Biology DP Unit Planner
Biology DP Unit Planner
● You can edit any of the text in this file and change the structure; however,
because this template is recommended by the IB, please check with your DP
coordinator before making any changes.
● Section headings and IB guidance from the original IB template are included in
blue.
● Examples have been highlighted in yellow like this. Please do not reproduce
these examples.
● Once you have completed your unit planner, delete all guidance, tips, and
examples so that they do not appear in the final version of your unit planner.
Annotated DP Unit Planner
Course part A. Unity and Diversity SL or SL/HL Duration 4-6 hours in a week
and topic HL/Year 1 Year 1.
2. Cells
or 2
A2.2 Cell structure
Guiding Questions :
1. What are the similarities and differences between - Paper 1A: Multiple-choice questions covering
prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells? fundamental concepts of cell structure.
- Paper 1B: Data-based and structured questions
2. How do membrane structures facilitate transport requiring detailed explanations and application
and communication within the cell? of cell biology concepts.
Prior Knowledge : - Internal Assesment : scientific investigation
Content :
1. Cell Theory
2. Ultrastructure of Cells
3. Membrane Structure
4. Techniques for Studying Cells (Microscopy)
Assessment objectives
Student will :
- AO1: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of facts, concepts, and theories related to cell structure
and function.
- AO2: Apply biological concepts to explain microscopic observations and analyze electron micrographs.
- AO3: Formulate, analyze, and evaluate experimental data related to microscopy and cell structure.
Transfer goals
Essential understandings
List here the key content/skills/concepts that students will know/have at the end of the unit.
Students will develop understanding of the complexity of cell structure through inquiry-based activities, focusing
on how the components work together to maintain life functions
Students will learn how to using microscopes and observe and interpret cell structures to comparing and
contrasting different types of cells
Students will develop an understanding the concept of cell is the fundamental unit of life, and all living organisms
are composed of cells.
Inquiry questions
Develop a series of questions to guide the inquiry and help students unpack the transfer goals and
essential understandings. Collectively, the inquiry questions should include a combination of:
Content-based questions
What are the specific functions of cellular organelles in maintaining life processes?
Concept-based questions
How do cell structures reflect their functions across different types of organisms?
Skill-based questions
How do experimental methods help us investigate membrane transport mechanisms?
💡Tip: Ensure that you have a balanced time distribution between the different types of questions. There should
not be an overwhelming focus on content questions alone.
Formative assessment:
Students will know the following content: .Low-stakes prior knowledge quiz at the start of the
unit
student should be familiar with identification of sel
and has giving living organism • Students answer questions embedded within the
experimental work and in lectures which act as useful
sel properties are important for habitats
formative feedback for the teacher
Summative assessment:
,End-of-topic test
Differentiation:
◻ Process :
◻ Content :
◻ Product :
◻ Environment :
Include the specific ATL skills indicators of each chosen category under ‘details’ used during the unit.
◻ Thinking
1. Critical Thinking :
- Analyze the differences and similarities between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells.
- Evaluate the evidence supporting cell theory (e.g., historical perspectives and modern
microscopy advances).
2. Creative Thinking
- Design a model or diagram that explains the function of various organelles within a cell.
- Create analogies to represent organelle functions
◻ Social
1. Collaboration
- Work in pairs or small groups to prepare microscope slides and share observations.
- Provide constructive feedback to peers during group work or peer review sessions.
◻ Communication
1. Written Communication
- Write lab reports explaining the process of observing cells under a microscope, including
method, data, analysis, and conclusion.
2. Visual Communication
- Present information through well-labeled diagrams of cell structures (electron micrographs,
hand-drawn diagrams, or digital visuals).
3. Oral Communication
- Explain to peers how certain organelles contribute to the overall function of the cell (e.g.,
group presentations or discussions).
◻ Self-management
1. Organization
- Manage time effectively to complete practical work and assignments on time.
- Keep a well-organized lab notebook or learning journal to reflect on lessons and personal
understanding of cell structure.
2. Affective Skills (Mindfulness & Perseverance)
- Demonstrate resilience during complex tasks, such as interpreting electron micrographs or
complex diagrams.
3. Reflection
- Reflect on learning progress and set personal goals for improving practical microscope
skills.
◻ Research
1. Information Literacy
- Find and analyze current scientific research or journal articles about
recent discoveries in cell biology (e.g., advancements in microscopy
techniques like cryo-electron microscopy).
- Evaluate sources of scientific information (e.g., distinguishing between
primary research articles and secondary summaries).
2. Data Collection & Recording
- Conduct practical investigations using microscopes to observe cells
(e.g., onion epidermis, cheek cells).
- Record and present findings in a scientifically appropriate manner (e.g.,
annotated drawings with magnification, scale bars).
Tips:
💡It is advised to restrict your selection of ATL skills to 2-3 per unit, with a reasonable number of specific
strands that students will have a chance to develop during the unit.
💡It is recommended to select skills that naturally align with the chosen assessment objectives.
💡It is good practice to align the chosen ATL skills with those skills identified under the ‘content/skills/concepts’
section.
Metacognition
Check the boxes for any metacognitive approaches used that ask students to reflect on unit content, their own skills,
or unit concepts. For more information on the IB’s approach to metacognition, please see the guide.
Select the metacognitive approaches that will be used during the unit and include a description of
each under 'details'. The description should:
◻ Reflection on content
Example: Use K-W-L to reflect on what content has been learned about WWI.
◻ Reflection on skills
Example: Use a checklist to help students evaluate the extent of mastering the OPCVL skill.
◻ Reflection on concepts
Example: Create a round table discussion about the concept of causation and have students contrast their initial
versus current understanding of the concept.
Details:
Language and learning TOK connections CAS connections
Check the boxes for any explicit Check the boxes for any explicit Check the boxes for any explicit
language and learning connections TOK connections made during the CAS connections. If you check any
made during the unit. For more unit. of the boxes, provide a brief note in
information on the IB’s approach to the “details” section explaining how
language and learning, please see students engaged in CAS for this
the guide. unit.
Select the explicit language and Select the explicit TOK connections Select the explicit CAS connections
learning connections from the listed and include a description of each and include a description of each
four options and include a under 'details' that will be made under 'details' that will be made
description of each under 'details' during the unit. Refer to the during the unit. How to brainstorm
used during the unit. How language guidance below that outlines some for CAS learning connections can be
learning connections can be carried points to consider under every carried out through each approach
out through each approach has connection. has been explained below, with an
been explained below, with an example:
example: ◻ TOK concepts: Choose one or
two of the TOK concepts that ▪ Think of connections between
naturally align with the subject- the written curriculum and CAS
◻ Activating background specific concepts outlined in the in the form of experiential
subject guide. These knowledge, which ultimately
knowledge: Encourage
connections should help brings about coherence and
students to make spontaneous
teachers ground the conceptual value to learning. Think about
connections between their
understanding of the unit. the CAS connection as the
personal knowledge and
◻ Optional themes: Choose no actionable portion of the unit.
content/texts.
more than one of the five ▪ Consider the learning outcomes
Example: Use anticipation
optional TOK themes. This under the 3 CAS strands:
guides to ask students to think,
connection should help teachers Creativity, activity, service.
write, and/or talk about their
explore subject-specific content These will provide direction
opinions on key themes or big
in an authentic, real-world when brainstorming for
ideas in upcoming texts and
context. The themes are connections.
units of study.
generic, so they should be ▪ For every unit, target one
◻ Scaffolding for new learning:
easily integrated into all
authentic, relevant CAS
Offer support to students as subjects.
connection grounded in the
they learn and develop a new
◻ Areas of knowledge: Choose target subject. This brings about
concept or skill or new content.
no more than one area of focus and meaning. This CAS
Example: Reflect using knowledge. Students consider connection can be part of the
exemplars to showcase the nature of the area of learning process or the
commendable performance. knowledge under study by
◻ Acquisition of new learning exploring the scope, summative assessment.
perspectives, methods and
through practice: Help students Example: In a group, organize a
tools, and ethics in its
practice necessary language gallery walk to explain the
development and make
skills to succeed in subjects. chronology of WWI. (Learning
comparisons and contrasts
outcome 5)
Example: Pre-teach key across areas of knowledge.
terminology through the use of Example: Organize a seminar to
◻ Core theme: In addition to the
visual representations, discuss the different
optional theme, draw
analogies, metaphors. perspectives regarding the role
connections to the core theme
of Germany versus Britain in the
◻ Demonstrating proficiency: of the TOK course. Teachers can
outbreak of WWI.
Offer students the choice to draw connections to the four
take ownership of their learning areas of the knowledge
and demonstrate mastery in a framework of the core and
◻ Creativity:
way that fits their learning style theme, including the scope,
and interest. perspectives, methods and ◻ Activity
tools, and ethics.
Example: Use digital tools and ◻ Service
sites that allow students to Details:
Details:
practice content and show
mastery.
Resources
List and attach (if applicable) any resources used in this unit.
▪ Technological integration
Examples: educational games and simulations, online labs, podcasts and audiobooks, websites, virtual
museums, etc.