: Impact of test scores in grade 10 on the logarithm of earnings
in young adulthood by school attainment
Low-education level
Secondary level Higher education level
(lower-secondary
(Matura) (BA or above)
or vocational school)
0.0192 0.0370*** 0.0758***
Mathematics scores
(0.0128) (0.00808) (0.00996)
0.00673 0.0102 0.00650
Reading scores
(0.0123) (0.00801) (0.0112)
N 4,948 14,644 8,544
R2 0.300 0.250 0.319
Note: OLS-estimation.
Dependent variable: logarithm of monthly wages. Control variables not shown in the
table: gender, potential work experience and its square, dummy variables signify-
ing missing values for experience and test scores as well as sector, occupation and
district fixed effects.
Standard errors are indicated in brackets.
***
Significant at a 1 per cent, **5 per cent, *10 per cent level.
Source: Authors’ compilation.
Table 2.1.4: Impact of test scores in grade 10 on the probability of unemployment
in young adulthood by school attainment, marginal effects
Low-education level
Secondary level Higher education level
(lower-secondary
(Matura) (BA or above)
or vocational school)
–0.0319*** –0.0136*** –0.0160***
Mathematics scores
(0.00618) (0.00274) (0.00305)
–0.0194*** –0.00201 –0.00301
Reading scores
(0.00609) (0.00274) (0.00337)
N 5,624 15,642 6,615
Estimated average
0.141 0.0699 0.0385
probability
Note: Probit estimates.
Dependent variable: Registered unemployed or public works participant (1) or em-
ployee (0). Control variables not shown in the table: gender, potential work experi-
ence and its square, dummy variables signifying missing values for experience and
test scores.
Standard errors are indicated in brackets.
***
Significant at a 1 per cent, **5 per cent, *10 per cent level.
Source: Authors’ compilation.
The above findings reveal that in the case of the low-qualified better cogni-
tive skills strongly contribute to avoiding unemployment; however, they do
not substantially contribute to higher (observed) wages. By contrast, among
50
2.1 The impact of reading and mathematics test results...
51
Hermann, Horn, Köllő, Sebők, Semjén & Varga
References
Bowles, S.–Gintis, H. (1976): Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform
and the Contradictions of Economic Life. Basic Books, New York.
Fazekas, K. (2018): What are the tendencies in demand? The appreciation of non-cog-
nitive skills. In: Fazekas, K.–Köllő, J. (eds.): The Hungarian labour market, 2017. In-
stitute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Acad-
emy of Sciences, Budapest, pp. 149–157.
Finnie, R.–Meng, R. (2001): Cognitive Skills and the Youth Labour Market. Applied
Economics Letters, Vol. 8. No. 10. pp. 675–679.
Hanushek, E. A. (2009): The Economic Value of Education and Cognitive Skills. In:
Sykes, G.–Schneider, B.–Plank, D. N. (eds.): Handbook of Education Policy Research.
Routledge, New York, pp. 39–56.
Jencks, C. (1979): Who Gets Ahead? The Determinants of Success in America. Basic
Books, New York.
Lazear, E. P. (2003): Teacher incentives. Swedish Economic Policy Review, Vol. 10.
pp. 179–214.
Mincer, J. (1974): Schooling, Experience and Earnings. New York: National Bureau of
Economic Research.
Ritchie, A. J.–Bates, T. C.–Deary, I. J. (2015): Is education associated with improve-
ments in general cognitive ability, or in specific skills? Developmental Psychology,
Vol. 51. No. 5. pp. 573–582.
Sebők, A. (2019): The Panel of Linked Administrative Data of CERS Databank. Buda-
pest Working Papers on the Labour Market, BWP-2019/2.
52
2.2 The impact of school tracks on student...
53
Zoltán Hermann
ing 1400 points in mathematics in Grade 8 also achieve about 1400 points
in Grade 10 in vocational school on average, while those of them studying in
general or vocational secondary schools obtain nearly 1500 points. This ap-
proximately 100-point difference amounts to half a standard deviation unit
(the standard deviation of test scores in Grade 8 is 200 points). In another re-
spect, the 100-point difference is somewhat smaller than the difference between
the average students of two consecutive skill levels (skill levels cover ranges of
about 140 points). The Figure reveals that there is also a slight difference in
the performance of general and vocational secondary schools (to the advan-
tage of the former) but this is much smaller than the lag of vocational schools.
Figure 2.2.1: Skill levels of Grade 10 students by school track,a 2017 (percentage)
Mathematics Reading
100 100
80 80
60 Skill level 7 60
Skill level 6
Skill level 5
40 Skill level 4
Skill level 3 40
Skill level 2
Skill level 1
20 Below skill 20
level 1
0 0
General Vocational Vocational General Vocational Vocational
secondary secondary school secondary secondary school
school school school school
Unweighted proportions.
a
2000 1800
Test score, Grade 10
1800 1600
1600 1400
1400 1200
1200 1000
1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Test score, Grade 8 Test score, Grade 8
General secondary school Vocational secondary school Vocational school
Note: The dots in the Figure represent unweighted averages of groups of students of
about 1000.
Source: Authors’ calculations based on data from NABC 2014–2017.
54
2.2 The impact of school tracks on student...
1700 1700
1600 1600
1500 1500
1400 1400
1300 1300
6. 8. 10. 6. 8. 10.
Grade Grade
General secondary school Vocational secondary school Vocational school
Note: Unweighted averages.
Source: Authors’ calculations based on data from NABC 2014–2017.
Estimates in Table 2.2.1 quantify the effect of school tracks more accurately.
These regression models include test scores in Grade 10 as dependent variables.
55
Zoltán Hermann
Estimates in Columns (1) and (3) include the following control variables: in-
dicators of prior student performance (test scores in both competence areas
in Grades 6 and 8 as well as grades at the end of Grades 8 and 6, the latter as
dummy variables) and individual characteristics of students (gender, special
education needs and severe disadvantage, educational attainment of mother
and father and the number of books possessed, all as dummy variables). The
missing values of control variables were substituted by average or typical val-
ues and missing values are denoted by independent dummy variables. Con-
trolling for these factors, coefficients show how students are likely to perform
in Grade 10 depending on the school track they attend.
Table 2.2.1: Regression estimates of the effect of school tracks on student
performance in Grade 10; students in Grade 8 in 2014
Mathematics Reading
(1) (2) (3) (4)
18.59*** 14.20*** 26.65*** 15.00***
General secondary school
(1.434) (1.437) (1.265) (1.472)
–51.28*** –71.09*** –58.87*** –63.94***
Vocational school
(2.138) (2.581) (1.803) (2.730)
General secondary school × test 0.0924*** 0.0696***
score in Grade 8 (0.00671) (0.00730)
Vocational school × score score in –0.108*** –0.0524***
Grade 8 (0.0107) (0.0116)
Number of observations 67,115 67,115 67,171 67,135
Number of schools 2,518 2,518 2,518 2,518
R2 0.702 0.706 0.729 0.703
Note: Unweighted OLS estimates.
Reference category for school track: vocational secondary school.
Control variables: test scores in both competence areas in Grades 6 and 8, the cat-
egories of grades at the end of Grades 8 and 6, gender, special education needs and
severe disadvantage, the categories of educational attainment of mother and father,
the categories of the number of books possessed as well as dummy variables denot-
ing the missing values of control variables.
Standard errors clustered for upper-secondary schools are shown in parentheses.
***
Significant at a 1 per cent, **5 per cent, *10 per cent level.
Source: Authors’ calculations based on data from NABC 2014–2017.
The findings show that a vocational school student achieves 50 points less in
mathematics and 60 points less in reading on average than a vocational sec-
ondary school student with equal performance in lower secondary school.
The advantage of a general secondary school student is 20–25 points. The
standard deviation of test scores is about 200 points, thus the lag of voca-
tional school students increases by a quarter, while the advantage of general
secondary school students increases by one-tenth of a standard deviation unit.
Estimates in Columns (2) and (4) of Table 2.2.1 also include the interaction
terms of school tracks and the test score in Grade 8 in the given competence
area. The coefficients of the interaction terms indicate that the effect of track
56
2.2 The impact of school tracks on student...
57
Zoltán Hermann
58
2.3 Application to and admission into upper-secondary...
59
Zoltán Hermann & Júlia Varga
Figure 2.3.1 shows the changes in the shares of school types in secondary
education (figure on the left); the proportion of students who were not ad-
mitted into the school type designated as their first choice in their priority
list; and the type of school they were admitted into instead of the school type
designated as their first choice in their priority list (figure on the right). After
2012, the rate of applications to vocational schools started decreasing follow-
ing the stagnation observed between 2005 and 2011, and by 2017, less than
a quarter of students wanted to get admitted into this school type. The rate
of applications to general secondary schools grew between 2009 and 2011,
and then continued to grow after 2012; this is the school type in which the
highest number of students wish to continue their studies. Vocational sec-
ondary schools are considered decreasingly popular among students. The
rate of students applying to this type of school decreased both in 2016 and
2017. The majority of students can continue their studies in the school type
of their choice (right side of Figure 2.3.1). The rate of those who only man-
aged to gain admission into a vocational school instead of a general or voca-
tional secondary school that provides a secondary school diploma decreased
from 5 percent in 2005 to 2 percent in 2017, and the rate of those who had
no choice but to study in a vocational secondary school instead of a general
secondary school decreased from 4 percent to 2 percent.
Figure 2.3.1: The proportion of those continuing their education at the secondary level and those who were not
admitted into the school type designated as their first choice in their priority list,
by school type, 2005–2017 (percentage)
Those who were not admitted into the school type
Those continuing their education at the secondary level designated as their first choice in their priority list
45 6
5
40
4
35 3
30 2
1
25
0
2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
General secondary Vocational Vocational Instead of General secondary school: Vocational secondary school
school secondary school school Instead of Secondary school: Vocational school
60
2.3 Application to and admission into upper-secondary...
and vocational secondary schools, and the rate of those doing so in vocational
schools dropped below 30 percent (Figure 2.3.2).
Figure 2.3.2: The proportion of those continuing their studies in secondary education,
by school type and gender, 2005–2017 (percentage)
Females Males
50 50
40 40
30 30
20
20
2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
General secondary school Vocational secondary school Vocational school
Source: Authors’ compilation.
61
Zoltán Hermann & Júlia Varga
0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15
62
2.3 Application to and admission into upper-secondary...
References
Csillag, M.–Greskovics, B.–Molnár, T. (2019): Girls in Hungarian vocational ed-
ucation. In: Fazekas, K.–Szabó-Morvai, Á. (ed.): The Hungarian Labour Market,
2018. Institute of Economics, Centre For Economic and Regional Studies, Hungar-
ian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, pp. 110–113.
Hajdu, T.–Hermann, Z.–Horn, D.–Kertesi, G.–Kézdi, G.–Köllő, J.–Varga, J. (2015):
Az érettségi védelmében [In defence of the Matura]. Budapesti Munkagazdaságtani
Füzetek, BWP, 2015/1.
Horn, D. (2014): The Effectiveness of Apprenticeship Training a within track compari-
son of workplace-based and school-based vocational training in Hungary. Budapest
Working Papers on the Labour Market, BWP, 2014/5.
Kézdi, G.–Köllő, J.–Varga, J. (2009): The Failures of “Uncertified” Vocational Train-
ing. In: Fazekas, K.–Köllő, J. (eds.): The Hungarian Labour Market, Review and
Analysis, 2009. Institute of Economics IE HAS–National Employment Founda-
tion, Budapest, pp. 92–144.
Makó, Á.–Bárdits, A. (2014): A pályakezdő szakmunkások munkaerő-piaci helyzete
– 2014 [Labour market success of vocational training school graduates]. MKIK Gaz-
daság- és Vállalkozáskutató Intézet, Budapest.
63
Hermann, Horn & Tordai
64
2.4 The effect of the 2013 vocational education reform...
general education classes, this number in Hungary is only 5742 (Hajdu et al,
2015). So, a Hungarian student participating in vocational education spends
about two or three years less with general education subjects, than his German
counterparts. Another goal of the reform was to create an educational struc-
ture more in line with the demands of the economy, to have a more transparent
and cost-effective operation, and to keep the unprivileged students in schools
and to help them catch up. However, keeping the youth in schools was made
harder by another reform, in which the government lowered the compulsory
schooling age from 18 to 16 after 2012 for those who had completed 9th grade.4
According to the literature important differences might arise if they improve
occupationally specific skills of students graduating from public education at
the expense of their general skills. Although they may find a job that fits to
their qualifications more easily when they enter the labour market (Level et al,
2014, Ryan, 2001, van der Velden–Wolbers, 2003), this advantage in the long
run is overturned and those with a more general education find themselves
in a better position (Hanushek et al, 2017). Due to the lack of general skills,
graduates won’t be able to adapt to the changing labour market environment,
so they become unemployed more easily, or can obtain a job only for lower
wages. However, the lengthening of the duration of secondary educational
vocational programmes doesn’t necessarily provide benefits even in a younger
age group (Oosterbeek–Webbink, 2007, Hall 2016).
In this subsection we examine the effect of the 2013 reform on mathemat-
ics and reading by comparing the changes of test scores between the 8th and
10th grade of cohorts before and after the reform. Reading and mathematics
competencies are important elements of general skills, so their decrease might
mean – according to the literature – that in the long run the labour market
position of the given students might worsen.
Analysis
For our analysis we use 8th and 10th grade test scores from the National Assess-
ment of Basic Competencies programme from 2010 until 2017. From 2010
the results were evaluated on the same scale, which makes the comparison of
different years’ results possible. The effect of the reform is examined on the
cohorts which commenced their 8th grade between 2010 and 2014. The av-
erage score in the whole sample every year is around 1600, and the standard
deviation is around 200.
Our independent variable is the change in mathematics and reading scores
between 8th and 10th grade. Our sample also contains students who had to re-
peat a year on 9th or 10th grade and had to do it only once. In the case of stu-
dents repeating a year in the 10th grade we considered their earlier test result.
We excluded vocational education programmes for special education needs 4 CXC law of 2011 on public
students from the sample. education.
65
Hermann, Horn & Tordai
Figure 2.4.1 shows the average score changes from 8th to 10th grade for both
mathematics and reading for the whole sample, and then divided for men and
women. After the introduction of the reform the difference between those,
whose programme concludes with a maturity exam and those whose doesn’t,
grows already in the first year. The effect of the reform is more apparent with
mathematics test scores, where the score change of those in a vocational school
is not only smaller compared to students in the other two educational forms
(vocational secondary and general secondary school), but it is becoming small-
er even to previous values of this school type. It can be easily observed from
the figure that reading and mathematics points of cohorts affected by the re-
form worsen compared to the students of the other two schools.
Figure 2.4.1: Average test score change between the 8th and 10th grade
for different school types. 2010–2014
Whole sample
Mathematics Reading
60 80
40 60
20
40
0
20
−20
0
−40
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Men
Mathematics Reading
80
60
40 60
20 40
0 20
−20 0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Women
Mathematics Reading
40 80
20 60
0 40
−20 20
−40 0
−60 −20
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
General secondary school Vocational secondary school Vocational school
Note: The year notes the year of the 8th grade test.
Source: Authors’ compilation.
66
2.4 The effect of the 2013 vocational education reform...
ing the vocational school, the after reform period, and the interaction of these
two. As a control variable we use in our estimation the first, second, and third
power of the 8th grade mathematics and reading test scores, the gender of the
students, whether the students have special educational needs or have a dis-
advantageous status, schooling of mother and father, the number of books at
home, and fixed effects concerning the cohorts and schools. Apart from the
test scores every variable is a dummy variable in the model. Missing values
were replaced by typical values and the missing values are noted by a separate
dummy variable. The effect of the reform is shown by the interaction variable
‘vocational school x reform’ (Table 2.4.1).
Table 2.4.1: The effect of the vocational school reform on test score change
between the 8th and 10th grade
Whole sample Men Women
mathematics reading mathematics reading mathematics reading
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Vocational school × –19.48*** –9.823*** –15.40*** –4.094** –23.81*** –13.28***
Reform (1.733) (1.494) (2.068) (1.852) (2.581) (2.105)
14.17*** 11.57*** 8.638*** –4.333*** 22.19*** 31.78***
Reform
(1.203) (1.041) (1.496) (1.354) (1.679) (1.397)
–64.97*** –73.41*** –74.53*** –81.11*** –49.82*** –62.53***
Vocational school
(1.160) (1.012) (1.372) (1.258) (1.643) (1.343)
R2 0.362 0.308 0.337 0.321 0.415 0.320
Number of observa-
199,975 200,097 112,754 112,780 87,221 87,317
tions
Number of schools 25,477 25,482 19,479 19,482 17,143 17,150
Note: Unweighted OLS estimates.
Control variables: first, second, and third power of the 8th grade test scores in both
fields, gender, special educational need and disadvantageous status, categories of
schooling of mother and father, categories of the number of books at home, catego-
ries of the 8th grade test’s year, and the dummy variables noting the missing values
of the control variables.
Standard errors clustered at the school level in parenthesis.
Significant at a ***1 per cent, **5 per cent, *10 per cent level.
Source: Authors’ compilation based on NABC data for 2010–2017.
67
Hermann, Horn & Tordai
The results confirm our conclusion, drawn based on Figure 2.4.1. After the
reform test scores decreased in both fields, but the reform had a bigger effect
on maths score changes.
Test score change of vocational schoolers between 8th and 10th grade was
19.5 points smaller due to the 2013 reform. For men this change was slight-
ly smaller (–15.4 points), for women it was bigger (–23.8). The reform had
a smaller effect on the change of reading scores, –9.8 points on the entire sam-
ple, –4.1 for men, and –13.3 for women. The cause of this difference can be
that students use their reading skills more outside the classroom than their
mathematics skills, so supposedly school has a stronger effect on the latter.
According to the estimated effects we can say that before the reform the av-
erage difference between vocational schools and vocational secondary schools
in mathematics was approximately 180, in reading 200 points. Our results
suggest that due to the effect of the reform this difference grew by more than
10% in mathematics, and by 5% in reading.
The estimation of the reform’s effect can be biased, since from 2012 the com-
pulsory schooling age was decreased from 18 years to 16 years, and therefore
the composition of students in 10th grade could have changed.5 We can expect
that mostly vocational school students older than 16 years old will fall out of
school due to this change. Since students with worse skills have a higher chance
of dropping out, we can expect the average scores of vocational schoolers to
be better after 2012 than before. So, this change can distort the estimations.
However, data shows that this is not behind the results. The reduced com-
pulsory schooling age was introduced first for those entering secondary edu-
cation in 2012. So, the cohort that was in 8th grade in 2012 was affected by
the lowered compulsory schooling age, but not by the vocational education
reform. Recalculating the estimations for the sample including only 2012 and
2013 cohorts yields basically unchanged results, so the reform decreased stu-
dents’ performance even with the same age limit.
Conclusions
To sum up, we can say that the 2013 reform worsened the mathematics and
reading skills of those studying in vocational education concluding without
the maturing exam, especially in mathematics and to a greater extent in the
5 The estimation might be bi-
case of women. Although our analysis cannot answer the question whether
ased due to a change in chang- these students can find a job more easily after school, we see that after two
ing school choice decisions, years of vocational education the general skills of students are worse after
and therefore the composition
of students in vocational and the reform than before, and that this effect is significant. Our interpretation
mixed schools changed signifi-
cantly However, this is not very
is that this deterioration happened due to the decrease in general education
likely since none of the average classes. Furthermore, it is likely that even if the more practice-oriented educa-
values of individual charac-
teristics changed to a notable tion helps students to find a job quickly following graduation, the decreasing
extent. general skills will worsen their position on the labour market in the long run.
68
2.4 The effect of the 2013 vocational education reform...
References
Bükki, E.–Domján, K.–Mártonfi, G.–Vinczéné Fekete, L. (2012): A szakképzés Ma-
gyarországon. ReferNet országjelentés. Oktatásfejlesztő Központ–TKKI, Budapest.
Bükki, E.–Domján, K.–Mártonfi, G.–Vinczéné Fekete, L. (2014): Hungary VET
in Europe – Country Report 2014. Hungary. Oktatásfejlesztő Központ–TKKI, Bu-
dapest.
Dogossy, K. (2016): Életkép a Szakképzésről. „Ezer négyzetméternyi tanműhelyünk
nincs rendesen kihasználva”. Új Pedagógiai Szemle, Vol. 66, No. 1–2, pp. 97–100.
Hajdu, T.–Hermann, Z.–Horn, D.–Kertesi, G.–Kézdi, G.–Köllő, J.–Varga, J. (2015):
Az érettségi védelmében [In defence of the Matura]. Budapesti Munkagazdaságtani
Füzetek, BWP, 2015/1.
Hall, C. (2016): Does more general education reducet he risk of future unemployment?
Evidence from an expansion of vocational upper secondary education. Economics
of Education Review, Vol. 52, pp. 251–271.
Hanushek, E. A.–Schwerdt, G.–Woessmann, L.–Zhang, L. (2017): General Educa-
tion, Vocational Education, and Labor-Market Outcomes over the Life-Cycle. Jour-
nal of Human Resources. Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 48–87.
Levels, M.–van der Velden, R.–Di Stasio, V. (2014): From School to Fitting Work:
How Education-to-Job Matching of European School Leavers Is Related to Educa-
tional System Characteristics. Acta Sociologica, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 341–361.
NMH (2014): A Szakképzés szabályozása. Tájékoztató a szakképzési szakértők szak-
képzési változásokra való felkészítéséhez. Nemzeti Munkaügyi Hivatal, Budapest.
Oosterbeek, H.–Webbink, D. (2007): Wage effects of an extra year of basic vocational
education. Economics of Education Review, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 408–419.
Ryan, P. (2001): The School-to-Work Transition: A Cross-National Perspective. Journal
of Economic Literature, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 34–92.
Tárki-Tudok (2012): Előrehozott szakképzés. Záró Tanulmány. Tudásmenedzsment
és Oktatáskutató Központ Zrt., Budapest.
Van der Velden, R. K.–Wolbers, M. H. J. (2003): The Integration of Young People
into the Labour Market: The Role of Training Systems and Labour Market Regu-
lation. In: Müller, W.–Gangl, M. (eds.): Transitions from education to work in Eu-
rope. The integration of youth into EU labour markets. Chapter 7, Oxford Univer-
sity Press, Oxford, pp. 186–211.
69
Zoltán Hermann
12
10
4
2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Hungary Czech Republic Slovakia Poland EU 28
Note: Early school leaver: with a lower-secondary (ISCED 2) qualification at most
and not in education.
Source: Eurostat.
This study analyses the process of dropping out but does not directly evalu-
ate the dropout rate or early school leaving. This can only be reliably assessed
when the majority of pupils have completed upper-secondary education and
1 Act CXC of 2011 on School
anyone who has not obtained an upper-secondary qualification is unlikely to
Education. obtain one. As in Hungary a significant proportion of pupils only complete
70
2.5 The impact of decreasing compulsory...
upper-secondary education at the age of 21–22 (Varga, ed., 2018), the im-
pact of the 2012 reform cannot yet be assessed in this respect. This Subchap-
ter examines changes in the proportion of those not in education and lack-
ing an upper-secondary qualification at a specific point in time. Since some
of the school leavers later return to continue their studies and some are not
enrolled because of switching schools, this indicator cannot be regarded as
a direct measure of the dropout rate. Thus the value of the indicator we use
is not sufficiently informative in itself but changes to it reveal the impact of
the school-leaving age reforms.
Earlier research suggests that it is advisable to examine the obtaining of
qualifications and the process of dropping out together, because they may
yield a different picture. After raising the compulsory school-leaving age to
18 in Hungary in the early 2000s, participation in education increased in the
age group 17–18 (Varga, ed., 2018); however, the share of those acquiring
an upper-secondary qualification did not increase as a result of the reform
(Adamecz-Völgyi, 2018). There is no consensus in international literature re-
garding the impact of raising the school-leaving age. Several studies found that
raising the school-leaving age increased participation rates but did not have
an impact on obtaining an upper-secondary qualification (for example Rai-
mondi–Vergolini, 2019, in Italy, Mackey–Duncan, 2013, in the United States),
while others found a positive effect in both areas (for example Wenger, 2002,
in the United States, Cabus–De Witte, 2011, in the Netherlands). Whereas
these studies investigate the impact of raising the school-leaving age, the anal-
ysis below looks at the impact of lowering the school-leaving age.
Data and methods
The analysis is based on the Admin3 dataset of the Centre for Economic and
Regional Studies containing linked administrative data, which contains in-
dividual-level data of 50 per cent of the Hungarian population in 2003 up
to 2017 (Sebők, 2019). In the dataset school enrolment status is recorded on
a monthly basis, the highest qualification of young people and the results of
pupils in the National Assessment of Basic Competences (NABC). The sam-
ple includes participants of the assessment of Grade 8 pupils between 2010 and
2013. The descriptive analysis compares these four cohorts of pupils, while the
econometric estimation only includes the 2011 and 2012 cohorts. The school-
leaving age of 16 applied to those who did not attend upper-secondary school
in the academic year of 2011/2012, that is they started upper-secondary stud-
ies in September 2012 or later. Consequently, the school-leaving age of 18
applied to 8th graders taking the test in 2010 or 2011 and the school-leaving
age of 16 applied to those in Grade 8 in 2012 or 2013. At the same time, pu-
pils in Grade 8 in 2013 were also affected by in the vocational education and
training reform (see Subchapter 2.4). Moreover, they cannot be observed for
71
Zoltán Hermann
72
2.5 The impact of decreasing compulsory...
However, the difference starts to decrease in the fourth and fifth school years
and by 5–6 years after finishing lower-secondary education the proportion of
young people not in education and lacking a qualification is equally about 15
per cent both in the cohorts before and after the reform.
Figure 2.5.2: The proportion of those not in education
and lacking a qualification after finishing lower-secondary education
Total sample Disadvantaged pupils
0.20 0.20
0.15 0.15
0.10 0.10
0.05 0.05
0.00 0.00
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
School year after competence test School year after competence test
8th graders in 2010 8th graders in 2011 8th graders in 2012 8th graders in 2013
Note: The ordinal number of the school year signifies the month September.
The right-hand Figure shows the same pattern in the subsample of disadvan-
taged pupils. The trends observed are essentially identical to those in the to-
tal sample. The share of young people not attending school is much higher in
this group: by the fifth school year it is over 30 per cent.
Figure 2.5.3: The proportion of those with an upper-secondary qualification
4 and 5 years after completing lower-secondary education
Total sample Disadvantaged pupils
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
8th graders in 2010 8th graders in 2011 8th graders in 2012 8th graders in 2013
Figure 2.5.3 presents the share of pupils at the end of the fourth and fifth
school year who have already obtained an upper-secondary qualification. In
the first cohort affected by the school-leaving age of 16, the proportion of
those who obtained a qualification is similar to that of the preceding years.
In the cohort of 2013, there is a slight decrease at the end of the fourth year
in the total sample; however, that cohort was also affected by the vocational
education and training reform (see Subchapter 2.4) – in the case of this co-
hort data about the end of the fifth year is not observed in the dataset.
73
Zoltán Hermann
On the whole, this suggests that lowering the school-leaving age resulted in
considerably lower participation rates but it possibly did not have a major im-
pact on obtaining an upper-secondary qualification and on the “ultimate” early
school leaving rate, which is only observed after the completion of school educa-
tion. In other words, apparently, dropping out following the reform primarily
increased because it occurred earlier than in the cohorts preceding the reforms.
Table 2.5.1 uses probit regression models to assess the differences seen in
Figures 2.5.2 and 2.5.3. Each column of the table contains estimates, at a given
date, for the difference between the last cohort before the reform and the first
cohort after the reform in the probability of not attending school and lack-
ing an upper-secondary qualification, controlling for the effect of observed
individual characteristics such as gender, age at the end of Grade 8, family
background (educational attainment of parents, severe disadvantage) and
pupil performance in Grade 8 (NABC test results, mathematics grade). The
“Reform” variable denotes the cohort in Grade 8 in 2012, while the reference
category is the 2011 cohort. In the case of “not attending school”, the third
month of the school year is considered, because in the sixth school year this is
the latest date the 2012 cohort can still be observed. As for obtaining a quali-
fication, the last month of the school year is taken into account.
The estimates confirm the above description. The proportion of those not
attending school increased in the third and fourth school year the most fol-
lowing the reform both in the total sample and among disadvantaged pu-
pils, then the difference had disappeared by the sixth school year. The share
of those acquiring a qualification did not decrease: the estimates even show
an increase of 1–2 percentage points after controlling for individual factors.
The above analysis compared data from cohorts preceding and following the
reform. The results may be interpreted as to show the impact of the reform but
they are not conclusive. To what extent is this the impact of the school-leaving
age? We can get closer to answering this question if taking into account that
even in classes completing lower-secondary education in 2012 or later not
all students were affected by the reform at each date. Pupils younger than 16
were not affected but those aged 16–17 were. Cohorts aged over 18 were in-
directly affected, since some of them had already dropped out as a result of
the reform. If the differences between the cohorts indicate the impact of the
changes in the school-leaving age, it must be apparent in the 16–18 age group.
Figure 2.5.4 shows the proportions of young people not attending school
and lacking a qualification broken down by age. It is evident that in the cohorts
not affected by the reform the proportion of those not attending school starts
to grow after age 18, while after the reform it increases in the 16-year-old age
group and continues to grow until age 19. By that time, most of the difference
between the cohorts disappear. As all cohorts of 8th graders consist of pupils
of different age, the database containing data up to the end of 2017 does not
74
2.5 The impact of decreasing compulsory...
allow the cohorts affected by the reform to be followed beyond age 19. Nev-
ertheless, Figure 2.5.4 reveals a similar picture to Figure 2.5.2 and Table 2.5.1.
Table 2.5.1: The effect of the school-leaving age reform on the status “not attending
school and lacking a qualification” and on acquiring an upper-secondary
qualification, marginal effects
Not attending school and Having an upper-second-
lacking a qualification ary qualification
2th school 3th school 4th school 5th school 6th school 4th school 5th school
year year year year year year year
at the end of November
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Total sample
0.012q*** 0.0313*** 0.0385*** 0.00466*** 0.00105 0.0196*** 0.00512**
Reform
(0.00123) (0.00138) (0.00174) (0.00181) (0.00182) (0.00333) (0.00242)
N 91 310 91 295 91 280 91 262 91 240 91 268 91 251
p-average 0.0503 0.0728 0.121 0.147 0.150 0.641 0.790
Disadvantaged pupils
0.0257*** 0.0889*** 0.0930*** 0.0215*** 0.0102 0.0236*** 0.00320
Reform
(0.00304) (0.00391) (0.00559) (0.00635) (0.00643) (0.00699) (0.00693)
N 22,114 22,109 22,110 22,103 22,096 22,106 22,101
p-average 0.0717 0.127 0.235 0.304 0.313 0.464 0.608
Note: Probit estimates.
Dependent variable: Not attending school and lacking a qualification at a given date
(1–5) and having an upper-secondary qualification (6–7).
Control variables: Gender, age when taking the test in Grade 8, severe disadvantage,
categories of parents’ educational attainment, categories of numeracy and literacy
performance levels in the competence test in Grade 8, categories of mathematics
grades at the end of Grade 7 as well as the dummy variables for missing test results,
parents’ educational attainment and grades.
Standard errors are shown in parantheses.
Significant at a ***1 per cent, **5 per cent, *10 per cent level.
Figure 2.5.4: The proportion of those not attending school and lacking a qualification, by age
Total sample Disadvantaged pupils
0.20 0.4
0.15 0.3
0.10 0.2
0.05 0.1
0.00 0.0
16 17 18 19 16 17 18 19
Age Age
8th graders in 2010 8th graders in 2011 8th graders in 2012 8th graders in 2013
The tendency of a gradual increase after age 18 before the reform is easily ex-
plained by the fact that education was compulsory until the end of the school
75
Zoltán Hermann
year, that is somewhere between the age of 18 and 19, depending on the month
of birth. After the reform, when the school-leaving age applies to the actual
age of pupils, although there is a break at age 16, the proportion of those not
attending school also increases gradually, suggesting that they do not drop
out immediately after reaching the school-leaving age.
Table 5.2.2 uses regression models similar to those in Table 5.2.1 to assess
the differences in the probability of not attending school between cohorts
preceding and following the reform in age groups below 16 and 16–18. Es-
timates cover the period until the middle of the second school year because
this is when both age groups may be observed in significant numbers. The
proportion of those not attending school did not, in fact, increase as a result
of the reform among pupils below 16, while in the directly affected 16–18 age
group the proportion of those not in education increased. This is consistent
with the interpretation that the difference between the two cohorts is due to
the impact of the raised school-leaving age.
Table 2.5.2: The impact of the school-leaving age reform on not attending school
and lacking a qualification in two age groups, marginal effects
Total sample Disadvantaged pupils
1th school year 2th school year 2th school year 1th school year 2th school year 2th school year
April November February April November February
Reform × be- 0.00610*** 0.00189 0.00371 –0.00542 –0.00889 0.000234
low age 16 (0.0150) (0.00253) (0.00408) (0.00363) (0.00586) (0.00920)
Reform × 16– 0.0356*** 0.0186*** 0.0276*** 0.0516*** 0.0409*** 0.0628***
18 age group (0.00299) (0.00160) (0.00155) (0.00635) (0.00385) (0.00389)
Note: Probit estimates.
Dependent variables: Not attending school and lacking a qualification at a given date.
Control variables: Gender, age group, severe disadvantage, categories of parents’ edu-
cational attainment, categories of numeracy and literacy performance levels in the
competence test in Grade 8, categories of mathematics grades at the end of Grade 7
as well as the dummy variables for missing test results, parents’ educational attain-
ment and grades.
Standard errors are shown in parantheses.
Significant at a ***1 per cent, **5 per cent, *10 per cent level.
Conclusion
The results suggest that lowering the school-leaving age increased the propor-
tion of young people not attending school, particularly in the 16–18 age group.
This, however, did not seem to coincide with a substantial decrease in the
proportion of pupils acquiring an upper-secondary qualification, since most
of the pupils who dropped out below the age of 18 as a result of the reform
would have dropped out when reaching the age of 18 if compulsory school-
ing age had remained unchanged. This implies that a higher school-leaving
age in itself is not sufficient to reduce early school leaving: this requires multi-
ple education policy measures, with school-leaving age as one of the elements.
76
2.5 The impact of decreasing compulsory...
References
Adamecz-Völgyi, A. (2018): Increased Compulsory ington, DC.
School Leaving Age Affects Secondary School Track Raimondi, E.–Vergolini, L. (2019): ‘Everyone in
Choice and Increases Dropout Rates in Vocational School’: The Effects of Compulsory Schooling Age
Training Schools. CERS-IE, BWP, 2018/1. on Drop-out and Completion Rates, European Jour-
Cabus, S. J.–De Witte, K. (2011): Does school time mat- nal of Education, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 471–490.
ter? On the impact of compulsory education age on Sebők, A. (2019): The Panel of Linked Administrative
school dropout. Economics of Education Review, Vol. Data of CERS Databank. Budapest Working Papers
30, No. 6, pp. 1384–1398. on the Labour Market, BWP-2019/2.
EC (2019): Education and Training Monitor 2019. Euro- Varga, J. (ed.) (2018): A közoktatás indikátorrendszere,
pean Commission. 2017. Authors: Hajdu, T.–Hermann, Z.–Horn, D.–Var-
Fehérvári, A. (2015): Lemorzsolódás és a korai iskolael- ga, J., MTA KRTK KTI, Budapest, 1 February.
hagyás trendjei. Neveléstudomány, 2015/3, pp. 31–47. Wenger, J. W. (2002) Does the Dropout Age Matter? How
Mackey, P. E.–Duncan, T. G. (2013): Does raising the Mandatory Schooling Laws Impact High School Com-
state compulsory school attendance age achieve the pletion and School Choice. Public Finance & Manage-
intended outcomes? Department of Education, Wash- ment, Vol. 2. No. 4. pp. 507–534.
77
János Köllő & Anna Sebők
Figure K2.5.1: The share of 17-year-olds in employment, and not in education, employment, or training
(NEET), 1992–2018
In employment (percentage) Not in education, employment, or training (percentage)
8 15
6
10
Percentage
5
2
0 0
1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019
With public works Without public works Public works=working Public works=not working
Note: The annual rate is calculated as the arithmetic vey (but have not reached the age of 18), and have not
mean of the rates of the first, second and fourth quar- attained a level of education higher than elementary.
ters. Because of the changes in the administration of In employment: employed as defined in the ILO-
the summer holidays, the data of the third quarter OECD convention.
cannot be examined in a long time series model, and Source: Authors’ calculations, based on the version of
are a priori uncertain. The data are representative of the labour force survey of KSH handled in the Data-
those who reached the age of 17 by the date of the sur- bank of MTA KRTK.
References
Adamecz-Völgyi, A.–Scharle, Á. (2018): The Ef- the Labour Market, BWP 2018/2.
fects of Increased Compulsory School Leaving Age on Machin, S. J.–Marie, O.–Vujic, S. (2011): The Crime
the Teenage Fertility of Roma Women, a Disadvan- Reducing Effect of Education. The Economic Journal,
taged Ethnic Minority. Budapest Working Papers on Vol. (121): No. No. 552. pp. 463–484.
78
3.1 Student work
79
Bori Greskovics & Ágota Scharle
20 Tertiary
Vocational secondary
15
General secondary
10
Vocational school*
5 Primary or less
0
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
*
ISCED3C.
Source: Own calculation based on CSO Labour Force Survey.
Figure 3.1.2: Share of those working while studying full-time by completed
education and sex, 2002–2017 (15–29 years old, per cent)
30
25
Tertiary: women
20
Vocational secondary:
15 women
Tertiary: men
10
Vocational secondary:
men
5
0
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
Source: own calculation based on CSO Labour Force Survey (average of four quar-
ters).
Among young people leaving school, while only a few have work experience,
this experience is largely (81 per cent on average in the past 10 years) related
to their intended profession which can make their transition to work easier.1
In theory, the Labour Force Survey of the HCSO would allow a more detailed
examination of this issue, if we compared the labour market outcomes after
leaving school among the formerly employed and the non-employed. How-
ever, the low proportion of those working while studying also means that the
sample of the Labour Force Survey includes very few student workers, only
1 Geel–Backes-Gellner (2012), 150–200, per quarter. If we further narrow the group of working students to
for example, found in a Swiss those who have just finished school (in 2017, this would be 18 percent of full-
survey on graduates’ careers
that only part-time work re- time students), the number of observations drops to a few dozen. Therefore,
lated to their field of studies due to the low number of observations we are unable to examine how work-
has a positive effect on later
employment and wages. ing while studying affects post-graduate employment.
80
3.1 Student work
References
Bajnai, B.–Hámori, Sz.–Köllő, J. (2009): The Hungarian Labour Market – A Euro-
pean Perspective. In: Fazekas, K.–Köllő, J. (eds.): The Hungarian Labour Market
Review and Analysis, 2009. IE-HAS–National Employment Foundation. Buda-
pest, pp. 44–94.
Geel, R.–Backes-Gellner, U. (2012): Earning while learning. When and how student
employment is beneficial. Labour, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 313–340.
Neyt, B.–Omey, E.–Verhaest, D.–Baert, S. (2018), Does student work really affect
educational outcomes? A review of the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol.
33. No. 3. pp. 896–921.
Pastore, F.–Zimmermann, K. F. (2019): Understanding school-to-work transitions.
International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 40, No. 3, 374–378. o.
Szanyi-F., E.–Susánszky, P. (2016): Iskolapadból a munkaerőpiacra – magyar fiatalok
karrierpályaszakaszainak elemzése. In: Székely, L.(ed.): Magyar fiatalok a Kárpát-
medencében. Magyar Ifjúság Kutatás, Kutatópont Kft.–Enigma 2001 Kiadó–Mé-
diaszolgáltató Kft., Budapest, pp. 207–230.
Szőcs, A. (2014): Aktív fiatalok a munkaerőpiacon. In: Szabó, A. (ed.): Racionálisan
lázadó hallgatók II. Apátia – radikalizmus – posztmaterializmus a magyar egye-
temisták és főiskolások körében. Belvedere Meridionale–MTA TK PTI, Budapest–
Szeged, pp. 252–260.
81
Dániel Horn
82
3.2 The short-term labour market effects...
– in the years of their labour market entry or their further education follow-
ing the secondary level. The responses contain the monthly data of any regu-
lar work carried out during the last school year and in the two years following
graduation, thus providing us with a more or less continuous picture of the
labour market integration of students. The 2006 scores of the eighth-grade
mathematics and reading comprehension tests of the national survey on com-
petences are available for all students participating in the panel survey, as well
as data on their school careers and family backgrounds. Making use of the
variance between the distribution of company and school based training place-
ments, this subchapter attempts to estimate the effect of an internship spent
at a company on initial labour market outcomes. As there was a significant
number of students at vocational schools who conducted their internship at
the school or at the school’s training workshops, comparing similar students
provides an opportunity for analysing the labour market effect of an appren-
ticeship spent at a company instead.
The distribution of training placements at companies among the applicant
students was probably not arbitrary: companies could select from among stu-
dents, in hopes of better labour force (cf. Bertschy et al, 2009). The analysis of
the Life-course Survey suggests that application to the apprenticeship train-
ing was indeed not arbitrary, but was much more related to the characteristics
of the local labour market than to the individual characteristics of students.3
Consequently, the estimates presented below probably provide a good esti-
mate of the labour market effect of the apprenticeship training.
The relation of the apprenticeship to employment after graduation
Even though in our analysis we applied various probability models in order to
expose an association between the apprenticeship training and employment,
there was no statistically significant difference in any of the cases between the
employment probabilities of those who did and those who did not spend their
internship at a company, one year after graduation. Although there was a mi-
nor difference between the students of the two groups, the estimated effect
size was only 6 percentage points, and statistically was not significant. And
as for students entering the labour market solely (in employment or unem-
ployed), we not only got a statistically not significant result, but the result was 3 The selection between train-
less significant from a public policy perspective as well (~3 percentage points). ing placements acquired indi-
vidually versus those organised
As can be seen in Figure 3.2.1, the probability of employment one year after by the school can be examined
the completion of school in June is approximately 6 percentage points higher in a similar way among ap-
prentices. Results show that
in the case of apprentices compared to those who were not apprentices, but although a few individual char-
acteristics do have an effect of
this is not significantly different from zero. Additionally, it has become clear minor significance, they disap-
that immediately after the end of the school year, the employment probability pear when the effect of the lo-
cal labour market in considered
of both apprentices and those who did not apprentice increases significantly. (county × vocational group
Although directly after graduation the employment probability of appren- fixed effects).
83
Dániel Horn
tices is slightly higher, this significant difference disappears very quickly, one
month after graduation, and the remaining difference continues to decrease.
Figure 3.2.1: The expected employment probability of students of vocational
schools, 2011–2012
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
84
3.2 The short-term labour market effects...
Overall, what is more likely suggested by the data is that in Hungary, there
was – even in the very short term – no difference between the labour market
success of vocational school students who did and those who did not spend
their internship at a company.
References
Bertschy, K.–Cattaneo, M. A.–Wolter, S. C. (2009): PISA and the Transition into
the Labour Market. Labour, Vol. 23, pp. 111–137.
Breen, R. (2005): Explaining Cross-National Variation in Youth Unemployment: Market
and Institutional Factors. European Sociological Review, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 125–134.
Horn, D. (2014): A szakiskolai tanoncképzés rövidtávú munkaerőpiaci hatásai [The
short-term labour market effects of apprenticeship training in vocational schools].
Közgazdasági Szemle, Vol. 61, No. 9, pp. 975–999.
Müller, W.–Shavit, Y. (1998): The Institutional Embeddedness of the Stratification
Process: A Comparative Study of Qualifications and Occupations in Thirteen Coun-
tries. In: Shavit, Y.–Müller, W. (eds.): From School to Work: A Comparative Study
of Educational Qualifications and Occupational Destinations. Clarendon Press,
Oxford. pp. 1–48.
Wolter, S. C.–Ryan, P. (2011): Apprenticeship. In: Hanushek, E. A.–Machin, S.–Woess-
mann, L. (eds.): Handbook of the Economics of Education. Elsevier. Vol. 3, pp.
521–576.
85
Bori Greskovics & Ágota Scharle
Force Survey before 2011, pub- Source: Own calculation based on CSO Labour Force Survey (average of four quarters).
lic workers can be identified
less accurately, therefore we Before and during the Great Recession, the share of non fixed-term contracts
show the share of non fixed-
term contracts in the long time
in all education groups declined somewhat, but this trend has stopped or re-
series. versed in the past few years.2 Among uneducated young people, the growing
86
3.3 Casual and other forms of work
Casual work occurred in 1–2 percent of first jobs during the period exam-
ined; the share of new entrants to work as entrepreneurs or in the family
business was only around 2–4 percent as well (slightly higher for men and
lower for women).
Based on the above, descriptive data, it seems that among flexible forms of
work, primarily fixed-term contracts can play a significant role in facilitating
the school-work transition. Even if there is segmentation, the share of sec-
ondary jobs that do not offer progression does not yet reach the critical level 3 The lower rate may also apply
experienced in Spain or Portugal.4 Although it is true that the share of fixed- to newcomers to a given firm
(but not as entrants), this was
term contracts increased among the less educated after the crisis, this is not not examined.
necessarily the sign of increasing segmentation, even as the share of fixed-term 4 Huszár–Sik (2019) find that
contracts in the total working population has been declining since the reces- the there is indeed a second-
ary labour market in Hungary,
sion. It is also possible that as labour shortages worsen, and possibly with an however, based on their calcu-
lations, it cannot be ascertained
increase in the range of wage subsidies offered to encourage the employment if it equals or expands beyond
of young people, employers become more open to giving a chance to jobseek- public works.
87
Bori Greskovics & Ágota Scharle
88
4.1 Does the economic recession have permanent effects?
89
Márton Csillag
rate was 1 percentage point higher,8 then how much do the labour outcomes
of the youth change throughout the years spent on the labour market. Our
results show that the unfavourable labour market situation quite significantly
decreases the employment probability of new entrants, and although this unfa-
vourable effect later subsides, it does not disappear. This means that if a young
person entered the labour market during the recent recession, when unemploy-
ment was around 5 percentage points higher (than in previous years), then
the probability of them being employment 6–7 years later was 4 percentage
points lower. Similarly, the labour market shock increased the risk of unem-
ployment as well9 by roughly 3 percentage points even 8–10 years afterwards.
Figure 4.1.1: Youth employment in terms of labour market experience,
in three graduation cohorts (between 2003–2017)
95
90
Employment rate (%)
85
80
75
70
65
60
55
0−1 year 2−3 years 4−5 years 6−7 years
Years of experience
2003−2004 2006−2007 2009−2010
Source: Own calculation based on the CSO Labour Force Survey data 2003–2017.
Figure 4.1.2: The effects of the unemployment rate in the year of graduation on
youth labour market status in terms of labour market experience, 2002–2017
(percentage points)
market at entry effect (percentage point)
1.5
Unemployment rate of the labour
1.0
90
4.1 Does the economic recession have permanent effects?
market shock varies amongst young people with different levels of education.
According to Figure 4.2.3, the so-called scarring effect which impacts sub-
sequent employment, or even the whole career, appears mainly in the case of
those with secondary or higher education, whilst the negative effects are less
significant in the case of those with lower educational attainment.10
Figure 4.1.3: The effects of the unemployment rate in the year graduation on youth
employment, by educational attainment groups, 2002–2017 (percentage points)
0.2
market at entry effect (percentage point)
Unemployment rate of the labour
0.0
−0.2
10 In the case of unemployment
−0.4
probability, there is no such dif-
−0.6 ference for those with different
educational qualifications, only
−0.8 the negative effect on those
−1.0 with vocational education is
exceptionally high.
−1.2 11 We did this with the help
0−1 year 2−3 years 4−5 years 6−7 years 8−10 years of the 2001–2016 Wage Tariff
Years of experience Survey of NES. Sample selec-
Elementary Vocational tion was done similar to the
Secondary Tertiary above analysis. Our depend-
education school
ent variable was the logarithm
Source: Own calculation based on the CSO Labour Force Survey data 2003–2017. of gross monthly real earnings
(including 1/12 of non-regular
Next, we examined another measure of labour market success, earnings, and income). The basic equation in-
we tried to draw conclusions regarding position and the quality of the com- cluded educational attainment
(7 categories), categories of ex-
pany.11 Our results demonstrate that in general, the lasting effects of a poor perience, the country, the cal-
labour market start are negligible, as seen in the first column of Table 4.1.1. endar year. In addition to the
basic equation, we first includ-
At the same time, those with higher education were paid around 5 percentage ed the occupation (three-digit
points less even 4–6 years after the recession, than those entering a favour- FEOR code), and then indicator
variables for the identity of the
able labour market (assuming that they entered the market in a year with a 5 company.
percentage point higher unemployment rate).12 Surprisingly, this is not due 12 At the same time, it is pos-
sible that because employment
to lower position or that the young person “got stuck” at a low-wage compa- declined, selection intensified
ny.13 We also tried to find out whether those entering the labour market dur- and therefore we can only give
a lower estimate of the wage
ing the recession are “overqualified”, i.e. if they are in an occupation which effect.
is characterized by lower education-levels than theirs. Similar to the above 13 That is, in the models in
which we included occupation
results, we did not find any indication that those youth leaving education in and corporate fixed effects, the
the years of the recession would get stuck at a low quality jobs. results did not change.
Our results suggest that the scarring effects of entering the labour market 14 That is, it is possible that
the short-term effects of the
in a recession in Hungary appeared mainly in permanently lower employ- negative labour market shock
will not become permanent for
ment. Wage disadvantages emerged only for those with tertiary education.14 those with lower education, as
It should also be noted that it is possible that the negatives effects on those in their case there is no serious
depreciation of human capital.
with higher education could have been greater if the cohorts entering the la- 15 These preliminary results
bour market during the recession would not have been significantly smaller further justify a closer exami-
than the generations in the early 2000s.15 Our results echo other European nation of the careers of young
people with higher education
analyses which found the effects on wages to be smaller, but they showed that (see Chapter 8 of In Focus).
91
Márton Csillag
K4.1 What are the consequences of young people entering the labour market
during an economic crisis? International outlook
Endre Tóth
The scarring effect refers to those negative conse- ic and financial recession in 2008, and in order to
quences which affect young people who begin their eliminate these negative consequences, the Euro-
careers with a potential period of unemployment. pean Union introduced their Youth Guarantee Pro-
In labour economics, two different issues are exam- gramme in 2013.1
ined under this term. First: whether young people The majority of research on the scarring effect
who leave school during a recession and start their examines this phenomenon via regression model
career therefore face higher risks of early-stage un- building, analysing young people belonging to dif-
employment are permanently “scarred” by these ferent cohorts, where the key independent varia-
circumstances. Second: for those young people ble is the labour market situation of the youth’s
who experience lasting unemployment when start- place of residence at the time of leaving school. In
ing their career, does this episode have long-term
negative effects on their later career? This topic re- 1 For the implementation of this Hungary, see
emerged in the literature due to the severe econom- Subchapter 5.2.
92
K4.1 What are the consequences of young people...
their analysis¸ the researchers do not only have to tions presents a trap for young people, because it
properly filter out differences of other origins be- has a long-term negative impact on most the ca-
tween the individuals, but they also have to deal reers of most young people (similar to unemploy-
with potentially distorting effects such as the en- ment).4 Young people from vulnerable backgrounds
dogenous relationship between unemployment and experience lower upward mobility and slower wage
the place and year of graduation, and migration. growth that those who began their careers in jobs
In order to remedy the potentially distorting ef- which match their qualifications.5 There can be two
fects, researchers are including new control vari- main explanations for the lasting negative effects
ables (for example: place of birth, unemployment of early-stage unemployment or overqualification.
measured at the start of the training). Every re- The first is the negative signalling function of ear-
search paper2 we examined drew the conclusion ly unemployment, i.e., employers view it as a sig-
that young people entering a labour market in a re- nal of lower productivity, which seriously affects
cession with high unemployment must face lasting the perception of job-seekers (Cockx–Pichio, 2011).
negative consequences. In their case, lower wages, Another possible explanation is the decline of pro-
fewer hours worked, lower quality job and higher fessional knowledge and skills due to cognitive de-
risk of unemployment can be detected even 7–15 cline, or that the acquisition of new skills is rare in
years after starting their career, compared to their low-skilled jobs.
counterparts who started working at a more for-
tunate time (Kahn, 2010). When the initial unem- 2 On the topic of the scarring effect, most of the re-
ployment rate that is one percentage point higher, search is based on North American data (Schwandt–
von Wachter, 2018, Kahn, 2010, Altonji et al, 2014,
the rate of loss of income is estimated at 6–10 per- Speer, 2016, Oreopoulos et al, 2012). But several
cent in the year of graduation by studies examining excellent studies used data from European countries
higher education degree-holders, which then slowly (Cutler et al, 2014, Liu et al, 2016, Cockx–Ghirelli,
decreases, but stays around 2–3 percent even ten 2016), and there are also studies examining multiple
years later. (Kahn, 2010, Altonji et al, 2014). Several continents and larger groups of countries (Cutler et
al, 2014, Liu et al, 2016, Cockx–Ghirelli, 2016). Most
studies have pointed out that the negative effects research based on North American data analyses ex-
may be more significant in the case of less educated clusively newly graduated young people (Kahn, 2010,
young people, who experience a more significant Altonji et al, 2014, Oreopoulos et al, 2012), but there
decrease of employment (Schwandt–von Wachter, are also studies which exclusively include those with
2018, Cockx, 2016), and amongst graduates, those lower education (Speer, 2015), or those that examine
all young people, regardless of their education.
with lower abilities (Oreopoulos et al, 2012). It seems 3 This can have very significant negative consequenc-
that stricter labour market regulation increases the es, for example, Gregg–Tominey (2005) found that
persistence of the scarring effect, with young peo- young people who experienced long-term unemploy-
ple getting “stuck” in low-paying jobs that do not ment early in their career, had earnings around 12
match their qualifications in a more rigid labour percent lower than their luckier counterparts, even
twenty years later.
market structure (Kawaguchi–Murao, 2014). Re- 4 See for example, Büchel–Mertens, 2004, Mendes de
search based on individual-level data not only ana- Oliveira et al, 2000, Baert et al, 2012, Liu et al, 2012.
lysed the effect of early-stage unemployment,3 but 5 This is in contrast to previous North American re-
also the consequences of a young person accept- sults, where accepting positions that did not match
ing a job for which they are overqualified. Stud- qualifications might have been a good choice in terms
of subsequent higher than average mobility opportu-
ies examining data from European countries with nities (i.e., it provided a kind of “springboard func-
a relatively inflexible labour market show that ac- tion”). See for example: Sicherman (1991) and Rubb
cepting a job not compatible with their qualifica- (2003).
93
Endre Tóth
References
Altonji, J. G.–Kahn, L. B.–Speer. J. D. (2016): Cash- ment. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 46,
ier or consultant? Entry labor market conditions, field No. 2, pp. 95–116.
of study, and career success. Journal of Labor Eco- Liu, K.–Salvanes, K. G.–Sörensen, E. (2016): Good
nomics, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 361–401. skills in bad times: Cyclical skill mismatch and the
Baert, S.–Cockx, B.–Verhaest, D. (2013): Overedu- long-term effects of graduating in a recession. European
cation at the start of the career: Stepping stone or trap? Economic Review, Vol. 84, pp. 3–17.
Labour Economics, Vol. 25, pp. 123–140. Mendes De Oliveira, M.–Santos, M. C.–Kiker,
Büchel, F.–Mertens, A. (2004): Overeducation, un- B. F. (2000): The role of human capital and technologi-
dereducation, and the theory of career mobility. Ap- cal change in overeducation. Economics of Education
plied Economics, Vol. 36, No. 8, pp. 803–816. Review, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 199–206.
Cockx, B. (2016): Do youths graduating in a recession Oreopoulos, P.–Von Wachter, T.–Heisz, A. (2012):
incur permanent losses. IZA World of Labor, No. 281, The short- and long-term career effects of graduating in
pp. 1–11. a recession. American Economic Journal: Applied Eco-
Cockx, B.–Ghirelli, C. (2016): Scars of recessions in nomics, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1–29.
a rigid labor market. Labour Economics, Vol. 41, pp. Rubb, S. (2003): Overeducation: a short or long run phe-
162–176. nomenon for individuals? Economics of Education Re-
Cockx, B.–Picchio, M. (2011): Scarring Effects of view, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 389–394.
Remaining Unemployed for Long-Term Unemployed Schwandt, H.–Von Wachter, T. (2018): Unlucky Co-
School-Leavers., IZA Discussion Papers, No. 5937. horts: Estimating the Long-Term Effects of Entering the
Cutler, D.–Wei Huang, M.–Lleras-Muney, A. Labor Market in a Recession in Large Cross-Sectional
(2015): When does education matter? The protec- Data Sets. NBER Working Paper No. 25141.
tive effect of education for cohorts graduating in bad Sicherman, N. (1991): Overeducation in the Labor
times. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 127, pp. 63–73. Market. Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp.
Gregg P.–Tominey E. (2005): TheWage Scar from 101–122.
Male Youth Unemployment. Labour Economics, Vol. Sicherman, N.–Galor, O. (1990): A Theory of Career
12, No. 4, pp. 487–509. Mobility. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, No. 1,
Kahn, L. B. (2010): The long-term labor market conse- pp. 169–192.
quences of graduating from college in a bad economy. Speer, J. D. (2016): Wages, hours, and the school-to-
Labour Economics, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 303–316. work transition. The consequences of leaving school in
Kawaguchi, D.–Murao, T. (2014): Labor market in- a recession for less-educated men. The B.E. Journal of
stitutions and long-term effects of youth unemploy- Economic Analysis & Policy, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 97–124.
94
4.2 Unemployment among labour market entrants
95
Márton Csillag
where unemployment was more than one and a half times higher than among
those who did not experience unemployment. Another important lesson from
the table is that those who were in public works (on top of unemployment),
came from a particularly disadvantaged background in every respect.5
Table 4.2.1: Characteristics of young men by categories based on time spent as
registered jobseekers or in public works in the two calendar years after graduation
Reading Unemployment
Length of time spent in registered Proportion Mathematics
comprehension rate
unemployment or public works (percent)
average score (percent)
None 59.4 1608 1664 6.69
1–6 months 25.2 1582 1639 8.24
7–12 months, no PW 5.9 1578 1632 9.03
7–12 months and PW 3.2 1561 1605 10.34
13–24 months, no PW 3.7 1556 1603 10.35
13–24 months and PW 2.6 1529 1568 11.95
Sample: those young men who finished secondary school (ISCED 3A or 3B) in 2011–
2012 and did not go on to higher education.
Note: Data from the two calendar years after completing upper-secondary education,
the length of registered unemployment or public works participation is summed up
5 We note that those who con- (and PW participation is noted separately).
tinue their studies two years Source: Own calculation based on linked public administration panel database of the
af ter f inishing secondar y CERS Databank.
school (although they did not
complete higher education un-
til 2019) have higher cognitive In Table 4.2.2, we summarised the results of multiple regression analyses
skills. In this short paper we
do not deal with the fact that
in which we measured the labour market situation of the young person in
the current state of the labour the fifth calendar year after finishing secondary school, depending on the
market may also affect the con-
tinuation of studies. number of months spent as a registered jobseeker (or in public works).6 First,
6 In the analysis we use the we were curious about how many more months those who experienced diffi-
entire calendar year, therefore culty entering the labour market spent as registered unemployed or in pub-
we consider the average daily
wages as well as the proportion lic works (or less time employed in the primary labour market). Second, we
of time spent as overqualified
within employment. It is im-
examined whether, if a young person was employed in the primary labour
portant to emphasise that when market, they received lower (daily) wages, and whether it was more likely
we talk about employment, we
are looking at employment that they were overqualified7 for their job if they had been previously un-
(and the earnings or occupa- employed/in public works. The key variables were divided into the six cat-
tional status) on the primary
labour market. egories in Table 4.2.1.8
7 Here we use the same ap- Estimation results show that shorter unemployment (not exceeding six
proach as Jú l ia Va rga i n
subchapter 7.3. Those who
months) does not significantly worsen the labour market outcomes of youth.
worked in occupations belong- Those who had been unemployed for a longer period of time and were (also)
ing to HSCO major group 8 or 9
were classified as overqualified. in public works were particularly unfortunate, while the labour market out-
8 Regressions included tenth come of those who spent the 7–12 months as registered jobseekers (but not
grade test scores (and their
squares), year of birth, region
in public works) deteriorated only slightly.
of residence, and how many First, an individual’s participation in public works clearly predicts getting
months the young person stud-
ied as a full-time student in the “stuck” in subsequent unemployment (or further public works): the long-term
two years after graduation. unemployed who were also in public works, spent nearly three months more
96
4.2 Unemployment among labour market entrants
in a similar status even in the fifth year after graduation. Similarly, members
of this group spent about 1.3 months less on the primary labour market than
those who had not been unemployed. All this suggests that in terms of em-
ployment status, those who are long-term unemployed and who were in pub-
lic works are the worst off. If a young person was long-term unemployed but
was not in public works or was a registered jobseeker and in public works but
was able to get out of this situation within a year also had negative, but not
so unfavourable, consequences.
Table 4.2.2: The relationship between unemployment in the first two years of the
career and the labour market outcomes in the fifth year
after finishing secondary school, finished secondary school in 2011–2012
Length of time spent in regis- Registered job- Employed on the Occupation over-
Daily earnings
tered unemployment or public seeker or public primary labour educated
(logarithm)
works works (months) market (month) (percent)
0.3534*** 0.4214*** 0.003006 7.0275***
1–6 months
(0.05196) (0.1125) (0.01434) (1.1160)
0.5386*** 0.2794 –0.02838 12.992***
7–12 months, no PW
(0.1081) (0.2016) (0.02500) (2.0245)
2.0151*** –0.5261* –0.09400** 8.1912***
7–12 months and PW
(0.2311) (0.2802) (0.03794) (2.6704)
1.3562*** –0.6197** –0.1067*** 9.2666***
13–24 months, no PW
(0.2010) (0.2686) (0.03308) (2.7348)
2.9125*** –1.3137*** –0.1134*** 16.300***
13–24 months and PW
(0.2893) (0.3183) (0.03754) (3.2424)
R2 0.145 0.051 0.064 0.063
N 11,147 11,147 8,904 8,904
Average of the outcome
0.818 7.962 8.526 30.391
variable
Key independent variable: number of months spent as registered jobseeker or public
works participant in the two calendar years following secondary school gradua-
tion. Regressions included tenth grade test scores (and their squares), year of birth,
region of residence, and how many months the young person studied as a full-time
student in the two years after graduation.
Source: Own calculation based on linked public administration panel database of the
CERS Databank.
Second, in terms of wages and the quality of work five years after labour
market entry, the ranking based on the status immediately following enter-
ing the labour market is not so clear. Members of those three groups whose
employment was negatively affected by the experiences of the first two years
also received around 10 percent lower daily wages. In terms of jobs, all young
people who had been unemployed for a significant period of time were about
10 percentage points more likely to be forced to accept a job for which they
were overqualified. Those who were both long-term unemployed and in public
works were particularly disadvantaged as they were about one and a half times
more likely to be overqualified than young people who were not unemployed.
97
Márton Csillag
98
5.1 Job search behaviour of young people...
99
Tamás Molnár
0.8
Share of NEETs
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0 1 2 3 4
2 We used a survival analysis, Quarter
merging the waves of the Labor Short term unemployed Re-entrant Long term illness
Force Survey 2015–2018. The Care obligations Discouraged Other
sample included those who
did not have NEET status in Source: Own calculation based on LFS data.
the first wave and then became
NEET in one of the six quarters. In addition to labor demand and individual motivation, help from the pub-
As output variable we used the
time until exiting the NEET lic employment services can also shorten the duration of job search through
status, and we controlled for providing jobseekers with specific job offers, training or advice to improve
– among others – level of edu-
cation, age, gender, region, and the effectiveness of individual job search (see also section 5.2). Identifying the
quarter. Leaving NEET status
to study has not been taken into
causal effect is difficult because there is a two-way relationship: registration
account here. can improve the efficiency of job search, but registration itself can be a step
100
5.1 Job search behaviour of young people...
101
Tamás Molnár
ful for those who are able to look for a job on their own (see Box K5.1), while
those who themselves are not seeking employment for some reason may be
activated by the help of PES.
Table 5.1.2: Relationship between motivational factors and registration with time
until exit from NEET status to employment, 2015–2018
Wants to Does not want Wants to work and Wants to work but does
work to work actively seeks a job not actively seek a job
Registered jobseeker in the 1.3582** 1.2549 0.9139 1.9937***
previous period (0.1812) (0.6490) (0.1654) (0.4319)
Number of observations 934 1,644 529 405
Note: Coefficients express the effect on the logarithm of the odds ratio. Coefficients
greater than 1 mean that this factor speeds up the placement process, while factors
with a coefficient less than 1 impede it.
***
Significant at 1 percent, **5 percent, *10 percent level.
Source: Own calculation from LFS data.
Within the group of NEET young people, those who are the closest to the
primary labor market (short-term unemployed and re-entrants) register with
the employment services at the highest rate. The somewhat more problemat-
ic groups (long-term unemployed, discouraged jobseekers and other NEETs
who want to work), for whom the services of the PES would likely be more
helpful, register at a lower and, in recent years, declining rate. Not surpris-
ingly, people who, for whatever reason, are unable to work are registered at
a very low rate at PES offices.
Figure 5.1.3: Registration rate by distance from the primary labor market,
2013–2018
100
80
60
Percent
40
20
0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Close to the primary Further away from the Cannot work
labour market primary labour market
Note: Close to the primary labour market: re-entrant or short term unem-
ployed. Further away from the primary labour market: long term unem-
ployed or discouraged worker.
Source: Own calculation based on LFS second quarter waves.
Overall, we have found that young people not in education, training or em-
ployment face different opportunities in the labor market: a smaller and de-
102
5.1 Job search behaviour of young people...
clining portion finds work quickly, others remain unemployed for a more
protracted period, while an increasing portion remain stuck in NEET sta-
tus due to their care responsibilities or health issues. The employment service
reaches no more than half of the second group and less than one in twenty
young persons from the third group. From our descriptive analysis, it seems
that registration at the job center can accelerate the employment of young peo-
ple who are further away from the labor market and want to work. Therefore,
in order to further reduce the number and proportion of young people not
in education, employment or work, the access of vulnerable young people to
employment services needs to be increased, and the efficiency of services for
job-seekers (see section 5.2) and social services that can reduce (or compen-
sate for) barriers related to illness or care should be improved.
References
Mascherini, M.–Ledermaier, S. (2016): Exploring the diversity of NEETs. Euro-
found, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
Micklewright, J.–Nagy, Gy. (1999): The informational value of job search data and
the dynamics of search behaviour: Evidence from Hungary. Budapest Working Pa-
pers on the Labour Market, 1999/1. Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy
of Sciences, Budapest.
103
Tamás Molnár
Figure K5.1.1: Search tools used by unemployed Figure K5.1.2: Search tools used by ILO unemployed
young people who completed vocational school, young people who completed secondary education,
2014–2018 2014–2018
100 100
Proportion of NEETs (percent)
Proportion of NEETs (percent)
80 80
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Public employment services Private employment services Public employment services Private employment services
Answers/posts job adverts Reads job adverts Answers/posts job adverts Reads job adverts
Contacts employers Family and acquaintances Contacts employers Family and acquaintances
Note: here we look at the unemployed as defined by Note: here we consider the unemployed as defined by
the ILO (not just registered jobseekers). the ILO (not just registered jobseekers).
Source: LFS second quarter data. Source: LFS second quarter data.
104
5.2 Active labour market instruments targeting...
105
Judit Krekó, Tamás Molnár & Ágota Scharle
106
5.2 Active labour market instruments targeting...
the recipients of wage subsidies work in the open labour market at a higher
wage level than in public works. International analyses show that wage subsidy
schemes providing employment in the private sector could improve post-pro-
gramme employment opportunities to a greater extent than public employ-
ment schemes7 (Card et al, 2018). The results of early analyses of the Hun-
garian public works scheme also demonstrate that public employment does
not aid long-term employment (Cseres-Gergely–Molnár, 2015, Köllő–Scharle,
2012). At the same time, based on the significant increase in employment and
the increase in labour shortages, it is likely that the wage subsidy instruments
supported, in part, the employment of young people who could have found
employment without support.
Figure 5.2.1: What happens to young people under the age of 25 registered
as jobseekers in the first six months after registration?
100
90
80
70
Percentage
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2015 2016 2017*
Enters active measure Enters public works
Enters ALMP and public works Remains jobseeker,
Leaves the register without programme no programme
Until 30 June 2017. The horizontal axis shows the year of registration.
*
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
2015 2016 2017 2018
Wage subsidy Combination
Training Other*
7 In fact, the employment im-
*
Housing subsidy, entrepreneurship subsidy. pacts of the latter are typically
Source: Ministry of Finance. negligible or negative.
107
Judit Krekó, Tamás Molnár & Ágota Scharle
108
5.2 Active labour market instruments targeting...
References
Budapest Institute (2019): Mind the Gap! Roma fiatalok elérése és részvétele a ma-
gyarországi Ifjúsági Garancia keretrendszerben – jó gyakorlatok, tanulságok és
ajánlások [Mind the Gap! Access and participation of Roma youth in the Youth
Guarantee – good practices, lessons and recommendations]. Manuscript, Budapest
Institute for Policy Analysis.
Card, D.–Kluve, J.–Weber, A. (2018): What Works? A Meta Analysis of Recent Ac-
tive Labor Market Program Evaluations. Journal of the European Economic Asso-
ciation, Vol. 16. No. 3. pp. 894–931.
Cseres-Gergely, Zs.–Molnár, Gy. (2015): Labour market situation following exit
from public works. In: Fazekas, K.–Varga, J. (eds.): The Hungarian Labour Market
in 2015. IE HAS, Budapest, pp. 148–159.
EU (2013): Council recommendation of 22 April 2013 on establishing a Youth Guaran-
tee. The Council of the European Union. 2013/C 120/01.
Kluve, J.–Puerto, S.–Robalino, D.–Romero, J. M.–Rother, F.–Stöterau, J.–Wei-
denkaff, F.–Witte, M. (2019): Do youth employment programs improve labor
market outcomes? A quantitative review. World Development, Vol. 114. pp. 237–253.
Köllő, J.–Scharle, Á. (2012): The impact of the expansion of public works programs
on long-term unemployment. In: Fazekas, K.–Kézdi, G. (eds.): The Hungarian La-
bour Market, 2012 Research Centre for Economic and Regional Studies and Hun-
garian Academy of Sciences. National Employment Non-profit Public Company Ltd,
Budapest, Budapest, pp. 123–137.
Szabó-Morvai, Á.–Balás, G.–Remete, Zs.–Grócz, M.–Hollósy, B. (2015): Az Ifjú-
sági Foglalkoztatási Kezdeményezés elemzése. Hétfa Kutatóintézet, Budapest.
Tóth, R.–Temesszentandrási, J. (2019): Az Ifjúsági Garancia az Európai Unióban
és Magyarországon. Munkaügyi Szemle, Vol. 62. No. 6. pp. 55–61.
109
András Svraka
110
5.3 The effect of the job protection action plan
the year of introduction, and these effects rose continuously until 2015. By
2015, the employment probability of those under the age of 25 rose by 2.6
percent compared to a control group of similar individuals to whom the re-
lief did not apply.3 Making an estimate for those above the age of 55 using
a similar method, this change was 0.8 percent, and among unskilled labour-
ers – using occupations requiring low educational attainment and offering
similar wages, to which the relief did not apply, as the control group – it was
2.7 percent. Among youth and the unskilled, there was no significant differ-
ence between the changes in the employment chances of males and females,
but among older age groups, the whole effect can be attributed to the higher
employment rate of females.
As a result of the reliefs, due to the change in relative labour costs, employ-
ers might have employed individuals that the relief applies to, instead of in-
dividuals who do not belong to any of the target groups. Among youth and
older age groups, Svraka (2019a) did not find any signs indicating such po-
tential substitution, but the employment rate of individuals with low educa-
tional attainment to whom the relief was not applicable did decrease slightly. 3 The Youth Guarantee Pro-
gramme, which also targets
Considering this, by 2015, the reliefs generated an expansion in employment youth aged under 25, was in-
by 53,000 individuals, 16,000 of which were under the age of 25. troduced in 2015: the effects
estimated for the subsequent
The effect of the excess budgetary income generated by a higher employ- years may partly capture the
ment rate manifesting through taxes and contributions, calculated based on impact of that Programme.
4 This indicator does not ac-
the abovementioned partial equilibrium results, without broader macroeco- count for potential deadweight
nomic consequences, was HUF 55 billion in 2015 – which is 40 percent of loss and measures short term
returns. In the long run, as
the cost of the reliefs that year. This cost efficiency indicator was, however, costs increase (as the subsidy is
different for different target groups: 42 percent for youth, 70 percent for also available to those already
in employment), cost efficiency
the undereducated, and only 14 percent for the older generations, in 2015.4 is likely to deteriorate.
References
Svraka, A. (2018): The Effect of Labour Cost Reduction on Employment of Vulnera-
ble Groups – Evaluation of the Hungarian Job Protection Act. MPRA Paper, 88234.
University Library of Munich, Germany.
Svraka, A. (2019a): A Munkaerőköltség csökkentésének hatása a sérülékeny csoportba
tartozók foglalkoztatására. Pénzügyi Szemle, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 70–93.
Svraka, A. (2019b): The Effect of Labour Cost Reduction on Employment of Vulnerable
Groups – Evaluation of the Hungarian Job Protection Act. Public Finance Quar-
terly, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 72–92.
111
Márton Csillag
0.020 0.010
0.015 0.008
0.006
0.010
0.004
0.005 0.002
0.000 0.000
0 100 200 300 400 0 200 400 600
Total monthly gross earnings, thousand HUF, real (2016 = 1) Total monthly gross earnings, thousand HUF, real (2016 = 1)
2002 2016
Notes: The wage dsitribution for those with vocational school (ISCED3C) is very
similar to that of those with secondary education (see: Csillag et al, 2019).
Source: Wage Survey (NES), private sector; own calculations.
112
5.4 The role of the minimum wage in the evolution...
The minimum wage (or the guaranteed wage minimum) can affect not only
the low-educated, but also those who completed vocational school or second-
ary school (Table 5.4.1). It is also noteworthy that the guaranteed minimum
wage has become the norm among young people who completed vocational
school or secondary school (in the spirit of the law).
Table 5.4.1: The percentage of 16–29 and 30–64 year-olds employed in the private
sector who earn around the minimum wage or the guaranteed minimum wage
2002 2009 2016
minimum minimum guaranteed minimum guaranteed
Level of Education wage wage minimum wage wage minimum wage
Below age 30
Primary school 25 17 13 17 10
Vocational school 30 10 20 8 23
Secondary 23 5 14 4 18
Tertiary 9 1 4 1 9
Total 24 7 13 6 16
Above age 30
Primary school 21 15 12 15 13
Vocational school 22 6 16 6 19
Secondary 14 3 10 3 14
Tertiary 8 1 3 1 4
Total 17 5 11 5 14
Source: Wage Survey (NES), private sector; own calculations.
113
Márton Csillag
References
Csillag Márton–Molnár Tamás–Scharle Ágota–Tóth Endre (2019): Fiatalok
a munkapiacon és az iskolában a 2002 és 2018 közötti időszakban [Young persons
ont he labour market and in school between 2002 and 2018]. Research Report, Bu-
dapest Institute for Policy Analysis, Budapest.
Dolado, J.–Kramarz, F.–Machin, S.–Manning, A.–Margolis, D.–Teulings, C.–
Saint-Paul, G.–Keen, M. (1996): The economic impact of minimum wages in Eu-
rope. Economic Policy, Vol. 11, No. 23, pp. 317–372.
Kertesi Gábor–Köllő János (2004): A 2001. évi minimálbér-emelés foglalkoztatási
következményei [The employment effect of the 2001 minimum wage hike]. Közgaz-
dasági Szemle, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 293–324.
Neumark, D.–Wascher, W. (2004): Minimum wages, labor market institutions, and
youth employment: a cross-national analysis. Industrial & Labor Relations Review,
Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 223–248.
114
5.5 Youth in public employment, with particular...
115
György Molnár
These are relatively low figures: exactly 2 percent of 16-year-olds and 4 per-
cent of 17-year-olds in 2016.
Table 5.5.1: The number of youth between the ages of 16–19 registering
as unemployed for the first time, 2011–2017
Age at the time of first
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
registration
16 44 106 738 1,980 1,716 1,948 1,670
17 284 472 1,412 2,660 3,676 3,924 3,718
18 6,796 9,360 10,196 9,714 8,562 7,742 6,754
19 10,660 12,902 12,728 10,482 9,344 8,240 7,306
Total 17,784 22,840 25,074 24,836 23,298 21,854 19,448
The total number of the
477,855 479,224 465,768 447,224 427,252 407,023 395,715
age group of 16–19
Note: The results obtained from the sample of 50 percent were multiplied by 2 in the
table.
Source: Author’s calculations, based on the Admin3 database; source of the demo-
graphic data: the demographic database of the Hungarian Central Statistical Office.
The increase can be explained neither by the developments in unemployment
(see Table 5.7 of the chapter on Statistical data), nor demographic data. These
are relatively low figures: exactly 2 percent of 16-year-olds and 4 percent of
17-year-olds in 2016.
In the case of 18- and 19-year-olds, a more marked rise can only be seen
between 2011 and 2012, which continued slightly in 2013 as well, in the
case of 18-year-olds. In this year, the share within the age group of 18-year-
olds who registered as unemployed for the first time during that year was 8.6
percent, while that of 19-year-olds was 10.5 percent; and it continuously de-
creases from then on.
Table 5.5.2 shows the number of those entering public employment for the
first time, broken down by age. In 2011 and 2012, there were essentially no
16- and 17-year-olds in public employment, and even the number of 18- and
19-year-olds was relatively low. The number of youth entering public employ-
ment suddenly increased in 2013, and peaked the next year at a figure of 8400.
Even though the Youth Guarantee scheme was launched in 2015, eligible
youth could still enter public employment if they initiated it themselves. Thus
in the case of the two younger groups, the number of those entering public
employment continued to grow after 2014, peaking in 2016. Their share also
grew continuously within the group of those entering public employment for
the first time, and reached 13.6 percent in 2016.
The entry of youth into public employment received substantial media cov-
erage; numerous news articles reported on cases where children of poor fami-
lies left school due to the lure of public workers’ wages (see Fülöp, 2016).
In response to the phenomenon, the regulation was amended: Government
Decree 1139/2017 (20th March) provided that those under the age of 25 “may
116
5.5 Youth in public employment, with particular...
enter public employment schemes only if the Youth Guarantee labour market
scheme does not offer them any other realistic opportunities”. This resulted in
a significant drop in the numbers of all age groups in 2017, and the share of
those under the age of 20 within the number of new entrants also decreased
somewhat (to 10.3 percent). In the course of the seven years reviewed, a total
of nearly 40 thousand youth entered the public employment system.
Table 5.5.2: The number of youth between the ages of 16–19 entering public
employment for the first time, and their share within the group of all first entrants,
2011–2017
Age at the time of first entry
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total
into public employment
16 2 6 190 630 500 744 352 2,424
17 8 60 398 1016 1132 1434 692 4,740
18 372 1,180 2,390 3,148 2,366 2,430 1,052 12,938
19 1,850 2,266 3,928 3,610 2,400 2,372 1,044 17,470
Total 2,232 3,512 6,906 8,404 6,398 6,980 3,140 37,572
Share (percentage) 1.0 3.6 6.1 10.0 10.8 13.6 10.3 5.7
Note: The public employment of a small section of those entering for the first time in
2011 already commenced in 2010. The results obtained from the sample of 50 per-
cent were multiplied by 2 in the table.
Source: Author’s calculations, based on the Admin3 database.
Nearly 30 percent of newly registered 16-year-olds became a public employ-
ee within 90 days (Table 5.5.3). The highest figure can be seen in 2016. The
younger someone was, the more likely it was that they would become a pub-
lic worker within 90 days. In 2013, the proportion of youth becoming pub-
lic workers within three months rose significantly, and this trend kept grow-
ing in 2014, when it peaked at 21 percent. It may be an effect of the Youth
Guarantee scheme that in 2015 the rate of those starting public work early
decreased somewhat among the age group of 17–19-year-olds, but it stagnat-
ed among 16-year-olds, and then kept growing steadily in 2016. A marked
decrease only occurred in 2017.
Table 5.5.3: The share of those among the 16–19-year-olds registering ias
unemployed for the first time who entered public employment within 90 days,
2011–2017 (percent)
Age at the time of
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Average
first registration
16 5 6 28 28 28 36 19 28
17 1 11 24 27 20 24 11 20
18 3 9 18 23 17 17 8 14
19 2 6 11 15 12 13 6 9
Total 2 8 15 21 16 19 9 13
Source: Author’s calculations, based on the Admin3 database.
117
György Molnár
118
5.5 Youth in public employment, with particular...
119
György Molnár
this proportion does rise to a minimal extent broken down by age at entry
into public employment, but these differences are statistically not significant.
Table 5.5.7: The share of those among youth entering public employment with an
educational attainment of the eighth grade of elementary school and having started
secondary school who obtained secondary-level qualification within two years,
2011–2015 (percentage)
Age at the time of
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Average
first entry
16 0 0 0 0 2 1
17 0 0 2 1 3 2
18 4 2 2 3 3 2
19 7 4 3 4 5 4
Total 6 3 3 3 4 3
Note: The data regarding educational attainment levels two years after entry into
public employment are only known from the data of the Hungarian Educational
Authority, thus the number of cases in this table is only 14,346.
Source: Author’s calculations, based on the Admin3 database.
Main conclusions
Overall, it can be concluded that the number of 16- and 17-year-olds entering
public employment rose significantly after the lowering of the school leaving
age: in the period under review, a total of approximately 7 thousand people
under the age of 18, and 38 thousand people under the age of 20 became public
employees. The rate of new labour market entrants entering public works did
not decrease upon the launch of the Youth Guarantee scheme, only after the
relevant government decree was issued in 2017. The educational attainment
of nearly 80 percent of youth entering public works was not higher than the
eighth grade of elementary school, and having entered public employment,
their chance of completing secondary school within a few years is insignifi-
cant, even if they had started it before their entry into public employment.
References
Fülöp, Zs. (2016): Újratermelni a nyomort. Fiatalkorúak a közfoglalkoztatásban. Ma-
gyar Narancs, Vol. 17., 28 April.
Sebők, A. (2019): The Panel of Linked Administrative Data of CERS Databank, Buda-
pest Working Papers on the Labour Market, BWP-2019/2.
120
6.1 Schooling and employment of Roma youth...
121
Ágota Scharle
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0.0 0.0
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Age Age
Non-Roma, 2011 Non-Roma, 2016 Roma, 2011 Roma, 2016
Source: Calculations of Tamás Molnár using the 2011 Census and 2016 Microcensus
4 Act CXC of 2011 on National of the Hungarian Statistical Office.
Public Education lowered the
compulsory schooling age from Most recent developments are captured by the other indicator: the share of
18 to 16. The age limit of 16 first full-time students by cohort shows the share of young people who continue
applied to those who started
eighth grade in the 2011/2012 their education in secondary and higher education after primary school. The
school year. reduction of the compulsory school age introduced in 20114 increased the
5 The measurement of Roma
identity was very similar in share of early school leavers among both Roma and non-Roma youth, but
two surveys, but the census may this effect was significantly higher for Roma, particularly Roma men (Figure
include a higher rate of those
who claim to be Roma for two 6.2). As discussed in subchapter 6.2, this effect was above the average in dis-
reasons: on the one hand, the advantaged small regions. Comparing the data of the 2011 Census conduct-
sample is comprehensive, while
in the sample of the micro- ed before the reform and the 2016 Microcensus five years later,5 the share of
census, Roma settlements are full-time students decreased by 4–7 percentage points for non-Roma, and by
underrepresented, and on the
other hand a special campaign 14 (women) and 27 (men) percentage points for Roma youth in the 17 year-
encouraged the assumption of
Roma identity at the time of the
old cohort. The decrease is already significant among 16 year-olds in the case
2011 census. of Roma youth.
Figure 6.1.2: The share of full-time students among Roma and non-Roma youth, 2011, 2016
(percentage)
Women Men
1.0 1.0
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0.0 0.0
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Age Age
Non-Roma, 2011 Non-Roma, 2016 Roma, 2011 Roma, 2016
Source: Calculations of Tamás Molnár using the 2011 Census and 2016 Microcensus
of the Hungarian Statistical Office.
122
6.1 Schooling and employment of Roma youth...
The comparison of the data for 2011 and 2016 also shows that Roma youth
are less involved in the expansion of higher education: in the 21–23 cohort,
the share of full-time students among non-Roma increased by an average 5
percentage points, while among Roma it increased by only 3 percentage points
in five years. This also means that the disadvantage of Roma people has fur-
ther increased in participation in higher education.
Employment
According to the CSO Labour Force Survey, in 2017, 55 percent of men and
36 percent of women were employed in the Roma population aged 15–64,
while within the non-Roma population, the proportion of the employed was
76 and 62 percent, respectively. The employment of Roma people increased
more than that of non-Roma between 2014 (the first year when ethnicity was
included in the Labour Force Survey) and 2017, so that the Roma employment
gap has somewhat narrowed. At the same time, the already huge disadvantage
of the Roma further increased regarding the rate of early school leavers and
youth not in employment, education or training (NEET). These two indica-
tors slightly improved in the non-Roma population between 2014 and 2017,
while they worsened or remained unchanged in the case of Roma youth.6 In
the five years between the 2011 Census and the 2016 Microcensus (roughly
corresponding to a period of steady economic growth), the employment rate
increased from 16 to 25 percent for Roma men, and from 7 to 12 percent for
Roma women aged 16–25 (excluding public works).
Table 6.1.1: The 16–25 year-old population by ethnicity and labour market status,
2011 and 2016 (thousand people)
Roma Non-Roma
2011 2016 2011 2016
Men
Full time education 9.8 7.9 311.1 261.6
Employment 5.0 9.2 184.2 213.8
Public works 1.7 4.3 5.1 9.1
Parental leave 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.3
Other 15.4 15.7 99.9 69.5
Total 32.2 37.2 600.6 554.3
6 The rate of early school leav-
Women ers increased from 57 to 65
Full time education 8.3 6.9 303.8 258.8 percent (decreased from 10 to
Employment 2.1 3.6 149.0 171.6 9 percent among non-Roma),
Public works 0.7 2.0 3.7 7.4 the NEET-rate was 38 percent
in both years (decreased from
Parental leave 9.2 7.6 29.7 30.6 13 to 9 percent among non-
Other 9.8 10.1 84.6 59.5 Roma). The former indicator
Total 30.1 30.2 570.8 527.9 is published by the CSO on the
18–24 year-old age group, and
Source: Own calculations using the 2011 Census and 2016 Microcensus of the Hun- the latter on the 15–24 year-old
garian Statistical Office. cohort (2018).
123
Ágota Scharle
The large sample of the 2011 Census and the 2016 Microcensus also provides
an opportunity to examine employment trends independently of education.
Comparing the data of these two surveys, the disadvantage of the Roma is still
large in employment, though it is significantly smaller for those completing
at least secondary school (with matriculation, i.e. ISCED 3A or 3B) than for
the unskilled (Figure 6.1.3). The disadvantage of young Roma women did not
decrease between 2011 and 2016, despite an increase in the employment rate
of both education categories. In the case of young Roma men, there is a sig-
nificant decrease in the disadvantage of the unskilled, but this is largely due to
public works. In 2016, 34 percent of low educated Roma men in employment
participated in public works, while among the non-Roma, the corresponding
ratio was only 8 percent. For working Roma women, the share of public work-
ers is even higher: 40 percent of the unskilled and 21 percent even of those
with at least secondary education were employed in public works in 2016.
Figure 6.1.3: Employment rate of the 16–25 year-old, not in education population, 2011 and 2016
(percent)
100 100
80 80
60 60
40 40
20 20
0 0
2011 2016 2011 2016 2011 2016 2011 2016 2011 2016 2011 2016 2011 2016 2011 2016
Non-Roma Roma Non-Roma Roma Non-Roma Roma Non-Roma Roma
Primary or vocational Secondary education Primary or vocational Secondary education
school or higher school or higher
Public works Employed (excluding public works)
Source: Own calculations using the 2011 Census and 2016 Microcensus of the Hun-
garian Statistical Office.
References
Hajdu, T.–Hermann, Z.–Horn, D.–Kertesi, G.–Kézdi, G.–Köllő, J.–Varga, J.
(2015): Az érettségi védelmében [In defence of the school leaving exam]. Budapesti
Munkagazdaságtani Füzetek, BWP, 2015/1.
Hajdu, T.–Kertesi, G.–Kézdi, G. (2014): Roma fiatalok a középiskolában [Roma Stu-
dents in Hungarian Secondary Schools]. Budapesti Munkagazdaságtani Füzetek,
BWP, 2014/7.
Kemény, I.–Janky, B. (2005): Roma population of Hungary 1971–2003. East European
Monographs, Vol. 702. pp.70–225.
Kertesi, G. (2005a): A társadalom peremén. Romák a munkaerőpiacon és az iskolá-
ban [On the margins of society. Roma in school and in the labour market]. Osiris,
Budapest.
Kertesi, G. (2005b): Roma foglalkoztatás az ezredfordulón. A rendszerváltás maradan-
dó sokkja [The employment of the Romain the end of the 20th century]. Budapesti
Munkagazdaságtani Füzetek, BWP, 2005/4.
124
6.1 Schooling and employment of Roma youth...
125
János Köllő & Anna Sebők
126
6.2 Neighbourhood-related differences in the share...
bourhood belonging to the second, third or fourth worst census tract quartile
(Q2 –Q4) instead of the best quartile (Q1) determined by the 2011 indicator
(employment rate, unemployment rate, etc.).
Table 6.2.1: The impact of gender, ethnic group and neighbourhood characteristics
on participation in education, 2011, 2016 (probabilistic regression)
Non- Census tract quartiles
Roma Roma
Census tract Roma Constant R2 N
boy girl 2. 3. 4.
indicator girl
Employment rate
–10.8 –0.4 –29.2 –0.0 –0.4 –4.0 99.2 0.11 9358
2011
(4.5) (1.5) (9.3) (0.1) (1.5) (5.8)
–25.4 0.0 –26.0 0.1 –3.0 –12.7 97.6 0.14 7464
2016
(9.6) (1.2) (8.9) (0.2) (4.5) (12.5)
Unemployment rate
–12.1 –0.4 –30.3 –0.5 –1.0 –3.0 99.5 0.10 9358
2011
(5.1) (1.5) (9.6) (1.5) (2.6) (4.5)
–29.3 0.1 –30.3 –2.3 –4.3 –10.1 98.3 0.12 7464
2016
(11.3) (0.3) (10.5) (3.7) (6.1) (10.4)
Quality of the labour marketa
–12.8 –0.4 –30.8 –0.5 –0.9 –1.9 99.6 0.10 9358
2011
(5.4) (1.8) (9.8) (1.4) (2.5) (4.4)
–30.7 0.1 –31.4 –1.7 –3.9 –7.1 98.2 0.11 7464
2016
(11.9) (0.2) (10.9) (2.2) (5.1) (8.8)
Proportion of the Roma
–10.3 –0.4 –28.5 –3.6 –3.6 –4.1 95.2 0.11 9358
2011
(4.3) (1.5) (9.0) (4.9) (5.1) (6.5)
–25.6 0.2 –26.3 –7.2 –10.1 –10.8 86.1 0.13 7464
2016
(9.6) (0.4) (8.9) (6.0) (9.2) (10.8)
a
See the Appendix at the end of the Subchapter.
Sample: 17-year-old residents of the census tracts observed in both the 2011 cen-
sus and the 2016 micro-census. A Roma is defined as someone who identifies
themselves as Roma first or secondly when asked about ethnicity or speaks Roma,
Boyash or Romani as a first or second language.
N = the number of individuals observed. Coefficients were multiplied by one-hun-
dred, t-values are provided in brackets.
Roma and non-Roma youngsters are differentiated between because the for-
mer attend much worse basic and secondary schools on average compared
with the non-Roma, their immediate neighbourhood is less likely to encour-
age them to complete their education, or their families are less likely to afford
the additional costs of learning and thus they are more inclined or forced to
drop out of education. In the strongly segregated and typically bad quality
“Roma schools” these effects are further magnified.
Please note that, for 2011 the equations are estimated only for the subset of
census tracts also observed in the micro-census. Q1 – Q4 groups contain the
same census tracts in 2011 as in 2016. (Results concerning the total sample
of the census are similar.)
127
János Köllő & Anna Sebők
128
6.2 Neighbourhood-related differences in the share...
2016, which was hardly offset by the increase in employment. As regards the
social consequences, it is especially worrying that by 2016 the proportion of
Roma boys living in a disadvantaged neighbourhood, not in education, em-
ployment or training had increased to an alarmingly high level (at least dou-
ble the 2011 level). In 2016, four out of ten such youth were not in education,
employment or training.
Table 6.2.2: The effect of gender, ethnicity and certain neighbourhood
characteristics on NEET status (not in education, employment or training), 2011,
2016 (probabilistic regression)
Non- Census tract quartiles
Roma Roma
Census tract Roma Constant R2 N
boy girl 2. 3. 4.
indicator girl
Employment rate
11.3 0.5 30.4 0.4 0.9 3.0 0.5 0.10 9358
2011
(4.9) (1.8) (9.7) (1.5) (2.3) (4.4)
28.5 0.5 31.3 2.1 3.7 9.3 0.9 0.13 7464
2016
(11.2) (0.9) (10.9) (3.8) (5.7) (10.2)
Sample: 17-year-old residents of the census tracts observed in both the 2011 cen-
sus and the 2016 micro-census. A Roma is defined as someone who identifies
themselves as Roma first or secondly when asked about ethnicity or speaks Roma,
Boyash or Romani as a first or second language.
N = the number of individuals observed. Coefficients were multiplied by one-hun-
dred, t-values are provided in brackets.
Appendix
Definition of the census tract indicators
129
János Köllő & Anna Sebők
the net wages less travel-related monetary and time costs are higher than the
expected amount of available benefits and public works wages. The related
estimation was undertaken by Melinda Tir and János Köllő, using the GEO-
database of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (http://adatbank.krtk.mta.
hu/adatbazisok___geo).
130
7.1 Workplace and non-formal education...
131
Júlia Varga
Percent
40
30
20
10
0
2007 2011 2016
EU-28 EU-19 (Eurozone) Hungary
Source: Author’s compilation based on the Eurostat AES surveys.
Figure 7.1.2 shows the changes in the participation of 25–34-year-olds by
educational attainment groups between 2005 and 2018.6 Between 2005 and
2012, the already very low participation rates of 25–34-year-olds decreased
continuously in all educational attainment groups, and then between 2013
and 2015, a higher rate of youth reported participation in training. A part of
the increase may be due to the rearrangement of the classification system (see
footnote 3). Participation rates started declining again after 2015. Through-
out the entire period, participation rates were the highest in the “secondary
school diploma with vocational qualification” and “secondary school diplo-
ma without vocational qualification” groups. After 2014, the lowest rates of
participation in education and training were found in “the eighth grade of
elementary school or less as educational attainment” category.
Figure 7.1.2: The participation rates of 25–34-year-olds in non-formal education
and training, according to the data of the labour force survey,
broken down by educational attainment
8
6
Percent
0
2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
At most lower Vocational qualification Vocational qualification
secondary without matriculation exam and matriculation exam
Matriculation exam without Tertiary education
vocational qualification
Source: Calculated from the data of waves 53–108 of the labour force survey.
6 The annual data are the aver- Aggregating the data of the four waves of the labour force survey of 2018,
age of the quarterly data. we examined the probability of the participation of 16–34-year-olds in non-
7 Binary outcome probit model,
whether they participated in formal education and training with a simple probability model as well.7 The
education or training (yes/no). results – the significant marginal effects – are summarised in Table 7.1.1.
132
7.1 Workplace and non-formal education...
Youth with a vocational qualification were 3.1 per cent more likely, youth
who obtained a secondary school diploma in a grammar school (second-
ary school diploma without vocational qualification) was 4.2 per cent more
likely, and youth with a higher education diploma was 5.7 per cent more
likely to participate in training in 2018 than the reference category of youth
with the eighth grade of elementary school or less as educational attainment.
Youth in employment were 5 per cent more likely to participate in non-for-
mal education and training than inactive youth. Those working in certain
sectors (industry, construction, agriculture) were less likely to participate
in non-formal education and training than the reference category of those
working in the vehicle industry. We did not find significant variabilities in
the probability of participation in education and training based on the rest
of the characteristics recorded (gender, the region of residence, type of mu-
nicipality, other sectors).
133
Károly Fazekas
134
7.2 The growing importance of non-cognitive...
References
Adhvaryu A.–Kala, N.–Nyshadham, A. (2018): The Skills to Pay the Bills: Returns
to On-the-job Soft Skills Training. NBER Working Paper, No. 24313.
Alabdulkareem A.–Frank, M. R.–Sun L.–AlShebli, B.–Hidalgo, C.–Rahwan, I.
(2018): Unpacking the polarization of workplace skills. Science Advances, Vol. 4.
No. 7.
Bassi, V.–Nansamba, A. (2019): Screening and Signaling Non-Cognitive Skills. UCS-
INET Research Paper No. 19-08.
DeAngelo, G.–McCannon, B. C. (2015): Theory of Mind Predicts Cooperative Behav-
ior. West Virginia University College of Business and Economics, Working Paper
Series, No. 16–16.
Deming, D. (2017): The Growing Importance of Social Skills in the Labor Market. The
Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 132. No. 4. pp. 1593–1640.
135
Károly Fazekas
Deming, D.–Kahn, L. B. (2018): Skill requirements across firms and labor markets:
Evidence from job postings for professionals. Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 36.
pp. S337–S369.
Fazekas, K. (2018a): What are the tendencies in demand? The appreciation of non-cog-
nitive skills. In: Fazekas, K.–Köllő, J. (eds.): The Hungarian labour market, 2017. In-
stitute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Acad-
emy of Sciences, Budapest, pp. 149–157.
Fazekas, K. (2018b): The impact of the increasing significance of non-cognitive skills
on the labour market situation of women. In: Fazekas, K.–Szabó-Morvai, Á (eds.):
The Hungarian labour market, 2018. Institute of Economics, Centre for Econom-
ic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, pp. 122–129.
Gaelle, P.–Sanchez Puerta, M. L.–Valerio, A.–Rajadel, T. (2014): STEP Skills
Measurement Surveys. Innovative Tools for Assessing Skills. Social Protection and
Labor, Discussion Paper, No. 1421. World Bank Group, Washington, DC.
Groh, M.–Krishnan, N.–McKenzie, D. J.–Vishwanath, T. (2012): Soft skills or hard
cash? The Impact of Training and Wage Subsidy Programs on Female Youth Employ-
ment in Jordan. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 6141.
Guerra, N.–Modecki, K.–Cunningham, W. (2014): Developing Social-Emotional
Skills for the Labor Market: The PRACTICE Model. World Bank, Social Protec-
tion and Labor Global Practice Group. Policy Research Working Paper, No. 7123.
Hoeschler, P.–Backes-Gellner, U. (2018): The Relative Importance of Personal Char-
acteristics for the Hiring of Young Workers. Economics of Education Working Paper
Series, No. 142. University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
Hoeschler, P.–Balestra, S.–Backes-Gellner, U. (2018): The Development of non-
cognitive skills in adolescence. Economics Letters, Vol. 163. pp. 40–45.
Kautz, T.–Heckman, J. J.–Diris, R.–Weel, B.–Borghans, L. (2017): Fostering and
Measuring Skills: Improving Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Skills to Promote Life-
time Success. NBER Working Paper, No. 20749.
Morgan, F. R.–Autor, D.–Bessen, J. E.–Brynjolfsson, E.–Cebrian, M.–Deming, D.
J.–Feldman, M.–Groh, M.–Lobo, J.–Moro, E.–Wang, D.–Youn, H.–Rahwan, I.
(2019): Toward understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on labor. Proceed-
ings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 116. No. 14. 6531–6539.
Quintini, G. (2015): Enhancing the non-cognitive skills of disconnected youth. OECD,
Skills and Work. November 26.
Schanzenbach, D. W.–Nunn, R.–Bauer, L.–Mumford, M.–Breitwieser, A. (2016):
Seven Facts on Noncognitive Skills from Education to the Labor Market. The
Hamilton Project.
Zhou, K. (2016): Non-cognitive skills: Definitions, measurement and malleability.
UNESCO Global Education Monitoring Report. ED/GEMR/MRT/2016/P1/5.
136
7.3 The labour market situation of young graduates...
60
Percent
40
20
0
1 The indicators of school edu-
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 cation, Indicator D1.10. (Varga,
Employed BA Employed MA Unemployed BA ed., 2018).
Unemployed MA Inactive BA Inactive MA
2 See: Eurostat.
Source: Calculated from the Labour Force Survey of the Central Statistical Office. 3 See: Eurostat.
137
Júlia Varga
Another key indicator of labour market success is wage return. Young grad-
uates realized very high wage returns on average. The average wage return of
BA/college degree holders younger than 36, compared with those with a lower-
secondary qualification was 130–140 per cent at the beginning of the period.4
It decreased between 2010 and 2012 then started to increase and returned
to the earlier high level, suggesting that the temporary decline was probably
due to the economic crisis. The average wage return of MA degree holders
4 The indicators of school edu- only slightly changed between 2003 and 2016: it ranged between 200–220
cation, Indicator D2.2., D2.8. per cent.5
(Varga, ed., 2018).
5 The indicators of school edu- The average change in the wage return is driven by various trends: it may
cation, Indicator D2.8., Table be a result of returns at all points of the wage distribution changing similarly
D2.8.2. (Varga, ed., 2018).
6 Quantile regression estimates
or also because primarily the well-paid and badly paid graduates experience
were based on a subsample of changes in their wage returns.
the Wage Survey containing
those with at least an upper-
Figure 7.3.2 presents changes, over time, in the wage returns (the estimated
secondary qualification (Mat- parameters of the quantile regressions)6 of young BA and MA degree holders
ura). The dependent variable
was the logarithm of earnings, compared with those with an upper-secondary qualification (Matura). Quantile
while the explanatory variables regressions were run for various points of the wage distribution for each year
were qualification categories as
well as potential labour market between 2006 and 2016. Wage returns were estimated for each point of the
experience and its square and wage distribution by quantile regression method.7 The Figure shows changes
a binary variable for gender.
7 See for example Chamberlain
in the wage returns estimated at the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th and the 90th percen-
(1994), Martins–Pereira (2004). tiles between 2006 and 2016.
Figure 7.3.2: Wage return to BA/college and MA/university degrees
compared with a Matura, by quantiles, 2006–2016
BA/college MA/university
1.0 1.0
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0.0 0.0
2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
P10 P25 P50 P75 P90
Source: Calculated from data from the Wage Survey.
138
7.3 The labour market situation of young graduates...
and to a large extent after 2012: from about 50 per cent in 2006 to below 10
per cent in 2016. The wage return of MA degree holders slightly dropped as
a result of the crisis at the bottom of the distribution, at the 10th and 25th per-
centile, although it started to improve again at the 25th percentile after 2012
and at the 10th percentile after 2014.
The wage return of youth with either a BA or MA qualification at the top of
the distribution, belonging to the 75th and 90th percentile, was high through-
out the period, whereas the return of those belonging to the 50th and 25th
percentile temporarily declined for a few years, probably as a result of the cri-
sis, then started to grow again and returned to earlier levels. The bottom ten
per cent of BA degree holders, however, permanently fell behind the other
groups. This may be due to skills, differences in the quality of higher educa-
tion institutions and departments or mismatch problems. It is possible that
some young graduates can only find a job which does not require a higher
education qualification.
However, it is not easy to determine which jobs are for higher education
graduates. There are three methods in use. The first create categories based on
the subjective judgement of graduates, relying on interviews. Since there is no
long time series of this available, we did not apply this method.
The second method classifies occupations into categories of graduate and
other occupations according to their task content. Occupational classification
systems, such as the international ISCO system8 or the Hungarian Standard
Classification of Occupations (HSCO), are also based on this; they consider
8 See: ILO.
the content of the actual activity undertaken in an occupation and the key 9 Occupations were classified
criterion for grouping is the level of expertise, knowledge and skills necessary into six groups on the basis of
the main categories of the Hun-
to follow an occupation. garian Standard Classification
Figure 7.3.3 shows how the proportion of young graduates changed in of Occupations (HSCO): 1) oc-
cupations in HSCO category 1
the groups formed using HSCO categories.9 Those working in the groups containing managers, senior
of trade, agriculture, industry, semi-skilled and unskilled work of the Figure officials of public administra-
tion and interest organisations,
are very likely to work in occupations not requiring a degree. Those belong- legislators; 2) HSCO category
ing to the first three groups (managers; professionals; other professionals) 2: professionals – occupations
requiring the autonomous use
obviously work in occupations requiring a higher education degree. It is dif- of higher education qualifica-
ficult to judge what qualification the group “office and management (cus- tions; 3) HSCO category 3:
occupations with other higher
tomer services)” requires since it contains heterogeneous occupations in education or upper-secondary
terms of qualification requirements and therefore they are possible to hold qualifications, 4) HSCO cat-
egory 4: office and manage-
with various qualifications. ment (customer service) occu-
Changes in the proportions of workers within the occupational groups do pations; 5) HSCO categories
5, 6 and 7: occupations mostly
not indicate that MA degree holders cannot find a job in occupations requir- with upper-secondary qualifi-
cations – commercial, services,
ing a higher education qualification. Among BA degree holders, however, the agricultural, forestry, industry
share of those working in semi-skilled or unskilled jobs increased to 10 per and construction industry;
6) HSCO categories 7 and 8:
cent after 2011, which suggests that 10–15 per cent of these young graduates semi-skilled and unskilled oc-
do not find a job suitable to their qualifications. cupations.
139
Júlia Varga
60 60
Percent
40 40
20 20
0 0
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Managers Professionals Other professionals
BA MA
20 20
15 15
Percent
10 10
5 5
0 0
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Clerical support workers Sales workers, agricultural, and industrial workers Plant and machine operators, and
assemblers, elementary occupations
Source: Calculated from the Labour Force Survey of the Central Statistical Office.
140
7.3 The labour market situation of young graduates...
the two qualification levels. The required qualification level is re-defined for
each year, which makes it possible to take into account potential changes in
qualification requirements.
Figure 7.3.4: The proportion of well-matched, overqualified and underqualified graduates,
by qualification level, 2004–2016 (percentage)
BA MA
80 80
60 60
Percent
40 40
20 20
0 0
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
Matching Undereducated Overeducated Matching Overeducated
Source: Calculated from data from the Wage Survey.
The proportion of those in a well-matched job dropped slightly first be- 11 The results are not to be compared
directly with the results of Galasi
tween 2007 and 2010 among BA degree holders, then declined more (2004, 2008), on the one hand be-
rapidly between 2013 and 2016, while the proportion of the overquali- cause our sample only includes young
people below 36 with at least an upper-
fied increased. In 2016, about 40 per cent of BA degree holders aged secondary qualification (Matura) and
younger than 36 were working in a well-matched job, 42 per cent of Galasi carried out the estimation for
the entire adult population and all
them were overqualified in their job and 18 per cent of them were un- qualification categories, and on the
derqualified. At the beginning of the period, 57 per cent of young MA hand because those studies also con-
tained variables for the interaction be-
graduates were working in a well-matched job, while 43 per cent of tween labour market experience and
them were overqualified. By the end of the period, these proportions overqualification, underqualification
and well-matched qualification. As our
were roughly the opposite: in 2016, 54 per cent of the graduates were sample only includes those aged below
overqualified and 46 per cent of them were working in a well-matched 36 and we have no information on how
many years of labour market experi-
job, which may indicate that during the transition from education to ence these individuals have spent as
work, an increasing share of young graduates starts their career in a job overqualified, underqualified or well-
matched employees, our study does not
requiring a lower level qualification. use such interaction variables.
Overqualification, underqualification and working in a well-matched 12 Based on Duncan–Hoffman (1981),
we investigated the effects of overqual-
job may have an impact on the wage return of young graduates. Rely- ification and underqualification using
ing on Hungarian data, Galasi (2004, 2008) assessed the influence of Mincer earnings functions by breaking
down the number of years in educa-
over- and underqualification on wage return. His analysis included all tion (S) into three elements: number
qualification levels and covered the entire working-age population. In of required years (R), overqualification
years (O) and underqualification years
the following we present changes in the impact of overqualification, un- (U) (S = R + O – U). We estimated the
derqualification and adequate qualification level on wage returns,11 using following extended Mincer earnings
function: log(W i) = β 0 + β1 R i + β 2Oi +
the model of Duncan–Hoffman (1981).12 Similarly to findings of other β3Ui + β 4 EXPi + β 5 EXPi2 + β 6GENi +
μi, where Wi is earnings, EXP is potential
studies using this method [see the summary of Leuven et al (2011)], the labour market experience and GEN is
results show that the return on “required” and “surplus” years in high- binary variable for gender. The Figures
show coefficients β1, β1 and β2 obtained
er education is positive, while the return on “missing” years is negative. from the cross-sectional regressions es-
The return on required years is higher than that of surplus years. The timated for each year.
141
Júlia Varga
wage return on required higher education years was excessively high, 15–17
per cent, over the entire period. Each surplus year in addition to the required
qualification yielded 10–12 per cent, that is less than the required years but
still a substantial positive return. The return on the surplus years started to
decrease after 2012 and had declined to 7 per cent by 2016. Those who were
underqualified for their jobs (in this case BA graduates who undertook tasks
typically performed by MA graduates), realized 10–12 per cent lower wage
returns with each missing higher education year.
However, this model does not take into account the varying skills and com-
petences of young graduates. Firstly, it is not accidental as to which young
graduate has a BA or MA level qualification: it may be related to their unob-
served skills, which may also change over time due to changes in the propor-
tions of applicants and entrants to higher education. Secondly, they do not
randomly take well-matched or mismatched jobs: this may also be related to
unobserved skills. Thus the estimated return on overqualification and under-
qualification may be associated with other unobserved characteristics of the
human capital stock of young graduates.
Figure 7.3.5: Wage return on required, surplus and missing years, 2004–2016
0.2
0.1
0.0
–0.1
–0.2
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
Required education Overeducation Undereducation
Source: Calculated data from the Wage Survey.
As presented in Subchapter 8.1 on youth employment mobility, the over- or
underqualification of young graduates may be temporary. It may be reasonable
for the talented and highly qualified to start working in jobs inferior to their
skills if it is compensated by faster promotion prospects (Sicherman–Galor,
1990). Subchapter 8.1 presents how the frequency of occupational change
among young graduates increased after 2010 and that in the case of occupa-
tional change, they are less likely to move downwards or switch to another
occupation of the same level than members of other qualification groups. It
142
7.3 The labour market situation of young graduates...
warrants further analysis of why young graduates are more likely to choose
this way of entering the labour market.
References
Chamberlain, G. (1994): Quantile regression, censoring and the structure of wages. In:
Sims, C. A. (ed.): Advances in Econometrics. Sixth World Congress. Vol. I. Econo-
metric Society Monographs, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MA.
Duncan, G.–Hoffman, S. (1981): The incidence and wage effects of overeducation.
Economics of Education Review, Vol. 1. No. 1. pp. 75–86.
Galasi, P. (2004): Túlképzés, alulképzés és bérhozam a magyar munkaerőpiacon, 1994–
2002 [Over-education, under-education and wage premiums on the Hungarian la-
bour market, 1994–2002]. Közgazdasági Szemle, Vol. 51. No. 5. pp. 449–471.
Galasi, P. (2008): The effect of educational mismatch on wages for 25 countries. Buda-
pest Working Papers on the Labour Market, BWP, No. 8.
Leuven, E.–Oosterbeek, H. (2011): Overeducation and mismatch in the labor mar-
ket. In: Hanushek, E. A.–Machin, S.–Woessmann, L. (eds.): Handbook of The Eco-
nomics of Education, Vol. 4. Elsevier, pp. 283–326.
Martins, P. S.–Pereira, T. P. (2004): Does education reduce wage inequality? Quantile
regression evidence from 16 countries. Labour Economics, Vol. 11. No. 3. pp. 355–371.
Mendes de Oliveira, M.–Santosa, M. C.–Kikerb, B. F. (2000): The role of human
capital and technological change in overeducation. Economics of Education Review,
Vol. 19. No. 2. pp. 199–206.
Sicherman, N.–Galor, O. (1990): A theory of career mobility. Journal of Political
Economy, Vol. 98. No. 1. pp. 169–192.
Varga, J. (ed.) (2018): A közoktatás indikátorrendszere, 2017 [Indicator system of the
Hungarian public education]. Authors: Hajdu, T.–Hermann, Z.–Horn, D.–Varga, J.,
MTA KRTK KTI, Budapest, 1 February.
Verdugo, R.–Verdugo, N. (1988): The impact of surplus schooling on earnings. Jour-
nal of Human Resources, Vol. 24. No. pp. 629–643.
143
Júlia Varga
144
8.1 Occupational mobility among youth...
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
16–35 years old 36–64 years old
Source: Author’s compilation.
The low level of occupational mobility is partly explained by the labour market
institutions, the high proportion – in international comparison – of occupa-
tions that require specific qualifications (Varga, 2018b), and the particulari-
ties of the education system as well. The intensity of occupational mobility is
also related to the extent to which the education system provides specialised
knowledge or general knowledge (Lindberg, 2009). This is because one of the
preconditions of occupational mobility is the transferability of (at least a part
of) workers’ competencies and knowledge from one occupation to the other.
In countries where the education policy emphasises the acquisition of general
145
Júlia Varga
4 4
Percent
2 2
0 0
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
At most lower Vocational Secondary Tertiary
secondary education school school education
Source: Author’s compilation.
146
8.1 Occupational mobility among youth...
Males are more likely to change occupations both by two-digit and four digit
categories than females, and are also more likely to move downwards within
the occupational hierarchy. Those with a higher education diploma are sig-
nificantly less likely to change occupations, but if they do, they are less likely
to move downwards or stay within the same occupational level than the ref-
erence category of those with a secondary school diploma. Between the other
educational attainment categories, there are no differences in the probability
of an occupational change.
Those with the eighth grade of elementary school as their educational at-
tainment are more likely to move upwards, which could be explained by the
fact that a great proportion of these has public worker status, which is con-
sidered the lowest in the hierarchy. Youth with a vocational qualification but
no secondary school diploma are more likely to stay within the same main oc-
cupational category. The longer time someone has spent at a certain employer,
the less likely they are to switch to a different occupation. Those working as
public workers or working abroad are more likely to switch.
147
Júlia Varga
References
Berde, É.–Scharle, Á. (2004): A kisvállalkozók foglalkozási mobilitása 1992 és 2001
között [Occupational mobility of small businesses]. Közgazdasági Szemle, Vol. 51,
No. 4, pp. 346–361.
Boeri, T.–Flinn, C. J. (1999): Returns to Mobility in the Transition to a Market Econ-
omy. Journal of comparative economics, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 4–32.
Buchs, H.–Helbling, L. A. (2016): Job opportunities and school-to-work transitions
in occupational labour markets. Are occupational change and unskilled employment
after vocational education interrelated? Empirical Research in Vocational Educa-
tion and Training, Vol. 8, No. 17.
Carrillo-Tudela, C.–Hobijn, B.–She, P.–Visschers, L. (2016): The extent and cy-
clicality of career changes: Evidence for the U.K. European Economic Review, Vol.
84, No. C, pp. 18–41.
Johnson, W. R. (1978): A theory of job shopping. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,
Vol. 92, No. 2, pp. 261–277.
Lindberg, M. E. (2009): Student and early career mobility patterns among highly edu-
cated people in Germany, Finland, Italy, and the United Kingdom. Higher Educa-
tion, Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 339–358.
148
8.1 Occupational mobility among youth...
149
Ágnes Hárs & Dávid Simon
The young and entrepreneurial are assumed to be more mobile and more like-
ly to migrate. This seems to be evident, and, based on human capital theory,
outward migration during a long career is a better investment for younger
people (Becker, 1975). At the same time, their entrance to the labour market,
their initial insecure and marginal situation and their exploration within the
labour market may also encourage them to take up employment abroad (Os-
terman, 1979). If the prospects of young people finding a good job in Hun-
gary are poor, an alternative may be to work abroad for some time. However,
in the case of job search abroad, often only secondary workplaces are acces-
sible for new arrivals (Piore, 1979). Finding employment abroad may also be
1 Data from the LFS are weight- a response to social-political dissatisfaction and despair at home. The nature
ed based on mirror statistics,
using the characteristics of the of finding employment abroad varies over time according to the combina-
main host countries, assum-
ing that the characteristics of
tion of these factors.
leavers closely match those of This subchapter investigates who among young people look for employment
the sub-population defined
by the variable “place of work abroad and how this has changed in the past more than ten years since Hun-
abroad”. Estimation concern- gary’s EU accession, when working abroad became easier and more frequent,
ing outward migration is made
using the weighted database. and then accelerated and became part of everyday life after 2011 (Hárs, 2018).
Weighting was based on the The analysis includes young people aged 18–29 who work in Hungary vs. those
annual population data of the
mirror statistics of major host who have worked in Hungary and work abroad in the next quarter, according
countries, broken down by to the Labour Force Survey (LFS) and it covers the time period 2006–2017.1
gender, which enabled us to
estimate changes in the num- The sample shows that nearly half of the active age workers (aged 18–64) tak-
ber of Hungarians working ing up employment abroad are below age 30 (48.5 per cent), while more than
abroad (relying on Eurostat
EU LFS employment data on one-third of them (35 per cent) are of prime working age (aged 30–44).2 This
Hungarians living abroad) dur- study does not look into their return but according to the relevant literature
ing the periods 2006–2010 and
2011–2017 in the major host we assume that migration is not unidirectional. The proportion of returnees
countries (Germany, Austria, and repeated leavers is also considerable (Horváth, 2016, Hárs–Simon, 2018).
United Kingdom and other
countries). Data on outward
migration were fit to the above The empirical study of young people finding employment abroad
estimated change, using the
flow data from the LFS. Based on LFS data, we measured factors that influence outward migration us-
2 Recent estimates of migra- ing demographic, family status, labour market activity and regional explana-
tion intentions reveal similar
proportions. The probability tory variables. In addition to the usual impact of gender and age on working
of young people aged 18–28 abroad, the family situation is also expected to reveal motivations: in the case
taking up employment abroad
is especially high: it is nearly of youth living together with their parents it may indicate difficulties in en-
two and a half times higher for tering the labour market, while in the case of those living independently or
short-term intentions, com-
pared with the age group of with a partner (or especially those raising children) it may indicate a lack of
29–38, and nearly the same
for long-term intentions (Sik–
subsistence and prospects. The impact of educational attainment depends on
Szeitl, 2016). the domestic and host country labour market, where educational attainment
150
8.2 Outward migration of youth...
does not necessarily yield the expected status and income. The labour market
activity prior to migration may reveal motivations: it may suggest exploration 3 The analysis included C-sta-
in the case of students and young graduates, unfavourable prospects at home tistic and link test instead of
the usual Hosmer–Lemeshow
in the case of the unemployed, while the migration of those permanently in test because with a large num-
ber of items a small difference
employment may point to labour market causes. The region of residence and from the expected distribution
type of municipality primarily reveal the impact of labour market opportu- would have been significant,
while it would not have influ-
nities in the Hungarian labour market. enced the readability of the
Logistic regression was used to explain employment abroad, with the out- model. The value of C-statistic
was 0.8, which is satisfactory;
put variable of entering the labour market abroad (a young person not living the linear term of the link was
abroad in one quarter and working abroad in the next quarter as opposed to significant (p = 0.001), while
the squared term was not
those who did not enter the labour market abroad). The model tested quar- (p = 0.751).
terly effects, which were expressed as annual effects for better interpretability. 4 Change over time was meas-
ured by including an interac-
Based on the applied fit test, the model proved satisfactory.3 tion using a variable in quar-
Independent effects were evaluated and the marginal effect of each variable terly breakdown and it is pre-
sented by marginal estimates
(or estimated marginal probability for continuous variables), and their change given for the first quarters of 7
over time, on the employment of youth aged 18–29 abroad is presented.4 Re- selected years at evenly spaced
intervals. The significance of
sults are shown in Figure 8.2.1 (the effects of gender and municipality type the marginal effect was esti-
are included in the analysis but not in the Figure). mated at certain selected dates.
Figure 8.2.1: The effect of factors influencing the employment of youth abroad
Age Region
3.5 5
3.0
4
2.5
2.0 3
1.5 2
1.0
1
0.5
0.0 0
2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
18 years old 21 years old Central Western Southern
24 years old 27 years old Transdanubia Transdanubia Transdanubia
Northern Northern Great Southern Great
Hungary Plain Plain
Note: A variable estimated for single-year of age. It Note: Reference category: Central Hungary. The
is not significant at the measurement point for the Region variable is not significant at the measure-
18-year-olds in the first quarter of 2006. The effect of ment points of the first quarters of 2006–2010 in
the variable does not change significantly over time. Central Transdanubia, the first quarter of 2006 in
Western Transdanubia, the first quarters of 2006–
2008 in Northern Hungary, the first quarters of
2014–2018, at any of the measurement points of
the Northern Great Plain and the first quarters of
2006–2012 and 2016–2018 of the Southern Great
Plain. The effect of the variable does not change
significantly over time.
151
Ágnes Hárs & Dávid Simon
Note: Reference category: lives with a partner. The Note: Reference category: no children. The variable
Family status variable is not significant in the Having a child below six years of age is not signifi-
first quarters of 2010–2014 of the Lives alone cat- cant at the measurement points of the first quar-
egory, in the first quarter of 2006 of the Lives with ters of 2014–2018 in the category With a child
parents category and at any of the measurement below six years of age. The effect of the variable
points of the Other category. does not change significantly over time.
2.0 8
1.5 6
1.0 4
0.5 2
0.0 0
–0.5 –2
2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Secondary voca- Matura obtained in general Young graduate Unemployed
tional qualification secondary schools Student in employmen young graduate
Matura obtained in vocatio- Higher educa- On parental Newly Permanently One year in
nal secondary schools tion college University leave employed unemployed employment
Note: Reference category: lower-secondary qualifi- Note: Reference category: uninterrupted employ-
cation at most. The Educational attainment vari- ment. The Labour market activity prior to migra-
able is not significant at the measurement points tion variable is not significant at the measurement
in the first quarters of 2006–2008 in the catego- points in the first quarters of 2014–2018 in the
ry Secondary vocational qualification, in the first category Student, in the first quarters of 2006–
quarters of 2016–2018 in the category Matura 2014 and 2018 in the category Young graduate in
obtained in general or vocational secondary schools employment, in the first quarter of 2006 in the
and in the first quarters of 2006 and 2014–2018 in category Unemployed young graduate, in the first
the category University or higher education college. quarters of 2006–2010 in the category On paren-
tal leave and at any of the measurement points in
the category Newly employed.
The acceleration of outward migration after 2010 was due to several factors,
including the prolonged impact of the economic crisis and the measures
152
8.2 Outward migration of youth...
153
Ágnes Hárs & Dávid Simon
The effect of family status changed markedly: compared with those living with
a partner, those living with their parents have been significantly and increas-
ingly more likely to take up employment abroad possibly due to labour market
pressure in addition to wishing to gain experience, while there has been a sig-
nificant increase among those living alone (since 2016).6 Having a child below
six years of age does not significantly hold back employment abroad any more,
probably due to labour market reasons and unfavourable prospects as well
as social and political dissatisfaction. The impact of educational attainment
on labour market significance has also altered considerably: compared with
primary education, the effect of tertiary education (after 2012) and second-
ary education (after 2014) has not been significant, while having vocational
school qualifications has significantly and steeply increased the probability of
working abroad since 2010. At the end of the period only vocational school
qualifications have a significant effect, indicating that educational attainment
hardly influences employment abroad.
Overall, labour market activity prior to migration had the strongest effect:
those unemployed in Hungary are increasingly more likely to go abroad and
fresh graduates also leave at an increasing rate. Compared with those perma-
nently in employment, the strongest significant effect was seen among those
who had been working a year prior but had become unemployed or inactive,
6 Results concerning people liv- followed by those permanently unemployed. After 2012 young graduates un-
ing alone need to be interpreted
with caution, since reaching able or unwilling to find a job in Hungary found employment abroad at a rap-
this group is uncertain due idly increasing rate and at the end of the period this effect was nearly as strong
to the nature of the survey.
Nevertheless, looking at those as that of quitting a job. We suspect that the motivation of young people has
dropping out of the Labour changed: the effect of deteriorating labour market prospects and expectations
Force Survey due to panel at-
trition, we found that although has grown. Since 2012, being on parental leave has significantly reduced the
the survey underestimates this probability of working abroad but being in education has not and neither has
group, the association found is
relevant. taking up employment in Hungary after graduation.
References
Becker, G. (1975): Human Capital. The University of and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sci-
Chicago Press. Chicago. ences, Budapest, pp. 110–116.
Hárs, Á. (2018): Növekvő elvándorlás – lehetőségek, re- Osterman, P. (1979): The Structure of the Labor Mar-
mények, munkaerőpiaci hatások. In: Kolosi, T.–Tóth, ket for Young Men. In: Piore, M. J. (ed.): Institutional
I. Gy. (eds.): Társadalmi riport, 2018. Tárki, Buda- and Structural Views of Unemployment and Inflation.
pest, pp. 81–105. Sharpe, New York, pp. 186–196.
Hárs, Á.–Simon, D. (2018): Labour Emigration and La- Piore, M. J. (1979): Birds of passage. Migrant labour and
bour Shortage. In: Fazekas, K.–Köllő, J. (eds.): The industrial society. Cambridge University Press, Cam-
Hungarian Labour Market, 2017. Institute of Econom- bridge.
ics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hun- Sik, E.–Szeitl, B. (2016): Migration intentions in contem-
garian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, pp. 94–108. porary. In: Blaskó, Zs.–Fazekas, K. (eds.): The Hun-
Horváth, Á. (2016): Returning Migrants. In: Blaskó, Zs– garian Labour Market, 2016. Institute of Economics,
Fazekas, K. (eds.): The Hungarian Labour Market, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungar-
2016. Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic ian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, pp. 55–59.
154
LABOUR MARKET
POLICY TOOLS
(JUNE 2018
– MAY 2019)
Miklós Hajdu
Ágnes Makó
Fruzsina Nábelek
Zsanna Nyírő
This Chapter overviews major changes in the regulation of labour market
policy tools between June 2018 and May 2019.
1 INSTITUTIONAL CHANGES
1.1 The system of vocational education and training
The amendment of Act CLXXXVII on Vocational Education and Training
in December 20181 introduced the possibility to provide distance e-learning
in a closed system in vocational education and training from 1 January 2019,
which imparts theoretical knowledge as a digital curriculum through an IT
network.
In January 2019, modelled on the system introduced at universities, chan-
cellors were appointed at vocational education and training centres of the
Ministry for Innovation and Technology. The director general continues to be
the chief manager responsible for a vocational training centre, whose primary
task is to manage the educational activities of the institution and supervise the
quality of education. The chancellor is a senior manager of the institution, in
charge of economic, financial, employment, legal and administrative activities
as well as the asset management of the institution. Chancellors are appointed
by the Minister responsible for vocational education and training. The director
general will be the employer of teachers and staff directly supporting educa-
tion but their wages will have to be approved by the chancellor. All other staff
will be appointed and employed by the chancellor. Measures of the director
general affecting the management, organisation or operation of the institu-
tion with financial implications will have to be approved by the chancellor:
his consent is a prerequisite of these decisions to take effect or be effective.
The Vocational Education and Training Innovation Council was established
in September 2018 on the initiative of the Ministry for Innovation and Tech-
nology.2 The most important goal of the council is to provide a regular fo-
rum for dialogue between key stakeholders of the vocational sector and the
government. The task of the council is to determine future developmental
trends and to formulate recommendations for infrastructural developments 1 Act CIV of 2018 on the
amendment of certain Acts
and for the revision of vocational and adult training curricula. In addition to on research and development
the government, the members of the Council include chambers, enterprises, and vocational education and
training.
trade unions, advocacy organisations, educational organisations, maintainers 2 See kormany.hu for more
of institutions and delegates of student councils. about the Council.
157
Hajdu, Makó, Nábelek & Nyírő
2 BENEFITS
Enforcement Agencies and
other related Acts.
7 Publication about this con-
tribution. 2.1 Unemployment benefits
8 Government Decree
324/2018. (XII. 30.) on the
minimum wage and the guar- As a result of raising the minimum wage in 20198 (see section 5.1), the max-
anteed minimum wage in 2019. imum amount of the unemployment benefit (so-called job-seekers’ allow-
158
Labour Market Policy Tools
3 SERVICES
3.1 Improving adaptability to labour market changes
The call for proposals of the programme “Thematic projects aiming at improv-
ing adaptability to labour market changes EDIOP-5.3.5-18” was published
in September 2018: enterprises can apply for a non-refundable grant of HUF 9 About provisions available
10–50 million. The projects improve labour market adaptability, strength- for disabled employees.
10 Resolution 21/2018. (XI. 14.)
en corporate social responsibility, promote service provider roles, reinforce AB of the Constitutional Court.
the engagement of social partners in society and the labour market, develop 11 G o v e r n m e n t D e c r e e
324/2018. (XII. 30.) on the
their capacities and improve their representative power. The total budget to minimum wage and the guar-
be granted to applicants amounts to HUF 4 billion. anteed minimum wage in 2019.
159
Hajdu, Makó, Nábelek & Nyírő
160
Labour Market Policy Tools
161
Hajdu, Makó, Nábelek & Nyírő
162
Labour Market Policy Tools
exempt from the 10 percent pension contribution and from the 4 percent in-
kind health insurance contribution stipulated by the Act on Social Security
Contributions17 previously.18 Such employment is also exempt from the social
contribution tax and vocational training tax.19
5.2.3 Changes in the cafeteria system
The cafeteria system was significantly modified on 1 January 2019. Due to
the amendment of the Act on the Personal Income Tax, only up to HUF 450
thousand per year may be given to employees on SZÉP-cards as a non-cash
fringe benefit from 2019 on. The tax rate on this benefit slightly grew because
of modification of the social contribution tax (from 34.22 per cent to 34.5
per cent). Additionally, the sub-accounts of the SZÉP-cards of each employee
are allocated separate bank account numbers. The cash benefit of HUF 100
thousand per year no longer qualifies as a benefit in kind.
From 2019 on, only benefits specified in the Act may qualify as certain
specific benefits. In the future these will not include benefits which qualified
as benefits in kind until 2017, such as the school start allowance, local travel
allowance, Erzsébet voucher and contributions to voluntary pension insur-
ance funds.
The maximum amount of the “allowance for cultural services”, exempt from
personal income tax, has increased from HUF 50 thousand to HUF 149 thou-
sand, equal to the minimum wage. However, the tax exemption of several al-
lowances ceased: assistance for housing, housing assistance for mobility, risk
insurance premium and assistance for repaying student loans will be subject
to tax as earned income.
5.3 Overtime Act
The amendment of the Labour Code adopted in December 2018 took effect
on 1 January 2019.20 The amendment increased the maximum timeframe of
working time from 12 months to 36 months in the case of collective agree-
ments. Employers may continue to require 250 hours of overtime annually; 17 Act LXXX of 1997 on the
however, under the amendment, based on a written agreement concluded by beneficiaries of social security
provisions and private pension
the employer and the employee, an additional 150 hours of overtime (volun- and on the contributions pay-
tary overtime) per calendar year at most may be required by the employer. In able to cover these.
18 Act XLI of 2018 on the
the case of collective agreements, an additional 100 hours of voluntary over- amendment of certain tax laws
time may be required annually at most, based on a written agreement, in ad- and related Acts and on the spe-
cial immigration tax.
dition to a maximum of 300 hours of overtime annually. 19 Act LII of 2018 on the social
The amended law also legislates on the rules of allocating rest days: two rest contribution tax.
days a week must be allocated but not necessarily evenly. After six consecu- 20 Act CXVI of 2018 on the
amendment of Acts related to
tive working days a minimum of one resting day a week must be provided. In the organisation of working
time and the minimum fee
the case of an uneven work schedule, uninterrupted, seasonal or shift work, payable for temporary employ-
at least one of the weekly resting days must be provided every month. At least ment.
163
Hajdu, Makó, Nábelek & Nyírő
one of the weekly resting days per month must be provided on Sundays, ex-
cept for part-time employees working on Saturday and Sunday.
5.4 Expanding the programme on building workers’
accommodation
Since the autumn of 2019, employers are also eligible to grants for building
workers’ accommodation, in addition to municipalities. Due to the expansion
of the programme, business organizations can apply for regional investment
aid for building workers’ accommodation, with a 50 percent rate in Northern
Hungary, Northern Great Plain, Southern Great Plain and Southern Trans-
danubia, a 35 percent rate in Central Transdanubia and a 25 percent rate in
Western Transdanubia, while small enterprises may secure an additional 20
percent and medium-sized enterprises an additional 10 percent investment
aid. The grant is for establishing workers’ accommodation for at least 80 per-
sons and eligible costs include construction and refurbishment costs and the
costs of new tangible assets required for the investment. The beneficiary must
undertake to operate the facility for at least ten years.21
5.5 Summer student work
The Ministry of Finance has also published its summer student work pro-
gramme in 2019, with a budget of HUF 3.6 billion. This time, however, youth
aged between 16 and 25 may not only be employed by regional and local mu-
nicipalities or municipality institutions but also by enterprises active in ag-
riculture, tourism or catering. According to the estimates of the Ministry,
21 A new economy protection from the budget available in 2019 it is possible to provide work for about 30
measure: enterprises are also
eligible to a workers’ accom- thousand students between 1 July and 31 August, with a daily maximum
modation grant. working time of 6 hours. Employers are reimbursed for 75 per cent of wages
22 Up to 30 thousand students
may work in the summer stu-
and related social contribution tax, while for municipalities the rate is one
dent work programme. hundred percent.22
References
Kiss, Z. (2018): Az új szociális hozzájárulási adóról szóló törvény [The Act on the new
social contribution tax]. Adóváltozások. Adó szaklap, 2018/10.
Wiedemann, T. (2018): Mire igazán beindult volna, már át is alakul a nyugdíjasok fog-
lalkoztatása. G7, 21 November 2018.
164
Labour Market Policy Tools
Appendix
Table A1: Expenditures and revenues of the employment policy section of the national budget,
2013–2019 (million HUF)*
2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 2017 2017 2018 2019
Expenditures actual actual actual plan actual plan actual plan plan
1. Active subsidies
Employment and training subsi-
25,105.9 28,120.8 12,302.4 16,172 27,503.9 16,172.0 27,238.9 35,000.0 35,000.0
dies
Co-financing EU-funded employ-
ability (and adaptability) pro- 16,279.6 17,130.1 11,064.6 3,808.7 3,808.7 84,300.0
jects
8. Public works (SART work
171,053.4 225,471.1 253,723.3 340,000.0 267,965.7 325,000.0 265,837.2 225,000.0 180,000.0
programme)
SROP 1.1. Labour market ser-
33,804.9 35,790.1 12,305.1 54.5 79.5
vices and support
SROP 1.2. Normative support for
14,477.3 1,080.1
promoting employment
EDIOP 5. Employment priority –
81,600.0 7,800.0 28,000.0
annually published budget
Of which CCHOP funding 1,000.0
EDIOP 6. Competitive workforce
74,380.0 9,770.0
– annually published budget
Reimbursement of social security
3,277.5 551.5
contribution relief
Pre-financing labour market
0.0 13,654.9 54,700.0 50,101.3 74,116.4 70,995.3 84,300.0
programmes 2014–2020
2. Vocational and adult training
18,736.2 24,725.9 30,084.7 13,819.0 27,872.0 20,000.0 29,919.4 29,930.0
subsidies
4. Passive expenditures
Job seekers’ allowances 51,819.9 49,235 49,657.7 47,000.0 53,454.1 47,000.0 59,674.0 55,000.0 75,000.0
Transfer to Pension Insurance
961.3 451.6 309.1 0.0
Fund
5. Payments from Wage Guaran-
5,487.8 4,178.5 3,790.7 4,950.0 3,994.3 4,000.0 3,341.2 4,000.0 4,500.0
tee Fund
6. Operational expenditures 1,472.8 2,418.3 2,816.0 3,283.4 2,899.3 3,500.0 2,785.6 2,900.0 4,310.0
7. Other budget contribution 70,000.0
15. Headline stability reserves 389.5 389.5
Supplementary subsidies for employers
16. Sectoral subsidy for mini-
7,000.0 9.1
mum wage increase
17. Other expenditures 22.3
Total expenditures 349,498.9 389,162.1 389,708.5 484,177.1 438,068.3 645,768.4 459,791.6 443,930.0 522,574.8
165
Hajdu, Makó, Nábelek & Nyírő
166
STATISTICAL
DATA
Edited by
Éva Czethoffer
Compiled by
János Köllő
Judit Lakatos
József Tajti
Statistical data
Statistical tables on labour market trends that have been published in The Hungarian La-
bour Market Yearbook since 2000 can be download in full from the website of the Research
Centre for Economic and Regional Studies: http://adatbank.krtk.mta.hu/tukor_kereso
DATA SOURCES
CIRCA Communication & Information Resource Centre Administrator
KSH Table compiled from regular Central Statistical Office publications [Központi
Statisztikai Hivatal]
KSH IMS CSO institution-based labour statistics [KSH intézményi munkaügyi
statisztika]
KSH MEF CSO Labour Force Survey [KSH Munkaerő-felmérés]
KSH MEM CSO Labour Force Account [KSH Munkaerő-mérleg]
NAV National Tax and Customs Administration [Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal]
NEFMI Ministry of National Resources [Nemzeti Erőforrás Minisztérium]
NEFMI EMMI STAT Ministry of National Resources, Educational Statistics [Nemzeti Erőforrás
Minisztérium, Oktatásstatisztika]
NFA National Market Fund [Nemzeti Foglalkoztatási Alap]
NFSZ National Employment Service [Nemzeti Foglalkoztatási Szolgálat]
NFSZ BT National Employment Service Wage Survey [NFSZ Bértarifa-felvétel]
NFSZ IR NFSZ integrated tracking system [NFSZ Integrált (nyilvántartási) Rendszer]
NFSZ PROG National Employment Service Short-term Labour Market Projection Survey
[NFSZ Rövid Távú Munkaerőpiaci Prognózis]
NFSZ REG National Employment Service Unemployment Register [NFSZ regisztere]
NGM Ministry of National Economy [Nemzetgazdasági Minisztérium]
NMH National Labour Office [Nemzeti Munkaügyi Hivatal]
NSZ Population Census [Népszámlálás]
NYUFIG Pension Administration [Nyugdíjfolyósító Igazgatóság]
ONYF Central Administration of National Pension Insurance [Országos
Nyugdíjbiztosítási Főigazgatóság]
TB Social Security Records [Társadalombiztosítás]
EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS
(–) Non-occurrence.
( .. ) Not available.
( n.a.) Not applicable.
( ... ) Data cannot be given due to data privacy restrictions.
168
1 Basic economic indicators
0 Employment
–3
GDP
–6
–9
–12
–15
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Source: KSH.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena01_01
169
Statistical data
Slovakia
175
Poland
Per cent
150 Hungary
Czech Republic
125
EU-15
100
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Source: Eurostat.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena01_02
70 Slovakia
Poland
65
Per cent
Hungary
60
Czech Republic
55 EU-15
50
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Source: Eurostat.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena01_03
170
2 Population
171
Statistical data
80 80
70 70
60 60
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
90,000 60,000 30,000 00 30,000 60,000 90,000 90,000 60,000 30,000 0 30,000 60,000 90,000
Source: KSH.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena02_01
172
2 Population
173
Statistical data
Table 3.1: Labour force participation of the population over 14 years, in thousandsa
Population of males 15–59 Population of males over 59
and females 15–54 and females over 54
Inactive Pensioner,
Unem- Unem-
Employed Full time On child Other Inactive Total Employed other Total
ployed Pensioner ployed
Year student care leave inactive total inactive
1980 4,887.9 0.0 300.8 370.1 259.0 339.7 1,269.6 6,157.5 570.3 0.0 1,632.1 2,202.4
1990 4,534.3 62.4 284.3 548.9 249.7 297.5 1,380.4 5,977.1 345.7 0.0 1,944.9 2,290.6
1991 4,270.5 253.3 335.6 578.2 259.8 317.1 1,490.7 6,014.5 249.5 0.0 2,045.2 2,294.7
1992 3,898.4 434.9 392.7 620.0 262.1 435.9 1,710.7 6,044.0 184.3 9.8 2,101.7 2,295.8
1993 3,689.5 502.6 437.5 683.9 270.5 480.1 1,872.0 6,064.1 137.5 16.3 2,141.2 2,295.0
1994 3,633.1 437.4 476.5 708.2 280.9 540.7 2,006.3 6,076.8 118.4 11.9 2,163.8 2,294.1
1995 3,571.3 410.0 495.2 723.4 285.3 596.1 2,100.0 6,081.3 107.5 6.4 2,180.6 2,294.5
1996 3,546.1 394.0 512.7 740.0 289.2 599.4 2,141.2 6,081.3 102.1 6.1 2,184.6 2,292.8
1997 3,549.5 342.5 542.9 752.0 289.0 599.9 2,183.8 6,075.8 96.9 6.3 2,189.0 2,292.2
1998 3,608.5 305.5 588.8 697.0 295.5 565.7 2,147.0 6,061.0 89.3 7.5 2,197.6 2,294.4
1999 3,701.0 283.3 534.7 675.6 295.3 549.8 2,055.4 6,039.6 110.4 1.4 2,185.2 2,297.0
2000 3,745.9 261.4 517.9 721.7 281.4 571.4 2,092.4 6,099.7 130.3 2.3 2,268.0 2,400.6
2001 3,742.6 231.7 516.3 717.9 286.6 601.6 2,122.4 6,096.7 140.7 2.4 2,271.8 2,414.9
2002 3,719.6 235.7 507.1 738.3 286.8 593.0 2,125.2 6,080.5 164.1 3.2 2,263.9 2,431.2
2003 3,719.0 239.6 485.0 730.7 286.9 595.0 2,097.6 6,056.2 202.9 4.9 2,245.6 2,453.4
2004 3,663.1 247.2 480.5 739.8 282.4 622.4 2,125.1 6,035.4 237.3 5.7 2,236.1 2,479.1
2005 3,653.9 296.0 449.7 740.8 278.6 590.3 2,059.4 6,009.3 247.6 7.9 2,258.3 2,513.8
2006 3,680.1 309.9 416.1 811.4 261.1 524.3 2,012.9 6,002.9 248.3 8.4 2,270.2 2,526.9
2007 3,649.5 303.7 413.2 822.7 273.9 519.7 2,029.5 5,982.7 252.5 8.4 2,292.9 2,553.8
2008 3,596.3 315.5 394.7 814.3 282.2 549.0 2,040.2 5,952.0 252.0 10.9 2,323.6 2,586.5
2009 3,480.9 403.0 360.3 805.7 282.0 578.4 2,026.4 5,910.3 266.9 14.8 2,345.7 2,627.4
2010 3,435.8 450.1 336.6 805.4 275.9 558.1 1,976.0 5,861.9 298.5 19.3 2,353.3 2,671.1
2011 3,430.1 440.9 296.4 783.8 280.7 557.9 1,932.0 5,789.8 328.9 25.1 2,366.3 2,720.3
2012 3,498.6 447.0 260.1 769.6 263.2 484.3 1,777.2 5,722.8 328.6 26.1 2,407.2 2,761.9
2013 3,551.1 415.7 247.6 737.3 255.4 466.4 1,706.7 5,673.5 341.6 25.2 2,424.5 2,791.3
2014 3,720.7 317.5 222.3 701.2 237.8 412.5 1,573.8 5,612.0 380.0 25.8 2,419.0 2,824.8
2015 3,782.1 281.3 197.3 688.8 240.0 368.1 1,494.2 5,557.6 428.4 26.5 2,400.8 2,855.7
2016 3,860.6 211.3 181.6 656.3 242.4 361.2 1,441.5 5,483.8 491.0 23.3 2,364.1 2,878.4
2017 3,909.9 172.2 164.1 636.5 233.1 362.0 1,362.5 5,444.7 511.4 19.6 2,356.7 2,887.7
2018 3,933.9 158.3 140.9 627.6 232.1 368.4 1,369.0 5,461.2 535.6 13.6 2,339.2 2,888.4
a Annual average figures.
Note: Up to the year 1999, weighting is based on the 1990 population census. From 2000 to
2011, weighting is based on the 2001 population census. From 2012 onwards population
weights are based on the 2011 population census. To ensure comparability, the estimates for
2006 –2011 have been modified by the new weighting scheme.
Data on ‘employed’ includes conscripts and those working while receiving pension or child
support. The data on students for 1995–97 are estimates.
’Other inactive’ is a residual category calculated by deducting the sum of the figures in the
indicated categories from the mid-year population, so it includes the institutional popula-
tion not observed by MEF. The population weights have been corrected using the 2011 Cen-
sus data.
Source: Pensioners: 1980–91: NYUFIG, 1992–: KSH MEF. Child care recipients: up to the
year 1997 TB and estimation, after 1997 MEF. Unemployment: 1990–91: NFSZ REG, 1992–:
KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent03_01
174
3 Economic activity
Table 3.2: Labour force participation of the population over 14 years, males, in thousandsa
Population of males 15–59 Population of males 60 and over
Inactive Pensioner,
Unem- Unem-
Employed Full time On child Other Inactive Total Employed other Total
ployed Pensioner ployed
Year student care leave inactive total inactive
1980 2,750.5 0.0 173.8 196.3 0.0 99.1 469.2 3,219.7 265.3 0.0 491.8 757.1
1990 2,524.3 37.9 188.4 284.2 1.2 80.3 554.1 3,116.3 123.7 0.0 665.5 789.2
1991 2,351.6 150.3 218.7 296.5 1.5 115.0 631.7 3,133.6 90.4 0.0 700.7 791.1
1992 2,153.1 263.2 252.0 302.4 1.7 174.8 730.9 3,147.2 65.1 3.2 722.1 790.4
1993 2,029.1 311.5 263.2 346.9 2.0 203.3 815.4 3,156.0 47.9 4.5 735.7 788.1
1994 2,013.4 270.0 277.6 357.1 3.7 239.6 878.0 3,161.4 41.6 3.8 740.0 785.4
1995 2,012.5 259.3 282.2 367.4 4.9 237.8 892.3 3,164.1 37.1 2.1 742.6 781.8
1996 2,007.4 242.4 291.9 372.8 3.3 248.3 916.3 3,166.1 28.9 1.3 746.3 776.5
1997 2,018.0 212.2 306.0 377.6 1.5 251.6 936.7 3,166.9 25.5 1.9 743.5 770.9
1998 2,015.5 186.5 345.4 350.4 1.0 264.2 961.0 3,163.0 26.2 2.8 737.3 766.3
1999 2,068.4 170.3 312.7 338.8 4.2 261.5 917.2 3,155.9 34.7 0.4 727.2 762.3
2000 2,086.0 158.2 315.2 358.2 4.1 261.7 939.2 3,183.4 39.8 0.7 758.8 799.3
2001 2,087.6 141.6 311.0 353.4 4.3 283.2 951.9 3,181.1 41.1 0.9 763.0 805.0
2002 2,080.4 137.3 307.5 370.3 5.0 273.4 956.2 3,173.9 45.2 0.7 764.4 810.3
2003 2,073.5 137.6 293.6 367.9 4.3 288.1 953.9 3,165.0 53.0 0.9 762.5 816.4
2004 2,052.7 136.2 293.5 371.2 4.6 300.2 969.5 3,158.4 64.6 0.6 758.8 824.0
2005 2,050.7 158.2 278.8 375.4 5.8 288.8 948.8 3,157.7 65.4 0.9 763.9 830.2
2006 2,078.4 163.4 258.9 404.1 4.0 249.6 916.6 3,158.4 60.2 1.1 771.5 832.8
2007 2,067.4 162.5 261.8 410.2 4.1 248.8 924.9 3,154.8 61.9 1.0 777.5 840.4
2008 2,033.6 172.7 261.2 408.3 4.7 264.6 938.8 3,145.1 60.0 1.0 790.4 851.4
2009 1,961.9 230.3 240.1 409.0 4.4 288.7 942.2 3,134.4 63.1 1.6 798.9 863.6
2010 1,929.5 259.5 228.7 410.3 4.6 287.1 930.7 3,119.7 63.0 2.2 812.9 878.1
2011 1,950.9 248.7 203.7 397.9 3.6 286.8 892.0 3,091.6 70.1 2.9 826.2 899.2
2012 1,979.2 257.9 187.7 395.6 4.2 238.8 826.3 3,063.4 69.6 4.1 846.1 919.8
2013 2,022.2 234.4 169.5 375.6 3.8 232.0 780.9 3,037.5 81.5 4.8 852.4 938.7
2014 2,120.3 173.1 151.3 352.5 3.0 200.9 707.7 3,001.1 100.1 8.6 855.6 964.3
2015 2,152.1 152.1 133.7 345.1 3.1 181.4 663.3 2,967.5 131.4 9.8 849.3 990.5
2016 2,192.4 119.0 119.6 332.3 3.8 173.6 629.3 2,940.7 170.1 8.5 832.5 1,011.1
2017 2,228.9 89.8 107.3 322.9 1.9 169.2 601.2 2,920.0 188.4 6.0 828.8 1,023.2
2018 2,245.4 83.9 94.2 315.9 1.3 171.0 582.4 2,911.7 200.8 4.1 824.4 1,029.3
a Annual average figures.
Note: Up to the year 1999, weighting is based on the 1990 population census. From 2000 to
2011, weighting is based on the 2001 population census. From 2012 onwards population
weights are based on the 2011 population census. To ensure comparability, the estimates for
2006 –2011 have been modified by the new weighting scheme.
Data on ‘employed’ includes conscripts and those working while receiving pension or child
support. The data on students for 1995–97 are estimates.
’Other inactive’ is a residual category calculated by deducting the sum of the figures in the
indicated categories from the mid-year population, so it includes the institutional popula-
tion not observed by MEF. The population weights have been corrected using the 2011 Cen-
sus data.
Source: Pensioners: 1980–91: NYUFIG, 1992–: KSH MEF. Child care recipients: up to the
year 1997 TB and estimation, after 1997 MEF. Unemployment: 1990–91: NFSZ REG, 1992–:
KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent03_02
175
Statistical data
Table 3.3: Labour force participation of the population over 14 years, females, in thousandsa
Population of females 15–54 Population of females 55 and above
Inactive Pensioner,
Unem- Unem-
Employed Full time On child Other Inactive Total Employed other Total
ployed Pensioner ployed
Year student care leave inactive total inactive
1980 2,137.4 0.0 127.0 173.8 259.0 240.6 800.4 2,937.8 305.0 0.0 1,140.3 1,445.3
1990 2,010.0 24.5 95.8 264.7 248.5 217.3 826.3 2,860.8 222.0 0.0 1,279.4 1,501.4
1991 1,918.9 103.1 116.9 281.8 258.3 201.9 858.9 2,880.9 159.1 0.0 1,344.5 1,503.6
1992 1,745.3 171.7 140.8 317.6 260.4 261.1 979.9 2,896.9 119.2 6.6 1,379.6 1,505.4
1993 1,660.4 191.1 174.3 337.0 268.5 276.8 1,056.6 2,908.1 89.6 11.8 1,405.5 1,506.9
1994 1,619.7 167.4 198.9 351.1 277.2 301.1 1,128.3 2,915.4 76.8 8.1 1,423.8 1,508.7
1995 1,558.8 150.7 213.0 356.0 280.4 358.3 1,207.7 2,917.2 70.4 4.3 1,438.0 1,512.7
1996 1,538.7 151.6 220.7 367.2 285.9 351.1 1,224.9 2,915.2 73.2 4.8 1,438.3 1,516.3
1997 1,531.5 130.3 236.9 374.4 287.5 348.3 1,247.1 2,908.9 71.4 4.4 1,445.3 1,521.1
1998 1,593.0 119.0 243.4 346.6 294.5 301.5 1,186.0 2,898.0 63.1 4.7 1,460.3 1,528.1
1999 1,632.6 113.0 222.0 336.8 291.1 288.3 1,138.2 2,883.8 75.8 1.0 1,458.0 1,534.8
2000 1,659.9 103.2 202.7 363.5 277.3 309.7 1,153.2 2,916.3 90.5 1.6 1,509.2 1,601.3
2001 1,655.0 90.1 205.3 364.5 282.3 318.3 1,170.4 2,915.5 99.6 1.5 1,508.8 1,609.9
2002 1,639.2 98.4 199.6 368.0 281.8 319.6 1,169.0 2,906.6 118.9 2.5 1,499.5 1,620.9
2003 1,645.6 102.0 191.4 362.8 282.6 306.9 1,143.7 2,891.2 149.9 4.0 1,483.2 1,637.1
2004 1,610.2 111.0 186.8 368.6 277.8 322.2 1,155.4 2,876.6 172.8 5.1 1,477.3 1,655.2
2005 1,603.2 137.8 170.9 365.4 272.8 301.5 1,110.6 2,851.6 182.2 7.0 1,494.4 1,683.6
2006 1,601.7 146.5 157.2 407.3 257.1 274.7 1,096.3 2,844.5 188.1 7.3 1,498.7 1,694.1
2007 1,582.1 141.2 151.4 412.5 269.8 270.9 1,104.6 2,827.9 190.6 7.4 1,515.4 1,713.4
2008 1,562.7 142.8 133.5 406.0 277.5 284.4 1,101.4 2,806.9 192.0 9.9 1,533.2 1,735.1
2009 1,519.0 172.7 120.2 396.7 277.6 289.7 1,084.2 2,775.9 203.8 13.2 1,546.8 1,763.8
2010 1,506.3 190.6 107.9 395.1 271.3 271.0 1,045.3 2,742.2 235.5 17.1 1,540.4 1,793.0
2011 1,479.2 192.2 92.7 385.9 277.1 271.1 1,040.0 2,698.2 258.8 22.2 1,540.1 1,821.1
2012 1,519.4 189.1 72.4 374.0 259.0 245.5 950.9 2,659.4 259.0 22.0 1,561.1 1,842.1
2013 1,528.9 181.3 78.1 361.7 251.6 234.4 925.8 2,636.0 260.1 20.4 1,572.1 1,852.6
2014 1,600.4 144.4 71.0 348.7 234.8 211.6 866.1 2,610.9 279.9 17.2 1,563.4 1,860.5
2015 1,630.0 129.2 63.6 343.7 236.9 186.7 830.9 2,590.1 297.0 16.7 1,551.5 1,865.2
2016 1,668.2 92.3 62.0 324.0 238.6 187.6 812.2 2,543.1 320.9 14.8 1,531.6 1,867.3
2017 1,681.0 82.4 56.8 313.6 231.2 192.8 761.3 2,524.7 323.0 13.6 1,527.9 1,864.5
2018 1,688.5 74.4 46.8 311.7 230.7 197.4 786.6 2,549.5 334.8 9.5 1,514.8 1,859.1
a Annual average figures.
Note: Up to the year 1999, weighting is based on the 1990 population census. From 2000 to
2011, weighting is based on the 2001 population census. From 2012 onwards population
weights are based on the 2011 population census. To ensure comparability, the estimates for
2006 –2011 have been modified by the new weighting scheme.
Data on ‘employed’ includes conscripts and those working while receiving pension or child
support. The data on students for 1995–97 are estimates.
’Other inactive’ is a residual category calculated by deducting the sum of the figures in the
indicated categories from the mid-year population, so it includes the institutional popula-
tion not observed by MEF. The population weights have been corrected using the 2011 Cen-
sus data.
Source: Pensioners: 1980–91: NYUFIG, 1992–: KSH MEF. Child care recipients: up to the
year 1997 TB and estimation, after 1997 MEF. Unemployment: 1990–91: NFSZ REG, 1992–:
KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent03_03
176
3 Economic activity
Table 3.4: Labour force participation of the population over 14 years, per cent
Population of males 15–59 Population of males over 59
and females 15–54 and female over 54
Inactive Pensioner,
Unem- Unem-
Employed Full time On child Other Inactive Total Employed other Total
ployed Pensioner ployed
Year student care leave inactive total inactive
1980 79.4 0.0 4.9 6.0 4.2 5.5 20.6 100.0 25.9 0.0 74.1 100.0
1990 75.9 1.0 4.8 9.2 4.2 5.0 23.1 100.0 15.1 0.0 84.9 100.0
1995 58.7 6.7 8.1 11.9 4.7 9.8 34.5 100.0 4.7 0.3 95.0 100.0
2000 61.4 4.3 8.5 11.8 4.6 9.4 34.3 100.0 5.4 0.1 94.5 100.0
2001 61.4 3.8 8.5 11.8 4.7 9.9 34.8 100.0 5.8 0.1 94.1 100.0
2002 61.2 3.9 8.3 12.1 4.7 9.8 35.0 100.0 6.7 0.1 93.1 100.0
2003 61.4 4.0 8.0 12.1 4.7 9.8 34.6 100.0 8.3 0.2 91.5 100.0
2004 60.7 4.1 8.0 12.3 4.7 10.3 35.2 100.0 9.6 0.2 90.2 100.0
2005 60.8 4.9 7.5 12.3 4.6 9.8 34.3 100.0 9.8 0.3 89.8 100.0
2006 61.3 5.2 6.9 13.5 4.3 8.7 33.5 100.0 9.8 0.3 89.8 100.0
2007 61.0 5.1 6.9 13.8 4.6 8.7 33.9 100.0 9.9 0.3 89.8 100.0
2008 60.4 5.3 6.6 13.7 4.7 9.2 34.3 100.0 9.7 0.4 89.8 100.0
2009 58.9 6.8 6.1 13.6 4.8 9.8 34.3 100.0 10.2 0.6 89.3 100.0
2010 58.6 7.7 5.7 13.7 4.7 9.5 33.7 100.0 11.2 0.7 88.1 100.0
2011 59.2 7.6 5.1 13.5 4.8 9.6 33.1 100.0 12.1 0.9 87.0 100.0
2012 61.1 7.8 4.5 13.4 4.6 8.5 31.1 100.0 11.9 0.9 87.2 100.0
2013 62.6 7.3 4.4 13.0 4.5 8.2 30.1 100.0 12.2 0.9 86.9 100.0
2014 66.3 5.7 4.0 12.5 4.2 7.3 28.0 100.0 13.5 0.9 85.6 100.0
2015 68.1 5.1 3.6 12.4 4.3 6.6 26.9 100.0 15.0 0.9 84.1 100.0
2016 70.4 3.9 3.3 12.0 4.4 6.6 26.3 100.0 17.1 0.8 82.1 100.0
2017 71.8 3.2 3.0 11.7 4.3 6.6 25.0 100.0 17.7 0.7 81.6 100.0
2018 72.0 2.9 2.6 11.5 4.2 6.7 25.1 100.0 18.5 0.5 81.0 100.0
Source: Pensioners: 1980–90: NYUFIG, 1995–: KSH MEF. Child care recipients: up to the
year 1995 TB and estimation, after 1995 MEF. Unemployment: 1990: NFSZ REG, 1995–:
KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent03_04
Figure 3.1: Labour force participation of population
for males 15–59 and females 15–54, total
100 100
Other inactive
80 80
On child care leave
60 60 Student
Per cent
40 40 Pensioner
Unemployed
20 20
Employed
0 0
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Source: Pensioners: 1990–91: NYUFIG, 1992–: KSH MEF. Child care recipients: up to the
year 1997 TB and estimation, after 1997 MEF. Unemployment: 1990 –91: NFSZ REG,
1992–: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena03_01
177
Statistical data
Table 3.5: Labour force participation of the population over 14 years, males, per cent
Population of males 15–59 Population of males 60 and above
Inactive Pensioner,
Unem- Unem-
Employed Full time On child Other Inactive Total Employed other Total
ployed Pensioner ployed
Year student care leave inactive total inactive
1980 85.4 0.0 5.4 6.1 0.0 3.1 14.6 100.0 35.0 0.0 65.0 100.0
1990 81.0 1.2 6.0 9.1 0.0 2.6 17.8 100.0 15.7 0.0 84.3 100.0
1995 63.6 8.2 8.9 11.6 0.2 7.5 28.2 100.0 4.7 0.3 95.0 100.0
1996 63.4 7.7 9.2 11.8 0.1 7.8 28.9 100.0 3.7 0.2 96.1 100.0
1997 63.7 6.7 9.7 11.9 0.0 7.9 29.6 100.0 3.3 0.2 96.4 100.0
1998 63.7 5.9 10.9 11.1 0.0 8.4 30.4 100.0 3.4 0.4 96.2 100.0
1999 65.5 5.4 9.9 10.7 0.1 8.3 29.1 100.0 4.6 0.1 95.4 100.0
2000 65.5 5.0 9.9 11.3 0.1 8.2 29.5 100.0 5.0 0.1 94.9 100.0
2001 65.6 4.5 9.8 11.1 0.1 8.9 29.9 100.0 5.1 0.1 94.8 100.0
2002 65.5 4.3 9.7 11.7 0.2 8.6 30.1 100.0 5.6 0.1 94.3 100.0
2003 65.5 4.3 9.3 11.6 0.1 9.1 30.1 100.0 6.5 0.1 93.4 100.0
2004 65.0 4.3 9.3 11.8 0.1 9.5 30.7 100.0 7.8 0.1 92.1 100.0
2005 64.9 5.0 8.8 11.9 0.2 9.1 30.0 100.0 7.9 0.1 92.0 100.0
2006 65.8 5.2 8.2 12.8 0.1 7.9 29.0 100.0 7.2 0.1 92.6 100.0
2007 65.5 5.2 8.3 13.0 0.1 7.9 29.3 100.0 7.4 0.1 92.5 100.0
2008 64.7 5.5 8.3 13.0 0.1 8.4 29.8 100.0 7.0 0.1 92.8 100.0
2009 62.6 7.3 7.7 13.0 0.1 9.2 30.1 100.0 7.3 0.2 92.5 100.0
2010 61.8 8.3 7.3 13.2 0.1 9.2 29.8 100.0 7.2 0.3 92.6 100.0
2011 63.1 8.0 6.6 12.9 0.1 9.3 28.9 100.0 7.8 0.3 91.9 100.0
2012 64.6 8.4 6.1 12.9 0.1 7.8 27.0 100.0 7.6 0.4 92.0 100.0
2013 66.6 7.7 5.6 12.4 0.1 7.6 25.7 100.0 8.7 0.5 90.8 100.0
2014 70.7 5.8 5.0 11.7 0.1 6.7 23.6 100.0 10.4 0.9 88.7 100.0
2015 72.5 5.1 4.5 11.6 0.1 6.1 22.4 100.0 13.3 1.0 85.7 100.0
2016 74.6 4.0 4.1 11.3 0.1 5.9 21.4 100.0 16.8 0.8 82.3 100.0
2017 76.3 3.1 3.7 11.1 0.1 5.8 20.6 100.0 18.4 0.6 81.0 100.0
2018 77.1 2.9 3.2 10.8 0.0 5.9 20.0 100.0 19.5 0.4 80.1 100.0
Source: Pensioners: 1980–90: NYUFIG, 1995–: KSH MEF. Child care recipients: up to the
year 1997 TB and estimation, after 1997 MEF. Unemployment: 1990: NFSZ REG, 1995–:
KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent03_05
Figure 3.2: Labour force participation of population for males 15–59
100 100
Other inactive
80 80
On child care leave
60 60
Per cent
Student
40 40 Pensioner
Unemployed
20 20
Employed
0 0
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Source: Pensioners: 1990–91: NYUFIG, 1992–: KSH MEF. Child care recipients: up to the
year 1997 TB and estimation, after 1997 MEF. Unemployment: 1990 –91: NFSZ REG,
1992–: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena03_02
178
3 Economic activity
Table 3.6: Labour force participation of the population over 14 years, females, per cent
Population of females 15–54 Population of females 55 and above
Inactive Pensioner,
Unem- Unem-
Employed Full time On child Other Inactive Total Employed other Total
ployed Pensioner ployed
Year student care leave inactive total inactive
1980 72.8 0.0 4.3 5.9 8.8 8.2 27.2 100.0 21.1 0.0 78.9 100.0
1990 70.3 0.9 3.3 9.3 8.7 7.6 28.9 100.0 14.8 0.0 85.2 100.0
1995 53.4 5.2 7.3 12.2 9.6 12.3 41.4 100.0 4.7 0.3 95.1 100.0
1996 52.8 5.2 7.6 12.6 9.8 12.0 42.0 100.0 4.8 0.3 94.9 100.0
1997 52.6 4.5 8.1 12.9 9.9 12.0 42.9 100.0 4.7 0.3 95.0 100.0
1998 55.0 4.1 8.4 12.0 10.2 10.4 40.9 100.0 4.1 0.3 95.6 100.0
1999 56.6 3.9 7.7 11.7 10.1 10.0 39.5 100.0 4.9 0.1 95.0 100.0
2000 56.9 3.5 7.0 12.5 9.5 10.6 39.5 100.0 5.7 0.1 94.2 100.0
2001 56.8 3.1 7.0 12.5 9.7 10.9 40.1 100.0 6.2 0.1 93.7 100.0
2002 56.4 3.4 6.9 12.7 9.7 11.0 40.2 100.0 7.3 0.2 92.5 100.0
2003 56.9 3.5 6.6 12.5 9.8 10.6 39.6 100.0 9.2 0.2 90.6 100.0
2004 56.0 3.9 6.5 12.8 9.7 11.2 40.2 100.0 10.4 0.3 89.3 100.0
2005 56.2 4.8 6.0 12.8 9.6 10.6 38.9 100.0 10.8 0.4 88.8 100.0
2006 56.3 5.2 5.5 14.3 9.0 9.7 38.5 100.0 11.1 0.4 88.5 100.0
2007 55.9 5.0 5.4 14.6 9.5 9.6 39.1 100.0 11.1 0.4 88.4 100.0
2008 55.7 5.1 4.8 14.5 9.9 10.1 39.2 100.0 11.1 0.6 88.4 100.0
2009 54.7 6.2 4.3 14.3 10.0 10.4 39.1 100.0 11.6 0.7 87.7 100.0
2010 54.9 7.0 3.9 14.4 9.9 9.9 38.1 100.0 13.1 1.0 85.9 100.0
2011 54.8 7.1 3.4 14.3 10.3 10.0 38.1 100.0 14.2 1.2 84.6 100.0
2012 57.1 7.1 2.7 14.1 9.7 9.2 36.0 100.0 14.1 1.2 84.7 100.0
2013 58.0 6.9 3.0 13.7 9.5 8.8 35.1 100.0 14.0 1.1 84.9 100.0
2014 61.3 5.5 2.8 13.4 9.0 8.1 33.2 100.0 15.0 0.9 84.0 100.0
2015 62.9 5.0 2.5 13.3 9.1 7.2 32.1 100.0 15.9 0.9 83.2 100.0
2016 65.6 3.6 2.4 12.7 9.4 7.4 31.9 100.0 17.2 0.8 82.0 100.0
2017 66.6 3.3 2.3 12.4 9.2 7.6 30.2 100.0 17.3 0.7 81.9 100.0
2018 66.2 2.9 1.8 12.2 9.1 7.7 30.9 100.0 18.0 0.5 81.5 100.0
Source: Pensioners: 1980–90: NYUFIG, 1995–: KSH MEF. Child care recipients: up to the
year 1997 TB and estimation, after 1997 MEF. Unemployment: 1990: NFSZ REG, 1995–:
KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent03_06
Figure 3.3: Labour force participation of population for females 15–54
100 100
Other inactive
80 80
On child care leave
60 60
Per cent
Student
40 40 Pensioner
Unemployed
20 20
Employed
0 0
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Source: Pensioners: 1990–91: NYUFIG, 1992–: KSH MEF. Child care recipients: up to the
year 1997 TB and estimation, after 1997 MEF. Unemployment: 1990 –91: NFSZ REG,
1992–: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena03_03
179
Statistical data
Table 3.7: Population aged 15–64 by labour market status (self-categorised), in thousands
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Together
In work 3,862.5 3,831.6 3,769.3 3,681.5 3,660.3 3,690.1 3,748.4 3,824.5 4,039.5 4,159.5 4,298.5 4,366.9 4,401.6
Unemployed 470.4 450.2 476.7 591.3 670.7 675.8 700.4 666.5 538.8 454.6 366.3 314.0 284.1
Students, pupils 846.3 861.1 863.7 854.8 854.6 842.2 811.2 772.5 733.5 710.3 675.6 650.4 644.2
Pensioner 622.9 592.2 635.6 627.6 599.3 582.0 630.3 613.6 557.5 477.5 420.1 392.6 364.9
Disabled 506.8 554.4 525.8 498.9 488.4 455.1 356.7 335.7 317.7 318.0 303.1 285.7 253.4
On child care
275.5 286.2 295.0 293.0 289.3 290.2 265.0 259.1 237.0 236.9 236.4 227.5 228.6
leave
Dependent 115.2 111.9 104.0 101.9 95.3 104.3 93.1 96.9 85.3 91.7 93.7 93.2 106.2
Out of work for
107.7 101.8 101.7 104.9 78.2 78.9 89.1 78.0 78.4 81.9 84.1 84.9 86.4
other reasons
Total 6,807.3 6,789.4 6,771.6 6,753.8 6,736.0 6,718.5 6,694.1 6,646.8 6,587.7 6,530.4 6,477.9 6,415.2 6,369.5
Males
In work 2,106.3 2,095.3 2,056.8 1,993.3 1,958.0 1,985.4 2,009.3 2,065.1 2,186.4 2,256.0 2,331.6 2,384.2 2,407.8
Unemployed 251.6 242.0 255.8 333.6 375.6 372.2 382.9 364.4 283.7 241.4 198.9 159.4 146.9
Students, pupils 418.3 428.4 431.7 430.6 432.7 427.2 416.1 393.4 366.9 354.3 338.2 329.1 322.6
Pensioner 234.9 217.4 243.4 246.2 245.6 243.7 254.9 236.7 209.7 167.1 133.1 118.3 109.4
Disabled 243.0 269.4 257.9 238.2 234.6 215.7 177.1 161.6 152.5 152.0 149.4 137.8 123.1
On child care
5.6 4.3 5.6 5.7 6.7 4.5 4.1 4.1 3.1 2.9 3.8 1.9 1.4
leave
Dependent 5.4 6.3 6.8 6.8 9.6 10.0 7.0 9.8 8.3 9.4 8.9 7.8 9.9
Out of work for
55.1 51.8 51.6 49.8 36.1 35.8 40.8 37.1 36.0 39.8 39.2 38.4 40.1
other reasons
Total 3,320.2 3,314.9 3,309.6 3,304.2 3,298.9 3,294.4 3,292.2 3,272.1 3,246.7 3,222.9 3,203.1 3,176.9 3,161.2
Females
In work 1,756.3 1,736.3 1,712.4 1,688.2 1,702.2 1,704.7 1,739.1 1,759.4 1,853.1 1,903.6 1,967.0 1,982.7 1,993.9
Unemployed 218.8 208.3 220.9 257.6 295.1 303.6 317.5 302.1 255.0 213.2 167.4 154.5 137.2
Students, pupils 428.0 432.7 432.0 424.2 421.9 415.0 395.1 379.0 366.6 356.0 337.4 321.3 321.6
Pensioner 388.0 374.8 392.2 381.4 353.7 338.2 375.4 376.9 347.8 310.3 287.0 274.3 255.5
Disabled 263.9 285.0 267.9 260.7 253.8 239.5 179.6 174.1 165.2 166.0 153.7 147.9 130.3
On child care
269.9 281.9 289.4 287.3 282.6 285.7 260.9 255.0 233.8 233.9 232.6 225.6 227.2
leave
Dependent 109.7 105.6 97.2 95.1 85.7 94.3 86.1 87.2 77.0 82.3 84.7 85.4 96.3
Out of work for
52.6 50.0 50.1 55.1 42.1 43.1 48.3 40.9 42.4 42.2 44.9 46.5 46.3
other reasons
Total 3,487.1 3,474.5 3,462.1 3,449.6 3,437.1 3,424.1 3,401.9 3,374.7 3,341.1 3,307.5 3,274.8 3,238.2 3,208.3
Source: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent03_07
180
3 Economic activity
Table 3.8: Population aged 15–64 by labour market status (self-categorised), per cent
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Together
In work 56.5 56.7 56.4 55.7 54.5 54.3 54.9 56.0 57.5 61.3 63.7 66.4 68.1 69.1
Unemployed 7.2 6.9 6.6 7.0 8.8 10.0 10.1 10.5 10.0 8.2 7.0 5.7 4.9 4.5
Students, pupils 11.6 12.4 12.7 12.8 12.7 12.7 12.5 12.1 11.6 11.1 10.9 10.4 10.1 10.1
Pensioner 11.1 9.2 8.7 9.4 9.3 8.9 8.7 9.4 9.2 8.5 7.3 6.5 6.1 5.7
Disabled 5.3 7.4 8.2 7.8 7.4 7.3 6.8 5.3 5.1 4.8 4.9 4.7 4.5 4.0
On child care leave 4.0 4.0 4.2 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.0 3.9 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.6
Dependent 2.0 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.7
Out of work for other
2.3 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4
reasons
Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Males
In work 62.7 63.4 63.2 62.1 60.3 59.4 60.3 61.0 63.1 67.3 70.0 72.8 75.0 76.2
Unemployed 8.0 7.6 7.3 7.7 10.1 11.4 11.3 11.6 11.1 8.7 7.5 6.2 5.0 4.6
Students, pupils 12.0 12.6 12.9 13.0 13.0 13.1 13.0 12.6 12.0 11.3 11.0 10.6 10.4 10.2
Pensioner 9.1 7.1 6.6 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.7 7.2 6.5 5.2 4.2 3.7 3.5
Disabled 5.4 7.3 8.1 7.8 7.2 7.1 6.5 5.4 4.9 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.3 3.9
On child care leave 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0
Dependent 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3
Out of work for other
2.4 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3
reasons
Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Females
In work 50.6 50.4 50.0 49.5 48.9 49.5 49.8 51.1 52.1 55.5 57.6 60.1 61.2 62.1
Unemployed 6.4 6.3 6.0 6.4 7.5 8.6 8.9 9.3 9.0 7.6 6.4 5.1 4.8 4.3
Students, pupils 11.3 12.3 12.5 12.5 12.3 12.3 12.1 11.6 11.2 11.0 10.8 10.3 9.9 10.0
Pensioner 12.9 11.1 10.8 11.3 11.1 10.3 9.9 11.0 11.2 10.4 9.4 8.8 8.5 8.0
Disabled 5.2 7.6 8.2 7.7 7.6 7.4 7.0 5.3 5.2 4.9 5.0 4.7 4.6 4.1
On child care leave 7.6 7.7 8.1 8.4 8.3 8.2 8.3 7.7 7.6 7.0 7.1 7.1 7.0 7.1
Dependent 3.7 3.1 3.0 2.8 2.8 2.5 2.8 2.5 2.6 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.6 3.0
Out of work for other
2.3 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4
reasons
Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Source: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent03_08
181
Statistical data
4,500 55
In thousands
Per cent
4,000 50
3,500 45
3,000 40
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Source: 1990 –91: KSH MEM, 1992–: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena04_01
182
4 Employment
2,500
2,000
In thousands
1,500
Females
1,000
Males
500
0
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Source: 1990–91: KSH MEM, 1992–: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena04_02
183
Statistical data
Table 4.3: Composition of the employed by age groups, males, per cent
15–19 20–24 25–49 50–54 55–59 60+
Total
Year years old
2000 1.5 12.4 67.3 10.6 6.4 1.8 100.0
2001 1.2 10.4 68.6 11.1 6.7 2.0 100.0
2002 0.9 9.4 69.4 11.3 6.9 2.1 100.0
2003 0.7 8.6 69.1 11.8 7.3 2.5 100.0
2004 0.7 7.4 69.5 12.0 7.3 3.0 100.0
2005 0.6 6.8 68.9 12.7 7.9 3.1 100.0
2006 0.6 6.7 71.1 10.3 8.5 2.8 100.0
2007 0.5 6.7 71.3 10.2 8.4 2.9 100.0
2008 0.5 6.4 71.2 10.6 8.5 2.8 100.0
2009 0.4 5.7 70.6 10.9 9.3 3.1 100.0
2010 0.3 5.8 70.5 10.8 9.8 2.8 100.0
2011 0.3 5.5 69.8 10.9 10.0 3.5 100.0
2012 0.3 5.5 69.4 10.7 10.7 3.4 100.0
2013 0.4 6.1 68.6 10.3 10.7 3.9 100.0
2014 0.5 6.4 68.2 9.9 10.5 4.5 100.0
2015 0.7 6.3 67.3 10.0 10.1 5.8 100.0
2016 0.7 6.7 66.1 9.9 9.5 7.2 100.0
2017 0.6 6.6 65.6 10.4 9.0 7.8 100.0
2018 0.7 6.5 64.9 10.7 9.0 8.2 100.0
Source: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent04_03
Table 4.4: Composition of the employed by age groups, females, per cent
15–19 20–24 25–49 50–54 55+
Total
Year years old
2000 1.4 11.1 69.6 12.7 5.2 100.0
2001 1.1 9.6 70.5 13.1 5.7 100.0
2002 0.8 9.2 69.4 13.8 6.8 100.0
2003 0.5 8.2 68.8 14.0 8.5 100.0
2004 0.5 7.1 68.2 14.6 9.7 100.0
2005 0.4 6.3 67.7 15.4 10.2 100.0
2006 0.4 6.0 70.1 12.9 10.6 100.0
2007 0.3 5.8 70.0 13.1 10.8 100.0
2008 0.3 5.6 69.8 13.4 10.9 100.0
2009 0.2 5.4 69.1 13.5 11.8 100.0
2010 0.3 5.3 67.4 13.6 13.4 100.0
2011 0.2 5.1 66.4 13.4 14.9 100.0
2012 0.2 5.2 66.6 13.4 14.6 100.0
2013 0.3 5.1 67.1 13.1 14.4 100.0
2014 0.4 5.6 66.4 12.7 14.9 100.0
2015 0.4 6.1 65.6 12.5 15.4 100.0
2016 0.5 6.0 65.2 12.2 16.1 100.0
2017 0.5 5.8 65.4 12.2 16.1 100.0
2018 0.5 5.5 64.4 13.0 16.6 100.0
Source: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent04_04
184
4 Employment
Table 4.5: Composition of the employed by level of education, males, per cent
8 grades of primary Vocational Secondary College,
Total
Year school or less school school university
2001 15.6 42.8 26.0 15.6 100.0
2002 14.6 43.2 26.4 15.8 100.0
2003 14.0 41.3 27.7 17.0 100.0
2004 13.0 40.4 28.0 18.6 100.0
2005 13.0 40.8 27.7 18.5 100.0
2006 12.3 41.0 28.2 18.5 100.0
2007 11.7 40.7 28.8 18.8 100.0
2008 11.7 39.4 29.1 19.8 100.0
2009 10.9 38.7 30.1 20.3 100.0
2010 10.6 38.3 30.6 20.5 100.0
2011 10.7 37.2 30.2 21.9 100.0
2012 10.6 36.8 30.1 22.5 100.0
2013 10.2 37.1 30.1 22.6 100.0
2014 11.1 35.8 30.6 22.5 100.0
2015 11.8 34.5 31.0 22.7 100.0
2016 11.9 34.6 31.6 21.9 100.0
2017 11.5 35.4 31.0 22.1 100.0
2018 11.4 35.6 30.4 22.6 100.0
Source: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent04_05
Table 4.6: Composition of the employed by level of education, females, per cent
8 grades of primary Vocational Secondary College,
Total
Year school or less school school university
2001 19.1 21.3 40.3 19.3 100.0
2002 18.5 21.5 40.2 19.8 100.0
2003 16.4 21.5 40.9 21.2 100.0
2004 15.9 20.5 40.2 23.4 100.0
2005 15.4 20.2 40.0 24.4 100.0
2006 14.2 20.7 40.0 25.1 100.0
2007 13.5 21.2 40.0 25.3 100.0
2008 13.3 20.3 39.2 27.2 100.0
2009 12.5 19.8 39.3 28.4 100.0
2010 12.3 20.3 38.8 28.6 100.0
2011 11.7 20.1 38.0 30.2 100.0
2012 11.0 19.5 38.4 31.1 100.0
2013 10.9 19.6 38.1 31.4 100.0
2014 11.4 19.4 37.8 31.5 100.0
2015 11.5 19.1 37.4 32.0 100.0
2016 12.0 18.4 38.3 31.3 100.0
2017 12.4 18.6 38.4 30.6 100.0
2018 11.5 19.0 37.5 32.0 100.0
Source: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent04_06
185
Statistical data
Table 4.8: Composition of the employed persons by employment status, per cent
Self-employed
Member of Member of other
Employees and assisting Total
cooperatives partnerships
Year family members
2004 85.8 0.2 3.5 10.5 100.0
2005 86.3 0.1 3.8 9.8 100.0
2006 87.3 0.1 3.2 9.4 100.0
2007 87.6 0.1 3.1 9.2 100.0
2008 87.7 0.1 3.2 9.0 100.0
2009 87.5 0.1 3.6 8.8 100.0
2010 87.7 0.1 3.7 8.5 100.0
2011 87.9 0.0 3.5 8.5 100.0
2012 88.3 0.1 3.8 7.9 100.0
2013 88.9 0.1 4.0 7.0 100.0
2014 89.1 0.1 4.0 6.8 100.0
2015 89.1 0.0 3.6 7.3 100.0
2016 89.3 0.0 3.4 7.3 100.0
2017 89.7 0.0 3.5 6.8 100.0
2018 89.6 0.0 3.3 7.1 100.0
Note: Conscripts are excluded. The participants of winter-time training programs within the
Public Works Program are accounted as employees (contrary to the practice of STADAT).
There are differences in data for 2014 –2016.
Source: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent04_08
186
4 Employment
Table 4.10: Employed in their present job for 0–6 months, per cent
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Hungary 7.2 6.3 6.6 7.2 6.8 7.0 6.8 7.5 7.6 7.4 7.9 7.3 8.4 9.1 8.9 8.4 7.5 7.7 8.1
Source: MEF, IV. quarterly waves.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent04_10
187
Statistical data
Table 4.11: Distribution of employees in the competitive sectora by firm size, per cent
Less than 20 20 –49 50–249 250–999 1000 and more
Year employees
2002 21.6 14.0 21.5 20.1 22.9
2003 23.0 15.3 20.5 19.3 21.8
2004 23.6 14.8 21.3 18.3 22.0
2005 27.0 15.0 20.5 17.5 20.0
2006 15.7 10.7 25.7 24.3 23.6
2007 25.2 14.2 20.0 18.4 22.2
2008 26.0 15.7 20.7 18.9 18.6
2009 23.4 15.7 19.7 18.4 22.8
2010 23.5 15.7 18.6 18.0 24.2
2011 24.9 15.6 18.5 17.7 23.4
2012 24.2 14.7 18.3 18.6 24.1
2013 23.2 14.5 18.1 19.0 25.2
2014 23.8 15.0 18.4 19.2 23.5
2015 24.0 15.4 18.5 17.9 24.2
2016 24.9 15.9 18.0 16.9 24.3
2017 24.4 16.1 17.4 16.6 25.5
2018 24.9 16.6 15.4 16.4 26.7
a Firms employing 5 or more workers.
80 80
1000– Minority
60 250–999 60 Majority
Per cent
Per cent
40 50–249 40 100%
–49 0%
20 20
0 0
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Source: NFSZ BT.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena04_03
188
4 Employment
Table 4.13: Employment rate of population aged 15–74 by age group, males, per cent
Year 15–19 20–24 25–49 50–54 55–59 60–64 65–74 Total
1999 10.6 60.3 80.5 69.0 44.0 10.4 3.8 56.2
2000 8.4 58.9 80.9 69.6 49.6 11.8 3.8 56.8
2001 7.9 56.7 81.6 68.2 51.3 13.1 3.1 57.1
2002 5.6 53.1 81.9 68.6 52.8 14.4 3.4 57.1
2003 4.8 51.8 82.2 69.7 55.2 16.8 3.8 57.6
2004 4.5 46.5 82.7 69.7 54.0 20.1 4.3 57.5
2005 4.0 43.6 82.5 70.1 56.6 20.9 4.2 57.4
2006 4.1 44.0 83.1 70.7 58.5 18.9 4.2 58.0
2007 3.7 44.0 83.4 71.0 57.3 18.0 4.7 57.8
2008 3.5 42.0 82.9 71.6 54.5 16.5 4.8 56.9
2009 2.4 36.7 80.5 70.5 56.1 16.7 5.0 55.1
2010 2.2 36.7 79.6 69.0 56.3 16.5 4.7 54.2
2011 2.4 36.1 81.0 71.2 56.9 17.4 4.4 55.0
2012 2.2 35.9 81.5 73.1 61.2 17.0 5.2 55.7
2013 2.8 40.8 82.6 74.2 64.9 21.1 4.9 57.4
2014 3.8 45.6 86.6 76.9 70.6 26.9 4.4 60.8
2015 5.9 46.6 87.9 80.5 73.9 35.3 4.6 62.7
2016 6.2 52.7 89.0 83.0 76.2 44.7 5.9 65.0
2017 6.4 55.6 90.7 86.6 77.5 49.6 6.3 66.9
2018 6.9 56.6 91.0 87.1 80.6 52.5 7.8 67.9
Source: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent04_13
Table 4.14: Employment rate of population aged 15–74 by age group, females, per cent
Year 15–19 20–24 25–49 50–54 55–59 60–64 65–74 Total
1999 8.7 48.1 67.3 59.4 16.2 5.5 1.6 42.3
2000 8.0 45.9 67.8 62.5 20.0 5.1 1.8 43.0
2001 6.3 44.2 68.0 62.1 23.2 5.5 1.3 43.1
2002 4.3 44.2 67.0 64.0 28.3 6.0 1.5 43.3
2003 3.1 41.9 67.8 65.8 35.1 7.3 2.0 44.3
2004 2.7 37.4 67.2 66.0 39.8 9.0 1.9 44.1
2005 2.6 34.7 67.4 66.6 41.7 9.6 1.5 44.2
2006 2.5 33.6 67.8 67.5 42.4 8.5 1.6 44.4
2007 2.0 32.4 67.8 68.1 40.0 9.4 2.2 44.1
2008 1.8 31.3 67.8 68.7 38.7 9.8 2.3 43.8
2009 1.5 30.0 66.7 68.3 40.7 9.7 2.2 43.1
2010 1.9 30.3 66.6 69.4 46.6 9.5 2.4 43.6
2011 1.5 30.0 66.2 68.8 49.9 11.0 2.6 43.7
2012 1.4 31.3 68.3 72.7 49.7 11.2 2.6 44.9
2013 1.7 30.5 69.3 74.0 51.4 11.1 2.4 45.4
2014 3.0 35.2 72.3 77.9 56.8 13.4 2.3 48.0
2015 2.9 39.9 73.4 80.3 60.0 17.3 2.6 49.5
2016 3.9 41.8 75.3 81.6 64.7 21.9 2.9 51.3
2017 4.3 42.2 76.5 81.1 66.1 23.3 3.3 52.1
2018 4.6 41.4 76.5 84.0 68.2 26.4 3.9 52.9
Source: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent04_14
189
Statistical data
Figure 4.4: Activity rate by age groups, males aged 15 –64, quarterly
15–19 20–24 25–49 50–54 55–59 60–64
100
80
60
Per cent
40
20
0
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Quarterly
Source: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena04_04
190
4 Employment
Figure 4.5: Activity rate by age groups, females aged 15 –64, quarterly
15–19 20–24 25–49 50–54 55–59 60–64
100
80
60
Per cent
40
20
0
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Quarterly
Source: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena04_05
191
Statistical data
Table 5.1: Unemployment rate by gender and share of long term unemployed, per cent
Unemployment rate Share of long term
Year Males Females Total unemployeda
1992 10.7 8.7 9.8 ..
1993 13.2 10.4 11.9 ..
1994 11.8 9.4 10.7 43.2
1995 11.3 8.7 10.2 50.6
1996 10.7 8.8 9.9 54.4
1997 9.5 7.8 8.7 51.3
1998 8.5 7.0 7.8 48.8
1999 7.5 6.3 7.0 49.5
2000 7.0 5.6 6.4 49.1
2001 6.3 5.0 5.7 46.7
2002 6.1 5.4 5.8 44.9
2003 6.1 5.6 5.9 43.9
2004 6.1 6.1 6.1 45.0
2005 7.0 7.5 7.2 46.2
2006 7.1 7.9 7.5 46.9
2007 7.1 7.7 7.4 48.1
2008 7.7 8.0 7.8 48.1
2009 10.3 9.7 10.0 42.9
2010 11.6 10.7 11.2 50.6
2011 11.1 11.0 11.0 49.4
2012 11.3 10.6 11.0 47.0
2013 10.2 10.1 10.2 50.4
2014 7.6 7.9 7.7 49.5
2015 6.6 7.0 6.8 47.6
2016 5.1 5.1 5.1 48.4
2017 3.8 4.6 4.2 42.6
2018 3.5 4.0 3.7 41.0
aLong term unemployed are those who have been without work for 12 months or more, ex-
cluding those who start a new job within 90 days.
Note: Conscripted soldiers are included in the denominator.
Source: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent05_01
12
Females
Per cent
9
Males
3
1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Source: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena05_01
192
5 Unemployment
Table 5.3: Composition of the unemployed by level of education, males, per cent
8 grades of primary Vocational Secondary College,
Total
Year school or less school school university
2000 32.9 45.8 17.9 3.4 100.0
2001 36.5 43.2 17.5 2.8 100.0
2002 36.7 43.3 16.7 3.3 100.0
2003 34.0 44.7 17.2 4.1 100.0
2004 33.9 42.6 18.6 4.9 100.0
2005 32.1 43.1 19.0 5.8 100.0
2006 33.4 40.3 19.9 6.4 100.0
2007 35.1 38.6 20.4 5.9 100.0
2008 35.9 39.4 19.2 5.5 100.0
2009 31.2 40.5 21.7 6.6 100.0
2010 30.3 40.5 21.1 8.1 100.0
2011 29.4 41.1 21.9 7.6 100.0
2012 28.1 39.3 24.9 7.6 100.0
2013 29.2 39.3 24.4 7.1 100.0
2014 30.6 37.0 24.5 7.9 100.0
2015 33.4 34.9 24.5 7.2 100.0
2016 34.9 33.2 24.6 7.3 100.0
2017 35.7 33.7 22.5 8.1 100.0
2018 35.6 32.8 24.2 7.4 100.0
Source: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent05_03
193
Statistical data
Table 5.5: Composition of the unemployed by level of education, females, per cent
8 grades of primary Vocational Secondary College,
Total
Year school or less school school university
2000 31.8 28.2 35.0 5.0 100.0
2001 33.7 28.0 32.2 6.1 100.0
2002 33.2 26.0 32.2 8.5 100.0
2003 32.7 28.3 32.0 7.0 100.0
2004 27.8 27.4 34.2 10.6 100.0
2005 28.2 27.1 35.2 9.5 100.0
2006 31.8 27.9 32.3 8.0 100.0
2007 31.3 27.2 31.6 9.9 100.0
2008 32.3 24.7 33.0 10.0 100.0
2009 31.8 26.4 30.6 11.2 100.0
2010 30.5 24.4 34.3 10.7 100.0
2011 30.8 24.1 33.9 11.2 100.0
2012 29.8 23.8 33.5 12.9 100.0
2013 28.5 25.6 33.4 12.5 100.0
2014 30.5 23.1 33.4 13.0 100.0
2015 33.5 24.1 31.2 11.3 100.0
2016 32.4 24.9 31.8 10.9 100.0
2017 33.0 22.2 33.1 11.7 100.0
2018 32.8 20.8 33.0 13.4 100.0
Source: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent05_05
194
5 Unemployment
Figure 5.2: Intensity of quarterly flows between labour market status, population between 15–64 years
Employment Unemployment Inactivity
100 100 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4
90 90
3 3 3 3
Employment 80 80
2 2 2 2
70 70
1 1 1 1
60 60 0 0 0 0
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
25 25 100 100 25 25
20 20 20 20
90 90
15 15 15 15
Unemployment 80 80
10 10 10 10
70 70
5 5 5 5
0 0 60 60 0 0
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
5 5 5 5 100 100
4 4 4 4
90 90
3 3 3 3
Inactivity 80 80
2 2 2 2
70 70
1 1 1 1
0 0 0 0 60 60
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Note: The calculations were carried out for the age group between 15 –64 based on KSH la-
bour force survey microdata. The probability of transition is given by the number of people
who transitioned from one status to the other in the quarter, divided by the initial size of the
group in the previous quarter, which were then corrected to preserve the consistency of
stock flows. The red curves show the trend smoothed using a 4th degree polynomial.
Source: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena05_02
195
Statistical data
196
5 Unemployment
Figure 5.3: Unemployment rate by age groups, males aged 15 –59, quarterly
15–19 20–24 25–49 50–54 55–59
5
4
Log of the unemployment rate
0
1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Quarterly
Source: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena05_03
Figure 5.4: Unemployment rate by age groups, females aged 15 –59, quarterly
15–19 20–24 25–49 50–54 55–59
5
4
Log of the unemployment rate
0
1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Quarterly
Source: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena05_04
197
Statistical data
15
LFS unemployed
Per cent
10
Registered unemployed
0
1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Note: Since 1st of November, 2005: database of registered jobseekers.
Source: Registered unemployment/jobseekers: NFSZ; LFS unemployment: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena05_05
198
5 Unemployment
Table 5.8: Composition of the registered unemployeda by educational attainment, yearly averages, per cent
Educational
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
attainment
8 grades of primary
42.7 42.3 41.9 42.0 42.4 43.3 40.1 39.3 40.3 40.3 40.5 41.0 42.4 42.2 43.4 43.7
school or less
Vocational school 32.9 32.3 32.4 32.1 31.5 30.9 32.5 31.4 29.8 29.2 29.0 28.3 27.1 27.0 26.2 25.6
Vocational second-
13.1 13.4 13.5 13.4 13.3 13.1 14.4 15.0 14.9 15.1 15.3 15.3 15.0 14.9 14.6 14.7
ary school
Grammar school 7.5 7.7 7.9 8.0 8.2 8.2 8.5 9.1 9.5 9.7 9.8 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.3
College 2.7 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.2 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.4 3.4
University 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.4
Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
aSince 1st of November, 2005: registered jobseekers. From the 1st of November, 2005 the
Employment Act changed the definition of registered unemployed to registered jobseekers.
Source: NFSZ.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent05_08
Table 5.9: The distribution of registered unemployed school-leaversa
by educational attainment, yearly averages, per cent
Educational
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
attainment
8 grades of primary
34.7 35.2 36.1 38.2 40.1 41.3 37.7 35.2 35.6 34.9 35.5 39.4 43.8 44.9 45.8 45.1
school or less
Vocational school 20.4 20.2 20.5 19.7 18.1 17.3 18.9 18.9 18.5 19.8 20.1 18.3 16.9 16.6 16.4 15.7
Vocational second-
23.2 22.1 21.5 20.3 20.7 21.2 23.1 23.9 23.6 23.7 23.1 21.7 19.8 18.9 18.3 19.0
ary school
Grammar school 10.8 10.7 10.8 11.7 12.8 13.3 13.7 14.3 15.0 14.9 14.9 15.0 14.7 14.6 15.0 16.0
College 7.7 8.1 7.8 6.9 5.8 4.9 4.5 4.8 4.2 3.6 3.4 2.8 2.3 2.2 1.8 1.6
University 3.3 3.6 3.4 3.0 2.5 2.0 2.1 2.8 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.7 2.5 2.8 2.7 2.6
Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
aSince 1st of November, 2005: registered school-leaver jobseekers. From the 1st of November,
2005 the Employment Act changed the definition of registered unemployed to registered
jobseekers.
Source: NFSZ.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent05_09
199
Statistical data
Table 5.10: Registered unemployed by economic activity as observed in the LFS, per cent
Year Employed LFS-unemployed Inactive Total Year Employed LFS-unemployed Inactive Total
2001 6.5 45.2 48.3 100.0 2010 3.2 70.4 26.4 100.0
2002 4.4 47.4 48.2 100.0 2011 3.5 66.7 29.8 100.0
2003 9.4 44.1 46.5 100.0 2012 3.4 64.9 31.7 100.0
2004 3.0 53.5 43.5 100.0 2013 4.9 61.6 33.4 100.0
2005 2.3 59.7 38.0 100.0 2014 6.2 60.5 33.2 100.0
2006 3,0 60.9 36.1 100.0 2015 3.9 67.1 29.0 100.0
2007 3.7 62.2 34.1 100.0 2016 4.9 61.7 33.4 100.0
2008 3.9 62.8 33.2 100.0 2017 6.7 57.8 35.5 100.0
2009 3.7 67.1 29.2 100.0 2018 6.6 55.0 38.4 100.0
Note: The data pertain to those who consider themselves registered jobseekers in the KSH
MEF. From 1999 those who reported that their last contact with the employment centre was
more than two months ago were filtered from among those who reported themselves as reg-
istered unemployed.
Source: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent05_10
Table 5.11: Monthly entrants to the unemployment registera, monthly averages, in thousands
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
First time
11.2 10.4 10.0 10.5 10.8 8.6 8.0 7.1 8.3 7.2 6.6 7.5 7.3 6.3 5.5 5.0 4.6 4.4
entrants
Previously
45.8 45.6 44.8 47.3 50.0 42.2 43.4 46.9 60.7 58.1 64.3 62.0 58.2 63.1 52.1 46.5 43.3 39.8
registered
Together 57.0 56.0 54.8 57.8 60.7 50.8 51.4 54.0 69.0 65.3 70.9 69.5 65.5 69.4 57.6 51.5 47.9 44.2
aSince 1st of November, 2005: database of jobseekers. From the 1st of November, 2005 the
Employment Act changed the definition of registered unemployed to registered jobseekers.
Source: NFSZ REG.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent05_11
40
30
20
10
0
1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Source: NFSZ REG.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena05_06
200
5 Unemployment
Table 5.12: Selected time series of registered unemployment, monthly averages, in thousands and per cent
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Registered unemploymenta 409.5 390.5 364.1 344.7 357.2 375.9 409.9 393.5 426.9 442.3
Of which: School-leavers 29.9 26.0 26.8 28.5 31.3 33.8 40.9 38.7 40.4 41.4
Non school-leavers 379.6 364.4 337.4 316.2 325.9 342.2 369.1 354.7 386.5 400.9
Male 221.4 209.7 196.4 184.6 188.0 193.3 210.4 200.9 219.9 228.3
Female 188.1 180.8 167.7 160.1 169.2 182.6 199.5 192.5 207.0 214.0
25 years old and younger 85.4 79.1 75.6 71.1 71.6 71.4 78.9 75.8 80.3 75.9
Manual workers 336.8 321.2 302.0 286.3 296.2 308.5 336.2 321.9 .. ..
Non manual workers 72.7 69.3 62.1 58.4 61.0 67.4 73.7 71.6 .. ..
Unemployment benefit recipientsb 140.7 131.7 119.2 114.9 120.0 124.0 134.4 151.5 134.6 136.5e
Unemployment assistance recipientsc 148.6 143.5 131.2 113.4 116.2 120.4 133.4 121.8 133.0 147.5
Unemployment rated 9.7 9.3 8.5 8.0 8.3 8.7 9.4 9.0 9.7 10.0
Shares within registered unemployed, %
School-leavers 7.3 6.7 7.3 8.3 8.8 9.0 10.0 9.8 9.5 9.4
Male 54.1 53.7 53.9 53.5 52.6 51.4 51.3 51.1 51.5 51.6
25 years old and younger 20.9 20.3 20.8 20.6 20.0 19.0 19.2 16.5 18.8 17.2
Manual workers 82.3 82.2 82.9 83.1 82.9 82.1 82.0 81.8 .. ..
Flows, in thousands
Inflow to the Register 57.2 54.1 57.0 56.0 54.8 57.8 60.7 50.8 51.4 54.0
Of which: school-leavers 9.3 8.0 7.8 7.8 7.7 7.6 8.2 7.0 6.2 6.3
Outflow from the Register 57.2 56.8 59.4 55.8 53.5 54.4 59.8 51.4 48.4 51.3
Of which: school-leavers 9.4 8.2 7.7 7.5 7.6 7.1 7.9 7.1 6.0 6.2
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Registered unemploymenta 561.8 582.7 582.9 559.1 527.6 422.4 378.2 313.8 283.0 255.3
Of which: School-leavers 49.3 52.6 52.9 61.5 66.0 54.6 47.0 35.8 29.6 24.8
Non school-leavers 512.5 530.1 529.9 497.6 461.6 367.8 331.2 278.0 253.4 230.5
Male 297.9 305.0 297.1 275.8 267.7 214.2 187.5 156.0 137.9 122.4
Female 263.9 277.7 285.8 283.3 259.9 208.2 190.7 157.8 145.1 132.9
25 years old and younger 104.3 102.8 102.3 101.1 97.8 78.2 68.8 56.0 49.8 43.6
Manual workers .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
Non manual workers .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
Unemployment benefit recipientsb 202.1 187.7 159.9 71.1 61.2 56.4 57.1 60.2 63.1 64.0
Unemployment assistance recipientsc 156.0 167.8 182.1 200.3 184.4 132.4 126.2 99.8 87.4 75.7
Unemployment rated 12.8 13.3 13.2 12.6 11.9 9.5 8.5 6.9 6.1 5.5
Shares within registered unemployed, %
School-leavers 8.8 9.0 9.1 11.0 12.5 12.9 12.4 11.4 10.5 11.0
Male 53.0 52.3 51.0 49.3 50.8 50.7 49.6 49.7 48.7 47.9
25 years old and younger 18.6 17.6 17.5 18.1 18.5 18.5 18.2 17.8 17.6 17.1
Manual workers .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
Flows, in thousands
Inflow to the Register 69.0 65.3 70.9 69.5 65.5 69.4 57.6 51.5 47.9 44.2
Of which: school-leavers 7.5 7.9 8.2 10.0 10.8 11.2 9.0 7.7 6.7 5.9
Outflow from the Register 58.4 66.4 74.2 68.1 78.4 71.3 62.1 56.8 49.4 45.3
Of which: school-leavers 6.7 7.5 8.1 8.6 11.8 11.3 9.7 8.2 7.0 6.1
a Since 1st of November, 2005: registered jobseekers. (The data concern the closing date of
each month.) From the 1st of November, 2005 the Employment Act changed the definition
of registered unemployed to registered jobseekers.
b Since 1st of November, 2005: jobseeker benefit recipients. From September 1st, 2011, the
201
Statistical data
c Only recipients who are in the NFSZ register. Those receiving the discontinued income sup-
port supplement were included in the number of those receiving income support supplement
up to the year 2004, and in the number of those receiving regular social assistance from 2005
to 2008. From 2009, those receiving social assistance were included in a new support type,
the on call support. This allowance was replaced by the wage replacement support from Jan-
uary 1, 2011, then from September 1, 2011, the name was changed to employment substitu-
tion support.
d Relative index: registered unemployment rate in the economically active population. From
1st of November, 2005, registered jobseekers’ rate in the economically active population.
e The new IT system introduced at the NFSZ in 2008 made the methodological changes pos-
sible:
1) The filtering out of those returning after, or starting a break from, the number of those en-
tering or leaving the different types of jobseeking support. The main reasons for a break are,
work for short time periods, receipt of child support (GYES) or TGYÁS, or involvement in
training.
2) Taking into account in the previous period the number of those entrants, for whom the first
accounting of the jobseeking support was delayed due to missing documentation.
2008 data, comparable to 2009: 141.5 thousand people.
Source: NFSZ REG.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent05_12
202
5 Unemployment
Table 5.14: Benefit recipients and participation in active labour market programmes
Unemploy- Regular UA for Do not
Public Wage Other
ment social school- receive Retrainingc Total
workc subsidyc programmesc
Year benefita assistanceb leavers provision
In thousands 117.0 139.7 0.0 106.5 26.7 25.3 27.5 73.5 516.2
2000
Per cent 22.7 27.1 0.0 20.6 5.2 4.9 5.3 14.2 100.0
In thousands 111.8 113.2 0.0 105.2 29.0 30.0 25.8 37.2 452.2
2001
Per cent 24.7 25.0 0.0 23.3 6.4 6.6 5.7 8.2 100.0
In thousands 104.8 107.6 – 115.3 21.6 23.5 21.2 32.8 426.8
2002
Per cent 24.6 25.2 – 27.0 5.1 5.5 5.0 7.7 100.0
In thousands 105.1 109.5 – 125.0 21.2 22.5 20.1 36.6 440.0
2003
Per cent 23.9 24.9 – 28.4 4.8 5.1 4.6 8.3 100.0
In thousands 117.4 118.4 – 132.3 16.8 12.6 16.8 28.5 442.8
2004
Per cent 26.5 26.7 – 29.9 3.8 2.8 3.8 6.4 100.0
In thousands 125.6 127.8 – 140.2 21.5 14.7 20.8 31.0 481.6
2005
Per cent 26.1 26.5 – 29.1 4.5 3.1 4.3 6.4 100.0
In thousands 117.7 112.9 – 146.4 16.6 12.3 14.6 13.8 434.3
2006
Per cent 27.1 26.0 – 33.7 3.8 2.8 3.4 3.2 100.0
In thousands 128.0 133.1 – 151.8 19.3 14.6 23.4 6.8 477.0
2007
Per cent 27.6 28.7 – 32.7 2.7 2.3 3.7 2.3 100.0
In thousands 120.7d 145.7 – 158.2 21.2 21.2 25.0 14.1 506.1
2008
Per cent 23.8 28.8 – 31.3 4.2 4.2 4.9 2.8 100.0
In thousands 202.8 151.9 – 215.0 135.3 13.6 17.8 54.1 790.5
2009
Per cent 25.7 19.2 – 27.2 17.1 1.7 2.3 6.8 100.0
In thousands 159.6 163.5 – 222.4 164.5 17.8 26.7 40.3 794.8
2010
Per cent 20.1 20.6 – 28.0 20.7 2.2 3.4 5.1 100.0
In thousands 120.2 168.2 – 242.3 91.6 12.6 26.1 3.4 664.4
2011
Per cent 18.1 25.3 – 36.5 13.8 1.9 3.9 0.5 100.0
In thousands 54.0 185.6 – 283.4 134.1 28.6 25.7 2.9 714.3
2012
Per cent 7.6 26.0 – 39.7 18.8 4.0 3.6 0.4 100.0
In thousands 52.6 169.3 – 266.7 157.2 42.0e 31.7 3.9 723.4
2013
Per cent 7.3 23.4 – 36.9 21.7 5.8 4.4 0.5 100.0
In thousands 55.3 123.4 – 216.5 170.3 24.6 17.7 2.7 610.5
2014
Per cent 9.1 20.2 – 35.5 27.9 4.0 2.9 0.4 100.0
In thousands 55.0 110.6 – 168.7 224.9 11.0 9.1 2.1 581.4
2015
Per cent 9.5 19.0 – 29.0 38.7 1.9 1.6 0.4 100.0
In thousands 56.8 85.0 – 136.0 219.6 17.9 21.1 3.0 539.4
2016
Per cent 10.5 15.8 – 25.2 40.7 3.3 3.9 0.6 100.0
In thousands 59.5 80.8 – 120.0 171.0 17.2 30.9 4.2 483.6
2017
Per cent 12.3 16.7 – 24.8 35.4 3.6 6.4 0.9 100.0
In thousands 64.1 70.4 – 109.7 123.9 13.2 40.5 6.0 427.8
2018
Per cent 15.0 16.5 – 25.6 29.0 3.1 9.5 1.4 100.0
a Since 1st of November, 2005: jobseeker benefit recipients. From September 1, 2011, the system of jobseeking sup-
port changed.
b Only recipients who are in the NFSZ register. Those receiving the discontinued income support supplement were
included in the number of those receiving income support supplement up to the year 2004, and in the number of
those receiving regular social assistance from 2005 to 2008. From 2009, those receiving social assistance were in-
cluded in a new support type, the on call support. This allowance was replaced by the wage replacement support
from January 1, 2011, then from September 1, 2011., the name was changed to employment substitution support.
c Up to the year 2008 the number financed from the MPA Decentralized Base, since 2009 the number financed from
MPA, TAMOP.
Public-type employment: community service, public service, public work programmes.
203
Statistical data
Wage subsidy: wage subsidy, wage-cost subsidy, work experience acquisition assistance to career-starters, support
for employment of availability allowance recipients, part-time employment, wage support for those losing their
job due to the crisis.
Other support: job preservation support, support to would-be entrepreneurs, contribution to costs related to com-
muting to work, job creation support, jobseeker’s clubs.
d The new IT system introduced at the NFSZ in 2008 made the methodological changes possible:
1) The filtering out of those returning after a break or starting a break from the number of those entering or leaving
the different types of jobseeking support. The main reasons for a break are work for short time periods, receipt
of child support (GYES) or TGYÁS, or involvement in training.
2) Taking into account in the previous period the number of those entrants, for whom the first accounting of the
jobseeking support was delayed due to missing documentation.
2008 data, comparable to 2009: 134.1 thousand people.
e In 2013, 18.1 thousand trainees were simultaneously involved in public works programmes.
Note: The closing numbers from October of each year. For the percentage data, the sum of those registered and
those taking part in labour market programmes ≈100.0.
Source: NFSZ.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent05_14
Table 5.15: The ratio of those who are employed among the former participants of ALMPsa, per cent
Active labour mar-
2003b 2004b 2005b 2006b 2007b 2008b 2009c 2010c 2011c 2012c 2013c 2014c 2015c 2016c 2017c 2018c
ket programmes
Suggested training
43.0 45.5 43.8 41.1 37.5 42.2 40.4 49.4 42.6 44.9 55.1 61.4 54.8 47.8 48.2 44.2
programmesd
Accepted training
46.0 45.6 51.4 50.9 47.6 48.0 41.9 48.8 41.6 56.7 65.9 58.8 63.4 55.7 44.9 48.7
programmese
Retraining of those
93.3 92.1 90.4 .. 92.3 93.9 .. 59.9 75.0 65.7 72.7 61.4 87.7 41.7 92.2 93.8
who are employedf
Support for self-
89.6 90.7 89.6 86.4 87.6 83.6 73.1 76.4 71.5 72.6 74.1 76.3 81.0 40.0 30.8 33.7
employmentg
Wage subsidy
62.0 64.6 62.6 62.3 63.4 65.0 72.4 90.9 69.6 70.3 73.0 56.0 70.9 53.5 28.6 30.2
programmesh
Work experience
66.1 66.5 66.8 66.6 66.3 74.6 .. .. 72.0 69.9 68.5 – – – – –
programmesi
Further employment
78.2 71.5 70.9 65.0 77.5 – – – – – – – – – – –
programmej
a The data relate to people having completed their courses successfully.
b Three months after the end of programmes.
c Six months after the end of programmes.
d Suggested training: group training programmes for jobseekers organized by the NFSZ.
e Accepted training: participation in programmes initiated by the jobseekers and accepted by NFSZ for full or
partial support.
f Training for employed persons: training for those whose jobs are at risk of termination, if new knowledge allows
mum HUF 3 million lump sum support (to be repaid or not), aimed at helping them become individual entrepre-
neurs or self-employed.
h Wage support: aimed at helping the employment of disadvantaged persons, who would not be able to, or would
have a harder time finding work without support. The data on wage subsidies and labour cost subsidies exclude
the programs supporting job seeking school leavers and student work during summer vacation.
i Work experience-gaining support: the support of new entrants with no work experience for 6 –9 months, the
amount of the support is equal to 50 –80% of the wage costs. The instrument was discontinued after December
31, 2006.. In 2009 they reintroduced the work experience gaining support for skilled new entrants, for employers
who ensure employment of at least 4 hours a day and for 365 days. The amount of the support is 50 –100% of the
wage cost. Monitoring for the first exiters is available from 2011. The program supporting the school to work
transition of skilled school leavers was abolished in 2014.
j Further employment programmes: to support the continued employment of new entrants under the age of 25 for
204
5 Unemployment
supplement were included in the number of those receiving income support supplement up to the
year 2004, and in the number of those receiving regular social assistance from 2005 to 2008. From
2009, those receiving social assistance were included in a new support type, the on call support.
This allowance was replaced by the wage replacement support from January 1, 2011, then from
September 1, 2011, the name was changed to employment substitution support.
d After 1st of November, 2005: jobseeking support. Does not contain those receiving unemploy-
ment aid prior to pension in 2004. From the 1st of September 2011, the system of jobseeking sup-
port changed.
e The new IT system introduced at the NFSZ in 2008 made the methodological changes possible:
1) The filtering out of those returning after or starting a break from the number of those entering or
leaving the different types of jobseeking support. The main reasons for a break are, work for short
time periods, receipt of child support (GYES) or TGYÁS, or involvement in training.
2) Taking into account in the previous period the number of those entrants, for whom the first ac-
counting of the jobseeking support was delayed due to missing documentation.
The right-hand column of 2008 contains the 2008 data in a form comparable to the 2009 data.
Note: Data from the closing date of June in each year.
Source: NFSZ.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent05_16
205
Statistical data
lic works participants in 2013, 143,275 public works participants in 2014, 50,124 public
works participants in 2015, 29,686 public works participants in 2016, 40,432 public works
participants in 2017, 32,735 public works participants in 2018).
Source: NFSZ.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent05_18
206
5 Unemployment
207
Statistical data
Table 5.21: The distribution of those entering training programmes by age groups and educational level
Training Training for public works participants Together
2015 2016 2017 2018 2015 2016 2017 2018 2015 2016 2017 2018
Total number of entrants 12,016 17,312 18,958 32,171 28,036 26,361 31,508 32,735 40,052 43,673 50,466 64,906
By age groups, %
–20 11.5 5.7 7.5 7.4 4.8 7.1 6.3 5.5 6.8 6.5 6.7 6.4
20–24 39.3 15.1 17.7 16.4 15.8 11.4 10.7 9 22.8 12.9 13.3 12.7
25–44 35.8 56.4 51.4 52.2 49.5 47.5 47.1 47.8 45.4 51.0 48.7 50.0
45–49 6.0 10.8 10.4 10.8 10.5 12.2 12.9 13.1 9.2 11.6 12.0 12.0
50+ 7.4 12.0 13.0 13.1 19.4 21.9 23.0 24.7 15.8 17.9 19.2 18.9
Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
By level of education, %
Less than primary school 0.8 1.1 2.2 2.2 6.9 15.6 16.0 16.3 5.1 9.9 10.8 9.3
Primary school 35.2 35.1 38.8 36.2 44.6 78.8 75.2 71.3 41.8 61.4 61.6 53.9
Vocational school 19.7 22.4 21.8 21.4 21.5 1.8 5.7 7.9 21.0 10.0 11.7 14.6
Vocational and technical
23.5 21.7 18.7 20.2 14.0 1.9 1.6 2.4 16.8 9.8 8.0 11.2
secondary school
Grammar school 17.8 15.1 14.9 15.8 9.4 1.6 1.3 1.9 11.9 7.0 6.4 8.8
College, university 3.0 4.6 3.6 4.2 3.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 3.4 2.0 1.4 2.2
Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Source: NFSZ.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent05_21
208
6 Wages
Figure 6.1: Annual changes of gross nominal and net real earnings
30
Gross earnings index Real earnings index
25
20
15
10
5
Per cent
0
–5
–10
–15
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Source: KSH IMS (earnings) and consumer price accounting STADAT (2018. 02. 20. version).
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena06_01
209
Statistical data
210
6 Wages
211
Statistical data
Figure 6.2: The percentage of low paid workers by gender, per cent
Males Females Together
30
25
20
Per cent
15
10
5
1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Source: NFSZ BT.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena06_02
212
6 Wages
Table 6.4: Percentage of low paid workersa by gender, age groups, level of education and industries
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
By gender
Males 20.7 22.3 24.8 25.1 25.4 26.7 21.9 21.2 21.1 21.2 20.5 15.5 16.2 18.8 18.3 19.2 10.0 11.1
Females 25.0 22.5 21.6 22.8 22.9 21.9 21.3 20.8 21.7 21.2 20.8 18.2 17.0 17.6 20.0 19.8 9.8 12.2
By age groups
–24 35.5 37.6 39.9 43.9 44.2 46.3 40.1 34.6 38.9 38.2 36.6 26.4 30.9 29.7 31.2 31.7 16.4 16.4
25–54 21.9 21.8 22.3 23.6 24.0 24.2 21.4 20.6 21.0 20.9 20.4 16.3 16.3 18.0 18.5 19.0 9.3 10.6
55+ 18.1 16.2 15.3 16.5 16.5 16.4 15.8 15.5 17.6 18.1 17.6 17.0 14.3 16.4 18.5 18.7 10.7 14.0
By level of education
8 grades of primary
40.4 38.3 37.1 39.6 41.2 40.1 41.4 41.3 47.4 43.4 45.4 38.6 38.7 41.1 42.1 40.1 36.6 32.6
school or less
Vocational school 29.4 32.1 35.4 35.7 36.8 37.9 32.9 32.1 33.5 33.3 31.3 25.2 24.0 27.5 28.3 30.0 14.0 14.4
Secondary school 18.0 16.5 17.7 18.6 18.6 19.7 16.1 15.4 16.4 17.3 17.2 13.7 15.3 17.0 18.4 19.1 5.9 6.3
Higher education 4.7 3.6 3.5 3.9 3.8 4.3 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.9 2.7 2.0 2.5 3.0 2.9 3.9 0.9 1.4
By industriesb
Agriculture, forestry,
34.3 37.9 37.3 37.1 37.5 41.6 37.9 36.6 36.7 34.6 31.8 21.8 26.3 28.2 25.8 24.6 15.2 18.5
fishing
Manufacturing 19.1 19.4 25.4 24.7 22.1 24.1 20.8 23.5 23.0 20.5 19.4 13.7 14.1 16.7 15.1 15.9 10.9 9.8
Construction 41.7 44.8 49.8 51.2 50.2 55.2 43.1 37.5 38.1 43.0 41.9 31.8 35.9 43.8 41.0 44.7 22.8 24.0
Trade, repairing 41.3 44.0 49.0 49.3 51.5 49.4 40.9 35.9 35.2 36.4 35.2 24.2 27.3 28.9 31.3 31.8 13.5 12.2
Transport, storage,
10.6 10.5 13.6 12.6 13.8 15.1 13.2 14.6 11.2 13.3 13.1 10.1 11.6 14.9 13.8 13.6 8.7 10.5
communication
Financial interme-
22.6 20.7 23.1 23.9 24.6 26.2 20.9 20.0 20.5 20.7 19.6 15.0 16.6 19.0 16.5 18.7 9.8 9.2
diation
Public administra-
tion and defence,
13.8 9.3 6.6 8.2 6.0 6.3 7.4 6.7 8.7 8.8 9.8 13.4 9.1 11.8 15.3 13.2 3.9 11.0
compulsory social
security
Education 22.6 16.0 4.8 6.9 8.8 6.1 9.0 7.2 11.9 10.6 11.2 16.3 14.9 10.2 15.7 13.8 3.1 12.7
Health and social
19.9 16.1 6.3 8.4 10.3 8.6 12.6 11.1 14.5 13.8 14.3 18.2 13.6 9.2 14.6 14.8 8.0 11.3
work
Total 22.8 22.4 23.2 24.0 24.2 24.3 21.6 21.0 21.4 21.2 20.7 16.8 16.6 18.3 19.1 19.5 9.9 11.5
a Percentage of those who earn less than 2/3 of the median earning amount.
b 2001–2008: by TEÁOR’03, 2009: by TEÁOR’08.
213
Statistical data
1
1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Source: NFSZ BT.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena06_03
Figure 6.4: Age-income profiles by education level in 1998 and 2016, women and men
Males Females
Primary school Vocational school Secondary school College, university
700,000 700,000
1998 1998
600,000 600,000
500,000 500,000
400,000 400,000
300,000 300,000
200,000 200,000
100,000 100,000
0 0
20 30 40 50 60 20 30 40 50 60
700,000 700,000
2016 2016
600,000 600,000
500,000 500,000
400,000 400,000
300,000 300,000
200,000 200,000
100,000 100,000
0 0
20 30 40 50 60 20 30 40 50 60
Age
Source: NFSZ BT.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena06_04
214
6 Wages
Figure 6.5: The dispersion of the logarithm of gross real earnings (2016 = 100%)
Males Females
1992 2.0 2.0
1.5 1.5
1.0 1.0
0.5 0.5
0.0 0.0
11 12 13 14 11 12 13 14
1.5 1.5
1.0 1.0
0.5 0.5
0.0 0.0
11 12 13 14 11 12 13 14
1.5 1.5
1.0 1.0
0.5 0.5
0.0 0.0
11 12 13 14 11 12 13 14
1.5 1.5
1.0 1.0
0.5 0.5
0.0 0.0
11 12 13 14 11 12 13 14
Source: NFSZ BT.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena06_05
215
Statistical data
Figure 7.1: Full time students as a percentage of the different age groups
100
80
60 2018
Per cent
40 1993
20
0
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Age
Source: KSH STADAT (Education – Time series of annual data).
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena07_01
216
7 Education
Note: In secondary schools number of students in 9th grade. In tertiary education number of
students in 1st grade, from 2013/2014 school year number of new entrants.
Source: KSH STADAT (Education – Time series of annual data).
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent07_02
Figure 7.2: Flows of the educational system by level
Outflow Inflow
200,000 200,000
Primary school Vocational school
150,000 150,000
100,000 100,000
50,000 50,000
Pupils/students
Pupils/students
0 0
1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018
200,000 200,000
Secondary school University, college
150,000 150,000
100,000 100,000
50,000 50,000
0 0
1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018
Source: KSH STADAT (Education – Time series of annual data).
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena07_02
217
Statistical data
Note: In secondary schools number of students in 9th grade. In tertiary education number of
students in 1st grade, from 2013/2014 school year number of new entrants.
Source: KSH STADAT (Education – Time series of annual data).
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent07_03
218
7 Education
Note: In secondary schools number of students in 9th grade. In tertiary education number of
students in 1st grade, from 2013/2014 school year number of new entrants.
Source: KSH STADAT (Education – Time series of annual data).
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent07_04
219
Statistical data
220
8 Labour demand indicators
Table 8.1: The number of vacanciesa reported to the local offices of the NFSZ
Number of vacancies at closing date Number of registered Vacancies
Of which: public unemployedb per 100 registered
Total at closing date unemployedb
Year works participants
1992 21,793 – 556,965 3.9
1993 34,375 – 671,745 5.1
1994 35,569 – 568,366 6.3
1995 28,680 – 507,695 5.6
1996 38,297 – 500,622 7.6
1997 42,544 – 470,112 9.0
1998 46,624 – 423,121 11.0
1999 51,438 – 409,519 12.6
2000 50,000 – 390,492 12.8
2001 45,194 – 364,140 12.4
2002 44,603 – 344,715 12.9
2003 47,239 – 357,212 13.2
2004 48,223 – 375,950 12.8
2005 41,615 – 409,929 10.2
2006 41,677 – 393,465 10.6
2007 29,933 – 426,915 7.0
2008 25,364 – 442,333 5.7
2009 20,739 – 561,768 3.7
2010 22,241 – 582,664 3.8
2011 41,123 – 582,868 7.1
2012 35,850 18,669 559,102 6.4
2013 51,524 27,028 527,624 9.8
2014 75,444 37,840 422,445 16.4
2015 73,122 34,591 378,181 19.3
2016 96,841 49,405 313,782 30.9
2017 88,243 43,659 282,970 31.2
2018 85,641 33,736 255,310 33.5
aMonthly average stock figures.
bSince 1st of November, 2005: registered jobseekers.
Source: NFSZ.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent08_01
Figure 8.1: The number of vacancies reported to the local offices of the NFSZ
100,000
80,000
60,000
40,000
20,000
0
1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Source: NFSZ.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena08_01
221
Statistical data
Note: The data include vacancies posted in the Public Works program.
Source: NFSZ.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent08_02
222
8 Labour demand indicators
40
Per cent
30
20
10
1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018
Source: NFSZ PROG.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena08_02
223
Statistical data
Note: The territorial code system was modified on 1 January 2018. The modification was justi-
fied by international and national legislative changes. Based on the changes, Budapest and
Pest county are also planning and statistical regions, while Central Hungary became exclu-
sively a statistical large region.
Source: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent09_01
Figure 9.1: Regional inequalities: Labour force participation rates,
gross monthly earnings and gross domestic product in NUTS-2 level regions
Labour force participation (2018)
Gross domestic product (2017) Gross monthly earnings (2018)
200 400,000
150 350,000
Per cent
100 300,000
HUF
50 250,000
0 200,000
Central Hungary Western Transdanubia Nothern Hungary Southern Great Plain
Central Transdanubia Southern Transdanubia Nothern Great Plain
Source: Employment rate: KSH MEF; gross domestic product: KSH; earnings: NFSZ BT.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena09_01
224
9 Regional inequalities
Note: The territorial code system was modified on 1 January 2018. The modification was justi-
fied by international and national legislative changes. Based on the changes, Budapest and
Pest county are also planning and statistical regions, while Central Hungary became exclu-
sively a statistical large region.
Source: KSH MEF.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent09_02
Figure 9.2: Regional inequalities: LFS-based unemployment rates in NUTS-2 level regions
16.1
9.0 6.6
3.1
2.2 2.2
12.4
12.8 2.0
3.3
1993 5.6
225
Statistical data
ous year.
Source: NFSZ REG.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent09_03
Figure 9.3: Regional inequalities: The share of registered unemployed
relative to the economically active population, per cent, in NUTS-2 level regions
19.1
18.2
8.0
2018
12.8 13.1
11.8
9.1
3.7
4.7
14.7
13.1 3.6
7.0
1993 9.8
226
9 Regional inequalities
Table 9.4: Annual average registered unemployment ratea by counties, per centb
County 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Budapest 3.0 2.6 2.2 2.4 2.8 2.9 2.6 3.0 3.1 4.6 5.9 6.2 6.1 5.8 4.5 4.0 3.0 2.2 1.8
Baranya 11.6 11.1 11.2 11.9 11.6 13.4 13.3 12.9 13.6 14.7 17.1 16.6 16.4 15.0 9.1 11.6 9.6 6.3 8.1
Bács-Kiskun 10.0 9.3 8.8 9.4 9.9 10.4 10.2 11.4 12.0 17.9 15.6 14.8 13.7 13.3 15.8 9.7 7.3 8.6 5.5
Békés 13.1 11.9 11.2 11.5 12.0 13.0 13.5 15.0 14.8 17.3 18.1 17.8 15.8 14.8 12.0 9.6 8.2 7.6 7.0
Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén 20.3 19.0 19.1 19.6 18.3 18.9 18.0 19.9 20.1 23.1 23.7 23.5 22.9 20.9 19.6 16.6 14.0 13.2 12.3
Csongrád 8.6 8.3 8.1 8.5 9.7 10.7 8.8 9.2 9.3 11.6 12.4 11.5 11.5 11.0 8.5 7.2 5.6 4.6 3.9
Fejér 7.2 6.4 6.4 7.1 7.3 7.4 7.3 7.1 7.5 11.5 12.4 12.1 10.8 10.1 7.6 6.6 5.1 4.5 4.0
Győr-Moson-Sopron 4.6 4.1 4.0 4.1 4.6 5.4 4.6 4.1 4.1 6.9 6.8 5.7 5.0 4.6 2.9 2.4 1.9 1.6 1.3
Hajdú-Bihar 14.7 13.6 12.8 13.1 12.9 14.0 13.9 15.6 16.5 19.1 20.3 20.7 19.9 18.6 16.1 14.1 11.5 10.3 9.4
Heves 12.0 10.6 9.8 10.0 10.6 11.3 11.1 12.2 12.7 15.8 16.1 16.1 15.7 15.0 11.9 11.5 9.8 9.0 7.9
Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok 13.4 11.5 10.2 10.7 11.2 12.0 11.4 11.8 12.2 15.5 16.4 18.1 16.8 15.4 13.4 12.0 10.3 9.2 8.1
Komárom-Esztergom 8.3 7.0 6.7 6.0 5.8 6.8 5.8 5.4 5.5 10.2 10.4 9.5 8.9 8.7 6.5 5.7 4.1 3.8 3.3
Nógrád 14.9 14.3 13.8 14.6 14.6 16.1 16.1 17.7 17.8 21.2 22.0 22.9 23.9 21.7 19.1 17.4 15.3 13.9 12.0
Pest 5.2 4.4 3.7 3.7 3.8 4.2 3.9 4.3 4.4 6.7 7.7 7.6 7.4 7.2 6.2 5.5 4.7 3.9 3.2
Somogy 11.9 11.6 11.5 12.2 13.4 14.5 14.6 16.2 16.9 19.4 18.9 18.3 18.2 17.1 16.1 13.8 11.6 11.2 10.3
Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg 19.5 17.8 16.7 17.7 17.5 18.6 18.8 21.0 22.4 24.7 24.8 26.0 25.0 23.0 19.5 16.0 13.0 12.0 11.0
Tolna 11.8 11.0 10.0 10.7 11.6 11.8 10.5 11.5 12.1 15.2 14.7 14.2 13.7 13.7 11.1 9.3 7.7 7.2 6.0
Vas 5.2 4.9 4.5 5.0 6.0 6.8 6.1 6.2 6.1 9.8 9.6 7.7 6.7 6.9 5.1 4.3 3.5 3.5 3.3
Veszprém 7.2 6.9 6.6 7.0 7.3 8.0 7.7 8.0 8.2 12.6 12.3 10.8 9.6 9.4 6.9 5.9 4.5 3.9 3.6
Zala 7.2 6.5 6.4 7.0 7.4 9.3 9.0 9.3 9.4 13.0 12.9 11.7 11.6 12.3 9.6 7.8 6.3 5.8 5.2
Total 9.3 8.5 8.0 8.3 8.7 9.4 9.0 9.7 10.0 12.8 13.3 13.2 12.6 11.9 9.8 8.5 6.9 6.2 5.5
a Since 1st of November, 2005: the ratio of registered jobseekers. From the 1st of November,
2005 the Employment Act changed the definition of registered unemployed to registered
jobseekers.
b The denominator of the ratio is the economically active population on January 1st of the
previous year.
Source: NFSZ REG.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent09_04
Figure 9.4: Regional inequalities:
Means of registered unemployment rates in the counties, 2018
12.3
12.0 11.0
7.9
1.3 3.3
1.8 9.4
3.2
3.3 8.1
3.6 4.0
5.2 7.0
5.5
10.3 6.0
3.9
8.1
227
Statistical data
Note: The data refer to full-time employees in the budgetary sector and firms employing at
least 5 workers, respectively.
Source: NFSZ BT.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent09_05
Table 9.6: Regression-adjusted earnings differentials
Central Western Southern Northern Northern Southern
Year
Hungary Transdanubia Transdanubia Hungary Great Plain Great Plain
2002 0.0903 –0.0378 –0.1120 –0.0950 –0.1170 –0.1070
2003 0.0493 –0.0542 –0.1220 –0.1220 –0.1400 –0.1410
2004 0.0648 –0.0313 –0.1410 –0.0953 –0.1400 –0.1270
2005 0.0291 –0.0372 –0.1310 –0.1010 –0.1450 –0.1390
2006 0.0478 –0.0170 –0.1640 –0.0922 –0.1480 –0.1130
2007 0.0528 –0.0926 –0.1520 –0.1340 –0.1610 –0.1420
2008 0.0438 –0.0751 –0.1730 –0.1320 –0.1780 –0.1630
2009 0.0766 –0.0377 –0.1250 –0.1170 –0.1380 –0.1500
2010 0.0704 –0.0758 –0.1450 –0.1200 –0.1620 –0.1500
2011 0.0893 –0.0604 –0.1020 –0.0863 –0.1340 –0.1170
2012 0.0664 –0.0361 –0.0750 –0.0947 –0.1140 –0.1170
2013 0.0267 –0.0605 –0.1120 –0.1140 –0.1540 –0.1320
2014 0.0203 –0.0474 –0.1250 –0.1150 –0.1390 –0.1330
2015 0.0303 –0.0145 –0.0990 –0.0920 –0.1290 –0.1180
2016 0.0414 –0.0321 –0.1420 –0.1670 –0.1900 –0.1410
Note: the results indicate the earnings differentials of the various groups relative to the refer-
ence group in log points (approximately percentage points). All parameters are significant at
the 0.01 level.
Reference category: women, with leaving certificate (general education certificate), not in the
public sector, working in the Central-Transdanubia region.
Source: NFSZ BT.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent09_06
228
9 Regional inequalities
229
Statistical data
Note: The ratio of registered unemployed was calculated using the following method: number
of registered unemployed divided by the permanent population of age 15 –64. The number
of registered unemployed is a quarterly average. The permanent population data is annual.
Source: Registered unemployed: NFSZ IR. Population: KSH T-Star.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena09_05
Note: The ratio of registered unemployed was calculated using the following method: number
of registered unemployed divided by the permanent population of age 15 –64. The number
of registered unemployed is a quarterly average. The permanent population data is from the
year 2017 (since 2018 data is not yet available).
Source: Registered unemployed: NFSZ IR. Population: KSH T-Star.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena09_06
230
9 Regional inequalities
Note: The ratio of registered unemployed was calculated using the following method: number
of registered unemployed divided by the permanent population of age 15 –64. The number
of registered unemployed is a quarterly average. The permanent population data is annual.
Source: Registered unemployed: NFSZ IR. Population: KSH T-Star.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena09_07
Note: The ratio of registered unemployed was calculated using the following method: number
of registered unemployed divided by the permanent population of age 15 –64. The number
of registered unemployed is a quarterly average. The permanent population data is from the
year 2017 (since 2018 data is not yet available).
Source: Registered unemployed: NFSZ IR. Population: KSH T-Star.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ena09_08
231
Statistical data
232
10 Industrial relations
Table 10.7: The number of firm wage agreementsa, the number of affected firms,
and the number of employees covered
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Number of agreements 214 202 785 905 888 863 874 876 867 878 873 874
Number of persons covered 171,259 100,206 377,677 414,522 416,562 415,751 422,887 384,182 424,914 437,238 368,021 336,288
aUntil 2008, the data relate to the number of ’wage agreements’ concerning the next year’s
average wage increase, in the typical case. In and after 2009, the figures relate to resolutions
within collective agreements, which affect the remuneration of workers (including long-
term agreements on wage supplements, bonuses, premia, non-wage benefits and rights and
responsibilities connected with wage payments).
Source: PM, Employment Relations Information System.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent10_07
233
Statistical data
Table 10.8: The number of multi-employer wage agreementsa, the number of affected firms,
and the number of covered companies and employees
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Number of agreements 40 45 62 68 68 73 74 74 74 73 70 72
Number of companies 147 150 2,350 2,460 2,199 2,219 1,096 2,886 3,700 1,833 1,833 1,830
Number of persons covered 33,735 40,046 191,258 211,753 180,131 191,013 160,092 208,128 289,154 199,779 165,789 165,293
aUntil 2008, the data relate to the number of ’wage agreements’ concerning the next year’s
average wage increase, in the typical case. In and after 2009, the figures relate to resolutions
within collective agreements, which affect the remuneration of workers (including long-
term agreements on wage supplements, bonuses, premia, non-wage benefits and rights and
responsibilities connected with wage payments).
Source: PM, Employment Relations Information System.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent10_08
Table 10.9: The share of employees covered by collective agreements, percenta
Multi-employer collective agreements Single employer collective agreements
in the business sectorb in the national economy
Industries 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Agriculture 21.12 40.83 36.90 35.88 37.33 9.87 21.81 15.77 14.34 14.99
Mining and quarrying 5.35 6.87 16.02 16.21 14.08 40.46 58.42 52.92 35.02 30.41
Manufacturing 11.94 10.82 11.15 8.96 8.73 25.86 27.28 27.14 21.61 21.16
Electricity, gas, steam and air condi-
73.69 78.50 89.54 84.24 87.06 53.19 58.00 55.15 52.27 55.21
tioning supply
Water supply; sewerage, waste man-
27.10 35.25 43.26 42.61 42.64 46.57 59.09 57.08 53.44 55.43
agement and remediation activities
Construction 98.00 98.91 98.54 98.56 98.89 6.65 6.63 5.57 3.80 3.47
Wholesale and retail trade; repair of
6.88 7.56 6.65 5.84 5.54 7.71 7.34 6.81 5.03 4.57
motor vehicles and motorcycles
Transportation and storage 37.38 42.22 50.17 57.91 33.59 54.40 59.69 61.93 69.12 66.06
Accommodation and food service
87.66 93.51 94.02 93.26 93.05 6.24 5.62 5.75 2.94 2.59
activities
Information and communication 0.81 0.74 0.58 0.28 0.26 19.19 20.81 17.64 15.04 13.69
Financial and insurance activities 5.36 5.85 5.94 6.05 5.95 32.89 37.50 37.05 36.78 36.72
Real estate activities 17.36 16.77 16.81 1.38 1.39 26.14 26.82 29.89 5.68 5.79
Professional, scientific and technical
4.49 5.39 4.20 0.85 0.80 12.78 10.37 7.45 4.71 4.16
activities
Administrative and support service
7.06 6.30 6.24 3.96 3.59 8.17 6.18 5.87 2.63 2.40
activities
Public administration and defence;
.. .. .. 0.00 0.00 15.55 7.27 9.75 3.82 12.62
compulsory social security
Education 4.81 5.43 2.27 2.32 2.65 44.98 70.79 68.30 61.75 15.55
Human health and social work activi-
.. .. .. 0.00 0.00 36.38 26.50 27.36 24.35 26.79
ties
Arts, entertainment and recreation 0.14 0.09 0.02 0.00 0.00 22.99 21.68 23.51 21.15 19.10
Other service activities 1.46 7.58 2.54 1.52 1.66 6.88 11.80 12.58 11.18 10.86
National economy, total 21.51 20.85 23.66 22.14 20.32 24.59 25.84 25.99 22.14 18.18
aPercentage share of employees covered by collective agreements.
bIn the observed period only a single multi-employer collective agreement was in effect in
the public sector.
Source: PM, Employment Relations Information System, Register of Collective Agreements.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent10_09
234
10 Industrial relations
235
Statistical data
236
11 Welfare provisions
able by the PES. Since 1st of January 2009 two types of social assistance exist; group 1 receive
social benefit, while group 2 receive ‘availability assistance’, conditional on acceptance of job
offers provided by the PES. From the 1st of January 2011, the second type of benefit was re-
named as ‘wage replacement allowance’. On 1st of September 2011 the name changed again to
‘non-employment subsidy’. These welfare payments are regulated in Law 1993. III.
c The average net wage refers to the entire economy, competitive sector: firms with at least 4
employees.
Source: NFSZ: Labour Market Report, 2001. KSH: Welfare systems 2007, Welfare Statistics, Year-
book of Demographics. KSH Social Statistics Yearbooks. KSH STADAT.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent11_02
237
Statistical data
Table 11.3.a: Number of those receiving pensiona, and the mean sum of the provisions
they received in January of the given year
Old age pension Disability pension under and above retirement age
Number of Average amount before Average amount Number of Average amount before Average amount
Year recipients increase, HUF after increase, HUF recipients increase, HUF after increase, HUF
2000 1,671,090 33,258 35,931 762,514 29,217 31,556
2001 1,667,945 37,172 41,002 772,286 32,381 35,705
2002 1,664,062 43,368 47,561 789,544 37,369 40,972
2003 1,657,271 50,652 54,905 799,966 43,185 46,801
2004 1,637,847 57,326 60,962 806,491 48,180 51,220
2005 1,643,409 63,185 67,182 808,107 52,259 55,563
2006 1,658,387 69,145 72,160 806,147 56,485 58,935
2007 1,676,477 74,326 78,577 802,506 59,978 63,120
2008 1,716,315 81,975 87,481 794,797 65,036 69,160
2009 1,731,213 90,476 93,256 779,130 70,979 73,166
2010 1,719,001 94,080 98,804 750,260 73,687 77,500
2011 1,700,800 99,644 104,014 721,973 77,945 81,367
2012 1,959,202b 99,931 104,610 302,990c .. ..
a Pension: Excludes survivors pensions.
b From 2012 onwards, the disability pensions of persons older than the mandatory retirement
age are granted as old-age pensions.
c Excludes persons older than the mandatory retirement age.
Source: MÁK.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent11_03a
Table 11.3.b: Number of those receiving pensiona, and the mean sum of the provisions
they received in January of the given year
2015 2016 2017 2018
Average Average Average Average
Number of amount after Number of amount after Number of amount after Number of amount after
recipients increase recipients increase recipients increase recipients increase
Type of benefit (HUF/month) (HUF/month) (HUF/month) (HUF/month)
Old age pension 2,022,905 118,439 2,014,666 121,041 2,045,738 123,725 2,027,256 129,637
Of which:
–old age pension of persons
above the mandatory retire- 1,894,897 118,194 1,870,457 120,930 1,901,565 123,799 1,876,148 129,801
ment ageb
–pension for women entitled
to retire before the manda-
tory age after having accu- 122,253 117,926 139,639 119,457 141,904 121,184 149,971 126,797
mulated at least 40 accrual
years
–old age pension of persons
younger than the mandatory 5,755 210,014 4,570 215,017 2,269 220,526 1,137 233,700
retirement age
a Pension: Excludes survivors pensions. From 2012 onwards, no old-age pension is granted to
persons younger than the mandatory retirement age. Exceptions are pensions for women
having accumulated 40 or more accrual years.
b From 2012 onwards, the disability pensions of persons older than the mandatory retirement
238
11 Welfare provisions
Table 11.4.a: Number of those receiving social annuities for people with damaged health, and the mean sum of
the provisions they received after the increase, in January of the given year
Temporary annuity Regular social annuity Health damage annuity for miners Total
Number of Average Number of Average Number of Average amount, Number of Average
Year recipients amount, HUF recipients amount, HUF recipients HUF recipients amount, HUF
2000 15,491 18,309 196,689 14,435 2,852 48,581 215,032 15,167
2001 15,640 20,809 198,820 15,610 3,304 53,379 217,764 16,556
2002 11,523 26,043 200,980 17,645 3,348 59,558 215,851 18,744
2003 12,230 30,135 203,656 19,907 3,345 65,380 219,231 21,171
2004 11,949 33,798 207,300 21,370 2,950 69,777 222,199 22,681
2005 13,186 36,847 207,091 22,773 2,839 74,161 223,116 24,259
2006 14,945 40,578 195,954 23,911 2,786 77,497 213,685 25,776
2007 19,158 42,642 184,845 25,050 2,693 80,720 206,696 27,406
2008 21,538 46,537 170,838 27,176 2,601 85,805 194,977 30,096
2009 21,854 46,678 159,146 27,708 2,533 86,165 183,533 30,774
2010 20,327 47,060 148,704 27,645 2,448 86,252 171,479 30,783
2011 16,448 47,096 139,277 27,588 2,371 86,411 158,096 30,500
Disability pensions and temporary provisions for disability groups 1 –2, granted prior to 2012,
have been transformed to ‘disability allotments’. The provisions for permanent social benefit
recipients born before 1955 have also been transformed to ‘disability allotments’. Disability
pensions and permanent social benefits granted before 2012 to the members of disability
group 3 have been transformed to ‘rehabilitation allotment’. The conditions of these provi-
sions will be set in the framework of a complex revision of entitlement and eligibility.
Source: MÁK.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent11_04a
Table 11.4.b: Number of those receiving social annuities for people with damaged health, and the mean sum of
the provisions they received after the increase, in January of the given year
2015 2016 2017 2018
Average Average Average Average
Number of amount after Number of amount after Number of amount after Number of amount after
Support for recipients increase recipients increase recipients increase recipients increase
disabled persons (HUF/month) (HUF/month) (HUF/month) (HUF/month)
Support for disabled persons 404,880 67,759 357,979 69,399 355,188 70,127 338,906 72,762
Of which:
–disability provision for persons
older than the mandatory 44,436 74,509 52,215 78,425 62,518 80,833 51,965 84,885
retirement age
–disability provision for persons
younger than the mandatory 217,625 74,463 228,730 73,215 249,909 71,199 250,062 73,696
retirement
–rehabilitation provision 140,658 54,810 92,951 54,282 40,741 45,604 34,955 46,292
–annuity for miners with dam-
2,161 96,567 2,038 98,621 2,020 100,817 1,924 104,818
aged health
Disability pensions and temporary provisions for disability groups 1 –2, granted prior to 2012, have been transformed to
‘disability allotments’. The provisions for permanent social benefit recipients born before
1955 have also been transformed to ‘disability allotments’. Disability pensions and perma-
nent social benefits granted before 2012 to the members of disability group 3 have been
transformed to ‘rehabilitation allotment’. The conditions of these provisions will be set in
the framework of a complex revision of entitlement and eligibility.
Source: MÁK.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent11_04b
239
Statistical data
Table 11.5: The median age for retirement and the number of pensioners
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Pension Age Persons Age Persons Age Persons Age Persons Age Persons
Females
Old age and similar pensions 59.9 15,243 60.7 13,617 58.5 84,922 59.2 51,011 59.6 40,032
Pension for women entitled to retire before
the mandatory age after having accumu- – – – – 57.6 54,770 57.8 26,554 58.0 24,033
lated at least 40 accrual years
Disability and accident-related disab. pens. 51.1 9,065 50.8 10,478 50.7 8,667 – – – –
Rehabilitation annuity 44.9 6,574 47.6 6,789 47.2 4,386 .. .. .. ..
Total 54.1 30,882 54.4 30,884 57.3 97,975 .. .. .. ..
Males
Old age and similar 59.7 37,116 60.2 37,219 60.3 43,240 61.8 20,411 62.2 21,525
Disability and accident-related disab. pens. 52.3 11,992 52.1 13,345 51.9 10,673 – – – –
Rehabilitation annuity 44.8 6,278 47.4 6,123 47.0 4,102 .. .. .. ..
Total 56.4 55,386 56.9 56,687 57.8 58,015 .. .. .. ..
Together
Old age and similar pensions 59.7 52,359 60.3 50,836 59.1 128,162 59.9 71,422 60.5 61,557
Disability and accident-related disab. pens. 51.8 21,057 51.5 23,823 51.4 19,340 – – – –
Rehabilitation annuity 44.9 12,852 47.5 12,912 47.1 8,488 .. .. .. ..
Total 55.6 86,268 56.0 87,571 57.5 155,990 .. .. .. ..
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018a
Females
Old age and similar pensions 59.6 38,911 60.0 41,558 61.1 55,288 61.0 46,372 61.2 48,436
Pension for women entitled to retire before
the mandatory age after having accumu- 58.3 27,450 58.7 28,537 59.0 28,126 59.3 28,500 59.5 29,009
lated at least 40 accrual years
Disability and accident-related disab. pens. – – – – – – – – – –
Rehabilitation annuity .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
Total .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
Males
Old age and similar pensions 62.7 18,634 62.7 22,195 63.1 49,831 63.5 31,822 63.6 33,851
Disability and accident-related disab. pens. – – – – – – – – – –
Rehabilitation annuity .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
Total .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
Together
Old age and similar pensions 60.6 57,545 60.9 63,753 62.0 105,119 62.0 78,194 62.2 82,287
Disability and accident-related disab. pens. – – – – – – – – – –
Rehabilitation annuity .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
Total .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
Note: The source of these statistics is data from the pension determination system of the
ONYF (NYUGDMEG), so these do not include the data for the armed forces and the police.
Data on MÁV is included from 2008. ’Old age pensions’ include some allowances of minor
importance paid to recipients younger than the mandatory retirement age. The data on
2012 –2016 have been revised and may differ from those in earlier publications.
a Preliminary data.
Source: MÁK.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent11_05
240
11 Welfare provisions
Table 11.6: The number of those receiving a disability annuity and the mean sum of the
provisions they received after the increase, in January of the given year
Disability annuity Disability annuity
Number of Average amount, Number of Average amount,
Year recipients HUF Year recipients HUF
2003 27,058 23,884 2011 32,314 33,429
2004 27,923 25,388 2012 32,560 33,426
2005 28,738 27,257 2013 32,463 33,422
2006 29,443 28,720 2014 32,497 33,422
2007 30,039 30,219 2015 32,528 34,034
2008 30,677 32,709 2016 32,430 34,581
2009 31,263 33,434 2017 32,789 35,147
2010 31,815 33,429 2018 33,027 36,494
Source: MÁK.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent11_06
Table 11.7: Newly determined disability pension claims and detailed data
on the number of newly determined old-age pension claims
Disability and accident- Old-age and From the total: From the total:
related disability pen- old-age type pensionsa at the age limit under the age limit
Year sions (total number) Male Female Together Male Female Together Male Female Together
2005 41,057 33,175 48,771 81,946 4,035 6,721 10,756 27,719 40,142 67,861
2006 36,904 34,207 47,531 81,738 4,013 732 4,745 29,025 45,675 74,700
2007 34,991 51,037 62,168 113,205 3,722 6,660 10,382 45,731 54,177 99,908
2008 19,832 25,912 39,423 65,335 3,154 288 3,442 22,180 38,761 60,941
2009 21,681 37,468 15,468 52,936 4,193 6,692 10,885 32,452 8,289 40,741
2010 24,094 37,394 13,719 51,113 6,350 7,213 13,563 29,990 5,801 35,791
2011 19,340 43,240 84,922 128,162 9,058 7,938 16,996 32,400 76,019 108,419
2012 n.a. 20,411 51,011 71,422 8,173 7,601 15,774 7,507 40,512 48,019
2013 n.a. 21,525 40,032 61,557 15,948 11,281 27,229 513 25,493 26,006
2014 n.a. 18,634 38,911 57,545 10,537 6,996 17,533 1,756 28,617 30,373
2015 n.a. 22,195 41,558 63,753 11,735 7,760 19,495 2,434 29,773 32,207
2016 n.a. 49,831 55,288 105,119 32,787 21,078 53,865 1,611 28,782 30,393
2017 n.a. 31,822 46,372 78,194 16,506 11,920 28,426 2,084 29,004 31,088
2018b n.a. 33,851 48,436 82,287 17,029 12,079 29,108 1,963 29,393 31,356
a Before 2012 old-age type pensions include: old-age pensions given with a retirement age
threshold allowance (early retirement), artists’ pensions, pre-pension up until 1997, miners’
pensions. From 2012 onwards the data include the recipients of allowances substituting
(abolished) early retirement pensions.
b Preliminary data.
Note: These statistics exclude data for the armed forces and police, and those for the State
Railways (MÁV) until 2008. Pensions disbursed in the given year (determined according to
the given year’s rules). The data for old age pensions include some items paid to people retir-
ing before the mandatory age. The data on 2012–2016 have been revised and may differ
from those in earlier publications. The column for ‘of which in the year of reaching the man-
datory age’ exclude people, who retired before reaching the mandatory age but expected to
reach it in the given calendar year.
Source: MÁK.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent11_07
241
Statistical data
242
12 The tax burden on work
243
Statistical data
Table 12.2: Changes in the magnitude of the tax wedge in the case of minimum wage and the temporary work
booklet (AMK)
Minimum Total wage cost in the AMK public bur- Total wage costa, AMK tax wedge,
wage case of minimum wage Minimum dena, HUF/day HUF/day %a
gross, net, wage tax registered registered registered
gross, net,
HUF/ HUF/ HUF/month HUF/day wedge, % general unem- general unem- general unem-
HUF/day HUF/day
Year month month ployed ployed ployed
1997 17,000 783 15,045 693 26,450 1,196 43.1 500 500 1,193 1,193 41.9 41.9
1998 19,500 899 17,258 795 30,297 1,369 43.0 500 500 1,295 1,295 38.6 38.6
1999 22,500 1,037 18,188 838 34,538 1,546 47.3 500 500 1,338 1,338 37.4 37.4
2000 25,500 1,175 20,213 931 38,963 1,746 48.1 800 800 1,731 1,731 46.2 46.2
2001 40,000 1,843 30,000 1,382 58,400 2,638 48.6 1,600 1,600 2,982 2,982 53.6 53.6
2002 50,000 2,304 36,750 1,694 71,250 3,226 48.4 1,000 500 2,694 2,194 37.1 22.8
2003 50,000 2,304 42,750 1,970 70,200 3,191 39.1 1,000 500 2,970 2,470 33.7 20.2
2004 53,000 2,442 45,845 2,113 74,205 3,376 38.2 1,000 500 3,113 2,613 32.1 19.1
2005 57,000 2,627 49,305 2,272 79,295 3,572 37.8 700 500 2,972 2,772 23.6 18.0
2006 62,500 2,880 54,063 2,491 85,388 3,910 36.7 700 700 3,191 3,191 21.9 21.9
2007 65,500 3,018 53,915 2,485 89,393 4,095 39.7 700 700 3,185 3,185 22.0 22.0
2008 69,000 3,180 56,190 2,589 94,065 4,310 40.3 900 900 3,489 3,489 25.8 25.8
2009 71,500 3,295 57,815 2,664 97,403b 4,464 40.6 900 900 3,564 3,564 25.3 25.3
2010 73,500 3,387 60,236 2,776 94,448 4,352 36.2 900 900 3,676 3,676 24.5 24.5
Minimum Total wage cost in the Simplified employ- Total wage cost, Tax wedge, simpli-
wage case of minimum wage mentc, Ft/day HUF/day fied employment,%
Minimum
wage tax seasonal seasonal seasonal
gross, net, wedge, tempo- agricul- tempo- agricul- tempo- agricul-
gross, net,
HUF/ HUF/ HUF/month HUF/day % rary tural/ rary tural/ rary tural/
HUF/day HUF/day
month month work tourism work tourism work tourism
work work work
2011 78,000 3,594 60,600 2,793 100,230 4,619 39.5 1,000 500 3,793 3,293 26.4 15.2
2012 93,000 4,280 60,915 2,803 119,505 5,500 49.0 1,000 500 3,383 2,883 29.6 17.3
2013 98,000 4,510 64,190 2,954 125,930 5,795 49.0 1,000 500 3,511 3,011 28.5 16.6
2014 101,500 4,670 66,483 3,059 130,428 6,001 49.0 1,000 500 3,600 3,100 27.8 16.1
2015 105,000 4,830 68,775 3,164 134,925 6,207 49.0 1,000 500 3,689 3,189 27.1 15.7
2016 111,000 5,110 73,815 3,398 142,635 6,566 48.2 1,000 500 3,888 3,388 25.7 14.8
2017 127,500 5,870 84,788 3,904 157,463 7,543 46.2 1,000 500 4,318 3,818 23.2 13.1
2018 138,000 6,603 91,770 4,391 167,670 8,022 45.3 1,000 500 4,732 4,232 21.1 11.8
2019 149,000 7,163 99,085 4,764 180,290 8,668 45.0 1,000 500 5,049 4,549 19.8 11.0
a Wage paid at the amount in accordance with the gross daily minimum wage column and in
the case of work performed with a temporary work booklet. The basis for the comparison
with the minimum wage is the assumption that employers pay temporary workers the small-
est possible amount.
b According to regulations pertaining to the first half of 2009.
c From April 1st, 2010. the temporary work booklets and the public contribution tickets were
244
12 The tax burden on work
Table 12.3: The monthly amount of the minimum wage, the guaranteed wage minimum,
and the minimum pension, in thousands of current-year HUF
Guaranteed
Monthly amount of As a percentage Minimum
As a ratio of APW, skilled workers
the minimum wage, of mean gross pension,
% minimum wage,
HUF earnings HUF
Date HUF
1990. II. 1. 4,800 .. 40.9 – 4,300
1991. IV.1. 7,000 .. .. – 5,200
1992. I. 1. 8,000 35.8 41.4 – 5,800
1993. II. 1. 9,000 33.1 39.7 – 6,400
1994. II. 1. 10,500 30.9 37.8 – 7,367
1995. III. 1. 12,200 31.4 37.0 – 8,400
1996. II. 1. 14,500 31.0 35.8 – 9,600
1997. I. 1. 17,000 29.7 35.1 – 11,500
1998. I. 1. 19,500 28.8 34.4 – 13,700
1999. I. 1. 22,500 29.1 34.6 – 15,350
2000. I. 1. 25,500 29.1 35.0 – 16,600
2001. I. 1. 40,000 38.6 48.3 – 18,310
2002. I. 1. 50,000 40.8 54.5 – 20,100
2003. I. 1. 50,000 36.4 51.5 – 21,800
2004. I. 1. 53,000 37.2 50.7 – 23,200
2005. I. 1. 57,000 33.6 49.2 – 24,700
2006. I. 1. 62,500 36.5 52.3 68,000 25,800
2007. I. 1. 65,500 35.4 49.3 75,400 27,130
2008. I. 1. 69,000 34.7 49.5 86,300 28,500
2009. I. 1. 71,500 35.8 50.0 87,500 28,500
2010. I. I. 73,500 36.3 48.6 89,500 28,500
2011. I. I. 78,000 36.6 49.8 94,000 28,500
2012. I. I. 93,000 41.7 54.3 108,000 28,500
2013. I. I. 98,000 42.5 55.1 114,000 28,500
2014. I. I. 101,500 42.7 56.9 118,000 28,500
2015. I. I. 105,000 42.4 54.0 122,000 28,500
2016. I. I. 111,000 42.2 53.5 129,000 28,500
2017. I. I. 127,500 42.9 .. 161,000 28,500
2018. I. I. 138,000 41.8 .. 180,500 28,500
2019. I. I. 149,000 .. .. 195,000 28,500
Notes: Up to the year 1999, sectors employing unskilled labour usually received an extension
of a few months for the introduction of the new minimum wage.
The guaranteed wage minimum applies to skilled employees, the minimum wage and the
skilled workers minimum wage are gross amounts.
The minimum wage is exempt from the personal income tax from September 2002. This policy
resulted in a 15.9% increase in the net minimum wage.
APW: mean wage of workers in the processing industry, based on the NFSZ BT. In 1990, the
data is the previous year’s data, indexed (since there was no NFSZ BT conducted in 1990).
Source: Minimum wage: 1990–91: http://www.mszosz.hu/files/1/64/345.pdf, 1992–: CSO.
Guaranteed wage minimum: http://www.nav.gov.hu/nav/szolgaltatasok/adokulcsok_jaru
lekmertekek/minimalber_garantalt. Minimum pension: http://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/
xtabla/nyugdij/tablny11_03.html. APW: NFSZ BT.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent12_03
245
Statistical data
Table 12.4: The tax burden on work as a ratio of tax revenue and earnings
Tax burden on work
Implicit Tax wedge on 67% Tax wedge on the
as a ratio of
tax rateb level of mean earnings minimum wagec
Year tax revenuea, %
1990 .. .. 38.2
1991 52.4 .. .. 40.4
1992 54.8 .. .. 40.9
1993 54.4 .. .. 42.3
1994 53.7 .. .. 41.2
1995 52.1 42.3 .. 44.2
1996 52.5 42.1 .. 41.8
1997 54.2 42.5 .. 43.1
1998 53.1 41.8 .. 43.0
1999 51.5 41.9 .. 47.3
2000 48.7 41.4 51.4 48.1
2001 49.8 40.9 50.9 48.6
2002 50.3 41.2 48.2 48.4
2003 48.7 40.0 44.6 39.1
2004 47.5 39.1 44.8 38.2
2005 48.6 37.6 43.1 37.8
2006 48.8 38.2 43.3 36.7
2007 49.3 40.6 46.1 39.7
2008 51.0 41.9 46.8 40.3
2009 47.9 39.9 46.2 40.6d
2010 46.7 38.1 43.8 36.2
2011 46.8 37.9 45.2 39.5
2012 46.0 39.2 47.9 49.0
2013 45.7 39.0 49.0 49.0
2014 45.3 39.6 49.0 49.0
2015 45.0 41.6 49.0 49.0
2016 45.6 40.9 48.3 48.3
2017 45.3 39.5 46.2 46.2
2018 .. .. 45.0 45.0
a Tax burden on work and contributions as a ratio of tax revenue from all tax forms.
b The implicit tax rate is the quotient of the revenue from taxes and contributions pertaining
to work and the income derived from work.
c The tax wedge is the quotient of the total public burden (tax and contribution) and the total
wage cost, it is calculated as: tax wedge = (total wage cost – net wage)/total wage cost.
d The tax wedge of the minimum wage is the 2009 annual mean (the contributions decreased
in June).
Source: 1991–1995: estimate of Ágota Scharle based on Ministry of Finance (PM) balance
sheet data. 1996–2002: http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/taxation/gen_info/econom-
ic_analysis/tax_structures/index_en.htm. 2003 –: https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/
business/economic-analysis-taxation/data-taxation_en, Eurostat online database. Implicit
tax rate: Eurostat online database (gov_a_tax_itr). 2003 –: https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_
customs/business/economic-analysis-taxation/data-taxation_en. Tax wedge on the 67 per-
cent level of the mean wage: OECD: Taxing wages 2010, Paris 2011, OECD Tax Statisctics/
Taxing wages/ Comparative tables. Tax wedge at the level of the minimum wage: calcula-
tions of Ágota Scharle.
Online data source in xls format: http://www.bpdata.eu/mpt/2019ent12_04
246
13 International comparison
247
Statistical data
248
13 International comparison
249
Statistical data
250
14 Description of the main data sources
The labour force (i.e. economically active population) Institution-Based Labour Statistics – KSH IMS
comprises employed and unemployed persons. The source of the earnings data is the monthly (annual)
Persons are defined economically inactive (i.e. not institutional labour statistical survey. The sample frame
in the labour force) if they were neither employed in covers enterprises with at least 5 employees, and public
regular, income-earning jobs, nor searching for a job, and social insurance and non-profit institutions irre-
or, if they had searched, had not yet started work. Pas- spective of the staff numbers of employees.
sive unemployed are included here – those who would The earnings data relate to the full-time employees
like a job, but have given up any active search for work, on every occasion. The potential elements of the pre-
because they do not believe that they have a chance of vailing monthly average earnings are: base wage, al-
finding any. lowances (including the miner’s loyalty bonus, and the
The Labour Force Survey is based on a multi-stage Széchenyi and Professor’s scholarships), supplementary
stratified sample design. The sample design strata were payments, bonuses, premiums, and wages and salaries
defined in terms of geographic units, size categories for the 13th and further months.
of settlements and area types such as city centres, out- Net average earnings are calculated by deducting
skirts, etc. The sample has a simple rotation pattern: any from the institution’s gross average earnings the em-
household entering the sample at some time is expected ployer’s contributions, the personal income tax, ac-
to provide labour market information at six consecu- cording to the actual rates (i.e. taking into account the
tive quarters, then leaves the sample forever. The quar- threshold concerning the social security contributions
terly sample is made up of three monthly sub-samples. and employee deductions). The personal income tax is
In each sampled dwelling, labour market information calculated based on the actual withholding rate applied
is collected from each household and each person aged by the employers when disbursing monthly earnings
15–74 living there. The number of addresses selected for in the given year.
the sample in a quarter is about 38 thousand. The size and direction of the difference between the
Grossing up of LFS data has been carried out monthly gross and the net (after-tax) income indexes depends
on the basis of the population number of the last Census on actual annual changes in the tax table (tax brack-
corrected with the extrapolated population numbers. ets) and in the tax allowances. Thus the actual size of
Estimated totals or levels based on the LFS sample are the differences are also influenced by the share of indi-
computed by inflating and summing the observations viduals at given firms that fall outside the bracket for
by suitable sample weights. The weights to the estima- employee allowances.
tion are made in two steps. First the primary weights The indexes pertain to the comparable sample, tak-
are calculated for the 275 strata of the sample, then ing changes in the definitions, and of the sample frame
these weights need to be adjusted for non-response by into account. The KSH traditionally publishes the main
updated census counts in cross-classes defined by age, average index as the earnings growth measure. Thus
sex and geographic units. In the correction procedure the indicator of change in earnings reflects both the
the further calculated population and dwelling num- changes in the number of observations and the actual
bers have a key role. earnings changes simultaneously. The change of net
Since 2003, the weights used to make the sample real earnings is calculated from the ratio of net income
representative are based on the 2001 census popula- index and the consumer price index in the same period.
tion record base. At the same time, the 2001–2002 data Non-manual workers are persons with occupa-
was recalculated and replaced as well. The LFS-based tions classified by the standardized occupational code
time series published in this volume use the following (FEOR) in major groups 1–4., manual workers are per-
weighting schemes: (i) in 1992 –1997 the weights are sons with occupations classified in major groups 5–9.
based on the 1990 Census (ii) in 1998 –2001 the weights
KSH Job vacancy statistics
based on the 1990 Census have been corrected using
data of the 2001 Census (iii) in 2002 –2005 the weights The Job Vacancies Survey is a firm-based survey of
are based on the 2001 Census (iv) from 2006 onwards quarterly frequency. The survey covers all corporations
the weights based on the 2001 Census have been cor- with more than 49 employees. Businesses with 5–49
rected using the 2011 Census. Due to correction, the employees are randomly sampled. Budgetary institu-
LFS statistics published earlier were modified. tions and non-profit ones with more than two employ-
251
Statistical data
ees are observed on a full-scope basis. In line with EU task they performed changed as well. The new name
recommendations, newly created, unfilled positions of special vocational schools is vocational school and
are those which are unfilled or about to become vacant special skills development school, the name of ear-
within 3 months, provided that the employer takes ac- lier vocational schools became secondary vocational
tive steps to find a suitable candidate for the job, and school and that of earlier secondary vocational schools
is in the position to fill the job. became vocational grammar school. In the new voca-
tional schools pupils with special educational need who
KSH Strike statistics
are unable to make progress with the other pupils are
The CSO data cover strikes with at least 10 participants prepared for vocational examinations; the special skills
and token strikes lasting for at least 2 hours. development schools provide preparation for SEN-stu-
dents with moderate disability for commencing inde-
Labour Force Accounting Census – KSH MEM
pendent life or the learning of work processes requiring
Before the publication of the MEF, the annual MEM simple training, which enable employment. In the new
gave an account of the total labour force in the time system secondary vocational schools students aquire
period between the two censuses. a vocational qualification during the first 3 years, af-
The MEM, as its name shows, is a balance-like ac- ter which they have the opportunity to complete two
count that compares the labour supply (human resourc- further years preparing for a final examination at sec-
es) to the labour demand at an ideal moment (1 Janu- ondary level then they can pass a maturity examina-
ary). Population is taken into account by economic tion. After completing the first four years of vocational
activity, with a differentiation between statistical data grammar schools, students pass a vocational grammar
of those of working age and the population outside of school-leaving examination, during an additional year
the working age. Source of data: Annual labour survey students prepare for the vocational examination. There
on employment since 1992 of enterprises and of all gov- was no change in the case of secondary general schools.
ernment institutions, labour force survey, census, na- The category of secondary school preparing students
tional healthcare records, social security records, and for final examination at secondary level (maturity ex-
company registry. Data on unemployment comes from amination) has changed. Earlier the secondary general
the registration system of the NFSZ. school and the secondary vocational school belonged
in this category, in the new system the secondary vo-
Source of educational data
cational school, the secondary general school and the
Data on educational institutions are collected and pro- vocational grammar school together are meant by it.
cessed by the Ministry of Human Capacities (or the at As a result, some of the education time series can no
all times ministry responsible for education). Data sur- longer be resumed in their earlier forms.
veys relating to education have undergone changes both till 2015/16 school year from 2016/17 school year
in content and in methodology since the 2000/2001 Vocational school
school-year (the paper-based questionnaires were re- Special
vocational school and special skills
placed by the electronic data collection system, which development school
in the year of transition temporarily has resulted in Vocational Secondary
lower reliability data); they follow the structural and school vocational school
secondary school
252
14 Description of the main data sources
data are based on national account statistics, the con- cial data of jobseeking benefits (for example, average
sumer’s and producer’s price statistics and industrial monthly amount, average support paid for the num-
surveys. A detailed description of the data sources are ber of participants on the closing date, for exiters, and
to be found in the relevant publications of the KSH. those who found placement).
MAIN NFSZ DATA SOURCES
The jobseeking benefit register can also monitor the
average duration of the period of benefit allocation and
Unemployment (Jobseekers’) Register Database the average monthly amount of the benefits allocated.
– NFSZ-REG For the period between 1991 and 1996, the register
The other main source of unemployment data in Hun- also contains the stock and flow data of the recipients
gary – and in most of the developed countries – is the of new entrant’s unemployment benefit. Between 1997–
huge database containing so called administrative re- 2005, the system also contained the recipients of pre-
cords which are collected monthly and include the in- retirement unemployment benefit.
dividual data of the registered unemployed/jobseekers. Jobseeking allowance recipients: from September 1,
The register actually includes all jobseekers, but from 2011 the conditions for determining and disbursing the
these, at a given point of time, only those are regarded jobseeking allowance changed. The two phases of the
as registered unemployed/jobseekers, who: jobseeking allowance were discontinued and the peri-
– had themselves registered with a local office of the od of entitlement decreased from 270 days to 90 days.
NFSZ as unemployed/jobseekers (i. e. he/she has no Jobseekers needed to have at least 360 days of work-
job but wishes to work, for which they seek assistance time counting towards entitlement in the 5 years prior
from the labour market organisation); to becoming a jobseeker (prior to September 1, 2011,
– at the time of the examination (on the final day of any this was 365 days in the previous 4 years). Its amount
month), the person is not a pensioner or a full-time is 60% of the allowance base, but the maximum is the
student, does not receive any rehabilitation provision amount of the smallest mandatory wage on the first day
or benefit, and is ready to co-operate with the local of the entitlement (allowance base: the monthly aver-
employment office in order to become employed (i. e. age amount from the four calendar quarters preceding
he/she accepts the suitable job or training offered to the submission of the application).
him/her, and keeps the appointments made with the Jobseeking assistance recipients: from September 1,
local employment office’s placement officer/counsel- 2011 the conditions for determining and disbursing the
lor/benefit administrator). jobseeking assistance changed. The “a” and “b” type of
If a person included in the register is working under benefit were discontinued, jobseekers can still request
any subsidised employment programme on the clos- the “c” type of benefit under the title of pre-retirement
ing day, or is a participant of a labour market training jobseeking benefit, but the period of entitlement (and
programme, her/his unemployed/jobseeker status is depletion) of at least 140 days decreased to 90 days.
suspended. Regular social assistance recipients: those from
If the client is not willing to co-operate with the lo- among the regular registered jobseekers who are of
cal office, he/she is removed from the register of the active age and are in a disadvantaged labour market po-
unemployed/ jobseekers. sition, and who receive social assistance to complement
The data – i. e. the administrative records of the reg- or substitute their income. From January 1, 2009, those
ister – allow not only for the identification of date-re- receiving regular social assistance were included in two
lated stock data, but also for monitoring flows, inflows categories: regular social assistance recipients, and re-
as well as outflows, within a period. cipients of on call support. This support was replaced by
The database contains the number of decrees per- a new type of assistance, the wage replacement support
taining to the removal or suspension of jobseeking from January 1, 2011, then from September 1, 2011, the
benefits, the number of those receiving monetary name was changed to employment substitution support.
support based on accounting items, support transac- (Legislation III. of 1993 pertaining to social manage-
tions, the exact date of entry and exit and the reason ment and social assistance).
for the exit (for example, job placement, the end of Based on the records of labour demand needs re-
entitlement, disqualification, entry into a subsidized ported to the NFSZ, the stock and flow data of vacan-
employment programme, etc.), as well as the finan- cies are also processed and published for each month.
253
Statistical data
Furthermore, detailed monthly statistics of partici- are likely to occur in the short term, and to effectively
pation in the different active programmes, number of meet the ever-changing needs of their clients.
participants, and their inflows and outflows are also The forecast is only one of the outputs of the survey.
prepared based on the assistance disbursed. Further very important “by-products” include regular
The very detailed monthly statistics – in a breakdown and personal liaison with companies, the upgraded
by country, region, county, local employment office ser- skills of the placement officers and other administra-
vice delivery area and community – build on the sec- tive personnel, enhanced awareness of the local circum-
ondary processing of administrative records that are stances, and the adequate orientation of labour market
generated virtually as the rather important and useful training programmes in view of the needs identified
“by-products” of the accomplishment of the NFSZ’s by the surveys.
main functions (such as placement services, payment The prognosis surveys are occasionally supplemented
of benefits, active programme support, etc.). by supplementary questions and sets of questions to ob-
The NFSZ (and its predecessors, i. e. NMH, OMK – tain some further useful information that can be used
National Labour Centre, OMMK and OMKMK) has by researchers and the decision-makers of employment
published the key figures of these statistics on a month- and education/ training policy.
ly basis since 1989. The denominators of the unemploy- From 2005, the surveys are conducted in cooperation
ment rates calculated for the registered unemployed/ with the Institute for Analyses of the Economy and En-
jobseekers are the economically active population data trepreneurship of the Hungarian Chamber of Industry
published by the KSH MEM. and Commerce (in Hungarian: Magyar Kereskedelmi
The figures of the number of registered unemployed/ és Iparkamara Gazdaság- és Vállalkozáskutató Intézet,
jobseekers and the registered unemployment rate are MKIK GVI), with one additional benefit being that
obviously different from the figures based on the KSH with the help of the surveyors of the Institute, the sam-
MEF. It is mainly the different conceptual approach, ple size has increased to nearly 8,000.
definition, and the fundamentally different monitor-
Wage Survey Database – NFSZ BT
ing/measuring methods that account for this variance.
The NFSZ (and its legal predecessors) has conducted
Short-Term Labour Market Projection Surveys
since 1992, once a year, a representative survey with a
– NFSZ PROG
huge sample size to investigate individual wages and
At the initiative and under the coordination of the earnings, at the request of the Ministry of National
NFSZ (and its legal predecessors), the NFSZ PROG Economy (and its legal predecessors).
has been conducted since 1991, twice a year, in March The reference month of data collection is the month
and September, by interviewing over 7,500 employers. of May in each year, but for the calculation of the
Since 2004 the survey is conducted once a year, in the monthly average of irregularly paid benefits (beyond
month of September. the base wage/salary), 1/12th of the total amount of
The interviews focus on the companies’ projections such benefits received during the previous year is used.
of their material and financial processes, their devel- In the competitive sector, the data collection only
opment and human resource plans, and they are also covered initially companies of over 20 persons; it was
asked about their concrete lay-off or recruitment plans, incumbent on all companies to provide information,
as well as their expected need for any active labour mar- but the sample includes only employees born on cer-
ket programmes. tain dates in any month of any year.
The surveys are processed from bottom up, from the Data collection has also covered companies of 10–19
service delivery areas, through counties, to the whole since 1995, and companies of 5–9 have been covered
country, providing useful information at all levels for since 2000, where the companies actually involved in
the planning activities of the NFSZ. data collection are selected at random (ca. 20 per cent),
The survey provides an opportunity and possibility and the selected ones have to provide information about
for the regions, the counties and Budapest to analyse all of their full-time employees.
in greater depth (also using information from other Data on basic wages and earnings structure can only
sources) the major trends in their respective labour mar- be retrieved from these surveys in Hungary, thus it is,
kets, to make preparations for tackling problems that in practice, these huge, annually generated databases
254
14 Description of the main data sources
that can serve as the basis of the wage reconciliation – model calculations to determine the expected impact
negotiations conducted by the social partners. of the rise of the minimum wage;
In the budgetary sector, all budgetary institutions – analyses to meet the needs of the Wage Policy Depart-
provide information, regardless of their size, in such a ment, Ministry of National Resources, for the analy-
way that the decisive majority of the local budgetary sis and presentation of wage ratios;
institutions – the ones that are included in the TAKEH – analyses for the four volume statistical yearbook (to-
central payroll accounting system – provide fully com- tal national economy, competitive sector, budgetary
prehensive information, and the remaining budgetary sector, and regional volumes).
institutions provide information only about their em- The entire database is adopted every year by the KSH,
ployees who were born on certain days (regarded as which enables the Office to also provide data for certain
the sample). international organisations, (e. g. ILO and OECD). The
Data has only been collected on the professional NGM earlier the NMH also regularly provides special
members of the armed forces since 1999. analyses for the OECD.
Prior to 1992, such data collection took place in every The database containing the data by individual al-
third year, thus we are in possession of an enormous lows for a) the analysis of data for groups of people de-
database for the years of 1983, 1986 and also 1989. termined by any combination of pre-set criteria, b) the
Of the employees included in the sample, the follow- comparison of basic wages and earnings, with special
ing data are available: regard to the composition of the different groups ana-
– the sector the employer operates in, headcount, em- lysed, as well as c) the analysis of the dispersion of the
ployer’s local unit, type of entity, ownership struc- basic wages and earnings.
ture; Since 2002, the survey of individual wages and earn-
– employee’s wage category, job occupation, gender, age, ings was substantially developed to fulfill all require-
educational background. ments of the EU, so from this time on it serves also for
Based on the huge databases which include the data the purposes of the Structure of Earnings Survey (SES),
by individual, the data is analysed every year in the which is obligatory for each member state in every fourth
following ways: year. One important element of the changes was the in-
– standard data analysis, as agreed upon by the social clusion of part-time employees in the sample since 2002.
partners, used for wage reconciliation negotiations SES 2002 was the first, and recently the databases
(which is received by every confederation participat- of SES 2006 and 2010 were also sent to the Eurostat in
ing in the negotiations); anonymized form in accordance with EU regulations.
255
index of tables and figures
257
The hungarian labour market
policy tools size, per cent ................................... 188 recipients and unemployment as-
Table A1: Expenditures and revenues Table 4.12: Employees of the compe- sistance recipients by educational
of the employment policy section of titive sector by the share of foreign attainment ...................................... 205
the national budget, 2013–2019 .. 165 ownership, per cent ....................... 188 Table 5.17: Outflow from the Register
Statistical Data Table 4.13: Employment rate of po- of Beneficiaries .............................. 206
Table 1.1: Basic economic pulation aged 15–74 by age group, Table 5.18: The distribution of the to-
indicators ........................................ 169 males, per cent ............................... 189 tal number of labour market train-
Table 2.1: Population ........................ 171 Table 4.14: Employment rate of po- ing participants .............................. 206
Table 2.2: Population by age groups, pulation aged 15–74 by age group, Table 5.19: Employment ratio of
in thousands .................................... 171 females, per cent ............................ 189 participants ALMPs by gender, age
Table 2.3: Male population by age Table 4.15: Employment rate of popu- groups and educational attainment
groups, in thousands .................... 173 lation aged 15–64 by level of educa- for the programmes finished in
Table 2.4: Female population by age tion, males, per cent ...................... 190 2018, per cent ................................. 207
groups, in thousands .................... 173 Table 4.16: Employment rate of popu- Table 5.20: Distribution of the aver-
Table 3.1: Labour force participation lation aged 15–64 by level of educa- age annual number of those with no
of the population over 14 years ... 174 tion, females, per cent .................... 191 employment status who participate
Table 3.2: Labour force participation Table 5.1: Unemployment rate by gen- in training categorised by the type
of the population over 14 years, der and share of long term unemp- of training, percentage ................. 207
males, in thousands ...................... 175 loyed, per cent ................................ 192 Table 5.21: The distribution of those
Table 3.3: Labour force participation Table 5.2: Unemployment rate by le- entering training programmes by age
of the population over 14 years, fe- vel of education, males ................. 193 groups and educational level ........ 208
males, in thousands ...................... 176 Table 5.3: Composition of the unemp- Table 6.1: Annual changes of gross
Table 3.4: Labour force participation loyed by level of education, males, and real earnings ........................... 209
of the population over 14 years ... 177 per cent ............................................ 193 Table 6.2.a: Gross earnings ratios in
Table 3.5: Labour force participation Table 5.4: Unemployment rate by le- the economy ................................... 210
of the population over 14 years, vel of education, females .............. 194 Table 6.2.b: Gross earnings ratios in
males, per cent ............................... 178 Table 5.5: Composition of the unem- the economy, per cent .................... 211
Table 3.6: Labour force participation ployed by level of education, females, Table 6.3: Regression-adjusted earn-
of the population over 14 years, fe- per cent ............................................ 194 ings differentials ............................ 212
males, per cent ............................... 179 Table 5.6: The number of unemployed Table 6.4: Percentage of low paid wor-
Table 3.7: Population aged 15–64 by by duration of job search ............. 196 kers by gender, age groups, level of
labour market status (self-categori- Table 5.7: Registered unemployed and education and industries ............. 213
sed), in thousands .......................... 180 LFS unemployment ....................... 198 Table 7.1: Graduates in full-time edu-
Table 3.8: Population aged 15–64 by Table 5.8: Composition of the regis- cation ............................................... 216
labour market status (self-categori- tered unemployed by educational Table 7.2: Pupils/students entering
sed), per cent ................................... 181 attainment, yearly averages ......... 199 the school system by level of educa-
Table 4.1: Employment .................... 182 Table 5.9: The distribution of regis- tion, full-time education ............... 217
Table 4.2: Employment by gender ... 183 tered unemployed school-leavers by Table 7.3: Students in full-time educa-
Table 4.3: Composition of the emp- educational attainment, yearly aver- tion ................................................... 218
loyed by age groups, males ........... 184 ages, per cent .................................. 199 Table 7.4: Students in part-time edu-
Table 4.4: Composition of the emp- Table 5.10: Registered unemployed by cation ............................................... 219
loyed by age groups, females, per economic activity as observed in the Table 7.5: Number of applicants for
cent ................................................... 184 LFS, per cent ................................... 200 full-time high school courses ...... 220
Table 4.5: Composition of the emp- Table 5.11: Monthly entrants to the Table 8.1: The number of vacancies
loyed by level of education, males, unemployment register, monthly reported to the local offices of the
per cent ............................................ 185 averages, in thousands ................. 200 NFSZ ................................................ 221
Table 4.6: Composition of the emp- Table 5.12: Selected time series of Table 8.2: The number of vacancies
loyed by level of education, females, registered unemployment, monthly reported to the local offices of the
per cent ............................................ 185 averages ........................................... 201 NFSZ, by level of education ........ 222
Table 4.7: Employed by employment Table 5.13: The number of registered Table 8.3: The number of
status, in thousands ...................... 186 unemployed who became employed vacancies ......................................... 222
Table 4.8: Composition of the emp- on subsidised and non-subsidised Table 8.4: Firms intending to increase/
loyed persons by employment status, employment .................................... 202 decrease their staff, per cent ......... 223
per cent ............................................ 186 Table 5.14: Benefit recipients and par- Table 9.1: Regional inequalities: Emp-
Table 4.9: Composition of employed ticipation in active labour market loyment rate .................................... 224
persons by sector, by gender, per programmes ................................... 203 Table 9.2: Regional inequalities:
cent ................................................... 187 Table 5.15: The ratio of those who are LFS-based unemployment rate ... 225
Table 4.10: Employed in their present employed among the former partici- Table 9.3: Regional differences: The
job for 0–6 months, per cent ....... 187 pants of ALMPs, per cent ............ 204 share of registered unemployed
Table 4.11: Distribution of employees Table 5.16: Distribution of registered relative to the economically active
in the competitive sector by firm unemployed, unemployment benefit population, per cent ...................... 226
258
index of tables and figures
Table 9.4: Annual average registered pensioners ....................................... 240 by age group, 2002–2018 ............... 40
unemployment rate by counties ... 227 Table 11.6: The number of those re- Figure 1.4: Share of youth not in
Table 9.5: Regional inequalities: ceiving a disability annuity and the employment, education or training
Gross monthly earnings ............... 228 mean sum of the provisions they re- (NEET) by age group and gender,
Table 9.6: Regression-adjusted ear- ceived after the increase, in January 2002–2018 (percent) ........................ 41
nings differentials ......................... 228 of the given year ............................. 241 Figure 2.1.1: Association between test
Table 9.7: Regional inequalities: Table 11.7: Newly determined disa- scores in grade 10 and the logarithm
Gross domestic product ............... 229 bility pension claims and detailed of earnings ......................................... 47
Table 9.8: Commuting ..................... 229 data on the number of newly deter- Figure 2.1.2: Association between test
Table 10.1: Strikes ............................ 232 mined old-age pension claims ..... 241 scores in grade 10 and unemploy-
Table 10.2: National agreements on Table 11.8: Retirement age ment .................................................... 47
wage increase recommendations ... 232 threshold ......................................... 242 Figure 2.2.1: Skill levels of Grade 10
Table 10.3: Single employer collective Table 12.1: The mean, minimum, and students broken down by school
agreements in the business sector .. 233 maximum value of the personal in- track, 2017 (percentage) ................. 54
Table 10.4: Single institution collective come tax rate, per cent .................. 243 Figure 2.2.2: Test scores in Grade 10
agreements in the public sector ... 233 Table 12.2: Changes in the magnitude as a function of Grade 8 scores, bro-
Table 10.5: Multi-employer collective of the tax wedge in the case of mini- ken down by school track; students
agreements in the business sector .. 233 mum wage and the temporary work in Grade 8 in 2014 ........................... 54
Table 10.6: Multi-institution collective booklet (AMK) .............................. 244 Figure 2.2.3: Changes in average test
agreements in the public sector ... 233 Table 12.3: The monthly amount of scores between Grades 6 and 10,
Table 10.7: The number of firm wage the minimum wage, the guaranteed broken down by school track; stu-
agreements, the number of affected wage minimum, and the minimum dents in Grade 8 in 2014 ................. 55
firms, and the number of employees pension, in thousands of current- Figure 2.3.1: The proportion of those
covered ............................................ 233 year HUF ........................................ 245 continuing their education at the
Table 10.8: The number of multi- Table 12.4: The tax burden on work secondary level and those who were
employer wage agreements, the as a ratio of tax revenue and earn- not admitted into the school type
affected firms, and the covered com- ings ................................................... 246 designated as their first choice in
panies and employees ................... 234 Table 13.1: Employment and unemploy- their priority list, by school type,
Table 10.9: The share of employees cov- ment rate of population aged 15–64 2005–2017 ........................................ 60
ered by collective agreements .......... 234 by gender in the EU, 2018 .............. 247 Figure 2.3.2: The proportion of those
Table 10.10: Single employer collec- Table 13.2: Employment composition continuing their studies in second-
tive agreements in the national eco- of the countries in the EU, 2018 ... 248 ary education, by school type and
nomy ................................................ 235 Table 13.3: The ration of vacancies, gender, 2005–2017 ........................... 61
Table 10.11: Multi-employer collec- IV. quarter, 2018 ............................ 249 Figure 2.3.3: The proportion of those
tive agreements in the business sec- Figures continuing their studies after el-
tor ..................................................... 236 The Hungarian Labour Market ementary school, by gender ........... 62
Table 11.1: Family benefits ............. 237 Figure 1: The number of employees Figure 2.4.1: Average test score
Table 11.2: Unemployment benefits in the 15–74 age group and the change between the 8th and 10th
and average earnings .................... 237 employment rate among those aged grade for different school types.
Table 11.3.a: Number of those rece- 15–74, 2010–2018 ............................ 18 2010–2014 ......................................... 66
iving pension, and the mean sum Figure 2: Changes in the headcount of Figure 2.5.1: The share of early school
of the provisions they received in public works participants, leavers in the population aged 18–
January of the given year ............. 238 2010–2018 .......................................... 21 24 in Hungary, in the Visegrad
Table 11.3.b: Number of those rece- Figure 3: Employment rates of men countries and in the EU on average,
iving pension, and the mean sum and women aged 20–64, 2009–2018 ........................................ 70
of the provisions they received in 2014–2018 ......................................... 23 Figure 2.5.2: Changes in the propor-
January of the given year ............. 238 Figure 4: The number of vacancies in tion of those not in education and
Table 11.4.a: Number of those recei- the business sector, 2010–2018 ..... 25 lacking a qualification after finish-
ving social annuities for people with Figure 5: The average duration of job ing lower-secondary education ..... 73
damaged health, and the mean sum seeking and the share of the long- Figure 2.5.3: The proportion of those
of the provisions they received after term unemployed, 2010–2018 ...... 26 with an upper-secondary qualifica-
the increase, in January of the given Figure 6: Labour reserve and labour tion 4 and 5 years after completing
year ................................................... 239 demand by county, 2018 ................. 27 lower-secondary education ............ 73
Table 11.4.b: Number of those recei- Figure 7.: The rate of increase in gross Figure 2.5.4: The proportion of those
ving social annuities for people with earnings (2013 = 100 per cent) ..... 29 not attending school and lacking
damaged health, and the mean sum In Focus a qualification, by age ..................... 75
of the provisions they received after Figure 1.1: Employment rate of men Figure K2.5.1: The share of 17-year-
the increase, in January of the given and women aged 15–29 .................. 38 olds in employment, and not in
year ................................................... 239 Figure 1.2: Employment rate by age education, employment, or training
Table 11.5: The median age for and gender, 2002–2018 .................. 40 (NEET), 1992–2018 ........................ 78
retirement and the number of Figure 1.3: Share of full-time students, Figure 3.1.1: Share of those working
259
The hungarian labour market
while studying full-time by complet- Figure 7.1.1: The participation rates Figure 4.5: Activity rate by age groups,
ed education, 2002–2017 ............... 80 of 25–34-year-olds in non-formal females aged 15 –64 ....................... 191
Figure 3.1.2: Share of those working education and training, according Figure 5.1: Unemployment rates by
while studying full-time by complet- to the data of the AES surveys .... 132 gender .............................................. 192
ed education and sex, 2002–2017 ... 80 Figure 7.1.2: The participation rates Figure 5.2: Intensity of quarterly flows
Figure 3.2.1: The expected employ- of 25–34-year-olds in non-formal between labour market status, popu-
ment probability of students of vo- education and training, according lation between 15–64 years .......... 195
cational schools, 2011–2012 .......... 84 to the data of the labour force sur- Figure 5.3: Unemployment rate by age
Figure 3.3.1: The share of non fixed- vey, by educational attainment ... 132 groups, males aged 15 –59 ........... 197
term contracts among 15–29 years Figure 7.3.1: The distribution of Figure 5.4: Unemployment rate by age
old employees, by education, 2002– young graduates by labour market groups, females aged 15 –59 ........ 197
2017 (percent) ................................... 86 status and the level of qualification Figure 5.5: Registered and LFS
Figure 4.1.1: Youth employment in (MA/BA), 2004–2018 .................. 137 unemployment rates ..................... 198
terms of labour market experience, Figure 7.3.2: Wage return to BA/ Figure 5.6: Entrants to the unemploy-
in three graduation cohorts ........... 90 college and MA/university de- ment register, monthly averages .. 200
Figure 4.1.2: The effects of the unem- grees compared with a Matura, by Figure 6.1: Annual changes of gross
ployment rate in the year of gradua- quantiles, 2006–2016 ................... 138 nominal and net real earnings .... 209
tion on youth labour market status Figure 7.3.3: The proportions of those Figure 6.2: The percentage of low paid
in terms of labour market experi- employed in occupational groups workers by gender, per cent .......... 212
ence, 2002–2017 .............................. 90 among young graduates, by qualifi- Figure 6.3: The dispersion of gross
Figure 4.1.3: The effects of the cation level, 2004–2018 ............... 140 monthly earnings .......................... 214
unemployment rate in the year Figure 7.3.4: The proportion of well- Figure 6.4: Age-income profiles by edu-
graduation on youth employment, matched, overqualified and under- cation level in 1998 and 2016 ......... 214
by educational attainment groups, qualified graduates, by qualification Figure 6.5: The dispersion of the loga-
2002–2017 ......................................... 91 level, 2004–2016 (percentage) ..... 141 rithm of gross real earnings ......... 215
Figure 5.1.1: Changes in the number Figure 7.3.5: Wage return on required, Figure 7.1: Full time students as a percen-
of NEET groups in the 16–29 age surplus and missing years, 2004– tage of the different age groups ...... 216
group, 2013–2018 ............................ 99 2016 .................................................. 142 Figure 7.2: Flows of the educational
Figure 5.1.2: Number of year quarters Figure 8.1.1: The share of those chang- system by level ................................ 217
until exit from NEET status to emp- ing occupations among youth in em- Figure 8.1: The number of vacancies
loyment by type of unemployment, ployment and among older groups in reported to the local offices of the
2015–2018 ....................................... 100 employment, 2000–2004 ............. 145 NFSZ ................................................ 221
Figure 5.1.3: Registration rate by Figure 8.1.2: The share of youth chang- Figure 8.2: Firms intending to increa-
distance from the primary labor ing occupations among youth in em- se/decrease their staff ................... 223
market, 2013–2018 ....................... 102 ployment, by educational attainment Figure 9.1: Regional inequalities: La-
Figure K5.1.1: Search tools used by categories, 2000–2018 .................. 146 bour force participation rates, gross
unemployed young people who Figure 8.2.1: The effect of factors in- monthly earnings and gross domestic
completed vocational school, fluencing the employment of youth product in NUTS-2 level regions .. 224
2014–2018 ....................................... 104 abroad ............................................... 151 Figure 9.2: Regional inequalities:
Figure K5.1.2: Search tools used by Statistical Data LFS-based unemployment rates in
ILO unemployed young people who Figure 1.1: Annual changes of basic NUTS-2 level regions ................... 225
completed secondary education, economic indicators ...................... 169 Figure 9.3: Regional inequalities: The
2014–2018 ....................................... 104 Figure 1.2: Annual GDP time series .. 170 share of registered unemployed
Figure 5.2.1: What happens to young Figure 1.3: Employment rate of popu- relative to the economically active
people under the age of 25 regis- lation aged 15 –64 ......................... 170 population, per cent, in NUTS-2
tered as jobseekers in the first six Figure 2.1: Age structure of the Hun- level regions .................................... 226
months after registration? ........... 107 garian population, 1980, 2015 .... 172 Figure 9.4: Regional inequalities:
Figure 5.2.2: The number of entrants Figure 3.1: Labour force participation Means of registered unemployment
into the Youth Guarantee Pro- of population for males 15–59 and rates in the counties, 2018 ........... 227
gramme by active instruments ... 107 females 15–54, total ...................... 177 Figure 9.5: The share of registered
Figure 5.4.1: The distribution of wag- Figure 3.2: Labour force participation unemployed relative to the population
es of young people aged 16–25, by of population for males 15–59 .... 178 aged 15–64, 1st quarter 2007 ........ 230
education, 2002, 2006 .................. 112 Figure 3.3: Labour force participation Figure 9.6: The share of registered
Figure 6.1.1: Share of matriculated of population for females 15–54 ... 179 unemployed relative to the population
youth by age, 2011, 2016 .............. 122 Figure 4.1: Employed ....................... 182 aged 15–64, 1st quarter 2018 ........ 230
Figure 6.1.2: The share of full-time Figure 4.2: Employment by gender .. 183 Figure 9.7: The share of registered
students among Roma and non-Ro- Figure 4.3: Employees of the corpo- unemployed relative to the population
ma youth, 2011, 2016 .................... 122 rate sector by firm size and by the aged 15–64, 3rd quarter 2007 ........ 231
Figure 6.1.3: Employment rate of the share of foreign ownership .......... 188 Figure 9.8: The share of registered
16–25 year-old, not in education Figure 4.4: Activity rate by age unemployed relative to the population
population, 2011 and 2016 .......... 124 groups, males aged 15 –64 ........... 190 aged 15–64, 3rd quarter 2018 ........ 231
260
x!7HB7I5-iagcjd! ,L.T.k.k.m
THE HUNGARIAN LABOUR MARKET, 2019; IN FOCUS: YOUNG
THE HUNGARIAN
LABOUR MARKET
2019
EDITORS
KÁROLY FAZEKAS
MÁRTON CSILLAG
ZOLTÁN HERMANN
ÁGOTA SCHARLE