05 - Equity
05 - Equity
Equity
Equity 2024 Level II High Yield Notes
Intrinsic value is the true or real value given a hypothetically complete understanding of
the asset’s investment characteristics. Intrinsic value might be different from the current
(market) price of an asset.
Perceived mispricing is the difference between the estimated intrinsic value and the
market price of an asset. It can be expressed as:
VE – P = (V – P) + (VE – V)
Interpretation:
• The first component (V-P) is the true mispricing or market error. It is the difference
between the unobservable intrinsic value V, and the observed market price P. An
analyst exploits the mispricing if it arises from the first term as it contributes to the
abnormal return.
• The second component (VE – V) is the error in the estimate of the intrinsic value or
analyst error. It is the difference between the valuation estimate and the
unobservable intrinsic value. The smaller the second term, the better it is for the
analyst.
For active investing to be successful, an analyst’s estimates must be different from the
consensus estimate and must be correct.
A going-concern assumption is the assumption that the company will continue its business
activities into the foreseeable future, i.e., it will continue to produce and sell its products
and services. The value of a company based on this assumption is called the going-concern
value.
On the other hand, liquidation value is the value of a company if it were dissolved and its
assets sold individually.
Fair market value is the price at which an asset (or liability) would change hands between
a willing buyer and a willing seller when the former is not under any compulsion to buy
and the latter is not under any compulsion to sell.
Fair value is the price of an asset used for financial reporting, for example, impairment
testing.
Investment value is the value to a specific buyer based on potential synergies and the
investor’s requirements and expectations.
Instructor’s Note: Of the many definitions of value, the definition most relevant to public
company valuation is intrinsic value calculated using the going-concern assumption.
Analysts use valuation concepts and models in the following practical scenarios:
• Selecting stocks
• Inferring market expectations
• Evaluating corporate events
• Rendering fairness opinion
• Evaluating business strategies
• Appraising private businesses
An absolute valuation model estimates an asset’s intrinsic value that can be compared to
the asset’s market price. The two types of absolute valuation models are:
• Present value model: The value of an asset is the present value of its expected future
cash flows.
• Asset-based valuation: Value of a company is equal to the market value of the assets
or resources it controls.
A relative valuation model estimates an asset’s value relative to that of another asset. The
underlying notion is that similar assets should sell at similar prices. Commonly used
multiples include:
• Price multiples: Ratio of a stock’s price to a fundamental such as earnings, book
value or cash flow per share.
• Enterprise multiples: Ratio of the total value of a firm to a fundamental such as
EBITDA.
A valuation that sums the estimated values of each of the company’s businesses as if each
business were an independent going concern is known as a sum-of-the-parts valuation.
A conglomerate discount is a discount applied to the stock of a company operating in
multiple, unrelated businesses compared to the stock of companies with narrower focuses.
It is sometimes applied to value companies that require a sum-of-the-parts valuation.
The criteria for choosing an appropriate approach for valuing a given company implies that
the model is:
• consistent with the characteristics of the company
• appropriate given the availability and quality of data
• consistent with the purpose of valuation or analyst’s perspective
Two important aspects of converting forecasts to valuation are:
• Sensitivity analysis that determines how changes to an input variable changes the
value of equity.
• Situation adjustments such as control premium, lack of marketability discount,
illiquidity discount, blockage factor, etc.
Discounted cash flow models are based on the idea that value of a security today is equal to
the present value of its future cash flows.
The three most widely used definitions of cash flows are: dividends, free cash flow (FCFF
and FCFE), and residual income.
The suitability of each of these models is summarized in the table below:
Dividend discount model Free cash flow model Residual income model
The company has a history Company pays no Company pays no
of dividend payments. dividends. Or the dividends dividends.
significantly exceed or fall
short of free cash flow to
equity.
The investor takes a non- The investor takes a control
control perspective. perspective.
The board of directors has The company’s free cash The company’s expected
established a dividend flows align with the free cash flows are negative
policy that bears an company’s profitability within the analyst’s
understandable and within a forecast horizon comfortable forecast
consistent relationship to with which the analyst is horizon.
the company’s profitability. comfortable.
Applicable to mature, The firm has accounting
profitable firms disclosures of high quality.
The value of a stock using DDM for multiple finite holding periods is:
n
Dt Pn
V0 = ∑ t
+
(1 + r) (1 + r)n
t=1
The present value of growth opportunities (PVGO), also known as the value of growth, is
the present value of opportunities to profitably reinvest future earnings.
A stock’s value comprises of two parts:
• present value of the company with no growth component and
• present value of growth opportunities.
E1
V0 = + PVGO
r
E1
If price = value, then PVGO = P0 − r
The Gordon growth model can also be used to estimate justified leading and trailing P/E
ratios based on the fundamentals of the firm.
Companies with varying growth prospects must be valued using multistage DCF models
such as the two-stage DDM, H-model, three-stage DDM or spreadsheet modeling. The
assumptions of these models are:
• Two-stage DDM: This model assumes different growth rates in stage 1 and stage 2.
A supernormal growth in stage 1 is followed by a lower, sustainable growth rate in
second stage.
• H-model: The dividend growth rate declines linearly from a high supernormal rate
to the normal growth rate in stage 1, and becomes constant and normal in stage 2.
• Three-stage DDM: There are two variations of this model.
o In one version, the growth in the middle stage is constant.
o In the second version, the middle stage is similar to the first stage in the H-
model. Dividends grow at a constant high rate in the second stage, and
declines linearly to a sustainable, mature growth rate in the third stage. The
second and third stages can be valued as an H-model.
The value of a stock using two-stage DDM is:
N
D0 (1 + g s )t D0 (1 + g s )n (1 + g L )
V0 = ∑ +
(1 + r)t (1 + r)n (r − g L )
t=1
where:
gs = short-term high growth rate
gL = long-term sustainable growth rate
n = number of years of high growth rate
The strength of multistage models is that they are flexible to pattern different growth
patterns in dividends.
However, multistage models have several limitations:
• Often, the present value of the terminal stage represents more than three-quarters
of the total value of shares.
• Terminal value can be very sensitive to the growth and required return
assumptions.
• Technological innovation can make the lifecycle model a crude representation.
Phases of growth
Most companies experience varying phases of growth. The growth of most publicly traded
A required return can be calculated if all the inputs to a DDM and price are given. For a
Gordon growth model, the return can be calculated using the formula:
D1
r= +g
P0
For multistage models and spreadsheet models, required return is calculated through trial
and error by equating the present value of cash flows to the current stock price.
Spreadsheet modeling
• The DDM models, such as the Gordon growth model or the H-model, assume
patterns of growth. Spreadsheet modeling makes it easier to model any growth
pattern.
• It allows the analyst to build complicated models that would be very cumbersome to
describe using Algebra, or where an iterative process is necessary.
• Built-in spreadsheet functions (such as those for finding rates of return) use
algorithms to get a numerical answer when a mathematical solution would be
impossible or extremely challenging.
• Several analysts can work together or exchange information by sharing their
spreadsheet models.
The sustainable growth rate is the dividend/earnings growth rate that can be sustained for
a given level of return on equity, assuming that the capital structure stays constant through
time and the firm issues no new stock.
The formula for calculating the sustainable growth rate is: g = b ∗ ROE
The sustainable growth rate using the DuPont analysis is:
Net Income − Dividends Net Income Sales Total Assets
g= ∗ ∗ ∗
Net Income Sales Total Assets Shareholder ′ s Equity
An easy way to remember this formula is:
g=P*R*A*T
where, P = profit margin; R = retention rate; A = asset turnover; T = financial leverage
• If the DDM estimate of a stock’s value is more than its current price, then the stock is
undervalued.
• If the DDM estimate of a stock’s value is less than its current price, then the stock is
overvalued.
• If the DDM estimate of a stock’s value is equal to its current price, then the stock is
fairly valued.
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) is the cash flow available to the company’s suppliers of
capital after all operating expenses (including taxes) have been paid and necessary
investments in working capital and fixed capital have been made. A firm’s suppliers of
capital include common shareholders, bondholders, and preferred shareholders.
Free cash flow to equity (FCFE) is the cash flow available to the company’s common
shareholders after all operating expenses, interest, and principal payments have been paid
and necessary investments in working and fixed capital have been made.
The two methods to value equity using free cash flows are:
• Discount FCFF at the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) because FCFF is an
after-tax cash flow. Then, estimate the value of equity by subtracting the value of
debt from the estimated value of the firm.
• Discount FCFE at the required return of equity.
FCFF is preferred over FCFE for
• a levered company with negative FCFE, or
• for a company with changing capital structure.
In free cash valuation, the focus is on the value of assets needed to generate operating cash
flows. Analysts often exclude non-operating assets such as cash and marketable securities.
However, if the non-operating assets are significant and were excluded, then they must be
added to the value of operating assets.
Value of firm = Value of operating assets + Values of non-operating assets
Analysts prefer to use the FCFF or FCFE approaches if one of the following conditions exist:
• The company does not pay dividends.
• The company pays dividends but the dividends do not reflect the company’s
capacity to pay dividends.
• The investor takes a control perspective.
Free cash flow approaches reflect a control (ownership) perspective, whereas DDM
approaches reflect a non-control perspective. An ownership perspective implies that the
acquirer can take control of the company and change the dividends substantially.
Therefore, free cash flow approaches make more sense than DDM approaches.
FCFF
FCFF from NI: FCFF = NI + NCC + Int (1 − tax rate) − FCInv − WCInv
FCFF from EBIT: FCFF = EBIT (1 – Tax rate) + Dep – FCInv – WCInv
FCFF from EBITDA: FCFF = EBITDA (1 – Tax rate) + Dep (Tax rate) – FCInv – WCInv
FCFF from CFO: FCFF = CFO + Int (1 – Tax rate) - FCInv
FCFE
FCFE from FCFF: FCFE = FCFF – Int (1 – Tax rate) + Net Borrowing
FCFE from NI: FCFE = NI + NCC – FCInv – WCInv + Net borrowing
FCFE from CFO: FCFE = CFO – FCInv + Net borrowing
To determine the WCInv, we ignore cash and short-term debt. For example, if we are given
the following information about a company:
Y1 Y2
Cash 10 12
AR 20 22
Inv 30 33
AP 10 10
Short-term debt 14 17
WCInv = (22 + 33 – 10) – (20 + 30 – 10) = 5
Analysts prefer the FCFE model over dividend discount model for the following reasons:
Dividends, share repurchases, and share issues do not affect FCFE and FCFF.
Increase in leverage increases the tax savings for FCFF.
Leverage affects FCFE in two ways:
• When new debt is issued, FCFE increases by the amount of debt issued.
• Later, FCFE decreases as interest expense increases.
Using net income and EBITDA as proxies for FCFE and FCFF
EBITDA is a poor proxy for cash flow because it does not account for depreciation,
investments in fixed capital and working capital, and cash outflow due to taxes.
FCFF = EBITDA (1 – Tax rate) + Dep (Tax rate) – FCInv – WCInv
Similarly, net income is a poor proxy for FCFE because it does not account for fixed capital,
working capital investment and net borrowings.
FCFE = NI + NCC – FCInv – WcInv + Net borrowing
n
FCFEt FCFEn+1 1
Equity value = ∑ + ∗
(1 + r)t r−g (1 + r)n
t=1
The value of a firm or equity depends on estimates for future growth rates, duration of
growth, and base-year values for FCFF and FCFE. Growth rate and duration of growth
depend on the growth phase of the company and the profitability of the industry.
Valuation models are sensitive to these inputs as the values can have a large impact on the
value of equity or firm. Analysts perform a sensitivity analysis to examine how valuation
changes with each of these inputs.
• If the model’s estimate of a stock’s value is more than its current price, then the
stock is undervalued.
• If the model’s estimate of a stock’s value is less than its current price, then the stock
is overvalued.
• If the model’s estimate of a stock’s value is equal to its current price, then the stock
is fairly valued.
Price multiples are ratios of a stock’s market price to some measure of fundamental value
per share, for example – price to earnings (P/E) ratio. There are two methods to use price
multiples: method of comparables and method based on forecasted fundamentals.
• The method of comparables compares the price multiple of an asset with
comparable or similar assets. The price multiple of an asset is compared to that of a
benchmark value of the multiple to evaluate if it is overvalued, undervalued, or
fairly valued. The benchmark value of the multiple may be the mean or median
value of a peer group of companies, an industry or sector, an equity index, or the
historical price multiple of the stock. The economic rationale for the method of
comparables is the law of one price: identical assets should sell at the same price.
• The method based on forecasted fundamentals compares the actual value of a
firm or its equity with one based on its forecasted fundamentals. The economic
rationale behind this method is that fundamentals drive future cash flows, and
multiples can be related to fundamentals through its DCF value.
The justified price multiple is an estimate of the fair value of a multiple using either the
method of comparables or the method of forecasted fundamentals. It represents what the
price multiple should be if the stock is fairly valued.
Price to earnings (P/E): Ratio of a stock’s market price to its earnings per share.
There are two variations of P/E: the trailing P/E and the forward P/E.
• Trailing P/E is a stock’s current market price divided by the most recent four
quarters’ EPS.
• The forward P/E or leading P/E, is a stock’s current price divided by next year’s
expected earnings.
Rationales for using P/E include:
• Earnings are the key driver of value.
• P/E ratio is widely recognized and used by investors.
• Differences in P/Es may be related to differences in long-run average returns.
Drawbacks of using P/E include:
• Earnings can be negative which will make the ratio meaningless.
• Earnings often contain volatile, transient components.
• Management’s choice of accounting policies may taint EPS’s value.
Price to book value (P/B): Price divided by book value per share.
Book value per share represents, on a per-share basis, the investment that common
shareholders have made in the company. Book value will generally need to be adjusted.
When comparing, we often use tangible book value.
Rationales for using P/B include:
• Can be used when EPS is negative
• BVPS is more stable than EPS (especially when EPS is volatile)
• More useful for valuing companies with liquid assets (banks, etc.)
• Can be used when company is not a going concern
• Differences in P/B may relate to differences in long-run returns
Drawbacks of using P/B include:
• Some assets creating value (e.g. human capital) are not on the balance sheet
• Can be misleading when companies have different level of assets
• Accounting effects (e.g. R&D) can compromise BV
• BV is generally not reflective of market value
Price to sales (P/S): Ratio of market price per share to sales per share.
Rationale for using P/S include:
• Sales are less subject to accounting manipulation than EPS or BVPS
• Sales are positive even when EPS is negative
• Sales are more stable than EPS
• More useful in valuing mature, cyclical and zero income companies
• Differences in P/S may relate to differences in long-run returns
Drawbacks of using P/S include:
• A company may show sales growth despite low earnings and cash flow from
operations.
• P/S does not capture differences in cost structures.
• P/S does not capture different capital structures.
• Room for manipulating revenues remains.
Price to cash flow (P/CF): Ratio of market price to cash flow per share.
Rationales for using P/CF:
• Cash flow is less prone to manipulation than earnings.
• More stable than EPS
• Addresses the issue of accounting differences
• Differences in P/CF may relate to differences in long-run returns
Normalized EPS
Analysts address the issue of cyclicality in business by using normalized EPS. Normalized
EPS for cyclical companies are earnings expected under mid-cyclical conditions. Two main
methods for calculating normalized EPS are:
• Historical average method: Normalized EPS is calculated as the average EPS over
the most recent full cycle.
• Average ROE method: Normalized EPS = average full cycle ROE * current BV per
share
The ROE method is preferred because the historic average method does not account for
change in a business’s size.
Earnings yield (E/P) is the reciprocal of the P/E. A high E/P indicates an undervalued
security, whereas a low E/P indicates an overvalued security.
When stocks have zero or negative EPS, a ranking by earnings yield is meaningful, whereas
a ranking by P/E is not.
An analyst can compute ratios based on company fundamentals and compare with ratios
based on actual market price.
If the ratio based on actual market price is low then the stock is undervalued.
D1
P0 E 1−b
Forward P/E: = 1 =
E1 r − g r − g
P0 (1 − b)(1 + g)
Trailing P/E: =
E0 r−g
P0 ROE − g
Price to book value: =
B0 r−g
E0
P0 ( S0 ) (1 − b)( 1 + g)
Price to sales: =
S0 r−g
D0 r − g
Dividend yield: =
P0 1 + g
(1 + g)FCFE0
Value based on cash flow: V0 =
r−g
We can make the following inferences from the above formulas:
• P/E is directly related to expected earnings growth and inversely related to the
required rate of return.
• P/B is directly related to ROE. The larger the difference between ROE and r, the
higher the P/B.
• P/S is directly related to profit margin and growth, and inversely related to the
required rate of return.
• Dividend yield is directly related to the required rate of return and negatively
related to the expected rate of growth in dividends.
fundamentals believed to drive security valuation. We can take several similar companies
and run a regression with the predicted P/E as the dependent variable and fundamental
characteristics such as the dividend payout ratio, beta, earnings growth rate, etc. as the
independent variables.
Example: Predicted P/E = 12.12 + (2.25 x DPR) – (0.20 X Beta) + (14.43 x EGR)
Predicted P/E is calculated by substituting the values of the variables in the estimated
regression equation. If the predicted P/E is less than the actual P/E, then the stock is
overvalued.
This method has three limitations:
• The model captures valuation relationships only for the specific stock over a
particular time period.
• Regression coefficients and explanatory power of regression tend to change
substantially over time.
• The method is prone to multicollinearity, or correlation within linear combinations
of the independent variables.
In the method of comparables, the analyst compares the price multiple of a stock with the
mean or media price multiple of comparable stocks. The method of comparables to
estimate the value of a company’s stock involves the following four steps:
1. Select and calculate the price multiple that will be used in the comparison.
2. Select the comparison asset or assets and calculate the value of the multiple for the
comparison assets. For a group of comparison asset, calculate the median or mean
value of the multiple for the assets. This multiple of the comparison asset(s) is called
the benchmark value of the multiple.
3. Adjust for differences in the fundamentals of stock and comparison stocks. Use the
benchmark value of the multiple to estimate the value of a company’s stock. Or,
compare the stock’s actual multiple with the benchmark value.
4. Fundamentals play an important role in the method of comparables as analysts can
use fundamentals to explain the differences between the estimated value of a
company’s stock and the current price of the company’s stock.
PEG is calculated as the stock’s P/E divided by the expected earnings growth rate in
percent. Stocks with lower PEGs are more attractive than stocks with higher PEGs, all else
being equal. Some consider that a PEG ratio less than 1 is an indicator of an attractive value
level.
Terminal price multiple based on fundamentals: Divide both sides of the Gordon
growth model equation by the EPS. This gives the justified trailing terminal price multiple.
Terminal price multiple based on comparables: Determine the benchmark value, which
is the median industry P/E, the average industry P/E, or an average of its own historical
P/Es. The benchmark value is used to estimate the terminal P/E multiple using the formula
below:
P
Terminal value at time n: Vn = Benchmark value of trailing terminal E ∗ En
P
Terminal value at time n: Vn = Benchmark value of forward terminal E ∗ E(n+1)
EV multiples
total company value to EBITDA. The rationales for using EV/EBITDA are as follows:
• For companies with different financial leverage, EV/EBITDA is a better choice than
P/E as it is a pre-interest figure.
• It increases the comparability across businesses as the age of the assets (and hence,
depreciation and amortization) may vary.
• EBITDA is often positive, whereas EPS can be negative.
The drawbacks for using EV/EBITDA are as follows:
• EBITDA overestimates cash flow from operations if working capital is growing.
• FCFF is more appropriate in valuation than EBITDA because it takes into account
capital expenditures. EBITDA will reflect capital expenditures only if depreciation
expenses match capital expenditures.
Other income measures used instead of EBITDA includes EBIT, EBITA, and FCFF.
EV/EBITDA is positively related to the expected growth rate in FCFF, profitability and
negatively related to the firm’s weighted average cost of capital.
Momentum indicators are valuation indicators that relate price to a fundamental such as
earnings to its own past values, or expected value. Three momentum indicators widely
used include:
• Earnings surprise: Earnings surprise (also called unexpected earnings) is the
difference between reported earnings and expected earnings.
• Standardized unexpected earnings (SUE): SUE is unexpected earnings divided by
the standard deviation in past unexpected earnings.
• Relative strength: Relative-strength indicators compare a stock’s performance
during a given period with its own past performance or with the performance of
some group of stocks.
• If the price multiple of a stock is less than the benchmark value of the multiple, then the
stock is undervalued.
• If the price multiple of a stock is greater than the benchmark value of the multiple, then
the stock is overvalued.
• If the price multiple of a stock is equal to the benchmark value of the multiple, then the
stock is fairly valued.
Residual income is defined as the earnings for a given period minus the opportunity cost of
equity holders. It can be calculated in two ways:
Residual income = net income – (equity capital x cost of equity)
Residual income = EBIT (1 – tax rate) – (total capital x WACC)
According to the residual income model, the intrinsic value of equity is a sum of two
components:
• The current book value of equity
• The present value of expected future residual income
There are three ways to express the value of a stock under this model:
∞
RIt
V0 = B0 + ∑
(1 + r)t
t=1
∞
(Et − rBt−1 )
V0 = B0 + ∑
(1 + r)t
t=1
∞
(ROEt − r)Bt−1
V0 = B0 + ∑
(1 + r)t
t=1
As compared to the DDM and FCFE/FCFF models, residual income models are less sensitive
to terminal value estimates. This is because RI models include the company’s current book
value which usually represents a large portion of the estimated intrinsic value.
In a multistage residual income model, we assume different growth rates for the short term
and the long-term. We forecast the residual incomes over a short term horizon and
estimate a terminal value based on the assumption made about continuing residual income
over the long term.
Continuing residual income is residual income after the forecast horizon. Usually, one of
the following assumptions is made for continuing residual income:
• Residual income continues indefinitely at a positive level.
• Residual income is zero from the terminal year forward.
• Residual income declines to zero as ROE reverts to the cost of equity through time.
• Residual income declines to some mean level.
If residual income continues indefinitely at a positive level, then we can use the following
If residual income fades over time, we can use the following formula:
T−1
Et − rBt−1 ET − rBT−1
V0 = B0 + ∑ +
(1 + r)t (1 + r − ω)(1 + r)T−1
t=1
Where, ω = persistence factor between 0 and 1
1 → residual income will not fade
0 → residual income will not continue after the initial forecast horizon
The following exhibit reproduced from the curriculum indicates characteristics associated
with high and low levels of persistence:
Lower residual income persistence Higher residual income persistence
Extreme accounting rates of return (ROE) Low dividend payout
Extreme levels of special items (e.g., High historical persistence in the
nonrecurring items) industry
Extreme levels of accounting accruals
This equation can be used to calculate the implied growth rate in residual income given the
market P/B ratio and the required rate of return.
ROE − r
P0 = B0 + ∗ B0
r−g
Residual income models versus dividend discount and free cash flow models
The DDM and free cash flow to equity discount future cash flows, while the residual income
model starts with the book value of equity, and discounts the expected stream of residual
income available to equity shareholders.
As compared to the DDM and FCFE/FCFF models, residual income models are less sensitive
to terminal value estimates. This is because, RI models include the company’s current book
value which usually represents a large portion of the estimated intrinsic value.
Accounting considerations
When using residual income models, analysts must take the following into account:
1. Violations of the clean surplus relationship: Bt = B(t–1) + Et − Dt
2. Balance sheet adjustments for fair value
3. Intangible assets
4. Nonrecurring items
5. Other aggressive accounting practices
6. Differences in accounting standards across countries
• If the intrinsic value based on residual income model is lower than the market price,
then the stock is overvalued.
• If the intrinsic value based on residual income model is equal to the market price, then
the stock is fairly valued.
• If the intrinsic value based on residual income model is greater than the market price,
then the stock is undervalued.
The differences between private and public companies can be categorized into company-
specific and stock-specific factors.
Company specific factors include:
• Stage in lifecycle – are generally in the early stages.
• Size – are generally smaller.
• Concentrated ownership – are often characterized by family ownership or other
forms of concentrated control.
• Limited disclosures – disclose limited financial information.
• Overlap of shareholders and management – have high managerial ownership.
Stock-specific factors include:
• Liquidity – Shares are less liquid.
• Concentration of control – Control may be limited to one or two investors and
controlling shareholders may benefit at the cost of minority shareholders.
• Sale restrictions - Agreements may limit the ability to sell shares.
Private company valuations may require adjustments to the reported earnings to estimate
normalized earnings of the company.
Normalized earnings are earnings with specific adjustments for non-recurring, non-
economic items and other anomalies which prevent direct comparisons to publicly owned
companies. Examples of adjustments include:
• Goodwill impairment
• Market pricing and terms for sales between affiliates
• Related party compensation
• Real estate use
• Adjustments related to asset value
• Adjusted taxes
• Adjustments for distribution to private owner versus public company shareholders
In addition to earnings normalization, cash flow estimation is an important part of the
estimation process. Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) represents cash flow at the enterprise
level and is used to value the firm or, indirectly, the firm’s equity. Alternatively, free cash
flow to equity (FCFE) can be used to value equity directly.
The cash flow estimation issues relate to the nature of equity interest being appraised and
uncertainty regarding future cash flows resulting in several possible scenarios of growth
and profitability.
The following factors make estimating the discount rate for a private company challenging:
• Application of size premiums: Size premiums are added to reflect financial/operating
distress and risk of private companies. The smaller the firm size, the higher the risk.
Adding a size premium increases the discount rate.
• Relative debt availability and cost of debt: Since private companies have less access
to debt financing than public companies, they must use more equity financing, which
is expensive. Furthermore, the smaller size can also lead to greater operating risk
and higher cost of debt. Both these factors increase the WACC for private companies.
• Discount rates in an acquisition context: The cost of capital used to value an
acquisition should be based on the target company’s capital structure and the
riskiness of the target company’s cash flows. The buyer’s cost of capital is not
relevant.
• Discount rate adjustment for projection risk: Less financial information is available
for a private company relative to a comparable public company and the management
may be inexperienced in forecasting future cash flows. This uncertainty in projecting
future cash flows leads to a higher required rate of return.
Models used to estimate the required rate of return for private companies
Two factors that affect the valuation of private companies are issues related to control and
marketability.
Discounts for lack of control are used to convert a controlling interest value into a non-
controlling equity interest value. The formula for a discount for lack of control is given by:
1
DLOC = 1 − [ ]
1 + Control premium
A discount for lack of marketability (DLOM) is an amount or percentage deducted from
the value of an ownership interest to reflect the relative absence of marketability.
DLOC and DLOM are multiplicative and not additive.
Total discount = 1 – [(1 − DLOC)(1 − DLOM)]
The three methods used in the income approach are: free cash flow, capitalized cash flow
and excess earnings method.
In the free cash flow method, value of the firm = PV of expected future cash flows + PV of
terminal value.
In the capitalized cash flow method, the value of the firm is calculated as:
FCFF1 FCFE1
Vf = or V𝑒 =
WACC−gf r−g
The steps to calculate the value of equity using the excess earnings method are:
1. Calculate the return on working capital.
2. Calculate the return on fixed assets.
3. Calculate residual income.
Residual income = Normalized earnings – return on working capital – return on
fixed assets
4. Calculate the value of intangible assets for a growing perpetuity.
RI(1 + g)
Value of intangible assets =
r−g
5. Calculate the value of the business as:
Value of the firm = Value of intangible assets + Value of fixed assets + Value of
working capital